05000275/FIN-2012005-02: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| identified by = NRC | | identified by = NRC | ||
| Inspection procedure = IP 71111.15 | | Inspection procedure = IP 71111.15 | ||
| Inspector = G Guerra, P Elkmann, L Willoughby, N O, | | Inspector = G Guerra, P Elkmann, L Willoughby, N O'Keefe, T Hipschman, G Warnick, N Hernandez, L Micewski, D You | ||
| CCA = H.14 | | CCA = H.14 | ||
| INPO aspect = DM.2 | | INPO aspect = DM.2 | ||
| description = The inspectors identified a non-cited violation of Technical Specification 3.7.10, Control Room Ventilation System, after the control room envelope boundary for both units was inoperable for a greater duration than permitted by the out-of-service time. Specifically, the licensee operated Units 1 and 2 without an operable control room envelope from between at least September 2011 and December 2012, which is greater than the 90-day allowed outage time. The licensee entered the condition into the corrective action program as Notifications 50483820, 50497328, and 50485800. The failure to comply with Technical Specification 3.7.10 was a performance deficiency. The finding was more than minor because it was associated with the Barrier Integrity Cornerstone objective design control attribute to provide reasonable assurance that the control room physical design would protect operators from radionuclide releases caused by accidents or events. Using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix A, Exhibit 3, Barrier Integrity Screening Questions, the inspectors concluded that the finding was of very low safety significance (Green) because the finding only represented a degradation of the radiological barrier function provided for the control room. This finding had a crosscutting aspect in the area human performance associated with decision-making component because the licensee did not use conservative assumptions in their decision to implement compensatory actions following the inoperability of the control room envelope boundary | | description = The inspectors identified a non-cited violation of Technical Specification 3.7.10, Control Room Ventilation System, after the control room envelope boundary for both units was inoperable for a greater duration than permitted by the out-of-service time. Specifically, the licensee operated Units 1 and 2 without an operable control room envelope from between at least September 2011 and December 2012, which is greater than the 90-day allowed outage time. The licensee entered the condition into the corrective action program as Notifications 50483820, 50497328, and 50485800. The failure to comply with Technical Specification 3.7.10 was a performance deficiency. The finding was more than minor because it was associated with the Barrier Integrity Cornerstone objective design control attribute to provide reasonable assurance that the control room physical design would protect operators from radionuclide releases caused by accidents or events. Using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix A, Exhibit 3, Barrier Integrity Screening Questions, the inspectors concluded that the finding was of very low safety significance (Green) because the finding only represented a degradation of the radiological barrier function provided for the control room. This finding had a crosscutting aspect in the area human performance associated with decision-making component because the licensee did not use conservative assumptions in their decision to implement compensatory actions following the inoperability of the control room envelope boundary | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:18, 21 February 2018
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000275/2012005 Section 1R15 |
| Date counted | Dec 31, 2012 (2012Q4) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Barrier Integrity |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.15 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | G Guerra P Elkmann L Willoughby N O'Keefe T Hipschman G Warnick N Hernandez L Micewski D You |
| CCA | H.14, Conservative Bias |
| INPO aspect | DM.2 |
| ' | |