05000272/FIN-2015004-02: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 12: Line 12:
| identified by = NRC
| identified by = NRC
| Inspection procedure = IP 71111.12
| Inspection procedure = IP 71111.12
| Inspector = A Defrancisco, A Siwy, A Ziedonis, C Lally, F Bower, J Furia, P Finney, R Barkley, R Nimitz, S Chaudhary, T O,'Har
| Inspector = A Defrancisco, A Siwy, A Ziedonis, C Lally, F Bower, J Furia, P Finney, R Barkley, R Nimitz, S Chaudhary, T O, 'Har
| CCA = H.14
| CCA = H.14
| INPO aspect = DM.2
| INPO aspect = DM.2
| description = Inspectors identified a Green NCV of 10 CFR 50.65(a)(2) when control area ventilation (CAV) radiation monitor (RM) performance was not being effectively controlled through appropriate PM. Specifically, there were repetitive foil issues and a repeat maintenance preventable functional failure (RMPFF) during the monitoring period. PSEG placed the system in monitoring under 10 CFR 50.65(a)(1) and entered this in their CAP. The issue was more than minor since it was associated with the barrier performance attribute of the Barrier Integrity cornerstone and adversely affected its objective to provide reasonable assurance that physical design barriers protect the public from radionuclide releases caused by accidents or events. The finding was screened in accordance with IMC 0609, Attachment 4 and Appendix A, Exhibit 3, where it screened to Green since it only represented a degradation of the radiological barrier function provided for the control room. The finding has a cross-cutting aspect in Human Performance, Conservative Bias, in that licensees take timely action to address degraded conditions commensurate with their safety significance and take a conservative approach to decision making.
| description = Inspectors identified a Green NCV of 10 CFR 50.65(a)(2) when control area ventilation (CAV) radiation monitor (RM) performance was not being effectively controlled through appropriate PM. Specifically, there were repetitive foil issues and a repeat maintenance preventable functional failure (RMPFF) during the monitoring period. PSEG placed the system in monitoring under 10 CFR 50.65(a)(1) and entered this in their CAP. The issue was more than minor since it was associated with the barrier performance attribute of the Barrier Integrity cornerstone and adversely affected its objective to provide reasonable assurance that physical design barriers protect the public from radionuclide releases caused by accidents or events. The finding was screened in accordance with IMC 0609, Attachment 4 and Appendix A, Exhibit 3, where it screened to Green since it only represented a degradation of the radiological barrier function provided for the control room. The finding has a cross-cutting aspect in Human Performance, Conservative Bias, in that licensees take timely action to address degraded conditions commensurate with their safety significance and take a conservative approach to decision making.
}}
}}

Revision as of 20:53, 20 February 2018

02
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Report IR 05000272/2015004 Section 1R12
Date counted Dec 31, 2015 (2015Q4)
Type: NCV: Green
cornerstone Barrier Integrity
Identified by: NRC identified
Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.12
Inspectors (proximate) A Defrancisco
A Siwy
A Ziedonis
C Lally
F Bower
J Furia
P Finney
R Barkley
R Nimitz
S Chaudhary
T O
'Har
Violation of: 10 CFR 50.65(a)(1)

10 CFR 50.65(a)(2)

10 CFR 50.65
CCA H.14, Conservative Bias
INPO aspect DM.2
'