ML17333A315: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:CATEGORY1REGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION | ||
.EM(RIDS)ACCFCSSIOU NBR:9602260305 DOC.DATE: | |||
96/02/22NOTARIZED: | |||
YESDOCKET¹FACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuc'earPowerPlant,Unit1,IndianaM0500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,IndianaM05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION FITZPATRICK,E. | |||
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly Indiana&MichiganEleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk) | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
Application foramendstolicensesDPR-58!'PR-74,modifying Table4.8-1,DGTestSchedulebyrefRG1.9,Rev3ratherthanRG1.108,Rev 1criteriafordetermination ofvalidDGtest.DISTRIBUTION CODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR 1ENCLISIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal: | |||
'lgr | GeneralDistribution NOTES:RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LAHICKMAN,J INTERNA:FAIRECRENATE>INRRDRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SRXB OGC/HDS2EXTERNAL: | ||
NOACCOPIESLTTRENCL11111111111011RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDNRR/DE/EMCB NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL1111111111NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS: | |||
PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE!CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMOWFNSD-5(EXT. | |||
415-2083) | |||
TOELIMINATE YOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTION LISTSFORDOCUMENTS YOUDON'TNEED!TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED: | |||
LTTR12ENCL,11 IndianaMichiganPowerCompanyPOBox16631Columbus, OH43216lNOIANANICHIGANPWMFebruary22,1996AEP:NRC:1243 Docket:Nos.:50-31550-316U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission ATTN:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Gentlemen: | |||
DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2PROPOSEDAMENDMENT TOTECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS3/4.8.1~1FORELECTRICAL POWERSYSTEMSThisletterand"itsattachments constitute anapplication foramendment tothetechnical specifications,(T/Ss) forDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantunits1and2.Specifically, weareproposing tomodifyTable4.8-1,DieselGenerator TestSchedule, byreferencing Regulatory Guide1.9,Revision3ratherthanRegulatory Guide1.108,Revision1criteriaforthedetermination ofavaliddieselgenerator test.Attachment 1providesadetaileddescription oftheproposedchanges,thejustification forthechanges,andourdetermination ofnosignificant hazardsconsideration performed pursuantto10CFR50.92.Attachment 2containstheexistingT/Spagesmarkedtoreflecttheproposedchanges.Attachment 3containstheproposedT/Spages.Webelievetheproposedchangeswillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofanyeffluentthatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure. | |||
TheseproposedchangeshavebeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee andtheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee. | |||
9'602260305 960222PDRADQCK05000315PPDR U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Page2AEP:NRC:1243 Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(1), | |||
copiesofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted totheMichiganPublicServiceCommission andtot'eMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth.Sincerely, C4.4E.E.Fitzpatrick VicePresident SWORNTOANDSUBSCRIBED BEFOREMETHIS~~DAYOF1996otaryPubicpitAttachments CC:A.A.BlindG.CharnoffH.J,MillerNFEMSectionChiefNRCResidentInspector | |||
-BridgmanJ.R.Padgett | |||
'lgr ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC:1243 DESCRIPTION ANDJUSTIFICATION OFCHANGES10CFR50.92ANALYSISFORCHANGESTOTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITS1AND2TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC:1243 Page1DESCRIPTION OFCHANGESTheproposedamendment toTechnical Specification (T/S)3/4.8.1.1 makesthefollowing specificchangetotheCookNuclearPlantunits1and2T/S:RevisesafootnoteinTable4.8-1toreadasfollows:Criteriafordetermining numberoffailuresandvalidtestsshallbeinaccordance withRegulatory PositionC.2.1ofRegulatory Guide1.9,Revision3,wherethenumberoftestsandfailuresisdetermined onaperdieselgenerator basis.Forthepurposesofthistestschedule, onlyvalidtestsconducted aftertheOLissuancedateshallbeincludedinthecomputation ofthe"last20validtests."II.JUSTIFICATION FORCHANGESTheproposedrevisiontotheT/SisbasedonthefactthatRegulatory Guide1.9,Revision3hasincorporated thepertinent guidancepreviously addressed inRevision1ofRegulatory Guide1.108,and,beingamorerecentdocument, itbetterreflectstheNRCrequirements regarding dieselgenerator testing.IIX.10CFR5092CRITERIAPer10CFR50.92,proposedchangesdonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration ifthechangesdonot:involveasignificant increaseintheprobability ofconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated, 2.createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated, or3.involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafetyCriterion 1Thisamendment requestdoesnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated becausetheproposedchangetotheT/Sdoesnotaffecttheassumptions, parameters, orresultsofanyUFSARaccidentanalysis. | |||
Theproposedamendment doesnotmodifyanyexistingequipment, andtheproposedacceptance criteriafordieselgenerator testingwillconformtoNRCguidance. | |||
Basedontheseconsiderations, itisconcluded thatthechangesdonotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated. | |||
ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP'NRC'1243 Page2CriteronTheproposedchangesdonotinvolvephysicalchangestotheplantorchangesinplantoperating configuration. | |||
Theproposedchangesupdateguidancefordieselgenerator testing.Thus,itisconcluded thattheproposedchangesdonotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated. | |||
Criteion3Theproposedchangesupdateguidanceforthetestingofdieselgenerators. | |||
TheguidanceisendorsedbytheNRCinRegulatory Guide1.9,andcompliance withthisguidancewillensuretheoperability ofthedieselgenerators. | |||
Thus,thereisnosignificant reduction inthemarginofsafety.}} |
Revision as of 07:55, 29 June 2018
ML17333A315 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook ![]() |
Issue date: | 02/22/1996 |
From: | FITZPATRICK E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
Shared Package | |
ML17333A316 | List: |
References | |
RTR-REGGD-01.009, RTR-REGGD-01.108, RTR-REGGD-1.009, RTR-REGGD-1.108 AEP:NRC:1243, NUDOCS 9602260305 | |
Download: ML17333A315 (8) | |
Text
CATEGORY1REGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION
.EM(RIDS)ACCFCSSIOU NBR:9602260305 DOC.DATE:
96/02/22NOTARIZED:
YESDOCKET¹FACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuc'earPowerPlant,Unit1,IndianaM0500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,IndianaM05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION FITZPATRICK,E.
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly Indiana&MichiganEleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk)
SUBJECT:
Application foramendstolicensesDPR-58!'PR-74,modifying Table4.8-1,DGTestSchedulebyrefRG1.9,Rev3ratherthanRG1.108,Rev 1criteriafordetermination ofvalidDGtest.DISTRIBUTION CODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR 1ENCLISIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal:
GeneralDistribution NOTES:RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LAHICKMAN,J INTERNA:FAIRECRENATE>INRRDRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SRXB OGC/HDS2EXTERNAL:
NOACCOPIESLTTRENCL11111111111011RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDNRR/DE/EMCB NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL1111111111NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:
PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE!CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMOWFNSD-5(EXT.
415-2083)
TOELIMINATE YOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTION LISTSFORDOCUMENTS YOUDON'TNEED!TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
LTTR12ENCL,11 IndianaMichiganPowerCompanyPOBox16631Columbus, OH43216lNOIANANICHIGANPWMFebruary22,1996AEP:NRC:1243 Docket:Nos.:50-31550-316U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission ATTN:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Gentlemen:
DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2PROPOSEDAMENDMENT TOTECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS3/4.8.1~1FORELECTRICAL POWERSYSTEMSThisletterand"itsattachments constitute anapplication foramendment tothetechnical specifications,(T/Ss) forDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantunits1and2.Specifically, weareproposing tomodifyTable4.8-1,DieselGenerator TestSchedule, byreferencing Regulatory Guide1.9,Revision3ratherthanRegulatory Guide1.108,Revision1criteriaforthedetermination ofavaliddieselgenerator test.Attachment 1providesadetaileddescription oftheproposedchanges,thejustification forthechanges,andourdetermination ofnosignificant hazardsconsideration performed pursuantto10CFR50.92.Attachment 2containstheexistingT/Spagesmarkedtoreflecttheproposedchanges.Attachment 3containstheproposedT/Spages.Webelievetheproposedchangeswillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofanyeffluentthatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure.
TheseproposedchangeshavebeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee andtheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee.
9'602260305 960222PDRADQCK05000315PPDR U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Page2AEP:NRC:1243 Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(1),
copiesofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted totheMichiganPublicServiceCommission andtot'eMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth.Sincerely, C4.4E.E.Fitzpatrick VicePresident SWORNTOANDSUBSCRIBED BEFOREMETHIS~~DAYOF1996otaryPubicpitAttachments CC:A.A.BlindG.CharnoffH.J,MillerNFEMSectionChiefNRCResidentInspector
-BridgmanJ.R.Padgett
'lgr ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC:1243 DESCRIPTION ANDJUSTIFICATION OFCHANGES10CFR50.92ANALYSISFORCHANGESTOTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITS1AND2TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC:1243 Page1DESCRIPTION OFCHANGESTheproposedamendment toTechnical Specification (T/S)3/4.8.1.1 makesthefollowing specificchangetotheCookNuclearPlantunits1and2T/S:RevisesafootnoteinTable4.8-1toreadasfollows:Criteriafordetermining numberoffailuresandvalidtestsshallbeinaccordance withRegulatory PositionC.2.1ofRegulatory Guide1.9,Revision3,wherethenumberoftestsandfailuresisdetermined onaperdieselgenerator basis.Forthepurposesofthistestschedule, onlyvalidtestsconducted aftertheOLissuancedateshallbeincludedinthecomputation ofthe"last20validtests."II.JUSTIFICATION FORCHANGESTheproposedrevisiontotheT/SisbasedonthefactthatRegulatory Guide1.9,Revision3hasincorporated thepertinent guidancepreviously addressed inRevision1ofRegulatory Guide1.108,and,beingamorerecentdocument, itbetterreflectstheNRCrequirements regarding dieselgenerator testing.IIX.10CFR5092CRITERIAPer10CFR50.92,proposedchangesdonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration ifthechangesdonot:involveasignificant increaseintheprobability ofconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated, 2.createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated, or3.involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafetyCriterion 1Thisamendment requestdoesnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated becausetheproposedchangetotheT/Sdoesnotaffecttheassumptions, parameters, orresultsofanyUFSARaccidentanalysis.
Theproposedamendment doesnotmodifyanyexistingequipment, andtheproposedacceptance criteriafordieselgenerator testingwillconformtoNRCguidance.
Basedontheseconsiderations, itisconcluded thatthechangesdonotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.
ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP'NRC'1243 Page2CriteronTheproposedchangesdonotinvolvephysicalchangestotheplantorchangesinplantoperating configuration.
Theproposedchangesupdateguidancefordieselgenerator testing.Thus,itisconcluded thattheproposedchangesdonotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated.
Criteion3Theproposedchangesupdateguidanceforthetestingofdieselgenerators.
TheguidanceisendorsedbytheNRCinRegulatory Guide1.9,andcompliance withthisguidancewillensuretheoperability ofthedieselgenerators.
Thus,thereisnosignificant reduction inthemarginofsafety.