ML17325A711: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:)'Ii'4'Agi*i54Ih'K~I~.'CCE7& | {{#Wiki_filter:)'Ii'4'Agi*i54Ih'K~I~.'CCE7&MTEDDISYRIBUYION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEMREGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:8805050077 DOC.DATE: | ||
88/04/29NOTARIZED: | |||
NO,DOCKETFACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,.Indiana&0500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,Indiana&-05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILXATION ALEXICH,M.P. | |||
XndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly Indiana&MichiganEleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATXON DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk) | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
Application foramendstoLicensesDPR-58&DPR-74,changing surveillance requirements forstationbatteries. | |||
DISTRIBUTION CODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR IENCL1SIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal: | |||
GeneralDistribution NOTES:RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LASTANG,JINTERNAL: | |||
ARM/DAF/LFMB NRR/DEST/CEB 8HNRR/DEST/MTB 9HNRR/DOEA/TSB 11OGC15-B-18RES/DE/EIB EXTERNAL: | |||
LPDRNSICCOPIESLTTRENCL101110111111101,11111RECIPIENT XDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDNRR/DEST/ADS 7ENRR/DEST/ESB 8DNRR/DEST/RSB 8ESILRB12REGFILE01NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL55111.111111111Agczcc~JlISoqogiATOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED: | |||
LTTR21ENCL18 IndianaMichiganPowerCompanyP,O.Box16631Columbus, OH43216AEP:NRC:0896J DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGETOALLOWTHEUSEOFSIMULATED LOADSFORBATTERYTESTINGU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D~C~20555Attn:T.E.Hurley/pwca,l29(1988 | |||
==DearDr.Murley:== | ==DearDr.Murley:== | ||
Thisletterconstitutes anapplication foramendment totheTechnical Specifications (T/Ss)fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2.Specifically, weareproposing tochangethesurveillance requirements forthestationbatteries (including N-trainbatteries) toallowtheuseofsimulated loadsfortestingbatterycapacity. | |||
T.E.Murley-2-AEP:NRC: | Adetaileddescription oftheproposedchangesandouranalysesconcerning significant hazardsconsiderations areincludedinAttachment 1tothisletter.Attachment 2containstheproposedrevisedT/Spages.LastyearINPOraisedaconcernregarding inconsistent loadprofilesbeingusedforbatterytesting.Inresponsetothatconcernwedeveloped loadprofilesforthebatteries whichreflectthemaximumaccidentloadrequirements andcommitted toincorporating theloadprofilesintoourtestprocedures priortotheUnit2refueling outage.Inthistechnical specifications changeproposalwearerequesting thatwebeallowedtoimplement thenewbatteryloadprofilesusingsimulated loads.Theuseofactualloadstoconductthetestinginvolvestheburdenofensuringthatallactualloadsareavailable. | ||
Aswewillbetestingthebatteries duringthecurrentUnit2refueling outage,wewouldappreciate yourresponseassoonaspossible. | |||
Webelievethattheproposedchangeswillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofeffluents orasignificant increaseintheamountofanyeffluents thatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure. | |||
TheseproposedchangeshaveSafetyReviewCommittee andandDesignReviewCommittee meeting.8805050077 88042988F'DRADOCK05000315DCDbeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearwillbereviewedbytheNuclearSafetyattheirnextregularly scheduleJIBi/ig~gg4IIlb/ | |||
T.E.Murley-2-AEP:NRC:0896J Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(l), | |||
copiesofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted toMr.R.C.CallenoftheMi.chigan PublicServiceCommission andMr.G.Bruchmann oftheMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth.Pursuantto10CFR170.12(c), | |||
wehaveenclosedanapplication feeof$150.00fortheproposedamendments. | |||
Thisdocumenthasbeenpreparedfollowing Corporate procedures whichincorporate areasonable setofcontrolstoensureitsaccuracyandcompleteness priortosignature bytheundersigned. | |||
Sincerely, M.P.AlexiVicePresident ehEnclosure Attachments cc:D.H.Williams, Jr.W.G.Smith,Jr.-BridgmanR.C.CallenG.Bruchmann G~CharnoffNRCResidentInspector | |||
'-BridgmanA.B.Davis-RegionIII Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0896J Reasonsand10CFR50.92Significant HazardsEvaluation forChangestotheTechnical Specifications forDonaldC.CookUnits1and2 | |||
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0896J Page1Theproposedchangesdescribed inthisletterareintendedtoassistusinresponding toanINPOconcernregarding inconsistent loadprofilesbeingusedduringtestingofthestationbatteries. | |||
Theinconsistencies aretheresultofhavingbatteryloadsoutofserviceformaintenance duringbatterytesting;the'refore, toaddr'esstheINPOconcern,wearedeveloping abatteryloadprofiletoreflectthemaximumaccidentloadrequirements, andrevisingthetestprocedure toensurethattheloadprofileissatisfied byeithersimulated oractualstationloads.Useofsimulated loadstoproducetheloadprofilewillmakethetestingeasier,andwearetherefore procuring astationbatterytesterwhichwillgeneratetheloadprofilewithahighdegreeofaccuracy. | |||
SinceexistingT/Ssdonotallowtheuseofsimulated loadsforalloftheemergency batteryloads,weareproposing tochangeSpecifications 4.8.2.3.2.d and4.8'.5.2.dtoallowtheuseofeitheractualorsimulated emergency loadsduringbatterycapacitytesting.Wearealsodeletingthedoubleasterisks andtheirassociated footnotefromTable4.8-1A.Thisfootnoteallowstheuseofeitheractualorsimulated loadsfortheinverters duringbatterytesting.Thisfootnoteisnolongernecessary sincespecification 4.8.2'.2.dhasbeenchangedtoallowtheuseofeitheractualorsimulated loadsforallofthebatteryloads.Sincethestationbatterytesterwillbeabletosimulatetheactualloadswithahighdegreeofaccuracy, webelievethatuseofthebatterytesterconstitutes anequivalent methodoftesting.Itisalsonotedthatachangetoallowtheuseofsimulated loadsforthestaticinverters waspreviously approvedinAmendment 86totheUnit1T/SsandAmendment 72totheUnit2T/Ss.Inaddition, thischangemakesourT/Ssmoreconsistent withtheWestinghouse StandardT/Ss(STS)(NUREG-0452, Rev.4),whichallowtheuseofsimulated loads.TheT/Spagesaffectedbythissubmittal arepagesforwhichchangesarependingduetoAEP:NRC:0896B datedJanuary16,1987.Theproposedchangesdescribed inthissubmittal areinadditiontoourpreviousrequestandarenotintendedtosupersede it.Per10CFR50.92,aproposedamendment willnotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration iftheproposedamendment doesnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously | |||
: analyzed, (2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccident. | |||
previously analyzedorevaluated, or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Ourevaluation oftheproposedchangewithrespecttothesecriteriaisprovidedbelow. | |||
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0896J Page2Criterion 1Webelievethatusingthehighlyaccuratesimulated loadsappliedbythestationbatterytesterconstitutes ameansoftestingequivalent tousingactualloads.Inaddition, thechangemakesourT/Ssmoreconsistent withtheSTS.Wetherefore believethattheproposedchangewillnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously analyzed. | |||
Criterion 2Theproposedchanges,introduce nonewoperating conditions orplantconfigurations; therefore, webelievethischangewillnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanypreviously evaluated. | |||
Criterion 3ForthereasonscitedinCriterion 1above,webelievethattheproposedchangewillnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Lastly,wenotethattheCommission hasprovidedguidanceconcerning thedetermining ofsignificant hazardsbyproviding certainexamples(48FR14870)ofamendments considered notlikelytoinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration. | |||
Thischangeissimilartothesixthexample,whichreferstochangesthatmightresultinsomeincreaseintheprobability ofoccurrence orconsequences ofapreviously analyzedaccident, buttheresultsofwhichareclearlywithinlimitsestablished asacceptable. | |||
Webelievethischangeisclearlywithinacceptable limitssinceitwasapprovedfortheSTS.Basedontheabove,webelievethischangedoesnotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdefinedin10CFR50.92. | |||
Attachment 2toAEP:NRC:0896J ProposedRevisedTechnical Specifications Pages}} | |||
Revision as of 08:23, 29 June 2018
| ML17325A711 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 04/29/1988 |
| From: | ALEXICH M P INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| To: | MURLEY T E NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17325A712 | List: |
| References | |
| AEP:NRC:0896J, AEP:NRC:896J, NUDOCS 8805050077 | |
| Download: ML17325A711 (9) | |
Text
)'Ii'4'Agi*i54Ih'K~I~.'CCE7&MTEDDISYRIBUYION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEMREGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:8805050077 DOC.DATE:
88/04/29NOTARIZED:
NO,DOCKETFACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,.Indiana&0500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,Indiana&-05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILXATION ALEXICH,M.P.
XndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly Indiana&MichiganEleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATXON DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk)
SUBJECT:
Application foramendstoLicensesDPR-58&DPR-74,changing surveillance requirements forstationbatteries.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR IENCL1SIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal:
GeneralDistribution NOTES:RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LASTANG,JINTERNAL:
ARM/DAF/LFMB NRR/DEST/CEB 8HNRR/DEST/MTB 9HNRR/DOEA/TSB 11OGC15-B-18RES/DE/EIB EXTERNAL:
LPDRNSICCOPIESLTTRENCL101110111111101,11111RECIPIENT XDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDNRR/DEST/ADS 7ENRR/DEST/ESB 8DNRR/DEST/RSB 8ESILRB12REGFILE01NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL55111.111111111Agczcc~JlISoqogiATOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
LTTR21ENCL18 IndianaMichiganPowerCompanyP,O.Box16631Columbus, OH43216AEP:NRC:0896J DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGETOALLOWTHEUSEOFSIMULATED LOADSFORBATTERYTESTINGU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D~C~20555Attn:T.E.Hurley/pwca,l29(1988
DearDr.Murley:
Thisletterconstitutes anapplication foramendment totheTechnical Specifications (T/Ss)fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2.Specifically, weareproposing tochangethesurveillance requirements forthestationbatteries (including N-trainbatteries) toallowtheuseofsimulated loadsfortestingbatterycapacity.
Adetaileddescription oftheproposedchangesandouranalysesconcerning significant hazardsconsiderations areincludedinAttachment 1tothisletter.Attachment 2containstheproposedrevisedT/Spages.LastyearINPOraisedaconcernregarding inconsistent loadprofilesbeingusedforbatterytesting.Inresponsetothatconcernwedeveloped loadprofilesforthebatteries whichreflectthemaximumaccidentloadrequirements andcommitted toincorporating theloadprofilesintoourtestprocedures priortotheUnit2refueling outage.Inthistechnical specifications changeproposalwearerequesting thatwebeallowedtoimplement thenewbatteryloadprofilesusingsimulated loads.Theuseofactualloadstoconductthetestinginvolvestheburdenofensuringthatallactualloadsareavailable.
Aswewillbetestingthebatteries duringthecurrentUnit2refueling outage,wewouldappreciate yourresponseassoonaspossible.
Webelievethattheproposedchangeswillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofeffluents orasignificant increaseintheamountofanyeffluents thatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure.
TheseproposedchangeshaveSafetyReviewCommittee andandDesignReviewCommittee meeting.8805050077 88042988F'DRADOCK05000315DCDbeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearwillbereviewedbytheNuclearSafetyattheirnextregularly scheduleJIBi/ig~gg4IIlb/
T.E.Murley-2-AEP:NRC:0896J Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(l),
copiesofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted toMr.R.C.CallenoftheMi.chigan PublicServiceCommission andMr.G.Bruchmann oftheMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth.Pursuantto10CFR170.12(c),
wehaveenclosedanapplication feeof$150.00fortheproposedamendments.
Thisdocumenthasbeenpreparedfollowing Corporate procedures whichincorporate areasonable setofcontrolstoensureitsaccuracyandcompleteness priortosignature bytheundersigned.
Sincerely, M.P.AlexiVicePresident ehEnclosure Attachments cc:D.H.Williams, Jr.W.G.Smith,Jr.-BridgmanR.C.CallenG.Bruchmann G~CharnoffNRCResidentInspector
'-BridgmanA.B.Davis-RegionIII Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0896J Reasonsand10CFR50.92Significant HazardsEvaluation forChangestotheTechnical Specifications forDonaldC.CookUnits1and2
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0896J Page1Theproposedchangesdescribed inthisletterareintendedtoassistusinresponding toanINPOconcernregarding inconsistent loadprofilesbeingusedduringtestingofthestationbatteries.
Theinconsistencies aretheresultofhavingbatteryloadsoutofserviceformaintenance duringbatterytesting;the'refore, toaddr'esstheINPOconcern,wearedeveloping abatteryloadprofiletoreflectthemaximumaccidentloadrequirements, andrevisingthetestprocedure toensurethattheloadprofileissatisfied byeithersimulated oractualstationloads.Useofsimulated loadstoproducetheloadprofilewillmakethetestingeasier,andwearetherefore procuring astationbatterytesterwhichwillgeneratetheloadprofilewithahighdegreeofaccuracy.
SinceexistingT/Ssdonotallowtheuseofsimulated loadsforalloftheemergency batteryloads,weareproposing tochangeSpecifications 4.8.2.3.2.d and4.8'.5.2.dtoallowtheuseofeitheractualorsimulated emergency loadsduringbatterycapacitytesting.Wearealsodeletingthedoubleasterisks andtheirassociated footnotefromTable4.8-1A.Thisfootnoteallowstheuseofeitheractualorsimulated loadsfortheinverters duringbatterytesting.Thisfootnoteisnolongernecessary sincespecification 4.8.2'.2.dhasbeenchangedtoallowtheuseofeitheractualorsimulated loadsforallofthebatteryloads.Sincethestationbatterytesterwillbeabletosimulatetheactualloadswithahighdegreeofaccuracy, webelievethatuseofthebatterytesterconstitutes anequivalent methodoftesting.Itisalsonotedthatachangetoallowtheuseofsimulated loadsforthestaticinverters waspreviously approvedinAmendment 86totheUnit1T/SsandAmendment 72totheUnit2T/Ss.Inaddition, thischangemakesourT/Ssmoreconsistent withtheWestinghouse StandardT/Ss(STS)(NUREG-0452, Rev.4),whichallowtheuseofsimulated loads.TheT/Spagesaffectedbythissubmittal arepagesforwhichchangesarependingduetoAEP:NRC:0896B datedJanuary16,1987.Theproposedchangesdescribed inthissubmittal areinadditiontoourpreviousrequestandarenotintendedtosupersede it.Per10CFR50.92,aproposedamendment willnotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration iftheproposedamendment doesnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously
- analyzed, (2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccident.
previously analyzedorevaluated, or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Ourevaluation oftheproposedchangewithrespecttothesecriteriaisprovidedbelow.
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0896J Page2Criterion 1Webelievethatusingthehighlyaccuratesimulated loadsappliedbythestationbatterytesterconstitutes ameansoftestingequivalent tousingactualloads.Inaddition, thechangemakesourT/Ssmoreconsistent withtheSTS.Wetherefore believethattheproposedchangewillnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously analyzed.
Criterion 2Theproposedchanges,introduce nonewoperating conditions orplantconfigurations; therefore, webelievethischangewillnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanypreviously evaluated.
Criterion 3ForthereasonscitedinCriterion 1above,webelievethattheproposedchangewillnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Lastly,wenotethattheCommission hasprovidedguidanceconcerning thedetermining ofsignificant hazardsbyproviding certainexamples(48FR14870)ofamendments considered notlikelytoinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration.
Thischangeissimilartothesixthexample,whichreferstochangesthatmightresultinsomeincreaseintheprobability ofoccurrence orconsequences ofapreviously analyzedaccident, buttheresultsofwhichareclearlywithinlimitsestablished asacceptable.
Webelievethischangeisclearlywithinacceptable limitssinceitwasapprovedfortheSTS.Basedontheabove,webelievethischangedoesnotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdefinedin10CFR50.92.
Attachment 2toAEP:NRC:0896J ProposedRevisedTechnical Specifications Pages