ML13127A339: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Poehler, JeffreyFrom: Poehler, JeffreySent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 1:25 PMTo: Basavaraju, ChakrapaniCc: Kim, James; Cheruvenki, GaneshSubject: FW: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248) | {{#Wiki_filter:Poehler, JeffreyFrom: Poehler, JeffreySent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 1:25 PMTo: Basavaraju, ChakrapaniCc: Kim, James; Cheruvenki, GaneshSubject: FW: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Attachments: Core Plate Hold Down Bolt SE Input ME6248 -(2-7-12).docxPani, attached is my input to the SE for the areas that I reviewed -specifically, the determination of theamount of preload loss and the adequacy of the proposed inspection plan. Ganesh peer-reviewed for me, seeemail below.I'm not sure how you structured your SE, so feel free to move things aro ind and cut and paste my sections asneeded. We probably should meet to discuss. I'll be in the office tomorrow and Thursday.Thanks,JeffFrom: Cheruvenki, GaneshSent: Tuesday, Feke1bruary 4, 02 10:20 AMTo: Poehler, JeffreySubject: RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Jeff-Looks good-specially the statistical approachFrom: Poehler, JeffreySent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:25 AMTo: Cheruvenki, GaneshCc: Purtscher, PatrickSubject: RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Did you guys have time to comment?From: Cheruvenki, GaneshSent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 12:07 PMTo: Poehler, JeffreySubject: RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Will do.From: Poehler, JeffreySent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:45 AMTo: Cheruvenki, GaneshCc: Purtscher, PatrickSubject: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Ganesh,21 As discussed yesterday, please peer review (technical only) my SE input for Vermont Yankee. Use TACME6248. Note that it is not a complete SE because Pani has the lead on the SE. He can integrate my inputsinto the structure of his SE.If you can give me comments by the end of the week that would be fine.Pat, I copied you so if you have time to review your comments would also be appreciated.Thanks,Jeff22 | ||
}} | |||
Core Plate Hold Down Bolt SE Input ME6248 -(2-7-12).docxPani, attached is my input to the SE for the areas that I reviewed -specifically, the determination of theamount of preload loss and the adequacy of the proposed inspection plan. Ganesh peer-reviewed for me, seeemail below.I'm not sure how you structured your SE, so feel free to move things aro ind and cut and paste my sections asneeded. We probably should meet to discuss. I'll be in the office tomorrow and Thursday.Thanks,JeffFrom: Cheruvenki, GaneshSent: Tuesday, Feke1bruary 4, 02 10:20 AMTo: Poehler, JeffreySubject: RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Jeff-Looks good-specially the statistical approachFrom: Poehler, JeffreySent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:25 AMTo: Cheruvenki, GaneshCc: Purtscher, PatrickSubject: RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Did you guys have time to comment?From: Cheruvenki, GaneshSent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 12:07 PMTo: Poehler, JeffreySubject: RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Will do.From: Poehler, JeffreySent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:45 AMTo: Cheruvenki, GaneshCc: Purtscher, PatrickSubject: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Ganesh,21 As discussed yesterday, please peer review (technical only) my SE input for Vermont Yankee. Use TACME6248. Note that it is not a complete SE because Pani has the lead on the SE. He can integrate my inputsinto the structure of his SE.If you can give me comments by the end of the week that would be fine.Pat, I copied you so if you have time to review your comments would also be appreciated.Thanks,Jeff22}} |
Revision as of 18:12, 22 March 2018
ML13127A339 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
Issue date: | 02/14/2012 |
From: | Poehler J C NRC/NRR/DE/EVIB |
To: | Chakrapani Basavaraju NRC/NRR/DE/EMCB |
References | |
FOIA/PA-2013-0030, TAC ME0248 | |
Download: ML13127A339 (2) | |
Text
Poehler, JeffreyFrom: Poehler, JeffreySent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 1:25 PMTo: Basavaraju, ChakrapaniCc: Kim, James; Cheruvenki, GaneshSubject: FW: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Attachments: Core Plate Hold Down Bolt SE Input ME6248 -(2-7-12).docxPani, attached is my input to the SE for the areas that I reviewed -specifically, the determination of theamount of preload loss and the adequacy of the proposed inspection plan. Ganesh peer-reviewed for me, seeemail below.I'm not sure how you structured your SE, so feel free to move things aro ind and cut and paste my sections asneeded. We probably should meet to discuss. I'll be in the office tomorrow and Thursday.Thanks,JeffFrom: Cheruvenki, GaneshSent: Tuesday, Feke1bruary 4, 02 10:20 AMTo: Poehler, JeffreySubject: RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Jeff-Looks good-specially the statistical approachFrom: Poehler, JeffreySent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:25 AMTo: Cheruvenki, GaneshCc: Purtscher, PatrickSubject: RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Did you guys have time to comment?From: Cheruvenki, GaneshSent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 12:07 PMTo: Poehler, JeffreySubject: RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Will do.From: Poehler, JeffreySent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:45 AMTo: Cheruvenki, GaneshCc: Purtscher, PatrickSubject: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)Ganesh,21 As discussed yesterday, please peer review (technical only) my SE input for Vermont Yankee. Use TACME6248. Note that it is not a complete SE because Pani has the lead on the SE. He can integrate my inputsinto the structure of his SE.If you can give me comments by the end of the week that would be fine.Pat, I copied you so if you have time to review your comments would also be appreciated.Thanks,Jeff22