ML20207N528: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project = TAC:52890
| stage = Approval
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-
{{#Wiki_filter:r e
r e ,
January 9, 1987 Docket No. 50-344 DISTRIBilTION pectet File: B. Grimes NRC ~PDR '"'"" J. Partlow Mr. William J. Lindblad Local PDR N. Thompson President PD#3 Rdg.
'                                        January 9, 1987 Docket No. 50-344                         DISTRIBilTION pectet File: B. Grimes NRC ~PDR '"'"" J. Partlow Local PDR      N. Thompson Mr. William J. Lindblad President                                 PD#3 Rdg.       T. Chan Portland General Electric Company         T. Novak       C. Vogan 121 S.W. Salmon Street                   OGC             ACRS (10)
T. Chan Portland General Electric Company T. Novak C. Vogan 121 S.W. Salmon Street OGC ACRS (10)
Portland, Oregon 97204                   E. Jordan
Portland, Oregon 97204 E. Jordan


==Dear Mr. Lindblad:==
==Dear Mr. Lindblad:==
==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
  -GENERIC. LETTER 83-28, ITEM 2.1~(PART 2) (VENDOR INTERFACE PROGRAM -
  -GENERIC. LETTER 83-28, ITEM 2.1~(PART 2) (VENDOR INTERFACE PROGRAM -
RTS COMP 0NENTS)
RTS COMP 0NENTS)
By letter dated November 4, 1983, Portland General Electric (PGE) responded to several Items of Generic Letter (GL) 83-28, among them, Item 2.1 Equipment Classification and Vendor Interface.
By {{letter dated|date=November 4, 1983|text=letter dated November 4, 1983}}, Portland General Electric (PGE) responded to several Items of Generic Letter (GL) 83-28, among them, Item 2.1 Equipment Classification and Vendor Interface.
The staff has completed its review of Item 2.1 Part 2 (Vendor Interface Progams) and concludes that PGE's response for this topic is acceptable. The staff was assisted in its review by EGAG Idaho. Enclosed is our Safety Evaluation along with EG&G Idaho's Technical Evaluation, which provides the bases for our conclusion.
The staff has completed its review of Item 2.1 Part 2 (Vendor Interface Progams) and concludes that PGE's response for this topic is acceptable. The staff was assisted in its review by EGAG Idaho.
Enclosed is our Safety Evaluation along with EG&G Idaho's Technical Evaluation, which provides the bases for our conclusion.
Part 1 (Equipment Classification) to Item 2.1 of GL 83-28 was addressed in our Safety Evaluation of September 17, 1986.
Part 1 (Equipment Classification) to Item 2.1 of GL 83-28 was addressed in our Safety Evaluation of September 17, 1986.
Sincerely, 5
Sincerely, 5
Line 34: Line 36:


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
As stated cc: See next page PD#3 y PD#3 h-CVogan TChan~
Iq/87 1/j/87 k,hIggKo 87o2o9 05000344 P
PDR


As stated cc: See next page                                                                ,
Mr. William J. Lindblad Portland General Eletric Company Trojan Nuclear Plant cc:
PD#3 y                PD#3 h-CVogan                TChan~
Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Trojan Nuclear Plant
Iq/87                1/j/87 k,hIggKo 87o2o9 P                  05000344 PDR
. Post Office Box 0 Rainier, Oregon 97048 Robert M. Hunt, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Columbia County St. Helens, Oregon 97501 William T. Dixon Oregon Department of Energy Labor and Industries Building Room 111 Salem, Oregon 97310 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Executive Director for Operations 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 I
 
Mr. William J. Lindblad Portland General Eletric Company                                         Trojan Nuclear Plant cc:
Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                             -
Trojan Nuclear Plant
                    . Post Office Box 0 Rainier, Oregon 97048 Robert M. Hunt, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Columbia County St. Helens, Oregon 97501 William T. Dixon Oregon Department of Energy Labor and Industries Building Room 111                                                                                         -
Salem, Oregon 97310 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Executive Director for Operations 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 I
I
I
        .    -.            -.      .--_ -- -    ..        - - . _ - - . - - - . - - . _ . . - - - . - - . . . _ ,}}
- -. _ - -. - - -. - -. _.. - - -. - -... _,}}

Latest revision as of 20:11, 6 December 2024

Forwards Safety Evaluation & Eg&G Idaho Input Reviewing Util 831104 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 2), Vendor Interface Program - Reactor Trip Sys Components. Response Acceptable
ML20207N528
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Mcguire, Kewaunee, Harris, Summer, Prairie Island, Robinson, South Texas, McGuire, 05000000, Trojan
Issue date: 01/09/1987
From: Chan T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Lindblad W
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
Shared Package
ML19310H790 List:
References
GL-83-28, TAC-52890, NUDOCS 8701140270
Download: ML20207N528 (2)


Text

r e

January 9, 1987 Docket No. 50-344 DISTRIBilTION pectet File: B. Grimes NRC ~PDR '"'"" J. Partlow Mr. William J. Lindblad Local PDR N. Thompson President PD#3 Rdg.

T. Chan Portland General Electric Company T. Novak C. Vogan 121 S.W. Salmon Street OGC ACRS (10)

Portland, Oregon 97204 E. Jordan

Dear Mr. Lindblad:

SUBJECT:

-GENERIC. LETTER 83-28, ITEM 2.1~(PART 2) (VENDOR INTERFACE PROGRAM -

RTS COMP 0NENTS)

By letter dated November 4, 1983, Portland General Electric (PGE) responded to several Items of Generic Letter (GL) 83-28, among them, Item 2.1 Equipment Classification and Vendor Interface.

The staff has completed its review of Item 2.1 Part 2 (Vendor Interface Progams) and concludes that PGE's response for this topic is acceptable. The staff was assisted in its review by EGAG Idaho.

Enclosed is our Safety Evaluation along with EG&G Idaho's Technical Evaluation, which provides the bases for our conclusion.

Part 1 (Equipment Classification) to Item 2.1 of GL 83-28 was addressed in our Safety Evaluation of September 17, 1986.

Sincerely, 5

Terence L. C an, Project Manager Project Directorate #3 Division of PWR Licensing-A

Enclosures:

As stated cc: See next page PD#3 y PD#3 h-CVogan TChan~

Iq/87 1/j/87 k,hIggKo 87o2o9 05000344 P

PDR

Mr. William J. Lindblad Portland General Eletric Company Trojan Nuclear Plant cc:

Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Trojan Nuclear Plant

. Post Office Box 0 Rainier, Oregon 97048 Robert M. Hunt, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Columbia County St. Helens, Oregon 97501 William T. Dixon Oregon Department of Energy Labor and Industries Building Room 111 Salem, Oregon 97310 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Executive Director for Operations 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 I

I

- -. _ - -. - - -. - -. _.. - - -. - -... _,