ML16153A207: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Opila - CDPHE, JenniferTo:Wertz, Geoffrey
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Opila - CDPHE, Jennifer To:Wertz, Geoffrey


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] Re: U.S. Geological Survey Research Reactor RE: State of Colorado Review of the draft Environmental Assessment Supporting License RenewalDate:Friday, May 27, 2016 11:13:20 AMMr. Wertz,The contact information you have for me is correct. Thank you for the opportunity to review this document. I have no comments and agree with the NRC's determination that there are no significant environmental impacts from the proposed action, and the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment.Jennifer T. Opila, MPARadiation Program ManagerP 303-692-3403 l F 303-691-7841 l C 720-666-4074 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530jennifer.opila@state.co.us l  www.colorado.gov/cdphe/radiationOn Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Wertz, Geoffrey <Geoffrey.Wertz@nrc.gov> wrote:Hello Ms. Jennifer Opila,This email is a follow-up to the voice message I left earlier today:
[External_Sender] Re: U.S. Geological Survey Research Reactor RE: State of Colorado Review of the draft Environmental Assessment Supporting License Renewal Date:Friday, May 27, 2016 11:13:20 AM Mr. Wertz, The contact information you have for me is correct.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is nearing the completion of our review of the license renewal application (LRA) for the U.S. Geological Survey TRIGA Research Reactor (GSTR) located on the property of the U.S. Denver Federal Center in Lakewood, Colorado. The NRC review of the GSTR LRA includes the issuance of an Environmental Assessment (EA), which involves a radiological review of the proposed continued operation of the GSTR facility for an additional 20 years from issuance of the renewed license (which is anticipated later this year).
Thank you for the opportunity to review this document.
One of the final steps in the EA development process is an opportunity for a review of the draft EA by the facility's state. Please review the attached draft EA and contact me with any comments, questions or concerns. We will attempt to resolve any issues to your satisfaction in order obtain your acknowledgement that our EA is acceptable. We request an email response within 30-days in order to maintain our review schedule. Please note that your email response will be referenced in the final EA and a copy of the email will be publicly-available in our document management system in accordance with the NRC policy for openness. Since the EA is pre-decisional (i.e., in draft form), we request that you do not release it to public. A public version of the final EA will be noticed in the Federal Register prior to the issuance of the renewed license. Finally, for our records, please confirm the accuracy of the information below:
I have no comments and agree with the NRC's determination that there are no significant environmental impacts from the
Jennifer Opila, Program Manager Hazardous Materials & Waste Management Division Department of Public Health and Environment HMWM-RAD-B2 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 PH (303)692-3403 FX (303)759-5355 Jennifer.opila@state.co.us Thanks in advance for your support.
 
proposed action, and the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the
 
quality of the human environment.
Jennifer T. Opila, MPA Radiation Program Manager P 303-692-3403 l F 303-691-7841 l C 720-666-4074
 
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530 jennifer.opila@state.co.us l  www.colorado.gov/cdphe/radiation On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Wertz, Geoffrey <Geoffrey.Wertz@nrc.gov
> wrote:Hello Ms. Jennifer Opila, This email is a follow-up to the voice message I left earlier today:
 
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is nearing the completion of our review of the license renewal application (LRA) for the U.S. Geological Survey
 
TRIGA Research Reactor (GSTR) located on the property of the U.S. Denver
 
Federal Center in Lakewood, Colorado.
The NRC review of the GSTR LRA includes the issuance of an Environmental Assessment (EA), which involves a
 
radiological review of the proposed continued operation of the GSTR facility for an
 
additional 20 years from issuance of the renewed license (which is anticipated later
 
this year).
One of the final steps in the EA development process is an opportunity for a review of the draft EA by the facility's state.
Please review the attached draft EA and contact me with any comments, questions or concerns.
We will attempt to resolve
 
any issues to your satisfaction in order obtain your acknowledgement that our EA is
 
acceptable.
We request an email response within 30-days in order to maintain our
 
review schedule.
Please note that your email response will be referenced in the
 
final EA and a copy of the email will be publicly-available in our document
 
management system in accordance with the NRC policy for openness.
Since the EA is pre-decisional (i.e., in draft form), we request that you do not release it to public.
A public version of the final EA will be noticed in the Federal
 
Register prior to the issuance of the renewed license.
Finally, for our records, please confirm the accuracy of the information below:
 
Jennifer Opila
, Program Manager Hazardous Materials
& Waste Management Division Department of Public Health and Environment
 
HMWM-RAD-B2
 
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530
 
PH (303)692-3403 FX (303)759-5355 Jennifer.opila@state.co.us Thanks in advance for your support.
 
Geoffrey A. Wertz, P.E.
Geoffrey A. Wertz, P.E.
Project Manager Research and Test Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-0893geoffrey.wertz@nrc.gov}}
 
Project Manager
 
Research and Test Reactors
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
 
(301) 415-0893 geoffrey.wertz@nrc.gov}}

Revision as of 07:57, 30 June 2018

E-mail U.S. Geological Survey Triga Research Reactor Environmental Assessment Review
ML16153A207
Person / Time
Site: U.S. Geological Survey
Issue date: 05/27/2016
From: Opila J
State of CO, Dept of Public Health & Environment
To: Wertz G A
NRC/NRR/DPR/PRLB
Wertz G A
References
TAC ME1593
Download: ML16153A207 (2)


Text

From:Opila - CDPHE, Jennifer To:Wertz, Geoffrey

Subject:

[External_Sender] Re: U.S. Geological Survey Research Reactor RE: State of Colorado Review of the draft Environmental Assessment Supporting License Renewal Date:Friday, May 27, 2016 11:13:20 AM Mr. Wertz, The contact information you have for me is correct.

Thank you for the opportunity to review this document.

I have no comments and agree with the NRC's determination that there are no significant environmental impacts from the

proposed action, and the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the

quality of the human environment.

Jennifer T. Opila, MPA Radiation Program Manager P 303-692-3403 l F 303-691-7841 l C 720-666-4074

4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530 jennifer.opila@state.co.us l www.colorado.gov/cdphe/radiation On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Wertz, Geoffrey <Geoffrey.Wertz@nrc.gov

> wrote:Hello Ms. Jennifer Opila, This email is a follow-up to the voice message I left earlier today:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is nearing the completion of our review of the license renewal application (LRA) for the U.S. Geological Survey

TRIGA Research Reactor (GSTR) located on the property of the U.S. Denver

Federal Center in Lakewood, Colorado.

The NRC review of the GSTR LRA includes the issuance of an Environmental Assessment (EA), which involves a

radiological review of the proposed continued operation of the GSTR facility for an

additional 20 years from issuance of the renewed license (which is anticipated later

this year).

One of the final steps in the EA development process is an opportunity for a review of the draft EA by the facility's state.

Please review the attached draft EA and contact me with any comments, questions or concerns.

We will attempt to resolve

any issues to your satisfaction in order obtain your acknowledgement that our EA is

acceptable.

We request an email response within 30-days in order to maintain our

review schedule.

Please note that your email response will be referenced in the

final EA and a copy of the email will be publicly-available in our document

management system in accordance with the NRC policy for openness.

Since the EA is pre-decisional (i.e., in draft form), we request that you do not release it to public.

A public version of the final EA will be noticed in the Federal

Register prior to the issuance of the renewed license.

Finally, for our records, please confirm the accuracy of the information below:

Jennifer Opila

, Program Manager Hazardous Materials

& Waste Management Division Department of Public Health and Environment

HMWM-RAD-B2

4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530

PH (303)692-3403 FX (303)759-5355 Jennifer.opila@state.co.us Thanks in advance for your support.

Geoffrey A. Wertz, P.E.

Project Manager

Research and Test Reactors

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(301) 415-0893 geoffrey.wertz@nrc.gov