ML19310H789
| ML19310H789 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Mcguire, Kewaunee, Harris, Summer, Prairie Island, Robinson, South Texas, McGuire, 05000000, Trojan |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1986 |
| From: | Farmer F EG&G IDAHO, INC. |
| To: | NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19310H790 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-D-6001, CON-FIN-D-6002 EGG-NTA-7448, GL-83-28, TAC-52852, TAC-52853, NUDOCS 8612290030 | |
| Download: ML19310H789 (19) | |
Text
.
'5 EGG-NTA-7448 e
November 1986 INFORMAL REPORT 6
. /daho INPUT FOR SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR Nat/Ona/
POWER PLANT ficGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION UNITS 1 AND 2
- Eng/neerinE -
PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 Laboratory SALEtt GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 1 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 AND 2 VIRGIL C. SUf1MER NUCLEAR Managed STATION TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM by the U.S.
VENDOR INTERFACE ITEM 2.1 (PART 2) 0F GENERIC Department LETTER 83-28 ofEnergy F. G. Farmer
' 'q.
EE 8
GD Prepared for the U
- 8. MGM W%%%M WM%IW w,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
DOE Contract No. DE-AC07-76tD01S70 O,cg (TL@CdN
L DISCLAIMER This book was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neitner the United States Government nor any agency thereof.
nor any of their empioyees. makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not mfnnge pnvately owned rignis. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trace riame, trademarar, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessanly constitute or impiy its encorsement, recommendation, or f avonng by the United States Government or any agency tnereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
e 4
EGG-NTA-7448 INPUT FOR SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 3
McGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT UNITS 1 AUD 2 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. E SALEM GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 1 SOUTH TEXAS PR9 JECT UNITS 1 AND 2 VIRGIL C. SUMML3 NUCLEAR STATION TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANY REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM VENDOR INTERFACE ITEM 2.1 (PART 2) 0F GENERIC LETTER 83-28 l
L F. G. Farmer i
Published November 1986 f
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory EG&G Idaho, Inc.
1 l
Prepared for tfe i
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC07-76ID01570 FIN Nos. D6001 and D6002 1
l
-., ~
. ~ - ~
~_
ABSTR8CT Thit EG&G Idaho,-Inc. report provides a review of the submittals for some of the Westinghouse (W) nuclear plants' for conforrrance to Generic
~
Letter 83-28, Item 2.1 (Part 2). The report includes the following plants, all Westinghouse, and is in partial fulfillment of the following TAC Nos.:
plant Docket Number TAC Number Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant 50-305 52848 i
McGuire Nuclear Station Unit 1 50-369 52852 McGuire Nuclear Station Unit 2 50-370 52853 Prairie Island Unit 1 50-282 52870 Prairie Island Unit 2 50-306 52871 Robinson 2 50-261 52875 Salem Unit 1.
50-272 52876 Salem Unit 2 50-311 52877 Shearon Harris Un 1 (OL) 50-400 N/A South Texas Unit 1 (OL) 50-498 N/I South Texas Unit 2'(OL) 50-499 N/A Virgil C. Summer 50-395 52885 Trojan Nuclear Plant 50-344 52890 I
6 O
ii
=.
t 1
s i
i I
4 FOREWORD e
This report is provided as part of the program for evaluating
' licensee / applicant conformance to Generic Letter 83-28, " Required Actions Based on Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events." This work is conducted for the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Division of PWR Licensing-A by EG&G Idaho, Inc.
The U. S.' Nuclear Regulatory Commission funded the work under the authorization, B&R 20-19-19-11-3, FIN Nos. D6001 and D6002._
l l
i s
l 1
i iii
. ~.--
r CONTENTS i
ABSTRACT.............................................................
i i FO R E WOR D.............................................................
ii i 1.
INTRODUCTION....................................................-
1
'2 R E V I E W R EQU I R EMENT S.............................................
2 i
3.
- GROUP REVIEW RESULTS............................................
3
- 4. -
REVIEW RESULTS FOR KEWAUNEE NU CLEAR POWER PLANT.................
4~
4.1 Evaluation................................................
4 4.2 Conclusion................................................
4 5.
REVIEW RESULTS FOR McGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION UNITS 1 AND 2........
5 5.1 E v a l u at i o n................................................
5 5.2 Conclusion................................................
5 0
6.
REVIEW.RESULTS FOR PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING 1
PLANT UNITS 1 2.................................................
6 l
6.1 Evaluation................................................
6 l
6.2 Conclusion................................................
6 7.
REVIEW RESULTS FOR H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2......................................................
7 7.1 E v al u at i o n................................................
7 7.2 Conclusion................................................
7 8.
REVIEW RESULTS FOR SALEM GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2.......
8 8.1 Evaluation................................................
8 8.2 Conclusion................................................
8 9.
REVIEW RESULTS FOR SHEAR 0N HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 1.........................................................
9 9.1 Evaluation................................................
9 9.2 C on c l u s i o n................................................
9
- 10. REVIEW RESULTS FOR SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 AND 2............
10 10.1 E v a l u at i o n................................................
10 iv l
t t
7 e-y y..
n-,-
,n
..v.-,
10.2 Conclusion................................................
. 10
- 11. REVIEW RESULTS FOR VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION.............-
11 11.1 Evaluation........'........................................
11 11.2 Conclusion................................................
11 1
c
- 12.. REVIEW RESULTS FOR TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT.........................
12 12.1. Evaluation................................................
12 12.2 Conclusion................................................
12
- 13. GROUP CONCLUSION................................................
13
- 14. REFERENCES......................................................
14 e
d W
a 7
m V
,m, y
e-,y
.--,y yy m-r-
.w,
,-q,,
,,.y,,m,,
_,m,
,.-y-
CONFORMANCE TO GENERIC LETTER 83-28 ITEM 2.1 (PART 2)
KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT McGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 1 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 AND 2 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT 1.
INTRODUCTION i
I On July 8, 1983, Generic Letter 83-28 was issued by D. G. Eisenhut, Director of the Division of Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, to all licensees of operating reactors, applicants for operating licenses, and holders of construction permits. This letter included required actions based on generic implications of the Salem ATWS events. These requirements have been published in Volume 2 of NUREG-1000,
" Generic Implicatians of ATWS Events at the Salem Nuclear Power Plant."2 This report documents the EG&G Idaho, Inc. review of the submittals of a group of Westinghouse plants including Kewaunee, McGuire Units 1 and 2, Prairie Isi ad Units 1 and 2, Robinson 2, Salem Units 1 and 2, Shearon d
Harris Unit 1, South Texas Units 1 and 2, Summer and Trojan for conformance to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of Generic Letter 83-28. The submittals from the licensees and applicants utilized in these evaluations are referenced in Section 14 of this report.
1 1
i C,0NFORMANCE TO GENERIC LETTER 83-28 ITEM 2.1 (PART 2) l KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT McGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION UNITS 11AND 2 l
PRA'IRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 SALEM GENERATING STATION-UNITS 1 AND 2 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 1 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 AND 2 VIRGIL'C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT 1.
INTRODUCTION I
On July 8, 1983, Generic Letter 83-28 was issued by D. G. Eisenhut, Director of the Division of Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
- Regulation, to all licensees of operating reactors, applicants for oper; ting licenses, and holders of construction permits. This letter included required actions based on gener c implications of the Salem ATWS i
events. These requirements have been published in Volume 2 of NUREG-1000,
" Generic Implications of ATWS Events at the Salem Nuclear Power Plant."2 This report documents the EG&G Idaho, Inc. review of the submittals of a group of Westinghouse plants including Kewaunee, McGuire Units 1 and 2, Prairie Island Units 1 and 2, Robinson 2, Salem Units 1 and 2, Shearon Harris Unit 1, South Texas Units 1 and 2, Summer and Trojan for conformance to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of Generic Letter 83-28. The submittals from the licensees and applicants utilized in these evaluations are referenced in Section 14 of this report.
O 1
2.
REVIEW REQUIREMENTS l
Item 2.1 (Part 2) (Reactor Trip System - Vendor Interf ace) requires licensees and applicants to establish, implement and maintain a continuing program to ensure that vendor information on Reactor Trip System (RTS) components is complete, current and controlled throughout the life of the plant, and appropriately referenced or incorporated in plant instructions and procedures. The vendor interf ace program is to include periodic l
communications with vendors to assure that all applicable information has been received, as well as a system 'of positive feedback with vendors for mailings containing technical information, e.
g., licensee / applicant acknowledgement for receipt of technical information.
That part of the vendor interf ace pro 5 ram which ensures that vendor information on RTS components, once acquirei, is appropriately controlled, referenced and incorporated in plant instructions and procedures, will be evaluated as part of the review of Item 2.2 of the Generic Letter.
Because the Nuclear Steam System Supplier (NSSS) is ordinarily also the supplier of the entire RTS, the NSSS is also the principal source of information on the components of the RTS. This review of the licensee and applicar,t submittals will:
1.
Confirm that the licensee / applicant has identified an interface with 1
either the NSSS or with the vendors of each of the components of the Reactor Trip System.
2.
Confirm that the interf ace identified by licensees / applicants includes periodic communication with the NSSS or with the vendors of each of the components of the Reactor Trip System.
-3.
Confirm that the interface identified by licensees / applicants includes a system of positive feedback to confirm receipt of transmittals of technical information.
2
3.
GROUP REVIEW RESULTS The relevant submittals from each of the included reactor plants were reviewed to determine compliance with Item 2.1 (Part 2). First, the submittals frg's each plant were reviewed to establish that Item 2.1 (Part
- 2) was specifically addressed.
Second, the submittals were evaluated to determine the extent to which each of the plants complies with the staff guidelines for Item 2.1 (Part 2).
M 3
l
~
si 4
REVIEW RESULTS FOR KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 4.1 Evaluation Wisconsin /Public Service Corporation, the licensee for Kewaunee, h
provided their response to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter on f
November 115, 1984.
In that response, the licensee confirms that_the NSSS for Kewaunee is Westinghouse and that the RTS.for Kewaunee is. included as a
=
part of the Westinghouse interf ace program established for the Kewaunee r
NSSS.
LThe Westinghouse interface program for the NSSS includes'botn periodic coniunication between 13estinghouse and licensees / applicants and positive feedback from licensees / applicants in the form of signed receipts for technical information transmitted by Westinghouse.
l 4.2 Conclusion i
l The staff finds the licensee's confirming statement that Kewaunee is a participant in the Westinghouse interf ace program for the RTS meets the staff position on Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter and is, therefore, acceptable.
i L
i n
l I
I
l I
5.
REVIEW RESULTS FDR McGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 5.1 Evaluation Duke Power Company, the licensee for McGuire Units 1 and-2, provided their response to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter on November 4, 1983.
In that response, the licensee confirms that the NSSS for McGuire Units 1 and 2 is Westinghouse and that the RTS for McGuire Units 1 and 2 is 2
included _as a part of'the Westinghouse interface program established for the McGuire Units 1 and 2 NSSS.
The Westinghouse interface program for the NSSS includes both periodic communication between Westinghouse and licensees / applicants and positive feedback from licensees / applicants in the form of signed receipts for technical information transmitted by Westinghouse.
5.2 Conclusion The staff finds the licensee's confirming statement that McGuire Units 1 and 2 is a participant in the Westinghouse interf ace program for the RTS l
meets the staff position on Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter and is, therefore, acceptable.
?
)
9-8 i
T 5
n-,-
i 6.
REVIEW RESULTS FOR' PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR l
GENERATING PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 6.1 Evaluation Northern confirms Power Company, the licensee for Prairie Island Units 1 and 2, responded to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter on November-4, 1983..In that response, the licensee confirms that the NSSS for Prairie Island Units 1 and 2 is Westinghouse and that the RTS for Prairie Island Units 1 and 2 is incl.uded as a part of the Westinghouse interface program established for the Prairie Island Units 1 and 2 NSSS.
The Westinghouse interface program for the NSSS includes both periodic-communication between Westinghouse and licensees / applicants and positive feedback from licensees / applicants in the form'of signed receipts for technical information transmitted by Westinghouse.
6.2 Cpnclusion The staff finds the licensee's confirming statement that Prairie
' Island Units 1 and 2 is a part:cipant in the Westinghouse interface program for the RTS meets the staff position on Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter and is, therefore, acceptable.
~
h 6
i 7.
REVIEW RESULTS FOR H. B. ROBINSON STEAM' ELECTRIC PLANT UNIT NO. 2 7.1 Evaluation Carolina Power and Light, the licensee for Robinson 2, responded to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter on November 7, 1983.
In that response the licensee confirms 'that the NSSS for Robinson 2 is Westinghouse
~
and that the RTS for Robinson 2 is included as a part of the Westinghouse interface program established for the Robinson 2 NSSS.
The Westinghouse interface program for the NSSS includes both periodic communication between Westinghouse and licensees / applicants and positive feedback from licensees / applicants in the form of signed receipts for i
technical information transmitted by Westinghouse.
7.2 Conclusion r
The staff finds the licensee's confirming statement that Robinson 2 is
^
a participant in the Westinghouse interface program for the RTS meets the staff position on Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter and is, therefore, acceptable.
e 7
y y.
V b
8.
REVIEW RESULTS FOR SALEM GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 8.1 Evaluation
}
Public Service _ Electric' and Gas, the licensee for Salem Units.1 and 2, i
responded to the concern of Item 2.1 (Part.2) of the Generic Letter on March 8, 1983, and March 14, 1983.
In those responses, the licensee-l confirms that the NSSS for Salem Units 1 and 2 is Westinghouse and.that the RTS for Salem Units 1 and 2 is included as a part of-the Westinghouse
]
interf ace program established for the Salem Units 1 and 2 NSSS.
The Westinghouse interface program for the NSSS includes both periodic communication between Westinghouse and licensees / applicants and positive j
feedback from licensees / applicants in the form of signed receipts for f
' technical information transmitted by Westinghouse.
I
- 8.2 Conclusion The-staff. finds the licensee's confirming statement that Salem Units 1 and 2 is a participant in the Westinghouse ir.terf ace program for the RTS meets the staff position on Item 2.1 (Part 2), of the Generic Letter and is, therefore, acceptable.
e o
}
7 I
i I
i
)
8
+r-
,.r---4.
--,,,-m.r.,-4.--
-r--r~r-
i 9.
REVIEW RESULTS FOR SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 1 9.1 Evaluation Carolina Power and Light, the applicant for Shearon Harris Unit 1, responded to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of tha Generic Letter on November 7, 1983.
. In that response, the' applicant conf ums that the NSSS for Shearon Harris i
Unit 1 is Westinghouse and that the RTS fcr Shearon Harris Unit 1 is included as a part of the Westinghouse interface program established for the Shearon Harris Unit 1 NSSS.
The Westinghouse interf ace program for the NSSS includes both periodic communicati9n between Westinghouse and licensees / applicants and positive feedback from licensees / applicants in the form of signed receipts for technical information transmitted by Westinghouse.
5.2 Conclusion The staff finds the applicant's confirming statement that Shearon Harris Unit 1 is a participant in the Westinghouse interf ace program for the RTS meets the staff position on Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter and is, therefore, acceptable.
I e
9
- 10. REVIEW RESULTS FOR SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 AND 2 10.1 Evaluation Houston Lighting and Power, the applicant for South. Texas Units 1 and 2, provided their response to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter on June 28, 1985.
In that response, the applicant confirms that the NSSS for South Texas Units 1 and 2 is Westinghouse and that the RTS for South Texas Units 1 and 2 is included as a part of the Westinghouse interf ace program established for the South Texas Units 1 and 2 NSSS.
The Westinghouse interface progran for the NSSS includes both periodic communication between Westinghouse and. licensees / applicants and positive feedback from licensees / applicants in the form of signed receipts for technical information transmitted by Westinghouse.
10.2 Conclusion The staff finds the applicant's confirming statement that South Texas Ur.!ts 1 and 2 is a participant in the Westinghouse interf ace program for the RTS meets the staff position on Item 2.1 (Part.2) of the Generic Letter and is, therefore, acceptable.
E a
10
=-.
- 11. REVIEW RESULTS FOR VIRGIt' C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION
~11.1 Evaluation South Carolina Electric and Gas, the licensee for Virgil C. Summer, provided their response to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter on November. 4, 1983.
'n that response, the licensee confirms that'the NSSS for Summer is Westinghouse and that the RTS for, Summer is included as a part of the Westinghouse interf ace program-established for the Summer NSSS.
The Westinghouse interf ace program for the NSSS includes both periodic communication between Westinghouse and licensees / applicants and positive feedback from licensees / applicants in the form of signed receipts for technical information transmitted by Westinghouse.
11.2 Conclusion
- The staff finds the licensee's confirming statement.that Summer is a participant in the Westinghouse interface program for the RTS meets the staff position on Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter and is, therefore, acceptable.
I d
a 11
i i
- 12. REVIEW RESULTS FOR TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT 12.1 Evaluation Portland General Electric Company, the licensee for Trojan Nuclear Plant,'provided their response to Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter on November 4, 1983.
In that response, the licensee confirms that the NSSS for Trojan is Westinghouse and that the RTS for Trojan is included as a l
part of the Westinghouse interf ace program established for the Trojan NSSS.
The Westinghouse interf ace program for the NSSS includes both periodic connunication between Westinghouse and licensees / applicants and positive feedback from licensees / applicants in the form of signed receipts for technical information transmitted by West 4.nghouse.
i 11.2 Conclusion The staff finds the licensee's confinning statement that Trojan is a participant in the Westinghouse interf ace program for the RTS meets the staff position on Item 2.1 (Part 2) of the Generic Letter and is,
.therefore, acceptable.
t I
5 12
l l
l
- 13. GROUP CONCLUSION l
The staff concludes that the licensee / applicant responses for the listed Westinghouse plants for Item 4.5.2 of Generic Letter 83-28 are acceptable, e
O l
l l
i 13 i
1
')
14.
REFERENCES 1.
NRC' Letter, D. G. Eisenhut to all licensees.of Operating Reactors, Applicants for Operating License,' and Holders of Construction Permits,
" Required Actions Based on Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events (Generic Letter 83-28)," July 8,1983. '
2.
Generic Imolications of ATWS Events at the Salem Nuclear Power Plant NUREG-1000, Volume 1, April 1983; Volume 2, July 1983.
3.
Wisconsin Public Service Corporation letcer to NRC, D. C. Hintz to D.
G. Eisenhut, Director, Division of Licensing, " Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events," November 15, 1984.
4.
Duke Power Company' letter to NRC, W. T. Orders to D. G. Eisenhut, i
Director, Division of Licensing, November 4, 1983.
1 5..
Northern States Power Company letter to NRC, D. M. Musolf, to Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, " Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events," November 4, 1983.
l 6.
Carolina Power and Light letter to NRC, A. B. Cutter to D. G.
Eisenhut, Director, Division of Licensing, " Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events," November 7, 1983.
7.
Public Service Electric and Gas letter to NRC, Richard A. Uderitz to D. G. Eisenhut, Director, Division of Licensing, " Reactor Trip Breaker Failure," March 8, 1983.
8.
Public Service Electric and Gas letter to NRC, Richard A. Uderitz to D. G. Eisenhut, Director, Division of Licensing, " Corrective Action Program Related to Reactor Trip Breaker Failures," March 14, 1983.
Carolina Power and Light letter to NRC, A. B. Cutter to'D. G.
9.
Eisenhut, Director, Division of Licensing, " Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events," November 7,1983.
i
- 10. Houston Lighting and Power letter to NRC, J. H. Goldberg to Hugh J.
Thompson, Jr., Director, Division of Licensing, " Response to Generic Letter 83-28, Required Actions Based on Generic Implications of Salem 3
ATWS Events," June 28, 1985.
- 11. South Carolina Electric and Gas letter to NRC, O. W. Dixon to Harold R. Denton, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, " Generic Letter 83-28," November 4, 1983.
- 12. Portland General Electric Company letter to NRC, Bart D. Withers, to Darrel G. Eisenhut, Director, Division of Licensing, " Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events," November 4, 1983.
B 14
~ ~ -.. -
r---.
,~
..--...-..--n....
..n,
1..G T No
~--u em.
No.....,
t us Nucu m.2u u T m
.. a N c.,.
m.
- "!,"3;;
BIBUOGRAPHIC DATA SHEET EGG-NTA-7448 sit tNsTsuctsCNs ON t-g af vf msg J LEAvg 3 LANK 2 Trf LE AND s.;sinTit laput for Safety Evaluation Report Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant......... Item 2.1 (Part 2) of Generic L
j a o^n a5' oat co='<o Letter 83-28 g
ve.a j
ooNT-November 1986
. =wT-ca+
- F. G. Farmer
- c-n macar ssueo sw
)
n..
Novenber 1986 T 5(APQnMING QRGAN6KATRON NAMG AND MasLtNG ADDRE$$ HeuppId Cesars 6 PRQ4CT77 A$4&somsL WNt1 Numsf A EG&G Idaho, Inc.
...No.73 rrm -sea Idaho Falls, IL 33415 D6001/D6002 to SPON50RsNG ORGAN 6Zaf SON NAwt AND Masking acLaE&& ##acesse te Cases 11a Tvet GF mkPORT Division of Pt/R Licensing A Office of !!uclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission tlashington, DC 20555 12 $wP'LEMENTem v NQTE3
- 13. 485TeaCT :JJD wears or ' eses This EG&G Idaho, Inc. report presents the results of our evaluation o' the submittals of some of the llestinghouse nuclear plants for conformance to Generic Letter 33-28, Iten 2.1 (Part 2).
,I te DCCLet NT *NAL'565 - e 8t E'WO*DS'DL5cniPToms
- ' S,*' "'g*8 -[ '
Un1icited s se:ua.vv :.. Ass > cATIC%-
a.s
...es=T....sze,im Noen via=s Unciassified a..
..n Unclassified a e...c
. acts is PoiCE I
a.
, - - _