ML14017A058: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Pn cc 1 t-f 1RULES 1: ) DIRECTIVESAs of: January 14, 2014Received:
January 09, 2014PUBLIC SUBM ISSION 4 J 14 PM 3:15 Status: Pending-Post Tracking No. ljy-89rt-8xlIy Comments Due: March 05, 2014Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2013-0283 RF CFIVEDDuke Energy Florida, Inc. Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities ReportComment On: NRC-2013-0283-0001 Duke Energy Florida, Inc., Cyrstal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities ReportDocument:
NRC-2013-0283-DRAFT-0003 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-31317 Submitter Information Name: William KranAddress:2218 Hennesen DriveClearwater, FL, 33764Email: wkran3@tampabay.rr.com General CommentHow is it reasonable that our Florida Power Company totally destroyed the Crystal River Nuclear powerfacilities and then, by Duke Power gaining control, that Duke Power assumes responsibility for the economicresults to repair or decommission the Crystal River facilities and then expect the customers to pay for thedecommissioning costs? In what commercial enterprise can a company make such huge economic
: mistakes, thatare really criminal negligence, and then allowing Duke Power to make a profit. If Duke Power will not step upand resume responsibility, after acquiring Florida Power and their failures, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission bowing to Duke Power proposals then we the people must assume that there must be some underthe table negotiations between Duke Power and the NRC that are happening.
PLEASE be OPEN and HONESTand tell us why the NRC thinks the Duke Power proposals to charge customers for repairs, maintenance andconstruction related to the Crystal River Nuclear power plant decommissioning amounting to $1.466 billionwhile making a profit on this effort as well.Asking for HELP,William C. Kran Clearwater resident since June 1972. Please reply to wkran3@tampabay.rr.com.
SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate
= ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add= 0c.d https ://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648 14f7f8b&for...
01/14/2014}}

Revision as of 02:58, 3 July 2018

Comment (2) of William Kran on Duke Energy Florida, Inc., Cyrstal River, Unit 3, Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML14017A058
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/09/2014
From: Kran W
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR79709 00002, NRC-2013-0283
Download: ML14017A058 (1)


Text

Pn cc 1 t-f 1RULES 1: ) DIRECTIVESAs of: January 14, 2014Received:

January 09, 2014PUBLIC SUBM ISSION 4 J 14 PM 3:15 Status: Pending-Post Tracking No. ljy-89rt-8xlIy Comments Due: March 05, 2014Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2013-0283 RF CFIVEDDuke Energy Florida, Inc. Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities ReportComment On: NRC-2013-0283-0001 Duke Energy Florida, Inc., Cyrstal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities ReportDocument:

NRC-2013-0283-DRAFT-0003 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-31317 Submitter Information Name: William KranAddress:2218 Hennesen DriveClearwater, FL, 33764Email: wkran3@tampabay.rr.com General CommentHow is it reasonable that our Florida Power Company totally destroyed the Crystal River Nuclear powerfacilities and then, by Duke Power gaining control, that Duke Power assumes responsibility for the economicresults to repair or decommission the Crystal River facilities and then expect the customers to pay for thedecommissioning costs? In what commercial enterprise can a company make such huge economic

mistakes, thatare really criminal negligence, and then allowing Duke Power to make a profit. If Duke Power will not step upand resume responsibility, after acquiring Florida Power and their failures, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission bowing to Duke Power proposals then we the people must assume that there must be some underthe table negotiations between Duke Power and the NRC that are happening.

PLEASE be OPEN and HONESTand tell us why the NRC thinks the Duke Power proposals to charge customers for repairs, maintenance andconstruction related to the Crystal River Nuclear power plant decommissioning amounting to $1.466 billionwhile making a profit on this effort as well.Asking for HELP,William C. Kran Clearwater resident since June 1972. Please reply to wkran3@tampabay.rr.com.

SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate

= ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add= 0c.d https ://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648 14f7f8b&for...

01/14/2014