ML20133E237: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
| project = | | project = | ||
| stage = | | stage = RAI | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
: 3. For the letters E and F, the applicable. item nunbers should include items 6 and 5 respectively. | : 3. For the letters E and F, the applicable. item nunbers should include items 6 and 5 respectively. | ||
: 4. Discuss the rationale for the large difference in binder lug location between Model Nos. NUS 10-135A, NUS 6-80L, and NUS 6-80H and the balance of the packaging codels. The najority of packagings have a 15.5-inch dimension which results in a short ratchet binder assenbly that is less vulnerable to damage. | : 4. Discuss the rationale for the large difference in binder lug location between Model Nos. NUS 10-135A, NUS 6-80L, and NUS 6-80H and the balance of the packaging codels. The najority of packagings have a 15.5-inch dimension which results in a short ratchet binder assenbly that is less vulnerable to damage. | ||
STRUCTURAL The proposed alternate naterial for the cask tie-down lugs provides only three percent (0.03) safety nargin (Attachment File No. 5025.05-01, page4). Such a small safety nargin is inadequate to cover any inherent inexactness that nay exist in the material properties, method of analysis, and assumptions. The information provided in your May 14, 1985, letter has not changed our opinion. | STRUCTURAL The proposed alternate naterial for the cask tie-down lugs provides only three percent (0.03) safety nargin (Attachment File No. 5025.05-01, page4). Such a small safety nargin is inadequate to cover any inherent inexactness that nay exist in the material properties, method of analysis, and assumptions. The information provided in your {{letter dated|date=May 14, 1985|text=May 14, 1985, letter}} has not changed our opinion. | ||
OPERATING PROCEDURES In Section 8.7.5 Torque requirements for ratchet binders, of the application it is stated that the ratchet binders are not designed for the measurement of applied torque and are, therefore, tightened in an unaided nanual fashion until no further tightening can be $trocalished. Show how this rethod of tightening will assure the fina' v.hinun torque value of 50 | OPERATING PROCEDURES In Section 8.7.5 Torque requirements for ratchet binders, of the application it is stated that the ratchet binders are not designed for the measurement of applied torque and are, therefore, tightened in an unaided nanual fashion until no further tightening can be $trocalished. Show how this rethod of tightening will assure the fina' v.hinun torque value of 50 | ||
, foot / pounds as specified in the table gi ?2 net Binder Data. | , foot / pounds as specified in the table gi ?2 net Binder Data. |
Latest revision as of 02:59, 10 August 2022
ML20133E237 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | 07109159, 07109176, 07109177, 07109178, 07109179 |
Issue date: | 10/03/1985 |
From: | Macdonald C NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
To: | Hipsher W NUS CORP. |
References | |
NUDOCS 8510090317 | |
Download: ML20133E237 (2) | |
Text
. - .
4 /- W39, 71-9/ 76, 9/-9/77,7l-7/7f 7/-9/79 ;
W A **RH cme TO FCTC: RHO 71-9159, 71-9176, 71-9177 g
71-9178, 71-9179 OCT 0 3 5 Nt!S Process Services ATTN: fir. Walter Hipsher 1501 Key Road Coluabia, SC 29201 Gentlemen:
This refers to your application dated December 14, 1934, as supplemented January 8 and fiay 14, 1985, requesting an amendaent to package designs approved by Certificates of Compliance Nos. 9159, 9176, 9177, 9178, and 9179.
In connection with our review, we need the information identified in the enclosure to this letter.
1 Please advise us within 30 days from the date of this letter when this information will be provided. Additional information requested by this letter should be submitted in the form of revised pages. If you have any questions regarding this matter, we would be pleased to meet with you and your staff.
Sincerely.
Original Signed by ORARLESE. RACDONALD Charles E. MacDonald, Chief Transportation Certification Branch Division of Fuel Cycle and flaterial Safety, NfiSS Erclosure: As stated Distribution: w/ encl Docket File RH0degaarden (2)
HWLee 8510090317 e51003 CEWilliams ADOCK 0710 9
- Region II NMSS R/F '
CTC R/F ;_
i n t __
.FCTC.. .. FCTC.. . . }CT C. . ..
i =~RN0degaarden:al m HWLee CEWilliams C ac onald
=> 09/st/85 10/o[/85 10/07/85 10M5' l nac roau na nasoi unce o24o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
. o NUS Process Services Corporation Docket Nos. 71-9159, 71-9176, 71-9177, 71-9170, and 71-9179 Encl to ltr dtd: m03W DRANINGS
- 1. The infornation given in Note 16, Drawing No. 5026M2005, Sheet 2 of 2, Rev. D, is inconplete in that the nodel number has not been shown and is one of the required itens of infornation to appear on the packaging. Information pertaining to DOT Specification 7A should be deleted.
- 2. The difference between the dinensions N and R for the Model Nos. ,
1 NUS 10-135A, NUS 6-80L, and NUS 6-80H is not compatible with the i lug dinensions and lug location given in Section B-B. '
- 3. For the letters E and F, the applicable. item nunbers should include items 6 and 5 respectively.
- 4. Discuss the rationale for the large difference in binder lug location between Model Nos. NUS 10-135A, NUS 6-80L, and NUS 6-80H and the balance of the packaging codels. The najority of packagings have a 15.5-inch dimension which results in a short ratchet binder assenbly that is less vulnerable to damage.
STRUCTURAL The proposed alternate naterial for the cask tie-down lugs provides only three percent (0.03) safety nargin (Attachment File No. 5025.05-01, page4). Such a small safety nargin is inadequate to cover any inherent inexactness that nay exist in the material properties, method of analysis, and assumptions. The information provided in your May 14, 1985, letter has not changed our opinion.
OPERATING PROCEDURES In Section 8.7.5 Torque requirements for ratchet binders, of the application it is stated that the ratchet binders are not designed for the measurement of applied torque and are, therefore, tightened in an unaided nanual fashion until no further tightening can be $trocalished. Show how this rethod of tightening will assure the fina' v.hinun torque value of 50
, foot / pounds as specified in the table gi ?2 net Binder Data.
OFFICE) ............ ... ........ ....... . ... .. .......... ............. .. .... ..... ....... .....
WRN AME k ,,, ,, , , ,,. .. . , , , . , , , , , , , , , , ,, ,,.
DATE) ........ .......... .. .............
,....... ....i... ............ ............ . ..........
WRC FORM 318 (10 80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIR RECORD COPY
_ _ _ - - - .- - ~ . - -_. - - - - . -- -
Mr. John C. Brons Power Authority of the State Indian Point 3 Nuclear of New York Generating cc:
Regional sdministrator, Region I Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Indian Point Nuclear Generating 631 Park Avenue U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission King of Prussia, Pennsylvania' 19406 Post Office Box 337 Buchanan, New York 10511 Mr. Gerald C. Goldstein Assistant General Counsel Mr. Robert L. Spring Power Authority of the State Nuclear Licensing Engineer of New York Consolidated Edison Company 10 Columbus Circle of New York, Inc.
New York, New York 10019 4 Irving Place New York, New York 10003 Ms. Ellyn Weiss Harmon, Weiss and Jordan Mr. A. Klausmann, Vice President 2001 S Street, N.W., Suite 430 Quality Assurance Washington, DC 20009 Power Authority of the State of New York Dr. Lawrence R. Quarles 10 Columbus Circle Apartment 51 New York, New York 10019 Kendal at Longwood Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348 Mayor, Village of Buchanan 236 Tate Avenue Mr. George M. Wilverding, Manager Buchanan, New York 10511 Nuclear Safety Evaluation Power Authority of the State of New York Mr. F. X. Pindar 123 Main Street Quality Assurance Superintendent White Plains, New York 10601 Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant Post Office Box 215 Director, Technical Development Buchanan, New York 10511 Programs
, State of New York Energy Office S. S. Zulla, Vice President Agency Building 2 Nuclear Support Empire State Plaza Power Authority of the State Albany, New York 12223 of New York 123 Main Street Mr. Leroy W. Sinclair White Plains, New York 10601 Power Authority of the State of New York Mr. William Josiger 123 Main Street Resident Manager White Plains, New York 10601 Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant Post Office Box 215 Buchanan, New York 10511
E Power Authority of the State of New York Indian Point 3 cc Ezra I. Bialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau New York State Department of Law 2 World Trade Center New York, New York 10047 P. Kokolakis, Director Nuclear Licensing Power Authority of the State of New York 123 Main Street White Plains, New York 10601 Mr. Jay Dunkleberger Division of Policy Analysis and Planning New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2, Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 1
l l
l
_- ._ . - . - - - . - .