ML17334A489: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:r-.-.""' | {{#Wiki_filter:r-.-.""'EGUlATOINFORMATION DISTRIBUTiON TEM(RIDS)ACCESSION NBR;8312200494 DOC~DATE::83/12/15NOTARIZED; f30DOCKETFACIL:503i5DonaldCeCookNuclearPower,Plant< | ||
'Un)'t1iIndiana80500031550~316DonaldC,CookNuclearPowerPlantiUnit2iIndiana805000316AUTH~NAf1E,AUTHORAFFILIATION ALEXICHiM,PE Indiana8MichiganElectricCo,RECIPNAI1ERECIPIENT. | |||
AFFILIATION DENTONiH~REOfficeofNuclearReactorRegvlationi DirectorSUBJECTsApplication;to amend.LicensesOPR588DPR74iconsisting, ofproposedadministrative changestoTechSpecs.DI'STRIBUTI NCODE$A001S"COPIESRECEIVEDgLTR.''ENCISIZEe.TITLE:ORSubmittal':GeneralDistributionNOTES;RECIPIENT IOCODE/NAME NRROR81BC01.-COPIESL.TTRENCL"77"RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME- | |||
~COPIESLTiTRENCLINTERNAL! | |||
ElO/HDS3NRR/DLDIRNRR/DSETBILEEXTERNAL! | |||
ACRSNRC,PDRNTIS04090210111166111NRR/DE/MTEB NRR/Dl/ORA8 NRR/OSI/RABRGN3I.P.ORNSIC0305'=1011121TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED''TTR 26ENCL24 1~)tUUlff'<<1<<>1!hi',C<<'I'I}BCUU~>><<U<<C<<rI!<<,f,fIWllIC>i'<<CUWWPUIIvI":<<<<f<<Wo~~U~Wll<<lrI>>',~'<<'}>W<<,',ll'IU}I>I<<UWI+'ll<<)CW,lI~<<U'i>vCI>'C<<<U>iCCWlWCf<<>>'I'<<<<g>t'>>U<<<<IIIU'ljI<<g~U~~fla<<}}.Il<<C>f'IIIC'I~C,JIjI<<~<<)<')Ill'Ilif11fU<<<<,t>IW't<<I | |||
)'lIv'I''IJ,)IT,I>l'>1>>ti)I,)IfJfVi)IIf<<<<10<<Ulit>,>>>'i'll.1'IlI<<Ut>till1i<<II~'a1U lNDlANA8MICHlGANELECTRICCOMPANYP.O.BOX1663ICOLUMBUS, OHIO43216December15,1983AEP:NRC:0790 DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnitNos.1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGEREQUESTSMr.HaroldR.Denton,DirectorOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555 | |||
==DearMr.Denton:== | ==DearMr.Denton:== | ||
ThisletteranditsAttachments requestchangestotheTechnical Specifications andtheOperating LicensesfortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnitsNos.1and2.Theserequestshavebeenpreviously discussed withmembersofyourstaff,andarebeingmadetoeithersimplifyorclarifythelicenses. | |||
,<<~,E))h<<<<>>.<<f,'' | Attachment Nos.1and2tothisletteraddresstheproposedchangestothelicensesandthereasonsforthechangesforUnitNos.1and2,respectively. | ||
'Mr.HaroldR.DenAEP:NRC: | Attachment Nos.3and4tothislettercontaintherevisedTechnical Specification (T/S)pages.Allofthechangesareindicated byverticalbarsdrawnontherighthandmarginofthepage.Becausetheproposedchangesarepurelyadministrative innature/webelievethattheydonotinvolvesignificant hazardsconsiderations, inthattheoperations oftheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnitNos.1and2,inaccordance withtheAmendments, wouldnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(3)involveasignificant reduction inmarginofsafety.Thereisreasonable assurance thatthehealthandsafetyofthepublicwillnotbeendangered byoperation intheproposedmanner.Furthermore, activities relatedtotheamendments willbeconducted incompliance withtheNRC'sregulations andwillnotbeinimicaltothecommondefenseandsecurityortothehealthandsafetyofthepublic.TheseproposedchangeshavebeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC)andtheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee (NSDRC).8312200494 831215,PDRADOCK05000315P'DR~) | ||
1.ThefirstproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR- | ,<<~,E))h<<<<>>.<<f,''Ktf p.h'<<tth'h>>.~yg<<,f>>,t"$>>~<<t',"'>>A>>t)~tIihf4It>>>>ftI>>IItI,l,ht",)'>>,l'II,*Ptth-'P,'I'=fII.~+II>gP',P't')'f>>'Il)t)r'~4h)8,Itgh)4I<<]f'I,',h'hh'"nP4h)II,Irf)>>,f.<<<<Ihhih") | ||
i'>4'>>tfttV | |||
'Mr.HaroldR.DenAEP:NRC:0790 Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(1),acopyofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted toMr.R.C.CallenoftheMichiganPublicServiceCommission. | |||
Sincethesechangerequestsareadministrative andeditorial innature,andwiththepurposeofsimplifying orclarifying thelicenseandTechnical Specifications, andweremadeattherequestofyourstaff,weinterpret 10CFR170.22asnotrequiring afeetoaccompany thissubmittal. | |||
Thisdocumenthasbeenpreparedfollowing Corporate procedures whichincorporate areasonable setofcontrolstoinsureitsaccuracyandcompleteness priortosignature bytheundersigned. | |||
Verytrulyyours,P.exichaceresidentMPA/camcc:JohnE.DolanW.G.Smith,Jr.-BridgmanR.C.CallenG.CharnoffE.R.Swanson,NRCResidentInspector | |||
-Bridgman AIIt Attachment No.1toAEP:NRC:0790 ProposedLicenseChangestoDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnitNo.1 i~.'3fg.'i:)'IPSE',>-'..'.(>~i~'.~~C;~.'+24X.1;t.'i~ | |||
~,'',.3~>Sf~.,tQ:l)~) | |||
1.ThefirstproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-58istodeleteLicenseCondition 2.C.(6),whichstates:(6)SentFuelPoolModifications Thelicenseeisauthorized tomodifythespentfuelpoolasdescribed intheapplication datedNovember22,'978assupplemented bylettersdatedJanuary22,January24/April16,June29,July27,andSeptember ll,September 26,andSeptember 27,1979.Sincespentfuelisnowbeingstoredinthespentfuelpool,uponcommencement ofworkoneithertheexistingracksorthenewracksinthespentfuelpoolinconjunction withreplacement oftheexistingrackswithnewracks:(a)the-waterinthespentfuelpoolshallcontainat'least2000ppmboronandshallbemaintained atthisboronconcentration untilcompletion oftherackreplacement,; | |||
and(b)theboroninthespentfuelpoolshallbeverifiedtomeettheconcentration requirement bychemicalanalysisatleast3timesper7days,withamaximumtimeintervalbetweensamplesof72hours.Priortofinalconversion tothemodifiedrackdesign,fuelmaybestored,asneeded,ineitherthemodifiedstorageracksdescribed inTechnical Specification 5.6.2orintheunmodified storageracks(orboth)whicharedesignedandshallbemaintained withacenter-to-center distancebetweenfuelassemblies placedinthestoragerackstoensureaKffof~0.95withthestoragepoolfilledwitRunborated water,including aconservative allowance foruncertainties asdescribed inSection9.7oftheFSAR.Sincealloftheoldrackshavebeenreplacedwithnewracks,andnofurthermodifications areforeseen, webelievethatthisLicenseCondition shouldberemoved.2.ThesecondproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-58istodeletetheLicenseCondition 2.Ewhichstates:"2.E.Beforeengaginginanoperational activitynotevaluated bytheCommission, thelicensees willevaluatetheenvironmental effectsofsuchactivity. | |||
Whentheevaluation indicates thatsuchactivitymayresultinasignificant adverseenvironmental impactthatwasnotevaluated orthatissignificantly greaterthanthatevaluated intheFinalEnvironmental Statement, thelicensees shallprovideawrittenevaluation ofsuchactivities andobtainpriorapprovaloftheDirector, OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation fortheactivities." | |||
-)4I~r4)II4tI'I4~4r-(rfw4<<44ilI<<~4h>>r'I(>>f)tt(II"f>>'h)44<<Iw,.1~II4.IhI4l-,)<<4,i<<A44I~'<<I',l44)h4r4t4,4,"-+~r)il4f<<I>>II',4Iwr) | -)4I~r4)II4tI'I4~4r-(rfw4<<44ilI<<~4h>>r'I(>>f)tt(II"f>>'h)44<<Iw,.1~II4.IhI4l-,)<<4,i<<A44I~'<<I',l44)h4r4t4,4,"-+~r)il4f<<I>>II',4Iwr) | ||
InLicenseAmendment No.54,issuedonMay6,1982,theEnvironmental Technical Specifications (Appendix BtotheLicense)wererevisedtoincludealltheenvironmental considerations contained inthethennewEnvironmental Protection Plan(EPP).InSection5.4.2ofthisAmendment werethe"Nonroutine Reports"requirements whichincludedthefollowing: | |||
Irhf'>MMeFap~r~n"J'tLIIF)Mhahhlhl)IaI'MlI"1v*<<.,tMM)I*~~a)haI,I7JI''haI'aeheF~'Lr''~)M Asstatedinitem2above, | 5.4.2.2ChanchesWhenachangetothePlantdesign,tothePlantoperation, ortotheprocedures described inSection5.3isplannedwhichinvolvesanenvironmental matterorquestionnotpreviously reviewedandevaluated bytheNRC,areportonthechangeshallbemadetotheOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation priortoimplementation. | ||
rr="g>>F,)v1'I*rhf.Iq*rhearhI,hgIhhrI)lI'rIhrI',"hrr$rrh,I'I~I'I~IrhI~,hr.lghI'hh'Slhrl'*"y,l~I.II''1Igv,"><l7"h>>'IIf'hIIhI' | Thereportshallincludeadescription andevaluation ofthechange.Changesoradditions topermitsandcertificates requiredbyFederal,state,localandregionalauthorities fortheprotection oftheenvironment shallbereported. | ||
',7I'~7)4IIf~f)I'()Y(fI~-I~(4['.Y~I)4II~f-II'447I'IN(444INhIf}'(g(fIY'ItL'..f}}l'NIN (i) | .Whentherequiredchangesaresubmitted totheconcerned agencyforapproval, theyshallalsobesubmitted totheDirector, OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation, USNRC,forinformation. | ||
Thesubmittal shallincludeanevaluation oftheenvironmental impactofthechange.Requestforchangesinenvironmental technical specifications shallbesubmitted totheDirector, OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation, USNRC,forpriorreviewandauthorisation. | |||
Therequestshallincludeanevaluation oftheimpactofthechange,including asupporting benefit-cost analysis. | |||
SincethisEnvironmental Technical Specification addresses thesamerequirements asthosecontained inLicenseCondition 2.E.,wefeelthatthelattercannowbedeleted.3.ThethirdproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-58istodeletetheLicenseCondition 2.F,whichstates:"2.F.Thisamendedlicenseissub)ecttothefollowing additional condition fortheprotection oftheenvironment: | |||
Thelicensees willcomplywithappropriate waterqualitystandards inaccordance withFederal,State,andlocalregulations (including changesasrequiredbytheFederalWaterPollution ControlActAmendments of1972)." | |||
Irhf'>MMeFap~r~n"J'tLIIF)Mhahhlhl)IaI'MlI"1v*<<.,tMM)I*~~a)haI,I7JI''haI'aeheF~'Lr''~)M Asstatedinitem2above,Amendment No.54revisedtheEnvironmental Technical Specifications toincludealltheenvironmental considerations inthethennewEPP.InSection3.1ofthisAmendment, werethe"Radiological Environmental hfonitoring" requirements forthemonitoring ofthelakeandwellwaterqualities intheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantarea.Fortheabovereasons,wefeelthatLicenseCondition 2.Fcanbedeleted.4.ThefourthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-58istodeletethefootnoteonpage3/45-3whichisnolongerapplicable. | |||
Thefootnoteaddresses achangeintheLimitingConditions forOperation fora'giventimeperiodinOctoberof1982.Sincetheeffective periodoftimeforthischangehasexpired,thefootnoteshouldbedeleted.5.ThefifthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-58istorequestthere-issuance ofT/Spage3/46-35.Achangewaspreviously requested tothetimedelayaddressed inparagraph 4.6.5.6.a. | |||
Amendment No.63oftheT/SwasissuedonOctober4,1982withoutthechange.TheSafetyEvaluation ReportforbothunitsandtheTechnical Specification forUnit2werecorrectinchangingthe10+1minutedelayin4.6.5.6to9+1minute.However,theUnit1Technical Specification wasissuedwithoutthechange.Thebasisforthechangeremainsvalidaspresented intheAmendment, 63SafetyEvaluation Report.6.ThesixthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-58istoremovethe"Amendment No.63"revisionreference atthebottomofpages3/43-50,3/46-36,3/49-9,B3/42-3,and6'-10.OnlythereversesidesofthesepageswereaffectedbyAmendment 63.Therefore, the"Amendment 63"revisionreference oneachofthesepagesshouldberemoved,andthecorrect"Amendment No."shouldbeputinitsplace.Attachment, No.3tothislettercontainstherevisedT/Spageswiththeappropriate "Amendment No."oneachpage.Pleasenotethatseveralofthesepageshaveno"Amendment No.";becausetheyhaveneverbeenrevised. | |||
rr="g>>F,)v1'I*rhf.Iq*rhearhI,hgIhhrI)lI'rIhrI',"hrr$rrh,I'I~I'I~IrhI~,hr.lghI'hh'Slhrl'*"y,l~I.II''1Igv,"><l7"h>>'IIf'hIIhI' Attachment No.2toAEP:NRC:0790 ProposedLicenseChangestoDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnitNo.2 p1t 1.ThefirstproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istodeletetheLicenseCondition 2.C.3.(h), | |||
whichstates:2.C.(3).(H) | |||
Containment SumpDesignVerification IndianaandMichiganPowerCompanyshallcompleteteststoverifycontainment sumpdesignbeforeNovember1978andsubmittheresultsforCommission reviewandapproval. | |||
InaletterfromMr.S.VargaoftheNRCdatedJuly2,1982/andbytheSafetyEvaluation Reportthatwastransmitted withthat.letter,theNRCdetermined thatwehadadequately responded totherequirements oftheLicenseCondition andthatthetestingwasacceptable. | |||
DeletionofthisLicenseCondition 2.C.3.(h) isconsistent withthatSafetyEvaluation Report.2.ThesecondproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istodeletetheLicenseCondition 2.C.(3)(1), | |||
whichstates:2.C.(3).(1)ResidualHeatRemovalSystemLowFlowAlarmIndianaandMichiganPowerCompanyshallpriortostartup,following thefirstregularly scheduled refueling outage,developandsubmitforCommission reviewandapprovalthecontrollogicforanalarmdesignedtoalertthereactoroperatortopossiblelossofflowintheresidualheatremovalsystem.Following initialstartupandpriortoinstallation ofthealarm,IndianaandMichiganPowerCompanyshallstationanoperatorat.alocalpaneltomonitorcooldownflowwhentheresidualheatremovalsystemisinoperation andthevesselheadisinplace.TheSafetyEvaluation Report(SER)forAmendment 10tothelicensestated:"thelicenseconditions havebeenmetandthelicensecondition 2.C.(3)(1) onResidualHeatRemovalSystemLowFlowAlarmmayberemovedfromtheLicense." | |||
However,thelicensecondition wasnotdeletedfromthelicense.3.ThethirdproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istodeleteLicenseCondition 2.C.(3)(t), | |||
whichstates:2.C.(3)(t) | |||
SentFuelPoolModifications Thelicenseeisauthorized tomodifythespentfuelpoolasdescribed intheapplication datedNovember22,1978assupplemented bylettersdatedJanuary22,January24,April16,June29,July27,andSeptember 11,September 26,andSeptember 27,1979.Sincespentfuelisnowbeingstoredinthespentfuelpool,uponcommencement ofworkoneithertheexistingracksorthenewracksinthespentfuelpoolinconjunction withreplacement oftheexistingrackswithnewracks: | |||
',7I'~7)4IIf~f)I'()Y(fI~-I~(4['.Y~I)4II~f-II'447I'IN(444INhIf}'(g(fIY'ItL'..f}}l'NIN (i)thewaterinthespentfuelpoolshallcontainatleast2000ppmboronandshallbemaintained atthisboronconcentration untilcompletion oftherackreplacement; and(ii)theboroninthespentfuelpoolshallbeverifiedtomeettheconcentration requirement bychemicalanalysisatleast3timesper7days,withamaximumtimeintervalbetweensamplesof72hours.Priortofinalconversion tothemodifiedrackdesign,fuelmaybestored,asneeded,ineitherthemodifiedstorageracksdescribed inTechnical Specification 5.6.2oxintheunmodified storageracks(orboth)whicharedesignedandshallbemaintained withacenter-to-center distancebetweenfuelassembliesplacedinthestoragerackstoensureaKffof~.95withthestoragepoolfilledeffwithunborated water,including aconservative allowance foruncertainties as'described inSection9.7oftheFSAR.'Sincealloftheoldrackshavebeenreplacedwithnewxacks,andnofurthermodifications areforeseen, webelievethatthislicensecondition shouldberemoved.4.ThefourthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istodeleteLicenseCondition 2.E>whichstates:2E.Thislicenseissub)ecttothefollowing additional conditions fortheprotection oftheenvironment: | |||
(1)Thelicensees willcomplywithappropriate waterqualitystandards, inaccordance withFederal,Stateandlocalregulations (including changesasrequiredbytheFederalWaterPollution ControlActAmendments of1972)~(2)Ifharmfuleffectsorevidenceofunacceptable damagearedetectedbythemonitoring | |||
: programs, thelicensees shallprovidetotheCommission ananalysisofthe'roblem andaplanofactiontobetakentoeliminate orsignificantly reducethedetrimental effectsordamage.(3)Beforeengaginginanoperational activitynotevaluated bytheCommission, thelicensees willprepaxeandrecordanenvironmental evaluation ofsuchactivity. | |||
Whentheevaluation indicates thatsuchactivitymayresultinasignificant adverseenvironmental impactthatwasnotevaluated, orthatissignificantly greaterthanevaluated intheFinalEnvironmental Statement, thelicensees shallprovideawrittenevaluation ofsuchactivities andobtainpriorapprovaloftheDirector, OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation fortheactivities. | |||
),I")X'>>a~ilI'=I))I'rh*")rI1I>>ihha')!i')t''at1-gtiih)"~)XIIIiI'FItr~=.)>>r,I'~t'v*II-)ItIIitI'I*,i))'.'7.t,)b,I,i;.)r)'hII)ar.II'tlbIr~),i'))bII),'<<)h~X'h"I"I,'IVbtih'r'brt'I~'I"Ih~))t'1JhII")ra)htXt~IIh"hiar'i>> | ),I")X'>>a~ilI'=I))I'rh*")rI1I>>ihha')!i')t''at1-gtiih)"~)XIIIiI'FItr~=.)>>r,I'~t'v*II-)ItIIitI'I*,i))'.'7.t,)b,I,i;.)r)'hII)ar.II'tlbIr~),i'))bII),'<<)h~X'h"I"I,'IVbtih'r'brt'I~'I"Ih~))t'1JhII")ra)htXt~IIh"hiar'i>> | ||
WithregardtoCondition 2.E.(1),Amendment No.40toUnitNo.2licenserevisedtheEnvironmental Technical Specifications toincludealltheenvironmental considerations inthenewEPP.InSection3.1ofthisAmendment, werethe"Radiological Environmental Monitoring" requirements forthemonitoring ofthelakeandwellwaterqualities intheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantarea.Fortheabovereasons,wefeelthatLicenseCondition 2.E.(1)canbedeleted.WithregardtoCondition 2.E.(2),Section5.4.1(Environmental Technical Specification) ofAmendment No.40totheUnitNo.2Licensestates:"Ifharmfuleffectsorevidenceoftrendstowardsirxeversible damagetotheenvixonment areobserved, thelicenseeshallprovideadetailedanalysisofthedataandaproposedcourseofactiontoalleviate theproblem." | |||
444r.4~r)*)PP>>")4F)PPIPw-WV)~~P4~IP'Il-,II"-*WPIWP'()~I4~~~wvr-I)j,4F)~r)))Fg>'"4IIV))~f~ll)~)f>>>,P~ill>I'IPWrP,I4III 5.ThefifthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istodeletethefootnoteatthebottomofT/Spage3/46-39,whichstates:" | SincethisEnvixonmental Technical Specification addxesses thesamerequirements asthosecontained inLicenseCondition 2.E.(2),wefeelthatthelattercanbedeleted.WithregardtoCondition 2.E.(3),Section5.4.2.2(Environmental Technical Specification) ofAmendment No.40toUnitNo.2Licensestates:5.4.2.2~ChanesWhenachangetothePlantdesign,tothePlantoperation, ortotheprocedures described inSection5.3isplannedwhichinvolvesanenvironmental matterorquestionnotpreviously reviewedandevaluated bytheNRC,areportonthechangeshallbemadetotheOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation priortoimplementation. | ||
Thereportshallincludeadescription andevaluation ofthechange.Changesoradditions topermitsandcertificates requiredbyFederal,state,localandregionalauthorities fortheprotection oftheenvironment shallbereported. | |||
Whentherequiredchangesaresubmitted totheconcerned agencyforapproval, theyshallalsobesubmitted totheDirector, OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation, USNRC,forinformation. | |||
Thesubmittal shallincludeanevaluation oftheenvironmental impactofthechange.Requestfor'hanges inEnvironmental Technical Specifications shallbesubmitted totheDirector, OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation, USNRC,forpriorreviewandauthorization. | |||
Therequestshallincludeanevaluation oftheimpactofthechange,including asupporting benefit-cost analysis. | |||
SincethisEnvironmental Technical Specification addresses thesamex'equirements asthosecontained inLicenseCondition 2.E.(3),wefeelthatthelattercannowbedeleted. | |||
444r.4~r)*)PP>>")4F)PPIPw-WV)~~P4~IP'Il-,II"-*WPIWP'()~I4~~~wvr-I)j,4F)~r)))Fg>'"4IIV))~f~ll)~)f>>>,P~ill>I'IPWrP,I4III 5.ThefifthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istodeletethefootnoteatthebottomofT/Spage3/46-39,whichstates:"Forthelowerinletdoorinspection intervalscheduled toendJune8,1980,including theextension permitted bySpecification 4.0.2,aonetimeonlydelayisallowedtoextendthisinspection intervalthroughJuly20,1980'Sincetheextension isnolongervalid(i.e.,pastJuly20/1980),werequestdeletionofthefootnote. | |||
6.ThesixthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74isthedeletionofthefootnoteatthebottomofpage3/49-9,whichstates:"Duringtherefueling outagecommencing aboutNovember1982,theContainment PurgeandExhaustIsolation Systemshallbedefinedtoincludearadiation signaltoeithertheinneroroutervalveoraprovision forimmediate manualclosureofthevalveintheeventclosuremayberequired. | |||
Thisdefinition istemporary anditandthisfootnoteshallnolongerapplyfollowing therefueling outagecommencing aboutNovember1982.Forthetemporary reliefperiod,theprovisions ofSpecification 3.0.4arenotapplicable." | |||
Sincetheextension isnolongervalid(i.e.,therefueling outagecommencing aboutNovember1982isover),werequestdeletionofthefootnote. | |||
7.TheseventhproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istherequesttoamendpageB3/46-3bythedeletionofSection3/46.1.7ontheContainment Ventilation System.Amendment No.47issuedonDecember8,1982issuedanewT/SpageB3/46-2awhichincludedaBasesSection3/46.1.7ontheContainment PurgeandExhaustIsolation Valves.ThisnewsectionreplacedtheoldBasesSection3/46.1.7contained onpageB3/46-3,however,thelatterwasnotdeleted.Basedonthis,webelieveBasesSection3/46.1.7onpageB3/46-3shouldbedeleted.8.TheeighthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istoremovethe"Amendment No.45"revisionreference atthebottomofpages:III;3/41-l~3/42-15~3/43-4g3/43-42;3/44-2;3/44-26;3/45-5~3/46-11;3/46-43;3/49-10;andB3/42-3.OnlythereversesidesofthesepageswereaffectedbyAmendment 45.Therefore, the"Amendment 45"revisionreference oneachofthesepagesshouldberemoved,andthecorrect"Amendment No.."shouldbeputinitsplace.Attachment No.4tothislettercontainstherevisedT/Spageswiththeappropriate "Amendment No."oneachpage.Pleasenoteseveralofthesepageshaveno"Amendment No.";becausetheyhaveneverbeenrevised. | |||
P~*f'g)>>P'h'P)PhP*f',IP>"j'>>!~~I,'(>>S'(iJ)>><<A1"J)>>I)~PP)ijt')ti~~~pqI'-'I~~II)Ql~~*I.IP,u>>''IIPI'( | P~*f'g)>>P'h'P)PhP*f',IP>"j'>>!~~I,'(>>S'(iJ)>><<A1"J)>>I)~PP)ijt')ti~~~pqI'-'I~~II)Ql~~*I.IP,u>>''IIPI'( | ||
tloeotU,S. | tloeotU,S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COM,aaSSION | ||
~REACTORFACILITYFEEDETERMINATION 1.FEEFORMTTPE(Checaoher PAELIMIHART FINALAMENDEDINSTRUCTIONS. | |||
Fasthllama1throughta,aaaPPllcabre, ahdacheIheorrclhatCOPyIotheUcehsaFeeMshsoemehl Branch.2.DOCKETNUMBERISI 3.ACCESSOHNUMSER Qg0+$ParUCENSEEI".rrx'A.~.se~'~,~ayrrlsoapn'a~L,PLANTNAMEANDUNITISI... | |||
~.'-'sI.C.:C.'rsrd: | |||
:-''::i~(.$s~4$DATEOFAPPLSCATIOH i2/-if/gg~~'.FEEREMITTEDYESNO~m~s;.~ | |||
A'~e~4.UCENSEEFEEDETERMIHATIQN | |||
~.~-42dp~~.ocLAsavcLAaavlcxsvaTNOH$10.TAONUMBERASQONEg(ifavaaabief KO'S--:"CLASSIEXASS~CLAsa5CIAsaIv~12.NRCFEEDETERMINATION 11~APPROVALLETTshonoaII'VHoplEHTNuuatrvsl 0+5DATEOFISSUANCE0-2-Theaboveapplication hasbeenreviewedInaccordance withSection17022otPart170andIsproperlycategorfsed. | |||
~Theaboveapplication hasbeonreviewodInaccordance withSection170.22ofPerlTTGandIsIncorreclly classified. | |||
Feeshouldbeclasstes): | |||
JUS'TIFFCATIOH FORCLASSIFICATION OAAECLASSIFICATION: | |||
yomallpocallo lssclass~sypeoyacpoo~oleeempllyomleesbacaseIlls:FiledDyanonprofit educational lnslitulion.'iled ItyaGOVernment agenCyandISnOIfOrapOwerreaCtOr.ForaClassI,II,orIIIamendment whichresultsfromanNRCrequestdatedforIheapplication andtheamendment lsloslmplityorclarifyLicenseorTechnical Specificalions; hasonlyminorsafelysignificance; andisbeingissuedtortheconvenience ofNRC(muslmeet~IrofthecriteriaJ.Other(Stalereasonfhereforf ayspysmCr13.SIGNA'IUREISrahch hieirpmDATEIa.FINAl.cEATIFIGATI H:ThereIteedetermlhsrlonhas beeresssessedarydrs herebyarnrmed. | |||
sIGNATURE Ipro(aneSychlerrm'ATE | |||
'tlttoL-C-P..FORFEEMANAGEMENT BRANCHUSEONLY(AIIOtherSdpnOlwr(lebefdpVthf | |||
'nefTheboveerempraon requesthasbeenrevle dIsherebyacceptedasbetheeaempl.rrlUREIChler. | |||
LFMDATERecordsServicesBanchDI.BranchChlelDISTRIBUTION BYLFMBLFMBEaenpbOnFIIeLFLISAeacrorFile}} |
Revision as of 07:41, 29 June 2018
ML17334A489 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook |
Issue date: | 12/15/1983 |
From: | ALEXICH M P INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
To: | DENTON H R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
Shared Package | |
ML17320A884 | List: |
References | |
AEP:NRC-0790, AEP:NRC-790, NUDOCS 8312200494 | |
Download: ML17334A489 (25) | |
Text
r-.-.""'EGUlATOINFORMATION DISTRIBUTiON TEM(RIDS)ACCESSION NBR;8312200494 DOC~DATE::83/12/15NOTARIZED; f30DOCKETFACIL:503i5DonaldCeCookNuclearPower,Plant<
'Un)'t1iIndiana80500031550~316DonaldC,CookNuclearPowerPlantiUnit2iIndiana805000316AUTH~NAf1E,AUTHORAFFILIATION ALEXICHiM,PE Indiana8MichiganElectricCo,RECIPNAI1ERECIPIENT.
AFFILIATION DENTONiH~REOfficeofNuclearReactorRegvlationi DirectorSUBJECTsApplication;to amend.LicensesOPR588DPR74iconsisting, ofproposedadministrative changestoTechSpecs.DI'STRIBUTI NCODE$A001S"COPIESRECEIVEDgLTR.ENCISIZEe.TITLE:ORSubmittal':GeneralDistributionNOTES;RECIPIENT IOCODE/NAME NRROR81BC01.-COPIESL.TTRENCL"77"RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME-
~COPIESLTiTRENCLINTERNAL!
ElO/HDS3NRR/DLDIRNRR/DSETBILEEXTERNAL!
ACRSNRC,PDRNTIS04090210111166111NRR/DE/MTEB NRR/Dl/ORA8 NRR/OSI/RABRGN3I.P.ORNSIC0305'=1011121TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIREDTTR 26ENCL24 1~)tUUlff'<<1<<>1!hi',C<<'I'I}BCUU~>><<U<<C<<rI!<<,f,fIWllIC>i'<<CUWWPUIIvI":<<<<f<<Wo~~U~Wll<<lrI>>',~'<<'}>W<<,',ll'IU}I>I<<UWI+'ll<<)CW,lI~<<U'i>vCI>'C<<iCCWlWCf<<>>'I'<<<<g>t'>>U<<<<IIIU'ljI<<g~U~~fla<<.Il<<C>f'IIIC'I~C,JIjI<<~<<)<')Ill'Ilif11fU<<<<,t>IW't<l'>1>>ti)I,)IfJfVi)IIf<<<<10<<Ulit>,>>>'i'll.1'IlI<<Ut>till1i<<II~'a1U lNDlANA8MICHlGANELECTRICCOMPANYP.O.BOX1663ICOLUMBUS, OHIO43216December15,1983AEP:NRC:0790 DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnitNos.1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGEREQUESTSMr.HaroldR.Denton,DirectorOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555
DearMr.Denton:
ThisletteranditsAttachments requestchangestotheTechnical Specifications andtheOperating LicensesfortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnitsNos.1and2.Theserequestshavebeenpreviously discussed withmembersofyourstaff,andarebeingmadetoeithersimplifyorclarifythelicenses. Attachment Nos.1and2tothisletteraddresstheproposedchangestothelicensesandthereasonsforthechangesforUnitNos.1and2,respectively. Attachment Nos.3and4tothislettercontaintherevisedTechnical Specification (T/S)pages.Allofthechangesareindicated byverticalbarsdrawnontherighthandmarginofthepage.Becausetheproposedchangesarepurelyadministrative innature/webelievethattheydonotinvolvesignificant hazardsconsiderations, inthattheoperations oftheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnitNos.1and2,inaccordance withtheAmendments, wouldnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(3)involveasignificant reduction inmarginofsafety.Thereisreasonable assurance thatthehealthandsafetyofthepublicwillnotbeendangered byoperation intheproposedmanner.Furthermore, activities relatedtotheamendments willbeconducted incompliance withtheNRC'sregulations andwillnotbeinimicaltothecommondefenseandsecurityortothehealthandsafetyofthepublic.TheseproposedchangeshavebeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC)andtheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee (NSDRC).8312200494 831215,PDRADOCK05000315P'DR~) ,<<~,E))h<<<<>>.<<f,Ktf p.h'<<tth'h>>.~yg<<,f>>,t"$>>~<<t',"'>>A>>t)~tIihf4It>>>>ftI>>IItI,l,ht",)'>>,l'II,*Ptth-'P,'I'=fII.~+II>gP',P't')'f>>'Il)t)r'~4h)8,Itgh)4I<<]f'I,',h'hh'"nP4h)II,Irf)>>,f.<<<<Ihhih") i'>4'>>tfttV 'Mr.HaroldR.DenAEP:NRC:0790 Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(1),acopyofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted toMr.R.C.CallenoftheMichiganPublicServiceCommission. Sincethesechangerequestsareadministrative andeditorial innature,andwiththepurposeofsimplifying orclarifying thelicenseandTechnical Specifications, andweremadeattherequestofyourstaff,weinterpret 10CFR170.22asnotrequiring afeetoaccompany thissubmittal. Thisdocumenthasbeenpreparedfollowing Corporate procedures whichincorporate areasonable setofcontrolstoinsureitsaccuracyandcompleteness priortosignature bytheundersigned. Verytrulyyours,P.exichaceresidentMPA/camcc:JohnE.DolanW.G.Smith,Jr.-BridgmanR.C.CallenG.CharnoffE.R.Swanson,NRCResidentInspector -Bridgman AIIt Attachment No.1toAEP:NRC:0790 ProposedLicenseChangestoDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnitNo.1 i~.'3fg.'i:)'IPSE',>-'..'.(>~i~'.~~C;~.'+24X.1;t.'i~ ~,,.3~>Sf~.,tQ:l)~) 1.ThefirstproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-58istodeleteLicenseCondition 2.C.(6),whichstates:(6)SentFuelPoolModifications Thelicenseeisauthorized tomodifythespentfuelpoolasdescribed intheapplication datedNovember22,'978assupplemented bylettersdatedJanuary22,January24/April16,June29,July27,andSeptember ll,September 26,andSeptember 27,1979.Sincespentfuelisnowbeingstoredinthespentfuelpool,uponcommencement ofworkoneithertheexistingracksorthenewracksinthespentfuelpoolinconjunction withreplacement oftheexistingrackswithnewracks:(a)the-waterinthespentfuelpoolshallcontainat'least2000ppmboronandshallbemaintained atthisboronconcentration untilcompletion oftherackreplacement,; and(b)theboroninthespentfuelpoolshallbeverifiedtomeettheconcentration requirement bychemicalanalysisatleast3timesper7days,withamaximumtimeintervalbetweensamplesof72hours.Priortofinalconversion tothemodifiedrackdesign,fuelmaybestored,asneeded,ineitherthemodifiedstorageracksdescribed inTechnical Specification 5.6.2orintheunmodified storageracks(orboth)whicharedesignedandshallbemaintained withacenter-to-center distancebetweenfuelassemblies placedinthestoragerackstoensureaKffof~0.95withthestoragepoolfilledwitRunborated water,including aconservative allowance foruncertainties asdescribed inSection9.7oftheFSAR.Sincealloftheoldrackshavebeenreplacedwithnewracks,andnofurthermodifications areforeseen, webelievethatthisLicenseCondition shouldberemoved.2.ThesecondproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-58istodeletetheLicenseCondition 2.Ewhichstates:"2.E.Beforeengaginginanoperational activitynotevaluated bytheCommission, thelicensees willevaluatetheenvironmental effectsofsuchactivity. Whentheevaluation indicates thatsuchactivitymayresultinasignificant adverseenvironmental impactthatwasnotevaluated orthatissignificantly greaterthanthatevaluated intheFinalEnvironmental Statement, thelicensees shallprovideawrittenevaluation ofsuchactivities andobtainpriorapprovaloftheDirector, OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation fortheactivities." -)4I~r4)II4tI'I4~4r-(rfw4<<44ilI<<~4h>>r'I(>>f)tt(II"f>>'h)44<<Iw,.1~II4.IhI4l-,)<<4,i<<A44I~'<<I',l44)h4r4t4,4,"-+~r)il4f<>II',4Iwr) InLicenseAmendment No.54,issuedonMay6,1982,theEnvironmental Technical Specifications (Appendix BtotheLicense)wererevisedtoincludealltheenvironmental considerations contained inthethennewEnvironmental Protection Plan(EPP).InSection5.4.2ofthisAmendment werethe"Nonroutine Reports"requirements whichincludedthefollowing: 5.4.2.2ChanchesWhenachangetothePlantdesign,tothePlantoperation, ortotheprocedures described inSection5.3isplannedwhichinvolvesanenvironmental matterorquestionnotpreviously reviewedandevaluated bytheNRC,areportonthechangeshallbemadetotheOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation priortoimplementation. Thereportshallincludeadescription andevaluation ofthechange.Changesoradditions topermitsandcertificates requiredbyFederal,state,localandregionalauthorities fortheprotection oftheenvironment shallbereported. .Whentherequiredchangesaresubmitted totheconcerned agencyforapproval, theyshallalsobesubmitted totheDirector, OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation, USNRC,forinformation. Thesubmittal shallincludeanevaluation oftheenvironmental impactofthechange.Requestforchangesinenvironmental technical specifications shallbesubmitted totheDirector, OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation, USNRC,forpriorreviewandauthorisation. Therequestshallincludeanevaluation oftheimpactofthechange,including asupporting benefit-cost analysis. SincethisEnvironmental Technical Specification addresses thesamerequirements asthosecontained inLicenseCondition 2.E.,wefeelthatthelattercannowbedeleted.3.ThethirdproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-58istodeletetheLicenseCondition 2.F,whichstates:"2.F.Thisamendedlicenseissub)ecttothefollowing additional condition fortheprotection oftheenvironment: Thelicensees willcomplywithappropriate waterqualitystandards inaccordance withFederal,State,andlocalregulations (including changesasrequiredbytheFederalWaterPollution ControlActAmendments of1972)." Irhf'>MMeFap~r~n"J'tLIIF)Mhahhlhl)IaI'MlI"1v*<<.,tMM)I*~~a)haI,I7JIhaI'aeheF~'Lr~)M Asstatedinitem2above,Amendment No.54revisedtheEnvironmental Technical Specifications toincludealltheenvironmental considerations inthethennewEPP.InSection3.1ofthisAmendment, werethe"Radiological Environmental hfonitoring" requirements forthemonitoring ofthelakeandwellwaterqualities intheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantarea.Fortheabovereasons,wefeelthatLicenseCondition 2.Fcanbedeleted.4.ThefourthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-58istodeletethefootnoteonpage3/45-3whichisnolongerapplicable. Thefootnoteaddresses achangeintheLimitingConditions forOperation fora'giventimeperiodinOctoberof1982.Sincetheeffective periodoftimeforthischangehasexpired,thefootnoteshouldbedeleted.5.ThefifthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-58istorequestthere-issuance ofT/Spage3/46-35.Achangewaspreviously requested tothetimedelayaddressed inparagraph 4.6.5.6.a. Amendment No.63oftheT/SwasissuedonOctober4,1982withoutthechange.TheSafetyEvaluation ReportforbothunitsandtheTechnical Specification forUnit2werecorrectinchangingthe10+1minutedelayin4.6.5.6to9+1minute.However,theUnit1Technical Specification wasissuedwithoutthechange.Thebasisforthechangeremainsvalidaspresented intheAmendment, 63SafetyEvaluation Report.6.ThesixthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-58istoremovethe"Amendment No.63"revisionreference atthebottomofpages3/43-50,3/46-36,3/49-9,B3/42-3,and6'-10.OnlythereversesidesofthesepageswereaffectedbyAmendment 63.Therefore, the"Amendment 63"revisionreference oneachofthesepagesshouldberemoved,andthecorrect"Amendment No."shouldbeputinitsplace.Attachment, No.3tothislettercontainstherevisedT/Spageswiththeappropriate "Amendment No."oneachpage.Pleasenotethatseveralofthesepageshaveno"Amendment No.";becausetheyhaveneverbeenrevised. rr="g>>F,)v1'I*rhf.Iq*rhearhI,hgIhhrI)lI'rIhrI',"hrr$rrh,I'I~I'I~IrhI~,hr.lghI'hh'Slhrl'*"y,l~I.II1Igv,"><l7"h>>'IIf'hIIhI' Attachment No.2toAEP:NRC:0790 ProposedLicenseChangestoDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnitNo.2 p1t 1.ThefirstproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istodeletetheLicenseCondition 2.C.3.(h), whichstates:2.C.(3).(H) Containment SumpDesignVerification IndianaandMichiganPowerCompanyshallcompleteteststoverifycontainment sumpdesignbeforeNovember1978andsubmittheresultsforCommission reviewandapproval. InaletterfromMr.S.VargaoftheNRCdatedJuly2,1982/andbytheSafetyEvaluation Reportthatwastransmitted withthat.letter,theNRCdetermined thatwehadadequately responded totherequirements oftheLicenseCondition andthatthetestingwasacceptable. DeletionofthisLicenseCondition 2.C.3.(h) isconsistent withthatSafetyEvaluation Report.2.ThesecondproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istodeletetheLicenseCondition 2.C.(3)(1), whichstates:2.C.(3).(1)ResidualHeatRemovalSystemLowFlowAlarmIndianaandMichiganPowerCompanyshallpriortostartup,following thefirstregularly scheduled refueling outage,developandsubmitforCommission reviewandapprovalthecontrollogicforanalarmdesignedtoalertthereactoroperatortopossiblelossofflowintheresidualheatremovalsystem.Following initialstartupandpriortoinstallation ofthealarm,IndianaandMichiganPowerCompanyshallstationanoperatorat.alocalpaneltomonitorcooldownflowwhentheresidualheatremovalsystemisinoperation andthevesselheadisinplace.TheSafetyEvaluation Report(SER)forAmendment 10tothelicensestated:"thelicenseconditions havebeenmetandthelicensecondition 2.C.(3)(1) onResidualHeatRemovalSystemLowFlowAlarmmayberemovedfromtheLicense." However,thelicensecondition wasnotdeletedfromthelicense.3.ThethirdproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istodeleteLicenseCondition 2.C.(3)(t), whichstates:2.C.(3)(t) SentFuelPoolModifications Thelicenseeisauthorized tomodifythespentfuelpoolasdescribed intheapplication datedNovember22,1978assupplemented bylettersdatedJanuary22,January24,April16,June29,July27,andSeptember 11,September 26,andSeptember 27,1979.Sincespentfuelisnowbeingstoredinthespentfuelpool,uponcommencement ofworkoneithertheexistingracksorthenewracksinthespentfuelpoolinconjunction withreplacement oftheexistingrackswithnewracks: ',7I'~7)4IIf~f)I'()Y(fI~-I~(4['.Y~I)4II~f-II'447I'IN(444INhIf}'(g(fIY'ItL'..f}}l'NIN (i)thewaterinthespentfuelpoolshallcontainatleast2000ppmboronandshallbemaintained atthisboronconcentration untilcompletion oftherackreplacement; and(ii)theboroninthespentfuelpoolshallbeverifiedtomeettheconcentration requirement bychemicalanalysisatleast3timesper7days,withamaximumtimeintervalbetweensamplesof72hours.Priortofinalconversion tothemodifiedrackdesign,fuelmaybestored,asneeded,ineitherthemodifiedstorageracksdescribed inTechnical Specification 5.6.2oxintheunmodified storageracks(orboth)whicharedesignedandshallbemaintained withacenter-to-center distancebetweenfuelassembliesplacedinthestoragerackstoensureaKffof~.95withthestoragepoolfilledeffwithunborated water,including aconservative allowance foruncertainties as'described inSection9.7oftheFSAR.'Sincealloftheoldrackshavebeenreplacedwithnewxacks,andnofurthermodifications areforeseen, webelievethatthislicensecondition shouldberemoved.4.ThefourthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istodeleteLicenseCondition 2.E>whichstates:2E.Thislicenseissub)ecttothefollowing additional conditions fortheprotection oftheenvironment: (1)Thelicensees willcomplywithappropriate waterqualitystandards, inaccordance withFederal,Stateandlocalregulations (including changesasrequiredbytheFederalWaterPollution ControlActAmendments of1972)~(2)Ifharmfuleffectsorevidenceofunacceptable damagearedetectedbythemonitoring
- programs, thelicensees shallprovidetotheCommission ananalysisofthe'roblem andaplanofactiontobetakentoeliminate orsignificantly reducethedetrimental effectsordamage.(3)Beforeengaginginanoperational activitynotevaluated bytheCommission, thelicensees willprepaxeandrecordanenvironmental evaluation ofsuchactivity.
Whentheevaluation indicates thatsuchactivitymayresultinasignificant adverseenvironmental impactthatwasnotevaluated, orthatissignificantly greaterthanevaluated intheFinalEnvironmental Statement, thelicensees shallprovideawrittenevaluation ofsuchactivities andobtainpriorapprovaloftheDirector, OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation fortheactivities. ),I")X'>>a~ilI'=I))I'rh*")rI1I>>ihha')!i')tat1-gtiih)"~)XIIIiI'FItr~=.)>>r,I'~t'v*II-)ItIIitI'I*,i))'.'7.t,)b,I,i;.)r)'hII)ar.II'tlbIr~),i'))bII),'<<)h~X'h"I"I,'IVbtih'r'brt'I~'I"Ih~))t'1JhII")ra)htXt~IIh"hiar'i>> WithregardtoCondition 2.E.(1),Amendment No.40toUnitNo.2licenserevisedtheEnvironmental Technical Specifications toincludealltheenvironmental considerations inthenewEPP.InSection3.1ofthisAmendment, werethe"Radiological Environmental Monitoring" requirements forthemonitoring ofthelakeandwellwaterqualities intheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantarea.Fortheabovereasons,wefeelthatLicenseCondition 2.E.(1)canbedeleted.WithregardtoCondition 2.E.(2),Section5.4.1(Environmental Technical Specification) ofAmendment No.40totheUnitNo.2Licensestates:"Ifharmfuleffectsorevidenceoftrendstowardsirxeversible damagetotheenvixonment areobserved, thelicenseeshallprovideadetailedanalysisofthedataandaproposedcourseofactiontoalleviate theproblem." SincethisEnvixonmental Technical Specification addxesses thesamerequirements asthosecontained inLicenseCondition 2.E.(2),wefeelthatthelattercanbedeleted.WithregardtoCondition 2.E.(3),Section5.4.2.2(Environmental Technical Specification) ofAmendment No.40toUnitNo.2Licensestates:5.4.2.2~ChanesWhenachangetothePlantdesign,tothePlantoperation, ortotheprocedures described inSection5.3isplannedwhichinvolvesanenvironmental matterorquestionnotpreviously reviewedandevaluated bytheNRC,areportonthechangeshallbemadetotheOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation priortoimplementation. Thereportshallincludeadescription andevaluation ofthechange.Changesoradditions topermitsandcertificates requiredbyFederal,state,localandregionalauthorities fortheprotection oftheenvironment shallbereported. Whentherequiredchangesaresubmitted totheconcerned agencyforapproval, theyshallalsobesubmitted totheDirector, OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation, USNRC,forinformation. Thesubmittal shallincludeanevaluation oftheenvironmental impactofthechange.Requestfor'hanges inEnvironmental Technical Specifications shallbesubmitted totheDirector, OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation, USNRC,forpriorreviewandauthorization. Therequestshallincludeanevaluation oftheimpactofthechange,including asupporting benefit-cost analysis. SincethisEnvironmental Technical Specification addresses thesamex'equirements asthosecontained inLicenseCondition 2.E.(3),wefeelthatthelattercannowbedeleted. 444r.4~r)*)PP>>")4F)PPIPw-WV)~~P4~IP'Il-,II"-*WPIWP'()~I4~~~wvr-I)j,4F)~r)))Fg>'"4IIV))~f~ll)~)f>>>,P~ill>I'IPWrP,I4III 5.ThefifthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istodeletethefootnoteatthebottomofT/Spage3/46-39,whichstates:"Forthelowerinletdoorinspection intervalscheduled toendJune8,1980,including theextension permitted bySpecification 4.0.2,aonetimeonlydelayisallowedtoextendthisinspection intervalthroughJuly20,1980'Sincetheextension isnolongervalid(i.e.,pastJuly20/1980),werequestdeletionofthefootnote. 6.ThesixthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74isthedeletionofthefootnoteatthebottomofpage3/49-9,whichstates:"Duringtherefueling outagecommencing aboutNovember1982,theContainment PurgeandExhaustIsolation Systemshallbedefinedtoincludearadiation signaltoeithertheinneroroutervalveoraprovision forimmediate manualclosureofthevalveintheeventclosuremayberequired. Thisdefinition istemporary anditandthisfootnoteshallnolongerapplyfollowing therefueling outagecommencing aboutNovember1982.Forthetemporary reliefperiod,theprovisions ofSpecification 3.0.4arenotapplicable." Sincetheextension isnolongervalid(i.e.,therefueling outagecommencing aboutNovember1982isover),werequestdeletionofthefootnote. 7.TheseventhproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istherequesttoamendpageB3/46-3bythedeletionofSection3/46.1.7ontheContainment Ventilation System.Amendment No.47issuedonDecember8,1982issuedanewT/SpageB3/46-2awhichincludedaBasesSection3/46.1.7ontheContainment PurgeandExhaustIsolation Valves.ThisnewsectionreplacedtheoldBasesSection3/46.1.7contained onpageB3/46-3,however,thelatterwasnotdeleted.Basedonthis,webelieveBasesSection3/46.1.7onpageB3/46-3shouldbedeleted.8.TheeighthproposedchangetotheLicenseNo.DPR-74istoremovethe"Amendment No.45"revisionreference atthebottomofpages:III;3/41-l~3/42-15~3/43-4g3/43-42;3/44-2;3/44-26;3/45-5~3/46-11;3/46-43;3/49-10;andB3/42-3.OnlythereversesidesofthesepageswereaffectedbyAmendment 45.Therefore, the"Amendment 45"revisionreference oneachofthesepagesshouldberemoved,andthecorrect"Amendment No.."shouldbeputinitsplace.Attachment No.4tothislettercontainstherevisedT/Spageswiththeappropriate "Amendment No."oneachpage.Pleasenoteseveralofthesepageshaveno"Amendment No.";becausetheyhaveneverbeenrevised. P~*f'g)>>P'h'P)PhP*f',IP>"j'>>!~~I,'(>>S'(iJ)>><<A1"J)>>I)~PP)ijt')ti~~~pqI'-'I~~II)Ql~~*I.IP,u>>IIPI'( tloeotU,S.NUCLEARREGULATORY COM,aaSSION ~REACTORFACILITYFEEDETERMINATION 1.FEEFORMTTPE(Checaoher PAELIMIHART FINALAMENDEDINSTRUCTIONS. Fasthllama1throughta,aaaPPllcabre, ahdacheIheorrclhatCOPyIotheUcehsaFeeMshsoemehl Branch.2.DOCKETNUMBERISI 3.ACCESSOHNUMSER Qg0+$ParUCENSEEI".rrx'A.~.se~'~,~ayrrlsoapn'a~L,PLANTNAMEANDUNITISI... ~.'-'sI.C.:C.'rsrd:
- -::i~(.$s~4$DATEOFAPPLSCATIOH i2/-if/gg~~'.FEEREMITTEDYESNO~m~s;.~
A'~e~4.UCENSEEFEEDETERMIHATIQN ~.~-42dp~~.ocLAsavcLAaavlcxsvaTNOH$10.TAONUMBERASQONEg(ifavaaabief KO'S--:"CLASSIEXASS~CLAsa5CIAsaIv~12.NRCFEEDETERMINATION 11~APPROVALLETTshonoaII'VHoplEHTNuuatrvsl 0+5DATEOFISSUANCE0-2-Theaboveapplication hasbeenreviewedInaccordance withSection17022otPart170andIsproperlycategorfsed. ~Theaboveapplication hasbeonreviewodInaccordance withSection170.22ofPerlTTGandIsIncorreclly classified. Feeshouldbeclasstes): JUS'TIFFCATIOH FORCLASSIFICATION OAAECLASSIFICATION: yomallpocallo lssclass~sypeoyacpoo~oleeempllyomleesbacaseIlls:FiledDyanonprofit educational lnslitulion.'iled ItyaGOVernment agenCyandISnOIfOrapOwerreaCtOr.ForaClassI,II,orIIIamendment whichresultsfromanNRCrequestdatedforIheapplication andtheamendment lsloslmplityorclarifyLicenseorTechnical Specificalions; hasonlyminorsafelysignificance; andisbeingissuedtortheconvenience ofNRC(muslmeet~IrofthecriteriaJ.Other(Stalereasonfhereforf ayspysmCr13.SIGNA'IUREISrahch hieirpmDATEIa.FINAl.cEATIFIGATI H:ThereIteedetermlhsrlonhas beeresssessedarydrs herebyarnrmed. sIGNATURE Ipro(aneSychlerrm'ATE 'tlttoL-C-P..FORFEEMANAGEMENT BRANCHUSEONLY(AIIOtherSdpnOlwr(lebefdpVthf 'nefTheboveerempraon requesthasbeenrevle dIsherebyacceptedasbetheeaempl.rrlUREIChler. LFMDATERecordsServicesBanchDI.BranchChlelDISTRIBUTION BYLFMBLFMBEaenpbOnFIIeLFLISAeacrorFile}}