ML24093A275: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 24: Line 24:
Jeremy A. Mercer, Chair Nicholas G. Trikouros Dr. Gary S. Arnold
Jeremy A. Mercer, Chair Nicholas G. Trikouros Dr. Gary S. Arnold


In the Matter of:                                         Docket Nos. 50-275 LR-2 50-323 LR-2 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ASLBP No. 24-983-02-LR-BD01 (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)
In the Matter of: Docket Nos. 50-275 LR-2 50-323 LR-2 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ASLBP No. 24-983-02-LR-BD01 (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)
April 2, 2024
April 2, 2024


Line 41: Line 41:
person in the Panels Rockville Hearing Room, located on the third floor of Two White Flint
person in the Panels Rockville Hearing Room, located on the third floor of Two White Flint


North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 1 Members of the public are welcome to
North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 1 Members of the public are welcome to


1                                                                                               The Board thanks counsel for their positions relative to when to hold oral argument (unanimous agreement) and whether the non-evident iary oral argument should be conducted in the Panels Hearing Room or at a location near the plant at issue. Each of the three submissions took a different position relative to where to hold the argument. Because all counsel who filed pleadings and all ASLBP judges and staff are located near the already equipped and secured Rockville, Maryland Hearing Room, and argument at a remote location would necessitate costs of obtaining, equipping, and securing a remote location (not to mention cross-country travel for all involved personnel), the Board has decided to hold the oral argument in the Hearing Room. But as discussed below, t he Board will webcast the oral argument so that those not able to attend in-person can view/listen to the argument.
1 The Board thanks counsel for their positions relative to when to hold oral argument (unanimous agreement) and whether the non-evident iary oral argument should be conducted in the Panels Hearing Room or at a location near the plant at issue. Each of the three submissions took a different position relative to where to hold the argument. Because all counsel who filed pleadings and all ASLBP judges and staff are located near the already equipped and secured Rockville, Maryland Hearing Room, and argument at a remote location would necessitate costs of obtaining, equipping, and securing a remote location (not to mention cross-country travel for all involved personnel), the Board has decided to hold the oral argument in the Hearing Room. But as discussed below, t he Board will webcast the oral argument so that those not able to attend in-person can view/listen to the argument.


attend and observe this oral argument. No signs, banners, displays, or other demonstration
attend and observe this oral argument. No signs, banners, displays, or other demonstration
Line 59: Line 59:
the One White Flint North building (11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland). Visitors, i.e.,
the One White Flint North building (11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland). Visitors, i.e.,


anyone not an NRC employee, must have a valid government-issued picture ID and are
anyone not an NRC employee, must have a valid government-issued picture ID and are


required to submit to a security screening process to gain entrance to the building. Given the
required to submit to a security screening process to gain entrance to the building. Given the
Line 81: Line 81:
permitted to speak or participate in the oral argument.
permitted to speak or participate in the oral argument.


The oral arguments primary purpose is to allow the Board to ask questions and obtain
The oral arguments primary purpose is to allow the Board to ask questions and obtain


answers concerning standing and the admissibility of the petitioners three proffered
answers concerning standing and the admissibility of the petitioners three proffered
Line 91: Line 91:
counsel for Applicant, and counsel for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff. Because the
counsel for Applicant, and counsel for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff. Because the


argument is not an evidentiary hearing, the participants should not attempt to introduce
argument is not an evidentiary hearing, the participants should not attempt to introduce
                                    -         3 -
- 3 -


evidence during the argument. Material not cited and arguments not advanced in the
evidence during the argument. Material not cited and arguments not advanced in the
Line 124: Line 124:
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY ANDLICENSINGBOARD
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY ANDLICENSINGBOARD


                                                  /RA/
/RA/
JeremyA.Mercer,Chair ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
JeremyA.Mercer,Chair ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE


Rockville, Maryland April 2, 2024 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Rockville, Maryland April 2, 2024 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


In the Matter of     )
In the Matter of )
      )
)
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY                                                                                                                         )                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Docket Nos. 50-275-LR-2
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-275-LR-2
                                                              )                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               50-323-LR-2 (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     )
) 50-323-LR-2 (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, )
Units 1 and 2)     )
Units 1 and 2) )
                                                              )
)


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing   MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Scheduling Initial Prehearing Conference) have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.
I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Scheduling Initial Prehearing Conference) have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.


U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                               U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication                     Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop: O-16B33                                               Mail Stop - O-14A44 Washington, DC 20555-0001                                       Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: ocaamail.resource@nrc.gov                               Ian Murphy David Roth Susan H. Vrahoretis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                               Jeremy L. Wachutka Office of the Secretary of the Commission                       Caitlin R. Byrd, Law Clerk Mail Stop: O-16B33                                               Georgiann E. Hampton, Law Clerk Washington, DC 20555-0001                                       E-mail: ian.murphy@nrc.gov E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov                                     david.roth@nrc.gov susan.vrahoretis@nrc.gov jeremy.wachutka@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                 caitlin.byrd@nrc.gov Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel                           georgiann.hampton@nrc.gov Mail Stop: T-3F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Jeremy A. Mercer, Chair, Administrative                         Counsel for Pacific Gas and Electric Judge                                                           Company Nicholas G. Trikouros, Administrative Judge                     Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLC Dr. Gary S. Arnold, Administrative Judge                         1111 Pennsylvania Ave NW Emily Newman, Law Clerk                                         Washington, DC 20004 E-mail: jeremy.mercer@nrc.gov                                   Paul Bessette nicholas.trikouros@nrc.gov                             Scott Clausen gary.arnold@nrc.gov                                     Ryan K. Lighty emily.newman@nrc.gov                                           Timothy Matthews E-mail: paul.bessette@morganlewis.com scott.clausen@morganlewis.com ryan.lighty@morganlewis.com timothy.matthews@morganlewis.com
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop: O-16B33 Mail Stop - O-14A44 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: ocaamail.resource@nrc.gov Ian Murphy David Roth Susan H. Vrahoretis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Jeremy L. Wachutka Office of the Secretary of the Commission Caitlin R. Byrd, Law Clerk Mail Stop: O-16B33 Georgiann E. Hampton, Law Clerk Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: ian.murphy@nrc.gov E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov david.roth@nrc.gov susan.vrahoretis@nrc.gov jeremy.wachutka@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission caitlin.byrd@nrc.gov Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel georgiann.hampton@nrc.gov Mail Stop: T-3F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Jeremy A. Mercer, Chair, Administrative Counsel for Pacific Gas and Electric Judge Company Nicholas G. Trikouros, Administrative Judge Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLC Dr. Gary S. Arnold, Administrative Judge 1111 Pennsylvania Ave NW Emily Newman, Law Clerk Washington, DC 20004 E-mail: jeremy.mercer@nrc.gov Paul Bessette nicholas.trikouros@nrc.gov Scott Clausen gary.arnold@nrc.gov Ryan K. Lighty emily.newman@nrc.gov Timothy Matthews E-mail: paul.bessette@morganlewis.com scott.clausen@morganlewis.com ryan.lighty@morganlewis.com timothy.matthews@morganlewis.com


Pacific Gas and Electric Company (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Scheduling Initial Prehearing Conference)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Scheduling Initial Prehearing Conference)


Counsel for San Luis Obispo Mothers for     Counsel for Friends of the Earth Peace                                       1101 15th Street, 11th Floor Harmon, Curran, Spielberg, &                 Washington, DC 20005 Eisenberg, LLP                         Hallie Templeton 1725 DeSales Street, N.W.                   E-mail: HTempleton@foe.org Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 Diane Curran                                 California Energy Commission E-mail: dcurran@harmoncurran.com             Chief Counsels Office 715 P Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Counsel for Environmental Working Group     Devin Black 1250 I Street, NW. Suite 1000               E-mail: devin.black@energy.ca.gov Washington, DC 20005 Caroline Leary E-mail: cleary@ewg.org
Counsel for San Luis Obispo Mothers for Counsel for Friends of the Earth Peace 1101 15th Street, 11th Floor Harmon, Curran, Spielberg, & Washington, DC 20005 Eisenberg, LLP Hallie Templeton 1725 DeSales Street, N.W. E-mail: HTempleton@foe.org Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 Diane Curran California Energy Commission E-mail: dcurran@harmoncurran.com Chief Counsels Office 715 P Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Counsel for Environmental Working Group Devin Black 1250 I Street, NW. Suite 1000 E-mail: devin.black@energy.ca.gov Washington, DC 20005 Caroline Leary E-mail: cleary@ewg.org


Office of the Secretary of the Commission
Office of the Secretary of the Commission

Latest revision as of 18:51, 4 October 2024

Memorandum and Order (Scheduling Initial Prehearing Conference)
ML24093A275
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 04/02/2024
From: Mercer J
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
SECY RAS
References
RAS 56980, 50-275-LR-2, 50-323-LR-2, ASLBP 24-983-02-LR-BD01
Download: ML24093A275 (0)


Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD PANEL

Before the Licensing Board:

Jeremy A. Mercer, Chair Nicholas G. Trikouros Dr. Gary S. Arnold

In the Matter of: Docket Nos. 50-275 LR-2 50-323 LR-2 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ASLBP No. 24-983-02-LR-BD01 (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)

April 2, 2024

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Scheduling Initial Prehearing Conference)

The Licensing Board will conduct an initial prehearing conference in this license renewal

proceeding on Wednesday, May 22, 2024, beginning at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time to hear

argument on the standing of and admissibility of contentions asserted by San Luis Obispo

Mothers for Peace (Mothers for Peace), Friends of the Earth (Friends), and Environmental

Working Group (Group) (collectively, Petitioners). The oral argument will be conducted in-

person in the Panels Rockville Hearing Room, located on the third floor of Two White Flint

North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 1 Members of the public are welcome to

1 The Board thanks counsel for their positions relative to when to hold oral argument (unanimous agreement) and whether the non-evident iary oral argument should be conducted in the Panels Hearing Room or at a location near the plant at issue. Each of the three submissions took a different position relative to where to hold the argument. Because all counsel who filed pleadings and all ASLBP judges and staff are located near the already equipped and secured Rockville, Maryland Hearing Room, and argument at a remote location would necessitate costs of obtaining, equipping, and securing a remote location (not to mention cross-country travel for all involved personnel), the Board has decided to hold the oral argument in the Hearing Room. But as discussed below, t he Board will webcast the oral argument so that those not able to attend in-person can view/listen to the argument.

attend and observe this oral argument. No signs, banners, displays, or other demonstration

materials will be permitted inside the Hearing Room.

No later than May 15, 2024, each counsel shall advise the Boards law clerk, Ms.

Newman, by email (emily.newman@nrc.gov), with copy to all other counsel, how many counsel

and experts (if any) will be attending the in-person hearing on behalf of each participant.

Anyone attending the oral argument in-person must enter through the main entrance of

the One White Flint North building (11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland). Visitors, i.e.,

anyone not an NRC employee, must have a valid government-issued picture ID and are

required to submit to a security screening process to gain entrance to the building. Given the

time needed for security screening and to be escorted to the Hearing Room, anyone attending

the oral argument in person should plan to arrive at the main entrance to One White Flint North

no later than 12:40 p.m. EDT.

The oral argument also will be webcas t on the NRCs website and a listen-only

telephone number will be provided. Additional details regarding viewing the webcast and

accessing the listen-only call-in number will be provided in a subsequent order. Please note,

though, that those who attend in-person (other than counsel), watch the webcast, or listen on

the phone line will be permitted only to listen to or observe the argument; they will not be

permitted to speak or participate in the oral argument.

The oral arguments primary purpose is to allow the Board to ask questions and obtain

answers concerning standing and the admissibility of the petitioners three proffered

contentions. See, e.g., 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(d), (e), & (f). The Board will hear from counsel for

Petitioners (we understand Ms. Curran will present argument on behalf of Petitioners jointly),

counsel for Applicant, and counsel for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff. Because the

argument is not an evidentiary hearing, the participants should not attempt to introduce

- 3 -

evidence during the argument. Material not cited and arguments not advanced in the

submissions should not be raised (with the exception of financial support of Groupsee below).

In addition to whatever preparation counsel believes is necessary for the oral argument,

counsel should be prepared to discuss two standing-related issues. First, counsel should be

prepared to discuss standing of groups without members but with supporters, in light of

Consolidated Edison Company of New York (Indian Point, Unit No. 2), LBP-82-25, 15 N.R.C.

715 (1982). That preparation should include, among other things, whether any of the three

supporters who submitted Declarations in support of Group, or whether any of its supporters

who may live within 50 miles of the Diablo Canyon plant, are financial supporters of Group.

Second, counsel should be prepared to address the discretionary intervention standards

cited by Group and how Group meets/does not meet those standards, especially in the context

of it being a joint Petitioner here who raises no contention not already raised by another

Petitioner.

It is so ORDERED.

FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY ANDLICENSINGBOARD

/RA/

JeremyA.Mercer,Chair ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

Rockville, Maryland April 2, 2024 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

In the Matter of )

)

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-275-LR-2

) 50-323-LR-2 (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, )

Units 1 and 2) )

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Scheduling Initial Prehearing Conference) have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop: O-16B33 Mail Stop - O-14A44 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: ocaamail.resource@nrc.gov Ian Murphy David Roth Susan H. Vrahoretis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Jeremy L. Wachutka Office of the Secretary of the Commission Caitlin R. Byrd, Law Clerk Mail Stop: O-16B33 Georgiann E. Hampton, Law Clerk Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: ian.murphy@nrc.gov E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov david.roth@nrc.gov susan.vrahoretis@nrc.gov jeremy.wachutka@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission caitlin.byrd@nrc.gov Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel georgiann.hampton@nrc.gov Mail Stop: T-3F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Jeremy A. Mercer, Chair, Administrative Counsel for Pacific Gas and Electric Judge Company Nicholas G. Trikouros, Administrative Judge Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLC Dr. Gary S. Arnold, Administrative Judge 1111 Pennsylvania Ave NW Emily Newman, Law Clerk Washington, DC 20004 E-mail: jeremy.mercer@nrc.gov Paul Bessette nicholas.trikouros@nrc.gov Scott Clausen gary.arnold@nrc.gov Ryan K. Lighty emily.newman@nrc.gov Timothy Matthews E-mail: paul.bessette@morganlewis.com scott.clausen@morganlewis.com ryan.lighty@morganlewis.com timothy.matthews@morganlewis.com

Pacific Gas and Electric Company (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Scheduling Initial Prehearing Conference)

Counsel for San Luis Obispo Mothers for Counsel for Friends of the Earth Peace 1101 15th Street, 11th Floor Harmon, Curran, Spielberg, & Washington, DC 20005 Eisenberg, LLP Hallie Templeton 1725 DeSales Street, N.W. E-mail: HTempleton@foe.org Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 Diane Curran California Energy Commission E-mail: dcurran@harmoncurran.com Chief Counsels Office 715 P Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Counsel for Environmental Working Group Devin Black 1250 I Street, NW. Suite 1000 E-mail: devin.black@energy.ca.gov Washington, DC 20005 Caroline Leary E-mail: cleary@ewg.org

Office of the Secretary of the Commission

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day of April 2024.

2