RS-14-042, Attachment 7 - UHS Calculation LSCS Design Analysis L-002457, Revision 8, Part 2 of 2: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H188 of H344 1% 5%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5 97.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.0 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 97.2 50%88.4 98.5 89.2 Program : LAKET Page : 1 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H189 of H344 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Date 04/07/2006 Time : 13:54:23.56 Case 32 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 999 FPLANT TPRISE 3548 28.95 16.79 16.39 1542 15.06 14.61 14.36 13.95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 D: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.OF, 1.5')070100 1 0 1 6 080500 1 20.1 0 3 2 0.2 5500. 0 2 690 690 689 688 687 686 685 1 102.R/I S/I 81.35 34 79.75 26 78.15 18 29.70 10 22 .22 60 13.42 43 0 3 86 98.36 1.4 0.8 1.9 2.2.0.8 73.21 71.78 70.34 26.73 20.00 12.08 18 19 307.2 234.7 163.7 92.0 54.0 39.4 20 86.0 IPROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H190 of H344 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.16 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95 10. 94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H191 of H344 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9 .27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 I REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H192 of H344 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H193 of H344 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.51 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H194 of H344 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H195 of H344 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H196 of H344 Program LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page 7 Date : 04/07/2006 Time 13:54:23.56 Case 3b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.0F, 1.5')RUN 36 DAYS FROM 70100 TO 80500 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT
{{#Wiki_filter:CALCULATION NO. L-002457                 REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H188 of H344 1%     5% 50%
: 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 81.350 341.400 73.210 307.200 689.000 79.750 260.800 71.780 234.700 688.000 78.150 181.900 70.340 163.700 687.000 29.700 102.200 26.730 92.000 686.000 22.220 60.000 20.000 54.000 685.000 13.420 43.800 12.080 39.400 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5   97.0 88.4 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.0 98.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0   97.2 89.2 Program : LAKET                                                               Page :       1 I                                           PROJECT NO. 11333-297
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:
 
18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 102.86 98.36 WEATHER STATION ID 0.20.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H197 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 8 Date 04/07/2006 Time 13:54:23.56 Case 3b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.0F, 1.5')FPLANT 70100 -TPRISE 70100 -80500 R/I 80500 S/I 86.000 35.480 15.420 13.950 13.360 12.500 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.160 11.150 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.480 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8.940 8.940 8.940 28.950 15.060 13.520 13.300 12.500 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.150 10.950 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8.940 8.940 8.940 16.790 14.610 13.360 12.790 12.300 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.150 10.940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.810 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.230 8.940 8.940 8.940 16.390 14.360 13.360 12.790 12.090 12.080 11.560 11.560 11.150 10.940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.360 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.940 8.940 8.810 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 REVISION NO. 8 8.940 8.940 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.610 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.940 8.940 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8. 570 8 .570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 80310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H198 of H344 8.940 8.940 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.520 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 I IPROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H199 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 9 Date : 04/07/2006 Time : 13:54:23.59 Case 3b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.0F, 1.5')SEASONAL  
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                           REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H189 of H344 Number         03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                 Date  04/07/2006 Created   : 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                             Time : 13:54:23.56 Case 32 D:  LaSalle UHS      (09:00,  Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp;  To=104.OF, 1.5')
1 2          070100    080500        1      1      0            3      2 3          1    0        20.
4          1        0.2          5500.       0 5          6        2            690 690 81.35        34 1.4      73.21  307.2 689 79.75        26 0.8      71.78  234.7 688 78.15        18 1.9      70.34  163.7 687 29.70        10 2.2      26.73  92.0 686 22 .22      60 .0      20.00  54.0 685 13.42        43 .8      12.08  39.4 7          1         0 3            18      19    20 8          102. 86    98.36 999 FPLANT    R/I       86.0 TPRISE    S/I 3548 28.95 16.79 16.39 1542 15.06 14.61 14.36 13.95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 IPROJECT                                                                            NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H190 of H344 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.16 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95
: 10. 94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H191 of H344 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9 .27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8      ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H192 of H344 I 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 I                         PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                     I
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H193 of H344 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.51 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H194 of H344 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457   REVISION NO. 8     ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H195 of H344 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END I                             PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I     CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                     REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H196 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                                                       Page            7 Number   : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                               Date : 04/07/2006 Created   11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                         Time  13:54:23.56 Case 3b: LaSalle UHS   (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp;   To=104.0F,   1.5')
RUN     36 DAYS FROM     70100 TO       80500 PLOT FILE OPTION :   1 CYCLE FLAG:   1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG:     0 TIME INCREMENT     : 3 TIME UNITS:     2 WEATHER FILE OPTION:   1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION:     0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT         20.00 DENSITY:         62.40 SEEPAGE:           0.20 LAKE LENGTH:       5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION             690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION     TOTAL AREA   TOTAL VOLUME         EFF AREA       EFF VOLUME 690.000         81.350           341.400         73.210         307.200 689.000         79.750           260.800         71.780         234.700 688.000         78.150           181.900         70.340         163.700 687.000         29.700           102.200         26.730           92.000 686.000         22.220             60.000         20.000           54.000 685.000         13.420             43.800         12.080           39.400 PLOT FILE FREQENCY     1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)
PLOT FILE FORMAT       0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE:       3 PLOT VARIABLES:
18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL     (F) 19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET     (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET     (F)
INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS.     =       102.86   98.36 WEATHER STATION ID       0.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I   CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                   REVISION NO. 8             ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H197 of H344 Program     LAKET                                                                                      Page :          8 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                             Date  04/07/2006 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                       Time   13:54:23.56 Case 3b:   LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.0F, 1.5')
FPLANT 70100 -     80500   R/I             86.000 TPRISE 70100  -    80500   S/I             35.480               28.950           16.790      16.390 15.420              15.060          14.610      14.360 13.950              13.520          13.360      13.360 13.360              13.300          12.790      12.790 12.500              12.500          12.300      12.090 12.090              12.090          12.090      12.080 11.560              11.560          11.560      11.560 11.560              11.560          11.560      11.560 11.160              11.150          11.150      11.150 11.150              10.950           10.940      10.940 10.590              10.590          10.590      10.590 10.590              10.590           10.590     10.590 10.590               10.590          10.590      10.590 10.590              10.590          10.590      10.360 10.070               10.070           10.070     10.070 10.070              10.070          10.070      10.070 10.070              10.070          10.070      10.070 10.070              10.070          10.070      10.070 10.070              10.070            9.810      9.790 9.790                9.790            9.790      9.790 9.630                9.630            9.630      9.630 9.630                9.630            9.630      9.630 9.630                9.630            9.630      9.630 9.480                9.270            9.270      9.270 9.270                9.270            9.270      9.270 9.270                9.270            9.270       9.270 9.270               9.270           9.270       9.270 9.270               9.270           9.270       9.270 9.270               9.270            9.270      9.270 9.270                9.270            9.270      9.270 9.270                9.270            9.270      9.270 9.270                9.270            9.270      9.270 9.270                9.270            9.270      9.270 9.270               9.270           9.270       9.270 9.270               9.270           9.230      8.940 8.940                8.940            8.940      8.940 8.940                8.940            8.940      8.940 8.940               8.940           8.940       8.940 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.940 REVISION NO. 8 8.940                8.940 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H198 of H344 8.940 I
8.940  8.940                8.940      8.940 8.810  8.780                8.780      8.780 8.780  8.780                8.780      8.780 8.780  8.780                8.780      8.780 8.780  8.780                8.780      8.780 8.780  8.780                8.780      8.780 8.780  8.780                8.780      8.780 8.780  8.610                8. 570      8.570 8.570  8.570                8.570      8.570 8.570  8.570                8.570      8.570 8.570   8.570               8.570       8.570 8.570   8.570               8.570       8.570 8.570   8.570               8.570       8.570 8.570  8.570                8.570      8.570 8.570  8. 570              8.570      8.570 8.570  8.570                8.570      8.570 8.570  8.570                8. 570      8.570 8.570  8.570                8 .570      8.570 8.570   8.570               8.570       8.570 8.570   8.570               8.570       8.570 8.570   8.570               8.570       8.520 8.310  8.310                8.310       8.310 8.310   8.310               8.310       8.310 8.310   8.310               8.310       8.310 8.310   8.310                8.310      8.310 8.310  8.310                8.310      8.310 8.310  8.310                8.310      8.310 8.310  8.310                80310      8.310 8.310  8.310                8.310      8.310 8.310  8.310                8.310      8.310 8.310   8.310               8.310       8.310 8.310   8.310               8.310       8.310 8.310   8.310               8.310       8.310 IPROJECT                                     NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                         REVISION NO. 8     ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H199 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                                                      Page :          9 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                             Date : 04/07/2006 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                       Time : 13:54:23.59 Case 3b: LaSalle UHS       (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp;   To=104.0F,   1.5')
SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
FOR SUMMER ( 6/1900 -8/1900 )QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES JUN JUL AVERAGE AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
FOR SUMMER       (   6/1900 - 8/1900   )
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY AVERAGES               AVERAGE JUN           JUL             AUG     VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT     (FT)             0.00          20.00          20 .00      20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)               0.00        689.27        688.54      689.17 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)               0.00          80.18          79.02        80.02 TOTAL VOLUME   (ACRE-FT)               0.00        282.78        224.66      274.71 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)               0.00          72.17          71.12        72.02 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)                 0.00         254.47        202.18      247.21 CIRCULATION TIME      (HR)            0.00           0.00           0.00       0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)              0.00           0.00           0 .00       0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL        (CFS)              0.00           0.00           0 .00       0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)              0.00         -0.17          -0 .14      -0.16 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                0.00         -1.62          -1.33        -1.58 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                0.00         -0.97          -0.76        -0.94 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                0.00         -0.65          -0.56        -0.64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL      (CFS)              0.00          0.00            0.00        0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)                0.00         219.94         214.31       219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                  0.00        153.58         152.47       153.43 EVAP  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                0.00          64. 65         51 .78       62.87 COND  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                0.00          5.34           5.25       5.32 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)            0.00          90.92         89.93       90.78 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)            0.00        101.40         98.78       101.03 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET      (F)            0.00          91.58         90.55       91.43 DISSOLVED SOLIDS    (PPM)              0.00           0.00           0.00       0.00 QUANTITY                                        MONTHLY TOTALS                    TOTAL JUN            JUL              AUG      VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP  (ACRE-FT)              0.00           0.00           0 .00      0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00          0.00           0.00       0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)                0.00         -10.33          -1.34      -11.67 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00        -99.71        -13.15      -112.86 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)               0.00        -59.60          -7.58      -67.18 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)               0.00         -40.11          -5.57      -45.68 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00           0.00           0.00       0.00 TEMPERATURE                         FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES PROJECT NO. 11333-297
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                 REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H200 of H344 1%     5%   50%
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)  100.5  97 .5  90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)  132.0  110.4  100.8 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0   98.0   91.5 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)QUANTITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 JUN 20.00 20 .00 689.27 688.54 80.18 79.02 282.78 224.66 72.17 71.12 254.47 202.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00-0.17 -0 .14-1.62 -1.33-0.97 -0.76-0.65 -0.56 0.00 0.00 219.94 214.31 153.58 152.47 64. 65 51 .78 5.34 5.25 90.92 89.93 101.40 98.78 91.58 90.55 0.00 0.00 20.00 689.17 80.02 274.71 72.02 247.21 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.16-1.58-0.94-0.64 0.00 219.16 153.43 62.87 5.32 90.78 101.03 91.43 0.00 TOTAL VALUE 0.00 0.00-11.67-112.86-67.18-45.68 0.00 MONTHLY TOTALS JUL AUG TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                   REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H201 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                                                Page :          10 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                       Date  04/07/2006 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                   Time : 13:54:23.59 Case 3b: LaSalle UHS (09:00,   Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.OF,   1.5')
SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  
EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-10.33-99.71-59.60-40.11 0.00 0 .00 0.00-1.34-13.15-7.58-5.57 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H200 of H344 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL LAKE TEMP @ INLET LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)(F)(F)100.5 132.0 103.0 97 .5 110.4 98.0 90.9 100.8 91.5 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H201 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 10 Date 04/07/2006 Time : 13:54:23.59 Case 3b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.OF, 1.5')CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
: SUMMER QUANTITY JUN MONTHLY AVERAGES JUL AUG ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
: SUMMER QUANTITY                                   MONTHLY AVERAGES               AVERAGE JUN          JUL             AUG       VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT     (FT)       0.00        20.00            20.00      20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)         0.00        689.27          688.54      689.17 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)         0.00        80.18            79.02      80.02 TOTAL VOLUME   (ACRE-FT)         0.00        282.78        224.66        274.71 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)         0.00        72.17            71.12      72.02 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)           0.00        254.47        202.18        247.21 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)       0.00         0.00             0.00       0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)        0.00         0.00             0.00       0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL        (CFS)        0.00         0.00             0.00       0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)        0.00         -0.17            -0.14      -0.16 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)            0.00         -1.62            -1.33      -1.58 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)            0.00         -0.97            -0.76      -0.94 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)            0.00         -0.65            -0.56      -0.64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL      (CFS)        0.00         0.00             0.00       0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)            0.00       219.94        214.31        219.16 SURF  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)          0.00        153.58        152.47        153.43 EVAP  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)          0.00        64. 65           51.78      62.87 COND  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)          0.00         5.34             5.25       5.32 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)      0.00        90.92           89.93       90.78 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)      0.00        101.40           98.78     101.03 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET      (F)      0.00        91.58           90.55       91.43 DISSOLVED SOLIDS    (PPM)        0.00         0.00             0. 00       0.00 QUANTITY                                  MONTHLY TOTALS                    TOTAL JUN          JUL              AUG      VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP  (ACRE-FT)          0.00         0.00             0.00        0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)          0.00          0.00             0.00       0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)          0.00       -10.33            -1.34      -11.67 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)           0.00        -99.71          .13.15    -112.86 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)           0.00        -59.60            -7. 58    -67.18 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)           0.00       -40.11            -5.57      -45.68 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)          0.00         0.00             0. 00       0.00 TEMPERATURE                     FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I                                             PROJECT NO. 11333-297
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
 
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                 REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H202 of H344 1%     5%   50%
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)  100.5  97.5  90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)  132.0  110.4  100.8 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0   98.0   91.5 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                         REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H203 of H344 Program     LAKET                                                                                         Page :        11 Number   : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                 Date : 04/07/2006 Created     11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                           Time : 13:54:23.59 Case 3b:   LaSalle UHS     (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.OF, 1.5')
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)QUANTITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 JUN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 689.27 688.54 80.18 79.02 282.78 224.66 72.17 71.12 254.47 202.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17 -0.14-1.62 -1.33-0.97 -0.76-0.65 -0.56 0.00 0.00 219.94 214.31 153.58 152.47 64. 65 51.78 5.34 5.25 90.92 89.93 101.40 98.78 91.58 90.55 0.00 0. 00 MONTHLY TOTALS AVERAGE VALUE 20.00 689.17 80.02 274.71 72.02 247.21 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.16-1.58-0.94-0.64 0.00 219.16 153.43 62.87 5.32 90.78 101.03 91.43 0.00 TOTAL VALUE 0.00 0.00-11.67-112.86-67.18-45.68 0.00 JUL AUG TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
TOTAL CUMULATIVE  
SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00-10.33-99.71-59.60-40.11 0.00 0.00 0.00-1.34.13.15-7. 58-5.57 0. 00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H202 of H344 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL LAKE TEMP @ INLET LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)(F)(F)100.5 132.0 103.0 97.5 110.4 98.0 90.9 100.8 91.5 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H203 of H344 Program LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 11 Date : 04/07/2006 Time : 13:54:23.59 Case 3b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.OF, 1.5')TOTAL CUMULATIVE  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM VALUE ( DATE VALUE ( DATE AVERAGE VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
 
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
QUANTITY                             MAXIMUM                 MINIMUM             AVERAGE VALUE ( DATE           VALUE ( DATE       VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)           20.00    7011900)        20.00  7011900)    20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)           689.99    7011900)      688.45  8051900)    689.17 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             81.33    7011900)        78.86  8051900)    80.02 TOTAL VOLUME    (ACRE-FT)           340.63    7011900)      216.86  8051900)    274.71 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             73.20    7011900)        70.98  8051900)    72.02 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)               306.51    7011900)      195.16  8051900)    247.21 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)           0.00    7011900)        0.00  7011900)      0.00 PRECIPITATION         (CFS)             0.00    7011900)         0.00  7011900)      0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL         (CFS)             0.00    7011900)         0.00  7011900)       0 .00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)           -0.13    8051900)        -0.20  7011900)     -0.16 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                -0.24    8051900)       -4.12  7051900)     -1.58 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                 0.00    7031900)       -2.72  7051900)     -0. 94 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)               -0.23    7311900)        -1.86  7011900)    -0 64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)            0.00   7011900)        0.00   7011900)      0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)              430.59    7191900)      101.21  7221900)    219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                165.63   7011900)      142.19  7241900)    153.43 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                179.35    7051900)        0.00   7031900)     62.87 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 26.28    7051900)       -30.81  7251900)       5.32 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)         101.47    7011900)       80.45  7241900)     90 .78 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)         137.71    7011900)       89.71  7241900)   101 .03 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)        104 .00  7011900)       81.35  7241900)     91 .43 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)             0.00    7011900)         0.00  7011900)       0.00 QUANTITY                            MAXIMUM                  MINIMUM                TOTAL VALUE    DATE          VALUE (  DATE        VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP    (ACRE-FT)             0.00    7011900)         0.00  7011900)       0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00    7011900)         0.00  7011900)       0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)               -0.03    8051900)       -0.05  7011900)   -11.67 TOTAL  EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)               -0.06    8051900)       -1 02  7051900)   -112.86 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)               0.00   7031900)       -0.68  7051900)   -67.18 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)               -0.06    7311900)       -0.46  7011900)   -45.68 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00   7011900)         0.00  7011900)       0.00 TEMPERATURE                          FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES PROJECT NO. 11333-297
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8      ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H204 of H344 1%    5%  50%
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATUPAL  (F) 100.5  97.5  90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET  (F) 132.0  110.4 100.8 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)  103.0   98.0 91.5 Program  : LAKET                                                              Page :
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)20.00 689.99 81.33 340.63 73.20 306.51 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.13-0.24 0.00-0.23 0.00 430.59 165.63 179.35 26.28 101.47 137.71 104 .00 0.00 7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)8051900)8051900)7031900)7311900)7011900)7191900)7011900)7051900)7051900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)DATE 7011900)7011900)8051900)8051900)7031900)7311900)7011900)20.00 7011900)688.45 8051900)78.86 8051900)216.86 8051900)70.98 8051900)195.16 8051900)0.00 7011900)0.00 7011900)0.00 7011900)-0.20 7011900)-4.12 7051900)-2.72 7051900)-1.86 7011900)0.00 7011900)101.21 7221900)142.19 7241900)0.00 7031900)-30.81 7251900)80.45 7241900)89.71 7241900)81.35 7241900)0.00 7011900)MINIMUM VALUE ( DATE 20.00 689.17 80.02 274.71 72.02 247.21 0.00 0.00 0 .00-0.16-1.58-0. 94-0 64 0.00 219.16 153.43 62.87 5.32 90 .78 101 .03 91 .43 0.00 TOTAL VALUE 0.00 0.00-11.67-112.86-67.18-45.68 0.00 QUANTITY MAXIMUM VALUE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
 
SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
I    CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                          REVISION NO. 8      ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H205 of H344 Number    : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                              Date  04/11/2006 Created  : 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                          Time  15:49:35.51 Case 3 c:    LaSalle UHS      (12:00,    Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')
EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
1 2        061854    071754      1        1      0            3    2 3        1    0        20.
EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
4        1          0.2        5.500.       0 5        6          2          6 90 690 81  .35      341.4      73.21  307.2 689 79  .75      260.8      71.78  234.7 688 78  .15      181.9      70.34  163.7 687 29  .70      102.2      26.73  92.0 686 22  .22      60.0       20.00   54.0 685 13  .42      43.8        12.08  39.4 7        1          0 3            18      19    20 8        102.3      97.8 999 FPLANT    R/I        86.0 TPRISE    S/I 35.48 28.95 16.79 16.39 15.42 15.06 14.61 14.36 13.95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 I                                                                      PROJECT NO. 11333-297
BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00-0.03-0.06 0.00-0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.05-1 02-0.68-0.46 0.00 7011900)7011900)7011900)7051900)7051900)7011900)7011900)TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H204 of H344 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATUPAL (F) 100.5 97.5 90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.4 100.8 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 98.0 91.5 Program : LAKET Page : PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H205 of H344 Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Date 04/11/2006 Time 15:49:35.51 Case 3 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 999 FPLANT TPRISE 35.48 28.95 16.79 16.39 15.42 15.06 14.61 14.36 13.95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')061854 1 0 1 6 690 81 689 79 688 78 687 29 686 22 685 13 1 102.3 R/I S/I 071754 1 20.1 0 3 2 0.2 2.35.75.15.70.22.42 0 3 97.8 5.6 341.4 260.8 181.9 102.2 60.0 43.8 500. 0 90 73.21 71.78 70.34 26.73 20.00 12.08 18 19 307.2 234.7 163.7 92.0 54.0 39.4 20 86.0 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H206 of H344 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.16 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95 10.94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10. 07 10. 07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H207 of H344 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H208 of H344 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H209 of H344 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8 .57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H210 of H344 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H211 of H344 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H212 of H344 Program : LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 7 Date : 04/11/2006 Time : 15:49:35.51 Case 3c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')RUN 30 DAYS FROM 61854 TO 71754 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H206 of H344 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.16 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95 10.94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07
: 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION
: 10. 07
= 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 81.350 341.400 73.210 307.200 689.000 79.750 260.800 71.780 234.700 688.000 78.150 181.900 70.340 163.700 687.000 29.700 102.200 26.730 92.000 686.000 22.220 60.000 20.000 54.000 685.000 13.420 43.800 12.080 39.400 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
: 10. 07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:
 
18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 102.30 97.80 WEATHER STATION ID 93822.20.00 IPROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 Program LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created: 11/18/2004 08:08:26 m REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H213 of H344 Page : 8 Date 04/11/2006 Time : 15:49:35.51 I_______a m Case 3c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')FPLANT 61854 -TPRISE 61854 -71754 R/I 71754 S/I 86.000 35.480 15.420 13.950 13.360 12.500 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.160 11.150 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.480 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8.940 8.940 8.940 28.950 15.060 13.520 13.300 12.500 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.150 10.950 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8. 940 8.940 8.940 16.790 14.610 13.360 12.790 12.300 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.150 10.940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.810 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.230 8.940 8.940 8.940 16.390 14.360 13.360 12.790 12.090 12.080 11.560 11.560 11.150 10.940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.360 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 8 .940 8. 940 8.810 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8. 780 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 REVISION NO. 8 8.940 8.940 8.780 8. 780 8. 780 8. 780 8.780 8.780 8.610 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.940 8.940 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8-570 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H214 of H344 8. 940 8.940 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.520 IJ I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H215 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 9 Date : 04/11/2006 Time 15:49:35.54 Case 3c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')SEASONAL  
CALCULATION NO. L-002457  REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H207 of H344 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457  REVISION NO. 8      ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H208 of H344 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457  REVISION NO. 8      ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H209 of H344 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8 .57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457  REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H210 of H344 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457  REVISION NO. 8     ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H211 of H344 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END I                              PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                     1
 
I      CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                     REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H212 of H344 Program : LAKET                                                                                          Page :          7 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                Date : 04/11/2006 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                            Time : 15:49:35.51 Case 3c:  LaSalle UHS  (12:00,  Worst 30-day Evaporation;  To=104F,  1.5')
RUN      30 DAYS FROM      61854 TO      71754 PLOT FILE OPTION :    1 CYCLE FLAG:    1 CIRCULATION  TIME FLAG:    0 TIME INCREMENT    :  3 TIME UNITS:    2 WEATHER FILE OPTION:    1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION:    0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT          20.00 DENSITY:        62.40 SEEPAGE:          0.20 LAKE LENGTH:      5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION      =      690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION      TOTAL AREA    TOTAL VOLUME        EFF AREA      EFF VOLUME 690.000          81.350          341.400        73.210          307.200 689.000          79.750          260.800        71.780          234.700 688.000          78.150          181.900        70.340          163.700 687.000          29.700          102.200        26.730            92.000 686.000          22.220            60.000        20.000            54.000 685.000          13.420            43.800        12.080            39.400 PLOT FILE FREQENCY      1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)
PLOT FILE FORMAT        0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE:        3 PLOT VARIABLES:
18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL      (F) 19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET      (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET    (F)
INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS.     =      102.30    97.80 WEATHER STATION ID    93822.
IPROJECT                                                                    NO. 11333-297
 
m CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                 REVISION NO. 8             ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H213 of H344         I
_______a m Program   LAKET                                                                                      Page :           8 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                             Date  04/11/2006 Created:  11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                       Time : 15:49:35.51 Case 3c:   LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')
FPLANT 61854 -    71754   R/I              86.000 TPRISE 61854 -    71754    S/I              35.480              28.950            16.790      16.390 15.420              15.060            14.610      14.360 13.950              13.520            13.360      13.360 13.360              13.300            12.790      12.790 12.500              12.500            12.300      12.090 12.090              12.090            12.090      12.080 11.560              11.560            11.560      11.560 11.560              11.560            11.560      11.560 11.160              11.150            11.150      11.150 11.150              10.950            10.940      10.940 10.590              10.590            10.590      10.590 10.590              10.590            10.590      10.590 10.590              10.590            10.590      10.590 10.590              10.590            10.590      10.360 10.070              10.070            10.070      10.070 10.070              10.070            10.070      10.070 10.070              10.070            10.070      10.070 10.070              10.070           10.070     10.070 10.070             10.070             9.810      9.790 9.790               9.790            9.790      9.790 9.630              9.630            9.630      9.630 9.630               9.630             9.630      9.630 9.630              9.630            9.630      9.630 9.480              9.270             9.270       9.270 9.270               9.270             9.270      9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270      9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270      9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270      9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270      9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270      9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270      9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270       9.270 9.270               9.270             9.270       9.270 9.270               9.270             9.270       9.270 9.270               9.270             9.230      8.940 8.940               8. 940           8.940      8.940 8.940              8.940            8.940      8.940 8.940              8.940            8.940      8.940 I                                                            PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 8 .940 REVISION NO. 8 8.940            8.940 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H214 of H344
: 8. 940 IJ
: 8. 940    8.940            8.940      8.940 8.810      8.780            8.780      8.780 8.780      8. 780            8.780      8.780 8.780      8. 780            8.780      8.780 8.780      8. 780            8.780      8.780 8.780      8.780            8.780      8.780 8.780      8.780            8.780      8.780
: 8. 780    8.610            8.570      8.570 8.570      8.570            8.570      8.570 8.570      8.570            8.570      8.570 8.570      8.570            8.570      8.570 8.570      8.570            8.570      8.570 8.570      8.570            8.570      8.570 8.570      8.570            8.570      8.570 8.570      8.570            8.570      8.570 8.570      8.570            8.570      8.570 8.570      8.570            8.570     8.570 8.570     8.570             8.570     8. 570 8.570     8.570             8.570     8.570 8.570     8.570             8.570     8.570 8.570      8.570            8-570      8.520 I                                PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I    CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                          REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H215 of H344 Program    LAKET                                                                                          Page :          9 Number    03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                  Date : 04/11/2006 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                            Time  15:49:35.54 Case 3c:  LaSalle UHS      (12:00,  Worst 30-day Evaporation;  To=104F,  1.5')
SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
FOR SUMMER ( 6/1954 -8/1954 )QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES JUN JUL AUG ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
FOR SUMMER         (   6/1954 - 8/1954   )
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
QUANTITY                                         MONTHLY AVERAGES                 AVERAGE JUN           JUL           AUG         VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT     (FT)             20.00          20.00          0.00          20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)               689.61        688.91          0.00        689.21 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)               80.72          79.61          0.00          80.09 TOTAL VOLUME   (ACRE-FT)               309.79        253.94          0 .00        278.14 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)               72.65          71.65          0.00          72.08 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)                 278.76        228.52          0.00        250.29 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)               0.00           0.00          0.00           0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)                0.00           0.00          0.00          0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL        (CFS)                0.00           0.00           0.00           0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)              -0.18          -0.15           0 .00        -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                  -2.01          -1. 69          0.00         -1.83 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                  -1.28          -1.13          0.00          -1.20 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                  -0.73          -0.56          0.00         -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL      (CFS)                0.00           0.00           0.00           0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)                226.40        221.82          0.00         223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                  148.11        145.43          0.00         146.59 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                  85.13          76.30          0.00         80.13 COND  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                  4.10          0. 93          0.00           2.30 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)            85.92          83.46          0.00         84.52 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)            98.17         93.25          0.00         95.38 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET      (F)            86.90          84.51          0.00          85.55 DISSOLVED SOLIDS    (PPM)                0.00          0.00          0.00           0.00 QUANTITY                                          MONTHLY   TOTALS                   TOTAL JUN           JUL           AUG         VALUE TOTAL PRECIP   (ACRE-FT)                 0.00           0.00          0.00          0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)                 0.00          0.00          0.00           0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)                 -4.71         -5.12           0.00          -9.84 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)               -51.84         -56.94           0 .00      -108.78 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)               -33.07         -38.13           0 .00        -71.20 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)               -18.77         -18.81           0 .00        -37.58 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)                 0.00           0.00           0.00           0.00 TEMPERATURE                            FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I                                                                     PROJECT NO. 11333-297
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457               REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H216 of H344 1%   5% 50%
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.0   93.3 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 133.0 107.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.0   94.0 85.2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)QUANTITY 20.00 689.61 80.72 309.79 72.65 278.76 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.18-2.01-1.28-0.73 0.00 226.40 148.11 85.13 4.10 85.92 98.17 86.90 0.00 20.00 688.91 79.61 253.94 71.65 228.52 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.15-1. 69-1.13-0.56 0.00 221.82 145.43 76.30 0. 93 83.46 93.25 84.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AVERAGE VALUE 20.00 689.21 80.09 278.14 72.08 250.29 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.83-1.20-0.63 0.00 223.80 146.59 80.13 2.30 84.52 95.38 85.55 0.00 MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)  
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                       REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H217 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                                                      Page          10 Number     03.7.292-2.2       0                                                                       Date  04/11/2006 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                         Time 15:49:35.54 Case 3c:   LaSalle UHS       (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')
-4.71 -5.12 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)  
CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  
-51.84 -56.94 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)  
-33.07 -38.13 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)  
-18.77 -18.81 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00-9.84-108.78-71.20-37.58 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H216 of H344 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.0 93.3 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 133.0 107.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.0 94.0 85.2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H217 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page 10 Date 04/11/2006 Time 15:49:35.54 Case 3c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
: QUANTITY SUMMER MONTHLY AVERAGES JUN JUL AVERAGE AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
:       SUMMER QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY AVERAGES               AVERAGE JUN           JUL           AUG         VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT     (FT)           20.00        20.00          0.00        20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)             689.61        688.91          0.00        689.21 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             80.72        79.61          0.00        80.09 TOTAL VOLUME   (ACRE-FT)             309.79        253.94          0.00        278.14 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             72.65        71.65          0.00        72.08 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)               278.76        228.52          0.00        250.29 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)             0.00         0.00          0.00           0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)              0.00         0.00          0.00          0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL        (CFS)              0.00         0.00           0.00           0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)            -0.18        -0.15           0.00        -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                -2.01        -1.69          0.00         -1.83 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                -1.28        -1.13          0.00        -1.20 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                -0.73        -0.56          0.00         -0. 63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL      (CFS)              0.00         0.00           0.00           0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)              226.40        221.82          0.00       223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                148.11        145.43          0.00       146.59 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                85.13        76.30          0.00         80.13 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                  4.10          0.93          0.00           2.30 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)          85.92        83.46          0.00         84.52 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)          98.17         93.25          0.00         95.38 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET      (F)          86.90        84.51          0.00        85.55 DISSOLVED SOLIDS    (PPM)              0.00          0.00          0.00          0.00 QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY TOTAL S                  TOTAL JUN          JUL           AUG        VALUE TOTAL PRECIP   (ACRE-FT)               0.00          0.00           0.00          0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00          0.00           0.00          0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)               -4.71         -5.12           0.00        -9.84 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)             -51.84       -56.94           0.00      -108.78 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)             -33.07       -38.13           0.00        -71.20 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)             -18.77       -18.81           0.00        -37.58 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00         0.00           0.00           0.00 TEMPERATURE                          FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I                                                                 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
 
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-0024571      % 5%   REVISION NO. 8       ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H218 of H344 1%   5%   50%
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.0 93.3 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 133.0 107.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.0 94.0 85.2 L-                                           PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                     1
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                         REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H219 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                                                          Page :          11 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                 Date : 04/11/2006 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                           Time   15:49:35.54 Case 3c:   LaSalle UHS       (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)20.00 689.61 80.72 309.79 72.65 278.76 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.18-2.01-1.28-0.73 0.00 226.40 148.11 85.13 4.10 85.92 98.17 86.90 0.00 JUN 20.00 688.91 79.61 253.94 71.65 228.52 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.15-1.69-1.13-0.56 0.00 221.82 145.43 76.30 0.93 83.46 93.25 84.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 S AUG 20.00 689.21 80.09 278.14 72.08 250.29 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.83-1.20-0. 63 0.00 223.80 146.59 80.13 2.30 84.52 95.38 85.55 0.00 TOTAL VALUE QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTAL JUL TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)  
TOTAL CUMULATIVE  
-4.71 -5.12 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)  
-51.84 -56.94 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)  
-33.07 -38.13 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)  
-18.77 -18.81 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-9.84-108.78-71.20-37.58 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 1 % 5% REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H218 of H344 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.0 93.3 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 133.0 107.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.0 94.0 85.2 L- PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H219 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 11 Date : 04/11/2006 Time 15:49:35.54 Case 3c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')TOTAL CUMULATIVE  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
QUANTITY ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
 
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
QUANTITY                             MAXIMUM                MINIMUM                AVERAGE VALUE (  DATE          VALUE    DATE        VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)           20.00    6181954)        20.00    6181954)    20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)             690.00    6181954)      688.52    7171954)    689.21 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             81.34    6181954)        78.98    7171954)    80.09 TOTAL VOLUME    (ACRE-FT)             341.13    6181954)      222.77    7171954)    278.14 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             73.21    6181954)        71.09    7171954)    72.08 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)               306.96    6181954)      200.48    7171954)    250.29 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)             0.00  6181954)          0.00  6181954)      0.00 PRECIPITATION         (CFS)             0.00  6181954)          0.00  6181954)      0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL         (CFS)             0.00  6181954)          0.00  6181954)      0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)             -0.13  7171954)        -0.20    6181954)    -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                 -0.48  66291954)       -5.43    6181954)     -1.83 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                 -0.24  6291954)         -4.14    6271954)     -1.20 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                -0.15  7171954)         -2.48    6181954)     -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)             0.00   6181954)           0.00   6181954)     0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)               451.13   6191954)         90.18    7071954)   223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 165.58  6181954)       134.89    7071954)    146.59 EVAP  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)               275.61  6271954)         16.17    6291954)    80.13 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 37.15  6271954)        -47.13    7121954)     2.30 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)          101.42  6181954)         73.38    7071954)    84.52 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)         140.00   6181954)       82.37    7071954)    95.38 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)         104.65    6181954)       73.45    7071954)    85.55 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)             0.00    6181954)         0.00   6181954)     0.00 QUANTITY                              MAXIMUM                 MINIMUM                 TOTAL VALUE (   DATE   )     VALUE    DATE        VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP  (ACRE-FT)               0.00  6181954)           0.00  6181954)     0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)                 0.00  6181954)           0.00  6181954)     0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)                -0.03  7171954)         -0.05    6181954)     -9.84 TOTAL  EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)               -0.12  6291954)         -1.35    6181954)   -108.78 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)                -0.06  6291954)        -1.03    6271954)    -71.20 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)                -0.04  7171954)        -0. 0   6181954)    -37.58 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00   6181954)          0.00   6181954)      0.00 I                                                                    PROJECT NO. 11333-297
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                          REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H220 of H344 I TEMPERATURE              FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1%        5%      50%
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL  (F)  100.0      93.3    84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET  (F)  133.0     107.5    94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)  104.0       94.0     85.2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)QUANTITY MAXIMUM VALUE ( DATE MINIMUM VALUE AVERAGE DATE VALUE 20.00 6181954) 20.00 690.00 6181954) 688.52 81.34 6181954) 78.98 341.13 6181954) 222.77 73.21 6181954) 71.09 306.96 6181954) 200.48 0.00 6181954) 0.00 0.00 6181954) 0.00 0.00 6181954) 0.00-0.13 7171954) -0.20-0.48 66291954)  
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                          REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H221 of H344 Program        LAKET                                                                                      Page :          1 Number          03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                             Date : 02/24/2011 Created        11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                        Time  10:27:07.17 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F,          1.0')
-5.43-0.24 6291954) -4.14-0.15 7171954) -2.48 0.00 6181954) 0.00 451.13 6191954) 90.18 165.58 6181954) 134.89 275.61 6271954) 16.17 37.15 6271954) -47.13 101.42 6181954) 73.38 140.00 6181954) 82.37 104.65 6181954) 73.45 0.00 6181954) 0.00 MAXIMUM MINIMUM VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE 6181954)7171954)7171954)7171954)7171954)7171954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6271954)6181954)6181954)7071954)7071954)6291954)7121954)7071954)7071954)7071954)6181954)DATE 20.00 689.21 80.09 278.14 72.08 250.29 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.83-1.20-0.63 0.00 223.80 146.59 80.13 2.30 84.52 95.38 85.55 0.00 TOTAL VALUE 0.00 0.00-9.84-108.78-71.20-37.58 0.00 TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)
1 2          070100    073100    1      1        0          3    2 3          1    0       20.
-0.03 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)  
4          1          0.2        5500.      0 5          6          2          690 E 90        32.15      381.9        73. 94      343.7 E;89        30.55      300.6    72.49      270.5 E88        18.96      220.8    71.06      198.7 E87        77.33      142.7    69.60      128.4
-0.12 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
( 86        29.70      71.74    26.73      64.57 85       14.75      50.79    13.28      45.71 7          1        0    3        18    19      20 8          102.74    98.24 999 F PLANT    R/I        86.0 TPRISE      S/I 35.48 28.95 16.79 16.39 15.42 15.06 14.61 14.36
-0.06 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
: 13. 95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 I                                                                      PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                    1
-0.04 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954)6181954)7171954)6291954)6291954)7171954)6181954)0.00 0.00-0.05-1.35-1.03-0. 0 0.00 6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6271954)6181954)6181954)I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.0 93.3 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 133.0 107.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.0 94.0 85.2 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H220 of H344 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H221 of H344 Program LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 1 Date : 02/24/2011 Time 10:27:07.17 Case 1 2 3 4a: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')070100 073100 1 1 0 20.1 0 3 2 4 1 0.2 5 6 2 5500. 0 E E E E (7 8 999 F PLANT TPRISE 35.48 28.95 16.79 16.39 15.42 15.06 14.61 14.36 13. 95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 90;89 88 87 86 85 1 102.74 R/I S/I 32.15 30.55 18.96 77.33 29.70 14.75 0 3 98.24 86.0 690 381.9 300.6 220.8 142.7 71.74 50.79 18 73.72.49 71.06 69.60 26.73 13.28 19 94 343.7 270.5 198.7 128.4 64.57 45.71 20 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
 
[CALCULATION NO. L-002457 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.16 11.15 m REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H222 of H344 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 Program LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H223 of H344 I Page : 2 Date 02/24/2011 Time 10:27:07.17 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95 10.94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H224 of H344 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 IPROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H225 of H344 I Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 3 Date : 02/24/2011 Time 10:27:07.17 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H226 of H344 I PROJECT NO. 11333-2971 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H227 of H344 I Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 4 Date : 02/24/2011 Time 10:27:07.17 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8 .94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8 .94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8. 94 8 .94 8 .94 8.81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8 .78 8 .78 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.57 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H228 of H344 I IPROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H229 of H344 Program : LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 5 Date 02/24/2011 Time 10:27:07.17 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H230 of H344 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H231 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 6 Date : 02/24/2011 Time 10:27:07.17 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H232 of H344 I IPROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H233 of H344 Program LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 7 Date : 02/24/2011 Time : 10:27:07.18 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')RUN 31 DAYS FROM 70100 TO 73100 PLOT FILE OPTION : I CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT
m
: 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION  
[CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H222 of H344 I 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.16 11.15 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
= 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 82.150 381.900 73.940 343.700 689.000 80.550 300.600 72.490 270.500 688.000 78.960 220.800 71.060 198.700 687.000 77.330 142.700 69.600 128.400 686.000 29.700 71.740 26.730 64.570 685.000 14.750 50.790 13.280 45.710 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
 
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:
I CALCULATION    NO. L-002457    REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H223 of H344 I Program  LAKET                                                        Page :          2 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                              Date  02/24/2011 Created  11/18/2004 08:08:26                                          Time  10:27:07.17 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95 10.94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 102.74 98.24 WEATHER STATION ID 0.20.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H234 of H344 Program : LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 8 Date 02/24/2011 Time 10:27:07.31 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')FPLANT 70100 -TPRISE 70100 -73100 R/I 73100 S/I 86.000 35.480 15.420 13.950 13.360 12.500 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.160 11.150 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9. 630 9. 630 9.630 9.480 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8. 940 8. 940 28. 950 15.060 13.520 13.300 12.500 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.150 10.950 10. 590 10. 590 10. 590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9. 630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8. 940 8. 940 16.790 14.610 13.360 12 .790 12.300 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.150 10.940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.810 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9. 270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.230 8.940 8.940 16. 390 14.360 13.360 12.790 12.090 12.080 11.560 11.560 11.150 10.940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.360 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9.790 9.630 9. 630 9. 630 9.270 9.270 9. 270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8.940 8.940 8.940 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.810 8 .780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.310 8.310 REVISION NO. 8 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.610 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.310 8.310 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.310 8.310 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H235 of H344 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.780 8.780 8.780 8. 780 8.780 8.780 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.520 8.310 8.310 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H236 of H344 Program : LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 9 Date : 02/24/2011 Time : 10:27:07.40 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')SEASONAL  
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H224 of H344 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 IPROJECT                            NO. 11333-297
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457    REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H225 of H344 I Program LAKET                                                        Page :          3 Number  03.7.292-2.2 0                                              Date : 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                          Time  10:27:07.17 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H226 of H344 I 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-2971
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457    REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H227 of H344 I Program LAKET                                                        Page :          4 Number  03.7.292-2.2 0                                              Date : 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                          Time  10:27:07.17 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8 .94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8 .94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94
: 8. 94 8 .94 8 .94 8.81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8 .78 8 .78 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H228 of H344 I 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.57 IPROJECT                            NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457      REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H229 of H344 Program : LAKET                                                        Page :          5 Number    03.7.292-2.2 0                                              Date  02/24/2011 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                          Time  10:27:07.17 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H230 of H344 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 I                            PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457    REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H231 of H344 Program LAKET                                                        Page :          6 Number  03.7.292-2.2 0                                              Date : 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                          Time  10:27:07.17 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H232 of H344 I 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END IPROJECT                            NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                         REVISION NO. 8             ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H233 of H344 Program    LAKET                                                                                            Page :          7 Number    : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                   Date : 02/24/2011 Created   : 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                             Time : 10:27:07.18 Case 4a:   LaSalle UHS   (09:00, Worst Day Temp;   To=104F, 1.0')
RUN     31 DAYS FROM       70100 TO     73100 PLOT FILE OPTION :     I CYCLE FLAG:   1 CIRCULATION   TIME FLAG:     0 TIME INCREMENT     : 3 TIME UNITS:   2 WEATHER FILE OPTION:     1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION:     0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       20.00 DENSITY:         62.40 SEEPAGE:           0.20 LAKE LENGTH:         5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION         =       690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION       TOTAL AREA     TOTAL VOLUME           EFF AREA     EFF VOLUME 690.000           82.150           381.900           73.940         343.700 689.000           80.550           300.600           72.490         270.500 688.000           78.960           220.800           71.060         198.700 687.000           77.330           142.700           69.600         128.400 686.000           29.700           71.740           26.730         64.570 685.000           14.750           50.790           13.280         45.710 PLOT FILE FREQENCY       1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)
PLOT FILE FORMAT         0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
NUMBER OF VARIABLES   FOR PLOT FILE:     3 PLOT VARIABLES:
18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL       (F) 19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET       (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET       (F)
INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS.     =       102.74       98.24 WEATHER STATION ID         0.
I                                                                     PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                       1
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                 REVISION NO. 8                   ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H234 of H344 Program : LAKET                                                                                           Page :          8 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                 Date  02/24/2011 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                             Time  10:27:07.31 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS   (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')
FPLANT 70100 -   73100     R/I             86.000 TPRISE 70100 -    73100     S/I             35.480             28. 950            16.790        16. 390 15.420             15.060            14.610        14.360 13.950              13.520            13.360        13.360 13.360              13.300            12 .790        12.790 12.500              12.500            12.300        12.090 12.090              12.090            12.090        12.080 11.560              11.560            11.560        11.560 11.560              11.560            11.560        11.560 11.160              11.150            11.150        11.150 11.150              10.950            10.940         10.940 10.590              10. 590            10.590        10.590 10.590             10. 590           10.590         10.590 10.590              10. 590            10.590        10.590 10.590              10.590            10.590        10.360 10.070             10.070             10.070         10.070 10.070             10.070            10.070        10.070 10.070              10.070            10.070        10.070 10.070              10.070            10.070        10.070 10.070              10.070              9.810          9.790 9.790              9.790              9.790          9.790
: 9. 630              9. 630            9.630          9.630
: 9. 630              9.630              9.630          9. 630 9.630              9.630              9.630          9. 630 9.480              9.270              9.270          9.270 9.270              9.270              9.270          9.270 9.270              9.270              9. 270        9. 270 9.270              9.270              9.270          9.270 9.270               9.270             9.270         9.270 9.270               9.270             9.270         9.270 9.270               9.270             9.270          9.270 9.270              9.270              9.270          9.270 9.270              9.270              9.270          9.270 9.270              9.270              9.270          9.270 9.270               9.270             9.270         9.270 9.270               9.270             9.230          8.940
: 8. 940              8. 940            8.940          8.940
: 8. 940              8. 940             8.940         8.940 I                                                               PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457       REVISION NO. 8               ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H235 of H344 8.940         8.940           8.940        8.940 8.940        8.940            8.940        8.940 8.940        8.940            8.940        8.940 8.810        8.780            8.780        8.780 8 .780        8.780            8.780        8.780 8.780        8.780            8.780        8.780 8.780        8.780            8.780        8. 780 8.780        8.780            8.780        8.780 8.780         8.780           8.780         8.780 8.780         8.610           8.570         8.570 8.570         8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570         8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570         8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570        8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570        8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570         8.570 8.570         8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570         8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570         8.570           8.570         8. 570 8.570        8.570            8.570        8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570        8.570 8.570         8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570         8.570           8.570         8.520 8.310        8.310            8.310        8.310 8.310        8.310            8.310         8.310 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                         REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H236 of H344 Program : LAKET                                                                                         Page :          9 Number   : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                               Date : 02/24/2011 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                           Time : 10:27:07.40 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS       (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')
SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
FOR SUMMER ( 6 QUANTITY ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
FOR SUMMER     ( 6 /1900 - 8/1900 )
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
QUANTITY                                        MONTHLY AVERAGES             AVERAGE JUN           JUL           AUG       VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT      (FT)            0.00         20.00           0.00       20.00 LAKE ELEVATION      (FEET)              0.00       689.34          0.00     689.34 TOTAL AREA          (ACRE)              0.00         81.10          0.00       81.10 TOTAL VOLUME    (ACRE-FT)              0.00       328.51          0.00     328.51 EFFECTIVE AREA      (ACRE)              0.00         72.99          0.00       72.99 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)                0.00         295.63          0.00     295.63 CIRCULATION TIME        (HR)            0.00           0.00           0.00         0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)            0.00           0.00           0.00         0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL          (CFS)            0.00           0.00           0.00         0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)            0.00         -0.17          0.00       -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                0.00         -1.40           0.00       -1.40 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                0.00          -0.76           0.00       -0.76 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                0.00          -0.63           0.00       -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)              0.00           0.00         0.00         0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)                0.00        204.97           0.00     204.97 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                  0.00        151.30           0.00     151.30 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                  0.00          50.37           0.00       50.37 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                  0.00            6.88         0.00         6.88 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)          0.00          88.87           0.00       88.87 LAKE TEMP  @ INLET      (F)          0.00          99.69           0.00       99.69 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)          0.00          89.86           0.00       89.86 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)            0.00          0.00           0.00         0.00 QUANTITY                                        MONTHLY TOTALS                   TOTAL JUN          JUL           AUG       VALUE TOTAL PRECIP   (ACRE-FT)               0.00          0.00          0.00        0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)                 0.00          0.00          0.00        0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)                 0.00       -10.71          0.00     -10.71 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)                 0.00       -85.89          0.00     -85.89 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)               0.00         -46.97          0.00     -46.97 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)                0.00         -38.91          0.00     -38. 91 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00           0.00           0.00         0.00 I                                                                   PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                     1
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457                           REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H237 of H344 I TEMPERATURE              FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1%         5%     50%
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL  (F)  100.5       97.0     88.3 LAKE TEMP @ INLET  (F)  132.0     110.0     98.7 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)  103.0       97.0     89.4 I                                                     PROJECT NO. 11333-297
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)QUANTITY/1900 -8/1900 )MONTHLY AVERAGES JUN JUL AUG AVERAGE VALUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 689.34 0.00 689.34 81.10 0.00 81.10 328.51 0.00 328.51 72.99 0.00 72.99 295.63 0.00 295.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17 0.00 -0.17-1.40 0.00 -1.40-0.76 0.00 -0.76-0.63 0.00 -0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 204.97 0.00 204.97 151.30 0.00 151.30 50.37 0.00 50.37 6.88 0.00 6.88 88.87 0.00 88.87 99.69 0.00 99.69 89.86 0.00 89.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUL AUG VALUE JUN TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) 0.00 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) 0.00 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00-10.71-85.89-46.97-38.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-10.71-85.89-46.97-38. 91 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                       REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H238 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                                                        Page :        10 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                               Date  02/24/2011 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                         Time : 10:27:07.40 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS       (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 TEMPERATURE LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H237 of H344 I FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%100.5 97.0 88.3 132.0 110.0 98.7 103.0 97.0 89.4 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H238 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 10 Date 02/24/2011 Time : 10:27:07.40 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  
CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
: SUMMER QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 0.00 20.00 0.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 0.00 689.34 0.00 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 0.00 81.10 0.00 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 0.00 328.51 0.00 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 0.00 72.99 0.00 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 0.00 295.63 0.00 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) 0.00 -0.17 0.00 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 -1.40 0.00 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 -0.76 0.00 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) 0.00 -0.63 0.00 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 204.97 0.00 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 151.30 0.00 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 50.37 0.00 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 6.88 0.00 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 0.00 88.87 0.00 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 0.00 99.69 0.00 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 0.00 89.86 0.00 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 689.34 81.10 328.51 72.99 295.63 0.00 0.00 0.00-0. 17-1.40-0.76-0. 63 0.00 204.97 151.30 50.37 6.88 88.87 99.69 89.86 0.00 TOTAL VALUE QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS JUL JUN AUG TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
:       SUMMER QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY AVERAGES             AVERAGE JUN           JUL         AUG         VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT     (FT)           0.00         20.00         0.00        20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)             0.00       689.34         0.00       689.34 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             0.00         81.10         0.00         81.10 TOTAL VOLUME   (ACRE-FT)             0.00       328.51         0.00       328.51 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             0.00         72.99         0.00         72.99 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)               0.00       295.63         0.00       295.63 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)           0.00         0.00         0.00          0.00 PRECIPITATION       (CFS)             0.00          0.00         0.00         0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL         (CFS)             0.00          0.00         0.00         0.00 SEEPAGE             (CFS)             0.00         -0.17         0.00         -0. 17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)               0.00         -1.40         0.00         -1.40 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)               0.00         -0.76         0.00         -0.76 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)               0.00         -0.63         0.00         -0. 63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL       (CFS)             0.00          0.00         0.00         0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)               0.00       204.97         0.00       204.97 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 0.00       151.30         0.00       151.30 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 0.00         50.37         0.00         50.37 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 0.00         6.88         0.00         6.88 LAKE TEMP NATURAL       (F)           0.00         88.87         0.00         88.87 LAKE TEMP @ INLET       (F)           0.00         99.69         0.00         99.69 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET       (F)           0.00         89.86         0.00         89.86 DISSOLVED SOLIDS     (PPM)             0.00         0.00         0.00         0.00 QUANTITY                                      MONTHLY TOTALS                  TOTAL JUN            JUL          AUG        VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP  (ACRE-FT)              0.00         0.00         0.00         0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)              0.00          0.00          0.00         0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)               0.00        -10.71          0.00      -10.71 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00       -85.89          0.00       -85.89 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)              0.00       -46.97          0.00       -46. 97 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)              0.00       -38.91          0.00       -38. 91 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)              0.00         0.00         0.00         0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
 
TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                           REVISION NO. 8              ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H239 of H344 I REVIIONNO.8 ATACHENTH, PGE      O. 239  f H44 TEMPERATURE               FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1%       5%       50%
TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5     97.0     88.3 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0     110.0     98.7 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0     97.0     89.4 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-10.71-85.89-46.97-38.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-10.71-85.89-46. 97-38. 91 0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5 97.0 88.3 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.0 98.7 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 97.0 89.4 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H239 of H344 I REVIIONNO.8 ATACHENTH, PGE O. 239 f H44 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H240 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 11 Date 02/24/2011 Time 10:27:07.40 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')TOTAL CUMULATIVE  
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                     REVISION NO. 8               ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H240 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                                                          Page :          11 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                 Date  02/24/2011 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                             Time   10:27:07.40 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS     (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')
TOTAL CUMULATIVE  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
QUANTITY MAXIMUM VALUE MINIMUM AVERAGE DATE ) VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
 
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
QUANTITY                           MAXIMUM                 MINIMUM             AVERAGE VALUE    DATE   )     VALUE ( DATE   )   VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT     (FT)           20.00  7011900)        20.00    7011900)    20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)           689.99  7011900)      688.81    7311900)    689.34 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             82. 14  7011900)       80.24    7311900)     81.10 TOTAL VOLUME    (ACRE-FT)           381.31  7011900)       285.29    7311900)   328.51 EFFECTIVE AREA    (ACRE)             73.93  7011900)       72.22    7311900)     72.99 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)             343.17  7011900)       256.73    7311900)   295.63 CIRCULATION TIME      (HR)             0.00  7011900)          0.00  7011900)      0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)             0.00  7011900)         0.00  7011900)     0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL        (CFS)             0.00  7011900)         0.00   7011900)      0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)            -0.15  7311900)        -0.20    7011900)    -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)              -0.26   7161900)        -4.78    7021900)    -1.40 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                0.00 7011900)        -3.60    7031900)    -0.76 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)              -0.26  7161900)       -2.08    7011900)     -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL      (CFS)             0.00  7011900)         0.00  7011900)     0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)             426.50  7011900)       97.95    7041900)   204.97 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)               165.49  7011900)       143.62    7061900)   151.30 EVAP  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)             234.70  7031900)         0.00  7011900)     50.37 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)               39.43  7261900)       -6.87    7261900)     6.88 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)         101.35  7011900)       81.80    7061900)     88.87 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)        138 .41  7011900)        92.47    7251900)    99.69 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET      (F)        104.00   7011900)        82.96    7061900)    89.86 DISSOLVED SOLIDS    (PPM)              0.00 7011900)          0.00   7011900)      0.00 QUANTITY                            MAXIMUM                MINIMUM                TOTAL VALUE (  DATE          VALUE    DATE  )    VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP  (ACRE-FT)              0.00  7011900)          0.00   7011900)     0.00 TOTAL  MXUP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00  7011900)         0.00  7011900)     0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)             -0 .04  7311900)       -0.05    7011900)   -10.71 TOTAL  EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)              -0.06  7161900)       -1.18    7021900)   -85.89 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)               0.00  7011900)       -0.89    7031900)   -46.97 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)             -0.06  7161900)       -0.51    7011900)   -38.91 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00 7011900)          0.00   7011900)      0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                          REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H241 of H344 i TEMPERATURE              FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1%        5%      50%
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL  (F)  100.5      97.0      88.3 LAKE TEMP @ INLET  (F)  132.0    110.0      98.7 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)  103.0     97.0      89.4 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)20.00 689.99 82. 14 381.31 73.93 343.17 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.15-0.26 0.00-0.26 0.00 426.50 165.49 234.70 39.43 101.35 138 .41 104.00 0.00 7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7311900)7161900)7011900)7161900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7031900)7261900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)20.00 688.81 80.24 285.29 72.22 256.73 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.20-4.78-3.60-2.08 0.00 97.95 143.62 0.00-6.87 81.80 92.47 82.96 0.00 7011900)7311900)7311900)7311900)7311900)7311900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7021900)7031900)7011900)7011900)7041900)7061900)7011900)7261900)7061900)7251900)7061900)7011900)DATE )20.00 689.34 81.10 328.51 72.99 295.63 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.40-0.76-0.63 0.00 204.97 151.30 50.37 6.88 88.87 99.69 89.86 0.00 TOTAL VALUE QUANTITY MAXIMUM VALUE ( DATE MINIMUM VALUE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)MXUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                      REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H242 of H344 I Program      LAKET                                                                                  Page :          1 Number        03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                         Date  02/21/2011 Created      11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                    Time  14:25:17.25 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F,      1.0')
SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
1 2          070100    080500      1      1      0          3  2 3          1    0        20.
EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
4          1        0.2        5500. 0 5          6        2          690 690        82.15      381.9      73.94      343.7 689        80.55      300.6    72.49    270.5 688        78.96      220.8    71.06    198.7 687        77.33      142.7    69.60    128.4 686        29.70      71.74    26.73    64.57 685        14 .75      50.79    13.28    45.71 7          1        0   3         18    19      20 8          103.02    98.52 999 FPLANT    R/I        86.0 TPRISE    S/I 35.48 28.95 16.79 16.39 15.42 15.06 14.61 14.36 13.95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 I                                                                  PROJECT NO. 11333-297
EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
 
BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00-0 .04-0.06 0.00-0.06 0.00 7011900)7011900)7311900)7161900)7011900)7161900)7011900)0.00 0.00-0.05-1.18-0.89-0.51 0.00 7011900)7011900)7011900)7021900)7031900)7011900)7011900)0.00 0.00-10.71-85.89-46.97-38.91 0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5 97.0 88.3 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.0 98.7 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 97.0 89.4 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H241 of H344 i PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H242 of H344 I Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 1 Date 02/21/2011 Time 14:25:17.25 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')1 2 3 070100 080500 1 1 0 20.1 0 3 2 4 1 5 6 690 689 688 687 686 685 7 1 0.2 2 82.15 80.55 78.96 77.33 29.70 14 .75 0 3 5500. 0 690 381.9 300.6 220.8 142.7 71.74 50.79 18 73.94 343.7 72.49 270.5 71.06 198.7 69.60 128.4 26.73 64.57 13.28 45.71 19 20 8 999 FPLANT TPRISE 35.48 28.95 16.79 16.39 15.42 15.06 14.61 14.36 13.95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 103.02 R/I S/I 98.52 86.0 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11 56 11.16 11.15 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H243 of H344 REVISION NO.8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H243 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
ICALCULATION              REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H243 of H344 11.56 NO. L-002457 REVISION NO.8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H243 of H344 I 11.56 11.56 11.56 11 56 11.16 11.15 I                          PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                      1
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H244 of H344 I Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 2 Date : 02/21/2011 Time 14:25:17.25 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95 10.94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.79 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H245 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H246 of H344 I Program : LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 3 Date : 02/21/2011 Time 14:25:17.25 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 lCALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H247 of H344 I REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H247 of H344 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H248 of H344 Program : LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 4 Date 02/21/2011 Time 14:25:17.25 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8 .94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8. 94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8 .81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8 .78 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.57 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H249 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H250 of H344 Program LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 5 Date 02/21/2011 Time : 14:25:17.25 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H251 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H252 of H344 Program : LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 6 Date : 02/21/2011 Time 14:25:17.25 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H253 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H254 of H344 Program LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 7 Date 02/21/2011 Time : 14:25:17.25 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')RUN 36 DAYS FROM 70100 TO 80500 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457    REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H244 of H344 I Program LAKET                                                        Page :          2 Number  03.7.292-2.2 0                                              Date : 02/21/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                          Time  14:25:17.25 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95 10.94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
: 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION
 
= 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF V(690.000 82.150 381.900 73.940 342 689.000 80.550 300.600 72.490 27(688.000 78.960 220.800 71.060 687.000 77.330 142.700 69.600 686.000 29.700 71.740 26.730 6 685.000 14.750 50.790 13.280 4 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H245 of H344 I 9.79 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 I                            PROJECT NO. 11333-297
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:
 
18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 103.02 98.52 WEATHER STATION ID 0.20.00 OLUME 3.700 0.500 8.700 8.400 4.570 5.710 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H255 of H344 Program LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')Page : 8 Date : 02/21/2011 Time : 14:25:17.25 FPLANT 70100 -TPRISE 70100 -80500 R/I 80500 S/I 86.000 35.480 15.420 13.950 13.360 12.500 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.160 11.150 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.480 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8.940 8.940 28.950 15.060 13.520 13.300 12.500 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.150 10. 950 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8.940 8.940 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 16.790 14.610 13.360 12.790 12.300 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.150 10.940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.810 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.230 8.940 8.940 16.390 14.360 13.360 12.790 12.090 12.080 11.560 11.560 11.150 10.940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.360 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8.940 8.940 8.940 I I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 8 940 8.940 8.940 8.810 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8. 310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 REVISION NO. 8 8. 940 8.940 8. 940 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.610 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.780 8.780 8 .780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.570 8.570 8 .570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8-310 8.310 8.310 ATTACHMENT H, 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8. 570 8. 570 8. 570 8.520 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 PAGE NO. H256 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H257 of H344 Program : LAKET Page 9 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/21/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 14:25:17.31 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')SEASONAL  
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457      REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H246 of H344 I Program : LAKET                                                      Page :           3 Number    03.7.292-2.2 0                                              Date : 02/21/2011 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                        Time   14:25:17.25 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H247 of H344 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.27                    REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H247 of H344 II l
9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457       REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H248 of H344 Program : LAKET                                                       Page :          4 Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                               Date  02/21/2011 Created   11/18/2004 08:08:26                                         Time   14:25:17.25 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8 .94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94
: 8. 94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8 .81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8 .78 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H249 of H344 I 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.57 I                           PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                       1
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457       REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H250 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                        Page :           5 Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                               Date  02/21/2011 Created   11/18/2004 08:08:26                                         Time : 14:25:17.25 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H251 of H344 II 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457       REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H252 of H344 Program : LAKET                                                       Page :          6 Number   03.7.292-2.2 0                                               Date : 02/21/2011 Created   11/18/2004 08:08:26                                         Time   14:25:17.25 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H253 of H344 I 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END I                           PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                     REVISION NO. 8                 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H254 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                                                              Page :           7 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                     Date  02/21/2011 Created   11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                               Time : 14:25:17.25 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00,    Worst  5/1/30 Day Temp;  To=104F,  1.0')
RUN      36 DAYS FROM      70100 TO      80500 PLOT FILE OPTION :    1 CYCLE FLAG:    1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG:    0 TIME INCREMENT    :  3 TIME UNITS:  2 WEATHER FILE OPTION:    1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION:    0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT            20.00 DENSITY:        62.40 SEEPAGE:          0.20 LAKE LENGTH:      5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION      =      690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION      TOTAL AREA    TOTAL VOLUME        EFF AREA        EFF V(OLUME 690.000          82.150          381.900        73.940          3423.700 689.000          80.550          300.600        72.490          27( 0.500 688.000          78.960          220.800        71.060          19*8.700 687.000          77.330          142.700        69.600          12*8.400 686.000          29.700            71.740        26.730            6 4.570 685.000          14.750            50.790        13.280            4 5.710 PLOT FILE FREQENCY      1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)
PLOT FILE FORMAT        0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE:        3 PLOT VARIABLES:
18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL      (F) 19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET      (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET      (F)
INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS.     =      103.02    98.52 WEATHER STATION ID        0.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                             I
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457                                   REVISION NO. 8                 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H255 of H344 Program     LAKET                                                                                         Page :          8 Number   : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                 Date : 02/21/2011 Created   : 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                           Time : 14:25:17.25 Case 4b:   LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')
FPLANT 70100 -    80500   R/I              86.000 TPRISE 70100  -    80500    S/I              35.480              28.950            16.790        16.390 15.420              15.060            14.610        14.360 13.950              13.520            13.360        13.360 13.360              13.300            12.790        12.790 12.500              12.500            12.300        12.090 12.090              12.090            12.090        12.080 11.560              11.560            11.560        11.560 11.560              11.560            11.560        11.560 11.160              11.150            11.150        11.150 11.150              10. 950          10.940        10.940 10.590              10.590            10.590        10.590 10.590              10.590            10.590        10.590 10.590              10.590            10.590        10.590 10.590              10.590            10.590        10.360 10.070              10.070            10.070        10.070 10.070              10.070            10.070        10.070 10.070              10.070            10.070        10.070 10.070              10.070            10.070        10.070 10.070             10.070             9.810        9.790 9.790              9.790            9.790        9.790 9.630               9.630            9.630        9.630 9.630              9.630            9.630         9.630 9.630              9.630            9.630        9.630 9.480              9.270             9.270         9.270 9.270               9.270             9.270         9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270        9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270        9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270        9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270        9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270        9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270        9.270 9.270              9.270            9.270         9.270 9.270               9.270             9.270         9.270 9.270               9.270             9.270         9.270 9.270               9.270             9.230        8.940 8.940              8.940            8.940        8.940 8.940              8.940             8.940        8.940 PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                           I
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457        REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H256 of H344 I 8 940        8. 940          8.940          8.940 8.940        8.940            8.940          8.940 8.940        8. 940          8.940          8.940 8.810        8.780            8.780          8.780 8.780        8.780            8.780          8.780 8.780        8.780            8 .780        8.780 8.780        8.780            8.780          8.780 8.780        8.780            8.780          8.780 8.780        8.780            8.780          8.780 8.780        8.610            8.570          8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570          8.570 8.570        8.570            8 .570        8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570          8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570          8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570          8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570          8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570          8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570          8.570
: 8. 570        8.570            8.570          8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570          8. 570 8.570         8.570           8.570         8. 570 8.570         8.570           8.570         8. 570 8.570         8.570           8.570         8.520 8.310         8.310           8.310         8.310 8.310         8.310           8.310         8.310 8.310         8.310           8.310         8.310 8.310        8.310            8.310          8.310 8.310        8.310            8.310          8.310 8.310        8.310            8.310          8.310
: 8. 310        8.310            8.310          8.310 8.310        8.310            8.310          8.310 8.310        8.310            8.310          8.310 8.310         8.310           8-310         8.310 8.310         8.310           8.310         8.310 8.310         8.310           8.310         8.310 I                                  PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                        REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H257 of H344 Program : LAKET                                                                                        Page            9 Number      03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                              Date : 02/21/2011 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                        Time  14:25:17.31 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS        (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F,   1.0')
SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
FOR SUMMER ( 6/1900 -8/1900 )QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 0.00 689.27 688.54 689.17 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 0.00 80.98 79.82 80.82 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 0.00 322.70 264.07 314.56 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 0.00 72.88 71.84 72.74 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 0.00 290.40 237.63 283.07 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) 0.00 -0.17 -0.14 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 -1.64 -1.33 -1.59 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 -0.98 -0.76 -0.95 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) 0.00 -0.65 -0.56 -0.64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 219.94 214.31 219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 153.68 152.29 153.49 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 64.97 51.32 63.07 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 5.42 5.16 5.38 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 0.00 91.01 89.78 90.84 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 0.00 101.58 98.83 101.20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 0.00 91.75 90.57 91.59 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) 0.00 -10.53 -1.41 -11.95 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -100.60 -13.14 -113.75 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -60.49 -7.59 -68.07 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -40.12 -5.56 -45.67 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5 97.2 90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.6 100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 98.1 91.7 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H258 of H344 I REVIIONNO.8 ATACHENTH, PGE O. 258 f H44 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H259 of H344 I Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page 10 Date 02/21/2011 Time 14:25:17.31 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  
FOR SUMMER       ( 6/1900 - 8/1900   )
QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY AVERAGES             AVERAGE JUN           JUL             AUG     VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)           0.00         20.00           20.00     20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)             0.00         689.27         688.54     689.17 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             0.00         80.98           79.82     80.82 TOTAL VOLUME     (ACRE-FT)             0.00         322.70         264.07     314.56 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             0.00         72.88           71.84     72.74 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)                 0.00         290.40         237.63     283.07 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)           0.00           0.00           0.00     0.00 PRECIPITATION         (CFS)             0.00           0.00           0.00     0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL         (CFS)             0.00           0.00           0.00     0.00 SEEPAGE               (CFS)             0.00         -0.17         -0.14     -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                 0.00         -1.64         -1.33     -1.59 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                 0.00         -0.98           -0.76     -0.95 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                 0.00         -0.65           -0.56     -0.64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL       (CFS)             0.00           0.00           0.00     0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)                 0.00         219.94         214.31     219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 0.00         153.68         152.29     153.49 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 0.00         64.97           51.32     63.07 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 0.00           5.42           5.16     5.38 LAKE TEMP NATURAL         (F)           0.00         91.01           89.78     90.84 LAKE TEMP @ INLET         (F)           0.00         101.58           98.83   101.20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET       (F)           0.00         91.75           90.57     91.59 DISSOLVED SOLIDS     (PPM)             0.00           0.00           0.00     0.00 QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY TOTALS                 TOTAL JUN           JUL             AUG     VALUE TOTAL PRECIP     (ACRE-FT)             0.00           0.00           0.00     0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)                 0.00           0.00           0.00     0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)               0.00         -10.53         -1.41     -11.95 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00       -100.60         -13.14   -113.75 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)               0.00         -60.49           -7.59   -68.07 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)               0.00         -40.12         -5.56     -45.67 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00           0.00           0.00     0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457                           REVISION NO. 8              ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H258 of H344 I TEMPERATURE               FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES                 REVIIONNO.8 ATACHENTH, PGE      O. 258  f H44 1%         5%     50%
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5       97.2     90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0     110.6   100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0       98.1     91.7 I                                                     PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                       REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H259 of H344 I Program   LAKET                                                                                        Page          10 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                               Date  02/21/2011 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                         Time 14:25:17.31 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS       (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F,   1.0')
CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
: SUMMER QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
:       SUMMER QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY AVERAGES             AVERAGE JUN           JUL             AUG     VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)           0.00        20.00            20.00    20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)             0.00        689.27          688.54    689.17 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             0.00        80.98            79.82    80.82 TOTAL VOLUME   (ACRE-FT)               0.00        322.70          264 .07    314.56 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             0.00        72.88            71.84    72.74 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)                 0.00        290.40          237.63    283.07 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)           0.00         0.00             0.00     0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)            0.00         0.00             0.00     0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL          (CFS)            0.00         0.00             0.00     0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)            0.00         -0.17            -0.14    -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                0.00         -1.64            -1.33    -1.59 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                0.00         -0.98           -0.76    -0.95 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                0.00         -0.65            -0.56    -0.64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)            0.00         0.00             0.00     0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)                0.00       219.94          214.31    219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                  0.00       153.68          152.29     153.49 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                  0.00        64.97            51.32     63.07 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                  0.00          5.42            5.16     5.38 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)          0.00        91.01            89.78     90.84 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)          0.00       101.58            98.83    101.20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)          0.00         91.75            90.57    91.59 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)            0.00          0.00            0.00     0.00 QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY TOTALS                 TOTAL JUN           JUL             AUG     VALUE TOTAL PRECIP   (ACRE-FT)               0.00         0.00             0.00     0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00         0.00             0.00     0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)                0.00       -10.53           -1.41    -11.95 TOTAL  EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00      -100.60           -13.14  -113.75 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)                0.00       -60.49            -7.59    -68.07 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)                0.00        -40.12            -5.56   -45.67 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00         0.00             0.00     0.00 I                                                                   PROJECT NO. 11333-297
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
 
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                           REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H260 of H344 TEMPERATURE              FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1%       5%       50%
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL  (F)  100.5     97.2     90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET  (F)  132.0     110.6     100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)  103.0     98.1     91.7 I                                                     PROJECT NO. 11333-297
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                                 REVISION NO. 8                 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H261 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                                                                         Page :         11 Number     03.7.292-2.20         o02/21/2011                                                                           Date Time  14:25:17.31 Created     11/18/2004         08:08:26 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS           (09:00,     Worst   5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F,   1.0')
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 689.27 80.98 322.70 72.88 290.40 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.64-0.98-0.65 0.00 219.94 153.68 64.97 5.42 91.01 101.58 91.75 0.00 20.00 688.54 79.82 264 .07 71.84 237.63 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.14-1.33-0.76-0.56 0.00 214.31 152.29 51.32 5.16 89.78 98.83 90.57 0.00 20.00 689.17 80.82 314.56 72.74 283.07 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.59-0.95-0.64 0.00 219.16 153.49 63.07 5.38 90.84 101.20 91.59 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS JUN JUL TOTAL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
TOTAL CUMULATIVE  
TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-10.53-100.60-60.49-40.12 0.00 0.00 0.00-1.41-13.14-7.59-5.56 0.00 0.00 0.00-11.95-113.75-68.07-45.67 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 TEMPERATURE LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H260 of H344 FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%100.5 97.2 90.9 132.0 110.6 100.9 103.0 98.1 91.7 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H261 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 11 Number 03.7.292-2.20 Date o02/21/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 14:25:17.31 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')TOTAL CUMULATIVE  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 7011900) 20.00 7011900) 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.99 7011900) 688.45 8051900) 689.17 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 82.13 7011900) 79.67 8051900) 80.82 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 381.11 7011900) 256.19 8051900) 314.56 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 73.93 7011900) 71.69 8051900) 72.74 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 342.99 7011900) 230.54 8051900) 283.07 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.14 8051900) -0.20 7011900) -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -0.29 8051900) -4.06 7051900) -1.59 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 7031900) -2.73 7051900) -0.95 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)  
 
-0.25 7311900) -1.84 7011900) -0.64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 430.59 7191900) 101.21 7221900) 219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 165.45 7011900) 142.91 7241900) 153.49 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 178.35 7051900) 0.00 7031900) 63.07 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 26.10 7051900) -31.35 7251900) 5.38 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 101.31 7011900) 81.13 7241900) 90.84 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 137.91 7011900) 90.55 7241900) 101.20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.00 7011900) 82.04 7241900) 91.59 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 ( 7011900) 0.00 ( 7011900) 0.00 TOTAL MEUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)  
QUANTITY                                     MAXIMUM                   MINIMUM                 AVERAGE VALUE   ( DATE   )     VALUE   (   DATE   )   VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT           (FT)               20.00     7011900)         20.00     7011900)     20.00 LAKE ELEVATION         (FEET)                 689.99     7011900)       688.45     8051900)   689.17 TOTAL AREA             (ACRE)                 82.13     7011900)         79.67     8051900)     80.82 TOTAL VOLUME       (ACRE-FT)                   381.11     7011900)       256.19     8051900)   314.56 EFFECTIVE AREA         (ACRE)                 73.93     7011900)         71.69     8051900)     72.74 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)                       342.99     7011900)       230.54     8051900)   283.07 CIRCULATION TIME           (HR)                 0.00     7011900)         0.00     7011900)     0.00 PRECIPITATION             (CFS)                 0.00     7011900)         0.00     7011900)     0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL             (CFS)                 0.00     7011900)         0.00     7011900)     0.00 SEEPAGE                   (CFS)                 -0.14     8051900)         -0.20     7011900)     -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                         -0.29     8051900)       -4.06     7051900)     -1.59 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                         0.00     7031900)       -2.73     7051900)     -0.95 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                         -0.25     7311900)       -1.84     7011900)     -0.64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL           (CFS)                 0.00     7011900)         0.00     7011900)     0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)                       430.59     7191900)       101.21     7221900)   219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                         165.45     7011900)       142.91     7241900)   153.49 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                         178.35     7051900)         0.00     7031900)     63.07 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                         26.10     7051900)       -31.35     7251900)     5.38 LAKE TEMP NATURAL             (F)             101.31     7011900)         81.13     7241900)     90.84 LAKE TEMP @ INLET             (F)             137.91     7011900)         90.55     7241900)   101.20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET           (F)             104.00     7011900)         82.04     7241900)     91.59 DISSOLVED SOLIDS         (PPM)                 0.00     7011900)         0.00     7011900)     0.00 QUANTITY                                     MAXIMUM                   MINIMUM                   TOTAL VALUE   ( DATE   )     VALUE   (   DATE )   VALUE TOTAL PRECIP       (ACRE-FT)                     0.00   ( 7011900)         0.00 ( 7011900)       0.00 TOTAL MEUP TOT(ACRE-FT)                         0.00     7011900)         0.00     7011900)     0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)                       -0.03     8051900)       -0.05     7011900)   -11.95 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)                       -0.07     8051900)       -1.01     7051900)   -113.75 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)                         0.00     7031900)         -0.68     7051900)   -68.07 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)                       -0.06     7311900)       -0.46     7011900)   -45.67 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)                         0.00     7011900)         0.00     7011900)     0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
-0.03 8051900) -0.05 7011900) -11.95 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)  
 
-0.07 8051900) -1.01 7051900) -113.75 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7031900) -0.68 7051900) -68.07 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)  
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457                           REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H262 of H344 I TEMPERATURE              FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1%         5%       50%
-0.06 7311900) -0.46 7011900) -45.67 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 TEMPERATURE LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H262 of H344 I FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%100.5 97.2 90.9 132.0 110.6 100.9 103.0 98.1 91.7 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
LAKE TEMP NATURAL  (F)  100.5       97.2     90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET  (F)  132.0     110.6     100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)  103.0       98.1     91.7 I                                                     PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                       1
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H263 of H344 I Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 1 Date : 02/24/2011 Time : 13:13:58.01 Case 4c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')1 2 3 061854 071754 1 1 0 20.1 0 3 2 4 1 5 6 690 689 8 688 687 686 685 1 0.2 2 32.15 0.55 18.96 7.33 9. 70.4.75 0 3 98.24 86.0 5500.690 381.9 300.6 220.8 142.7 71.74 50.79 18 0 73.94 343.7 72.49 270.5 71.06 198.7 69.60 128.4 26.73 64.57 13.28 45.71 19 20 7 8 999 FPLANT TPRISE 35.48 28.95 16.79 16.39 15.42 15.06 14.61 14.36 13.95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 1 102.74 R/I S/I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.16 11.15 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H264 of H344 i REVIIONNO.
 
ATACHMNT , PGE O. H64 f H44 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H265 of H344 Program LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 2 Date 02/24/2011 Time 13:13:58.01 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95 10.94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO, L-002457 9.79 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H266 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H267 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 3 Date : 02/24/2011 Time : 13:13:58.01 9.63 9.63 9. 63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 lCALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H268 of H344 I REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H268 of H344 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H269 of H344 Program : LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created: 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 4 Date : 02/24/2011 Time 13:13:58.01 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8 .94 8 .94 8.94 8. 94 8. 94 8.94 8 .94 8 .94 8 .94 8.81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H270 of H344 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.57 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H271 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 5 Date 02/24/2011 Time 13:13:58.01 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H272 of H344 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H273 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 6 Date 02/24/2011 Time : 13:13:58.01 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H274 of H344 I IPROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H275 of H344 Program : LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 7 Date : 02/24/2011 Time 13:13:58.01 Case 4c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')RUN 30 DAYS FROM 61854 TO 71754 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                         REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H263 of H344 I Program     LAKET                                                                                        Page :          1 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                               Date : 02/24/2011 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                         Time : 13:13:58.01 Case 4c:   LaSalle UHS (12:00,       Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')
: 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION  
1 2         061854     071754     1     1      0          3      2 3        1   0         20.
= 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 82.150 381.900 73.940 343.700 689.000 80.550 300.600 72.490 270.500 688.000 78.960 220.800 71.060 198.700 687.000 77.330 142.700 69.600 128.400 686.000 29.700 71.740 26.730 64.570 685.000 14.750 50.790 13.280 45.710 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
4        1         0.2       5500. 0 5         6         2          690 690        32.15     381.9      73.94    343.7 689      8 0.55      300.6    72.49    270.5 688        18.96      220.8   71.06    198.7 687        7.33      142.7   69.60   128.4 686        9. 70    71.74    26.73   64.57 685      1.4.75      50.79    13.28   45.71 7         1          0 3          18    19      20 8         102.74    98.24 999 FPLANT R/I          86.0 TPRISE S/I 35.48 28.95 16.79 16.39 15.42 15.06 14.61 14.36 13.95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 I                                                                   PROJECT NO. 11333-297
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:
 
18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 102.74 98.24 WEATHER STATION ID 93822.20.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H264 of H344 i REVIIONNO. ATACHMNT    , PGE  O. H64 f H44 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.16 11.15 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H276 of H344 I Program LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 8 Date : 02/24/2011 Time 13:13:58.03 Case 4c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')FPLANT 61854 -TPRISE 61854 -71754 R/I 71754 S/I 86.000 35.480 15.420 13.950 13.360 12.500 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.160 11.150 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9.630 9.630 9. 630 9.480 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8.940 8.940 28.950 15.060 13.520 13.300 12.500 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.150 10.950 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8.940 8.940 16.790 14.610 13.360 12.790 12.300 12.090 11.560 11.560 11.150 10.940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.810 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.230 8.940 8.940 16.390 14.360 13.360 12.790 12.090 12.080 11.560 11.560 11.150 10. 940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.360 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.790 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 8.940 8.940 8.940 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.810 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 REVISION NO. 8 8.940 8.940 8. 940 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8. 610 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H277 of H344 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.520 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO, L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H278 of H344 Program : LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Case 4c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')Page : 9 Date 02/24/2011 Time : 13:13:58.09 SEASONAL  
CALCULATION NO. L-002457    REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H265 of H344 Program LAKET                                                        Page :          2 Number  03.7.292-2.2 0                                              Date  02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                         Time   13:13:58.01 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95 10.94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO, L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H266 of H344 I 9.79 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 I                           PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457     REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H267 of H344 Program LAKET                                                      Page :          3 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0                                             Date : 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                         Time : 13:13:58.01 9.63 9.63
: 9. 63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H268 of H344 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.27                   REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H268 of H344 II l
9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457     REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H269 of H344 Program : LAKET                                                       Page :          4 Number   03.7.292-2.2 0                                             Date : 02/24/2011 Created: 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                         Time   13:13:58.01 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8 .94 8 .94 8.94
: 8. 94
: 8. 94 8.94 8 .94 8 .94 8 .94 8.81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H270 of H344 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.57 I                           PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457     REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H271 of H344 Program LAKET                                                        Page :          5 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0                                               Date  02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                         Time   13:13:58.01 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                     I
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H272 of H344 I 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457     REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H273 of H344 Program LAKET                                                      Page :          6 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0                                             Date  02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                         Time : 13:13:58.01 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H274 of H344 I 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END IPROJECT                            NO. 11333-297
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457                                     REVISION NO. 8               ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H275 of H344 Program : LAKET                                                                                           Page :          7 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                   Date : 02/24/2011 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                             Time   13:13:58.01 Case 4c:   LaSalle UHS   (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation;   To=104F, 1.0')
RUN     30 DAYS FROM     61854 TO     71754 PLOT FILE OPTION :   1 CYCLE FLAG:   1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG:     0 TIME INCREMENT     : 3 TIME UNITS:   2 WEATHER FILE OPTION:   1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION:     0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT         20.00 DENSITY:         62.40 SEEPAGE:           0.20 LAKE LENGTH:       5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION     =     690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION     TOTAL AREA   TOTAL VOLUME         EFF AREA       EFF VOLUME 690.000           82.150           381.900         73.940         343.700 689.000           80.550           300.600         72.490         270.500 688.000           78.960           220.800         71.060         198.700 687.000           77.330           142.700         69.600         128.400 686.000           29.700           71.740         26.730           64.570 685.000           14.750           50.790         13.280           45.710 PLOT FILE FREQENCY     1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)
PLOT FILE FORMAT       0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
NUMBER OF VARIABLES   FOR PLOT FILE:     3 PLOT VARIABLES:
18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL     (F) 19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET     (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET     (F)
INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS.     =       102.74   98.24 WEATHER STATION ID   93822.
I                                                               PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                           1
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                   REVISION NO. 8                 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H276 of H344 I Program   LAKET                                                                                         Page :          8 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                 Date : 02/24/2011 Created   11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                           Time   13:13:58.03 Case 4c:   LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')
FPLANT 61854 -     71754   R/I             86.000 TPRISE 61854 -    71754   S/I             35.480               28.950            16.790        16.390 15.420               15.060            14.610        14.360 13.950               13.520            13.360        13.360 13.360               13.300            12.790        12.790 12.500               12.500            12.300        12.090 12.090              12.090            12.090        12.080 11.560               11.560           11.560        11.560 11.560              11.560            11.560        11.560 11.160              11.150            11.150        11.150 11.150              10.950            10.940        10. 940 10.590              10.590            10.590        10.590 10.590              10.590            10.590        10.590 10.590              10.590            10.590        10.590 10.590              10.590            10.590        10.360 10.070              10.070            10.070        10.070 10.070              10.070            10.070        10.070 10.070              10.070            10.070        10.070 10.070              10.070            10.070       10.070 10.070               10.070             9.810        9.790 9.790                9.790            9.790        9.790 9.630                9.630            9.630        9.630 9.630                9.630            9.630        9.630
: 9. 630              9.630            9.630        9.630 9.480                9.270             9.270         9.270 9.270               9.270             9.270         9.270 9.270                9.270            9.270        9.270 9.270                9.270            9.270        9.270 9.270                9.270            9.270        9.270 9.270                9.270            9.270        9.270 9.270                9.270            9.270        9.270 9.270                9.270            9.270        9.270 9.270                9.270             9.270         9.270 9.270               9.270             9.270         9.270 9.270               9.270             9.270         9.270 9.270                9.270            9.230         8.940 8.940               8.940            8.940        8.940 8.940                8.940            8.940        8.940 I                                                              PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                              1
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457      REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H277 of H344 8.940       8.940            8.940        8.940 8.940        8.940            8.940        8.940 8.940        8. 940          8.940        8.940 8.810        8.780            8.780        8.780 8.780        8.780            8.780        8.780 8.780        8.780            8.780        8.780 8.780        8.780            8.780        8.780 8.780        8.780            8.780        8.780 8.780       8.780           8.780         8.780 8.780       8. 610          8.570         8.570 8.570       8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570       8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570       8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570        8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570        8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570         8.570 8.570       8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570       8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570       8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570        8.570            8.570        8.570 8.570       8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570       8.570           8.570         8.570 8.570       8.570           8.570         8.520 I                                PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I CALCULATION NO, L-002457                                          REVISION NO. 8             ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H278 of H344 Program  : LAKET                                                                                              Page :          9 Number    : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                    Date  02/24/2011 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                                Time : 13:13:58.09 Case 4c:    LaSalle UHS       (12:00,   Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')
SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
FOR SUMMER ( 6/1954 -QUANTITY JUN 8/1954 )MONTHLY AVERAGES JUL AUG ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.60 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 81.52 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 349.69 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 73.37 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 314.70 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.18 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -2.04 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)  
FOR SUMMER         (   6/1954 - 8/1954   )
-1.31 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)  
QUANTITY                                          MONTHLY AVERAGES               AVERAGE JUN            JUL           AUG           VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)             20.00          20.00          0.00          20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)               689.60         688.91          0.00        689.21 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)               81.52         80.40          0.00          80.89 TOTAL VOLUME     (ACRE-FT)               349.69       293.35          0.00        317.77 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)               73.37         72.36          0.00          72.80 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)                 314.70       263.98          0.00        285.96 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)               0.00          0.00          0.00            0.00 PRECIPITATION         (CFS)               0.00          0.00          0.00            0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL         (CFS)               0.00          0.00          0.00            0.00 SEEPAGE               (CFS)               -0.18         -0.16          0.00          -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                   -2.04         -1.70          0.00          -1.85 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                   -1.31         -1.14          0.00          -1 22 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                   -0.73         -0.56          0.00          -0. 63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL       (CFS)               0.00          0.00          0.00            0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)                 226.40         221.82          0.00        223. 80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                   148.36         145.47          0.00        146.72 EVAP   LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 86.34         76.25          0.00          80. 62 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                     4.41           0.97          0.00            2.46 LAKE TEMP NATURAL         (F)             86.14         83.50          0.00          84. 64 LAKE TEMP @ INLET         (F)             98.38         93.35          0.00          95. 53 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET       (F)             87.12         84.58          0.00          85. 68 DISSOLVED SOLIDS     (PPM)               0.00           0.00         0.00           0.00 QUANTITY                                          MONTHLY TOTALS                     TOTAL JUN            JUL           AUG          VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP    (ACRE-FT)                0.00           0.00         0.00           0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)                  0.00           0.00         0.00           0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)                  -4.76          -5.29          0.00         -10.05 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)                 -52.66        -57.30          0.00       -109.95 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)                -33.87       -38.48          0.00         -72.35 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)                -18.78        -18.82         0.00         -37. 60 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)                  0.00           0.00         0.00           0.00 I                                                                     PROJECT NO. 11333-297
-0.73 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 226.40 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 148.36 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 86.34 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 4.41 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 86.14 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 98.38 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 87.12 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 QUANTITY JUN 20.00 688.91 80.40 293.35 72.36 263.98 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.16-1.70-1.14-0.56 0.00 221.82 145.47 76.25 0.97 83.50 93.35 84.58 0.00 MONTHLY TOTALS JUL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AUG AVERAGE VALUE 20.00 689.21 80.89 317.77 72.80 285.96 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.85-1 22-0. 63 0.00 223. 80 146.72 80. 62 2.46 84. 64 95. 53 85. 68 0.00 TOTAL VALUE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
 
SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                           REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H279 of H344 I TEMPERATURE              FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1%         5%     50%
EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL  (F)  100.0       94.0     84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET  (F)  133.0     108.0     94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)  104.0       94.0     85.1 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
 
BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00-4.76-52.66-33.87-18.78 0.00 0.00 0.00-5.29-57.30-38.48-18.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-10.05-109.95-72.35-37. 60 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 TEMPERATURE LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H279 of H344 I FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%100.0 94.0 84.0 133.0 108.0 94.5 104.0 94.0 85.1 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H280 of H344 1 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 10 Date : 02/24/2011 Time : 13:13:58.09 Case 4c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                       REVISION NO. 8             ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H280 of H344 1 Program   LAKET                                                                                          Page :          10 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                 Date : 02/24/2011 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                             Time : 13:13:58.09 Case 4c:   LaSalle UHS       (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')
CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
: SUMMER QUANTITY JUN MONTHLY AVERAGES JUL AUG AVERAGE VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.60 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 81.52 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 349.69 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 73.37 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 314.70 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.18 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -2.04 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)  
:       SUMMER QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY AVERAGES               AVERAGE JUN          JUL           AUG         VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT     (FT)             20.00        20.00          0.00          20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)             689.60       688.91          0.00        689.21 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)               81.52       80.40          0.00          80.89 TOTAL VOLUME   (ACRE-FT)             349.69       293.35          0.00        317.77 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)               73.37       72.36          0.00          72.80 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)               314.70       263.98          0.00        285.96 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)             0.00        0.00          0.00          0.00 PRECIPITATION       (CFS)               0.00        0.00          0.00          0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL         (CFS)               0.00        0.00          0.00          0.00 SEEPAGE             (CFS)             -0.18       -0.16          0.00          -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                 -2.04       -1.70          0.00          -1.85 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                 -1.31       -1.14          0.00          -1.22 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                 -0.73       -0.56          0.00          -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL       (CFS)               0.00        0.00          0.00          0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)               226.40       221.82          0.00        223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)               148.36       145.47          0.00        146.72 EVAP   LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)               86.34       76.25          0.00          80. 62 COND   LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 4.41         0.97          0.00          2.46 LAKE TEMP NATURAL       (F)           86.14       83.50          0.00          84.64 LAKE TEMP @ INLET       (F)           98.38       93.35          0.00          95.53 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET       (F)           87.12       84.58           0.00         85.68 DISSOLVED SOLIDS    (PPM)              0.00         0.00           0.00           0.00 QUANTITY                                        MONTHLY TOTALS                    TOTAL JUN          JUL          AUG          VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP  (ACRE-FT)                0.00         0.00           0.00           0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00         0.00           0.00           0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)                -4.76        -5.29          0.00       -10.05 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)             -52.66        -57.30          0.00      -109.95 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)             -33.87       -38.48          0.00       -72.35 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)              -18.78        -18.82           0.00       -37. 60 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00         0.00           0.00           0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
-1.31 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)  
 
-0.73 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 226.40 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 148.36 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 86.34 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 4.41 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 86.14 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 98.38 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 87.12 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 QUANTITY MO JUN 20.00 688.91 80.40 293.35 72.36 263.98 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.16-1.70-1.14-0.56 0.00 221.82 145.47 76.25 0.97 83.50 93.35 84.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 689.21 80.89 317.77 72.80 285.96 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.85-1.22-0.63 0.00 223.80 146.72 80. 62 2.46 84.64 95.53 85.68 0.00 TOTAL VALUE NTHLY TOTALS JUL AUG TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
I ICALCULATION NO. L-002457                                 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H281 of H344 I TEMPERATURE                    FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1%       5%       50%
TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL    (F)    I00.0     94.0       84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET    (F)    133.0     108.0       94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET  (F)    104.0     94.0       85.1 I                                                           PROJECT NO. 11333-297
TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
 
TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                         REVISION NO. 8             ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H282 of H344 Program   : LAKET                                                                                           Page :          11 Number   : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                   Date  02/24/2011 Created     11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                             Time   13:13:58.09 Case 4c:   LaSalle UHS       (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')
TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00-4.76-52.66-33.87-18.78 0.00 0.00 0.00-5.29-57.30-38.48-18.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-10.05-109.95-72.35-37. 60 0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 TEMPERATURE
TOTAL CUMULATIVE  
---------------------------
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)I REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H281 of H344 I FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%---------------------------
I00.0 94.0 84.0 133.0 108.0 94.5 104.0 94.0 85.1 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H282 of H344 Program : LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 11 Date 02/24/2011 Time 13:13:58.09 Case 4c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')TOTAL CUMULATIVE  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
QUANTITY ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
 
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
QUANTITY                             MAXIMUM                MINIMUM              AVERAGE VALUE    DATE    )      VALUE (  DATE      VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)           20.00  6181954)        20.00    6181954)    20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)             690.00  6181954)        688.52    7171954)  689.21 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             82.14  6181954)        79.78    7171954)    80.89 TOTAL VOLUME     (ACRE-FT)             381.62  6181954)        261.88    7171954)  317.77 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             73.94  6181954)         71.80    7171954)    72.80 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)                343.45  6181954)        235.66    7171954)  285.96 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)             0.00  6181954)         0.00    6181954)    0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)               0.00  6181954)          0.00    6181954)     0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL         (CFS)               0.00  6181954)         0.00    6181954)     0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)             -0.14  7171954)         -0.20    6181954)   -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                -0.49  6291954)         -5.43    6181954)   -1.85 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                 -0.26  6291954)         -4.11    6271954)   -1.22 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                 -0.16  7171954)        -2.44    6181954)    -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)              0.00 6181954)          0.00   6181954)    0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)                451.13   6191954)        90.18    7071954)  223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 165.64  6181954)       136.01    7071954)   146.72 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 270.89  6271954)         17.13    6291954)   80.62 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 37.53  6271954)       -47.07    7121954)     2.46 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)         101.48  6181954)         74.48    7071954)   84.64 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)         140.00  6181954)         83.77    7071954)   95.53 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)         104.84  6181954)         74.79    7071954)   85.68 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)               0.00 6181954)         0.00   6181954)     0.00 QUANTITY                              MAXIMUM                MINIMUM                TOTAL VALUE    DATE    )       VALUE (  DATE      VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP    (ACRE-FT)               0 .00 6181954)         0.00   6181954)     0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)                 0 .00 6181954)         0.00   6181954)     0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)                -0 .04  7171954)        -0.05    6181954)  -10.05 TOTAL  EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)                -0 .12  6291954)        -1.35    6181954)  -109.95 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)               -0 .06  6291954)        -1.02    6271954)  -72.35 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)               -0 .04  7171954)        -0.61    6181954)  -37.60 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)                 0 .00 6181954)         0.00    6181954)     0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                          REVISION NO. 8              ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H283 of H344 I REVIIONNO. ATACHMNT    , PGE  O. H83  f H44 TEMPERATURE              FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1%        5%      50%
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL  (F) 100.0       94.0     84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET  (F)  133.0      108.0     94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)  104.0       94.0    85.1 I                                                      PROJECT NO. 11333-297
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)MAXIMUM VALUE 20.00 690.00 82.14 381.62 73.94 343.45 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.14-0.49-0.26-0.16 0.00 451.13 165.64 270.89 37.53 101.48 140.00 104.84 0.00 MINIMUM DATE ) VALUE ( DATE AVERAGE VALUE 6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)7171954)6291954)6291954)7171954)6181954)6191954)6181954)6271954)6271954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)DATE )20.00 6181954)688.52 7171954)79.78 7171954)261.88 7171954)71.80 7171954)235.66 7171954)0.00 6181954)0.00 6181954)0.00 6181954)-0.20 6181954)-5.43 6181954)-4.11 6271954)-2.44 6181954)0.00 6181954)90.18 7071954)136.01 7071954)17.13 6291954)-47.07 7121954)74.48 7071954)83.77 7071954)74.79 7071954)0.00 6181954)MINIMUM VALUE ( DATE 20.00 689.21 80.89 317.77 72.80 285.96 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.85-1.22-0.63 0.00 223.80 146.72 80.62 2.46 84.64 95.53 85.68 0.00 TOTAL VALUE QUANTITY MAXIMUM VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)  
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                     REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H284 of H344 I Program : LAKET                                                                                        Page :          1 Number      03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                             Date  04/07/2006 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                        Time  09:37:07.53 Case 00ev:    LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst    30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat 1
-0 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)  
2      061854      071754    1                      3      2 3      1        0        20.
-0 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)  
4      1      0.2        550 0. 0 5      6      2          690 690    83.83      464. 9    75.45 418.4 689    82.15      381. 9    73.94 343.7 688    80.55      300. 5    72.50 270.5 687    78.96      220 .8  71.06  198.7 686   77.33     142. 6    69.60 128.4 685    29.70     71.7     26.73 65.6 7       1           0 3         19  20  21 8      97.6         93.1 999 FPLANT  R/I        86.0 TPRISE  S/I 35.26 28.79 16.68 16.28 15.32 14.97 14.53 14.29 13.88 13.45 13.30 13.30 13.30 13.24 12.73 12.73 12.57 12.43 12.24 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.01 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 I                                                                 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
-0 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
 
-0 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00.00.04.12.06.04.00 6181954)6181954)7171954)6291954)6291954)7171954)6181954)0.00 0.00-0.05-1.35-1.02-0.61 0.00 6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6271954)6181954)6181954)0.00 0.00-10.05-109.95-72.35-37.60 0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.0 94.0 84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 133.0 108.0 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.0 94.0 85.1 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H283 of H344 I REVIIONNO.
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H285 of H344 I 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.09 11.07 11.07 11.07 11.07
ATACHMNT , PGE O. H83 f H44 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H284 of H344 I Program : LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 1 Date 04/07/2006 Time 09:37:07.53 Case 00ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat 1 2 061854 071754 1 3 1 0 20.4 1 0.2 550 5 6 2 690 690 83.83 464.689 82.15 381.688 80.55 300.687 78.96 220 686 77.33 142.685 29.70 71.7 7 1 0 3 97.6 93.1 3 2 0.9 9 5.8 6 19 0 75.45 73.94 72.50 71.06 69.60 26.73 20 418.4 343.7 270.5 198.7 128.4 65.6 21 8 999 FPLANT TPRISE 35.26 28.79 16.68 16.28 15.32 14.97 14.53 14.29 13.88 13.45 13.30 13.30 13.30 13.24 12.73 12.73 12.57 12.43 12.24 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.01 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 R/I S/I 86.0 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.09 11.07 11.07 11.07 11.07 10. 87 10.86 10.86 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.27 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.72 9.70 9.70 9.70 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H285 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.70 9.70 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.40 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 m REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H286 of H344 I I IPROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.15 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.72 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H287 of H344 i PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H288 of H344 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.52 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H289 of H344 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.44 END I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H290 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 7 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created :11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time :09:37:07.53 Case 00ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat RUN 30 DAYS FROM 61854 TO 71754 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT
: 10. 87 10.86 10.86 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.27 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.72 9.70 9.70 9.70 I                           PROJECT NO. 11333-297
: 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT 20.00 DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION  
 
= 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 83.830 464.900 75.450 418.400 689.000 82.150 381.900 73.940 343.700 688.000 80.550 300.500 72.500 270.500 687.000 78.960 220.800 71.060 198.700 686.000 77.330 142.600 69.600 128.400 685.000 29.700 71.700 26.730 65.600 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
m CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H286 of H344 II 9.70 9.70 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.40 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 IPROJECT                           NO. 11333-297
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:
 
19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)21 LAKE TEMP @ DAM (F)INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 97.60 93.10 WEATHER STATION ID 93822.I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H291 of H344 Program : LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 8 Date 04/07/2006 Time 09:37:07.53 Case 00ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat FPLANT 61854 -TPRISE 61854 -71754 R/I 71754 S/I 86.000 35.260 15.320 13.880 13.300 12.570 12.020 11.490 11.490 11.090 11.070 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.700 9.540 9. 540 9.540 9.400 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9. 190 9.190 9.190 9.190 8.850 8.850 8.850 28.790 14.970 13.450 13.240 12.430 12.020 11.490 11.490 11.070 10.870 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 8.850 8.850 8.850 16.680 14.530 13.300 12.730 12.240 12.020 11.490 11.490 11.070 10.860 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.720 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.150 8.850 8.850 8.850 16.280 14 .290 13.300 12.730 12.020 12.010 11.490 11.490 11.070 10.860 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.270 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.700 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H292 of H344 8.850 8.850 8.720 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.850 8.850 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.520 8.490 8.490 8.490 8. 490 8. 490 8. 490 8. 490 8. 490 8. 490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.850 8.850 8. 700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.490 8.490 8.490 8 .490 8 .490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.850 8.850 8. 700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.440 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H293 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 9 Date : 04/07/2006 Time : 09:37:07.56 Case 00ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat SEASONAL  
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H287 of H344 i 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.15 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.72 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H288 of H344 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.52 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H289 of H344 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.44 END I               PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                     REVISION NO. 8               ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H290 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                                                           Page :           7 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                 Date : 04/07/2006 Created :11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                             Time :09:37:07.53 Case 00ev:   LaSalle UHS   (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200;   power uprat RUN     30 DAYS FROM     61854 TO     71754 PLOT FILE OPTION :   1 CYCLE FLAG:   1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG:     0 TIME INCREMENT     : 3 TIME UNITS:   2 WEATHER FILE OPTION:   1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION:     0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT         20.00 DENSITY:         62.40 SEEPAGE:         0.20 LAKE LENGTH:       5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION     =     690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION     TOTAL AREA   TOTAL VOLUME         EFF AREA     EFF VOLUME 690.000           83.830         464.900         75.450         418.400 689.000           82.150         381.900         73.940         343.700 688.000           80.550         300.500         72.500         270.500 687.000           78.960         220.800         71.060         198.700 686.000           77.330         142.600         69.600         128.400 685.000           29.700           71.700         26.730         65.600 PLOT FILE FREQENCY     1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)
PLOT FILE FORMAT       0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE:       3 PLOT VARIABLES:
19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET     (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET     (F) 21 LAKE TEMP @ DAM       (F)
INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS.   =         97.60   93.10 WEATHER STATION ID   93822.
I                                                                 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                   REVISION NO. 8                   ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H291 of H344 Program   : LAKET                                                                                           Page :          8 Number      03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                 Date  04/07/2006 Created     11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                             Time   09:37:07.53 Case 00ev:   LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat FPLANT 61854 -     71754   R/I             86.000 TPRISE 61854  -    71754   S/I             35.260             28.790              16.680        16.280 15.320              14.970              14.530        14 .290 13.880             13.450              13.300       13.300 13.300              13.240              12.730        12.730 12.570              12.430              12.240        12.020 12.020              12.020              12.020        12.010 11.490             11.490              11.490        11.490 11.490              11.490              11.490        11.490 11.090              11.070              11.070        11.070 11.070              10.870              10.860        10.860 10.500              10.500              10.500        10.500 10.500              10.500              10.500        10.500 10.500              10.500              10.500        10.500 10.500              10.500              10.500        10.270 9.990              9.990              9.990        9.990 9.990              9.990               9.990         9.990 9.990               9.990               9.990        9.990 9.990              9.990              9.990        9.990 9.990              9.990              9.720        9.700 9.700              9.700              9.700        9.700 9.540              9.540              9.540        9.540
: 9. 540              9.540              9.540        9.540 9.540              9.540              9.540        9.540 9.400              9.190              9.190        9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190        9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190        9.190 9.190              9.190               9.190         9.190 9.190               9.190               9.190         9.190 9.190               9.190               9.190         9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190        9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190        9.190
: 9. 190              9.190              9.190        9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190        9.190 9.190              9.190               9.190         9.190 9.190               9.190               9.150        8.850 8.850              8.850              8.850        8.850 8.850              8.850              8.850        8.850 8.850               8.850               8.850         8.850 PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                             I
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457       REVISION NO. 8                 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H292 of H344 8.850       8.850             8.850          8.850 8.850        8.850            8.850          8.850 8.720      8.700             8. 700        8. 700 8.700      8.700            8.700          8.700 8.700      8.700            8.700          8.700 8.700      8.700            8.700          8.700 8.700      8.700             8.700         8.700 8.700       8.700             8.700         8.700 8.700      8.520             8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490             8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490             8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490             8 .490         8.490 8.490      8. 490            8 .490        8.490 8.490      8. 490            8.490          8.490 8.490       8. 490           8.490         8.490 8.490       8. 490           8.490         8.490 8.490       8. 490           8.490         8.490 8.490       8. 490            8.490          8.490 8.490      8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490      8.490             8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490             8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490             8.490         8.440 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457                                        REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H293 of H344 Program    LAKET                                                                                        Page :          9 Number    03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                              Date : 04/07/2006 Created   11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                         Time : 09:37:07.56 Case 00ev:   LaSalle UHS     (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
FOR SUMMER ( 6/1954 -8/1954 )QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES JUL JUN AVERAGE AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
FOR SUMMER       (   6/1954 - 8/1954   )
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY AVERAGES             AVERAGE JUN            JUL         AUG       VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)           20.00          20.00        0.00        20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)           689.62        688.93        0.00      689.23 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             83.19          82.04        0.00        82.54 TOTAL VOLUME   (ACRE-FT)             433.37        376.32        0.00      401.04 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             74.88          73.84        0.00        74.29 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)               390.02        338. 68        0.00      360.93 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)           0.00           0.00         0.00         0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)            0.00          0.00        0.00         0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL          (CFS)            0.00           0.00         0.00         0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)            -0.19          -0.17         0.00        -0.18 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                -2.03          -1.72        0.00       -1.85 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                -1.31          -1.16         0.00        -1.23 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                -0.72         -0.55        0.00       -0. 62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)            0.00           0.00         0.00         0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)              226.40        221.82        0.00       223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                148.00         145.52        0.00       146.59 EVAP  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)              84.28          76.16        0.00       79.68 COND  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                4.08          1.01        0.00         2.34 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)          85.84          83.56        0.00        84.55 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)          98.17          93.43        0.00       95.49 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)          86.96          84 .72        0.00       85.69 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)            0.00          0.00         0.00          0.00 QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY TOTALS                 TOTAL JUN             JUL         AUG       VALUE TOTAL PRECIP   (ACRE-FT)               0.00          0.00        0.00          0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00          0.00        0.00          0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)               -4.84          -5.58        0 .00      -10.42 TOTAL  EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)             -52.28        -57.83        0 .00     -110.11 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)              -33.73         -39.21        0.00       -72.94 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)              -18.55        -18.62         0.00       -37.17 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00           0.00         0.00         0.00 TEMPERATURE                         FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I                                                 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
I CALCULATION   NO. L-002457                   REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H294 of H344 I 1%   5%  50%
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL   (F)     95.8   92.2 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET   (F)   128.0 106.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)     99.0   92.7 85.2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)20.00 689.62 83.19 433.37 74.88 390.02 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.19-2.03-1.31-0.72 0.00 226.40 148.00 84.28 4.08 85.84 98.17 86.96 0.00 20.00 688.93 82.04 376.32 73.84 338. 68 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.72-1.16-0.55 0.00 221.82 145.52 76.16 1.01 83.56 93.43 84 .72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 20.00 689.23 82.54 401.04 74.29 360.93 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.18-1.85-1.23-0. 62 0.00 223.80 146.59 79.68 2.34 84.55 95.49 85.69 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS JUN JUL TOTAL AUG VALUE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457                                       REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H295 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                                                        Page :          10 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                               Date : 04/07/2006 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                           Time   09:37:07.56 Case 00ev:   LaSalle UHS     (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  
SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00-4.84-52.28-33.73-18.55 0.00 0.00 0.00-5.58-57.83-39.21-18.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-10.42-110.11-72.94-37.17 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 1%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 95.8 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H294 of H344 I 5% 50%92.2 84.1 106.5 94.5 92.7 85.2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H295 of H344 Page : 10 Date : 04/07/2006 Time 09:37:07.56 Case 00ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
: SUMMER QUANTITY J MONTHLY AVERAGES UN JUL A AVERAGE G VALUE U ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
:       SUMMER QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY AVERAGES               AVERAGE J UN         JUL           AUG        VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)         20.00        20. 00          0.00        20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)           689.62        688.93          0.00        689.23 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             83.19        82.04          0.00        82. 54 TOTAL VOLUME   (ACRE-FT)           433.37        376.32          0.00        401.04 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)           74.88        73.84          0.00        74.29 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)             390.02        338.68          0.00        360.93 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)           0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)            0.00          0.00          0.00         0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL          (CFS)            0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)          -0.19        -0.17           0.00        -0.18 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)              -2.03        -1.72          0.00         -1.85 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)              -1.31        -1.16           0.00        -1.23 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)              -0.72         -0.55          0.00         -0.62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)            0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)              226.40        221.82          0.00       223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)              148.00       145.52          0.00       146.59 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                84.28        76.16          0.00         79.68 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                4.08          1.01          0.00         2.34 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)        85.84        83.56          0.00        84.55 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)        98.17        93.43          0.00         95.49 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)        86.96        84.72          0.00         85.69 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)            0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 QUANTITY                                      MONTHLY TOTALS                   TOTAL JUN         JUL           AUG         VALUE TOTAL PRECIP   (ACRE-FT)             0.00          0.00          0.00          0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00          0.00          0.00          0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)             -4.84        -5.58          0.00        -10.42 TOTAL  EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)             -52.28        -57.83          0.00       -110.11 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)            -33.73       -39.21          0.00       -72.94 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)            -18.55        -18.62           0.00       -37.17 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)              0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 TEMPERATURE                         FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES PROJECT NO. 11333-297
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
 
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H296 of H344 1%   5% 50% REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H296 of H344 II LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)   95.8 92.2 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 106.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)   99.0 92.7 85.2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                       REVISION NO. 8                     ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H297 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                                                                  Page :        11 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                       Date  04/07/2006 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                                   Time   09:37:07.56 Case 00ev:   LaSalle UHS     (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat TOTAL CUMULATIVE  
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)QUANTITY 20.00 689.62 83.19 433.37 74.88 390.02 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.19-2.03-1.31-0.72 0.00 226.40 148.00 84.28 4.08 85.84 98.17 86.96 0.00 20. 00 688.93 82.04 376.32 73.84 338.68 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.72-1.16-0.55 0.00 221.82 145.52 76.16 1.01 83.56 93.43 84.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 689.23 82. 54 401.04 74.29 360.93 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.18-1.85-1.23-0.62 0.00 223.80 146.59 79.68 2.34 84.55 95.49 85.69 0.00 TOTAL VALUE 0.00 0.00-10.42-110.11-72.94-37.17 0.00 MONTHLY TOTALS JUN JUL AUG TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00-4.84-52.28-33.73-18.55 0.00 0.00 0.00-5.58-57.83-39.21-18.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 95.8 92.2 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 106.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 92.7 85.2 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H296 of H344 I REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H296 of H344 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H297 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 11 Date 04/07/2006 Time 09:37:07.56 Case 00ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat TOTAL CUMULATIVE  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
QUANTITY MAXIMUM--  
 
-- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -QUANTITY MAXIMUM VALUE (DATE MINIMUM AVERAGE VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
QUANTITY                             -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
MAXIMUM--
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
QUANTITY                           MAXIMUM                 MINIMUM                  AVERAGE VALUE (DATE             VALUE ( DATE       )       VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)           20.00  6181954)        20.00    6181954)        20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)           690.00  6181954)      688 54    7171954)      689.23 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             83.83  6181954)        81.41    7171954)        82.54 TOTAL VOLUME     (ACRE-FT)           464.67  6181954)      344.36    7171954)      401 .04 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             75.45  6181954)       73 .28    7171954)        74.29 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)              418.19  6181954)      309.94    7171954)      360.93 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)           0.00  6181954)         0.00    6181954)          0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)             0.00  6181954)          0.00    6181954)         0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL         (CFS)             0.00  6181954)         0.00    6181954)         0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)           -0.15  7171954)       -0.20    6181954)         -0.18 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                -0.54  6291954)       -5.33    6271954)         -1 85 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)               -0.28  6221954)       -4 .07    6271954)         -1.23 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)               -0.15  6181954)        -1. 92    6181954)        -0. 62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)            0.00   6181954)          0.00   6181954)          0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)              451.13   6191954)        90.18    7071954)      223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                159.63  6181954)       137 .82    7071954)       146.59 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)               262.99  6271954)       17 .98    6221954)         79.68 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 37.83  6271954)       -46.87    7121954)         2.34 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)         96.31  6181954)       76.25    7071954)         84. 55 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)         134.81  6181954)       85.65    7071954)         95.49 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)         99.95  6181954)       76.80    7071954)         85.69 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)             0.00  6181954)         0.00   6181954)          0.00 QUANTITY                            MAXIMUM                  MINIMUM                      TOTAL VALUE (  DATE          VALUE (    DATE            VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP    (ACRE-FT)              0.00   6181954)          0.00   6181954)          0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00  6181954)          0.00    6181954)          0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)              -0.04  7171954)        -0.05    6181954)       -10.42 TOTAL  EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)               -0.13  6291954)       -1.32    6271954)     -110.11 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)               -0.07  6221954)       -1.01    6271954)       -72. 94 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)               -0.04  6181954)       -0.48    6181954)       -37 .17 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00  6181954)         0.00    6181954)         0.00 TEMPERATURE                        FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I                                                                  PROJECT NO. 11333-297
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                      REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H298 of H344 1%    5%  50%
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL    (F)    95.8  92.2  84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET    (F)  128.0 106.5  94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET  (F)    99.0   92.85.2 Program  LAKET                                                                      Page :          1 Number    03.7.292-2.2   0                                                            Date : 04/07/2006 I                                                PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                    1
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)20.00 690.00 83.83 464.67 75.45 418.19 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.15-0.54-0.28-0.15 0.00 451.13 159.63 262.99 37.83 96.31 134.81 99.95 0.00 6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)7171954)6291954)6221954)6181954)6181954)6191954)6181954)6271954)6271954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)20.00 688 54 81.41 344.36 73 .28 309.94 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.20-5.33-4 .07-1. 92 0.00 90.18 137 .82 17 .98-46.87 76.25 85.65 76.80 0.00 6181954)7171954)7171954)7171954)7171954)7171954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6271954)6271954)6181954)6181954)7071954)7071954)6221954)7121954)7071954)7071954)7071954)6181954)20.00 689.23 82.54 401 .04 74.29 360.93 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.18-1 85-1.23-0. 62 0.00 223.80 146.59 79.68 2.34 84. 55 95.49 85.69 0.00--------------------------------
 
-----------------
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                  REVISION NO. 8              ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H299 of H344 Created  : 11/18/2004      08:08:26                                                                  Time : 09:41:26.34 Case 06ev:    LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate) 1 2        061854    071754        1      1    0      3      2 3        1    0        20.
QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM VALUE ( DATE VALUE ( DATE TOTAL VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954)TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954)TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)
4        1        0.2          5500. 0 5        6        2            690 590      82.99        423. 5    74.69 381.2 89      81.35        341. 4    73.21 307.2 88      79.75        260. 8    71.78 234.7 87      78.15        181. 9    70.34 163.7 86      29.70        102. 02  26.73 92.0 7      85      22.22        60.0     20.00 54.0 8        1        0 3            19    20    21 97.4      92.9 999 FPLANT R/I          86.0 TPRISE S/I 35.26 28.79 16.68 16.28 15.32 14.97 14.53 14.29 13.88 13.45 13.30 13.30 13.30 13.24 12.73 12.73 12.57 12.43 12.24 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.01 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
-0.04 7171954)TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
 
-0.13 6291954)TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H300 of H344 I 11.49 11.49 11.09 11.07 11.07 11.07 11.07 10.87 10.86 10.86 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.27 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.72 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 I                            PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                      1
-0.07 6221954)TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
 
-0.04 6181954)TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954)TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 0.00 0.00-0.05-1.32-1.01-0.48 0.00 6181954)6181954)6181954)6271954)6271954)6181954)6181954)0.00 0.00-10.42-110.11-72. 94-37 .17 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H298 of H344 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL LAKE TEMP @ INLET LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)(F)(F)95.8 128.0 99.0 92.2 106.5 92.7 84.1 94.5 85.2 Program LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Page : 1 Date : 04/07/2006 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H301 of H344 1 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.40 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 I                          PROJECT NO. 11333-297
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H299 of H344 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 09:41:26.34 Case 06ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate)1 2 061854 071754 1 1 0 3 2 3 1 0 20.4 1 0.2 5500. 0 5 6 2 690 7 8 999 FPLANT TPRISE 35.26 28.79 16.68 16.28 15.32 14.97 14.53 14.29 13.88 13.45 13.30 13.30 13.30 13.24 12.73 12.73 12.57 12.43 12.24 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.01 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 590 82.99 423.89 81.35 341.88 79.75 260.87 78.15 181.86 29.70 102.85 22.22 60.0 1 0 3 97.4 92.9 0 5 74.69 4 73.21 8 71.78 9 70.34 2 26.73 20.00 19 20 381.2 307.2 234.7 163.7 92.0 54.0 21 R/I S/I 86.0 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 11.49 11.49 11.09 11.07 11.07 11.07 11.07 10.87 10.86 10.86 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.27 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.72 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H300 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.40 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H301 of H344 1 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H302 of H344 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.15 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.72 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8 .52 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H303 of H344 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H302 of H344 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.15 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.72 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.44 END REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H304 of H344 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H305 of H344 Program : LAKET Page : 7 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created: 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 09:41:26.34 Case 06ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat RUN 30 DAYS FROM 61854 TO 71754 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT
 
: 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT 20.00 DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H303 of H344 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8 .52 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 I                            PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                    1
= 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 82.990 423.500 74.690 381.200 689.000 81.350 341.400 73.210 307.200 688.000 79.750 260.800 71.780 234.700 687.000 78.150 181.900 70.340 163.700 686.000 29.700 102.200 26.730 92.000 685.000 22.220 60.000 20.000 54.000 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
 
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H304 of H344 I 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.44 END PROJECT NO. 11333-297
19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)21 LAKE TEMP @ DAM (F)INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 97.40 92.90 WEATHER STATION ID 93822.I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
 
I ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 Program LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H306 of H344 I Page :8 Date :04/07/2006 Time :09:41:26.34 Case 06ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat FPLANT 61854 -TPRISE 61854 -71754 R/I 71754 S/I 86.000 35.260 15.320 13.880 13.300 12.570 12.020 11.490 11.490 11.090 11.070 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.400 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9. 190 9.190 9.190 9.190 8.850 8.850 8.850 28.790 14.970 13.450 13.240 12.430 12.020 11.490 11.490 11.070 10.870 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 9. 990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 8.850 8.850 8.850 16.680 14.530 13.300 12.730 12.240 12.020 11.490 11.490 11.070 10.860 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.720 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9. 190 9.190 9.190 9.150 8.850 8.850 8.850 16.280 14 .290 13.300 12.730 12.020 12.010 11.490 11.490 11.070 10.860 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.270 9. 990 9. 990 9. 990 9. 990 9.700 9. 700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.190 9.190 9.190 9. 190 9.190 9.190 9. 190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                     REVISION NO. 8             ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H305 of H344 Program : LAKET                                                                                          Page :          7 Number    03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                Date : 04/07/2006 Created: 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                              Time : 09:41:26.34 Case 06ev:    LaSalle UHS  (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap;  Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat RUN      30 DAYS FROM      61854 TO      71754 PLOT FILE OPTION :    1 CYCLE FLAG:    1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG:    0 TIME INCREMENT    :  3 TIME UNITS:    2 WEATHER FILE OPTION:    1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION:    0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT        20.00 DENSITY:        62.40 SEEPAGE:          0.20 LAKE LENGTH:      5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION      =      690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION      TOTAL AREA    TOTAL VOLUME        EFF AREA      EFF VOLUME 690.000          82.990          423.500        74.690        381.200 689.000          81.350          341.400        73.210        307.200 688.000          79.750          260.800        71.780        234.700 687.000          78.150          181.900        70.340        163.700 686.000          29.700          102.200        26.730        92.000 685.000          22.220            60.000        20.000        54.000 PLOT FILE FREQENCY      1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.850 8.850 8.720 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 REVISION NO. 8 8.850 8.850 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.520 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.850 8.850 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.490 8.490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H307 of H344 8.850 8.850 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8. 490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.440 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
PLOT FILE FORMAT        0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H308 of H344 Program : LAKET Page : 9 Number Created 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Date 04/07/2006 Time 09:41:26.35 Case 06ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat SEASONAL  
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE:        3 PLOT VARIABLES:
19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET      (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET    (F) 21 LAKE TEMP @ DAM        (F)
INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS.     =        97.40    92.90 WEATHER STATION ID    93822.
I                                                                 PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                         1
 
I ICALCULATION      NO. L-002457                               REVISION NO. 8                   ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H306 of H344 I Program     LAKET                                                                                             Page :8 Number   : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                   Date :04/07/2006 Created     11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                               Time :09:41:26.34 Case 06ev:   LaSalle UHS   (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat FPLANT 61854  -    71754    R/I              86.000 TPRISE 61854 -    71754   S/I              35.260              28.790              16.680          16.280 15.320              14.970              14.530        14 .290 13.880              13.450              13.300        13.300 13.300              13.240              12.730        12.730 12.570              12.430              12.240          12.020 12.020              12.020              12.020          12.010 11.490              11.490              11.490        11.490 11.490              11.490              11.490        11.490 11.090              11.070              11.070        11.070 11.070              10.870              10.860        10.860 10.500              10.500              10.500        10.500 10.500              10.500              10.500        10.500 10.500              10.500              10.500        10.500 10.500              10.500              10.500        10.270 9.990              9. 990              9.990          9. 990 9.990              9.990              9.990          9. 990 9.990              9.990              9.990          9. 990 9.990              9.990              9.990          9. 990 9.990              9.990              9.720          9.700 9.700              9.700              9.700          9. 700 9.540              9.540              9.540           9.540 9.540               9.540              9.540          9.540 9.540              9.540              9.540          9.540 9.400              9.190               9.190           9.190 9.190               9.190               9.190           9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190          9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190          9. 190 9.190              9.190              9.190          9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190          9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190          9. 190 9.190              9.190              9.190          9.190
: 9. 190              9.190              9. 190         9.190 9.190               9.190               9.190           9.190 9.190               9.190               9.190           9.190 9.190               9.190               9.150          8.850 8.850               8.850               8.850          8.850 8.850              8.850              8.850          8.850 8.850              8.850              8.850          8.850 I                                                              PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                                1
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457      REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H307 of H344 8.850        8.850            8.850          8.850 8.850        8.850            8.850          8.850 8.720       8.700           8.700          8.700 8.700        8.700            8.700          8.700 8.700        8.700            8.700          8.700 8.700        8.700            8.700          8.700 8.700        8.700            8.700          8.700 8.700        8.700            8.700          8.700 8.700        8.520            8.490         8. 490 8.490        8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490        8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490        8.490            8 .490        8.490 8.490        8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490        8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490        8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490        8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490        8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490        8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490        8.490            8 .490        8.490 8.490       8.490           8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490           8 .490         8.490 8.490       8.490           8.490         8.440 I                                PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                            1
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                        REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H308 of H344 Program  : LAKET                                                                                          Page :          9 Number      03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                Date  04/07/2006 Created     11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                           Time   09:41:26.35 Case 06ev:   LaSalle UHS     (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap;   Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
FOR SUMMER (6/1954 -8/1954 )QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES JUN JUL AUG AVERAGE VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
FOR SUMMER       (   6/1954 - 8/1954   )
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY AVERAGES                 AVERAGE JUN           JUL           AUG         VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)           20.00          20.00          0.00          20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)           689.62        688.93          0.00        689.23 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             82.37          81.24          0.00          81.73 TOTAL VOLUME     (ACRE-FT)           392.37        335.79            0.00        360.30 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             74 .13        73.11          0.00          73.55 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)               353.14        302.16          0.00        324.25 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)           0.00           0.00          0.00          0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)            0.00           0.00         0.00           0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL          (CFS)            0.00            0.00         0.00           0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)            -0.19          -0.16           0.00         -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                -2.00         -1.70          0.00         -1.83 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                -1.28          -1.15           0.00         -1.21 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                -0.72          -0.55          0.00         -0.62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)            0.00           0.00         0.00           0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)              226.40        221.82            0.00       223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                147.84        145.50            0.00       146.51 EVAP  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)              83.54          76.20          0.00         79.38 COND  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                3.88            0.99          0.00           2.24 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)          85.70          83.53          0.00         84.47 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)          97.97          93.35          0.00         95.35 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)          86.77          84.64          0.00          85.57 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)            0.00           0.00         0.00           0.00 QUANTITY                                        MONTHLY TOTALS                      TOTAL JUN           JUL          AUG         VALUE TOTAL PRECIP   (ACRE-FT)             0.00            0.00          0.00          0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00            0.00          0.00          0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)               -4.81         -5.46          0.00        -10.27 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)             -51.65       -57.47            0.00      -109.12 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)             -33.10       -38.85            0.00        -71.95 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)             -18.55       -18.62            0.00        -37.17 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00           0.00         0.00           0.00 TEMPERATURE                         FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I                                                                   PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                       1
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                   REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H309 of H344 1%     5% 50%
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL  (F)  95.8  92.2  84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 106.0 94.4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)  99.0   92.3 85.1 I                                               PROJECT NO. 11333-297
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)QUANTITY 20.00 689.62 82.37 392.37 74 .13 353.14 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.19-2.00-1.28-0.72 0.00 226.40 147.84 83.54 3.88 85.70 97.97 86.77 0.00 20.00 688.93 81.24 335.79 73.11 302.16 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.16-1.70-1.15-0.55 0.00 221.82 145.50 76.20 0.99 83.53 93.35 84.64 0.00 MONTHLY TOTALS JUL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 689.23 81.73 360.30 73.55 324.25 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.83-1.21-0.62 0.00 223.80 146.51 79.38 2.24 84.47 95.35 85.57 0.00 TOTAL VALUE 0.00 0.00-10.27-109.12-71.95-37.17 0.00 JUN AUG TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)  
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                       REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H310 of H344 I Program   LAKET                                                                                        Page :          10 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                               Date : 04/07/2006 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                           Time   09:41:26.35 Case 06ev:   LaSalle UHS     (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  
-4.81 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)  
-51.65 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)  
-33.10 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)  
-18.55 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00-5.46-57.47-38.85-18.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H309 of H344 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP LAKE TEMP LAKE TEMP NATURAL@ INLET@ OUTLET (F)(F)(F)95.8 128.0 99.0 92.2 106.0 92.3 84.0 94.4 85.1 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H310 of H344 I Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 10 Date : 04/07/2006 Time 09:41:26.35 Case 06ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
: SUMMER QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGE JUN JUL S AVERAGE AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
:       SUMMER QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY AVERAGE S              AVERAGE JUN           JUL           AUG       VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)         20.00        20.00          0.00        20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)           689. 62      688.93          0.00      689.23 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)           82.37        81.24          0.00        81.73 TOTAL VOLUME   (ACRE-FT)           392.37        335.79          0.00      360.30 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)           74.13        73.11          0.00        73.55 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)             353.14        302.16          0.00      324.25 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)           0.00         0.00          0.00          0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)            0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL          (CFS)            0.00          0.00           0.00         0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)          -0.19        -0.16           0.00       -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)              -2.00         -1.70          0.00       -1.83 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)              -1.28        -1.15           0.00       -1.21 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)              -0.72        -0.55          0.00       -0 .62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)            0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)              226.40        221.82          0.00       223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)              147 .84      145.50          0.00       146.51 EVAP  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)              83.54        76.20          0.00       79.38 COND  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)              3.88          0.99          0.00         2 .24 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)        85.70        83.53          0.00       84 .47 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)        97.97        93.35          0.00       95.35 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)        86.77        84.64          0.00        85.57 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)            0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY TOTALS                  TOTAL JUN         JUL            AUG       VALUE TOTAL PRECIP   (ACRE-FT)             0.00         0.00          0.00          0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00          0.00           0.00          0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)             -4.81         -5.46           0.00      -10.27 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)             -51.65       -57.47           0.00      -109.12 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)             -33.10       -38.85           0.00      -71.95 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)             -18.55       -18.62           0.00      -37.17 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 TEMPERATURE                        FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I                                                 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
 
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                     REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H311 of H344 1%     5% 50%
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)  95.8  92.2  84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 106.0 94 .4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)  99.0   92.3 85.1 I                                               PROJECT NO. 11333-297
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                     REVISION NO. 8                 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H312 of H344 I Program : LAKET                                                                                               Page :          11 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                     Date  04/07/2006 Created     11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                               Time : 09:41:26.35 Case 06ev:   LaSalle UHS     (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat TOTAL CUMULATIVE  
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)20.00 689. 62 82.37 392.37 74.13 353.14 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.19-2.00-1.28-0.72 0.00 226.40 147 .84 83.54 3.88 85.70 97.97 86.77 0.00 20.00 688.93 81.24 335.79 73.11 302.16 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.16-1.70-1.15-0.55 0.00 221.82 145.50 76.20 0.99 83.53 93.35 84.64 0.00 MONTHLY TOTALS JUL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 689.23 81.73 360.30 73.55 324.25 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.83-1.21-0 .62 0.00 223.80 146.51 79.38 2 .24 84 .47 95.35 85.57 0.00 TOTAL VALUE 0.00 0.00-10.27-109.12-71.95-37.17 0.00 QUANTITY JUN AUG TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)  
-4.81 -5.46 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)  
-51.65 -57.47 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)  
-33.10 -38.85 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)  
-18.55 -18.62 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H311 of H344 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL LAKE TEMP @ INLET LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)(F)(F)95.8 128.0 99.0 92.2 106.0 92.3 84.0 94 .4 85.1 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H312 of H344 I Program : LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 11 Date 04/07/2006 Time : 09:41:26.35 Case 06ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat TOTAL CUMULATIVE  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
QUANTITY MAXIMUM VALUE MINIMUM DATE VALUE ( DATE AVERAGE VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 6181954)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 690.00 6181954)TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 82.99 6181954)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 423.27 6181954)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 74.69 6181954)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 381.00 6181954)CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 6181954)PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 6181954)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 6181954)SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.15 7171954)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -0.52 6291954)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)  
 
-0.27 6221954)EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)  
QUANTITY                           MAXIMUM                 MINIMUM                AVERAGE VALUE   DATE           VALUE ( DATE           VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)         20.00   6181954)       20.00  6181954)        20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)           690.00   6181954)       688.54  7171954)      689.23 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)           82.99   6181954)       80.61  7171954)        81.73 TOTAL VOLUME     (ACRE-FT)           423.27   6181954)       304.09  7171954)      360.30 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)           74.69   6181954)       72.55  7171954)        73.55 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)             381.00   6181954)       273.64  7171954)      324.25 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)           0.00   6181954)         0.00  6181954)          0.00 PRECIPITATION         (CFS)           0.00  6181954)          0.00 6181954)         0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL         (CFS)           0.00   6181954)         0.00  6181954)          0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)          -0.15   7171954)       -0.20  6181954)        -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)               -0.52   6291954)       -5.34  6271954)        -1.83 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)               -0.27   6221954)       -4.09  6271954)        -1.21 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)               -0.14   6181954)       -1.97  6181954)        -0.62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL       (CFS)           0.00   6181954)         0.00  6181954)          0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)             451.13   6191954)       90.18  7071954)      223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)               159.72   6181954)       137.02  7071954)      146.51 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)               266.48   6271954)       17.56  6221954)        79.38 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)               37.73   6271954)       -46.97  7121954)          2.24 LAKE TEMP NATURAL         (F)         96.39   6181954)       75.47  7071954)        84.47 LAKE TEMP @ INLET         (F)       134.78   6181954)       84.76  7071954)        95.35 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET       (F)         99.96   6181954)       75.91  7071954)        85.57 DISSOLVED SOLIDS     (PPM)           0.00   6181954)         0.00  6181954)          0.00 QUANTITY                           MAXIMUM                 MINIMUM                    TOTAL VALUE (  DATE          VALUE ( DATE           VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP    (ACRE-FT)            0.00   6181954)          0.00 6181954)          0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)              0.00  6181954)          0.00  6181954)          0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)              -0.04  7171954)        -0.05  6181954)      -10.27 TOTAL  EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)              -0.13  6291954)        -1.32  6271954)      -109.12 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)              -0.07  6221954)       -1.01  6271954)       -71.95 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)             -0.04  6181954)       -0 .49  6181954)       -37.17 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00  6181954)         0.00  6181954)         0.00 TEMPERATURE                        FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I                                                                  PROJECT NO. 11333-297
-0.14 6181954)BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 6181954)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 451.13 6191954)SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 159.72 6181954)EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 266.48 6271954)COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 37.73 6271954)LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 96.39 6181954)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 134.78 6181954)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.96 6181954)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 6181954)QUANTITY MAXIMUM VALUE ( DATE 20.00 688.54 80.61 304.09 72.55 273.64 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.20-5.34-4.09-1.97 0.00 90.18 137.02 17.56-46.97 75.47 84.76 75.91 0.00 6181954)7171954)7171954)7171954)7171954)7171954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6271954)6271954)6181954)6181954)7071954)7071954)6221954)7121954)7071954)7071954)7071954)6181954)20.00 689.23 81.73 360.30 73.55 324.25 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.83-1.21-0.62 0.00 223.80 146.51 79.38 2.24 84.47 95.35 85.57 0.00 TOTAL VALUE MINIMUM VALUE ( DATE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954)TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954)TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)
 
-0.04 7171954)TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                    REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H313 of H344 I 1%    5%  50%
-0.13 6291954)TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL    (F)  95.8  92.2 84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET    (F) 128.0 106.0 94.4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET  (F)  99.0 92.3 85.1 Program  LAKET                                                                    Page :          1 Number    03.7.292-2.2 0                                                           Date : 04/07/2006 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
-0.07 6221954)TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
 
-0.04 6181954)TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954)TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 0.00 0.00-0.05-1.32-1.01-0 .49 0.00 6181954)6181954)6181954)6271954)6271954)6181954)6181954)0.00 0.00-10.27-109.12-71.95-37.17 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 95.8 92.2 84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 106.0 94.4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 92.3 85.1 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H313 of H344 I Program LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Page : 1 Date : 04/07/2006 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H314 ofH344 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 09:43:32.15 Case 18e: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate 1 2 3 4 5 061854 071754 1 1 0 20.1 0.2 5 6 2 6 690 81.35 341.4 689 79.75 260.8 688 78.15 181.9 687 29.70 102.2 686 22.22 60.0 685 13.42 43.8 1 0 3 96.8 92.3 1 0 3 500.90 0 73.21 71.78 70.34 26.73 20.00 12.08 19 20 307.2 234.7 163.7 92.0 54.0 39.4 21 7 8 999 FPLANT TPRISE 35.26 28.79 16.68 16.28 15.32 14.97 14.53 14.29 13.88 13.45 13.30 13.30 13.30 13.24 12.73 12.73 12.57 12.43 12.24 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.01 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 R/I S/I 86.0 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 11.49 11.49 11.09 11.07 11.07 11.07 11.07 10.87 10.86 10.86 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.27 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.72 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H315 of H344 1 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.40 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H316 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.15 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.72 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H317 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.52 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H318 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H314 ofH344 Created  : 11/18/2004    08:08:26                                                                Time : 09:43:32.15 Case 18e:  LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate 1
CALCULATION NO, L-002457 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.44 END REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H319 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H320 of H344 Program: LAKET Page: 7 Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created: 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time :09:43:32.15 Case 18e: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate RUN 30 DAYS FROM 61854 TO 71754 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT
2        061854  071754      1        1      0    3 3        1    0        20.
: 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT 20.00 DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION
4        1        0.2        5 500.      0 5        6        2          6 90 690 81.35      341.4      73.21  307.2 689 79.75      260.8      71.78  234.7 688 78.15      181.9      70.34  163.7 687 29.70      102.2      26.73  92.0 686 22.22      60.0       20.00   54.0 685 13.42      43.8        12.08  39.4 7        1        0   3        19      20    21 8        96.8    92.3 999 FPLANT R/I       86.0 TPRISE S/I 35.26 28.79 16.68 16.28 15.32 14.97 14.53 14.29 13.88 13.45 13.30 13.30 13.30 13.24 12.73 12.73 12.57 12.43 12.24 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.01 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 I                                                            PROJECT NO. 11333-297
= 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 81.350 341.400 73.210 307.200 689.000 79.750 260.800 71.780 234.700 688.000 78.150 181.900 70.340 163.700 687.000 29.700 102.200 26.730 92.000 686.000 22.220 60.000 20.000 54.000 685.000 13.420 43.800 12.080 39.400 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
 
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H315 of H344 1I 11.49 11.49 11.09 11.07 11.07 11.07 11.07 10.87 10.86 10.86 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.27 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.72 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 I                           PROJECT NO. 11333-297
19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)21 LAKE TEMP @ DAM (F)INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 96.80 92.30 WEATHER STATION ID 93822.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H321 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 8 Date : 04/07/2006 Time : 09:43:32.15 Case 18e: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate FPLANT 61854 -TPRISE 61854 -71754 R/I 71754 S/I 86.000 35.260 15.320 13.880 13.300 12.570 12.020 11.490 11.490 11.090 11.070 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.400 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 8.850 8.850 8.850 28.790 14.970 13.450 13.240 12.430 12.020 11.490 11.490 11.070 10.870 10.500 10. 500 10.500 10.500 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9. 190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 8.850 8.850 8.850 16.680 14.530 13.300 12.730 12.240 12.020 11.490 11.490 11.070 10.860 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.720 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.150 8.850 8.850 8.850 16.280 14.290 13.300 12.730 12.020 12.010 11.490 11.490 11.070 10.860 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.270 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.700 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.850 8.850 8.720 8.700 8.700 8. 700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 REVISION NO. 8 8.850 8.850 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8. 520 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.850 8.850 8.700 8.700 8.700 8. 700 8.700 8.700 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 ATTACHMENT H, 8.850 8.850 8.700 8.700 8.700 8. 700 8.700 8.700 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.440 PAGE NO. H322 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H323 of H344 I Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 9 Date : 04/07/2006 Time 09:43:32.18 Case 18e: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate SEASONAL  
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H316 of H344 I 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.40 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 I                           PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H317 of H344 II 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.15 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.72 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H318 of H344 I 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.52 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 I                          PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                      1
 
CALCULATION NO, L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H319 of H344 I 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.44 END I                            PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                      REVISION NO. 8               ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H320 of H344 Program: LAKET                                                                                            Page:          7 Number    : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                Date : 04/07/2006 Created: 11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                              Time :09:43:32.15 Case 18e:    LaSalle UHS  (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap;  Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate RUN      30 DAYS FROM      61854 TO    71754 PLOT FILE OPTION :    1 CYCLE FLAG:    1 CIRCULATION  TIME FLAG:  0 TIME INCREMENT      : 3 TIME UNITS:    2 WEATHER FILE OPTION:    1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION:    0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT        20.00 DENSITY:        62.40 SEEPAGE:          0.20 LAKE LENGTH:      5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION      =    690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION      TOTAL AREA    TOTAL VOLUME        EFF AREA      EFF VOLUME 690.000            81.350          341.400        73.210        307.200 689.000            79.750          260.800        71.780        234.700 688.000            78.150          181.900        70.340        163.700 687.000            29.700          102.200        26.730          92.000 686.000            22.220          60.000        20.000          54.000 685.000            13.420          43.800        12.080          39.400 PLOT FILE FREQENCY      1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)
PLOT FILE FORMAT        0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE:       3 PLOT VARIABLES:
19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET      (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET      (F) 21 LAKE TEMP @ DAM        (F)
INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS.    =         96.80    92.30 WEATHER STATION ID    93822.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H321 of H344 Program  LAKET                                                                                          Page :          8 Number    03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                  Date : 04/07/2006 Created  11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                             Time : 09:43:32.15 Case 18e:  LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate FPLANT 61854 -    71754    R/I              86.000 TPRISE 61854 -    71754    S/I              35.260              28.790              16.680        16.280 15.320              14.970              14.530        14.290 13.880              13.450              13.300        13.300 13.300              13.240              12.730        12.730 12.570              12.430              12.240        12.020 12.020              12.020              12.020        12.010 11.490              11.490              11.490        11.490 11.490              11.490              11.490        11.490 11.090              11.070              11.070        11.070 11.070              10.870              10.860        10.860 10.500              10.500              10.500        10.500 10.500              10. 500            10.500        10.500 10.500              10.500              10.500        10.500 10.500             10.500             10.500       10.270 9.990               9.990               9.990         9.990 9.990               9.990              9.990        9.990 9.990              9.990              9.990        9.990 9.990              9.990              9.990        9.990 9.990              9.990              9.720        9.700 9.700              9.700              9.700        9.700 9.540              9.540              9.540        9.540 9.540              9.540              9.540        9.540 9.540              9.540              9.540        9.540 9.400              9.190              9.190        9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190        9.190 9.190               9.190               9.190         9.190 9.190               9.190               9.190         9.190 9.190               9.190               9.190         9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190        9.190 9.190              9. 190              9.190        9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190        9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190        9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190         9.190 9.190               9.190               9.190         9.190 9.190               9.190               9.150        8.850 8.850              8.850              8.850         8.850 8.850               8.850              8.850        8.850 8.850              8.850              8.850        8.850 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457        REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H322 of H344 I 8.850        8.850            8.850          8.850 8.850        8.850            8.850          8.850 8.720        8.700             8.700         8.700 8.700        8.700            8.700          8.700 8.700        8.700            8.700          8.700
: 8. 700      8.700            8. 700        8. 700 8.700        8.700            8.700          8.700 8.700        8.700            8.700         8.700 8.700       8. 520            8.490          8.490 8.490       8.490             8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490             8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490             8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490        8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490        8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490       8.490             8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490             8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490             8.490         8.490 8.490        8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490       8.490             8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490             8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490             8.490         8.440 I                                  PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                          REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H323 of H344 I Program    LAKET                                                                                            Page :          9 Number    03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                    Date : 04/07/2006 Created   11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                               Time   09:43:32.18 Case 18e:   LaSalle UHS     (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap;     Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
FOR SUMMER ( 6/1954 -8/1954 )QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
FOR SUMMER       (   6/1954 - 8/1954   )
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
QUANTITY                                         MONTHLY AVERAGES                 AVERAGE JUN             JUL             AUG       VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT     (FT)             20.00          20.00            0 .00        20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)             689.62        688.93            0.00        689.23 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)               80.75          79.64            0.00        80.12 TOTAL VOLUME   (ACRE-FT)             311.10        255.47            0.00        279.57 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)               72.67          71.68            0.00        72.11 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)               279.94        229. 90          0.00        251.58 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)             0.00          0.00            0.00          0.00 PRECIPITATION       (CFS)               0.00          0.00            0.00          0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL         (CFS)               0.00          0.00            0.00          0.00 SEEPAGE             (CFS)             -0.18          -0.15            0.00         -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                -1.95         -1. 68          0.00         -1.80 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                -1.23          - .13            0 .00       -1.18 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                -0.72          -0.55            0.00         -0.62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL      (CFS)              0.00           0.00           0.00         0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)                226.40        221.82            0.00        223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                147.50        145. 43           0.00        146.33 EVAP  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                81.97          76. 30          0.00         78.76 COND  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                3.45          0.93            0.00         2.02 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)            85.38          83.46            0 .00       84.29 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)            97.62          93.16            0 .00       95.09 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET      (F)            86.44          84.50            0.00         85.34 DISSOLVED SOLIDS    (PPM)              0.00           0.00           0.00         0.00 QUANTITY                                        MONTHLY TOTALS                      TOTAL JUN            JUL            AUG        VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP  (ACRE-FT)                0.00           0.00           0 .00         0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00           0.00           0.00         0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)                -4.73          -5.15            0.00         -9.89 TOTAL  EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)              -50.36        -56.78            0.00       -107.14 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)              -31.83        -38.14            0.00       -69.97 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)              -18.53        -18.64           0.00       -37.17 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)                0.00           0.00           0.00          0.00 TEMPERATURE                          FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I                                                                     PROJECT NO. 11333-297
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
B CALCULATION NO. L-002457                   REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H324 of H344 I 1%     5% 50%
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)   96.0 91.7 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 105.5 94 .4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)   99.0 92.6 85.2 I                                               PROJECT NO. 11333-297
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)QUANTITY TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                       REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H325 of H344 Program   LAKET                                                                                        Page :          10 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                               Date  04/07/2006 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                         Time   09:43:32.18 Case 18e:   LaSalle UHS     (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  
TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)
TEMPERATURE 20.00 689.62 80.75 311.10 72.67 279.94 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.18-1.95-1.23-0.72 0.00 226.40 147.50 81.97 3.45 85.38 97.62 86.44 0.00 JUN 0.00 0.00-4.73-50.36-31.83-18.53 0.00 20.00 688.93 79.64 255.47 71.68 229. 90 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.15-1. 68-.13-0.55 0.00 221.82 145. 43 76. 30 0.93 83.46 93.16 84.50 0.00 MONTHLY TOTALS JUL 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 AUG 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 689.23 80.12 279.57 72.11 251.58 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.80-1.18-0.62 0.00 223.80 146.33 78.76 2.02 84.29 95.09 85.34 0.00 TOTAL VALUE 0.00 0.00-5.15-56.78-38.14-18.64 0.00 0.00 0.00-9.89-107.14-69.97-37.17 0.00 FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 B CALCULATION NO. L-002457 1% 5%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 96.0 91.7 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 105.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 92.6 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H324 of H344 I 50%84.1 94 .4 85.2 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H325 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 10 Date 04/07/2006 Time 09:43:32.18 Case 18e: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
: SUMMER QUANTITY JUN MONTHLY AVERAGES JUL AUG AVERAGE VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
:       SUMMER QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY AVERAGES               AVERAGE JUN          JUL         AUG         VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)           20.00        20.00          0.00        20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)           689.62        688. 93        0.00        689.23 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             80.75        79. 64        0.00        80.12 TOTAL VOLUME     (ACRE-FT)           311.10        255. 47        0.00        279.57 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             72.67        71.68          0.00        72.11 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)               279. 94      229. 90        0.00        251.58 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)           0.00          0.00          0.00          0.00 PRECIPITATION         (CFS)             0.00          0.00          0.00          0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL         (CFS)             0.00         0.00         0.00         0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)            -0.18         -0.15          0.00         -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                -1.95        -1. 68         0.00         -1.80 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                -1 23        -1. 13         0.00         -1.18 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                -0.72        -0.55          0.00         -0.62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)            0.00         0.00         0.00         0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)              226.40        221.82          0.00       223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                147.50        145.43          0.00       146.33 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                81.97        76.30          0.00         78.76 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                  3.45          0.93          0.00         2.02 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)          85.38        83.46          0.00         84.29 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)          97. 62        93. 16        0.00         95.09 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)          86.44        84.50          0.00         85.34 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)            0.00         0.00         0.00         0.00 QUANTITY                                        MONTHLY TOTALS                  TOTAL JUN          JUL          AUG        VALUE TOTAL PRECIP   (ACRE-FT)             0.00          0.00         0.00          0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00          0.00          0.00         0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)               -4.73         -5.15         0.00        -9.89 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)             -50.36       -56.78         0.00      -107.14 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)             -31.83       -38.14         0.00        -69.97 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)             -18.53       -18.64         0.00        -37.17 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00         0.00         0.00         0.00 TEMPERATURE                         FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I                                                                   PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                     1
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
 
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                     REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H326 of H344 1%     5% 50%
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)  96.0  91.7  84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)  128.0  105.5  94 .4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)   99.0   92.6 85.2 I                                               PROJECT NO. 11333-297
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                       REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H327 of H344 I Program     LAKET                                                                                             Page :        11 Number   : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                     Date  04/07/2006 Created     11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                               Time   09:43:32.18 Case 18e:   LaSalle UHS     (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate TOTAL CUMULATIVE  
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)20.00 689.62 80.75 311.10 72.67 279. 94 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.18-1.95-1 23-0.72 0.00 226.40 147.50 81.97 3.45 85.38 97. 62 86.44 0.00 20.00 688. 93 79. 64 255. 47 71.68 229. 90 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.15-1. 68-1. 13-0.55 0.00 221.82 145.43 76.30 0.93 83.46 93. 16 84.50 0.00 MONTHLY TOTALS JUL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AUG 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 689.23 80.12 279.57 72.11 251.58 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.80-1.18-0.62 0.00 223.80 146.33 78.76 2.02 84.29 95.09 85.34 0.00 TOTAL VALUE QUANTITY JUN TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)  
-4.73 -5.15 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)  
-50.36 -56.78 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)  
-31.83 -38.14 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)  
-18.53 -18.64 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-9.89-107.14-69.97-37.17 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H326 of H344 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL LAKE TEMP @ INLET LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)(F)(F)96.0 128.0 99.0 91.7 105.5 92.6 84.1 94 .4 85.2 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 Program LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H327 of H344 I Page : 11 Date 04/07/2006 Time 09:43:32.18 Case 18e: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate TOTAL CUMULATIVE  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
QUANTITY ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
 
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
QUANTITY                             MAXIMUM                MINIMUM                AVERAGE VALUE (  DATE          VALUE  (  DATE  )      VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)           20.00  6181954)        20.00    6181954)      20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)           690.00  6181954)      688.54    7171954)      689.23 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             81.35  6181954)        79.01    7171954)      80 .12 TOTAL VOLUME     (ACRE-FT)           341.18  6181954)      224.36    7171954)      279.57 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             73.21  6181954)       71.11    7171954)      72. 11 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)               307.00  6181954)       201.91    7171954)     251.58 CIRCULATION TIME        (HR)           0.00  6181954)          0.00  6181954)        0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)             0.00  6181954)         0.00  6181954)         0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL         (CFS)             0.00  6181954)          0.00  6181954)        0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)            -0.14  7171954)       -0.20    6181954)       -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                -0.48  6291954)       -5.39    6271954)       -1.80 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)               -0.24  6291954)       -4.14    6271954)       -1.18 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)               -0.14  6181954)        -2.08    6181954)      -0 .62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)             0.00   6181954)          0.00   6181954)        0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)              451.13  6191954)        90.18    7071954)      223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                159.94   6181954)      134.94    7071954)      146.33 EVAP  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)              275.39  6271954)        16.21    6291954)      78.76 COND  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)               37.16  6271954)       -47.13    7121954)         2.02 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)         96.58  6181954)       73.43    7071954)       84.29 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)         134.67  6181954)       82.31    7071954)       95.09 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)         99.96  6181954)       73.50    7071954)       85.34 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)             0.00  6181954)         0.00  6181954)         0.00 QUANTITY                            MAXIMUM                MINIMUM                  TOTAL VALUE (  DATE          VALUE (  DATE          VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP    (ACRE-FT)             0.00  6181954)         0.00   6181954)         0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00   6181954)         0.00   6181954)         0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)               -0.03  7171954)       -0.05    6181954)       -9.89 TOTAL  EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)               -0.12  6291954)       -1 34    6271954)   -107.14 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)               -0.06  6291954)       -1.03    6271954)     -69.97 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)              -0.03  6181954)        -0.52    6181954)     -37.17 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00   6181954)         0.00   6181954)        0.00 TEMPERATURE                          FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES IPROJECT                                                                      NO. 11333-297
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                  REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H328 of H344 I 1%    5%  50%
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL  (F)  96.0   91.7 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET  (F)  128.0  105.5 94.4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)  99.0  92.6 85.2 Program  : LAKET                                                                  Page I                                              PROJECT NO. 11333-297
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)QUANTITY MAXIMUM VALUE ( DATE MINIMUM AVERAGE VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE 20.00 690.00 81.35 341.18 73.21 307.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.14-0.48-0.24-0.14 0.00 451.13 159.94 275.39 37.16 96.58 134.67 99.96 0.00 6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)7171954)6291954)6291954)6181954)6181954)6191954)6181954)6271954)6271954)6181954)6181954)6181954)6181954)20.00 6181954)688.54 7171954)79.01 7171954)224.36 7171954)71.11 7171954)201.91 7171954)0.00 6181954)0.00 6181954)0.00 6181954)-0.20 6181954)-5.39 6271954)-4.14 6271954)-2.08 6181954)0.00 6181954)90.18 7071954)134.94 7071954)16.21 6291954)-47.13 7121954)73.43 7071954)82.31 7071954)73.50 7071954)0.00 6181954)MINIMUM VALUE ( DATE 20.00 689.23 80 .12 279.57 72. 11 251.58 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.80-1.18-0 .62 0.00 223.80 146.33 78.76 2.02 84.29 95.09 85.34 0.00 TOTAL VALUE MAXIMUM VALUE ( DATE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                  REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H329 of H344 i Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                           Date : 04/07/2006 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                    Time : 09:56:32.71 Case 0609:    LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate 1
SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
2      070100 080500        1        1      0      3      2 3      1    0        20 4      1        0.2        5500.       0 5      6        2          690 690 82.99        423.5      74.69  381.2 689 81.35        341.4      73.21  307.2 688 79.75        260.8      71.78  234.7 687 78.15        181.9      70.34  163.7 686 29.70        102.2      26.73  92.0 685 22.22        60.0       20.00  54.0 7       1         0    3        19      20    21 8      97.5     93.0 999 FPLANT R/I       86.0 TPRISE  S/I 35.26 28.79
EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
: 16. 68 16.28 15.32
EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
: 14. 97 14.53 14.29 13.88 13.45 13.30 13.30 13.30 13.24 12.73 12.73 12.57 12.43 12.24 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.01 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 I                                                              PROJECT NO. 11333-297
BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00-0.03-0.12-0.06-0.03 0.00 6181954)6181954)7171954)6291954)6291954)6181954)6181954)0.00 0.00-0.05-1 34-1.03-0.52 0.00 6181954)6181954)6181954)6271954)6271954)6181954)6181954)0.00 0.00-9.89-107.14-69.97-37.17 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES IPROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 1%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 96.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H328 of H344 I 5% 50%91.7 84.1 105.5 94.4 92.6 85.2 Program : LAKET Page I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H329 of H344 i Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Date : 04/07/2006 Time : 09:56:32.71 Case 0609: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate 1 2 070100 080500 1 1 0 3 2 3 1 0 20 4 1 0.2 5500. 0 5 6 2 690 690 82.99 423.5 689 81.35 341.4 688 79.75 260.8 687 78.15 181.9 686 29.70 102.2 685 22.22 60.0 1 0 3 97.5 93.0 74.69 73.21 71.78 70.34 26.73 20.00 19 20 381.2 307.2 234.7 163.7 92.0 54.0 21 7 8 999 FPLANT TPRISE 35.26 28.79 16. 68 16.28 15.32 14. 97 14.53 14.29 13.88 13.45 13.30 13.30 13.30 13.24 12.73 12.73 12.57 12.43 12.24 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.01 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 R/I S/I 86.0 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.09 11.07 11.07 11.07 11.07 10.87 10.86 10.86 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.27 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.72 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H330 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.70 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.40 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H331 of H344 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.15 8.85 8.85 8 .85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.72 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8 .70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H332 of H344 I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
 
I ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.52 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H333 of H344 I I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.44 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8,22 8,22 8.22 8,22 8,22 8,22 8,22 8.22 8.22 8,22 8,22 8.22 8,22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H334 of H344 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 END REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H335 of H344 I I I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H330 of H344 I 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.09 11.07 11.07 11.07 11.07 10.87 10.86 10.86 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.27 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.72 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 I                          PROJECT NO. 11333-297
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H336 of H344 Program : LAKET Page : 7 Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 09:56:32.71 Case 0609: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate RUN 36 DAYS FROM 70100 TO 80500 PLOT FILE OPTION 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT
 
: 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT 20.00 DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION  
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H331 of H344 I 9.70 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.40 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
= 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 82.990 423.500 74.690 381.200 689.000 81.350 341.400 73.210 307.200 688.000 79.750 260.800 71.780 234.700 687.000 78.150 181.900 70.340 163.700 686.000 29.700 102.200 26.730 92.000 685.000 22.220 60.000 20.000 54.000 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
 
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H332 of H344 I 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.15 8.85 8.85 8 .85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.72 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8 .70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 I                            PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                      1
19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)21 LAKE TEMP @ DAM (F)INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. 97.50 93.00 WEATHER STATION ID 0.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 Program LAKET Number : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H337 of H344 I Page : 8 Date :04/07/2006 Time 09:56:32.71 Case 0609: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate FPLANT 70100 -TPRISE 70100 -80500 R/I 80500 S/I 86.000 35.260 15.320 13.880 13.300 12.570 12.020 11.490 11.490 11.090 11.070 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.400 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 8.850 8.850 8.850 28.790 14.970 13.450 13.240 12.430 12.020 11.490 11.490 11.070 10.870 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 8.850 8.850 8.850 16.680 14.530 13.300 12.730 12.240 12.020 11.490 11.490 11.070 10.860 10.500 10.500 10. 500 10.500 9. 990 9.990 9. 990 9.990 9.720 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.150 8.850 8.850 8.850 16.280 14.290 13.300 12.730 12.020 12.010 11.490 11.490 11.070 10.860 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.270 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.700 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.850 8.850 8.720 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8 .490 8 .490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 REVISION NO. 8 8.850 8.850 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.520 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.850 8.850 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.490 8.490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8 .490 8 .490 8 .490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H338 of H344 8.050 8.850 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.440 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H339 of H344 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 9 Date 04/07/2006 Time 09:56:32.75 Case 0609: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate SEASONAL  
 
I ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H333 of H344 II 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.52 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 I                          PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H334 of H344 I 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.44 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8,22 8,22 8.22 8,22 8,22 8,22 8,22 8.22 8.22 8,22 8,22 8.22 8,22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H335 of H344 II 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 END I                            PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                        1
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                       REVISION NO. 8               ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H336 of H344 Program   : LAKET                                                                                           Page :           7 Number   : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                 Date : 04/07/2006 Created     11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                             Time   09:56:32.71 Case 0609:   LaSalle UHS   (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp;   Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate RUN     36 DAYS FROM     70100 TO       80500 PLOT FILE OPTION       1 CYCLE FLAG:   1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG:     0 TIME INCREMENT     : 3 TIME UNITS:     2 WEATHER FILE OPTION:     1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION:     0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       20.00 DENSITY:         62.40 SEEPAGE:           0.20 LAKE LENGTH:       5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION       =     690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION       TOTAL AREA   TOTAL VOLUME         EFF AREA     EFF VOLUME 690.000           82.990           423.500         74.690         381.200 689.000           81.350           341.400         73.210         307.200 688.000           79.750           260.800         71.780         234.700 687.000           78.150           181.900         70.340         163.700 686.000           29.700           102.200         26.730         92.000 685.000           22.220             60.000         20.000         54.000 PLOT FILE FREQENCY       1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)
PLOT FILE FORMAT         0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)
NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE:         3 PLOT VARIABLES:
19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET       (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET     (F) 21 LAKE TEMP @ DAM         (F)
INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS.               97.50   93.00 WEATHER STATION ID         0.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                   REVISION NO. 8                    ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H337 of H344 I Program     LAKET                                                                                           Page :          8 Number   : 03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                   Date :04/07/2006 Created     11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                             Time   09:56:32.71 Case 0609:   LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate FPLANT 70100 -     80500   R/I             86.000 TPRISE 70100 -      80500   S/I             35.260             28.790              16.680          16.280 15.320             14.970              14.530          14.290 13.880             13.450              13.300         13.300 13.300              13.240              12.730          12.730 12.570              12.430              12.240          12.020 12.020              12.020              12.020          12.010 11.490             11.490             11.490          11.490 11.490              11.490              11.490          11.490 11.090              11.070              11.070          11.070 11.070              10.870              10.860          10.860 10.500             10.500             10.500         10.500 10.500              10.500              10.500          10.500 10.500              10.500              10. 500        10.500 10.500              10.500              10.500          10.270 9.990               9.990               9. 990         9.990 9.990               9.990              9.990          9.990 9.990              9.990              9. 990          9.990 9.990              9.990              9.990          9.990 9.990              9.990              9.720          9.700 9.700              9.700              9.700          9.700 9.540              9.540              9.540          9.540 9.540              9.540              9.540          9.540 9.540              9.540              9.540          9.540 9.400              9.190              9.190          9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190          9.190 9.190              9.190               9.190           9.190 9.190               9.190               9.190           9.190 9.190               9.190               9.190           9.190 9.190               9.190              9.190          9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190          9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190          9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190          9.190 9.190              9.190              9.190          9.190 9.190              9.190               9.190           9.190 9.190               9.190               9.150          8.850 8.850              8.850              8.850          8.850 8.850              8.850               8.850           8.850 8.850              8.850              8.850          8.850 I                                                              PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457        REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H338 of H344 8.850        8.850          8.850          8.050 8.850        8.850          8.850          8.850 8.720        8.700          8.700         8.700 8.700        8.700          8.700          8.700 8.700        8.700          8.700          8.700 8.700        8.700          8.700          8.700 8.700        8.700            8.700          8.700 8.700        8.700            8.700         8.700 8.700       8.520            8.490          8.490 8.490         8.490           8.490         8.490 8.490         8.490           8.490         8.490 8.490         8.490           8 .490         8.490 8.490       8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490        8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490        8.490            8.490          8.490 8.490        8.490            8 .490        8.490 8 .490      8.490            8 .490        8.490 8 .490      8.490            8 .490        8.490 8.490        8.490            8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490           8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490           8.490         8.490 8.490       8.490           8.490         8.440 8.220       8.220           8.220         8.220 8.220       8.220           8.220         8.220 8.220       8.220           8.220         8.220 8.220        8.220            8.220          8.220 8.220        8.220            8.220          8.220 8.220        8.220            8.220          8.220 8.220        8.220            8.220          8.220 8.220        8.220            8.220          8.220 8.220        8.220           8.220         8.220 8.220       8.220           8.220         8.220 8.220       8.220           8.220         8.220 8.220       8.220            8.220          8.220 I                                  PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                          REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H339 of H344 Program    LAKET                                                                                            Page :          9 Number    03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                  Date  04/07/2006 Created   11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                             Time   09:56:32.75 Case 0609:   LaSalle UHS     (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp;   Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
FOR SUMMER (QUANTITY 6/1900 -JUN 8/1900 )MONTHLY AVERAGES JUL AUG AVERAGE VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 0.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 0.00 689.29 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 0.00 81.83 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 0.00 365.53 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 0.00 73.65 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 0.00 328.96 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) 0.00 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 -1.62 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 -0.97 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) 0.00 -0.64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 219.94 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 153.43 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 63.62 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 5.18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 0.00 90.79 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 0.00 101.45 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 0.00 91.70 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 688.57 689.19 80.66 81. 67 306.60 357.34 72.59 73.50 275.90 321.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.15 -0.17-1.32 -1.58-0.77 -0.94-0.55 -0.63 0.00 0.00 214.31 219.16 152.11 153.24 50.87 61.85 5.08 5.16 89.62 90.63 98.76 101.08 90.57 91.54 0.00 0.00 TOTAL AUG VALUE QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS JUL JUN TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) 0.00 -10.76 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -99.48 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -59.82 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -39.66 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 0.00 0.00-1.48-13.08-7.60-5.48 0.00 0.00 0.00-12.23-112.56-67. 42-45.14 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H340 of H344 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL LAKE TEMP @ INLET LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)(F)(F)97.0 128.0 99.0 95.9 109.4 97.1 90.9 100.9 91.9 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H341 of H344 7 Program Number Created LAKET 03.7.292-2.2 0 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Page : 10 Date : 04/07/2006 Time : 09:56:32.75 Case 0609: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  
FOR SUMMER       (   6/1900 - 8/1900   )
QUANTITY                                        MONTHLY AVERAGES                 AVERAGE JUN            JUL             AUG       VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)           0.00         20.00          20.00        20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)             0.00       689.29           688.57      689.19 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             0.00         81.83           80.66        81. 67 TOTAL VOLUME   (ACRE-FT)               0.00       365.53           306.60      357.34 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             0.00         73.65           72.59        73.50 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)                 0.00       328.96           275.90      321.59 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)           0.00          0.00           0.00          0.00 PRECIPITATION         (CFS)             0.00          0.00            0.00         0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL         (CFS)             0.00           0.00            0.00          0.00 SEEPAGE               (CFS)             0.00         -0.17          -0.15        -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                 0.00         -1.62           -1.32        -1.58 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                 0.00         -0.97           -0.77        -0.94 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                 0.00         -0.64           -0.55        -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL       (CFS)             0.00          0.00           0.00          0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)                 0.00       219.94           214.31      219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 0.00       153.43           152.11      153.24 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 0.00         63.62           50.87        61.85 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                 0.00           5.18           5.08          5.16 LAKE TEMP NATURAL         (F)           0.00         90.79           89.62        90.63 LAKE TEMP @ INLET         (F)           0.00         101.45           98.76      101.08 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET       (F)           0.00         91.70           90.57        91.54 DISSOLVED SOLIDS     (PPM)             0.00           0.00           0.00         0.00 QUANTITY                                        MONTHLY  TOTALS                    TOTAL JUN            JUL            AUG        VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP  (ACRE-FT)              0.00           0.00           0.00         0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00           0.00           0.00         0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)               0.00       -10.76           -1.48      -12.23 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00       -99.48           -13.08      -112.56 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)               0.00       -59.82           -7.60      -67. 42 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)               0.00       -39.66           -5.48      -45.14 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)               0.00           0.00           0.00         0.00 TEMPERATURE                          FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I                                                                   PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                     REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H340 of H344 1%     5%   50%
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)  97.0  95.9  90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)  128.0  109.4  100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)   99.0   97.1   91.9 I                                               PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                       REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H341 of H344 7 Program   LAKET                                                                                        Page :        10 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                               Date : 04/07/2006 Created    11/18/2004 08:08:26                                                                           Time : 09:56:32.75 Case 0609:   LaSalle UHS     (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate CUMULATIVE SEASONAL  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
: SUMMER QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES JUL JUN AUG ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
:       SUMMER QUANTITY                                       MONTHLY AVERAGES               AVERAGE JUN            JUL             AUG       VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT       (FT)           0.00        20.00          20.00        20.00 LAKE ELEVATION     (FEET)             0.00        689.29        688.57        689.19 TOTAL AREA         (ACRE)             0.00        81.83          80.66        81.67 TOTAL VOLUME   (ACRE-FT)             0.00        365.53        306.60        357.34 EFFECTIVE AREA     (ACRE)             0.00        73.65          72.59        73. 50 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)               0.00        328.96        275.90        321.59 CIRCULATION TIME       (HR)           0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)            0.00         0.00           0 .00         0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL          (CFS)            0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)            0.00         -0.17          -0.15        -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)                0.00         -1.62         -1 32        -1.58 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                0.00         -0.97         -0.77        -0.94 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)                0.00         -0.64          -0.55        -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)            0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)                0.00       219. 94        214.31        219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)                0.00       153.43        152.11        153.24 EVAP  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)              0.00         63.62          50.87        61.85 COND  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)              0.00         5.18            5.08         5.16 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)          0.00         90.79          89.62        90.63 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)          0.00       101.45          98.76        101.08 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)          0.00         91.70          90.57        91.54 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)            0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 QUANTITY                                      MONTHLY TOTALS                    TOTAL JUN            JUL            AUG        VALUE TOTAL PRECIP   (ACRE-FT)             0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)              0.00         0.00           0.00         0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)              0.00       -10.76         -1.48       -12.23 TOTAL  EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)              0.00       -99.48         -13.08       -112.56 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)              0.00        -59.82          -7 . 60     -67.42 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)              0.00        -39.66          -5.48       -45.14 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)              0.00          0.00            0.00          0.00 TEMPERATURE                         FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I                                                 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
 
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                   REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H342 of H344 I 1%     5%   50%
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)   97.0 95.9  90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 109.4 100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)   99.0 97.1   91.9 I                                             PROJECT NO. 11333-297
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
 
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                     REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H343 of H344 1 Program   : LAKET                                                                                             Page :        11 Number     03.7.292-2.2 0                                                                                   Date :04/07/2006 Created     11/28/2004 08:08:26                                                                               Time :09:56:32.75 Case 0609:   LaSalle UHS     (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate TOTAL CUMULATIVE  
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)QUANTITY 0.00 20.00 0.00 689.29 0.00 81.83 0.00 365.53 0.00 73.65 0.00 328.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.17 0.00 -1.62 0.00 -0.97 0.00 -0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 219. 94 0.00 153.43 0.00 63.62 0.00 5.18 0.00 90.79 0.00 101.45 0.00 91.70 0.00 0.00 MONTHLY TOTALS JUN JUL 20.00 688.57 80.66 306.60 72.59 275.90 0.00 0 .00 0.00-0.15-1 32-0.77-0.55 0.00 214.31 152.11 50.87 5.08 89.62 98.76 90.57 0.00 AUG AVERAGE VALUE 20.00 689.19 81.67 357.34 73. 50 321.59 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.58-0.94-0.63 0.00 219.16 153.24 61.85 5.16 90.63 101.08 91.54 0.00 TOTAL VALUE 0.00 0.00-12.23-112.56-67.42-45.14 0.00 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-10.76-99.48-59.82-39.66 0.00 0.00 0.00-1.48-13.08-7 .60-5.48 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 1% 5%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 97.0 95.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 109.4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 97.1 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H342 of H344 I 50%90.9 100.9 91.9 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 Program : LAKET Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Created 11/28/2004 08:08:26 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H343 of H344 1 Page : 11 Date :04/07/2006 Time :09:56:32.75 Case 0609: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate TOTAL CUMULATIVE  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
QUANTITY ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT)LAKE ELEVATION (FEET)TOTAL AREA (ACRE)TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT)EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE)EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)CIRCULATION TIME (HR)PRECIPITATION (CFS)MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS)SEEPAGE (CFS)EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)
EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)
BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS)SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)
SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)
LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F)LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F)LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM)QUANTITY MAXIMUM VALUE ( DATE 20.00 7011900)689.99 7011900)82.98 7011900)422.94 7011900)74.68 7011900)380.69 7011900)0.00 7011900)0.00 7011900)0.00 7011900)-0.15 8051900)-0.32 8051900)0.00 7031900)-0.26 7311900)0.00 7011900)430.59 7191900)161.26 7041900)172.30 7051900)24.99 7051900)97.72 7041900)132.96 7011900)99.98 7011900)0.00 7011900)MAXIMUM VALUE ( DATE MINIMUM VALUE ( DATE AVERAGE VALUE 20.00 688.47 80.50 298.69 72.45 268.78 0.00 0 .00 0.00-0.20-4 .06-2.67-1.53 0.00 101.21 143.56 0 .00-31 .64 81.75 91 .00 82.51 0.00 7011900)8051900)8051900)8051900)8051900)8051900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7011900)7051900)7051900)7011900)7011900)7221900)7241900)7031900)7251900)7241900)7241900)7241900)7011900)20.00 689.19 81.67 357.34 73.50 321.59 0.00 0.00 0.00-0.17-1.58-0.94-0.63 0.00 219.16 153.24 61.85 5.16 90. 63 101 .08 91.54 0.00 MINIMUM TOTAL VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT)MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)
SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)
EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)
EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)
BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00-0.04-0.08 0.00-0.07 0.00 7011900)7011900)8051900)8051900)7031900)7311900)7011900)0.00 0.00-0.05-1.01-0.66-0.38 0.00 7011900)7011900)7011900)7051900)7051900)7011900)7011900)0.00 0.00-12.23-112.56-67.42-45.14 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H344 of H344 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 97.0 95.9 90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 109.4 100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 97.1 91.9 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. I1 of 122 11.0 PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE The purpose of this attachment is to evaluate the UHS transient analyses with an allowable plant intake temperature of 104'F and an increased allowable plant intake temperature of 107 0 F for MUR PU and EPU power levels. Additionally, new weather data from January 1995 to September 2010 is considered in prediction of the UHS temperature response.
The initial lake temperature is adjusted such that the plant intake temperature remains below 104'F or 107'F during the accident scenario.12.0 METHODOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The S&L LAKET-PC computer program [Ref. 15.2] is utilized to determine the combined impact of decay heat, initial UHS temperature, and allowable sediment accumulation in the UHS. The maximum allowable UHS temperature is determined for average sediment accumulations of zero (0), six (6), twelve (12), and eighteen (18) inches.12.1 Methodology 12.1.1 Selection of Weather Data -The selection of the most limiting weather data is done in Attachment M. The worst weather day was determined to be 7/25/2001 ending at 6:00 AM and the worst weather month runs from 7/21/1995 4:00PM to 8/20/1995 3:00PM. The most limiting net evaporation month was determined to be from 6/18/1954 to 7/18/1954, which is unchanged from previous revisions of this calculation.
12.1.2 Lake Area and Volume -The initial lake elevation is 690-ft, which corresponds to the top water elevation of the UHS per the UFSAR. [Ref. 15.1]. However, UFSAR Section 9.2.6.3 [Ref. 15.1] states that 440,400 gallons of water from the UHS must be available for fire fighting following an accident (Design Input 14.3). Assuming that this inventory is removed from the UHS immediately following an accident (Assumption 13.2) leads to a decrease in the initial lake elevation of 690-ft and lake volume and area.440,400 gallons corresponds to 1.35 acre-ft of water and a 0.02-ft drop in lake elevation.
The initial lake level in the LAKET file is modified to incorporate these changes as shown in Table 12-1. The volume at an elevation of 689.98-ft is determined by subtracting the 1.35 acre-ft used in fire-fighting from the lake volume at 690-ft. The surface area is determined by interpolation using the information given in Table 7.1 of the main body of this calculation.
The effective volume and effective area are determined by multiplying the volume and surface area by the effective volume and effective area percentages determined in Attachment J (effective volume is 63.4% of total volume and effective area is 57.9% of total area).Table 12-1: Initial Lake Level e E o Effective Sediment Level Lake Elevation Area Volume Effective Area Volume (ft) (acre) (acre-ft) (acre) (acre" (acre-ft)18-in 689.98 81.32 340.0 47.08 215.59 12-in 689.98 82.12 380.5 47.55 241.24 6-in 689.98 .82.96 422.1 48.03 267.64 0-in 689.98 83.80 463.5 48.52 293.89 The remainder of the drawdown curve (from a lake elevation of 689-ft through 685-ft) remains the same as given in Table 7.1 of the main body of this calculation with respect to the total lake voluire and surface area. The effective volume and effective area are updated using the percentages determined in Attachment J.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 12 of 122 12.1.3 Plant Temperature Rise -The UHS heat load is increased due to an increase in power level. In addition, the core decay heat is changed as a result of EPU [Ref. 15.3] The new heat load on the UHS for EPU operation is determined in L-002453 [Ref. 15.4]. The plant temperature rise is dependent on the UHS heat load, and the calculation of the new plant temperature rise at MUR PU and EPU is documented in Attachment L.12.1.4 LAKET Case Runs -For the worst weather cases (cases ending with the letter a), the initial temperature for each case is iteratively set until the lake outlet temperature is equal to the maximum allowable lake outlet temperature (either 104'F or 107'F). The net evaporation cases use the same input file as the corresponding worst weather case, but are run with the most limiting net evaporation month weather file.A list of all cases run for this analysis is shown below: Table 12-2: List of LAKET Cases SPower Level Sediment Case Type Power Level Design Criteria S(MWt) Level la i Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) Pl-antInlet Temp=- 107"F 1c Worst Net Evaporation 4067 (EPU) 0" Initial Temp of Case la 2a Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 1 6" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 2c Worst Net Evaporation 4067 (EPU) 6" Initial Temp of Case 2a 3a_12am Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 1077F 3a_3am Worst Weather 4067(EPU)
-ý 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3a_6am Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F__3a_9am Worst Weather 1 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp 107'F 3a_912pm Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3a_3pm Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3a_6pm I Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3a_9pmr Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3c worst Net Evaporationj 4067 (EPU) 18" Initial Temp of Case 3a at 6AM 4a Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 12" Plant Inlet Temp = 107'F 4c Worst Net Evaporation 4067 (EPU) 12" Initial Temp of Case 4a 4la 1-F Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 0 1" Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F 1c 104F I Worst Net Evaporation 4067 (EPU) 0" Initial Temp of Case 1a_104F 2a-104F Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 6" Plant Inlet Temp = 104-F 3a_104F Worst Wether 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 104"F 4a_104F Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 12" Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F 1laMUR~ Worst Weather 3559 (MUR PU) 011 Plant Inlet Temp =107-F___cMUR 1Worst Net Evaporation 13559_(MUR PU) 0" Initial Temp of Case la_MUR 2a_ MUR Worst Weather 3559 (MUR PU) 6" Plant Inlet Temp = 1074F 3a_4MU--iR
.V-Wor-st Weather _- 3559_(MUR PU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107'F 4a MUR Worst Weather 3559 (MUR PU) 12" Plant Inlet Temp = 107'F laMUR 104F Worst Weather 3559 (MUR PU) 0" Plant Inlet Temp = 1047F I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 13 of 122 1 Power Level S Case Type (I (MWt)lc_MUR_104F Worst Net Evaporation 3559 (MUR PU)2aMUR_104F Worst Weather 3559 (MUR PU)3aMUR_104F Worst Weather 3559 (MUR PU)4a_MUR_104F Worst Weather , 3559 (MUR PU)ediment Level 0" Design Criteria 6" 18" 12" Initial Temp of Case la MUR_104F Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F Cases are run at varying times for the most limiting case, Case 3a. The purpose of this is to determine at which time an accident would provide the most limiting results. For all other cases besides Case 3a, only the time determined to be the most limiting will be used.For EPU power level and a maximum allowable lake temperature of 107'F, the worst net evaporation cases are ran for all levels of sediment.
The worst case in terms of UHS drawdown is determined from the four different sediment levels, and the remainder of the worst evaporation cases are run at this sediment level only.12.2 Acceptance Criteria 12.2.1 Acceptance Criterion
#1 -Peak Temperature
-The maximum plant inlet temperature from the UHS shall remain equal to or less than 104'F or 107°F.12.2.2 Acceptance Criterion
#2 -UHS Drawdown -There are no specific acceptance criteria for maximumn UHS lake drawdown.
However, for the worst 30-day evaporation period, the maximum lake drawdown is determined for input to calculation L-00 1355 [Ref. 15.6].12.3 Limitations Same as main body of calculation.
12.4 Identification of Computer Programs Postprocessing of the LAKET-PC results is done using Microsoft Excel 2003 [Ref. 15.5], which is commercially available.
The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all spreadsheets used in this analysis.
All computer runs were performed using PC No. ZD6661 under the Windows XP operating system.LAKET-PC Version 2.2 [Ref. 15.2] was used to perform the lake transient analysis contained in this evaluation.
This was run on S&L PC No. ZD6661 on Windows XP operating system.I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 14 of 122 13.0 ASSUMPTIONS 13.1 Fuel Pool Heat Load -It is assumed that the fuel pool emergency makeup pumps provide required makeup flow to the fuel pools. Including fuel pool heat loads is not realistic because it is improbable that the required operator actions to align the fuel pool emergency makeup pumps to the RHR system could be performed in the post-LOCA reactor building environment
[Ref. 15.3]. Therefore, the 600 gpm emergency fuel pool makeup flow rate (See Design Input 14.1) is added to the UHS seepage rate.13.2 UHS Inventory for Fire Fighting -It is assumed that all UHS inventory for fire fighting is used immediately following an accident.
This is conservative as it decreases the volume of water in the UHS.13.3 Effective Area and Volume at Different Sediment Levels -The effective area and volume percentages determined in Attachment J are determined for 18-in of sediment.
It is assumed that these percentages apply to the other sediment levels analyzed in this evaluation.
Since changes in sediment level change the depth of the lake evenly throughout the entire lake (see Section 6.2 of the main body of this calculation), the percentages of effective area and volume will negligibly change with sediment level.13.4 Other -All other assumptions are the same as the assumptions in the main body of calculation.
I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 15 of 122 14.0 DESIGN INPUT 14.1 Spent Fuel Pool Makeup Flow -The emergency fuel pool makeup flow rate is 600 gpm, which corresponds to 300 gpm per unit [Ref. 15.3].14.2 General Seepage Rate -A seepage rate of 0.2 cfs is retained from Design Input 4.3 of the main body of this calculation.
This will be added to the spent fuel pool makeup flow (See Assumption 13.1) to determine the total seepage rate of the UHS.14.3 UHS Inventory for Fire Fighting Following an Accident -Following an accident, 440,400 gallons of water from the UHS must be available for fire fighting [Ref. U5. 1, Section 9.2.6.3].14.4 Anemometer Height -For the worst net evaporation weather data, which is from the Peoria weather data spanning from 1948 to 1996, the anemometer height is 20-ft (as taken from input files for the worst net evaporation cases in previous revisions).
For the worst weather data, which is taken from the LaSalle Station weather data spanning from 1995 to 2010, the anemometer is at a height of 33-ft (See Attachment K).14.5 Other -All other design inputs are the same as the design inputs in the main body of calculation.
I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 16 of 122 1 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5


==15.6 REFERENCES==
QUANTITY                            MAXIMUM                MINIMUM                AVERAGE VALUE (  DATE            VALUE (    DATE        VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT      (FT)          20.00  7011900)        20.00    7011900)    20.00 LAKE ELEVATION      (FEET)          689.99  7011900)      688.47      8051900)    689.19 TOTAL AREA          (ACRE)            82.98  7011900)        80.50    8051900)    81.67 TOTAL VOLUME    (ACRE-FT)          422.94  7011900)      298.69      8051900)    357.34 EFFECTIVE AREA      (ACRE)            74.68  7011900)        72.45    8051900)    73.50 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT)              380.69  7011900)      268.78      8051900)    321.59 CIRCULATION TIME        (HR)          0.00  7011900)          0.00    7011900)      0.00 PRECIPITATION        (CFS)            0.00  7011900)          0 .00  7011900)      0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL          (CFS)            0.00  7011900)          0.00    7011900)      0.00 SEEPAGE              (CFS)          -0.15  8051900)        -0.20    7011900)    -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS)              -0.32  8051900)        -4 .06    7051900)    -1.58 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS)                0.00  7031900)        -2.67    7051900)    -0.94 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS)              -0.26  7311900)        -1.53    7011900)    -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL        (CFS)            0.00  7011900)          0.00    7011900)      0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2)              430.59  7191900)      101.21      7221900)    219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)              161.26  7041900)      143.56      7241900)    153.24 EVAP  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)            172.30  7051900)          0 .00  7031900)    61.85 COND  LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2)              24.99  7051900)      -31 .64    7251900)      5.16 LAKE TEMP NATURAL        (F)        97.72  7041900)        81.75    7241900)    90. 63 LAKE TEMP @ INLET        (F)        132.96  7011900)        91 .00    7241900)    101 .08 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET        (F)        99.98  7011900)        82.51    7241900)    91.54 DISSOLVED SOLIDS      (PPM)            0.00  7011900)          0.00    7011900)      0.00 QUANTITY                            MAXIMUM                MINIMUM                  TOTAL VALUE (  DATE          VALUE    (  DATE    )  VALUE TOTAL  PRECIP    (ACRE-FT)            0.00  7011900)          0.00    7011900)      0.00 TOTAL  MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT)              0.00  7011900)          0.00    7011900)      0.00 TOTAL  SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT)              -0.04  8051900)        -0.05    7011900)    -12.23 TOTAL  EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT)              -0.08  8051900)        -1.01    7051900)  -112.56 TOTAL  EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT)              0.00  7031900)        -0.66    7051900)    -67.42 TOTAL  EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT)              -0.07  7311900)        -0.38    7011900)    -45.14 TOTAL  BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT)              0.00  7011900)          0.00    7011900)      0.00 I                                                                  PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                          REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H344 of H344 TEMPERATURE                FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1%        5%      50%
LAKE TEMP NATURAL  (F)    97.0      95.9    90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET  (F)  128.0      109.4    100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)    99.0      97.1    91.9 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                        REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. I1 of 122 11.0  PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE The purpose of this attachment is to evaluate the UHS transient analyses with an allowable plant intake temperature of 104'F and an increased allowable plant intake temperature of 107 0 F for MUR PU and EPU power levels. Additionally, new weather data from January 1995 to September 2010 is considered in prediction of the UHS temperature response. The initial lake temperature is adjusted such that the plant intake temperature remains below 104'F or 107'F during the accident scenario.
12.0  METHODOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The S&L LAKET-PC computer program [Ref. 15.2] is utilized to determine the combined impact of decay heat, initial UHS temperature, and allowable sediment accumulation in the UHS. The maximum allowable UHS temperature is determined for average sediment accumulations of zero (0), six (6), twelve (12), and eighteen (18) inches.
12.1  Methodology 12.1.1 Selection of Weather Data - The selection of the most limiting weather data is done in Attachment M. The worst weather day was determined to be 7/25/2001 ending at 6:00 AM and the worst weather month runs from 7/21/1995 4:00PM to 8/20/1995 3:00PM. The most limiting net evaporation month was determined to be from 6/18/1954 to 7/18/1954, which is unchanged from previous revisions of this calculation.
12.1.2 Lake Area and Volume - The initial lake elevation is 690-ft, which corresponds to the top water elevation of the UHS per the UFSAR. [Ref. 15.1]. However, UFSAR Section 9.2.6.3 [Ref. 15.1] states that 440,400 gallons of water from the UHS must be available for fire fighting following an accident (Design Input 14.3). Assuming that this inventory is removed from the UHS immediately following an accident (Assumption 13.2) leads to a decrease in the initial lake elevation of 690-ft and lake volume and area.
440,400 gallons corresponds to 1.35 acre-ft of water and a 0.02-ft drop in lake elevation. The initial lake level in the LAKET file is modified to incorporate these changes as shown in Table 12-1. The volume at an elevation of 689.98-ft is determined by subtracting the 1.35 acre-ft used in fire-fighting from the lake volume at 690-ft. The surface area is determined by interpolation using the information given in Table 7.1 of the main body of this calculation. The effective volume and effective area are determined by multiplying the volume and surface area by the effective volume and effective area percentages determined in Attachment J (effective volume is 63.4% of total volume and effective area is 57.9% of total area).
Table 12-1: Initial Lake Level eE      o                                                      Effective Sediment Level Lake Elevation          Area        Volume      Effective Area      Volume (ft)          (acre)              "
(acre-ft)        (acre)          (acre (acre-ft) 18-in    689.98          81.32          340.0          47.08          215.59 12-in    689.98          82.12          380.5          47.55          241.24 6-in    689.98    . 82.96          422.1          48.03          267.64 0-in    689.98          83.80          463.5          48.52          293.89 The remainder of the drawdown curve (from a lake elevation of 689-ft through 685-ft) remains the same as given in Table 7.1 of the main body of this calculation with respect to the total lake voluire and surface area. The effective volume and effective area are updated using the percentages determined in Attachment J.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                            REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 12 of 122 12.1.3 Plant Temperature Rise - The UHS heat load is increased due to an increase in power level. In addition, the core decay heat is changed as a result of EPU [Ref. 15.3] The new heat load on the UHS for EPU operation is determined in L-002453 [Ref. 15.4]. The plant temperature rise is dependent on the UHS heat load, and the calculation of the new plant temperature rise at MUR PU and EPU is documented in Attachment L.
12.1.4 LAKET Case Runs - For the worst weather cases (cases ending with the letter a), the initial temperature for each case is iteratively set until the lake outlet temperature is equal to the maximum allowable lake outlet temperature (either 104'F or 107'F). The net evaporation cases use the same input file as the corresponding worst weather case, but are run with the most limiting net evaporation month weather file.
A list of all cases run for this analysis is shown below:
Table 12-2: List of LAKET Cases SPower                        Level    Sediment Case              Type S(MWt)                Power        Level Level                Design Criteria lai      Worst Weather            4067 (EPU)                      Pl-antInlet Temp=- 107"F 1c  Worst Net Evaporation        4067 (EPU)          0"            Initial Temp of Case la 2a      Worst Weather            4067 (EPU)    1    6"          Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 2c    Worst Net Evaporation        4067 (EPU)          6"            Initial Temp of Case 2a 3a_12am          Worst Weather            4067 (EPU)        18"          Plant Inlet Temp = 1077F 3a_3am        Worst Weather            4067(EPU) -ý      18"          Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3a_6am        Worst Weather            4067 (EPU)        18"          Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F
__3a_9am      Worst Weather        1  4067 (EPU)        18"          Plant Inlet Temp 107'F 3a_912pm        Worst Weather            4067 (EPU)        18"          Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3a_3pm        Worst Weather            4067 (EPU)        18"          Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3a_6pm I      Worst Weather            4067 (EPU)        18"          Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3a_9pmr        Worst Weather            4067 (EPU)        18"          Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3c    worst Net Evaporationj      4067 (EPU)        18"      Initial Temp of Case 3a at 6AM 4a      Worst Weather            4067 (EPU)        12"          Plant Inlet Temp = 107'F 4c Worst Net Evaporation          4067 (EPU)        12"            Initial Temp of Case 4a 1 -F 4la      Worst Weather            4067 (EPU)        0 1"          Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F 1c 104F I Worst Net Evaporation          4067 (EPU)        0"        Initial Temp of Case 1a_104F 2a-104F        Worst Weather            4067 (EPU)          6"          Plant Inlet Temp = 104-F 3a_104F        Worst Wether              4067 (EPU)        18"          Plant Inlet Temp = 104"F 4a_104F        Worst Weather            4067 (EPU)        12"          Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F 1laMUR~ Worst Weather                  3559 (MUR PU)        011          Plant Inlet Temp =107-F
___cMUR 1Worst Net Evaporation 13559_(MUR PU)                  0"      Initial Temp of Case la_MUR 2a_ MUR        Worst Weather          3559 (MUR PU)        6"          Plant Inlet Temp = 1074F 3a_4MU--iR . V-Wor-st Weather  _-    3559_(MUR PU)        18"          Plant Inlet Temp = 107'F 4a MUR          Worst Weather          3559 (MUR PU)        12"          Plant Inlet Temp = 107'F laMUR 104F            Worst Weather          3559 (MUR PU)        0"          Plant Inlet Temp = 1047F I                                                  PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                          REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 13 of 122          1 Power Level      Sediment Case            Type                (
I (MWt)                                Design Criteria Level lc_MUR_104F      Worst Net Evaporation  3559 (MUR PU)        0"      Initial Temp of Case la MUR_104F 2aMUR_104F            Worst Weather      3559 (MUR PU)        6"            Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F 3aMUR_104F            Worst Weather      3559 (MUR PU)        18"            Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F 4a_MUR_104F          Worst Weather    , 3559 (MUR PU)        12"            Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F Cases are run at varying times for the most limiting case, Case 3a. The purpose of this is to determine at which time an accident would provide the most limiting results. For all other cases besides Case 3a, only the time determined to be the most limiting will be used.
For EPU power level and a maximum allowable lake temperature of 107'F, the worst net evaporation cases are ran for all levels of sediment. The worst case in terms of UHS drawdown is determined from the four different sediment levels, and the remainder of the worst evaporation cases are run at this sediment level only.
12.2  Acceptance Criteria 12.2.1 Acceptance Criterion #1 - Peak Temperature - The maximum plant inlet temperature from the UHS shall remain equal to or less than 104'F or 107°F.
12.2.2 Acceptance Criterion #2 - UHS Drawdown - There are no specific acceptance criteria for maximumn UHS lake drawdown. However, for the worst 30-day evaporation period, the maximum lake drawdown is determined for input to calculation L-00 1355 [Ref. 15.6].
12.3  Limitations Same as main body of calculation.
12.4  Identification of Computer Programs Postprocessing of the LAKET-PC results is done using Microsoft Excel 2003 [Ref. 15.5], which is commercially available. The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all spreadsheets used in this analysis. All computer runs were performed using PC No. ZD6661 under the Windows XP operating system.
LAKET-PC Version 2.2 [Ref. 15.2] was used to perform the lake transient analysis contained in this evaluation. This was run on S&L PC No. ZD6661 on Windows XP operating system.
I                                                PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                              1
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                      REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 14 of 122 13.0 ASSUMPTIONS 13.1 Fuel Pool Heat Load - It is assumed that the fuel pool emergency makeup pumps provide required makeup flow to the fuel pools. Including fuel pool heat loads is not realistic because it is improbable that the required operator actions to align the fuel pool emergency makeup pumps to the RHR system could be performed in the post-LOCA reactor building environment [Ref. 15.3]. Therefore, the 600 gpm emergency fuel pool makeup flow rate (See Design Input 14.1) is added to the UHS seepage rate.
13.2 UHS Inventory for Fire Fighting - It is assumed that all UHS inventory for fire fighting is used immediately following an accident. This is conservative as it decreases the volume of water in the UHS.
13.3 Effective Area and Volume at Different Sediment Levels - The effective area and volume percentages determined in Attachment J are determined for 18-in of sediment. It is assumed that these percentages apply to the other sediment levels analyzed in this evaluation. Since changes in sediment level change the depth of the lake evenly throughout the entire lake (see Section 6.2 of the main body of this calculation),
the percentages of effective area and volume will negligibly change with sediment level.
13.4 Other - All other assumptions are the same as the assumptions in the main body of calculation.
I                                  PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                      REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 15 of 122 14.0 DESIGN INPUT 14.1 Spent Fuel Pool Makeup Flow - The emergency fuel pool makeup flow rate is 600 gpm, which corresponds to 300 gpm per unit [Ref. 15.3].
14.2 General Seepage Rate - A seepage rate of 0.2 cfs is retained from Design Input 4.3 of the main body of this calculation. This will be added to the spent fuel pool makeup flow (See Assumption 13.1) to determine the total seepage rate of the UHS.
14.3 UHS Inventory for Fire Fighting Following an Accident - Following an accident, 440,400 gallons of water from the UHS must be available for fire fighting [Ref. U5. 1, Section 9.2.6.3].
14.4 Anemometer Height - For the worst net evaporation weather data, which is from the Peoria weather data spanning from 1948 to 1996, the anemometer height is 20-ft (as taken from input files for the worst net evaporation cases in previous revisions). For the worst weather data, which is taken from the LaSalle Station weather data spanning from 1995 to 2010, the anemometer is at a height of 33-ft (See Attachment K).
14.5 Other - All other design inputs are the same as the design inputs in the main body of calculation.
I                                            PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                                    1


LaSalle County Station Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), Rev. 19.LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 12/09/2004.
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                   REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 16 of 122   1
Controlled File Path: \\SNLVS5\SYS3\OPS$kLAK29222\
SEAG # 12-000098, "DIR for LAS-EPU-U 1/2-DIR-T0608-1," 4/18/2012."UHS Heat Load," Calculation L-002453, Rev. 3, June 2012.Microsoft Office Excel 2003 (11.8120.8122)
SP2, Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corporation.
L-001355, "LaSalle County Station CSCS Hydraulic Model," Rev. 005A.IPROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 17 of 122 16.0 CALCULATIONS 16.1 Calculation of Plant Temperature Rise The CSCS temperature rise across the plant is computed in Attachment L. Changes from the determination of the plant temperature rise in previous revisions of this calculation included a change in the decay heat ratio as a result of EPU, the removal of fuel pool heat loads, and a one-hour time interval between calculations.
See Appendix L9.2 of Attachment L for the results of the plant temperature rise at MUR PU and Appendix L9.4 of Attachment L for the plant temperature rise at EPU.16.2 Seepage Rate The seepage rate is determined from a UHS seepage of 0.2 cfs (Design Input 14.2) and a constant flow of 600 gpm for spent fuel pool makeup (See Design Input 14.1). This gives a total seepage rate of 1.537 cfs, which a constant for all cases.16.3 Maximum Allowable Lake Temperature For this analysis, cases are run at MUR PU and EPU power levels. Each case is run with a limiting plant intake temperature of 104'F and 107'F, allowing for a comparison of the maximum allowable UHS temperature at the differing plant intake temperatures.
Limiting weather data is determined from two sets of weather data (See Attachment M).The time of day which the transient is assumed is critical when determining the maximum allowable initial temperature of the UHS. To account for the time of day at which the UHS transient may start, eight start times are used for the limiting sediment depth of 18-in. As seen in Table 17.1, the most limiting time is 6AM (as it results in the lowest allowable initial temperature).
Therefore, the remaining worst weather cases are run beginning at 6AM.In order to determine the limiting amount of sediment, the worst net evaporation case was run at four different sediment levels at EPU power level (Cases la, 2a, 3a, and 4a) for a maximum plant inlet temperature of 107°F. The case with no sediment (Case 1 a) was determined to be the most limiting (as it resulted in the highest drawdown).
Therefore, the remaining worst evaporation cases were run with a sediment level of 0-in.16.4 LAKET-PC Files The S&L LAKET-PC computer program [Ref. 15.2] was utilized to determine the combined impact of decay heat, initial UHS temperature, and allowable sediment accumulation in the UHS. The files used in this analysis are shown in Table 16.1, below.I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 18 of 122 1 Table 16.1: LAKET Files I Name -IType:-1Casela.cdat DAT File I' Case la.out OUT File 11 Case la.pit PLT File 11 Case la. pltX PLTX File?l Case la-lO-F.dat DAT File-Casela_104F.out OUT File P1 Case lal04F.plt PLT File?iCase laj104F.pltX PLTX File Case laMUR.dat DAT File Pj Case la-MUR.out OUT File Case lajMUR.plt PLT File P Case lajMUR,pltX PLTX File LA1 Case laMUR_10-4Fdat DAT File F1 Casela MUR_10-F~out OUT File Case la MUR_104F.plt PLT File_Case laYMUR_1O4F.pltX PLTX File 11 Case lc.dat DAT File S Case c. out OUT File L; Caselc.plt PLT File P1 Case lc.pltX PLI-X File Case lclO41F.dat DAT File DI Case lc 104F.out OUT File L Case 1c 104Fplt PLT File LA Case lc_104F.pltX PLTX File PL Case IcMUR.dat DAT File 5 Case lc MUR.out OUT File Case IcYMUR.plt PLT File 4 Case lcMUR.pltX PLTX File Case IcMUR_104F.dat DAT File-ACase lcMUR_104F.out OUT File Case 1cqMURO-4F.plt PLT File P11 Case 1c MUR 104F.pltX PLTX File PlCase2adat DAT File L1 Case2a.out OUT File IlCase2a~plt PLT FileCase2a,pltX PLTX File_5 Case2a 10-1F.dat DAT File LA Case2a_104F.out OUT File LA Case 2a_104F.plt PLT File LACase 2a104F.pitX PLTX File P1Case 2aMUR.dat DAT File EA Case2ajMUR.out OUT File Case 2aMUR.plt PLT File LACase2aMUR.plLX PLTX File lACase2aMUR 104F.dat DAT File P-l1 Case2aMUR_10-F.out OUT File LA Case2aMUR 104F.pit PLT File 51 Case 2a MUR_10-F.pltX PLTX File l Modified 6/21(2012 10:21 AM 6/21/2012 11:16 AM 6/21/2012 11:16 AM 6/21/2012 11:16 AM 6/21/2012 10: 22 AM 6/21/2012 11: 18 AM 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 6/21/2012 11: 18 AM 5/17/2012 4:29 PM 5/17(2012 4:32 PM 5/17/2012 4:32 PM 5/17/2012 4:32 PM 5/17/2012 4:30 PM 5/17/2012 4:35 PM 5/17(2012 4:35 PM 5/17/2012 4:35 PM 6/21/2012 10:21 AM 6/21/2012 11: 17AM 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 6/21/2012 11: 17 AM 6/21/2012 10:22 AM 6(21(2012 11:18 AM 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 5(22/2012 5:50 PM 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 6/21(2012 10:21 AM 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 6/21/2012 10:22 AM 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 5/17/2012 4:30 PM 5/17/2012 4:32 PM 5/17/2012 4:32 PM 5/17(2012 4:32 PM 5/17/2012 4:31 PM 5/17/2012 4:35 PM 5/17/2012 4:35 PM 5/17/2012 4:35 PM Size 5,134 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,138 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,069 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,074 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,143 103,572 421,692 52,560 5,145 103,541 421,692 43,200 5,0/-9 103,572 421,692 52,560 5,081 103,541 421,692 43,200 5,137 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,140 104,2011 435,7038 44,610 5,072 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,077 104,201 435,708 44,640 Ratio 91%97%73%78%91%/97%73%78%91%97%73%783%91%97%73%78%91%97%73%77%91%97%73%76%90%97%73%76%90%97%730/c 76%91%97%73%78%91%97%73%78%91%97%73%78%90%97%73%Packed 470 3,159 118,789 9,967 472 3, 168 118,774 9,873 475 3,175 118,813 9,946 480 3,176 118,807 9,879 478 3,358 115,779 12,348 481 3,349 115,769 10,197 484 3,359 115,753 12,358 487 3,333 115,783 10,244 474 3,154 118,896 9,985 475 3,187 118,835 10,007 478 3,176 118,932 10,011 483 3,183 118,914 78% 9,969 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 19 of 122 1 Table 16.1: LAKET Files (cont.)I Name PIlCase2c.dat
.P1 Case 2c.out PlCase2c.plt
-1 Case2c.pltX
.1 Case 3a_104F.cdat PI1 Case 3a_ 104F. out P1 Case 3a_ 104F.pitCase 3a_104F.pltX P1Case 3a 12am. dat Ri Case 3al12am.out 1ýj Case 3a_12am.pit
%1 Case 3a_ 12am.pltX 51 Case 3a_ j2pm.dat P1 Case 3a_ 12pm, out Q1 Case 3a_ 12pm. pit', Case 3a_ 12pm.pltX P1 Case 3a_3am. dat
-1 Case Ba jam. plt P Case 3a3am.pltX P1 Case 3a_3pm, dat D1 Case 3a_3pm, out P Case 3a_3pm. pit P. Case 3a_3pm. pltX P1Case 3a.6am, dat P1Case 3a_6am. out A Case 3a.6amplt Pl Case 3a_6am, pltX i Case 3a_6pm, dat P1 Case 3a_6pm, out P1 Case 3a_6pmplt P1 Case 3a_6pm, pltX P Case 3agamdat P1 Case 3a_9am out PICase3a_9amplt P_1iCase3a_9ampltX P1 Case 3a._pmdat 51 Case 3a_9pm.out P1 Case 3a._pmplt 5 Case 3a_9pmpltX P1Case3aMUR.dat 51 Case 3aMUR. out I1 Case3aMUR.plt PI Case 3aMUR.pltX S;1 Case3a MUR_104F.dat P Case 3aMUR_ 10F. out 51 Case 3aMUR_ 104F. pit A°I Case 3a MUR_ 10*F, pltI I Type DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTFX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File I Modified 6/21/20 12 10:21 AM 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 6/21/2012 11: 17 AM 6/21/2012 10:23 AM 6/21/2012 11: 18 AM 6/21/2012 11: 16 AM 6/21/2012 11: 18 AM 6122/2012 10:15 AM 6/22/2012 10:16 AM 6/22/2012 10:16 AM 6/24222012 10:16 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:50 AM 6/21/2012 9:50 AM 6/21/2012 9:50 AM 6/21/2012 9:47 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:47 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:48 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:48 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:48 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:48 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 5/17/2012 4:30 PM 5/17/2012 4:33 PM 5/17/20 12 4:33 PM 5/17/2012 4:33 PM 5/17/20 12 4:38 PM 5/17/20 12 4:38 PM 5/17/2012 4:38 PM 5/17/2012 4:38 PM Size I 5,144 103,541 421,692 43,200 5,133 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,137 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,137 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,134 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,134 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,135 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,136 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,136 104,201 435,708 4-1,640 5,136 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,067 104,201 435,7038 44,640 5,070 104,201 435,708-4,640 Ratio I 91%97%73%76%91%97%73%77%91%97%73%779/91%97%*73%77 %c 91%97%73%77%91%97%73%77%91%97%73%77%91%97%73%77%Ac 91%97%73%77%91%97%73%77%91%97%73%77%91%97%73%77%Packed I 482 3,346 115,828 10,261 469 3,174 118,968 10,133 474 3,181 119,012 10,115 476 3,161 119,003 10,143 472 3,161 118,996 10,133 472 3,159 118,909 10,126 474 3,158 118,984 10,112 475 3,162 118,984 10,068 473 3,166 118,983 10,082 475 3,163 118,954 10,105 478 3,166 118,981 10, 145 478 3,172 118,942 10,124 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 110 of 122 1 Table 16.1: LAKET Files (cont.)Name ,-1_' Case 3c. datCase3c.out"I Case3c.plt P Case 3c.pltX P-1 Case-a.dat 51 Case4a.outCase4a.plt Li Case4a.pItX
';I Case-la_10F.dat
-1 Casela_10-F.out 1 Case4a_ IOF pit 51 Case4alO14F.
pltX_1 Casela_MUR~dat LiCaselaMUR.out 5;l Case4aMUR.pit Pl Case4aMUR.pltX 1 Case-laMUR_104F.dat Li Case4a1MUR_104F.out Li Case-aMUR_1O4F.plt S11 Case4ajMURJO-1F.plLt Li Case-qc.dat
: Case4c.plt
............
p.......I Type DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File DAT File OUT File PLT File PLTX File I Modified 6/21/2012 10:21 AM 6/21/2012 11:17AM 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 6/21/2012 11: 17AM 6/21/2012 10:22 AM 6/21/2012 11: 17 AM 6/21/2012 11: 17 AM 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 6/21/2012 10:23 AM 6/21/2012 11: 18 AM 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 6/21/2012 11: 18 AM 5/17/2012 4:30 PM 5/17/2012 4:33 PM 5/17/2012 4:33 PM 5/17/2012 4:33 PM 5/17/2012 4:39 PM 5/17/2012 4:-40 PM 5/17/2012 4:40 PM 5/17/2012 4:40 PM 6/21/2012 10:22 AM 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 6/21/2012 11:18 AM Size 5,133 103,541 421,692 43,200 5,133 104,201 435,703 44,640 5,136 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,068 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,071 104,201 435,708 44,640 5,139 103,541 421,692 43,200 Ratio 91%97%72%76%91%97%73%77%91%97%73%77%91%97%73%77%91%97%73%77%91%97%73%76%Packed 478 3,327 115,987 10,334 467 3,171 118,931 10,066 470 3,178 118,884 10,046 477 3,176 118,927 10,111 480 3,188 113,868 10,102 475 3,332 115,829 10,333 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. Ill of 122 17.0 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 17.1 Summary Table 17.1 provides a summary of the limiting maximum initial lake temperature for the worst weather cases. Table 17.2 provides a sununary of the maximum lake drawdown for the worst net evaporation cases.Table 17.1a: MUR PU (3559 MW) Overall Summary for Maximum Temperature Case Weather Data Sediment Initial Lake Max Plant Inlet Level (in.) Temp. (°F) Temp. (°F)la MUR 1/30 0 103.63 107.0 2aMUR 1/30 J 6 103.32 107.0 3a MUR 1/30 18 102.46 107.0 4aMUR 1/30 12 102.93 107.0 laMUR_104F 1/30 0 100.30 104.0 2aMUR_104F 1/30 6 _ 99.95 104.0 3aMUR_104F 1/30 18 91.68 104.0 4aMUR 104F 1/30 12 89.54 104.0 Table 17.1b: EPU Case la 2a 3a 12am 3a_3am 3a_6am 3a_9am 3a_12pmr 3a_3pm 3a_6pm (4067 M W,) Overall Summary for Maximum Temperature I Sediment Initial Lake Max Plant Inlet Weather Data 1 Level (in.) Temp. (*F) Temp. (fF)1/30 I 0 103.63 107.0 1/30 6 103.32 107.0 1/30 18 104.95 107.0 1/30 18 103.14 106.81 1/30 18 102.42 107.0 1/30 18 103.61 107.0 1/30 18 105.80 107.0 1/30 18 1 106.97 107.0 1/30 18 107.00 107.0 3a_9pm 1/30 18 107.00 107.0 4a 1/30 12 102.93 107.0 is_104F 1/30 0 o 100.30 104.0 2a 104F 1/30 6 96.80 104.0 3a 104F 1/30 18 87.01 104.0 4a_104F 1/30 12 85.47 104.0 (1) Due to a discontinuity in LAKET, this is as close to 107°F that can be reached.I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 112 of 122 1 Table 17.2a: MUR PU Overall Summary for Maximum Evaporation Sediment Maximum Case Weather Data Level (in.) Drawdown (ft)1 1c_MUR Worst 30-day Evaporation 0 2.24 lcMUR_104F Worst 30-day Evaporation 0 2.22 1) Determined from initial lake elevation of 689.98-ft.
Table 17.2b: EPU Overall Summary for Maximum Evaporation Sediment Maximum Case Weather Data Level (in.) Drawdown (ft)1 ic Worst 30-dayEvaporation 0 2.27 2c Worst 30-day Evaporation 6 2.25 3c Worst 30-day Evaporation 18 2.20 4c Worst 30-day Evaporation 12 Ic_104F Worst 30-day Evaporation 0 1) Determined from initial lake elevation of 689.98-ft.
2.23 2.26 Figures 17.1 through 17.8, below, show the plant outlet temperature and plant inlet temperature over the entire 31 day period for the 107'F maximum plant inlet temperature case at MUR PU and EPU. Figures 17.9 and 17.10 show the maximum lake drawdown over the worst 30 days of evaporation weather.17.2 Compliance with Acceptance Criteria 17.2.1 Acceptance Criterion
#1 -Peak Temperature
-Acceptance Criterion
#1 is met provided the plant is operated, monitored, and maintains UHS initial temperatures below the applicable limits per the results listed in Table 17.1.17.2.2 Acceptance Criterion
#2 -UHS Drawdown -The maximum expected lake drawdown for the cases evaluated is given in Table 17.2. This will be used in calculation L-001355 [Ref. 15.6].I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 113 of 122 Figure 17.11: Plant Outlet Temperature (MUR PU)150.000 140.000 U.0 130.000 C-E 120.000 I-0 E 110.000 0.100.000 90.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 114 of 122 1 Figure 17.2: Plant Outlet Temperature (EPU)150.000 140.000 U-0 130.000 CL 4..E 120.000 4W'0* 110.000 EU 100.000 90.000-.--Case la ... Case 2a Case 3a 6am ---Case 4a 0 5 10 15 20 25 Days Following Accident 30 35 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 115 of 122 Figure 17.3: Plant Inlet Temperature (MUR PU)U-0'E M-FL 108.000 106.000 104.000 102.000 100.000 98.000 96.000 94.000 92.000 90.000 88.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident IPROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 116 of 122 Figure 17.4: Plant Inlet Temperature (EPU)LL 0 CL 0.E 4)108.000 106.000 104.000 102.000 100.000 98.000 96.000 94.000 92.000 90.000 88.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident IPROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 117 of 122 Figure 17.5, Case 3aMUR: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 31-Day Temperature Period (d = 18", t = 0600 hrs, Ti = 102.46°F)150.000 140.000 130.000-UHS Inlet Temperature
-UHS Outlet Temperature I LL 0 1,..0 E 0 120.000 110.000 100.000 90.000 80.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 118 of 122 Figure 17.6, Case 4a_MUR: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 31-Day Temperature Period (d = 12", t = 0600 hrs, Ti = 102.93°F)150.000 140.000 130.000 LL 0-" 120.000 C.E: 110.000 I.-.100.000 90.000 80.000-UHS Inlet Temperature
-UHS Outlet Temperature 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 35 Days Following Accident I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 119 of 122 1 Figure 17.7, Case 3a: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 31-Day Temperature Period (d = 18", t = 0600 hrs, Ti = 102.43*F)150.000 140.000 130.000 L-0 120.000 I-4.'E= 110.000 I--100.000 90.000 80.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days Following Accident 35 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 120 of 122 1 Figure 17.8, Case 4a: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 31-Day Temperature Period (d = 12", t = 0600 hrs, T 1= 102.93*F)150.000 140.000 130.000 U_0 120.000 E 110.000 I-100.000 90.000 80.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days Following Accident 35 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 121 of 122 Figure 17.9, Case lc_MUR: UHS LOCA Drawdown Worst 30 Day Evaporation Weather Period Sediment Level = 0-in 690.500 690.000 689.500 0 CU> 689.000 688.500 688.000 687.500 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days Following Accident 35 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 122 of 122 Figure 17.10, Case Ic: UHS LOCA Drawdown Worst 30 Day Evaporation Weather Period Sediment Level = 0-in 690.500 690.000 0 MU 689.500 689.000 688.500 688.000 687.500 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J1 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE Ji of J40 Attachment J -UHS Flow Path Analysis Prepared: IiO "f D9aniele Ludovisi -Sargent & LundyLLc Reviewed: Pawel Kut -Sargent & LundyLLc Date OQCAL 1 V2,,o113 Date 10- o-2,oOi Revision 8 of this attachment adds Appendix J8.6 (pages J33 to J40).PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J2 of J40 J1.O PURPOSE The purpose of this attachment is to evaluate the water flow pattern in the man-made Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) at LaSalle County Generating Station with the water depth at its minimum, that the water level is at elevation 690 ft [Ref. J5.1] and the UHS bottom is covered with approximately 1.5 ft of silt [Ref. J5.8]. The analysis is carried by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The recirculation areas in the UHS are identified and the UHS volume actively involved in the main water flow is estimated along with and the associated surface area. The output of this evaluation is to provide effective lake volume and surface area for use in the S&L LAKET-PC computer program.J1.1 Background The UHS is designed to provide sufficient cooling water to permit the safe shutdown and cool down of the station for both normal and accident conditions.
In the unlikely event that the main dike is breached, there is a submerged pond within the cooling lake for the LaSalle County Station that is designed to hold water. This remaining water constitutes the ultimate heat sink for the station. It has a depth of approximately 5 feet and a top water elevation established at 690 feet [Ref. J5.1].Considering approximately 1.5 ft of silt at the bottom of the UHS, a CFD analysis is performed to predict the water main flow pattern and estimate the volume of water contained in the active zones of the UHS and the corresponding surface area. These inputs are used in main report to determine the combined impact of power uprate and allowable sediment accumulation in the UHS on the maximum plant inlet temperature and evaporative drawdown by use of the S&L LAKET-PC computer program.J2.0 METHODOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA J2.1 Methodology J2. 1.1 Effective volume and effective surface area Figure J-3 shows a top view of the UHS computational domain. As shown, water enters the UHS in one of the UHS side branches and exits from the intake flume. Zones of recirculation are expected in the other branch of the UHS, which is a dead leg, and in proximity of the UHS inlet. LAKET-PC is a one-dimensional lake thermal prediction computer program [Ref. J5. 10]. The one-dimensional assumption coerces the water body into an idealized rectangular channel. In this idealization, water entering the channel displaces an equal amount of water out of the back end (see Figure J-1 ). At some time (t,)after the start of flow (to), the volume of displaced water is equal to Q.( t, -to), where is the Q is the flow rate of the water flowing into the channel. Indicating the total volume of the channel with Vchannel, all of the water is considered to have swept out of the channel at time t = to+Vchannel/Q.
However, if the lake being modeled has stagnant volumes, the water in those volumes would not be swept out of the exit as idealized in the LAKET-PC modeling.
For more accurately conforming the real lake to the idealized channel, these stagnant volumes and the corresponding surfaces must be removed from the active volume.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J3 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J3 of J40 Figure J-1. Reference water flow.Initial volume of water still present in the channel at time t Vchannel Veffective Straight channel Channel with to teffecive t = to + Vchannel/Q Time Figure J-2. Water displaced in the reference straight channel and in channel with recirculation zones.Figure J-2 shows both the idealized and actual amount of water displaced from a lake with recirculating (stagnant) volumes. If we could differentiate between water that was initially in the lake from new water entering the lake, we could use the concentration of initial water remaining in the lake at time t to find the fraction of water that was not swept out at time t. This is the fraction of the lake not actively participating in the channel flow.This volume and the corresponding surface area should be removed from the lake total dimensions to provide more accurate and conservative results.The amount of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel, trapped in the recirculation zones, at time t = to + (Vchannel/Q) is calculated as follows (with to =0): Vtrapped in the reciruclation zones (t) = Jc V initial water in the channel (t)dV (J2. I -)Vchannel PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J4 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J4 of J40 where Vchannel is the total volume of the channel and CVinitial water in the channel(t) is the volumetric distribution of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel at time t. The effective volume is calculated as follows: Veffective
-Vchannel -Vtrapped in the reciruclation zones (t) =JC V initial water in the channel (t)dV VchannelI
-Vchannel Vhannel (J2.1-2)= Vchannel (1 -c'V initial water in the channel (t))where the term CV initial water in the channel (t)= C initial water in the channel (t)dV Vchannel is equal to VchanneI /the volume average concentration of the amount of water initially in the channel at time t, and still present in the channel at time t. The effective surface area is calculated in manner similar to the effective volume. At the surface of the channel, the amount of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel, trapped in the recirculation zones, at time t = (Vchannel/Q) is calculated as follows: S trapped in the reciruclation zones (t) = JC S initial water in the channel (t)dS (J2.1-3)Schannel where Schannel is the total surface of the channel and CSinitial water in the channel(t) is the surface distribution of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel at time t. The effective surface is calculated as follows: Seffective Sdchannel -Strapped in the reciruclation zones (t) =f C S initial water in the channel (t)dV Schanne 1- Schannel =channel (J2.1-4)waeS ntechanne l td= Schannet (i -c'Sinitial water in the channet (t))where the tenn C 5 initial water in the channel (t) = PC initial water in the channel (t)dVj channel is equal to Schannel /the surface average concentration of the amount of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel at time t.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J5 of J40 J2.1.2 Calculation strategy As indicated in Section J2.1.1, the volume and surface averaged concentrations of the water initially in the UHS at to = 0 sec still present in the UHS at time t = VUHs/Q are necessary in order to calculate the effective UHS volume and surface.The analysis of the water flow in the UHS is carried out through the use of the commercially available CFD code STAR-CCM+
[Ref. J5.2]. The calculation is performed in two steps: I. The first step is employed to find the steady state flow distribution in the UHS. This solution is used as initial condition for the transient multi-component fluid mixture in the second step.2. During this second step, newly introduced water in the UHS is specified to be a different liquid but with the same properties of the water already present in the UHS.The flow pattern and mixing of these liquids are calculated and tracked over time from time to = 0 sec to t = VuHs/Q. At the end of the transient analysis, the surface average concentration of the amount of water initially in the UHS and still present in the UHS at time t = VUHs/Q are calculated to find the effective volume and surface.J2.1.3 Geometrical domain The CFD analysis is carried out in three-dimensions.
For the computations, the water domain is considered from the outlet of the inlet chute into the UHS to the exit of the intake flume. Figure J-3 shows a top view of the computational domain while Figures J-4 and J-5 show the inlet and outlet boundaries, respectively.
Figure J-6 shows the bottom view of the UHS. Design Input J4.1 reports the dimensional information used to generate the model. Assumption J3.1 is used to evaluate the UHS thickness.
The main dimensions are indicated in Figures J-1 to J-3. Figures J-4 to J-7 also show, in quotations, names associated to each of the boundaries in the numerical model. Note that this evaluation reports the fraction of active volume and surface area. Therefore, slight variations in the lake dimensions will not significantly affect the final results.J2.1.4 Mesh The computational domain is discretized by using polyhedral cells with a base size of 12 ft, and six thin layers through the thickness of the UHS. Where necessary, the cell size is reduced down to 6 ft and, in proximity of the inlet boundary, down to 1.5 ft. Figures J-5 to J-8 show the mesh employed for the computations, which consists of 1,761,870 nodes for a total of 748,386 cells. Appendix J8.1 provides the STAR-CCM+
report of the mesh quality.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J6 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J6 of J40 t Domain outlet 2200 ft 820 f 180ft Domain inlet-t 780 ft Figure J-3. UHS computational domain: Top view."FreeSurface""Inlet" Figure J-4. UHS computational domain: Inlet boundary.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J7 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J7 of J40"Outlet"/i 80 t i Figure J-5. UHS computational domain: Outlet boundary.14"Soil"/Figure J-6. UHS computational domain: Bottom view.Note: The indicated depths are net values; the silt layer of 1.5 ft (see Design Input J4.3) is already considered in the indicated values.Figure J-7. UHS computational domain: Mesh detail of the inlet boundary.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J8 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J8 of J40 Figure J-8. UHS computational domain: Mesh detail of the outlet boundary.Figure J-9. UHS computational domain: Cross section of the outlet boundary mesh both along and across the axis.Figure J-10. UHS computational domain: Mesh detail of the free surface boundary.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J9 of J40 J2.1.5 Numerical model As indicated in Section J2.1.2, the calculation is carried out in two steps.Step One: Steady State Single-Fluid Analysis The numerical analysis is carried out using the segregated SST (Menter) k-wO model with the all y+ wall treatment.
The shear stress transport (SST) formulation is a blend of a k-(0 formulation, which is used near walls, and a k-e formulation, which is used in regions far from walls. The use of a k-co formulation in the inner parts of the boundary layer makes the model directly usable all the way down to the wall through the viscous sub-layer without additional modifications.
Hence, the SST k-w model can be used as a low Reynolds turbulence model without any extra damping functions.
The SST formulation also switches to a k-c behavior in the free-stream and thereby avoids the common k-o0 problem of being too sensitive to the inlet free-stream turbulence properties.
This model is fairly robust, it demonstrated superior performance for wall bounded problems and low Reynolds number flows, it showed potential for predicting transition regions and it also is often found to do a better job at capturing recirculation regions than other models [Ref.J5.2].Therefore, the SST (Menter) k-o model with the all y+ wall treatment is particularly suited for the geometry analyzed in this calculation which presents a confined flow with very extensive surface associated to an extremely small thickness, and a uniform mesh through the thickness of the domain as generated by the thin mesher generator.
A constant-density single-fluid is specified as working liquid with the properties of water at 100°F (see Assumption J3.2) with a density of approximately 62 lb/ft 3 and a dynamic viscosity of 6.727"10-9 atm-s [Ref. J5.7].The following boundary conditions are applied:* "FreeSurface" -This boundary represents the free surface of the lake. As a simplification, this boundary is considered to be rigid in order to reduce the computational time. This simplification does not significantly impact the results of the calculation since the water velocity is small and very small or no waves are expected to form (tranquil flow). Furthermore, this boundary is specified to be a symmetry plane in order to guarantee a zero shear stress (free surface flow)." "Inlet" -This boundary represents the inlet to the UHS. It is specified to be a mass flow inlet boundary with an inlet flow rate of 86 ft 3/sec, which is approximately equal to 5333.7 lb/sec [Ref. J5.8].* "Outlet" -This boundary represents the outlet to the UHS. It is specified to be a simple pressure outlet boundary.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE A 0 of J40* "Soil" -This boundary represents the bottom and sloped sides of the UHS. It is specified to be a rough no-slip wall boundary with a roughness of 5.0 in (see Assumption J3.3).The system is initialized with constant zero velocity and pressure and let to evolve to final steady state solution.Step Two: Transient Two-Fluid Analysis The results of Step One are used as initial condition to the calculation performed in this second phase. The following changes are made to the model: 1. Transient solver -The solver is specified to be implicit unsteady with maxinmm number of inner iteration per time step equal to 20. The time step is adjusted through the computation for an initial minimum value of 0.1 sec to a final maximum value of 100 sec. The transition from one time step to the other is nonrmally performed after ensuring that the residuals are always small and the solution is converged at each time step.2. Two-fluid specification
-The solver is changed to account for a two fluid mixture.Both fluids have the properties of water at 100°F and the are labeled "WaterLake" for the water initially present in the UHS at the beginning of the transient analysis (from Step One) and "WaterCirculating" for the water injected from the "Inlet" boundary.For the two-fluid mixture, the code can compute the mixture properties based on the local concentration of the two base fluids and their molecular weight. Since there is no difference between the "WaterLake" and "WaterCirculating", the properties of the mixture are specified to be constant and equal to that of water at I 00'F.In order to compute the diffusion of one liquid into the other, the Schmidt number and the turbulent Schmidt number need to be specified for the mixture. The Schmidt number is a dimensionless parameter defined as the ratio of momentum diffusivity and mass diffusivity as [Ref. J5.2]: Schmidt- P (J2.1-5)P Dim where Vt is the dynamic viscosity, p is the density and Dim is the molecular diffusivity of component-i into the mixture. The Schmidt number used in this analysis is equal to 219.8 (see Appendix J8.2). The turbulent Schmidt number is taken as the default value in STAR-CCM+
which is equal to 0.9. This implies that the turbulent mass diffusivity is proportional to the turbulent viscosity, which is an unknown a-priori variable and it is locally computed by the code. Note that the computed solution is fairly insensitive to the choice of the Schmidt number and the turbulent Schmidt number within the range of realistic values. The molecular weight for both fluids, which is another input required to compute the mass diffusivity, is specified to be 18.0153 lb/lbmol [Ref. J5.9].PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J 11 of J40 3. Boundary conditions
-The boundary conditions are kept the same as for the steady-state analysis.
However, the fluid entering the "Inlet" surface is specified to the 100%"WaterCirculating" and, in case of backflow at the "Outlet" surface, the re-entering fluid is specified to the 100% "WaterLake".
This last condition is specified only to complete the STAR-CCM+
input file for this analysis but it is not used during the computation.
: 4. Initial conditions
-The results of steady state analysis are used as initial conditions for the transient calculation.
The liquid present in the UHS at the beginning of the transient simulation (t = 0 sec) is specified to be 100% "WaterLake".
: 5. Simulation time -The calculation is perforned from time tstart = 0 sec to time tend =VUHs/Q. The total volume of the UHS is manually requested and printed out by STAR-CCM+
after the generation of the computational domain and it is equal to VUHS = 1.454446"107 ft 3.The flow entering the UHS is equal to 86 ft 3/sec [Design Input J4.2]. Therefore, tend = VUHs/Q = (1.454446' 10' ft 3)/(86 ft 3/sec) = 169,122 sec 47 hrs.After the completion of the transient simulation, the volume and surface average concentrations of "WaterLake" are computed and the results are used to manually calculate the UHS effective volume and surface as percentages respectively of the total UHS volume and surface by applying equations J2.1-2 and J2.1-4 as follows: Veffective
= 1- 'VLakeWater (t = 47 hr) (J2.1-6)VUHS Seffective
= 1---SLakeWater (t = 47 hr) (J2.1-7)SUHS Appendix J8.3 provides the STAR-CCM+
summary report of the model including physics and boundary conditions.
J2.2 Computer Programs and Software The analysis performed herein utilizes: 1. STAR-CCM+
6.04.014, S&L Program No. 03.7.863-6.04.014.
Controlled folder on Sargent & Lundy STARCCM server: C:\Program Files\CD-adapco (see code file listing in Appendix J8.4).All runs are executed on Sargent & Lundy server STARCCM with 64-bit Windows Server Standard 2007 operating system. The code has been validated under the Sargent & Lundy Quality Assurance Program.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J 12 of J40 2. MathCad 14.35, S&L Program No. 03.7.548-1435.
Controlled folder on Sargent& Lundy PC: C:\Program Files\ MathCad\ MathCadl4 (see code file listing in Appendix J8.5).All runs are executed on Sargent & Lundy PC ZL5581 with 32-bit Windows XP SP3 operating system. The code has been validated under the Sargent & Lundy Quality Assurance Program 3. Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Office Professional 2003 SP-2 including Excel, S&L Program No. 03.2.286-1.0.
All runs are executed on Sargent & Lundy PC ZL5581 with 32-bit Windows XP SP3 operating system. The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all spreadsheets used in this analysis.J2.3 Acceptance Criteria There are no specific acceptance criteria for the effective volume and surface values estimated in this calculation.
This information is gathered to support thermal analysis of the UHS performed in the main report.For the CFD analysis, the computational mesh must be of acceptable quality, as verified by Appendix J8. 1. Furthermore, the calculated results must be converged as verified by the plot of the residuals in Appendix J8.3 (page J31).PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J 13 of J40 J3.0 ASSUMPTIONS J3.1 Silt thickness
-The depth of the silt layer at the bottom of the UHS is assumed to be 1.5 ft (see Design input 5.3). The use of 1.5 ft silt thickness (maximum allowed value) causes the calculation of a reduced UHS effective volume.J3.2 Water temperature
-The water in the UHS is assumed to be at a constant temperature of 100'F. This input is used to estimate the density, viscosity and self-diffusivity of water in the UHS. This input does not significantly impact the results of this calculation.
J3.3 Soil roughness
-The roughness of the bottom of the UHS (including the silt layer) is assumed to be 5 in. Since this calculation determines the UHS inactive volumes rather than pressure losses, based on the calculated UHS low water velocities, this input does not significantly impact the results of this calculation.
J4.0 DESIGN INPUTS J4.l UHS dimensions
-The UHS dimensions are obtained from References J5.3 to J5.6 as follows: i. The nominal elevation of the UHS cooling pond bottom is approximately 685 ft[Ref. J5.5].ii. The elevation of the bottom of the intake flume is approximately 678.5 ft [Ref.J5.5].iii. The bottom of the UHS between the cooling pond and intake flume is approximately flat and its depth varies from 678.5 ft to 685 ft in a linear manner[Refs. J5.3 to J5.6].iv. The slope of the UHS side is approximately 1:4 all around its perimeter
[Refs.J5.3 to J5.6].v. The width of the water inlet chute is 8 ft [Ref. J5.4].vi. The width of the intake flume bottom is approximately 40 ft [Ref. J5.6].vii. The dimensions of the UHS that are not listed above are scaled from Reference J5.3.viii. The elevation of the UHS free surface is 690 ft [Ref. J5.1].J4.2 UHS flow -The mass flow rate through the UHS is equal to 86 ft 3/s [Ref. J5.8].J4.3 UHS sediment level -The sediment level in the intake flume and cooling pond must remain less than or equal to 1.5 ft [Ref. J5.8]. The use of maximum silting reduces the PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J14 of J40 UHS volume, and therefore the residence time. This reduces the effectiveness of the UHS and it is thus conservative.
J4.4 Properties of water -Water at 1007F has the following properties:
density z 62 lb/ft 3;dynamic viscosity z 6.727.10-9 atm-s [Ref. J5.7].J


==5.0 REFERENCES==
==15.0 REFERENCES==


J5.1 LSCL-UFSAR, Section 9.2.6 "Ultimate Heat Sink", Rev. 19 J5.2 CD-adapco, User Guide, STAR-CCM+
15.1 LaSalle County Station Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), Rev. 19.
Version 6.04.014, 2011 J5.3 Exelon Nuclear -LaSalle Station Drawing No. S-16B Rev. B, "Composite Lake Drawing, Sheet 2" J5.4 Exelon Nuclear -LaSalle Station Drawing No. S-79 Rev. H, "CSCS Pond Water Inlet Chutes Plan and Sections" J5.5 Exelon Nuclear -LaSalle Station Drawing No. 97ES083.1 Rev. 0, "Contours Hydrographic Survey" J5.6 Exelon Nuclear -LaSalle Station Drawing No. 97ES083.2 Rev. 0, "Profiles Hydrographic Survey" J5.7 Frank Kreith, "Principles of Heat Transfer", 3 rd Ed. 1976, IEP, New York, NY J5.8 LSCL Calculation No. L-002457, Rev. 5 J5.9 T.L. Brown, H.E. LeMay Jr., B.E. Bursten, J.R. Burdge, "Chemistry", 9 th Ed. 2003, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ J5.10 LAKET-PC User Manual, S&L Program Number 03.7.292-2.2, Rev. 0, October 30, 2004 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J15 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J15 of J40 J6.0 EVALUATIONS Step One: Steady State Analysis The steady state simulation is run until convergence for approximately 6,000 iterations
15.2 LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 12/09/2004. Controlled File Path: \\SNLVS5\SYS3\OPS$kLAK29222\
[see Residual graph in Appendix J8.3]. Figure J- 11 shows the velocity magnitude distribution and stream lines at the free surface. As seen, the right leg of the UHS presents two large recirculation cells which are not expected to participate significantly to the main water flow. Additional two smaller recirculation areas are visible in proximity to the UHS inlet created by the inlet water stream.Velocity:
15.3 SEAG # 12-000098, "DIR for LAS-EPU-U 1/2-DIR-T0608- 1," 4/18/2012.
Magnitude (ft/s)v3,1399 25319 21819 12560 0.6Z2798 Figure J-1 1. UHS computation
15.4 "UHS Heat Load," Calculation L-002453, Rev. 3, June 2012.
-Step One: Velocity magnitude and stream lines on the UHS free surface.Step Two: Transient Analysis After applying the changes indicated in Section J2.1.5 to the steady state model, the transient simulation is run for approximately 40,000 iterations from time tstar, = 0 sec to time tend = 47 hrs [see Residual graph in Appendix J8.3]. Figure 12 shows the surface concentration distribution for the "WaterLake".
15.5 Microsoft Office Excel 2003 (11.8120.8122) SP2, Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corporation.
As expected, the velocity distribution is practically unchanged with respect to the steady-state solution (see Figure J-13).PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J16 of J40 MassFraction of WaterLake L.0000 Velocity:
15.6 L-001355, "LaSalle County Station CSCS Hydraulic Model," Rev. 005A.
Magnitude (ft/s)2.5 22 0.8000 0.6000 0.240O 90.0=00 V2561 562805 t48 .006 Figure J-12. UHS computation
IPROJECT                                              NO. 11333-297
-Step Two: Surface concentration for "WaterLake" at 47 hrs.Figure J-13. UHS computation
-Step Two: Velocity magnitude and stream lines on the UHS free surface.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J 17 of J40 The numerical computation of both Step One and Two is considered to be successful upon evaluation of the relative residual (unitless) plot shown in Appendix J8.3 (see page 31). The residuals of the fluid dynamics variables are very well behaved and with a magnitude, at the end of each main iteration, small enough to ensure a sufficiently converged solution.
Therefore, the acceptance criteria in Section J2.3 are satisfied.
7 0 0 C 0 0 E.5 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1--Straight Channel-UHS I-,.I N N N N N I N N N-- N 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time [hr]30 35 40 45 50 Figure J-14. UHS computation
-Time variation of the"WaterLake" volume average concentration in the UHS.Figure J-14 shows the trend over time of the "WaterLake" volume average concentration.
As seen, the concentration decreases linearly at the beginning since the incoming water displaces the water in the UHS. After about 20 hrs, some the incoming water is already exiting the UHS and thus "WaterLake" volume average concentration change is no longer linear: some of the incoming water is being trapped in the areas of recirculation and it cannot efficiently displace the "WaterLake" out of the UHS.After 47 hrs, the volume average concentration is computed to be 36.59 %. Therefore, the UHS effective volume percentage as compute by Equation J2.1.6 is equal to (see Appendix J8.3): Veffective
= 1 -0.3659 = 63.4%VUHS (J2.1-8)PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J18 of J40 After 47 hrs, the surface average concentration is computed to be 42.09 %. Therefore, the UHS effective surface percentage as compute by Equation J2.1.7 is equal to (see Appendix J8.3: Seffective
= 1- 0.4209 = 57.9%SUHS (J2.1-9)J


==7.0 CONCLUSION==
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                      REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 17 of 122 16.0 CALCULATIONS 16.1 Calculation of Plant Temperature Rise The CSCS temperature rise across the plant is computed in Attachment L. Changes from the determination of the plant temperature rise in previous revisions of this calculation included a change in the decay heat ratio as a result of EPU, the removal of fuel pool heat loads, and a one-hour time interval between calculations. See Appendix L9.2 of Attachment L for the results of the plant temperature rise at MUR PU and Appendix L9.4 of Attachment L for the plant temperature rise at EPU.
16.2 Seepage Rate The seepage rate is determined from a UHS seepage of 0.2 cfs (Design Input 14.2) and a constant flow of 600 gpm for spent fuel pool makeup (See Design Input 14.1). This gives a total seepage rate of 1.537 cfs, which a constant for all cases.
16.3 Maximum Allowable Lake Temperature For this analysis, cases are run at MUR PU and EPU power levels. Each case is run with a limiting plant intake temperature of 104'F and 107'F, allowing for a comparison of the maximum allowable UHS temperature at the differing plant intake temperatures. Limiting weather data is determined from two sets of weather data (See Attachment M).
The time of day which the transient is assumed is critical when determining the maximum allowable initial temperature of the UHS. To account for the time of day at which the UHS transient may start, eight start times are used for the limiting sediment depth of 18-in. As seen in Table 17.1, the most limiting time is 6AM (as it results in the lowest allowable initial temperature). Therefore, the remaining worst weather cases are run beginning at 6AM.
In order to determine the limiting amount of sediment, the worst net evaporation case was run at four different sediment levels at EPU power level (Cases la, 2a, 3a, and 4a) for a maximum plant inlet temperature of 107°F. The case with no sediment (Case 1a) was determined to be the most limiting (as it resulted in the highest drawdown). Therefore, the remaining worst evaporation cases were run with a sediment level of 0-in.
16.4 LAKET-PC Files The S&L LAKET-PC computer program [Ref. 15.2] was utilized to determine the combined impact of decay heat, initial UHS temperature, and allowable sediment accumulation in the UHS. The files used in this analysis are shown in Table 16.1, below.
I                                            PROJECT NO. 11333-297


The UHS effective volume as percentage of the UHS total volume is 63.4 %.The UHS effective surface as percentage of the UHS total free surface is 57.9 %.J8.0 APPENDICES J8.1 STAR-CCM+
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                      REVISION NO. 8    ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 18 of 122  1 Table 16.1: LAKET Files I Name -                   IType      l Modified                        Size    Ratio  Packed
mesh quality report [see Page J19]J8.2 Calculation of the Schmidt number [see Pages J20 to J23]J8.3 Summary Report of STAR-CCM+
:-1Casela.cdat            DAT File    6/21(2012  10:21 AM            5,134    91%        470 I' Case la.out            OUT File    6/21/2012  11:16 AM          104,201    97%      3,159 11 Case la.pit            PLT File    6/21/2012  11:16 AM        435,708      73%  118,789 11 Case la. pltX          PLTX File    6/21/2012 11:16 AM            44,640      78%    9,967
Analysis [see Pages J24 to J32]J8.4 STAR-CCM+
    ?l Case la-lO-F.dat        DAT File     6/21/2012 10: 22 AM            5,138    91%/        472
6.01.014, S&L Prog. No. 03.7.863-6.04.014, Controlled folder file listing Electronically attached: File name: EAppendix J8.4.pdf Size: 22,128 KB; Type: Adobe Acrobat Document; Date 5/23/2012 3:25 PM J8.5 MathCad 14.35, S&L Program No. 03.7.548-1435, Controlled folder file listing Electronically attached: File name: EAppendix J8.5.pdf Size: 2,068 KB; Type: Adobe Acrobat Document; Date 5/23/2012 3:27 PM J8.6 Additional information requested by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on June 27th 2013 [see Page J33 to J40]PROJECT NO. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.1 Revision No. 8 Attachment J Page J19 of J40 Boundaries of region Lake: Boundary soil: 126832 faces (7 triangular, 236 quadrilateral, 126589 polygonal)
    - Casela_104F.out          OUT File    6/21/2012 11: 18 AM          104,201    97%      3, 168 P1 Case lal04F.plt        PLT File    6/21/2012 11:18 AM        435,708      73%  118,774
Extents: x: [-4.2672000000e+000, 7.8150720000e+002]
    ?iCase laj104F.pltX        PLTX File    6/21/2012 11: 18 AM          44,640    78%      9,873 Case laMUR.dat        DAT File     5/17/2012 4:29 PM             5,069    91%        475 Pj Case la-MUR.out        OUT File    5/17(2012 4:32 PM          104,201      97%      3,175 Case lajMUR.plt        PLT File    5/17/2012 4:32 PM          435,708      73%    118,813 P Case lajMUR,pltX        PLTX File    5/17/2012 4:32 PM            44,640    783%    9,946 LA1 Case laMUR_10-4Fdat    DAT File    5/17/2012 4:30 PM              5,074    91%        480 F1 Casela MUR_10-F~out    OUT File    5/17/2012 4:35 PM          104,201      97%      3,176 Case la MUR_104F.plt  PLT File    5/17(2012 4:35 PM          435,708      73%    118,807
m y: [-4.2672000000e+000, 1.4874240000e+003]
_Case  laYMUR_1O4F.pltX  PLTX File    5/17/2012 4:35 PM            44,640    78%      9,879 11 Case lc.dat            DAT File    6/21/2012 10:21 AM            5,143    91%        478 S Case c. out              OUT File    6/21/2012 11: 17AM          103,572      97%      3,358 L; Caselc.plt              PLT File    6/21/2012 11:17 AM          421,692      73%    115,779 P1 Case lc.pltX            PLI-X File  6/21/2012 11: 17 AM          52,560    77%    12,348 Case lclO41F.dat      DAT File    6/21/2012  10:22 AM            5,145    91%        481 DI Case lc 104F.out        OUT File    6(21(2012 11:18 AM          103,541      97%      3,349 L Case 1c 104Fplt        PLT File    6/21/2012 11:18 AM          421,692      73%    115,769 LA Case lc_104F.pltX      PLTX File    6/21/2012 11:18 AM            43,200    76%    10,197 PL Case IcMUR.dat          DAT File    5/22/2012 5:50 PM              5,0/-9    90%        484 5 Case lc MUR.out          OUT File    5/22/2012 5:50 PM          103,572      97%      3,359 Case IcYMUR.plt        PLT File    5/22/2012 5:50 PM          421,692      73%    115,753 4 Case lcMUR.pltX        PLTX File    5(22/2012 5:50 PM            52,560    76%    12,358 Case IcMUR_104F.dat    DAT File    5/22/2012 5:50 PM              5,081    90%        487
m z: [-1.9812000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+000]
    -ACase lcMUR_104F.out      OUT File    5/22/2012 5:50 PM          103,541      97%      3,333 Case 1cqMURO-4F.plt    PLT File    5/22/2012 5:50 PM          421,692      730/c  115,783 P11 Case 1c MUR 104F.pltX  PLTX File    5/22/2012 5:50 PM            43,200    76%    10,244 PlCase2adat                DAT File    6/21(2012 10:21 AM            5,137    91%        474 L1 Case2a.out              OUT File    6/21/2012 11:17 AM          104,201      97%      3,154 IlCase2a~plt              PLT File    6/21/2012 11:17 AM          435,708      73%    118,896
a surface area: 3.2716753125e+005 mA2 maximum boundary skewness angle = 1.2161578369e+002 deg in cell with Prostar cell Index 754941 Boundary FreeSurface:
    *AICase2a,pltX            PLTX File    6/21/2012 11:17 AM            44,640    78%      9,985
126581 faces (1 triangular, 201 quadrilateral, 126379 polygonal)
_5 Case2a 10-1F.dat        DAT File    6/21/2012 10:22 AM            5,140    91%        475 LA  Case2a_104F.out        OUT File    6/21/2012 11:18 AM          104,2011    97%      3,187 LACase 2a_104F.plt        PLT File    6/21/2012 11:18 AM          435,7038    73%    118,835 LACase 2a104F.pitX        PLTX File    6/21/2012 11:18 AM            44,610    78%    10,007 P1Case 2aMUR.dat          DAT File    5/17/2012 4:30 PM              5,072    91%        478 EA Case2ajMUR.out          OUT File    5/17/2012 4:32 PM          104,201      97%      3,176 Case 2aMUR.plt        PLT File    5/17/2012 4:32 PM          435,708      73%    118,932 LACase2aMUR.plLX          PLTX File    5/17(2012 4:32 PM            44,640    78%    10,011 lACase2aMUR 104F.dat      DAT File    5/17/2012 4:31 PM              5,077    90%        483 P-l1Case2aMUR_10-F.out    OUT File    5/17/2012 4:35 PM          104,201      97%      3,183 LA  Case2aMUR 104F.pit    PLT File    5/17/2012 4:35 PM          435,708      73%    118,914 51 Case 2a MUR_10-F.pltX  PLTX File    5/17/2012 4:35 PM            44,640    78%      9,969 I                                              PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                1
Extents: x: [-4.2672000000e+000, 7.8150720000e+002) m y: [-4.2672000000e+000, 1.4874240000e+003]
 
m z: [1.0668000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+000]
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                          REVISION NO. 8    ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 19 of 122    1 Table 16.1: LAKET Files (cont.)
m surface area: 3.2625790625e+005 mA2 maximum boundary skewness angle = 8.5943321228e+001 deg in cell with Prostar cell Index 158035 Boundary Inlet: 30 quadrilateral faces Extents: x: [9.0220800000e+001, 9.2659200000e+001]
I Name                      I Type      I Modified                        Size I  Ratio  I  Packed  I PIlCase2c.dat .             DAT File    6/21/20 12  10:21 AM            5,144      91%          482 P1 Case 2c.out              OUT File    6/21/2012  11:17 AM          103,541      97%      3,346 PlCase2c.plt                PLT File    6/21/2012  11:17 AM          421,692      73%     115,828
m y: [1.7526000000e+002, 1.7526000000e+002]
    -1 Case2c.pltX              PLTX File    6/21/2012  11: 17 AM          43,200      76%     10,261
m z: [0.0000000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+0001 m surface area: 2.6012849808e+000 mA2 maximum boundary skewness angle = 2.4523153305e+001 deg in cell with Prostar Cell Index 372457 Boundary Outlet: 176 faces (174 quadrilateral, 2 polygonal)
    .1 Case 3a_104F.cdat        DAT File    6/21/2012  10:23 AM            5,133      91%          469 PI1 Case 3a_ 104F. out      OUT File    6/21/2012  11: 18 AM        104,201      97%       3,174 P1 Case 3a_ 104F.pit        PLT File    6/21/2012  11: 16 AM        435,708      73%    118,968
Extents: x: [2.9565600000e+002, 3.4442400000e+002]
  *Case 3a_104F.pltX            PLTX File    6/21/2012  11: 18 AM          44,640      77%      10,133 P1Case 3a 12am. dat          DAT File    6122/2012  10:15 AM            5,137      91%         474 Ri Case 3al12am.out          OUT File    6/22/2012  10:16 AM          104,201      97%      3,181 1ýj Case 3a_12am.pit        PLT File    6/22/2012  10:16 AM          435,708      73%    119,012
m y: [1.4874240000e+003, 1.4874240000e+003]
    %1 Case 3a_ 12am.pltX      PLTX File    6/24222012 10:16 AM          44,640      779/    10,115 51 Case 3a_j2pm.dat          DAT File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM              5,137      91%          476 P1 Case 3a_ 12pm, out        OUT File    6/21/2012 9:50 AM            104,201      97%*      3,161 Q1 Case 3a_ 12pm. pit        PLT File    6/21/2012 9:50 AM            435,708      73%     119,003
m z: [-1.9812000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+000]
    ', Case 3a_ 12pm.pltX        PLTX File    6/21/2012 9:50 AM            44,640      77 %c    10,143 P1 Case 3a_3am. dat          DAT File    6/21/2012 9:47 AM              5,134      91%          472
m surface area: 1.1132573700e+002 mA2 maximum boundary skewness angle = 2.8035736084e+001 deg in cell with Prostar Cell Index 739634 Region Lake: 43 tetrahedral cells 25 hexahedral cells 2 wedge cells 2 pyramid cells 748314 polyhedral cells 748386 cells total 2880831 interior faces (5724 triangular, 2249993 quadrilateral, 625114 polygonal) 1761870 vertices Extents: x: [-4.2672000000e+000, 7.8150720000e+002]
  ?1*Case3a_3am.out            OUT File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            104,201      97%       3,161
m y: [-4.2672000000e+000, 1.4874240000e+003]
  -1 Case Ba jam. plt          PLT File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            435,708      73%     118,996 P Case 3a3am.pltX            PLTX File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            44,640      77%      10,133 P1 Case 3a_3pm, dat          DAT File    6/21/2012 9:47 AM              5,134      91%          472 D1 Case 3a_3pm, out          OUT File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            104,201      97%      3,159 73%
m z: [-1.9812000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+0003 m Maximum interior cell index delta: 2296, average: 7.8781478469e+002 Maximum cell face index delta: 9001, average: 5.6040540283e+003 volume range: [4.2707888497e-005, 3.1967809200e+000]
P Case 3a_3pm. pit            PLT File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            435,708              118,909 P. Case 3a_3pm. pltX        PLTFX File  6/21/2012 9:49 AM            44,640      77%      10,126 P1Case 3a.6am, dat          DAT File    6/21/2012 9:48 AM              5,135      91%         474 P1Case 3a_6am. out          OUT File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            104,201      97%       3,158 A Case 3a.6amplt            PLT File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            435,708      73%    118,984 Pl Case 3a_6am, pltX        PLTX File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            44,640      77%      10,112 i Case 3a_6pm, dat        DAT File    6/21/2012 9:48 AM              5,136      91%          475 P1 Case 3a_6pm, out          OUT File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            104,201      97%       3,162 P1 Case 3a_6pmplt            PLT File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            435,708      73%     118,984 P1 Case 3a_6pm, pltX        PLTX File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            44,640      77%Ac    10,068 P Case 3agamdat              DAT File    6/21/2012 9:48 AM              5,136      91%         473 P1 Case 3a_9am out          OUT File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            104,201      97%       3,166 PICase3a_9amplt              PLT File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            435,708      73%     118,983 P_1iCase3a_9ampltX          PLTX File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            4-1,640      77%      10,082 P1 Case 3a._pmdat            DAT File    6/21/2012 9:48 AM              5,136      91%          475 51 Case 3a_9pm.out          OUT File    6/21/2012 9:49 AM            104,201      97%       3,163 P1 Case 3a._pmplt            PLT File    6/21/2012 9:49  AM          435,708      73%     118,954 5 Case 3a_9pmpltX            PLTX File    6/21/2012 9:49  AM          44,640      77%      10,105 P1Case3aMUR.dat              DAT File    5/17/2012 4:30  PM            5,067      91%          478 51 Case 3aMUR. out          OUT File    5/17/2012 4:33  PM          104,201      97%        3,166 I1 Case3aMUR.plt            PLT File    5/17/20 12 4:33  PM          435,7038      73%     118,981 PI Case 3aMUR.pltX          PLTX File    5/17/2012 4:33  PM          44,640      77%      10, 145 S;1 Case3a MUR_104F.dat      DAT File    5/17/20 12 4:38  PM            5,070      91%          478 P Case 3aMUR_ 10F. out      OUT File    5/17/20 12 4:38  PM          104,201      97%       3,172 51 Case 3aMUR_ 104F. pit    PLT File    5/17/2012 4:38  PM          435,708      73%    118,942 A°I Case 3a MUR_ 10*F,pltI  PLTX File    5/17/2012 4:38 PM              -4,640      77%      10,124 I                                                PROJECT NO. 11333-297
mA3 Minimum volume in cell with Prostar cell Index 747962 Minimum distance between centroids of neighbor cells = 1.9749755266e-002 between cells with Prostar Cell Index 452140 and 576394 Maximum skewness angle = 1.7942733765e+002 deg in cell with Prostar cell Index 718600 Face validity: Minimum Face validity:
 
8.4159338474e-001 Maximum Face validity:
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                      REVISION NO. 8  ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 110 of 122 1 Table 16.1: LAKET Files (cont.)
1.0000000000e+000 Face validity < 0.50 0 0.000%0.50 <= Face validity < 0.60 0 0.000%0.60 <= Face validity < 0.70 0 0.000%0.70 <= Face validity < 0.80 0 0.000%0.80 <= Face validity < 0.90 24 0.003%0.90 <= Face validity < 0.95 94 0.013%0.95 <= Face validity < 1.00 357 0.048%1.00 <= Face validity 747911 99.937%volume change: Minimum volume change: 1.052741e-003 Maximum volume change: 1.000000e+000 volume change < 0.000000e+000 0 0.000%0.000000e+000
Name ,-                 I Type      I Modified                        Size    Ratio  Packed 1_'Case 3c. dat            DAT File    6/21/2012 10:21 AM            5,133      91%       478
<= volume change < 1.0000OOe-006 0 0.000%1.0000OOe-006
  *1 Case3c.out              OUT File    6/21/2012 11:17AM          103,541      97%     3,327 "I Case3c.plt              PLT File    6/21/2012 11:17 AM        421,692      72%  115,987 PLTX File  6/21/2012 11: 17AM          43,200      76%    10,334 P Case 3c.pltX P-1 Case-a.dat              DAT File    6/21/2012 10:22 AM            5,133      91%        467 51 Case4a.out              OUT File    6/21/2012 11: 17 AM        104,201      97%      3,171
<= volume Change < 1.0000OOe-005 0 0.000%1.000000e-005
  *1l Case4a.plt              PLT File    6/21/2012 11: 17 AM        435,703      73%    118,931 77%     10,066 Li Case4a.pItX              PLTX File  6/21/2012 11:17 AM          44,640
<= volume change < 1.000000e-004 0 0.000%1.000000e-004
  ';ICase-la_10F.dat          DAT File    6/21/2012 10:23 AM            5,136      91%        470
<= volume Change < 1.0000OOe-003 0 0.000%1.000000e-003
    -1 Casela_10-F.out        OUT File    6/21/2012 11: 18 AM        104,201      97%      3,178 1 Case4a_ IOF pit        PLT File    6/21/2012 11:18AM          435,708      73%    118,884 51 Case4alO14F. pltX        PLTX File  6/21/2012 11:18 AM          44,640      77%    10,046 DAT File    5/17/2012 4:30 PM            5,068      91%        477
<= volume change < 1.000000e-002 166 0.022%1.000000e-002
_&#x17d;1 Casela_MUR~dat LiCaselaMUR.out            OUT File    5/17/2012 4:33 PM          104,201      97%      3,176 5;l Case4aMUR.pit          PLT File    5/17/2012 4:33 PM          435,708      73%    118,927 Pl Case4aMUR.pltX          PLTX File  5/17/2012 4:33 PM            44,640      77%    10,111 1 Case-laMUR_104F.dat  DAT File    5/17/2012 4:39 PM            5,071      91%        480 Li Case4a1MUR_104F.out    OUT File    5/17/2012 4:-40 PM          104,201      97%      3,188 Li Case-aMUR_1O4F.plt      PLT File    5/17/2012 4:40 PM          435,708      73%    113,868 S11 Case4ajMURJO-1F.plLt    PLTX File  5/17/2012 4:40 PM            44,640      77%    10,102 Li Case-qc.dat            DAT File    6/21/2012 10:22 AM            5,139      91%        475 21Case4*.out                OUT File    6/21/2012 11:18 AM          103,541      97%      3,332
<= volume change < 1.0000OOe-001 685 0.092%1.000000e-001
:    Case4c.plt            PLT File    6/21/2012 11:18 AM          421,692      73%    115,829 p.......
<= volume change <= 1.000000e+000 747535 99.886%Maximum boundary skewness angle in region = 1.216158e+002 deg overall Face validity: Minimum Face validity:
        ............         PLTX File  6/21/2012 11:18 AM          43,200      76%    10,333 I                                            PROJECT NO. 11333-297
8.415934e-001 Maximum Face validity:
 
1.000000e+000 Face validity < 0.50 0 0.000%0.50 <= Face validity < 0.60 0 0.000%0.60 <= Face validity < 0.70 0 0.000%0.70 <= Face validity < 0.80 0 0.000%0.80 <= Face validity < 0.90 24 0.003%0.90 <= Face validity < 0.95 94 0.013%0.95 <= Face validity < 1.00 357 0.048%1.00 <= Face validity 747911 99.937%overall volume change: Minimum volume Change: 1.052741e-003 Maximum volume Change: 1.000000e+000 volume change < 0.000000e+000 0 0.000%0.000000e+000
ICALCULATION NO. L-002457                            REVISION NO. 8              ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. Ill of 122 17.0 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 17.1 Summary Table 17.1 provides a summary of the limiting maximum initial lake temperature for the worst weather cases. Table 17.2 provides a sununary of the maximum lake drawdown for the worst net evaporation cases.
<= volume Change < 1.00OOOOe-006 0 0.000%1.000000e-006
Table 17.1a: MUR PU (3559 MW) Overall Summary for Maximum Temperature Case          Weather Data      Sediment        Initial Lake      Max Plant Inlet Level (in.)      Temp. (&deg;F)           Temp. (&deg;F) la MUR                1/30              0            103.63                107.0 2aMUR                  1/30      J       6            103.32                107.0 3a MUR                1/30              18            102.46                107.0 4aMUR                  1/30              12            102.93                107.0 laMUR_104F                1/30              0            100.30                104.0 2aMUR_104F                1/30              6 _            99.95                104.0 3aMUR_104F                1/30              18              91.68                104.0 4aMUR 104F                1/30              12              89.54                104.0 Table 17.1b: EPU (4067 M W,) Overall Summary for Maximum Temperature I Sediment          Initial Lake      Max Plant Inlet Case          Weather Data 1 Level (in.)      Temp. (*F)          Temp. (fF) la                1/30      I        0            103.63                107.0 2a                  1/30              6            103.32                107.0 3a 12am                1/30              18            104.95                107.0 3a_3am                1/30              18            103.14              106.81 3a_6am                1/30              18            102.42                107.0 3a_9am                1/30              18            103.61                107.0 3a_12pmr              1/30              18            105.80                107.0 3a_3pm                1/30              18      1    106.97                107.0 3a_6pm                1/30              18            107.00                107.0 3a_9pm                1/30              18            107.00                107.0 4a                1/30              12            102.93                107.0 is_104F              1/30              o0            100.30                104.0 2a 104F                1/30              6              96.80                104.0 3a 104F                1/30              18              87.01                104.0 4a_104F                1/30              12              85.47                104.0 (1) Due to a discontinuity in LAKET, this is as close to 107&deg;F that can be reached.
<= volume Change < 1.OOOOOe-005 0 0.000%1.000000e-005
I                                                PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                            1
<= volume Change < 1.000000e-004 0 0.000%1.000000e-004
 
<= volume Change < 1.0000OOe-003 0 0.000%1.000000e-003
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                            REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 112 of 122  1 Table 17.2a: MUR PU Overall Summary for Maximum Evaporation Sediment      Maximum Case                Weather Data              Level (in.) Drawdown (ft)1 1c_MUR        Worst 30-day Evaporation              0          2.24 lcMUR_104F Worst 30-day Evaporation                    0          2.22
<= volume change < 1.0000OOe-002 166 0.022%1.0000OOe-002
: 1) Determined from initial lake elevation of 689.98-ft.
<= volume Change < 1.000000e-001 685 0.092%1.000000e-001
Table 17.2b: EPU Overall Summary for Maximum Evaporation Sediment      Maximum Case                Weather Data              Level (in.) Drawdown (ft)1 ic        Worst 30-dayEvaporation                0          2.27 2c        Worst 30-day Evaporation              6          2.25 3c        Worst 30-day Evaporation              18          2.20 4c        Worst 30-day Evaporation              12          2.23 Ic_104F      Worst 30-day Evaporation              0          2.26
<= volume Change <= 1.000000e+000 747535 99.886%PROJECT NO. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No. 8 Appendix J8.2 Page J20 of J40 Attachment J Appendix B8.2 Calculation of the Schmidt number References
: 1) Determined from initial lake elevation of 689.98-ft.
: 1. Frank Kreith, "Principles of Heat Transfer", 3rd Ed. 1976, IEP, New York, NY 2. R.S. Smith, Z. Dohnalek, G.A Kimmel, K.P. Stevenson, B.D. Kay, "The self-diffusivity of amorphous solid water near 150 K", Chemical Physics Vol. 258, Page 291-305, 2000 Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.2 Revision No. 8 Attachment J Page J21 of J40 Water fluid dynamics properties as function of temperature
Figures 17.1 through 17.8, below, show the plant outlet temperature and plant inlet temperature over the entire 31 day period for the 107'F maximum plant inlet temperature case at MUR PU and EPU. Figures 17.9 and 17.10 show the maximum lake drawdown over the worst 30 days of evaporation weather.
[Ref. 1]i 0.. 4 70-F 80 OF Tdata.water.i 90OF Temperature 100 0 F 1150 OF, (62.3" 62.2:= /62.1 lb Density Pdaia.,,vater.[
17.2  Compliance with Acceptance Criteria 17.2.1 Acceptance Criterion #1 - Peak Temperature - Acceptance Criterion #1 is met provided the plant is operated, monitored, and maintains UHS initial temperatures below the applicable limits per the results listed in Table 17.1.
62.0 ft 161.2)"0.658 0.578:=dala.water.
17.2.2 Acceptance Criterion #2 - UHS Drawdown - The maximum expected lake drawdown for the cases evaluated is given in Table 17.2. This will be used in calculation L-001355 [Ref. 15.6].
0.514 10- 3 lb Dynamic viscosity 4 ft sec 0.458.0.292 Based on these values, the water density and dynamic viscosity are defined as function of temperature using a linear interpolation procedure:
I                                                    PROJECT NO. 11333-297
Pwater(Texnp)
 
:= linterp(Tdata.water.
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8                    ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 113 of 122 Figure 17.11: Plant Outlet Temperature (MUR PU) 150.000 140.000 U.
I, Pdata.water.
0 130.000 C-I-
I, Temp).,v.ater(Temp)
E  120.000 0
:= linterp(Tdata.water.
E 110.000 0.
I, -Idata.water.
100.000 90.000 0      5    10                15              20            25          30              35 Days Following Accident I                                          PROJECT NO. 11333-297
I, Temp)Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No. 8 Attachment J Appendix J8.2 Page J22 of J40 Water self-diffusivity as function of temperature
 
[Ref. 2]Reference 2 plots self-diffusivity values for water in liquid state for temperature from 273.15 K (32 'F) to 373.15 K (212 -F). The data below are extracted from Figure 7 of Ref. 2: Tdata.water,2
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457            REVISION NO. 8                      ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 114 of 122    1 Figure 17.2: Plant Outlet Temperature (EPU) 150.000
:=277.0 282.2 286.4 291.1 295.7 299.4 318.6 334.1 ,364.2 K j := 0.. 8 Temperature Dww-daIa.watcr.2:=
                                                                      -.--  Case la      ... Case 2a 140.000                                                        Case 3a 6am - - - Case 4a U-0 130.000 CL 4..
1.23E-05 1.49E-05 1.69E-05 1.92E-05 2.05E-05 2.33E-05 3.65E-05 4.71E-05 7.85E-05 2 cm S Self-diffusivity Based on these values, the water self-diffusivity is defined as function of temperature using a linear interpolation procedure:
E 120.000 4W' 0
Dj(Temp) := linterp(Tdta.water.2, Dww.data.water.2, Teinp)Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No. 8 Appendix J8.2 Page J23 of J40 Attachment J The Schmidt number is defined as [Ref. B5.2]: Schmidt(Temp)
110.000 EU 100.000 90.000 0      5  10                15            20            25            30              35 Days Following Accident I                                      PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                                      1
:= ..,,(Temp)Pwater(Temp)
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457              REVISION NO. 8                    ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 115 of 122 Figure 17.3: Plant Inlet Temperature (MUR PU) 108.000 106.000 104.000 U-  102.000 0
100.000
        'E 98.000 M-FL 96.000 94.000 92.000 90.000 88.000 0      5    10                15              20          25            30              35 Days Following Accident IPROJECT                                            NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457          REVISION NO. 8                    ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 116 of 122 Figure 17.4: Plant Inlet Temperature (EPU) 108.000 106.000 104.000 LL  102.000 0
100.000 CL E  98.000 4) 0.
96.000 94.000 92.000 90.000 88.000 0      5  10                15              20        25            30              35 Days Following Accident IPROJECT                                        NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                        REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 117 of 122 Figure 17.5, Case 3aMUR: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 31-Day Temperature Period (d = 18", t = 0600 hrs, Ti = 102.46&deg;F) 150.000 140.000 UHS Inlet Temperature UHS Outlet Temperature I
130.000 LL 0
1,..
120.000 0
E 110.000 0
100.000 90.000 80.000 0    5              10                15                20      25            30              35 Days Following Accident I                                                PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                                1
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                        REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 118 of 122 Figure 17.6, Case 4a_MUR: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 31-Day Temperature Period (d = 12", t = 0600 hrs, Ti = 102.93&deg;F) 150.000
                                                                                      -  UHS Inlet Temperature
                                                                                      -  UHS Outlet Temperature 140.000 130.000 LL 0
      -"    120.000 C.
I.-.
E: 110.000 100.000 90.000 80.000 0    5            10                15                20      25            30              35 Days Following Accident I                                                PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                    REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 119 of 122    1 Figure 17.7, Case 3a: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 31-Day Temperature Period (d = 18", t = 0600 hrs, Ti = 102.43*F) 150.000 140.000 130.000 L-0 120.000 I-4.'
E=110.000 I--
100.000 90.000 80.000 0      5        10                15                20      25            30              35 Days Following Accident I                                            PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457                    REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 120 of 122    1 Figure 17.8, Case 4a: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 31-Day Temperature Period (d = 12", t = 0600 hrs, T1 = 102.93*F) 150.000 140.000 130.000 U_
0 120.000 E 110.000 I-100.000 90.000 80.000 0        5        10                15                20      25            30              35 Days Following Accident I                                              PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                                  1
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 121 of 122 Figure 17.9, Case lc_MUR: UHS LOCA Drawdown Worst 30 Day Evaporation Weather Period Sediment Level = 0-in 690.500 690.000 689.500 0
CU
        > 689.000 688.500 688.000 687.500 0      5      10              15            20        25            30              35 Days Following Accident I                                        PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457            REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 122 of 122 Figure 17.10, Case Ic: UHS LOCA Drawdown Worst 30 Day Evaporation Weather Period Sediment Level = 0-in 690.500 690.000 689.500 0
MU 689.000 688.500 688.000 687.500 0        5    10              15            20        25            30              35 Days Following Accident I                                      PROJECT NO. 11333-297                                              1
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8      ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J1 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8      ATTACHMENT J, PAGE Ji of J40 Attachment J - UHS Flow Path Analysis Prepared:    *VLLJ& IiO        "f                        Date OQCAL    V2,,o113 1
D9aniele Ludovisi - Sargent & LundyLLc Reviewed:                                                Date 10- o-2,oOi Pawel Kut - Sargent & LundyLLc Revision 8 of this attachment adds Appendix J8.6 (pages J33 to J40).
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                  REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J2 of J40 J1.O    PURPOSE The purpose of this attachment is to evaluate the water flow pattern in the man-made Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) at LaSalle County Generating Station with the water depth at its minimum, that the water level is at elevation 690 ft [Ref. J5.1] and the UHS bottom is covered with approximately 1.5 ft of silt [Ref. J5.8]. The analysis is carried by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The recirculation areas in the UHS are identified and the UHS volume actively involved in the main water flow is estimated along with and the associated surface area. The output of this evaluation is to provide effective lake volume and surface area for use in the S&L LAKET-PC computer program.
J1.1    Background The UHS is designed to provide sufficient cooling water to permit the safe shutdown and cool down of the station for both normal and accident conditions. In the unlikely event that the main dike is breached, there is a submerged pond within the cooling lake for the LaSalle County Station that is designed to hold water. This remaining water constitutes the ultimate heat sink for the station. It has a depth of approximately 5 feet and a top water elevation established at 690 feet [Ref. J5.1].
Considering approximately 1.5 ft of silt at the bottom of the UHS, a CFD analysis is performed to predict the water main flow pattern and estimate the volume of water contained in the active zones of the UHS and the corresponding surface area. These inputs are used in main report to determine the combined impact of power uprate and allowable sediment accumulation in the UHS on the maximum plant inlet temperature and evaporative drawdown by use of the S&L LAKET-PC computer program.
J2.0    METHODOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA J2.1    Methodology J2. 1.1 Effective volume and effective surface area Figure J-3 shows a top view of the UHS computational domain. As shown, water enters the UHS in one of the UHS side branches and exits from the intake flume. Zones of recirculation are expected in the other branch of the UHS, which is a dead leg, and in proximity of the UHS inlet. LAKET-PC is a one-dimensional lake thermal prediction computer program [Ref. J5. 10]. The one-dimensional assumption coerces the water body into an idealized rectangular channel. In this idealization, water entering the channel displaces an equal amount of water out of the back end (see Figure J-1 ). At some time (t,)
after the start of flow (to), the volume of displaced water is equal to Q.( t, -to), where is the Q is the flow rate of the water flowing into the channel. Indicating the total volume of the channel with Vchannel, all of the water is considered to have swept out of the channel at time t = to+Vchannel/Q. However, if the lake being modeled has stagnant volumes, the water in those volumes would not be swept out of the exit as idealized in the LAKET-PC modeling. For more accurately conforming the real lake to the idealized channel, these stagnant volumes and the corresponding surfaces must be removed from the active volume.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                              REVISION NO. 8                          ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J3 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457                              REVISION NO. 8                          ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J3 of J40 Figure J-1. Reference water flow.
Initial volume of water still present inthe channel at time t Vchannel Straight channel Veffective Channel with to        teffecive  t = to + Vchannel/Q                      Time Figure J-2. Water displaced in the reference straight channel and in channel with recirculation zones.
Figure J-2 shows both the idealized and actual amount of water displaced from a lake with recirculating (stagnant) volumes. If we could differentiate between water that was initially in the lake from new water entering the lake, we could use the concentration of initial water remaining in the lake at time t to find the fraction of water that was not swept out at time t. This is the fraction of the lake not actively participating in the channel flow.
This volume and the corresponding surface area should be removed from the lake total dimensions to provide more accurate and conservative results.
The amount of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel, trapped in the recirculation zones, at time t = to + (Vchannel/Q) is calculated as follows (with to =0):
Vtrapped in the reciruclation zones (t) =      Jc Vinitial water in the channel (t)dV      (J2. I - )
Vchannel PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                          REVISION NO. 8                                ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J4 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457                          REVISION NO. 8                                ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J4 of J40 where Vchannel is the total volume of the channel and                                        CVinitial water in the channel(t)  is the volumetric distribution of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel at time t. The effective volume is calculated as follows:
Veffective    - Vchannel - Vtrapped in the reciruclation zones (t) =
JC Vinitial water      in the channel    (t)dV VchannelI      -  Vchannel          Vhannel                                            (J2.1-2)
                                      =  Vchannel (1 -    c'V initial water  in the channel (t))
where the term CV initial water inthe channel (t)=                C    initial water in the channel  (t)dV    Vchannel  is equal to VchanneI                                        /
the volume average concentration of the amount of water initially in the channel at time t, and still present in the channel at time t. The effective surface area is calculated in manner similar to the effective volume. At the surface of the channel, the amount of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel, trapped in the recirculation zones, at time t = (Vchannel/Q) is calculated as follows:
S trapped inthe reciruclation zones (t)      =      JC Sinitial water inthe channel (t)dS                    (J2.1-3)
Schannel where Schannel is the total surface of the channel and CSinitial water inthe channel(t) is the surface distribution of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel at time t. The effective surface is calculated as follows:
Seffective        Sdchannel -Strapped inthe reciruclation zones            (t)  =
f C S initial water in the channel (t)dV Schanne      1- Schannel                                              =channel            (J2.1-4) waeS ntechanne        l  td
                                        = Schannet  (i  - c'Sinitial water in the channet      (t))
where the tenn C5      initial water inthe channel (t) =        PC initial water inthe channel (t)dVj          channel is equal to Schannel                                      /
the surface average concentration of the amount of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel at time t.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                  REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J5 of J40 J2.1.2 Calculation strategy As indicated in Section J2.1.1, the volume and surface averaged concentrations of the water initially in the UHS at to = 0 sec still present in the UHS at time t = VUHs/Q are necessary in order to calculate the effective UHS volume and surface.
The analysis of the water flow in the UHS is carried out through the use of the commercially available CFD code STAR-CCM+ [Ref. J5.2]. The calculation is performed in two steps:
I. The first step is employed to find the steady state flow distribution in the UHS. This solution is used as initial condition for the transient multi-component fluid mixture in the second step.
: 2. During this second step, newly introduced water in the UHS is specified to be a different liquid but with the same properties of the water already present in the UHS.
The flow pattern and mixing of these liquids are calculated and tracked over time from time to = 0 sec to t = VuHs/Q. At the end of the transient analysis, the surface average concentration of the amount of water initially in the UHS and still present in the UHS at time t = VUHs/Q are calculated to find the effective volume and surface.
J2.1.3 Geometrical domain The CFD analysis is carried out in three-dimensions. For the computations, the water domain is considered from the outlet of the inlet chute into the UHS to the exit of the intake flume. Figure J-3 shows a top view of the computational domain while Figures J-4 and J-5 show the inlet and outlet boundaries, respectively. Figure J-6 shows the bottom view of the UHS. Design Input J4.1 reports the dimensional information used to generate the model. Assumption J3.1 is used to evaluate the UHS thickness. The main dimensions are indicated in Figures J-1 to J-3. Figures J-4 to J-7 also show, in quotations, names associated to each of the boundaries in the numerical model. Note that this evaluation reports the fraction of active volume and surface area. Therefore, slight variations in the lake dimensions will not significantly affect the final results.
J2.1.4 Mesh The computational domain is discretized by using polyhedral cells with a base size of 12 ft, and six thin layers through the thickness of the UHS. Where necessary, the cell size is reduced down to 6 ft and, in proximity of the inlet boundary, down to 1.5 ft. Figures J-5 to J-8 show the mesh employed for the computations, which consists of 1,761,870 nodes for a total of 748,386 cells. Appendix J8.1 provides the STAR-CCM+ report of the mesh quality.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457              REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J6 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457              REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J6 of J40 t  Domain outlet 2200 ft 820 f Domain inlet                          180ft
                                                                    -t 780 ft Figure J-3. UHS computational domain: Top view.
                                                                        "FreeSurface" "Inlet" Figure J-4. UHS computational domain: Inlet boundary.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                  REVISION NO. 8                            ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J7 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457                    REVISION NO. 8                          ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J7 of J40 "Outlet"
                                                                                /
i            80 t                      i Figure J-5. UHS computational domain: Outlet boundary.
14                                  "Soil"
                                                                                                /
Figure J-6. UHS computational domain: Bottom view.
Note: The indicated depths are net values; the silt layer of 1.5 ft (see Design Input J4.3) is already considered in the indicated values.
Figure J-7. UHS computational domain: Mesh detail of the inlet boundary.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457              REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J8 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457              REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J8 of J40 Figure J-8. UHS computational domain: Mesh detail of the outlet boundary.
Figure J-9. UHS computational domain: Cross section of the outlet boundary mesh both along and across the axis.
Figure J-10. UHS computational domain: Mesh detail of the free surface boundary.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J9 of J40 J2.1.5 Numerical model As indicated in Section J2.1.2, the calculation is carried out in two steps.
Step One: Steady State Single-Fluid Analysis The numerical analysis is carried out using the segregated SST (Menter) k-wO model with the all y+ wall treatment. The shear stress transport (SST) formulation is a blend of a k-(0 formulation, which is used near walls, and a k-e formulation, which is used in regions far from walls. The use of a k-co formulation in the inner parts of the boundary layer makes the model directly usable all the way down to the wall through the viscous sub-layer without additional modifications. Hence, the SST k-w model can be used as a low Reynolds turbulence model without any extra damping functions. The SST formulation also switches to a k-c behavior in the free-stream and thereby avoids the common k-o0 problem of being too sensitive to the inlet free-stream turbulence properties. This model is fairly robust, it demonstrated superior performance for wall bounded problems and low Reynolds number flows, it showed potential for predicting transition regions and it also is often found to do a better job at capturing recirculation regions than other models [Ref.
J5.2].
Therefore, the SST (Menter) k-o model with the all y+ wall treatment is particularly suited for the geometry analyzed in this calculation which presents a confined flow with very extensive surface associated to an extremely small thickness, and a uniform mesh through the thickness of the domain as generated by the thin mesher generator.
A constant-density single-fluid is specified as working liquid with the properties of water at 100&deg;F (see Assumption J3.2) with a density of approximately 62 lb/ft3 and a dynamic viscosity of 6.727"10-9 atm-s [Ref. J5.7].
The following boundary conditions are applied:
            *  "FreeSurface" - This boundary represents the free surface of the lake. As a simplification, this boundary is considered to be rigid in order to reduce the computational time. This simplification does not significantly impact the results of the calculation since the water velocity is small and very small or no waves are expected to form (tranquil flow). Furthermore, this boundary is specified to be a symmetry plane in order to guarantee a zero shear stress (free surface flow).
            " "Inlet" - This boundary represents the inlet to the UHS. It is specified to be a mass flow inlet boundary with an inlet flow rate of 86 ft3/sec, which is approximately equal to 5333.7 lb/sec [Ref. J5.8].
            * "Outlet" - This boundary represents the outlet to the UHS. It is specified to be a simple pressure outlet boundary.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT J, PAGE A 0 of J40
          *    "Soil" - This boundary represents the bottom and sloped sides of the UHS. It is specified to be a rough no-slip wall boundary with a roughness of 5.0 in (see Assumption J3.3).
The system is initialized with constant zero velocity and pressure and let to evolve to final steady state solution.
Step Two: Transient Two-Fluid Analysis The results of Step One are used as initial condition to the calculation performed in this second phase. The following changes are made to the model:
: 1. Transient solver - The solver is specified to be implicit unsteady with maxinmm number of inner iteration per time step equal to 20. The time step is adjusted through the computation for an initial minimum value of 0.1 sec to a final maximum value of 100 sec. The transition from one time step to the other is nonrmally performed after ensuring that the residuals are always small and the solution is converged at each time step.
: 2. Two-fluid specification - The solver is changed to account for a two fluid mixture.
Both fluids have the properties of water at 100&deg;F and the are labeled "WaterLake" for the water initially present in the UHS at the beginning of the transient analysis (from Step One) and "WaterCirculating" for the water injected from the "Inlet" boundary.
For the two-fluid mixture, the code can compute the mixture properties based on the local concentration of the two base fluids and their molecular weight. Since there is no difference between the "WaterLake" and "WaterCirculating", the properties of the mixture are specified to be constant and equal to that of water at I 00'F.
In order to compute the diffusion of one liquid into the other, the Schmidt number and the turbulent Schmidt number need to be specified for the mixture. The Schmidt number is a dimensionless parameter defined as the ratio of momentum diffusivity and mass diffusivity as [Ref. J5.2]:
Schmidt-    P                              (J2.1-5)
P Dim where Vtis the dynamic viscosity, p is the density and Dim is the molecular diffusivity of component-i into the mixture. The Schmidt number used in this analysis is equal to 219.8 (see Appendix J8.2). The turbulent Schmidt number is taken as the default value in STAR-CCM+ which is equal to 0.9. This implies that the turbulent mass diffusivity is proportional to the turbulent viscosity, which is an unknown a-priori variable and it is locally computed by the code. Note that the computed solution is fairly insensitive to the choice of the Schmidt number and the turbulent Schmidt number within the range of realistic values. The molecular weight for both fluids, which is another input required to compute the mass diffusivity, is specified to be 18.0153 lb/lbmol [Ref. J5.9].
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                    REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J 11 of J40
: 3. Boundary conditions - The boundary conditions are kept the same as for the steady-state analysis. However, the fluid entering the "Inlet" surface is specified to the 100%
          "WaterCirculating" and, in case of backflow at the "Outlet" surface, the re-entering fluid is specified to the 100% "WaterLake". This last condition is specified only to complete the STAR-CCM+ input file for this analysis but it is not used during the computation.
: 4. Initial conditions - The results of steady state analysis are used as initial conditions for the transient calculation. The liquid present in the UHS at the beginning of the transient simulation (t = 0 sec) is specified to be 100% "WaterLake".
: 5. Simulation time - The calculation is perforned from time tstart = 0 sec to time tend =
VUHs/Q. The total volume of the UHS is manually requested and printed out by STAR-CCM+ after the generation of the computational domain and it is equal to VUHS = 1.454446"107 ft 3 . The flow entering the UHS is equal to 86 ft 3/sec [Design Input J4.2]. Therefore, tend = VUHs/Q = (1.454446' 10' ft3)/(86 ft3/sec) = 169,122 sec 47 hrs.
After the completion of the transient simulation, the volume and surface average concentrations of "WaterLake" are computed and the results are used to manually calculate the UHS effective volume and surface as percentages respectively of the total UHS volume and surface by applying equations J2.1-2 and J2.1-4 as follows:
Veffective = 1-    'VLakeWater (t = 47 hr)                        (J2.1-6)
VUHS Seffective  =1---SLakeWater (t = 47  hr)                        (J2.1-7)
SUHS Appendix J8.3 provides the STAR-CCM+ summary report of the model including physics and boundary conditions.
J2.2  Computer Programs and Software The analysis performed herein utilizes:
: 1. STAR-CCM+ 6.04.014, S&L Program No. 03.7.863-6.04.014. Controlled folder on Sargent & Lundy STARCCM server: C:\Program Files\CD-adapco (see code file listing in Appendix J8.4).
All runs are executed on Sargent & Lundy server STARCCM with 64-bit Windows Server Standard 2007 operating system. The code has been validated under the Sargent & Lundy Quality Assurance Program.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457              REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J 12 of J40
: 2. MathCad 14.35, S&L Program No. 03.7.548-1435. Controlled folder on Sargent
              & Lundy PC: C:\Program Files\ MathCad\ MathCadl4 (see code file listing in Appendix J8.5).
All runs are executed on Sargent & Lundy PC ZL5581 with 32-bit Windows XP SP3 operating system. The code has been validated under the Sargent & Lundy Quality Assurance Program
: 3. Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Office Professional 2003 SP-2 including Excel, S&L Program No. 03.2.286-1.0.
All runs are executed on Sargent & Lundy PC ZL5581 with 32-bit Windows XP SP3 operating system. The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all spreadsheets used in this analysis.
J2.3  Acceptance Criteria There are no specific acceptance criteria for the effective volume and surface values estimated in this calculation. This information is gathered to support thermal analysis of the UHS performed in the main report.
For the CFD analysis, the computational mesh must be of acceptable quality, as verified by Appendix J8. 1. Furthermore, the calculated results must be converged as verified by the plot of the residuals in Appendix J8.3 (page J31).
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457              REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J 13 of J40 J3.0  ASSUMPTIONS J3.1  Silt thickness - The depth of the silt layer at the bottom of the UHS is assumed to be 1.5 ft (see Design input 5.3). The use of 1.5 ft silt thickness (maximum allowed value) causes the calculation of a reduced UHS effective volume.
J3.2  Water temperature - The water in the UHS is assumed to be at a constant temperature of 100'F. This input is used to estimate the density, viscosity and self-diffusivity of water in the UHS. This input does not significantly impact the results of this calculation.
J3.3  Soil roughness - The roughness of the bottom of the UHS (including the silt layer) is assumed to be 5 in. Since this calculation determines the UHS inactive volumes rather than pressure losses, based on the calculated UHS low water velocities, this input does not significantly impact the results of this calculation.
J4.0  DESIGN INPUTS J4.l  UHS dimensions - The UHS dimensions are obtained from References J5.3 to J5.6 as follows:
: i.      The nominal elevation of the UHS cooling pond bottom is approximately 685 ft
[Ref. J5.5].
ii.      The elevation of the bottom of the intake flume is approximately 678.5 ft [Ref.
J5.5].
iii. The bottom of the UHS between the cooling pond and intake flume is approximately flat and its depth varies from 678.5 ft to 685 ft in a linear manner
[Refs. J5.3 to J5.6].
iv.      The slope of the UHS side is approximately 1:4 all around its perimeter [Refs.
J5.3 to J5.6].
: v.      The width of the water inlet chute is 8 ft [Ref. J5.4].
vi.      The width of the intake flume bottom is approximately 40 ft [Ref. J5.6].
vii. The dimensions of the UHS that are not listed above are scaled from Reference J5.3.
viii. The elevation of the UHS free surface is 690 ft [Ref. J5.1].
J4.2  UHS flow - The mass flow rate through the UHS is equal to 86 ft3/s [Ref. J5.8].
J4.3  UHS sediment level - The sediment level in the intake flume and cooling pond must remain less than or equal to 1.5 ft [Ref. J5.8]. The use of maximum silting reduces the PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457            REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J14 of J40 UHS volume, and therefore the residence time. This reduces the effectiveness of the UHS and it is thus conservative.
J4.4  Properties of water - Water at 1007F has the following properties: density z 62 lb/ft3; dynamic viscosity z 6.727.10-9 atm-s [Ref. J5.7].
J
 
==5.0  REFERENCES==
 
J5.1  LSCL-UFSAR, Section 9.2.6 "Ultimate Heat Sink", Rev. 19 J5.2  CD-adapco, User Guide, STAR-CCM+ Version 6.04.014, 2011 J5.3  Exelon Nuclear - LaSalle Station Drawing No. S-16B Rev. B, "Composite Lake Drawing, Sheet 2" J5.4  Exelon Nuclear - LaSalle Station Drawing No. S-79 Rev. H, "CSCS Pond Water Inlet Chutes Plan and Sections" J5.5  Exelon Nuclear - LaSalle Station Drawing No. 97ES083.1              Rev. 0, "Contours Hydrographic Survey" J5.6  Exelon Nuclear - LaSalle        Station Drawing      No. 97ES083.2  Rev. 0, "Profiles Hydrographic Survey" J5.7  Frank Kreith, "Principles of Heat Transfer", 3 rd Ed. 1976, IEP, New York, NY J5.8  LSCL Calculation No. L-002457, Rev. 5 J5.9  T.L. Brown, H.E. LeMay Jr., B.E. Bursten, J.R. Burdge, "Chemistry",        9 th Ed. 2003, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ J5.10 LAKET-PC User Manual, S&L Program Number 03.7.292-2.2, Rev. 0, October 30, 2004 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J15 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J15 of J40 J6.0  EVALUATIONS Step One: Steady State Analysis The steady state simulation is run until convergence for approximately 6,000 iterations
[see Residual graph in Appendix J8.3]. Figure J- 11 shows the velocity magnitude distribution and stream lines at the free surface. As seen, the right leg of the UHS presents two large recirculation cells which are not expected to participate significantly to the main water flow. Additional two smaller recirculation areas are visible in proximity to the UHS inlet created by the inlet water stream.
Velocity: Magnitude (ft/s) v3,1399 25319 21819 12560 0.6Z2798 Figure J-1 1. UHS computation - Step One: Velocity magnitude and stream lines on the UHS free surface.
Step Two: Transient Analysis After applying the changes indicated in Section J2.1.5 to the steady state model, the transient simulation is run for approximately 40,000 iterations from time tstar, = 0 sec to time tend = 47 hrs [see Residual graph in Appendix J8.3]. Figure 12 shows the surface concentration distribution for the "WaterLake". As expected, the velocity distribution is practically unchanged with respect to the steady-state solution (see Figure J-13).
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                REVISION NO. 8                              ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J16 of J40 MassFractionof WaterLake L.0000 Velocity: Magnitude (ft/s) 0.8000 2.5 22 0.6000 0.240O                                                                        V2561 562805 90.0=00 t48 .006 Figure J-12. UHS computation - Step Two: Surface                        Figure J-13. UHS computation - Step Two: Velocity concentration for "WaterLake" at 47 hrs.                            magnitude and stream lines on the UHS free surface.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J 17 of J40 The numerical computation of both Step One and Two is considered to be successful upon evaluation of the relative residual (unitless) plot shown in Appendix J8.3 (see page 31). The residuals of the fluid dynamics variables are very well behaved and with a magnitude, at the end of each main iteration, small enough to ensure a sufficiently converged solution. Therefore, the acceptance criteria in Section J2.3 are satisfied.
7  0.9                                                        -  -Straight    Channel 0
                                                                        -      UHS 0.8 0.7 0
0.6 C
0  0.5 0.4 0                                                      I-,.
E  0.3 I    N
        .5                                                                N 0.2                                                            N N
N I                      N 0.1                                                                          N N
                                                                                    --        N 0
0    5      10      15        20        25    30      35        40        45  50 Time [hr]
Figure J-14. UHS computation - Time variation of the "WaterLake" volume average concentration in the UHS.
Figure J-14 shows the trend over time of the "WaterLake" volume average concentration.
As seen, the concentration decreases linearly at the beginning since the incoming water displaces the water in the UHS. After about 20 hrs, some the incoming water is already exiting the UHS and thus "WaterLake" volume average concentration change is no longer linear: some of the incoming water is being trapped in the areas of recirculation and it cannot efficiently displace the "WaterLake" out of the UHS.
After 47 hrs, the volume average concentration is computed to be 36.59 %. Therefore, the UHS effective volume percentage as compute by Equation J2.1.6 is equal to (see Appendix J8.3):
Veffective  = 1 - 0.3659 = 63.4%
(J2.1-8)
VUHS PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457            REVISION NO. 8              ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J18 of J40 After 47 hrs, the surface average concentration is computed to be 42.09 %. Therefore, the UHS effective surface percentage as compute by Equation J2.1.7 is equal to (see Appendix J8.3:
Seffective = 1- 0.4209 = 57.9%
SUHS                                            (J2.1-9)
J
 
==7.0  CONCLUSION==
 
The UHS effective volume as percentage of the UHS total volume is 63.4 %.
The UHS effective surface as percentage of the UHS total free surface is 57.9 %.
J8.0  APPENDICES J8.1  STAR-CCM+ mesh quality report [see Page J19]
J8.2  Calculation of the Schmidt number [see Pages J20 to J23]
J8.3  Summary Report of STAR-CCM+ Analysis [see Pages J24 to J32]
J8.4  STAR-CCM+ 6.01.014, S&L Prog. No. 03.7.863-6.04.014, Controlled folder file listing Electronically attached:
File name: EAppendix J8.4.pdf Size: 22,128 KB; Type: Adobe Acrobat Document;                Date 5/23/2012 3:25 PM J8.5  MathCad 14.35, S&L Program No. 03.7.548-1435, Controlled folder file listing Electronically attached:
File name: EAppendix J8.5.pdf Size: 2,068 KB; Type: Adobe Acrobat Document;                Date 5/23/2012 3:27 PM J8.6  Additional information requested by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on June 27th 2013 [see Page J33 to J40]
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
Calculation No.L-002457                                                                                      Appendix J8.1 Revision No.8                                                        Attachment J                            Page J19 of J40 Boundaries of region Lake:
Boundary soil: 126832 faces (7 triangular, 236 quadrilateral, 126589 polygonal)
Extents:
x: [-4.2672000000e+000, 7.8150720000e+002] m y: [-4.2672000000e+000, 1.4874240000e+003] m z: [-1.9812000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+000] a surface area: 3.2716753125e+005 mA2 maximum boundary skewness angle = 1.2161578369e+002 deg in cell with Prostar cell Index          754941 Boundary FreeSurface: 126581 faces (1 triangular, 201 quadrilateral, 126379 polygonal)
Extents:
x: [-4.2672000000e+000, 7.8150720000e+002) m y: [-4.2672000000e+000, 1.4874240000e+003] m z: [1.0668000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+000] m surface area: 3.2625790625e+005 mA2 maximum boundary skewness angle = 8.5943321228e+001 deg in cell with Prostar cell Index          158035 Boundary Inlet: 30 quadrilateral faces Extents:
x: [9.0220800000e+001, 9.2659200000e+001] m y: [1.7526000000e+002, 1.7526000000e+002] m z: [0.0000000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+0001 m surface area: 2.6012849808e+000 mA2 maximum boundary skewness angle = 2.4523153305e+001 deg in cell with Prostar Cell Index          372457 Boundary Outlet: 176 faces (174 quadrilateral, 2 polygonal)
Extents:
x: [2.9565600000e+002, 3.4442400000e+002] m y: [1.4874240000e+003, 1.4874240000e+003] m z: [-1.9812000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+000] m surface area: 1.1132573700e+002 mA2 maximum boundary skewness angle = 2.8035736084e+001 deg in cell with Prostar Cell Index          739634 Region Lake:
43 tetrahedral cells 25 hexahedral cells 2 wedge cells 2 pyramid cells 748314 polyhedral cells 748386 cells total 2880831 interior faces (5724        triangular,  2249993 quadrilateral,        625114 polygonal) 1761870 vertices Extents:
x: [-4.2672000000e+000, 7.8150720000e+002] m y: [-4.2672000000e+000, 1.4874240000e+003] m z: [-1.9812000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+0003 m Maximum interior cell index delta: 2296, average: 7.8781478469e+002 Maximum cell face index delta: 9001, average: 5.6040540283e+003 volume range: [4.2707888497e-005, 3.1967809200e+000] mA3 Minimum volume in cell with Prostar cell Index 747962 Minimum distance between centroids of neighbor cells = 1.9749755266e-002 between cells with Prostar Cell Index 452140 and 576394 Maximum skewness angle = 1.7942733765e+002 deg in cell with Prostar cell Index 718600 Face validity:
Minimum Face validity:        8.4159338474e-001 Maximum Face validity:        1.0000000000e+000 Face validity  <  0.50            0      0.000%
0.50 <= Face validity      <  0.60            0      0.000%
0.60 <= Face validity      <  0.70            0      0.000%
0.70 <= Face validity      <  0.80            0      0.000%
0.80 <= Face validity      <  0.90            24      0.003%
0.90 <= Face validity      <  0.95            94      0.013%
0.95 <= Face validity      <    1.00          357      0.048%
1.00 <= Face validity                      747911    99.937%
volume change:
Minimum volume change: 1.052741e-003 Maximum volume change: 1.000000e+000 volume change < 0.000000e+000                  0    0.000%
0.000000e+000 <= volume change < 1.0000OOe-006                          0      0.000%
1.0000OOe-006 <= volume Change < 1.0000OOe-005                          0      0.000%
1.000000e-005 <= volume change < 1.000000e-004                          0      0.000%
1.000000e-004 <= volume Change < 1.0000OOe-003                          0      0.000%
1.000000e-003 <= volume change < 1.000000e-002                      166      0.022%
1.000000e-002 <= volume change < 1.0000OOe-001                      685      0.092%
1.000000e-001 <= volume change <= 1.000000e+000                747535        99.886%
Maximum boundary skewness angle in region = 1.216158e+002 deg overall Face validity:
Minimum Face validity: 8.415934e-001 Maximum Face validity: 1.000000e+000 Face validity < 0.50                0      0.000%
0.50 <= Face validity < 0.60                    0      0.000%
0.60 <= Face validity < 0.70                    0      0.000%
0.70 <= Face validity < 0.80                    0    0.000%
0.80 <= Face validity < 0.90                  24      0.003%
0.90 <= Face validity < 0.95                  94      0.013%
0.95 <= Face validity < 1.00                  357      0.048%
1.00 <= Face validity                      747911    99.937%
overall volume change:
Minimum volume Change: 1.052741e-003 Maximum volume Change: 1.000000e+000 volume change < 0.000000e+000                  0    0.000%
0.000000e+000 <= volume Change < 1.00OOOOe-006                          0      0.000%
1.000000e-006 <= volume Change < 1.OOOOOe-005                          0      0.000%
1.000000e-005 <= volume Change < 1.000000e-004                          0      0.000%
1.000000e-004 <= volume Change < 1.0000OOe-003                          0      0.000%
1.000000e-003 <= volume change < 1.0000OOe-002                      166      0.022%
1.0000OOe-002 <= volume Change < 1.000000e-001                      685      0.092%
1.000000e-001 <= volume Change <= 1.000000e+000                747535        99.886%
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
Calculation No. L-002457                                                                                        Appendix J8.2 Revision No. 8                                                Attachment J                                      Page J20 of J40 Appendix B8.2 Calculation of the Schmidt number References
: 1. Frank Kreith, "Principles of Heat Transfer", 3rd Ed. 1976, IEP, New York, NY
: 2. R.S. Smith, Z. Dohnalek, G.A Kimmel, K.P. Stevenson, B.D. Kay, "The self-diffusivity of amorphous solid water near 150 K", Chemical Physics Vol. 258, Page 291-305, 2000 Project No. 11333-297
 
Calculation No. L-002457                                                                                        Appendix J8.2 Revision No. 8                                                              Attachment J                        Page J21 of J40 Water fluid dynamics properties as function of temperature [Ref. 1]
i  0.. 4 70-F 80 OF Tdata.water.i          90OF                                    Temperature 0
100 F 1150 OF, (62.3" 62.2
:= /62.1      lb                              Density Pdaia.,,vater.[      62.0 ft 161.2)
                                "0.658 0.578 0.514
:=dala.water. 10- 3 lb                    Dynamic viscosity 4
0.458            ft sec
                                  .0.292 Based on these values, the water density and dynamic viscosity are defined as function of temperature using a linear interpolation procedure:
Pwater(Texnp) := linterp(Tdata.water. I, Pdata.water. I, Temp)
              .,v.ater(Temp) := linterp(Tdata.water. I, -Idata.water. I, Temp)
Project No. 11333-297
 
Calculation No. L-002457                                                                                              Appendix J8.2 Revision No. 8                                                        Attachment J                                    Page J22 of J40 Water self-diffusivity as function of temperature [Ref. 2]
Reference 2 plots self-diffusivity values for water in liquid state for temperature from 273.15 K (32 'F) to 373.15 K (212 -F). The data below are extracted from Figure 7 of Ref. 2:
277.0                                                                            j := 0.. 8 282.2 286.4 291.1 Tdata.water,2 :=  295.7      K                        Temperature 299.4 318.6 334.1
                            ,364.2 1.23E-05 1.49E-05 1.69E-05 1.92E-05          2 cm              Self-diffusivity Dww-daIa.watcr.2:=      2.05E-05 S
2.33E-05 3.65E-05 4.71E-05 7.85E-05 Based on these values, the water self-diffusivity is defined as function of temperature using a linear interpolation procedure:
Dj(Temp) :=        linterp(Tdta.water.2, Dww.data.water.2, Teinp)
Project No. 11333-297
 
Calculation No. L-002457                                                             Appendix J8.2 Page J23 of J40 Revision No. 8                                                  Attachment J The Schmidt number is defined as [Ref. B5.2]:
                                        .. ,,(Temp)
Schmidt(Temp) :=
Pwater(Temp)
* DN%,v(Temp)
* DN%,v(Temp)
A plot of the Schmidt number between 90'F and 130&deg;F is shown below: Temperature:=
A plot of the Schmidt number between 90'F and 130&deg;F is shown below:
90 OF I 10 OF 120 0 OF 130 OF)Schmid,(Teinperature  
90 OF                                  280.6 219.8 Temperature:=   I 10 OF     Schmid,(Teinperature .) = 182.1 0                                    151.8 120 OF 130 OF)                                ,126.9) 330 Temperaturei K
.)280.6 219.8= 182.1 151.8 ,126.9)330 Temperaturei K At 100'F, the Schmidt number is equal to 219.8.Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No. 8 Appendix J8.3 Page J24 of J40 Altachment J Summary Report: UHS step two Session Summary Date I Simulation C File size 2 Number of Partitions 1 Number of Restored Partitions 1 Software Summary Version B B R R Hardware Summary Hosts C N Simulation Properties a uHS+-1 Filters*-2 Parts 1 -1 Lake+-1 Surfaces+-1 FreeSurface I II 1 4-2 Inlet I I tar 29, 2012 6:16:13 PM;:\Users\0n7590\Desktop\UHS.sim
At 100'F, the Schmidt number is equal to 219.8.
.9e+02 MB uildArch:
Project No. 11333-297
win64 uildEnv: intell1.1 eleaseDate:
 
Fri Jun 3 18:25:06 UTC 2011 eleaseNumber:
Calculation No. L-002457                                                                                                   Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8                                                                       Altachment J                          Page J24 of J40 Summary Report: UHS step two Session Summary Date                                         I tar 29, 2012 6:16:13 PM Simulation                                 C;:\Users\0n7590\Desktop\UHS.sim File size                                   2 .9e+02 MB Number of Partitions                         1 Number of Restored Partitions 1 Software Summary Version                                       BuildArch: win64 BuildEnv: intell1.1 ReleaseDate: Fri Jun 3 18:25:06 UTC 2011 ReleaseNumber: 6.04.014 Hardware Summary Hosts                                        Controller: STARCCM Number of Workers: 0 Simulation Properties a uHS
6.04.014 ontroller:
        +-1 Filters
STARCCM umber of Workers: 0 Region Contacts Face count Tags Meta Data Boundary Tags Meta Data Boundary Tags Meta Data Boundary Tags Meta Data Boundary Tags Meta Data Tags Feature Curve+-3+-5+ -(+1 4-3 Outlet I" -4 Soilt-2 Curves"-a Edges 3D-CAD Models Tags Operations Continua 1 Mesh 1+-1 Modets 1 +-1 Surfacet I I II" -2 Thin Met Remesher sher Continua OOC translation Verbose Output Per-Region Meshing Use Parallel Meshing Interpolation Option Interfaces Regions Do curvature refinement Do proximity refinement Do compatibility refinement Retain geometric features Create aligned meshes Minimum face quality Enable automatic surface repair Polyhedral Cells Type Run Optimizer Automatic Correction Customize Thickness Threshold Customize Surface Size Ratio Threshold Value Project to CAD Enable curvature deviation distance# Pig/circle Surface Growth Rate# Points in gap Search Floor Relative/Absolute Size Method Value Value Number of Layers Size type Value Part Group Shapes Lake 0 572{}Lake: FreeSurface
          *-2 Parts 1 -1 Lake                                                 Region                                Lake Contacts                              0 Face count                            572 Tags Meta Data                            {}
{}Lake: Inlet[]{}Lake: Outlet U Lake: Soil[]{}U Lake:Edges 2 false false false false Nearest neighbor 0[Lake]true true false true false 0.05 false Polygonal prisms false true true false 12.0 ft true false 36.0 1.3 2.0 0.0 ft Absolute Min and Target 6.0 It 12.0 ft 6 Absolute 11.0 ft[Block 1]2 Reference Values+-I Base Size-2 CAD Projection
                +-1 Surfaces
+-3 Surface Curvature I '-I Basic Curvature+-4 Surface Growth Rate+-5 Surface Proximity 1-6 Surface Size I I I +-I Absolute Minimum Size 1 -2 Absolute Target Size+-7 Thin Mesher Layers 8 -6 Thin Solid Thickness"-I Absolute Size-3 Volumetric Controls'-a Volumetric Control 1 M+-I1 Mesh Conditions Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No. 8 Appendix J8.3 Page J25 of J40 Atlachment J I -+-7 I "-2 Physic-1 Surface Remesher Mesh Values-1 Custom Size'-1 Absolute Size s 1 Customize surface remesher Size type Value Interfaces Regions Enabled Absolute 1.5 ft 0[Lake]1 Models--1 All y+ Wall Treatment 4-2 Constant Density+-3 Implicit Unsteady+-4 K-Omega Turbulence
                    +-1 FreeSurface                                Boundary                            Lake: FreeSurface I II                                               Tags Meta Data                            {}
+-5 Multi-Component Liquid I-1 Liquid Mixture+-i Liquid Components I +-I WaterLake I I1 I I -1 Component Properties I I -1 MolecularWeight I -1 Constant" -2 WaterCirculating I I I -1 Component Properties
1 4-2 Inlet                                         Boundary                            Lake: Inlet II                                              Tags                                  []
' -1 Molecular Weight'-1 Constant-2 Mixture Properties
Meta Data                            {}
+-1 Density I -1 Constant+-2 Dynamic Viscosity I -1 Constant.--3 Molecular Diffusivity I '-1 Schmidt Number+-,I Molecular Weight I -1 Mixture-5 Turbulent Schmidt Numbe-1 Constant+--6 Non-reacting
1 4-3 Outlet                                        Boundary                            Lake: Outlet Tags                                  U Meta Data I " -4    Soilt                                Boundary                            Lake: Soil Tags                                []
+-7 Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes
Meta Data                            {}
+-,q Segregated Flow I I 1+-9 Segregated Species r I I v v+-i4- SST (Menter) K-Omega 1 +-1 Compressibility Parameters 1 '-2 Realizability Coefficient
                  -2 Curves
+- 11 Three Dimensional
                      "-a Edges                                      Tags                                U Feature Curve                        Lake:Edges
'-12 Turbulent+-2 Reference Values I +-1 Reference Pressure-2 Minimum Allowable Wall Distance-3 Initial Conditions 4-1 Pressure I "-1 Constant+-2 Species Mass Fraction I -1 Constant+-3 Species Specification
          +-3   3D-CAD Models Tags
+-.i Turbulence Intensity I -1 Constant+-5 Turbulence Specification
          +-5    Operations Continua                                            Continua                            2
+-6 Turbulent Velocity Scale I '-1 Constant+-7 Turbulent Viscosity Ratio I -1 Constant'-8 Velocity I"-1 Constant ID Database Material Method Value ID Database Matedal Method Value Method Value Method Value Method Schmidt Number Method Method Value Minimum Absolute Pressure Flow Boundary Diffusion Secondary Gradients Convection Flow Boundary Diffusion Secondary Gradients Convection al Kappa BetaStar Beta1 Sigma_k1 Sigma wl Beta2 Sigmak2 Sigmaw2 Secondary Gradients Convection Realizability Option Compressibility Correction Low Re Damping Modification Normal Stress Term Tke Minimum Sdr Minimum ZetaStar Realizability Coefficient Value Value Method Value Method Value Method Method Value Method Method Value Method Value Coordinate System Method Value Regions Index Physics Continuum Type Mesh Continuum Parts Boundaries Index 1 H20 (Water) [Standard/Liquids]
          + -(
Constant 18.0153 Ib/Ibmol 2 Hg (Mercury)
1 Mesh 1                                           OOC translation                      false Verbose Output                        false Per-Region Meshing                  false
[Standard/Liquids]
              +                                                      Use Parallel Meshing                false Interpolation Option                Nearest neighbor Interfaces                          0 Regions                              [Lake]
Constant 18.0153 Ib/Ibmol Constant 62.0 lb/ft^3 Constant 6.727E-9 atm-s Schmidt Number 219.8 Mixture Constant 0.9 0.009869232667160128 atm true On 2nd-order true On 2nd-order 0.31 0.41 0.09 0.075 0.85 0.5 0.0828 1.0 0.856 On 2nd-order Durbin Scale Limiter true false false I.OE-10 1.OE-10 1.5 0.6000000238418579 1.0 atm 3.280839895013123E-6 ft Constant 0.0 atm Constant[1.0, 0.0)Mass fraction Constant 0.01 Intensity
                +-1        Modets 1 +-1 Surfacet Remesher                            Do curvature refinement              true II I I                                               Do proximity refinement              true Do compatibility refinement          false Retain geometric features           true Create aligned meshes               false Minimum face quality                 0.05 Enable automatic surface repair     false
-Viscosity Ratio Constant 3.280839895013123 ft/s Constant 10.0 Laboratory Constant[0.0, 0.0, 0.0] ft/s 0 Physics 1 Fluid Region Mesh 1[Lake]4 2 Ri-1 4.egions Lake-i Bo&#xf7;-1 Pndaries:reeSudface Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No. 8 Attachment J Appendix J8.3 Page J26 of J40-1 Mesh Conditions
                      " -2    Thin Met sher                        Polyhedral Cells Type               Polygonal prisms Run Optimizer                       false Automatic Correction                 true Customize Thickness Threshold       true Customize Surface Size Ratio         false Threshold 2 Reference Values
+-1 Custom Surface Curvature 4-2 Custom Surface Proximity 4- 3 Custom Surface Size'-4 Customize Surface Remeshing Inlet+-1 Mesh Conditions 1 -1 Custom Surface Curvature I +-2 Custom Surface Proximity I +-3 Custom Surface Size I I-4 Customize Surface Remeshing 1 -2 Physics Conditions I +-i Flow Direction Specification I +-2 Mass Flow Option I 4-3 Species Specification 1I '-4 Turbulence Specification
                      +-I Base Size                                  Value                               12.0 ft
-3 Physics Values+-1 Mass Flow Rate I "-1 Constant I +-2 Species Mass Fraction I "-1 Constant 1 -3 Turbulence Intensity I '-1 Constant 1 -4 Turbulent Viscosity Ratio'-1 Constant+-3 Outlet I I I I I I I 4-1 Mesh Conditions I --1 Custom Surface Curvature I 4-2 Custom Surface Proximity I +-3 Custom Surface Size I --4 Customize Surface Remeshing 1 +-2 Physics Conditions I --1 Backflow Direction Specification S1+-2 Species Specification I "-3 Target Mass Flow Option I -4 Turbulence Specification
                        -2 CAD Projection                            Project to CAD                     true
"-3 Physics Values+-1 Pressure I '-1 Constant I +-2 Species Mass Fraction I '-1 Constant I -3 Turbulence Intensity I '-1 Constant"-4 Turbulent Viscosity Ratio 1 -1 Constant"- Soil I I I+-1 Mesh Conditions I +-1 Custom Surface Curvature I +-2 Custom Surface Proximity I +-3 Custom Surface Size 1 -4 Customize Surface Remeshing+-2 Physics Conditions I +-1 Shear Stress Specification I +-2 Tangential Velocity Specification I I I +-3 Wall Species Option 1 -4 Wall Surface Specification
                      +-3 Surface Curvature                          Enable curvature deviation distance false I '-I Basic Curvature                        # Pig/circle                         36.0
-3 Physics Values 4-1 Blended Wall Function 1+-2 Roughness Height I "-i Constant-3 Wall Roughness Parameters
                      +-4 Surface Growth Rate                       Surface Growth Rate                  1.3
-2 Feature Curves-t Edges--1 Mesh Conditions
                      +-5 Surface Proximity                          # Points in gap                     2.0 1                                            Search Floor                         0.0 ft
'-1 Custom Surface Size-3 Mesh Conditions
                          -6 Surface Size                            Relative/Absolute                   Absolute I I                                          Size Method                         Min and Target I +-I Absolute Minimum Size                 Value                               6.0 It 1 -2 Absolute Target Size                    Value                                12.0 ft
.-1 Customize Thin Mesher Parameters
                      +-7 Thin Mesher Layers                          Number of Layers                    6
-4 Physics Conditions 4-1 Initial Condition Option+-2 Momentum Source Option+-3 Species Source Option-4 Turbulence Source Option-5 Physics Values+-1 Axis Type Interfaces Part Surfaces Custom curvature Custom proximity Custom surface size Disable Surface Remeshing Index Type Interfaces Part Surfaces Custom curvature Custom proximity Custom surface size Disable Surface Remeshing Method Specification Option Method Method Method Value Method Value Method Value Method Value Index Type Interfaces Part Surfaces Custom curvature Custom proximity Custom surface size Disable Surface Remeshing Method Method Target Mass Flow Option Method Method Value Method Value Method Value Method Value Index Type Interfaces Part Surfaces Custom curvature Custom proximity Custom surface size Disable Surface Remeshing Method Method Reference Frame Method Method Kappa E Method Value B C RplusSmooth RplusRough Feature Curves Part Curves Custom surface size Customize Thin Mesher Parameters Option Momentum Source Option Species Source Term Turbulence Source Option Direction Coordinate System Symmetry Plane[Lake.FreeSurface]
                          -68 Thin Solid Thickness                    Size type                          Absolute
Use Continuum Values Use Continuum Values Disabled Disabled 3 Mass Flow Inlet[Lake.Inlet]
                            "-I Absolute Size                                                              11.0 ft Value
Use Continuum Values Use Continuum Values Disabled Disabled Boundary-Normal Mass Flow Rate Mass fraction Intensity
                    -3 Volumetric Controls
+ Viscosity Ratio Constant 5333.7 Ib/s Constant[0.0, 1.0]Constant 0.01 Constant 10.0 4 Pressure Outlet[Lake.Outlet]
                      '-a Volumetric Control 1                      Part Group M                                  Shapes                              [Block 1]
Use Continuum Values Use Continuum Values Disabled Disabled Boundary-Normal Mass fraction Disabled Intensity
                            +-I1 Mesh Conditions Project No. 11333-297
+ Viscosity Ratio Constant 0.0 atm Constant[1.0, 0.0]Constant 0.01 Constant 10.0 1 Wall[Lake.Soil]
 
Use Continuum Values Use Continuum Values Disabled Disabled No-Slip None Relative To Mesh Impermeable Rough 0.42 9.0 Constant 5.0 in 0.0 0.253 2.25 90.0 1[Lake.Edges]
Calculation No. L-002457                                                                                                                Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8                                                                      Atlachment J                                        Page J25 of J40 I    " -1      Surface Remesher            Customize surface remesher          Enabled I-            -2     Mesh Values
Disabled Use Default Values Use Continuum Values None Disabled None[0.0, 0.0, 1.0]Laboratory Project No. 11333-297 CalcUjlation No. L-002457 Revioion No. 8 Appendix J8.3 Page J27 of J40 Attachmenl J I "-2 Motion Specification
                                -1 Custom Size                      Size type                          Absolute
+-8 Derived Parts+-1 HorizontalCenter
                                    '-1 Absolute Size                Value                                1.5 ft Physic s 1                                      Interfaces                          0 Regions                            [Lake]
+-.-1 Single section 2 Horizontallnlet
1 Models
'-1 Single section+-3 HorizontalOutlet II I I Single section+-'J Streamline
                    -- 1 All y+ Wall Treatment 4-2 Constant Density
+-I Source Seed II"-2 2nd Order Integrator
                    +-3 Implicit Unsteady
+-5 VerticalCenter I I Origin Motion Reference Frame Derived Parts Coordinate System Origin Normal Section Mode Displayed Index Parts Offset Coordinate System Origin Normal Section Mode Displayed Index Parts Offset Coordinate System Origin Normal Section Mode Displayed Index Parts Offset Seed Type Rotation Scale Integration Solver Vector Field Parts Seed Parts On Ratio Randomize N Grid Points Integration Direction Initial Integration Step Maximum Propagation Max Steps Coordinate System Origin Normal Section Mode Displayed Index Parts Offset Coordinate System Origin Normal Section Mode Displayed Index Parts Offset Time-Step Freeze Time Temporal Discretization Solver Frozen Verbosity Parallel memory optimization scaling factor Solver Frozen Reconstruction Frozen Reconstruction Zeroed Temporary Storage Retained Solver Frozen Under-Relaxation Factor Ramp Method Verbosity Max Cycles Parallel Migration Limit Extra partition-boundary sweeps Enable direct-solver Maximum direct-solver equations Convergence Tolerance Epsilon Cycle Type Group Size Control Group Size Relaxation Scheme Acceleration method Scaling Restriction Tolerance Prolongation Tolerance Sweeps Under-Relaxation Factor Pressure Reference Location Ramp Method Verbosity[0.0, 0.0, 0.0] ft Stationary Lab Reference Frame 6 Laboratory
                    +-4 K-Omega Turbulence
[700.0, 1000.0, -1.49999999999999981 it,it,it[0.0, 1.0, 0.0] ft,ft,ft Single Section-1[Lake]0.0 Laboratory
                    +-5 Multi-Component Liquid I-1 Liquid Mixture
[500.0, 500.0, -1.4999999999999998[
                            +-i Liquid Components I +-I WaterLake                        ID                                  1 I      I1                            Database Material                  H20 (Water) [Standard/Liquids]
ft,ft,ft[0.0, 1.0, 0.0] tt,tt,it Single Section-1[Lake]0.0 Laboratory
II      -1 Component Properties I I              -1 MolecularWeight    Method                              Constant I                   -1 Constant        Value                                18.0153 Ib/Ibmol
[1050.0, 4000.0, -1.4999999999999998]
                                    "-2 WaterCirculating            ID                                  2 I I                              Database Matedal                    Hg (Mercury) [Standard/Liquids]
ft,ft,ft[0.0, 1.0, 0.0] ft,ft,it Single Section-1[Lake]0.0 Part 1.0 2nd-Order RK Cell Relative Velocity[Lake: FreeSurface]
I          -1    Component Properties
[Lake: FreeSurface]
                                            ' -1 Molecular Weight  Method                              Constant
281 false[30, 30]Both 0.5 20.0 2000 Laboratory
                                                '-1 Constant        Value                                18.0153 Ib/Ibmol
[1050.0, 2433.0000000000005, -1.4999999999999998]
                                -2 Mixture Properties
it,it,ft[1.0, 0.0, 0.0] ft,ft,ft Single Section-1[Lake]0.0 Laboratory
                                  +-1 Density                      Method                              Constant I -1 Constant                    Value                              62.0 lb/ft^3
[300.0, 1000.0, -1.4999999999999998]
                                  +-2 Dynamic Viscosity            Method                              Constant I -1 Constant                    Value                              6.727E-9 atm-s
fitft,it[1.0, 0.0, 0.0] ft,fIft Single Section-1[Lake]0.0 11.0s false 1 st-order false 0 1.0 false false false false false 0.7 No Ramp None 30 25 0 false 32 0.1 0.0 Flex Cycle Auto 4 Gauss-Seidel None Disabled 0.9 0.5 1 0.3 Automatic Selection No Ramp None-1 Single section Verticallnlet
                                  .-- 3 Molecular Diffusivity      Method                              Schmidt Number I '-1 Schmidt Number            Schmidt Number                      219.8
+--'-1 Single section-9 Solvers+-1 Implicit Unsteady&#xf7;-2 Wall Distance I 4-3 Segregated Flow I I I I I I I+- Velocity+-I Under-Relaxation Factor Ramp*-2 AMG Linear Solver"-1 Flex Cycle-2 Pressure I+-1 Under-Relaxation Factor Ramp"-2 AMG Linear Solver Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No. 8 Appendix J8.3 Page J28 of J40 Attachment J'-I VCycle 1+-4 Segregated Species I I I I+-i Under-Relaxation Factor-2 AMG Linear Solver I -1 V Cycle I I 1 -5 K-Omega Turbulence I I+-1 Under-Relaxation Factor F I -2 AMG Linear Solver.-1 FlexCycle"-6 K-Omega Turbulent Viscosi+-10 Stopping Criteria I +-i Maximum Inner Iterations 1+-2 Maximum Physical Time f+-3 Maximum Sep S-4 Stop File Ramp Ramp Max Cycles Parallel Migration Limit Extra partition-boundary sweeps Enable direct-solver Maximum direct-solver equations Convergence Tolerance Epsilon Cycle Type Group Size Control Group Size Relaxation Scheme Acceleration method Scaling Pre-Sweeps Post-Sweeps Max Levels Under-Relaxation Factor Reconstruction Frozen Reconstruction Zeroed Temporary Storage Retained Solver Frozen Ramp Method Verbosity Max Cycles Parallel Migration Limit Extra partition-boundary sweeps Enable direct-solver Maximum direct-solver equations Convergence Tolerance Epsilon Cycle Type Group Size Control Group Size Relaxation Scheme Acceleration method Scaling Pre-Sweeps Post-Sweeps Max Levels Under-Relaxation Factor Reconstruction Frozen Reconstruction Zeroed Temporary Storage Retained Solver Frozen Ramp Method Verbosity Max Cycles Parallel Migration Limit Extra partition-boundary sweeps Enable direct-solver Maximum direct-solver equations Convergence Tolerance Epsilon Cycle Type Group Size Control Group Size Relaxation Scheme Acceleration method Scaling Restriction Tolerance Prolongation Tolerance Sweeps Under-Relaxation Factor Maximum Ratio Solver Frozen Maximum Inner Iterations Enabled Criterion Satisfied Logical Rule Maximum Physical Time Enabled Criterion Satisfied Logical Rule Maximum Steps Enabled Criterion Satisfied Logical Rule Stop Inner Iterations Path Enabled Criterion Satisfied Logical Rule Reports Scalar Field Function Parts Smooth Values Units Scalar Field Function Parts Smooth Values Units Parts 30 25 0 false 32 0.1 0.0 V Cycle Auto 4 Gauss-Seidel Conjugate Gradient Auto 1 1 50 0.9 false false false false No Ramp None 30 25 0 false 32 0.1 0.0 V Cycle Auto 4 Gauss-Seidel None Disabled 1 1 5O 0.8 false false false false No Ramp None 30 25 0 false 32 0.1 0.0 Flex Cycle Auto 4 Gauss-Seidel None Disabled 0.9 0-5 1 1.0 100000.0 false 20 true true Or 169122.0 s true true Or 1000000000 true false Or true ABORT true false Or 8 MassFraction of WaterLake[Lake: FreeSurface]
                                  +-,I Molecular Weight            Method                              Mixture I -1 Mixture
false MassFraction of WaterLake[Lake]false[Lake: Inlet]Ly+-11 Reports+-1 ConcenfrationSurfaceLakeWater
                                      -5 Turbulent Schmidt Numbe r  Method                              Constant
+-2 ConcentrationVolumeLakeWater I I+-3 MasslFlow-lnlet Project No. 11333-297 Celculalion No. L-002457 Revision No. 8 Appendix J8.3 Page J29 of J40 Attachmnenl J+-4 MassFlowOutlet
                                          -1 Constant                Value                              0.9
+-5 MassFlowTotal
                    +--6 Non-reacting
&#xf7;-6 Velocity_Plane4AveVel t-7 Velocity_Plane4MaxVel-a Velocity_Plane4ManVel 4-12 Monitors I+-.L Concern trationSurfaceLakeWater Monitor I I I I+-4 Inlet Monitor+ -5 Plane4AveVel Monitor I+-6 Plane4MaxVel Monitor I I+-7 Plane4MinVel Monitor+-8 Total Monitor II II+-13 Representations 1 +-1 Geometry 1 +-2 Initial Surface II-1 Regions-1 Lake I+-I Boundaries-I --1 FreeSurface I +-2 Inlet I +-3 Outlet ,I --I Soil"-2 Feature Curves I -1 Edges 1 +-3 Remeshed Surface I I I I -1 Regions I -1 Lake II I Smooth Values Units Parts Smooth Values Units Parts Smooth Values Units Scalar Field Function Parts Smooth Values Units Scalar Field Function Parts Smooth Values Units Scalar Field Function Parts Smooth Values Units Monitors Monitors To Print Output Direction Heading Print Frequency Report Trigger Maximum Plot Samples Normalization Option Frequency Report Trigger Maximum Plot Samples Normalization Option Frequency Report Trigger Maximum Plot Samples Normalization Option Frequency Report Trigger Maximum Plot Samples Normalization Option Frequency Report Trigger Maximum Plot Samples Normalization Option Frequency Report Trigger Maximum Plot Samples Normalization Option Frequency Report Trigger Maximum Plot Samples Normalization Option Frequency Report Trigger Maximum Plot Samples Normalization Option Frequency false Ib/s[Lake: Outlet]false Ibis (Lake: FreeSurface, Lake: Inlet, Lake: Outlet, Lake: Soil]false lb/s Velocity:
                    +-7 Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes
Magnitude[HodzontalCenter]
                    +-,q Segregated Flow                            Minimum Absolute Pressure          0.009869232667160128 atm I                                              Flow Boundary Diffusion            true I                                              Secondary Gradients                  On 1                                               Convection                          2nd-order
false ft/s Velocity:
                    +-9 Segregated Species                          Flow Boundary Diffusion              true v v I                                               Secondary Gradients                  On I
Magnitude[HorizontalCenter]
Convection                          2nd-order
false ft/s Velocity:
                    +-i4-       SST (Menter) K-Omega                al                                  0.31 Kappa                                0.41 BetaStar                            0.09 Beta1                                0.075 Sigma_k1                            0.85 Sigma wl                            0.5 Beta2                                0.0828 Sigmak2                              1.0 Sigmaw2                              0.856 Secondary Gradients                  On Convection                          2nd-order Realizability Option                Durbin Scale Limiter Compressibility Correction          true Low Re Damping Modification          false Normal Stress Term                  false Tke Minimum                          I.OE-10 Sdr Minimum                          1.OE-10 1 +-1 Compressibility Parameters                ZetaStar                              1.5 1 '-2 Realizability Coefficient                Realizability Coefficient            0.6000000238418579
Magnitude[HorizontalCenter]
                    +- 11 Three Dimensional
false ft/s 18[Z-momentum, WaterLake, Sdr, Tke, Y-momentum, X-momentum, Continuity, Inlet Monitor, Outlet Monitor, Total Monitor, Plane4AveVel Monitor, Plane4MinVel Monitor, Plane4MaxVel Monitor, ConcentrationSurface LakeWater Monitor, ConcentrationVolumeLakeWater Monitor]Horizontal 10 ConcentrationSurfaceLakeWater Time Step 100000 Off 1 ConcentrationVolumeLakeWater Time Step 100000 Off 1 MassFIowmInlet Iteration 5000 Off 1 MassFlowOutlet Iteration 5000 Off 1 Velocity_Plane4AveVel Iteration 5000 Off 1 Velocity_PIane4MaxVel Iteration 5000 Off 1 Velocity_Plane4MinVel Iteration 5000 Off 1 MassFIowTotal Iteration 5000 Off I akeWater Monitor Faces Edges Faces Edges Faces Faces Faces Faces Edges Faces Edges Faces Edges 572 154 572 154 142 2 2 426 154 493496 2460 493496 2460 Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No. 8 Appendix J8.3 Page J30 of J40 Attachment J+-1 Boundaries I I +-1 FreeSurface I I +-2 Inlet I I 1 +-3 Outlet SI I "-4 Soil 1 -2 Feature Curves I I -I Edges I -4 Volume Mesh I I I I I +-I Finite Volume Regions I -1 Lake I I I I I -1 Finite Volume Boundaries I ; -1 FreeSurface 1 +-2 Inlet I --3 Outlet I "-4 Soil"-2 Cell Sets+-14 Coordinate Systems+-15 Tables--16 Units+-17 Field Functions+-Is Volume Shapes I -1 Block 1 Faces Faces Faces Faces 250750 32 94 242620 Edges Cells Interior Faces Vertices Cells Interior Faces Vertices Faces Faces Faces Faces Preferred System Coordinate System Corner1 2460 748386 2880831 1761870 748386 2880831 1761870 126581 30 176 126832 United States Customary System Laboratory
                    '-12 Turbulent
[295.00000120147945, 558.9999802156383, -1.4999999696501283]
                +-2 Reference Values I +-1 Reference Pressure                            Value                                1.0 atm
ff,ft,[304.9999897874246, 576.0, 5.000000159571489]
                      -2 Minimum Allowable Wall Distance            Value                                3.280839895013123E-6 ft
fl,f,ft Comer2--19 UserCode+-20 Data Set Functions+-21 Layouts I '-1 default+-22 Data Mappers+-23 Motions 1 "-1 Stationary
                  -3 Initial Conditions 4-1 Pressure                                    Method                              Constant I "-1 Constant                                  Value                                0.0 atm
+-24 Reference Frames I '-I Lab Reference Frame Solution Accumulated CPU Time over all processes (s) 641294.4330000208 Elapsed Time (s) 641294.4820000213 Time Level 1947 Solution Time 169122.0 Project No. 11333-297 Residuals_.J
                    +-2 Species Mass Fraction                        Method                              Constant I -1 Constant                                  Value                                [1.0, 0.0)
-0 0 O 0 No 0.1 p.J01 0 .0 1.. ..- --- ----------- ------ ---- ------0.001-1 E-4 ....Continuity
                    +-3 Species Specification                       Method                              Mass fraction
.. .1 E5 -X-momentum
                    +-.i Turbulence Intensity                       Method                              Constant I -1 Constant                                   Value                                0.01
.. --Y-momentum z 1E-6:- -Z-momentum O CD Tke AllO 11111 Will 111.1111 d.11 l 11.1[ i1 -- Sdrmk _'1E-7I WaterLake 1E-8 1E-9 1 E-12 1 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 '" xIteration 9D 0 Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8 Attachment J Page J32 of J40 Volume Average of MassFraction of WaterLake Part Value Lake 3. 658991e-01 Total: 3.658991e-01 Surface Average of MassFraction of WaterLake Part Value Lake: FreeSurface 4.209259e-01 Total: 4.209259e-01 Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No.8 Appendix J8.6 Attachment J Page J33 of J40 Appendix J8.6 Additional information requested by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on June 2 7 th 2013.
                    +-5 Turbulence Specification                     Method                              Intensity - Viscosity Ratio
                    +-6 Turbulent Velocity Scale                     Method                              Constant I '-1 Constant                                 Value                                3.280839895013123 ft/s
                    +-7 Turbulent Viscosity Ratio                   Method                              Constant I -1 Constant                                 Value                                10.0
                    '-8 Velocity                                     Coordinate System                    Laboratory I                                           Method                              Constant
                          "-1 Constant                               Value                                 [0.0, 0.0, 0.0] ft/s
          +-7 Riegions                                                Regions
              -1 Lake                                                Index                                0 Physics Continuum                    Physics 1 Type                                Fluid Region 4.
Mesh Continuum                      Mesh 1 Parts                                [Lake]
                  -i Bo                                              Boundaries Pndaries                  4
                    &#xf7;-1        :reeSudface                          Index                                2 Project No. 11333-297
 
Calculation No. L-002457                                                                                                            Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8                                                                      Attachment J                                    Page J26 of J40 Type                                  Symmetry Plane Interfaces Part Surfaces                        [Lake.FreeSurface]
                            -1 Mesh Conditions
                              +-1 Custom Surface Curvature        Custom curvature                      Use Continuum Values 4-2 Custom Surface Proximity        Custom proximity                      Use Continuum Values 4- 3 Custom Surface Size            Custom surface size                  Disabled
                                '-4 Customize Surface Remeshing    Disable Surface Remeshing            Disabled Inlet                              Index                                3 Type                                  Mass Flow Inlet Interfaces Part Surfaces                        [Lake.Inlet]
                        +-1 Mesh Conditions 1 -1 Custom Surface Curvature            Custom    curvature                  Use Continuum Values I +-2 Custom Surface Proximity            Custom    proximity                  Use Continuum Values I +-3 Custom Surface Size                Custom    surface size                Disabled I I-4 Customize Surface Remeshing        Disable  Surface Remeshing          Disabled 1 -2 Physics Conditions I +-i Flow Direction Specification        Method                                Boundary-Normal I +-2 Mass Flow Option                  Specification Option                  Mass Flow Rate I 4-3 Species Specification              Method                                Mass fraction 1I '-4 Turbulence Specification                Method                                Intensity + Viscosity Ratio
                            -3 Physics Values
                              +-1 Mass Flow Rate                  Method                                Constant I "-1 Constant                    Value                                5333.7 Ib/s I          +-2 Species Mass Fraction          Method                                Constant I "-1 Constant                    Value                                [0.0, 1.0]
1          -3       Turbulence Intensity      Method                                Constant I '-1 Constant                    Value                                0.01 1 -4 Turbulent Viscosity Ratio      Method                              Constant
                                    '-1 Constant                  Value                                10.0
                    +-3 Outlet                                      Index                                4 II                                          Type                                  Pressure Outlet II                                          Interfaces II                                          Part Surfaces                        [Lake.Outlet]
I 4-1 Mesh Conditions I -- 1 Custom Surface Curvature           Custom curvature                    Use Continuum Values I 4-2 Custom Surface Proximity           Custom proximity                    Use Continuum Values I +-3 Custom Surface Size                 Custom surface size                  Disabled I -- 4 Customize Surface Remeshing       Disable Surface Remeshing            Disabled 1 +-2 Physics Conditions I -- 1 Backflow Direction Specification   Method                              Boundary-Normal S1+-2 Species Specification              Method                              Mass fraction I "-3 Target Mass Flow Option             Target Mass Flow Option              Disabled I -4 Turbulence Specification             Method                              Intensity + Viscosity Ratio
                          "-3 Physics Values
                                +-1 Pressure                        Method                              Constant I '-1 Constant                     Value                                0.0 atm I         +-2 Species Mass Fraction           Method                              Constant I '-1 Constant                     Value                                [1.0, 0.0]
I            -3 Turbulence Intensity         Method                              Constant I '-1 Constant                     Value                                0.01
                                "-4 Turbulent Viscosity Ratio     Method                              Constant 1 - 1 Constant                 Value                                10.0
                      "- Soil                                      Index                                1 I                                       Type                                Wall I                                       Interfaces I                                       Part Surfaces                        [Lake.Soil]
                          +-1 Mesh Conditions I +-1 Custom Surface Curvature           Custom    curvature                  Use Continuum Values I +-2 Custom Surface Proximity           Custom    proximity                  Use Continuum Values I +-3 Custom Surface Size               Custom    surface size              Disabled 1 -4 Customize Surface Remeshing         Disable  Surface Remeshing          Disabled
                          +-2 Physics Conditions I +-1 Shear Stress Specification         Method                                No-Slip I +-2 Tangential Velocity Specification Method                                None I I                                      Reference Frame                      Relative To Mesh I +-3 Wall Species Option               Method                                Impermeable 1 -4 Wall Surface Specification         Method                                Rough
                              -3 Physics Values 4-1 Blended Wall Function          Kappa                                0.42 1                                 E                                    9.0
                                +-2 Roughness Height              Method                                Constant I "-i Constant                   Value                                5.0 in
                                  -3 Wall Roughness Parameters    B                                    0.0 C                                    0.253 RplusSmooth                          2.25 RplusRough                            90.0
                  -2 Feature Curves                                Feature Curves                        1
                        -t Edges                                    Part Curves                          [Lake.Edges]
                          - -1       Mesh Conditions
                                  '-1 Custom Surface Size          Custom surface size                  Disabled
                  -3 Mesh Conditions
                      . -1 Customize Thin Mesher Parameters        Customize Thin Mesher Parameters      Use Default Values
                  -4 Physics Conditions 4-1 Initial Condition Option                  Option                                Use Continuum Values
                    +-2 Momentum Source Option                      Momentum Source Option              None
                    +-3 Species Source Option                       Species Source Term                  Disabled
                        -4 Turbulence Source Option                Turbulence Source Option              None
                  -5 Physics Values
                    +-1 Axis                                        Direction                            [0.0, 0.0, 1.0]
Coordinate System                    Laboratory Project No. 11333-297
 
CalcUjlation No. L-002457                                                                                                              Appendix J8.3 Revioion No. 8                                                              Attachmenl J                                              Page J27 of J40 Origin                                [0.0, 0.0, 0.0] ft I            "-2 Motion Specification          Motion                                Stationary Reference Frame                        Lab Reference Frame
          +-8 Derived Parts                              Derived Parts                          6
              +-1 HorizontalCenter                      Coordinate System                      Laboratory Origin                                [700.0, 1000.0, -1.49999999999999981 it,it,it Normal                                [0.0, 1.0, 0.0] ft,ft,ft Section Mode                          Single Section Displayed Index                        -1 Parts                                  [Lake]
                    .- 1 Single section                  Offset                                0.0
              +-
2 Horizontallnlet                      Coordinate System                      Laboratory Origin                                [500.0, 500.0, -1.4999999999999998[
ft,ft,ft Normal                                  [0.0, 1.0, 0.0] tt,tt,it Section Mode                            Single Section Displayed Index                       -1 Parts                                  [Lake]
                    '-1 Single section                    Offset                                0.0
              +-3 HorizontalOutlet                        Coordinate System                      Laboratory Origin                                [1050.0, 4000.0, -1.4999999999999998]
ft,ft,ft II                                        Normal                                [0.0, 1.0, 0.0] ft,ft,it Section Mode                          Single Section Displayed Index                        -1 Parts                                  [Lake]
I        I Single section                  Offset                                0.0
              +-'J Streamline                            Seed Type                              Part Rotation Scale                          1.0 Integration Solver                    2nd-Order RK Vector Field                          Cell Relative Velocity Parts                                  [Lake: FreeSurface]
                  +-I Source Seed                        Seed Parts                            [Lake: FreeSurface]
II                                      On Ratio                               281 Randomize                              false N Grid Points                          [30, 30]
                    "-2 2nd Order Integrator              Integration Direction                  Both Initial Integration Step              0.5 Maximum Propagation                    20.0 Max Steps                              2000
              +-5 VerticalCenter                        Coordinate System                      Laboratory I I                                        Origin                                  [1050.0, 2433.0000000000005, -
1.4999999999999998] it,it,ft Normal                                  [1.0, 0.0, 0.0] ft,ft,ft Section Mode                            Single Section Displayed Index                        -1 Parts                                  [Lake]
                      -1 Single section                  Offset                                  0.0 Verticallnlet                    Coordinate System                      Laboratory Origin                                  [300.0, 1000.0, -1.4999999999999998]
fitft,it Normal                                  [1.0, 0.0, 0.0] ft,fIft Section Mode                            Single Section Displayed Index                        -1 Parts                                  [Lake]
                    '-1 Single section                  Offset                                  0.0
          +-- -9  Solvers
              +-1 Implicit Unsteady                      Time-Step                              11.0s Freeze Time                            false Temporal Discretization                1 st-order Solver Frozen                          false
              &#xf7;-2 Wall Distance                          Verbosity                              0 I                                          Parallel memory optimization scaling    1.0 factor Solver Frozen                          false 4-3 Segregated Flow                        Reconstruction Frozen                  false II                                      Reconstruction Zeroed                  false II                                     Temporary Storage Retained            false I I                                       Solver Frozen                          false I+-         Velocity                      Under-Relaxation Factor                0.7
                        +-I Under-Relaxation Factor Ramp  Ramp Method                            No Ramp
                          *-2 AMG Linear Solver            Verbosity                              None Max Cycles                              30 Parallel Migration Limit                25 Extra partition-boundary sweeps        0 Enable direct-solver                  false Maximum direct-solver equations        32 Convergence Tolerance                  0.1 Epsilon                                0.0 Cycle Type                             Flex Cycle Group Size Control                    Auto Group Size                            4 Relaxation Scheme                      Gauss-Seidel Acceleration method                    None Scaling                                Disabled
                            "-1 Flex Cycle                Restriction Tolerance                  0.9 Prolongation Tolerance                0.5 Sweeps                                  1
                      -2  Pressure                      Under-Relaxation Factor                 0.3 I                                Pressure Reference Location            Automatic Selection
                        +-1 Under-Relaxation Factor Ramp  Ramp Method                            No Ramp
                          "-2 AMG Linear Solver Verbosity                               None Project No. 11333-297
 
Calculation No. L-002457                                                                                          Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8                                                      Attachment J                                  Page J28 of J40 Max Cycles                          30 Parallel Migration Limit            25 Extra partition-boundary sweeps      0 Enable direct-solver                false Maximum direct-solver equations      32 Convergence Tolerance                0.1 Epsilon                              0.0 Cycle Type                          V Cycle Group Size Control                  Auto Group Size                          4 Relaxation Scheme                    Gauss-Seidel Acceleration method                  Conjugate Gradient
                          '-I VCycle              Scaling                              Auto Pre-Sweeps                          1 Post-Sweeps                          1 Max Levels                          50 1+-4 Segregated Species                Under-Relaxation Factor              0.9 I
Reconstruction Frozen                false I
Reconstruction Zeroed                false I
Temporary Storage Retained          false I
Solver Frozen                        false
                  +-i Under-Relaxation Factor Ramp Ramp Method                          No Ramp
                    -2 AMG Linear Solver Verbosity                            None Max Cycles                          30 Parallel Migration Limit            25 Extra partition-boundary sweeps      0 I I                                      Enable direct-solver                false Maximum direct-solver equations      32 Convergence Tolerance                0.1 Epsilon                              0.0 Cycle Type                          V Cycle Group Size Control                  Auto Group Size                          4 Relaxation Scheme                    Gauss-Seidel Acceleration method                  None I          -1  V Cycle              Scaling                              Disabled Pre-Sweeps                          1 Post-Sweeps                          1 1 -5      K-Omega Turbulence          Max Levels                          5O Under-Relaxation Factor              0.8 I                              Reconstruction Frozen                false I                              Reconstruction Zeroed                false Temporary Storage Retained          false
                  +-1 Under-Relaxation Factor F    Solver Frozen                        false I -2 AMG Linear Solver    Ramp Ramp Method                          No Ramp Verbosity                            None Max Cycles                          30 Parallel Migration Limit            25 Extra partition-boundary sweeps      0 Enable direct-solver                false Maximum direct-solver equations      32 Convergence Tolerance                0.1 Epsilon                              0.0 Cycle Type                          Flex Cycle Group Size Control                  Auto Group Size                          4 Relaxation Scheme                    Gauss-Seidel Acceleration method                  None
                      .- 1  FlexCycle            Scaling                              Disabled Restriction Tolerance                0.9 Prolongation Tolerance              0-5 Sweeps                              1
              "-6 K-Omega Turbulent Viscosi Ly  Under-Relaxation Factor              1.0 Maximum Ratio                        100000.0 Solver Frozen                        false
          +-10 Stopping Criteria I+-i Maximum Inner Iterations Maximum Inner Iterations            20 Enabled                              true Criterion Satisfied                  true Logical Rule                        Or 1+-2 Maximum Physical Time Maximum Physical Time                169122.0 s Enabled                              true Criterion Satisfied                  true Logical Rule                        Or f+-3 Maximum Sep                      Maximum Steps                        1000000000 Enabled                              true Criterion Satisfied                  false Logical Rule                        Or S-4 Stop File Stop Inner Iterations                true Path                                ABORT Enabled                            true Criterion Satisfied                false Logical Rule                        Or
          +-11 Reports                            Reports                            8
              +-1 ConcenfrationSurfaceLakeWater    Scalar Field Function              MassFraction of WaterLake Parts                              [Lake: FreeSurface]
Smooth Values                      false Units
              +-2 ConcentrationVolumeLakeWater    Scalar Field Function                MassFraction of WaterLake I                                   Parts                              [Lake]
I                                  Smooth Values                      false Units
              +-3 MasslFlow-lnlet                  Parts                                [Lake: Inlet]
Project No. 11333-297
 
Celculalion No. L-002457                                                                                                                   Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8                                                                 Attachmnenl J                                              Page J29 of J40 Smooth Values                      false Units                              Ib/s
            +-4 MassFlowOutlet                                Parts                              [Lake: Outlet]
Smooth Values                      false Units                              Ibis
            +-5 MassFlowTotal                                  Parts                              (Lake: FreeSurface, Lake: Inlet, Lake:
Outlet, Lake: Soil]
Smooth Values                      false Units                              lb/s
              &#xf7;-6 Velocity_Plane4AveVel                        Scalar Field Function              Velocity: Magnitude Parts                              [HodzontalCenter]
Smooth Values                      false Units                              ft/s t-7 Velocity_Plane4MaxVel                        Scalar Field Function              Velocity: Magnitude Parts                              [HorizontalCenter]
Smooth Values                      false Units                              ft/s
                -a    Velocity_Plane4ManVel Scalar Field Function              Velocity: Magnitude Parts                              [HorizontalCenter]
Smooth Values                      false Units                              ft/s 4-12 Monitors                                        Monitors                            18 Monitors To Print                  [Z-momentum, WaterLake, Sdr, Tke, Y-momentum, X-momentum, Continuity, Inlet Monitor, Outlet Monitor, Total Monitor, Plane4AveVel Monitor, Plane4MinVel Monitor, Plane4MaxVel Monitor, ConcentrationSurface LakeWater Monitor, ConcentrationVolumeLakeWater I                                                                                      Monitor]
Output Direction                    Horizontal Heading Print Frequency              10
              +-.L ConcerntrationSurfaceLakeWater Monitor Report                                    ConcentrationSurfaceLakeWater Trigger                              Time Step Maximum Plot Samples                100000 Normalization Option                Off Frequency                            1 akeWater Monitor Report                              ConcentrationVolumeLakeWater II                                                  Trigger                              Time Step I                                                  Maximum Plot Samples                100000 Normalization Option                Off Frequency                            1 Report                              MassFIowmInlet I                                                Trigger                              Iteration
              +-4 Inlet Monitor                                Maximum Plot Samples                5000 Normalization Option                Off Frequency                            1 Report                              MassFlowOutlet Trigger                              Iteration Maximum Plot Samples                5000 Normalization Option                Off Frequency                            1
              + -5 Plane4AveVel Monitor                        Report                              Velocity_Plane4AveVel I                                                Trigger                              Iteration Maximum Plot Samples                5000 Normalization Option                Off Frequency                            1
              +-6 Plane4MaxVel Monitor                          Report                              Velocity_PIane4MaxVel I                                                Trigger                              Iteration I                                                Maximum Plot Samples                5000 Normalization Option                Off Frequency                            1
              +-7 Plane4MinVel Monitor                          Report                              Velocity_Plane4MinVel Trigger                              Iteration Maximum Plot Samples                5000 Normalization Option                Off Frequency                            1
              +-8 Total Monitor                                  Report                              MassFIowTotal Trigger                              Iteration II                                                  Maximum Plot Samples                5000 II                                                  Normalization Option                Off Frequency                            I
          +-13 Representations 1 +-1 Geometry 1 +-2 Initial Surface                                Faces                                572 II                                            Edges                                154
                    -1 Regions
                        -1 Lake                                  Faces                                572 I                                      Edges                                154
                          +-I Boundaries
                            ---I1 FreeSurface                  Faces                                142 I +-2 Inlet                            Faces                                2 I +-3 Outlet                          Faces                                2
                            ,I--I Soil                          Faces                                426
                          "-2 Feature Curves I -1 Edges                          Edges                                154 1 +-3 Remeshed Surface                                Faces                                493496 II I                                                Edges                                2460 I -1 Regions I      -1 Lake                                  Faces                                493496 II          I                                      Edges                                2460 Project No. 11333-297
 
Calculation No. L-002457                                                                                                  Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8                                                          Attachment J                                      Page J30 of J40
                        +-1 Boundaries I            I +-1 FreeSurface            Faces                                250750 I            I +-2 Inlet                    Faces                                32 I I          1 +-3 Outlet                  Faces                                94 SI        I "-4 Soil                    Faces                                242620 1          -2 Feature Curves I      I      -I Edges                Edges                                2460 I -4 Volume Mesh                            Cells                                748386 I      I                                    Interior Faces                      2880831 I      I                                    Vertices                            1761870 I      +-I Finite Volume Regions I -1 Lake                           Cells                                748386 I      I                            Interior Faces                      2880831 I      I                                Vertices                            1761870 I        -1 Finite Volume Boundaries I;          -1 FreeSurface          Faces                                126581 1        +-2 Inlet                  Faces                                30 I         -- 3 Outlet              Faces                                176 I         "-4 Soil                  Faces                                126832
                  "-2 Cell Sets
          +-14 Coordinate Systems
        +-15 Tables
          -- 16 Units                                  Preferred System                    United States Customary System
          +-17 Field Functions
          +-Is Volume Shapes I -1 Block 1                                Coordinate System                    Laboratory Corner1                              [295.00000120147945, 558.9999802156383, -
1.4999999696501283] ff,ft, Comer2                              [304.9999897874246, 576.0, 5.000000159571489] fl,f,ft
          -- 19 UserCode
        +-20 Data Set Functions
          +-21 Layouts I '-1 default
          +-22 Data Mappers
          +-23 Motions 1 "-1 Stationary
          +-24 Reference Frames I '-I Lab Reference Frame Solution Accumulated CPU Time over all processes (s) 641294.4330000208 Elapsed Time (s)                                641294.4820000213 Time Level                                      1947 Solution Time                                    169122.0 Project No. 11333-297
 
Residuals_.J                                                                              -
0 0
O 0 No 0.1                                                                                                                            p.
J01 0.01..  ..-         -----------------
0.001-1 E-4                                                                  ....
Continuity
                                                            ..            . 1 E5                              -X-momentum
                                                                                                        ..      -- Y-momentum
* z  1E-6:-          O
                                                                                                                  -Z-momentum        CD AllO                  11111Will      111.1111 d.11    l 11.1[ i1        -- Tke Sdrmk            _'
1E-7I WaterLake 1E-8 1E-9 1 E-121 0  10000                20000                30000                            40000            50000              '" x 9D Iteration                                                                        0
 
Calculation No. L-002457                                          Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8                                  Attachment J      Page J32 of J40 Volume Average of MassFraction of WaterLake Part                                        Value Lake                                         3. 658991e-01 Total:         3.658991e-01 Surface Average of MassFraction  of WaterLake Part                                        Value Lake:     FreeSurface                       4.209259e-01 Total:         4.209259e-01 Project No. 11333-297
 
Calculation No. L-002457                                             Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8                       Attachment J                   Page J33 of J40 Appendix J8.6 Additional information requested by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on June 2 7 th 2013.


==References:==
==References:==
Line 647: Line 1,218:


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 - Request for additional information related to license amendment request to technical specification 3.7.3 Ultimate Heat Sink (TAC. NOS. ME9076 and ME9077)", June 27, 2013.
Project No. 11333-297
Calculation No. L-002457                                                  Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8                          Attachment J                    Page J34 of J40 This appendix is added in response to the U.S. N.R.C. request for additional information for the review of CFD and entrance mixing conclusions
[Sec. 6, Ref. 1].
Request "a":
The dimensions of the inlet channel are shown in Figure J-4 in the main body of the calculation. As seen, the channel cross-section is modeled as a rectangular area 8 feet wide and 3.5 feet high, which is an accurate representation of the actual inlet channel. The inlet velocity of the water is equal to approximately 3.07 ft/s, which corresponds to 86 ft 3/s (see Section J.2.1.5 in the main body of the calculation). This is an accurate modeling of the inlet water velocity based on the dimensions of the discharge channel. The roughness of the bottom of the UHS (including the silt layer) is assumed to be 5 in. As indicated in Assumption J3.3 in the main body of the calculation, this value does not significantly affect the result of the analysis which is the overall water flow pattern and speed within the UHS.
Figures J.8.6-1 to J.8.6-3 show the nodalization used at the inlet region of the UHS model (see also Section J2.1.4 in the main body of the calculation).
Figure J.8.6-1 shows a to-scale perspective side view of the UHS inlet channel.
The dimensions the channel are show in Figure J-4 in the main body of the calculation. Figure J.8.6-2 shows a to-scale perspective bottom view of the same region, while Figure J.8.6-3 shows the mesh at the mid-level plane of the UHS.
41 Figure J8.6-1. Detail of the mesh at the inlet boundary (perspective side view)
Project No. 11333-297
Calculation No. L-002457                                                Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8                        Attachment J                    Page J35 of J40 Figure J8.6-2. Detail of the mesh at the inlet boundary (perspective bottom view)
Figure J8.6-3. Detail of the mesh at the inlet boundary (top view of the mid-level plane)
Project No. 11333-297


LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 -Request for additional information related to license amendment request to technical specification
Calculation No. L-002457                                                              Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8                              Attachment J                              Page J36 of J40 Request "b":
Figures J8.6-4 to J8.6-9 show the fluid velocity at the inlet region (images are to scale) including the top surface, horizontal mid-elevation plane and a vertical cross-section along the inlet channel and UHS (with details of the mesh).
Velocity- Magnitude (ft/s) r J    .06-    00  0.62774  o832 1 255v8                    2.5110    3.1387 Figure J8.6-4. Water velocity on the free surface at inlet region Velocity Magnitude (1f/s) 0,00000  0.62756        1.2551          1.8827    2.5102    3.1378 Figure J8.6-5. Water velocity at the mid-plane of the UHS Project No. 11333-297


====3.7.3 Ultimate====
Calculation No. L-002457                                                             Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8                               Attachment J                           Paqe J37 of J40 Figure J8.6-6. Location of the vertical cross-section across the inlet channel and UHS (used in the figures below)
Heat Sink (TAC. NOS. ME9076 and ME9077)", June 27, 2013.Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No.8 Appendix J8.6 Attachment J Page J34 of J40 This appendix is added in response to the U.S. N.R.C. request for additional information for the review of CFD and entrance mixing conclusions
Velocity: Magnitude(ft/s) o.00000      0.62956      12591          1.8887  2.5183    3.1478 Figure J8.6-7. Water velocity on the vertical cross section along the inlet channel and UHS (see Figure J.8.6-6). Note: The scale of the y-axis is 3.5 times larger that the scale of the x-axis.
[Sec. 6, Ref. 1].Request "a": The dimensions of the inlet channel are shown in Figure J-4 in the main body of the calculation.
Project No. 11333-297
As seen, the channel cross-section is modeled as a rectangular area 8 feet wide and 3.5 feet high, which is an accurate representation of the actual inlet channel. The inlet velocity of the water is equal to approximately 3.07 ft/s, which corresponds to 86 ft 3/s (see Section J.2.1.5 in the main body of the calculation).
 
This is an accurate modeling of the inlet water velocity based on the dimensions of the discharge channel. The roughness of the bottom of the UHS (including the silt layer) is assumed to be 5 in. As indicated in Assumption J3.3 in the main body of the calculation, this value does not significantly affect the result of the analysis which is the overall water flow pattern and speed within the UHS.Figures J.8.6-1 to J.8.6-3 show the nodalization used at the inlet region of the UHS model (see also Section J2.1.4 in the main body of the calculation).
Calculation No. L-002457                                                          Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8                            Attachment J                            Page J38 of J40 Velocity: Magnitude(ft/s) 0.00000  0.62956      17250 7        1.8887  2,5183    3.1478 Figure J8.6-8. Water velocity on the vertical cross section along the inlet channel and UHS (see Figure J.8.6-6) with details of the mesh. Note: The scale of the y-axis is 3.5 times larger that the scale of the x-axis.
Figure J.8.6-1 shows a to-scale perspective side view of the UHS inlet channel.The dimensions the channel are show in Figure J-4 in the main body of the calculation.
Velocity: Magnitude(tfts) 0.00000  0.62956      12591          1.8887  2.5182    3.1478 Figure J8.6-9. Water velocity on the vertical cross section along the inlet channel and UHS (see Figure J.8.6-6) with details of the mesh (close-up view of the inlet)
Figure J.8.6-2 shows a to-scale perspective bottom view of the same region, while Figure J.8.6-3 shows the mesh at the mid-level plane of the UHS.41 Figure J8.6-1. Detail of the mesh at the inlet boundary (perspective side view)Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No.8 Appendix J8.6 Page J35 of J40 Attachment J Figure J8.6-2. Detail of the mesh at the inlet boundary (perspective bottom view)Figure J8.6-3. Detail of the mesh at the inlet boundary (top view of the mid-level plane)Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No.8 Appendix J8.6 Attachment J Page J36 of J40 Request "b": Figures J8.6-4 to J8.6-9 show the fluid velocity at the inlet region (images are to scale) including the top surface, horizontal mid-elevation plane and a vertical cross-section along the inlet channel and UHS (with details of the mesh).Velocity-Magnitude (ft/s)r J .06- 00 0.62774 1 255v8 o832 2.5110 3.1387 Figure J8.6-4. Water velocity on the free surface at inlet region 0,00000 0.62756 Velocity Magnitude (1f/s)1.2551 1.8827 2.5102 3.1378 Figure J8.6-5. Water velocity at the mid-plane of the UHS Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No.8 Appendix J8.6 Attachment J Paqe J37 of J40 Figure J8.6-6. Location of the vertical cross-section across the inlet channel and UHS (used in the figures below)o.00000 0.62956 Velocity:
Project No. 11333-297
Magnitude (ft/s)12591 1.8887 2.5183 3.1478 Figure J8.6-7. Water velocity on the vertical cross section along the inlet channel and UHS (see Figure J.8.6-6).
 
Note: The scale of the y-axis is 3.5 times larger that the scale of the x-axis.Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No.8 Appendix J8.6 Attachment J Page J38 of J40 0.00000 0.62956 Velocity:
Calculation No. L-002457                                                    Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8                          Attachment J                        Page J39 of J40 Request "c":
Magnitude (ft/s)17250 7 1.8887 2,5183 3.1478 Figure J8.6-8. Water velocity on the vertical cross section along the inlet channel and UHS (see Figure J.8.6-6) with details of the mesh. Note: The scale of the y-axis is 3.5 times larger that the scale of the x-axis.Velocity:
Figure J8.6-10 shows the two recirculation loops at the entry region. The following variables are estimated from the CFD results (see Figure J8.6-10):
Magnitude (tfts)0.00000 0.62956 12591 1.8887 2.5182 3.1478 Figure J8.6-9. Water velocity on the vertical cross section along the inlet channel and UHS (see Figure J.8.6-6) with details of the mesh (close-up view of the inlet)Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Revision No.8 Appendix J8.6 Attachment J Page J39 of J40 Request "c": Figure J8.6-10 shows the two recirculation loops at the entry region.following variables are estimated from the CFD results (see Figure J8.6-10): The Mass flow rate in section Si: Mass flow rate in section S2: Mass flow rate in section S3: Mass flow rate entering the UHS: Mean return period in Loop A: Mean return period in Loop B: 184.5 ft 3/s 52.4 ft 3/s 46.1 ft 3/s 86.0 ft 3/s-1 hour-14 hours ((-61% of plant flow to the UHS)-54% of plant flow to the UHS)Loop A Figure J8.6-10. Recirculation loops at the entry region Project No. 11333-297 Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8 Attachment J Page J40 of J40 Request "d": The use of constant density fluid and thermal stratification effects in the UHS are addressed in Attachment N, Section N6.4.The purpose of the CFD analysis is to evaluate the water flow pattern in the man-made Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) at LaSalle County Generating and to provide effective lake volume and surface area for use in the S&L LAKET-PC computer program. Recirculation regions are present in the UHS due to its shape, which causes the water to flow in a non-straight path. Since water can be practically considered an incompressible fluid, the average velocity distribution within the UHS is governed by the conservation of mass. Changes in average water temperatures within the range of expected values (-100'F to 120'F)produce small changes in water properties and thus may marginally affect the local water velocity distribution.
Mass flow rate in section Si:        184.5  ft3/s Mass flow rate in section S2:          52.4  ft3/s  (( -61% of plant flow to the UHS)
However, these changes would not cause a significant change in the UHS overall water flow pattern and thus to the size of the recirculation regions. Therefore, the results of the CFD calculation are insignificantly affected by a change in water temperature.
Mass flow rate in section S3:          46.1  ft3/s    -54% of plant flow to the UHS)
Project No. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT K, PAGE KI of K6 CALCULAllON NO. 1-002457 REVISION NO.8 A1TACHMENT K, PAGE KI of K6 Attachment K -Preparation of Hourly Meteorological Data Prepared:
Mass flow rate entering the UHS: 86.0        ft 3/s Mean return period in Loop A:          -1 hour Mean return period in Loop B:        -14 hours Loop A Figure J8.6-10. Recirculation loops at the entry region Project No. 11333-297
~ (-t Date Z+/- M A 2,012, Erwin T. Prater -Sargent & LundyLLc Reviewed:
 
I___ Date ______Paul N. Derezotes
Calculation No. L-002457                                             Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8                       Attachment J                   Page J40 of J40 Request "d":
-Sargent & LundyLLc PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 RBASION No. 8 ATTACHMENT 1-&#xfd; PAGE K2 of K6 Preparation of Hourly Meteorological Data Used for Cooling Lake Analysis 1 Purpose This attachment describes update of a meteorological data input file provided to support a validation study of the cooling lake at the LaSalle County Nuclear Generating Station, near Marseilles, IL. The file was expanded to include older data collected from January 1, 1995 -December 31, 2004. The updated file now includes the period of record from January 1, 1995 -September 30, 2010.2 Parameters included in the Meteorological Data File The meteorological data file was compatible with the Laket program (Reference 1), which S&L uses to evaluate the thermal performance of cooling lakes. The parameter content and digital format of Laket meteorological files are listed in Table 1.3 Meteorological Data Selection Wind and temperature data were taken from an on-site meteorological tower at the generating station. The on-site tower measured the dry-bulb temperature and wind speed/direction at three levels: 33 ft., 200 ft. and 375 ft above ground level. Wind speed/direction and dry-bulb temperature from the lowest level (33 ft, or 10.1 meter) level were extracted for use in Laket.The on-site meteorological tower contractor supplied the on-site tower data in the form of digital text file.The on-site meteorological tower did not collect hourly humidity, precipitation type, cloud height and cloud cover, which are required inputs for Laket. These parameters were taken from a National Weather Service observing station at the Peoria, IL airport (station identifier KPIA).That weather station is located approximately 70 miles southwest of the generating station.4 Raw Meteorological Data Observed ("raw") meteorological data from KPIA were used to develop the meteorological data input file for Laket. Raw data were purchased from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)in Asheville, NC. Two separate digital files were purchased.
The use of constant density fluid and thermal stratification effects in the UHS are addressed in Attachment N, Section N6.4.
These two files are briefly described below.(1) Surface Weather Observations Raw surface weather observations (Reference
The purpose of the CFD analysis is to evaluate the water flow pattern in the man-made Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) at LaSalle County Generating and to provide effective lake volume and surface area for use in the S&L LAKET-PC computer program. Recirculation regions are present in the UHS due to its shape, which causes the water to flow in a non-straight path. Since water can be practically considered an incompressible fluid, the average velocity distribution within the UHS is governed by the conservation of mass. Changes in average water temperatures within the range of expected values (-100'F to 120'F) produce small changes in water properties and thus may marginally affect the local water velocity distribution. However, these changes would not cause a significant change in the UHS overall water flow pattern and thus to the size of the recirculation regions. Therefore, the results of the CFD calculation are insignificantly affected by a change in water temperature.
: 2) from KPIA covered the period of record from January 1, 1995 through December 31, 2004. NCDC subjects meteorological data to rigorous quality control checks before archiving it. Nevertheless, meteorological databases still typically include gaps and data values outside of valid ranges. The PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT K, PAGE K3 of K6 archived data included most of the weather parameters required by Laket (Table 1), with the following exceptions:
Project No. 11333-297
freezing precipitation code, solar radiation, atmospheric radiation, and partial pressure of water vapor. S&L estimated those parameters using standard methods. To check the thermodynamic consistency of the input data, S&L estimated hourly wet bulb temperature, dew point temperature and humidity to ensure consistency between those parameters and the (on-site) dry-bulb temperature.
 
In instances when the dew point temperature at KPIA exceeded the dry-bulb temperature at the on-site meteorological tower, the dew point temperature at KPIA was set equal to the dry-bulb temperature observed at the on-site tower. This ensured thermodynamic consistency between the relative humidity and the dry-bulb, wet-bulb temperature and dew point temperatures.
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8    ATTACHMENT K, PAGE KI of K6 CALCULAllON NO. 1-002457                REVISION NO.8       A1TACHMENT K, PAGE KI of K6 Attachment K - Preparation of Hourly Meteorological Data Prepared:    ~  (-t                                Date Z+/- M A 2,012, Erwin T. Prater - Sargent & LundyLLc Reviewed:                    I___                  Date ______
(2) Precipitation Data Raw hourly digital precipitation data (Reference
Paul N. Derezotes - Sargent & LundyLLc PROJECT NO. 11333-297
: 3) from KPIA were available for the period of record from January 1, 1995 through December 31, 2004.5 Creating Input Meteorological Data for Laket S&L uses a series of modular computer programs collectively called the Surface Data Generator ("Surgen")
 
and judgements and adjustments by a qualified, experienced, professional meteorologist to create digital meteorological data files for input into Laket. Key requirements of Laket include a specific set of weather parameters and specific digital format (Table 1), and a complete meteorological database with no bad (out of range), or missing, parameters.
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                    RBASION No. 8            ATTACHMENT 1-&#xfd; PAGE K2 of K6 Preparation of Hourly Meteorological Data Used for Cooling Lake Analysis 1    Purpose This attachment describes update of a meteorological data input file provided to support a validation study of the cooling lake at the LaSalle County Nuclear Generating Station, near Marseilles, IL. The file was expanded to include older data collected from January 1, 1995 -
Surgen modules are executed independently and perform the following functions:
December 31, 2004. The updated file now includes the period of record from January 1, 1995 -
September 30, 2010.
2 Parameters included in the Meteorological Data File The meteorological data file was compatible with the Laket program (Reference 1), which S&L uses to evaluate the thermal performance of cooling lakes. The parameter content and digital format of Laket meteorological files are listed in Table 1.
3 Meteorological Data Selection Wind and temperature data were taken from an on-site meteorological tower at the generating station. The on-site tower measured the dry-bulb temperature and wind speed/direction at three levels: 33 ft., 200 ft. and 375 ft above ground level. Wind speed/direction and dry-bulb temperature from the lowest level (33 ft, or 10.1 meter) level were extracted for use in Laket.
The on-site meteorological tower contractor supplied the on-site tower data in the form of digital text file.
The on-site meteorological tower did not collect hourly humidity, precipitation type, cloud height and cloud cover, which are required inputs for Laket. These parameters were taken from a National Weather Service observing station at the Peoria, IL airport (station identifier KPIA).
That weather station is located approximately 70 miles southwest of the generating station.
4 Raw Meteorological Data Observed ("raw") meteorological data from KPIA were used to develop the meteorological data input file for Laket. Raw data were purchased from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) in Asheville, NC. Two separate digital files were purchased. These two files are briefly described below.
(1) Surface Weather Observations Raw surface weather observations (Reference 2) from KPIA covered the period of record from January 1, 1995 through December 31, 2004. NCDC subjects meteorological data to rigorous quality control checks before archiving it. Nevertheless, meteorological databases still typically include gaps and data values outside of valid ranges. The PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                    REVISION NO. 8              ATTACHMENT K, PAGE K3 of K6 archived data included most of the weather parameters required by Laket (Table 1), with the following exceptions: freezing precipitation code, solar radiation, atmospheric radiation, and partial pressure of water vapor. S&L estimated those parameters using standard methods. To check the thermodynamic consistency of the input data, S&L estimated hourly wet bulb temperature, dew point temperature and humidity to ensure consistency between those parameters and the (on-site) dry-bulb temperature. In instances when the dew point temperature at KPIA exceeded the dry-bulb temperature at the on-site meteorological tower, the dew point temperature at KPIA was set equal to the dry-bulb temperature observed at the on-site tower. This ensured thermodynamic consistency between the relative humidity and the dry-bulb, wet-bulb temperature and dew point temperatures.
(2) PrecipitationData Raw hourly digital precipitation data (Reference 3) from KPIA were available for the period of record from January 1, 1995 through December 31, 2004.
5 Creating Input Meteorological Data for Laket S&L uses a series of modular computer programs collectively called the Surface Data Generator
("Surgen") and judgements and adjustments by a qualified, experienced, professional meteorologist to create digital meteorological data files for input into Laket. Key requirements of Laket include a specific set of weather parameters and specific digital format (Table 1), and a complete meteorological database with no bad (out of range), or missing, parameters. Surgen modules are executed independently and perform the following functions:
(1) Interpret the unique digital formats of raw surface weather observations and precipitation data and extract required meteorological parameters.
(1) Interpret the unique digital formats of raw surface weather observations and precipitation data and extract required meteorological parameters.
(2) Convert numeric units of extracted parameters to those required by the Laket program.(3) Scan hourly surface weather observations, and identify periods when values for selected parameters are either missing or invalid (outside of acceptable ranges). Those periods are identified by starting and ending date, and by the length of each gap (in hours).(4) Scan hourly surface weather observations, identify periods within the digital file when whole days or specific hours are missing; insert new, or blank records into the file to fill time gaps.(5) Estimate values for the following weather parameters:
(2) Convert numeric units of extracted parameters to those required by the Laket program.
an indicator whether precipitation is liquid or frozen, solar radiation reaching the lake surface, atmospheric radiation reaching the lake surface, partial pressure of water vapor in the atmosphere, wet bulb temperature and dew point temperature.
(3) Scan hourly surface weather observations, and identify periods when values for selected parameters are either missing or invalid (outside of acceptable ranges). Those periods are identified by starting and ending date, and by the length of each gap (in hours).
PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION No. 8 ATTACHMENT K, PAGE K4 of K6 (6) Perform simple linear interpolation of weather parameter values through gaps, and insert the new interpolated values into the database.(7) Allow insertion of manually selected substitution values into gaps in the database that are judged not to be suitable for simple linear interpolation.
(4) Scan hourly surface weather observations, identify periods within the digital file when whole days or specific hours are missing; insert new, or blank records into the file to fill time gaps.
(8) Translate processed and adjusted databases into the format required by the Laket program.Since the project required combining wind and temperature data from an on-site meteorological tower with data collected at another site (Peoria, IL), S&L developed a project-specific FORTRAN program which merged the on-site wind speed/direction and dry-bulb temperature data with other data from KPIA. The program produced a single input file that was subsequently processed with Surgen, as described above.6 Review and Adjustment of Meteorological Data Surgen identified short periods of missing, or bad (out of range), raw meteorological data and used linear interpolation to fill short gaps that were generally 1-2 hours long. However, there were three periods identified which had data gaps too long for linear interpolation.
(5) Estimate values for the following weather parameters: an indicator whether precipitation is liquid or frozen, solar radiation reaching the lake surface, atmospheric radiation reaching the lake surface, partial pressure of water vapor in the atmosphere, wet bulb temperature and dew point temperature.
Data were manually substituted from Peoria in these periods. These periods are listed below: Wind direction and speed from Peoria, IL was used for the following periods: (1) 10/30/97 21:00 local standard time (LST) through 11/03/97 14:00 LST (2) 08/23/02 05:00 LST through 09/04/02 11:00 LST The anemometer height at Peoria during both of these time periods was 32.8 ft (10 meters) (Reference 4).Dry bulb temperature from Peoria, IL used for the following period: (3) 06/15/98 08:00 LST through 06/16/98 11:00 LST 7 Laket Meteorological Input File Surgen produced a single Laket meteorological input file which was appended to the original meteorological data file produced in 2011. The specifications of the original and combined (updated) file are listed below PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION No. 8 ATTACHMENT K, PAGE K5 of K6 Original file: Name: PIALSL05 10.DAT Type: ASC text Size: 7,773 Kb Creation date/time:
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
3/17/2011 4:04 PM Updated file: Name: PIALSL9510.DAT Type: ASC text Size: 21,301 Kb Creation date/time:
 
3/9/2012 11:08 AM The updated meteorological data file was tested with a short Laket input file to ensure that Laket could read the updated meteorological data file. Laket read the updated meteorological data file normally.8 Wind Sensor Height The wind speed/direction sensor height is an input in Laket. The wind speed and direction were taken from the 33 ft. (10.1 meter) level of the on-site meteorological tower at the generating station.9 References
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                     REVISION   No. 8           ATTACHMENT K, PAGE K4 of K6 (6) Perform simple linear interpolation of weather parameter values through gaps, and insert the new interpolated values into the database.
: 1. Sargent & Lundy (S&L), 2004. "LAKET-PC, A One Dimensional Lake Thermal Prediction Program, S&L Program Number LAK 03.7.292-2.2, Revision 0, October 30, 2004, User Manual", S&L, Chicago IL.2. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), 2006. "Federal Climate Complex Data Documentation for Integrated Surface Data", August 25, 2006. Published by NCDC, Asheville, NC.3. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), 2000. "Data Documentation for Hourly Precipitation Data TD-3240", November 15, 2000. Published by NCDC, Asheville, NC.4. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), 2012. Data file "anem_elev_inf' referenced in"Data Documentation for Data Set 6421 (DSI-642 1) Enhanced hourly wind station data for the contiguous United States" National Climatic Data Center, Asheville North Carolina.Website: http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/ftpref/support/climate/wind daily/td6421.pdf Accessed March, 2012.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT K, PAGE K6 of K6 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO.8 A1TACHMENT K, PAGE K6 of K6 Table 1. Parameters and Digital Record Format of the Standard Weather Data File Used by S&L Laket Program Field No.Parameter Units 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Station Code Number 5 digits Year 4 digits Month 2 digits Day 2 digits Hour of Day (00 (midnight)-23 (11 pm)) 2 digits Cloud Ceiling Height above feet Ground Level Direction Sector from which Wind Blows (I(N) -16(NNW))Wind Speed knots Dry Bulb Temperature deg F Wet Bulb Temperature deg F Dow Point Temperature deg F Relative Humidity percent Station Atmospheric Pressure Inches Hg Cloud Cover Tenths Freezing Precipitation Code 1 digit One-Hour Total Water 1 00ths inches Equivalent Precipitation Solar Radiation Btu/ft-hour Atmospheric Radiation Btulfte-hour Partial Pressure of Water inches Hg Vapor Lower Upper Digital Limit Limit Format F7.0 F6.0 F4.0 F4.0 F9.2 0 70,000 F9.2 1 16 0 96-129 136-129 136-129 136 0 100 25.69 32.01 00 10 0 -liquid 1 -solid 0 1,200 0 4,000 5 220 0 2.00 F9.2 F9.2 F9.2 F9.2 F9.2 F9.2 F9.2 F9.2 F9.2 F9.2 F9.2 F9.2 F9.2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION No. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE Ll of L58 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO.8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE LI of L58 Attachment L -Plant Temperature Rise Prepared:
(7) Allow insertion of manually selected substitution values into gaps in the database that are judged not to be suitable for simple linear interpolation.
."/04 w. (L). JL Date (o a'- Iacn;L Daniel W. Nevill -Sargent & LundyLLc Checked: ____ Date __2_7__z_William D. Brey -:Sargent
(8) Translate processed and adjusted databases into the format required by the Laket program.
& LundyI+/-c Reviewed: , / Date 062- 7-2-o0/Z Pawel Kut -Sargent & LundyLic PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L2 of L58 ATTACHMENT L -TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No.L 1.0 P u rp o se .......................................................................................................................
Since the project required combining wind and temperature data from an on-site meteorological tower with data collected at another site (Peoria, IL), S&L developed a project-specific FORTRAN program which merged the on-site wind speed/direction and dry-bulb temperature data with other data from KPIA. The program produced a single input file that was subsequently processed with Surgen, as described above.
L 3 L 2 .0 M eth od o lo g y ................................................................................................................
6   Review and Adjustment of Meteorological Data Surgen identified short periods of missing, or bad (out of range), raw meteorological data and used linear interpolation to fill short gaps that were generally 1-2 hours long. However, there were three periods identified which had data gaps too long for linear interpolation. Data were manually substituted from Peoria in these periods. These periods are listed below:
L 4 L 3.0 A ssum ptions .............................................................................................................
Wind direction and speed from Peoria, IL was used for the following periods:
L 6 L 4 .0 D esig n In p u ts ................................................................................................................
(1) 10/30/97 21:00 local standard time (LST) through 11/03/97 14:00 LST (2) 08/23/02 05:00 LST through 09/04/02 11:00 LST The anemometer height at Peoria during both of these time periods was 32.8 ft (10 meters) (Reference 4).
L 7 L 5 .0 R eferen ces ....................................................................................................................
Dry bulb temperature from Peoria, IL used for the following period:
L 8 L 6 .0 E v a lu atio n s ...................................................................................................................
(3) 06/15/98 08:00 LST through 06/16/98 11:00 LST 7 Laket Meteorological Input File Surgen produced a single Laket meteorological input file which was appended to the original meteorological data file produced in 2011. The specifications of the original and combined (updated) file are listed below PROJECT NO. 11333-297
L 9 L7.0 Summary and Conclusions
......................................................................................
L1O L8.0 Limitations and Open Items ....................................................................................
Ll1 L 9 .0 A p p en d ice s .................................................................................................................
L 12 (Total Pages -Attachment L (12) plus Appendices (46) for a Total of 58 pages)LIST OF APPENDICES No. Title Page L9.1 MUR PU Total Generated Heat Load L13 to L14 L9.2 j MUR_ PU Plant Temperature Rise Results L15 to L34 L9.3 ! EPU Total Generated Heat Load L35 to L37 L9.4 i EPU Plant Temperature Rise Results L38 to L57 L9.5 Plant Temperature Rise Equations L58 (Total Appendix Pages -46)PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L3 of L58 L1.O PURPOSE The purpose of this attachment is to determine the Core Standby Cooling System (CSCS)temperature rise across the plant for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate (MUR PU) and Extended Power Uprate (EPU) based on the new heat load to the Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) determined in L-002453 [Ref. L5.1]. This temperature rise is to be used in the LAKET-PC [Ref. L5.3] model of the LaSalle County Station UHS.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L4 of L58 L2.0 METHODOLOGY The plant temperature rise is used in LAKET-PC [Ref. L5.3] to compute the rise in water temperature caused by the heat rejected to the UHS during the postulated accident.There are two types of heat loads that are considered when determining the CSCS temperature rise across the plant: 1) the total generated heat load and 2) the sensible heat load. The total generated heat load can be further divided into decay heat load, pump heat load and cooler heat load. Heat load from the spent fuel pool is not considered since it is improbable that required operator actions could be performed in the post-Loss Of Coolant Accident (LOCA) reactor building environment (Assumption L3.4). The total heat load, consisting of the generated heat load and the sensible heat load, is the heat rejection to the UHS and is used to determine the plant temperature rise.The total generated heat load (Design Input L4.1) is computed for various time steps between zero seconds and IE+9 seconds in Calculation L-002453 [Ref. L5.1]. Linear interpolation of the results from L-002453 is used to detennine the integrated total generated heat load at each time step.The total sensible heat load is determined to be [R ]] (Design Input L4.2). It is assumed that all sensible heat is dissipated to the UHS at a constant rate within six hours (See Assumption L3.2).Once the heat rejection to the UHS is determined by adding the total generated head load and the sensible heat load, the temperature rise through the plant is determrined by the following equation: AT= Q (Eq. L3-1)where: AT = plant temperature rise ['F]Q = heat rejection rate to the UHS [BTU/hr]Cp = specific heat capacity of water [BTU/(lbm-&deg;F)]
m = mass flow rate [lbm/hr]The mass flow rate is determined by converting the CSCS volumetric flow rate of 86 ft 3/s (Assumption L3.3) to a mass flow rate at a density of 62.0 lb,n/ft 3 (Assumption L3.1).L2.1 Computer Programs and Software The analysis performed herein utilizes Microsoft Excel 2003 [Ref. L5.4], which is commercially available.
The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L5 of L58 spreadsheets used in this analysis.
All computer runs were performed using PC No.ZD6661 under the Windows XP operating system. Excel Add-in function STMFUNC is used to calculate the thermal properties of water and steam at varying operating conditions
[Ref. L5.5]. The Excel Add-in function STMFUNC has been validated and approved for use in accordance with the S&L Quality Assurance (QA) program.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L6 of L58 L3.0 ASSUMPTIONS L3.1 Water Properties
-The properties of water are evaluated at a temperature of 100&deg;F and atmospheric pressure.
The density and specific heat capacity of water at 100&deg;F and 1 atm are 62.0 lbm/ft 3 and 0.998 BTU/lbm-&deg;F, respectively
[Ref. L5.5].L3.2 Sensible Heat Load from Reactor Coolant System -It is conservatively assumed that all of the sensible heat from the reactor and the primary system is dissipated to the UHS within six hours. One-sixth of the heat is assumed to be rejected per 1-hour time step until the full sensible heat load is rejected by the sixth hour. This is based on the assumption that the temperature within the reactor will be at 100&deg;F within six hours.L3.3 CSCS Volumetric Flow -The total plant flow during the UHS analysis is assumed to be 38,600 gpm (86.0 ft 3/s). The total flow is based upon the cumulative flow contribution from thirteen CSCS pumps operating at design flow conditions (eight Residual Heat Removal (RHR)-Service Water pumps, 4,000 gpm each; three Diesel Generator (DG)pumps, two at 1300 gpm and one at 2,000 gpm; and two High Pressure Core Spray DG pumps, 1000 gpm each) (See Attachment D).L3.4 Spent Fuel Pool Heat Load -Heat load from the spent fuel pool is not considered because it is improbable that required operator action (RHR alignment) could be performed in the post-LOCA reactor building environment.
Instead, the fuel pool emergency makeup pumps are modeled as providing required makeup flow to the fuel pools at 600 gpm [Ref.L5.2].PROJECT NO. 11333-297 Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L7 of L58 L4.0 DESIGN INPUTS L4.1 Total Generated Heat Load -The total generated heat load rejected to the UHS following a LOCA for one unit while the second unit is in normal shutdown from maximum power is determined in L-002453 [Ref. L5.1]. These results are presented in Appendix L9.1 for MUR PU and Appendix L9.3 for EPU.L4.2 Sensible Heat -The sensible heat load is [[]], per L-002453 [Ref. L5.1 ].L4.3 CSCS Pump Curves -The CSCS pump curves are provided in Attachment D of this calculation.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L8 of L58 L


==5.0 REFERENCES==
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                  REVISION No. 8              ATTACHMENT K, PAGE K5 of K6 Original file:
Name: PIALSL05 10.DAT Type: ASC text Size: 7,773 Kb Creation date/time: 3/17/2011 4:04 PM Updated file:
Name: PIALSL9510.DAT Type: ASC text Size: 21,301 Kb Creation date/time: 3/9/2012 11:08 AM The updated meteorological data file was tested with a short Laket input file to ensure that Laket could read the updated meteorological data file. Laket read the updated meteorological data file normally.
8 Wind Sensor Height The wind speed/direction sensor height is an input in Laket. The wind speed and direction were taken from the 33 ft. (10.1 meter) level of the on-site meteorological tower at the generating station.
9 References
: 1. Sargent & Lundy (S&L), 2004. "LAKET-PC, A One Dimensional Lake Thermal Prediction Program, S&L Program Number LAK 03.7.292-2.2, Revision 0, October 30, 2004, User Manual", S&L, Chicago IL.
: 2. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), 2006. "Federal Climate Complex Data Documentation for Integrated Surface Data", August 25, 2006. Published by NCDC, Asheville, NC.
: 3. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), 2000. "Data Documentation for Hourly Precipitation Data TD-3240", November 15, 2000. Published by NCDC, Asheville, NC.
: 4. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), 2012. Data file "anem_elev_inf' referenced in "Data Documentation for Data Set 6421 (DSI-642 1) Enhanced hourly wind station data for the contiguous United States" National Climatic Data Center, Asheville North Carolina.
Website: http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/ftpref/support/climate/wind daily/td6421.pdf Accessed March, 2012.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297


L5.1 L-002453, "UHS Heat Load," Rev. 3.L5.2 SEAG #12-000098, "DIR for LAS-EPU-U 1 /2-DIR-T0608-1," 4/18/2012.
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                    REVISION NO.      8          ATTACHMENT K, PAGE K6 of K6 CALCULATION NO. L-002457                    REVISION NO.8                A1TACHMENT K, PAGE K6 of K6 Table 1. Parameters and Digital Record Format of the Standard Weather Data File Used by S&L Laket Program Field                                            Lower      Upper    Digital No. Parameter                    Units        Limit      Limit    Format 1      Station Code Number          5 digits                          F7.0 2      Year                        4 digits                          F6.0 3      Month                        2 digits                          F4.0 4      Day                          2 digits                          F4.0 5      Hour of Day (00 (midnight)-23 (11 pm))  2 digits                          F9.2 6      Cloud Ceiling Height above feet            0          70,000    F9.2 Ground Level 7      Direction Sector from which Wind Blows (I(N) - 16(NNW))                1          16        F9.2 8      Wind Speed                  knots        0          96        F9.2 9      Dry Bulb Temperature        deg F        -129      136      F9.2 10    Wet Bulb Temperature        deg F        -129      136      F9.2 11    Dow Point Temperature        deg F        -129      136      F9.2 12    Relative Humidity            percent      0          100      F9.2 13    Station Atmospheric Pressure Inches Hg    25.69      32.01    F9.2 14    Cloud Cover                  Tenths        00        10        F9.2 15    Freezing Precipitation Code 1 digit        0 - liquid 1 - solid F9.2 16    One-Hour Total Water        100ths inches 0          1,200    F9.2 Equivalent Precipitation 17    Solar Radiation              Btu/ft-hour  0          4,000    F9.2 18    Atmospheric Radiation        Btulfte-hour  5          220      F9.2 19    Partial Pressure of Water    inches Hg    0          2.00      F9.2 Vapor PROJECT NO. 11333-297
L5.3 LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 12/09/2004.
 
L5.4 Microsoft@
CALCULATION NO. L-002457            REVISION No. 8      ATTACHMENT L, PAGE Ll of L58 CALCULATION NO. L-002457            REVISION NO.8        ATTACHMENT L, PAGE LI of L58 Attachment L - Plant Temperature Rise Prepared: ."/04          w.
Excel 2003, Sargent & Lundy LLC Program No. 03.2.286-1.0, dated 02/02/2004.
(L). JL              Date (o a'-Iacn;L Daniel W. Nevill - Sargent & LundyLLc Checked: ____                                  Date __2_7__z_
L5.5 STMFUNC (Steam Table Function Dynamic Link Library) S&L Program Number 03.7.598-2.0, dated 5/15/2003.
William D. Brey -:Sargent & LundyI+/-c Reviewed:  ,        /                          Date  062- 7-2-o0/Z Pawel Kut - Sargent & LundyLic PROJECT NO. 11333-297
PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L9 of L58 L6.0 CALCULATIONS L6.1 Total and Integrated Generated Heat Load Rejected to the UHS The total generated heat load rejected to the UHS following a LOCA for one unit while the second unit is in normal shutdown from maximum power is determined for MUR PU (3559 MWt) and EPU (4067 MWt) in L-002453 [Ref. L5.1]. These results are presented in Appendix L9.1 for MUR PU and Appendix L9.3 for EPU and are used to determine the temperature rise through the plant.L6.2 Plant Temperature Rise In order to facilitate the creation of a LAKET-PC [Ref. L5.3] input file, the plant temperature rise results are determined in one hour increments.
 
This requires linear interpolation of the integrated total generated heat load found in L-002453 [Ref. L5.1] to determine the integrated total generated heat load at hourly intervals.
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                            REVISION NO. 8                                        ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L2 of L58 ATTACHMENT L - TABLE OF CONTENTS Section                                                                                                                                    Page No.
Adding the integrated total generated heat load and the sensible heat load gives the total heat load, which is the heat rejected to the UHS used to determine the plant temperature rise. The plant temperature rise is calculated in Excel using Eq. L3-1. The results of this calculation are shown in Appendix L9.2 for MUR PU and Appendix L9.4 for EPU.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L10 of L58 L7.0  
L 1.0        Pu rp o se ....................................................................................................................... L 3 L2 .0        M eth od o log y ................................................................................................................ L 4 L 3.0        Assum ptions ............................................................................................................. L 6 L 4 .0      D esig n In p uts ................................................................................................................ L 7 L 5 .0      Referen ces .................................................................................................................... L 8 L6 .0        E v a lu atio n s ................................................................................................................... L 9 L7.0        Summary and Conclusions ...................................................................................... L1O L8.0        Limitations and Open Items .................................................................................... Ll1 L 9 .0      A p p en d ice s ................................................................................................................. L 12 (Total Pages - Attachment L (12) plus Appendices (46) for a Total of 58 pages)
LIST OF APPENDICES No.          Title                                                                                                                  Page L9.1      MUR PU Total Generated Heat Load                                                                                    L13 to L14 L9.2  j  MUR_PU Plant Temperature Rise Results                                                                              L15 to L34 L9.3    ! EPU Total Generated Heat Load                                                                                      L35 to L37 L9.4    i EPU Plant Temperature Rise Results                                                                                  L38 to L57 L9.5      Plant Temperature Rise Equations                                                                                        L58 (Total Appendix Pages - 46)
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457          REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L3 of L58 L1.O  PURPOSE The purpose of this attachment is to determine the Core Standby Cooling System (CSCS) temperature rise across the plant for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate (MUR PU) and Extended Power Uprate (EPU) based on the new heat load to the Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) determined in L-002453 [Ref. L5.1]. This temperature rise is to be used in the LAKET-PC [Ref. L5.3] model of the LaSalle County Station UHS.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457            REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L4 of L58 L2.0  METHODOLOGY The plant temperature rise is used in LAKET-PC [Ref. L5.3] to compute the rise in water temperature caused by the heat rejected to the UHS during the postulated accident.
There are two types of heat loads that are considered when determining the CSCS temperature rise across the plant: 1) the total generated heat load and 2) the sensible heat load. The total generated heat load can be further divided into decay heat load, pump heat load and cooler heat load. Heat load from the spent fuel pool is not considered since it is improbable that required operator actions could be performed in the post-Loss Of Coolant Accident (LOCA) reactor building environment (Assumption L3.4). The total heat load, consisting of the generated heat load and the sensible heat load, is the heat rejection to the UHS and is used to determine the plant temperature rise.
The total generated heat load (Design Input L4.1) is computed for various time steps between zero seconds and IE+9 seconds in Calculation L-002453 [Ref. L5.1]. Linear interpolation of the results from L-002453 is used to detennine the integrated total generated heat load at each time step.
The total sensible heat load is determined to be [R              )) (Design Input L4.2). It is assumed that all sensible heat is dissipated to the UHS at a constant rate within six hours (See Assumption L3.2).
Once the heat rejection to the UHS is determined by adding the total generated head load and the sensible heat load, the temperature rise through the plant is determrined by the following equation:
AT=    Q                              (Eq. L3-1) where:
AT          = plant temperature rise ['F]
Q            = heat rejection rate to the UHS [BTU/hr]
Cp          = specific heat capacity of water [BTU/(lbm-&deg;F)]
m            = mass flow rate [lbm/hr]
The mass flow rate is determined by converting the CSCS volumetric flow rate of 86 ft3/s (Assumption L3.3) to a mass flow rate at a density of 62.0 lb,n/ft3 (Assumption L3.1).
L2.1  Computer Programs and Software The analysis performed herein utilizes Microsoft Excel 2003 [Ref. L5.4], which is commercially available. The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457            REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L5 of L58 spreadsheets used in this analysis. All computer runs were performed using PC No.
ZD6661 under the Windows XP operating system. Excel Add-in function STMFUNC is used to calculate the thermal properties of water and steam at varying operating conditions
[Ref. L5.5]. The Excel Add-in function STMFUNC has been validated and approved for use in accordance with the S&L Quality Assurance (QA) program.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457            REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L6 of L58 L3.0  ASSUMPTIONS L3.1  Water Properties - The properties of water are evaluated at a temperature of 100&deg;F and atmospheric pressure. The density and specific heat capacity of water at 100&deg;F and 1 atm are 62.0 lbm/ft3 and 0.998 BTU/lbm-&deg;F, respectively [Ref. L5.5].
L3.2  Sensible Heat Load from Reactor Coolant System - It is conservatively assumed that all of the sensible heat from the reactor and the primary system is dissipated to the UHS within six hours. One-sixth of the heat is assumed to be rejected per 1-hour time step until the full sensible heat load is rejected by the sixth hour. This is based on the assumption that the temperature within the reactor will be at 100&deg;F within six hours.
L3.3  CSCS Volumetric Flow - The total plant flow during the UHS analysis is assumed to be 38,600 gpm (86.0 ft3/s). The total flow is based upon the cumulative flow contribution from thirteen CSCS pumps operating at design flow conditions (eight Residual Heat Removal (RHR)-Service Water pumps, 4,000 gpm each; three Diesel Generator (DG) pumps, two at 1300 gpm and one at 2,000 gpm; and two High Pressure Core Spray DG pumps, 1000 gpm each) (See Attachment D).
L3.4  Spent Fuel Pool Heat Load - Heat load from the spent fuel pool is not considered because it is improbable that required operator action (RHR alignment) could be performed in the post-LOCA reactor building environment. Instead, the fuel pool emergency makeup pumps are modeled as providing required makeup flow to the fuel pools at 600 gpm [Ref.
L5.2].
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457            REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L7 of L58 L4.0  DESIGN INPUTS L4.1  Total Generated Heat Load - The total generated heat load rejected to the UHS following a LOCA for one unit while the second unit is in normal shutdown from maximum power is determined in L-002453 [Ref. L5.1]. These results are presented in Appendix L9.1 for MUR PU and Appendix L9.3 for EPU.
L4.2  Sensible Heat - The sensible heat load is ((          )), per L-002453 [Ref. L5.1 ].
L4.3  CSCS Pump Curves - The CSCS pump curves are provided in Attachment D of this calculation.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457          REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L8 of L58 L
 
==5.0  REFERENCES==
 
L5.1  L-002453, "UHS Heat Load," Rev. 3.
L5.2 SEAG #12-000098, "DIR for LAS-EPU-U 1/2-DIR-T0608- 1," 4/18/2012.
L5.3 LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 12/09/2004.
L5.4 Microsoft@ Excel 2003, Sargent & Lundy LLC Program No. 03.2.286-1.0, dated 02/02/2004.
L5.5 STMFUNC (Steam Table Function Dynamic Link Library) S&L Program Number 03.7.598-2.0, dated 5/15/2003.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457           REVISION NO. 8                   ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L9 of L58 L6.0 CALCULATIONS L6.1 Total and Integrated Generated Heat Load Rejected to the UHS The total generated heat load rejected to the UHS following a LOCA for one unit while the second unit is in normal shutdown from maximum power is determined for MUR PU (3559 MWt) and EPU (4067 MWt) in L-002453 [Ref. L5.1]. These results are presented in Appendix L9.1 for MUR PU and Appendix L9.3 for EPU and are used to determine the temperature rise through the plant.
L6.2 Plant Temperature Rise In order to facilitate the creation of a LAKET-PC [Ref. L5.3] input file, the plant temperature rise results are determined in one hour increments. This requires linear interpolation of the integrated total generated heat load found in L-002453 [Ref. L5.1] to determine the integrated total generated heat load at hourly intervals. Adding the integrated total generated heat load and the sensible heat load gives the total heat load, which is the heat rejected to the UHS used to determine the plant temperature rise. The plant temperature rise is calculated in Excel using Eq. L3-1. The results of this calculation are shown in Appendix L9.2 for MUR PU and Appendix L9.4 for EPU.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457             REVISION NO. 8                 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L10 of L58 L7.0


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
AND CONCLUSIONS The CSCS temperature rise across the plant following a postulated accident is determined in hourly intervals in order to be used as input to LAKET-PC [Ref. L5.3]. These results are given in Appendix L9.2 for MUR PU and Appendix L9.4 for EPU.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE Ll 1 of L58 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE Lii of L58 L8.0 LIMITATIONS AND OPEN ITEMS L8.1 Limitations None.L8.2 Open Items None.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO
AND CONCLUSIONS The CSCS temperature rise across the plant following a postulated accident is determined in hourly intervals in order to be used as input to LAKET-PC [Ref. L5.3]. These results are given in Appendix L9.2 for MUR PU and Appendix L9.4 for EPU.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457  REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT L, PAGE Ll 1 of L58 CALCULATION NO. L-002457  REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT L, PAGE Lii of L58 L8.0  LIMITATIONS AND OPEN ITEMS L8.1  Limitations None.
L8.2  Open Items None.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L12 of L58 L9.0    APPENDICES LIST OF APPENDICES App.        Title                                                        No. of Pages L9,1      MUR PU Total Generated Heat Load [Ref. L5.1]                      2 L9,2      MUR PU Plant Temperature Rise Results                            20 L9.3      EPU Total Generated Heat Load [Ref. L5.1]                          3 L9,4      EPU Plant Temperature Rise Results                                20 L9.5      Plant Temperature Rise Equations                                  1 (Total Appendix Pages - 46)
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457        REVISION NO. 8                            ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L13 of L58 APPENDIX L9.1: MUR PU TOTAL GENERATED HEAT LOAD [Ref. L5.11 i          I(([                    Pump        Cooler Heat Fuel Pool Heat
[
Time      Time                              Heat (seconds)    (hours)                            Load        Load          Load L__(Btu/hr)      (Btu/hr)      (Btulhr) 0      2.781E-11                        4.15E+07    5.04E+07      0.OOE+00 1.00E-01    2.78E-05                        4.15E+07 ! 5.04E+07        0.OOE+00
                                              , 4.5E 0    i
M2.2 Worst 30-Days of Net Evaporation For determining the worst 30-days of net evaporation, a UHS model is created in LAKET (based on Case 3c in Attachment H). Case 3c is used since it uses a worst 30-day net evaporation weather file and represents the worst case scenario of 18-in sedimentation.
M2.2 Worst 30-Days of Net Evaporation For determining the worst 30-days of net evaporation, a UHS model is created in LAKET (based on Case 3c in Attachment H). Case 3c is used since it uses a worst 30-day net evaporation weather file and represents the worst case scenario of 18-in sedimentation.
The following changes were made to Case 3c for determining the worst net evaporation conditions:
The following changes were made to Case 3c for determining the worst net evaporation conditions:
* The date range is changed to match the date range of weather file 'PIALSL950O.txt.'
* The date range is changed to match the date range of weather file 'PIALSL950O.txt.'
* Anemometer height is set at 33-ft in accordance with the instrument setup at LaSalle County Station (Design Input M4.2).* Lake elevation is fixed at 690-ft (Assumption M3.2).* Initial temperature is set at 407F as a representative winter UHS temperature (Assumption M3. 1).* The temperature rise through the plant (TPRISE variable in LAKET) is set at the approximate average temperature rise at EPU of -9&deg;F (Assumption M3.3).* Effective area and effective volume are set to 47.10 acres and 216.45. acre-ft, respectively, due to the results of Attachment J -UHS Flow Path Analysis and the Case 3c model area and volume.The net evaporation is calculated by subtracting precipitation from the total evaporation.
* Anemometer height is set at 33-ft in accordance with the instrument setup at LaSalle County Station (Design Input M4.2).
The worst 30 days of net evaporation is determined using rolling averages, similar to the methodology used in determining the worst weather.M2.3 Weather File Creation for Comparison to Existing Analysis Following determination of the worst weather days and the worst net evaporation days, weather files for input to LAKET are created. For the worst weather input file, conditions from the worst weather day are used as the first day in the new weather file.Following the first day, the conditions from the worst 30-day period are added to create a 31-day worst weather "month." Precipitation is conservatively set to zero for all time steps comprising the worst weather month (Assumption M3.4). To determine if this new worst weather month is more limiting than the existing worst weather month used in Attachment H, the input file from Case 3a is ran using the new worst weather month. If the new weather month does not result in a higher maximum UHS outlet temperature, the existing worst weather month will be retained as it is more severe.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M6 of M17 For the worst net evaporation weather file, the conditions from the worst 30-day period are compiled to create a 30-day worst net evaporation "month." Similar to the worst weather month, precipitation is set to zero for all time steps (Assumption M3.4). To detennine if this new worst net evaporation month is more limiting than the existing worst net evaporation month from Attachment H, the input file from Case 3c is ran using the new worst net evaporation month. If the new weather file does not result in more lake drawdown, the existing worst net evaporation month will be retained as it is more severe.M2.4 Weather File Creation for UHS Analysis If the existing weather file is not bounding, new weather files are created based on the new most limiting day and month determined by this analysis.
* Lake elevation is fixed at 690-ft (Assumption M3.2).
These weather files use the weather information provided in 'PIALSL95IO.txt' with the following changes: " The station code is set to zero. This input has no impact on the results of this analysis.* The start date and time is set at 7/1/1900 at 12AM. This input has no effect on the results of this analysis." Precipitation is set to zero for all time steps (Assumption M3.4).In order to determine the effect of the time of day of the worst weather day on the UHS, eight different worst weather files will be created. The first file will start at 12 AM of the worst weather day followed by subsequent files at 3 hour intervals (e.g. the second weather file starts at 3 AM of the worst weather day). After 24 hours of the worst weather day, the worst 30 days subsequently added to the file. The start of the worst 30 days is selected to maintain a 1 hour interval between time steps. For example, if the worst 24 hour day ends at 11PM, the next time step will be at 12AM of the beginning of the worst 30 days.For the worst net evaporation, only one weather file will be created, corresponding to the dates and times determined to be the most limiting.M2.5 Computer Programs and Software LAKET-PC Version 2.2 [Ref. M5.2] was used to perform the lake transient analysis contained in this evaluation.
* Initial temperature is set at 407F as a representative winter UHS temperature (Assumption M3. 1).
This was run on S&L PC No. ZD6661 on Windows XP operating system.Postprocessing of the LAKET-PC results is done using Microsoft Excel 2003 [Ref.M5.1], which is commercially available.
* The temperature rise through the plant (TPRISE variable in LAKET) is set at the approximate average temperature rise at EPU of -9&deg;F (Assumption M3.3).
The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all spreadsheets used in this analysis.
* Effective area and effective volume are set to 47.10 acres and 216.45. acre-ft, respectively, due to the results of Attachment J - UHS Flow Path Analysis and the Case 3c model area and volume.
All computer runs were perfon-ned using PC No. ZD6661 under the Windows XP operating system.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M7 of M17 M3.0 ASSUMPTIONS M3.1 Initial Lake Temperature
The net evaporation is calculated by subtracting precipitation from the total evaporation.
-For the worst weather evaluation, the initial lake temperature is set at 100&deg;F. This is an arbitrary reference value for determrining the relative weather severity and does not influence the results of this analysis.For the worst net evaporation month, the initial lake temperature is assumed to be 40'F.This is used as a representative value for the lake temperature during the winter since the weather data file begins on January 1. This does not influence the results of this analysis as the worst net evaporation month occurs during the summer.M3.2 Fixed Lake Elevation
The worst 30 days of net evaporation is determined using rolling averages, similar to the methodology used in determining the worst weather.
-The lake elevation when determining the worst weather month and worst net evaporation month is fixed at 690-ft. A constant lake elevation removes the effects of lake level in determining the weather effects on the UHS temperature and evaporation.
M2.3 Weather File Creation for Comparison to Existing Analysis Following determination of the worst weather days and the worst net evaporation days, weather files for input to LAKET are created. For the worst weather input file, conditions from the worst weather day are used as the first day in the new weather file.
M3.3 Station Thermal Boundary Condition
Following the first day, the conditions from the worst 30-day period are added to create a 31-day worst weather "month." Precipitation is conservatively set to zero for all time steps comprising the worst weather month (Assumption M3.4). To determine if this new worst weather month is more limiting than the existing worst weather month used in Attachment H, the input file from Case 3a is ran using the new worst weather month. If the new weather month does not result in a higher maximum UHS outlet temperature, the existing worst weather month will be retained as it is more severe.
-The plant discharge water temperature when determining the worst weather day and month is assumed to be 100&deg;F. Since the lake is modeled as open cycle, the lake starts at this temperature at the start of each 3 hour time interval.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
A constant initial temperature allows for isolation of the meteorological effects on the lake.When determining the worst net evaporation month, the temperature rise through the plant is assumed to be constant at approximately 9&deg;F, which is the average temperature rise for EPU over the calculated 30 day period (Calculated from Appendix L9.3 of Attachment L -Plant Temperature Rise). A constant temperature rise through the plant removes the effects of the plant heat load in determining the evaporation.
 
M3.4 Precipitation
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                 REVISION NO. 8             ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M6 of M17 For the worst net evaporation weather file, the conditions from the worst 30-day period are compiled to create a 30-day worst net evaporation "month." Similar to the worst weather month, precipitation is set to zero for all time steps (Assumption M3.4). To detennine if this new worst net evaporation month is more limiting than the existing worst net evaporation month from Attachment H, the input file from Case 3c is ran using the new worst net evaporation month. If the new weather file does not result in more lake drawdown, the existing worst net evaporation month will be retained as it is more severe.
-When creating the worst weather "month" and worst net evaporation"month," precipitation is set to zero for all time steps. This is conservative when determining the limiting initial UHS temperature.
M2.4 Weather File Creation for UHS Analysis If the existing weather file is not bounding, new weather files are created based on the new most limiting day and month determined by this analysis. These weather files use the weather information provided in 'PIALSL95IO.txt' with the following changes:
PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M8 of M17 M4.0 DESIGN INPUTS M4.1 Weather Data File -The LAKET-compatible meteorological data file is developed from weather data from LaSalle County Station and Peoria from 1/1/1995 to 9/30/2010 in Attachment K -Preparation of Hourly Meteorological Data. This file has the following properties:
        " The station code is set to zero. This input has no impact on the results of this analysis.
Name: PIALSL95 10.txt Type: ASC text Size: 21,812 KB Creation date/time:
* The start date and time is set at 7/1/1900 at 12AM. This input has no effect on the results of this analysis.
3/9/2012 11:08 AM CST (12:08 PM CDT)M4.2 Anemometer Height -The anemometer height at LaSalle County Station is 33 feet from Attachment K -Preparation of Hourly Meteorological Data.M4.3 Plant Temperature Rise -The approximate average plant temperature rise at EPU is calculated to be -9&deg;F as taken from Attachment L -Plant Temperature Rise (Appendix L9.3: Calculated average of the first 30 days following an accident evaluated in Attachment L).M4.4 Effective Area and Volume Percentages
        " Precipitation is set to zero for all time steps (Assumption M3.4).
-The effective area percentage is 57.9% and the effective volume percentage is 63.4% from Attachment J -UHS Flow Path Analysis.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M9 of M17 M
In order to determine the effect of the time of day of the worst weather day on the UHS, eight different worst weather files will be created. The first file will start at 12 AM of the worst weather day followed by subsequent files at 3 hour intervals (e.g. the second weather file starts at 3 AM of the worst weather day). After 24 hours of the worst weather day, the worst 30 days subsequently added to the file. The start of the worst 30 days is selected to maintain a 1 hour interval between time steps. For example, if the worst 24 hour day ends at 11PM, the next time step will be at 12AM of the beginning of the worst 30 days.
For the worst net evaporation, only one weather file will be created, corresponding to the dates and times determined to be the most limiting.
M2.5 Computer Programs and Software LAKET-PC Version 2.2 [Ref. M5.2] was used to perform the lake transient analysis contained in this evaluation. This was run on S&L PC No. ZD6661 on Windows XP operating system.
Postprocessing of the LAKET-PC results         is done using Microsoft Excel 2003 [Ref.
M5.1], which is commercially available.         The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all spreadsheets used       in this analysis. All computer runs were perfon-ned using PC No. ZD6661 under the       Windows XP operating system.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297


==5.0 REFERENCES==
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                  REVISION NO. 8              ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M7 of M17 M3.0 ASSUMPTIONS M3.1  Initial Lake Temperature - For the worst weather evaluation, the initial lake temperature is set at 100&deg;F. This is an arbitrary reference value for determrining the relative weather severity and does not influence the results of this analysis.
For the worst net evaporation month, the initial lake temperature is assumed to be 40'F.
This is used as a representative value for the lake temperature during the winter since the weather data file begins on January 1. This does not influence the results of this analysis as the worst net evaporation month occurs during the summer.
M3.2  Fixed Lake Elevation - The lake elevation when determining the worst weather month and worst net evaporation month is fixed at 690-ft. A constant lake elevation removes the effects of lake level in determining the weather effects on the UHS temperature and evaporation.
M3.3  Station Thermal Boundary Condition - The plant discharge water temperature when determining the worst weather day and month is assumed to be 100&deg;F. Since the lake is modeled as open cycle, the lake starts at this temperature at the start of each 3 hour time interval. A constant initial temperature allows for isolation of the meteorological effects on the lake.
When determining the worst net evaporation month, the temperature rise through the plant is assumed to be constant at approximately 9&deg;F, which is the average temperature rise for EPU over the calculated 30 day period (Calculated from Appendix L9.3 of Attachment L - Plant Temperature Rise). A constant temperature rise through the plant removes the effects of the plant heat load in determining the evaporation.
M3.4  Precipitation - When creating the worst weather "month" and worst net evaporation "month," precipitation is set to zero for all time steps. This is conservative when determining the limiting initial UHS temperature.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297


M5.1 Microsoft Office Excel 2003 (11.8120.8122)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M8 of M17 M4.0  DESIGN INPUTS M4.1  Weather Data File - The LAKET-compatible meteorological data file is developed from weather data from LaSalle County Station and Peoria from 1/1/1995 to 9/30/2010 in Attachment K - Preparation of Hourly Meteorological Data. This file has the following properties:
SP2, Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corporation, Sargent & Lundy LLC Program No. 03.2.286-1.0, dated 2/2/2004.M5.2 LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 12/09/2004.
Name: PIALSL95 10.txt Type: ASC text Size: 21,812 KB Creation date/time: 3/9/2012 11:08 AM CST (12:08 PM CDT)
Controlled File Path: \\SNLVS5\SYS3\OPS$\LAK29222\
M4.2  Anemometer Height - The anemometer height at LaSalle County Station is 33 feet from Attachment K -Preparation of Hourly Meteorological Data.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M10 of M17 M6.0 CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS Analysis of rolling averages determine the worst day and 30 day period for UHS temperature and the worst 30 day period for net evaporation for the weather file created from LaSalle County Station meteorological data from I/1/1995 to 9/30/2010.
M4.3  Plant Temperature Rise - The approximate average plant temperature rise at EPU is calculated to be -9&deg;F as taken from Attachment L - Plant Temperature Rise (Appendix L9.3: Calculated average of the first 30 days following an accident evaluated in Attachment L).
These results are then compared to the existing weather files used in the Attachment H of this calculation.
M4.4  Effective Area and Volume Percentages - The effective area percentage is 57.9% and the effective volume percentage is 63.4% from Attachment J - UHS Flow Path Analysis.
M6.1 Worst Weather Conditions LAKET input file 'Worst Weather.dat' was compiled to detennine the worst weather day and 30-day period from 1/1/1995 to 9/30/2010.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
The top ten worst 24-hour periods and 30-day periods are shown below in Table M6-1. Note that the temperature provided is for comparison purposes only and not representative of the expected actual temperature of the UHS (See Limitation M8. 1).Table M6-1: Worst Weather Days 24-Hour 30-Day End Date Average Temp. End Date I Average Temp.(&deg;F) (&deg;F)7/25/01 6:00 AM 99.609 8/20/95 3:00 PM 98.867 7/25/01 3:00 AM 99.586 -8/20/95 6:00 PM 98.866 7/19/98 12:00 AM 99.576 8/21/95 12:00 PM 98.865 7/18/98 9:00 PM 99.576 8/21/95 3:00 AM 98.865 7/25/01 12:00 AM 99.526 8/21/95 6:00 PM 98.864 7/24/01 9:00 PM 99.516 8/20/95 9:00 PM 98.864 7/19/98 3:00 AM 99.515 8/21/95 6:00 AM 98.864 7/25/01 9:00 AM 99.488 8/21/95 12:00 AM 98.864 8/19/95 12:00 AM 99.474 8/21/95 9:00 PM 98.864 7/22/01 3:00 PM 99.464 8/20/95 12:00 PM 98.863 Based on this data, a weather file for LAKET was created for the worst (hottest) weather,'Worst Weather.txt'.
 
The worst weather file is created by first inputting the worst 24-hr day (7/25/2001 ending at 6:00 AM) and then inputting the worst period of 30 days (7/21/1995 4:00PM to 8/20/1995 3:00PM) to create a 3 1-day weather file.To compare the new weather file with the existing weather file, Case 3a from L-002457 was run using the new weather file. This was done by creating a LAKET input file,"WorstWeatherComparison.dat,'
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8      ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M9 of M17 M
with the same conditions as Case 3a, but an adjusted anemometer height to reflect the setup at LaSalle County Station. As seen in the output file, 'WorstWeather Comparison.out,'
 
the maximum UHS outlet temperature using the new worst weather file is 105.967F.
==5.0  REFERENCES==
From Attachment H, the results from Case 3a using the existing weather file is a maximum UHS outlet temperature of 104.00'F.
 
The new weather file results in a greater UHS outlet temperature, so it will replace the existing worst weather file in the UHS analysis.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M11 of M17 M6.2 Worst Net Evaporation LAKET input file 'NetEvapWorstMonth.dat' was compiled to determine the worst 30-day period of net evaporation from 1/1/1995 to 9/30/2010.
M5.1  Microsoft Office Excel 2003 (11.8120.8122) SP2, Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corporation, Sargent & Lundy LLC Program No. 03.2.286-1.0, dated 2/2/2004.
Using the results from LAKET, the worst ten 30-day periods in terms of net evaporation are shown below in Table M6-2. Note that the net evaporation values provided are for comparison purposes only and not representative of the expected actual evaporation of the UHS (See Limitation M8. 1).Table M6-2: Worst Net Evaporation Days End Date 30-Day Net Evaporation (cfs)7/13/02 9:00 PM 1.569 7/13/02 6:00 PM 1.568 7/14/02 12:00 AM 1.566 7/13/02 3:00 PM j 1.565 7/13/02 12:00 PM 1.563 7/14/02 3:00 AM 1.563 7/13/02 9:00 AM j 1.563 7/13/02 6:00 AM -1.562 7/14/02 6:00 AM 1.560 7/13/02 3:00 AM 1.557 The worst net evaporation weather file, 'NetEvapweather.txt,'
M5.2  LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 12/09/2004. Controlled File Path: \\SNLVS5\SYS3\OPS$\LAK29222\
is created by inputting the weather conditions from the worst net evaporation period of 30 days (6/13/2002 10:00 PM to 7/13/2002 9:00 PM). In order to compare this with the worst 30 day net evaporation period from Attachment H, Case 3c from Attachment H was run using the new weather file. This was done by creating a LAKET input file,"NetEvapComparison.dat,'
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
with the same conditions as Case 3c, but an adjusted anemometer height to reflect the setup at LaSalle County Station.As seen in the output file, 'NetEvapComparison.out,'
 
the minimum lake elevation using the new worst net evaporation weather file is 688.63-ft.
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                    REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M10 of M17 M6.0  CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS Analysis of rolling averages determine the worst day and 30 day period for UHS temperature and the worst 30 day period for net evaporation for the weather file created from LaSalle County Station meteorological data from I/1/1995 to 9/30/2010. These results are then compared to the existing weather files used in the Attachment H of this calculation.
From Attachment H, the results from Case 3c using the existing weather file is a minimum lake elevation of 688.52-ft.
M6.1  Worst Weather Conditions LAKET input file 'Worst Weather.dat' was compiled to detennine the worst weather day and 30-day period from 1/1/1995 to 9/30/2010. The top ten worst 24-hour periods and 30-day periods are shown below in Table M6-1. Note that the temperature provided is for comparison purposes only and not representative of the expected actual temperature of the UHS (See Limitation M8. 1).
Since the existing weather file results in greater lake drawdown, the existing weather conditions from 6/18/1954 to 7/18/1954 will continue to be used for this analysis.M6.3 Weather File Creation for UHS Analysis After determination of the worst weather day and month and the worst net evaporation month, weather files are created for use in the UHS Analysis.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M12 of M17 For the worst weather day and month, eight new weather files are created starting at different times to determine the limiting time of day. A summary of the eight created weather files, including the start times and end times used in taking weather data from'PIALSL95 1O.txt' is presented in the table below: Table M6-3: Worst Weather 24-Hour/30-Day Files-File Name Worst 24-hr Start Worst 24-hr End Worst 30-Day Start Worst 30-Day End 1-30day_12am.txt 7/24/2001 12AM 7/24/2001 11PM 7/21/1995 12AM 8/19/1995 11PM 1-30day_3am.txt 7/24/2001 3AM 7/25/2001 2AM 7/21/1995 3AM 8/20/1995 2AM 1-30day6am.txt 7/24/2001 6AM 7/25/2001 5AM 7/21/1995 6AM 8/20/1995 5AM 1-30day_9am.txt 7/24/2001 9AM 7/25/2001 8AM 7/21/1995 9AM 8/20/1995 8AM 1-30day_12pm.txt 7/24/2001 12PM 7/25/2001 11AM 7/21/1995 12PM 8/20/1995 11AM 1-30day_3pm.txt 7/24/2001 3PM 7/25/2001 2PM 7/21/1995 3PM 8/20/1995 2PM 1-30day_6pm.txt 7/24/2001 6PM 7/25/2001 5PM 7/21/1995 6PM 8/20/1995 5PM 1-30day_9pm.txt 7/24/2001 9PM 7/25/2001 8PM 7/21/1995 9PM 8/20/1995 8PM The worst net evaporation month was determined to be the existing weather file,'30dayevap.txt'.
Table M6-1: Worst Weather Days 24-Hour                                30-Day End Date Average Temp.               End Date I Average Temp.
This will continued to be used in the UHS analysis, and no further weather file compilation is needed.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M 13 of M 17 M7.0  
(&deg;F)                                    (&deg;F) 7/25/01 6:00 AM      99.609          8/20/95 3:00 PM      98.867 7/25/01 3:00 AM      99.586        -  8/20/95 6:00 PM       98.866 7/19/98 12:00 AM      99.576          8/21/95 12:00 PM      98.865 7/18/98 9:00 PM      99.576          8/21/95 3:00 AM      98.865 7/25/01 12:00 AM      99.526          8/21/95 6:00 PM      98.864 7/24/01 9:00 PM      99.516          8/20/95 9:00 PM      98.864 7/19/98 3:00 AM      99.515          8/21/95 6:00 AM      98.864 7/25/01 9:00 AM      99.488          8/21/95 12:00 AM      98.864 8/19/95 12:00 AM      99.474          8/21/95 9:00 PM      98.864 7/22/01 3:00 PM      99.464          8/20/95 12:00 PM      98.863 Based on this data, a weather file for LAKET was created for the worst (hottest) weather,
        'Worst Weather.txt'. The worst weather file is created by first inputting the worst 24-hr day (7/25/2001 ending at 6:00 AM) and then inputting the worst period of 30 days (7/21/1995 4:00PM to 8/20/1995 3:00PM) to create a 3 1-day weather file.
To compare the new weather file with the existing weather file, Case 3a from L-002457 was run using the new weather file. This was done by creating a LAKET input file, "WorstWeatherComparison.dat,' with the same conditions as Case 3a, but an adjusted anemometer height to reflect the setup at LaSalle County Station. As seen in the output file, 'WorstWeather Comparison.out,' the maximum UHS outlet temperature using the new worst weather file is 105.967F. From Attachment H, the results from Case 3a using the existing weather file is a maximum UHS outlet temperature of 104.00'F. The new weather file results in a greater UHS outlet temperature, so it will replace the existing worst weather file in the UHS analysis.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                    REVISION NO. 8      ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M11 of M17 M6.2  Worst Net Evaporation LAKET input file 'NetEvapWorstMonth.dat' was compiled to determine the worst 30-day period of net evaporation from 1/1/1995 to 9/30/2010. Using the results from LAKET, the worst ten 30-day periods in terms of net evaporation are shown below in Table M6-2. Note that the net evaporation values provided are for comparison purposes only and not representative of the expected actual evaporation of the UHS (See Limitation M8. 1).
Table M6-2: Worst Net Evaporation Days End Date       30-Day Net Evaporation (cfs) 7/13/02 9:00 PM           1.569 7/13/02 6:00 PM           1.568 7/14/02 12:00 AM           1.566 7/13/02 3:00 PM j         1.565 7/13/02 12:00 PM           1.563 7/14/02 3:00 AM           1.563 7/13/02 9:00 AM j         1.563 7/13/02 6:00 AM       - 1.562 7/14/02 6:00 AM           1.560 7/13/02 3:00 AM           1.557 The worst net evaporation weather file, 'NetEvapweather.txt,' is created by inputting the weather conditions from the worst net evaporation period of 30 days (6/13/2002 10:00 PM to 7/13/2002 9:00 PM). In order to compare this with the worst 30 day net evaporation period from Attachment H, Case 3c from Attachment H was run using the new weather file.           This was done by creating a LAKET input file, "NetEvapComparison.dat,' with the same conditions as Case 3c, but an adjusted anemometer height to reflect the setup at LaSalle County Station.
As seen in the output file, 'NetEvapComparison.out,' the minimum lake elevation using the new worst net evaporation weather file is 688.63-ft. From Attachment H, the results from Case 3c using the existing weather file is a minimum lake elevation of 688.52-ft.
Since the existing weather file results in greater lake drawdown, the existing weather conditions from 6/18/1954 to 7/18/1954 will continue to be used for this analysis.
M6.3 Weather File Creation for UHS Analysis After determination of the worst weather day and month and the worst net evaporation month, weather files are created for use in the UHS Analysis.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                   REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M12 of M17 For the worst weather day and month, eight new weather files are created starting at different times to determine the limiting time of day. A summary of the eight created weather files, including the start times and end times used in taking weather data from
        'PIALSL95 1O.txt' is presented in the table below:
Table M6-3: Worst Weather 24-Hour/30-Day Files
        -File Name         Worst 24-hr Start Worst 24-hr End Worst 30-Day Start Worst 30-Day End 1-30day_12am.txt 7/24/2001 12AM     7/24/2001 11PM 7/21/1995 12AM     8/19/1995 11PM 1-30day_3am.txt 7/24/2001 3AM     7/25/2001 2AM   7/21/1995 3AM     8/20/1995 2AM 1-30day6am.txt   7/24/2001 6AM     7/25/2001 5AM   7/21/1995 6AM     8/20/1995 5AM 1-30day_9am.txt 7/24/2001 9AM     7/25/2001 8AM   7/21/1995 9AM     8/20/1995 8AM 1-30day_12pm.txt 7/24/2001 12PM     7/25/2001 11AM 7/21/1995 12PM     8/20/1995 11AM 1-30day_3pm.txt 7/24/2001 3PM     7/25/2001 2PM   7/21/1995 3PM     8/20/1995 2PM 1-30day_6pm.txt 7/24/2001 6PM     7/25/2001 5PM   7/21/1995 6PM     8/20/1995 5PM 1-30day_9pm.txt 7/24/2001 9PM     7/25/2001 8PM   7/21/1995 9PM     8/20/1995 8PM The worst net evaporation month was determined to be the existing weather file,
        '30dayevap.txt'. This will continued to be used in the UHS analysis, and no further weather file compilation is needed.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                 REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M13 of M17 M7.0


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
AND CONCLUSIONS The worst weather day and 30 days and worst net evaporation 30 days were determined by running LAKET over a range of days spanning from 1/1/1995 to 9/30/2010.
AND CONCLUSIONS The worst weather day and 30 days and worst net evaporation 30 days were determined by running LAKET over a range of days spanning from 1/1/1995 to 9/30/2010. The worst weather day was determined to be 7/25/2001 ending at 6:00 AM, while the worst 30 day period of weather spanned from 7/21/1995 4:00 PM to 8/20/1995 3:00 PM. A comparison of this weather file with the existing weather file shows that the new weather file based on the weather data from 'PIALSL951O.txt' results in a higher maximum UHS outlet temperature than the existing weather file. Therefore the new weather files summarized in Table M6-3 will be used in the UHS analysis.
The worst weather day was determined to be 7/25/2001 ending at 6:00 AM, while the worst 30 day period of weather spanned from 7/21/1995 4:00 PM to 8/20/1995 3:00 PM. A comparison of this weather file with the existing weather file shows that the new weather file based on the weather data from 'PIALSL951O.txt' results in a higher maximum UHS outlet temperature than the existing weather file. Therefore the new weather files summarized in Table M6-3 will be used in the UHS analysis.For net evaporation, the worst 30 day period was determined to span from 6/13/2002 10:00 PM to 7/13/2002 9:00 PM. Comparison of this 30 day span with the previous limiting 30 days, 6/18/1954 to 7/18/1954, shows that the 1954 span remains bounding.Therefore, the existing worst 30-day net evaporation weather file will be used in the UHS analysis.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M14 of M1 7 M8.0 LIMITATIONS M8.1 24-Hour and 30-Day Rolling Average Values -The values for UHS outlet temperature and net evaporation provided in Tables M6-1 and M6-2 are merely representative values for use in comparing weather effects over different time periods. These values are not actual expected values for the LaSalle UHS.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 M9.0 APPENDICES List of Appendices App. -Description M9.1 Electronic File Listing REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M15 of M17 No. of Pages 2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M16 of M17 Appendix M9. I: Electronic File Listing Appendix M9.1: Electronic File Listing A summary of the electronic files and their purposes is provided below: LaSalle County Station / Peoria Weather File File Name Date PIALSL951O.txt 3/09/2012 12:08 PM Files for Determining 24-Hour and 30-Day Worst Weather File Name Date Worst W~eather~dat  
For net evaporation, the worst 30 day period was determined to span from 6/13/2002 10:00 PM to 7/13/2002 9:00 PM. Comparison of this 30 day span with the previous limiting 30 days, 6/18/1954 to 7/18/1954, shows that the 1954 span remains bounding.
.. 4/24/2012 11:26 AM-_______ 4/24/2012 11:26 AM WorstWeatherdaut Worst Weather.out  
Therefore, the existing worst 30-day net evaporation weather file will be used in the UHS analysis.
-4/24/2012 11:26 AM____WorstWeather.plt
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
_ _4/24/2012 11:26 AM WorstWeather.pltX 24/24/2012 11:26-AM Files for Determining Worst Net Evaporation File Name Date NetEvapWorstMonth.dat 5/17/2012 3:01-PM NetEvap_WorstMonth.out 5/17/2012 3:03 PM NetEvap_WorstMonth.plt 5/17/2012 3:03 PM NetEvapWorstMonth.pltX 5/17/2012 3:03 PM Compiled Weather Files (Section M6.1 and Section M6.2)-File Name ' Date Worst Weather.txt 4/26/2012 10:11 AM NetEvapweather.txt 5/17/2012 3:23 PM Files for Comparison to Previous Worst Weather File Name Date WorstWeatherComparison.dat 4/26/2012 10:12 AM WorstWeather Comparison.out 4/26/2012 10:12 AM WorstWeather Comparison.plt 4/26/2012 10:12 AM WorstWeatherComparison.
 
pltX 4/26/2012 10:12 AM Files for Comparison to Previous Worst Net Evaporation Weather File Name Date NetEvapComparison.dat 5/17/2012 3:20 PM NetEvapComparison.out 5/17/2012 3:23 PM NetEvapComparison.plt 5/17/20123:23 PM NetEvapComparison.pltX 5/17/2012 3:23 PM PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M17 of M17 Appendix M9. 1: Electronic File Listing Weather Files for UHS Analysis File Name 1-30day_1 2am.txt 1-30day_3am.txt 1-330day_6am.txt 1-30day_9am.txt 1-30day_1 2pm.txt 1-30day_3pm.txt 1-30day_6pm.txt 1-30day_9pm.txt 30dayevap.txt Date .4/26/2012 3:23 PM_14/26/2012 3:25 PM 1. .&#xfd;4/26 /2 012 _3 :26 P .M .... ..i 4/26/2012 3:29 PM 4/26/2012 3:30 PM t 4/26/2012 3:32 PM--4/26/20123:33_PM--  
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                 REVISION NO. 8         ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M14 of M1 7 M8.0 LIMITATIONS M8.1 24-Hour and 30-Day Rolling Average Values - The values for UHS outlet temperature and net evaporation provided in Tables M6-1 and M6-2 are merely representative values for use in comparing weather effects over different time periods. These values are not actual expected values for the LaSalle UHS.
---.4/26/2012 3:34 PM 4/06/2006 4:18 PM A more detailed look at the files listed in the tables above is provided below: Further Detail for Electronic Files Name Q ..30day.12am.at.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
1-30day_6pm.txt 1-3tday gam.txt 91-N3dayfipm.tbt 9 -302dyam.bct 9 3OdayevapxIt
 
.,Net0vaCompanson.dat Pl IktEvapCompanson.out_COrnlpason.plt P NeatEvaComparma.p X 9 NetEvaptVeadter.txt.DI etEvap..worstMonth.dat Dl Net~vapWorsdmonth.out R1 NetMvapWorstOonth.0.pt
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                       REVISION NO. 8  ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M15 of M17 M9.0 APPENDICES List of Appendices App. -   Description                                         No. of Pages M9.1     Electronic File Listing                                   2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
.1NetEvapYiorxsdonth.
 
pLtX 9) PIALSI9510.gxt DIlWorstWeather .dat DlWorstWeather.out P1lWortw&#xfd;eadherplt 01 Worst Weather.ptl 9WAorsteather.txt P.1 WorstWeatherCome anson.dat DlWorstWeather ComDarison.out D0IvorstWeatherComyarison.pIt 0- vorstweathercomDarison.pitx I Type I Size l TextDocument 4/26/2012 3:23PM 118,296 Text 4/26f2012 3:30 PM 113,296 Text Document 4/26/2012 3:25 PM1 113,296 TextDocument 4/26/2012 3:2 PM 118,296 Text Document 4126/2012 3:26 PM 118,296 TextDocument 4i26/2012 3:33PM 118,296 Text Document 4/26/2012 3:29 PM 113,2%Text Document 4/26/2012 3:34 PM 113,296 Text Document 4/6/2006 4:18 PM 116,802 OAT File 5117/20312 3:20 PM 2,623 OUT He 5/17/2012 3:23 PM11 4a,857 PT File 5117/2012 3:23 PM 141,372 PL'X He 53/17/2012 3:23 PM 14,400 TextDocument 5/17/2012 3:23 PM 114,430 DAT e 51/17/2012 3:01PM 357 OUIT le 5/17/2012 3:03 PM 278,69 1 PLT e 51/17/2012 3:03 PM 26,374,556 P1.TX Pe 5/17/2012 3:03 PM1 3,957,37i TextDocument 3/9/2012 12:03 PNt 21.811,532 DAT File 4/24/2012 11:26 M 401 OUT Fie 4/24/2012 11:26 AM 305,229 PT Fle 4/24/2012 11:26 AM 26,374,556 PLTX Pie 4/24/2012 11:26 AM. 2,760,960 Text Document 4/26/2012 10:11 AM 113,296 DAT Pel 4/26/2012 10:12 *1 2,355 OUT Fie 4/26/2012 10:12 AM 49,077 PLT ie 4/26/2012 10:12 AM 146,0-HFde 41/2/2012 10:12 ,1 14,330 Ratio I Packed I 33% 14,272 33% 14,300 88% 14,293 03% 14,224 88% 14,339 83% 14,262 03% 14,321 a3% 14,245 85% 17,890 83% 449 95% 2,679 72% 39,051 76% 3,495 37% 14,843 38% 222 91% 23,803 B0% 5,390.500 73% 871,914 87% 2,742,002 44% 223 92% 25,441 81% 5,234,116 84% 435,906 83% 14,341 82% 425 95% 2,664 72% 40,312 77% 3,461 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N1 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE Ni of N20 Attachment N -LAKET-PC Methodology Validation Prepared:-
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                     REVISION NO. 8                   ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M16 of M17 Appendix M9. I: Electronic File Listing Appendix M9.1: Electronic File Listing A summary of the electronic files and their purposes is provided below:
p, Daniel W. Nevill -Sargent & LundyLLC Date ZoI3 Reviewed:
LaSalle County Station / Peoria Weather File File Name                     Date PIALSL951O.txt                                   3/09/2012 12:08 PM Files for Determining 24-Hour and 30-Day Worst Weather File Name                     Date Worst - W~eather~dat
Date V__1_201 P/ul J. Szymiczek.&#xfd;
_______      ..                                       AM 4/24/2012 11:26 AM WorstWeatherdaut Worst Weather.out                         -4/24/2012     11:26 AM____
-gent & LundyLLC PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N2 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N2 of N20 Section N1.0 N2.0 N3.0 N4.0 N5.0 N6.0 N7.0 N8.0 N9.0 ATTACHMENT N -TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No.P u rp o se ........................................................................................................................
WorstWeather.plt           _   _4/24/2012                 11:26 AM WorstWeather.pltX                           24/24/2012 11:26-AM Files for Determining Worst Net Evaporation File Name                     Date NetEvapWorstMonth.dat                           5/17/2012 3:01-PM NetEvap_WorstMonth.out                           5/17/2012 3:03 PM NetEvap_WorstMonth.plt                           5/17/2012 3:03 PM NetEvapWorstMonth.pltX                           5/17/2012 3:03 PM Compiled Weather Files (Section M6.1 and Section M6.2)
N 3 M ethodology
              -             File Name                   ' Date Worst Weather.txt                               4/26/2012 10:11 AM NetEvapweather.txt                               5/17/2012 3:23 PM Files for Comparison to Previous Worst Weather File Name                     Date WorstWeatherComparison.dat                       4/26/2012 10:12 AM WorstWeather Comparison.out                     4/26/2012 10:12 AM WorstWeather Comparison.plt                     4/26/2012 10:12 AM WorstWeatherComparison. pltX                     4/26/2012 10:12 AM Files for Comparison to Previous Worst Net Evaporation Weather File Name                     Date NetEvapComparison.dat                           5/17/2012 3:20 PM NetEvapComparison.out                           5/17/2012 3:23 PM NetEvapComparison.plt                           5/17/20123:23 PM NetEvapComparison.pltX                           5/17/2012 3:23 PM PROJECT NO. 11333-297
..........................................................................................................
 
N 4 A ssum ptions ............................................................................................................
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                     REVISION NO. 8                             ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M17 of M17 Appendix M9. 1: Electronic File Listing Weather Files for UHS Analysis File Name                       Date .
N 6 Design Inputs ..........................................................................................................
1-30day_1 2am.txt                                         4/26/2012 3:23 PM 1-30day_3am.txt                                       _14/26/2012
N 7 References
                                                                    . &#xfd;4/26
....................................................................................................................
: 1.               _3:26 PM
N 8 E v a lu a tio n s ...................................................................................................................
                                                                              /2 012 3:25        P .M....      .     .
N 9 Sum m ary and Conclusions
1-330day_6am.txt 1-30day_9am.txt                                         i 4/26/2012 3:29 PM 1-30day_1 2pm.txt                                          4/26/2012 3:30 PM 1-30day_3pm.txt                                          t 4/26/2012 3:32 PM--
.........................................................................................
1-30day_6pm.txt                                            4/26/20123:33_PM--                     -   --.
N 18 Lim itations and Open Item s ..................................................................................
1-30day_9pm.txt                                            4/26/2012 3:34 PM 30dayevap.txt                                              4/06/2006 4:18 PM A more detailed look at the files listed in the tables above is provided below:
N 19 Appendices
Further Detail for Electronic Files Name                                                         I Type          I t*efied                            Size l RatioI  PackedI Q                       .   .30day.12am.at.                   TextDocument    4/26/2012 3:23PM                118,296    33%    14,272 Q1-30day_3l*.txt                                               Text D*cument    4/26f2012 3:30 PM              113,296    33%    14,300 r*1-30day_3pm.1xt                                            Text Document    4/26/2012 3:25 PM1              113,296    88%    14,293 TextDocument    4/26/2012 3:2 PM                118,296    03%    14,224
.................................................................................................................
[*1-30day_-6am~txt 1-30day_6pm.txt                                            Text Document    4126/2012 3:26 PM              118,296    88%    14,339 1-3tday gam.txt                                           TextDocument    4i26/2012 3:33PM                118,296    83%    14,262 91-N3dayfipm.tbt                                                Text Document    4/26/2012 3:29 PM              113,2%    03%    14,321 9 -302dyam.bct                                              TextDocument4/26/2012      3:34PM              113,296    a3%      14,245 9    3OdayevapxIt                                              Text Document    4/6/2006 4:18 PM                116,802    85%    17,890
N 20 (Total Pages -Attachment N (20) plus Appendices (0) for a Total of 20 pages)LIST OF APPENDICES No. Title _ Page A i -I (Total Appendix Pages -0) .....PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N3 of N20 N1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this attachment is to evaluate the methodology in the LAKET-PC program and compare it to accepted methods for analyzing UHS cooling ponds. The LAKET-PC method is compared to NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds," [Ref. N5.1]. This evaluation reviews the individual equations for heat transfer, wind characterization, and evaporation used in both the NUREG document and the LAKET-PC program.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N4 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N4 of N20 N2.0 METHODOLOGY NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds" [Ref. N5.1] presents a method for analyzing the performance of ultimate heat sink cooling ponds. It was published in November 1980 and contains the accepted methodology for characterizing the thermal performance of cooling ponds.The methodology of LAKET-PC is compared to NUREG-0693 based onl review of the LAKET-PC manual [Ref. N5.2]. The equations for heat transfer, wind characterization, evaporation, and the iterative method are compared between both documents.
                  .,Net0vaCompanson.dat                                   OAT File        5117/203123:20 PM                  2,623  83%        449 Pl IktEvapCompanson.out                                       OUT He          5/17/2012 3:23 PM11              4a,857    95%      2,679 D1*NEvep _COrnlpason.plt                                      PT File          5117/2012 3:23 PM               141,372    72%    39,051 P NeatEvaComparma.p X                                          PL'X He          53/17/2012 3:23 PM               14,400  76%      3,495 9    NetEvaptVeadter.txt                                        TextDocument     5/17/2012 3:23 PM               114,430    37%     14,843
LAKET-PC is validated in the process of demonstrating that the method of calculation is equal to the approved method outlined in NUREG-0693.
            .DI etEvap..worstMonth.dat                                    DAT e            51/17/2012 3:01PM                    357  38%        222 Dl Net~vapWorsdmonth.out                                      OUIT le          5/17/2012 3:03 PM              278,69 1  91%    23,803 R1NetMvapWorstOonth.0.pt                                      PLT    e        51/17/2012 3:03 PM           26,374,556    B0% 5,390.500
N2.0.1 Lake Stratification
            .1NetEvapYiorxsdonth. pLtX                                    P1.TXPe          5/17/2012 3:03 PM1            3,957,37i    73% 871,914
-NRC RAI #6 [Ref. N5.4] asks for additional information about the effects of thermal stratification of the lake.A method for determining if a lake is stratified is presented in Sargent & Lundy standard MES-11.1 [Ref. N5.7]. This method consists of assuming the lake is stratified with the less dense hot water floating on top of the slightly more dense colder water. If the calculated value for the upper layer depth is close to or beneath the actual lake bottom, then the lake can be regarded as not stratified.
: 9)  PIALSI9510.gxt                                            TextDocument    3/9/2012 12:03 PNt          21.811,532   87% 2,742,002 DIlWorstWeather .dat                                            DATFile        4/24/2012 11:26 M                   401   44%        223 DlWorstWeather.out                                              OUTFie          4/24/2012 11:26 AM             305,229   92%    25,441 P1lWortw&#xfd;eadherplt                                              PT Fle         4/24/2012 11:26 AM           26,374,556   81% 5,234,116 01Worst Weather.ptl                                            PLTXPie        4/24/2012 11:26 AM.           2,760,960   84%    435,906 9WAorsteather.txt                                                Text Document   4/26/2012 10:11 AM             113,296   83%      14,341 P.1WorstWeatherCome anson.dat                                  DATPel          4/26/2012 10:12 *1                 2,355   82%        425 DlWorstWeather ComDarison.out                                  OUTFie          4/26/2012 10:12 AM               49,077   95%      2,664 D0IvorstWeatherComyarison.pIt                                  PLT ie         4/26/2012 10:12 AM               146,0-H  72%    40,312 0- vorstweathercomDarison.pitx                                  PL'r* Fde      41/2/2012 10:12 ,1               14,330   77%       3,461 PROJECT NO. 11333-297
The depth of the upper layer hot water is determined using Eq. 1.FiQ2D_3L 1/h,, 14gfATB -(Eq. N2-1)Where: fi -Interfacial shear coefficient, estimated as one-half of bottom friction coefficient fi = 0.5
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8    ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N1 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8    ATTACHMENT N, PAGE Ni of N20 Attachment N - LAKET-PC Methodology Validation Prepared:- p,                                       Date
* ZoI3 Daniel W. Nevill - Sargent & LundyLLC Reviewed:                                          Date V__1_201 P/ul J. Szymiczek.&#xfd;-    gent & LundyLLC PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                      REVISION NO. 8                                    ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N2 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457                                      REVISION NO. 8                                  ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N2 of N20 ATTACHMENT N - TABLE OF CONTENTS Section                                                                                                                                            Page No.
N1.0        P urp o se ........................................................................................................................          N3 N2.0        M ethodology ..........................................................................................................                     N4 N3.0        A ssum ptions ............................................................................................................                   N6 N4.0        Design Inputs ..........................................................................................................                     N7 N5.0        References ....................................................................................................................              N8 N6.0        E v a lu a tio n s ...................................................................................................................       N9 N7.0        Sum m ary and Conclusions .........................................................................................                         N 18 N8.0        Lim itations and Open Item s ..................................................................................                             N 19 N9.0        Appendices .................................................................................................................               N20 (Total Pages - Attachment N (20) plus Appendices (0) for a Total of 20 pages)
LIST OF APPENDICES No.         Title                                                  _                                                                          Page Ai Pages (Total Appendix          -  0)                                                        -
                                                                                          .         .     ...                                   I PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N3 of N20 N1.0  PURPOSE The purpose of this attachment is to evaluate the methodology in the LAKET-PC program and compare it to accepted methods for analyzing UHS cooling ponds. The LAKET-PC method is compared to NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds," [Ref. N5.1]. This evaluation reviews the individual equations for heat transfer, wind characterization, and evaporation used in both the NUREG document and the LAKET-PC program.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                    REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N4 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457                    REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N4 of N20 N2.0  METHODOLOGY NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds" [Ref. N5.1] presents a method for analyzing the performance of ultimate heat sink cooling ponds. It was published in November 1980 and contains the accepted methodology for characterizing the thermal performance of cooling ponds.
The methodology of LAKET-PC is compared to NUREG-0693 based onl review of the LAKET-PC manual [Ref. N5.2]. The equations for heat transfer, wind characterization, evaporation, and the iterative method are compared between both documents. LAKET-PC is validated in the process of demonstrating that the method of calculation is equal to the approved method outlined in NUREG-0693.
N2.0.1 Lake Stratification - NRC RAI #6 [Ref. N5.4] asks for additional information about the effects of thermal stratification of the lake.
A method for determining if a lake is stratified is presented in Sargent & Lundy standard MES-11.1 [Ref. N5.7]. This method consists of assuming the lake is stratified with the less dense hot water floating on top of the slightly more dense colder water. If the calculated value for the upper layer depth is close to or beneath the actual lake bottom, then the lake can be regarded as not stratified. The depth of the upper layer hot water is determined using Eq. 1.
FiQ2D_3L 1/
h,,  14gfATB -                            (Eq. N2-1)
Where:
fi - Interfacial shear coefficient, estimated as one-half of bottom friction coefficient fi = 0.5
* 8
* 8
* g / C, 2 (Eq. N2-2)C, -Chezy coefficient C, = 1.47
* g / C, 2                     (Eq. N2-2)
* H" 6/ n (Eq. N2-3)H -lake depth (ft)n -Manning roughness coefficient Q -Circulating water flow (ft 3/s)D, -Dilution ratio (total lake flow / circulating water flow)L -Lake length (fi)g -gravity, 32.2 ft/s 2-Bulk expansion coefficient of water (&deg;F)13 = 4.1x10 6 * (Tawe -39&deg;F) (Eq. N2-4)Tare- Average temperature of discharge and receiving water temperature
C, - Chezy coefficient C, = 1.47
(&deg;F)AT -Temperature difference between upper and lower levels (fF)B -Width of lake (ft)PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N5 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N5 of N20 For the case where a jet or plume is formed in the lake, the dilution ratio (D,) is found from the following steps.Fr = U d / Vhg/3AT (Eq. N2-5)hmax = 0.42. -hdb, (hd / bd )1/4 Fr (Eq. N2-6)D: = 1.4 1l + Fr 2 (hd /bj,)'" 4  (Eq. N2-7)Where: Fr -discharge Froude number Ud -Velocity at discharge structure 015s)hd -Depth of discharge structure 00)bd- '/2 width of discharge structure (ft)D,*- Dilution ratio without correction for lake bottom If the maximum depth of the plume (hmax) is greater than the depth of the lake, a correction factor is applied to the dilution ratio.r = (0.75H / hmax )3/4 (Eq. N2-8)D, = rD: (Eq. N2-9)Where: r -Dilution correction factor The upper layer depth (hu) is used to determine the degree of stratification in the lake. If the volume of the lake below the upper layer depth is small compared to the total volume of the lake, then a plug flow model such as LAKET should be valid. When the volume below the upper layer depth is greater than one half the total volume of the lake, a different model that accounts for stratification should be used.N2.1 Acceptance Criteria N2.1.1 Acceptance Criterion N I -The calculation method in LAKET-PC for analysis of the thermal performance of cooling ponds shall be consistent with the accepted methodology presented in NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds" [Ref.N5. I].N2.1.2 Acceptance Criterion N2 -The LAKET-PC program [Ref. N5.2] is not applicable for stratified lakes. The fraction of lake volume below the upper layer depth shall be less than 50% for the UHS to be considered not stratified
* H"6/ n                         (Eq. N2-3)
[Ref. N5.7].PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N6 of N20 N3.0 ASSUMPTIONS N3.1 Lake Stratification Calculation Inputs -The minimum mixing zone temperature is assumed to be 100.0&deg;F. The maximum mixing zone temperature is assumed to be 125.0&deg;F. These values are based on values of interest (during the first few days following an accident) from the mixing zone analysis done in Attachment 0.The Manning coefficient is assumed to be 0.02. This is an approximate, conservative value [Ref. 5.6, Table 3.3.17] based on the surface of crushed stone bedding and rip rap[Ref. N5.5].PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N7 of N20 N4.0 DESIGN INPUTS N4.1 Accepted UHS Analysis Method -The accepted analysis method for UHS cooling ponds is taken from NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds" [Ref.N5.1].N4.2 LAKET-PC Methodology
H - lake depth (ft) n - Manning roughness coefficient Q-     Circulating water flow (ft3 /s)
-The analysis method used in LAKET-PC is determined from the LAKET-PC user manual and the computer code [Ref. N5.2].N4.3 Wind Dependence Functions
D, - Dilution ratio (total lake flow / circulating water flow)
-Wind dependence functions are taken from MIT Report 161, "An Analytical and Experimental Study of Transient Cooling Pond Behavior," [Ref.N5.3].N4.4 Lake Stratification Inputs -The bases for inputs to the lake stratification analysis are provided in Table N6-4.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N8 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N8 of N20 N
L - Lake length (fi) 2 g - gravity, 32.2 ft/s
            - Bulk expansion coefficient of water (&deg;F) 13= 4.1x10 6 * (Tawe - 39&deg;F)                   (Eq. N2-4)
Tare- Average temperature of discharge and receiving water temperature (&deg;F)
AT - Temperature difference between upper and lower levels (fF)
B - Width of lake (ft)
PROJECT NO. 11333-297


==5.0 REFERENCES==
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                  REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N5 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457                  REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N5 of N20 For the case where a jet or plume is formed in the lake, the dilution ratio (D,) is found from the following steps.
Fr = Ud / Vhg/3AT                          (Eq. N2-5) hmax = 0.42. -hdb,  (hd / bd )1/4 Fr              (Eq. N2-6)
D: = 1.4 1l+ Fr 2 (hd /bj,)'" 4                  (Eq. N2-7)
Where:
Fr - discharge Froude number Ud - Velocity at discharge structure 015s) hd - Depth of discharge structure 00) bd- '/2 width of discharge structure (ft)
D,*- Dilution ratio without correction for lake bottom If the maximum depth of the plume (hmax) is greater than the depth of the lake, a correction factor is applied to the dilution ratio.
r = (0.75H / hmax )3/4                      (Eq. N2-8)
D, = rD:                              (Eq. N2-9)
Where:
r - Dilution correction factor The upper layer depth (hu) is used to determine the degree of stratification in the lake. If the volume of the lake below the upper layer depth is small compared to the total volume of the lake, then a plug flow model such as LAKET should be valid. When the volume below the upper layer depth is greater than one half the total volume of the lake, a different model that accounts for stratification should be used.
N2.1  Acceptance Criteria N2.1.1 Acceptance Criterion N I - The calculation method in LAKET-PC for analysis of the thermal performance of cooling ponds shall be consistent with the accepted methodology presented in NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds" [Ref.
N5. I].
N2.1.2 Acceptance Criterion N2 - The LAKET-PC program [Ref. N5.2] is not applicable for stratified lakes. The fraction of lake volume below the upper layer depth shall be less than 50% for the UHS to be considered not stratified [Ref. N5.7].
PROJECT NO. 11333-297


N5.1 NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Regulatory Cormnission, November 1980.N5.2 LAKET-PC Version 2.2, Sargent & LundyLLC, Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 12/09/2004.
CALCULATION NO. L-002457              REVISION NO. 8              ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N6 of N20 N3.0  ASSUMPTIONS N3.1  Lake Stratification Calculation Inputs -  The minimum mixing zone temperature is assumed to be 100.0&deg;F. The maximum          mixing zone temperature is assumed to be 125.0&deg;F. These values are based on values  of interest (during the first few days following an accident) from the mixing zone analysis done in Attachment 0.
The Manning coefficient is assumed to be 0.02. This is an approximate, conservative value [Ref. 5.6, Table 3.3.17] based on the surface of crushed stone bedding and rip rap
[Ref. N5.5].
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457              REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N7 of N20 N4.0  DESIGN INPUTS N4.1  Accepted UHS Analysis Method - The accepted analysis method for UHS cooling ponds is taken from NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds" [Ref.
N5.1].
N4.2  LAKET-PC Methodology - The analysis method used in LAKET-PC is determined from the LAKET-PC user manual and the computer code [Ref. N5.2].
N4.3  Wind Dependence Functions - Wind dependence functions are taken from MIT Report 161, "An Analytical and Experimental Study of Transient Cooling Pond Behavior," [Ref.
N5.3].
N4.4  Lake Stratification Inputs - The bases for inputs to the lake stratification analysis are provided in Table N6-4.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457              REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N8 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457              REVISION NO. 8          ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N8 of N20 N
 
==5.0  REFERENCES==
 
N5.1 NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Regulatory Cormnission, November 1980.
N5.2 LAKET-PC Version 2.2, Sargent & LundyLLC, Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 12/09/2004.
Controlled File Path: \\SNLVS5\SYS3\OPS$\LAK-9222\
Controlled File Path: \\SNLVS5\SYS3\OPS$\LAK-9222\
N5.3 MIT Report 161, "An Analytical and Experimental Study of Transient Cooling Pond Behavior," Ryan and Harleman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1973.N5.4 Request for Additional Information Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374, "LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 -Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Technical Specification  
N5.3 MIT Report 161, "An Analytical and Experimental Study of Transient Cooling Pond Behavior," Ryan and Harleman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1973.
N5.4 Request for Additional Information Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374, "LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Technical Specification 3.7.3 Ultimate Heat Sink (TAC Nos.
ME9076 and ME 9077," 6/27/2013.
N5.5  S-79, "CSCS Pond Water Inlet Chutes Plan and Sections," Rev. H.
N5.6  Avallone, Eugene A. and Baumeister III, Theodore, "Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers," 10t' edition.
N5.7  MES- 11.1, S&L Mechanical Engineering Standard, "Effective Area of Cooling Lakes,"
Rev. 1.
N5.8  RS-13-002, "Response to Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Technical Specification 3.7.3, 'Ultimate Heat Sink'," l/18/2013.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N9 of N20 N6.0  EVALUATIONS N6.1  LAKET-PC Background LAKET-PC is a one-dimensional thermal prediction model first written in 1976 which has been well established in many areas of cooling lake sizing and analysis. The lake simulation model is used to yield water surface temperature as a function of position and time. The inherent assumptions used in the LAKET-PC model are as follows:
: 1. Thermal One Dimensionality - A one dimensional model assumes that the temperature is constant at any point along the plane perpendicular to the direction of flow. There are neither cross-stream variations nor thermal stratification with respect to depth.
: 2. Time Increment - The calculation scheme in LAKET-PC is an iterative process, where the calculation interval can be set to increments of minutes or hours. Weather data input to the model is generally hourly, and so weather data is held fixed for intervals smaller than one hour.
: 3. Fluid Interactions - The simulation model used in LAKET-PC involves adjacent fluid masses at different temperatures. The horizontal heat conduction due to this temperature difference is assumed to be negligible with respect to the heat rejection at the air / water interface, and is ignored. Similarly, conductive heat loss and frictional retardation at the water / channel interface are ignored.
: 4. Lake Rectanaularization - The one-dimensional model assumptions coerce the water body into an idealized rectangular channel. The length of this channel is the flow path length of the actual water body, while the width and depth are computed theoretical values.
: 5. Global Flow Components - LAKET-PC assumes that all secondary water gains and losses, such as makeup, blowdown, and runoff are distributed globally over the entire lake surface. This is a reasonable assumption for the majority of applications; an actual configuration in which component flow is known to exert a disproportionate local influence will not be modeled accurately on that local scale. However, the net result of the component will be correctly modeled.
The movement of fluid through the one-dimensional channel is envisioned as a series of individual, distinct fluid segments.        Each segment has an individual length and temperature, while the width and depth remain constant for all. The channel thus fornms a queue of fluid segments, where additions are made at the inlet, and deletions are made at the outlet. This is referred to as a "first in, first out" queue. Any segment that enters the channel will cause an equal amount to be expelled at the outlet. The program assumes that all segments are uniform in temperature, and each segment is allowed to react independently with the environment.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N10 of N20 N6.2  Heat Transfer Model This evaluation only considers the thermal model utilized in calculating the lake surface temperature, and does not delve into the effects of precipitation, makeup, blow down, or calculation of total dissolved solids.
A) Edinger and Geyer Equilibrium Temperature Heat Transfer Model Both NUREG-0693 and LAKET-PC present thermal models in which the surface temperature of the cooling pond is calculated, as the bulk heat transfer modeled in these equations occurs at the water / air surface boundary. Both thermal models utilize the Edinger and Geyer "Equilibrium Temperature Heat Transfer Model." The equilibrium temperature is defined as the water surface temperature at which the lake is in thermal equilibrium with the environment. At this temperature, the heat removal from the water balances the heat addition, and the net effective heat transfer at the air / water surface is zero. Thus, the equilibrium temperature at any given time is a function only of the current meteorological environment. This is not to be confused with the "natural" lake temperature used in LAKET-PC, which is the instantaneous water temperature in response to the meteorological parameters. The equilibrium temperature is the theoretical steady state solution, while the natural temperature is the actual transient thennal response to the weather conditions.
The equilibrium temperature is used to define the heat transfer (Q) per the following equation:
Q      Ts JdQ =  JK dT 0    E where Q      = net heat transfer into the water (BTU/ft2day)
E      = equilibrium temperature ('F)
T,    = water surface temperature (fF)
K      = equilibrium heat transfer coefficient (BTU/ft2 day 'F)
Note that for this equation, K is assumed to be constant. However, when evaluating ultimate heat sinks, which accept high heat loads, the external heat load rejected to the pond will increase the surface temperature significantly higher than the equilibrium temperature. Thus, this equation is an iterative process in which the lake surface temperature is co-dependent on the net heat transfer rate and the heat transfer coefficient.
The surface temperature and heat transfer coefficient is held constant for each time step iteration when calculated in LAKET-PC.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                      REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N1 1 of N20 B) Heat Sources Contributing to the Cooling Pond The contributing components for the net heat transfer to the lake, listed below, are consistent between both LAKET-PC and NUREG-0693.
Q = QSN + QAN - QBR - QE - QC + QRJ where:
QSN      =  net incident short wave solar radiation QAN      =  net  incident long wave atmospheric radiation QBR      =  net  rate of long wave back radiation from the lake surface QE      =  net  rate of heat loss due to evaporation Qc      =  net  rate of heat loss due to conduction and convection QRJ      =  net  rate of heat rejected to the lake by the plant Table N6-1 below presents the equations for each component of the net heat load. Note that for both methods, the solar radiation is generally a measured value, while the others are approximated based on meteorological conditions.
Table N6-1: Heat Load Equations NUREG-0693                                  LAKET-PC QSN              Measured value                              Calculated outside of LAKET-PC 1
L  -                                          (included with weather data) 13 QAN  -.              2x10- (T+460 )(l+O.17C2 )                Calculated outside of LAKET-PC (included with weather data)1 QBR                4.026x1O"8(460+Ts)4                        4x10 8 (460+Ts) 4 QE                (es - eA)F(w)                              (e. - ea)F(w) approximated as:  j3(Ts-TD)F(w)
Qc        _        0.26(Ts-TA)F(w)                            0.255(Ts-TA)F(w)
QRJ              Input based on plant heat load              Input based on plant heat load
: 1) An additional description of solar radiation and atmospheric radiation can be found in RS-13-002 [Ref.
5.8].
where:
C        = fraction of sky covered by clouds (0.0 - 1.0) (measured)
T4      = dry bulb air temperature (fF)
Ts      = water surface temperature (fF)
TD      = dew point temperature (&deg;F) es      = saturated vapor pressure at Ts (nrunHg) e.4      = partial vapor pressure at TA and relative humidity (mrnHg)
                          =+0.255-0.0085(          . Tj+/- 0.000204            2    )J (mrnHg/0 F)
F(w)    =  wind speed function (see Section N6.2C) (BTU/ft2 day/mmHg)
Table N6-1 shows that the equations for each contributing heat load to the cooling pond are the same between NUREG-0693 and LAKET-PC.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N12 of N20 C) Wind Function NUREG-0693 The wind function (F(w)) is used to characterize the effect of wind on the evaporative heat loss from the water.
The simple thermal model presented in NUREG-0693 utilizes a form of the wind function developed by Brady, which is solely dependent on the wind speed.
2 FB(w) =  70 + 0.7W where FB(w) = Brady wind function (BTU/ft2 day/mrnHg)
W      = wind speed measured 18-ft above the water surface (mph)
However, Section 2.3 of NUREG-0693 discusses possible over-conservatism in this wind function and also presents an alternative equation. The Brady wind function, presented above, seems to underestimate the evaporative heat flux. Another approach presented by Patrick Ryan in MIT Report No. 161 [Ref. N5.3] and summarized in NUREG-0693 includes the temperature dependence of the water surface when calculating evaporative heat loss. This Ryan function is less conservative than the Brady function, but based on firmer physical grounds. The Ryan function presented in NUREG-0693 is as follows:
FR (w)=22.4rrTs    + 460      F1'4  + 460      +14W 0.378e,          0.378e,,
P          P where FR(w) = Ryan wind function (BTU/ft2 day/mrnHg)
P      = atmospheric pressure (mmHg)
W2      = wind speed measured 2 meters above the water surface (mph)
A comparison of calculations utilizing each of these two wind functions is shown in Fig.
N6-1 in Section N6.3.
LAKET-PC LAKET-PC uses two different wind speed functions, one for natural evaporation off a pond at its natural temperature, and another for the forced evaporation off a heated pond with elevated surface temperatures. This is done to capture the effect of different phenomena above forced and natural water surfaces. Both wind functions are taken from MIT Report No. 161 [Ref. N5.3].
The wind speed function for a natural lake is solely dependent on the wind speed:
FLH (W) = 17W, PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N13 of N20 where FLH(W) =  Lake Hefner wind function (BTU/ft2 day/mmHg) [Ref. N5.3]
Additional heat rejected to the cooling pond will increase the temperature of the water surface, and introduce the effect of free convection due to the temperature differential between the water and the air. Consistent with NUREG-0693, LAKET-PC utilizes the Ryan wind function (F,.(w)) to account for free and forced convection when the surface of the water is at an elevated temperature. Specifically, LAKET-PC utilizes the Ryan wind function when the surface temperature is 2.5&deg;F higher than the natural temperature of the lake.
N6.3  Comparison of Calculation Methods There are several simplifying assumptions made when generating the set of equations used for the heat transfer model defined on page 9 of NUREG-0693 [Ref. N5.1]. This includes the approximation that the heat transfer from the back radiation and atmospheric radiation effectively cancel each other out. The model presented in NUREG-0693 also utilizes the Brady wind function (FB(w)), which is solely a function of wind speed.
However, Figure 2.4 in NUREG-0693 (reproduced below) presents the results from a hypothetical one square foot section of a pond surface subject to constant meteorological conditions utilizing varying levels of rigor in the calculations and wind functions.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297


====3.7.3 Ultimate====
CALCULATION NO. L-002457               REVISION NO. 8           ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N14 of N20 SUAFACE ',
Heat Sink (TAC Nos.ME9076 and ME 9077," 6/27/2013.
TEMPON TS-'IF   150                                                                   b 140                                       0 1301 120 100.
N5.5 S-79, "CSCS Pond Water Inlet Chutes Plan and Sections," Rev. H.N5.6 Avallone, Eugene A. and Baumeister III, Theodore, "Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers," 10t' edition.N5.7 MES- 11.1, S&L Mechanical Engineering Standard, "Effective Area of Cooling Lakes," Rev. 1.N5.8 RS-13-002, "Response to Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Technical Specification 3.7.3, 'Ultimate Heat Sink'," l/18/2013.
1     2     3     4     5     8   7     a           10    11     1 12 2
PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N9 of N20 N6.0 EVALUATIONS N6.1 LAKET-PC Background LAKET-PC is a one-dimensional thermal prediction model first written in 1976 which has been well established in many areas of cooling lake sizing and analysis.
HEAT LOAD FROM PLANT - BTU/(FT OAY) x 1000 Fig. N6-1: Comparison of Calculation Methods where a) Simplified method with equilibrium temperature and heat transfer coefficients based on unloaded pond conditions (not a function of pond temperature).
The lake simulation model is used to yield water surface temperature as a function of position and time. The inherent assumptions used in the LAKET-PC model are as follows: 1. Thermal One Dimensionality
Brady wind function.
-A one dimensional model assumes that the temperature is constant at any point along the plane perpendicular to the direction of flow. There are neither cross-stream variations nor thermal stratification with respect to depth.2. Time Increment
b) Simplified method where         atmospheric and back radiation are ignored, but equilibrium temperature and heat transfer coefficients are based on pond temperatures.
-The calculation scheme in LAKET-PC is an iterative process, where the calculation interval can be set to increments of minutes or hours. Weather data input to the model is generally hourly, and so weather data is held fixed for intervals smaller than one hour.3. Fluid Interactions
Brady wind function.
-The simulation model used in LAKET-PC involves adjacent fluid masses at different temperatures.
c) Rigorous method where each contributing heat source is explicitly calculated.
The horizontal heat conduction due to this temperature difference is assumed to be negligible with respect to the heat rejection at the air / water interface, and is ignored. Similarly, conductive heat loss and frictional retardation at the water / channel interface are ignored.4. Lake Rectanaularization
Brady wind function.
-The one-dimensional model assumptions coerce the water body into an idealized rectangular channel. The length of this channel is the flow path length of the actual water body, while the width and depth are computed theoretical values.5. Global Flow Components
d) Rigorous method where each contributing heat source is explicitly calculated.
-LAKET-PC assumes that all secondary water gains and losses, such as makeup, blowdown, and runoff are distributed globally over the entire lake surface. This is a reasonable assumption for the majority of applications; an actual configuration in which component flow is known to exert a disproportionate local influence will not be modeled accurately on that local scale. However, the net result of the component will be correctly modeled.The movement of fluid through the one-dimensional channel is envisioned as a series of individual, distinct fluid segments.
Each segment has an individual length and temperature, while the width and depth remain constant for all. The channel thus fornms a queue of fluid segments, where additions are made at the inlet, and deletions are made at the outlet. This is referred to as a "first in, first out" queue. Any segment that enters the channel will cause an equal amount to be expelled at the outlet. The program assumes that all segments are uniform in temperature, and each segment is allowed to react independently with the environment.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N10 of N20 N6.2 Heat Transfer Model This evaluation only considers the thermal model utilized in calculating the lake surface temperature, and does not delve into the effects of precipitation, makeup, blow down, or calculation of total dissolved solids.A) Edinger and Geyer Equilibrium Temperature Heat Transfer Model Both NUREG-0693 and LAKET-PC present thermal models in which the surface temperature of the cooling pond is calculated, as the bulk heat transfer modeled in these equations occurs at the water / air surface boundary.
Both thermal models utilize the Edinger and Geyer "Equilibrium Temperature Heat Transfer Model." The equilibrium temperature is defined as the water surface temperature at which the lake is in thermal equilibrium with the environment.
At this temperature, the heat removal from the water balances the heat addition, and the net effective heat transfer at the air / water surface is zero. Thus, the equilibrium temperature at any given time is a function only of the current meteorological environment.
This is not to be confused with the "natural" lake temperature used in LAKET-PC, which is the instantaneous water temperature in response to the meteorological parameters.
The equilibrium temperature is the theoretical steady state solution, while the natural temperature is the actual transient thennal response to the weather conditions.
The equilibrium temperature is used to define the heat transfer (Q) per the following equation: Q Ts JdQ = JK dT 0 E where Q = net heat transfer into the water (BTU/ft 2 day)E = equilibrium temperature
('F)T, = water surface temperature (fF)K = equilibrium heat transfer coefficient (BTU/ft 2 day 'F)Note that for this equation, K is assumed to be constant.
However, when evaluating ultimate heat sinks, which accept high heat loads, the external heat load rejected to the pond will increase the surface temperature significantly higher than the equilibrium temperature.
Thus, this equation is an iterative process in which the lake surface temperature is co-dependent on the net heat transfer rate and the heat transfer coefficient.
The surface temperature and heat transfer coefficient is held constant for each time step iteration when calculated in LAKET-PC.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N1 1 of N20 B) Heat Sources Contributing to the Cooling Pond The contributing components for the net heat transfer to the lake, listed below, are consistent between both LAKET-PC and NUREG-0693.
Q = QSN + QAN -QBR -QE -QC + QRJ where: QSN = net incident short wave solar radiation QAN = net incident long wave atmospheric radiation QBR = net rate of long wave back radiation from the lake surface QE = net rate of heat loss due to evaporation Qc = net rate of heat loss due to conduction and convection QRJ = net rate of heat rejected to the lake by the plant Table N6-1 below presents the equations for each component of the net heat load. Note that for both methods, the solar radiation is generally a measured value, while the others are approximated based on meteorological conditions.
Table N6-1: Heat Load Equations NUREG-0693 LAKET-PC QSN Measured value Calculated outside of LAKET-PC L -(included with weather data)1 QAN -.2x10-1 3 (T+460 )(l+O.17C2 ) Calculated outside of LAKET-PC (included with weather data)1 QBR 4.026x1O"8(460+Ts)4 4x10 8 (460+Ts)4 QE (es -eA)F(w) (e. -ea)F(w)approximated as: j3(Ts-TD)F(w)
Qc _ 0.26(Ts-TA)F(w) 0.255(Ts-TA)F(w)
QRJ Input based on plant heat load Input based on plant heat load 1) An additional description of solar radiation and atmospheric radiation can be found in RS-13-002
[Ref.5.8].where: C = fraction of sky covered by clouds (0.0 -1.0) (measured)
T4 = dry bulb air temperature (fF)Ts = water surface temperature (fF)TD = dew point temperature
(&deg;F)es = saturated vapor pressure at Ts (nrunHg)e.4 = partial vapor pressure at TA and relative humidity (mrnHg)=+0.255-0.0085( .Tj+/- 0.000204 2 ) J (mrnHg/0 F)F(w) = wind speed function (see Section N6.2C) (BTU/ft 2 day/mmHg)Table N6-1 shows that the equations for each contributing heat load to the cooling pond are the same between NUREG-0693 and LAKET-PC.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N12 of N20 C) Wind Function NUREG-0693 The wind function (F(w)) is used to characterize the effect of wind on the evaporative heat loss from the water.The simple thermal model presented in NUREG-0693 utilizes a form of the wind function developed by Brady, which is solely dependent on the wind speed.FB(w) = 70 + 0.7W 2 where FB(w) = Brady wind function (BTU/ft 2 day/mrnHg)
W = wind speed measured 18-ft above the water surface (mph)However, Section 2.3 of NUREG-0693 discusses possible over-conservatism in this wind function and also presents an alternative equation.
The Brady wind function, presented above, seems to underestimate the evaporative heat flux. Another approach presented by Patrick Ryan in MIT Report No. 161 [Ref. N5.3] and summarized in NUREG-0693 includes the temperature dependence of the water surface when calculating evaporative heat loss. This Ryan function is less conservative than the Brady function, but based on firmer physical grounds. The Ryan function presented in NUREG-0693 is as follows: FR (w)=22.4rrTs
+ 460 F1'4 + 460 + 14W 0.378e, 0.378e,, P P where FR(w) = Ryan wind function (BTU/ft 2 day/mrnHg)
P = atmospheric pressure (mmHg)W2 = wind speed measured 2 meters above the water surface (mph)A comparison of calculations utilizing each of these two wind functions is shown in Fig.N6-1 in Section N6.3.LAKET-PC LAKET-PC uses two different wind speed functions, one for natural evaporation off a pond at its natural temperature, and another for the forced evaporation off a heated pond with elevated surface temperatures.
This is done to capture the effect of different phenomena above forced and natural water surfaces.
Both wind functions are taken from MIT Report No. 161 [Ref. N5.3].The wind speed function for a natural lake is solely dependent on the wind speed: FLH (W) = 17W, PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N13 of N20 where FLH(W) = Lake Hefner wind function (BTU/ft 2 day/mmHg)
[Ref. N5.3]Additional heat rejected to the cooling pond will increase the temperature of the water surface, and introduce the effect of free convection due to the temperature differential between the water and the air. Consistent with NUREG-0693, LAKET-PC utilizes the Ryan wind function (F,.(w)) to account for free and forced convection when the surface of the water is at an elevated temperature.
Specifically, LAKET-PC utilizes the Ryan wind function when the surface temperature is 2.5&deg;F higher than the natural temperature of the lake.N6.3 Comparison of Calculation Methods There are several simplifying assumptions made when generating the set of equations used for the heat transfer model defined on page 9 of NUREG-0693
[Ref. N5.1]. This includes the approximation that the heat transfer from the back radiation and atmospheric radiation effectively cancel each other out. The model presented in NUREG-0693 also utilizes the Brady wind function (FB(w)), which is solely a function of wind speed.However, Figure 2.4 in NUREG-0693 (reproduced below) presents the results from a hypothetical one square foot section of a pond surface subject to constant meteorological conditions utilizing varying levels of rigor in the calculations and wind functions.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N14 of N20 SUAFACE ', TEMPON b TS-'IF 150 140 0 1301 120 100.1 2 3 4 5 8 7 a 1 0 11 1 HEAT LOAD FROM PLANT -BTU/(FT 2 OAY) x 1000 Fig. N6-1: Comparison of Calculation Methods where a) Simplified method with equilibrium temperature and heat transfer coefficients based on unloaded pond conditions (not a function of pond temperature).
Brady wind function.b) Simplified method where atmospheric and back radiation are ignored, but equilibrium temperature and heat transfer coefficients are based on pond temperatures.
Brady wind function.c) Rigorous method where each contributing heat source is explicitly calculated.
Brady wind function.d) Rigorous method where each contributing heat source is explicitly calculated.
Ryan wind function (LAKET methodology)
Ryan wind function (LAKET methodology)
Furthermore, the explicit impact of the wind function on evaporative heat flux is analyzed to demonstrate the significant influence of forced evaporation.
Furthermore, the explicit impact of the wind function on evaporative heat flux is analyzed to demonstrate the significant influence of forced evaporation. This is done by PROJECT NO. 11333-297
This is done by 12 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N15 of N20 calculating the evaporative heat flux for several lake surface temperatures at the constant meteorological conditions used in Fig. N6-1 (per NUREG-0693).
 
The evaporative heat flux is calculated using the equation given in Table N6-1: QE = (es -e,4) F(W)Note that the equation above shows that given a constant water temperature, a decrease in atmospheric pressure will result in a slightly increased heat flux. The constant meteorological conditions used in the calculation are presented below in Table N6-2.Table N6-2: Constant Weather Parameters Parameter Symbol Value Dew Point Temp (oF) Td 70 Ambient Air Temp (0 F) Ta 90 Relative Humidity (%)-RH ...52%Wind Speed measured at 18-ft (mph) W W .2 Wind Speed corrected at 2-m (mph) W 2  1.7 Atm Pressure (mmHg) T P I 760.137 Partial Vapor Pressure at TA and RH (mmHg)j eA 18.772 The calculation of the evaporative heat flux and each contributing term is conducted below in Table N6-3.Table N6-3: Calculation of Evaporative Heat Flux Water Surface Temperature (7F) j Ts 150 135 L 120 105 90 Saturated Vapor at Ts (mmHg) I_ es 192.279 131.212 87.531 56.971 36.100 Brady WindFunction FB(W) 72.80 72.80 72.80 72.80 72.80 (BTU/ft day/mmHg)
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                     REVISION NO. 8                       ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N15 of N20 calculating the evaporative heat flux for several lake surface temperatures at the constant meteorological conditions used in Fig. N6-1 (per NUREG-0693). The evaporative heat flux is calculated using the equation given in Table N6-1:
FBW .. .. ... ......- ... ..... ..- .. ..- -'Ryan / Lake Hefner Wind Function 1 -1 69- 90.39 617 (BTU/ft 2 day/mmHg)
QE = (es - e,4)   F(W)
FR(W) 134.06 120.85 106.97 , 90.39 61.76 (BTU/t~da/mm~g i ,/fvv Evaporative Heat Flux (BTU/ft 2 day) [ QEB 12,631 8,186 2,781 1,261 (using Brady Wind Func.) 166 ,006 2 Evaporative Heat Flux (BTU/ft day) Q 23,261 &#xfd;13,588 7 3,453 (Using Ryan / Lake Hefner Wind Func.) 7,355,070 1) Per the methodology in LAKET-PC, the Lake Hefner wind function is used instead of the Ryan wind function when es approaches eA.Results from Table N6-3 are presented in Fig. N6-2.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N16 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N16 of N20 25,000-Evaporation w/ Brady Wind Func.S--Evaporation w/ Ryan and Lake Hefner Wind Func.'s 20,000.15,000 x 3 LL 4)4) 10,000 0 5U 5,000 I 0 90 100 110 120 130 140 Water Surface Temperature
Note that the equation above shows that given a constant water temperature, a decrease in atmospheric pressure will result in a slightly increased heat flux. The constant meteorological conditions used in the calculation are presented below in Table N6-2.
('F)Fig. N6-2: Evaporative Heat Flux Calculation Results 150 Fig. N6-2 shows that the Ryan wind function (which accounts for forced evaporation due to elevated pond temperatures) results in significantly higher evaporative heat flux values at elevated water temperatures.
Table N6-2: Constant Weather Parameters Parameter                                       Symbol         Value Dew Point Temp (oF)                               Td             70 Ambient Air Temp (0F)                             Ta             90 Relative Humidity (%)-RH                             ...       52%
As UHS cooling ponds are expected to see significant heat rejection, the surface temperatures will be notably higher than the natural lake temperature and thus, accounting for this effect when calculating evaporation is necessary.
Wind Speed measured at 18-ft (mph)                 W       .       2 Wind Speed corrected at 2-m (mph)                 W2            1.7 Atm Pressure (mmHg)                         T     P       I   760.137 Partial Vapor Pressure at TA and RH (mmHg)j       eA           18.772 The calculation of the evaporative heat flux and each contributing term is conducted below in Table N6-3.
The results in Fig. N6-2 are consistent with the results presented in NUREG-0693, shown in Fig. N6-1. The differences in evaporation calculated with either of the two wind functions are negligible for lightly loaded cooling ponds (where the lake temperature is relatively close to the natural lake temperature).
Table N6-3: Calculation of Evaporative Heat Flux Water Surface Temperature (7F)         j   Ts         150             135     L 120           105         90 Saturated Vapor at Ts (mmHg)             I_ es       192.279         131.212       87.531     56.971     36.100 Brady WindFunction                         FB(W)     72.80           72.80         72.80     72.80       72.80 (BTU/ft day/mmHg)                         FBW         ..   ..   ...   ......- ...   .     .... ..- ..   ..- - '
However, when the heat rejection to the pond is increased and the resulting water temperature increases significantly beyond the natural lake temperature, the effect of the Brady vs. Ryan wind functions becomes apparent.
Ryan / Lake Hefner Wind Function 1   -1                                                 69-   90.39       617 2
The increased evaporative heat flux shown in Fig. N6-2 will result in lower water temperatures, as shown by Cases c) and d) in Fig. N6- 1.N6.4 Lake Stratification The calculation of the upper layer depth was done for the UHS at LaSalle in order to detennine the degree of stratification.
day/mmHg)
The following table shows the calculation of the upper layer depth, which is done according to the methodology presented in Section N2.0. 1. This calculation is done for varying values of temperature rise through the plant since this value changes significantly during the first few hours following an accident.The temperature difference between the upper and lower layers is calculated as the PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N17 of N20 difference between the plant outlet temperature and the 'mixing zone' of the UHS located near the plant outlet. The temperature of a mixing zone comprising 10% and 20% of the UHS area is determined in a Section 06.9 of Attachment 0.Table N6-4: Calculation of Upper Layer Depth Parameter I Symbol 1 Units j Hour 1 Hour 4 Hour 6 1 Basis Gross Lake Area 1A Acres I 81.32 I 81.32 81.32 i Att. 0, Table 02-1&#xfd;Gross- Lakme Vol u-me- -o -jAr-t 30 _ 4 4 t.0able 02-1 Average Depth l H ft I 4.18 4.18 j 4.18: =VIA Flow Rate Q 0 cfs I 86 I 86 _ 86 Att. O, Design Inp. 4.6 Plant Inlet Temperature Ti -F i102.00 101.73 102.62 i Case 3aJ6AM from Att. 0 Temperature Rise through Plant AT.._ _ 0 F 25.95 i 35.8 22.43 Att. P, Appendix P9.2 Plant Outlet Temperature To ' F 127.95 137.53 125.05 = Ti + ATP Minimum Assumed Mixing Zone Tm -F 100.0 100.0 100.0 Assumed Temperature----
(BTU/ft(BTU/t~da/mm~g                      ,/fvv i FR(W)     134.06         120.85         106.97 , 90.39       61.76 Evaporative Heat Flux (BTU/ft 2day)
AT Between Plant Outlet and Mix. Zone AT -F 27.95 37.53 25.05 = To- Tm ke Le ft I 5500 5500 -5500 I Main Body, Design lnp. 4.4 Lake Length .........
(using Brady Wind Func.)
... ..Lake Width B ft 644 644 644 ,k=A*43560/L Width of Discharge Structure I BdI ft 8.0 8.0 8.0 i Ref. N5.5 Dth f Dschrge trutur -I UHS Depth with 1.5 feet of Depth of Discharge Structure d t ft 1 3.5 3.5 3.5 sedimentation of-Discharge Velocity Vd .. ft/s -3.071 3.071 3.071 =-Q-/ (B *hd).Maximum AssuImed MixingZone-T ' F 125.0 125.0 125.0 Assumed Temperature  
[ QEB       12,631 166 8,186
-I .--- T -- 'F -Assumed Manning Roughness Coeff. n -(-) .0.2 0.02 .02 i Ref. N5.6, Table 3.3.17 Bulk Exp ansion Coefficient 3.. .3-0,13.53E-0, 3.53E-041 Eq. N2-4 Discharge_-Froude Number Fr .) 2.91 2.52 3.08 Eq.N2-5 Maximum Plume Depth hmax ft I 4.43 3.82 4.68 Eq. N2-6 Dilution ratio (uncorrected)
                                                                                                ,006 2,781 2
D* .(_) 4.17 3.66 4.38 Eq. N2-7 Dbiution Ratot Correction-Factor r (-) 0.77 0.86 0.74 Eq. N2-8---Dilution Ratio (corrected)
1,261 Evaporative Heat Flux (BTU/ft day)         Q         23,261 &#xfd;13,588                 7         3,453 (Using Ryan / Lake Hefner Wind Func.)                                               7,355,070
Ds () 3.221 3.16 3.25 _ Eq. N2-9 Chezy's Coefficient C _ _ ) 93.29 93.29 I 93.29 Eq. N2-3 Interfacial Friction Coefficient ) 0,015 0.015 .0.015 Eq. N2-2 Upper Layer Depth ho ft 2.49 j 2.28 2.57 Eq. N2-1 Test for Lake Stratification Gross Volume .... .. V I Acre-ft 1 340 4 340 40 .At. 0, Table 02-1 Volume Below Upper Layer V, Acre-ft 143.2 159.9 136.4 Interpolation of Table 7.1 in S--_ I _ I Main Body____ _Fraction of Lake Volume Below hu (') -0.42 0.47 0.40 = Vb/V As seen in Table N6-4, the most conservative calculated upper layer depth for the LaSalle UHS is 2.28 ft. Using this depth, the fraction of the UHS below the upper layer depth is 47%. According to MES- 11.1 [Ref. N5.7], LAKET is applicable to a certain lake if this fraction is less than 50%. Therefore, LAKET is acceptable for analyzing the LaSalle UHS.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N18 of N20 N7.0  
: 1) Per the methodology in LAKET-PC, the Lake Hefner wind function is used instead of the Ryan wind function when es approaches eA.
Results from Table N6-3 are presented in Fig. N6-2.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                           REVISION NO. 8                 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N16 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457                           REVISION NO. 8                 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N16 of N20 25,000
                    -Evaporation     w/ Brady Wind Func.
S
                      - - Evaporation w/ Ryan and Lake Hefner Wind Func.'s 20,000 I
      .15,000 x
3 LL 4)
: 4) 10,000 0
5U 5,000 0
90             100             110             120             130       140         150 Water Surface Temperature ('F)
Fig. N6-2: Evaporative Heat Flux Calculation Results Fig. N6-2 shows that the Ryan wind function (which accounts for forced evaporation due to elevated pond temperatures) results in significantly higher evaporative heat flux values at elevated water temperatures. As UHS cooling ponds are expected to see significant heat rejection, the surface temperatures will be notably higher than the natural lake temperature and thus, accounting for this effect when calculating evaporation is necessary. The results in Fig. N6-2 are consistent with the results presented in NUREG-0693, shown in Fig. N6-1. The differences in evaporation calculated with either of the two wind functions are negligible for lightly loaded cooling ponds (where the lake temperature is relatively close to the natural lake temperature). However, when the heat rejection to the pond is increased and the resulting water temperature increases significantly beyond the natural lake temperature, the effect of the Brady vs. Ryan wind functions becomes apparent. The increased evaporative heat flux shown in Fig. N6-2 will result in lower water temperatures, as shown by Cases c) and d) in Fig. N6- 1.
N6.4       Lake Stratification The calculation of the upper layer depth was done for the UHS at LaSalle in order to detennine the degree of stratification. The following table shows the calculation of the upper layer depth, which is done according to the methodology presented in Section N2.0. 1. This calculation is done for varying values of temperature rise through the plant since this value changes significantly during the first few hours following an accident.
The temperature difference between the upper and lower layers is calculated as the PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                               REVISION NO. 8                             ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N17 of N20 difference between the plant outlet temperature and the 'mixing zone' of the UHS located near the plant outlet. The temperature of a mixing zone comprising 10% and 20% of the UHS area is determined in a Section 06.9 of Attachment 0.
Table N6-4: Calculation of Upper Layer Depth Parameter                                   I Symbol 1 Units           j Hour 1     Hour 4       Hour 6 1                 Basis Gross Lake Area                                           1A Acres     I   81.32 I 81.32         81.32 i         Att. 0, Table 02-1
        &#xfd;Gross-Lakme Volu-me-             -o-                                         30 _ 4                 4             t.0able jAr-t 02-1 Average Depth                               l     H             ft   I 4.18         4.18 j       4.18:                 =VIA Flow Rate                                         0 Q             cfs   I 86         I 86 _ 86                 Att. O, Design Inp. 4.6 Plant Inlet Temperature                           Ti             -F       i102.00   101.73       102.62 i Case 3aJ6AM from Att. 0 0
Temperature Rise through Plant                   AT.._ _           F         25.95 i 35.8           22.43         Att. P, Appendix P9.2 Plant Outlet Temperature                         To       '       F       127.95   137.53       125.05                 = Ti + ATP Minimum Assumed Mixing Zone                       Tm             -F         100.0     100.0       100.0                 Assumed Temperature----
AT Between Plant Outlet and Mix. Zone             AT             -F         27.95     37.53       25.05                 = To- Tm Lake Length .........                    ...
ke Le                                                         ft   I 5500         5500     - 5500 I Main Body,.. Design lnp. 4.4 Lake Width                                         B             ft           644     644         644                 ,k=A*43560/L Width of Discharge Structure                 I   BdI             ft           8.0       8.0         8.0 i             Ref. N5.5 Dth trutur f Dschrge                                                         -I               UHS Depth with 1.5 feet of Depth of Discharge Structure                       d     t     ft   1     3.5       3.5         3.5             sedimentation   of-Discharge Velocity                               Vd ..         ft/s -     3.071     3.071       3.071             =-Q-/ (B *hd).
Maximum AssuImed MixingZone-                       T       '     F         125.0     125.0       125.0                 Assumed Temperature       -                   . ---               I        T     --                                   -'F Assumed Manning Roughness Coeff.                   n   -         (-)     .0.2         0.02   .02       i   Ref. N5.6, Table 3.3.17 Bulk Expansion Coefficient                                             3...3-0,13.53E-0,     3.53E-041                   Eq. N2-4 Discharge_-Froude Number                         Fr .               )         2.91     2.52         3.08                 Eq.N2-5 Maximum Plume Depth                             hmax             ft   I 4.43         3.82         4.68                 Eq. N2-6 Dilution ratio (uncorrected)                     D*           .   (_)         4.17     3.66         4.38                 Eq. N2-7 Dbiution Ratot Correction-Factor                   r             (-)         0.77     0.86         0.74                 Eq. N2-8---
Dilution Ratio (corrected)                       Ds             ()           3.221   3.16         3.25   _             Eq. N2-9 Chezy's Coefficient                               C       _ _ )             93.29     93.29   I   93.29                 Eq. N2-3 Interfacial Friction Coefficient                                   )       0,015     0.015
                                                                                                  .         0.015                 Eq. N2-2 Upper Layer Depth                                 ho             ft         2.49 j 2.28           2.57                 Eq. N2-1 Test for Lake Stratification Gross Volume .           .         .. ..         V       I Acre-ft 1 340              340 4           40 .         At. 0, Table 02-1 Volume Below Upper Layer                         V,           Acre-ft     143.2     159.9       136.4     Interpolation of Table 7.1 in S--_ I                   _             I             Main Body____ _
Fraction of Lake Volume Below hu                                 (') -       0.42     0.47         0.40                   = Vb/V As seen in Table N6-4, the most conservative calculated upper layer depth for the LaSalle UHS is 2.28 ft. Using this depth, the fraction of the UHS below the upper layer depth is 47%. According to MES- 11.1 [Ref. N5.7], LAKET is applicable to a certain lake if this fraction is less than 50%. Therefore, LAKET is acceptable for analyzing the LaSalle UHS.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457               REVISION NO. 8             ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N18 of N20 N7.0


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
AND CONCLUSIONS The methodology used in LAKET-PC is entirely consistent with the thermal model presented in NUREG-0693 and the wind speed functions presented in MIT Report No 161, which is also referenced and cited in NUREG-0693.
AND CONCLUSIONS The methodology used in LAKET-PC is entirely consistent with the thermal model presented in NUREG-0693 and the wind speed functions presented in MIT Report No 161, which is also referenced and cited in NUREG-0693. The use of the Ryan wind function (LAKET-PC) over the Brady wind function (NUREG thermal model) results in lower lake temperatures. This is due to the fact that the Ryan wind function accounts for the effect of forced evaporation at water temperatures significantly higher than ambient air temperatures. However, NUREG-0693 fully endorses the use of the Ryan wind function as a more accurate, although less conservative, method for calculating evaporative heat flux. Thus, Acceptance Criterion N I is met.
The use of
In Table N6-4, it is determined that the fraction of lake volume below the calculated upper layer depth is 47%. Acceptance Criterion N2 requires that the lake volume below the upper layer depth be less than 50% for the lake to be considered not stratified.
Therefore, Acceptance Criterion N2 is met.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457    REVISION NO. 8    ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N19 of N20 N8.0  LIMITATIONS AND OPEN ITEMS None, PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457  REVISION NO. 8      ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N20 of N20 N9.0  APPENDICES None.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                      REVISION NO. 8            ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 01 of 042 01.0 PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE The purpose of this attachment


==05.0 REFERENCES==
CALCULATION NO. L-002457              REVISION NO. 8                ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P6 of P58 P4.0 DESIGN INPUTS P4.1  Total Heat Load - The total heat load rejected to the UHS following a LOCA for one unit and a reactor SCRAM for the non-LOCA unit is determined in Attachment D of L-002453
[Ref. P5.1 ].
P4.2  CSCS Volumetric Flow - The total plant flow during the UHS analysis is 29,300 GPM (65.3 ft3/s) for the first 16 hours of the event [Ref. P5.2, Attachment C]. The total plant flow is 38,600 gpm (86.0 ft3/s) after 16 hours [Ref. P5.2, Attachment C]. The total flow after 16 hours is based upon the cumulative flow contribution from thirteen CSCS pumps operating at design flow conditions (eight Residual Heat Removal (RHR)-Service Water pumps, 4,000 gpm each; three Diesel Generator (DG) pumps, two at 1,300 gpm and one at 2,000 gpm; and two High Pressure Core Spray DG pumps, 1000 gpm each) (See Attachment D). Prior to 16 hours, two RHR Service Water pumps and one of the 1,300 gpm DG pumps are not in operation [Ref. P5.2, Attachment C].
PROJECT NO. 11333-297


05.1 LaSalle County Station Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), Rev. 19.05.2 LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 7/31/2013.
CALCULATION NO. L-002457          REVISION NO. 8              ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P7 of P58 P
Controlled File Path: \\SNLVS5\SYS3\OPSS\LAK29222\
05.3 NRC Request for Additional Information, Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374, "LaSalle County Station, Units I and 2 -Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Technical Specification


====3.7.3 Ultimate====
==5.0  REFERENCES==
Heat Sink (TAC Nos. ME9076 and ME 9077)," ADAMS Accession No.M13099A206, 6/27/2013.
05.4 L-002453, "UHS Heat Load," Rev. 4.05.5 Microsoft Excel 2003, Sargent & Lundy LLC Program No. 03.2.286-1.0, dated 02/02/2004.
05.6 L-001355, "LaSalle County Station CSCS Hydraulic Model," Rev. 005A.05.7 MIT Report 161, "An Analytical and Experimental Study of Transient Cooling Pond Behavior," Ryan and Harlernan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1973.05.8 Regulatory Guide 1.27, "Ultimate Heat Sink for Nuclear Power Plants," Rev. 2.05.9 RS-12-084, "Request for a License Amendment to LaSalle County Station, Units I and 2, Technical Specification 3.7.3, 'Ultimate Heat Sink'," NRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374, ADAMS Accession No.ML12200A330, 6/12/2012.
05.10 EC 394434, "UHS Wind Correction Exponent Evaluation," Rev. 1.05.11 SEAG 13-000074, "LaSalle County Station Transmittal of Design Information (TODI) for UHS Analyses," Rev. 0.05.12 SEAG 13-000080, "LaSalle Station Transmittal of Design Information (TODI) for Calc L-002457 with WSR of Intake Flume," 9/30/2013.
I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 012 of 042 06.0 CALCULATIONS 06.1 Calculation of Plant Temperature Rise The CSCS temperature rise across the plant is computed in Attachment P. The heat rejected to the UHS is determined for an operating scenario that considers a LOCA on one unit and a reactor SCRAM for the non-LOCA unit coincident with a loss of the cooling lake. Both RHR heat exchangers are in service for the LOCA unit. For the non-LOCA unit one RHR heat exchanger is in suppression pool cooling mode (and later shutdown cooling mode) while the other RHR heat exchanger is in fuel pool cooling assist mode.See Appendix P9.2 of Attachment P for the results of the plant temperature rise.06.2 Seepage Rate The seepage rate is determined from a UHS seepage of 0.2 ft 3/s (Design Input 04.2). Revision 7 included a constant flow of 600 gpm for spent fuel pool makeup (See Design Input 14.1). Instead of spent fuel pool makeup drawn from the UHS, the spent fuel pool is cooled through the use of the RHR heat exchanger[Ref. 05.4, Attachment D]. The heat load rejected by the RHR heat exchanger to the UHS is calculated in L-002453 [Ref, 05.4], and included in the plant temperature rise calculated in Attachment P. Therefore, no additional seepage flow is added to account for spent fuel pool makeup flow.06.3 UHS Transit Time The UHS transit time for each sedimentation level can be determined using the effective volume and the UHS flow rate. This calculation is shown in Table 06-1, below.Table 06-1: UHS Transit Time Calculation
_ Symbol 0-in 6-in j 12-in 18-in Basis Eff. Volume (acre-ft)
_ V 8 293.89 267.64 .241.27 215.59 Table 02-1 Conversion (ft 3/acre-ft) i C i 43560 43560 I 43560 43560 o0iu-me( ... ... V 12,801,848 1 11,658,398 1 10,509,721 9,391,100 Ve* C lB16 _65. 65.3 65.3 65.3 ;Design Input 04.6 Volume Removed in 16,rsf (W) ,V, 6 I 3,761,280 3,761,280 3,761,280 3,761,280
;=QB16*16hr*3600s/hr Transit Time (s) tB 1 6  57,600 57,600 -57,600 -57,600 ,16 hr* 3600 s/hr Flow 8Rate6 (is) ...6- 80 86.0 86.0 86.0 'Design Input 04.6 Remaining Volume (ft) VA16 9,040,568 7,897,118 6,748,441
.1 5,629,820-V
-V13 .1 6 Transit Time (s) tA1, 105,123 91,827 78,470 65,463 '=VA16/QA16 Total Transit Time (s) t I 162,723 149,427 136,070 123,063 .=tg16 +tA1 Total Transit Time (hr) t- 45.2 .4.5 37.8 34.2 =t /(3600 s/hr)For weather sorting, the weather file is sorted in three hour increments.
For compatibility, the transit time for 18-in, 12-in, 6-in, and 0-in of sedimentation is assumed to be approximately 33-hr, 39-hr, 42-hr, and 45-hr, respectively (see Assumption 03.3).PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 013 of 042 06.4 Weather File Creation 06.4.1 Worst Weather Screening Rolling averages of the lake output results from the weather screening files 'Worst Weather 11 O.dat' and'WorstWeather 120.dat' were computed for varying lengths of time: 24 hours, 33 hours, 39 hours, 42 hours, and 45 hours. Besides the 24 hours, these time periods represent potential transit times for the LaSalle UHS depending on the level of sedimentation.
The time with the highest rolling average corresponds to the start time of the worst weather period over the time span that is under consideration.
Since LAKET-PC cases are made at varying accident start times and sedimentation levels, the worst weather periods are determined for various start times over multiple time periods. These results are shown in Tables 06-2 and 06-3.Table 06-2: Worst Weather Periods -I10'F Initial Temperature Start Time 24 Hour 33 Hour 36 Hour 39 Hour 42 Hour 45 Hour 12AM 6/23/09 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/15/95 8/18/95 3AM 6/23/09 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 6/22/09 6/22/09 6AM 7/24/01 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 9AM 7/24/01 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 8/17/95 12PM 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 8/17/95 3PM 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 8/17/95 8/17/95 8/17/95 6PM 6/22/09 8/11/10 8/11/10 8/14/95 8/17/95 8/17/95 9PM 6/22/09 8/11/10 8/14/95 8/14/95 8/14/95 8/14/95 Table 06-3: Worst Weather Periods -120'F Initial Temperature Start Time 24 Hour 33 Hour 36 Hour 39 Hour 42 Hour 45 Hour 12AM 6/23/09 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/15/95 8/18/95 3AM 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 6AM 7/24/01 8/18/95 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 9AM 7/24/01 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 8/17/95 12PM 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 8/17/95 8/17/95 3PM 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 8/17/95 8/17/95 8/17/95 6PM 8/11/10 8/11/10 8/26/95 8/26/95 8/17/95 8/17/95 9PM 8/11/10 8/26/95 8/26/95 8/14/95 8/17/95 8/14/95 In cases in which different worst weather periods are determined, the differences in the rolling average of the worst time periods are negligible.
For example, the rolling average of the 24 hours starting at 3AM on 6/23/2009 for an initial temperature of 1 lOF was determined to be 107.980'F.
For the 24 hours starting at 3AM on 8/18/1995, the rolling average is 107.9771F.
This is typical of all time periods in which the differing initial temperature causes a change in the worst weather period. Therefore, it is concluded that the 11 0IF and 120'F screenings produce essentially the same worst running average periods.In addition to determining the worst time span corresponding to the UHS transit time, it is also important to check for the worst weather for shorter time periods. It is possible that in screening based on transit time, a short span of bad weather can be missed if it is quickly followed by relatively mild weather.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 014 of 042 Because of this, the worst weather periods for 9 hours and 12 hours have also been determined.
Table 06-4: Worst Weather -9 Hour and 12 Hour Period 9 Hour -L 12 Hour 1170F 120OF 19A0MF7/ 1201F 1) 7/22/019AM 7/22/019AM 6/23/09 6AM 1 6/23/09 6AM 2) 6/23/09 9AM 6/23/09 9AM 6/23/09 9AM 6/23/09 9AM 3) 6/23/95 9AM 6/23/95 9AM 6/23/95 6AM j 6/23/95 6AM Due to the prevalence of the 6/22/2009
-6/23/2009 in the 9 and 12 hour periods in Table 06-3 and the UHS transit time periods in Tables 06-2 and 06-3, LAKET-PC runs at each starting time are run starting on 6/22/2009 in addition to the worst weather periods found in Tables 06-2 and 06-3. This ensures that the worst 9 hour and 12 hour weather periods align with the initial accident heat loads exiting the UHS.06.4.2 Weather File Creation Weather files are created for each run based on the worst weather periods determined in Section 06.4.1.For the cases in Table 06-5, the worst weather file is created by inputting the worst 33 hour time (the transit time for 18 inches of sedimentation) period as determined in Tables 06-2 and 06-3 plus the following 31 days. An additional 15 hours is added since LAKET-PC requires a weather file comprised of weather input in multiples of 24.The weather conditions are taken from the file 'PIALSL9510.txt', creation of which is documented in Attachment K. The table below gives a summary of the start and end times used for creating the weather file based on a 33 hour transit time. The 33 hour transit time is used since it corresponds to the case with the most sedimentation (18 in.), which is expected to produce the most limiting temperature.
Table 06-5: Worst Weather Files File Name Start Time End Time WW 0.txt 8/18/1995 12AM 9/19/1995 11 PM WW_3.txt 8/18/1995 3AM 9/20/1995 2AM WW 6.txt 8/18/1995 6AM 9/20/1995 5AM WW 9.txt 6/22/2009 9AM J 7/25/2009 8AM WW 12.txt 6/22/2009 12PM 7/25/2009 11AM WW 15.txt 6/22/2009 3PM 7/25/2009 2PM WW 18.txt 8/11/2010 6PM 9/13/2010 5PM WW 21.txt 8/11/2010 9PM 9/13/2010 8PM WW 0-6.22.txt 6/22/2009 12AM 7/24/2009 11PM WW 3-6.22.txt 6/22/2009 3AM 7/25/2009 2AM WW 6-6.22.txt 6/22/2009 6AM 7/25/2009 5AM WW 18-6.22.txt 6/22/2009 6PM 7/25/2009 5PM WW_21-6.22.txt 6/22/2009 9PM 7/25/2009 8PM The file listings for these weather files are presented in Appendix 08. 1.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 015 of 042 06.4.3 Worst Weather Comparison For times at which 6/22/2009 is not chosen as the worst weather period for 33 hours in Table 06-2, cases are run using the given worst weather period and using the 6/22/2009 weather period. This is only done for the 1 8-inches of sedimentation cases (approximately 33 hour transit time), as these cases are expected to be the most limiting.
The results are shown in Table 06-6, below.Table 06-6: Worst Weather Comparison Case Start Time Initial Maximum Temperature Temperature 12AM Case 3a_12AM -6/22/2009 12AM 104.537F 104"53&deg;F Case 3a_12AM-8.18 8/18/1995 12AM 104.53 0 F 104.53&deg;F 3AM Case 3a_3AM 6/22/2009 3AM 102.72&deg;F 105.757F Case 3a_3AM-8.18 8/18/1995 3AM 102.72&deg;F 104.60-F 6AM Case 3a 6AM 6/22/2009 6AM 7 102.00'F 106.15-F Case 3a_6AM-8.18 8/18/19956AM L 102.00&deg;F 103.72 0 F 6PM Case 3a-6PM 6/22/2009 6PM 104.75.F 104.75-F Case 3a 6PM-8.11 I 8/11/2010 6PM 104.75OF 104.75'F 9PM Case 3a 9PM 6/22/2009 9PM 104.75"F 104.75&deg;F Case 3a_9PM-8.11 8/11/2010 6PM t 104.757F 10475&deg;F As seen in the results of Table 06-6, the 6/22/2009 cases result in an equal maximum temperature (when the maximum temperature is the initial temperature) or higher maximum temperature for all time periods.Therefore, all cases will be run using the 6/22/2009 weather data as it produces the most limiting results.Cases with differing levels of sedimentation use the same weather files. This is acceptable since the weather files consist of the worst 33 hours plus the following 31 days and any extra time needed to make the number of entries in the weather file a multiple of 24. Due to the extra time added after the 31 days, these weather files are the same for the longer transit times of the lower sedimentation cases.06.5 Comparison to 33-24-30 Case As described in Section 02.1.5., Rev. 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.27 [Ref. 05.8] gives two alternatives for selecting the worst weather data.To determine which of these methods is most conservative, cases were run using weather files created using both alternatives.
The UHS transit time for 18 inches of sedimentation is approximately 33 hours (See Section 06.3). Therefore, a synthetic weather file period of 33 days is created consisting of the worst 33 hours plus the worst 24 hours plus the worst 30 days. The worst 33 hour and worst 24 hour time periods are determined from Tables 06-2 and 06-3. The worst 30-day time period was determined in Attachment M. Three different cases are run, one starting at 9 AM and the other two starting at 6 AM.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 016 of 042 Two 6 AM cases are run, one starting at the worst weather time period of 8/8/1995, and the other starting at 6/22/2009.
These weather files are summarized in Table 06-7.Table 06-7: 33-24-30 Case Weather Files 33- hr Start File Name Tm[ Time WW_33 6/22/2009 30.txt 9AM WW_33-24 8/18/1995 6AM.txt 6AM WW_33-24 6/22/2009 6AM2.txt 6AM 33-hr End Time 6/23/2009 5PM 8/19/1995 2PM 6/23/2009 2PM 24-hr Start 24-hr End 30-day Start 30-day End Time Time Time Time 1 6/22/2009 6/23/2009 7/21/1995 8/22/1995 6PM 5PM 6PM 8AM 6/22/2009 6/23/2009 7/21/1995 8/22/1995 3PM 2PM 3PM 5AM 6/22/2009 6/23/2009 7/21/1995 8/22/1995 3PM 2PM 3PM 5AM 1) An extra 15 hours is added to make the entries in the weather file a multiple of 24 Case 3a_6AM and Case 3a_9AM use the worst 33-consecutive-day weather period, and the weather files used for these cases are described in Table 06-5.A comparison of the results of these cases is provided in Table 06-8, below.Table 06-8: 33-24-30 Case Comparison Case Initial Maximum Weather File Temperature Temperature 6AM Cases WW_33-24-30-6AM I WW_33-24-30-6AM.txt 102.00 104.73 WW_33-24-30-6AM2 WW_33-24-30-6AM2.txt 102.00 105.93 Case 3a_6AM WW_6-6.22.txt 102.00 106.15 9AM Cases WW_33-24-30 WW _33-24-30.txt 103.19 F 105.21 Case 3a_9AM WW_9.txt 103.19 105.31 The results in Table 06-8 show that the cases run with the 33-consecutive-day weather period result in a higher maximum temperature.
Since this is more conservative, the 33-consecutive-day weather period is used for the worst weather cases.06.6 Maximum Allowable Lake Temperature LAKET-PC [Ref. 05.2] is run to determine the UHS response to the heat load developed in Attachment P.Cases are run at four different sedimentation levels: 0 inches, 6 inches, 12 inches, and 18 inches. The time of day which the transient is assumed is critical when determining the maximum allowable initial temperature of the UHS. To account for the time of day at which the UHS transient may start, eight start times are used for all sedimentation levels.Each case is run with an initial temperature corresponding to the Technical Specification limits (see Design Input 04.5). Limiting weather data was determined in Sections 06.4 and 06.5, and the weather file dates are outlined in Table 06-5. The results of the LAKET runs are provided in Table 06-9.I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 017 of 042 1 Table 06-9: Worst Temperature Cases.Sediment Initial UHS Case Weather Data I Maximum Plant Inlet Level (in.) Temp. (*F) Temp. ('F)Case 1a-12AM VVW_0-6.22.txt 0 104.53 104.53 Case la_3AM WW 3-6.22.txt 0 102.72 102.72 Case la_6AM WW_6-6.22.txt 0 102.00 -. 103.12 Case la_9AM WW_9.txt 0 103.19 104.33 Case la_12PM WW_12.txt 0 104.75 104.97 Case 1a_3PM WW_1 5.txt 0 104.75 104.75 Case Ia_6PM 'W_18-6.22.txt 0 104.75 104.75 Case la_9PM WW_21-6.22.txt 0 104.75 104.75 Case 2a_12AM WW_0-6.22.txt 6 104.53 105.21 Case 2a_3AM WW_3-6.22.txt
] 6 102.72 104.54 Case 2a_6AM WW_6-6.22.txt 6 102.00 103.21 Case 2a_9AM WW_9.txt 6 103.19 104.42 Case 2a_12PM WW_12.txt 6 104.75 104.99 Case 2a_3PM WWI 5.txt 6 104.75 104.75 Case 2a_6PM NWW_18-6.22.txt 6 104.75 104.75 Case 2a_9PM WW_21-6.22.txt 6 104.75 104.75 Case 3a_12AM 'W_0-6.22.txt 18 104.53 104.53 Case 3a 3AM / VW 3-6.22.txt 18 102.72 .105.75 Case 3a_6AM 'NW_6-6.22.txt 18 102.00 106.15 Case 3a 9AM .W 9.txt 18 103.19 105.31 Case 3a_12PM WW_12.txt 18 104.75 105.05 Case 3a_3PM WW_ 15.txt -, 18 104.75 104.75 Case 3a_6PM WW_18-6.22.txt 18 104.75 104.75 Case 3a_9PM WW_21-6.22.txt 18 104.75 104.75 Case4a_12AM W'W_0-6.22.txt 12 104.53 105.86 Case 4a_3AM i WW_3-6.22.xt 12 102.72 105.97 Case 4a_6AM 'WV_6-6.22.txt 12 102.00 105.33 Case 4a_ 9AM W_ 9.txt 12 1 103.19 104.54 Case4a 12PM WW_ 2txt 12 104.75 105.01 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 018 of 042 Sediment Initial UHS Maximum Plant Inlet Case Weather DataI Level (in.) Temp. (&deg;F) Temp. (&deg;F)Case 4a_3PM WW_1 5.txt 12 104.75 104.75 Case 4a6PM _WW _18-6.22.txt 12 104.75 104.75 Case4a_9PM WW_21-6.22.txt 12 104.75 104.75 Casea_9M W~_216.2.txt 12104.5 14.7 The results in Table 06-9 show that no cases exceed the maximum allowable plant inlet temperature of 1077F (Design Input 04.1). The most limiting case is 'Case 3a_6AM', which corresponds to 18 inches of sedimentation and an accident start time of 6AM.06.7 Maximum Net Evaporation Cases l c, 2c, 3c, and 4c are run to determine the maximum expected UHS drawdown at different sedimentation levels. These cases are run using the worst 30-day net evaporation weather period, which was determined to be 6/18/1954 to 7/18/1954 in Attachment M. The results of these cases are presented in Table 06-10.In addition to Cases I c through 4c, two additional cases were run to determine the sensitivity of the net evaporation to the wind power law exponent used by LAKET-PC [Ref. 05.2]. The power law equation is defined as [Ref. 05.2]: (Eq. 06-1)V1I ZI Where: v, = wind velocity at LAKET evaluation height (knots)V2 = wind velocity at anemometer height (knots)z, = LAKET evaluation height (2 meters = 6.562 feet)z, = Anemometer height (ft)a = Power law exponent The default exponent used when adjusting the wind from the anemometer height to the 2-meter height used in the LAKET-PC calculations is an exponent of 0.3 [Ref. 05.2]. The wind input to the weather file'30dayevap.txt' was altered to simulate an exponent of 0.1 in case 'NetEvap-0.
1' and an exponent of 0.2 in case 'NetEvap-0.2'.
The weather files with the adjusted wind speeds are 'NetEvap_0.1.txt' and'NetEvap_0.2.txt'.
These results are summarized in Table 06-10.Table 06-10: Worst Net Evaporation Cases Cas Weather..a Sediment I Initial Lake Maximum UHS Case Weather Data Level (in.) I Temp. (*F) I Drawdown (ft)Case 1c 30dayevap.txt 0 104.53 1.42 Case 2c 1 __61.Case 3c 30dayevap.txt 6 104.53 1.42 Case 3c 30dayevap.txt 18 104.53 1.42 Case 4c 30dayevap.txt 12 104.53 31.42 I II I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 019 of 042 Sediment Initial Lake Maximum UHS Case Weather DataI Level (in.) Temp. (&deg;F) Drawdown (ft)NetEvap-0.1 NetEvap_0.1.txt 18 104.53 1.47 NetEvap-0.2 NetEvapO0.2.txt 18 104.53 1.45 As seen in the results from Table 06-10, the maximum UHS drawdown is around 1.5 feet. Please note that more limiting UHS drawdown of 2.27 would exist with consideration of inventory loss due to spent fuel pool makeup as documented in Section 17.1 of Attachment I. Reducing the power law exponent increases the UHS drawdown, but the change is relatively small.06.8 Wind Sensitivity Cases To determine the effects of a diurnal wind power law coefficient on the maximum UHS temperature, a weather file was created for a LAKET-PC run to incorporate the coefficients determined in EC 394434[Ref. 05.10]. The base weather case of 'WW_6-6.22.txt', provides wind speed values at a height of 33 feet. The adjusted wind speed at 2 meters was found using Eq. 06-1 and the power law exponents (a)from EC 394434 [Ref. 05.10]. These adjusted wind speed values were inserted into 'WW_6-6.22.txt' to create the new weather file, 'Diumal.txt'.
The LAKET-PC run 'Case Diurnal' was run to determine the maximum UHS temperature using the diurnal wind speed exponents.
For Case Wind_375, wind speeds were taken from EC 394434 [Ref. 05.10] as measured at an anemometer height of 375 feet. These wind speeds were multiplied by a wind speed ratio of 0.405, which is the calculated multiplier to adjust the wind speed from 375 feet at the meteorological tower to 2 meters (6.56 feet) above the UHS [Ref. 05.12]. These wind speeds were then converted to knots for entry into a LAKET weather file. These adjusted wind speed values were inserted into 'WW_6-6.22.txt' to create the new weather file, 'Wind_375.txt'.
The LAKET-PC run Case Wind_375 was then run with this weather file and the results are reported in Table 06-11.Table 06-11: Wind Sensitivity Runs Case Weather Data Sediment Initial Lake Maximum UHS Level (in.) Temp. (*F) Temperature
(&deg;F)Case 3a_6AM WW_6-6.22.txt 18 102.00 " 106.15 Case Diurnal Diurnal.txt 18 102.00 105.08 Case Wind_375 Wind_375.txt 18 102.00 104.34.......,, ., .= I ....As seen in Table 06-11, the maximum UHS temperature from the diurnal case remains below the maximum UHS temperature of Case 3a_6AM, which uses a constant wind speed coefficient of 0.3.Therefore, the use of a constant coefficient of 0.3 is conservative.
The maximum UHS temperature of Case Wind_375 also remains below the maximum UHS temperature of Case 3a_6AM.06.9 UHS Mixing To determine the effect of mixing at the plant discharge into the UHS, several sensitivity cases were run in I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 020 of 042 LAKET-PC [Ref. 05.2]. These cases include a mixing region that is 10% the size of the UHS and a mixing region at 20% the size of the UHS. Microsoft Excel [Ref. 05.5] is used to calculate the temperature in the mixing zone, and LAKET-PC is used to calculate temperature for the remaining UHS.06.9.1 Non-Mixing Zone UHS Area and Volume -For these LAKET-PC runs, the area and volume of the UHS not in the mixing zone is needed. These values were calculated as 10% of the total UHS area and volume for the 10% sensitivity run and 20% of the total UHS area and volume for the 20% sensitivity run. The effective area is 57.9% and the effective volume is 63.4% as determined in Attachment J. The UHS drawdown curves for these cases are summarized in Table 06-12.Table 06-12: UHS Drawdown Curves for Mixing Zone Sensitivity Runs Total Area Total Volume Effective Area Effective Volume Elevation (acres) (acre-ft) (acres) (acre-ft)10% Mixing Region 689.98 73.19 306.00 42.38 194.00 689_ 71.78 234.72 41.56 148.81 688 70.34 163.71 40.72 103.79 687 26.73 91.98 15.48 58.32 686 20.00 54.00 11.58 34.24 685 12.08 39.42 6.99 24.99 20% Mixing Region 689.98 65.06 272.00 _ 37.67 172.45 689 63.80 208.64 36.94 132.28 688 62.52 145.52 36.20 92.26 687 -23.76 81.76 13.76 51.84 686 17.78 48.00 10.29 30.43 685 10.74 35.04 6.22 22.22 06.9.2 Mixing Zone Temperature
-The case 'Case3a_6AM.dat' is selected as the nominal case for the UHS mixing sensitivity runs. The temperature of the mixing zone is determined in Microsoft Excel, and then LAKET-PC is run to determine the impact on the UHS temperature in the non-mixing zone portion of the UHS. Multiple iterations of the LAKET-PC analysis are needed as these results are used in calculating the mixing zone temperature.
The change in the mixing zone temperature between time steps is input as the FPLANT variable in LAKET-PC.
Iterations are run until the desired convergence in the mixing zone temperature is achieved.Additional cases are run for 10% mixing starting at 9AM and 20% mixing starting at 12PM. This is to account for the reduced UHS transit time due to the reduced UHS volumes determined in Table 06-12.The Microsoft Excel [Ref. 05.5] equations used for the UHS mixing analysis are given in Appendix 08.2.I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 021 of 042 06.9.3 Results -The full Microsoft Excel [Ref. 05.5] results for the 10% mixing zone and 20% mixing zone cases are provided in Appendix 08.2. A summary of these results are provided in Table 06-13.Table 06-13: UHS Mixing Sensitivi Case Weather Data ty Runs Sediment Initial Lake Level (in.) Temp. (&deg;F)6AM Cases Maximum UHS Temperature
(&deg;F)Case 3a_6AM (0% Mixing) WW_6-6.22.txt 18 102.00 106.15 Mixing -10% WW_6-6.22.txt 18 102.00 104.32 Mixing -20% [ VWW 6-6.22.txt 18 102.00 104.66 9AM Cases Case 3a_9AM (0% Mixing)Mixing -10% -9AM I WW_9.txt 1 18 103.19 105.31----I- '--- I -WW_9.txt 18 103.19 104.67 12PM Cases Case La_12PM Cas 3a12gPM WW_12.txt 18 104.75 105.05 Mixing -20% -WW 12.txt 18 104.75 105.05 12PM -F- -As seen from the results in Table 06-13, the highest maximum UHS temperature occurs when no mixing zone is considered.
For the 12PM case, the maximum UHS temperature occurs three hours following the accident.
The UHS discharge to the plant at this time has not been through the mixing zone, which accounts for the temperature being identical between the mixing and non-mixing cases. It is considered conservative to run the cases in LAKET without adjusting the results for a mixing zone at the inlet of the UHS.I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 022 of 042 07.0 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 07.1 Maximum Allowable Lake Temperature Summary Table 06-9 provides a summary of the maximum UHS temperatures for the maximum allowable initial temperatures given in the Tech Specs (see Design Input 04.1). The highest UHS temperature is 106.15 from Case 3c_6AM, which corresponds to an accident start time at 6:00 AM and 18 inches of sedimentation.
This remains below the maximum allowable UHS outlet temperature of 107&deg;F. Figure 07.1 shows the UHS inlet temperature and UHS inlet temperature over the 33 day worst temperature event for Case 3c_6AM.07.2 Maximum Net Evaporation Summary Table 06-10 provides a summary of the maximum lake drawdown for the worst net evaporation cases.These results show that there is a maximum UHS drawdown of approximately 1.5 feet occuring at a sedimentation level of 0, 6, or 18 inches. In addition, it is shown that there is a small increase in the UHS drawdown when the power law exponent for the wind speed adjustment is decreased.
Please note that more limiting UHS drawdown of 2.27 would exist with consideration of inventory loss due to spent fuel pool makeup as documented in Section 17.1 of Attachment I Figure 07.2 shows the UHS drawdown over the worst 30 days for net evaporation from Case Ic.07.3 Compliance with Acceptance Criteria 07.3.1 Acceptance Criterion
#1 -Peak Temperature
-As shown in Table 06-9, the maximum UHS temperature is not greater than 1077F for any of the worst weather cases. Therefore, Acceptance Criterion
#1 is met.07.3.2 Acceptance Criterion
#2 -UHS Drawdown -The maximum expected lake drawdown for the cases evaluated is given in Table 06-10 and summarized in Section 07.2. This will be used in calculation L-001355 [Ref. 05.6].I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 023 of 042 1 Figure 07.1, Case 3a_6AM: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 33-Day Temperature Period (d = 18", t = 0600 hrs, Ti = 102.0'F 150 140 130 120 110 E 100 90 80 70 60 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days Following Accident 35 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 024 of 042 1 Figure 07.2, Case Ic: UHS LOCA Drawdown Worst 30 Day Evaporation Weather Period (d = 0", t = 0000 hrs, Ti = 104.531F)690.2 690.0 689.8 689.6689.4 LU n 689.2 689.0 688.8 688.6 688.4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident IPROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 025 of 042 1 8.0 APPENDICES No. Title No. of Pages 08.1 Electronic File Listing 5 08.2 1UHS Mixing Results and Equations 4 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 026 of 042 Appendix 08.1 -Electronic File Listing APPENDIX 08.1 -ELECTRONIC FILE LISTING Weather Files File Name Size I Date PIALSL9510.txt 21,301 KB 3/09/2012 11:08 PM CST WW_33-24-30.txt 123 KB 9/5/2013 8:58 AM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM.txt 123 KB 9/5/2013 9:09 AM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM2.txt 123 KB 9/5/2013 9:08 AM CST WW _.txt 123 KB 1/28/2013 8:35 AM CST WW_3.txt 123 KB 1/28/2013 8:37 AM CST WW6 .txt 123 KB 1/28/2013 8:38 AM CST WW 9.txt WWI 2.txt WW-1l5txt WW_l 8.txt WW_21.txt WW 0-6.22.txt WW 3-6.22.txt WW_6-6.22.txt WW_18-6.22.txt WW_21-6.22.txt NetEvap_0.1 .txt NetEvap_0.2.txt Diurnal.txt Wind_375.txt 123 KB 1/28/2013 8:38 AM CST 123 KB .1/28/2013 8:39 AM CST 123 KB 1/28/2013 8:40 AM CST 123 KB 9/5/2013 10:23 AM CST 123 KB -1/28/2013 8:42 AM CST 123 KB 1/28/2013 11:07 AM CST 123 KB 1/28/2013 11:08 AM CST 123 KB F 1/28/2013 11:09AM CST 123 KB .1/28/2013 8:41 AM CST 12-3KB 1/28/2013 11:09 AM CST 116 KB 9/4/2013 10:10 AM CST 116 KB 9/4/2013 10:11 AM CST 123 KB 9/13/2013 2:26 PM CST 123 KB 9/20/2013 1:40 PM CST Weather Sorting Files ...File Name !Size Date WorstWeather_110.dat 1 KB 12/3/2012 10:12 AM CST WorstWeather_110Qout 299 KB 7/1 5/2013 3:29 PM CST WorstWeather 110.ptX --2,697 KB 7/15/2013 3:29 PM CST WorstWeather_120.dat 1 KB 11/30/2012 3:52 PM CST WorstWeather_120.out 299 KB 7/15/2013 3:31 PM CST Worst_Weather 120.pltX 2,697 KB 7/15/2013 3:31 PM CST Worst Weather Comparison File Name Size Case3a_12AM-8.18.dat 6 KB Case3a 12AM-8.18.out 129 KB Case3a_1 2AM-8.18.pltX 47 KB Date 9/18/2013 4:53 PM CST 9/18/2013 5:02 PM CST 9/18/2013 5:02 PM CST I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 027 of 042 Appendix 08.1 -Electronic File Listing Case3a 3AM-8.18.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:51 PM CST-------------------
129KB 9/18/20135:051 PMCST Case3a 3AM-8.18.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:05 PM CST Case3a_3AM-8.18.pltX 47 KB -;9/18/2013 5:05 PM CST Case3a_6AM-8.18.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:51 PM CST Case3a_6AM-8.18.out 129KB-- 9/18/2013 5:06 PM CST Case3a_6AM-8.18.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:06 PM CST Case3a 6PM-8.11.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:52 PM CST Case3a_6PM-8.1 .out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:07 PM CST Case3a_6PM-8.11 .pltX_ _ 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:07 PM CST Case3a69PM-8.11.dat 6 KB i 9/18/2013 4:52 PM CST Case3a_9PM-8.11.out
-129 KB '9/18/20135:09 PM CST Case3a_9PM-8.11 .pltXI 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:09 PM CST 33-24-30 Comparison
-File Name Size 'Date WW 33-24-30.dat
"_6KB 9/18/2013 4:58 PM CST WW_33-24-30.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:11 PM CST WW_33-24-30.pltX
_ 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:11 PM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM.dat
-6 KB 9/18/2013 4:58 PM CST WW 33-24-30-6AM.out 129 KB 1 9/18/2013 5:11 PM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM.pltX
-47 KB 9/18/2013 5:11 PM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM2.dat 7-6KB -9/18/2013 4:58 PM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM2.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:11 PM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM2.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:11 PM CST Worst Weather Files File Name Casela_12AM.dat
* Size Date 6 KB i9/18/201 3 4:47 PM CST-case I a1_ -2MIVI.u1 IZZI ND Casela_12AM.pltX
-47 KB Casela_3AM.dat
] 6 KB Casela_3AM.out 129 KB Casela_3AM.pltX
,_47 KB Casela_6AM.dat 6 KB Ca~se la_6AMM.out
.. ... .... .1_2.9 KB Casela_6AM pltX ____47 KB Casela_9AM~dat 6 KB w I Ioi/UI a Z).LU ri1vi L'o I 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST 1 9/18/2013 4:46 PM CST-5:19 P 9/18/2013 5:19 PM CST.... --
PM CST 9/18/2013 4:47 PM CST 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST-79/18/2013 4:47 PM CST Casela 9AM.out Casela_9AM.pltX Casela_12PM.dat 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST 6KB 9/18/2013 4:48 PM CST I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 028 of 042 Appendix 08.1 -Electronic File Listing Casela 12PM.out 129 KB 1 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST.... 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela_12PM.pltX KB- -Casela_3PM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:47 PM CST Casela_3PM.out I 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela_3PM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela-6PM.dat
--6 KB 9/18/2013 4:47 PM CST Casela 6PM.out 129 KB -9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela_6PM.pltX 47KB 9/18/2013 5:20PM CST Casela 9PM.dat 6 KB i 9/18/2013 4:47 PM CST Casela 9PM.out I 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela_9PM.pltX 47 KB i 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Case2a 12AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:49 PM CST Case2a-12AM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:24 PM CST Case2a_12AM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:24 PM CST Case2a 3AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 5:27 PM CST Case2a_3AM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:27 PM CST Case2a_3AM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:27 PM CST Case2a_6AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:48 PM CST Case2a_6AM.out 129 KB +9/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a_6AM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a_9AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:49 PM CST Case2a_9AM.out 129 KB- 9/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a_9AM.pltX I 47 KB 9/1812013 5:23 PM CST Case2a_12PM.dat I6 KB 9/18/2013 4:49 PM CST Case2a12PM.out
_129 KB 9/18/2013 5:24 PM CST Case2a_12PM.putX 47 KB I 9/18/2013 5:24 PM CST Case2a_3PM.dat 6KB 9/18/2013 4:48 PM CST Case2a_3PM.out
_129 KB .9/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a_3PM.pltX 47 KB 79/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a -6PM.dat 6KB 9/18/2013 4:49 PM CST Case2a_6PM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a-6PM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a_9PM.dat j 6 KB -9/18/2013 4:49 PM CST Case2a_9PM.out 129 KB T1/18/2013 5:24 PM CST Case2a_9PM.pltX
__47 KB 9/18/2013 5:24 PM CST Case3a.12AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:52 PM CST Case3a 12AM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 4:55 PM CST Case3a_12AM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 4:55 PM CST Case3a 3AM.dat KB- 9/18/2013 4:51 PM CST Case3a_3AM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:04 PM CST PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 029 of 042 Appendix 08.1 -Electronic File Listing Case3a_3AM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:04 PM CST Case3a.6AM.dat 6.KB .9/18/20134:51 PM CST Case3a_6AM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:06 PM CST Case3a 6AM.ptX 247 KB 9/18/2013 5:06 PM CST Case3a_9AM.dat
-&#xfd; __- ~KB -31/03:2P S Case3a_9AM.out 129 KB 1 9/18/2013 5:14 PM CST Case3a 9AM.patX 47 KB 5:14 PM CST Case3a 12PM.dat I6KB 9/18/2013 4:53 PM CST Case3a_12PM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:29 PM CST Case3a_12PM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:29 PM CST Case3a_3PM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:51 PM CST Case3a 3PM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:30 PM CST Case3a_3PM.pltX Case3a_6PM.dat Case3a_6PM.out Case3a_6PM.pltX Case3a_9PM.dat Case3a_9PM.out Case3a_9PM.pltX Case4a 12AM.dat Case4a_12AM.out Case4a_12AM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:30 PM CST 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:52 PM CST 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:07 PM CST 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:07 PM CST 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:52 PM CST 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:09 PM CST 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:09 PM CST 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:36 PM CST 47 KB .9/1812013 5:36 PM CST 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:56 PM CST 129 KB I 9/18/2013 5:34 PM CST 47 KB [F9/18/2013 5:34 PM CST 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST 129 KB -9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST 417 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST 1 130 LenI 01AM/9fl1" &#xa3;'l DKA C-T Case4a_3AM.out Case4a_3AM.pltX Case4a_6AM.dat Case4a_6AM.out Case4a_6AM.plX Case4a_9AM.dat Case4a_9AM.out Case4a_9AM.pltX Case4a_12PM.dat Case4a_12PM.out Case4a_12PM.pl1 Case4a_3PM.dat Case4a_3PM.out Case4a_3PM.pltX Case4a_6PM.dat 47 KB 6 KB 129 KB 47 KB 6 KB 9/18/2013 5:36 PM CST 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST Case4a_6PM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST Case4a_6PM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 030 of 042 Appendix 08.1 -Electronic File Listing Case4a_9PM.dat Case4a_9PM.out Case4a_9PM.pltX 16 KB 129 KB 47 KB 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST Worst Net Evaporation Files File Name Size Date Caselc.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:48 PM CST Caselc.out
] 125 KB 9/18/2013 5:43 PM CST Caselc.pltX l52 KB 9/18/2013 5:43 PM CST Case2c.dat 6KB -9/18/2013 4:49 PM CST Case2c.out 125 KB 9/18/2013 5:43 PM CST Case2c.pltX 43 KB 9/18/2013 5:43 PM CST Case3c.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:53 PM CST Case3c.out 125 KB 9/18/2013 5:43 PM CST Case3c.pltX 43 KB 9/18/2013 5:43 PM CST Case4c.--
at 6KB 9/18/2013 4:58 PM CST Case4c.out 125 KB 9/18/2013 5:44 PM CST Case4c.pltX 43 KB 1 9/18/2013 5:44 PM CST NetEvap-0.1.dat 6 KB 9/20/2013 2:46 PM CST NetEvap-0.1.out j125 KB 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST NetEvap-0.1 .pltX NetEvap-0.2.dat NetEvap-0.2.out NetEvap-0.2.pltX 43 KB 6 KB 125 KB 1-4KB 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST 9/20/2013 2:46 PM CST 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST UHS Mixing Files File Name Mixing-1 0%.dat Mixing-1 0%.out Mixing-10%.pltX Mixing-20%.dat Mixing-20%.out Mixing-20%.pltX Mixing-10%-9AM.dat Mixing-i0%-9AM_.out Mixing-10%-9AMppltX Mixing-20%-12PM.dat Mixing-20%-1 2PM.out Mixing-20%-12PM.pltX Size Date 6 KB 9/18/2013 6:02 PM CST 129 KB 9/18/2013 6:02 PM CST 57 KB 9/18/2013 6:02 PM CST 6 KB 9/19/2013 3:51 PM CST 129 KB 9/19/2013 3:52 PM CST 57 KB 9/19/2013 3:52 PM CST 6 KBO 9/27/2013 12:42 PM CST 129 KB 9/27/2013 12:42 PM CST 47 KB ' 9/27/2013 12:42 PM CST 6 KB 9/27/2013 12:27 PM CST 1 129 KB 9/27/2013 12:27 PM CST 47 KB 9/27/2013 12:27 PM CST I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 031 of 042 Appendix 08.1 -Electronic File Listing Wind Sensitivity Files File Name Size Date CaseDiural.dat 6 KB 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST CaseDiurnal.out 129 KB 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST CaseDiurnal.pltX 47 KB 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST Case Wind 375.dat 6 KB 9/20/2013 2:40 PM CST Case Wind_375.out
___ 47 KB 9/20/2013 2:40 PM CST Case Wind_375.pltX 129 KB i 9/20/2013 2:40 PM CST I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 032 of 042 Appendix 08.2 -[IHS Mixing Results and Equations UHS Mixinp Enuations I A I C 1 ________ =MAX(B5:B748)
T=A(SC4) 4 E II G I H J 1 F i F !-4 -- --I-I-Mixing Zone Vol= =Input!E5"43560*0.1 x Temp Vnew= =65.3*60*60 5-nt3 K L 2 J10% Mixing T Nat TIN T OUT Plant Tout ft3 3 New LakeT 2.3c (*F)(*F)(*F)(&deg;F)Plant DT LAKET DT Convergence DT LAKET DT i1 LAKET DT i2 4 =D5 =SUM(HS:H749)
=SUM(15:1749)
=MAX(J6:J749) 6780.91066338037 6801.35172098318 5 183 89.1909 106.123 102.003 =D5+H5 =(I$2*E5+G4*(I$1-1$2))/I$1 25.95 =G5-D5 =ABS(L5-15) 4.12 4.11894749635391 6 183.041666667 89.4723 110.516 101.636 =D6+H6 =(1$2*E6+G5"(I$1-152))/151 32.2 =G6-D6 =ABS(L6-16) 8.88 8.88489652038913 7 183.083333333 90.0218 114.694 101.624 =D7+H7 =(I$2*E7+G6*(I$1-1$2))/I$1 35.16 =G7-D7 =ABS(L7-17) 13.07 13.0655417737158 8 183.125 90.6814 118.317 101.727 =D8+H8 =(1$2*E8+G7 (I$1-152))/I$1 35.8 =G8-D8 =ABS(L8-18) 16.59 16.5874470293705 9 183.166666667 91.5572 119.772 102.132 =D9&#xf7;H9 =(1$2*E9+G8*(I$1-I$2))/I$l 25.36 =G9-D9 =ABS(L9-19) 17.64 17.639166059468 10 183.208333333 92.4975 120.614 102.624 =D10+H10 =(152"E10+G9"(151-1$2))/I$1 22.43 =G10-D10 =ABS(L10-110) 17.99 17.9856907466745 11 183.25 93.373 121.196 103.036 =D11+H11 =(1$2*E11+G10*(I$1-152))/I$1 21.26 =G11-D11 =ABS(L11-I111 18.16 18.1588049767235 12 183.291666667 94.1185 121.585 103.315 =D12+H12 =(1$2*E12+G11*(I$1-$2))/I$1 20.32 =G12-D12 =ABS(L12-112) 18.27 18.2671281051142 13 183.333333333 94.7224 121.784 103.464 =D13+H13 =(I$2*E13+G12*(I$1-152))/I$1 19.39 =G13-D13 =ABS(L13-113) 18.32 18.3200076256199 14 183.375 95.1096 121.813 103.403 =D14+H14 =(1$2*EI4+G13"(1$1-1$2))/I$1 18.57 =G14-D14 =ABS(L14-114) 18.41 18.4110056860162 15 183.416666667 95.2859 121.703 103.133 =D15+H15 =(1$2*El5&#xf7;G14*(I$1-152))/I$1 17.96 =G15-D15 =ABS(L15-115) 18.57 18.5665631208804 16 183.458333333 95.2445 121.451 102.671 =D16+H16 =(1$2*E16+G15*(I$1-152))/I$1 17.45 =G16-D16 =ABS(L16-116) 18.78 18.7780036366959 17 183.5 95.0577 121.074 102.104 =D17+H17 =(1$2*E17+G16*(I$1-1$2))/I$1 16.98 =G17-D17 =ABS([17-117) 18.97 18.9696153589219 18 183.541666667 94.8666 120.615 101.545 =D18+H18 =(1$2*E18+G17*(I$1-1$2))/I$1 16.64 =G18-D18 =ABS(L18-118) 19.07 19.0701161296132 19 183.583333333 94.5514 120.066 100.826 =D19+H19 =(1$2*E19+G18*(I$1-152))/I$1 16.35 =G19-D19 =ABS(L19-119) 19.24 19.2432379495846 20 183.625 94.2603 119.47 100.14 =D20+H20 =(1$2*E20&#xf7;G19*(I$1-152))/I$1 16.17 =G20-D20 =ABS(L20-120) 19.33 19.3325480173827 21 183.666666667 93.9183 119.936 99.4062 =D21+H21 =(J$2 E21+G20*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 22.29 =G21-D21 =ABS(L21-121) 20.53 20.5311853302293 22 183.708333333 93.6113 119.531 98.7207 =D22+H22 =(J$2*E22+G21*(1$1-J$2))/I$1 19.27 =G22-D22 =ABS(L22-122) 20.81 20.8097457619266 23 183.75 93.2993 118.625 98.0447 =D23+H23 =(J$2*E23+G22*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 17.13 =G23-D23 =ABS(L23-123) 20.58 20.5752106731427 24 183.791666667 92.9855 117.441 97.3806 =D24+H24 =(J$2*E24+G23*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 15.6 =G24-D24 =ABS(L24-124) 20.06 20.0604562300453 25 183.833333333 192.6697 116.138 96.7276 =D25+H25 =(J$2*E25+G24*(1$1-J$2))/I$1 14.46 =G25-D25 =ABS(L25-125) 19.41 19.4062193905123 26 183.875 92.3989 114.84 96.1396 =D26&#xf7;H26 =(J$2*E26+G25*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 13.79 =G26-D26 =ABS(L26-126) 18.7 18.6972751328943 27 183.916666667 92.1258 113.615 95.5546 =D27+H27 =(J$2*E27&#xf7;G26"(I$1-J$2))/I$1 13.42 =G27-D27 =ABS(L27-127) 18.06 18.0568116875153 28 183.958333333 92.0281 112.52 95.1697 =D28+H28 =(J$2*E28+G27*(5$1-J$2))/I$1 13.22 =G28-D28 =ABS(L28-128) 17.35 17.3501530945977 29 184 92.1894 111.592 95.0521 =D29+H29 =(J$2*E29+G28*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 13.05 =G29-D29 =ABS(L29-129) 16.54 16.54425585071 30 184.041666667 92.5473 110.831 95.1515 =D30+H30 =(J$2*E30+G29*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 12.8 =G30-D30 =ABS(L30-130) 15.68 15.6829268201775 31 184.083333333 93.1978 110.308 95.7779 =D31+H31 =(J$2*E31+G30*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 12.52 =G31-D31 =ABS(L31-131) 14.53 14.5262854333635 32 184.125 93.9705 109.989 96.5194 =D32+H32 =(J$2*E32&#xf7;G31*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 12.27 =G32-D32 =ABS([32-132) 13.47 13.4681312105408 33 184.166666667 94.8213 109.869 97.3392 =D33+H33 =(J$2*E33+G32*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 12.1 =G33-D33 =ABS(L33-133) 12.53 12.5337067960865 34 184.208333333 95.7017 109.938 98.1883 =D34+H34 =(J$2*E34+G33*(1$1-J$2))/I$1 11.98 =G34-D34 =ABS(L34-134) 11.75 11.7463564692429 35 184.25 96.5625 109.55 99.82 =D35+H35 =(J$2*E35+G34*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.88 =G35-D35 =ABS(L35-135) 10.46 10.4836879316764 36 184.291666667 97.3197 110.187 101.264 =D36+H36 =(J$2*E36&#xf7;G35*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.79 =G36-D36 =ABS(L36-136) 9.58 9.61461947731524 37 184.333333333 97.9185 111.083 102.741 =D37+H37 =(J$2*E37+G36*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.71 =G37-D37 =ABS(L37-137) 8.85 T.88439809897515 38 184.375 98.3195 111.904 104.248 =D38+H38 =(J$2*E38+G37*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.65 =G38-D38 =ABS(L38-138) 8.22 8.27055260429391 39 184.416666667 98.5568 113.037 104.316 =D39+H39 =(J$2*E39+G38*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.58 =G39-D39 =ABS(L39-139) 8.86 8.90858195779592 40 184.458333333 98.5639 113.623 104.132 =D40+H40 =(J$2*E40+G39*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.51 =G40-D40 =ABS(L40-140) 9.55 9.59792457235487 411184.6 98.412 113.831 104.067 =D41+H41 =(J$2*E41+G40*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.45 =G41-D41 =ABS(L41-141) 9.98 10.0364989203799 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297
-
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 033 of 042 Appendix 08.2 -UHS Mixing Results and Equations 0% Mixing Results (partial)0% Mixing T Nat T IN T OUT (*F) (*F) (*F) Actual Time 7/1/1900 12:00 AM 89.19 127.95 102.00 06:00 AM 7/1/1900 01:00 AM 89.47 133.84 101.64 07:00 AM 7/1/1900 02:00 AM 90.02 136.78 101.62 08:00 AM 7/1/1900 03:00 AM 90.68 137.53 101.73 09:00 AM 7/1/1900 04:00 AM 91.56 127.49 102.13 10:00 AM 7/1/1900 05:00 AM 92.50 125.05 102.62 11:00 AM 7/1/1900 06:00 AM 93.37 124.30 103.04 12:00 PM 7/1/1900 07:00 AM 94.12 123.64 103.32 01:00 PM 7/1/1900 08:00 AM 94.72 122.85 103.46 02:00 PM 7/1/1900 09:00 AM 95.11 121.97 103.40 03:00 PM 7/1/1900 10:00 AM 95.28 121.09 103.13 04:00 PM 7/1/1900 11:00 AM 95.24 120.12 102.67 05:00 PM 7/1/1900 12:00 PM 95.06 119.08 102.10 06:00 PM 7/1/1900 01:00 PM 94.87 118.19 101.55 07:00 PM 7/1/1900 02:00 PM 94.55 117.18 100.83 08:00 PM 7/1/1900 03:00 PM 94.26 116.31 100.14 09:00 PM 7/1/1900 04:00 PM 93.92 121.70 99.41 10:00 PM 7/1/1900 05:00 PM 93.61 117.99 98.72 11:00 PM 7/1/1900 06:00 PM 93.30 115.17 98.04 12:00AM 7/1/1900 07:00 PM 92.98 112.98 97.38 01:00 AM 7/1/1900 08:00 PM 92.67 111.19 96.73 02:00 AM 7/1/1900 09:00 PMj 92.40 109.93 96.14 03:00 AM 7/1/1900 10:00 PM 92.12 108.97 95.55 04:00 AM 7/1/1900 11:00 PM 92.03 108.39 95.17 05:00 AM 7/2/1900 12:00 AM 92.19 108.10 95.05 06:00 AM 7/2/1900 01:00 AM 92.55 107.95 95.15 07:00 AM 7/2/1900 02:00 AM 93.20 108.30 95.78 08:00 AM 7/2/1900 03:00 AM 93.97 108.79 96.52 09:00 AM 7/2/1900 04:00 AM 94.82 109.44 97.34 10:00 AM 7/2/1900 05:00 AM 95.70 110.17 98.19 11:00 AM 7/2/1900 06:00 AM 96.56 110.90 99.02 12:00 PM 7/2/1900 07:00 AM 97.32 111.53 99.74 01:00 PM 7/2/1900 08:00 AM 97.92 112.02 100.31 02:00 PM 7/2/1900 09:00 AM 98.32 112.68 104.88 03:00 PM 7/2/1900 10:00 AM 98.56 116.65 105.91 04:00 PM 7/2/1900 11:00 AM 98.56 117.36 106.15 05:00 PM 7/2/1900 12:00 PM 98.41 117.20 104.59 06:00 PM 7/2/1900 01:00 PM 98.21 115.25 103.65 07:00 PM 7/2/1900 02:00 PM 97.96 114.29 102.96 08:00 PM 7/2/1900 03:00 PM 97.58 113.42 102.18 09:00 PM 7/2/1900 04:00 PM 96.94 112.29 101.11 10:00 PM 7/2/1900 05:00 PM 96.35 111.26 100.13 11:00 PM 7/2/1900 06:00 PM 95.83 110.38 99.37 12:00 AM 7/2/1900 07:00 PM 95.38 109.58 98.61 01:00 AM 7/2/1900 08:00 PM 94.99 108.89 97.96 02:00 AM 7/2/1900 09:00 PM 94.47 108.34 98.94 03:00 AM 7/2/1900 10:00 PM 94.04 108.90 97.62 04:00 AM 7/2/1900 11:00 PM 93.81 107.80 1 96.69 05:00 AM PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 034 of 042 Appendix 08.2 -UHS Mixing Results and Equations 10% Mixing Results (partial)10% Mixing TNat TIN TOUT Plant Tout I MixTemp [ Vnew= 235080 309600 ft3 /hr Convergence LAKET LAKET (&deg;F) (&deg;F) (*F) (&deg;F) Plant DT LAKET DT DT DT ii DT i2 7/1/1900 12:00 AM 89.19 106.12 102.00 127.95 106.121 25.95 4.12 0.00 4.12 4.12 7/1/1900 01:00 AM 89.47 110.52 101.64 133.84 110.521 32.2 8.88 0.00 8.88 8.88 7/1/1900 02:00 AM 90.02 114.69 101.62 136.78 114.69 35.16 13.07 0.00 13.07 13.07 7/1/1900 03:00 AM 90.68 118.32 101.73 137.53 118.31 35.8 16.59 0.00 16.59 16.59 7/1/1900 04:00 AM 91.56 119.77 102.13 127.49 119.77 25.36 17.64 0.00 17.64 17.64 7/1/1900 05:00 AM 92.50 120.61 102.62 125.05 120.61 22.43 17.99 0.00 17.99 17.99 7/1/1900 06:00 AM 93.37 121.20 103.04 124.30 121.19 21.26 18.16 0.00 18.16 18.16 7/1/1900 07:00 AM 94.12 121.59 103.32 123.64 121.581 20.32 18.27 0.00 18.27 18.27 7/1/1900 08:00 AM 94.72 121.78 103.46 122.85 121.78 19.39 18.32 0.00 18.32 18.32 7/1/1900 09:00 AM 95.11 121.81 103.40 121.97 121.811 18.57 18.41 0.00 18.41 18.41 7/1/1900 10:00 AM 95.29 121.70 103.13 121.09 121.701 17.96 18.57 0.00 18.57 18.57 7/1/1900 11:00 AM 95.24 121.45 102.67 120.12 121.451 17.45 18.78 0.00 18.78 18.78 7/1/1900 12:00 PM 95.06 121.07 102.10 119.08 121.071 16.98 18.97 0.00 18.97 18.97 7/1/1900 01:00 PM 94.87 120.62 101.55 118.19 120.62 16.64 19.07 0.00 19.07 19.07 7/1/1900 02:00 PM 94.55 120.07 100.83 117.18 120.07 16.35 19.24 0.00 19.24 19.24 7/1/1900 03:00 PM 94.26 119.47 100.14 116.31 119.47 16.17 19.33 0.00 19.33 19.33 7/1/1900 04:00 PM 93.92 119.94 99.41 121.70 119.94 22.29 20.53 0.00 20.53 20.53 7/1/1900 05:00 PM 93.61 119.53 98.72 117.99 119.53 19.27 20.81 0.00 20.81 20.81 7/1/1900 06:00 PM 93.30 118.63 98.04 115.17 118.62 17.13 20.58 0.00 20.58 20.58 7/1/1900 07:00 PM 92.99 117.44 97.38 112.98 1 117.44 15.6 20.06 0.00 20.06 20.06 7/1/1900 08:00 PM 92.67 116.14 96.73 111.19 116.13 14.46 19.41 0.00 19.41 19.41 7/1/1900 09:00 PM 92.40 114.84 96.14 109.93 114.841 13.79 18.70 0.00 18.70 18.70 7/1/1900 10:00 PM 92.13 113.62 95.55 108.97 113.61 13.42 18.06 0.00 18.06 18.06 7/1/1900 11:00 PM 92.03 112.52 95.17 108.39 112.52 13.22 17.35 0.00 17.35 17.35 7/2/1900 12:00 AM 92.19 111.59 95.05 108.10 111.60 13.05 16.54 0.00 16.54 16.54 7/2/1900 01:00 AM 92.55 110.83 95.15 107.95 110.831 12.8 15.68 0.00 15.68 15.68 7/2/1900 02:00 AM 93.20 110.31 95.78 108.30 110.30 12.52 14.53 0.00 14.53 14.53 7/2/1900 03:00 AM 93.97 109.99 96.52 108.79 109.99 12.27 13.47 0.00 13.47 13.47 7/2/1900 04:00 AM 94.82 109.87 97.34 109.44 109.871 12.1 12.53 0.00 12.53 12.53 7/2/1900 05:00 AM 95.70 109.94 98.19 110.17 109.931 11.98 11.75 0.00 11.75 11.75 7/2/1900 06:00 AM 96.56 109.55 99.82 111.70 110.30 11.88 10.48 0.00 10.46 10.48 7/2/1900 07:00 AM 97.32 110.19 101.26 113.05 i 110.88 11.79 9.61 0.00 9.58 9.61 7/2/1900 08:00 AM 97.92 111.08 102.74 114.45 1 111.63 11.71 8.88 0.00 8.85 8.88 7/2/1900 09:00 AM. 98.32 111.90 104.25 115.90 112.52 11.65 8.27 0.00 8.22 8.27 7/2/1900 10:00 AM 98.56 113.04 104.32 115.90 113.22 11.58 8.91 0.00 8.86 8.91 7/2/1900 11:00 AM 98.56 113.62 104.13 115.64 113.73 11.51 9.60 0.00 9.55 9.60 7/2/1900 12:00 PM 98.41 113.83 104.07 115.52 114.10 11.45 10.04 0.00 9.98 10.04 7/2/1900 01:00 PM 98.21 114.13 103.74 115.13 114.32 11.39 10.58 0.00 10.53 10.58 7/2/1900 02:00 PM 97.96 114.26 103.35 114.68 L 114.39 11.33 11.04 0.00 11.00 11.04 7/2/1900 03:00 PM 97.59 114.06 103.10 114.37 114.39 11.27 11.29 0.00 11.24 11.29 7/2/1900 04:00 PM 96.94 114.00 102.20 113.41 114.181 11.21 11.98 0.00 11.94 11.98 7/2/1900 05:00 PM 96.35 113.71 101.42 112.58 [ 113.85 11.16 12.43 0.00 12.40 12.43 7/2/1900 06:00 PM 95.84 112.93 101.33 112.43 1 113.55 11.1 12.22 0.00 12.20 12.22 7/2/1900 07:00 PM 95.38 112.85 100.74 111.78 113.181 11.04 12.44 0.00 12.43 12.44 7/2/1900 08:00 PM 94.99 112.55 100.07 111.06 112.741 10.99 12.67 0.00 12.66 12.67 7/2/1900 09:00 PM 94.47 112.08 99.20 110.14 112.201 10.94 12.99 0.00 12.99 12.99 7/2/1900 10:00 PM 94.04 111.52 98.41 109.30 111.59 10.89 13.18 0.00 13.17 13.18 7/2/1900 11:00 PM 93.81 110.94 97.80 108.64 110.97 10.84 13.17 0.00 13.17 13.17 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 035 of 042 Appendix 08.2 -UHS Mixing Results and Equations 20% Mixing Results (partial)20% Mixing T Nat T IN I TOUT Plant Tout Mix Temp Vnew= 235080 309600 ft3/hr&deg;F LAKET LAKET LAKET (&deg;F) (&deg;) (*F) (*F) Plant DT LAKET DT Convergence DT DT il DT i2 DT B3 7/1/1900 12:00AM 89.19 10406 10200 127.95 104.06 25.95 2.06 0.00 2.06 2.06 2.06 7/1/1900 01:00 AM 89.47 107.181 101.64 133.84 107.17 32.2 5.54 0.00 5.54 5.54 5.54 7/1/1900 02:00 AM 90.02 110.271101.62 136.78 110.271 35.16 8.65 0.00 8.65 8.65 8.65 7/1/1900 03:00AM 90.68 113.12 101.73 137.53 113.121 35.8 11.39 0.00 11.39 11.39 11.39 7/1/1900 04:00 AM 91.56 114.62 102.13 127.49 114.621 25.36 12.49 0.00 12.49 12.49 12.49 7/1/1900 05:00AM 92.50 115.71 102.62 125.05 115.711 22.43 13.09 0.00 13.09 13.09 13.09 7/1/1900 06:00AM 93.37 116.61 103.04 124.30 116.611 21.26 13.57 0.00 13.57 13.57 13.57 7/1/1900 07:00 AM 94.12 117.35 103.32 123.64 117.34 20.32 14.03 0.00 14.03 14.03 14.03 7/1/1900 08:00 AM 94.72 117.91 103.46 122.85 117.92 19.39 14.45 0.00 14.45 14.45 14.45 7/1/1900 09:00 AM 95.11 118.34 103.40 121.97 118.34 18.57 14.94 0.00 14.94 14.94 14.94 7/1/1900 10:00AM 95.29 118.63 103.13 121.09 118.63 17.96 15.50 0.00 15.50 15.50 15.50 7/1/1900 11:00 AM 95.24 118.78j 102.67 120.12 118.79 17.45 16.11 0.00 16.12 16.11 16.11 7/1/1900 12:00 PM 95.06 118.81 102.10 119.08 118.82 16.98 16.71 0.00 16.71 16.71 16.71 7/1/1900 01:00 PM 94.87 118.76 101.55 118.19 118.75 16.64 17.21 0.00 17.21 17.21 17.21 7/1/1900 02:00 PM 94.55 118.59 100.83 117.18 118.59 16.35 17.76 0.00 17.76 17.76 17.76 7/1/1900 03:00 PM 94.26 118.351100.14 116.31 118.35 16.17 18.21 0.00 18.21 18.21 18.21 7/1/1900 04:00 PM 93.92 118.701 99.41 121.70 118.70 22.29 19.29 0.00 19.29 19.29 19.29 7/1/1900 05:00 PM 93.61 118.62 98.72 117.99 118.62 19.27 19.90 0.00 19.91 19.90 19.90 7/1/1900 06:00 PM 93.30 118.27 98.05 115.18 118.26 17.13 20.22 0.00 20.22 20.22 20.22 7/1/1900 07:00 PM 92.99 117.71 97.38 112.98 117.71 15.6 20.33 0.00 20.33 20.33 20.33 7/1/1900 08:00 PM 92.67 117.03 96.73 111.19 117.03 14.46 20.30 0.00 20.31 20.30 20.30 7/1/1900 09:00 PM 92.40 116.29 96.14 109.93 116.29 13.79 20.15 0.00 20.15 20.15 20.15 7/1/1900 10:00 PM 92.13 115.53 95.56 108.98 115.52 13.42 19.97 0.00 19.97 19.97 19.97 7/1/1900 11:00 PM 92.03 114.78 95.17 108.39 114.78 13.22 19.61 0.00 19.61 19.61 19.61 7/2/1900 12:00AM 92.19 114.08 95.05 108.10 114.08 13.05 19.03 0.00 19.03 19.03 19.03 7/2/1900 01:00 AM 92.55 113.44 95.15 107.95 113.44 12.8 18.29 0.00 18.10 18.29 18.29 7/2/1900 02:00AM 93.20 112.90 95.78 108.30 112.90 12.52 17.12 0.00 16.95 17.12 17.12 7/2/1900 03:00AM 93.97 112.01 97.07 109.34 112.531 12.27 15.46 0.00 9.78 1 15.46 15.46 7/2/1900 04:00AM 94.82 111.78 98.71 110.81 112.35 12.1 13.64 0.00 8.24 13.64 13.64 7/2/1900 05:00AM 95.70 111.86 100.40 112.38 112.35. 11.98 11.95 0.00 7.47 , 11.95 11.95 7/2/1900 06:00AM 96.56 111.901102.41 114.29 112.561 11.88 10.15 0.00 8.72 10.15 10.15 7/2/1900 07:00AM 97.32 112.56 103.10 114.89 112.801 11.79 9.70 0.00 9.21 9.70 9.70 7/2/1900 08:00AM 97.92 112.91,103.59 115.30 113.061 11.71 9.47 0.00 9.42 9.47 9.47 7/2/1900 09:00AM 98.32 112.97 104.23 115.88 113.36 11.65 9.13 0.00 9.69 9.13 9.13 7/2/1900 10:00AM 98.56 113.36 104.40 115.98 113.63 11.58 9.23 0.00 10.07 9.23 9.23 7/2/1900 11:00AM 98.56 113.69 104.37 115.88 113.86 11.51 9.50 0.00 10.55 9.50 9.50 7/2/1900 12:00 PM 98.41 113.61 104.66 116.11 114.10 11.45 9.44 0.00 10.98 9.44 9.44 7/2/1900 01:00 PM 98.21 114.00 104.45 115.84 114.28 11.39 9.83 0.00 11.45 9.83 9.83 7/2/1900 02:00 PM 97.96 114.20 104.21 115.54 114.41 11.33 10.20 0.00 11.91 10.20 10.20 7/2/1900 03:00PM 97.59 113.83 104.42 115.69 114.55 11.27 10.13 0.00 10.38 10.13 10.13 7/2/1900 04:00PM 96.94 114.11 103.69 114.90 114.58 11.21 10.89 0.00 12.17 10.89 10.89 7/2/1900 05:00 PM 96.35 114.141102.92 114.06 114.53 11.16 11.61 0.00 13.48 11.62 11.61 7/2/1900 06:00 PM 95.83 114.08 102.19 113.29 114.40 11.1 12.21 0.00 14.38 12.21 12.21 7/2/1900 07:00 PM 95.38 113.94 101.49 112.53 114.21 11.04 12.71 0.00 15.00 12.71 12.71 7/2/1900 08:00 PM 94.99 113.75 100.81 111.80 113.951 10.99 13.14 0.00 15.36 1 13.14 13.14 7/2/1900 09:00 PM 94.47 113.45 100.00 110.94 113.64 10.94 13.64 0.00 15.69 13.64 13.64 7/2/1900 10:00PM 94.03 113.13 99.26 110.15 113.27 10.89 14.02 0.00 15.81 14.02 14.02 7/2/1900 11:00 PM 93.81 112.811 98.65 109.49 112.881 10.84 14.22 0.00 15.71 1 14.22 14.22 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 036 of 042 Appendix 08.2 -UHS Mixing Results and Equations 10% -9AM Mixing Results (partial)10% Mixing -9AM T Nat T IN T OUT Plant Tout Mix Temp I Vnew= 235080 309600 ft3 /hr Convergence LAKET LAKET (&deg;F) (CF) (&deg;F) (&deg;F) Plant DT LAKET DT DT DT il DT i2 7/1/1900 12:00 AM 89.81 107.31 103.19 129.14 107.31 25.95 4.12 0.00 4.12 4.12 7/1/1900 01:00 AM 90.70 111.82 103.54 135.74 111.83i 32.2 8.28 0.00 8.88 8.28 7/1/1900 02:00 AM 91.65 116.17 103.99 139.15 116.161 35.16 12.18 0.00 13.07 12.18 7/1/1900 03:00 AM 92.53 119.97 104.35 140.15 119.971 35.8 15.62 0.00 16.59 15.62 7/1/1900 04:00 AM 93.29 121.55 104.57 129.93 121.55 25.36 16.98 0.00 17.64 16.98 7/1/1900 05:00 AM 93.90 122.43 104.67 127.10 122.43 22.43 17.76 0.00 17.99 17.76 7/1/1900 06:00 AM 94.30 122.97 104.56 125.82 122.97 21.26 18.41 0.00 18.16 18.41 7/1/1900 07:00 AM 94.49 123.23 104.25 124.57 123.22 20.32 18.98 0.00 18.27 18.98 7/1/1900 08:00 AM 94.46 123.21 103.74 123.13 123.21 19.39 19.47 0.00 18.32 19.47 7/1/1900 09:00 AM 94.28 122.97 103.13 121.70 122.97 18.57 19.84 0.00 18.41 19.84 7/1/1900 10:00 AM 94.10 122.58 102.54 120.50 122.58 17.96 20.04 0.00 18.57 20.04 7/1/1900 11:00 AM 93.80 122.05 101.78 119.23 122.05 17.45 20.27 0.00 18.78 20.27 7/1/1900 12:00 PM 93.52 121.41 101.06 118.04 121.41 16.98 20.35 0.00 18.97 20.35 7/1/1900 01:00 PM 93.19 120.70 100.29 116.93 1 120.70! 16.64 20.41 0.00 19.07 20.41 7/1/1900 02:00 PM 92.89 119.94 99.57 115.92 119.94[ 16.35 20.37 0.00 19.24 20.37 7/1/1900 03:00 PM 92.59 119.16 98.86 115.03 119.16 16.17 20.30 0.00 19.33 20.30 7/1/1900 04:00 PM 92.29 119.43 98.17 120.46 119.43 22.29 21.26 0.00 20.53 21.26 7/1/1900 05:00 PM 91.98 118.87 97.49 116.76 118.871 19.27 21.38 0.00 20.81 21.38 7/1/1900 06:00 PM 91.72 117.86 96.88 114.01 117.86 17.13 20.98 0.00 20.58 20.98 7/1/1900 07:00 PM 91.46 116.60 96.27 111.87 116.611 15.6 20.33 0.00 20.06 20.33 7/1/1900 08:00 PM 91.37 115.29 95.86 110.32 115.291 14.46 19.43 0.00 19.41 19.43 7/1/1900 09:00 PM 91.54 114.08 95.72 109.51 114.081 13.79 18.36 0.00 18.70 18.36 7/1/1900 10:00 PM 91.90 113.07 95.80 109.22 j 113.07 13.42 17.27 0.00 18.06 17.27 7/1/1900 11:00 PM 92.56 112.31 96.21 109.43 1 1 112.31 13.22 16.10 0.00 17.35 16.10 7/2/1900 12:00AM 93.34 111.79 96.75 109.80 1 111.78 13.05 15.04 0.00 16.54 15.04 7/2/1900 01:00 AM 94.19 111.45 97.36 110.16 1 111.441 12.8 14.09 0.00 15.68 14.09 7/2/1900 02:00 AM 95.08 111.29 98.20 110.72 111.29 12.52 13.09 0.00 14.53 13.09 7/2/1900 03:00 AM 95.95 111.29 99.03 111.30 111.29 12.27 12.26 0.00 13.47 12.26 7/2/1900 04:00 AM 96.71 111.42 99.76 111.86 111.41 12.1 11.66 0.00 12.53 11.66 7/2/1900 05:00 AM 97.32 111.60 100.32 112.30 111.60 11.98 11.28 0.00 11.75 11.28 7/2/1900 06:00 AM 97.73 111.45 100.81 112.69 111.83 11.88 11.02 0.00 10.48 11.02 7/2/1900 07:00 AM 97.97 111.22 101.99 113.78 112.24 11.79 10.24 0.13 9.61 10.11 7/2/1900 08:00 AM 97.98 112.05 102.79 114.50 112.71 11.71 9.92 0.15 8.88 9.77 7/2/1900 09:00 AM 97.83 112.52 103.82 115.47 113.29 11.65 9.46 0.07 8.27 9.40 7/2/1900 10:00 AM 97.64 113.44 103.63 115.21 113.69 11.58 10.05 0.03 8.91 10.08 7/2/1900 11:00 AM 97.40 113.88 103.35 114.86 113.93 11.51 10.58 0.12 9.60 10.70 7/2/1900 12:00 PM 97.03 113.94 103.26 114.71 114.10 11.45 10.83 0.28 10.04 11.11 7/2/1900 01:00 PM 96.40 114.08 102.43 113.82 114.04 11.39 11.61 0.27 10.58 11.88 7/2/1900 02:00 PM 95.83 113.90 101.60 112.93 113.81 11.33 12.21 0.22 11.04 12.43 7/2/1900 03:00 PM 95.32 113.36 101.23 112.50 113.53 11.27 12.31 0.17 11.29 12.47 7/2/1900 04:00 PM 94.88 113.09 100.59 111.80 113.17 11.21 12.58 0.13 11.98 12.71 7/2/1900 05:00 PM 94.49 112.69 99.97 111.13 112.74 11.16 12.77 0.06 12.43 12.83 7/2/1900 06:00 PM 93.99 111.78 99.77 110.87 112.35 11.1 12.59 0.03 12.22 12.55 712/1900 07:00 PM 93.56 111.56 99.18 110.22 111.91 11.04 12.72 0.06 12.44 12.66 7/2/1900 08:00 PM 93.35 111.22 98.66 109.65 111.441 10.99 12.77 0.08 12.67 12.69 7/2/1900 09:00 PM 93.37 110.82 98.32 109.26 110.98 10.94 12.66 0.09 12.99 12.57 7/2/1900 10:00 PM 93.57 110.43 98.10 108.99 110.56 10.89 12.47 0.13 13.18 12.34 7/2/1900 11:00 PM 93.97 110.09 98.03 108.87 1 1 110.211 10.84 12.18 0.18 13.17 12.00 1 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 037 of 042 Appendix 08.2 -UHS Mixing Results and Equations 20% -12PM Mixing Results (partial)20% Mixing -12AM T Nat TIN -TOUT Plant Tout Mix Temp I Vnew= 235080 309600 ft3/hr LAKET LAKET LAKET (&deg;F) (*F) (*F) (*F) Plant DT LAKET DT Convergence DT DT ii DT i2 DT 13 7/1/1900 12:00AM 90.05 106.81 104.75 130.70 106.81 25.95 2.06 0.00 2.06 2.06 2.06 7/1/1900 01:00 AM 90.84 109.98 104.96 137.16 109.98 32.2 5.02 0.00 5.54 5.02 5.02 7/1/1900 02:00AM 91.48 113.15 105.05 140.21 113.14 35.16 8.10 0.00 8.65 8.10 8.10 7/1/1900 03:00AM 91.91 116.02 104.92 140.72 116.03 35.8 11.10 0.00 11.39 11.10 11.10 7/1/1900 04:00 AM 92.14 117.48 104.59 129.95 117.48 25.36 12.89 0.00 12.49 12.89 12.89 7/1/1900 05:00AM 92.14 118.42 104.07 126.50 118.42 22.43 14.35 0.00 13.09 14.35 14.35 7/1/1900 06:00 AM 91.99 119.08 103.45 124.71 119.08, 21.26 15.63 0.00 13.57 I 15.63 15.63 7/1/1900 07:00 AM 91.84 119.51 102.85 123.17 119.51 20.32 16.66 0.00 14.03 16.66 16.66 7/1/1900 08:00 AM 91.58 119.72 102.08 121.47 119.71 19.39 17.64 0.00 14.45 L 17.64 17.64 7/1/1900 09:00 AM 91.33 119.73 101.34 119.91 119.73 18.57 18.39 0.00 14.94 18.39 18.39 7/1/1900 10:00AM 91.04 119.60 100.56 118.52 119.61 17.96 19.04 0.00 15.50 1 19.04 19.04 7/1/1900 11:00AM 90.77 119.37 99.84 117.29 119.36 17.45 19.53 0.00 16.11 19.53 19.53 7/1/1900 12:00 PM 90.50 119.02 99.12 116.10 119.02 16.98 19.90 0.00 16.71 19.90 19.90 7/1/1900 01:00 PM 90.23 118.61 98.42 115.06 118.611 16.64 20.19 0.00 17.21 i 20.19 20.19 7/1/1900 02:00 PM 89.95 118.13 97.73 114.08 118.14 16.35 20.40 0.00 17.76 20.40 20.40 7/1/1900 03:00 PM 89.71 117.63 97.11 113.28 117.63 16.17 20.52 0.00 18.21 20.52 20.52 7/1/1900 04:00 PM 89.47 117.75 96.50 118.79 117.75 22.29 21.25 0.00 19.29 21.25 21.25 7/1/1900 05:00 PM 89.41 117.50 96.08 115.35 117.50 19.27 21.42 0.00 19.90 21.42 21.42 7/1/1900 06:00 PM 89.60 117.041 95.94 113.07 117.041 17.13 21.10 0.00 20.22 I 21.10 21.10 7/1/1900 07:00 PM 89.99 116.47 96.01 111.61 116.47 15.6 20.46 0.00 20.33 20.46 20.46 7/1/1900 08:00 PM 90.67 115.88 96.41 110.87 115.88 14.46 19.47 0.00 20.30 19.47 19.47 7/1/1900 09:00 PM 91.46 115.35 96.94 110.73 115.35 13.79 18.41 0.00 20.15 18.41 18.41 7/1/1900 10:00 PM 92.34 114.88 97.54 110.96 114.89 13.42 17.34 0.00 19.97 17.35 17.34 7/1/1900 11:00 PM 93.25 114.52 98.17 111.39 114.52 13.22 16.35 0.00 19.61 16.35 16.35 7/2/1900 12:00AM 94.14 114.24 98.77 111.82 114.24 13.05 15.47 0.00 19.03 15.47 15.47 7/2/1900 01:00 AM 94.92 114.01 F-99.24 112.04 114.01 12.8 14.77 0.00 18.29 14.77 14.77 7/2/1900 02:00AM 95.55 113.80 99.54 112.06 113.81 12.52 14.26 0.00 17.12 14.27 14.26 7/2/1900 03:00 AM 95.98 112.97 100.40 112.67 113.69 12.27 13.29 0.00 15.46 13.29 13.29 7/2/1900 04:00 AM 96.24 112.91 101.39 113.49 113.67 12.1 12.28 0.00 13.64 12.12 12.28 7/2/1900 05:00 AM 96.27 113.221102.14 114.12 113.71 11.98 11.57 0.00 11.95 11.43 11.57 7/2/1900 06:00 AM 96.13 112.95 103.45 115.33 113.88 11.88 10.43 0.00 10.15 10.58 10.43 7/2/1900 07:00 AM 95.96 113.57 103.52 115.31 114.03 11.79 10.51 0.00 9.70 10.87 10.51 7/2/1900 08:00AM 95.73 113.88 103.44 115.15 114.15 11.71 10.71 0.00 9.47 11.25 10.71 7/2/1900 09:00 AM 95.40 113.62 103.68 115.33 114.27 11.65 10.60 0.00 9.13 11.41 10.60 7/2/1900 10:00AM 94.81 113.961102.97 114.55 114.30 11.58 11.33 0.00 9.23 12.11 11.33 7/2/1900 11:00AM 94.27 114.03 102.31 113.82 114.25 11.51 11.94 0.00 9.50 12.65 11.94 7/2/1900 12:00PM 93.80 113.711102.10 113.55 114.18 11.45 12.08 0.00 9.44 i 12.64 12.08 7/2/1900 01:00 PM 93.39 113.77 101.50 112.89 114.04 11.39 12.54 0.00 9.83 12.99 12.54 7/2/1900 02:00 PM 93.02 113.69 100.94 112.27 113.86 11.33 12.91 0.00 10.20 13.21 12.91 7/2/1900 03:00PM 92.55 113.12 100.72 111.99 113.66 11.27 12.94 0.00 10.13 13.03 12.94 7/2/1900 04:00 PM 92.15 113.09 100.14 111.35 113.42 11.21 13.28 0.00 10.89 I 13.23 13.28 7/2/1900 05:00 PM 91.96 112.97 99.62 110.78 113.14 11.16 13.53 0.00 11.61 I 13.31 13.53 7/2/1900 06:00 PM 92.00 112.76 99.26 110.36 112.85 11.1 13.60 0.00 12.21 I 13.19 13.60 7/2/1900 07:00 PM 92.23 112.61 98.93 109.97 112.55 11.04 13.63 0.00 12.71 I 13.00 13.63 7/2/1900 08:00 PM 92.66 112.34 98.82 109.81 112.26 10.99 13.45 0.00 13.14 12.63 13.45 7/2/1900 09:00 PM 93.27 112.10 98.91 109.85 112.01 10.94 13.10 0.00 13.64 12.11 13.10 7/2/1900 10:00 PM 93.94 111.87 99.08 109.97 111.80 10.89 12.72 0.00 14.02 11.65 12.72 7/2/1900 11:00 PM 94.66 111.68 99.36 110.20 111.63 10.84 12.27 0.00 14.22 11.22 12.27 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 038 of 042 Appendix 08.2 -UHS Mixing Results and Equations 150 r Plant Outlet Temperature
--- Mixing Zone Temperature
---Plant Inlet Temperature 140 130 L-120 110 I-100 90 80--- ---*-- -S S -S *-S.0 0 2 3 4 Days Following Accident Fig. 08.2-1: Five Day Temperature Profile for the 10% Mixing Case 5 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1
CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 039 of 042 Appendix 08.2 -UHS Mixing Results and Equations 150 140 130120 110 I-100 90 80 0 1 2 3 4 5 Days Following Accident Fig. 08.2-2: Five Day Temperature Profile for the 20% Mixing Case PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 040 of 0427 Appendix 08.2 -UHS Mixing Results and Equations 0.E.S I-108 106 104 102 100 98 96 94 92 90 0 1 2 3 5 Days Following Accident Fig. 08.2-3: Plant Inlet Temperature for 6AM Cases PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 041 of 042 Appendix 08.2 -UHS Mixing Results and Equations 150 140 130 ,'_120 CL E S110 100 90 80 0 2 3 4 Days Following Accident 5 Fig. 08.2-4: Case Mixing -10% -9AM Results I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 042 of 042 Appendix 08.2 -UHS Mixing Results and Equations 150 140 130120 CL 0.E* 110 I,-100 90 80 0 2 3 4 5 Days Following Accident Fig. 08.2-5: Case Mixing -20% -12PM Results I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P1 of P58 Attachment P -Plant Temperature Rise for Rev. 8 Prepared:
Li. Date  Daniel W. Nevill -Sargent & LundyLLc Reviewed:
Date 11/43 Stephen. J. Paarlberg.-
Sargelf& LundyLLc PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P2 of P58 ATTACHMENT P -TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No.P 1.0 P u rp o se .......................................................................................................................
P 3 P2.0 M ethodology
............................................................................................................
P4 P3.0 Assumptions
............................................................................................................
P5 P4.0 Design Inputs .............................................................................................................
P6 P 5 .0 R e feren ce s ....................................................................................................................
P 7 P6.0 Calculations
............................................................................................................
P8 P7.0 Summary and Conclusions
.......................................................................................
P9 P8.0 Limitations and Open Items ..................................................................................
PlO P9.0 Appendices
............................................................................................................
P11 (Total Pages -Attachment P (11) plus Appendices (47) for a Total of 58 pages)LIST OF APPENDICES No. I Title Page P9.1 Integrated UHS Heat Load P12 P9.2 _ Plant Temperature Rise Results __P39 P9.3 Excel Equations P57 (Total Appendix Pages -47)PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P3 of P58 P1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this attachment is to determine the Core Standby Cooling System (CSCS)temperature rise across the plant based on the new heat load to the Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) determined in Revision 4 of L-002453 [Ref. P5.1]. This temperature rise is to be used in the LAKET-PC [Ref. P5.3] model of the LaSalle County Station UHS.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P4 of P58 P2.0 METHODOLOGY The plant temperature rise is used in LAKET-PC [Ref. P5.3] to compute the rise in water temperature caused by the heat rejected to the UHS during the postulated accident.The total heat load rejected to the UHS is determined in Attachment D of L-002453 [Ref.P5,1]. The heat rejection rate is determined for an operating scenario that would maximize the heat load to the UHS. This scenario considers a Design Basis Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) on one unit and a reactor SCRAM on the non-LOCA unit coincident with a UHS design event (loss of the cooling lake) occurring 100 days after refueling of the non-LOCA unit. Both Residual Heat Removal (RHR) heat exchangers are in service to remove reactor heat on the LOCA unit. For the non-LOCA unit, one RHR heat exchanger is placed into suppression pool cooling mode (and later shutdown cooling mode), while the other RHR heat exchanger is placed into fuel pool cooling assist mode 16 hours after the initiation of the event.Once the total heat load rejected to the UHS is known, the temperature rise through the plant is determined by the following heat transfer equation: AT- Q (Eq. P3-1)where: AT = plant temperature rise ['F]Q = heat rejection rate to the UHS [BTU/hr]cP = specific heat capacity of water [BTU/(lbm-&deg;F)]
In = mass flow rate [lbm/hr]The mass flow rate is determined by converting the Core Standby Cooling System (CSCS)volumetric flow rates of 65.3 ft 3/s and 86.0 ft 3/s (Design Input P4.2) to a mass flow rate at a density of 62.0 lbm/ft 3 (Assumption P3.1).P2.1 Computer Programs and Software The analysis performed herein utilizes Microsoft Excel 2003 [Ref. P5.4], which is commercially available.
The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all spreadsheets used in this analysis.
All computer nins were performed using PC No.ZD6661 under the Windows XP operating system. Excel Add-in function STMFUNC is used to calculate the thermal properties of water and steam at varying operating conditions
[Ref. P5.5]. The Excel Add-in finction STMFUJNC has been validated and approved for use in accordance with the S&L Quality Assurance (QA) program.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P5 of P58 P3.0 ASSUMPTIONS P3.1 Water Properties
-The properties of water are evaluated at a temperature of 1007F and atmospheric pressure.
The density and specific heat capacity of water at 100&deg;F and I atm are 62.0 lb "/ft 3 and 0.998 BTU/lbm-&deg;F, respectively
[Ref. P5.5].PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P6 of P58 P4.0 DESIGN INPUTS P4.1 Total Heat Load -The total heat load rejected to the UHS following a LOCA for one unit and a reactor SCRAM for the non-LOCA unit is determined in Attachment D of L-002453[Ref. P5.1 ].P4.2 CSCS Volumetric Flow -The total plant flow during the UHS analysis is 29,300 GPM (65.3 ft 3/s) for the first 16 hours of the event [Ref. P5.2, Attachment C]. The total plant flow is 38,600 gpm (86.0 ft3/s) after 16 hours [Ref. P5.2, Attachment C]. The total flow after 16 hours is based upon the cumulative flow contribution from thirteen CSCS pumps operating at design flow conditions (eight Residual Heat Removal (RHR)-Service Water pumps, 4,000 gpm each; three Diesel Generator (DG) pumps, two at 1,300 gpm and one at 2,000 gpm; and two High Pressure Core Spray DG pumps, 1000 gpm each) (See Attachment D). Prior to 16 hours, two RHR Service Water pumps and one of the 1,300 gpm DG pumps are not in operation
[Ref. P5.2, Attachment C].PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P7 of P58 P


==5.0 REFERENCES==
P5.1  L-002453, "UHS Heat Load," Rev. 4.
P5.2  SEAG 13-000074, "LaSalle County Station Transmittal of Design Information (TODI) for UHS Analyses," Rev. 0.
P5.3  LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 7/31/2013.
P5.4  Microsoft Excel 2003, Sargent & Lundy LLC Program No. 03.2.286-1.0, dated 02/02/2004.
P5.5 STMFUNC (Steam Table Function Dynamic Link Library) S&L Program Number 03.7.598-2.0, dated 5/15/2003.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297


P5.1 L-002453, "UHS Heat Load," Rev. 4.P5.2 SEAG 13-000074, "LaSalle County Station Transmittal of Design Information (TODI) for UHS Analyses," Rev. 0.P5.3 LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 7/31/2013.
CALCULATION NO. L-002457             REVISION NO. 8                 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P8 of P58 P6.0 CALCULATIONS P6.1 Total and Integrated Generated Heat Load Rejected to the UHS The total heat load rejected to the UHS following a LOCA for one unit and a reactor SCRAM for the non-LOCA unit is determined in Attachment D of L-002453 [Ref. P5.1].
P5.4 Microsoft Excel 2003, Sargent & Lundy LLC Program No. 03.2.286-1.0, dated 02/02/2004.
These values are integrated in order to determine the heat load rejected to the UHS over the entire event. The integration uses the average total heat load between the current time step and the preceding time step.
P5.5 STMFUNC (Steam Table Function Dynamic Link Library) S&L Program Number 03.7.598-2.0, dated 5/15/2003.
Exceptions to this method occur at two separate time steps. One exception to this method is for the integrated heat load at 16 hours, which is when fuel pool cooling begins. The heat load rejected to the UHS increases at hour 16 due to inclusion of the fuel pool heat load. Therefore, at the 16 hour time step only the UHS heat load from the preceding time step (15.21 hours) is utilized for integration.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P8 of P58 P6.0 CALCULATIONS P6.1 Total and Integrated Generated Heat Load Rejected to the UHS The total heat load rejected to the UHS following a LOCA for one unit and a reactor SCRAM for the non-LOCA unit is determined in Attachment D of L-002453 [Ref. P5.1].These values are integrated in order to determine the heat load rejected to the UHS over the entire event. The integration uses the average total heat load between the current time step and the preceding time step.Exceptions to this method occur at two separate time steps. One exception to this method is for the integrated heat load at 16 hours, which is when fuel pool cooling begins. The heat load rejected to the UHS increases at hour 16 due to inclusion of the fuel pool heat load. Therefore, at the 16 hour time step only the UHS heat load from the preceding time step (15.21 hours) is utilized for integration.
The other exception occurs at the 4.13 hour time step. Sensible heat is rejected to the UHS until 3.5 hours (12,600 seconds) after the design basis event [Ref. P5.1]. To account for the sensible heat load rejected to the UHS between the 3.33 hour and 4.13 hour time step, the heat load at 3.33 hours is conservatively used for the UHS heat load integration.
The other exception occurs at the 4.13 hour time step. Sensible heat is rejected to the UHS until 3.5 hours (12,600 seconds) after the design basis event [Ref. P5.1]. To account for the sensible heat load rejected to the UHS between the 3.33 hour and 4.13 hour time step, the heat load at 3.33 hours is conservatively used for the UHS heat load integration.
These results are presented in Appendix P9.1 for MUR PU and are used to determine the temperature rise through the plant. The equations used in Excel for this calculation are included in Appendix P9.3.P6.2 Plant Temperature Rise In order to facilitate the creation of a LAKET-PC [Ref. P5.3] input file, the plant temperature rise results are determined in one hour increments.
These results are presented in Appendix P9.1 for MUR PU and are used to determine the temperature rise through the plant. The equations used in Excel for this calculation are included in Appendix P9.3.
This requires linear interpolation of the integrated total generated heat load found in L-002453 [Ref. P5.1] to determine the integrated total generated heat load at hourly intervals.
P6.2 Plant Temperature Rise In order to facilitate the creation of a LAKET-PC [Ref. P5.3] input file, the plant temperature rise results are determined in one hour increments. This requires linear interpolation of the integrated total generated heat load found in L-002453 [Ref. P5.1] to determine the integrated total generated heat load at hourly intervals. The plant temperature rise is calculated in Excel using Eq. P3-1. The results of this calculation are shown in Appendix P9.2, and equations used in Excel are included in Appendix P9.3.
The plant temperature rise is calculated in Excel using Eq. P3-1. The results of this calculation are shown in Appendix P9.2, and equations used in Excel are included in Appendix P9.3.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P9 of P58 P7.0  
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457             REVISION NO. 8               ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P9 of P58 P7.0


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
AND CONCLUSIONS The CSCS temperature rise across the plant following a postulated accident is determined in hourly intervals in order to be used as input to LAKET-PC [Ref. P5.3]. These results are given in Appendix P9.2.PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 P8.0 LIMITATIONS AND OPEN ITEMS P8.1 Limitations None.P8.2 Open Items None.ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P10 of P58 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P1 1 of P58 P9.0 APPENDICES LIST OF APPENDICES App. Title No. of Pages P9.1 Integrated UHS Heat Load 27 P9.2 Plant Temperature Rise Results 18 P9.3 Excel Equations 2 (Total Appendix Pages -47)PROJECT NO. 11333-297 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P12 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Total UHS UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) Heat Load Load[Ref. P5.1] (Btulhr) (Btu)O.OOOE+00 0.00 _ 1.97E+04 7.10E+07 0.00E+00 6.000E+01 0.02 6.32E+04
AND CONCLUSIONS The CSCS temperature rise across the plant following a postulated accident is determined in hourly intervals in order to be used as input to LAKET-PC [Ref. P5.3]. These results are given in Appendix P9.2.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457  REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P10 of P58 P8.0  LIMITATIONS AND OPEN ITEMS P8.1  Limitations None.
P8.2  Open Items None.
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457                REVISION NO. 8        ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P1 1 of P58 P9.0    APPENDICES LIST OF APPENDICES App.        Title                                                        No. of Pages P9.1      Integrated UHS Heat Load                                          27 P9.2      Plant Temperature Rise Results                                    18 P9.3      Excel Equations                                                    2 (Total Appendix Pages - 47)
PROJECT NO. 11333-297
 
CALCULATION NO. L-002457              REVISION NO. 8                  ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P12 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS                  Integrated Time      Time    Heat Load    Total UHS    UHS Heat (seconds)    (hours)    (Btu/s)    Heat Load        Load
[Ref. P5.1]    (Btulhr)        (Btu)
O.OOOE+00      0.

Latest revision as of 23:26, 19 March 2020

Attachment 7 - UHS Calculation LSCS Design Analysis L-002457, Revision 8, Part 2 of 2
ML14066A234
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML14066A250 List:
References
CC-AA-309-1001, Rev. 8, RS-14-042
Download: ML14066A234 (420)


Text

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H188 of H344 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5 97.0 88.4 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.0 98.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 97.2 89.2 Program : LAKET Page : 1 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H189 of H344 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/07/2006 Created  : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 13:54:23.56 Case 32 D: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.OF, 1.5')

1 2 070100 080500 1 1 0 3 2 3 1 0 20.

4 1 0.2 5500. 0 5 6 2 690 690 81.35 34 1.4 73.21 307.2 689 79.75 26 0.8 71.78 234.7 688 78.15 18 1.9 70.34 163.7 687 29.70 10 2.2 26.73 92.0 686 22 .22 60 .0 20.00 54.0 685 13.42 43 .8 12.08 39.4 7 1 0 3 18 19 20 8 102. 86 98.36 999 FPLANT R/I 86.0 TPRISE S/I 3548 28.95 16.79 16.39 1542 15.06 14.61 14.36 13.95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 IPROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H190 of H344 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.16 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95

10. 94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H191 of H344 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9 .27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H192 of H344 I 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H193 of H344 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.51 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H194 of H344 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H195 of H344 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H196 of H344 Program LAKET Page 7 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 13:54:23.56 Case 3b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.0F, 1.5')

RUN 36 DAYS FROM 70100 TO 80500 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT  : 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT 20.00 DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 81.350 341.400 73.210 307.200 689.000 79.750 260.800 71.780 234.700 688.000 78.150 181.900 70.340 163.700 687.000 29.700 102.200 26.730 92.000 686.000 22.220 60.000 20.000 54.000 685.000 13.420 43.800 12.080 39.400 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)

PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)

NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:

18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)

INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 102.86 98.36 WEATHER STATION ID 0.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H197 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 8 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 13:54:23.56 Case 3b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.0F, 1.5')

FPLANT 70100 - 80500 R/I 86.000 TPRISE 70100 - 80500 S/I 35.480 28.950 16.790 16.390 15.420 15.060 14.610 14.360 13.950 13.520 13.360 13.360 13.360 13.300 12.790 12.790 12.500 12.500 12.300 12.090 12.090 12.090 12.090 12.080 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.160 11.150 11.150 11.150 11.150 10.950 10.940 10.940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.360 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.810 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.480 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.230 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 8.940 REVISION NO. 8 8.940 8.940 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H198 of H344 8.940 I

8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.810 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.610 8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8 .570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.520 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 80310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 IPROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H199 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 9 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 13:54:23.59 Case 3b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.0F, 1.5')

SEASONAL

SUMMARY

FOR SUMMER ( 6/1900 - 8/1900 )

QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 0.00 20.00 20 .00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 0.00 689.27 688.54 689.17 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 0.00 80.18 79.02 80.02 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 0.00 282.78 224.66 274.71 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 0.00 72.17 71.12 72.02 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 0.00 254.47 202.18 247.21 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) 0.00 -0.17 -0 .14 -0.16 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 -1.62 -1.33 -1.58 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 -0.97 -0.76 -0.94 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) 0.00 -0.65 -0.56 -0.64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 219.94 214.31 219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 153.58 152.47 153.43 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 64. 65 51 .78 62.87 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 5.34 5.25 5.32 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 0.00 90.92 89.93 90.78 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 0.00 101.40 98.78 101.03 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 0.00 91.58 90.55 91.43 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) 0.00 -10.33 -1.34 -11.67 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -99.71 -13.15 -112.86 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -59.60 -7.58 -67.18 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -40.11 -5.57 -45.68 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H200 of H344 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5 97 .5 90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.4 100.8 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 98.0 91.5 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H201 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 10 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 13:54:23.59 Case 3b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.OF, 1.5')

CUMULATIVE SEASONAL

SUMMARY

SUMMER QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 0.00 689.27 688.54 689.17 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 0.00 80.18 79.02 80.02 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 0.00 282.78 224.66 274.71 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 0.00 72.17 71.12 72.02 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 0.00 254.47 202.18 247.21 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) 0.00 -0.17 -0.14 -0.16 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 -1.62 -1.33 -1.58 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 -0.97 -0.76 -0.94 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) 0.00 -0.65 -0.56 -0.64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 219.94 214.31 219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 153.58 152.47 153.43 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 64. 65 51.78 62.87 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 5.34 5.25 5.32 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 0.00 90.92 89.93 90.78 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 0.00 101.40 98.78 101.03 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 0.00 91.58 90.55 91.43 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) 0.00 -10.33 -1.34 -11.67 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -99.71 .13.15 -112.86 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -59.60 -7. 58 -67.18 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -40.11 -5.57 -45.68 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H202 of H344 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5 97.5 90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.4 100.8 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 98.0 91.5 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H203 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 11 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 13:54:23.59 Case 3b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104.OF, 1.5')

TOTAL CUMULATIVE

SUMMARY

QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE VALUE ( DATE VALUE ( DATE VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 7011900) 20.00 7011900) 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.99 7011900) 688.45 8051900) 689.17 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 81.33 7011900) 78.86 8051900) 80.02 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 340.63 7011900) 216.86 8051900) 274.71 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 73.20 7011900) 70.98 8051900) 72.02 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 306.51 7011900) 195.16 8051900) 247.21 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0 .00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.13 8051900) -0.20 7011900) -0.16 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -0.24 8051900) -4.12 7051900) -1.58 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 7031900) -2.72 7051900) -0. 94 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.23 7311900) -1.86 7011900) -0 64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 430.59 7191900) 101.21 7221900) 219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 165.63 7011900) 142.19 7241900) 153.43 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 179.35 7051900) 0.00 7031900) 62.87 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 26.28 7051900) -30.81 7251900) 5.32 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 101.47 7011900) 80.45 7241900) 90 .78 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 137.71 7011900) 89.71 7241900) 101 .03 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104 .00 7011900) 81.35 7241900) 91 .43 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL VALUE DATE VALUE ( DATE VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -0.03 8051900) -0.05 7011900) -11.67 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -0.06 8051900) -1 02 7051900) -112.86 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7031900) -0.68 7051900) -67.18 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -0.06 7311900) -0.46 7011900) -45.68 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H204 of H344 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATUPAL (F) 100.5 97.5 90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.4 100.8 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 98.0 91.5 Program  : LAKET Page :

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H205 of H344 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/11/2006 Created  : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 15:49:35.51 Case 3 c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')

1 2 061854 071754 1 1 0 3 2 3 1 0 20.

4 1 0.2 5.500. 0 5 6 2 6 90 690 81 .35 341.4 73.21 307.2 689 79 .75 260.8 71.78 234.7 688 78 .15 181.9 70.34 163.7 687 29 .70 102.2 26.73 92.0 686 22 .22 60.0 20.00 54.0 685 13 .42 43.8 12.08 39.4 7 1 0 3 18 19 20 8 102.3 97.8 999 FPLANT R/I 86.0 TPRISE S/I 35.48 28.95 16.79 16.39 15.42 15.06 14.61 14.36 13.95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H206 of H344 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.16 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95 10.94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07

10. 07
10. 07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H207 of H344 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H208 of H344 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H209 of H344 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8 .57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H210 of H344 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H211 of H344 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H212 of H344 Program : LAKET Page : 7 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/11/2006 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 15:49:35.51 Case 3c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')

RUN 30 DAYS FROM 61854 TO 71754 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT  : 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT 20.00 DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION = 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 81.350 341.400 73.210 307.200 689.000 79.750 260.800 71.780 234.700 688.000 78.150 181.900 70.340 163.700 687.000 29.700 102.200 26.730 92.000 686.000 22.220 60.000 20.000 54.000 685.000 13.420 43.800 12.080 39.400 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)

PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)

NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:

18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)

INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 102.30 97.80 WEATHER STATION ID 93822.

IPROJECT NO. 11333-297

m CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H213 of H344 I

_______a m Program LAKET Page : 8 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/11/2006 Created: 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 15:49:35.51 Case 3c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')

FPLANT 61854 - 71754 R/I 86.000 TPRISE 61854 - 71754 S/I 35.480 28.950 16.790 16.390 15.420 15.060 14.610 14.360 13.950 13.520 13.360 13.360 13.360 13.300 12.790 12.790 12.500 12.500 12.300 12.090 12.090 12.090 12.090 12.080 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.160 11.150 11.150 11.150 11.150 10.950 10.940 10.940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.360 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.810 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.480 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.230 8.940 8.940 8. 940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 8 .940 REVISION NO. 8 8.940 8.940 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H214 of H344

8. 940 IJ
8. 940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.810 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8. 780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8. 780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8. 780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780
8. 780 8.610 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8-570 8.520 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H215 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 9 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/11/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 15:49:35.54 Case 3c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')

SEASONAL

SUMMARY

FOR SUMMER ( 6/1954 - 8/1954 )

QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.61 688.91 0.00 689.21 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 80.72 79.61 0.00 80.09 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 309.79 253.94 0 .00 278.14 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 72.65 71.65 0.00 72.08 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 278.76 228.52 0.00 250.29 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.18 -0.15 0 .00 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -2.01 -1. 69 0.00 -1.83 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -1.28 -1.13 0.00 -1.20 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.73 -0.56 0.00 -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 226.40 221.82 0.00 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 148.11 145.43 0.00 146.59 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 85.13 76.30 0.00 80.13 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 4.10 0. 93 0.00 2.30 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 85.92 83.46 0.00 84.52 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 98.17 93.25 0.00 95.38 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 86.90 84.51 0.00 85.55 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -4.71 -5.12 0.00 -9.84 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -51.84 -56.94 0 .00 -108.78 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -33.07 -38.13 0 .00 -71.20 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -18.77 -18.81 0 .00 -37.58 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H216 of H344 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.0 93.3 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 133.0 107.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.0 94.0 85.2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H217 of H344 Program LAKET Page 10 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/11/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 15:49:35.54 Case 3c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')

CUMULATIVE SEASONAL

SUMMARY

SUMMER QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.61 688.91 0.00 689.21 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 80.72 79.61 0.00 80.09 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 309.79 253.94 0.00 278.14 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 72.65 71.65 0.00 72.08 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 278.76 228.52 0.00 250.29 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.18 -0.15 0.00 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -2.01 -1.69 0.00 -1.83 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -1.28 -1.13 0.00 -1.20 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.73 -0.56 0.00 -0. 63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 226.40 221.82 0.00 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 148.11 145.43 0.00 146.59 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 85.13 76.30 0.00 80.13 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 4.10 0.93 0.00 2.30 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 85.92 83.46 0.00 84.52 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 98.17 93.25 0.00 95.38 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 86.90 84.51 0.00 85.55 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTAL S TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -4.71 -5.12 0.00 -9.84 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -51.84 -56.94 0.00 -108.78 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -33.07 -38.13 0.00 -71.20 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -18.77 -18.81 0.00 -37.58 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-0024571  % 5% REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H218 of H344 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.0 93.3 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 133.0 107.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.0 94.0 85.2 L- PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H219 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 11 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/11/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 15:49:35.54 Case 3c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.5')

TOTAL CUMULATIVE

SUMMARY

QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE VALUE ( DATE VALUE DATE VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 6181954) 20.00 6181954) 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 690.00 6181954) 688.52 7171954) 689.21 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 81.34 6181954) 78.98 7171954) 80.09 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 341.13 6181954) 222.77 7171954) 278.14 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 73.21 6181954) 71.09 7171954) 72.08 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 306.96 6181954) 200.48 7171954) 250.29 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.13 7171954) -0.20 6181954) -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -0.48 66291954) -5.43 6181954) -1.83 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -0.24 6291954) -4.14 6271954) -1.20 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.15 7171954) -2.48 6181954) -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 451.13 6191954) 90.18 7071954) 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 165.58 6181954) 134.89 7071954) 146.59 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 275.61 6271954) 16.17 6291954) 80.13 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 37.15 6271954) -47.13 7121954) 2.30 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 101.42 6181954) 73.38 7071954) 84.52 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 140.00 6181954) 82.37 7071954) 95.38 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.65 6181954) 73.45 7071954) 85.55 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE DATE VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -0.03 7171954) -0.05 6181954) -9.84 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -0.12 6291954) -1.35 6181954) -108.78 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -0.06 6291954) -1.03 6271954) -71.20 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -0.04 7171954) -0. 0 6181954) -37.58 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H220 of H344 I TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.0 93.3 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 133.0 107.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.0 94.0 85.2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H221 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 1 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 10:27:07.17 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')

1 2 070100 073100 1 1 0 3 2 3 1 0 20.

4 1 0.2 5500. 0 5 6 2 690 E 90 32.15 381.9 73. 94 343.7 E;89 30.55 300.6 72.49 270.5 E88 18.96 220.8 71.06 198.7 E87 77.33 142.7 69.60 128.4

( 86 29.70 71.74 26.73 64.57 85 14.75 50.79 13.28 45.71 7 1 0 3 18 19 20 8 102.74 98.24 999 F PLANT R/I 86.0 TPRISE S/I 35.48 28.95 16.79 16.39 15.42 15.06 14.61 14.36

13. 95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

m

[CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H222 of H344 I 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.16 11.15 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H223 of H344 I Program LAKET Page : 2 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 10:27:07.17 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95 10.94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H224 of H344 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 IPROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H225 of H344 I Program LAKET Page : 3 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 10:27:07.17 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H226 of H344 I 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-2971

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H227 of H344 I Program LAKET Page : 4 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 10:27:07.17 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8 .94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8 .94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94

8. 94 8 .94 8 .94 8.81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8 .78 8 .78 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H228 of H344 I 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.57 IPROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H229 of H344 Program : LAKET Page : 5 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/24/2011 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 10:27:07.17 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H230 of H344 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H231 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 6 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 10:27:07.17 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H232 of H344 I 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END IPROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H233 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 7 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/24/2011 Created  : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 10:27:07.18 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')

RUN 31 DAYS FROM 70100 TO 73100 PLOT FILE OPTION : I CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT  : 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT 20.00 DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION = 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 82.150 381.900 73.940 343.700 689.000 80.550 300.600 72.490 270.500 688.000 78.960 220.800 71.060 198.700 687.000 77.330 142.700 69.600 128.400 686.000 29.700 71.740 26.730 64.570 685.000 14.750 50.790 13.280 45.710 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)

PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)

NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:

18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)

INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 102.74 98.24 WEATHER STATION ID 0.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H234 of H344 Program : LAKET Page : 8 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/24/2011 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 10:27:07.31 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')

FPLANT 70100 - 73100 R/I 86.000 TPRISE 70100 - 73100 S/I 35.480 28. 950 16.790 16. 390 15.420 15.060 14.610 14.360 13.950 13.520 13.360 13.360 13.360 13.300 12 .790 12.790 12.500 12.500 12.300 12.090 12.090 12.090 12.090 12.080 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.160 11.150 11.150 11.150 11.150 10.950 10.940 10.940 10.590 10. 590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10. 590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10. 590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.360 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.810 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.790

9. 630 9. 630 9.630 9.630
9. 630 9.630 9.630 9. 630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9. 630 9.480 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9. 270 9. 270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.230 8.940
8. 940 8. 940 8.940 8.940
8. 940 8. 940 8.940 8.940 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H235 of H344 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.810 8.780 8.780 8.780 8 .780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8. 780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.610 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.520 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H236 of H344 Program : LAKET Page : 9 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/24/2011 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 10:27:07.40 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')

SEASONAL

SUMMARY

FOR SUMMER ( 6 /1900 - 8/1900 )

QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 0.00 689.34 0.00 689.34 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 0.00 81.10 0.00 81.10 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 0.00 328.51 0.00 328.51 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 0.00 72.99 0.00 72.99 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 0.00 295.63 0.00 295.63 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) 0.00 -0.17 0.00 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 -1.40 0.00 -1.40 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 -0.76 0.00 -0.76 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) 0.00 -0.63 0.00 -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 204.97 0.00 204.97 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 151.30 0.00 151.30 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 50.37 0.00 50.37 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 6.88 0.00 6.88 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 0.00 88.87 0.00 88.87 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 0.00 99.69 0.00 99.69 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 0.00 89.86 0.00 89.86 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) 0.00 -10.71 0.00 -10.71 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -85.89 0.00 -85.89 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -46.97 0.00 -46.97 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -38.91 0.00 -38. 91 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H237 of H344 I TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5 97.0 88.3 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.0 98.7 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 97.0 89.4 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H238 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 10 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 10:27:07.40 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')

CUMULATIVE SEASONAL

SUMMARY

SUMMER QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 0.00 689.34 0.00 689.34 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 0.00 81.10 0.00 81.10 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 0.00 328.51 0.00 328.51 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 0.00 72.99 0.00 72.99 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 0.00 295.63 0.00 295.63 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) 0.00 -0.17 0.00 -0. 17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 -1.40 0.00 -1.40 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 -0.76 0.00 -0.76 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) 0.00 -0.63 0.00 -0. 63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 204.97 0.00 204.97 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 151.30 0.00 151.30 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 50.37 0.00 50.37 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 6.88 0.00 6.88 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 0.00 88.87 0.00 88.87 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 0.00 99.69 0.00 99.69 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 0.00 89.86 0.00 89.86 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) 0.00 -10.71 0.00 -10.71 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -85.89 0.00 -85.89 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -46.97 0.00 -46. 97 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -38.91 0.00 -38. 91 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H239 of H344 I REVIIONNO.8 ATACHENTH, PGE O. 239 f H44 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5 97.0 88.3 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.0 98.7 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 97.0 89.4 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H240 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 11 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 10:27:07.40 Case 4a: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')

TOTAL CUMULATIVE

SUMMARY

QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE VALUE DATE ) VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 7011900) 20.00 7011900) 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.99 7011900) 688.81 7311900) 689.34 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 82. 14 7011900) 80.24 7311900) 81.10 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 381.31 7011900) 285.29 7311900) 328.51 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 73.93 7011900) 72.22 7311900) 72.99 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 343.17 7011900) 256.73 7311900) 295.63 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.15 7311900) -0.20 7011900) -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -0.26 7161900) -4.78 7021900) -1.40 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 7011900) -3.60 7031900) -0.76 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.26 7161900) -2.08 7011900) -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 426.50 7011900) 97.95 7041900) 204.97 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 165.49 7011900) 143.62 7061900) 151.30 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 234.70 7031900) 0.00 7011900) 50.37 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 39.43 7261900) -6.87 7261900) 6.88 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 101.35 7011900) 81.80 7061900) 88.87 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 138 .41 7011900) 92.47 7251900) 99.69 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.00 7011900) 82.96 7061900) 89.86 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL VALUE ( DATE VALUE DATE ) VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 TOTAL MXUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -0 .04 7311900) -0.05 7011900) -10.71 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -0.06 7161900) -1.18 7021900) -85.89 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) -0.89 7031900) -46.97 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -0.06 7161900) -0.51 7011900) -38.91 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H241 of H344 i TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5 97.0 88.3 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.0 98.7 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 97.0 89.4 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H242 of H344 I Program LAKET Page : 1 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/21/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 14:25:17.25 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')

1 2 070100 080500 1 1 0 3 2 3 1 0 20.

4 1 0.2 5500. 0 5 6 2 690 690 82.15 381.9 73.94 343.7 689 80.55 300.6 72.49 270.5 688 78.96 220.8 71.06 198.7 687 77.33 142.7 69.60 128.4 686 29.70 71.74 26.73 64.57 685 14 .75 50.79 13.28 45.71 7 1 0 3 18 19 20 8 103.02 98.52 999 FPLANT R/I 86.0 TPRISE S/I 35.48 28.95 16.79 16.39 15.42 15.06 14.61 14.36 13.95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H243 of H344 11.56 NO. L-002457 REVISION NO.8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H243 of H344 I 11.56 11.56 11.56 11 56 11.16 11.15 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H244 of H344 I Program LAKET Page : 2 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/21/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 14:25:17.25 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95 10.94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H245 of H344 I 9.79 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H246 of H344 I Program : LAKET Page : 3 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/21/2011 Created : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 14:25:17.25 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H247 of H344 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.27 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H247 of H344 II l

9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H248 of H344 Program : LAKET Page : 4 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/21/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 14:25:17.25 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8 .94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94

8. 94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8 .81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8 .78 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H249 of H344 I 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.57 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H250 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 5 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/21/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 14:25:17.25 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H251 of H344 II 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H252 of H344 Program : LAKET Page : 6 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/21/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 14:25:17.25 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H253 of H344 I 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H254 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 7 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/21/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 14:25:17.25 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')

RUN 36 DAYS FROM 70100 TO 80500 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT  : 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT 20.00 DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION = 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF V(OLUME 690.000 82.150 381.900 73.940 3423.700 689.000 80.550 300.600 72.490 27( 0.500 688.000 78.960 220.800 71.060 19*8.700 687.000 77.330 142.700 69.600 12*8.400 686.000 29.700 71.740 26.730 6 4.570 685.000 14.750 50.790 13.280 4 5.710 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)

PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)

NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:

18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)

INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 103.02 98.52 WEATHER STATION ID 0.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H255 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 8 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/21/2011 Created  : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 14:25:17.25 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')

FPLANT 70100 - 80500 R/I 86.000 TPRISE 70100 - 80500 S/I 35.480 28.950 16.790 16.390 15.420 15.060 14.610 14.360 13.950 13.520 13.360 13.360 13.360 13.300 12.790 12.790 12.500 12.500 12.300 12.090 12.090 12.090 12.090 12.080 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.160 11.150 11.150 11.150 11.150 10. 950 10.940 10.940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.360 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.810 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.480 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.230 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H256 of H344 I 8 940 8. 940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8. 940 8.940 8.940 8.810 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8 .780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.610 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8 .570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570

8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8. 570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.520 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310
8. 310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8-310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 8.310 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H257 of H344 Program : LAKET Page 9 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/21/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 14:25:17.31 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')

SEASONAL

SUMMARY

FOR SUMMER ( 6/1900 - 8/1900 )

QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 0.00 689.27 688.54 689.17 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 0.00 80.98 79.82 80.82 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 0.00 322.70 264.07 314.56 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 0.00 72.88 71.84 72.74 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 0.00 290.40 237.63 283.07 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) 0.00 -0.17 -0.14 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 -1.64 -1.33 -1.59 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 -0.98 -0.76 -0.95 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) 0.00 -0.65 -0.56 -0.64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 219.94 214.31 219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 153.68 152.29 153.49 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 64.97 51.32 63.07 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 5.42 5.16 5.38 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 0.00 91.01 89.78 90.84 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 0.00 101.58 98.83 101.20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 0.00 91.75 90.57 91.59 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) 0.00 -10.53 -1.41 -11.95 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -100.60 -13.14 -113.75 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -60.49 -7.59 -68.07 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -40.12 -5.56 -45.67 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H258 of H344 I TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES REVIIONNO.8 ATACHENTH, PGE O. 258 f H44 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5 97.2 90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.6 100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 98.1 91.7 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H259 of H344 I Program LAKET Page 10 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/21/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 14:25:17.31 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')

CUMULATIVE SEASONAL

SUMMARY

SUMMER QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 0.00 689.27 688.54 689.17 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 0.00 80.98 79.82 80.82 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 0.00 322.70 264 .07 314.56 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 0.00 72.88 71.84 72.74 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 0.00 290.40 237.63 283.07 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) 0.00 -0.17 -0.14 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 -1.64 -1.33 -1.59 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 -0.98 -0.76 -0.95 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) 0.00 -0.65 -0.56 -0.64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 219.94 214.31 219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 153.68 152.29 153.49 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 64.97 51.32 63.07 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 5.42 5.16 5.38 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 0.00 91.01 89.78 90.84 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 0.00 101.58 98.83 101.20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 0.00 91.75 90.57 91.59 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) 0.00 -10.53 -1.41 -11.95 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -100.60 -13.14 -113.75 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -60.49 -7.59 -68.07 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -40.12 -5.56 -45.67 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H260 of H344 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5 97.2 90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.6 100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 98.1 91.7 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H261 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 11 Number 03.7.292-2.20 o02/21/2011 Date Time 14:25:17.31 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Case 4b: LaSalle UHS (09:00, Worst 5/1/30 Day Temp; To=104F, 1.0')

TOTAL CUMULATIVE

SUMMARY

QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 7011900) 20.00 7011900) 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.99 7011900) 688.45 8051900) 689.17 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 82.13 7011900) 79.67 8051900) 80.82 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 381.11 7011900) 256.19 8051900) 314.56 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 73.93 7011900) 71.69 8051900) 72.74 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 342.99 7011900) 230.54 8051900) 283.07 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.14 8051900) -0.20 7011900) -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -0.29 8051900) -4.06 7051900) -1.59 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 7031900) -2.73 7051900) -0.95 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.25 7311900) -1.84 7011900) -0.64 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 430.59 7191900) 101.21 7221900) 219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 165.45 7011900) 142.91 7241900) 153.49 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 178.35 7051900) 0.00 7031900) 63.07 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 26.10 7051900) -31.35 7251900) 5.38 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 101.31 7011900) 81.13 7241900) 90.84 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 137.91 7011900) 90.55 7241900) 101.20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.00 7011900) 82.04 7241900) 91.59 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 ( 7011900) 0.00 ( 7011900) 0.00 TOTAL MEUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -0.03 8051900) -0.05 7011900) -11.95 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -0.07 8051900) -1.01 7051900) -113.75 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7031900) -0.68 7051900) -68.07 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -0.06 7311900) -0.46 7011900) -45.67 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H262 of H344 I TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.5 97.2 90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.0 110.6 100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 103.0 98.1 91.7 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H263 of H344 I Program LAKET Page : 1 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 13:13:58.01 Case 4c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')

1 2 061854 071754 1 1 0 3 2 3 1 0 20.

4 1 0.2 5500. 0 5 6 2 690 690 32.15 381.9 73.94 343.7 689 8 0.55 300.6 72.49 270.5 688 18.96 220.8 71.06 198.7 687 7.33 142.7 69.60 128.4 686 9. 70 71.74 26.73 64.57 685 1.4.75 50.79 13.28 45.71 7 1 0 3 18 19 20 8 102.74 98.24 999 FPLANT R/I 86.0 TPRISE S/I 35.48 28.95 16.79 16.39 15.42 15.06 14.61 14.36 13.95 13.52 13.36 13.36 13.36 13.30 12.79 12.79 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.09 12.08 11.56 11.56 11.56 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H264 of H344 i REVIIONNO. ATACHMNT , PGE O. H64 f H44 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.16 11.15 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H265 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 2 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 13:13:58.01 11.15 11.15 11.15 10.95 10.94 10.94 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.59 10.36 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 10.07 9.81 9.79 9.79 9.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO, L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H266 of H344 I 9.79 9.79 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H267 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 3 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 13:13:58.01 9.63 9.63

9. 63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.63 9.48 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H268 of H344 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 9.27 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H268 of H344 II l

9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 9.27 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H269 of H344 Program : LAKET Page : 4 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/24/2011 Created: 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 13:13:58.01 9.27 9.27 9.23 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8.94 8 .94 8 .94 8.94

8. 94
8. 94 8.94 8 .94 8 .94 8 .94 8.81 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H270 of H344 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.61 8.57 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H271 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 5 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 13:13:58.01 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H272 of H344 I 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 8.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H273 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 6 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 13:13:58.01 8.57 8.52 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H274 of H344 I 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 8.31 END IPROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H275 of H344 Program  : LAKET Page : 7 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/24/2011 Created  : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 13:13:58.01 Case 4c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')

RUN 30 DAYS FROM 61854 TO 71754 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT  : 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT 20.00 DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION = 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 82.150 381.900 73.940 343.700 689.000 80.550 300.600 72.490 270.500 688.000 78.960 220.800 71.060 198.700 687.000 77.330 142.700 69.600 128.400 686.000 29.700 71.740 26.730 64.570 685.000 14.750 50.790 13.280 45.710 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)

PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)

NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:

18 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F)

INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 102.74 98.24 WEATHER STATION ID 93822.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H276 of H344 I Program LAKET Page : 8 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 13:13:58.03 Case 4c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')

FPLANT 61854 - 71754 R/I 86.000 TPRISE 61854 - 71754 S/I 35.480 28.950 16.790 16.390 15.420 15.060 14.610 14.360 13.950 13.520 13.360 13.360 13.360 13.300 12.790 12.790 12.500 12.500 12.300 12.090 12.090 12.090 12.090 12.080 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.560 11.160 11.150 11.150 11.150 11.150 10.950 10.940 10. 940 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.590 10.360 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 10.070 9.810 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.790 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.630

9. 630 9.630 9.630 9.630 9.480 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.270 9.230 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H277 of H344 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8.940 8. 940 8.940 8.940 8.810 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8.780 8. 610 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.570 8.520 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO, L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H278 of H344 Program  : LAKET Page : 9 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 13:13:58.09 Case 4c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')

SEASONAL

SUMMARY

FOR SUMMER ( 6/1954 - 8/1954 )

QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.60 688.91 0.00 689.21 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 81.52 80.40 0.00 80.89 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 349.69 293.35 0.00 317.77 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 73.37 72.36 0.00 72.80 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 314.70 263.98 0.00 285.96 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.18 -0.16 0.00 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -2.04 -1.70 0.00 -1.85 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -1.31 -1.14 0.00 -1 22 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.73 -0.56 0.00 -0. 63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 226.40 221.82 0.00 223. 80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 148.36 145.47 0.00 146.72 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 86.34 76.25 0.00 80. 62 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 4.41 0.97 0.00 2.46 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 86.14 83.50 0.00 84. 64 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 98.38 93.35 0.00 95. 53 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 87.12 84.58 0.00 85. 68 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -4.76 -5.29 0.00 -10.05 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -52.66 -57.30 0.00 -109.95 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -33.87 -38.48 0.00 -72.35 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -18.78 -18.82 0.00 -37. 60 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H279 of H344 I TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.0 94.0 84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 133.0 108.0 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.0 94.0 85.1 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H280 of H344 1 Program LAKET Page : 10 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 13:13:58.09 Case 4c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')

CUMULATIVE SEASONAL

SUMMARY

SUMMER QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.60 688.91 0.00 689.21 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 81.52 80.40 0.00 80.89 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 349.69 293.35 0.00 317.77 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 73.37 72.36 0.00 72.80 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 314.70 263.98 0.00 285.96 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.18 -0.16 0.00 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -2.04 -1.70 0.00 -1.85 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -1.31 -1.14 0.00 -1.22 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.73 -0.56 0.00 -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 226.40 221.82 0.00 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 148.36 145.47 0.00 146.72 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 86.34 76.25 0.00 80. 62 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 4.41 0.97 0.00 2.46 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 86.14 83.50 0.00 84.64 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 98.38 93.35 0.00 95.53 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 87.12 84.58 0.00 85.68 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -4.76 -5.29 0.00 -10.05 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -52.66 -57.30 0.00 -109.95 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -33.87 -38.48 0.00 -72.35 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -18.78 -18.82 0.00 -37. 60 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H281 of H344 I TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) I00.0 94.0 84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 133.0 108.0 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.0 94.0 85.1 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H282 of H344 Program  : LAKET Page : 11 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 02/24/2011 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 13:13:58.09 Case 4c: LaSalle UHS (12:00, Worst 30-day Evaporation; To=104F, 1.0')

TOTAL CUMULATIVE

SUMMARY

QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE VALUE DATE ) VALUE ( DATE VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 6181954) 20.00 6181954) 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 690.00 6181954) 688.52 7171954) 689.21 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 82.14 6181954) 79.78 7171954) 80.89 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 381.62 6181954) 261.88 7171954) 317.77 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 73.94 6181954) 71.80 7171954) 72.80 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 343.45 6181954) 235.66 7171954) 285.96 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.14 7171954) -0.20 6181954) -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -0.49 6291954) -5.43 6181954) -1.85 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -0.26 6291954) -4.11 6271954) -1.22 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.16 7171954) -2.44 6181954) -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 451.13 6191954) 90.18 7071954) 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 165.64 6181954) 136.01 7071954) 146.72 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 270.89 6271954) 17.13 6291954) 80.62 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 37.53 6271954) -47.07 7121954) 2.46 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 101.48 6181954) 74.48 7071954) 84.64 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 140.00 6181954) 83.77 7071954) 95.53 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.84 6181954) 74.79 7071954) 85.68 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL VALUE DATE ) VALUE ( DATE VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0 .00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0 .00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -0 .04 7171954) -0.05 6181954) -10.05 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -0 .12 6291954) -1.35 6181954) -109.95 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -0 .06 6291954) -1.02 6271954) -72.35 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -0 .04 7171954) -0.61 6181954) -37.60 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0 .00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H283 of H344 I REVIIONNO. ATACHMNT , PGE O. H83 f H44 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 100.0 94.0 84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 133.0 108.0 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 104.0 94.0 85.1 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H284 of H344 I Program : LAKET Page : 1 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 09:37:07.53 Case 00ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat 1

2 061854 071754 1 3 2 3 1 0 20.

4 1 0.2 550 0. 0 5 6 2 690 690 83.83 464. 9 75.45 418.4 689 82.15 381. 9 73.94 343.7 688 80.55 300. 5 72.50 270.5 687 78.96 220 .8 71.06 198.7 686 77.33 142. 6 69.60 128.4 685 29.70 71.7 26.73 65.6 7 1 0 3 19 20 21 8 97.6 93.1 999 FPLANT R/I 86.0 TPRISE S/I 35.26 28.79 16.68 16.28 15.32 14.97 14.53 14.29 13.88 13.45 13.30 13.30 13.30 13.24 12.73 12.73 12.57 12.43 12.24 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.01 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H285 of H344 I 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.09 11.07 11.07 11.07 11.07

10. 87 10.86 10.86 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.27 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.72 9.70 9.70 9.70 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

m CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H286 of H344 II 9.70 9.70 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.40 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 IPROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H287 of H344 i 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.15 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.72 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H288 of H344 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.52 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H289 of H344 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.44 END I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H290 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 7 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created :11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time :09:37:07.53 Case 00ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat RUN 30 DAYS FROM 61854 TO 71754 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT  : 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT 20.00 DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION = 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 83.830 464.900 75.450 418.400 689.000 82.150 381.900 73.940 343.700 688.000 80.550 300.500 72.500 270.500 687.000 78.960 220.800 71.060 198.700 686.000 77.330 142.600 69.600 128.400 685.000 29.700 71.700 26.730 65.600 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)

PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)

NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:

19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 21 LAKE TEMP @ DAM (F)

INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 97.60 93.10 WEATHER STATION ID 93822.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H291 of H344 Program  : LAKET Page : 8 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 09:37:07.53 Case 00ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat FPLANT 61854 - 71754 R/I 86.000 TPRISE 61854 - 71754 S/I 35.260 28.790 16.680 16.280 15.320 14.970 14.530 14 .290 13.880 13.450 13.300 13.300 13.300 13.240 12.730 12.730 12.570 12.430 12.240 12.020 12.020 12.020 12.020 12.010 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.090 11.070 11.070 11.070 11.070 10.870 10.860 10.860 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.270 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.720 9.700 9.700 9.700 9.700 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540

9. 540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.400 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190
9. 190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.150 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H292 of H344 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.720 8.700 8. 700 8. 700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.520 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 8.490 8. 490 8 .490 8.490 8.490 8. 490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8. 490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8. 490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8. 490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8. 490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.440 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H293 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 9 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 09:37:07.56 Case 00ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat SEASONAL

SUMMARY

FOR SUMMER ( 6/1954 - 8/1954 )

QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.62 688.93 0.00 689.23 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 83.19 82.04 0.00 82.54 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 433.37 376.32 0.00 401.04 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 74.88 73.84 0.00 74.29 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 390.02 338. 68 0.00 360.93 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.19 -0.17 0.00 -0.18 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -2.03 -1.72 0.00 -1.85 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -1.31 -1.16 0.00 -1.23 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.72 -0.55 0.00 -0. 62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 226.40 221.82 0.00 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 148.00 145.52 0.00 146.59 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 84.28 76.16 0.00 79.68 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 4.08 1.01 0.00 2.34 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 85.84 83.56 0.00 84.55 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 98.17 93.43 0.00 95.49 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 86.96 84 .72 0.00 85.69 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -4.84 -5.58 0 .00 -10.42 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -52.28 -57.83 0 .00 -110.11 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -33.73 -39.21 0.00 -72.94 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -18.55 -18.62 0.00 -37.17 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H294 of H344 I 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 95.8 92.2 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 106.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 92.7 85.2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H295 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 10 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 09:37:07.56 Case 00ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat CUMULATIVE SEASONAL

SUMMARY

SUMMER QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE J UN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 20. 00 0.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.62 688.93 0.00 689.23 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 83.19 82.04 0.00 82. 54 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 433.37 376.32 0.00 401.04 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 74.88 73.84 0.00 74.29 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 390.02 338.68 0.00 360.93 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.19 -0.17 0.00 -0.18 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -2.03 -1.72 0.00 -1.85 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -1.31 -1.16 0.00 -1.23 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.72 -0.55 0.00 -0.62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 226.40 221.82 0.00 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 148.00 145.52 0.00 146.59 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 84.28 76.16 0.00 79.68 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 4.08 1.01 0.00 2.34 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 85.84 83.56 0.00 84.55 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 98.17 93.43 0.00 95.49 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 86.96 84.72 0.00 85.69 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -4.84 -5.58 0.00 -10.42 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -52.28 -57.83 0.00 -110.11 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -33.73 -39.21 0.00 -72.94 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -18.55 -18.62 0.00 -37.17 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H296 of H344 1% 5% 50% REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H296 of H344 II LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 95.8 92.2 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 106.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 92.7 85.2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H297 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 11 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 09:37:07.56 Case 00ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat TOTAL CUMULATIVE

SUMMARY

QUANTITY -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -

MAXIMUM--

QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE VALUE (DATE VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 6181954) 20.00 6181954) 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 690.00 6181954) 688 54 7171954) 689.23 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 83.83 6181954) 81.41 7171954) 82.54 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 464.67 6181954) 344.36 7171954) 401 .04 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 75.45 6181954) 73 .28 7171954) 74.29 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 418.19 6181954) 309.94 7171954) 360.93 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.15 7171954) -0.20 6181954) -0.18 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -0.54 6291954) -5.33 6271954) -1 85 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -0.28 6221954) -4 .07 6271954) -1.23 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.15 6181954) -1. 92 6181954) -0. 62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 451.13 6191954) 90.18 7071954) 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 159.63 6181954) 137 .82 7071954) 146.59 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 262.99 6271954) 17 .98 6221954) 79.68 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 37.83 6271954) -46.87 7121954) 2.34 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 96.31 6181954) 76.25 7071954) 84. 55 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 134.81 6181954) 85.65 7071954) 95.49 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.95 6181954) 76.80 7071954) 85.69 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL VALUE ( DATE VALUE ( DATE VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -0.04 7171954) -0.05 6181954) -10.42 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -0.13 6291954) -1.32 6271954) -110.11 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -0.07 6221954) -1.01 6271954) -72. 94 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -0.04 6181954) -0.48 6181954) -37 .17 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H298 of H344 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 95.8 92.2 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 106.5 94.5 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 92.7 85.2 Program LAKET Page : 1 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H299 of H344 Created  : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 09:41:26.34 Case 06ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate) 1 2 061854 071754 1 1 0 3 2 3 1 0 20.

4 1 0.2 5500. 0 5 6 2 690 590 82.99 423. 5 74.69 381.2 89 81.35 341. 4 73.21 307.2 88 79.75 260. 8 71.78 234.7 87 78.15 181. 9 70.34 163.7 86 29.70 102. 02 26.73 92.0 7 85 22.22 60.0 20.00 54.0 8 1 0 3 19 20 21 97.4 92.9 999 FPLANT R/I 86.0 TPRISE S/I 35.26 28.79 16.68 16.28 15.32 14.97 14.53 14.29 13.88 13.45 13.30 13.30 13.30 13.24 12.73 12.73 12.57 12.43 12.24 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.01 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H300 of H344 I 11.49 11.49 11.09 11.07 11.07 11.07 11.07 10.87 10.86 10.86 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.27 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.72 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H301 of H344 1 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.40 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H302 of H344 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.15 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.72 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H303 of H344 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8 .52 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8 .49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H304 of H344 I 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.44 END PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H305 of H344 Program : LAKET Page : 7 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created: 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 09:41:26.34 Case 06ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat RUN 30 DAYS FROM 61854 TO 71754 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT  : 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT 20.00 DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION = 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 82.990 423.500 74.690 381.200 689.000 81.350 341.400 73.210 307.200 688.000 79.750 260.800 71.780 234.700 687.000 78.150 181.900 70.340 163.700 686.000 29.700 102.200 26.730 92.000 685.000 22.220 60.000 20.000 54.000 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)

PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)

NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:

19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 21 LAKE TEMP @ DAM (F)

INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 97.40 92.90 WEATHER STATION ID 93822.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

I ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H306 of H344 I Program LAKET Page :8 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date :04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time :09:41:26.34 Case 06ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat FPLANT 61854 - 71754 R/I 86.000 TPRISE 61854 - 71754 S/I 35.260 28.790 16.680 16.280 15.320 14.970 14.530 14 .290 13.880 13.450 13.300 13.300 13.300 13.240 12.730 12.730 12.570 12.430 12.240 12.020 12.020 12.020 12.020 12.010 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.090 11.070 11.070 11.070 11.070 10.870 10.860 10.860 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.270 9.990 9. 990 9.990 9. 990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9. 990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9. 990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9. 990 9.990 9.990 9.720 9.700 9.700 9.700 9.700 9. 700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.400 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9. 190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9. 190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190

9. 190 9.190 9. 190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.150 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H307 of H344 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.720 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.520 8.490 8. 490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.440 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H308 of H344 Program  : LAKET Page : 9 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 09:41:26.35 Case 06ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat SEASONAL

SUMMARY

FOR SUMMER ( 6/1954 - 8/1954 )

QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.62 688.93 0.00 689.23 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 82.37 81.24 0.00 81.73 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 392.37 335.79 0.00 360.30 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 74 .13 73.11 0.00 73.55 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 353.14 302.16 0.00 324.25 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.19 -0.16 0.00 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -2.00 -1.70 0.00 -1.83 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -1.28 -1.15 0.00 -1.21 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.72 -0.55 0.00 -0.62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 226.40 221.82 0.00 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 147.84 145.50 0.00 146.51 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 83.54 76.20 0.00 79.38 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 3.88 0.99 0.00 2.24 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 85.70 83.53 0.00 84.47 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 97.97 93.35 0.00 95.35 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 86.77 84.64 0.00 85.57 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -4.81 -5.46 0.00 -10.27 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -51.65 -57.47 0.00 -109.12 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -33.10 -38.85 0.00 -71.95 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -18.55 -18.62 0.00 -37.17 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H309 of H344 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 95.8 92.2 84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 106.0 94.4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 92.3 85.1 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H310 of H344 I Program LAKET Page : 10 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 09:41:26.35 Case 06ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat CUMULATIVE SEASONAL

SUMMARY

SUMMER QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGE S AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689. 62 688.93 0.00 689.23 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 82.37 81.24 0.00 81.73 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 392.37 335.79 0.00 360.30 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 74.13 73.11 0.00 73.55 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 353.14 302.16 0.00 324.25 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.19 -0.16 0.00 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -2.00 -1.70 0.00 -1.83 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -1.28 -1.15 0.00 -1.21 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.72 -0.55 0.00 -0 .62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 226.40 221.82 0.00 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 147 .84 145.50 0.00 146.51 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 83.54 76.20 0.00 79.38 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 3.88 0.99 0.00 2 .24 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 85.70 83.53 0.00 84 .47 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 97.97 93.35 0.00 95.35 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 86.77 84.64 0.00 85.57 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -4.81 -5.46 0.00 -10.27 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -51.65 -57.47 0.00 -109.12 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -33.10 -38.85 0.00 -71.95 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -18.55 -18.62 0.00 -37.17 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H311 of H344 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 95.8 92.2 84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 106.0 94 .4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 92.3 85.1 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H312 of H344 I Program : LAKET Page : 11 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 09:41:26.35 Case 06ev: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprat TOTAL CUMULATIVE

SUMMARY

QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE VALUE DATE VALUE ( DATE VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 6181954) 20.00 6181954) 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 690.00 6181954) 688.54 7171954) 689.23 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 82.99 6181954) 80.61 7171954) 81.73 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 423.27 6181954) 304.09 7171954) 360.30 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 74.69 6181954) 72.55 7171954) 73.55 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 381.00 6181954) 273.64 7171954) 324.25 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.15 7171954) -0.20 6181954) -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -0.52 6291954) -5.34 6271954) -1.83 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -0.27 6221954) -4.09 6271954) -1.21 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.14 6181954) -1.97 6181954) -0.62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 451.13 6191954) 90.18 7071954) 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 159.72 6181954) 137.02 7071954) 146.51 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 266.48 6271954) 17.56 6221954) 79.38 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 37.73 6271954) -46.97 7121954) 2.24 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 96.39 6181954) 75.47 7071954) 84.47 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 134.78 6181954) 84.76 7071954) 95.35 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.96 6181954) 75.91 7071954) 85.57 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL VALUE ( DATE VALUE ( DATE VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -0.04 7171954) -0.05 6181954) -10.27 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -0.13 6291954) -1.32 6271954) -109.12 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -0.07 6221954) -1.01 6271954) -71.95 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -0.04 6181954) -0 .49 6181954) -37.17 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H313 of H344 I 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 95.8 92.2 84.0 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 106.0 94.4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 92.3 85.1 Program LAKET Page : 1 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H314 ofH344 Created  : 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 09:43:32.15 Case 18e: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate 1

2 061854 071754 1 1 0 3 3 1 0 20.

4 1 0.2 5 500. 0 5 6 2 6 90 690 81.35 341.4 73.21 307.2 689 79.75 260.8 71.78 234.7 688 78.15 181.9 70.34 163.7 687 29.70 102.2 26.73 92.0 686 22.22 60.0 20.00 54.0 685 13.42 43.8 12.08 39.4 7 1 0 3 19 20 21 8 96.8 92.3 999 FPLANT R/I 86.0 TPRISE S/I 35.26 28.79 16.68 16.28 15.32 14.97 14.53 14.29 13.88 13.45 13.30 13.30 13.30 13.24 12.73 12.73 12.57 12.43 12.24 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.01 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H315 of H344 1I 11.49 11.49 11.09 11.07 11.07 11.07 11.07 10.87 10.86 10.86 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.27 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.72 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H316 of H344 I 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.40 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H317 of H344 II 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.15 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.72 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H318 of H344 I 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.52 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO, L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H319 of H344 I 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.44 END I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H320 of H344 Program: LAKET Page: 7 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created: 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time :09:43:32.15 Case 18e: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate RUN 30 DAYS FROM 61854 TO 71754 PLOT FILE OPTION : 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT  : 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT 20.00 DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION = 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 81.350 341.400 73.210 307.200 689.000 79.750 260.800 71.780 234.700 688.000 78.150 181.900 70.340 163.700 687.000 29.700 102.200 26.730 92.000 686.000 22.220 60.000 20.000 54.000 685.000 13.420 43.800 12.080 39.400 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)

PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)

NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:

19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 21 LAKE TEMP @ DAM (F)

INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. = 96.80 92.30 WEATHER STATION ID 93822.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H321 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 8 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 09:43:32.15 Case 18e: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate FPLANT 61854 - 71754 R/I 86.000 TPRISE 61854 - 71754 S/I 35.260 28.790 16.680 16.280 15.320 14.970 14.530 14.290 13.880 13.450 13.300 13.300 13.300 13.240 12.730 12.730 12.570 12.430 12.240 12.020 12.020 12.020 12.020 12.010 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.090 11.070 11.070 11.070 11.070 10.870 10.860 10.860 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10. 500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.270 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.720 9.700 9.700 9.700 9.700 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.400 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9. 190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.150 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H322 of H344 I 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.720 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700

8. 700 8.700 8. 700 8. 700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8. 520 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.440 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H323 of H344 I Program LAKET Page : 9 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 09:43:32.18 Case 18e: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate SEASONAL

SUMMARY

FOR SUMMER ( 6/1954 - 8/1954 )

QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 20.00 0 .00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.62 688.93 0.00 689.23 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 80.75 79.64 0.00 80.12 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 311.10 255.47 0.00 279.57 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 72.67 71.68 0.00 72.11 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 279.94 229. 90 0.00 251.58 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.18 -0.15 0.00 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -1.95 -1. 68 0.00 -1.80 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -1.23 - .13 0 .00 -1.18 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.72 -0.55 0.00 -0.62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 226.40 221.82 0.00 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 147.50 145. 43 0.00 146.33 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 81.97 76. 30 0.00 78.76 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 3.45 0.93 0.00 2.02 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 85.38 83.46 0 .00 84.29 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 97.62 93.16 0 .00 95.09 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 86.44 84.50 0.00 85.34 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -4.73 -5.15 0.00 -9.89 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -50.36 -56.78 0.00 -107.14 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -31.83 -38.14 0.00 -69.97 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -18.53 -18.64 0.00 -37.17 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

B CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H324 of H344 I 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 96.0 91.7 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 105.5 94 .4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 92.6 85.2 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H325 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 10 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 09:43:32.18 Case 18e: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate CUMULATIVE SEASONAL

SUMMARY

SUMMER QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.62 688. 93 0.00 689.23 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 80.75 79. 64 0.00 80.12 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 311.10 255. 47 0.00 279.57 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 72.67 71.68 0.00 72.11 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 279. 94 229. 90 0.00 251.58 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.18 -0.15 0.00 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -1.95 -1. 68 0.00 -1.80 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -1 23 -1. 13 0.00 -1.18 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.72 -0.55 0.00 -0.62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 226.40 221.82 0.00 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 147.50 145.43 0.00 146.33 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 81.97 76.30 0.00 78.76 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 3.45 0.93 0.00 2.02 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 85.38 83.46 0.00 84.29 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 97. 62 93. 16 0.00 95.09 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 86.44 84.50 0.00 85.34 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -4.73 -5.15 0.00 -9.89 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -50.36 -56.78 0.00 -107.14 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -31.83 -38.14 0.00 -69.97 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -18.53 -18.64 0.00 -37.17 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H326 of H344 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 96.0 91.7 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 105.5 94 .4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 92.6 85.2 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H327 of H344 I Program LAKET Page : 11 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 09:43:32.18 Case 18e: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 30-Day Evap; Ti=97.6F @ 1200; power uprate TOTAL CUMULATIVE

SUMMARY

QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE VALUE ( DATE VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 6181954) 20.00 6181954) 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 690.00 6181954) 688.54 7171954) 689.23 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 81.35 6181954) 79.01 7171954) 80 .12 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 341.18 6181954) 224.36 7171954) 279.57 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 73.21 6181954) 71.11 7171954) 72. 11 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 307.00 6181954) 201.91 7171954) 251.58 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.14 7171954) -0.20 6181954) -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -0.48 6291954) -5.39 6271954) -1.80 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) -0.24 6291954) -4.14 6271954) -1.18 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.14 6181954) -2.08 6181954) -0 .62 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 451.13 6191954) 90.18 7071954) 223.80 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 159.94 6181954) 134.94 7071954) 146.33 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 275.39 6271954) 16.21 6291954) 78.76 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 37.16 6271954) -47.13 7121954) 2.02 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 96.58 6181954) 73.43 7071954) 84.29 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 134.67 6181954) 82.31 7071954) 95.09 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.96 6181954) 73.50 7071954) 85.34 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL VALUE ( DATE VALUE ( DATE VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -0.03 7171954) -0.05 6181954) -9.89 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -0.12 6291954) -1 34 6271954) -107.14 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) -0.06 6291954) -1.03 6271954) -69.97 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -0.03 6181954) -0.52 6181954) -37.17 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 6181954) 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES IPROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H328 of H344 I 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 96.0 91.7 84.1 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 105.5 94.4 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 92.6 85.2 Program  : LAKET Page I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H329 of H344 i Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 09:56:32.71 Case 0609: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate 1

2 070100 080500 1 1 0 3 2 3 1 0 20 4 1 0.2 5500. 0 5 6 2 690 690 82.99 423.5 74.69 381.2 689 81.35 341.4 73.21 307.2 688 79.75 260.8 71.78 234.7 687 78.15 181.9 70.34 163.7 686 29.70 102.2 26.73 92.0 685 22.22 60.0 20.00 54.0 7 1 0 3 19 20 21 8 97.5 93.0 999 FPLANT R/I 86.0 TPRISE S/I 35.26 28.79

16. 68 16.28 15.32
14. 97 14.53 14.29 13.88 13.45 13.30 13.30 13.30 13.24 12.73 12.73 12.57 12.43 12.24 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.02 12.01 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.49 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H330 of H344 I 11.49 11.49 11.49 11.09 11.07 11.07 11.07 11.07 10.87 10.86 10.86 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.27 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.72 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.70 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H331 of H344 I 9.70 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.54 9.40 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H332 of H344 I 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.19 9.15 8.85 8.85 8 .85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.85 8.72 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8 .70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

I ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H333 of H344 II 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.70 8.52 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H334 of H344 I 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.49 8.44 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8,22 8,22 8.22 8,22 8,22 8,22 8,22 8.22 8.22 8,22 8,22 8.22 8,22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H335 of H344 II 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 8.22 END I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H336 of H344 Program  : LAKET Page : 7 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 09:56:32.71 Case 0609: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate RUN 36 DAYS FROM 70100 TO 80500 PLOT FILE OPTION 1 CYCLE FLAG: 1 CIRCULATION TIME FLAG: 0 TIME INCREMENT  : 3 TIME UNITS: 2 WEATHER FILE OPTION: 1 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT OPTION: 0 ANEMOMETER HEIGHT 20.00 DENSITY: 62.40 SEEPAGE: 0.20 LAKE LENGTH: 5500.00 LAKE ELEVATION OPTION = 2 INITIAL LAKE ELEVATION = 690.00 DRAWDOWN CURVE ELEVATION TOTAL AREA TOTAL VOLUME EFF AREA EFF VOLUME 690.000 82.990 423.500 74.690 381.200 689.000 81.350 341.400 73.210 307.200 688.000 79.750 260.800 71.780 234.700 687.000 78.150 181.900 70.340 163.700 686.000 29.700 102.200 26.730 92.000 685.000 22.220 60.000 20.000 54.000 PLOT FILE FREQENCY 1 (NUMBER OF TIME STEPS)

PLOT FILE FORMAT 0 (0-EXCEL/1-ACGRACE)

NUMBER OF VARIABLES FOR PLOT FILE: 3 PLOT VARIABLES:

19 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 20 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 21 LAKE TEMP @ DAM (F)

INITIAL FORCED/NATURAL LAKE TEMPS. 97.50 93.00 WEATHER STATION ID 0.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H337 of H344 I Program LAKET Page : 8 Number  : 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date :04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 09:56:32.71 Case 0609: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate FPLANT 70100 - 80500 R/I 86.000 TPRISE 70100 - 80500 S/I 35.260 28.790 16.680 16.280 15.320 14.970 14.530 14.290 13.880 13.450 13.300 13.300 13.300 13.240 12.730 12.730 12.570 12.430 12.240 12.020 12.020 12.020 12.020 12.010 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.490 11.090 11.070 11.070 11.070 11.070 10.870 10.860 10.860 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10. 500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.500 10.270 9.990 9.990 9. 990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9. 990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.990 9.720 9.700 9.700 9.700 9.700 9.700 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.540 9.400 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.190 9.150 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H338 of H344 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.050 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.850 8.720 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.700 8.520 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 8 .490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.490 8.440 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 8.220 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H339 of H344 Program LAKET Page : 9 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time 09:56:32.75 Case 0609: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate SEASONAL

SUMMARY

FOR SUMMER ( 6/1900 - 8/1900 )

QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 0.00 689.29 688.57 689.19 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 0.00 81.83 80.66 81. 67 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 0.00 365.53 306.60 357.34 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 0.00 73.65 72.59 73.50 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 0.00 328.96 275.90 321.59 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) 0.00 -0.17 -0.15 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 -1.62 -1.32 -1.58 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 -0.97 -0.77 -0.94 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) 0.00 -0.64 -0.55 -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 219.94 214.31 219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 153.43 152.11 153.24 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 63.62 50.87 61.85 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 5.18 5.08 5.16 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 0.00 90.79 89.62 90.63 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 0.00 101.45 98.76 101.08 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 0.00 91.70 90.57 91.54 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) 0.00 -10.76 -1.48 -12.23 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -99.48 -13.08 -112.56 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -59.82 -7.60 -67. 42 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -39.66 -5.48 -45.14 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H340 of H344 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 97.0 95.9 90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 109.4 100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 97.1 91.9 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H341 of H344 7 Program LAKET Page : 10 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date : 04/07/2006 Created 11/18/2004 08:08:26 Time : 09:56:32.75 Case 0609: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate CUMULATIVE SEASONAL

SUMMARY

SUMMER QUANTITY MONTHLY AVERAGES AVERAGE JUN JUL AUG VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 0.00 689.29 688.57 689.19 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 0.00 81.83 80.66 81.67 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 0.00 365.53 306.60 357.34 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 0.00 73.65 72.59 73. 50 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 0.00 328.96 275.90 321.59 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) 0.00 -0.17 -0.15 -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 -1.62 -1 32 -1.58 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 -0.97 -0.77 -0.94 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) 0.00 -0.64 -0.55 -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 219. 94 214.31 219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 153.43 152.11 153.24 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 63.62 50.87 61.85 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 0.00 5.18 5.08 5.16 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 0.00 90.79 89.62 90.63 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 0.00 101.45 98.76 101.08 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 0.00 91.70 90.57 91.54 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY MONTHLY TOTALS TOTAL JUN JUL AUG VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) 0.00 -10.76 -1.48 -12.23 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -99.48 -13.08 -112.56 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -59.82 -7 . 60 -67.42 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) 0.00 -39.66 -5.48 -45.14 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H342 of H344 I 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 97.0 95.9 90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 109.4 100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 97.1 91.9 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H343 of H344 1 Program  : LAKET Page : 11 Number 03.7.292-2.2 0 Date :04/07/2006 Created 11/28/2004 08:08:26 Time :09:56:32.75 Case 0609: LaSalle UHS (Updated Worst 36-Day Temp; Ti=97.7F @0900; power uprate TOTAL CUMULATIVE

SUMMARY

QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE VALUE ( DATE VALUE ( DATE VALUE ANEMOMETER HEIGHT (FT) 20.00 7011900) 20.00 7011900) 20.00 LAKE ELEVATION (FEET) 689.99 7011900) 688.47 8051900) 689.19 TOTAL AREA (ACRE) 82.98 7011900) 80.50 8051900) 81.67 TOTAL VOLUME (ACRE-FT) 422.94 7011900) 298.69 8051900) 357.34 EFFECTIVE AREA (ACRE) 74.68 7011900) 72.45 8051900) 73.50 EFFECTIVE VOL (ACRE-FT) 380.69 7011900) 268.78 8051900) 321.59 CIRCULATION TIME (HR) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 PRECIPITATION (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0 .00 7011900) 0.00 MAKEUP TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 SEEPAGE (CFS) -0.15 8051900) -0.20 7011900) -0.17 EVAPORATION TOTAL (CFS) -0.32 8051900) -4 .06 7051900) -1.58 EVAPORATION NATURL(CFS) 0.00 7031900) -2.67 7051900) -0.94 EVAPORATION FORCED(CFS) -0.26 7311900) -1.53 7011900) -0.63 BLOWDOWN TOTAL (CFS) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 SOLAR GAIN (BTU/HR-FT2) 430.59 7191900) 101.21 7221900) 219.16 SURF LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 161.26 7041900) 143.56 7241900) 153.24 EVAP LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 172.30 7051900) 0 .00 7031900) 61.85 COND LOSS (BTU/HR-FT2) 24.99 7051900) -31 .64 7251900) 5.16 LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 97.72 7041900) 81.75 7241900) 90. 63 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 132.96 7011900) 91 .00 7241900) 101 .08 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.98 7011900) 82.51 7241900) 91.54 DISSOLVED SOLIDS (PPM) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 QUANTITY MAXIMUM MINIMUM TOTAL VALUE ( DATE VALUE ( DATE ) VALUE TOTAL PRECIP (ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 TOTAL MKUP TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 TOTAL SEEPAGE (ACRE-FT) -0.04 8051900) -0.05 7011900) -12.23 TOTAL EVAP TOT(ACRE-FT) -0.08 8051900) -1.01 7051900) -112.56 TOTAL EVAP NAT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7031900) -0.66 7051900) -67.42 TOTAL EVAP FOR(ACRE-FT) -0.07 7311900) -0.38 7011900) -45.14 TOTAL BLWD TOT(ACRE-FT) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 7011900) 0.00 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT H, PAGE NO. H344 of H344 TEMPERATURE FREQUENCY OF OCCURENCES 1% 5% 50%

LAKE TEMP NATURAL (F) 97.0 95.9 90.9 LAKE TEMP @ INLET (F) 128.0 109.4 100.9 LAKE TEMP @ OUTLET (F) 99.0 97.1 91.9 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. I1 of 122 11.0 PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE The purpose of this attachment is to evaluate the UHS transient analyses with an allowable plant intake temperature of 104'F and an increased allowable plant intake temperature of 107 0 F for MUR PU and EPU power levels. Additionally, new weather data from January 1995 to September 2010 is considered in prediction of the UHS temperature response. The initial lake temperature is adjusted such that the plant intake temperature remains below 104'F or 107'F during the accident scenario.

12.0 METHODOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The S&L LAKET-PC computer program [Ref. 15.2] is utilized to determine the combined impact of decay heat, initial UHS temperature, and allowable sediment accumulation in the UHS. The maximum allowable UHS temperature is determined for average sediment accumulations of zero (0), six (6), twelve (12), and eighteen (18) inches.

12.1 Methodology 12.1.1 Selection of Weather Data - The selection of the most limiting weather data is done in Attachment M. The worst weather day was determined to be 7/25/2001 ending at 6:00 AM and the worst weather month runs from 7/21/1995 4:00PM to 8/20/1995 3:00PM. The most limiting net evaporation month was determined to be from 6/18/1954 to 7/18/1954, which is unchanged from previous revisions of this calculation.

12.1.2 Lake Area and Volume - The initial lake elevation is 690-ft, which corresponds to the top water elevation of the UHS per the UFSAR. [Ref. 15.1]. However, UFSAR Section 9.2.6.3 [Ref. 15.1] states that 440,400 gallons of water from the UHS must be available for fire fighting following an accident (Design Input 14.3). Assuming that this inventory is removed from the UHS immediately following an accident (Assumption 13.2) leads to a decrease in the initial lake elevation of 690-ft and lake volume and area.

440,400 gallons corresponds to 1.35 acre-ft of water and a 0.02-ft drop in lake elevation. The initial lake level in the LAKET file is modified to incorporate these changes as shown in Table 12-1. The volume at an elevation of 689.98-ft is determined by subtracting the 1.35 acre-ft used in fire-fighting from the lake volume at 690-ft. The surface area is determined by interpolation using the information given in Table 7.1 of the main body of this calculation. The effective volume and effective area are determined by multiplying the volume and surface area by the effective volume and effective area percentages determined in Attachment J (effective volume is 63.4% of total volume and effective area is 57.9% of total area).

Table 12-1: Initial Lake Level eE o Effective Sediment Level Lake Elevation Area Volume Effective Area Volume (ft) (acre) "

(acre-ft) (acre) (acre (acre-ft) 18-in 689.98 81.32 340.0 47.08 215.59 12-in 689.98 82.12 380.5 47.55 241.24 6-in 689.98 . 82.96 422.1 48.03 267.64 0-in 689.98 83.80 463.5 48.52 293.89 The remainder of the drawdown curve (from a lake elevation of 689-ft through 685-ft) remains the same as given in Table 7.1 of the main body of this calculation with respect to the total lake voluire and surface area. The effective volume and effective area are updated using the percentages determined in Attachment J.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 12 of 122 12.1.3 Plant Temperature Rise - The UHS heat load is increased due to an increase in power level. In addition, the core decay heat is changed as a result of EPU [Ref. 15.3] The new heat load on the UHS for EPU operation is determined in L-002453 [Ref. 15.4]. The plant temperature rise is dependent on the UHS heat load, and the calculation of the new plant temperature rise at MUR PU and EPU is documented in Attachment L.

12.1.4 LAKET Case Runs - For the worst weather cases (cases ending with the letter a), the initial temperature for each case is iteratively set until the lake outlet temperature is equal to the maximum allowable lake outlet temperature (either 104'F or 107'F). The net evaporation cases use the same input file as the corresponding worst weather case, but are run with the most limiting net evaporation month weather file.

A list of all cases run for this analysis is shown below:

Table 12-2: List of LAKET Cases SPower Level Sediment Case Type S(MWt) Power Level Level Design Criteria lai Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) Pl-antInlet Temp=- 107"F 1c Worst Net Evaporation 4067 (EPU) 0" Initial Temp of Case la 2a Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 1 6" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 2c Worst Net Evaporation 4067 (EPU) 6" Initial Temp of Case 2a 3a_12am Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 1077F 3a_3am Worst Weather 4067(EPU) -ý 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3a_6am Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F

__3a_9am Worst Weather 1 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp 107'F 3a_912pm Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3a_3pm Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3a_6pm I Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3a_9pmr Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107°F 3c worst Net Evaporationj 4067 (EPU) 18" Initial Temp of Case 3a at 6AM 4a Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 12" Plant Inlet Temp = 107'F 4c Worst Net Evaporation 4067 (EPU) 12" Initial Temp of Case 4a 1 -F 4la Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 0 1" Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F 1c 104F I Worst Net Evaporation 4067 (EPU) 0" Initial Temp of Case 1a_104F 2a-104F Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 6" Plant Inlet Temp = 104-F 3a_104F Worst Wether 4067 (EPU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 104"F 4a_104F Worst Weather 4067 (EPU) 12" Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F 1laMUR~ Worst Weather 3559 (MUR PU) 011 Plant Inlet Temp =107-F

___cMUR 1Worst Net Evaporation 13559_(MUR PU) 0" Initial Temp of Case la_MUR 2a_ MUR Worst Weather 3559 (MUR PU) 6" Plant Inlet Temp = 1074F 3a_4MU--iR . V-Wor-st Weather _- 3559_(MUR PU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 107'F 4a MUR Worst Weather 3559 (MUR PU) 12" Plant Inlet Temp = 107'F laMUR 104F Worst Weather 3559 (MUR PU) 0" Plant Inlet Temp = 1047F I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 13 of 122 1 Power Level Sediment Case Type (

I (MWt) Design Criteria Level lc_MUR_104F Worst Net Evaporation 3559 (MUR PU) 0" Initial Temp of Case la MUR_104F 2aMUR_104F Worst Weather 3559 (MUR PU) 6" Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F 3aMUR_104F Worst Weather 3559 (MUR PU) 18" Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F 4a_MUR_104F Worst Weather , 3559 (MUR PU) 12" Plant Inlet Temp = 104'F Cases are run at varying times for the most limiting case, Case 3a. The purpose of this is to determine at which time an accident would provide the most limiting results. For all other cases besides Case 3a, only the time determined to be the most limiting will be used.

For EPU power level and a maximum allowable lake temperature of 107'F, the worst net evaporation cases are ran for all levels of sediment. The worst case in terms of UHS drawdown is determined from the four different sediment levels, and the remainder of the worst evaporation cases are run at this sediment level only.

12.2 Acceptance Criteria 12.2.1 Acceptance Criterion #1 - Peak Temperature - The maximum plant inlet temperature from the UHS shall remain equal to or less than 104'F or 107°F.

12.2.2 Acceptance Criterion #2 - UHS Drawdown - There are no specific acceptance criteria for maximumn UHS lake drawdown. However, for the worst 30-day evaporation period, the maximum lake drawdown is determined for input to calculation L-00 1355 [Ref. 15.6].

12.3 Limitations Same as main body of calculation.

12.4 Identification of Computer Programs Postprocessing of the LAKET-PC results is done using Microsoft Excel 2003 [Ref. 15.5], which is commercially available. The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all spreadsheets used in this analysis. All computer runs were performed using PC No. ZD6661 under the Windows XP operating system.

LAKET-PC Version 2.2 [Ref. 15.2] was used to perform the lake transient analysis contained in this evaluation. This was run on S&L PC No. ZD6661 on Windows XP operating system.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 14 of 122 13.0 ASSUMPTIONS 13.1 Fuel Pool Heat Load - It is assumed that the fuel pool emergency makeup pumps provide required makeup flow to the fuel pools. Including fuel pool heat loads is not realistic because it is improbable that the required operator actions to align the fuel pool emergency makeup pumps to the RHR system could be performed in the post-LOCA reactor building environment [Ref. 15.3]. Therefore, the 600 gpm emergency fuel pool makeup flow rate (See Design Input 14.1) is added to the UHS seepage rate.

13.2 UHS Inventory for Fire Fighting - It is assumed that all UHS inventory for fire fighting is used immediately following an accident. This is conservative as it decreases the volume of water in the UHS.

13.3 Effective Area and Volume at Different Sediment Levels - The effective area and volume percentages determined in Attachment J are determined for 18-in of sediment. It is assumed that these percentages apply to the other sediment levels analyzed in this evaluation. Since changes in sediment level change the depth of the lake evenly throughout the entire lake (see Section 6.2 of the main body of this calculation),

the percentages of effective area and volume will negligibly change with sediment level.

13.4 Other - All other assumptions are the same as the assumptions in the main body of calculation.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 15 of 122 14.0 DESIGN INPUT 14.1 Spent Fuel Pool Makeup Flow - The emergency fuel pool makeup flow rate is 600 gpm, which corresponds to 300 gpm per unit [Ref. 15.3].

14.2 General Seepage Rate - A seepage rate of 0.2 cfs is retained from Design Input 4.3 of the main body of this calculation. This will be added to the spent fuel pool makeup flow (See Assumption 13.1) to determine the total seepage rate of the UHS.

14.3 UHS Inventory for Fire Fighting Following an Accident - Following an accident, 440,400 gallons of water from the UHS must be available for fire fighting [Ref. U5. 1, Section 9.2.6.3].

14.4 Anemometer Height - For the worst net evaporation weather data, which is from the Peoria weather data spanning from 1948 to 1996, the anemometer height is 20-ft (as taken from input files for the worst net evaporation cases in previous revisions). For the worst weather data, which is taken from the LaSalle Station weather data spanning from 1995 to 2010, the anemometer is at a height of 33-ft (See Attachment K).

14.5 Other - All other design inputs are the same as the design inputs in the main body of calculation.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 16 of 122 1

15.0 REFERENCES

15.1 LaSalle County Station Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), Rev. 19.

15.2 LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 12/09/2004. Controlled File Path: \\SNLVS5\SYS3\OPS$kLAK29222\

15.3 SEAG # 12-000098, "DIR for LAS-EPU-U 1/2-DIR-T0608- 1," 4/18/2012.

15.4 "UHS Heat Load," Calculation L-002453, Rev. 3, June 2012.

15.5 Microsoft Office Excel 2003 (11.8120.8122) SP2, Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corporation.

15.6 L-001355, "LaSalle County Station CSCS Hydraulic Model," Rev. 005A.

IPROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 17 of 122 16.0 CALCULATIONS 16.1 Calculation of Plant Temperature Rise The CSCS temperature rise across the plant is computed in Attachment L. Changes from the determination of the plant temperature rise in previous revisions of this calculation included a change in the decay heat ratio as a result of EPU, the removal of fuel pool heat loads, and a one-hour time interval between calculations. See Appendix L9.2 of Attachment L for the results of the plant temperature rise at MUR PU and Appendix L9.4 of Attachment L for the plant temperature rise at EPU.

16.2 Seepage Rate The seepage rate is determined from a UHS seepage of 0.2 cfs (Design Input 14.2) and a constant flow of 600 gpm for spent fuel pool makeup (See Design Input 14.1). This gives a total seepage rate of 1.537 cfs, which a constant for all cases.

16.3 Maximum Allowable Lake Temperature For this analysis, cases are run at MUR PU and EPU power levels. Each case is run with a limiting plant intake temperature of 104'F and 107'F, allowing for a comparison of the maximum allowable UHS temperature at the differing plant intake temperatures. Limiting weather data is determined from two sets of weather data (See Attachment M).

The time of day which the transient is assumed is critical when determining the maximum allowable initial temperature of the UHS. To account for the time of day at which the UHS transient may start, eight start times are used for the limiting sediment depth of 18-in. As seen in Table 17.1, the most limiting time is 6AM (as it results in the lowest allowable initial temperature). Therefore, the remaining worst weather cases are run beginning at 6AM.

In order to determine the limiting amount of sediment, the worst net evaporation case was run at four different sediment levels at EPU power level (Cases la, 2a, 3a, and 4a) for a maximum plant inlet temperature of 107°F. The case with no sediment (Case 1a) was determined to be the most limiting (as it resulted in the highest drawdown). Therefore, the remaining worst evaporation cases were run with a sediment level of 0-in.

16.4 LAKET-PC Files The S&L LAKET-PC computer program [Ref. 15.2] was utilized to determine the combined impact of decay heat, initial UHS temperature, and allowable sediment accumulation in the UHS. The files used in this analysis are shown in Table 16.1, below.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 18 of 122 1 Table 16.1: LAKET Files I Name - IType l Modified Size Ratio Packed

-1Casela.cdat DAT File 6/21(2012 10:21 AM 5,134 91% 470 I' Case la.out OUT File 6/21/2012 11:16 AM 104,201 97% 3,159 11 Case la.pit PLT File 6/21/2012 11:16 AM 435,708 73% 118,789 11 Case la. pltX PLTX File 6/21/2012 11:16 AM 44,640 78% 9,967

?l Case la-lO-F.dat DAT File 6/21/2012 10: 22 AM 5,138 91%/ 472

- Casela_104F.out OUT File 6/21/2012 11: 18 AM 104,201 97% 3, 168 P1 Case lal04F.plt PLT File 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 435,708 73% 118,774

?iCase laj104F.pltX PLTX File 6/21/2012 11: 18 AM 44,640 78% 9,873 Case laMUR.dat DAT File 5/17/2012 4:29 PM 5,069 91% 475 Pj Case la-MUR.out OUT File 5/17(2012 4:32 PM 104,201 97% 3,175 Case lajMUR.plt PLT File 5/17/2012 4:32 PM 435,708 73% 118,813 P Case lajMUR,pltX PLTX File 5/17/2012 4:32 PM 44,640 783% 9,946 LA1 Case laMUR_10-4Fdat DAT File 5/17/2012 4:30 PM 5,074 91% 480 F1 Casela MUR_10-F~out OUT File 5/17/2012 4:35 PM 104,201 97% 3,176 Case la MUR_104F.plt PLT File 5/17(2012 4:35 PM 435,708 73% 118,807

_Case laYMUR_1O4F.pltX PLTX File 5/17/2012 4:35 PM 44,640 78% 9,879 11 Case lc.dat DAT File 6/21/2012 10:21 AM 5,143 91% 478 S Case c. out OUT File 6/21/2012 11: 17AM 103,572 97% 3,358 L; Caselc.plt PLT File 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 421,692 73% 115,779 P1 Case lc.pltX PLI-X File 6/21/2012 11: 17 AM 52,560 77% 12,348 Case lclO41F.dat DAT File 6/21/2012 10:22 AM 5,145 91% 481 DI Case lc 104F.out OUT File 6(21(2012 11:18 AM 103,541 97% 3,349 L Case 1c 104Fplt PLT File 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 421,692 73% 115,769 LA Case lc_104F.pltX PLTX File 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 43,200 76% 10,197 PL Case IcMUR.dat DAT File 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 5,0/-9 90% 484 5 Case lc MUR.out OUT File 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 103,572 97% 3,359 Case IcYMUR.plt PLT File 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 421,692 73% 115,753 4 Case lcMUR.pltX PLTX File 5(22/2012 5:50 PM 52,560 76% 12,358 Case IcMUR_104F.dat DAT File 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 5,081 90% 487

-ACase lcMUR_104F.out OUT File 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 103,541 97% 3,333 Case 1cqMURO-4F.plt PLT File 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 421,692 730/c 115,783 P11 Case 1c MUR 104F.pltX PLTX File 5/22/2012 5:50 PM 43,200 76% 10,244 PlCase2adat DAT File 6/21(2012 10:21 AM 5,137 91% 474 L1 Case2a.out OUT File 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 104,201 97% 3,154 IlCase2a~plt PLT File 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 435,708 73% 118,896

  • AICase2a,pltX PLTX File 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 44,640 78% 9,985

_5 Case2a 10-1F.dat DAT File 6/21/2012 10:22 AM 5,140 91% 475 LA Case2a_104F.out OUT File 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 104,2011 97% 3,187 LACase 2a_104F.plt PLT File 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 435,7038 73% 118,835 LACase 2a104F.pitX PLTX File 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 44,610 78% 10,007 P1Case 2aMUR.dat DAT File 5/17/2012 4:30 PM 5,072 91% 478 EA Case2ajMUR.out OUT File 5/17/2012 4:32 PM 104,201 97% 3,176 Case 2aMUR.plt PLT File 5/17/2012 4:32 PM 435,708 73% 118,932 LACase2aMUR.plLX PLTX File 5/17(2012 4:32 PM 44,640 78% 10,011 lACase2aMUR 104F.dat DAT File 5/17/2012 4:31 PM 5,077 90% 483 P-l1Case2aMUR_10-F.out OUT File 5/17/2012 4:35 PM 104,201 97% 3,183 LA Case2aMUR 104F.pit PLT File 5/17/2012 4:35 PM 435,708 73% 118,914 51 Case 2a MUR_10-F.pltX PLTX File 5/17/2012 4:35 PM 44,640 78% 9,969 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 19 of 122 1 Table 16.1: LAKET Files (cont.)

I Name I Type I Modified Size I Ratio I Packed I PIlCase2c.dat . DAT File 6/21/20 12 10:21 AM 5,144 91% 482 P1 Case 2c.out OUT File 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 103,541 97% 3,346 PlCase2c.plt PLT File 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 421,692 73% 115,828

-1 Case2c.pltX PLTX File 6/21/2012 11: 17 AM 43,200 76% 10,261

.1 Case 3a_104F.cdat DAT File 6/21/2012 10:23 AM 5,133 91% 469 PI1 Case 3a_ 104F. out OUT File 6/21/2012 11: 18 AM 104,201 97% 3,174 P1 Case 3a_ 104F.pit PLT File 6/21/2012 11: 16 AM 435,708 73% 118,968

  • Case 3a_104F.pltX PLTX File 6/21/2012 11: 18 AM 44,640 77% 10,133 P1Case 3a 12am. dat DAT File 6122/2012 10:15 AM 5,137 91% 474 Ri Case 3al12am.out OUT File 6/22/2012 10:16 AM 104,201 97% 3,181 1ýj Case 3a_12am.pit PLT File 6/22/2012 10:16 AM 435,708 73% 119,012

%1 Case 3a_ 12am.pltX PLTX File 6/24222012 10:16 AM 44,640 779/ 10,115 51 Case 3a_j2pm.dat DAT File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 5,137 91% 476 P1 Case 3a_ 12pm, out OUT File 6/21/2012 9:50 AM 104,201 97%* 3,161 Q1 Case 3a_ 12pm. pit PLT File 6/21/2012 9:50 AM 435,708 73% 119,003

', Case 3a_ 12pm.pltX PLTX File 6/21/2012 9:50 AM 44,640 77 %c 10,143 P1 Case 3a_3am. dat DAT File 6/21/2012 9:47 AM 5,134 91% 472

?1*Case3a_3am.out OUT File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 104,201 97% 3,161

-1 Case Ba jam. plt PLT File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 435,708 73% 118,996 P Case 3a3am.pltX PLTX File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 44,640 77% 10,133 P1 Case 3a_3pm, dat DAT File 6/21/2012 9:47 AM 5,134 91% 472 D1 Case 3a_3pm, out OUT File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 104,201 97% 3,159 73%

P Case 3a_3pm. pit PLT File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 435,708 118,909 P. Case 3a_3pm. pltX PLTFX File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 44,640 77% 10,126 P1Case 3a.6am, dat DAT File 6/21/2012 9:48 AM 5,135 91% 474 P1Case 3a_6am. out OUT File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 104,201 97% 3,158 A Case 3a.6amplt PLT File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 435,708 73% 118,984 Pl Case 3a_6am, pltX PLTX File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 44,640 77% 10,112 i Case 3a_6pm, dat DAT File 6/21/2012 9:48 AM 5,136 91% 475 P1 Case 3a_6pm, out OUT File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 104,201 97% 3,162 P1 Case 3a_6pmplt PLT File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 435,708 73% 118,984 P1 Case 3a_6pm, pltX PLTX File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 44,640 77%Ac 10,068 P Case 3agamdat DAT File 6/21/2012 9:48 AM 5,136 91% 473 P1 Case 3a_9am out OUT File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 104,201 97% 3,166 PICase3a_9amplt PLT File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 435,708 73% 118,983 P_1iCase3a_9ampltX PLTX File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 4-1,640 77% 10,082 P1 Case 3a._pmdat DAT File 6/21/2012 9:48 AM 5,136 91% 475 51 Case 3a_9pm.out OUT File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 104,201 97% 3,163 P1 Case 3a._pmplt PLT File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 435,708 73% 118,954 5 Case 3a_9pmpltX PLTX File 6/21/2012 9:49 AM 44,640 77% 10,105 P1Case3aMUR.dat DAT File 5/17/2012 4:30 PM 5,067 91% 478 51 Case 3aMUR. out OUT File 5/17/2012 4:33 PM 104,201 97% 3,166 I1 Case3aMUR.plt PLT File 5/17/20 12 4:33 PM 435,7038 73% 118,981 PI Case 3aMUR.pltX PLTX File 5/17/2012 4:33 PM 44,640 77% 10, 145 S;1 Case3a MUR_104F.dat DAT File 5/17/20 12 4:38 PM 5,070 91% 478 P Case 3aMUR_ 10F. out OUT File 5/17/20 12 4:38 PM 104,201 97% 3,172 51 Case 3aMUR_ 104F. pit PLT File 5/17/2012 4:38 PM 435,708 73% 118,942 A°I Case 3a MUR_ 10*F,pltI PLTX File 5/17/2012 4:38 PM -4,640 77% 10,124 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 110 of 122 1 Table 16.1: LAKET Files (cont.)

Name ,- I Type I Modified Size Ratio Packed 1_'Case 3c. dat DAT File 6/21/2012 10:21 AM 5,133 91% 478

  • 1 Case3c.out OUT File 6/21/2012 11:17AM 103,541 97% 3,327 "I Case3c.plt PLT File 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 421,692 72% 115,987 PLTX File 6/21/2012 11: 17AM 43,200 76% 10,334 P Case 3c.pltX P-1 Case-a.dat DAT File 6/21/2012 10:22 AM 5,133 91% 467 51 Case4a.out OUT File 6/21/2012 11: 17 AM 104,201 97% 3,171
  • 1l Case4a.plt PLT File 6/21/2012 11: 17 AM 435,703 73% 118,931 77% 10,066 Li Case4a.pItX PLTX File 6/21/2012 11:17 AM 44,640

';ICase-la_10F.dat DAT File 6/21/2012 10:23 AM 5,136 91% 470

-1 Casela_10-F.out OUT File 6/21/2012 11: 18 AM 104,201 97% 3,178 1 Case4a_ IOF pit PLT File 6/21/2012 11:18AM 435,708 73% 118,884 51 Case4alO14F. pltX PLTX File 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 44,640 77% 10,046 DAT File 5/17/2012 4:30 PM 5,068 91% 477

_Ž1 Casela_MUR~dat LiCaselaMUR.out OUT File 5/17/2012 4:33 PM 104,201 97% 3,176 5;l Case4aMUR.pit PLT File 5/17/2012 4:33 PM 435,708 73% 118,927 Pl Case4aMUR.pltX PLTX File 5/17/2012 4:33 PM 44,640 77% 10,111 1 Case-laMUR_104F.dat DAT File 5/17/2012 4:39 PM 5,071 91% 480 Li Case4a1MUR_104F.out OUT File 5/17/2012 4:-40 PM 104,201 97% 3,188 Li Case-aMUR_1O4F.plt PLT File 5/17/2012 4:40 PM 435,708 73% 113,868 S11 Case4ajMURJO-1F.plLt PLTX File 5/17/2012 4:40 PM 44,640 77% 10,102 Li Case-qc.dat DAT File 6/21/2012 10:22 AM 5,139 91% 475 21Case4*.out OUT File 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 103,541 97% 3,332

Case4c.plt PLT File 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 421,692 73% 115,829 p.......

............ PLTX File 6/21/2012 11:18 AM 43,200 76% 10,333 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. Ill of 122 17.0 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 17.1 Summary Table 17.1 provides a summary of the limiting maximum initial lake temperature for the worst weather cases. Table 17.2 provides a sununary of the maximum lake drawdown for the worst net evaporation cases.

Table 17.1a: MUR PU (3559 MW) Overall Summary for Maximum Temperature Case Weather Data Sediment Initial Lake Max Plant Inlet Level (in.) Temp. (°F) Temp. (°F) la MUR 1/30 0 103.63 107.0 2aMUR 1/30 J 6 103.32 107.0 3a MUR 1/30 18 102.46 107.0 4aMUR 1/30 12 102.93 107.0 laMUR_104F 1/30 0 100.30 104.0 2aMUR_104F 1/30 6 _ 99.95 104.0 3aMUR_104F 1/30 18 91.68 104.0 4aMUR 104F 1/30 12 89.54 104.0 Table 17.1b: EPU (4067 M W,) Overall Summary for Maximum Temperature I Sediment Initial Lake Max Plant Inlet Case Weather Data 1 Level (in.) Temp. (*F) Temp. (fF) la 1/30 I 0 103.63 107.0 2a 1/30 6 103.32 107.0 3a 12am 1/30 18 104.95 107.0 3a_3am 1/30 18 103.14 106.81 3a_6am 1/30 18 102.42 107.0 3a_9am 1/30 18 103.61 107.0 3a_12pmr 1/30 18 105.80 107.0 3a_3pm 1/30 18 1 106.97 107.0 3a_6pm 1/30 18 107.00 107.0 3a_9pm 1/30 18 107.00 107.0 4a 1/30 12 102.93 107.0 is_104F 1/30 o0 100.30 104.0 2a 104F 1/30 6 96.80 104.0 3a 104F 1/30 18 87.01 104.0 4a_104F 1/30 12 85.47 104.0 (1) Due to a discontinuity in LAKET, this is as close to 107°F that can be reached.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 112 of 122 1 Table 17.2a: MUR PU Overall Summary for Maximum Evaporation Sediment Maximum Case Weather Data Level (in.) Drawdown (ft)1 1c_MUR Worst 30-day Evaporation 0 2.24 lcMUR_104F Worst 30-day Evaporation 0 2.22

1) Determined from initial lake elevation of 689.98-ft.

Table 17.2b: EPU Overall Summary for Maximum Evaporation Sediment Maximum Case Weather Data Level (in.) Drawdown (ft)1 ic Worst 30-dayEvaporation 0 2.27 2c Worst 30-day Evaporation 6 2.25 3c Worst 30-day Evaporation 18 2.20 4c Worst 30-day Evaporation 12 2.23 Ic_104F Worst 30-day Evaporation 0 2.26

1) Determined from initial lake elevation of 689.98-ft.

Figures 17.1 through 17.8, below, show the plant outlet temperature and plant inlet temperature over the entire 31 day period for the 107'F maximum plant inlet temperature case at MUR PU and EPU. Figures 17.9 and 17.10 show the maximum lake drawdown over the worst 30 days of evaporation weather.

17.2 Compliance with Acceptance Criteria 17.2.1 Acceptance Criterion #1 - Peak Temperature - Acceptance Criterion #1 is met provided the plant is operated, monitored, and maintains UHS initial temperatures below the applicable limits per the results listed in Table 17.1.

17.2.2 Acceptance Criterion #2 - UHS Drawdown - The maximum expected lake drawdown for the cases evaluated is given in Table 17.2. This will be used in calculation L-001355 [Ref. 15.6].

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 113 of 122 Figure 17.11: Plant Outlet Temperature (MUR PU) 150.000 140.000 U.

0 130.000 C-I-

E 120.000 0

E 110.000 0.

100.000 90.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 114 of 122 1 Figure 17.2: Plant Outlet Temperature (EPU) 150.000

-.-- Case la ... Case 2a 140.000 Case 3a 6am - - - Case 4a U-0 130.000 CL 4..

E 120.000 4W' 0

110.000 EU 100.000 90.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 115 of 122 Figure 17.3: Plant Inlet Temperature (MUR PU) 108.000 106.000 104.000 U- 102.000 0

100.000

'E 98.000 M-FL 96.000 94.000 92.000 90.000 88.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident IPROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 116 of 122 Figure 17.4: Plant Inlet Temperature (EPU) 108.000 106.000 104.000 LL 102.000 0

100.000 CL E 98.000 4) 0.

96.000 94.000 92.000 90.000 88.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident IPROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 117 of 122 Figure 17.5, Case 3aMUR: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 31-Day Temperature Period (d = 18", t = 0600 hrs, Ti = 102.46°F) 150.000 140.000 UHS Inlet Temperature UHS Outlet Temperature I

130.000 LL 0

1,..

120.000 0

E 110.000 0

100.000 90.000 80.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 118 of 122 Figure 17.6, Case 4a_MUR: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 31-Day Temperature Period (d = 12", t = 0600 hrs, Ti = 102.93°F) 150.000

- UHS Inlet Temperature

- UHS Outlet Temperature 140.000 130.000 LL 0

-" 120.000 C.

I.-.

E: 110.000 100.000 90.000 80.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 119 of 122 1 Figure 17.7, Case 3a: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 31-Day Temperature Period (d = 18", t = 0600 hrs, Ti = 102.43*F) 150.000 140.000 130.000 L-0 120.000 I-4.'

E=110.000 I--

100.000 90.000 80.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 120 of 122 1 Figure 17.8, Case 4a: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 31-Day Temperature Period (d = 12", t = 0600 hrs, T1 = 102.93*F) 150.000 140.000 130.000 U_

0 120.000 E 110.000 I-100.000 90.000 80.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 121 of 122 Figure 17.9, Case lc_MUR: UHS LOCA Drawdown Worst 30 Day Evaporation Weather Period Sediment Level = 0-in 690.500 690.000 689.500 0

CU

> 689.000 688.500 688.000 687.500 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT I, PAGE NO. 122 of 122 Figure 17.10, Case Ic: UHS LOCA Drawdown Worst 30 Day Evaporation Weather Period Sediment Level = 0-in 690.500 690.000 689.500 0

MU 689.000 688.500 688.000 687.500 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J1 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE Ji of J40 Attachment J - UHS Flow Path Analysis Prepared: *VLLJ& IiO "f Date OQCAL V2,,o113 1

D9aniele Ludovisi - Sargent & LundyLLc Reviewed: Date 10- o-2,oOi Pawel Kut - Sargent & LundyLLc Revision 8 of this attachment adds Appendix J8.6 (pages J33 to J40).

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J2 of J40 J1.O PURPOSE The purpose of this attachment is to evaluate the water flow pattern in the man-made Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) at LaSalle County Generating Station with the water depth at its minimum, that the water level is at elevation 690 ft [Ref. J5.1] and the UHS bottom is covered with approximately 1.5 ft of silt [Ref. J5.8]. The analysis is carried by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The recirculation areas in the UHS are identified and the UHS volume actively involved in the main water flow is estimated along with and the associated surface area. The output of this evaluation is to provide effective lake volume and surface area for use in the S&L LAKET-PC computer program.

J1.1 Background The UHS is designed to provide sufficient cooling water to permit the safe shutdown and cool down of the station for both normal and accident conditions. In the unlikely event that the main dike is breached, there is a submerged pond within the cooling lake for the LaSalle County Station that is designed to hold water. This remaining water constitutes the ultimate heat sink for the station. It has a depth of approximately 5 feet and a top water elevation established at 690 feet [Ref. J5.1].

Considering approximately 1.5 ft of silt at the bottom of the UHS, a CFD analysis is performed to predict the water main flow pattern and estimate the volume of water contained in the active zones of the UHS and the corresponding surface area. These inputs are used in main report to determine the combined impact of power uprate and allowable sediment accumulation in the UHS on the maximum plant inlet temperature and evaporative drawdown by use of the S&L LAKET-PC computer program.

J2.0 METHODOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA J2.1 Methodology J2. 1.1 Effective volume and effective surface area Figure J-3 shows a top view of the UHS computational domain. As shown, water enters the UHS in one of the UHS side branches and exits from the intake flume. Zones of recirculation are expected in the other branch of the UHS, which is a dead leg, and in proximity of the UHS inlet. LAKET-PC is a one-dimensional lake thermal prediction computer program [Ref. J5. 10]. The one-dimensional assumption coerces the water body into an idealized rectangular channel. In this idealization, water entering the channel displaces an equal amount of water out of the back end (see Figure J-1 ). At some time (t,)

after the start of flow (to), the volume of displaced water is equal to Q.( t, -to), where is the Q is the flow rate of the water flowing into the channel. Indicating the total volume of the channel with Vchannel, all of the water is considered to have swept out of the channel at time t = to+Vchannel/Q. However, if the lake being modeled has stagnant volumes, the water in those volumes would not be swept out of the exit as idealized in the LAKET-PC modeling. For more accurately conforming the real lake to the idealized channel, these stagnant volumes and the corresponding surfaces must be removed from the active volume.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J3 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J3 of J40 Figure J-1. Reference water flow.

Initial volume of water still present inthe channel at time t Vchannel Straight channel Veffective Channel with to teffecive t = to + Vchannel/Q Time Figure J-2. Water displaced in the reference straight channel and in channel with recirculation zones.

Figure J-2 shows both the idealized and actual amount of water displaced from a lake with recirculating (stagnant) volumes. If we could differentiate between water that was initially in the lake from new water entering the lake, we could use the concentration of initial water remaining in the lake at time t to find the fraction of water that was not swept out at time t. This is the fraction of the lake not actively participating in the channel flow.

This volume and the corresponding surface area should be removed from the lake total dimensions to provide more accurate and conservative results.

The amount of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel, trapped in the recirculation zones, at time t = to + (Vchannel/Q) is calculated as follows (with to =0):

Vtrapped in the reciruclation zones (t) = Jc Vinitial water in the channel (t)dV (J2. I - )

Vchannel PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J4 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J4 of J40 where Vchannel is the total volume of the channel and CVinitial water in the channel(t) is the volumetric distribution of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel at time t. The effective volume is calculated as follows:

Veffective - Vchannel - Vtrapped in the reciruclation zones (t) =

JC Vinitial water in the channel (t)dV VchannelI - Vchannel Vhannel (J2.1-2)

= Vchannel (1 - c'V initial water in the channel (t))

where the term CV initial water inthe channel (t)= C initial water in the channel (t)dV Vchannel is equal to VchanneI /

the volume average concentration of the amount of water initially in the channel at time t, and still present in the channel at time t. The effective surface area is calculated in manner similar to the effective volume. At the surface of the channel, the amount of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel, trapped in the recirculation zones, at time t = (Vchannel/Q) is calculated as follows:

S trapped inthe reciruclation zones (t) = JC Sinitial water inthe channel (t)dS (J2.1-3)

Schannel where Schannel is the total surface of the channel and CSinitial water inthe channel(t) is the surface distribution of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel at time t. The effective surface is calculated as follows:

Seffective Sdchannel -Strapped inthe reciruclation zones (t) =

f C S initial water in the channel (t)dV Schanne 1- Schannel =channel (J2.1-4) waeS ntechanne l td

= Schannet (i - c'Sinitial water in the channet (t))

where the tenn C5 initial water inthe channel (t) = PC initial water inthe channel (t)dVj channel is equal to Schannel /

the surface average concentration of the amount of water initially in the channel at time to and still present in the channel at time t.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J5 of J40 J2.1.2 Calculation strategy As indicated in Section J2.1.1, the volume and surface averaged concentrations of the water initially in the UHS at to = 0 sec still present in the UHS at time t = VUHs/Q are necessary in order to calculate the effective UHS volume and surface.

The analysis of the water flow in the UHS is carried out through the use of the commercially available CFD code STAR-CCM+ [Ref. J5.2]. The calculation is performed in two steps:

I. The first step is employed to find the steady state flow distribution in the UHS. This solution is used as initial condition for the transient multi-component fluid mixture in the second step.

2. During this second step, newly introduced water in the UHS is specified to be a different liquid but with the same properties of the water already present in the UHS.

The flow pattern and mixing of these liquids are calculated and tracked over time from time to = 0 sec to t = VuHs/Q. At the end of the transient analysis, the surface average concentration of the amount of water initially in the UHS and still present in the UHS at time t = VUHs/Q are calculated to find the effective volume and surface.

J2.1.3 Geometrical domain The CFD analysis is carried out in three-dimensions. For the computations, the water domain is considered from the outlet of the inlet chute into the UHS to the exit of the intake flume. Figure J-3 shows a top view of the computational domain while Figures J-4 and J-5 show the inlet and outlet boundaries, respectively. Figure J-6 shows the bottom view of the UHS. Design Input J4.1 reports the dimensional information used to generate the model. Assumption J3.1 is used to evaluate the UHS thickness. The main dimensions are indicated in Figures J-1 to J-3. Figures J-4 to J-7 also show, in quotations, names associated to each of the boundaries in the numerical model. Note that this evaluation reports the fraction of active volume and surface area. Therefore, slight variations in the lake dimensions will not significantly affect the final results.

J2.1.4 Mesh The computational domain is discretized by using polyhedral cells with a base size of 12 ft, and six thin layers through the thickness of the UHS. Where necessary, the cell size is reduced down to 6 ft and, in proximity of the inlet boundary, down to 1.5 ft. Figures J-5 to J-8 show the mesh employed for the computations, which consists of 1,761,870 nodes for a total of 748,386 cells. Appendix J8.1 provides the STAR-CCM+ report of the mesh quality.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J6 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J6 of J40 t Domain outlet 2200 ft 820 f Domain inlet 180ft

-t 780 ft Figure J-3. UHS computational domain: Top view.

"FreeSurface" "Inlet" Figure J-4. UHS computational domain: Inlet boundary.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J7 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J7 of J40 "Outlet"

/

i 80 t i Figure J-5. UHS computational domain: Outlet boundary.

14 "Soil"

/

Figure J-6. UHS computational domain: Bottom view.

Note: The indicated depths are net values; the silt layer of 1.5 ft (see Design Input J4.3) is already considered in the indicated values.

Figure J-7. UHS computational domain: Mesh detail of the inlet boundary.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J8 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J8 of J40 Figure J-8. UHS computational domain: Mesh detail of the outlet boundary.

Figure J-9. UHS computational domain: Cross section of the outlet boundary mesh both along and across the axis.

Figure J-10. UHS computational domain: Mesh detail of the free surface boundary.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J9 of J40 J2.1.5 Numerical model As indicated in Section J2.1.2, the calculation is carried out in two steps.

Step One: Steady State Single-Fluid Analysis The numerical analysis is carried out using the segregated SST (Menter) k-wO model with the all y+ wall treatment. The shear stress transport (SST) formulation is a blend of a k-(0 formulation, which is used near walls, and a k-e formulation, which is used in regions far from walls. The use of a k-co formulation in the inner parts of the boundary layer makes the model directly usable all the way down to the wall through the viscous sub-layer without additional modifications. Hence, the SST k-w model can be used as a low Reynolds turbulence model without any extra damping functions. The SST formulation also switches to a k-c behavior in the free-stream and thereby avoids the common k-o0 problem of being too sensitive to the inlet free-stream turbulence properties. This model is fairly robust, it demonstrated superior performance for wall bounded problems and low Reynolds number flows, it showed potential for predicting transition regions and it also is often found to do a better job at capturing recirculation regions than other models [Ref.

J5.2].

Therefore, the SST (Menter) k-o model with the all y+ wall treatment is particularly suited for the geometry analyzed in this calculation which presents a confined flow with very extensive surface associated to an extremely small thickness, and a uniform mesh through the thickness of the domain as generated by the thin mesher generator.

A constant-density single-fluid is specified as working liquid with the properties of water at 100°F (see Assumption J3.2) with a density of approximately 62 lb/ft3 and a dynamic viscosity of 6.727"10-9 atm-s [Ref. J5.7].

The following boundary conditions are applied:

  • "FreeSurface" - This boundary represents the free surface of the lake. As a simplification, this boundary is considered to be rigid in order to reduce the computational time. This simplification does not significantly impact the results of the calculation since the water velocity is small and very small or no waves are expected to form (tranquil flow). Furthermore, this boundary is specified to be a symmetry plane in order to guarantee a zero shear stress (free surface flow).

" "Inlet" - This boundary represents the inlet to the UHS. It is specified to be a mass flow inlet boundary with an inlet flow rate of 86 ft3/sec, which is approximately equal to 5333.7 lb/sec [Ref. J5.8].

  • "Outlet" - This boundary represents the outlet to the UHS. It is specified to be a simple pressure outlet boundary.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE A 0 of J40

  • "Soil" - This boundary represents the bottom and sloped sides of the UHS. It is specified to be a rough no-slip wall boundary with a roughness of 5.0 in (see Assumption J3.3).

The system is initialized with constant zero velocity and pressure and let to evolve to final steady state solution.

Step Two: Transient Two-Fluid Analysis The results of Step One are used as initial condition to the calculation performed in this second phase. The following changes are made to the model:

1. Transient solver - The solver is specified to be implicit unsteady with maxinmm number of inner iteration per time step equal to 20. The time step is adjusted through the computation for an initial minimum value of 0.1 sec to a final maximum value of 100 sec. The transition from one time step to the other is nonrmally performed after ensuring that the residuals are always small and the solution is converged at each time step.
2. Two-fluid specification - The solver is changed to account for a two fluid mixture.

Both fluids have the properties of water at 100°F and the are labeled "WaterLake" for the water initially present in the UHS at the beginning of the transient analysis (from Step One) and "WaterCirculating" for the water injected from the "Inlet" boundary.

For the two-fluid mixture, the code can compute the mixture properties based on the local concentration of the two base fluids and their molecular weight. Since there is no difference between the "WaterLake" and "WaterCirculating", the properties of the mixture are specified to be constant and equal to that of water at I 00'F.

In order to compute the diffusion of one liquid into the other, the Schmidt number and the turbulent Schmidt number need to be specified for the mixture. The Schmidt number is a dimensionless parameter defined as the ratio of momentum diffusivity and mass diffusivity as [Ref. J5.2]:

Schmidt- P (J2.1-5)

P Dim where Vtis the dynamic viscosity, p is the density and Dim is the molecular diffusivity of component-i into the mixture. The Schmidt number used in this analysis is equal to 219.8 (see Appendix J8.2). The turbulent Schmidt number is taken as the default value in STAR-CCM+ which is equal to 0.9. This implies that the turbulent mass diffusivity is proportional to the turbulent viscosity, which is an unknown a-priori variable and it is locally computed by the code. Note that the computed solution is fairly insensitive to the choice of the Schmidt number and the turbulent Schmidt number within the range of realistic values. The molecular weight for both fluids, which is another input required to compute the mass diffusivity, is specified to be 18.0153 lb/lbmol [Ref. J5.9].

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J 11 of J40

3. Boundary conditions - The boundary conditions are kept the same as for the steady-state analysis. However, the fluid entering the "Inlet" surface is specified to the 100%

"WaterCirculating" and, in case of backflow at the "Outlet" surface, the re-entering fluid is specified to the 100% "WaterLake". This last condition is specified only to complete the STAR-CCM+ input file for this analysis but it is not used during the computation.

4. Initial conditions - The results of steady state analysis are used as initial conditions for the transient calculation. The liquid present in the UHS at the beginning of the transient simulation (t = 0 sec) is specified to be 100% "WaterLake".
5. Simulation time - The calculation is perforned from time tstart = 0 sec to time tend =

VUHs/Q. The total volume of the UHS is manually requested and printed out by STAR-CCM+ after the generation of the computational domain and it is equal to VUHS = 1.454446"107 ft 3 . The flow entering the UHS is equal to 86 ft 3/sec [Design Input J4.2]. Therefore, tend = VUHs/Q = (1.454446' 10' ft3)/(86 ft3/sec) = 169,122 sec 47 hrs.

After the completion of the transient simulation, the volume and surface average concentrations of "WaterLake" are computed and the results are used to manually calculate the UHS effective volume and surface as percentages respectively of the total UHS volume and surface by applying equations J2.1-2 and J2.1-4 as follows:

Veffective = 1- 'VLakeWater (t = 47 hr) (J2.1-6)

VUHS Seffective =1---SLakeWater (t = 47 hr) (J2.1-7)

SUHS Appendix J8.3 provides the STAR-CCM+ summary report of the model including physics and boundary conditions.

J2.2 Computer Programs and Software The analysis performed herein utilizes:

1. STAR-CCM+ 6.04.014, S&L Program No. 03.7.863-6.04.014. Controlled folder on Sargent & Lundy STARCCM server: C:\Program Files\CD-adapco (see code file listing in Appendix J8.4).

All runs are executed on Sargent & Lundy server STARCCM with 64-bit Windows Server Standard 2007 operating system. The code has been validated under the Sargent & Lundy Quality Assurance Program.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J 12 of J40

2. MathCad 14.35, S&L Program No. 03.7.548-1435. Controlled folder on Sargent

& Lundy PC: C:\Program Files\ MathCad\ MathCadl4 (see code file listing in Appendix J8.5).

All runs are executed on Sargent & Lundy PC ZL5581 with 32-bit Windows XP SP3 operating system. The code has been validated under the Sargent & Lundy Quality Assurance Program

3. Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Office Professional 2003 SP-2 including Excel, S&L Program No. 03.2.286-1.0.

All runs are executed on Sargent & Lundy PC ZL5581 with 32-bit Windows XP SP3 operating system. The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all spreadsheets used in this analysis.

J2.3 Acceptance Criteria There are no specific acceptance criteria for the effective volume and surface values estimated in this calculation. This information is gathered to support thermal analysis of the UHS performed in the main report.

For the CFD analysis, the computational mesh must be of acceptable quality, as verified by Appendix J8. 1. Furthermore, the calculated results must be converged as verified by the plot of the residuals in Appendix J8.3 (page J31).

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J 13 of J40 J3.0 ASSUMPTIONS J3.1 Silt thickness - The depth of the silt layer at the bottom of the UHS is assumed to be 1.5 ft (see Design input 5.3). The use of 1.5 ft silt thickness (maximum allowed value) causes the calculation of a reduced UHS effective volume.

J3.2 Water temperature - The water in the UHS is assumed to be at a constant temperature of 100'F. This input is used to estimate the density, viscosity and self-diffusivity of water in the UHS. This input does not significantly impact the results of this calculation.

J3.3 Soil roughness - The roughness of the bottom of the UHS (including the silt layer) is assumed to be 5 in. Since this calculation determines the UHS inactive volumes rather than pressure losses, based on the calculated UHS low water velocities, this input does not significantly impact the results of this calculation.

J4.0 DESIGN INPUTS J4.l UHS dimensions - The UHS dimensions are obtained from References J5.3 to J5.6 as follows:

i. The nominal elevation of the UHS cooling pond bottom is approximately 685 ft

[Ref. J5.5].

ii. The elevation of the bottom of the intake flume is approximately 678.5 ft [Ref.

J5.5].

iii. The bottom of the UHS between the cooling pond and intake flume is approximately flat and its depth varies from 678.5 ft to 685 ft in a linear manner

[Refs. J5.3 to J5.6].

iv. The slope of the UHS side is approximately 1:4 all around its perimeter [Refs.

J5.3 to J5.6].

v. The width of the water inlet chute is 8 ft [Ref. J5.4].

vi. The width of the intake flume bottom is approximately 40 ft [Ref. J5.6].

vii. The dimensions of the UHS that are not listed above are scaled from Reference J5.3.

viii. The elevation of the UHS free surface is 690 ft [Ref. J5.1].

J4.2 UHS flow - The mass flow rate through the UHS is equal to 86 ft3/s [Ref. J5.8].

J4.3 UHS sediment level - The sediment level in the intake flume and cooling pond must remain less than or equal to 1.5 ft [Ref. J5.8]. The use of maximum silting reduces the PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J14 of J40 UHS volume, and therefore the residence time. This reduces the effectiveness of the UHS and it is thus conservative.

J4.4 Properties of water - Water at 1007F has the following properties: density z 62 lb/ft3; dynamic viscosity z 6.727.10-9 atm-s [Ref. J5.7].

J

5.0 REFERENCES

J5.1 LSCL-UFSAR, Section 9.2.6 "Ultimate Heat Sink", Rev. 19 J5.2 CD-adapco, User Guide, STAR-CCM+ Version 6.04.014, 2011 J5.3 Exelon Nuclear - LaSalle Station Drawing No. S-16B Rev. B, "Composite Lake Drawing, Sheet 2" J5.4 Exelon Nuclear - LaSalle Station Drawing No. S-79 Rev. H, "CSCS Pond Water Inlet Chutes Plan and Sections" J5.5 Exelon Nuclear - LaSalle Station Drawing No. 97ES083.1 Rev. 0, "Contours Hydrographic Survey" J5.6 Exelon Nuclear - LaSalle Station Drawing No. 97ES083.2 Rev. 0, "Profiles Hydrographic Survey" J5.7 Frank Kreith, "Principles of Heat Transfer", 3 rd Ed. 1976, IEP, New York, NY J5.8 LSCL Calculation No. L-002457, Rev. 5 J5.9 T.L. Brown, H.E. LeMay Jr., B.E. Bursten, J.R. Burdge, "Chemistry", 9 th Ed. 2003, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ J5.10 LAKET-PC User Manual, S&L Program Number 03.7.292-2.2, Rev. 0, October 30, 2004 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J15 of J40 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J15 of J40 J6.0 EVALUATIONS Step One: Steady State Analysis The steady state simulation is run until convergence for approximately 6,000 iterations

[see Residual graph in Appendix J8.3]. Figure J- 11 shows the velocity magnitude distribution and stream lines at the free surface. As seen, the right leg of the UHS presents two large recirculation cells which are not expected to participate significantly to the main water flow. Additional two smaller recirculation areas are visible in proximity to the UHS inlet created by the inlet water stream.

Velocity: Magnitude (ft/s) v3,1399 25319 21819 12560 0.6Z2798 Figure J-1 1. UHS computation - Step One: Velocity magnitude and stream lines on the UHS free surface.

Step Two: Transient Analysis After applying the changes indicated in Section J2.1.5 to the steady state model, the transient simulation is run for approximately 40,000 iterations from time tstar, = 0 sec to time tend = 47 hrs [see Residual graph in Appendix J8.3]. Figure 12 shows the surface concentration distribution for the "WaterLake". As expected, the velocity distribution is practically unchanged with respect to the steady-state solution (see Figure J-13).

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J16 of J40 MassFractionof WaterLake L.0000 Velocity: Magnitude (ft/s) 0.8000 2.5 22 0.6000 0.240O V2561 562805 90.0=00 t48 .006 Figure J-12. UHS computation - Step Two: Surface Figure J-13. UHS computation - Step Two: Velocity concentration for "WaterLake" at 47 hrs. magnitude and stream lines on the UHS free surface.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J 17 of J40 The numerical computation of both Step One and Two is considered to be successful upon evaluation of the relative residual (unitless) plot shown in Appendix J8.3 (see page 31). The residuals of the fluid dynamics variables are very well behaved and with a magnitude, at the end of each main iteration, small enough to ensure a sufficiently converged solution. Therefore, the acceptance criteria in Section J2.3 are satisfied.

7 0.9 - -Straight Channel 0

- UHS 0.8 0.7 0

0.6 C

0 0.5 0.4 0 I-,.

E 0.3 I N

.5 N 0.2 N N

N I N 0.1 N N

-- N 0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Time [hr]

Figure J-14. UHS computation - Time variation of the "WaterLake" volume average concentration in the UHS.

Figure J-14 shows the trend over time of the "WaterLake" volume average concentration.

As seen, the concentration decreases linearly at the beginning since the incoming water displaces the water in the UHS. After about 20 hrs, some the incoming water is already exiting the UHS and thus "WaterLake" volume average concentration change is no longer linear: some of the incoming water is being trapped in the areas of recirculation and it cannot efficiently displace the "WaterLake" out of the UHS.

After 47 hrs, the volume average concentration is computed to be 36.59 %. Therefore, the UHS effective volume percentage as compute by Equation J2.1.6 is equal to (see Appendix J8.3):

Veffective = 1 - 0.3659 = 63.4%

(J2.1-8)

VUHS PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT J, PAGE J18 of J40 After 47 hrs, the surface average concentration is computed to be 42.09 %. Therefore, the UHS effective surface percentage as compute by Equation J2.1.7 is equal to (see Appendix J8.3:

Seffective = 1- 0.4209 = 57.9%

SUHS (J2.1-9)

J

7.0 CONCLUSION

The UHS effective volume as percentage of the UHS total volume is 63.4 %.

The UHS effective surface as percentage of the UHS total free surface is 57.9 %.

J8.0 APPENDICES J8.1 STAR-CCM+ mesh quality report [see Page J19]

J8.2 Calculation of the Schmidt number [see Pages J20 to J23]

J8.3 Summary Report of STAR-CCM+ Analysis [see Pages J24 to J32]

J8.4 STAR-CCM+ 6.01.014, S&L Prog. No. 03.7.863-6.04.014, Controlled folder file listing Electronically attached:

File name: EAppendix J8.4.pdf Size: 22,128 KB; Type: Adobe Acrobat Document; Date 5/23/2012 3:25 PM J8.5 MathCad 14.35, S&L Program No. 03.7.548-1435, Controlled folder file listing Electronically attached:

File name: EAppendix J8.5.pdf Size: 2,068 KB; Type: Adobe Acrobat Document; Date 5/23/2012 3:27 PM J8.6 Additional information requested by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on June 27th 2013 [see Page J33 to J40]

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Calculation No.L-002457 Appendix J8.1 Revision No.8 Attachment J Page J19 of J40 Boundaries of region Lake:

Boundary soil: 126832 faces (7 triangular, 236 quadrilateral, 126589 polygonal)

Extents:

x: [-4.2672000000e+000, 7.8150720000e+002] m y: [-4.2672000000e+000, 1.4874240000e+003] m z: [-1.9812000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+000] a surface area: 3.2716753125e+005 mA2 maximum boundary skewness angle = 1.2161578369e+002 deg in cell with Prostar cell Index 754941 Boundary FreeSurface: 126581 faces (1 triangular, 201 quadrilateral, 126379 polygonal)

Extents:

x: [-4.2672000000e+000, 7.8150720000e+002) m y: [-4.2672000000e+000, 1.4874240000e+003] m z: [1.0668000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+000] m surface area: 3.2625790625e+005 mA2 maximum boundary skewness angle = 8.5943321228e+001 deg in cell with Prostar cell Index 158035 Boundary Inlet: 30 quadrilateral faces Extents:

x: [9.0220800000e+001, 9.2659200000e+001] m y: [1.7526000000e+002, 1.7526000000e+002] m z: [0.0000000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+0001 m surface area: 2.6012849808e+000 mA2 maximum boundary skewness angle = 2.4523153305e+001 deg in cell with Prostar Cell Index 372457 Boundary Outlet: 176 faces (174 quadrilateral, 2 polygonal)

Extents:

x: [2.9565600000e+002, 3.4442400000e+002] m y: [1.4874240000e+003, 1.4874240000e+003] m z: [-1.9812000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+000] m surface area: 1.1132573700e+002 mA2 maximum boundary skewness angle = 2.8035736084e+001 deg in cell with Prostar Cell Index 739634 Region Lake:

43 tetrahedral cells 25 hexahedral cells 2 wedge cells 2 pyramid cells 748314 polyhedral cells 748386 cells total 2880831 interior faces (5724 triangular, 2249993 quadrilateral, 625114 polygonal) 1761870 vertices Extents:

x: [-4.2672000000e+000, 7.8150720000e+002] m y: [-4.2672000000e+000, 1.4874240000e+003] m z: [-1.9812000000e+000, 1.0668000000e+0003 m Maximum interior cell index delta: 2296, average: 7.8781478469e+002 Maximum cell face index delta: 9001, average: 5.6040540283e+003 volume range: [4.2707888497e-005, 3.1967809200e+000] mA3 Minimum volume in cell with Prostar cell Index 747962 Minimum distance between centroids of neighbor cells = 1.9749755266e-002 between cells with Prostar Cell Index 452140 and 576394 Maximum skewness angle = 1.7942733765e+002 deg in cell with Prostar cell Index 718600 Face validity:

Minimum Face validity: 8.4159338474e-001 Maximum Face validity: 1.0000000000e+000 Face validity < 0.50 0 0.000%

0.50 <= Face validity < 0.60 0 0.000%

0.60 <= Face validity < 0.70 0 0.000%

0.70 <= Face validity < 0.80 0 0.000%

0.80 <= Face validity < 0.90 24 0.003%

0.90 <= Face validity < 0.95 94 0.013%

0.95 <= Face validity < 1.00 357 0.048%

1.00 <= Face validity 747911 99.937%

volume change:

Minimum volume change: 1.052741e-003 Maximum volume change: 1.000000e+000 volume change < 0.000000e+000 0 0.000%

0.000000e+000 <= volume change < 1.0000OOe-006 0 0.000%

1.0000OOe-006 <= volume Change < 1.0000OOe-005 0 0.000%

1.000000e-005 <= volume change < 1.000000e-004 0 0.000%

1.000000e-004 <= volume Change < 1.0000OOe-003 0 0.000%

1.000000e-003 <= volume change < 1.000000e-002 166 0.022%

1.000000e-002 <= volume change < 1.0000OOe-001 685 0.092%

1.000000e-001 <= volume change <= 1.000000e+000 747535 99.886%

Maximum boundary skewness angle in region = 1.216158e+002 deg overall Face validity:

Minimum Face validity: 8.415934e-001 Maximum Face validity: 1.000000e+000 Face validity < 0.50 0 0.000%

0.50 <= Face validity < 0.60 0 0.000%

0.60 <= Face validity < 0.70 0 0.000%

0.70 <= Face validity < 0.80 0 0.000%

0.80 <= Face validity < 0.90 24 0.003%

0.90 <= Face validity < 0.95 94 0.013%

0.95 <= Face validity < 1.00 357 0.048%

1.00 <= Face validity 747911 99.937%

overall volume change:

Minimum volume Change: 1.052741e-003 Maximum volume Change: 1.000000e+000 volume change < 0.000000e+000 0 0.000%

0.000000e+000 <= volume Change < 1.00OOOOe-006 0 0.000%

1.000000e-006 <= volume Change < 1.OOOOOe-005 0 0.000%

1.000000e-005 <= volume Change < 1.000000e-004 0 0.000%

1.000000e-004 <= volume Change < 1.0000OOe-003 0 0.000%

1.000000e-003 <= volume change < 1.0000OOe-002 166 0.022%

1.0000OOe-002 <= volume Change < 1.000000e-001 685 0.092%

1.000000e-001 <= volume Change <= 1.000000e+000 747535 99.886%

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.2 Revision No. 8 Attachment J Page J20 of J40 Appendix B8.2 Calculation of the Schmidt number References

1. Frank Kreith, "Principles of Heat Transfer", 3rd Ed. 1976, IEP, New York, NY
2. R.S. Smith, Z. Dohnalek, G.A Kimmel, K.P. Stevenson, B.D. Kay, "The self-diffusivity of amorphous solid water near 150 K", Chemical Physics Vol. 258, Page 291-305, 2000 Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.2 Revision No. 8 Attachment J Page J21 of J40 Water fluid dynamics properties as function of temperature [Ref. 1]

i 0.. 4 70-F 80 OF Tdata.water.i 90OF Temperature 0

100 F 1150 OF, (62.3" 62.2

= /62.1 lb Density Pdaia.,,vater.[ 62.0 ft 161.2)

"0.658 0.578 0.514

=dala.water. 10- 3 lb Dynamic viscosity 4

0.458 ft sec

.0.292 Based on these values, the water density and dynamic viscosity are defined as function of temperature using a linear interpolation procedure:

Pwater(Texnp) := linterp(Tdata.water. I, Pdata.water. I, Temp)

.,v.ater(Temp) := linterp(Tdata.water. I, -Idata.water. I, Temp)

Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.2 Revision No. 8 Attachment J Page J22 of J40 Water self-diffusivity as function of temperature [Ref. 2]

Reference 2 plots self-diffusivity values for water in liquid state for temperature from 273.15 K (32 'F) to 373.15 K (212 -F). The data below are extracted from Figure 7 of Ref. 2:

277.0 j := 0.. 8 282.2 286.4 291.1 Tdata.water,2 := 295.7 K Temperature 299.4 318.6 334.1

,364.2 1.23E-05 1.49E-05 1.69E-05 1.92E-05 2 cm Self-diffusivity Dww-daIa.watcr.2:= 2.05E-05 S

2.33E-05 3.65E-05 4.71E-05 7.85E-05 Based on these values, the water self-diffusivity is defined as function of temperature using a linear interpolation procedure:

Dj(Temp) := linterp(Tdta.water.2, Dww.data.water.2, Teinp)

Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.2 Page J23 of J40 Revision No. 8 Attachment J The Schmidt number is defined as [Ref. B5.2]:

.. ,,(Temp)

Schmidt(Temp) :=

Pwater(Temp)

  • DN%,v(Temp)

A plot of the Schmidt number between 90'F and 130°F is shown below:

90 OF 280.6 219.8 Temperature:= I 10 OF Schmid,(Teinperature .) = 182.1 0 151.8 120 OF 130 OF) ,126.9) 330 Temperaturei K

At 100'F, the Schmidt number is equal to 219.8.

Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8 Altachment J Page J24 of J40 Summary Report: UHS step two Session Summary Date I tar 29, 2012 6:16:13 PM Simulation C;:\Users\0n7590\Desktop\UHS.sim File size 2 .9e+02 MB Number of Partitions 1 Number of Restored Partitions 1 Software Summary Version BuildArch: win64 BuildEnv: intell1.1 ReleaseDate: Fri Jun 3 18:25:06 UTC 2011 ReleaseNumber: 6.04.014 Hardware Summary Hosts Controller: STARCCM Number of Workers: 0 Simulation Properties a uHS

+-1 Filters

  • -2 Parts 1 -1 Lake Region Lake Contacts 0 Face count 572 Tags Meta Data {}

+-1 Surfaces

+-1 FreeSurface Boundary Lake: FreeSurface I II Tags Meta Data {}

1 4-2 Inlet Boundary Lake: Inlet II Tags []

Meta Data {}

1 4-3 Outlet Boundary Lake: Outlet Tags U Meta Data I " -4 Soilt Boundary Lake: Soil Tags []

Meta Data {}

-2 Curves

"-a Edges Tags U Feature Curve Lake:Edges

+-3 3D-CAD Models Tags

+-5 Operations Continua Continua 2

+ -(

1 Mesh 1 OOC translation false Verbose Output false Per-Region Meshing false

+ Use Parallel Meshing false Interpolation Option Nearest neighbor Interfaces 0 Regions [Lake]

+-1 Modets 1 +-1 Surfacet Remesher Do curvature refinement true II I I Do proximity refinement true Do compatibility refinement false Retain geometric features true Create aligned meshes false Minimum face quality 0.05 Enable automatic surface repair false

" -2 Thin Met sher Polyhedral Cells Type Polygonal prisms Run Optimizer false Automatic Correction true Customize Thickness Threshold true Customize Surface Size Ratio false Threshold 2 Reference Values

+-I Base Size Value 12.0 ft

-2 CAD Projection Project to CAD true

+-3 Surface Curvature Enable curvature deviation distance false I '-I Basic Curvature # Pig/circle 36.0

+-4 Surface Growth Rate Surface Growth Rate 1.3

+-5 Surface Proximity # Points in gap 2.0 1 Search Floor 0.0 ft

-6 Surface Size Relative/Absolute Absolute I I Size Method Min and Target I +-I Absolute Minimum Size Value 6.0 It 1 -2 Absolute Target Size Value 12.0 ft

+-7 Thin Mesher Layers Number of Layers 6

-68 Thin Solid Thickness Size type Absolute

"-I Absolute Size 11.0 ft Value

-3 Volumetric Controls

'-a Volumetric Control 1 Part Group M Shapes [Block 1]

+-I1 Mesh Conditions Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8 Atlachment J Page J25 of J40 I " -1 Surface Remesher Customize surface remesher Enabled I- -2 Mesh Values

-1 Custom Size Size type Absolute

'-1 Absolute Size Value 1.5 ft Physic s 1 Interfaces 0 Regions [Lake]

1 Models

-- 1 All y+ Wall Treatment 4-2 Constant Density

+-3 Implicit Unsteady

+-4 K-Omega Turbulence

+-5 Multi-Component Liquid I-1 Liquid Mixture

+-i Liquid Components I +-I WaterLake ID 1 I I1 Database Material H20 (Water) [Standard/Liquids]

II -1 Component Properties I I -1 MolecularWeight Method Constant I -1 Constant Value 18.0153 Ib/Ibmol

"-2 WaterCirculating ID 2 I I Database Matedal Hg (Mercury) [Standard/Liquids]

I -1 Component Properties

' -1 Molecular Weight Method Constant

'-1 Constant Value 18.0153 Ib/Ibmol

-2 Mixture Properties

+-1 Density Method Constant I -1 Constant Value 62.0 lb/ft^3

+-2 Dynamic Viscosity Method Constant I -1 Constant Value 6.727E-9 atm-s

.-- 3 Molecular Diffusivity Method Schmidt Number I '-1 Schmidt Number Schmidt Number 219.8

+-,I Molecular Weight Method Mixture I -1 Mixture

-5 Turbulent Schmidt Numbe r Method Constant

-1 Constant Value 0.9

+--6 Non-reacting

+-7 Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes

+-,q Segregated Flow Minimum Absolute Pressure 0.009869232667160128 atm I Flow Boundary Diffusion true I Secondary Gradients On 1 Convection 2nd-order

+-9 Segregated Species Flow Boundary Diffusion true v v I Secondary Gradients On I

Convection 2nd-order

+-i4- SST (Menter) K-Omega al 0.31 Kappa 0.41 BetaStar 0.09 Beta1 0.075 Sigma_k1 0.85 Sigma wl 0.5 Beta2 0.0828 Sigmak2 1.0 Sigmaw2 0.856 Secondary Gradients On Convection 2nd-order Realizability Option Durbin Scale Limiter Compressibility Correction true Low Re Damping Modification false Normal Stress Term false Tke Minimum I.OE-10 Sdr Minimum 1.OE-10 1 +-1 Compressibility Parameters ZetaStar 1.5 1 '-2 Realizability Coefficient Realizability Coefficient 0.6000000238418579

+- 11 Three Dimensional

'-12 Turbulent

+-2 Reference Values I +-1 Reference Pressure Value 1.0 atm

-2 Minimum Allowable Wall Distance Value 3.280839895013123E-6 ft

-3 Initial Conditions 4-1 Pressure Method Constant I "-1 Constant Value 0.0 atm

+-2 Species Mass Fraction Method Constant I -1 Constant Value [1.0, 0.0)

+-3 Species Specification Method Mass fraction

+-.i Turbulence Intensity Method Constant I -1 Constant Value 0.01

+-5 Turbulence Specification Method Intensity - Viscosity Ratio

+-6 Turbulent Velocity Scale Method Constant I '-1 Constant Value 3.280839895013123 ft/s

+-7 Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Method Constant I -1 Constant Value 10.0

'-8 Velocity Coordinate System Laboratory I Method Constant

"-1 Constant Value [0.0, 0.0, 0.0] ft/s

+-7 Riegions Regions

-1 Lake Index 0 Physics Continuum Physics 1 Type Fluid Region 4.

Mesh Continuum Mesh 1 Parts [Lake]

-i Bo Boundaries Pndaries 4

÷-1 :reeSudface Index 2 Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8 Attachment J Page J26 of J40 Type Symmetry Plane Interfaces Part Surfaces [Lake.FreeSurface]

-1 Mesh Conditions

+-1 Custom Surface Curvature Custom curvature Use Continuum Values 4-2 Custom Surface Proximity Custom proximity Use Continuum Values 4- 3 Custom Surface Size Custom surface size Disabled

'-4 Customize Surface Remeshing Disable Surface Remeshing Disabled Inlet Index 3 Type Mass Flow Inlet Interfaces Part Surfaces [Lake.Inlet]

+-1 Mesh Conditions 1 -1 Custom Surface Curvature Custom curvature Use Continuum Values I +-2 Custom Surface Proximity Custom proximity Use Continuum Values I +-3 Custom Surface Size Custom surface size Disabled I I-4 Customize Surface Remeshing Disable Surface Remeshing Disabled 1 -2 Physics Conditions I +-i Flow Direction Specification Method Boundary-Normal I +-2 Mass Flow Option Specification Option Mass Flow Rate I 4-3 Species Specification Method Mass fraction 1I '-4 Turbulence Specification Method Intensity + Viscosity Ratio

-3 Physics Values

+-1 Mass Flow Rate Method Constant I "-1 Constant Value 5333.7 Ib/s I +-2 Species Mass Fraction Method Constant I "-1 Constant Value [0.0, 1.0]

1 -3 Turbulence Intensity Method Constant I '-1 Constant Value 0.01 1 -4 Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Method Constant

'-1 Constant Value 10.0

+-3 Outlet Index 4 II Type Pressure Outlet II Interfaces II Part Surfaces [Lake.Outlet]

I 4-1 Mesh Conditions I -- 1 Custom Surface Curvature Custom curvature Use Continuum Values I 4-2 Custom Surface Proximity Custom proximity Use Continuum Values I +-3 Custom Surface Size Custom surface size Disabled I -- 4 Customize Surface Remeshing Disable Surface Remeshing Disabled 1 +-2 Physics Conditions I -- 1 Backflow Direction Specification Method Boundary-Normal S1+-2 Species Specification Method Mass fraction I "-3 Target Mass Flow Option Target Mass Flow Option Disabled I -4 Turbulence Specification Method Intensity + Viscosity Ratio

"-3 Physics Values

+-1 Pressure Method Constant I '-1 Constant Value 0.0 atm I +-2 Species Mass Fraction Method Constant I '-1 Constant Value [1.0, 0.0]

I -3 Turbulence Intensity Method Constant I '-1 Constant Value 0.01

"-4 Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Method Constant 1 - 1 Constant Value 10.0

"- Soil Index 1 I Type Wall I Interfaces I Part Surfaces [Lake.Soil]

+-1 Mesh Conditions I +-1 Custom Surface Curvature Custom curvature Use Continuum Values I +-2 Custom Surface Proximity Custom proximity Use Continuum Values I +-3 Custom Surface Size Custom surface size Disabled 1 -4 Customize Surface Remeshing Disable Surface Remeshing Disabled

+-2 Physics Conditions I +-1 Shear Stress Specification Method No-Slip I +-2 Tangential Velocity Specification Method None I I Reference Frame Relative To Mesh I +-3 Wall Species Option Method Impermeable 1 -4 Wall Surface Specification Method Rough

-3 Physics Values 4-1 Blended Wall Function Kappa 0.42 1 E 9.0

+-2 Roughness Height Method Constant I "-i Constant Value 5.0 in

-3 Wall Roughness Parameters B 0.0 C 0.253 RplusSmooth 2.25 RplusRough 90.0

-2 Feature Curves Feature Curves 1

-t Edges Part Curves [Lake.Edges]

- -1 Mesh Conditions

'-1 Custom Surface Size Custom surface size Disabled

-3 Mesh Conditions

. -1 Customize Thin Mesher Parameters Customize Thin Mesher Parameters Use Default Values

-4 Physics Conditions 4-1 Initial Condition Option Option Use Continuum Values

+-2 Momentum Source Option Momentum Source Option None

+-3 Species Source Option Species Source Term Disabled

-4 Turbulence Source Option Turbulence Source Option None

-5 Physics Values

+-1 Axis Direction [0.0, 0.0, 1.0]

Coordinate System Laboratory Project No. 11333-297

CalcUjlation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.3 Revioion No. 8 Attachmenl J Page J27 of J40 Origin [0.0, 0.0, 0.0] ft I "-2 Motion Specification Motion Stationary Reference Frame Lab Reference Frame

+-8 Derived Parts Derived Parts 6

+-1 HorizontalCenter Coordinate System Laboratory Origin [700.0, 1000.0, -1.49999999999999981 it,it,it Normal [0.0, 1.0, 0.0] ft,ft,ft Section Mode Single Section Displayed Index -1 Parts [Lake]

.- 1 Single section Offset 0.0

+-

2 Horizontallnlet Coordinate System Laboratory Origin [500.0, 500.0, -1.4999999999999998[

ft,ft,ft Normal [0.0, 1.0, 0.0] tt,tt,it Section Mode Single Section Displayed Index -1 Parts [Lake]

'-1 Single section Offset 0.0

+-3 HorizontalOutlet Coordinate System Laboratory Origin [1050.0, 4000.0, -1.4999999999999998]

ft,ft,ft II Normal [0.0, 1.0, 0.0] ft,ft,it Section Mode Single Section Displayed Index -1 Parts [Lake]

I I Single section Offset 0.0

+-'J Streamline Seed Type Part Rotation Scale 1.0 Integration Solver 2nd-Order RK Vector Field Cell Relative Velocity Parts [Lake: FreeSurface]

+-I Source Seed Seed Parts [Lake: FreeSurface]

II On Ratio 281 Randomize false N Grid Points [30, 30]

"-2 2nd Order Integrator Integration Direction Both Initial Integration Step 0.5 Maximum Propagation 20.0 Max Steps 2000

+-5 VerticalCenter Coordinate System Laboratory I I Origin [1050.0, 2433.0000000000005, -

1.4999999999999998] it,it,ft Normal [1.0, 0.0, 0.0] ft,ft,ft Section Mode Single Section Displayed Index -1 Parts [Lake]

-1 Single section Offset 0.0 Verticallnlet Coordinate System Laboratory Origin [300.0, 1000.0, -1.4999999999999998]

fitft,it Normal [1.0, 0.0, 0.0] ft,fIft Section Mode Single Section Displayed Index -1 Parts [Lake]

'-1 Single section Offset 0.0

+-- -9 Solvers

+-1 Implicit Unsteady Time-Step 11.0s Freeze Time false Temporal Discretization 1 st-order Solver Frozen false

÷-2 Wall Distance Verbosity 0 I Parallel memory optimization scaling 1.0 factor Solver Frozen false 4-3 Segregated Flow Reconstruction Frozen false II Reconstruction Zeroed false II Temporary Storage Retained false I I Solver Frozen false I+- Velocity Under-Relaxation Factor 0.7

+-I Under-Relaxation Factor Ramp Ramp Method No Ramp

  • -2 AMG Linear Solver Verbosity None Max Cycles 30 Parallel Migration Limit 25 Extra partition-boundary sweeps 0 Enable direct-solver false Maximum direct-solver equations 32 Convergence Tolerance 0.1 Epsilon 0.0 Cycle Type Flex Cycle Group Size Control Auto Group Size 4 Relaxation Scheme Gauss-Seidel Acceleration method None Scaling Disabled

"-1 Flex Cycle Restriction Tolerance 0.9 Prolongation Tolerance 0.5 Sweeps 1

-2 Pressure Under-Relaxation Factor 0.3 I Pressure Reference Location Automatic Selection

+-1 Under-Relaxation Factor Ramp Ramp Method No Ramp

"-2 AMG Linear Solver Verbosity None Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8 Attachment J Page J28 of J40 Max Cycles 30 Parallel Migration Limit 25 Extra partition-boundary sweeps 0 Enable direct-solver false Maximum direct-solver equations 32 Convergence Tolerance 0.1 Epsilon 0.0 Cycle Type V Cycle Group Size Control Auto Group Size 4 Relaxation Scheme Gauss-Seidel Acceleration method Conjugate Gradient

'-I VCycle Scaling Auto Pre-Sweeps 1 Post-Sweeps 1 Max Levels 50 1+-4 Segregated Species Under-Relaxation Factor 0.9 I

Reconstruction Frozen false I

Reconstruction Zeroed false I

Temporary Storage Retained false I

Solver Frozen false

+-i Under-Relaxation Factor Ramp Ramp Method No Ramp

-2 AMG Linear Solver Verbosity None Max Cycles 30 Parallel Migration Limit 25 Extra partition-boundary sweeps 0 I I Enable direct-solver false Maximum direct-solver equations 32 Convergence Tolerance 0.1 Epsilon 0.0 Cycle Type V Cycle Group Size Control Auto Group Size 4 Relaxation Scheme Gauss-Seidel Acceleration method None I -1 V Cycle Scaling Disabled Pre-Sweeps 1 Post-Sweeps 1 1 -5 K-Omega Turbulence Max Levels 5O Under-Relaxation Factor 0.8 I Reconstruction Frozen false I Reconstruction Zeroed false Temporary Storage Retained false

+-1 Under-Relaxation Factor F Solver Frozen false I -2 AMG Linear Solver Ramp Ramp Method No Ramp Verbosity None Max Cycles 30 Parallel Migration Limit 25 Extra partition-boundary sweeps 0 Enable direct-solver false Maximum direct-solver equations 32 Convergence Tolerance 0.1 Epsilon 0.0 Cycle Type Flex Cycle Group Size Control Auto Group Size 4 Relaxation Scheme Gauss-Seidel Acceleration method None

.- 1 FlexCycle Scaling Disabled Restriction Tolerance 0.9 Prolongation Tolerance 0-5 Sweeps 1

"-6 K-Omega Turbulent Viscosi Ly Under-Relaxation Factor 1.0 Maximum Ratio 100000.0 Solver Frozen false

+-10 Stopping Criteria I+-i Maximum Inner Iterations Maximum Inner Iterations 20 Enabled true Criterion Satisfied true Logical Rule Or 1+-2 Maximum Physical Time Maximum Physical Time 169122.0 s Enabled true Criterion Satisfied true Logical Rule Or f+-3 Maximum Sep Maximum Steps 1000000000 Enabled true Criterion Satisfied false Logical Rule Or S-4 Stop File Stop Inner Iterations true Path ABORT Enabled true Criterion Satisfied false Logical Rule Or

+-11 Reports Reports 8

+-1 ConcenfrationSurfaceLakeWater Scalar Field Function MassFraction of WaterLake Parts [Lake: FreeSurface]

Smooth Values false Units

+-2 ConcentrationVolumeLakeWater Scalar Field Function MassFraction of WaterLake I Parts [Lake]

I Smooth Values false Units

+-3 MasslFlow-lnlet Parts [Lake: Inlet]

Project No. 11333-297

Celculalion No. L-002457 Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8 Attachmnenl J Page J29 of J40 Smooth Values false Units Ib/s

+-4 MassFlowOutlet Parts [Lake: Outlet]

Smooth Values false Units Ibis

+-5 MassFlowTotal Parts (Lake: FreeSurface, Lake: Inlet, Lake:

Outlet, Lake: Soil]

Smooth Values false Units lb/s

÷-6 Velocity_Plane4AveVel Scalar Field Function Velocity: Magnitude Parts [HodzontalCenter]

Smooth Values false Units ft/s t-7 Velocity_Plane4MaxVel Scalar Field Function Velocity: Magnitude Parts [HorizontalCenter]

Smooth Values false Units ft/s

-a Velocity_Plane4ManVel Scalar Field Function Velocity: Magnitude Parts [HorizontalCenter]

Smooth Values false Units ft/s 4-12 Monitors Monitors 18 Monitors To Print [Z-momentum, WaterLake, Sdr, Tke, Y-momentum, X-momentum, Continuity, Inlet Monitor, Outlet Monitor, Total Monitor, Plane4AveVel Monitor, Plane4MinVel Monitor, Plane4MaxVel Monitor, ConcentrationSurface LakeWater Monitor, ConcentrationVolumeLakeWater I Monitor]

Output Direction Horizontal Heading Print Frequency 10

+-.L ConcerntrationSurfaceLakeWater Monitor Report ConcentrationSurfaceLakeWater Trigger Time Step Maximum Plot Samples 100000 Normalization Option Off Frequency 1 akeWater Monitor Report ConcentrationVolumeLakeWater II Trigger Time Step I Maximum Plot Samples 100000 Normalization Option Off Frequency 1 Report MassFIowmInlet I Trigger Iteration

+-4 Inlet Monitor Maximum Plot Samples 5000 Normalization Option Off Frequency 1 Report MassFlowOutlet Trigger Iteration Maximum Plot Samples 5000 Normalization Option Off Frequency 1

+ -5 Plane4AveVel Monitor Report Velocity_Plane4AveVel I Trigger Iteration Maximum Plot Samples 5000 Normalization Option Off Frequency 1

+-6 Plane4MaxVel Monitor Report Velocity_PIane4MaxVel I Trigger Iteration I Maximum Plot Samples 5000 Normalization Option Off Frequency 1

+-7 Plane4MinVel Monitor Report Velocity_Plane4MinVel Trigger Iteration Maximum Plot Samples 5000 Normalization Option Off Frequency 1

+-8 Total Monitor Report MassFIowTotal Trigger Iteration II Maximum Plot Samples 5000 II Normalization Option Off Frequency I

+-13 Representations 1 +-1 Geometry 1 +-2 Initial Surface Faces 572 II Edges 154

-1 Regions

-1 Lake Faces 572 I Edges 154

+-I Boundaries

---I1 FreeSurface Faces 142 I +-2 Inlet Faces 2 I +-3 Outlet Faces 2

,I--I Soil Faces 426

"-2 Feature Curves I -1 Edges Edges 154 1 +-3 Remeshed Surface Faces 493496 II I Edges 2460 I -1 Regions I -1 Lake Faces 493496 II I Edges 2460 Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8 Attachment J Page J30 of J40

+-1 Boundaries I I +-1 FreeSurface Faces 250750 I I +-2 Inlet Faces 32 I I 1 +-3 Outlet Faces 94 SI I "-4 Soil Faces 242620 1 -2 Feature Curves I I -I Edges Edges 2460 I -4 Volume Mesh Cells 748386 I I Interior Faces 2880831 I I Vertices 1761870 I +-I Finite Volume Regions I -1 Lake Cells 748386 I I Interior Faces 2880831 I I Vertices 1761870 I -1 Finite Volume Boundaries I; -1 FreeSurface Faces 126581 1 +-2 Inlet Faces 30 I -- 3 Outlet Faces 176 I "-4 Soil Faces 126832

"-2 Cell Sets

+-14 Coordinate Systems

+-15 Tables

-- 16 Units Preferred System United States Customary System

+-17 Field Functions

+-Is Volume Shapes I -1 Block 1 Coordinate System Laboratory Corner1 [295.00000120147945, 558.9999802156383, -

1.4999999696501283] ff,ft, Comer2 [304.9999897874246, 576.0, 5.000000159571489] fl,f,ft

-- 19 UserCode

+-20 Data Set Functions

+-21 Layouts I '-1 default

+-22 Data Mappers

+-23 Motions 1 "-1 Stationary

+-24 Reference Frames I '-I Lab Reference Frame Solution Accumulated CPU Time over all processes (s) 641294.4330000208 Elapsed Time (s) 641294.4820000213 Time Level 1947 Solution Time 169122.0 Project No. 11333-297

Residuals_.J -

0 0

O 0 No 0.1 p.

J01 0.01.. ..- -----------------

0.001-1 E-4 ....

Continuity

.. . 1 E5 -X-momentum

.. -- Y-momentum

-Z-momentum CD AllO 11111Will 111.1111 d.11 l 11.1[ i1 -- Tke Sdrmk _'

1E-7I WaterLake 1E-8 1E-9 1 E-121 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 '" x 9D Iteration 0

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.3 Revision No. 8 Attachment J Page J32 of J40 Volume Average of MassFraction of WaterLake Part Value Lake 3. 658991e-01 Total: 3.658991e-01 Surface Average of MassFraction of WaterLake Part Value Lake: FreeSurface 4.209259e-01 Total: 4.209259e-01 Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8 Attachment J Page J33 of J40 Appendix J8.6 Additional information requested by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on June 2 7 th 2013.

References:

1. U.S. N.R.C. letter, "

Subject:

LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 - Request for additional information related to license amendment request to technical specification 3.7.3 Ultimate Heat Sink (TAC. NOS. ME9076 and ME9077)", June 27, 2013.

Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8 Attachment J Page J34 of J40 This appendix is added in response to the U.S. N.R.C. request for additional information for the review of CFD and entrance mixing conclusions

[Sec. 6, Ref. 1].

Request "a":

The dimensions of the inlet channel are shown in Figure J-4 in the main body of the calculation. As seen, the channel cross-section is modeled as a rectangular area 8 feet wide and 3.5 feet high, which is an accurate representation of the actual inlet channel. The inlet velocity of the water is equal to approximately 3.07 ft/s, which corresponds to 86 ft 3/s (see Section J.2.1.5 in the main body of the calculation). This is an accurate modeling of the inlet water velocity based on the dimensions of the discharge channel. The roughness of the bottom of the UHS (including the silt layer) is assumed to be 5 in. As indicated in Assumption J3.3 in the main body of the calculation, this value does not significantly affect the result of the analysis which is the overall water flow pattern and speed within the UHS.

Figures J.8.6-1 to J.8.6-3 show the nodalization used at the inlet region of the UHS model (see also Section J2.1.4 in the main body of the calculation).

Figure J.8.6-1 shows a to-scale perspective side view of the UHS inlet channel.

The dimensions the channel are show in Figure J-4 in the main body of the calculation. Figure J.8.6-2 shows a to-scale perspective bottom view of the same region, while Figure J.8.6-3 shows the mesh at the mid-level plane of the UHS.

41 Figure J8.6-1. Detail of the mesh at the inlet boundary (perspective side view)

Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8 Attachment J Page J35 of J40 Figure J8.6-2. Detail of the mesh at the inlet boundary (perspective bottom view)

Figure J8.6-3. Detail of the mesh at the inlet boundary (top view of the mid-level plane)

Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8 Attachment J Page J36 of J40 Request "b":

Figures J8.6-4 to J8.6-9 show the fluid velocity at the inlet region (images are to scale) including the top surface, horizontal mid-elevation plane and a vertical cross-section along the inlet channel and UHS (with details of the mesh).

Velocity- Magnitude (ft/s) r J .06- 00 0.62774 o832 1 255v8 2.5110 3.1387 Figure J8.6-4. Water velocity on the free surface at inlet region Velocity Magnitude (1f/s) 0,00000 0.62756 1.2551 1.8827 2.5102 3.1378 Figure J8.6-5. Water velocity at the mid-plane of the UHS Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8 Attachment J Paqe J37 of J40 Figure J8.6-6. Location of the vertical cross-section across the inlet channel and UHS (used in the figures below)

Velocity: Magnitude(ft/s) o.00000 0.62956 12591 1.8887 2.5183 3.1478 Figure J8.6-7. Water velocity on the vertical cross section along the inlet channel and UHS (see Figure J.8.6-6). Note: The scale of the y-axis is 3.5 times larger that the scale of the x-axis.

Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8 Attachment J Page J38 of J40 Velocity: Magnitude(ft/s) 0.00000 0.62956 17250 7 1.8887 2,5183 3.1478 Figure J8.6-8. Water velocity on the vertical cross section along the inlet channel and UHS (see Figure J.8.6-6) with details of the mesh. Note: The scale of the y-axis is 3.5 times larger that the scale of the x-axis.

Velocity: Magnitude(tfts) 0.00000 0.62956 12591 1.8887 2.5182 3.1478 Figure J8.6-9. Water velocity on the vertical cross section along the inlet channel and UHS (see Figure J.8.6-6) with details of the mesh (close-up view of the inlet)

Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8 Attachment J Page J39 of J40 Request "c":

Figure J8.6-10 shows the two recirculation loops at the entry region. The following variables are estimated from the CFD results (see Figure J8.6-10):

Mass flow rate in section Si: 184.5 ft3/s Mass flow rate in section S2: 52.4 ft3/s (( -61% of plant flow to the UHS)

Mass flow rate in section S3: 46.1 ft3/s -54% of plant flow to the UHS)

Mass flow rate entering the UHS: 86.0 ft 3/s Mean return period in Loop A: -1 hour Mean return period in Loop B: -14 hours Loop A Figure J8.6-10. Recirculation loops at the entry region Project No. 11333-297

Calculation No. L-002457 Appendix J8.6 Revision No.8 Attachment J Page J40 of J40 Request "d":

The use of constant density fluid and thermal stratification effects in the UHS are addressed in Attachment N, Section N6.4.

The purpose of the CFD analysis is to evaluate the water flow pattern in the man-made Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) at LaSalle County Generating and to provide effective lake volume and surface area for use in the S&L LAKET-PC computer program. Recirculation regions are present in the UHS due to its shape, which causes the water to flow in a non-straight path. Since water can be practically considered an incompressible fluid, the average velocity distribution within the UHS is governed by the conservation of mass. Changes in average water temperatures within the range of expected values (-100'F to 120'F) produce small changes in water properties and thus may marginally affect the local water velocity distribution. However, these changes would not cause a significant change in the UHS overall water flow pattern and thus to the size of the recirculation regions. Therefore, the results of the CFD calculation are insignificantly affected by a change in water temperature.

Project No. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT K, PAGE KI of K6 CALCULAllON NO. 1-002457 REVISION NO.8 A1TACHMENT K, PAGE KI of K6 Attachment K - Preparation of Hourly Meteorological Data Prepared: ~ (-t Date Z+/- M A 2,012, Erwin T. Prater - Sargent & LundyLLc Reviewed: I___ Date ______

Paul N. Derezotes - Sargent & LundyLLc PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 RBASION No. 8 ATTACHMENT 1-ý PAGE K2 of K6 Preparation of Hourly Meteorological Data Used for Cooling Lake Analysis 1 Purpose This attachment describes update of a meteorological data input file provided to support a validation study of the cooling lake at the LaSalle County Nuclear Generating Station, near Marseilles, IL. The file was expanded to include older data collected from January 1, 1995 -

December 31, 2004. The updated file now includes the period of record from January 1, 1995 -

September 30, 2010.

2 Parameters included in the Meteorological Data File The meteorological data file was compatible with the Laket program (Reference 1), which S&L uses to evaluate the thermal performance of cooling lakes. The parameter content and digital format of Laket meteorological files are listed in Table 1.

3 Meteorological Data Selection Wind and temperature data were taken from an on-site meteorological tower at the generating station. The on-site tower measured the dry-bulb temperature and wind speed/direction at three levels: 33 ft., 200 ft. and 375 ft above ground level. Wind speed/direction and dry-bulb temperature from the lowest level (33 ft, or 10.1 meter) level were extracted for use in Laket.

The on-site meteorological tower contractor supplied the on-site tower data in the form of digital text file.

The on-site meteorological tower did not collect hourly humidity, precipitation type, cloud height and cloud cover, which are required inputs for Laket. These parameters were taken from a National Weather Service observing station at the Peoria, IL airport (station identifier KPIA).

That weather station is located approximately 70 miles southwest of the generating station.

4 Raw Meteorological Data Observed ("raw") meteorological data from KPIA were used to develop the meteorological data input file for Laket. Raw data were purchased from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) in Asheville, NC. Two separate digital files were purchased. These two files are briefly described below.

(1) Surface Weather Observations Raw surface weather observations (Reference 2) from KPIA covered the period of record from January 1, 1995 through December 31, 2004. NCDC subjects meteorological data to rigorous quality control checks before archiving it. Nevertheless, meteorological databases still typically include gaps and data values outside of valid ranges. The PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT K, PAGE K3 of K6 archived data included most of the weather parameters required by Laket (Table 1), with the following exceptions: freezing precipitation code, solar radiation, atmospheric radiation, and partial pressure of water vapor. S&L estimated those parameters using standard methods. To check the thermodynamic consistency of the input data, S&L estimated hourly wet bulb temperature, dew point temperature and humidity to ensure consistency between those parameters and the (on-site) dry-bulb temperature. In instances when the dew point temperature at KPIA exceeded the dry-bulb temperature at the on-site meteorological tower, the dew point temperature at KPIA was set equal to the dry-bulb temperature observed at the on-site tower. This ensured thermodynamic consistency between the relative humidity and the dry-bulb, wet-bulb temperature and dew point temperatures.

(2) PrecipitationData Raw hourly digital precipitation data (Reference 3) from KPIA were available for the period of record from January 1, 1995 through December 31, 2004.

5 Creating Input Meteorological Data for Laket S&L uses a series of modular computer programs collectively called the Surface Data Generator

("Surgen") and judgements and adjustments by a qualified, experienced, professional meteorologist to create digital meteorological data files for input into Laket. Key requirements of Laket include a specific set of weather parameters and specific digital format (Table 1), and a complete meteorological database with no bad (out of range), or missing, parameters. Surgen modules are executed independently and perform the following functions:

(1) Interpret the unique digital formats of raw surface weather observations and precipitation data and extract required meteorological parameters.

(2) Convert numeric units of extracted parameters to those required by the Laket program.

(3) Scan hourly surface weather observations, and identify periods when values for selected parameters are either missing or invalid (outside of acceptable ranges). Those periods are identified by starting and ending date, and by the length of each gap (in hours).

(4) Scan hourly surface weather observations, identify periods within the digital file when whole days or specific hours are missing; insert new, or blank records into the file to fill time gaps.

(5) Estimate values for the following weather parameters: an indicator whether precipitation is liquid or frozen, solar radiation reaching the lake surface, atmospheric radiation reaching the lake surface, partial pressure of water vapor in the atmosphere, wet bulb temperature and dew point temperature.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION No. 8 ATTACHMENT K, PAGE K4 of K6 (6) Perform simple linear interpolation of weather parameter values through gaps, and insert the new interpolated values into the database.

(7) Allow insertion of manually selected substitution values into gaps in the database that are judged not to be suitable for simple linear interpolation.

(8) Translate processed and adjusted databases into the format required by the Laket program.

Since the project required combining wind and temperature data from an on-site meteorological tower with data collected at another site (Peoria, IL), S&L developed a project-specific FORTRAN program which merged the on-site wind speed/direction and dry-bulb temperature data with other data from KPIA. The program produced a single input file that was subsequently processed with Surgen, as described above.

6 Review and Adjustment of Meteorological Data Surgen identified short periods of missing, or bad (out of range), raw meteorological data and used linear interpolation to fill short gaps that were generally 1-2 hours long. However, there were three periods identified which had data gaps too long for linear interpolation. Data were manually substituted from Peoria in these periods. These periods are listed below:

Wind direction and speed from Peoria, IL was used for the following periods:

(1) 10/30/97 21:00 local standard time (LST) through 11/03/97 14:00 LST (2) 08/23/02 05:00 LST through 09/04/02 11:00 LST The anemometer height at Peoria during both of these time periods was 32.8 ft (10 meters) (Reference 4).

Dry bulb temperature from Peoria, IL used for the following period:

(3) 06/15/98 08:00 LST through 06/16/98 11:00 LST 7 Laket Meteorological Input File Surgen produced a single Laket meteorological input file which was appended to the original meteorological data file produced in 2011. The specifications of the original and combined (updated) file are listed below PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION No. 8 ATTACHMENT K, PAGE K5 of K6 Original file:

Name: PIALSL05 10.DAT Type: ASC text Size: 7,773 Kb Creation date/time: 3/17/2011 4:04 PM Updated file:

Name: PIALSL9510.DAT Type: ASC text Size: 21,301 Kb Creation date/time: 3/9/2012 11:08 AM The updated meteorological data file was tested with a short Laket input file to ensure that Laket could read the updated meteorological data file. Laket read the updated meteorological data file normally.

8 Wind Sensor Height The wind speed/direction sensor height is an input in Laket. The wind speed and direction were taken from the 33 ft. (10.1 meter) level of the on-site meteorological tower at the generating station.

9 References

1. Sargent & Lundy (S&L), 2004. "LAKET-PC, A One Dimensional Lake Thermal Prediction Program, S&L Program Number LAK 03.7.292-2.2, Revision 0, October 30, 2004, User Manual", S&L, Chicago IL.
2. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), 2006. "Federal Climate Complex Data Documentation for Integrated Surface Data", August 25, 2006. Published by NCDC, Asheville, NC.
3. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), 2000. "Data Documentation for Hourly Precipitation Data TD-3240", November 15, 2000. Published by NCDC, Asheville, NC.
4. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), 2012. Data file "anem_elev_inf' referenced in "Data Documentation for Data Set 6421 (DSI-642 1) Enhanced hourly wind station data for the contiguous United States" National Climatic Data Center, Asheville North Carolina.

Website: http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/ftpref/support/climate/wind daily/td6421.pdf Accessed March, 2012.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT K, PAGE K6 of K6 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO.8 A1TACHMENT K, PAGE K6 of K6 Table 1. Parameters and Digital Record Format of the Standard Weather Data File Used by S&L Laket Program Field Lower Upper Digital No. Parameter Units Limit Limit Format 1 Station Code Number 5 digits F7.0 2 Year 4 digits F6.0 3 Month 2 digits F4.0 4 Day 2 digits F4.0 5 Hour of Day (00 (midnight)-23 (11 pm)) 2 digits F9.2 6 Cloud Ceiling Height above feet 0 70,000 F9.2 Ground Level 7 Direction Sector from which Wind Blows (I(N) - 16(NNW)) 1 16 F9.2 8 Wind Speed knots 0 96 F9.2 9 Dry Bulb Temperature deg F -129 136 F9.2 10 Wet Bulb Temperature deg F -129 136 F9.2 11 Dow Point Temperature deg F -129 136 F9.2 12 Relative Humidity percent 0 100 F9.2 13 Station Atmospheric Pressure Inches Hg 25.69 32.01 F9.2 14 Cloud Cover Tenths 00 10 F9.2 15 Freezing Precipitation Code 1 digit 0 - liquid 1 - solid F9.2 16 One-Hour Total Water 100ths inches 0 1,200 F9.2 Equivalent Precipitation 17 Solar Radiation Btu/ft-hour 0 4,000 F9.2 18 Atmospheric Radiation Btulfte-hour 5 220 F9.2 19 Partial Pressure of Water inches Hg 0 2.00 F9.2 Vapor PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION No. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE Ll of L58 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO.8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE LI of L58 Attachment L - Plant Temperature Rise Prepared: ."/04 w.

(L). JL Date (o a'-Iacn;L Daniel W. Nevill - Sargent & LundyLLc Checked: ____ Date __2_7__z_

William D. Brey -:Sargent & LundyI+/-c Reviewed: , / Date 062- 7-2-o0/Z Pawel Kut - Sargent & LundyLic PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L2 of L58 ATTACHMENT L - TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No.

L 1.0 Pu rp o se ....................................................................................................................... L 3 L2 .0 M eth od o log y ................................................................................................................ L 4 L 3.0 Assum ptions ............................................................................................................. L 6 L 4 .0 D esig n In p uts ................................................................................................................ L 7 L 5 .0 Referen ces .................................................................................................................... L 8 L6 .0 E v a lu atio n s ................................................................................................................... L 9 L7.0 Summary and Conclusions ...................................................................................... L1O L8.0 Limitations and Open Items .................................................................................... Ll1 L 9 .0 A p p en d ice s ................................................................................................................. L 12 (Total Pages - Attachment L (12) plus Appendices (46) for a Total of 58 pages)

LIST OF APPENDICES No. Title Page L9.1 MUR PU Total Generated Heat Load L13 to L14 L9.2 j MUR_PU Plant Temperature Rise Results L15 to L34 L9.3  ! EPU Total Generated Heat Load L35 to L37 L9.4 i EPU Plant Temperature Rise Results L38 to L57 L9.5 Plant Temperature Rise Equations L58 (Total Appendix Pages - 46)

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L3 of L58 L1.O PURPOSE The purpose of this attachment is to determine the Core Standby Cooling System (CSCS) temperature rise across the plant for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate (MUR PU) and Extended Power Uprate (EPU) based on the new heat load to the Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) determined in L-002453 [Ref. L5.1]. This temperature rise is to be used in the LAKET-PC [Ref. L5.3] model of the LaSalle County Station UHS.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L4 of L58 L2.0 METHODOLOGY The plant temperature rise is used in LAKET-PC [Ref. L5.3] to compute the rise in water temperature caused by the heat rejected to the UHS during the postulated accident.

There are two types of heat loads that are considered when determining the CSCS temperature rise across the plant: 1) the total generated heat load and 2) the sensible heat load. The total generated heat load can be further divided into decay heat load, pump heat load and cooler heat load. Heat load from the spent fuel pool is not considered since it is improbable that required operator actions could be performed in the post-Loss Of Coolant Accident (LOCA) reactor building environment (Assumption L3.4). The total heat load, consisting of the generated heat load and the sensible heat load, is the heat rejection to the UHS and is used to determine the plant temperature rise.

The total generated heat load (Design Input L4.1) is computed for various time steps between zero seconds and IE+9 seconds in Calculation L-002453 [Ref. L5.1]. Linear interpolation of the results from L-002453 is used to detennine the integrated total generated heat load at each time step.

The total sensible heat load is determined to be [R )) (Design Input L4.2). It is assumed that all sensible heat is dissipated to the UHS at a constant rate within six hours (See Assumption L3.2).

Once the heat rejection to the UHS is determined by adding the total generated head load and the sensible heat load, the temperature rise through the plant is determrined by the following equation:

AT= Q (Eq. L3-1) where:

AT = plant temperature rise ['F]

Q = heat rejection rate to the UHS [BTU/hr]

Cp = specific heat capacity of water [BTU/(lbm-°F)]

m = mass flow rate [lbm/hr]

The mass flow rate is determined by converting the CSCS volumetric flow rate of 86 ft3/s (Assumption L3.3) to a mass flow rate at a density of 62.0 lb,n/ft3 (Assumption L3.1).

L2.1 Computer Programs and Software The analysis performed herein utilizes Microsoft Excel 2003 [Ref. L5.4], which is commercially available. The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L5 of L58 spreadsheets used in this analysis. All computer runs were performed using PC No.

ZD6661 under the Windows XP operating system. Excel Add-in function STMFUNC is used to calculate the thermal properties of water and steam at varying operating conditions

[Ref. L5.5]. The Excel Add-in function STMFUNC has been validated and approved for use in accordance with the S&L Quality Assurance (QA) program.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L6 of L58 L3.0 ASSUMPTIONS L3.1 Water Properties - The properties of water are evaluated at a temperature of 100°F and atmospheric pressure. The density and specific heat capacity of water at 100°F and 1 atm are 62.0 lbm/ft3 and 0.998 BTU/lbm-°F, respectively [Ref. L5.5].

L3.2 Sensible Heat Load from Reactor Coolant System - It is conservatively assumed that all of the sensible heat from the reactor and the primary system is dissipated to the UHS within six hours. One-sixth of the heat is assumed to be rejected per 1-hour time step until the full sensible heat load is rejected by the sixth hour. This is based on the assumption that the temperature within the reactor will be at 100°F within six hours.

L3.3 CSCS Volumetric Flow - The total plant flow during the UHS analysis is assumed to be 38,600 gpm (86.0 ft3/s). The total flow is based upon the cumulative flow contribution from thirteen CSCS pumps operating at design flow conditions (eight Residual Heat Removal (RHR)-Service Water pumps, 4,000 gpm each; three Diesel Generator (DG) pumps, two at 1300 gpm and one at 2,000 gpm; and two High Pressure Core Spray DG pumps, 1000 gpm each) (See Attachment D).

L3.4 Spent Fuel Pool Heat Load - Heat load from the spent fuel pool is not considered because it is improbable that required operator action (RHR alignment) could be performed in the post-LOCA reactor building environment. Instead, the fuel pool emergency makeup pumps are modeled as providing required makeup flow to the fuel pools at 600 gpm [Ref.

L5.2].

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L7 of L58 L4.0 DESIGN INPUTS L4.1 Total Generated Heat Load - The total generated heat load rejected to the UHS following a LOCA for one unit while the second unit is in normal shutdown from maximum power is determined in L-002453 [Ref. L5.1]. These results are presented in Appendix L9.1 for MUR PU and Appendix L9.3 for EPU.

L4.2 Sensible Heat - The sensible heat load is (( )), per L-002453 [Ref. L5.1 ].

L4.3 CSCS Pump Curves - The CSCS pump curves are provided in Attachment D of this calculation.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L8 of L58 L

5.0 REFERENCES

L5.1 L-002453, "UHS Heat Load," Rev. 3.

L5.2 SEAG #12-000098, "DIR for LAS-EPU-U 1/2-DIR-T0608- 1," 4/18/2012.

L5.3 LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 12/09/2004.

L5.4 Microsoft@ Excel 2003, Sargent & Lundy LLC Program No. 03.2.286-1.0, dated 02/02/2004.

L5.5 STMFUNC (Steam Table Function Dynamic Link Library) S&L Program Number 03.7.598-2.0, dated 5/15/2003.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L9 of L58 L6.0 CALCULATIONS L6.1 Total and Integrated Generated Heat Load Rejected to the UHS The total generated heat load rejected to the UHS following a LOCA for one unit while the second unit is in normal shutdown from maximum power is determined for MUR PU (3559 MWt) and EPU (4067 MWt) in L-002453 [Ref. L5.1]. These results are presented in Appendix L9.1 for MUR PU and Appendix L9.3 for EPU and are used to determine the temperature rise through the plant.

L6.2 Plant Temperature Rise In order to facilitate the creation of a LAKET-PC [Ref. L5.3] input file, the plant temperature rise results are determined in one hour increments. This requires linear interpolation of the integrated total generated heat load found in L-002453 [Ref. L5.1] to determine the integrated total generated heat load at hourly intervals. Adding the integrated total generated heat load and the sensible heat load gives the total heat load, which is the heat rejected to the UHS used to determine the plant temperature rise. The plant temperature rise is calculated in Excel using Eq. L3-1. The results of this calculation are shown in Appendix L9.2 for MUR PU and Appendix L9.4 for EPU.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L10 of L58 L7.0

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS The CSCS temperature rise across the plant following a postulated accident is determined in hourly intervals in order to be used as input to LAKET-PC [Ref. L5.3]. These results are given in Appendix L9.2 for MUR PU and Appendix L9.4 for EPU.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE Ll 1 of L58 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE Lii of L58 L8.0 LIMITATIONS AND OPEN ITEMS L8.1 Limitations None.

L8.2 Open Items None.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L12 of L58 L9.0 APPENDICES LIST OF APPENDICES App. Title No. of Pages L9,1 MUR PU Total Generated Heat Load [Ref. L5.1] 2 L9,2 MUR PU Plant Temperature Rise Results 20 L9.3 EPU Total Generated Heat Load [Ref. L5.1] 3 L9,4 EPU Plant Temperature Rise Results 20 L9.5 Plant Temperature Rise Equations 1 (Total Appendix Pages - 46)

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L13 of L58 APPENDIX L9.1: MUR PU TOTAL GENERATED HEAT LOAD [Ref. L5.11 i I(([ Pump Cooler Heat Fuel Pool Heat

[

Time Time Heat (seconds) (hours) Load Load Load L__(Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) (Btulhr) 0 2.781E-11 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 1.00E-01 2.78E-05 4.15E+07 ! 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00

, 4.5E 0 i 5~j

__.04E+07 0.00E+00 LI.

1.50E-01 4.17E-05 4.15E+07 I 5.04E+07 0.00E+00 K 2.OOE-01 5.56E-05 4.15E+07 _5.04E+07 o.ooE+00.

4.OOE-01 1.11E-04 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 6.OOE-01 1.67E-04 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.00 8.OOE-01 I 2.22E-04 1.OOE+00 2.78E-04

  • 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 I 0.OOE+00 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 1.50E+00 4.17E-04 2.OOE+00 5.56E-04 ' _4.15E+07 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 5.0E 0.OOE+00L

_7___O+0 4.OOE+00 1.11E-03 - 4.15E+07 O5.O4E+07 0.OOE+00-6_OOE+00"1 .67E-03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+_0 8.OOE+00 2.22E-03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 1.OOE+01 2.78E-03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.0OE+00 1.50E+01 4.17E-03,L 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+0 Ii 2.OOE+01 5.56E-03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 4.00E+01 I1.11E-02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 -. ooE+00 6.OOE+01 1.67E-02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 8.OOE+01 2.22E-02' 4.15E07 -5.04E7-O-O+00 1.OOE+02 2.78E-02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.00E+00 I 1.50E+02 4.17E-02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 2.0OE+02 5.56E-02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.00E+00 4.OOE+02 1.11E-01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.00E+00 6.00E+02 1.67E-01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.00E+00 8.00E+02 2.22E-01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.00E+00 1.OOE+03j 2.78E-01 1.50E+03 4.17E-01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.00E+00 2.001E+03 5.56E-01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 4.OOE+03 1.11E+00 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.00E+00 6.OOE+03 1.67E+00 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 8.OOE+03 2.22E+00 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 i0.00E00 1.00E+04 2.78E+00 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 1.50E+04 4.17E+00 2.00E+04 5.56E+00 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 4.OOE+04 1.11E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 j O.OOE+O00

-]-4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.00E+00 I 6.OOE+04 1.67E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+O0' 8.OOE+04 2.22E+01 ))

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L14 of L58 Pump Cooler Fuel Pool ((

Time Time Heat Heat Heat (seconds) (hours) Load Load Load (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) 8.64E+04 2.40E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+O0 L 1.OOE+05 2.78E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+O0 1.50E+05 4.17E+01 4.15E+07 I 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00

-4.1 5E+07 5.0 4 E+07 OOOE+0 1.73E+05 4.81E+01 2.OOE+05 5.56E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+O0 2.59E+05i 7.19E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+OO 3.46E+05 9.61E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+O0 4.OOE+05 1.11E+021 -- 4.15E+07 i4.15E+07 5.04E+07I O.OOE+0I 5.04E+07l O.OOE+O0 4.32E+05 1.20E+02 6.OOE+05 1.67E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 IO.OOE+O0 8.OOE+05 2.22E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+O0 8.64E+05 2.40E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+O0 1.OOE+06 2.78E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+O0O 1.50E+06 4.17E+02 r 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+O0 1.73E+06 4.81 E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 2.OOE+06 5.56E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 2.59E+06 I 7.19E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 I O.OOE+00I 3.46E+06 9.61E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+-00 1

4.OOE+06 1.11E+03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 4.32E+06 1.20E+03 4.15E+07 I 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 6.OOE+06 1.67E+03 4.15+07.04E 07 OOE+00&0 8.OOE+06 2.22E+03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 1.OOE+07 2.78E+03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0._OOE+00_

1.50E+07 4.17E+031 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 2.OOE+07 5.56E+03 - 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 4.OOE+07 1.11 E+04 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 6.OOE+07 1.67E+04 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 8.OOE+07 2.22E+04 4.15E+07 15.04E+07 O.OOE+00 1.OOE+08 2.78E+04L 4.15E+07 5.64E+0Z- O.OOE+00 1.50E+08 4.17E+04 4.15E+07 I 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 2.OOE+08 5.56E+04 j 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 4.00E+08 1.11E+051 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 6.OOE+08 1.67E+051 _4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 8.OOE+08 2.22E+05 I II4.15E+07 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 5.04E+07 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 1.OOE+09 2.78E+05 11 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L15 of L58 APPENDIX L9.2: MUR PU PLANT TEMPERATURE RISE RESULTS Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 40.75 21 321 31.98 29.49 3 - 4 L 28.41

__4 5 L 27.50 5 6 26.73 6 71 15.35 F 8 15.35

  • 819

-7 .L 15.35

_ 1. 5.35_

10 10 . 15.35 11 ___ 12 I 14.12 12 13 13.97 13 4 - 1 13.97 14 15 1 13.97 15 1- -13.97 16 F 17 13.70 17 1*8- 13.16 18 19L 13.16 19 _2_ 13.16 20 i 21 i 13.16 21 22 7_13.16 22 23 -r 12.84

_23 24 12.75 24 I 25 f F 12.51 25 26 _j 26 27 j 12.51 27 28 12.38 28 F 29 _L 11.92

_29- -o30 11.92 30 1 31_ _ 11.92 31 32 11.92 F 32 331 11.92 33 34 F T_ 1-1.92 34 35 - 11.92 35 36-F 36 _

37 11.92 11.92 37 38 I 11.92 38 I 39 S 11.92 I 39F 40 F 11.92 4o0 41 41 - -42 11.73 I 11.34 43 _4 _ )) I 11.34 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L16 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F) 45 46 I 11.34 11.34 46 47 I 11.34

! 11.341

__48_ I 49 ]_ 11.07 49 50 I 11.05 50 I 51 i 11.05 51__ 52 11.05 52 53 _ 11.05 53 54 11.05 554 54 ] -11.05 55 I 5 -

10.87 56 57 .I 10.65

_57 58 i J 10.65 58 _[ 59 - !! 1 10.65 59 60 1 10.65 60 61 I 10.65 61 _ 62 1 10.65

_ 62 ._ 63_ 10.65 63 1 64 10.65 64 65 10.65 65 66  ! 10.65 66 671 K 10.65

  • 67- -- 68--__ 10.65

_68 _1_69I 10.65 69 70 10.65 7 j 71 .I 10.65 10.62 72 73 10.12 73 74 _ 10.12 74 75 _ 10.12 75 I 76 _ 10.12 76-- 77 _ 10.12 77 78}[

10.12 79 98 8 810 T 10.12

. -_82- -1 T T_10.12 10.12 82 .:[ 83 84 __81-- 10.12 84 1_854- 10.12 10.12 85 86 10.12 86 _87 10.12 87 __ 88 i]i 10.12 10.12 j 88 89 '

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L17 of L58 Starting Ending [ Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 89 90 10.12 90 91 1 10.12 91 _ 92 10.12

" 92 -- --93-- - 1 -10.12 93 1 94 J 10.12 94 __ 95 "I 95 I 96 I 10.12 96 97 1 9.75 97 98 I 9.70 98 99 9.70 I 9.70 102 100 1 9.70 104i1 I. 1_01 102 II F_9.70o 105 103 9.70 9.70 104 1105 _ 9.70 1051 {F66 9.70 106 l_107 L 9.70 107 108 I 9.70 108 I 109 1 9.70 o9--- 110 9.70 liog ill _

9.70 110 111 1_I-2, 9.52 112 J_113 __1 9.50 9.50 114 115 I 9.50 1151 116 7 9.50 116 117_

9.50 117 I 118 - 9.50 1186 119 19 120 9.50 120 1211 9.14 121 122 9.14

._122 123 9.14 123 124 -

124 125_1 9.14 1j25 1j_226_

1 9.14 126 L127 9.14 127_1 128 I 9.14 128L 129 J- 9.14 1291____ 130 130 ý 131 9.14 131 132 9.14 132 133 __ I 9.14 9.14 133 134 _ _

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L18 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F) 134 135 9.14 135 136 I 9.14 136 J 137 9.14 13-[13 F 9.14 138 139 9.14 139 140 140 1411 9.14 141 142 I 9.14 142 143 - 9.14 143 144  ! 9.14 144 145 9.14 145 146 J_ 9.14 146 147 ,L 9.14 147 - 1486 9.14 148. 149 9.14 149 1501 ] 9.14 150 151 9.14 151 1-152 ] 9.14 152 1 153 I 9.14 153 154 1 9.14 154 155 9.14 155 I 156 9.14 156 157 157 .1158 __ - 9.14-158 159 I 9.14 159 160 _ - 9.14 160 161 - 9.14 161! 162 I 9.14 162 1 163 - 9.14 163 1164 I9.14 164__ 165 9.14 165 1661 166 I-167 _ 8.97 167 _i 168 1 8.63 1681 169 1 8.63

_169 170 I 8.63 170o 171 7 8.63 171 1 172 8.63 172  ! 173_

  • 173 !174 8.63 8.63 174 175 175 [176 I 8.63 8.63 176 177 .!_ 8-.63 177 178 8.63 178 179 _

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L19 of L58 Starting Ending i Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 179 j 180 8.63 180 181 8.63 181 182 8.63 182 183 8.63 183_ 184 -1 8.63 184 185 8.63 185 I 186 1 8.63 186 187 I 1 8.63 187 188 8.63 188 I 189 8.63 189 -- 1 _ 8.63 190 I 191 i 8.63 191 192 8.63 S192 193--- I 8.63 193 194 8.63 1941 195 I 8.63 195 196 I 8.63 196_ 197  ! 8.63 _.6 197 1 198 8.63 198 199 8.63 199  ! 200 8.63 200 201 8.63 201 202 1 8.63 202 I203 -I 86 203__._ 204 1. 8.63 204 I 205 8.63 j 205 206 8.63 I 206. 207 8.63 207 208 8.63 208 209 - 8.63 209 210 . .63.

8.

210 211 8.63 211 I- 212 8.63 212 I 213 8.63 213 214 8.63

_ 214 215L. 8.63 215 216 I 8.63 1 216 217 ... 8.63

  • 217 218 8.63 218 219 8.63 219 2201 8.63 220 221 8.63 2211 222 8.63 i 222 i 223 8.41 223 22ý4---- 8.3422 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L20 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 224 225 _ 8.34 225 226 8.34 2261 227 8.34 227_ -- 228 _- - 8.34

ý228 2229 8.34 229 _ 230 8.34 230 231 8.34 231 232 8.34 232 I 233 1 8.34 233 234r j 8.34 234_. 235 -r 8.34 235 -- 236- 8.34 236 237 L 8.34 237 I238 8.34 238 239 - 8.34 239 240 8.34 2401 241 1 8.18 241 I 242  ! 8.18 242 1 243 1 8.18 243 1244 1 8.18 244 J_245 L 8.18 245 246 1 8.18 246 247 8.18 247 248 _ 8.18 248 I 249 1I 8.18 249 250 8.18 250 251 r 8.18 251 252 8.18 2526 253 8.18 253 254 J_ 8.18 254 255

-i5* 256- - I 8.18 I 8.18 256 1I 257 I 8.18 8.18 257 I 258 i 8.18

'___258 _E 259

-7 8.18

_25_9 _;200I 8.18 2601261

._2_6_1 262 __ 8.18 26212632 8.18 263 264 8.18 264 265 _ -, 8.18 265 266 8.18 266 I.267 267 268 __1 8.18 268_1 269 1 8.18 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L21 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time I Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 269 2710 8.18 270 271 8.18 271 i272 8.18 272 273 1- 8.18 273 - 274 t 8.18 274 275 8.18 275 276 I 276 277 7 8.18 277 278 i 8.10

  • 278 279 7.83 279 280 L 7.83 280_ 21 I2 I 7.83 281 282 _.7.83 282 283 _ 7.83 283 284 7.83 284 285 I 7.83 285 I 286 L 7.83 286 287 7.83 287 288 I289 1288 L__7.83 7.83

.289 1 290_j 1-7.83 290 1 291 . 7.83 291 _29_2__2 _- 7.83 292 293 I 7.83 3

294 295 7.83 7.83 295 296 - 7.83 296 1 297 7.83 .

297 I 298 I 7.83 298 299 7.83

_.299 300 1-7.83 300 1 301 7.83 301 302 7.83 302 J 303 7.83 303 I 304 T 7.83 304 3-305 f , 7.83 305 306- 7.83 306 307- 7.83 307 308 7.83 308 309 7.83 3_09 _1_31_0 7.83 310 311 7.83 7.83 31~i 313 312

[7 31431 313 7.83 7.83 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L22 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (7F) 3141 315 7.83 3151 316 7.83 316 317 317J 318 I 7.83 318 i 319 7.83 319 320320 7.83 320 I 321--j- ] 7.83 321 322 7.83 322 323 f 7.83 323 324 7.83 3241 325 a 7.83 325 I 326 l 7.83 326 327 7.83 327 328 -I 7.83 328 329 1I 7.83 329 1 3301 1 7.83 330 J 331 331 332 - _1 7.83 7.83 7.83 333 1 334 j 7.83 334 335 7.83 335 336 I 7.83 336 337 7.83 337 I 338 _ I 7.83 338 I 33 339 I 7.83 339 340-i 7.83 340 __ --341"-1 7.83 341 342 j 7.83 3421 343 7.83 343 I 344 I 7.83 344 J 345 1 345 1 346 .- _ 7.83 _

346_ _ 347__ I 7.83 3471 348 I 7.83 348 1349 7.83 349 3507

_=7. 83 7.83

__350_._ 351 - _I _ _f7.83 7.83 _

351 352 I _ 7.83 352 353 (( 7.83 .

353 I 354 i I 7.83 355 , 356 7.83 i 7.83 356 J357 7.83 357 13581i_

358 i 359 -

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L23 of L58 Plant Starting Ending Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 359 1360 7.83 360j 361 7.83

_361 .... 362 7.83 362. 363 7.83 363 364 7.83 364 I 365 7.83 365 j 366 7.83 366 367 7.83 367 368 I 7.83 368 369 T- 7.83 369 370 7.83 370 371 J 7.83 371 372 372 .373 F I 7.83 7.83 373 _ 374 7.83 3741 375 7.83 375 376 1 7.83 376 377 7.83 377~ 378 7.83 378 379 7.83 1 7.83 379 380 380 381 7.83 381 3 7.83 382 383 7.83 383 384 7 384 385 _ 7.83 385 j 386 J i! 7.83 7.83 386 387 S 7.83 387 ] 388 I 7.83 - . -

388 - 389 S 7.83 7.83 389 390 _ 7.83 7.83 3901 391 7.83__

7.83 392 393 I 7.83 393 394 i, 7.83 394 395 7.83 39 396 7.83 7.83 397 . 398 7.83 398 399 400 - 7.83 7.83 399 F 7.83 400 401 7.83 401i 402

)) 7.83 402 i 403 I 7.8 403 404 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L24 of L58 Starting Ending i Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr)Rise (F) 404 I 405 1 7.83 405 406 I 7.83 406 407 - .83 407 J 408 T7.83 408 1 409 _1_ _ 7.83 409 ] 410 - 7.83 410 I 411 L I 7.83 411 412 7.83 412 413 7.83 413 414L 7.83 4141 415 _ J 7.83 415 1416 -I 7.83 416 1 417 .__ 7.71 417[418 7.49 4181 419 7.49 419] 420 I I 749 420 I 421 L _1 7.49 421 422 7.49 422 1 423- 7.49

-423 I 424 7A.49 424 ]425~ _ 7.49 425 426 . 7.49 426j 4271 7.49 427 I 428] I 7.49 428 429 7.49 429 I 430 L 7.49 430 431 - 7.49 431 432_ ____7.49 4321 433 7.49 433 T4i4-- .. 749 435 436 7.49 436. _437 7.49 437 438 J 1 7.49 438 ] 439 I 7.49 439 __440__ 74 S__7.49 -

440 441 7.49 441 442 -! 7.49 442 443 L 7.49 443 444 7.49 444 445 I 7.49 445 446 7.4 446 447 7.49 447 448 , 7.49 448 449 ___))i 7.49 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L25 of L58

.Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F) 449 I 450 7.49 450 451 J_ 7.49 451 J 452 I 7 7.49_

452 453 7.49 454 455 7.49 455 456 7.49 456 457 7.49 4577458 7.49 458 459 7.49 459 460 -- __1-7.49 460 461 L 7.49 461 462 I 7.49 462 463 - 7.49 463 464 -7.49 -

7.49 J

464 465 465 I 466 1 7.49 466 1467 1 I 7.49 _

467 7 468 - 7.49 468- 469 - 7.49 469 470 I 7.49 470 I 471 { _ 7.49 471  ! 472- 1 1 7.49 472 473 7.49 473 474 7.49 474 475 7.49 475j 476 7.49 1 476 1477 7.49 1 4771 478 j_ 7.49 478 .I 479 7.49 479 480 I 7.49 480 1481 7.42 481 482 J 7.34 482 L483 7.34 4831 484 7.34

_484 485 1---7.34 485 486 1 7.34 4861487] - 7.34 487 488 - 7.34 488 489 i_ 7.34 489-F 4904--9 7.34 490 491 7.34 4911492 7.34 492 493 i 7.34 493 494 ))I 7.34 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L26 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F) 494 - 495 1 I 734 4951 496 7

--4961 497 7.3 J 497 " 498 7.34 498 1 499 i. 4-499 500 l.......7.-34 500 501 7.34 501 502 7.34 502 503 I 7.34 503 504 7.34 504] I5 7.34 505 506 7.34 506 507 __ 7.34 507 508

  • I 7.34 508 509 7.34 509 . 510 7.34 5101 511 1__7.34 511 512 7.34 512 L513 7.34 513 . 514 I 7.34 514 515 J 7.34 515 . 516 7.34 I 516 517 7.34 518 I 7.34 518 - 519 .347 519 ! 520 L -j-7.34 520 I 521 7.34 521 I 522 :7.34 522 I 523 j. 7.34 523 524 I 7.34 524_I 525_ 7.34 525 52 7.34 526 1 527 7.34 527 528 7.34 5281 529 7.34 529 5377.34 530 531 7.34

-53 532 , 7.34 533 534 7.34

-- 534_ 535_4 7.34

. .... . . . I 7.34 535 536 7.34 536 537 7.34 537 538 7.34 538 I 539 - 7.34]

734 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L27 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F) 5391 540 I 7.34 540 541 7.34 I 541

-- I

  • 43 542 1- - 7.34 -

543 54I545 544 I 7.34 7.34 545 546 L 7.34 546 j 547 1 I 7.34 547 -548J 7.34 548/ 549 I I 7.34 549 550 ' 7.34 550 551 7.34 551 552 7.34 553 554 7.34 554 555 J 7.34

ý555 556 7.24 556 557 7.13 557 [ 558 7.13 558 _ 559 7.13 559 560 1 7.13 560 561 7.13 561 562 7.13 562 563 7.13

  • 563 . 564 J 7.13 564 565 11 7.13 565 566 ] 7.13 566 567 I 7.13 567 568 II 7.13 568 569 J 7.13

_569* _ 57

  • 70.1 570 I 571 _ 7.13 571 I 572 7.13 -..

572 I 573 . "--_7.-13--_ _

573 I 574 7.13

  • 575 576 1J 71 576*1 577 I 7.13

-_577 578 7.13 578 579- 7.13 580 7.13 580 581 7.13 581 582 7.13 582 583 I I 7.13 583 584 AF,....]i 7.13 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L28 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F) 584

_ 585 7.13 5 586 7.13 586 587 7.13 587 -588 -1 ... ... 7.-13 . .

588 589 I 7.13 589 590 7.13 590 591 7.13 591 1592 I71 592 - 593- 7.13 593 594 7.13 594 595 F 7.13 595- 596 7.13 596 597 7.13 597 598 I 7.13 598 599 7.13 5991 600 7.13 600 601 L 7.13 601 602 L 7.13 602 603 - 7.13 603 J 604 I 7.13 604 605 7.13 605 606 7.13 606 607 I 7.13 607 608 I 7.13 608 609 7.13 609 610 7L3 610I 611 -L 7.13 611 612 7.13 612 613 7.13 613 614 7.13 614 _ _615 7.13 615 I 616 7.13 616 I 617 I 7.13 617 618 I 7.13 618 I 619 7.13 -

619 620 -_ 7.13 620 621 I 7.13 6 622 F 7.13 622 623 7.13 623 624 7.13 624 1 625 J__ 7.13 625 626 7.13 __1 626- 627! 7.13 627 628 7.13 628 1 629 ......... ....... ]I 7.13 _j PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L29 of L58 Starting Ending i Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 629 630 7.13 630 631 L 7.13 631 632 .. 7.13 _

632 633 ,7.13 633 634 7.13 I 6363634 j 7.13 635 636 I 7.13 636 637 7.13 637 T638 -... 7.13.

638 . 639 ji 7.13

  • 639 J 640 j] 7.13 640 1 641 I 7.13 641 642 '7.13 642 643 1 7.13 643 644 7.13 644 645 -- 7.13 645 [ 646 7.13 646 647 7.13 647 648 7.13 648 649 7.133 649] 650 _ 7.13 650 651 - 7.13 651 652 . 7.13.

62 653 I 7.1 3 653. _ 654 __ 7.13 654 j655 7....

-713_...4 655 656 7.13 656 657 I 7.13 657 658 658 659 __

] 7.13___

71.13 659 66059 7.13 660 662 1 7.13 661 I 662 7.13 662 663 7.13 663 664 L 7.13

__664] 665 _L 7.7_13 665 666 J 7.13 666 667 7.13 667 668 7.13 6681 669 i 7.13 669 670-' 7.13-670 671 7.13 671 672 2 _ 7.13

__972 673 7.13 673 674 . ................. J]l 7.13 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L30 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 674 675 i 7.13 675 676 7.13 676 1677 _F 7.13 677 1 678 678 6 79! 7.13 j 679 680 1 7.13 7.13 j 1 680 681 1 7.13 681 682 682 7 683 I 683 I 684 7.13 684I 685 _

7.13 685 I686 7.13 686 I687 7.13 687 688 7.13 688__ 689 689 L 690 1 7.13 7.13 690-I 691 1 7.13 6911 692 - 7.13 692__!_ 693 I 7.13 693 J 694 _ 7.13 694 695 7.13 695 696 7.13 696f 697_ 7.13 697 L 698 7.13 698 I 699 7.13

-699-- - 700 7.13 700 !7 i 7.13 701 702 I _ 7.13 702 I 703 _ I 7.13 703 .[704 i 7.13 704 I 705 - _ 7.13

_705 _706  !, 7.13 706 707 7.13 707 708 7.13 708 709 L 7.13 709 710 7.13 710o__ 711 7.13 711 712 7.13 712 713 I 7.13 713 714 714 715l i 7.13 715 716 7.13 716 717 7.13 717 718 7.13

)) 7.13 718 719 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L31 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 719 720 j I 6.98 7201 721 ( 6.86 _

721 ... 722 ..- I 6.86 722 723 6.86 723 724 I 1 6.86 I 724 725 6.86 725 726 6.86 726 727 6.86 727 728 I 6.86 728 7297 6.86 729 730 -1"I 6.86 6.86 731I 732 1 6.86 732- 733 I 6.86 733 734 6.86 734 735 _- 6.86

--35j 736 I 6.86 736 737 6.86 7ýý37 -738

_ 6.86 _

738 739 6.86 739 740 - 6.86 740 741 6.86 741 [ 742 , 6.86 72743 6.86 743 I_744 6.86

._744 1 745 6.86 745 _. 746 6.86 746 1 747 6.86 747 748 6.86 7481 749 6.86

_ 7499 .__750 750 I751 I_6.86-__

6.86 751 j 752 6.86A 752 753 6.86 7531 754 I 6.86 754 755 - 6.86 7551__7561 6.86 7561 757_ý_ 6.86 1 757 758 6.86 758 759 759 760 I76076 9 6.86 761 1 762 6.86 762 763 _ _ _ _ _I --- 6.86 6- -6 -

763 764 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L32 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F) 764 [ 765 6.86 7651 766 6.86 766 F 767. 6.86 767- 768 6.86 768 769 1_ 6.86 769 770 I 6.86 770 771 -[ 6.86 771 772 6.86 772 773 6.86 773 774 6.86 774T] 775 *6.86

  • 7751 776 6.86 776 j 777 6.86 777I 778 6.86 778L 779 6.86 779 1 780 6.86 780 _ 781 6.86 781 782 6.86 782 _ 783 6.86 783  ! 784 6.86

- -784 I- 785 j 6.86 785 786 6.86 786 787 6.86 787 _. 788 j 6.86 788 _ 789 1 6.86 789_j 790 6.86 790 I 791

  • 6.86 7911 792 6.86 792- 1 793 1- 6.86 77931 794 L 6.86 794 795 6.86 795 I 796 6.86 796 797 6.86 797 798 j 6.86 798 799  ! 6.86 7991800 6.86 801 6.86 801 802 i 6L 6.86 802 803 1 I 6.86 803 804 " 6.86 804 805 6.86 805 806 i 6.86 806 807 I 6.86 807 808 - I 6.86 808 1 809 ))I 6.86 j PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L33 of L58 Starting Ending -[ Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) i Rise (*F) 809 810 _ 6.86 810 811 6.86

  • 8111 812' _. 6.86 812 813 6.86 813 814 , 6.86 814 815  ! 6.86 815 816 6.86 816 I 817 T 6.86 817 818 - 6.86 818 819 . 6.86 819 820 6.86 820 I 821 6.86 821 822 6.86 822- 823{ 6.86 823 L 824 ' 6.86 824 _ 825 ' 6.86

_8251826 j 6.86 826 I 827 .6.86 827 828 F-6.86 828 829 - 1' 6.86 829; 8301 6.86 830 831 1 6.86 831 832 , 6.86 832 833 -- 6.86 833 834 6.86 834 I 835 I _. 6.86 835 j836 - 6.86 836 837 - 6.86 837 I 838 i _ 6.86 838 I 839 6.86 8341 F-84 84---- -6.8---

6.86 842 843 . 6.86 843 844 J 6.86 844 - 845 1F 6.86 845 8464 I 6.86 846 8745_7 -- 6.86 847 __848 _ 6.86 846 849 6.86 849 850 6.86 850 851 6.86 851 _ 852 6.86 852 853 6.86 853 854 _)) 6.86 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L34 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise ('F) 854 855 6.86 855 856 6.86 8_56 857 6.86 __

857 858 6.86 858 859 6.86 859 860 I 6.86 860 8611 6.86 861 862 - -6.86 862 863 6.86 863 864 11 6.86 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L35 of L58 APPENDIX L9.3: EPU TOTAL GENERATED HEAT LOAD [Ref. L5.11 i[1 Pump I Cooler Fuel Pool Time Time Heat Heat Heat (seconds) (hours) Load Load Load (Btu/lhr) (Btulhr) (Btulhr) 0 2.78E-1 1 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 L.00E+00 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 1.OOE-01 2.78E-05 -I-4.15E+07 1.50E-01 4.17E-05 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 2.OOE-01 5.56E-05 4.15%E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 4.OOE-01 1.11E-04 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+0O 6.OOE-01 1.67E-04 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 8.OOE-01 2.22E-04 4.15E+07 5.04E+07! 0.OOE+00I 1.OOE+00 2.78E-04 1.50E+00 r 4.17E-04 4.15+075.04E+07 0.OOE+00 2.OOE+00 5.56E-04 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00L S4.OOE+00 1.11E-03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 6.OOE+00 1.67E-03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 .OE+00 8.OOE+00 2.22E-03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00

, 1.OOE+01 2.78E-03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07j 0.OOE+0O{

1.50E+01 4.17E-03 4.15E+071 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 2.00E+01 5.56E-03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 4.OOE+01 1.11E-02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+/-00 6.OOE+01 1.67E-02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 IOOOE+00 8.OOE+01_ 2.22E-02 h4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+OO 1.OOE+02 2-8E-02 4.15+0715.04E+07 0.OE00E 1.50E+02 4.17E-02 4.15E+07 I5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 2.00E+02 5.56E-02 4.15E0 .0 I.OE 3.OOE+02 8.33E-02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 4.OOE+02 1.11E-01_ 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 J 6.00E+02 1.67E-01 4.15E+07 j5.04E+07 0.OOE+00[

8.00E+02 2.22E-01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 I..OOE+o2J 1.00E+03 2.78E-01 J.5E0 5.04E+071IO.OE00j9I 1.50E+03 4.17E-01 4.15E+07_ 5.04E+07~ 0.OOE+00_

1.80E+03 5.OOE-01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 2.OOE+03 5.56E-01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 3.OOE+03_I 8.33E-01_ 4.1 5E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 4.OOE+03 1.11E+00 4.15E+07 [5.04E+07 I .OOE+00 -

4.80E+03 1.33E+00- 4.15E+07 I5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 6.OOE+03 1.67E+00 4.15E+07 I5.04E+07 0.OOE÷00 8.OOE+03 2.22E+00O 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 1.OOE+04 2.78E+0O 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+O0 1.50E+04 4.17E+00 ]:4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L36 of L58 Pump Cooler Fuel Pool Time 1 Time Heat Heat Heat (seconds) (hours) Load Load Load (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) 2.OOE+04 5.56E+00- 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 3.OOE+04 L8.33E+00 I 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.00E+00 4.00E+04 1.11E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 6.OOE+04 1.67E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 8.OOE+04 2.22E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 8.64E+04 2.40E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.00E+00 1.OOE+05 2.78E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.00E+00!

1.50E+05:4.17E+01 S4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.30E+00 I 1_.73E+05 4.80E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+0Ol 1.80E+05 5.OOE+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00L 2.OOE+05 5.56E+01i 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.011+0_0L 2.59E+05 7.20E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.00E+00 3.46E+05 960E+01 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.00E+00~

3.60E+05 1.OOE+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0O.OOE+O0 4.OOE+05 1.11E+02_ 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 4.32E+05 1.20E+02F 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.0_0E+00 6.OOE+05 1.67E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00OL 8.OOE+05 2.22E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 8.64E+05 2.40E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 I 0.OOE+00 1.OOE+06 2.78E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 1 0.OOE+00 1.50E+06 4.17E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 1.73E+06 4.80E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 2.OOE+06 j 5.56E+02 4.1E_0 5.04E+07 0.OOE+0!

2.59E+06-' 7.20E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 3.46E+06 9.60E+02 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 4.00E+06 1.11E+03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0OOE+00 4.32E+06 1.20E+03

4. 15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 6.OOE+06 1.67E+031 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 8.OOE+06 1.OOE+07 2.22E+03 2.78E+03
  • 4.15E+07 ]5.04E+07 0.OOE+OO i4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+0O 1.50E+07 4.17E+03 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 2.OOE+07_5. T+o3 4.OOE+07 1.11E+041 4.15E+07 I5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 6.00E+07 1.67E+04 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 8.OOE+07 2.22E+04 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00

] .0E+08 2.78E+04 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 c100E+00 1.50E+08 4.17E+04

]'4.15E+07 5.04E+07 0.OOE+00 2.OOE+08 5.56E+04 1]

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L37 of L58

ý Pump Cooler Fuel Pool ((

Time Time I Heat Heat Heat (seconds) (hours) Load Load Load (Btulhr) . (Btu/hr) (Btulhr) 4.OOE+08 1.11E+05 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 6.OOE+08 1.67E+05 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 8.OOE+08 2.22E+05 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 1.OOE+09 2.78E+051 ] 4.15E+07 5.04E+07 O.OOE+00 ! ))

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L38 of L58 APPENDIX L9.4: EPU PLANT TEMPERATURE RISE RESULTS Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F) 0 __ 1 44.80 S 34.57 1 2 2 3 _1 31.95 1 30.73 3 4 415 J 29.69-F 5 6_ _1 28.99 6 7 17.72 7 8 I 17.72 8 9 _ 17.03 9-H iO 16.69 10 11 16.69 11 12 15.84 12 13 J 15.73 13 14 I 15.73 14 5 - 15.73 15 [ 16 F 15.73 16 17 15.42 17 18 [ 14.80 18 I 19 14.80 .

19. F 20 .. 14.80 20 21 14.80

-[ 14.80 21 22 J 22 - 23 14.42 24 _25 14.31 .

IL14.03 25 26 -_ 14.03 26 j 27 14.03 27 28 " 13.88

_8 29 L 13.34 29 30 r 13.34 30 31 _ 13.34 13.34 32 33 - 13.34 33 34 - 13.34 34 35 13.34 35 36 13.34 36 , 37 J 13.34 13.34 38 1 39 , 13.34 39  ! 40 13.34 40 41 41 __ -- 13.34 41 42 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L39 of L58 Starting Ending Time Time (hr) (hr) 42 43 43 I 44

- 44_.1...45_-

45__! _4_46 ..

46 47 47 { 48 48 49 49 50 50 l 51 "

51 52 52 53 53 53 54 54 55 55 -ý 56

  • 56 1 57_C~

57 I 58 58 59 59 60 60__L 61 61 62 11.82 62 63 4 11.82 11.82 63 64 11.82 64 65 I 11.82 65 66 ]1 11.82 66 67 11.82 67 681 11.82 68 69 11.82 69 70 L 11.82 70 71 11.82 71 72 i 11.82 72 73 _ 11.18 73-7 74 ._- -! 11.18 74 75 11.18 75 I76 11.18 76 77 11.18 77 78 I 11.18 78 79 11.18 79 80 I 11.18 80 81 i 11.18 81 82 11.18 82 83 11.18 83 84 84 85 85 86 - ____ _j'j 11.18 11.18~

86 87 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L40 of L58

'Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise ('F) 87 88 11.18 88 89 11.18 89 90 11.18 go 91 11.18 91 I 92 11.18 92 93 11.18 93 _ 94 11.18 94 95 11.18 95 96 11.18 96 97 10.80 97 98 10.80 98 991 10.80 99 _100 10.80 100 101 10.64 101 L 102 10.64 102 103 10.64 103 _10o4 10.64 104 I 105 10.64 105 I 106 10.64 1061_107 JI 10.64 107 108 10.64 108 I 109 10.64 109 110 _1 10.64 110 ill 111 112 i 10.46 112 I 113 10.44 113 114 - F -10.44 114 I 115 10.44 115 I 116 10.44 116 117 10.44

- 11.7 118 K 10.44 118 119 _I 10.44 119 7 1 iO I 10.44 120 121 L 10.01 121 I 122 I 10.01

_1221 123_ i 10.01 123j 1241 10.01 124 1251 10.01 125 126 , 10.01 126 127 10.01 127 128 10.01 128 129 10.01 129 130 10.01 130 131 _

10.01 131 132 ', .))r 10.01 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L41 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F) 132 133 10.01 133 134 10.01 134 135 10.01 135 136 10.01 136 137 10.01 137 138 10.01 .

138 139 10.01 139 140 10.01 140 I 141 10.01 141 142 10.01 I 142 143 10.01 143 1144 _ 10.01 j 144 145 10.01 145 146 10.01 146 147 10.01 147 148 10.01 t 148 149 L 10.01 149 150 K 10.01 150 151K 10.01 151 152 I 10.01 152 153 10.01 K 153 154

  • 10.01 154 t 155 10.01 155 156 I 10.01 J 156 _ 157 l.Ol 1 157 158 - 10.01 1587 - 159 _ 10.01 159 160 1 10.01 160 161 _ 10.01 161 162
  • 10.01 162f163 1 10.01 164 I 165 -I-10.01

_1634 164

__ __ _ _ _ _ _. 10.01 165 166 10.01 166 167 9.81

.167 168 9.40 168 169 9.40 169 170 T 9.40 170I 171 K 9.40 171 I 172 9.40 172-K 173 9.40 173 174 9.40 174 L 175 , 9.40 175 1176-J 9.40 176 K 177 _,_ _I 9.40 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L42 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise ('F) 177 I178 9.40 178j 179 9.40 179. 180 180 81 __8 ' 9.40 181 I 182 9.40 182 183 9.40 183 184 9.40 184 185 9.40 185 186 -I 9.40-186 { 187 9.40 187 - 188 9.40 188 I 189 9.40 189 190 1 J 9.40 190 191 J- 9.40 191 I 192 9.40 192 {193 J 9.40 193 j 194 _ "1 - 9.40 194 I 195 J 9.40 S1951.196 1  ! 9.40 196 197 _

! 9.40 197 1-98 _ 9.40 198 199 9.40 1991_200 9.40 200 201j 9.40 201 202 __ I 9.40 202 203 1 1 9.40 203 204 1_

204 1 205 I I 9.40

] 9.40 205j 20606 9.40 S 9.40 2061 207 __

207 1 208 208 - 209 _ 9.40 209 210 _

9.40 210 211 9.40 211 1 212 9.40 212 _- 213 9.40 213 214 J_ 9.40 214 [ 215 _ 9.40 2151 216 1 9.40 216__ 217 -i. J[ 9.40 217 1 218 I 9.40 218 219 9.40 219 220 9.40 220 221 221 222

- __ 9.40 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L43 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F)

- - L 222 223 9.14 223 224 L 9.06

__224__ 225__ J 9.06--

225 - 226 _ 1___ 9.06 226 227 9.06 227 228 9.06 228 229 I -1 9.06 229 230 9.06 230 231 - 9.06 1- 9.06 231 232 232 233 _ 9.06 233 24 9.06 234 235 I 9.06 235 236 9.06 236 237 9.06 237 238 9.06 238 _239_ I 9.06 239 240 '_

240 241 I I 8.88 241 242 8.88 242 243 _ 8.88 243 I 244 8.88 244 T 245 8.88 245 246 246 247 _ 8.88 247 I 248 .. . 8.88 _

248 24 8.88 249 250 8.88 250 251 - 68.88 251 252 _ 8.88

-252--2*53 . -1 8.88 253 254 8.88 254 255 1 8.88 255 256 8.88 256 257 I --8.88 257 _258 8.88 258 259 8.88 259 . .260 _-

1 8.88 260 261I 8.88 261 262 8.88 262 263 -K 8.88 263 264 8.88 I 8.88 264 265 i 8.88 1 265 266 I 8.88 ,

266 267 * . ..... . . ._ .. . . ._]! 8 8 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L44 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F) 8.88 26 268 8.88 268 269 8.88 269 270 8.88 2-7-0 271 8.88 271 272 1 8.88 272 _ 273 8.88 273 274 I 8.88 274 275 8.88 275- 276 8.88 276 277 8.78 277 278 1 8.45 278 279 8.45 279 280 8.45 280 281 8.45 281 282 8.45 282 I 283 I 8.45 283 284 -

8.45 284 285 8.45 285 286 8.45 286 _- 287 8.45 287 288! I 8.45 288 289 8.45 289 290 8.45 290 291 8.45 291 292 _ 8.45 292 293 Ji 8.45 293 29494 F 8.45 294 295 8.45 295 I 296 8.45 296 297 8.45 297 298 8.45 298 1 299!

299 300 8 .45 8.45 300 I 301 8.45 301o 1 302 8.45 302 303 8.45 303 304 8.45 304 305 8.45 305 306 4- 8.45 306 - 307 8.45 307 308 _

8.45 308 309*

8.45 309 1_310 -j- 8.45 3101 311 8.45 311 312 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L45 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 312 1313 8.45 313l 314 8.45 314 315 8.45 315j 316 __ 8.45 316 317 8.45 317 . 318 F- 8.45J 318 _319 - 8.45 319 320 8.45 320 321 1 8.45 321 F 322 8.45 322L 323 _- 8.45 323 324 J 8.45 324 325 8.45 325. 326 8.45 326 327 8.45 327 328 "[ 8.45 328 329 J 8.45 329 330 J 8.45

__330 L 331 J 8.45 3311332 8.45 332 333 8.45 333 1 334 8.45 334 ..1 335 -8.45

-335 .1__336 1 8.45 8,45

_33_6_ i____...337 _-8.45 -- -

337 1 338 F 8.45 338 1339 7" 8.45 339 1 340 7 8.45 340 341 i_8.45 3-41 [342 7 8.45 342_!. 343 J . 8.45 343J 344J- 8.45-344 I 345 8.45 345 I 346 I 8.45

ýi3461 347 1 8.45 347 _ 348 T 8.45 3- 4 8 J 349 _ 8.45 349 J_ 350 I 8.45 3501 351 8.45 351 352 I 8.45 352 353 _ 8.45 353 354 8.45 3541 355 - - 8.45 355 _ 356 8.45 3568 357 7..... _))F 8.45 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L46 of L58 Starting Ending ((Plant Time L Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 357 j 358 8.45 358 359 8.45 F 360 _I 8.45 360 361 8.45 361 L _362 8.45 362 363 I 8.45 3631 364 1 8.45 364 365 F 8.45 365 366 8.45 F 366 367 J_8.45 F

____3_63-68 -8.45 368 369 1 8.45 3671 370 " 8.45 372 371 8.45 S7^1_ 374 _8.45 37 8.45 37j 3-37-3 374 8.45 374 375 F 8.45

_37$ 7 37 C 8.4

---3Tý6 -- 377 .,-- 8.45 377 378 L- 8.45 378 379 j 8.45 379 . 380 _8.45 380 381 -- 8.45 381 382 8.45 382 __ 383 F I 8.45 383 384Z I j 8.45 384 F 385 1- 8.45 385 j 386 8.45 386 387 . 8.45 S387 388 I 8.45 388 1.389. 8.45 389390 ____390....  ;- 8.45 3901 391 1 8.45 39_3 [_ 393 27F9-1::3 -t 84 8.45 i

- J- 8.45 393 I 394 394 395 8.45

-8.45 95 396 8.45 396 397 _ 8.45 397 - 398 1 8.45 398 ' 399 8.45 399 400 8.45 400 401 8.45 4011PROJ T N. 11333945 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L47 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F) 402 J 403 8.45 403 j 404 1 - 8.45 404 405 j 8.45 405 406 406

-1407 1-8.45 8.,45 407 408 _ 8.45 408 409 L 8.45 409 410 8.45 41o0[ 411 8.45 411 412 8.45 412 413 413 I44.415 414 8.45 8.45 415 416 8.45 416 417 8.32 417 418 8.06 418 419 419 420 8.06

_ 4201-421 _1 421 I 422 1 8.06

_ 4221 423-L 8.06 423 1 424k 8.06 424 1 425 8.06 425 I 426 i 8.06 426 1_427- _ 8.06 427 1 428 8.06 428 429 1 8.06 4291 430 _ . . 8.06 430 431 8.06 431 j 432 8.06 432 433 8.06 433 434 .... 8.06 434 I 435 8.06 435 436 8.06 436 4378 J 8.06 438 439 F._ .8.06 .

._806. . -E 8.06 439 440 440 441 8.06 441 442 J 8.06 8.06 442 ]443j 443 444 8.06

_444_ 445 8.06 44 5 I 446 8.06

__8.06 446 447 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L48 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 447 448 8.06 448 1 449 7 8.06 8.06 4491 450 - 8.06 450 I451 8.06 451_ I 452 I 8.06 452 453 8.06 453 454 8.06 454 455---_ 8.06 455 456  ! 8.06 456 457 8.06 457 458 __ 8.06 458 459 I 8.06 459 460 _ J 8.06 1 460 461 8.06 461 462 i 8.06 4621 463 - 8.06 463 464 I 8.06 464 1 465 _ 8.06 465 .- 466 I 466 j 467 I 8.06 467I 468 4 8.06 4681 469 8.06 469 _-470-- 8.066 470 471 8.06

__471 1 472 _ 8.06 472 1 _473 I 8.06 473I 474 J_ . 8.06

_474 475 , 8.06 475 476 " 8.06 476 7_7 8.06 477~j _478__j 8.06 478 . 479 I 8.06 8.06 479 480 I 480 I 481 7.87 481  ! 482 1 7.87 I 482 483 7.87 483 484 7.87 484 _ 485 J, 7.87 485 486 1 7.87 J 486 .. 48_7 J 7.87 I 487 488 1 7.87 488 489 7.87 489 490 7.87_-

49 49*9 7.87 491 492 1 _)).  : .7.87 j PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L49 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F) 492 493 7.87 493 494 7.87 494 495 7.87 495A 496- L _.7.87 496 I 497 7.87 497 498 7.87 498 I 499 7.87 499 500 7.87 500 501 7.87 501 502 I 7.87 502 503 _ 7.87

-503 - 504 - 7.87 504 505 505 7.87 506 i 506 507 - 7.87 7.87 507 1 508 7.87 508 509 7.87 509 510 7.87 511 I 511

-5 1-1---- 512 ---

I 7.87 7.87 512 i 513

  • 7.87 513 514 7.87 514 51 5 +. 7.87 515 516 7.87 516 517 . . 7.87 517- 5-1 7.87 518 519 7.87 519 520 7.87 520 521 i'I I 7.87 7.87 521 522 7.87 522 I 523 78 523 j 524 I 7.87 524 I 525 i 7.87 525 1526 _L 7.87 526! 527 I 7.87 527 S 528 1 7.87 528 I 529 7.87 529r 5307 - 7.87 530 531 7.87 531 532 7.87 532.1 533 7.87 533 534 7.87 534 535 , 7.87 535 536 7.87 536 _,537 _ ))_ 7.87 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L50 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 537 538 7.87 538 539 7.87 5391 540 .. .. 7.87 j 50 541__ 7.87 541 542 I_ 7.87 542 i 543 7.87 543 544 7.87 544 545 I 7.87 545 546 7.87 546 547 L 7.87

-547 548 _ - 7.87 548 549 _ 7.87 549 550 7.87 550 551 7.87 551 552 7.87 552 553 7.87 553 554 7.87 554 I 555 7.87 555 5561_ 7.86 556 I 557 7.63 557 558 7.63 558 I 559 7.63 S559 t560 7.63 560 561 _ "* 7.63 561 562 . T _ -- 7.63 562 563 7.63 5631 564 " 7.63 5641 565 T 7.63 565 I 566j 7.63 566 567 7.63 567 568 1 7.63 568 569F 7.63 569 I 570 7.63 5701 571 7.63

  • 571 572 _ -7.63 572 5731 7.63 573 . 574 L 7.63 7.63 575 576 7.63 576 577 7.63 577 578 7.63 _I 7.63 5_78___ _57_9_  ! 7.63 579 1 580 I 7.63 580 581 _- I 7.63 581 582 __: _

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L51 of L58 Starting Ending ((Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (°F) 582 I 583 7.63

_58 L58j4 7.63 584 j 585 7.63 2

__585 --- 586- 7.63 586 _1 587 1 _j_ 7.63 __

587 588 1 7.63 5_8_8 _589 J 7.63 5892 590 7.63 590 591 J- 7.63 591 1 592 7.63 592 E:7 4ý-

3 7.63 593  ! 59_4_ 7.63 594 595 7.63 595 5-96HF 7.63 596  ! 597 7.63 597 598 7.63 598! 599 I_ 7.63 599 . 600 7.63 600 _ 6011 763 601 602 __

! 7.63 I 602 603 J 7.63 603 1 604 7.63 604 605 I 7.63 605 !_606 7.63 606 607 7.63

  • _607 - 608 J 7.63 608 6097 7.63 609 610 I 7.63 610 611 7.63 611 612 J_ 7.63 612 613 __7.63 613 614 7.63 67.63-615 616 L 7.63 616 617 _ 7.63 61.7_ 1618 _7.63 6 18

_j_ 6 19 . 7.63 619 620 1 7.63 620 621 J 7.63

-621- 622 _ 7.63 622 I 623 I 7.63 623 624 7.63 624 625 7.63 62 626 7.63 6261 627'__ _ _._)). 7.63 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L52 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 627 I 628 7.63 628 629 7.63 6291 630 _ 763

- 6630-631 .. I 7.63 631 _632 7.63 7.63 633 I 634 1 7.63 634 i 635 I 7.63 635 ý1636 7.63 6361 637 7.63 6371. 638 __ 7.63 638 1 639 D_ j 7.63 639 640 _ I 7.63 640 641 7.63 641 642 7.63 642 643 I 7.63 643 644 7.63 644 645 7.63 645 646 7.63 j 646 1 647I 7.63 647-- 646 1 7.63 648 1649 1 7.63 649 1 650 _ 7.63 650 1._651 _1 7.63 6511 652 - 7.63 652 1 653-- 7.63 653 654 7.63 654 I 655 7.63 655 I 656 7.63 656 657 7.63 657 658 .! 7.63 658 I 659 L 7.63 7.63 659 I 660 I 660-1 661 J 7.63 661 _ 662 _- 7.63 662 663 1 7.63 663 664 7.63 664 L665 I 7.63 665 666 7.63 666 - 667 __ 7.63 667 668 7.63 6681 669 7.63 669 670 _ 7.63

" 7.63 670 i 671 671 7 672 _ _

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L53 of L58 Starting Ending [ Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (_F) 672 I 676 7.63 673 674 7.63 6_74_47 _67-5._ 7.63

_6751. 6.76 !7.63 676 677 ,,7.63 677 678 7.63 678 679 I 7.63 679 680 7.63 680 681 -- 7.63 681 682 i 7.63 682 683 r 7.63 683 684__ 7.63 684 -685 7.63 685 1 686 7.63 686 687 7.63 687 688 I 7.63 688 I 689 7.63 689 690 7.63 690 691 7.63 691 692 763 692 693 7.63 693 694 7.63 694 6 1 7.63 695 696 7.63 J 696 9 697 7.63 ...

697 698 7.63 698 I 699 F 7.63 J 7 63 699 1. 700 -J. . j 700I 701 7.63 7011 702 7.63 702 703 7.63 .

703 70 7.63 _

704 705 - 7.63 705 706 7.63 706 -707 -7.63

__..707_ 708 7.63 708 709 7.63 709 _71o0 __-__7.63 710 7111 7.63 711 712 7.63 712 713 7.63 713 714  ! 7.63 714 _ 715 -- 7.63 715 716 . 7.63 716 717 _ ] 7.63 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L54 of L58 Starting Ending R Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 717 718 7.63 718 719 7.63 719 720 7.63 70 721 7.31 721 722 -I I 7.31 722 723 j 7.31 723 724 1 7.31 724 725 F 7.31 725 ]T 726 j 7.31 726 727 - 7.31 727 728 - F7.31 728K 729 L 7.31 729 I 730 I 7.31 730 ]. 731 7.31 731 732 J 7.31 732 733 7.31 733 734 7.31 7.31 734 7 }7 736 735 7.31 736__ 737 7.31.31 7371 738 j 7.31 738 739 7.31 739 _ 740 7.31 ,

740 741 - 7.31 741 742 .. 7.31 7421 743 J- 7.31 743L 744 - 7.31

_744 j 745I 7.31 745 I 746 1 . 7.31 746 " 747 j 7.31 747 . 748 j. 7.31 748 749 7.31

_749 750 7.31 750 751 j 7.31 751 752 I 7.31 752 753 ,7.31 753 I 754 7.31 754 755 I.7.31 755 I 756 7.31 756 757 ... 7.31 757 I 758 - 7.31 758 ' 759 7.31 759 I 760 7.31 760 761 7.31 761 762 __]_7.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L55 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 762 763 7.31 763 764 L 7.31 764 765 7.31

_765_J 766 7.31 766 ] 767 7.31 767 768 7.31 768 769 7.31 769 770 7.31 770 -771 7.31 771 772 7.31 772 773 7.31 773 I 774 7.31 774 775 7.31 775 776 7.31 776 777 L 7.31 777 778 7.31 778 779 7.31 779 780 7.31 780 1781 7.31 781 782 _ 7.31 782 j 7831 7.31 78 784 7.31 784I 785 J 785 _ 786 7.31 7.31 786 787 787 788 7 7.31 788 789 7.31 789 790 L 7.31 790 791 7.31 791 792 i T 7.31 792 I_793 7.31 793 J 794 S 7.31 794 795 795 796 796 797

.797 798__ _7.31

_ý7.31 798 ' 799 7.31 799 800 7.31 800 801

.* 7.31 7.31 801 1 802 7.31 802 I 803 7.31 7.31 803 804

-i 7.31 804 805 805 1806

))l 7.31 806 I 807 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L56 of L58 Startingg Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 807 808 7.31 808 8o9 L 7.31

. 80.9 .80 7.31 81 _ _.. 7.31 811 _ 812 7.31 812 L 813 - 7.31 813 814 L 7.31 814 815 I 7.31 815 8161 7.31 816 817 I 7.31 817 818 7.31 818 819 7.31 819 820 7.31 820 821 7.31 821 _ 822 7.31 822 1 823 7.31 8231 __824t 7.31 824 1 825 L 7.31 825 L826 7.31 826 827 7.31 827 j 828 7.31 828 829 j 7.31 829 -- 830 , 7.31 830_ 831 1 7.31 831 832 7.31 832 33 - 8_ 7.31~

833 1 834 l-7.31 834 835 7.31 835 836 7.31 836 I 837 7.31

_837_ _838 7.31 838 839 _ 7.31 839 840 _ 7.31 840( 841 7.31 841 J 842-1. 7.31 842 L843 -1 7.31.

843 844 7.31 844 845 7.31 845 [846 !_ 7.31 846 j 847 i 7.31 847 _L848 7.31 848 849 7.31 849 850 7.31 850 851 7.31 851 852 7.-31__

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

Non-proprietary version CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L57 of L58 Starting Ending Plant Time Time Temperature (hr) (hr) Rise (*F) 852 .1 853 7.31 853 _j 854L 7.31 854__ 855 L 7.31 8551 856 7.31 856 1 857 1 7.31 857j 8581 7.31

__858 859 7.31 859 860 7.31

  • 860/ 861 J 7.31 861 862 7.31 862 863 7.31 863 864 I 7.31 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT L, PAGE L58 of L58 APPENDIX L9.5: Plant Temperature Rise Equations A 1 8 1 C 0 I E I F I G I H 1 S Flowrate 86 cfs Mass Flow $C$1"$C$2 3600 Ibrn/h, 2Density 62 lb 3 .. cp.(14.3.100) BTU/Ibm-F Starting Ending TTotalnHea Heat RatperhTimestap Plant Temperature (hr) (hr) I Itd erated Heet Load(BTU) Added (BTU) Added (BTU) (BTUlhr) I Rise (Deg F)

"4--0 -- 1- =FORECAST)$BA'OFFSET)Thta$E$I$E82 'M0$06ATOH)$64.Thta11$6$2:$6$60'1)102)0FFSET )$o4,To060202080MTH0404-001201-I 0O2)) .*TotaJ'66$2_1-6 1=0÷4.04 f=$E456-$84) SI-F440014002- "

=645 60A1 FORECAST C SB5,OFFSET(Totle$IE$2$E$80 MATCH$6 0,TotalrB$2$B$80,01) -,O12),OFFSET(TotlI'$2:06000,MATC6)$60,TotaL8e$B2:0$80,- 1)0,2) =Ttle$F$2J6+04 C0D =-$E0-SE-5)$B06)-- -- '-.$FOIG1$02--A'

- 80 B6 66.1

=7+I =fORECAST($B,OFFSET TTOaI'$E$*.'$EW0MATCH$B,TotaI'B$2 SB0$E,)-, 102),OFFS6T(T.1410602O TET(O-O6$B$6,0,MATC0$0T0$1)2)) - o !$F$0 l-It. 21-E6-/).==65 D7 $E7 Y SE6-/($-$A76) F $1/$$2 M67 J A+1 )=FORECAST($66,FFSET)ToI'aSE$20$E6806MATCH($B7,ToaoIISB2 SL$800*1)1,02) OFFSET)Totale$B2 $6S0, MATH)$B8,TotallB$2:$$801 )-1.0,2)) IlTotalF$2/6D67  :=6E+68  %=($8-$E7

-y)$E68-A) i$FE/$G$11$G$2

_9 =87 =A12+1 _ I=FOREC0AST($B12,FFSET(TolIalrSE2.$E$80,MATOH($10,TotaI$B$2$B$80,1) -10,2),OFFSETITotI6$B$2:0$80,60MATCH)SB1,TotalB$2:$ k2:11 ,1)102)) =1 2 ($E1-$E1 y($B1$AE12. =$F1 $G$F/0G0115G$2 9124611 "11 610I-- -IAleI ,12+ - =FORECAST($)062

.FORECAST($BII 5OFFSET(TotarlE$2"$E$80,0MATCH($)5T2tasý$Bl$26$B$80'1)102).OFFSETTolaTl$B$2:$60$60MATCmH$B012'Tota70$2.

OFaFISET)T1 -$-E2:$E$8-OM-A-TCH)$B14ITobI--$6*2:08*$080,1)10, ,)OF*FSET)Tota~l0SBS2:$B$0,MATOH)$-B14,TotaII$B$2 06871)102))

060601-1,0,2)) -011

-0D10301. I=15+12 D- _*--C )0E12-$E14ySB15-$A15)

-- =)0E11*4-0E1)/)0B1S l)F -- $F151$0$15G$2

-OF[:1IIGOG$2-13" 6 12 --- A 1"6=1 " =F-0RE-CAsi")$81 3 OSETTot$ OE2 '$E80,M ATOH($Ba3$1o$e0 060601)1 0,),2

.'$ ), 0F*SSETTo1aI$ BE2 06060 ATCH)0B$ hlI'0$ 006 1)1 2 )) -012 ="1.01 '=OI--($ $E12)l)061 063 -- F130-1/$ 6 - -S-

"0B19 "A l =FOREOAST)081_0.OFFSET)To!$E$2..'$E_0,MATCH($B)0,TotIal$B$2:$0$80,11)-01.002)OFFSET(Totall4!$062-0$B-6MATC.($B10,TotaIl$B$2 $B$80,1)-I,,)) ": =01 0.010 )=)0-$E19y$0615-A) 0G1/$G1 0

=1613- =Ald8l1 =FORECAST)$B4 1668 FST)TOteISE02 $ES60,MATCH )$61,Tot~l06$2 $60$E801)-1,02) 0FFST)TotaIl$62 SBETH$ -0681)11,02))

8*t1$2$$68*, D=13 ,=18+018 =(E184-E13r5)$B14-$A14)I 0=F18$G$1/$G$2 16 810 22 Abl " 1 *FORECAST)0$B23OFFET)1olerOEISE ,A-C eII$B$2$1060601)1 0.2),OFFSET(Totale$B$2$B$80 MATIICH$2613,Ttal'B$2:$B$80 0 02))

-1,01)1 =01= D21 )=)16$-$E2y5$B23-$A231) f=$F2131G$115G$2 17 826 17.1 FOREOAST($B27,0FFIET$To2lb$$2 :$E806,MATCH)$B27,TotaI$B$2$80,1)-1,02),O FFET(Totl$B$2:$6B80 MATCH$6127,TotaLIB$2:B$6801)-10,2)) -016 I=Cl27D27 = E27-$E261Y($B27-$A27) i=$F275G$1/$G$2 10 =B17 6A31 =FOREOAST)$B36'FFSET)Tota*I$E$2:$E$8OMATCH)$B36'ToloI$06$2:0B$601)1'02) 0FFETTOtahl$$2:$B$806MATCH($136'Th-etal0B$2:$B$80 1)*1*.02)) 0=529 1)6

+=01130 E30-E 2_F(1$6B-$A3. ýF0=$115$G$2 14- =130 1=A14e1 .=FORREAST)O1,OFFSET TaIE$2:E$8I 2 0MATOH$B31',TotaIl$B$20$B$0 X' 1)-10*2),OFFSET()Ttaol$0$26$* 0 *6MAT-CH($B1'Total6$B$2$B$806'1)-1'0.2)) ,=D01 .-- D1-1 )$E31-0($B314S~-$A1) I=$F31/$G$115G$2 2

1-620 I=÷-A 1 -- -FORFCAST)$B321FFSS-ET(Taol$6E$2:$E$80,MATCH($321,Totalý$6$2:6$B$1)1*0 )0FFSET(TLto0$B$2:$B$806060MATCH($B2*1Ttale!ý$820$B$80'1)*102)); '2to10 3 =l $B2-A -- F311$G0IS0$2 621 =A+621 i =FORECAST($B66'2FFsET(TOaI$E$2:$E$80.MATC$H)_62TotO$2:$$860 1)-1',02)'FFSET)Totall$B$20$B$806MATCH$B3T2tall$B$2 0$B$80,1)-1,0,2)) LOOI 22 )E2'-$E21Y)06$A16) '-$F2210G$I10062 23 6-2 623=1 -*ORECAST)$B2304,O Tot)$0E'$S8 ,MATCH)($B2 ,T0altS$2.$B$.L601)02),OFFSET(Toal 0 M$AT B$06080 82 el2 1)102)) )I- 022 1

23=23+D3 )$) -E32Y)$B3-$A23 ) *_=$F234$G$115G$2 24" 6238-- -'=A39+1 I=FOFREOAST)$B39 OFFSET)TotIIE$2.EB0,MATCH)39.Tolal$6$2.$$80,1 )-1,0,2),OFFSET)To(2ta 066$80,MATCH $B39,TOteI!$6$2$B$80,1)-10,2)) = 3 0 '=29+D24 YI,8$E3-$3y $B-$A39) I- $F341$G$115G$2 30 -j20LVi-A3O1 I R8AST)630 FFSET)TobelSEO$2:$E80,MATCH)$630,ToleIIBO62.0600.1)1 0,2) 0660ET)TotleT$O62 0B8060 MATO)3.TlI2 loak $800 -1)02)) -

iM I0000 )E002063-$A21) 1=$F30'6001I$G$2 I 260-625

" -A."1 FORE8AST)$B20,OFFSOET)To7IISE$2:$ESO0,MATCH)$B40TobaIl$B$2"080001 )-1,0,2) O6SE-ot ailO$2 :6060 ,ATC (0626.Tot11$63206080,1)102)) 025 ',___026=02 )082=0E200)/$---.06) -- F2-60$bOG$ 27 B216 A51 6--RECAST($*592FFSET)Ttal$E$2:$E$806MOlATCH-8$B45`Toa1$0-$2 B$06'01)102).OFFSET)Totall0$$2:0B8060 MTCH$B'7Totlt$B6$2:$6080'1)102))" 026 I 027.027 )E-0E26y)6827-A2)

_-_- T032__.032__ __; _______ _ -0i/)63.A32 F300160 29 =W29 3-4 -621 6323 -!-=34.1 33-666007063 63 '82=1 FFETTo~IIEO:008,MT06)033Tee106200,1 )-1,02)10FFSET(Total1$B$208060 MATCH)0633TtaT$~I00

_I=FORECAST($B260FFSETrToIe$_E$2:$E8080MATCqH$B620,Totl$B$2:$BS80.,)-1,012),OFFSETTotaIl$$20$B$8000,MATCH(B426TotalI!B2:06080,1)-1,0,2))

60660807)0634 OFFSET)T1OeII$E02:OýE$80,MATCH)0634,TýlIIO82$B68110)OFETTtl$0 B$3 68 66 MAO)841t1022 B$06001)102))

)0) -C303 -052=4+6 0332- C2 0240034-h)0834$E23Y$2)I)83363)IF310, j =82962$)5($620-$0A2) ) -F2410001$000 -

357=824 -A25+1 I F060060T)$B350(F60ET)ToaIIIEO$2 $E$80,MCATC A 35,TotetlO$S23$66001)-1.02).OFFSET)ToleI'$B60206060 MATCH)6830, Tteal!$02 080801 -1.0.2)) 004 39e00 )E350E4Y$635- A25) 03I0100 31 26 6B20 30 '-631=*471

.l *=FORECAST)$47,OFFSET)TotRlOE$2:$ES0,MlATCH$6B47,Ttall$S$2 6600607)636O6FSET)T.6eIIE$2:0E080,MATCH)0B636ToalaO$2

=A $B060,1)1l,0,2),OFFSETT(Otall$B$2:08060,MATrH)$7,ToteI16$2:06060,1)-102))

060001)1 0.2) OFFSET)Total'6602 0B8060 AATCII)$636,oteIIO8O2:$060870, 1)0) -0046

)=F47/$021/$G$2DOS -37÷D31 03603 )$E37-$E46)/($B4$-$A47)

IE-E3)06- -_6 F61010 232 B63I2 21 -=F0ECAsT)$BS06,1FFSET TrlýlO$Eý.2$ES60,MATCH.)2$B32,o0leSB$2:_

3 6 001)1 02) 2OFFSIETTotaII$B$$-$L 80MATCH($Bý3,TotaI$ýIT$2i06060B1)10,2))1021ýE2-$E49($B2

, __=$F23/$G $ 3) G$2 I 37 626 1 27e1 6060060ý($B7)6637066T)TotaIIOEO2 $ES80,MATCH)00327,T !IIO$2B 06001)-1 62) 0FFSE~T)leI'al$60ý2 06060MATCH)06L7.TotaleI 2$802 0600 1)10))__03D6 03=037-D2 )E37-$E36)I)067-W67) ,03I010 26 -37 6301 = 60660607)0630 066SET1Teb0lE$2 $$8060MATCH)0B830Totall$B$2 80660)) 1 0,2),OFFSET)Tol4Il0602 06060MATCH(083.Totlelk1$80 0680,110.02)) I 037 If030.26 )08-$E37Y)0630-$A28) O~F3OIOGSIIOO$2 39 =B83 ) 9-01 _I=FOR8CAST)O638OFFSE))TotaIIS6O2:$E808ATCH)$039.Totall$B6026B80001)-1.02),OFFSET)To~taI'0602 q$0600MATCH)0639.Tot~e0002:06080 1)10,2)) I 036-- -C23D903 )0E30.0183(8)I$3-049$2LI =S2F91000 i$G2 0639 j 1~FORECAST)$8400FFSET(Toteýl06E$2.ýE8$0,MAT0H)0640,To~lekl2B02 08600 1)0.2),OFFSET TotallbO6O2 08060MATCýH($)0640.tal$B02:$08800 1)10.2)) 03 4.00 )80.89I58604) -FOOG1O$

41 8430 1=1 64ýA 6 9 08 641 F S T oI IO $28 80 ,MATCH)0841 7.60116802 :88000 1)1.0,2)OFFSET)TobelO$B$O2 $06060 A T CH)0841,To ala'680' 0868 1) 2 )00 00 1= 4 E4 -1 (L) 8 4b06431)

E 30Y11) I O 4I G 10 6 42 8431 I 642 1)6006601)682 OFFSET)ToýeII0602 0E800,'MATOHI0B32,Tq0$60I16 8Q2 0601)0,2) OFFSEýT)Toalel$B$O 08060 MATCH)0642.To!l=II0802 08081)1j0.2))_ DI 061 ) 4.42 I)62-!ly084 II2-0642) F2IG1G2 4306060)043OFSE)TIOIOE2.E$0,AT 42 84.1 I H)843Toal$62 800 )1 )OFFSET)Tobo.l0802

, 08060 M60)8B Tolall$S$2$6080.1)j 62)) 1=0204.03

$}E4330 4g1404) - 041010 3483 644 606060(0644 0FFSET)T~aIISE$20ýE680,MATOH)0844.,Toeal6802 F 0B8001)1 02) O6STToel62$B0600 AATH084ToalOO 08801)i 2) 03 004 '.04-$E42(B3)I64-$A4)' 14F441$01/fG 2 40 46 845

~844 64=1 60680607)06345OFýFSET)TotaI!$E02-.$E8600MATCH6)6845T~lel$lO6O 06001)-102) OýFFSET)7otal10B

-646=1 1-0680S~k607)046FFSET)Totall E$208080,MAT0FI)835,Tdelb0BS2:$080001)1 02?)OFFSET)To11 2 0$8060MATqH)0L45,Totalb620081102)j5 B$6 013800MATOH)08356.taeI1062. 0606 1) 10) -004=C3063 045=40 )$4-SE33yI8845BA)

E -' F40I00011$$2

)6(lE40-$EL4W(B5)I4-W4)- 0F46/$101/i0002-4 7- = B48 63.64 =6480 4=5F )=FOECAST)086.8OFFSET 1 1 6 E 3 0 0 0 M T I I 68 7 T 6 O ST 0 4 , F O T TTotalbOE$2:$E$80,MATCH($B36,I00T ~~ 0 0 8 8 1) 1 .0.2 ),O FFS ET(To ale$B$ 2 1 08 . M

$4O2:0 T CH )0847.ToteI'0802 6 80801) 1 0 0 06ý3 ,0 4 7 e 0

.2)) _ 00$8_____=4eD6)E0-E7I62:$4)_J=F0I0100 )= 0 4 - F 6 I 0 4 -0 4 ) ! 0 4 1 0 16/$02$

~ ~ ~ ~~~B7 49~ =60_51.

6001162oFOT)oe!80:80,ATH04,TlI 11000)10)

-=96AT04~FFSET)TolaII080Z0806,MATCH($8346Ttel0$B$2:$06000-I1)02) O5FýFSET)T.1e$B$2 $:08000,ATCH($837,TotieO62:$080801)1I0,2) 040 374D4)')0E48-$E48)I)6649-0649 L=F 410 61=638 i=6891 4F06E0AST)06ol0(?FFSET)TolaII0 I E02:0066rAT0H)06511e~leI0862 $ý0 I88 ý1)0,2) OýFFOT)Toele$B$iO BBO280.MoATCH)0651,TotaeIIO 1)ý1.02))

$$8O0606 1=003- ' 39.~ $E395-$E8Y0)I06514651 I.06010G0i1/$GS2' 02=1 621 =60660607 ($B065,0660 (ToteIIOE$2i$E$80, CH67006,TMbII$862 0686001 1602)OFFSET T.ta115602B$06MATCHli65ToteIOO .- 86113 I0 )02D2 T~05-8155-62 I0010100 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION No. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M1 of M17 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO.8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE Ml of Mu Attachment M - LAKET-PC Weather File Creation Prepared: plm ,z .- I W Date (uIa7I;OaL Daniel W. Nevill - Sargent & LundyLLC Reviewed: /-g Date ,2?-.ý-ou-Robert W. Youn - S gent & LundyLic PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M2 of M17 ATTACHMENT M - TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No.

M 1.0 Purpose / Objective .............................................................................................. M3 M 2.0 M ethodology .......................................................................................................... M4 M 3.0 Assumptions ............................................................................................................ M7 M4.0 Design Inputs .......................................................................................................... M8 M 5 .0 References ................................................................................................................... M9 M 6.0 Calculations and Results ....................................................................................... M 10 M 7.0 Summary and Conclusions .................................................................................. M 13 M 8 .0 L im itatio n s ................................................................................................................. M 14 M 9 .0 A p pen d ices ................................................................................................................ M 15 (Total Pages - Attachment M (15) plus Appendices (2) for a Total of 17 pages)

LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title i_ Page M6-1 __ _Worst Weather Days ______M10_....

M6-2 Worst Net Evaporation Days - M1 M6-3 Worst Weather 24-Hour/30-Day Files M12 LIST OF APPENDICES No. Title Page M9.1 Electronic File Listing M16 (Total Appendix Pages - 2)

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M3 of M17 M1.0 PURPOSE / OBJECTIVE The purpose of this attachment is to determine the worst 24-hour and 30-day weather period and the worst 30-day period of net evaporation for LaSalle County Station. The new weather data is compared to the weather data used in the existing analysis to determine if the new weather data set is more limiting. If the existing weather data is no longer bounding, new LAKET weather files are compiled. This will be used as input in determining the maximum plant inlet temperature and evaporative drawdown of the LaSalle County Station Ultimate Heat Sink, which determines the design basis Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) performance for 30 days following an accident. Weather data has been provided from January 1, 1995 through September 30, 2010.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M4 of M1 7 M2.0 METHODOLOGY A LAKET-compatible meteorological data file, 'PIALSL9510.txt', was created consisting of meteorological data for LaSalle County Station and Peoria, IL from January 1, 1995 through September 30, 2010. See Design Input M4.1 for additional information on this file. Wind speed, wind direction, and dry-bulb temperature data were taken from an on-site meteorological tower at LaSalle County Station. Humidity, precipitation type, cloud height, and cloud cover data were not available from the on-site meteorological tower, and were taken from a National Weather Service observing station at the Peoria, IL airport (approximately 70 miles southwest of LaSalle County Station). This weather data file is input to LAKET [Ref. M5.2], and the worst weather and worst net evaporation time periods are found from the range of dates included in this file.

Based on options selected in the input file, the LAKET run returns a plot file that includes the total evaporation, precipitation, natural lake temperature, lake inlet temperature (same as the plant outlet temperature), and the UHS outlet temperature (same as the plant inlet temperature). Since LAKET returns results in three hour increments, a rolling average over 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> is created using Microsoft Excel [Ref. M5.1] by averaging the UHS outlet temperature of the selected time step along with the previous seven time steps. The worst weather day is chosen as the day with the highest UHS outlet temperature 24-hour rolling temperature average. The worst 30 days of weather is detennined using a similar methodology, in which a 30-day rolling average of the UHS outlet temperature is calculated and the maximum is chosen as the representative worst weather month.

M2.1 Worst 24-Hour and 30-Day Weather A specific UHS model was created in LAKET (based on Case 3a from Attachment H) with a transit time that corresponds to the three hour time step period. Case 3a is used since it uses a worst 1-day plus worst 30-day weather file and represents the worst case scenario of 18-in sedimentation. The following changes were made to Case 3a for determining the worst weather conditions:

  • The date range is changed to match the date range of weather file 'PIALSL95 I 0.txt.'
  • The lake initial temperature is set at 100°F. (Assumption M3.1)
  • The model is set as open cycle, so the UHS is at the same temperature at the beginning of each 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> interval.
  • Anemometer height is set at 33-ft in accordance with the instrument setup at LaSalle County Station (Design Input M4.2).
  • Lake elevation is fixed at 690-ft (Assumption M3.2).
  • The circulating plant flow is set at 873.0 ft3/s for a circulation time of 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />.
  • The plant discharge water temperature (TPRISE variable in LAKET) is set at 100°F (Assumption M3.3). For an open cycle model, this value is the lake inlet temperature.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M5 of M17

  • Effective area and effective volume are set to 57.9% of total area and 63.4% of total volume, respectively, due to the results of Attachment J - UHS Flow Path Analysis.

The UHS outlet temperature for each 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> period corresponds to the environmental effects on the UHS during these three hours. From these results, it can be implied that higher UHS outlet temperatures represent worse (hotter) weather conditions.

M2.2 Worst 30-Days of Net Evaporation For determining the worst 30-days of net evaporation, a UHS model is created in LAKET (based on Case 3c in Attachment H). Case 3c is used since it uses a worst 30-day net evaporation weather file and represents the worst case scenario of 18-in sedimentation.

The following changes were made to Case 3c for determining the worst net evaporation conditions:

  • The date range is changed to match the date range of weather file 'PIALSL950O.txt.'
  • Anemometer height is set at 33-ft in accordance with the instrument setup at LaSalle County Station (Design Input M4.2).
  • Lake elevation is fixed at 690-ft (Assumption M3.2).
  • Initial temperature is set at 407F as a representative winter UHS temperature (Assumption M3. 1).
  • The temperature rise through the plant (TPRISE variable in LAKET) is set at the approximate average temperature rise at EPU of -9°F (Assumption M3.3).
  • Effective area and effective volume are set to 47.10 acres and 216.45. acre-ft, respectively, due to the results of Attachment J - UHS Flow Path Analysis and the Case 3c model area and volume.

The net evaporation is calculated by subtracting precipitation from the total evaporation.

The worst 30 days of net evaporation is determined using rolling averages, similar to the methodology used in determining the worst weather.

M2.3 Weather File Creation for Comparison to Existing Analysis Following determination of the worst weather days and the worst net evaporation days, weather files for input to LAKET are created. For the worst weather input file, conditions from the worst weather day are used as the first day in the new weather file.

Following the first day, the conditions from the worst 30-day period are added to create a 31-day worst weather "month." Precipitation is conservatively set to zero for all time steps comprising the worst weather month (Assumption M3.4). To determine if this new worst weather month is more limiting than the existing worst weather month used in Attachment H, the input file from Case 3a is ran using the new worst weather month. If the new weather month does not result in a higher maximum UHS outlet temperature, the existing worst weather month will be retained as it is more severe.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M6 of M17 For the worst net evaporation weather file, the conditions from the worst 30-day period are compiled to create a 30-day worst net evaporation "month." Similar to the worst weather month, precipitation is set to zero for all time steps (Assumption M3.4). To detennine if this new worst net evaporation month is more limiting than the existing worst net evaporation month from Attachment H, the input file from Case 3c is ran using the new worst net evaporation month. If the new weather file does not result in more lake drawdown, the existing worst net evaporation month will be retained as it is more severe.

M2.4 Weather File Creation for UHS Analysis If the existing weather file is not bounding, new weather files are created based on the new most limiting day and month determined by this analysis. These weather files use the weather information provided in 'PIALSL95IO.txt' with the following changes:

" The station code is set to zero. This input has no impact on the results of this analysis.

  • The start date and time is set at 7/1/1900 at 12AM. This input has no effect on the results of this analysis.

" Precipitation is set to zero for all time steps (Assumption M3.4).

In order to determine the effect of the time of day of the worst weather day on the UHS, eight different worst weather files will be created. The first file will start at 12 AM of the worst weather day followed by subsequent files at 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> intervals (e.g. the second weather file starts at 3 AM of the worst weather day). After 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of the worst weather day, the worst 30 days subsequently added to the file. The start of the worst 30 days is selected to maintain a 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> interval between time steps. For example, if the worst 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> day ends at 11PM, the next time step will be at 12AM of the beginning of the worst 30 days.

For the worst net evaporation, only one weather file will be created, corresponding to the dates and times determined to be the most limiting.

M2.5 Computer Programs and Software LAKET-PC Version 2.2 [Ref. M5.2] was used to perform the lake transient analysis contained in this evaluation. This was run on S&L PC No. ZD6661 on Windows XP operating system.

Postprocessing of the LAKET-PC results is done using Microsoft Excel 2003 [Ref.

M5.1], which is commercially available. The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all spreadsheets used in this analysis. All computer runs were perfon-ned using PC No. ZD6661 under the Windows XP operating system.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M7 of M17 M3.0 ASSUMPTIONS M3.1 Initial Lake Temperature - For the worst weather evaluation, the initial lake temperature is set at 100°F. This is an arbitrary reference value for determrining the relative weather severity and does not influence the results of this analysis.

For the worst net evaporation month, the initial lake temperature is assumed to be 40'F.

This is used as a representative value for the lake temperature during the winter since the weather data file begins on January 1. This does not influence the results of this analysis as the worst net evaporation month occurs during the summer.

M3.2 Fixed Lake Elevation - The lake elevation when determining the worst weather month and worst net evaporation month is fixed at 690-ft. A constant lake elevation removes the effects of lake level in determining the weather effects on the UHS temperature and evaporation.

M3.3 Station Thermal Boundary Condition - The plant discharge water temperature when determining the worst weather day and month is assumed to be 100°F. Since the lake is modeled as open cycle, the lake starts at this temperature at the start of each 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> time interval. A constant initial temperature allows for isolation of the meteorological effects on the lake.

When determining the worst net evaporation month, the temperature rise through the plant is assumed to be constant at approximately 9°F, which is the average temperature rise for EPU over the calculated 30 day period (Calculated from Appendix L9.3 of Attachment L - Plant Temperature Rise). A constant temperature rise through the plant removes the effects of the plant heat load in determining the evaporation.

M3.4 Precipitation - When creating the worst weather "month" and worst net evaporation "month," precipitation is set to zero for all time steps. This is conservative when determining the limiting initial UHS temperature.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M8 of M17 M4.0 DESIGN INPUTS M4.1 Weather Data File - The LAKET-compatible meteorological data file is developed from weather data from LaSalle County Station and Peoria from 1/1/1995 to 9/30/2010 in Attachment K - Preparation of Hourly Meteorological Data. This file has the following properties:

Name: PIALSL95 10.txt Type: ASC text Size: 21,812 KB Creation date/time: 3/9/2012 11:08 AM CST (12:08 PM CDT)

M4.2 Anemometer Height - The anemometer height at LaSalle County Station is 33 feet from Attachment K -Preparation of Hourly Meteorological Data.

M4.3 Plant Temperature Rise - The approximate average plant temperature rise at EPU is calculated to be -9°F as taken from Attachment L - Plant Temperature Rise (Appendix L9.3: Calculated average of the first 30 days following an accident evaluated in Attachment L).

M4.4 Effective Area and Volume Percentages - The effective area percentage is 57.9% and the effective volume percentage is 63.4% from Attachment J - UHS Flow Path Analysis.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M9 of M17 M

5.0 REFERENCES

M5.1 Microsoft Office Excel 2003 (11.8120.8122) SP2, Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corporation, Sargent & Lundy LLC Program No. 03.2.286-1.0, dated 2/2/2004.

M5.2 LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 12/09/2004. Controlled File Path: \\SNLVS5\SYS3\OPS$\LAK29222\

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M10 of M17 M6.0 CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS Analysis of rolling averages determine the worst day and 30 day period for UHS temperature and the worst 30 day period for net evaporation for the weather file created from LaSalle County Station meteorological data from I/1/1995 to 9/30/2010. These results are then compared to the existing weather files used in the Attachment H of this calculation.

M6.1 Worst Weather Conditions LAKET input file 'Worst Weather.dat' was compiled to detennine the worst weather day and 30-day period from 1/1/1995 to 9/30/2010. The top ten worst 24-hour periods and 30-day periods are shown below in Table M6-1. Note that the temperature provided is for comparison purposes only and not representative of the expected actual temperature of the UHS (See Limitation M8. 1).

Table M6-1: Worst Weather Days 24-Hour 30-Day End Date Average Temp. End Date I Average Temp.

(°F) (°F) 7/25/01 6:00 AM 99.609 8/20/95 3:00 PM 98.867 7/25/01 3:00 AM 99.586 - 8/20/95 6:00 PM 98.866 7/19/98 12:00 AM 99.576 8/21/95 12:00 PM 98.865 7/18/98 9:00 PM 99.576 8/21/95 3:00 AM 98.865 7/25/01 12:00 AM 99.526 8/21/95 6:00 PM 98.864 7/24/01 9:00 PM 99.516 8/20/95 9:00 PM 98.864 7/19/98 3:00 AM 99.515 8/21/95 6:00 AM 98.864 7/25/01 9:00 AM 99.488 8/21/95 12:00 AM 98.864 8/19/95 12:00 AM 99.474 8/21/95 9:00 PM 98.864 7/22/01 3:00 PM 99.464 8/20/95 12:00 PM 98.863 Based on this data, a weather file for LAKET was created for the worst (hottest) weather,

'Worst Weather.txt'. The worst weather file is created by first inputting the worst 24-hr day (7/25/2001 ending at 6:00 AM) and then inputting the worst period of 30 days (7/21/1995 4:00PM to 8/20/1995 3:00PM) to create a 3 1-day weather file.

To compare the new weather file with the existing weather file, Case 3a from L-002457 was run using the new weather file. This was done by creating a LAKET input file, "WorstWeatherComparison.dat,' with the same conditions as Case 3a, but an adjusted anemometer height to reflect the setup at LaSalle County Station. As seen in the output file, 'WorstWeather Comparison.out,' the maximum UHS outlet temperature using the new worst weather file is 105.967F. From Attachment H, the results from Case 3a using the existing weather file is a maximum UHS outlet temperature of 104.00'F. The new weather file results in a greater UHS outlet temperature, so it will replace the existing worst weather file in the UHS analysis.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M11 of M17 M6.2 Worst Net Evaporation LAKET input file 'NetEvapWorstMonth.dat' was compiled to determine the worst 30-day period of net evaporation from 1/1/1995 to 9/30/2010. Using the results from LAKET, the worst ten 30-day periods in terms of net evaporation are shown below in Table M6-2. Note that the net evaporation values provided are for comparison purposes only and not representative of the expected actual evaporation of the UHS (See Limitation M8. 1).

Table M6-2: Worst Net Evaporation Days End Date 30-Day Net Evaporation (cfs) 7/13/02 9:00 PM 1.569 7/13/02 6:00 PM 1.568 7/14/02 12:00 AM 1.566 7/13/02 3:00 PM j 1.565 7/13/02 12:00 PM 1.563 7/14/02 3:00 AM 1.563 7/13/02 9:00 AM j 1.563 7/13/02 6:00 AM - 1.562 7/14/02 6:00 AM 1.560 7/13/02 3:00 AM 1.557 The worst net evaporation weather file, 'NetEvapweather.txt,' is created by inputting the weather conditions from the worst net evaporation period of 30 days (6/13/2002 10:00 PM to 7/13/2002 9:00 PM). In order to compare this with the worst 30 day net evaporation period from Attachment H, Case 3c from Attachment H was run using the new weather file. This was done by creating a LAKET input file, "NetEvapComparison.dat,' with the same conditions as Case 3c, but an adjusted anemometer height to reflect the setup at LaSalle County Station.

As seen in the output file, 'NetEvapComparison.out,' the minimum lake elevation using the new worst net evaporation weather file is 688.63-ft. From Attachment H, the results from Case 3c using the existing weather file is a minimum lake elevation of 688.52-ft.

Since the existing weather file results in greater lake drawdown, the existing weather conditions from 6/18/1954 to 7/18/1954 will continue to be used for this analysis.

M6.3 Weather File Creation for UHS Analysis After determination of the worst weather day and month and the worst net evaporation month, weather files are created for use in the UHS Analysis.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M12 of M17 For the worst weather day and month, eight new weather files are created starting at different times to determine the limiting time of day. A summary of the eight created weather files, including the start times and end times used in taking weather data from

'PIALSL95 1O.txt' is presented in the table below:

Table M6-3: Worst Weather 24-Hour/30-Day Files

-File Name Worst 24-hr Start Worst 24-hr End Worst 30-Day Start Worst 30-Day End 1-30day_12am.txt 7/24/2001 12AM 7/24/2001 11PM 7/21/1995 12AM 8/19/1995 11PM 1-30day_3am.txt 7/24/2001 3AM 7/25/2001 2AM 7/21/1995 3AM 8/20/1995 2AM 1-30day6am.txt 7/24/2001 6AM 7/25/2001 5AM 7/21/1995 6AM 8/20/1995 5AM 1-30day_9am.txt 7/24/2001 9AM 7/25/2001 8AM 7/21/1995 9AM 8/20/1995 8AM 1-30day_12pm.txt 7/24/2001 12PM 7/25/2001 11AM 7/21/1995 12PM 8/20/1995 11AM 1-30day_3pm.txt 7/24/2001 3PM 7/25/2001 2PM 7/21/1995 3PM 8/20/1995 2PM 1-30day_6pm.txt 7/24/2001 6PM 7/25/2001 5PM 7/21/1995 6PM 8/20/1995 5PM 1-30day_9pm.txt 7/24/2001 9PM 7/25/2001 8PM 7/21/1995 9PM 8/20/1995 8PM The worst net evaporation month was determined to be the existing weather file,

'30dayevap.txt'. This will continued to be used in the UHS analysis, and no further weather file compilation is needed.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M13 of M17 M7.0

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS The worst weather day and 30 days and worst net evaporation 30 days were determined by running LAKET over a range of days spanning from 1/1/1995 to 9/30/2010. The worst weather day was determined to be 7/25/2001 ending at 6:00 AM, while the worst 30 day period of weather spanned from 7/21/1995 4:00 PM to 8/20/1995 3:00 PM. A comparison of this weather file with the existing weather file shows that the new weather file based on the weather data from 'PIALSL951O.txt' results in a higher maximum UHS outlet temperature than the existing weather file. Therefore the new weather files summarized in Table M6-3 will be used in the UHS analysis.

For net evaporation, the worst 30 day period was determined to span from 6/13/2002 10:00 PM to 7/13/2002 9:00 PM. Comparison of this 30 day span with the previous limiting 30 days, 6/18/1954 to 7/18/1954, shows that the 1954 span remains bounding.

Therefore, the existing worst 30-day net evaporation weather file will be used in the UHS analysis.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M14 of M1 7 M8.0 LIMITATIONS M8.1 24-Hour and 30-Day Rolling Average Values - The values for UHS outlet temperature and net evaporation provided in Tables M6-1 and M6-2 are merely representative values for use in comparing weather effects over different time periods. These values are not actual expected values for the LaSalle UHS.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M15 of M17 M9.0 APPENDICES List of Appendices App. - Description No. of Pages M9.1 Electronic File Listing 2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M16 of M17 Appendix M9. I: Electronic File Listing Appendix M9.1: Electronic File Listing A summary of the electronic files and their purposes is provided below:

LaSalle County Station / Peoria Weather File File Name Date PIALSL951O.txt 3/09/2012 12:08 PM Files for Determining 24-Hour and 30-Day Worst Weather File Name Date Worst - W~eather~dat

_______ .. AM 4/24/2012 11:26 AM WorstWeatherdaut Worst Weather.out -4/24/2012 11:26 AM____

WorstWeather.plt _ _4/24/2012 11:26 AM WorstWeather.pltX 24/24/2012 11:26-AM Files for Determining Worst Net Evaporation File Name Date NetEvapWorstMonth.dat 5/17/2012 3:01-PM NetEvap_WorstMonth.out 5/17/2012 3:03 PM NetEvap_WorstMonth.plt 5/17/2012 3:03 PM NetEvapWorstMonth.pltX 5/17/2012 3:03 PM Compiled Weather Files (Section M6.1 and Section M6.2)

- File Name ' Date Worst Weather.txt 4/26/2012 10:11 AM NetEvapweather.txt 5/17/2012 3:23 PM Files for Comparison to Previous Worst Weather File Name Date WorstWeatherComparison.dat 4/26/2012 10:12 AM WorstWeather Comparison.out 4/26/2012 10:12 AM WorstWeather Comparison.plt 4/26/2012 10:12 AM WorstWeatherComparison. pltX 4/26/2012 10:12 AM Files for Comparison to Previous Worst Net Evaporation Weather File Name Date NetEvapComparison.dat 5/17/2012 3:20 PM NetEvapComparison.out 5/17/2012 3:23 PM NetEvapComparison.plt 5/17/20123:23 PM NetEvapComparison.pltX 5/17/2012 3:23 PM PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT M, PAGE M17 of M17 Appendix M9. 1: Electronic File Listing Weather Files for UHS Analysis File Name Date .

1-30day_1 2am.txt 4/26/2012 3:23 PM 1-30day_3am.txt _14/26/2012

. ý4/26

1. _3:26 PM

/2 012 3:25 P .M.... . .

1-330day_6am.txt 1-30day_9am.txt i 4/26/2012 3:29 PM 1-30day_1 2pm.txt 4/26/2012 3:30 PM 1-30day_3pm.txt t 4/26/2012 3:32 PM--

1-30day_6pm.txt 4/26/20123:33_PM-- - --.

1-30day_9pm.txt 4/26/2012 3:34 PM 30dayevap.txt 4/06/2006 4:18 PM A more detailed look at the files listed in the tables above is provided below:

Further Detail for Electronic Files Name I Type I t*efied Size l RatioI PackedI Q . .30day.12am.at. TextDocument 4/26/2012 3:23PM 118,296 33% 14,272 Q1-30day_3l*.txt Text D*cument 4/26f2012 3:30 PM 113,296 33% 14,300 r*1-30day_3pm.1xt Text Document 4/26/2012 3:25 PM1 113,296 88% 14,293 TextDocument 4/26/2012 3:2 PM 118,296 03% 14,224

[*1-30day_-6am~txt 1-30day_6pm.txt Text Document 4126/2012 3:26 PM 118,296 88% 14,339 1-3tday gam.txt TextDocument 4i26/2012 3:33PM 118,296 83% 14,262 91-N3dayfipm.tbt Text Document 4/26/2012 3:29 PM 113,2% 03% 14,321 9 -302dyam.bct TextDocument4/26/2012 3:34PM 113,296 a3% 14,245 9 3OdayevapxIt Text Document 4/6/2006 4:18 PM 116,802 85% 17,890

.,Net0vaCompanson.dat OAT File 5117/203123:20 PM 2,623 83% 449 Pl IktEvapCompanson.out OUT He 5/17/2012 3:23 PM11 4a,857 95% 2,679 D1*NEvep _COrnlpason.plt PT File 5117/2012 3:23 PM 141,372 72% 39,051 P NeatEvaComparma.p X PL'X He 53/17/2012 3:23 PM 14,400 76% 3,495 9 NetEvaptVeadter.txt TextDocument 5/17/2012 3:23 PM 114,430 37% 14,843

.DI etEvap..worstMonth.dat DAT e 51/17/2012 3:01PM 357 38% 222 Dl Net~vapWorsdmonth.out OUIT le 5/17/2012 3:03 PM 278,69 1 91% 23,803 R1NetMvapWorstOonth.0.pt PLT e 51/17/2012 3:03 PM 26,374,556 B0% 5,390.500

.1NetEvapYiorxsdonth. pLtX P1.TXPe 5/17/2012 3:03 PM1 3,957,37i 73% 871,914

9) PIALSI9510.gxt TextDocument 3/9/2012 12:03 PNt 21.811,532 87% 2,742,002 DIlWorstWeather .dat DATFile 4/24/2012 11:26 M 401 44% 223 DlWorstWeather.out OUTFie 4/24/2012 11:26 AM 305,229 92% 25,441 P1lWortwýeadherplt PT Fle 4/24/2012 11:26 AM 26,374,556 81% 5,234,116 01Worst Weather.ptl PLTXPie 4/24/2012 11:26 AM. 2,760,960 84% 435,906 9WAorsteather.txt Text Document 4/26/2012 10:11 AM 113,296 83% 14,341 P.1WorstWeatherCome anson.dat DATPel 4/26/2012 10:12 *1 2,355 82% 425 DlWorstWeather ComDarison.out OUTFie 4/26/2012 10:12 AM 49,077 95% 2,664 D0IvorstWeatherComyarison.pIt PLT ie 4/26/2012 10:12 AM 146,0-H 72% 40,312 0- vorstweathercomDarison.pitx PL'r* Fde 41/2/2012 10:12 ,1 14,330 77% 3,461 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N1 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE Ni of N20 Attachment N - LAKET-PC Methodology Validation Prepared:- p, Date

  • ZoI3 Daniel W. Nevill - Sargent & LundyLLC Reviewed: Date V__1_201 P/ul J. Szymiczek.ý- gent & LundyLLC PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N2 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N2 of N20 ATTACHMENT N - TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No.

N1.0 P urp o se ........................................................................................................................ N3 N2.0 M ethodology .......................................................................................................... N4 N3.0 A ssum ptions ............................................................................................................ N6 N4.0 Design Inputs .......................................................................................................... N7 N5.0 References .................................................................................................................... N8 N6.0 E v a lu a tio n s ................................................................................................................... N9 N7.0 Sum m ary and Conclusions ......................................................................................... N 18 N8.0 Lim itations and Open Item s .................................................................................. N 19 N9.0 Appendices ................................................................................................................. N20 (Total Pages - Attachment N (20) plus Appendices (0) for a Total of 20 pages)

LIST OF APPENDICES No. Title _ Page Ai Pages (Total Appendix - 0) -

. . ... I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N3 of N20 N1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this attachment is to evaluate the methodology in the LAKET-PC program and compare it to accepted methods for analyzing UHS cooling ponds. The LAKET-PC method is compared to NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds," [Ref. N5.1]. This evaluation reviews the individual equations for heat transfer, wind characterization, and evaporation used in both the NUREG document and the LAKET-PC program.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N4 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N4 of N20 N2.0 METHODOLOGY NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds" [Ref. N5.1] presents a method for analyzing the performance of ultimate heat sink cooling ponds. It was published in November 1980 and contains the accepted methodology for characterizing the thermal performance of cooling ponds.

The methodology of LAKET-PC is compared to NUREG-0693 based onl review of the LAKET-PC manual [Ref. N5.2]. The equations for heat transfer, wind characterization, evaporation, and the iterative method are compared between both documents. LAKET-PC is validated in the process of demonstrating that the method of calculation is equal to the approved method outlined in NUREG-0693.

N2.0.1 Lake Stratification - NRC RAI #6 [Ref. N5.4] asks for additional information about the effects of thermal stratification of the lake.

A method for determining if a lake is stratified is presented in Sargent & Lundy standard MES-11.1 [Ref. N5.7]. This method consists of assuming the lake is stratified with the less dense hot water floating on top of the slightly more dense colder water. If the calculated value for the upper layer depth is close to or beneath the actual lake bottom, then the lake can be regarded as not stratified. The depth of the upper layer hot water is determined using Eq. 1.

FiQ2D_3L 1/

h,, 14gfATB - (Eq. N2-1)

Where:

fi - Interfacial shear coefficient, estimated as one-half of bottom friction coefficient fi = 0.5

  • 8
  • g / C, 2 (Eq. N2-2)

C, - Chezy coefficient C, = 1.47

  • H"6/ n (Eq. N2-3)

H - lake depth (ft) n - Manning roughness coefficient Q- Circulating water flow (ft3 /s)

D, - Dilution ratio (total lake flow / circulating water flow)

L - Lake length (fi) 2 g - gravity, 32.2 ft/s

- Bulk expansion coefficient of water (°F) 13= 4.1x10 6 * (Tawe - 39°F) (Eq. N2-4)

Tare- Average temperature of discharge and receiving water temperature (°F)

AT - Temperature difference between upper and lower levels (fF)

B - Width of lake (ft)

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N5 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N5 of N20 For the case where a jet or plume is formed in the lake, the dilution ratio (D,) is found from the following steps.

Fr = Ud / Vhg/3AT (Eq. N2-5) hmax = 0.42. -hdb, (hd / bd )1/4 Fr (Eq. N2-6)

D: = 1.4 1l+ Fr 2 (hd /bj,)'" 4 (Eq. N2-7)

Where:

Fr - discharge Froude number Ud - Velocity at discharge structure 015s) hd - Depth of discharge structure 00) bd- '/2 width of discharge structure (ft)

D,*- Dilution ratio without correction for lake bottom If the maximum depth of the plume (hmax) is greater than the depth of the lake, a correction factor is applied to the dilution ratio.

r = (0.75H / hmax )3/4 (Eq. N2-8)

D, = rD: (Eq. N2-9)

Where:

r - Dilution correction factor The upper layer depth (hu) is used to determine the degree of stratification in the lake. If the volume of the lake below the upper layer depth is small compared to the total volume of the lake, then a plug flow model such as LAKET should be valid. When the volume below the upper layer depth is greater than one half the total volume of the lake, a different model that accounts for stratification should be used.

N2.1 Acceptance Criteria N2.1.1 Acceptance Criterion N I - The calculation method in LAKET-PC for analysis of the thermal performance of cooling ponds shall be consistent with the accepted methodology presented in NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds" [Ref.

N5. I].

N2.1.2 Acceptance Criterion N2 - The LAKET-PC program [Ref. N5.2] is not applicable for stratified lakes. The fraction of lake volume below the upper layer depth shall be less than 50% for the UHS to be considered not stratified [Ref. N5.7].

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N6 of N20 N3.0 ASSUMPTIONS N3.1 Lake Stratification Calculation Inputs - The minimum mixing zone temperature is assumed to be 100.0°F. The maximum mixing zone temperature is assumed to be 125.0°F. These values are based on values of interest (during the first few days following an accident) from the mixing zone analysis done in Attachment 0.

The Manning coefficient is assumed to be 0.02. This is an approximate, conservative value [Ref. 5.6, Table 3.3.17] based on the surface of crushed stone bedding and rip rap

[Ref. N5.5].

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N7 of N20 N4.0 DESIGN INPUTS N4.1 Accepted UHS Analysis Method - The accepted analysis method for UHS cooling ponds is taken from NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds" [Ref.

N5.1].

N4.2 LAKET-PC Methodology - The analysis method used in LAKET-PC is determined from the LAKET-PC user manual and the computer code [Ref. N5.2].

N4.3 Wind Dependence Functions - Wind dependence functions are taken from MIT Report 161, "An Analytical and Experimental Study of Transient Cooling Pond Behavior," [Ref.

N5.3].

N4.4 Lake Stratification Inputs - The bases for inputs to the lake stratification analysis are provided in Table N6-4.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N8 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N8 of N20 N

5.0 REFERENCES

N5.1 NUREG-0693, "Analysis of Ultimate Heat Sink Cooling Ponds," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Regulatory Cormnission, November 1980.

N5.2 LAKET-PC Version 2.2, Sargent & LundyLLC, Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 12/09/2004.

Controlled File Path: \\SNLVS5\SYS3\OPS$\LAK-9222\

N5.3 MIT Report 161, "An Analytical and Experimental Study of Transient Cooling Pond Behavior," Ryan and Harleman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1973.

N5.4 Request for Additional Information Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374, "LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Technical Specification 3.7.3 Ultimate Heat Sink (TAC Nos.

ME9076 and ME 9077," 6/27/2013.

N5.5 S-79, "CSCS Pond Water Inlet Chutes Plan and Sections," Rev. H.

N5.6 Avallone, Eugene A. and Baumeister III, Theodore, "Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers," 10t' edition.

N5.7 MES- 11.1, S&L Mechanical Engineering Standard, "Effective Area of Cooling Lakes,"

Rev. 1.

N5.8 RS-13-002, "Response to Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Technical Specification 3.7.3, 'Ultimate Heat Sink'," l/18/2013.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N9 of N20 N6.0 EVALUATIONS N6.1 LAKET-PC Background LAKET-PC is a one-dimensional thermal prediction model first written in 1976 which has been well established in many areas of cooling lake sizing and analysis. The lake simulation model is used to yield water surface temperature as a function of position and time. The inherent assumptions used in the LAKET-PC model are as follows:

1. Thermal One Dimensionality - A one dimensional model assumes that the temperature is constant at any point along the plane perpendicular to the direction of flow. There are neither cross-stream variations nor thermal stratification with respect to depth.
2. Time Increment - The calculation scheme in LAKET-PC is an iterative process, where the calculation interval can be set to increments of minutes or hours. Weather data input to the model is generally hourly, and so weather data is held fixed for intervals smaller than one hour.
3. Fluid Interactions - The simulation model used in LAKET-PC involves adjacent fluid masses at different temperatures. The horizontal heat conduction due to this temperature difference is assumed to be negligible with respect to the heat rejection at the air / water interface, and is ignored. Similarly, conductive heat loss and frictional retardation at the water / channel interface are ignored.
4. Lake Rectanaularization - The one-dimensional model assumptions coerce the water body into an idealized rectangular channel. The length of this channel is the flow path length of the actual water body, while the width and depth are computed theoretical values.
5. Global Flow Components - LAKET-PC assumes that all secondary water gains and losses, such as makeup, blowdown, and runoff are distributed globally over the entire lake surface. This is a reasonable assumption for the majority of applications; an actual configuration in which component flow is known to exert a disproportionate local influence will not be modeled accurately on that local scale. However, the net result of the component will be correctly modeled.

The movement of fluid through the one-dimensional channel is envisioned as a series of individual, distinct fluid segments. Each segment has an individual length and temperature, while the width and depth remain constant for all. The channel thus fornms a queue of fluid segments, where additions are made at the inlet, and deletions are made at the outlet. This is referred to as a "first in, first out" queue. Any segment that enters the channel will cause an equal amount to be expelled at the outlet. The program assumes that all segments are uniform in temperature, and each segment is allowed to react independently with the environment.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N10 of N20 N6.2 Heat Transfer Model This evaluation only considers the thermal model utilized in calculating the lake surface temperature, and does not delve into the effects of precipitation, makeup, blow down, or calculation of total dissolved solids.

A) Edinger and Geyer Equilibrium Temperature Heat Transfer Model Both NUREG-0693 and LAKET-PC present thermal models in which the surface temperature of the cooling pond is calculated, as the bulk heat transfer modeled in these equations occurs at the water / air surface boundary. Both thermal models utilize the Edinger and Geyer "Equilibrium Temperature Heat Transfer Model." The equilibrium temperature is defined as the water surface temperature at which the lake is in thermal equilibrium with the environment. At this temperature, the heat removal from the water balances the heat addition, and the net effective heat transfer at the air / water surface is zero. Thus, the equilibrium temperature at any given time is a function only of the current meteorological environment. This is not to be confused with the "natural" lake temperature used in LAKET-PC, which is the instantaneous water temperature in response to the meteorological parameters. The equilibrium temperature is the theoretical steady state solution, while the natural temperature is the actual transient thennal response to the weather conditions.

The equilibrium temperature is used to define the heat transfer (Q) per the following equation:

Q Ts JdQ = JK dT 0 E where Q = net heat transfer into the water (BTU/ft2day)

E = equilibrium temperature ('F)

T, = water surface temperature (fF)

K = equilibrium heat transfer coefficient (BTU/ft2 day 'F)

Note that for this equation, K is assumed to be constant. However, when evaluating ultimate heat sinks, which accept high heat loads, the external heat load rejected to the pond will increase the surface temperature significantly higher than the equilibrium temperature. Thus, this equation is an iterative process in which the lake surface temperature is co-dependent on the net heat transfer rate and the heat transfer coefficient.

The surface temperature and heat transfer coefficient is held constant for each time step iteration when calculated in LAKET-PC.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N1 1 of N20 B) Heat Sources Contributing to the Cooling Pond The contributing components for the net heat transfer to the lake, listed below, are consistent between both LAKET-PC and NUREG-0693.

Q = QSN + QAN - QBR - QE - QC + QRJ where:

QSN = net incident short wave solar radiation QAN = net incident long wave atmospheric radiation QBR = net rate of long wave back radiation from the lake surface QE = net rate of heat loss due to evaporation Qc = net rate of heat loss due to conduction and convection QRJ = net rate of heat rejected to the lake by the plant Table N6-1 below presents the equations for each component of the net heat load. Note that for both methods, the solar radiation is generally a measured value, while the others are approximated based on meteorological conditions.

Table N6-1: Heat Load Equations NUREG-0693 LAKET-PC QSN Measured value Calculated outside of LAKET-PC 1

L - (included with weather data) 13 QAN -. 2x10- (T+460 )(l+O.17C2 ) Calculated outside of LAKET-PC (included with weather data)1 QBR 4.026x1O"8(460+Ts)4 4x10 8 (460+Ts) 4 QE (es - eA)F(w) (e. - ea)F(w) approximated as: j3(Ts-TD)F(w)

Qc _ 0.26(Ts-TA)F(w) 0.255(Ts-TA)F(w)

QRJ Input based on plant heat load Input based on plant heat load

1) An additional description of solar radiation and atmospheric radiation can be found in RS-13-002 [Ref.

5.8].

where:

C = fraction of sky covered by clouds (0.0 - 1.0) (measured)

T4 = dry bulb air temperature (fF)

Ts = water surface temperature (fF)

TD = dew point temperature (°F) es = saturated vapor pressure at Ts (nrunHg) e.4 = partial vapor pressure at TA and relative humidity (mrnHg)

=+0.255-0.0085( . Tj+/- 0.000204 2 )J (mrnHg/0 F)

F(w) = wind speed function (see Section N6.2C) (BTU/ft2 day/mmHg)

Table N6-1 shows that the equations for each contributing heat load to the cooling pond are the same between NUREG-0693 and LAKET-PC.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N12 of N20 C) Wind Function NUREG-0693 The wind function (F(w)) is used to characterize the effect of wind on the evaporative heat loss from the water.

The simple thermal model presented in NUREG-0693 utilizes a form of the wind function developed by Brady, which is solely dependent on the wind speed.

2 FB(w) = 70 + 0.7W where FB(w) = Brady wind function (BTU/ft2 day/mrnHg)

W = wind speed measured 18-ft above the water surface (mph)

However, Section 2.3 of NUREG-0693 discusses possible over-conservatism in this wind function and also presents an alternative equation. The Brady wind function, presented above, seems to underestimate the evaporative heat flux. Another approach presented by Patrick Ryan in MIT Report No. 161 [Ref. N5.3] and summarized in NUREG-0693 includes the temperature dependence of the water surface when calculating evaporative heat loss. This Ryan function is less conservative than the Brady function, but based on firmer physical grounds. The Ryan function presented in NUREG-0693 is as follows:

FR (w)=22.4rrTs + 460 F1'4 + 460 +14W 0.378e, 0.378e,,

P P where FR(w) = Ryan wind function (BTU/ft2 day/mrnHg)

P = atmospheric pressure (mmHg)

W2 = wind speed measured 2 meters above the water surface (mph)

A comparison of calculations utilizing each of these two wind functions is shown in Fig.

N6-1 in Section N6.3.

LAKET-PC LAKET-PC uses two different wind speed functions, one for natural evaporation off a pond at its natural temperature, and another for the forced evaporation off a heated pond with elevated surface temperatures. This is done to capture the effect of different phenomena above forced and natural water surfaces. Both wind functions are taken from MIT Report No. 161 [Ref. N5.3].

The wind speed function for a natural lake is solely dependent on the wind speed:

FLH (W) = 17W, PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N13 of N20 where FLH(W) = Lake Hefner wind function (BTU/ft2 day/mmHg) [Ref. N5.3]

Additional heat rejected to the cooling pond will increase the temperature of the water surface, and introduce the effect of free convection due to the temperature differential between the water and the air. Consistent with NUREG-0693, LAKET-PC utilizes the Ryan wind function (F,.(w)) to account for free and forced convection when the surface of the water is at an elevated temperature. Specifically, LAKET-PC utilizes the Ryan wind function when the surface temperature is 2.5°F higher than the natural temperature of the lake.

N6.3 Comparison of Calculation Methods There are several simplifying assumptions made when generating the set of equations used for the heat transfer model defined on page 9 of NUREG-0693 [Ref. N5.1]. This includes the approximation that the heat transfer from the back radiation and atmospheric radiation effectively cancel each other out. The model presented in NUREG-0693 also utilizes the Brady wind function (FB(w)), which is solely a function of wind speed.

However, Figure 2.4 in NUREG-0693 (reproduced below) presents the results from a hypothetical one square foot section of a pond surface subject to constant meteorological conditions utilizing varying levels of rigor in the calculations and wind functions.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N14 of N20 SUAFACE ',

TEMPON TS-'IF 150 b 140 0 1301 120 100.

1 2 3 4 5 8 7 a 10 11 1 12 2

HEAT LOAD FROM PLANT - BTU/(FT OAY) x 1000 Fig. N6-1: Comparison of Calculation Methods where a) Simplified method with equilibrium temperature and heat transfer coefficients based on unloaded pond conditions (not a function of pond temperature).

Brady wind function.

b) Simplified method where atmospheric and back radiation are ignored, but equilibrium temperature and heat transfer coefficients are based on pond temperatures.

Brady wind function.

c) Rigorous method where each contributing heat source is explicitly calculated.

Brady wind function.

d) Rigorous method where each contributing heat source is explicitly calculated.

Ryan wind function (LAKET methodology)

Furthermore, the explicit impact of the wind function on evaporative heat flux is analyzed to demonstrate the significant influence of forced evaporation. This is done by PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N15 of N20 calculating the evaporative heat flux for several lake surface temperatures at the constant meteorological conditions used in Fig. N6-1 (per NUREG-0693). The evaporative heat flux is calculated using the equation given in Table N6-1:

QE = (es - e,4) F(W)

Note that the equation above shows that given a constant water temperature, a decrease in atmospheric pressure will result in a slightly increased heat flux. The constant meteorological conditions used in the calculation are presented below in Table N6-2.

Table N6-2: Constant Weather Parameters Parameter Symbol Value Dew Point Temp (oF) Td 70 Ambient Air Temp (0F) Ta 90 Relative Humidity (%)-RH ... 52%

Wind Speed measured at 18-ft (mph) W . 2 Wind Speed corrected at 2-m (mph) W2 1.7 Atm Pressure (mmHg) T P I 760.137 Partial Vapor Pressure at TA and RH (mmHg)j eA 18.772 The calculation of the evaporative heat flux and each contributing term is conducted below in Table N6-3.

Table N6-3: Calculation of Evaporative Heat Flux Water Surface Temperature (7F) j Ts 150 135 L 120 105 90 Saturated Vapor at Ts (mmHg) I_ es 192.279 131.212 87.531 56.971 36.100 Brady WindFunction FB(W) 72.80 72.80 72.80 72.80 72.80 (BTU/ft day/mmHg) FBW .. .. ... ......- ... . .... ..- .. ..- - '

Ryan / Lake Hefner Wind Function 1 -1 69- 90.39 617 2

day/mmHg)

(BTU/ft(BTU/t~da/mm~g ,/fvv i FR(W) 134.06 120.85 106.97 , 90.39 61.76 Evaporative Heat Flux (BTU/ft 2day)

(using Brady Wind Func.)

[ QEB 12,631 166 8,186

,006 2,781 2

1,261 Evaporative Heat Flux (BTU/ft day) Q 23,261 ý13,588 7 3,453 (Using Ryan / Lake Hefner Wind Func.) 7,355,070

1) Per the methodology in LAKET-PC, the Lake Hefner wind function is used instead of the Ryan wind function when es approaches eA.

Results from Table N6-3 are presented in Fig. N6-2.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N16 of N20 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N16 of N20 25,000

-Evaporation w/ Brady Wind Func.

S

- - Evaporation w/ Ryan and Lake Hefner Wind Func.'s 20,000 I

.15,000 x

3 LL 4)

4) 10,000 0

5U 5,000 0

90 100 110 120 130 140 150 Water Surface Temperature ('F)

Fig. N6-2: Evaporative Heat Flux Calculation Results Fig. N6-2 shows that the Ryan wind function (which accounts for forced evaporation due to elevated pond temperatures) results in significantly higher evaporative heat flux values at elevated water temperatures. As UHS cooling ponds are expected to see significant heat rejection, the surface temperatures will be notably higher than the natural lake temperature and thus, accounting for this effect when calculating evaporation is necessary. The results in Fig. N6-2 are consistent with the results presented in NUREG-0693, shown in Fig. N6-1. The differences in evaporation calculated with either of the two wind functions are negligible for lightly loaded cooling ponds (where the lake temperature is relatively close to the natural lake temperature). However, when the heat rejection to the pond is increased and the resulting water temperature increases significantly beyond the natural lake temperature, the effect of the Brady vs. Ryan wind functions becomes apparent. The increased evaporative heat flux shown in Fig. N6-2 will result in lower water temperatures, as shown by Cases c) and d) in Fig. N6- 1.

N6.4 Lake Stratification The calculation of the upper layer depth was done for the UHS at LaSalle in order to detennine the degree of stratification. The following table shows the calculation of the upper layer depth, which is done according to the methodology presented in Section N2.0. 1. This calculation is done for varying values of temperature rise through the plant since this value changes significantly during the first few hours following an accident.

The temperature difference between the upper and lower layers is calculated as the PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N17 of N20 difference between the plant outlet temperature and the 'mixing zone' of the UHS located near the plant outlet. The temperature of a mixing zone comprising 10% and 20% of the UHS area is determined in a Section 06.9 of Attachment 0.

Table N6-4: Calculation of Upper Layer Depth Parameter I Symbol 1 Units j Hour 1 Hour 4 Hour 6 1 Basis Gross Lake Area 1A Acres I 81.32 I 81.32 81.32 i Att. 0, Table 02-1

ýGross-Lakme Volu-me- -o- 30 _ 4 4 t.0able jAr-t 02-1 Average Depth l H ft I 4.18 4.18 j 4.18: =VIA Flow Rate 0 Q cfs I 86 I 86 _ 86 Att. O, Design Inp. 4.6 Plant Inlet Temperature Ti -F i102.00 101.73 102.62 i Case 3aJ6AM from Att. 0 0

Temperature Rise through Plant AT.._ _ F 25.95 i 35.8 22.43 Att. P, Appendix P9.2 Plant Outlet Temperature To ' F 127.95 137.53 125.05 = Ti + ATP Minimum Assumed Mixing Zone Tm -F 100.0 100.0 100.0 Assumed Temperature----

AT Between Plant Outlet and Mix. Zone AT -F 27.95 37.53 25.05 = To- Tm Lake Length ......... ...

ke Le ft I 5500 5500 - 5500 I Main Body,.. Design lnp. 4.4 Lake Width B ft 644 644 644 ,k=A*43560/L Width of Discharge Structure I BdI ft 8.0 8.0 8.0 i Ref. N5.5 Dth trutur f Dschrge -I UHS Depth with 1.5 feet of Depth of Discharge Structure d t ft 1 3.5 3.5 3.5 sedimentation of-Discharge Velocity Vd .. ft/s - 3.071 3.071 3.071 =-Q-/ (B *hd).

Maximum AssuImed MixingZone- T ' F 125.0 125.0 125.0 Assumed Temperature - . --- I T -- -'F Assumed Manning Roughness Coeff. n - (-) .0.2 0.02 .02 i Ref. N5.6, Table 3.3.17 Bulk Expansion Coefficient 3...3-0,13.53E-0, 3.53E-041 Eq. N2-4 Discharge_-Froude Number Fr . ) 2.91 2.52 3.08 Eq.N2-5 Maximum Plume Depth hmax ft I 4.43 3.82 4.68 Eq. N2-6 Dilution ratio (uncorrected) D* . (_) 4.17 3.66 4.38 Eq. N2-7 Dbiution Ratot Correction-Factor r (-) 0.77 0.86 0.74 Eq. N2-8---

Dilution Ratio (corrected) Ds () 3.221 3.16 3.25 _ Eq. N2-9 Chezy's Coefficient C _ _ ) 93.29 93.29 I 93.29 Eq. N2-3 Interfacial Friction Coefficient ) 0,015 0.015

. 0.015 Eq. N2-2 Upper Layer Depth ho ft 2.49 j 2.28 2.57 Eq. N2-1 Test for Lake Stratification Gross Volume . . .. .. V I Acre-ft 1 340 340 4 40 . At. 0, Table 02-1 Volume Below Upper Layer V, Acre-ft 143.2 159.9 136.4 Interpolation of Table 7.1 in S--_ I _ I Main Body____ _

Fraction of Lake Volume Below hu (') - 0.42 0.47 0.40 = Vb/V As seen in Table N6-4, the most conservative calculated upper layer depth for the LaSalle UHS is 2.28 ft. Using this depth, the fraction of the UHS below the upper layer depth is 47%. According to MES- 11.1 [Ref. N5.7], LAKET is applicable to a certain lake if this fraction is less than 50%. Therefore, LAKET is acceptable for analyzing the LaSalle UHS.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N18 of N20 N7.0

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS The methodology used in LAKET-PC is entirely consistent with the thermal model presented in NUREG-0693 and the wind speed functions presented in MIT Report No 161, which is also referenced and cited in NUREG-0693. The use of the Ryan wind function (LAKET-PC) over the Brady wind function (NUREG thermal model) results in lower lake temperatures. This is due to the fact that the Ryan wind function accounts for the effect of forced evaporation at water temperatures significantly higher than ambient air temperatures. However, NUREG-0693 fully endorses the use of the Ryan wind function as a more accurate, although less conservative, method for calculating evaporative heat flux. Thus, Acceptance Criterion N I is met.

In Table N6-4, it is determined that the fraction of lake volume below the calculated upper layer depth is 47%. Acceptance Criterion N2 requires that the lake volume below the upper layer depth be less than 50% for the lake to be considered not stratified.

Therefore, Acceptance Criterion N2 is met.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N19 of N20 N8.0 LIMITATIONS AND OPEN ITEMS None, PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT N, PAGE N20 of N20 N9.0 APPENDICES None.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 01 of 042 01.0 PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE The purpose of this attachment is to revise the existing Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) analysis to include the weather selection methodology from Rev. 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.27 [Ref. 05.8] and a more realistic heat release to the UHS based on Revision 4 of L-002453 [Ref. 05.4]. This attachment includes analysis for only the Current Licensed Thermal Power (CLTP) (3559 MW,).

Revision 7 included analysis for both CLTP (3559 MW) and Extended Power Uprate (EPU) (3998 MW,)

power levels. Since Revision 7 plans for EPU have been cancelled, therefore only the CLTP power level is analyzed in this attachment. The results in Revision 7 remain conservative as they utilize a more conservative UHS heat load than used in Revision 8. Rev. 8 shows that the acceptance criteria are met using Rev. 2 of Reg. Guide 1.27 [Ref. 05.8].

The results of this attachment serve as an update to the current UHS design basis at LaSalle. See Section 1.1 of the main body of this calculation for further description on the history of this calculation.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 02 of 042 02.0 METHODOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The Sargent & Lundy (S&L) LAKET-PC computer program [Ref. 05.2] is utilized to determine the combined impact of decay heat, initial UHS temperature, and allowable sediment accumulation in the UHS. Based on the allowable UHS initial temperature (Design Input 04.5), the maximum UHS temperature is determined for average sediment accumulations of zero (0), six (6), twelve (12), and eighteen (18) inches.

02.1 Worst Weather File Creation 02.1.1 Regulatory Guide Criteria Reg. Guide 1.27, Rev. 2 [Ref. 05.8] describes a method for considering meteorological conditions in the design of the UHS. A synthetic weather file is created using weather data from the critical time period due to design of the UHS (33-45 hours for the LaSalle UHS), the worst 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, and the worst 30 days. The synthetic weather file can be combined in this order, or alternatively the worst consecutive day period of the sum of these times can be used as the design basis. This calculation explores both options, each starting with the worst critical time period corresponding to the UHS transit time. For the LaSalle UHS, the critical time period unique to the design of the UHS is the transit time, which depends on the level of sedimentation. The transit time is -33 hours, -39 hours, -42 hours, or -45 hours for 18 inches of sedimentation, 12 inches, 6 inches, and 0 inches, respectively (see Section 06.3).

02.1.2 LAKET-PC Model for Weather Screening In order to find the worst weather periods, a specific UHS model was created in LAKET-PC with a transit time corresponding to the three hour time step period. The model is open cycle, which means water exiting the lake is discarded and new water enters the lake at predetermined conditions independent of the existing lake conditions. The UHS is set to the same initial temperature at the beginning of each three hour time step. Since initial conditions are the same for each time step, there are no residual effects due to the weather from the preceding time step. The UHS outlet temperature for each 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> period corresponds to the environmental effects on the UHS during these three hours. From these results, it can be concluded that higher U-S outlet temperatures represent worse (hotter) weather conditions.

The LAKET-PC models 'Worst Weather I l0.dat' and 'WorstWeather 120.dat' were used to find the worst weather based on a UHS initial temperature of 1 10°F and 120'F, respectively. The weather file analyzed is 'PIALSL95 I0.txt', which is documented in Attachment M of this calculation. The weather data spans from January 1995 to September 2010. 'WorstWeather_ 10.dat' and

'WorstWeather_ 120.dat' are based off the input file 'WorstWeather.dat', which was developed in Attachment M of this calculation to determine the worst meteorological conditions based on an initial UHS temperature of I00'F. The following changes were made to 'WorstWeather.dat' for the new input files:

  • 'WorstWeather_10O.dat' changes from 'WorstWeather.dat':

o Lake initial temperature set to II 0°F o TPRISE (plant discharge water temperature) parameter set to 110.0°F

" 'WorstWeather_120.dat' changes from 'WorstWeather.dat':

o Lake initial temperature set to 120°F o TPRISE (plant discharge water temperature) parameter set to 120.0°F PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 03 of 042 The worst weather with an initial UHS temperature of 110°F and 120'F is considered since the approximate average temperature of the flow from the plant input to the UHS over the first several days following an accident falls between these temperatures. Additionally, these temperatures ensure that the Ryan wind function is used throughout the entire weather screening since they remain greater than 2.57F above the natural lake temperature at all times.

The results from 'Worst Weather_ I I0.dat' and 'WorstWeather_ I20.dat' can be used to determine the worst weather over any time period using a similar methodology as outlined in Section M2.0 of this calculation. The rolling average of the lake temperature over the time period in which the worst weather conditions are being determined is calculated for each time step. The time periods with the highest rolling average are considered to have the worst weather. These periods of time are applied to the design event in order to determine the period that results in the highest UHS temperature. A synthetic weather file is created using the worst weather time periods that are required for each case as outlined in Table 02-2.

02.1.3 Lake Area and Volume - The lake area and volume remains unchanged from that described in Section 12.1.2 in Attachment 1. A summary of the initial lake levels is provided in Table 02-1, below.

Table 02-1: Initial Lake Level Sediment Lake Effective Effectiv Level Elevation Area Volume Area e Level(ft) (acre) (acre-ft) (acre) (acre

_____I-_ -]__ (acre-ft) 18-in 689.98 81.32 340.0 -1 47.08 215.59 12-in 689.98 82.12 380.5 47.55 241.24 6-in 689.98 82.96 422.1 48.03 267.64 0-in 689.98 83.80 463.5 48.52 293.89 The remainder of the drawdown curve (from a lake elevation of 689-ft through 685-ft) remains the same as given in Table 7.1 of the main body of this calculation with respect to the total lake volume and surface area. The effective volume and effective area are updated using the percentages determined in Attachment J (effective volume is 63.4% of total volume and effective area is 57.9% of total area).

02.1.4 Plant Temperature Rise - The UHS heat load has been revised for this attachment to include the effects of the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) heat exchangers. The new heat load on the UHS for CLTP operation is determined in L-002453 [Ref. 05.4]. The plant temperature rise is dependent on the UHS heat load, and the calculation of the new plant temperature rise is documented in Attachment P.

02.1.5 LAKET Case Runs - There are several different types of cases that are run. These include the worst weather cases, the worst net evaporation cases, worst 33 hour3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> plus 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> plus 30 day cases, and diurnal wind exponent cases.

A) Worst Temperature Cases - The worst temperature cases determine the maximum UHS outlet temperature based on an initial UHS temperature equal to the proposed Technical Specification (TS) temperature limits for the UHS (see Design Input 04.5). These cases determine if the UHS outlet temperature will remain below the limiting temperature of 107'F (see Design Input 04.1). Cases are run at varying start times due to the variable allowable UHS temperatures (see Design Input 04.5).

I- PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 04 of 042 B) Worst Net Evaporation Cases - The net evaporation cases use the same input file as the corresponding worst weather case, but are run with the most limiting 30-day net evaporation weather file. These cases are run at all levels of sedimentation. The limiting weather file begins at 12:00 AM, so the initial temperature is set to the TS initial UHS temperature limit of 104.53'F (Design Input 04.5). The most limiting net evaporation weather was determined to be 6/18/1954 to 7/18/1954 in Attachment M, and this weather is used for the net evaporation cases in this attachment. Additionally, sensitivity cases are run to determine the effect of changing the wind power law exponent.

C) Worst 33 Hour - 24 Hour - 30 Day Cases - Rev. 2 of Reg. Guide 1.27 [Ref. 05.8] gives two alternatives for selecting the worst weather data. The first alternative consists of finding three critical time periods: 1) the time period in which the UHS will reach a maximum following a shutdown (for this case it is the UHS transit time), 2) the worst 1-day weather period, and 3) the worst 30-day weather period. These three time periods, which do not have to occur contiguously, are combined to produce a synthetic weather period.

Alternatively, the worst 33-consecutive-day (transit time + I day + 30 days) weather period may be used as the basis for the worst weather period. For the LaSalle UHS, the consecutive 33 day period is chosen starting with the worst weather period corresponding to the UHS transit time.

To determine which of these alternatives is most conservative, cases are run using both methods and the results are compared.

D) Wind Sensitivity Cases - In the NRC Request for Additional Information (RAI) [Ref. 05.3], more information is requested regarding the diurnal effects of wind speed. This case determines the effects on the maximum UHS outlet temperature when considering a diurnal wind power law exponent based on the analysis performed in EC 394434 [Ref. 05.10]. Case Wind_375 is run to determine the results of adjusting the 375 feet wind speed at the meteorological tower to 2 meters above the UHS [Ref. 05.12]

based on wind tunnel testing as documented in EC394434 [Ref. 05.10].

A list of all cases run for this analysis is shown below:

Table 02-2: List of LAKET Cases Case Name Time Period Sedimentation Level Start Time Weather File Worst Temperature Cases Case la _12AM worst 45 hours5.208333e-4 days <br />0.0125 hours <br />7.440476e-5 weeks <br />1.71225e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 0 in. 0:00 WW_0-6.22.txt Case la_3AM worst 45 hours5.208333e-4 days <br />0.0125 hours <br />7.440476e-5 weeks <br />1.71225e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 0 in. 3:00 WW_3-6.22.txt Case 1a_6AM worst 45 hours5.208333e-4 days <br />0.0125 hours <br />7.440476e-5 weeks <br />1.71225e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 0 in. 6:00 WW_6-6.22.txt Case la_9AM worst 45 hours5.208333e-4 days <br />0.0125 hours <br />7.440476e-5 weeks <br />1.71225e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 0 in. 9:00 WW_9.txt Case 1a_12PM worst 45 hours5.208333e-4 days <br />0.0125 hours <br />7.440476e-5 weeks <br />1.71225e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 0 in. 12:00 WW_12.txt Case la_3PM worst 45 hours5.208333e-4 days <br />0.0125 hours <br />7.440476e-5 weeks <br />1.71225e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days_1 0 in. 15:00 I WW 15.txt Case Ia_6PM worst 45 hours5.208333e-4 days <br />0.0125 hours <br />7.440476e-5 weeks <br />1.71225e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 0 in. 18:00 WWI 8-6.22.txt Case la_9PM worst 45 hours5.208333e-4 days <br />0.0125 hours <br />7.440476e-5 weeks <br />1.71225e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 0 in. 21:00 WW_21-6.22.txt Case 2a 12AM worst 42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 6 in. 0:00 WW_0-6.22.txt Case 2a 3AM worst 42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 6 in. 3:00 WW 3-6.22.txt Case 2a_6AM worst 42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 6 in. 6:00 WW_6-6.22.txt Case 2a_9AM worst 42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 6 in. 9:00 WW_9.txt Case 2a_12PM worst 42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 6 in. 12:00 WW_12.txt PROJECT NO. 11333-297

ICALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 05 of 042 1 Case Name Time Period Sedimentation Start Weather File Level Time Case 2a 3PM worst 42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 6 in. 15:00 WW_15.txt Case 2a 6PM worst 42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 6 in. 18:00 WW_18-6.22.txt Case 2a_9PM worst 42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 6 in. 21:00 WW_21-6.22.txt Case 3a_12AM worst 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 18 in. 0:00 WW_0-6.22.txt Case 3a_3AM worst 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 18 in. 3:00 WW_3-6.22.txt Case 3a 6AM [worst 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 18 in. 6:00 WW_6-6.22.txt Case 3a_9AM worst 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 18 in. 9:00 WW_9.txt Case 3a_12PM worst 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 18 in. 12:00 WW_12.txt Case 3a_3PM worst 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 18 in. 15:00 WW 15.txt Case 3a_6PM worst 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 18 in. 18:00 WW_18-6.22.txt Case 3a_9PM worst 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 18 in. 21:00 WW_21-6.22.txt Case 4a 12AM worst 39 hours4.513889e-4 days <br />0.0108 hours <br />6.448413e-5 weeks <br />1.48395e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 12 in. 0:00 WWIN0-6.22.txt Case 4a_3AM worst 39 hours4.513889e-4 days <br />0.0108 hours <br />6.448413e-5 weeks <br />1.48395e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 12 in. 3:00 WW_3-6.22.txt Case 4a_6AM worst 39 hours4.513889e-4 days <br />0.0108 hours <br />6.448413e-5 weeks <br />1.48395e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 12 in. 6:00 WW_6-6.22.txt Case 4a_9AM worst 39 hours4.513889e-4 days <br />0.0108 hours <br />6.448413e-5 weeks <br />1.48395e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 12 in. 9:00 WW_9.txt Case 4a 12PM worst 39 hours4.513889e-4 days <br />0.0108 hours <br />6.448413e-5 weeks <br />1.48395e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 12 in. 12:00 WW_12.txt Case 4a_3PM worst 39 hours4.513889e-4 days <br />0.0108 hours <br />6.448413e-5 weeks <br />1.48395e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 12 in. 15:00 WW_15.txt Case 4a_6PM worst 39 hours4.513889e-4 days <br />0.0108 hours <br />6.448413e-5 weeks <br />1.48395e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 12 in. 18:00 WW_18-6.22.txt Case 4a_9PM worst 39 hours4.513889e-4 days <br />0.0108 hours <br />6.448413e-5 weeks <br />1.48395e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 12 in. 21:00 - WW_21-6.22.txt Worst Net Evaporation Cases Case 1c worst 30 days for evaporation 0 in. 0:00 30dayevap.txt Case 2c worst 30 days for evaporation 6 in. 0:00 30dayevap.txt Case 3c worst 30 days for evaporation 18 in. 0:00 30dayevap.txt Case 4c worst 30 days for evaporation 12 in. 0:00 30dayevap.txt NetEvap-0.r1 worst 30 days for evaporation 18 in. 0:00 NetEvap_0.1.txt NetEvap-0.2 worst 30 days for evaporation _ 18 in. 0:00 NetEvap_0.2.txt Worst 33 Hours + 24 Hours + 30 Day Cases WW_33-24-30-6AM18 worst 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> + worst 24 I WW 33 in. 9:00 -

WW_33-24-30-6AM2 worst worst 33+hours hours33 worst +

hours +30worst days24 worst 24 IWW 18 in. 6:00 33-24 6AM2.txt WW-33-24 WW_33-24-30-6AM2 /I hours + worst 30 days 18 in. 6:00 6AM2.txt Wind Sensitivity Cases Case Diurnal worst 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 18 in. 6:00 Diurnal.txt Case Wind 375 worst 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> + next 30 days 18 in. 6:00 Wind_375.txt I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 06 of 042 1 Case Name Time Period Sedimentation Start Weather File Level Time Mixing Cases Mixing - 10% 1 Mixing - 10% 18 in. 6:00 NWV 6-6.22.txt Mixing - 20% Mixing - 20% 18 in. 6:00 WW_6-6.22.txt Mixing - 10% - 9AM Mixing - 10% - 9AM 18 in. 9:00 WW_9.txt Mixing -20% - 12PM Mixing -20% - 12PM 18 in. 12:00 W _12.txt 02.2 UHS Mixing RAI #4 [Ref. 05.3], asks for a detailed analysis that conservatively accounts for fluid segment mixing and corresponding lower water surface temperatures. LAKET-PC [Ref. 05.2] currently does not have the capability to simulate this mixing; however, the included lake effectiveness compensates for this effect by simulating the resultant stagnant lake areas caused by mixing. To provide additional assurance, the effect of UHS mixing is determined using LAKET-PC [Ref. 05.2] results with modifications made outside of LAKET-PC in Microsoft Excel [Ref. 05.5].

The existing UHS thermal model consists of a plug type model developed in LAKET-PC [Ref. 05.2]. The simplified diagram of the LaSalle UHS model is shown on Figure 02.1. The model effective area and volume are 57.9% and 63.4% of their total values (see Attachment J).

From Plant 1 Effective Volume/Area op To Plant Figure 02.1 - Existing UHS Model To simulate the effect of entrance mixing, the existing model is modified as shown in Figure 02.2. This new model is similar to the two stage model described in the MIT Report 161 [Ref. 05.7, Figure 3-9] as presented in Figure 02.3. The mixing zone with various sizes has been created outside of LAKET-PC

[Ref. 05.2]. The discharge temperature out of the mixing zone is calculated for each time step (one hour) by assuming complete mixing of the plant discharge water and the mixing zone water. The effects of evaporation and other heat transfer are conservatively ignored. According to MIT Report 161 [Ref. 05.7, Section 6.5.1] the mixing region is typically small (<10% of the total area), therefore the two sensitivity cases are developed with 10% and 20% mixing zones. In these cases the mixing zone area/volume is subtracted from the nominal LAKET-PC model. For the purpose of the mixing zone sensitivity runs the 6AM case with 18" of sedimentation (Case 3a_6AM) is selected as the nominal case.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 07 of 042 Mixing From Plant -0 Effective Volume/Area To Plant Zone Figure 02.2 - Modified UHS Model for Mixing Effects T T 0 Tl Q

AI I Figure 02.3 - MIT Report 161 [Ref. 05.71 Two Stage Pond 02.3 Acceptance Criteria 02.3.1 Acceptance Criterion #1 - Peak Temperature - The maximum plant inlet temperature from the UHS shall T

remain equal to or less than 107°F.

02.3.2 Acceptance Criterion #2 - UHS Drawdown - There are no specific acceptance criteria for maximum UHS lake drawdown. However, for the worst 30-day evaporation period, the maximum lake drawdown is determined for input to calculation L-00 1355 [Ref. 05.6].

02.4 Limitations Same as main body of calculation.

r ý PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 08 of 042 02.5 Identification of Computer Programs Postprocessing of the LAKET-PC results is done using Microsoft Excel 2003 [Ref. 05.5], which is commercially available. The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all spreadsheets used in this analysis. All computer runs were perfonrned using PC No. ZD6661 under the Windows XP operating system.

LAKET-PC Version 2.2 [Ref. 05.2] was used to perforn the lake transient analysis contained in this evaluation. This was run on S&L PC No. ZD6661 on the Windows XP operating system.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 09 of 042 03.0 ASSUMPTIONS 03.1 Effective Area and Volume at Different Sediment Levels - The effective area and volume percentages determined in Attachment J are determined for 18-in of sediment. It is assumed that these percentages apply to the other sediment levels analyzed in this evaluation. Since changes in sediment level change the depth of the lake evenly throughout the entire lake (see Section 6.2 of the main body of this calculation),

the percentages of effective area and volume will negligibly change with sediment level.

03.2 UHS Inventory for Fire Fighting - It is assumed that all UHS inventory for fire fighting is used immediately following an accident. This is conservative as it decreases the volume of water in the UHS.

03.3 UHS Transit Time - For weather sorting, the weather file is sorted in three hour increments. For compatibility the transit time for 18-in, 12-in, 6-in, and 0-in of sedimentation is assumed to be approximately 33-hr, 39-hr, 42-hr, and 45-hr, respectively. See the UHS transit time calculation in Section 06.3.

03.4 Other - All other assumptions are the same as the assumptions in the main body of calculation.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 010 of 042 04.0 DESIGN INPUT 04.1 Maximum Allowable UHS Temperature - The maximum allowable UHS temperature is 1077F [Ref.

05.9].

04.2 General Seepage Rate - A seepage rate of 0.2 ft3/s is retained from Design Input 4.3 of the main body of this calculation. In Rev. 7, the spent fuel pool makeup flow was added to determine the total UHS seepage rate, but this is no longer added in Rev. 8 (see Section 06.2).

04.3 UHS Inventory for Fire Fighting Following an Accident- Following an accident, 440,400 gallons of water from the UHS must be available for fire fighting [Ref. 05.1, Section 9.2.6.3].

04.4 Anemometer Height - For the worst net evaporation weather data, which is from the Peoria weather data spanning from 1948 to 1996, the anemometer height is 20-ft (as taken from input files for the worst net evaporation cases in previous revisions). For the worst weather data, which is taken from the LaSalle Station weather data spanning from 1995 to 2010, the anemometer is at a height of 33-ft (See Attachment K).

04.5 Proposed TS Limits - The proposed TS temperature limits for the UHS for each of the event start times are provided in the proposed TS changes [Ref. 05.9]. These temperatures plus an uncertainty of 0.75'F are used as the initial UHS outlet temperature in the LAKET-PC model. Due to an initial iteration in the LAKET-PC code, the initial forced temperature input in the input file may differ from the values in Table 04-1. However, the initial UHS outlet temperature in the output file will match the value in Table 04-1.

Table 04-1: Proposed TS Limits Proposed TS Event Start Time Proposed TS Limit Limit Plus Uncertainty (0.75 0F) 0:00 103.78-F 104.53-F 3:00 101.97°F 102.72-F 6:00 101.25°F 102.00°F 9:00 102.44°F 103.19°F 12:00 104.00°F 104.75°F 15:00 I 104.00'F 104.75°F 18:00 " 104.00-F 104.75 0F 21:00 104.00°F 104.75°F 04.6 CSCS Volumetric Flow - The total plant flow during the UHS analysis is 29,300 GPM (65.3 ft3/s) for the first 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> of the event [Ref. 05.11, Attachment C]. The total plant flow is 38,600 gpm (86.0 ft3 /s) after 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> [Ref. 05.11, Attachment C]. The total flow after 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> is based upon the cumulative flow contribution from thirteen CSCS pumps operating at design flow conditions (eight Residual Heat Removal (RHR)-Service Water pumps, 4,000 gpm each; three Diesel Generator (DG) pumps, two at 1,300 gpm and one at 2,000 gpm; and two High Pressure Core Spray DG pumps, 1000 gpm each) (See Attachment D). Prior to 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br />, two RHR Service Water pumps and one of the 1,300 gpm DG pumps are not in operation [Ref. 05.11, Attachment C].

04.7 Other - All other design inputs are the same as the design inputs in the main body of calculation.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 011 of 042

05.0 REFERENCES

05.1 LaSalle County Station Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), Rev. 19.

05.2 LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 7/31/2013. Controlled File Path: \\SNLVS5\SYS3\OPSS\LAK29222\

05.3 NRC Request for Additional Information, Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374, "LaSalle County Station, Units I and 2 - Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Technical Specification 3.7.3 Ultimate Heat Sink (TAC Nos. ME9076 and ME 9077)," ADAMS Accession No.

M13099A206, 6/27/2013.

05.4 L-002453, "UHS Heat Load," Rev. 4.

05.5 Microsoft Excel 2003, Sargent & Lundy LLC Program No. 03.2.286-1.0, dated 02/02/2004.

05.6 L-001355, "LaSalle County Station CSCS Hydraulic Model," Rev. 005A.

05.7 MIT Report 161, "An Analytical and Experimental Study of Transient Cooling Pond Behavior,"

Ryan and Harlernan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1973.

05.8 Regulatory Guide 1.27, "Ultimate Heat Sink for Nuclear Power Plants," Rev. 2.

05.9 RS-12-084, "Request for a License Amendment to LaSalle County Station, Units I and 2, Technical Specification 3.7.3, 'Ultimate Heat Sink'," NRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374, ADAMS Accession No. ML12200A330, 6/12/2012.

05.10 EC 394434, "UHS Wind Correction Exponent Evaluation," Rev. 1.

05.11 SEAG 13-000074, "LaSalle County Station Transmittal of Design Information (TODI) for UHS Analyses," Rev. 0.

05.12 SEAG 13-000080, "LaSalle Station Transmittal of Design Information (TODI) for Calc L-002457 with WSR of Intake Flume," 9/30/2013.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 012 of 042 06.0 CALCULATIONS 06.1 Calculation of Plant Temperature Rise The CSCS temperature rise across the plant is computed in Attachment P. The heat rejected to the UHS is determined for an operating scenario that considers a LOCA on one unit and a reactor SCRAM for the non-LOCA unit coincident with a loss of the cooling lake. Both RHR heat exchangers are in service for the LOCA unit. For the non-LOCA unit one RHR heat exchanger is in suppression pool cooling mode (and later shutdown cooling mode) while the other RHR heat exchanger is in fuel pool cooling assist mode.

See Appendix P9.2 of Attachment P for the results of the plant temperature rise.

06.2 Seepage Rate The seepage rate is determined from a UHS seepage of 0.2 ft3/s (Design Input 04.2). Revision 7 included a constant flow of 600 gpm for spent fuel pool makeup (See Design Input 14.1). Instead of spent fuel pool makeup drawn from the UHS, the spent fuel pool is cooled through the use of the RHR heat exchanger

[Ref. 05.4, Attachment D]. The heat load rejected by the RHR heat exchanger to the UHS is calculated in L-002453 [Ref, 05.4], and included in the plant temperature rise calculated in Attachment P. Therefore, no additional seepage flow is added to account for spent fuel pool makeup flow.

06.3 UHS Transit Time The UHS transit time for each sedimentation level can be determined using the effective volume and the UHS flow rate. This calculation is shown in Table 06-1, below.

Table 06-1: UHS Transit Time Calculation

_ Symbol 0-in 6-in j 12-in 18-in Basis Eff. Volume (acre-ft) _ V8 293.89 267.64 . 241.27 215.59 Table 02-1 Conversion (ft3/acre-ft) i C i 43560 43560 I 43560 43560 o0iu-me( ... ... V 12,801,848 1 11,658,398 1 10,509,721 9,391,100 Ve* C lB16 _65. 65.3 65.3 65.3 ;Design Input 04.6 Volume Removed in 16,rsf(W) ,V, 6 I 3,761,280 3,761,280 3,761,280 3,761,280 ;=QB16*16hr*3600s/hr Transit Time (s) tB16 57,600 57,600 - 57,600 - 57,600 ,16 hr* 3600 s/hr Flow (is) . . . 6- 8Rate6 80 86.0 86.0 86.0 'Design Input 04.6 Remaining Volume (ft) VA16 9,040,568 7,897,118 6,748,441 .1 5,629,820-V - V13 16 .

Transit Time (s) tA1, 105,123 91,827 78,470 65,463 '=VA16/QA16 Total Transit Time (s) t I 162,723 149,427 136,070 123,063 .=tg16 +tA1 Total Transit Time (hr) t- 45.2 . 4.5 37.8 34.2 =t /(3600 s/hr)

For weather sorting, the weather file is sorted in three hour increments. For compatibility, the transit time for 18-in, 12-in, 6-in, and 0-in of sedimentation is assumed to be approximately 33-hr, 39-hr, 42-hr, and 45-hr, respectively (see Assumption 03.3).

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 013 of 042 06.4 Weather File Creation 06.4.1 Worst Weather Screening Rolling averages of the lake output results from the weather screening files 'Worst Weather 11 O.dat' and

'WorstWeather 120.dat' were computed for varying lengths of time: 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br />, 39 hours4.513889e-4 days <br />0.0108 hours <br />6.448413e-5 weeks <br />1.48395e-5 months <br />, 42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br />, and 45 hours5.208333e-4 days <br />0.0125 hours <br />7.440476e-5 weeks <br />1.71225e-5 months <br />. Besides the 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, these time periods represent potential transit times for the LaSalle UHS depending on the level of sedimentation. The time with the highest rolling average corresponds to the start time of the worst weather period over the time span that is under consideration.

Since LAKET-PC cases are made at varying accident start times and sedimentation levels, the worst weather periods are determined for various start times over multiple time periods. These results are shown in Tables 06-2 and 06-3.

Table 06-2: Worst Weather Periods - I10'F Initial Temperature Start Time 24 Hour 33 Hour 36 Hour 39 Hour 42 Hour 45 Hour 12AM 6/23/09 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/15/95 8/18/95 3AM 6/23/09 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 6/22/09 6/22/09 6AM 7/24/01 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 9AM 7/24/01 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 8/17/95 12PM 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 8/17/95 3PM 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 8/17/95 8/17/95 8/17/95 6PM 6/22/09 8/11/10 8/11/10 8/14/95 8/17/95 8/17/95 9PM 6/22/09 8/11/10 8/14/95 8/14/95 8/14/95 8/14/95 Table 06-3: Worst Weather Periods - 120'F Initial Temperature Start Time 24 Hour 33 Hour 36 Hour 39 Hour 42 Hour 45 Hour 12AM 6/23/09 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/15/95 8/18/95 3AM 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 8/18/95 6AM 7/24/01 8/18/95 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 9AM 7/24/01 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 8/17/95 12PM 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 8/17/95 8/17/95 3PM 6/22/09 6/22/09 6/22/09 8/17/95 8/17/95 8/17/95 6PM 8/11/10 8/11/10 8/26/95 8/26/95 8/17/95 8/17/95 9PM 8/11/10 8/26/95 8/26/95 8/14/95 8/17/95 8/14/95 In cases in which different worst weather periods are determined, the differences in the rolling average of the worst time periods are negligible. For example, the rolling average of the 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> starting at 3AM on 6/23/2009 for an initial temperature of 1lOF was determined to be 107.980'F. For the 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> starting at 3AM on 8/18/1995, the rolling average is 107.9771F. This is typical of all time periods in which the differing initial temperature causes a change in the worst weather period. Therefore, it is concluded that the 11 0IF and 120'F screenings produce essentially the same worst running average periods.

In addition to determining the worst time span corresponding to the UHS transit time, it is also important to check for the worst weather for shorter time periods. It is possible that in screening based on transit time, a short span of bad weather can be missed if it is quickly followed by relatively mild weather.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 014 of 042 Because of this, the worst weather periods for 9 hours1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br /> and 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> have also been determined.

Table 06-4: Worst Weather - 9 Hour and 12 Hour Period 9 Hour -L 12 Hour 1170F 120OF 19A0MF7/ 1201F

1) 7/22/019AM 7/22/019AM 6/23/09 6AM 1 6/23/09 6AM
2) 6/23/09 9AM 6/23/09 9AM 6/23/09 9AM 6/23/09 9AM
3) 6/23/95 9AM 6/23/95 9AM 6/23/95 6AM j 6/23/95 6AM Due to the prevalence of the 6/22/2009 - 6/23/2009 in the 9 and 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> periods in Table 06-3 and the UHS transit time periods in Tables 06-2 and 06-3, LAKET-PC runs at each starting time are run starting on 6/22/2009 in addition to the worst weather periods found in Tables 06-2 and 06-3. This ensures that the worst 9 hour1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br /> and 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> weather periods align with the initial accident heat loads exiting the UHS.

06.4.2 Weather File Creation Weather files are created for each run based on the worst weather periods determined in Section 06.4.1.

For the cases in Table 06-5, the worst weather file is created by inputting the worst 33 hour3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> time (the transit time for 18 inches of sedimentation) period as determined in Tables 06-2 and 06-3 plus the following 31 days. An additional 15 hours1.736111e-4 days <br />0.00417 hours <br />2.480159e-5 weeks <br />5.7075e-6 months <br /> is added since LAKET-PC requires a weather file comprised of weather input in multiples of 24.

The weather conditions are taken from the file 'PIALSL9510.txt', creation of which is documented in Attachment K. The table below gives a summary of the start and end times used for creating the weather file based on a 33 hour3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> transit time. The 33 hour3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> transit time is used since it corresponds to the case with the most sedimentation (18 in.), which is expected to produce the most limiting temperature.

Table 06-5: Worst Weather Files File Name Start Time End Time WW 0.txt 8/18/1995 12AM 9/19/1995 11 PM WW_3.txt 8/18/1995 3AM 9/20/1995 2AM WW 6.txt 8/18/1995 6AM 9/20/1995 5AM WW 9.txt 6/22/2009 9AM J 7/25/2009 8AM WW 12.txt 6/22/2009 12PM 7/25/2009 11AM WW 15.txt 6/22/2009 3PM 7/25/2009 2PM WW 18.txt 8/11/2010 6PM 9/13/2010 5PM WW 21.txt 8/11/2010 9PM 9/13/2010 8PM WW 0-6.22.txt 6/22/2009 12AM 7/24/2009 11PM WW 3-6.22.txt 6/22/2009 3AM 7/25/2009 2AM WW 6-6.22.txt 6/22/2009 6AM 7/25/2009 5AM WW 18-6.22.txt 6/22/2009 6PM 7/25/2009 5PM WW_21-6.22.txt 6/22/2009 9PM 7/25/2009 8PM The file listings for these weather files are presented in Appendix 08.1.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 015 of 042 06.4.3 Worst Weather Comparison For times at which 6/22/2009 is not chosen as the worst weather period for 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> in Table 06-2, cases are run using the given worst weather period and using the 6/22/2009 weather period. This is only done for the 18-inches of sedimentation cases (approximately 33 hour3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> transit time), as these cases are expected to be the most limiting. The results are shown in Table 06-6, below.

Table 06-6: Worst Weather Comparison Case Start Time Initial Maximum Temperature Temperature 12AM Case 3a_12AM - 6/22/2009 12AM 104.537F 104"53°F 0

Case 3a_12AM-8.18 8/18/1995 12AM 104.53 F 104.53°F 3AM Case 3a_3AM 6/22/2009 3AM 102.72°F 105.757F Case 3a_3AM-8.18 8/18/1995 3AM 102.72°F 104.60-F 6AM Case 3a 6AM 6/22/2009 6AM 7 102.00'F 106.15-F Case 3a_6AM-8.18 8/18/19956AM L 102.00°F 103.72 0 F 6PM Case 3a-6PM 6/22/2009 6PM 104.75.F 104.75-F Case 3a 6PM-8.11 I 8/11/2010 6PM 104.75OF 104.75'F 9PM Case 3a 9PM 6/22/2009 9PM 104.75"F 104.75°F Case 3a_9PM-8.11 8/11/2010 6PM t 104.757F 10475°F As seen in the results of Table 06-6, the 6/22/2009 cases result in an equal maximum temperature (when the maximum temperature is the initial temperature) or higher maximum temperature for all time periods.

Therefore, all cases will be run using the 6/22/2009 weather data as it produces the most limiting results.

Cases with differing levels of sedimentation use the same weather files. This is acceptable since the weather files consist of the worst 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> plus the following 31 days and any extra time needed to make the number of entries in the weather file a multiple of 24. Due to the extra time added after the 31 days, these weather files are the same for the longer transit times of the lower sedimentation cases.

06.5 Comparison to 33-24-30 Case As described in Section 02.1.5., Rev. 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.27 [Ref. 05.8] gives two alternatives for selecting the worst weather data.

To determine which of these methods is most conservative, cases were run using weather files created using both alternatives. The UHS transit time for 18 inches of sedimentation is approximately 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> (See Section 06.3). Therefore, a synthetic weather file period of 33 days is created consisting of the worst 33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> plus the worst 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> plus the worst 30 days. The worst 33 hour3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> and worst 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> time periods are determined from Tables 06-2 and 06-3. The worst 30-day time period was determined in Attachment M. Three different cases are run, one starting at 9 AM and the other two starting at 6 AM.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 016 of 042 Two 6 AM cases are run, one starting at the worst weather time period of 8/8/1995, and the other starting at 6/22/2009. These weather files are summarized in Table 06-7.

Table 06-7: 33-24-30 Case Weather Files File Name 33- Tm hr Start 33-hr End 24-hr Start 24-hr End 30-day Start 30-day End

[ Time Time Time Time Time Time 1 WW_33 6/22/2009 6/23/2009 6/22/2009 6/23/2009 7/21/1995 8/22/1995 30.txt 9AM 5PM 6PM 5PM 6PM 8AM WW_33-24 8/18/1995 8/19/1995 6/22/2009 6/23/2009 7/21/1995 8/22/1995 6AM.txt 6AM 2PM 3PM 2PM 3PM 5AM WW_33-24 6/22/2009 6/23/2009 6/22/2009 6/23/2009 7/21/1995 8/22/1995 6AM2.txt 6AM 2PM 3PM 2PM 3PM 5AM

1) An extra 15 hours1.736111e-4 days <br />0.00417 hours <br />2.480159e-5 weeks <br />5.7075e-6 months <br /> is added to make the entries in the weather file a multiple of 24 Case 3a_6AM and Case 3a_9AM use the worst 33-consecutive-day weather period, and the weather files used for these cases are described in Table 06-5.

A comparison of the results of these cases is provided in Table 06-8, below.

Table 06-8: 33-24-30 Case Comparison Initial Maximum Case Weather File Temperature Temperature 6AM Cases WW_33-24-30-6AM I WW_33-24-30-6AM.txt 102.00 104.73 WW_33-24-30-6AM2 WW_33-24-30-6AM2.txt 102.00 105.93 Case 3a_6AM WW_6-6.22.txt 102.00 106.15 9AM Cases WW_33-24-30 WW _33-24-30.txt 103.19 F 105.21 Case 3a_9AM WW_9.txt 103.19 105.31 The results in Table 06-8 show that the cases run with the 33-consecutive-day weather period result in a higher maximum temperature. Since this is more conservative, the 33-consecutive-day weather period is used for the worst weather cases.

06.6 Maximum Allowable Lake Temperature LAKET-PC [Ref. 05.2] is run to determine the UHS response to the heat load developed in Attachment P.

Cases are run at four different sedimentation levels: 0 inches, 6 inches, 12 inches, and 18 inches. The time of day which the transient is assumed is critical when determining the maximum allowable initial temperature of the UHS. To account for the time of day at which the UHS transient may start, eight start times are used for all sedimentation levels.

Each case is run with an initial temperature corresponding to the Technical Specification limits (see Design Input 04.5). Limiting weather data was determined in Sections 06.4 and 06.5, and the weather file dates are outlined in Table 06-5. The results of the LAKET runs are provided in Table 06-9.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 017 of 042 1 Table 06-9: Worst Temperature Cases.

Sediment Initial UHS Case Weather Data I Maximum Plant Inlet Level (in.) Temp. (*F) Temp. ('F)

Case 1a-12AM VVW_0-6.22.txt 0 104.53 104.53 Case la_3AM WW 3-6.22.txt 0 102.72 102.72 Case la_6AM WW_6-6.22.txt 0 102.00 -. 103.12 Case la_9AM WW_9.txt 0 103.19 104.33 Case la_12PM WW_12.txt 0 104.75 104.97 Case 1a_3PM WW_1 5.txt 0 104.75 104.75 Case Ia_6PM 'W_18-6.22.txt 0 104.75 104.75 Case la_9PM WW_21-6.22.txt 0 104.75 104.75 Case 2a_12AM WW_0-6.22.txt 6 104.53 105.21 Case 2a_3AM WW_3-6.22.txt ] 6 102.72 104.54 Case 2a_6AM WW_6-6.22.txt 6 102.00 103.21 Case 2a_9AM WW_9.txt 6 103.19 104.42 Case 2a_12PM WW_12.txt 6 104.75 104.99 Case 2a_3PM WWI 5.txt 6 104.75 104.75 Case 2a_6PM NWW_18-6.22.txt 6 104.75 104.75 Case 2a_9PM WW_21-6.22.txt 6 104.75 104.75 Case 3a_12AM 'W_0-6.22.txt 18 104.53 104.53 Case 3a 3AM /VW 3-6.22.txt 18 102.72 . 105.75 Case 3a_6AM 'NW_6-6.22.txt 18 102.00 106.15 Case 3a 9AM . W 9.txt 18 103.19 105.31 Case 3a_12PM WW_12.txt 18 104.75 105.05 Case 3a_3PM WW_15.txt -, 18 104.75 104.75 Case 3a_6PM WW_18-6.22.txt 18 104.75 104.75 Case 3a_9PM WW_21-6.22.txt 18 104.75 104.75 Case4a_12AM W'W_0-6.22.txt 12 104.53 105.86 Case 4a_3AM i WW_3-6.22.xt 12 102.72 105.97 Case 4a_6AM 'WV_6-6.22.txt 12 102.00 105.33 Case 4a_ 9AM W_ 9.txt 12 1 103.19 104.54 Case4a 12PM WW_ 2txt 12 104.75 105.01 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 018 of 042 Case Weather DataI Sediment Initial UHS Maximum Plant Inlet Level (in.) Temp. (°F) Temp. (°F)

Case 4a_3PM WW_1 5.txt 12 104.75 104.75 Case 4a6PM 12 104.75

_18-6.22.txt

_WW 104.75 Case4a_9PM WW_21-6.22.txt 12 104.75 104.75 Casea_9MW~_216.2.txt 12104.5 14.7 The results in Table 06-9 show that no cases exceed the maximum allowable plant inlet temperature of 1077F (Design Input 04.1). The most limiting case is 'Case 3a_6AM', which corresponds to 18 inches of sedimentation and an accident start time of 6AM.

06.7 Maximum Net Evaporation Cases l c, 2c, 3c, and 4c are run to determine the maximum expected UHS drawdown at different sedimentation levels. These cases are run using the worst 30-day net evaporation weather period, which was determined to be 6/18/1954 to 7/18/1954 in Attachment M. The results of these cases are presented in Table 06-10.

In addition to Cases I c through 4c, two additional cases were run to determine the sensitivity of the net evaporation to the wind power law exponent used by LAKET-PC [Ref. 05.2]. The power law equation is defined as [Ref. 05.2]:

(Eq. 06-1)

V1I ZI Where:

v, = wind velocity at LAKET evaluation height (knots)

V2 = wind velocity at anemometer height (knots) z, = LAKET evaluation height (2 meters = 6.562 feet) z, = Anemometer height (ft) a = Power law exponent The default exponent used when adjusting the wind from the anemometer height to the 2-meter height used in the LAKET-PC calculations is an exponent of 0.3 [Ref. 05.2]. The wind input to the weather file

'30dayevap.txt' was altered to simulate an exponent of 0.1 in case 'NetEvap-0. 1' and an exponent of 0.2 in case 'NetEvap-0.2'. The weather files with the adjusted wind speeds are 'NetEvap_0.1.txt' and

'NetEvap_0.2.txt'. These results are summarized in Table 06-10.

Table 06-10: Worst Net Evaporation Cases Cas Case Weather..a Weather Data Sediment Level (in.) II Initial Temp.Lake(*F) I Maximum DrawdownUHS(ft)

Case 1c 30dayevap.txt 0 104.53 1.42 Case 2c 1 __61.

Case 3c 30dayevap.txt 6 104.53 1.42 Case 3c 30dayevap.txt 18 104.53 1.42 Case 4c 30dayevap.txt 12 104.53 31.42 I II

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 019 of 042 Case Weather DataI Sediment Initial Lake Maximum UHS Level (in.) Temp. (°F) Drawdown (ft)

NetEvap-0.1 NetEvap_0.1.txt 18 104.53 1.47 NetEvap-0.2 NetEvapO0.2.txt 18 104.53 1.45 As seen in the results from Table 06-10, the maximum UHS drawdown is around 1.5 feet. Please note that more limiting UHS drawdown of 2.27 would exist with consideration of inventory loss due to spent fuel pool makeup as documented in Section 17.1 of Attachment I. Reducing the power law exponent increases the UHS drawdown, but the change is relatively small.

06.8 Wind Sensitivity Cases To determine the effects of a diurnal wind power law coefficient on the maximum UHS temperature, a weather file was created for a LAKET-PC run to incorporate the coefficients determined in EC 394434

[Ref. 05.10]. The base weather case of 'WW_6-6.22.txt', provides wind speed values at a height of 33 feet. The adjusted wind speed at 2 meters was found using Eq. 06-1 and the power law exponents (a) from EC 394434 [Ref. 05.10]. These adjusted wind speed values were inserted into 'WW_6-6.22.txt' to create the new weather file, 'Diumal.txt'. The LAKET-PC run 'Case Diurnal' was run to determine the maximum UHS temperature using the diurnal wind speed exponents.

For Case Wind_375, wind speeds were taken from EC 394434 [Ref. 05.10] as measured at an anemometer height of 375 feet. These wind speeds were multiplied by a wind speed ratio of 0.405, which is the calculated multiplier to adjust the wind speed from 375 feet at the meteorological tower to 2 meters (6.56 feet) above the UHS [Ref. 05.12]. These wind speeds were then converted to knots for entry into a LAKET weather file. These adjusted wind speed values were inserted into 'WW_6-6.22.txt' to create the new weather file, 'Wind_375.txt'. The LAKET-PC run Case Wind_375 was then run with this weather file and the results are reported in Table 06-11.

Table 06-11: Wind Sensitivity Runs Case Weather Data Sediment Initial Lake Maximum UHS Level (in.) Temp. (*F) Temperature (°F)

Case 3a_6AM WW_6-6.22.txt 18 102.00 " 106.15 Case Diurnal Diurnal.txt 18 102.00 105.08 Case Wind_375 ..

Wind_375.txt 18 102.00

, . = I . . ..

104.34 As seen in Table 06-11, the maximum UHS temperature from the diurnal case remains below the maximum UHS temperature of Case 3a_6AM, which uses a constant wind speed coefficient of 0.3.

Therefore, the use of a constant coefficient of 0.3 is conservative.

The maximum UHS temperature of Case Wind_375 also remains below the maximum UHS temperature of Case 3a_6AM.

06.9 UHS Mixing To determine the effect of mixing at the plant discharge into the UHS, several sensitivity cases were run in I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 020 of 042 LAKET-PC [Ref. 05.2]. These cases include a mixing region that is 10% the size of the UHS and a mixing region at 20% the size of the UHS. Microsoft Excel [Ref. 05.5] is used to calculate the temperature in the mixing zone, and LAKET-PC is used to calculate temperature for the remaining UHS.

06.9.1 Non-Mixing Zone UHS Area and Volume - For these LAKET-PC runs, the area and volume of the UHS not in the mixing zone is needed. These values were calculated as 10% of the total UHS area and volume for the 10% sensitivity run and 20% of the total UHS area and volume for the 20% sensitivity run. The effective area is 57.9% and the effective volume is 63.4% as determined in Attachment J. The UHS drawdown curves for these cases are summarized in Table 06-12.

Table 06-12: UHS Drawdown Curves for Mixing Zone Sensitivity Runs Total Area Total Volume Effective Area Effective Volume Elevation (acres) (acre-ft) (acres) (acre-ft) 10% Mixing Region 689.98 73.19 306.00 42.38 194.00 689_ 71.78 234.72 41.56 148.81 688 70.34 163.71 40.72 103.79 687 26.73 91.98 15.48 58.32 686 20.00 54.00 11.58 34.24 685 12.08 39.42 6.99 24.99 20% Mixing Region 689.98 65.06 272.00 _ 37.67 172.45 689 63.80 208.64 36.94 132.28 688 62.52 145.52 36.20 92.26 687 - 23.76 81.76 13.76 51.84 686 17.78 48.00 10.29 30.43 685 10.74 35.04 6.22 22.22 06.9.2 Mixing Zone Temperature - The case 'Case3a_6AM.dat' is selected as the nominal case for the UHS mixing sensitivity runs. The temperature of the mixing zone is determined in Microsoft Excel, and then LAKET-PC is run to determine the impact on the UHS temperature in the non-mixing zone portion of the UHS. Multiple iterations of the LAKET-PC analysis are needed as these results are used in calculating the mixing zone temperature. The change in the mixing zone temperature between time steps is input as the FPLANT variable in LAKET-PC. Iterations are run until the desired convergence in the mixing zone temperature is achieved.

Additional cases are run for 10% mixing starting at 9AM and 20% mixing starting at 12PM. This is to account for the reduced UHS transit time due to the reduced UHS volumes determined in Table 06-12.

The Microsoft Excel [Ref. 05.5] equations used for the UHS mixing analysis are given in Appendix 08.2.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 021 of 042 06.9.3 Results - The full Microsoft Excel [Ref. 05.5] results for the 10% mixing zone and 20% mixing zone cases are provided in Appendix 08.2. A summary of these results are provided in Table 06-13.

Table 06-13: UHS Mixing Sensitivi ty Runs Case Sediment Initial Lake Maximum UHS Weather Data Level (in.) Temp. (°F) Temperature (°F) 6AM Cases Case 3a_6AM (0% Mixing) WW_6-6.22.txt 18 102.00 106.15 Mixing - 10% WW_6-6.22.txt 18 102.00 104.32 Mixing - 20% [ VWW 6-6.22.txt 18 102.00 104.66 9AM Cases Case 3a_9AM I (0% Mixing) WW_9.txt - 1 -I- 103.19

'--- I - 105.31 Mixing - 10% -

9AM WW_9.txt 18 103.19 104.67 12PM Cases Case CasLa_12PM 3a12gPM WW_12.txt 18 104.75 105.05 Mixing - 20% - WW 12.txt 18 104.75 105.05 12PM -F- -

As seen from the results in Table 06-13, the highest maximum UHS temperature occurs when no mixing zone is considered. For the 12PM case, the maximum UHS temperature occurs three hours following the accident. The UHS discharge to the plant at this time has not been through the mixing zone, which accounts for the temperature being identical between the mixing and non-mixing cases. It is considered conservative to run the cases in LAKET without adjusting the results for a mixing zone at the inlet of the UHS.

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 022 of 042 07.0 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 07.1 Maximum Allowable Lake Temperature Summary Table 06-9 provides a summary of the maximum UHS temperatures for the maximum allowable initial temperatures given in the Tech Specs (see Design Input 04.1). The highest UHS temperature is 106.15 from Case 3c_6AM, which corresponds to an accident start time at 6:00 AM and 18 inches of sedimentation. This remains below the maximum allowable UHS outlet temperature of 107°F. Figure 07.1 shows the UHS inlet temperature and UHS inlet temperature over the 33 day worst temperature event for Case 3c_6AM.

07.2 Maximum Net Evaporation Summary Table 06-10 provides a summary of the maximum lake drawdown for the worst net evaporation cases.

These results show that there is a maximum UHS drawdown of approximately 1.5 feet occuring at a sedimentation level of 0, 6, or 18 inches. In addition, it is shown that there is a small increase in the UHS drawdown when the power law exponent for the wind speed adjustment is decreased. Please note that more limiting UHS drawdown of 2.27 would exist with consideration of inventory loss due to spent fuel pool makeup as documented in Section 17.1 of Attachment I Figure 07.2 shows the UHS drawdown over the worst 30 days for net evaporation from Case Ic.

07.3 Compliance with Acceptance Criteria 07.3.1 Acceptance Criterion #1 - Peak Temperature - As shown in Table 06-9, the maximum UHS temperature is not greater than 1077F for any of the worst weather cases. Therefore, Acceptance Criterion #1 is met.

07.3.2 Acceptance Criterion #2 - UHS Drawdown - The maximum expected lake drawdown for the cases evaluated is given in Table 06-10 and summarized in Section 07.2. This will be used in calculation L-001355 [Ref. 05.6].

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 023 of 042 1 Figure 07.1, Case 3a_6AM: UHS LOCA Temperature Transient Worst 33-Day Temperature Period (d = 18", t = 0600 hrs, Ti = 102.0'F 150 140 130 120 110 E 100 90 80 70 60 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 024 of 042 1 Figure 07.2, Case Ic: UHS LOCA Drawdown Worst 30 Day Evaporation Weather Period (d = 0", t = 0000 hrs, Ti = 104.531F) 690.2 690.0 689.8 689.6

  • 689.4 LU n 689.2 689.0 688.8 688.6 688.4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Days Following Accident IPROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 025 of 042 1 8.0 APPENDICES No. Title No. of Pages 08.1 Electronic File Listing 5 08.2 1UHS Mixing Results and Equations 4 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 026 of 042 Appendix 08.1 - Electronic File Listing APPENDIX 08.1 - ELECTRONIC FILE LISTING Weather Files File Name Size I Date PIALSL9510.txt 21,301 KB 3/09/2012 11:08 PM CST WW_33-24-30.txt 123 KB 9/5/2013 8:58 AM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM.txt 123 KB 9/5/2013 9:09 AM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM2.txt 123 KB 9/5/2013 9:08 AM CST WW_.txt 123 KB 1/28/2013 8:35 AM CST WW_3.txt 123 KB 1/28/2013 8:37 AM CST WW6 .txt 123 KB 1/28/2013 8:38 AM CST WW 9.txt 123 KB 1/28/2013 8:38 AM CST WWI 2.txt 123 KB .1/28/2013 8:39 AM CST WW-1l5txt 123 KB 1/28/2013 8:40 AM CST WW_l 8.txt 123 KB 9/5/2013 10:23 AM CST WW_21.txt 123 KB -1/28/20138:42 AM CST WW 0-6.22.txt 123 KB 1/28/2013 11:07 AM CST WW 3-6.22.txt 123 KB 1/28/2013 11:08 AM CST WW_6-6.22.txt 123 KB F1/28/2013 11:09AM CST WW_18-6.22.txt 123 KB . 1/28/2013 8:41 AM CST WW_21-6.22.txt 12-3KB 1/28/2013 11:09 AM CST NetEvap_0.1 .txt 116 KB 9/4/2013 10:10 AM CST NetEvap_0.2.txt 116 KB 9/4/2013 10:11 AM CST Diurnal.txt 123 KB 9/13/2013 2:26 PM CST Wind_375.txt 123 KB 9/20/2013 1:40 PM CST Weather Sorting Files ...

File Name !Size Date WorstWeather_110.dat 1 KB 12/3/2012 10:12 AM CST WorstWeather_110Qout 299 KB 7/1 5/2013 3:29 PM CST WorstWeather 110.ptX -- 2,697 KB 7/15/2013 3:29 PM CST WorstWeather_120.dat 1 KB 11/30/2012 3:52 PM CST WorstWeather_120.out 299 KB 7/15/2013 3:31 PM CST Worst_Weather 120.pltX 2,697 KB 7/15/2013 3:31 PM CST Worst Weather Comparison File Name Size Date Case3a_12AM-8.18.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:53 PM CST Case3a 12AM-8.18.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:02 PM CST Case3a_1 2AM-8.18.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:02 PM CST I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 027 of 042 Appendix 08.1 - Electronic File Listing Case3a 3AM-8.18.dat


KB 6129KB 9/18/2013 4:51 PMCST 9/18/20135:051 PM CST Case3a 3AM-8.18.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:05 PM CST Case3a_3AM-8.18.pltX 47 KB -;9/18/2013 5:05 PM CST Case3a_6AM-8.18.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:51 PM CST Case3a_6AM-8.18.out 129KB-- 9/18/2013 5:06 PM CST Case3a_6AM-8.18.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:06 PM CST Case3a 6PM-8.11.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:52 PM CST Case3a_6PM-8.1 .out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:07 PM CST Case3a_6PM-8.11 .pltX_ _ 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:07 PM CST Case3a69PM-8.11.dat 6 KB i 9/18/2013 4:52 PM CST Case3a_9PM-8.11.out - 129 KB '9/18/20135:09 PM CST Case3a_9PM-8.11 .pltXI 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:09 PM CST 33-24-30 Comparison -

File Name Size 'Date WW 33-24-30.dat "_6KB 9/18/2013 4:58 PM CST WW_33-24-30.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:11 PM CST WW_33-24-30.pltX _ 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:11 PM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM.dat - 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:58 PM CST WW 33-24-30-6AM.out 129 KB 1 9/18/2013 5:11 PM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM.pltX - 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:11 PM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM2.dat 7-6KB - 9/18/2013 4:58 PM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM2.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:11 PM CST WW_33-24-30-6AM2.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:11 PM CST Worst Weather Files File Name

  • Size Date Casela_12AM.dat 6 KB i9/18/201 3 4:47 PM CST

-case Ia1_ -2MIVI.u1 IZZI ND w I Ioi/UI a Z).LU ri1vi L'o I Casela_12AM.pltX -47 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela_3AM.dat ] 6 KB 1 9/18/2013 4:46 PM CST

- 5:19 P Casela_3AM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:19 PM CST

.... *-9/18/2013-5:19 PM CST Casela_3AM.pltX ,_47 KB Casela_6AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:47 PM CST Ca~se la_6AMM.out .. ... .... . 1_2.9 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela_6AM pltX ____47 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela_9AM~dat 6 KB -79/18/2013 4:47 PM CST Casela 9AM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela_9AM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela_12PM.dat 6KB 9/18/2013 4:48 PM CST I

I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 I

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 028 of 042 Appendix 08.1 - Electronic File Listing Casela 12PM.out 129 KB 1 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela_12PM.pltX .... 47 KB KB- 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST -

Casela_3PM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:47 PM CST Casela_3PM.out I 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela_3PM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela-6PM.dat - - 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:47 PM CST Casela 6PM.out 129 KB - 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela_6PM.pltX 47KB 9/18/2013 5:20PM CST Casela 9PM.dat 6 KB i 9/18/2013 4:47 PM CST Casela 9PM.out I 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Casela_9PM.pltX 47 KB i 9/18/2013 5:20 PM CST Case2a 12AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:49 PM CST Case2a-12AM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:24 PM CST Case2a_12AM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:24 PM CST Case2a 3AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 5:27 PM CST Case2a_3AM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:27 PM CST Case2a_3AM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:27 PM CST Case2a_6AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:48 PM CST Case2a_6AM.out 129 KB +9/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a_6AM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a_9AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:49 PM CST Case2a_9AM.out 129 KB- 9/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a_9AM.pltX I 47 KB 9/1812013 5:23 PM CST Case2a_12PM.dat I6 KB 9/18/2013 4:49 PM CST Case2a12PM.out _129 KB 9/18/2013 5:24 PM CST Case2a_12PM.putX 47 KB I 9/18/2013 5:24 PM CST Case2a_3PM.dat 6KB 9/18/2013 4:48 PM CST Case2a_3PM.out _129 KB . 9/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a_3PM.pltX 47 KB 79/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a -6PM.dat 6KB 9/18/2013 4:49 PM CST Case2a_6PM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a-6PM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:23 PM CST Case2a_9PM.dat j 6 KB - 9/18/2013 4:49 PM CST Case2a_9PM.out 129 KB T1/18/2013 5:24 PM CST Case2a_9PM.pltX __47 KB 9/18/2013 5:24 PM CST Case3a.12AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:52 PM CST Case3a 12AM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 4:55 PM CST Case3a_12AM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 4:55 PM CST Case3a 3AM.dat KB- 9/18/2013 4:51 PM CST Case3a_3AM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:04 PM CST PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 029 of 042 Appendix 08.1 - Electronic File Listing Case3a_3AM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:04 PM CST Case3a.6AM.dat 6.KB

.9/18/20134:51 PM CST Case3a_6AM.out 129KB 9/18/2013 5:06 PM CST Case3a 6AM.ptX 247 KB 9/18/2013 5:06 PM CST Case3a_9AM.dat -ý __- ~KB - 31/03:2P S Case3a_9AM.out 129KB 1 9/18/2013 5:14 PM CST Case3a 9AM.patX 47KB 5:14 PM CST Case3a 12PM.dat I6KB 9/18/2013 4:53 PM CST Case3a_12PM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:29 PM CST Case3a_12PM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:29 PM CST Case3a_3PM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:51 PM CST Case3a 3PM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:30 PM CST Case3a_3PM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:30 PM CST Case3a_6PM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:52 PM CST Case3a_6PM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:07 PM CST Case3a_6PM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:07 PM CST Case3a_9PM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:52 PM CST Case3a_9PM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:09 PM CST Case3a_9PM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:09 PM CST Case4a 12AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST Case4a_12AM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:36 PM CST Case4a_12AM.pltX 47 KB .9/1812013 5:36 PM CST 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:56 PM CST Case4a_3AM.out 129 KB I 9/18/2013 5:34 PM CST Case4a_3AM.pltX 47 KB [F9/18/2013 5:34 PM CST Case4a_6AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST Case4a_6AM.out 129 KB - 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST Case4a_6AM.plX 417 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST Case4a_9AM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST Case4a_9AM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST Case4a_9AM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST Case4a_12PM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST Case4a_12PM.out 1 130 LenI 01AM/9fl1" £'l DKA C-T Case4a_12PM.pl1 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:36 PM CST Case4a_3PM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST Case4a_3PM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST Case4a_3PM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST Case4a_6PM.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST Case4a_6PM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST Case4a_6PM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 030 of 042 Appendix 08.1 - Electronic File Listing Case4a_9PM.dat 9/18/2013 4:57 PM CST 16 KB Case4a_9PM.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST Case4a_9PM.pltX 47 KB 9/18/2013 5:35 PM CST Worst Net Evaporation Files File Name Size Date Caselc.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:48 PM CST Caselc.out ] 125 KB 9/18/2013 5:43 PM CST Caselc.pltX l52 KB 9/18/2013 5:43 PM CST Case2c.dat 6KB - 9/18/2013 4:49 PM CST Case2c.out 125 KB 9/18/2013 5:43 PM CST Case2c.pltX 43 KB 9/18/2013 5:43 PM CST Case3c.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 4:53 PM CST Case3c.out 125 KB 9/18/2013 5:43 PM CST Case3c.pltX 43 KB 9/18/2013 5:43 PM CST Case4c.--at 6KB 9/18/2013 4:58 PM CST Case4c.out 125 KB 9/18/2013 5:44 PM CST Case4c.pltX 43 KB 1 9/18/2013 5:44 PM CST NetEvap-0.1.dat 6 KB 9/20/2013 2:46 PM CST NetEvap-0.1.out j125 KB 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST NetEvap-0.1 .pltX 43 KB 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST NetEvap-0.2.dat 6 KB 9/20/2013 2:46 PM CST NetEvap-0.2.out 125 KB 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST NetEvap-0.2.pltX 1-4KB 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST UHS Mixing Files File Name Size Date Mixing-1 0%.dat 6 KB 9/18/2013 6:02 PM CST Mixing-1 0%.out 129 KB 9/18/2013 6:02 PM CST Mixing-10%.pltX 57 KB 9/18/2013 6:02 PM CST Mixing-20%.dat 6 KB 9/19/2013 3:51 PM CST Mixing-20%.out 129 KB 9/19/2013 3:52 PM CST Mixing-20%.pltX 57 KB 9/19/2013 3:52 PM CST Mixing-10%-9AM.dat 6 KBO 9/27/2013 12:42 PM CST Mixing-i0%-9AM_.out 129 KB 9/27/2013 12:42 PM CST Mixing-10%-9AMppltX 47 KB ' 9/27/2013 12:42 PM CST Mixing-20%-12PM.dat 6 KB 9/27/2013 12:27 PM CST Mixing-20%-1 2PM.out 1 129 KB 9/27/2013 12:27 PM CST Mixing-20%-12PM.pltX 47 KB 9/27/2013 12:27 PM CST I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 031 of 042 Appendix 08.1 - Electronic File Listing Wind Sensitivity Files File Name Size Date CaseDiural.dat 6 KB 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST CaseDiurnal.out 129 KB 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST CaseDiurnal.pltX 47 KB 9/20/2013 2:47 PM CST Case Wind 375.dat 6 KB 9/20/2013 2:40 PM CST Case Wind_375.out ___ 47 KB 9/20/2013 2:40 PM CST Case Wind_375.pltX 129 KB i 9/20/2013 2:40 PM CST I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 032 of 042 Appendix 08.2 - [IHS Mixing Results and Equations UHS Mixinp Enuations A I 1 ________ =MAX(B5:B748) 2 J10% Mixing T Nat I C TIN 4

T=A(SC4)

T OUT

-4 i

E Plant Tout 1

II FF !

-I-I-G x Temp I H Mixing Zone Vol= =Input!E5"43560*0.1 Vnew= =65.3*60*60 nt3 J

5-K ft3 L

3 New LakeT 2.3c (*F) (*F) (*F) (°F) Plant DT LAKET DT Convergence DT LAKET DT i1 LAKET DT i2 4 =D5 =SUM(HS:H749) =SUM(15:1749) =MAX(J6:J749) 6780.91066338037 6801.35172098318 5 183 89.1909 106.123 102.003 =D5+H5 =(I$2*E5+G4*(I$1-1$2))/I$1 25.95 =G5-D5 =ABS(L5-15) 4.12 4.11894749635391 6 183.041666667 89.4723 110.516 101.636 =D6+H6 =(1$2*E6+G5"(I$1-152))/151 32.2 =G6-D6 =ABS(L6-16) 8.88 8.88489652038913 7 183.083333333 90.0218 114.694 101.624 =D7+H7 =(I$2*E7+G6*(I$1-1$2))/I$1 35.16 =G7-D7 =ABS(L7-17) 13.07 13.0655417737158 8 183.125 90.6814 118.317 101.727 =D8+H8 =(1$2*E8+G7 (I$1-152))/I$1 35.8 =G8-D8 =ABS(L8-18) 16.59 16.5874470293705 9 183.166666667 91.5572 119.772 102.132 =D9÷H9 =(1$2*E9+G8*(I$1-I$2))/I$l 25.36 =G9-D9 =ABS(L9-19) 17.64 17.639166059468 10 183.208333333 92.4975 120.614 102.624 =D10+H10 =(152"E10+G9"(151-1$2))/I$1 22.43 =G10-D10 =ABS(L10-110) 17.99 17.9856907466745 11 183.25 93.373 121.196 103.036 =D11+H11 =(1$2*E11+G10*(I$1-152))/I$1 21.26 =G11-D11 =ABS(L11-I111 18.16 18.1588049767235 12 183.291666667 94.1185 121.585 103.315 =D12+H12 =(1$2*E12+G11*(I$1-$2))/I$1 20.32 =G12-D12 =ABS(L12-112) 18.27 18.2671281051142 13 183.333333333 94.7224 121.784 103.464 =D13+H13 =(I$2*E13+G12*(I$1-152))/I$1 19.39 =G13-D13 =ABS(L13-113) 18.32 18.3200076256199 14 183.375 95.1096 121.813 103.403 =D14+H14 =(1$2*EI4+G13"(1$1-1$2))/I$1 18.57 =G14-D14 =ABS(L14-114) 18.41 18.4110056860162 15 183.416666667 95.2859 121.703 103.133 =D15+H15 =(1$2*El5÷G14*(I$1-152))/I$1 17.96 =G15-D15 =ABS(L15-115) 18.57 18.5665631208804 16 183.458333333 95.2445 121.451 102.671 =D16+H16 =(1$2*E16+G15*(I$1-152))/I$1 17.45 =G16-D16 =ABS(L16-116) 18.78 18.7780036366959 17 183.5 95.0577 121.074 102.104 =D17+H17 =(1$2*E17+G16*(I$1-1$2))/I$1 16.98 =G17-D17 =ABS([17-117) 18.97 18.9696153589219 18 183.541666667 94.8666 120.615 101.545 =D18+H18 =(1$2*E18+G17*(I$1-1$2))/I$1 16.64 =G18-D18 =ABS(L18-118) 19.07 19.0701161296132 19 183.583333333 94.5514 120.066 100.826 =D19+H19 =(1$2*E19+G18*(I$1-152))/I$1 16.35 =G19-D19 =ABS(L19-119) 19.24 19.2432379495846 20 183.625 94.2603 119.47 100.14 =D20+H20 =(1$2*E20÷G19*(I$1-152))/I$1 16.17 =G20-D20 =ABS(L20-120) 19.33 19.3325480173827 21 183.666666667 93.9183 119.936 99.4062 =D21+H21 =(J$2 E21+G20*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 22.29 =G21-D21 =ABS(L21-121) 20.53 20.5311853302293 22 183.708333333 93.6113 119.531 98.7207 =D22+H22 =(J$2*E22+G21*(1$1-J$2))/I$1 19.27 =G22-D22 =ABS(L22-122) 20.81 20.8097457619266 23 183.75 93.2993 118.625 98.0447 =D23+H23 =(J$2*E23+G22*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 17.13 =G23-D23 =ABS(L23-123) 20.58 20.5752106731427 24 183.791666667 92.9855 117.441 97.3806 =D24+H24 =(J$2*E24+G23*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 15.6 =G24-D24 =ABS(L24-124) 20.06 20.0604562300453 25 183.833333333 192.6697 116.138 96.7276 =D25+H25 =(J$2*E25+G24*(1$1-J$2))/I$1 14.46 =G25-D25 =ABS(L25-125) 19.41 19.4062193905123 26 183.875 92.3989 114.84 96.1396 =D26÷H26 =(J$2*E26+G25*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 13.79 =G26-D26 =ABS(L26-126) 18.7 18.6972751328943 27 183.916666667 92.1258 113.615 95.5546 =D27+H27 =(J$2*E27÷G26"(I$1-J$2))/I$1 13.42 =G27-D27 =ABS(L27-127) 18.06 18.0568116875153 28 183.958333333 92.0281 112.52 95.1697 =D28+H28 =(J$2*E28+G27*(5$1-J$2))/I$1 13.22 =G28-D28 =ABS(L28-128) 17.35 17.3501530945977 29 184 92.1894 111.592 95.0521 =D29+H29 =(J$2*E29+G28*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 13.05 =G29-D29 =ABS(L29-129) 16.54 16.54425585071 30 184.041666667 92.5473 110.831 95.1515 =D30+H30 =(J$2*E30+G29*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 12.8 =G30-D30 =ABS(L30-130) 15.68 15.6829268201775 31 184.083333333 93.1978 110.308 95.7779 =D31+H31 =(J$2*E31+G30*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 12.52 =G31-D31 =ABS(L31-131) 14.53 14.5262854333635 32 184.125 93.9705 109.989 96.5194 =D32+H32 =(J$2*E32÷G31*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 12.27 =G32-D32 =ABS([32-132) 13.47 13.4681312105408 33 184.166666667 94.8213 109.869 97.3392 =D33+H33 =(J$2*E33+G32*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 12.1 =G33-D33 =ABS(L33-133) 12.53 12.5337067960865 34 184.208333333 95.7017 109.938 98.1883 =D34+H34 =(J$2*E34+G33*(1$1-J$2))/I$1 11.98 =G34-D34 =ABS(L34-134) 11.75 11.7463564692429 35 184.25 96.5625 109.55 99.82 =D35+H35 =(J$2*E35+G34*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.88 =G35-D35 =ABS(L35-135) 10.46 10.4836879316764 36 184.291666667 97.3197 110.187 101.264 =D36+H36 =(J$2*E36÷G35*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.79 =G36-D36 =ABS(L36-136) 9.58 9.61461947731524 37 184.333333333 97.9185 111.083 102.741 =D37+H37 =(J$2*E37+G36*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.71 =G37-D37 =ABS(L37-137) 8.85 T.88439809897515 38 184.375 98.3195 111.904 104.248 =D38+H38 =(J$2*E38+G37*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.65 =G38-D38 =ABS(L38-138) 8.22 8.27055260429391 39 184.416666667 98.5568 113.037 104.316 =D39+H39 =(J$2*E39+G38*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.58 =G39-D39 =ABS(L39-139) 8.86 8.90858195779592 40 184.458333333 98.5639 113.623 104.132 =D40+H40 =(J$2*E40+G39*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.51 =G40-D40 =ABS(L40-140) 9.55 9.59792457235487 411184.6 98.412 113.831 104.067 =D41+H41 =(J$2*E41+G40*(I$1-J$2))/I$1 11.45 =G41-D41 =ABS(L41-141) 9.98 10.0364989203799 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 -

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 033 of 042 Appendix 08.2 - UHS Mixing Results and Equations 0% Mixing Results (partial) 0% Mixing T Nat T IN T OUT

(*F) (*F) (*F) Actual Time 7/1/1900 12:00 AM 89.19 127.95 102.00 06:00 AM 7/1/1900 01:00 AM 89.47 133.84 101.64 07:00 AM 7/1/1900 02:00 AM 90.02 136.78 101.62 08:00 AM 7/1/1900 03:00 AM 90.68 137.53 101.73 09:00 AM 7/1/1900 04:00 AM 91.56 127.49 102.13 10:00 AM 7/1/1900 05:00 AM 92.50 125.05 102.62 11:00 AM 7/1/1900 06:00 AM 93.37 124.30 103.04 12:00 PM 7/1/1900 07:00 AM 94.12 123.64 103.32 01:00 PM 7/1/1900 08:00 AM 94.72 122.85 103.46 02:00 PM 7/1/1900 09:00 AM 95.11 121.97 103.40 03:00 PM 7/1/1900 10:00 AM 95.28 121.09 103.13 04:00 PM 7/1/1900 11:00 AM 95.24 120.12 102.67 05:00 PM 7/1/1900 12:00 PM 95.06 119.08 102.10 06:00 PM 7/1/1900 01:00 PM 94.87 118.19 101.55 07:00 PM 7/1/1900 02:00 PM 94.55 117.18 100.83 08:00 PM 7/1/1900 03:00 PM 94.26 116.31 100.14 09:00 PM 7/1/1900 04:00 PM 93.92 121.70 99.41 10:00 PM 7/1/1900 05:00 PM 93.61 117.99 98.72 11:00 PM 7/1/1900 06:00 PM 93.30 115.17 98.04 12:00AM 7/1/1900 07:00 PM 92.98 112.98 97.38 01:00 AM 7/1/1900 08:00 PM 92.67 111.19 96.73 02:00 AM 7/1/1900 09:00 PMj 92.40 109.93 96.14 03:00 AM 7/1/1900 10:00 PM 92.12 108.97 95.55 04:00 AM 7/1/1900 11:00 PM 92.03 108.39 95.17 05:00 AM 7/2/1900 12:00 AM 92.19 108.10 95.05 06:00 AM 7/2/1900 01:00 AM 92.55 107.95 95.15 07:00 AM 7/2/1900 02:00 AM 93.20 108.30 95.78 08:00 AM 7/2/1900 03:00 AM 93.97 108.79 96.52 09:00 AM 7/2/1900 04:00 AM 94.82 109.44 97.34 10:00 AM 7/2/1900 05:00 AM 95.70 110.17 98.19 11:00 AM 7/2/1900 06:00 AM 96.56 110.90 99.02 12:00 PM 7/2/1900 07:00 AM 97.32 111.53 99.74 01:00 PM 7/2/1900 08:00 AM 97.92 112.02 100.31 02:00 PM 7/2/1900 09:00 AM 98.32 112.68 104.88 03:00 PM 7/2/1900 10:00 AM 98.56 116.65 105.91 04:00 PM 7/2/1900 11:00 AM 98.56 117.36 106.15 05:00 PM 7/2/1900 12:00 PM 98.41 117.20 104.59 06:00 PM 7/2/1900 01:00 PM 98.21 115.25 103.65 07:00 PM 7/2/1900 02:00 PM 97.96 114.29 102.96 08:00 PM 7/2/1900 03:00 PM 97.58 113.42 102.18 09:00 PM 7/2/1900 04:00 PM 96.94 112.29 101.11 10:00 PM 7/2/1900 05:00 PM 96.35 111.26 100.13 11:00 PM 7/2/1900 06:00 PM 95.83 110.38 99.37 12:00 AM 7/2/1900 07:00 PM 95.38 109.58 98.61 01:00 AM 7/2/1900 08:00 PM 94.99 108.89 97.96 02:00 AM 7/2/1900 09:00 PM 94.47 108.34 98.94 03:00 AM 7/2/1900 10:00 PM 94.04 108.90 97.62 04:00 AM 7/2/1900 11:00 PM 93.81 107.80 1 96.69 05:00 AM PROJECT NO. 11333-297

I CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 034 of 042 I Appendix 08.2 - UHS Mixing Results and Equations 10% Mixing Results (partial) 10% Mixing TNat TIN TOUT Plant Tout I MixTemp [ Vnew= 235080 309600 ft3 /hr Convergence LAKET LAKET

(°F) (°F) (*F) (°F) Plant DT LAKET DT DT DT ii DT i2 7/1/1900 12:00 AM 89.19 106.12 102.00 127.95 106.121 25.95 4.12 0.00 4.12 4.12 7/1/1900 01:00 AM 89.47 110.52 101.64 133.84 110.521 32.2 8.88 0.00 8.88 8.88 7/1/1900 02:00 AM 90.02 114.69 101.62 136.78 114.69 35.16 13.07 0.00 13.07 13.07 7/1/1900 03:00 AM 90.68 118.32 101.73 137.53 118.31 35.8 16.59 0.00 16.59 16.59 7/1/1900 04:00 AM 91.56 119.77 102.13 127.49 119.77 25.36 17.64 0.00 17.64 17.64 7/1/1900 05:00 AM 92.50 120.61 102.62 125.05 120.61 22.43 17.99 0.00 17.99 17.99 7/1/1900 06:00 AM 93.37 121.20 103.04 124.30 121.19 21.26 18.16 0.00 18.16 18.16 7/1/1900 07:00 AM 94.12 121.59 103.32 123.64 121.581 20.32 18.27 0.00 18.27 18.27 7/1/1900 08:00 AM 94.72 121.78 103.46 122.85 121.78 19.39 18.32 0.00 18.32 18.32 7/1/1900 09:00 AM 95.11 121.81 103.40 121.97 121.811 18.57 18.41 0.00 18.41 18.41 7/1/1900 10:00 AM 95.29 121.70 103.13 121.09 121.701 17.96 18.57 0.00 18.57 18.57 7/1/1900 11:00 AM 95.24 121.45 102.67 120.12 121.451 17.45 18.78 0.00 18.78 18.78 7/1/1900 12:00 PM 95.06 121.07 102.10 119.08 121.071 16.98 18.97 0.00 18.97 18.97 7/1/1900 01:00 PM 94.87 120.62 101.55 118.19 120.62 16.64 19.07 0.00 19.07 19.07 7/1/1900 02:00 PM 94.55 120.07 100.83 117.18 120.07 16.35 19.24 0.00 19.24 19.24 7/1/1900 03:00 PM 94.26 119.47 100.14 116.31 119.47 16.17 19.33 0.00 19.33 19.33 7/1/1900 04:00 PM 93.92 119.94 99.41 121.70 119.94 22.29 20.53 0.00 20.53 20.53 7/1/1900 05:00 PM 93.61 119.53 98.72 117.99 119.53 19.27 20.81 0.00 20.81 20.81 7/1/1900 06:00 PM 93.30 118.63 98.04 115.17 118.62 17.13 20.58 0.00 20.58 20.58 7/1/1900 07:00 PM 92.99 117.44 97.38 112.98 1 117.44 15.6 20.06 0.00 20.06 20.06 7/1/1900 08:00 PM 92.67 116.14 96.73 111.19 116.13 14.46 19.41 0.00 19.41 19.41 7/1/1900 09:00 PM 92.40 114.84 96.14 109.93 114.841 13.79 18.70 0.00 18.70 18.70 7/1/1900 10:00 PM 92.13 113.62 95.55 108.97 113.61 13.42 18.06 0.00 18.06 18.06 7/1/1900 11:00 PM 92.03 112.52 95.17 108.39 112.52 13.22 17.35 0.00 17.35 17.35 7/2/1900 12:00 AM 92.19 111.59 95.05 108.10 111.60 13.05 16.54 0.00 16.54 16.54 7/2/1900 01:00 AM 92.55 110.83 95.15 107.95 110.831 12.8 15.68 0.00 15.68 15.68 7/2/1900 02:00 AM 93.20 110.31 95.78 108.30 110.30 12.52 14.53 0.00 14.53 14.53 7/2/1900 03:00 AM 93.97 109.99 96.52 108.79 109.99 12.27 13.47 0.00 13.47 13.47 7/2/1900 04:00 AM 94.82 109.87 97.34 109.44 109.871 12.1 12.53 0.00 12.53 12.53 7/2/1900 05:00 AM 95.70 109.94 98.19 110.17 109.931 11.98 11.75 0.00 11.75 11.75 7/2/1900 06:00 AM 96.56 109.55 99.82 111.70 110.30 11.88 10.48 0.00 10.46 10.48 7/2/1900 07:00 AM 97.32 110.19 101.26 113.05 i 110.88 11.79 9.61 0.00 9.58 9.61 7/2/1900 08:00 AM 97.92 111.08 102.74 114.45 1 111.63 11.71 8.88 0.00 8.85 8.88 7/2/1900 09:00 AM. 98.32 111.90 104.25 115.90 112.52 11.65 8.27 0.00 8.22 8.27 7/2/1900 10:00 AM 98.56 113.04 104.32 115.90 113.22 11.58 8.91 0.00 8.86 8.91 7/2/1900 11:00 AM 98.56 113.62 104.13 115.64 113.73 11.51 9.60 0.00 9.55 9.60 7/2/1900 12:00 PM 98.41 113.83 104.07 115.52 114.10 11.45 10.04 0.00 9.98 10.04 7/2/1900 01:00 PM 98.21 114.13 103.74 115.13 114.32 11.39 10.58 0.00 10.53 10.58 7/2/1900 02:00 PM 97.96 114.26 103.35 114.68 L 114.39 11.33 11.04 0.00 11.00 11.04 7/2/1900 03:00 PM 97.59 114.06 103.10 114.37 114.39 11.27 11.29 0.00 11.24 11.29 7/2/1900 04:00 PM 96.94 114.00 102.20 113.41 114.181 11.21 11.98 0.00 11.94 11.98 7/2/1900 05:00 PM 96.35 113.71 101.42 112.58 [ 113.85 11.16 12.43 0.00 12.40 12.43 7/2/1900 06:00 PM 95.84 112.93 101.33 112.43 1 113.55 11.1 12.22 0.00 12.20 12.22 7/2/1900 07:00 PM 95.38 112.85 100.74 111.78 113.181 11.04 12.44 0.00 12.43 12.44 7/2/1900 08:00 PM 94.99 112.55 100.07 111.06 112.741 10.99 12.67 0.00 12.66 12.67 7/2/1900 09:00 PM 94.47 112.08 99.20 110.14 112.201 10.94 12.99 0.00 12.99 12.99 7/2/1900 10:00 PM 94.04 111.52 98.41 109.30 111.59 10.89 13.18 0.00 13.17 13.18 7/2/1900 11:00 PM 93.81 110.94 97.80 108.64 110.97 10.84 13.17 0.00 13.17 13.17 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 035 of 042 Appendix 08.2 - UHS Mixing Results and Equations 20% Mixing Results (partial) 20% Mixing T Nat T IN I TOUT Plant Tout Mix Temp Vnew= 235080 309600 ft3/hr

°F LAKET LAKET LAKET

(°F) (*F)

(°) (*F) Plant DT LAKET DT Convergence DT DT il DT i2 DT B3 7/1/1900 12:00AM 89.19 10406 10200 127.95 104.06 25.95 2.06 0.00 2.06 2.06 2.06 7/1/1900 01:00 AM 89.47 107.181 101.64 133.84 107.17 32.2 5.54 0.00 5.54 5.54 5.54 7/1/1900 02:00 AM 90.02 110.271101.62 136.78 110.271 35.16 8.65 0.00 8.65 8.65 8.65 7/1/1900 03:00AM 90.68 113.12 101.73 137.53 113.121 35.8 11.39 0.00 11.39 11.39 11.39 7/1/1900 04:00 AM 91.56 114.62 102.13 127.49 114.621 25.36 12.49 0.00 12.49 12.49 12.49 7/1/1900 05:00AM 92.50 115.71 102.62 125.05 115.711 22.43 13.09 0.00 13.09 13.09 13.09 7/1/1900 06:00AM 93.37 116.61 103.04 124.30 116.611 21.26 13.57 0.00 13.57 13.57 13.57 7/1/1900 07:00 AM 94.12 117.35 103.32 123.64 117.34 20.32 14.03 0.00 14.03 14.03 14.03 7/1/1900 08:00 AM 94.72 117.91 103.46 122.85 117.92 19.39 14.45 0.00 14.45 14.45 14.45 7/1/1900 09:00 AM 95.11 118.34 103.40 121.97 118.34 18.57 14.94 0.00 14.94 14.94 14.94 7/1/1900 10:00AM 95.29 118.63 103.13 121.09 118.63 17.96 15.50 0.00 15.50 15.50 15.50 7/1/1900 11:00 AM 95.24 118.78j 102.67 120.12 118.79 17.45 16.11 0.00 16.12 16.11 16.11 7/1/1900 12:00 PM 95.06 118.81 102.10 119.08 118.82 16.98 16.71 0.00 16.71 16.71 16.71 7/1/1900 01:00 PM 94.87 118.76 101.55 118.19 118.75 16.64 17.21 0.00 17.21 17.21 17.21 7/1/1900 02:00 PM 94.55 118.59 100.83 117.18 118.59 16.35 17.76 0.00 17.76 17.76 17.76 7/1/1900 03:00 PM 94.26 118.351100.14 116.31 118.35 16.17 18.21 0.00 18.21 18.21 18.21 7/1/1900 04:00 PM 93.92 118.701 99.41 121.70 118.70 22.29 19.29 0.00 19.29 19.29 19.29 7/1/1900 05:00 PM 93.61 118.62 98.72 117.99 118.62 19.27 19.90 0.00 19.91 19.90 19.90 7/1/1900 06:00 PM 93.30 118.27 98.05 115.18 118.26 17.13 20.22 0.00 20.22 20.22 20.22 7/1/1900 07:00 PM 92.99 117.71 97.38 112.98 117.71 15.6 20.33 0.00 20.33 20.33 20.33 7/1/1900 08:00 PM 92.67 117.03 96.73 111.19 117.03 14.46 20.30 0.00 20.31 20.30 20.30 7/1/1900 09:00 PM 92.40 116.29 96.14 109.93 116.29 13.79 20.15 0.00 20.15 20.15 20.15 7/1/1900 10:00 PM 92.13 115.53 95.56 108.98 115.52 13.42 19.97 0.00 19.97 19.97 19.97 7/1/1900 11:00 PM 92.03 114.78 95.17 108.39 114.78 13.22 19.61 0.00 19.61 19.61 19.61 7/2/1900 12:00AM 92.19 114.08 95.05 108.10 114.08 13.05 19.03 0.00 19.03 19.03 19.03 7/2/1900 01:00 AM 92.55 113.44 95.15 107.95 113.44 12.8 18.29 0.00 18.10 18.29 18.29 7/2/1900 02:00AM 93.20 112.90 95.78 108.30 112.90 12.52 17.12 0.00 16.95 17.12 17.12 7/2/1900 03:00AM 93.97 112.01 97.07 109.34 112.531 12.27 15.46 0.00 9.78 1 15.46 15.46 7/2/1900 04:00AM 94.82 111.78 98.71 110.81 112.35 12.1 13.64 0.00 8.24 13.64 13.64 7/2/1900 05:00AM 95.70 111.86 100.40 112.38 112.35. 11.98 11.95 0.00 7.47 , 11.95 11.95 7/2/1900 06:00AM 96.56 111.901102.41 114.29 112.561 11.88 10.15 0.00 8.72 10.15 10.15 7/2/1900 07:00AM 97.32 112.56 103.10 114.89 112.801 11.79 9.70 0.00 9.21 9.70 9.70 7/2/1900 08:00AM 97.92 112.91,103.59 115.30 113.061 11.71 9.47 0.00 9.42 9.47 9.47 7/2/1900 09:00AM 98.32 112.97 104.23 115.88 113.36 11.65 9.13 0.00 9.69 9.13 9.13 7/2/1900 10:00AM 98.56 113.36 104.40 115.98 113.63 11.58 9.23 0.00 10.07 9.23 9.23 7/2/1900 11:00AM 98.56 113.69 104.37 115.88 113.86 11.51 9.50 0.00 10.55 9.50 9.50 7/2/1900 12:00 PM 98.41 113.61 104.66 116.11 114.10 11.45 9.44 0.00 10.98 9.44 9.44 7/2/1900 01:00 PM 98.21 114.00 104.45 115.84 114.28 11.39 9.83 0.00 11.45 9.83 9.83 7/2/1900 02:00 PM 97.96 114.20 104.21 115.54 114.41 11.33 10.20 0.00 11.91 10.20 10.20 7/2/1900 03:00PM 97.59 113.83 104.42 115.69 114.55 11.27 10.13 0.00 10.38 10.13 10.13 7/2/1900 04:00PM 96.94 114.11 103.69 114.90 114.58 11.21 10.89 0.00 12.17 10.89 10.89 7/2/1900 05:00 PM 96.35 114.141102.92 114.06 114.53 11.16 11.61 0.00 13.48 11.62 11.61 7/2/1900 06:00 PM 95.83 114.08 102.19 113.29 114.40 11.1 12.21 0.00 14.38 12.21 12.21 7/2/1900 07:00 PM 95.38 113.94 101.49 112.53 114.21 11.04 12.71 0.00 15.00 12.71 12.71 7/2/1900 08:00 PM 94.99 113.75 100.81 111.80 113.951 10.99 13.14 0.00 15.36 1 13.14 13.14 7/2/1900 09:00 PM 94.47 113.45 100.00 110.94 113.64 10.94 13.64 0.00 15.69 13.64 13.64 7/2/1900 10:00PM 94.03 113.13 99.26 110.15 113.27 10.89 14.02 0.00 15.81 14.02 14.02 7/2/1900 11:00 PM 93.81 112.811 98.65 109.49 112.881 10.84 14.22 0.00 15.71 1 14.22 14.22 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 036 of 042 Appendix 08.2 - UHS Mixing Results and Equations 10% - 9AM Mixing Results (partial) 10% Mixing -9AM T Nat T IN T OUT Plant Tout Mix Temp I Vnew= 235080 309600 ft3 /hr Convergence LAKET LAKET

(°F) (CF) (°F) (°F) Plant DT LAKET DT DT DT il DT i2 7/1/1900 12:00 AM 89.81 107.31 103.19 129.14 107.31 25.95 4.12 0.00 4.12 4.12 7/1/1900 01:00 AM 90.70 111.82 103.54 135.74 111.83i 32.2 8.28 0.00 8.88 8.28 7/1/1900 02:00 AM 91.65 116.17 103.99 139.15 116.161 35.16 12.18 0.00 13.07 12.18 7/1/1900 03:00 AM 92.53 119.97 104.35 140.15 119.971 35.8 15.62 0.00 16.59 15.62 7/1/1900 04:00 AM 93.29 121.55 104.57 129.93 121.55 25.36 16.98 0.00 17.64 16.98 7/1/1900 05:00 AM 93.90 122.43 104.67 127.10 122.43 22.43 17.76 0.00 17.99 17.76 7/1/1900 06:00 AM 94.30 122.97 104.56 125.82 122.97 21.26 18.41 0.00 18.16 18.41 7/1/1900 07:00 AM 94.49 123.23 104.25 124.57 123.22 20.32 18.98 0.00 18.27 18.98 7/1/1900 08:00 AM 94.46 123.21 103.74 123.13 123.21 19.39 19.47 0.00 18.32 19.47 7/1/1900 09:00 AM 94.28 122.97 103.13 121.70 122.97 18.57 19.84 0.00 18.41 19.84 7/1/1900 10:00 AM 94.10 122.58 102.54 120.50 122.58 17.96 20.04 0.00 18.57 20.04 7/1/1900 11:00 AM 93.80 122.05 101.78 119.23 122.05 17.45 20.27 0.00 18.78 20.27 7/1/1900 12:00 PM 93.52 121.41 101.06 118.04 121.41 16.98 20.35 0.00 18.97 20.35 7/1/1900 01:00 PM 93.19 120.70 100.29 116.93 1 120.70! 16.64 20.41 0.00 19.07 20.41 7/1/1900 02:00 PM 92.89 119.94 99.57 115.92 119.94[ 16.35 20.37 0.00 19.24 20.37 7/1/1900 03:00 PM 92.59 119.16 98.86 115.03 119.16 16.17 20.30 0.00 19.33 20.30 7/1/1900 04:00 PM 92.29 119.43 98.17 120.46 119.43 22.29 21.26 0.00 20.53 21.26 7/1/1900 05:00 PM 91.98 118.87 97.49 116.76 118.871 19.27 21.38 0.00 20.81 21.38 7/1/1900 06:00 PM 91.72 117.86 96.88 114.01 117.86 17.13 20.98 0.00 20.58 20.98 7/1/1900 07:00 PM 91.46 116.60 96.27 111.87 116.611 15.6 20.33 0.00 20.06 20.33 7/1/1900 08:00 PM 91.37 115.29 95.86 110.32 115.291 14.46 19.43 0.00 19.41 19.43 7/1/1900 09:00 PM 91.54 114.08 95.72 109.51 114.081 13.79 18.36 0.00 18.70 18.36 7/1/1900 10:00 PM 91.90 113.07 95.80 109.22 j 113.07 13.42 17.27 0.00 18.06 17.27 7/1/1900 11:00 PM 92.56 112.31 96.21 109.43 1 1 112.31 13.22 16.10 0.00 17.35 16.10 7/2/1900 12:00AM 93.34 111.79 96.75 109.80 1 111.78 13.05 15.04 0.00 16.54 15.04 7/2/1900 01:00 AM 94.19 111.45 97.36 110.16 1 111.441 12.8 14.09 0.00 15.68 14.09 7/2/1900 02:00 AM 95.08 111.29 98.20 110.72 111.29 12.52 13.09 0.00 14.53 13.09 7/2/1900 03:00 AM 95.95 111.29 99.03 111.30 111.29 12.27 12.26 0.00 13.47 12.26 7/2/1900 04:00 AM 96.71 111.42 99.76 111.86 111.41 12.1 11.66 0.00 12.53 11.66 7/2/1900 05:00 AM 97.32 111.60 100.32 112.30 111.60 11.98 11.28 0.00 11.75 11.28 7/2/1900 06:00 AM 97.73 111.45 100.81 112.69 111.83 11.88 11.02 0.00 10.48 11.02 7/2/1900 07:00 AM 97.97 111.22 101.99 113.78 112.24 11.79 10.24 0.13 9.61 10.11 7/2/1900 08:00 AM 97.98 112.05 102.79 114.50 112.71 11.71 9.92 0.15 8.88 9.77 7/2/1900 09:00 AM 97.83 112.52 103.82 115.47 113.29 11.65 9.46 0.07 8.27 9.40 7/2/1900 10:00 AM 97.64 113.44 103.63 115.21 113.69 11.58 10.05 0.03 8.91 10.08 7/2/1900 11:00 AM 97.40 113.88 103.35 114.86 113.93 11.51 10.58 0.12 9.60 10.70 7/2/1900 12:00 PM 97.03 113.94 103.26 114.71 114.10 11.45 10.83 0.28 10.04 11.11 7/2/1900 01:00 PM 96.40 114.08 102.43 113.82 114.04 11.39 11.61 0.27 10.58 11.88 7/2/1900 02:00 PM 95.83 113.90 101.60 112.93 113.81 11.33 12.21 0.22 11.04 12.43 7/2/1900 03:00 PM 95.32 113.36 101.23 112.50 113.53 11.27 12.31 0.17 11.29 12.47 7/2/1900 04:00 PM 94.88 113.09 100.59 111.80 113.17 11.21 12.58 0.13 11.98 12.71 7/2/1900 05:00 PM 94.49 112.69 99.97 111.13 112.74 11.16 12.77 0.06 12.43 12.83 7/2/1900 06:00 PM 93.99 111.78 99.77 110.87 112.35 11.1 12.59 0.03 12.22 12.55 712/1900 07:00 PM 93.56 111.56 99.18 110.22 111.91 11.04 12.72 0.06 12.44 12.66 7/2/1900 08:00 PM 93.35 111.22 98.66 109.65 111.441 10.99 12.77 0.08 12.67 12.69 7/2/1900 09:00 PM 93.37 110.82 98.32 109.26 110.98 10.94 12.66 0.09 12.99 12.57 7/2/1900 10:00 PM 93.57 110.43 98.10 108.99 110.56 10.89 12.47 0.13 13.18 12.34 7/2/1900 11:00 PM 93.97 110.09 98.03 108.87 1 1 110.211 10.84 12.18 0.18 13.17 12.00 1 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 037 of 042 Appendix 08.2 - UHS Mixing Results and Equations 20% - 12PM Mixing Results (partial) 20% Mixing - 12AM T Nat TIN -TOUT Plant Tout Mix Temp I Vnew= 235080 309600 ft3/hr LAKET LAKET LAKET

(°F) (*F) (*F) (*F) Plant DT LAKET DT Convergence DT DT ii DT i2 DT 13 7/1/1900 12:00AM 90.05 106.81 104.75 130.70 106.81 25.95 2.06 0.00 2.06 2.06 2.06 7/1/1900 01:00 AM 90.84 109.98 104.96 137.16 109.98 32.2 5.02 0.00 5.54 5.02 5.02 7/1/1900 02:00AM 91.48 113.15 105.05 140.21 113.14 35.16 8.10 0.00 8.65 8.10 8.10 7/1/1900 03:00AM 91.91 116.02 104.92 140.72 116.03 35.8 11.10 0.00 11.39 11.10 11.10 7/1/1900 04:00 AM 92.14 117.48 104.59 129.95 117.48 25.36 12.89 0.00 12.49 12.89 12.89 7/1/1900 05:00AM 92.14 118.42 104.07 126.50 118.42 22.43 14.35 0.00 13.09 14.35 14.35 7/1/1900 06:00 AM 91.99 119.08 103.45 124.71 119.08, 21.26 15.63 0.00 13.57 I 15.63 15.63 7/1/1900 07:00 AM 91.84 119.51 102.85 123.17 119.51 20.32 16.66 0.00 14.03 16.66 16.66 7/1/1900 08:00 AM 91.58 119.72 102.08 121.47 119.71 19.39 17.64 0.00 14.45 L 17.64 17.64 7/1/1900 09:00 AM 91.33 119.73 101.34 119.91 119.73 18.57 18.39 0.00 14.94 18.39 18.39 7/1/1900 10:00AM 91.04 119.60 100.56 118.52 119.61 17.96 19.04 0.00 15.50 1 19.04 19.04 7/1/1900 11:00AM 90.77 119.37 99.84 117.29 119.36 17.45 19.53 0.00 16.11 19.53 19.53 7/1/1900 12:00 PM 90.50 119.02 99.12 116.10 119.02 16.98 19.90 0.00 16.71 19.90 19.90 7/1/1900 01:00 PM 90.23 118.61 98.42 115.06 118.611 16.64 20.19 0.00 17.21 i 20.19 20.19 7/1/1900 02:00 PM 89.95 118.13 97.73 114.08 118.14 16.35 20.40 0.00 17.76 20.40 20.40 7/1/1900 03:00 PM 89.71 117.63 97.11 113.28 117.63 16.17 20.52 0.00 18.21 20.52 20.52 7/1/1900 04:00 PM 89.47 117.75 96.50 118.79 117.75 22.29 21.25 0.00 19.29 21.25 21.25 7/1/1900 05:00 PM 89.41 117.50 96.08 115.35 117.50 19.27 21.42 0.00 19.90 21.42 21.42 7/1/1900 06:00 PM 89.60 117.041 95.94 113.07 117.041 17.13 21.10 0.00 20.22 I 21.10 21.10 7/1/1900 07:00 PM 89.99 116.47 96.01 111.61 116.47 15.6 20.46 0.00 20.33 20.46 20.46 7/1/1900 08:00 PM 90.67 115.88 96.41 110.87 115.88 14.46 19.47 0.00 20.30 19.47 19.47 7/1/1900 09:00 PM 91.46 115.35 96.94 110.73 115.35 13.79 18.41 0.00 20.15 18.41 18.41 7/1/1900 10:00 PM 92.34 114.88 97.54 110.96 114.89 13.42 17.34 0.00 19.97 17.35 17.34 7/1/1900 11:00 PM 93.25 114.52 98.17 111.39 114.52 13.22 16.35 0.00 19.61 16.35 16.35 7/2/1900 12:00AM 94.14 114.24 98.77 111.82 114.24 13.05 15.47 0.00 19.03 15.47 15.47 7/2/1900 01:00 AM 94.92 114.01 F-99.24 112.04 114.01 12.8 14.77 0.00 18.29 14.77 14.77 7/2/1900 02:00AM 95.55 113.80 99.54 112.06 113.81 12.52 14.26 0.00 17.12 14.27 14.26 7/2/1900 03:00 AM 95.98 112.97 100.40 112.67 113.69 12.27 13.29 0.00 15.46 13.29 13.29 7/2/1900 04:00 AM 96.24 112.91 101.39 113.49 113.67 12.1 12.28 0.00 13.64 12.12 12.28 7/2/1900 05:00 AM 96.27 113.221102.14 114.12 113.71 11.98 11.57 0.00 11.95 11.43 11.57 7/2/1900 06:00 AM 96.13 112.95 103.45 115.33 113.88 11.88 10.43 0.00 10.15 10.58 10.43 7/2/1900 07:00 AM 95.96 113.57 103.52 115.31 114.03 11.79 10.51 0.00 9.70 10.87 10.51 7/2/1900 08:00AM 95.73 113.88 103.44 115.15 114.15 11.71 10.71 0.00 9.47 11.25 10.71 7/2/1900 09:00 AM 95.40 113.62 103.68 115.33 114.27 11.65 10.60 0.00 9.13 11.41 10.60 7/2/1900 10:00AM 94.81 113.961102.97 114.55 114.30 11.58 11.33 0.00 9.23 12.11 11.33 7/2/1900 11:00AM 94.27 114.03 102.31 113.82 114.25 11.51 11.94 0.00 9.50 12.65 11.94 7/2/1900 12:00PM 93.80 113.711102.10 113.55 114.18 11.45 12.08 0.00 9.44 i 12.64 12.08 7/2/1900 01:00 PM 93.39 113.77 101.50 112.89 114.04 11.39 12.54 0.00 9.83 12.99 12.54 7/2/1900 02:00 PM 93.02 113.69 100.94 112.27 113.86 11.33 12.91 0.00 10.20 13.21 12.91 7/2/1900 03:00PM 92.55 113.12 100.72 111.99 113.66 11.27 12.94 0.00 10.13 13.03 12.94 7/2/1900 04:00 PM 92.15 113.09 100.14 111.35 113.42 11.21 13.28 0.00 10.89 I 13.23 13.28 7/2/1900 05:00 PM 91.96 112.97 99.62 110.78 113.14 11.16 13.53 0.00 11.61 I 13.31 13.53 7/2/1900 06:00 PM 92.00 112.76 99.26 110.36 112.85 11.1 13.60 0.00 12.21 I 13.19 13.60 7/2/1900 07:00 PM 92.23 112.61 98.93 109.97 112.55 11.04 13.63 0.00 12.71 I 13.00 13.63 7/2/1900 08:00 PM 92.66 112.34 98.82 109.81 112.26 10.99 13.45 0.00 13.14 12.63 13.45 7/2/1900 09:00 PM 93.27 112.10 98.91 109.85 112.01 10.94 13.10 0.00 13.64 12.11 13.10 7/2/1900 10:00 PM 93.94 111.87 99.08 109.97 111.80 10.89 12.72 0.00 14.02 11.65 12.72 7/2/1900 11:00 PM 94.66 111.68 99.36 110.20 111.63 10.84 12.27 0.00 14.22 11.22 12.27 I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 038 of 042 Appendix 08.2 - UHS Mixing Results and Equations 150 r Plant Outlet Temperature

- -- Mixing Zone Temperature

- - - Plant Inlet Temperature 140 130

  • L- 120 I-110 100 -* S S -

S *

. 0 - S 90 80 0 2 3 4 5 Days Following Accident Fig. 08.2-1: Five Day Temperature Profile for the 10% Mixing Case I PROJECT NO. 11333-297 1

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 039 of 042 Appendix 08.2 - UHS Mixing Results and Equations 150 140 130

  • 120 110 I-100 90 80 0 1 2 3 4 5 Days Following Accident Fig. 08.2-2: Five Day Temperature Profile for the 20% Mixing Case PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 040 of 0427 Appendix 08.2 - UHS Mixing Results and Equations 108 106 104 102 100 E.

0.

S 98 I-96 94 92 90 0 1 2 3 5 Days Following Accident Fig. 08.2-3: Plant Inlet Temperature for 6AM Cases PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 041 of 042 Appendix 08.2 - UHS Mixing Results and Equations 150 140 130

,'_120 CL E

S110 100 90 80 0 2 3 4 5 Days Following Accident Fig. 08.2-4: Case Mixing - 10% - 9AM Results I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT 0, PAGE NO. 042 of 042 Appendix 08.2 - UHS Mixing Results and Equations 150 140 130

  • " 120 0.

CL E

  • 110 I,-

100 90 80 0 2 3 4 5 Days Following Accident Fig. 08.2-5: Case Mixing - 20% - 12PM Results I PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P1 of P58 Attachment P - Plant Temperature Rise for Rev. 8 Prepared: Li. Date J2q/*2*,I Daniel W. Nevill - Sargent &LundyLLc Reviewed: Date 11/43 Stephen. J. Paarlberg.- Sargelf& LundyLLc PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P2 of P58 ATTACHMENT P - TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No.

P 1.0 P urp o se ....................................................................................................................... P3 P2.0 M ethodology ............................................................................................................ P4 P3.0 Assumptions ............................................................................................................ P5 P4.0 Design Inputs ............................................................................................................. P6 P 5 .0 R e feren ce s .................................................................................................................... P7 P6.0 Calculations ............................................................................................................ P8 P7.0 Summary and Conclusions ....................................................................................... P9 P8.0 Limitations and Open Items .................................................................................. PlO P9.0 Appendices ............................................................................................................ P11 (Total Pages - Attachment P (11) plus Appendices (47) for a Total of 58 pages)

LIST OF APPENDICES No. I Title Page P9.1 Integrated UHS Heat Load P12 P9.2 _ Plant Temperature Rise Results __P39 P9.3 Excel Equations P57 (Total Appendix Pages - 47)

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P3 of P58 P1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this attachment is to determine the Core Standby Cooling System (CSCS) temperature rise across the plant based on the new heat load to the Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) determined in Revision 4 of L-002453 [Ref. P5.1]. This temperature rise is to be used in the LAKET-PC [Ref. P5.3] model of the LaSalle County Station UHS.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P4 of P58 P2.0 METHODOLOGY The plant temperature rise is used in LAKET-PC [Ref. P5.3] to compute the rise in water temperature caused by the heat rejected to the UHS during the postulated accident.

The total heat load rejected to the UHS is determined in Attachment D of L-002453 [Ref.

P5,1]. The heat rejection rate is determined for an operating scenario that would maximize the heat load to the UHS. This scenario considers a Design Basis Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) on one unit and a reactor SCRAM on the non-LOCA unit coincident with a UHS design event (loss of the cooling lake) occurring 100 days after refueling of the non-LOCA unit. Both Residual Heat Removal (RHR) heat exchangers are in service to remove reactor heat on the LOCA unit. For the non-LOCA unit, one RHR heat exchanger is placed into suppression pool cooling mode (and later shutdown cooling mode), while the other RHR heat exchanger is placed into fuel pool cooling assist mode 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> after the initiation of the event.

Once the total heat load rejected to the UHS is known, the temperature rise through the plant is determined by the following heat transfer equation:

AT- Q (Eq. P3-1) where:

AT = plant temperature rise ['F]

Q = heat rejection rate to the UHS [BTU/hr]

cP = specific heat capacity of water [BTU/(lbm-°F)]

In = mass flow rate [lbm/hr]

The mass flow rate is determined by converting the Core Standby Cooling System (CSCS) volumetric flow rates of 65.3 ft3/s and 86.0 ft3/s (Design Input P4.2) to a mass flow rate at a density of 62.0 lbm/ft3 (Assumption P3.1).

P2.1 Computer Programs and Software The analysis performed herein utilizes Microsoft Excel 2003 [Ref. P5.4], which is commercially available. The validation of Excel is implicit in the detailed review of all spreadsheets used in this analysis. All computer nins were performed using PC No.

ZD6661 under the Windows XP operating system. Excel Add-in function STMFUNC is used to calculate the thermal properties of water and steam at varying operating conditions

[Ref. P5.5]. The Excel Add-in finction STMFUJNC has been validated and approved for use in accordance with the S&L Quality Assurance (QA) program.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P5 of P58 P3.0 ASSUMPTIONS P3.1 Water Properties - The properties of water are evaluated at a temperature of 1007F and atmospheric pressure. The density and specific heat capacity of water at 100°F and I atm are 62.0 lb "/ft3 and 0.998 BTU/lbm-°F, respectively [Ref. P5.5].

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P6 of P58 P4.0 DESIGN INPUTS P4.1 Total Heat Load - The total heat load rejected to the UHS following a LOCA for one unit and a reactor SCRAM for the non-LOCA unit is determined in Attachment D of L-002453

[Ref. P5.1 ].

P4.2 CSCS Volumetric Flow - The total plant flow during the UHS analysis is 29,300 GPM (65.3 ft3/s) for the first 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> of the event [Ref. P5.2, Attachment C]. The total plant flow is 38,600 gpm (86.0 ft3/s) after 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> [Ref. P5.2, Attachment C]. The total flow after 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> is based upon the cumulative flow contribution from thirteen CSCS pumps operating at design flow conditions (eight Residual Heat Removal (RHR)-Service Water pumps, 4,000 gpm each; three Diesel Generator (DG) pumps, two at 1,300 gpm and one at 2,000 gpm; and two High Pressure Core Spray DG pumps, 1000 gpm each) (See Attachment D). Prior to 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br />, two RHR Service Water pumps and one of the 1,300 gpm DG pumps are not in operation [Ref. P5.2, Attachment C].

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P7 of P58 P

5.0 REFERENCES

P5.1 L-002453, "UHS Heat Load," Rev. 4.

P5.2 SEAG 13-000074, "LaSalle County Station Transmittal of Design Information (TODI) for UHS Analyses," Rev. 0.

P5.3 LAKET-PC Computer Program, Version 2.2, S&L Program No. 03.7.292-2.2, 7/31/2013.

P5.4 Microsoft Excel 2003, Sargent & Lundy LLC Program No. 03.2.286-1.0, dated 02/02/2004.

P5.5 STMFUNC (Steam Table Function Dynamic Link Library) S&L Program Number 03.7.598-2.0, dated 5/15/2003.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P8 of P58 P6.0 CALCULATIONS P6.1 Total and Integrated Generated Heat Load Rejected to the UHS The total heat load rejected to the UHS following a LOCA for one unit and a reactor SCRAM for the non-LOCA unit is determined in Attachment D of L-002453 [Ref. P5.1].

These values are integrated in order to determine the heat load rejected to the UHS over the entire event. The integration uses the average total heat load between the current time step and the preceding time step.

Exceptions to this method occur at two separate time steps. One exception to this method is for the integrated heat load at 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br />, which is when fuel pool cooling begins. The heat load rejected to the UHS increases at hour 16 due to inclusion of the fuel pool heat load. Therefore, at the 16 hour1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> time step only the UHS heat load from the preceding time step (15.21 hours2.430556e-4 days <br />0.00583 hours <br />3.472222e-5 weeks <br />7.9905e-6 months <br />) is utilized for integration.

The other exception occurs at the 4.13 hour1.50463e-4 days <br />0.00361 hours <br />2.149471e-5 weeks <br />4.9465e-6 months <br /> time step. Sensible heat is rejected to the UHS until 3.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> (12,600 seconds) after the design basis event [Ref. P5.1]. To account for the sensible heat load rejected to the UHS between the 3.33 hour3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> and 4.13 hour1.50463e-4 days <br />0.00361 hours <br />2.149471e-5 weeks <br />4.9465e-6 months <br /> time step, the heat load at 3.33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> is conservatively used for the UHS heat load integration.

These results are presented in Appendix P9.1 for MUR PU and are used to determine the temperature rise through the plant. The equations used in Excel for this calculation are included in Appendix P9.3.

P6.2 Plant Temperature Rise In order to facilitate the creation of a LAKET-PC [Ref. P5.3] input file, the plant temperature rise results are determined in one hour increments. This requires linear interpolation of the integrated total generated heat load found in L-002453 [Ref. P5.1] to determine the integrated total generated heat load at hourly intervals. The plant temperature rise is calculated in Excel using Eq. P3-1. The results of this calculation are shown in Appendix P9.2, and equations used in Excel are included in Appendix P9.3.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P9 of P58 P7.0

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS The CSCS temperature rise across the plant following a postulated accident is determined in hourly intervals in order to be used as input to LAKET-PC [Ref. P5.3]. These results are given in Appendix P9.2.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P10 of P58 P8.0 LIMITATIONS AND OPEN ITEMS P8.1 Limitations None.

P8.2 Open Items None.

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P1 1 of P58 P9.0 APPENDICES LIST OF APPENDICES App. Title No. of Pages P9.1 Integrated UHS Heat Load 27 P9.2 Plant Temperature Rise Results 18 P9.3 Excel Equations 2 (Total Appendix Pages - 47)

PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P12 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Total UHS UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) Heat Load Load

[Ref. P5.1] (Btulhr) (Btu)

O.OOOE+00 0.00 _ 1.97E+04 7.10E+07 0.00E+00 6.000E+01 0.02 6.32E+04 2.28E+08 2.49E+06 1.200E+02 0.03 7.64E+04 2.75E+08 6.68E+06 1.800E+02 0.05 7.75E+04 2.79E+08 1.13E+07 2.400E+02 0.07 7.85E+04 2.83E+08 1.60E+07 3.OOOE+02 0.08 7.95E+04 2.86E+08 2.07E+07 3.600E+02 0.10 8.05E+04 2.90E+08 2.55E+07

  • 4.200E+02 0.12 8.15E+04 2.93E+08 .L3.04E+07 4.800E+02 0.13 8.24E+04 2.97E+08 3.53E+07 5.400E+02 0.15 9.54E+04 3.44E+08 4.06E+07 6.OOOE+02 ... 0.17 9.63E+04 4 E+08 4.64E+07 3.451E+03 0.96 1.23E+05 j 4.42E+08 3.59E+08 7

6.301E+03 1.75 1.31E+05 4.73E+08 .21E+08 9.152E+03 2.54 1.47E+05 5.29E+08 1.12E+09 1.200E+04 3.33 1.44E+05 5.19E+08 1.53E+09 1.485E+04 4.13 9.98E+04J 3.59E+08 1.94E+09 1.770E+04 4.92 9.42E+04 3.39E+08 2.22E+09 2.055E+04 5.71 8.95E+04 3.22E+08 2.48E+09 2.340E+04! 6.50 8.57E+04 3.09E+08 12.73E+09 2.626E+04 7.29 8.26E+04 2.97E+08 2.97E+09 2.911E+04I 8.09 7.99E+04 2.88E+08 3.20E+09 3.196E+04 8.88 7.69E+04 2.77E+08 3.43E+09 3.481E+04 9.67 7.46E+04 2.68E+08{3.64E+09 3.766E+04 10.46 7.26E+04 2.61E+08 3.85E+09 4.051E+04 11.25 7.08E+04 2.55E+08 4.06E+09 4.336E+04 12.04 6.94E+04 2.50E+08 4.26E+09 4.6211+_04 12.84 6.81 E+04 2.45E+08 4.45E+09 4.906E+04 13.63 6.71E+04 2.41E+08 4.64E+09 5.191E+04 14.42 6.61E+04 2.38E+08__ 4.83E+09 5.476E+04 15.21 6.53E+04 2.35E+08 5.02E+09 5.761E+04 16.00 - 1.30E+05 4.69E+08o 5.21E+09 6.046E+04 16.79 1.13E+05 4.08E+08 5.56E+09 6.331E+04 17.59 1.01E+05 3.63E+08 5.86E+09 6.616E+04 18.38 9.16E+04 3.30E+08 6.13E+09 6.901E+04 19.17 8.47E+04 3.05E+08 6.39E+09 7.186E+04 19.96 7.97E+04 2.87E+08 6.62E+09 7.472E+04 20.76 7.59E+04 2.73E+08 6.84E+09 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P13 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load "tTotalUHS T UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load H Load UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) Heat Load

[ [Ref.(Btulhr)

P5ef._. _ (Btu) 7.757E+04 21.55 7.30E+04 2.63E+08 7.05E+09 8.042E+04 22.34 7.13E+04 - 2.57E+08 7.26E+09 8.327E+04 23.13 7.06E+04 2.54E+08 7.46E+09 8.612E+04 23.92 7.OOE+04 2.52E+08 . 7.66E+09 8.897E+04 24.71 6.94E+04 2.50E+08 7.86E+09 9.182E+04 25.51 6.81E+04 2.45E+08 8.06E+09 9.467E+041 26.30 6.68E+04 2.40E+08 8.25E+09 9.752E+04 27.09 6.57E+04 2.37E+08 8.44E+09 1.004E+05 27.89 6.49E+04 2.34E+08 8.63E+09 7

1.032E+05 28.671 6.43E+04 231E+08 8.81 E+09 1.061E+05 29.47 j 6.37E+04 2.29E+08 8.99E+09 1.089E+05 30.25__ 6.33E+04 2.28E+08 9.17E+09 1.118E+05 31.06 6.29E+04 2.27E+08 9.35E+09 1.146E+05 31.83 6.26E+04 2.25E+08 9.53E+09 1.175E+05 32.64 6.23E+04 2.24E+08 9.71E+09 1.203E+05 33.42 _ 6.20E+04 2.23E+08 9.88E+09 1.232E+05 34.22 6.17E+04 2.22E+08 1.01E+10 1.260E+05 35.00 6.14E+04 2.21E+08 1.02E+10 1.289E+05 35.81 6.12E+04 2.20E+08 1.04E+10 1.317E+05 36.58 1 6.09E+04 2.19E+081 1.06E+10 1*.346E+05J 37.39 6.07E+04 I 2.18E+08[ 1.08E+10 1.374E+05 38.17 - 6.04E+04 2.17E+08 1.09E+10 1.40311+05 38.97 02E+04 2.17E+08 1.11E+10 1.431E+05 39.75 5.99E+04 2.16E+08 1.13E+10 1.460E+05 40.56 5.97E+04 2.15E+08 1.14E+10 1.488E+05 41.33 5.94E+04 2.14E+08 1.16E+10 1.517E+05 42.14 5.92E+04 2.13E+08t 1.18E+10 1.545E+05 42.92 5.89E+041 2.12E+08 1.20E+10 1.574E+05 43.72 5.87E+04 2.11 E+08 1.21E+10 1.602E+05 44.50 5.85E+04 2.11E+08 I 1.23E+10 1.631E+05 45.31 5.83E+04 2.1 OE+08 1.25E+10 1.659E+05] 46.08 5.80E+04 2.09E+08 1.26E+10 1.688E+05 46.89 5.78E+04 2.08E+08 1.28E+10 1.716E+05 47.67 5.76E+04 2.07E+08 1.29E+10 1.745E+05 48.47 5.74E+04 2.07E+08 1.31E+10 1.773E+05 49.25 5.73E+04 2.06E+08 1.33E+10 1.802E+05 50.06 5.71E+04 2.06E+08 1.34E+10 1.830E+05 50.83 5.69E+04 2.05E+08 1.36E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P14 of P58 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT F, PAGE P14 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load

-Total UHS UH Integrated Time Time Heat Load Total UHS UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) Heat Load Load

[Ref. P5.1] (Btu/hr) (Btu) 1.859E+05 51.64 5.68E+04  ! 2.04E+08 1.38E+10 1.887E+05 52.42 5.66E+04 2.04E+08 I1.39E+10 1.916E+05 53.22 5.65E+04 2.03E+08 I 1.41E+10 1.944E+05 54.00 5.63E+04 2.03E+08 1.42E+10 1.973E+05 - 54.81 5.62E+04 [2.02E+08 1.44E+10 2.001E+05 55.58 5.60E+04 1 2.02E+08 I._1.46E+10 2.030E+05 56.39 5.58E+04 I 2.01E+08 1 1.47E+10 2.058E+05 L 57.17 5.57E+04 2.OOE+08 1.49E+10 2.087E+05 57.97 5.56E+04_- 2.00E+08 1.50E+10 2.115E+05 58.75 5.54E+04 1.99E+08 1.52E+10 2.144E+05 59.56 5.53E+04 1.99E+08 1.54E+10 2.172E+05 60.33 5.51E+04 1.98E+08- 1.55E+10 2.201E+05 61.14 5.50E+04 1.98E+08 1.57E+10 2.229E+05 61.92 5.48E+04 1.97E+08 1.58E+10 2.258E+05 62.72 5.47E+04 1.97E+08 1.60E+10 2.286E+05 1 63.50 5.46E+04 1.96E+08 1.61E+10 2.315E+05 64.31 5.44E+04 1.96E+08 1.63E+10 2.343E+05 65.08 5.43E+04 1.95E+08 1.65E+10 2.372E+05 65.89 5.41E+04 1.95E+08 1.66E+10 2.401E+05 66.69 5.40E+04 1.94E+08 1.68E+10 2.429E+05 67.47 5.39E+04 1.94E+08 1.69E+10 2.458E+05 68.28 5.37E+04 1.93E+08 1.71E+10 2.486E+05 69.06 5.36E+04 1.93E+08 1.72E+10 2.515E+05 69.86 5.34E+04_ 1.92E+08 1.74E+10 2.543E+05 70.64 5.33E+04 1.92E+08 1.75E+10 2.572E+05 71.44 5.32E+04 1.91E+08 1.77E+10 2.600E+05 72.22 5.30E+04 1.91E+08 1.78E+10 2.629E+05 73.03 5.59E+04 2.01E+08 1.80E+10 2.657E+05 73.81 5.53E+04 1.99E+08 1.81 E+10 2.686E+05 74.61 5.44E+04 1.96E+08 1.83E+10 2.714E+05 75.39 5.37E+04 1.93E+08 1.85E+10 2.743E+05 76.19 5.33E+04 1.92E+08 1.86E+10 2.771E+05 76.97 5.29E+04 1.91E+08 1.88E+10 2.800E+05 77.78 5.27E+04 1.90E+08 1.89E+10 2.828E+05 78.56 5.25E+04 1.89E+08 1.91E+10 2.857E+05 79.36 5.23E+04 1.88E+08 1.92E+10 2.885E+05 80.14 5.21E+04 1.88E+08 1.94E+10 2.914E+05 80.94 5.20E+04 I 1.87E+08 1.95E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P15 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Heat Load UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) Load

[Ref. P5.1] (Btu/hr) (Btu) 2.942E+05 81.72 5.19E+04 1.87E+08 1.97E+10 2.971E+05 82.53 5.18E+04 1.86E+08 1.98E+10 2.999E+05 83.311 5.16E+04 1.86E+08 1.99E+10 3.028E+05 84.11 5.15E+04 1.86E+08 2.01E+10 3.056E+05 1_84.89 5.14E+04 1i.85E+08 2.02E+10 3.085E+05 85.69 5.13E+04 1.85E+08 2.04E+10 3.113E+05 86.47 5.12E+04 1.84E+08 2.05E+10 3.142E+05 87.28 5.11E+04 1.84E+08 2.07E+10 3.170E+05 88.06 5.1OE+04 1.84E+08 2.08E+10 3.199E+05 88.86 5.09E+04 1.83E+08 2.10E+10 3.227E+05 89.64 5.08E+04 1.83E+08 2.11E+10 3.256E+05 90.44 5.07E+04 1.83E+08 2.13E+10 3.284E+05 91.22 5.06E+04 1.82E+08 2.14E+10 3.313E+05 92.03 5.05E+04 1.82E+0812.16E+10 3.341E+05 92.81 5.04E+04 1.81E+08 2.17E+10 3.370E+05 93.61 5.03E+04 1.81E+08 2.18E+10 3.398E+05 94.39 5.02E+04 1.81E+08 j_2.20E+10 3.427E+05 95.19 5.01E+04 1.80E+08 2.21E+10 3.455E+05 95.97 5.OOE+04 1.80E+08 2.23E+10 3.484E+05 96.78 4.99E+04 1.80E+08 2.24E+10 3.512E+05 97.56 4.99E+04 1.79E+08 2.26E+10 3.541E+05 I 98.36 4.98E+04 1.79E+08 i 2.27E+10 3.569E+05 99.14 4.971E+04 1.79E+08 2.28E+10 3.598E+05 99.94 4.96E+04 1.79E+08 2.30E+10 3.626E+05 100.72 4.95E+041 1.78E+08 2.31E+10 3.655E+05 101.53 _1 4.95E+04 1.78E+08 2.33E+10 3.683E+05 102.31 4.94E+04 1.78E+08 2.34E+10 3.712E+05 103.11 4.93E+04 1.78E+08 2.35E+10 3.740E+05 103.89 4.92E+04 1.77E+08 2.37E+10 3.769E+05 104.69 4.92E+04 1.77E+08 2.38E+10 3.797E+05 105.47 4.91E+04 1.77E+08 2.40E+10 3.826E+05 106.28 4 90E+04 1.76E+08 2.41E+10 3.854E+05 107.06 I 4.89E+04 1.76E+08 2.42E+10 3.883E+05 107.86 4.89E+04 1.76E+08 2.44E+10 3.911E+05 108.64 4.88E+04 1.76E+08 2.45E+10 3.940E+05 109.44 4.87E+04 1.75E+08 2.47E+10 3.968E+05 110.22 4.86E+04 i 1.75E+08 2.48E+10 3.997E+05 111.03 4.85E+04 1.75E+08 2.49E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P16 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Tot UHSa TUHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Total UHS UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btuls) eat Load Load

... .. , .[Ref. P5.1] ( _ h (Btu) 4.025E+05 111.81 4.85E+04 1.75E+08 2.51E+10 4.054E+05 112.61 4.84E+04 1.74E+08 2.52E+10 4.082E+05 113.39 - 4.83E+04 1.74E+08 253E+10 4.111E+05_ 114.19 4.83E+04 174E+08 2.55E+10 4.139E+05 114.97 4.82E+04 1.74E+08 2.56E+10 4.168E+05 115.78 4.81E+04 1.73E+08 2.58E+10 4.196E+05 j 116.56 4.80E+04 1.73E+08 2.59E+10 4.225E+05 117.36 4.80E+04 1.73E+08 2.60E+10 4.253E+051 118.14j4.79E+04 _1__1.72E+08I2.62E+10 4.282E+05 118.94 4.78E+04 1.72E+08 2.63E+10 4.310E+05 119.72 - 4.78E+04 1.72E+08 2.64E+10 4.339E+05 120.53 4.77E+04 1.72E+08 2.66E+10 4.367E+05 121.31 5.44E+04 1.96E+08 2.67E+10 4.396E+05 122.11 5.28E+04 1.90E+08 2.69E+10 4.424E+05 122.89 j5.11E+04 1.84E+08 2.70E+10 4.453E+05 123.69 4.99E+04 1.80E+08 2.72E+10 4.481E+05 124.47 4.91E+04 1.77E+08 2.73E+10 4.510E+05 125.28 4.85E+04 1.75E+08 2. 75E+10 4.538E+05 126.06 4.81E+04 1.73E+08 2.76E+10 4.567E+05 126.86 L4.78E+04 1.72E+08 2.77E+10 4.595E+05 127.64 4.76E+04 1.71E+08 22.79E+10 4.624E+05 128.44 4.74E+04 1.71E+08 2.80E+10 4.652E+05 129.22 4.73E+04 1.70E+08 2.81E+10 4.681E+05 130.03 4.72E+04 1.70E+08 2.83E+10 4.709E+05 130.81 4.71E+04 1.70E+08 2.84E+10 4.738E+05 131.61 4.70E+04 1.69E+08 2.85E+10 4.767E+05 132.42 4.69E+04 1.69E+08 2.87E+10 4.795E+05 133.19 4.69E+04 1.69E+08 2.88E+10 4.824E+05 134.00 4.68E+04 1.69E+08 2.89E+10 4.852E+05 134.78 4.68E+04 1.68E+08 2.91E+10 4.881E+05 135.58 4.67E+04 1.68E+08 2.92E+10 4.909E+05 136.58 4.66E+04 1.68E+08 2.93E+10 4.938E+05 137.17 4.66E+04 1.68E+08 2.95E+10 4.966E+05 137.94 4.65E+04 1.67E+08 I 2.96E+10 4.995E+05 138.75 4.65E+04 1.67E+08 2.97E+10 5.023E+05 139.53 4.64E+04 1.67E+08 2.99E+10 5.052E+05 140.33 4.64E+04 1.67E+08 3.OOE+10 5.080E+05 141.11 4.63E+04 1.67E+08 3.01E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P17 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS T Integrated Time Time Heat Load Total.UHS UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) Heat Load Load

  • (Btulhr)

[Ref. P5.1] (Btu) 5.109E+05 141.92 4.63E+04 1.67E+08 3.03E+10 5.137E1+05 142.69 4.62E+04 1.66E+08 3.04E+10 5.166E+05 143.50 4.62E+04 1.66E+08 3.05E+10 5.194E+05 144.28 4.61E+04 1.66E+08 3.07E+10 5.223E+05 145.08 5.91E+04 2.13E+08 3.08E+10 5.251E+05 145.86 5.77E+04 2.08E+08 3.10E+10 5.280E+05 146.67 5.38E+04 1.94E+08 3.11E+10 5.308E+05 147.44 5.13E+04 1.85E+08! 3.13E+10 5.337E+05 t 148.25 4.95E+04 1.78E+08 _ 3.14E+10 5.365E+05 149.03 4.83E+04 1.74E+08__ 3.16E+1_0 5.394E+05 149.83 4.75E+04 1.71E+08 3.17E+10 5.422E+05 150.61 4.69E+04 1.69E+08 3.18E+10 5.451E+05 151.42 4.65E+04 1.67E+08 3.20E+10 5.479E+05 152.19 4.62E+04 1.66E+08 3.21E+10 5.508E+05 153.00 4.60E+04 1.65E+08 3.22E+10 5.536E+05 153.78 4.58E+04 1.65E+08 3.24E+10 5.565E+05 154.58 4.57E+04 1.64E+08 3.25E+10 5.593E+05 155.36 4.56E+04 1.64E+08 3.26E+10 5.622E+05! 156.17 1 4.55E+04 i.64E+08 ] 3.28E+10 8

5.650E+05 156.94 1 4.54E+04 1.6 3 E+0 I 3.29E+10 5.679E+05 157.75 I 4.53E+04

  • 1.63E+08 3.30E+10 5.707E+05 158.53 4.53E+04 1.63E+08 3.31E+10 5.736E+05 159.33 4.52E+04 1.63E+08 3.33E+10 5.764E+05 160.11 I 4.52E+04 I 1.63E+08 3.34E+10 5.793E+05 160.92 4.51 E+04 T 1.62E+08 3.35E+10 5.821E+05 161.69 1 4.51E+04 j 1.62E+08 3.37E+10 5.850E+05 162.50 4.50E+04 1.62E+08 3.38E+10 5.878E+05 163.28 4.50E+04 1.62E+08 3.39E+10 5.907E+05 164.08 4.49E+04 1.62E+08 3.40E+10 5.935E+05 164.86 4.49E+04 1.62E+08 3.42E+10 5.964E+051 165.67 4.48E+04 1.61E+08 3.43E+10 5.992E+05 166.44 4.48E+04 1.61 E+08 3.44E+10 6.021E+05 167.25 4.47E+04 1.61E+08 3.46E+10 6.049E+05 168.03 4.47E+04 1.61E+08 3.47E+10 6.078E+05 168.83 4.46E+04 1.61E+08 3.48E+10 6.106E+05 169.61 4.46E+04 1.61E+08 3.49E+10 6.135E+05 170.42 4.46E+04 1.60E+08 3.51E+10 6.163E+05 171.19 4.45E+04 1.60E+08 3.52E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P18 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UH Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Hoad UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) HetuLoad Load

. [Ref.-P5.1]. (Btuhr) (Btu) 6.192E+05 172.00 4.45E+04 1.60E+08 3.53E+10 6.220E+05 172.78 4.45E+04 1.60E+08 3.54E+10 6.249E+05 173.58 4.44E+04 1.60E+08 3.56E+10 6.277E+05 174.36 4.44E+04 1.60E+08 3.57E+10 6.306E+05 175.17 4.44E+04 1.60E+08 ]3.58E+10 6.334E+05 175.94 4.43E+04 j 1.60E+08 3.59E+10 6.363E+05 176.75 4.43E+04 _ 1.59E+08 3.61E+10 6.391E+05 177.53 4.43E+04 1.59E+08 3.62E+10 6.420E+05 178.33 4.42E+04 1.59E+08 3.63E+10 6.448E+05 179.11 4.42E+04 1.59E+08 3.65E+10 6.477E+05 179.92 4.42E+04 1.59E+08 3.66E+10 6.505E+05 180.69 4.41E+04 1.59E+08 3.67E+10 6.534E+05 181.50 4.41E+04j 1.59E+08 3.68E+10 6.562E+05 182.28 4.41E+04 1.59E+08 .L3.70E+10 6.591E+05 183.08 4.40E+04 1.58E+08 3.71E+10 6.619E+05 183.86 j 4.40E+04 1.58E+08 3.72E+10 6.64811+05 184.67 4.40E+04 1.58E+08 3.73E+10 6.676E+05 185.44 4.39E+04 1.58E+08 3.75E+10 6.705E+05 186.25 4.39E+04 1.58E+08 3.76E+10 6.733E+05 187.03 4.38E+04 1.58E+08 3.77E+10 6.762E+05 187.83 j 4.38E+04 1.58E+08 3.78E+10 6.790E+05 188.61 4.38E+04 1.58E+08 3.80E+10 6.819E+05 189.42 4.37E+04 1.57E+08 3.81E+10 6.847E+05 190.19 4.37E+04 1.57E+08 j 3.82E+10 6.876E+05 191.00 4.37E+04 1.57E+08 3.83E+10 6.904E+05i 191.78 4.36E+04 1.57E+08 3.85E+10 6.933E+05 192.58 4.36E+04 1.57E+08 3.86E+10 6.961E+05 193.36 4.36E+04 1.57E+08 '3.87E+10 6.961E+05 194.17 4.35E+04 1.57E+08 3.88E+10 7.018E+05 194.94 4.35E+04 1.57E+08 3.90E+10 7.047E+05 195.75 4.35E+04 1.57E+08 3.91E+10 7.075E+05 196.53 4.35E+04 1.56E+08 3.92E+10 7.104E+05 197.33 4.34E+04 1.56E+08 J 3.93E+10 7.132E+05 198.11 4.34E+04 1.56E+08 - 3.94E+10 7.161E+05 198.92 4.34E+04 1.56E+08 3.96E+10 7.190E+05 199.72 4.33E+04 1.56E+08 3.97E+10 7.218E+05 200.50 1 4.33E+04 1.56E+08 3.98E+10 7.247E+05 201.31 4.33E+04 1.56E+08 3.99E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P19 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btuls) Heat Load Load

[Ref. P5.1] (Btu) 7.275E+05 202.08 4.32E+04 1.56E+08 4.01E+10 7.304E+05 202.89 4.32E+04 1.56E+08 4.02E+10 7.332E+05 203.67 4.32E+04 1.55E+08 4.03E+10 7.361E+05 1 204.47 4.31 E+04 1.55E+08  ! 4.04E+10 7.389E+05I 205.25 4.31 E+04 1_1.55E+08 4.06E+10 7.418E+05 206.06 4.31 E+04 1.55E+08 4.07E+10 7.446E+05 206.83 4.30E+04 I 1.55E+08 4.08E+10 7.475E+05 207.64 L_4.30E+04 1.55E+08 4.09E+10 7.503E+05 208.42 4.30E+04 1.55E+08 4.10E+10 7.532E+05 209.22 4.29E+04 1.55E+08 4.12E+10 7.560E+05 210.00 4.29E+04 1.54E+08 4.13E+10 7.589E+05 210.81 4.29E+04 1.54E+08 4.14E+10 7.617E+05 211.58 4.29E+04 1.54E+08 4.15E+10 7.646E+05 212.39 4.28E+04 1.54E+08 4.17E+10 7.674E+05 213.17 4.28E+04 1.54E+08 4.18E+10 7.703E+05I 213.97 4.28E+04 1.54E+08 4.19E+10 7.731E+05 214.75 4.27E+04 1.54E+08 4.20E+10 7.760E+05 , 215.56 4.27E+04 I 1.54E+08 4.22E+10 7.788E+05i 216.33 4.27E+04 1.54E+08 4.23E+10 7 5 2 7 4 7.81 E+0 1 .1 4.26E+04 1.54E+08 I4.24E+10 7.845E+05 217.92 4.26E+04 1.53E+08 4.25E+10 7.874E+05 218.72 4.26E+04 1.53E+08 4.26E+10 7.902E+05 219.50 4.26E+04 1.53E+08 4.28E+10 7.931E+05 220.31 4.25E+04 1.53E+08 4.29E+10 7.959E+05 221.08 4.25E+04 1.53E+08 4.30E+10 7.988E+05 221.89 4.25E+04 1.53E+08 4.31E+10 8.016E+051 222.67 4.24E+04 1.53E+08 4.32E+10 8.045E+05 1 223.47 4.24E+04 1.53E+08 4.34E+10 8.073E+05! 224.25 4.24E+04 1.53E+08 4.35E+10 8.102E+05 225.06 4.24E+04 1.52E+08 4.36E+10 8.130E+05 . 225.83 4.23E+04 1.52E+08 4.37E+10 8.159E+05 226.64 4.23E+04 1.52E+08 4.38E+10 8.187E+05 227.42 4.23E+04 1.52E+08 - 4.40E+10 8.216E+05 228.22 4.23E+04 1.52E+08 4.41E+10 8.244E+05 229.00 4.22E+04 1.52E+08 4.42E+10 8.273E+05 229.81 4.22E+04 1.52E+08 4.43E+10 8.301E+05 230.58 4.22E+04 1.52E+08 4.44E+10 r!4.46E+10 8.330E+05 231.39 4.22E+04 1.52E+08 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P20 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load I I Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Total UHS UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) Heat Load Load

. .. .. . .. ._[Ref. P5.1] ( hr(Btu) 8.358E+05 232.17 4.21E+04 1.52E+08 4.47E+10 8.387E+051 232.971 4.21E+04 I 1.52E+08 j 4.48E+10 8.415E+05 233.75 4.21 E+04 1.52E+08 4.49E+10 8.444E+05 234.56 4.21,E+04 1.51E+08 4.50E+10 8.472E+05 235.33 4.20E+04 1.51E+08 4.52E+10 8.501E+05 236.14 4.20E+04 1.51E+08 14.53E+10 8.529E+05 236.92 4.20E+041 1.51E+08 4.54E+10 8.558E+05 237.72 4.20E+04 1.51E+08 4.55E+10 8.586E+05 238.50 4.20E+04 1.51E+08 4.56E+10 8.615E+05 239.31 4.19E+04 1.51E+08 j4.58E+10 8.643E+05 240.08 1 4.19E+04 F 1.51E+08 4.59E+10 8.672E+05 240.89 4.19E+04 1.51E+08 4.60E+10 8.700E+05 241.67 4.19E+04 1.51E+08 4.61E+10 8.729E+05 242.47 4.18E+04 F 1.51E+08 4.62E+10 8.757E+05 243.25 4.18E+04 F 1.51E+08 I 4.64E+10 8.786E+05 1244.06 4.18E+04 1.50E+08 4.65E+10 8.814E+05 -244.83 4.18E+04 F 1.50E+08 4.66E+10 8.843E+05 245.64 4.18E+04 1.50E+08 4.67E+10 8.871E+05 246.42 4.17E+04 1.50E+08 4.68E+10 8.900E+05 247.22 4.17E+04 1.50E+08 . 4.70E+10 8.928E+05 248.00 F 4.17E+04 1.50E+08 4.71E+10 8.957.E+05 248.81 4.17E+04 1.50E2+08 4.72E+10 8.985E+05_ 249.58 I 4.17E+04 1.50E+08 4.73E+10 9.014E+05 F 250.39 4.16E+04 1.50E+08 4.74E+10 9.042E+05 _ 251.17 4.16E+04 1.50E+08 4.76E+10 9.071E+05 251.97 4.16E+04 I 1.50E+08 4.77E+10 9.099E+05, 252.75 4.16E+04 1.50E+08 4.78E+10 9.128E+05 253.56 4.15E+04.1.50E+08 4.79E+10 9.156E+05 254.33 4.15E+04 1.49E+08 4.80E+10 9.185E+05 255.14 4.15E+04 1.49E+08 4.81E+10 9.213E+05 255.92 4.15E+04 1.49E+08 4.83E+10 9.242E+05 256.72 4.15E+04 1 1.49E+08 4.84E+10 9.270E+05 257.50 4.14E+04 1.49E+08 4.85E+10 9.299E+05 258.31 4.14E+04 1.49E+08 4.86E+10 9.327E+05 I259.08 4.14E+04 1.49E+08-j4.87E+10 9.356E+05 259.89 4.14E+04 1.49E+08 4.89E+10 9.384E+05 260.67 4.14E+04 1.49E+08 I 4.90E+10 9.413E+05 261.47 4.13E+04 1.49E+08 4.91E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P21 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Total UHS IHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) (BtuLhr) Load

[Ref. P5.1] (Btu/hr) (Btu) 9.441-E+05 262.25 . 4.13E+04 1.49E+08 4.92E+10 9.470E1+05 263.06 4.13E+04 1.49E+08 4.93E+10 9.498E.05 263.83 4.13E+04 1.49E+08 4.94E+10 9.527E+05 264.64 4.12E+04 1.48E+08 4.96E+10 9.556E+05 265.44 1_4.12E+04 1.48E+08 4.97E+10 9.584E+05 266.22 4.12E+04 1.48E+08 4.98E+10 9.613E+05 267.03 4.12E+04 1.48E+08 4.99E+10 9.641E+05

. 9670E+05 267.81 268.61 4.12E+04 4.11E+04 J 1.48E+08_-

1.48E+08 5.00E+10 5.01E+10 96 05 0 I .5... ....

9.698E+05 269.39 4.11 E+04 1.48E+08 5.03E+10 9.727E+05 9.755E+O5_

270.19 270.97 j 4.11E+04 4.11E+04 1.48E+08 1.48E+08 5.04E+10 5.05E+10 9.784E+05 271.78 1 4.11E+04 1.48E+08 5.06E+10 9.812E+05 272.56 4.1OE+04 1.48E+08 5.07E+10

. 9.841E+05 273.36 4.1OE+04 1.48E+08 5.09E+10 9.869E+05 274.14 4.1OE+04 1.48E+08 5.10E+10 9.898E+05 274.94 4.1OE+04 1.48E+08 5.11E+10 9.926E+05 275.72 4.1OE+04 1.47E+08 5.12E+10 9.955E+05 276.53 4.09E+04 1.47E+08 5.13E+10 9.983E+05 277.31 4.09E+04 1.47E+08 5.14E+10 1.001E+06 278.06 4.0912+04 1.47E+08 5.15E+10 1.004E+06 278.89 4.09E+04 1.47E+08 5.17E+10 1.007E+06 279.72 4.09E+04 1.47E+08 5.18E+10 1.010E+06 280.56 4.09E+04 1.47E+08 5.19E+10 1.013E+06 281.39 4.08E+04 1.47E+08 5.20E+10 1.015E+06 281.94 4.08E+04 1.47E+08 5.21E+10 1.018E+06 282.78 [ 4.08E+04 1.47E+08 5.22E+10 1.021E+06 283.61 4.08E+04 1.47E+08 5.24E+10 1.024E+06 284.44 4.08E+04 1.47E+08 5.25E+10 1.027E+06 285.28 4.07E+04 1.47E+08 5.26E+10 1.030E+061 286.11 I 4.07E+04 _ 1.47E+08 5.27E+10 1.033E+06 286.941 4.07E+04 1.47E+08 5.28E+10 1.035E+06 287.50 j 4.07E+04 1.47E+08 5.29E+10 1.038E+06 _288.33__ 4.07E+04 1.46E+08 5.31E+10 1.041E+06_ 1__289.17 - 4.07E+04

  • 1.46E+08 5.32E+10 1.044E+06 290.001 4.07E.+ 1.46E+08 5.33E+10 1.047E+06 290.83 4.06E+04 1.46E+08 5.34E+10 1.050E+06 291.67 4.06E+04 1.46E+08 5.35E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P22 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UuHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Total UHSHeat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) Heat Load Load

[Ref. P5.1] (Btu) 1.052E+06 292.22 4.06E+04 1.46E+08 5.36E+10 1.055E+06 293.06 4.06E+04 1.46E+08 5.37E+10 1.058E+06 293.89 4.06E+04 1.46E+08 j 5.39E+10 1.061E+061 294.72 4.06E+04 1.46E+08 5.40E+10 1.064E+06" 295.56 4.05E+04 1.46E+08 5.41E+10 1.067E+06 296.39 4.05E+04 1.46E+08 j 5.42E+10 1.070E+06[ 297.22 4.05E+04 1.46E_+08 5.44E+10 1.072E+06 1 297.78 4.05E+04 1.46E+08 5.44E+10 1.075E+06 298.61 4.05E+04 1.46E+08 5.46E+10 1.078E+06 299.44 4.05E+04 1.46E+08 5.47E+10 1.081 E+06 300.28 4.05E+04 1.46E+08 5.48E+10 1.084E+06 301.11 4.04E+04 1.46E+08 5.49E+10 1.-087E+06 301.94 4.04E+04 1.46E+08 5.50E+10 1.090E+06 302.78 4.04E+04 1.45E+08 5.52E+10 1.092E+06 303.33 4.04E+04 1.45E+08 5.52E+10 1.095E+06 304.17 4.04E+04 1.451+08 5.54E+10 1.098E+06 305.00 4.04E+04 1.45E+08 5.55E+10 1.101E+06 305.83 4.03E+04 1.45E+08 5.56E+10

, 1.104E+06 306.67 4.03E+04 1.45E+08 5.57E+10 1.107E+06 307.50 4.03E+04 1.45E+08 5.58E+10 1.109E+06 308.06 4.03E+04 1.45E+08 5.59E+10 1.112E+06 308.89 4.03E+04 1.45E+08 5.60E+10 1.115E+06 309.72 4.03E+04 1.45E+08 5.62E+10 1.118E+06 310.56 4.03E+04 1.45E+08 5.63E+10 1.121E+06 311.39 4.02E+04 1.45E+08 5.64E+10 1.124E+06 312.22 4.02E+04 1.45E+08 5.65E+10 1.127E+06 313.06 4.02E+04 1.45E+08 5.6711+10 1.129E+06 313.61 4.02E+04 1.45E+08 5.67E+10 1.132E+06 314.44 4.02E+04 i 1.45E+08 5.69E+10 1.135E+06 315.28 4.02E+04 j 1.45E+08 5.70E+10 1.138E+06 316.11 4.01E+04 1.45E+08 5.71E+10 1.141E+06 316.94 4.01E+04 _1.44E+08 5.72E+10 1.144E+06 317.78 4.01E+04 1.44E+08 5.73E+10 It, IA7=*nC -1 .1Q zI A n11 l-. 7 "I 1 AAr:+On r, 7rA1.,

1.149E_ 06 I 1 4 E-- 1.44E.08 1.149E+06 319.17 4.01E+04 1.44E+08 5.75E+10 1.152E+06 320.00 4.01E+04 1.44E+08 5.77E+10 1.155E+06 320.83 4.O1E+04 I 1.44E+08 5.78E+10 5.79E+10 1.158E+06 321.67 4.00E+04 t1.44E+08 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P23 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Toa Integrated Total UJHS ITotal UHS USHa Time Time Heat Load l UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) Heat Loa Load

[_Ref.P5.]. (Btu/hr) (Btu) 1.161E+06 322.50 4.00E+04 1.44E+08 5.80E+10 1.164E+06 323.33 4.00E+04 1.44E+08 5.81E+10 1.166E+06 323.89 4.OOE+04 1.44E+08 1 5.82E+10 1.169E+06 324.72 4.00E+04 1.44E+08 5.83E+10 1.172E+06 325.56 4.OOE+04 1.44E+08 5.85E+10 1.175E+06 326.39 j 4.OOE+04 1.44E+08 5.86E+10 1.178E+06 327.22 3.99E+04 1.44E+08-5.87E+10 1.181E+06 328.06 3.99E+04 1.44E+08 5.88E+10

1.184E+06 328.89 3.99E+04 1.44E+08 5.89E+10 1.186E+06 329.44 -3;9E+04 - 1.44E+08 5.90E+10 1.189E+06 330.28 3.99E+04 1.44E+08 5.91E+10 1.192E+06 331.11 3.99E+04 1.44E+08 5.93E+10 1.195E+06 331.94 3.99E+04 1.43E+08 5.94E+10 1.198E+06 332.78 3.98E+04 1.43E+08 5.95E+10 1.201E+06 333.61 3.98E+04 1.43E+08 5.96E+10 1.2014E+06 33.61 .98E-0 1.4E_0 5.96E__

__10 1-204+_06_ 334.44 3.98E+04 1.43E+08 5.97E+10 1.206E+06 335.00 3.98E+04 1.43E+08 5.98E+10

  • 1209E+06 335.83 3.98E+04 1.43E+08 5.99E+10 1.212E+06 336.67 3.98E+04 1.43E+08 6.01E+10

_1215E+6.1 337.50 3.97E+04 1.43E+08 6.02E+10 1.218E+06 338.33 3.97E+04 1.43E+08 6.03E+10 1.221E+06 339.17 3.97E+04 1.43E+08 6.04E+10 1.224E+06 340.00 3.97E+04 1.43E+08 6.05E+10 1.226E+06 340.56 3.97E+04 1.43E+08 6.06E+10 1.229E+06 341.39 3.97E+04 1.43E+08 6.07E+10 1.232E+06 342.22 3.97E+04 1.43E+08 6.08E+10 1.235E+06 343.06 3.97E+04 1.43E+08 6.10E+10 1.238E+06 343.89 I 3.96E+04 1.43E+08 6.11E+10 1.241E+06 344.72 3.96E+04 1.43E+08 6.12E+10 1.243E+06 345.28 3.96E+04 1.43E+08 6.13E+ 10 1-246E+06 346.11 3.96E+04 1.43E+08 6.141+-10 1.249E+06 346.94 3.96E+04 1.42E+08 6.15E+10 1.252E+06 347.78 3.96E+04 1.42E+08 6.16E+10 1.255E+06 348.61 3.96E+04 1.42E+08 16.18E+10 1.258E+06 349.44 3.95E+04 1.42E+08 6.19E+10 1.261E+06 350.28 3.95E+04 1.42E+08 6.20E+10 1.263E+06 350.83 3.95E+04 1.42E+08 6.21E+10 1.266E+06 351.67 3.95E+04 1.42E+08 6.22E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P24 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS T Integrated Time Time Heat Load Total.UHS UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btus) LdLoa

[Ref. P5.11] (Btu/hr) (Btu) 1.269E+06 352.50 3.95E+04 1.42E+08 6.23E+10 1.272E+06 353.33 I 3.95E+04 1.42E+08 6.24E+10 1.275E+06 354.17 3.95E+04 1.42E+08 6.25E+10 1.278E+06 355.00 J 3.94E+04 1.42E+08 6.27E+10 1.281E+06 355.83 1 3.94E+04 1.42E+08] 6.28E+10 1.283E+06 356.39 3.94E+04 1.42E+08 6.29E+10 1.286E+06 357.22 3.94E+04 1.42E+08L 6.30E+10 1.289E+06 358.06 3.94E+04 , 1.42E+08 6.31E+10 1.292E+06j 358.89 3.94E+04 1.42E+08 . 6.32E+10 1.295E+061 359.72{- 3.94E+04 i1.42E+08 I 6.33E+10 1.298E+06-i -360.56---- 3.93E+04 --- 142E+08- 6.35E+10 1.300E+06 361.11 3.93E+04 1.42E+08 6.35E+10 1.303E+06 361.94 3.93E+04 1.42E+08 6.37E+10 1.306E+06 j 362.78 3.93E+04 1.41E+08 6.38E+10 1.309E+06 363.61 3.93E+04 1.41E+08 6.39E+10 1.312E+06- 364.44 3.93E+04 - 1.41 E+08 6.40E+10 1.315E+06 365.28 3.93E+04 1.41E+08 6.41E+10 1.318E+06- 366.11 I 3.92E+04 1.41E+08 6.42E+10 1.320E+06 366.67 3.92E+04 1.41E+08 6.43E+10 1.323E1+06 367.50 3.92E+04 1.41E+08 6.44E+10 1.326E+06 368.33 3.92E+04 1.41E+08 6.46E+10 1.329E+06 369.17 3.92E+04 1.41E+08 6.47E+10 1.332E+06 370.00 3.92E+04 1.41E+08 6.48E+10 1.335E+06 370.83 3.92E+04 1.41 E+08 6.49E+ 10 1.338E+06] 371.67 3.91E+04 1.41E+08 - 6.50E+10 1.340E+06 372.22 3.91 E+04 1.41E+08 6.51E+10 1.343E+06 1.346E+06 I 373.06 373.89 3.91E+04 3.91E+04 1.41E+08 1.41E+08 6.52E+10 6.53E+10 1.346E+06 373.89 3.91E+04 1.41E+08 6.53E+10 1.349E+061 374.72 3.91E+04 1.41E+08 6.55E+10 1.352E+06 375.56 3.91E+04 1.41E+08 6.56E+10 1.357E+06 376.39 3.91E+04 1.41E+08 6.57E+10 1.357E+06 376.94 3.91E+04 1.41 E+08 6.58E+10 1.360E+06 377.78 3.90E+04 1.41E+08 6.60E+10 1.363E+06 378.61 3.90E+04 1.40E+08 6.60E+10 1.366E+06 379.44 3.90E+04 1.40E+08 6.61E+10 1.369E+06 380.28 3.90E+04 1.40E+08 6.62E+10 1.372E+06 381.11 3.90E+04 1.40E+08 6.64E+10 1.375E+06 381.94 3.90E+04 1.40E+08 6.65E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P25 of P58 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P25 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btuls) Heat Load Load

[Ref. P5.1] I (Bt..hr) (Btu) 1.377E+06 382.50 3.90E+04 I 1.40E+08 6.65E+10 1.380E+06 383.33 3.90E+04 1.40E+08 6.67E+10 1.383E+06 384.17 3.89E+04 1.40E+08 6.68E+10 1.386E+06 385.00 3.89E+04 1.40E+08 6.69E+10 1.389E+06 385.83 3.89E+04 1.40E+08 6.70E+10 1.392E+06 386.67 3.89E+04 1.40E+08 6.71E+10 1.395E+06 387.50 3.89E+04 1.40E+08 6.72E+10 1.397E+06 388.06 3.89E+04 1.40E+08 6.73E+10 1.400E+06 388.89 3.89E+04 1.40E+08 6.74E+10 1.403E+06 389.72 3.88E+04 1.40E+08 6.76E+ 10 1.406E+06 390.56 3.88E+04 1.40E+08 6.77E+10 1.409E+06 391.39 3.88E+04 1.40E+08 6.78E+10 1.412E+06 392.22 3.88E+04 1.40E+08 6.79E+10 1.414E+06 392.78 3.88E+04 1.40E+08 6.80E+10 1.417E+06 393.61 3.88E+04 1.40E+08 6.81E+10 1.4- 39444 1.420E+06 395.28 3.88E+04 1.40E+08 6.82E+10 1.423E+06 395.28 3.87E+04 1.39E+08 6.83E+10 1.426E+06 396.11 3.87E+04 1.39E+08 6.85E+10 1.429E+06 396.94 3.87E+04 L 1.39E+08 6.86E+10 1.432E+06 397.78 3.87E+04 K 1.39E+08 6.87E+10 1.434E+06 398.33 I 3.87E+04 1.39E+08 6.88E+10 1.437E+06 399.17 3.87E+04 1,39E+08 6.89E+10 1.443E+06 400.00 1 3.87E+04 1I.3 91E+08 6.91E+10-1.4436E06 400.83 3.87E+04 1.39E+08 j_6.91E+10 1.446E+06 j 401.67 3.86E+04 1.39E+08 6.92E+10 1.449E+06 402.50 3.86E+04 1.39E+08 1 6.93E+10 1.452E+06- 403.33 3.86E+04 _K1.39E+08 6.95E+10 1.454E+06 403.89 3.86E+04 1.39E+08 6.95E+10 1.457E+06 404.72 3.86E+04 I 1.39E+08 6.96E+10 1.460E+06 405.56 3.86E+04 1.39E+08 J 6.98E+10 1.463E+06 406.39 3.86E+04 1.39E+08 6.99E+10 1.466E+06 407.22 3.86E+04 1.39E+08 7.01E+10 1.469E+06 408.06 3.85E+04 1.39E+08 7.01E+10 1.474E+06 408.89 3.85E'-04 1.39E+08 I 72E+10 1.477E+06 1.474E+06: 409.48 4109.284 3.85E+04 3.85E+04 I1.39E+08 1.39E+08 7.04E+10

  • _7.03E+10 1.480E+06 411.11 3.85E+04 1.39E+08 7.05E+10 1.483E+06 411.94 3.85E+04 1.38E+08 7.07E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P26 of P58 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P26 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load TTotal UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Total UHS UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) Het Load Load

[Ref.p5.1] (BtuP5,11 (Btu) 1.486E+06 412.78 1_3.85E+04 I 1.38E+08 7.08E+10 1.489E+06 413.61 3.84E+04 1.38E+08 7.09E+10 1.491E+06 414.17 3.84E+04- 1.38E+08 J 7.10E+10 1.494E+06 415.00 3.84E+04 I 1.38E+08 7.11E+10 1.497E+06 415.83 3.84E+04 1.38E+08] 7.12E+10 1.500E+06 416.67 3.84E+04 t 1.38E+08 7.13E+10 1.503E+06 417.50 3.84E+04 1.38E+08 7.14E+10 1.506E+06 418.33 3.84E+04 1.38E+08 7.15E+10 1.509E+06I 419.17 3.84E+04 1.38E+08 7.16E+10 1.51 -1E+061_419.72 3.83E+04 1i.38E+08 7.17E+10 1.514E+06 I 420.56 3.83E+04 1.38E+08 7

.18E+10 1.517E+06 421.39 3.83E+04 1.38E+08 7.20E+10 1.520E+06 422.22 3.83E+04 1.38E+08 7.21E+10 1.523E+06j 423.06 3.83E+04 1.38E+08.7.22E+10 1.526E+06 423.89 3.83E+04 1.38E+08 7.23E+10 1.529E+06 424.72 3.83E+04 1.38E+08 7.24E+10 1.531E+06 425.28 3.83E+04 1.38E+08 7.25E+10 1.534E+06 426.11 3.83E+04 1.38E+08 7.26E+10 1.537E+06 426.94 3.83E+04 1.38E+08 7.27E+10 1.540E+06 427.78 3.82E+04 1.38E+08 I 7.28E+10 1.543E+06 428.61 3.82E+04 1.38E+08 7.30E+10 1.546E+061 429.44 i 3.82E+04 1.38E+08 7.31E+10 1.546E+06 430.00 3.82E+04 1.38E+08 7.31E+10 3.82E+04 1.38E+08 7.35E+10 1.564E+06 431.67 3.82E+04 1.37E+08l 7.31E+10 1.551E+06 432.50 3.82E+04 1.37E+08 7.33E+10 1.566E+06 433.33 3.82E+04 1.37E+08 7.34E+10 1.568E+06 434.51 3.82E+04 1.37E+08 7.35E+10 1.560E+06 435.30 3.81E+04 1.37E+08 7..3E+10 1.574E+06 437.22 3.81E+04 1.37E+08 -7.41E+10 1.577E+06 438.06 3.81E+04 1.37E+08 7.42E+10 1.580E+06 438.89 3.81E+04 1.37E+08 7.44E+10 1.583E+06 439.72 3.81E+04 1.37E+08 7.45E+10 1.586E+06 440.56 3.81E+04 1.37E+08 7.46E+10 1.588E+06 441.11 3.81E+04 1.37E+08 7.47E+10 1.591E+06 441.94 3.81E+04 1.37E+08 7.48E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P27 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Heat ad UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btuls) Heat Load Load

[Ref. P5.1] ( , (Btu) 1.594E+06 442.78 3.81E+04 1.37E+08 7.49E+10 1.597E+06 443.61 3.80E+04 1.37E+08 7.50E+10 1.600E+06 444.44 3.80E+04 1.37E+08 7.51E+10 1.603E+06 445.28 3.80E+04 1.37E+08 7.52E+10 1.605E+06 445.83 3.80E+04 1.37E+08 7.53E+10 1.608E+06 446.67 3.80E+04 1.37E+08 7.54E+10 1.611E+06- 447.50 3.80E+04 -.3711+08 7.55E+10 1.614E+06 448.33 3.80E+04 1.37E+08- 7.57E+10 1.617E+06 449.17 3.80E+04 1.37E+08 7.58E+10 1.620E+06 450.00 3.80E+04 1.37E+08 7.59E+10 1.623E+06 450.83 3.80E+04 1.37E+08 7.60E+10 1.625E+061 451.39 3.79E+04 1.37E+08 7.61E+10 1.628E+06 452.22 3.79E+04 1.37E+08 7.62E+10 1.631E+06 453.06 3.79E+04 1.37E+08 7.63E+10 1.634E+06 453.89 3.79E+04 1.36E+08 7.64E+10 1.637E+06 454.72 3.79E+04 1.36E+08 7.65E+10 1.640E+06 455.56 3.79E+04 1.36E+08 7.66E+10 1.643E+06 456.39 3.79E+04 I 1.36E+08 7.68E+10 1.645E+06 . 456.94 1 3.79E+04 1.36E+08 7.68E+10 1

1.648E+06 457.78 3.79E+04 1i1.36E+08 7.69E+10 1.651E+06 458.61 i 3.79E+04 I 1.36E+08 7.71E+10 1.654E+06 459.44 -3.78E+04 1.36E+08 7.72E+10 8

1-.657E+06 460.28 3.78.E-+04 1...6E0 7.73E+10 1.660E+06 461.11 3.78E+04 1.36E+08 7.74E+10 1.662E+06 461.67 3.78E+04 1.36E+08 7.75E+10 1.665E+06 462.50 3.78E+04 1.36E+08 7.76E+10 1.668E+06 463.33 3.78E+04 1.36E+08 7.77E+10 1.671E+06 464.17 3.78E+04 1.36E+08 7.78E+10 1.674E+06 465.00 3.78E+04 1.36E+08 7.79E+10 167 6 465783 3.78E+04 1.36E+08 7.80E+10 1.680E+06 466.67 3.78E+04 1.36E+08 7.82E+10 1.682E+06 468.06 3.78E+04 1.36E+08 7.82E+10 1.685E+06 468.06 3.77E+04 1.36E+08 7.83E+10 1.688E+06 468.89 3.77E+04 1.36E+08 7.85E+10 1.691E+06 469.72 3.77E+04 1.36E+08 7.86E+10 1.694E+06 470.56 3.77E+04 1.36E+08 7.87E+10 1.697E+06 471.39 3.77E+04 1.36E+08 7.88E+10 1.700E+06 472.22 3.77E+04 1.36E+08 7.89E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P28 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS TIntegrated Time Time Heat Load Total UHS UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) Heat Load

[Ref. P5.1] (Bu 1.702E+06 472.78 3.77E+04 1.36E+08 7.90E+10 1.705E+06 473.61 3.77E+04 1.36E+08 7.91E+10 1.708E+061 474.44 3.77E+04 I 1.36E+08 7.92E+10 1.711E+06 475.28 j 3.77E+041 1.36E+08 7.93E+10 1.714E+06- 476.11 3.76E+04 1.36E+08 7.94E+10 1.717E+06 476.94 3.76E+04 1.35E+08 7.96E+10 1.720E+06 477.78! 3.76E+04 1.35E+08 7.97E+10 1.722E+06 478.331 3.76E+04 I 1.35E+08 7.97E+10 1.725E+06 479.17 3.76E+04 1.35E+08 7.99E+10 1.728E+06 480.00 [ 3.76E+04 1.35E+08 8.00E+10 1.731E+06 480.83 3.76E+04 1.35E+08 8.01E+10 1.734E+06 481.67 3.76E+04 1.35E+08 8.02E+10 1.737E+061 482.50 3.76E+04 1.35E+08 8.03E+10 1.739E+06 483.06 3.76E+04 1.35E+08 8.04E+10 1.742E+06 483.89 3.75E+04 1.35E+08 8.05E+10 1.745E+06 484.72 3.75E+04 1.35E+08 8.06E+10 1.748E+06 485.56 3.75E+04 1.35E+08 8.07E+10 1.751E+06 486.39 3.75E+04 1.35E+08 8.08E+10 1.754E+06 487.22 3.75E+04 1.35E+08 8.09E+10 1.757E+06 488.06 3.75E+04 1.35E+08 8.11E+10 1.759E+06 488.61 3.75E+04 1.35E+08 8.11E+10 1.762E+06 489.441 3.75E+04 1.35E+08 i 8.12E+10 1.765E+061 490.28 3.75E+04 1.35E+08 8.14E+10 1.768E+06 491.11 3.75E+04 1.35E+08 8.15E+10 1.771E+06-1 491.94 3.75E+04 1.35E+08 8.16E+10 1.774E+06 492.78 3.74E+04 1.35E+08 8.17E+10 1.777E+06_ 493.61 3.74E+04 1.35E+08 j 8.18E+10 1.779E+06 494.17 3.74E+04 1.35E+08 8.19E+10 1.782E+06 495.00 3.74E+04 1.35E+08 8.20E+10 1.785E+06 495.83 3.74E+04 1.35E+08 8.21E+10 1.788E+06 496.67 3.74E+04 1.35E+08 8.22E+10 1.791E+06 497.50 3.74E+04 1.35E+08 8.23E+10 1.794E+06 498.33 3.74E+04 1.35E+08 8.24E+10 1.796E+06 498.89 3.74E+04 1.35E+08 8.25E+10 1.799E+06 499.72 3.74E+04 1.35E+08 8.26E+10 1.802E+06 500.56_- 3.74E+04 I 1.35E+08 8.27E+10 1.805E+06 501.39 3.73E+04 1.34E+08 8.29E+10 1.808E+06 502.22 3.73E+04 1.34E+08 8.30E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P29 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Heat Load UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btuls) Loa Lotadd

[Ref. P5.1] (Btu/hr) .. tu) 1.811E+06 503.06 _ 3.73E+04 1.34E+081 8.31E+10 1.814E+06 503.89 3.73E+04 1.34E+08 I 8.32E+10 1.816E+06 504.44. 3.73E+04 1.34E+08 j 8.33E+10 1.819E+06 505.28 4.34E+04 1.56E+08 i 8.34E+10 1.822E+06 506.11 4.24E+04 1.53E+08 1- 8.35E+10 1.825E+06 506.94 4.07E+04 1.47E+08 L 8.36E+10 1-82811+06 507.78 3.9611+04 1.43E+08 8.38E+10 1.831E+061 508.61 3.89E+04 . 1.40E+08 I 8.39E+10 1.834E+06 509.44 3.83E+04-J 1.38E+08 8.40E+10 1.836E+06 I 510.00 3.80E+04 1.37E+08 8.41E+10 1.839E+06 I 510.83 3.78E+04 I 1.36E+08 8.42E+10 1.842E+06 511.67 3.76E+04 L 1.35E+08 8.43E+10 1.845E+06 512.50 3.75E+04 1.35E+08 8.44E+10 1.848E+06 513.33 3.74E+04 1.35E+08 8.45E+10 1.851E+06 514.17 3.73E+04 1.34E+08 8.46E+10 1.853E+06 514.72 3.73E+04 1.34E+08 8.47E+10 1.856E+06 515.56 3.72E+04 1.34E+08 8.48E+10 1.859E+06 516.39 3.72E+04 1.34E+08 8.49E+10 1.862E+06 517.22 3.72E+04 1.34E+08 8.50E+10 1.865E+06 518.06 1 3.72E+041 1.34E+08 8.52E+10 1.868E+06 518.89 j 3.72E+04 1.34E+08 8.53E+10 1.871E+06 519.72 3.72E+04 1.34E+08 8.54E+10 1.873E1+06 520.28 3.71-E+04- 1.34E+08 8.54E+10 1.876E+06 521.11 3.71E+04 1.34E+08 8.56E+10 1.879E+06j 521.94 3.71E+04 I 1.34E+08 8.57E+10 1.882E+06 522.78 3.71E+04 1.34E+08 .L8.58E+10 1.885E+06K 523.61 3.71E+04 1.34E+08 8.59E+10 1.888E+06 524.44 3.71E+04 1.34E+08 8.60E+10 1.891E+066 525.28 3.71E+04 1.33E+08 8.61E+10 1.893E+06 525.83 1_3.71 E+04 1.33E+08 8.62E+10 1.896E+061 526.67 3.71E+04 1.33E+08 8.63E+10 1.899E+06. 527.50 3.71E+04 1.33E+08 8.64E+10 1.902E+06 1528.33 3.70E+04 1.33E+08 8.65E+10 1.905E+06 529.17 3.70E+04 1.33E+08 8.66E+10 1.908E+06 530.00 3.70E+04 1.33E+08 8.67E+10 1.911E+06 530.83 3.70E+04 1.33E+08 8.69E+10 1.913E+06 531.39 3.70E+04 1.33E+08 -869E+10 1.916E+06 532.22 - 3.70E+04 1.33E+08 8.70E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P30 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS T Integrated Time Time Heat Load Total UHS UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) (BtuLhr)o

.. . .. . ... . . _ _ [R ef. P5 .1] . . . . . . .(Btu )

1.919E+06 533.06 3.70E+04 1.33E+08 8.72E+10 1.922E+06I 533.89 3.70E+04 1.33E+08 8.73E+10 1.925E+06 534.72 3.70E+04 1.33E+08 8.74E+10 1.928E+06 535.56 3.70E+04 1.33E+08 8.75E+10 1.930E+06 536.11 _3.70E+04 1.33E+081 8.76E+10 1.933r+06 536.94 3.69E+04 1.33E+08 8.77E+10 1.936E+06 537.78 3.69E+04 1.33E+08 8.78E+10 1.939E+06 538.61 3.69E+041 1.33E+08 8.79E+10 1.942E+06 539.44 j 3.69E+04 1.33E+08 8.80E+10 1.945E+06 540.28 f3.69E+04r 1.33E+08 8.81E+10 1.948E+06 541.11 I 3.69E+04 1" 1.33E+08 L8.82E+10 1.950E+06 541.67 3.69E+04 1.33E+08 8.83E+10 1.953E+06 542.50 3.69E+04 1.33E+08 8.84E+10 1.956E+06 543.33 3.69E+04 1.33E+08 8.85E+10 1.959E+06 544.17 3.69E+04 1.33E+08 8.86E+10 1.962E+06 545.00 1_3.69E+04 1.33E+08 8.87E+10 1.965E+06 545.83 3.69E+04 1.33E+08 8.89E+10 1.968E+06 546.67 3.69E+04 1.33E+08 8.90E+10 1.970E+06 [ 547.22 _ 3.68E+04 1.33E+08 _8.90E+10 1.973E+06 548.06 1 3.68E+04 j 1.33E+08 8.91E+10 1.976E+06 548.89 F 3.68E+04 1.33E+08 8.93E+10 1.979E+06 549.72 3.68E+04 1.33E+08 8.94E+10 1.982E+06 550.56 3.68E+04 .32E+08 8.95E+10 1.985E+06 551.391 3.68E+04 1.32E+08 8.96E+10 1.987E+061 551.94 3.68E+04 1.32E+08 8.97E+10 1.990E+06 552.78 3.68E+04 1.32E+08 8.98E+10 1.993E+06 553.61 3.68E+04 1.32E+08 8.99E+10 1.996E+06 554.44 3.68E+04 1.32E+08 9.00E+10 1.999E+06 555.28 3.68E+04 1.32E+08 9.01E+10 2.002E+06 556.11 3.67E+04 1.32E+08 9.02E+10 2.005E+06 556.94 3.67E+04 1.32E+08 9.03E+10 2.007E+06 / 557.50 3.67E+04 1.32E+08 9.04E+10 2.010E+06 558.33 3.67E+04 1.32E+08 9.05E+10 2.013E+06 559.17 3.67E+04 1.32E+08 19.06E+10 2.016E+06 560.00 3.67E+04 1.32E+08 9.07E+10 2.019E+06 560.83 3.67E+04 1.32E+08 9.08E+10 2.022E+06 561.67 3.67E+04 1.32E+08 9.09E+10 2.025E+06 562.50 3.67E+04 1.32E+08 9.11E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P31 of P58 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P31 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS -t UHS Integrated Time Time IBtuls Heat Load Heat LOad Teaotalod UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btuls) (Btu/hr) Load

.[Ref. P5.11] (Btu) 2.027E+06 563.06 3.67E+04 1.32E+08 9.11E+10 2.030E+06 563.89 3.67E+04 11.32E+08 9.12E+10 2.0335+06 564.72 3.67E+04 - 1.32E+08 9.14E+10 2.036E+06 565.56 3.675+04 1.32E+08 9.15E+10 2.039E+06 566.39 3.67E+04 1.32E+08 9.16E+10 2.042E+06 567.22 I 3.66E+04 1.32E+08 9.17E+10 2.044E+06 567.78 3.66E+04 1.32E+08 9.18E+10 2.047E+06 568.61 3.66E+04 1.32E+08 9.19E+10 2.050E+06 569.44 3.66E+04 1.32E+08 9.20E+10 2.053E+06 570.28 3.66E+04 1.32E+08 9.21E+10 2.056E+06 571.11 3.66E+04 I1.32E+08 9.22E+10 2.059E+06 571.94 3.66E+04 1.32E+08 9.22E+10 2.062E+06 572.78 3.66E+04 1.32E+08 9.24E+10 2.064E+06 573.33 3.66E+04 1.32E+08 9.25E+10 2.067E+06 574.17 3.66E+04 1.32E+08 9.26E+10 2.070E+06 575.007 3.66E+04 1.32E+08 9.27E+10 2.073E+06 575.83 3.66E+04 1.32E+08 9.28E+10 2.076E+06 576.67 3.66E+04 I 1.32E+08 9.29E+10 2.079E+06 577.50 3.65E+04 1.32E+08 9.30E+10 2.082E+06 578.33 3.65E+04 1.32E+08 9.31E+10 2.084E+06 578.89 3.65E+04 1.32E+08 9.31E+10 2.087E+06 579.72 3.65E+04 I 1.32E+08 9.33E+10 2.090E+06 580.56 3.65E+04 1.31E+08 9.34E+10 2.093E+06 581.39 3.65E+04 1.31E+08_1 9.35E+10 2.096E+06 582.22 3.65E+04 1.31E+08 9.37E+10 2.099E+06 583.06 3.65E+04 1.31E+08 9.38E+10 2.101 E+06 583.61 3.65E+04 1.31E+08 9.38E+10 2.104E+06 584.44 3.65E+04 1.31E+08 9.39E+10 2.107E+06_ 585.28 3.65E+04 1.31E+08 9.41E+10 2.1101+06 586.11 3.65E+04j 1.31E+08 9.42E+10 2.113E+06 586.94 3.65E+04 1.311+08 9.43E+10 2.116E+06 1587.78 3.65E+04 1.31E+08 9.44E+10 2.119E+06 588.61 3.65E+04 1.31E+08 9.45E+10 2.121E+06 589.17 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 9.46E+10 2.124E+06 590.00 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 9.47E+10 2.127E+06 590.83 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 9.45E+10 2.130E+06 591.67 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 9.49E+10 2.133E+06 592.50 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 9.50E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P32 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Heat LOad UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) Het Load Load

. [Ref. P5.1] i +(Btu/h (Btu) 2.136E+06 593.33 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 9.51E+10 2.139E+06 594.17 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 952E+10 2.141E+06 594.72 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 9.53E+10 2.144E+06 595.56 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 9.54E+10 2.147E+06 596.39 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 -9.55E+10 2.150E+06 597.22 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 I 9.56E+10 2.153E+06 598.06 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 I 9.57E+10 2.156E+06 598.89 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 L9.58E+10 2.159E+06 i 599.72 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 9.60E+10 2.161E+06 600.28 3.64E+04 1.31E+08 9.60E+10 2.164E+06 601.11 3.631+04 1.31E+08 9.61E+10 2.167E+06 601.94 3.63E+04 1.31E+08 9.62E+10 2.170E+06 602.78 3.63E+04 1.31E+08 9.64E+10 2.17312+06 603.61 3.63E+04 1.31E+08__l 9.65E+10 2.176E+06 604.44 3.63E+04 1.31E+08 I 9.66E+10 2.178E+06 605.00 3.63E+04 1.31E+08 I 9.66E+10 2.181E+06 605.83 3.63E+04 1.31E+08 9.68E+10 2.184E+06 606.67 3.63E+04 1.31E+08 9.69E+10 2.187E+06 607.50 3.63E+04 1.31E+08 9.70E+10 2.190E+06 608.33 3.63E+04 1.31E+08 9.71E+10 2.193E+06 609.17 3.63E+04 1.31E+08 9.72E+10 2.196E+06 610.00 3.63E+04 1.31E+08 9.73E+10 2.198E+06 610.56 3.63E+04 1.31E+08 9.74E+10 2.201E+06 611.39 3.63E+04 1.31E+08 9.75E+10 2.204E+06 612.22 3.63E+04 1.31E+08 9.76E+10 2.207E+06 613.06 3.62E+04 1.30E+08 9.77E+10 2.210E+06 . 613.89 3.62E+04 1.30E+08 9.78E+10 2.213E+06 614.72 3.62E+04 1.30E+08 9.79E+10 2.216E+06 615.56 3.62E+04 i1.30E+08 9.80E+10 2.218E+06 616.11 3.62E+04 1.30E+08 9.81E+10 2.221E+06 616.94 3.62E+04 1.30E+08 9.82E+10 2.224E+06 617.78 3.62E+04 1.30E+08 9.83E+10 2.227E+06 618.61 3.62E+04 1.30E+08 9.84E+10 2.2E0 !619.44 2.230E+06 61.1 36EI-4 3.6211+04 13E0 9.86E+10 1.30E+08J 9.85E+10 2.233E+06 620.28 3.62E+04 1.30E+08 9.86E+10 2.235E+06 620.83 3.62E+04 1.30E+08 9.87E+10 2.238E+06 621.67 3.62E+04 1.30E+08 9.88E+10 2.241E+06 622.50 3.62E+04 1.30E+08 9.89E+10 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P33 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Heat Load UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (BtU/s) (Btuthr) Load

[Ref. P5.1] F (Btu) 2.244E+06 623.33 3.62E+04 1.30E+08 9.90E+10 2.247E+06 624.17 3.61 E+04 1.30E+08 9.91E+10 2.250E+06t 625.00 3.61E+04 1.30E+08 9.92E+10 2.253E+06 625.83 3.61E1+04 1.30E+08 9.9412+1 2.255E+06_ 626.39 3.61E+04 1.30E+08 1 9.94E+10 2.258E+06 627.22 3.61E+04 1.30E+08 9.95E+10 2.261E+06 628.06 3.61_E+04 1.30E+08 L 9.96E+10 2.264E+06 628.89 3.61E+04- 1.30E+08 9.98E+10 2.267E+06 629.72 3.61 E+04 1.30E+08 9.99E+10 2.270E+06 630.56 3.61E+04 1.30E+08 1.00E+11 2.273E+06 631.39 3.61E+04 1.30E+08 . 1.00E+11 2.275E+06 631.94 3.61.E+04 1.30E+08 1..E+11 2.278E+06 632.78 3.61E+04 1.30E+08 j 1.00E+11 2.281E+061 633.61 3.61E+04 1.30E+08 1.00E+11 2.284E+061 634.44 3.61E+04 1.30E+08 1.00E+11 2.287E+06 635.28 3.61E+04 1.30E+08 1.01E+11 2.290E+06. 636.11 3.61E+04 1.30E+08 j 1.00E+11 2.292E+061 636.67 3.60E+04 1.30E+08 1.01E+11 2.295E+06 637.50 3.60E+04 1.30E+08 1.01E+11 2.298E+06-! 638.33 3.60E+04 1.30E+08 1.01E+11 2.301E+06 639.17 3.60E+04 1.30E+08 1.01E+11 2.304E+06 640.00 3.60E+04 1.30E+08 1.01E+11 2.307E+06 640.83 3.60E+04 j 1.30E+08 1.01E+11 2.310E+06 641.67 3.60E+04 1.30E+08 1.01E+11 2.312E+06, 642.22 3.60E+04 1.30E+08 1.010E+1 1 2.315E+06 643.06 3.60E+04 1.30E+08 1.02E+11 2.318E+06 643.89 3.60E+04 1.30E+08 1.02E+11 2.321E+06 644.72 3.60E+04 1.29E+08 1.02E+11 2.324E+06 2.327E+06 645.56 646.39 3.60E+04 3.60E+04 j 1.29E+08 1.29E+08

{ 1.02E+11 1.02E+11 2.330E+06 647.22 3.60E+04 1.29E+08 1.02E+11 2.332E+06 647.78 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.02E+11 2.335E+06 64861 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.02E+11 2.338E+06 649.44 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.02E+11 2.341E+06 650.28 L3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.03E+11 2.344E+06 F 651.11 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.03E+11 2.347E¢06' 651.94 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.03E+11 2.349E+06 652.50 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.03E+1 1 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P34 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load . oa UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btuls) (Btu/hr) Load

... . ..[R

... ef. P5.1] _. . . _ .. (B tu) 2.352E+06 653.33 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.03E+11 2.355E+06 654.17 " 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.03E+11 2.358E+06 655.00 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.03E+11 2.361E+06 655.83 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.03E+11 2.364E+06 656.67 j 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.03E+ 11 2.367E+06 657.50 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.03E+11 2.369E+06 658.06 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.04E+11 2.372E+06 658.89 3.59E+04 1.29E+08 1.04E+11 2.375E+06 659.72 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.04E+11 2.378E+06 1660.56 3.58-E+04 1-.29E+08___ 104E+1 1 2.381E+06 661.39 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.04E+11 2.384E+06 662.22 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.04E+11 2.387E+06 663.06 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.04E+11 2.389E+06 663.61 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.04E+11 2.392E+06 664.44 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.04E+11 2.395E+06 665.28 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.04E+ 11 2.398E+06 666.11 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.05E+11 2.401E+06 666.94 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.05E+11 2.404E+06 667.78 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.05E+11 2.407E+06 668.61 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.05E+11 2.409E+06 669.17 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.05E+11 2.412E+06 670.00 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.05E+11 2.415E+06 670.83 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.051+11 2.418E+06 671.67 3.58E+04 1.29E+08 1.05E+11 2.421E+06, 672.50 j 3.57E+04 1.29E+08 1.05E+11 2.424E+06 673.33 3.57E+04 1.29E+08 1.06E+11 2.426E+06 1673.89 3.57+04 1.29E+08 1.06E1+11 2.429E+06 674.72 3.57E+04 1.29E+08 1.06E+11 2.432E+06 675.56 3.57E+04 1.29E+08 1.06E+11 2.435E+06 676.39 3.57E+04 1.29E+08 1.06E+ 11 2.438E+06 677.22 3.57E+04 1.29E+08 1.06E+11 2.441E+067 678.06 3.57E+04 1.29E+08 1.06E+11 2.444E+06 678.89 3.57E+04 1.28E+08 1.06E+ 11 2.446E+06 679.44 3.57E+04 1.28E+08 1.06E+11 2.449E+06 680.28 3.57E+04 1.28E+08 1.06E+11 2.452E+06 681.11 3.57E+04 1.28E+08 1.07E+11 2.455E+06 681.94 3.57E+04 1.28E+08 1.07E+11 2.458E+06 682.78 3.57E+04 1.28E+08 1.07E+ 11 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P35 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load toad UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btuls) Heat Load Load

[Ref. P5.1] (Btu/hr) (Btu) 2.461E+06 683.61 3.57E+04 1.28E+08 1.07E+11 2.464E+061 684.44 3.57E+04 1.28E+08 1.07E+11 2.466E+06 685.00 3.56E+04 1.28E+08 1.07E+11 2.469E+06] 685.83 3.56E+04 1.28E+08 1.07E+1 1 2.472E+06 686.67 3.56E+04 1.28E+08 1.07E+11 2.475E+06 687.50 3.56E+04 1.28E+08 1.07E+ 11 2.478E+061688.3313.56E+04 1.28E+08 2.481E+06 689.17 3.56E+04 I 1.28E+08 1.08E+11 2.483E+06j 689.72 3.56E+04 I 1.28E+08 1.08E+11 2.486E+06 690.56 3.56E+04 i1.28E+08 1.08E+11 2.489E+06 691.39 3.56E+04 1.28E+08 1.08E+1 1 2.492E+06 692.22 3.56E+04 1.28E+08 1.08E+ 11 2.495E+06 693.06 3.56E+04 1.28E+08 1.08E+ 11 2.495E+06 693.89 3.56E+04 1.28E+08 1.08E+11 2.498+06 693.89 3.56E+04 1.28E+08 1.08E+11 2.501E+06 694.72 3.56E+04 I 1.28E+08 1.08E+ 11 2.503E+06 F 695.28 3.56E+04 1.28E+08 1.08E+ 11 2.506E+06 696.11 3.56E+04 1.28E+08 1.08E+ 11 2.509E+06 696.94 3.56E+04 1.28E+08 1.09E+11 2.512E+06 697.78 3.55E+04 1.28E+08 1.09E+11 2.515E+06 698.61 3.55E+04 1.28E+08 1.09E+11 2.518E+06 699.44 3.55E+04 1.28E+08 1.09E+11 2.5218E+06 699.44 3.55E+04 I1.28E+08 1.0911+11 2.521E+06 700.28 3.55E+04 1.28E+08 1.09E+11 2.526E+06 700.83 3.55E+04 1.28E+08 1.09E+11 2.529E+06 701.67 3.55E+04 1.28E+08 1.09E+11 2.532E+06 702.50 3.55E+04 1.28E+08J 1.09E+11 2.535E+06 703.33 3.55E+04 1.28E+08 1.09E+11 2.538E+06 705.17 3.55E+04 1.28E+08 1.0E+11 2.513E+06 705.00 3.55E+04 1.28E+08 1.10E+11 2.543E+06 705.6 I 3.55E+04 1.28E+08 1.10E+11 2.546E+06 706.39 3.55E+04 1.28E+08 1.10E+11 2.549E+06 707.22 3.55E+04 1.28E+I08 1.10E+ 11 2.552E+06 708.89 1 3.55E+04 1.28E+08 1.10E+11 2.555E+06 709.72 3.55E+04- 1.28E+08 11.10E+11 4

2.558E+06-i 710.56 _j.5 E+0 4 1.28E+08 1.10E+11 2.560E+06 711.11 3.54E+04 1.28E+08 1.10E+11 2 711.94 3.54E+04 1.28E+08 1.10E+11 2.566E+06 712.78 3.54E+04 1.28E+08 1.1IE+11 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P36 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load

] i ~Total uHs .Itgae Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load . .. UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) Heat Load Load

.. ...... ..... .[Ref. P5.11 r (u (Btu) 2.569E+06 713.61 3.54E+04 1.28E+08 1.11E+11 2.572E+06 714.44 3.54E+04 1.27E+08 1.11E+11 2.575E+06 715.28 3.54E+04 1.27E+08 1.11E+1 1 2.578E+06 716.11 3.54E+04 1.27E+08 1.11E+11 2.580E+06 716.67 3.54E+04 1.27E+08 1.11E+11 2.583E+06 717.50 3.54E+04 1.27E+08 1.11E+11 2.586E+06 718.33 3.54E+04 1.27E+08 1.11E+11 2.589E+06 2.592E+06 2.595E+06 r

j 719.17 720.00 720.83 3.54E+04 3.54E+04 3.54E+04 1.27E+08 1.27E+08 1.27E+08 1.11E+11 1.11E+11 1.12E+11 2.597E+06 721.39 3.54E+04 1.27E+08 1.12E+11 2.600E+06 722.22 3.54E+04 1.27E+08 1.12E+11 2.603E+06 723.06 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.12E+11 2.606E+06 723.89 3.53E+04 1.27E+08L 1.12E+11 2.609E+06 724.72 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.12E+11 2.612E+06 725.56 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.12E+11 2.615E+06 726.39 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.12E+11 2.617E+06 726.94 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.12E+11 2.620E+06 727.78 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.12E+11 2.623E+06 728.61 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.13E+11 2.626E+06 729.44 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.13E+11 2.629E+06 730.28 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.13E+11 2.632E+06 731.11 3.53E+04 j 1.27E+08 1.13E+11 2.635E+06 731.94 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 _ 1.13E+11 2.637E+06 732.50 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.13E+11 2.640E+06 733.33 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.13E+11 2.643E+06 734.17 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.13E+11 2.646E+06 735.00 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.13E+11 2.649E+06 735.83 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.13E+11 2.652E+06 736.67 3.53E+04 1.27E+08 1.14E+11 2.655E+06 737.0 3.52E+04 _1.27E+08 1.14E+ 11 2.655E+06 738.50 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 1.14E+11 2.663E+066 738.89 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 - 1.14E+11 2.660E+06i 739.72 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 1.14E+11 2.666E+06 1740.56 *3.52E+04 1,27E+08 1.14E+1 1 2.669E+06 741.39 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 1.14E+11 2.672E+06 742.22 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 1.14E+11 2.674E+06 742.78 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 1.14E+11 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P37 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load I Total UHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Total UHS UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btu/s) HeatLoad Load

.. [.Ref. P5.1] __B ) (Btu) 2.677E+06 743.61 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 1.14E+11 2.680E+06 744.44 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 1.15E+11 2.683E+06 745.28 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 1.15E+11 2.689E+06_ 746.11 2.686E+06 746.94 1 3.52E+04 3.52E+04 1.27E+08

__1.27E+08 - 1.15E+11 1.15E+11 2.692E+06 747.78 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 1.15E+11 2.694E+06 748.33 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 1.15E+11 2.697E+06 749.17 i3.52E+04 1.27E+08i 1.15E+11 2.700E+06 750.00 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 1.15E+11 2.703E+06 750.83 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 1.15E-11 2.706E+06 751.67 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 T1.15E+11 2.709E+06 752.50 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 71.16E+111 2.712E+06 753.33 3.52E+04 1.27E+08 1.16E+11 2.714E+06 753.89 3.51E+04 1.27E+08 1.16E+11 2.717E+06 754.72 3.51E+04 1.27E+08 1.16E+11 2.720E+06 755.56 3.51E+04 1.26E+08 1.16E+11 2.723E+06 756.39 3.51 E+04 1.26E+08 1.16E+11 2.726E+06 757.22 3.51E+04 1.26E+08 1.16E+11 2.729E+06 758.06 3.51E+04 1.26E+08 1.16E+11 2.731E+06 758.61 3.51 E+04 1.26E+08 1 1.16E+11 2.734E+06 759.44 3.51E+04 1.26E+08 1.16E+11 2.737E+06 760.28 3.51_E+04 1.26E+08 1.17E+11 2.740E+06t 761.11 3.51E+04 1.26E+08 1.17E+11 2.743E+06 761.94 3.51E+04 1.26E+08 11.17E+11 2.746E+06 762.78 3.51E+04 1.26E+08 1.17E+11 2.749E+06 763.61 3.51E+04 1.26E+08 1.17E+11 2.751E+06 764.17 3.51E+04 1.26E+08 1.17E+11 2.754E+06 .765.00 3.51E+04 1.26E+08 1.17E+11 2.757E+06 765.83 3.51E+04 T 1.26E+08 1.17E+11 2.760E+06 766.678 3.51E+04 I 1.26E+08 1.17E+11 2.763E+06 767.50 3.51E+04 1.26E+08 1.17E+11 2.766E+06 768.33 3.51 E+04 i1.26E+08 1.18E+11 2.769E+06 769.17 3.51E+04 1.26E+08 1.18E+11 2.771E+06 769.72 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 + 1.18E+11 2.774E+06 770.56 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 1.18E+11 2.777E+06 771.39 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 1.18E+11 2.780E+06 772.22 3.5011+04 1.2611+08 1.18E-11 2.783E+06 773.06 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 1.18E+11 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P38 of P58 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P38 of P58 Appendix P9.1: Integrated UHS Heat Load Total UHS TotalUHS Integrated Time Time Heat Load Total UHS Heat (seconds) (hours) (Btuls) Heat LOad Load

[Ref. P5.1] (Btu,-r) (Btu) 2.786E+06 773.89 j 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 1.18E+11 2.788E+06 774.44 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 1.18E+11 2.791E+06 775.28 3.50E+04 j 1.26E+08 1.18E+11 2.794E+06 776.11 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 1.19E+11 2.797E+06 776.94 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 1.19E+11 2.800E+06 777.78 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 1.19E+11 2.803E+06j 778.61 3.50E+04 "1.26E+08 1.19E+11 2.806E+06 779.44 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 1.19E+11 2.808E+06 780.00 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 1.19E+11 2.811E+06 780.83[ 3.50E+04 i.26E+O8 j_.19E+11 2.814E+06 781.67 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 1.19E+11 2.817E+06 782.50 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 ' 1.19E+11 2.820E+06 783.33 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 1.19E+11 2.823E+06 784.17 1 3.50E+04 1.26E+08 120E+11 2.826E+06 785.00 3.49E+04 1.26E+08 1.20E+11 2.828E+06 785.56 3.49E+04 1.26E+08 1.20E+11 2.831E+06 786.39 3.49E+04 1.26E+08 1.20E+11 2.834E+06 787.22 3.49E+04 1.26E+08 J 1.20E+11 2.837E+06 788.06 3.49E_+_04 1.2_6E+08 1_20+11_

2.840E+06 788.89 3.49E+04 1.26E+08 1.20E+11 2.843E+06 789.72 3.49E+04 1.26E+08 I 1.20E+11 2.845E+06 790.28 $ 3.49E+04 1 .26E+08 1.20E+11 2.848E+06 791.11 -- 3.49E+04 1.26E+08 1.20E+11 2.851E+061 791.94 3.49E+04 1.26E+08 1.21E+11 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P39 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Heat Rate Starting Time Ending Time Integrated UHS Heat Te per Plant Temperature (hr) (hr) (cfs) Load (BTU) Tihrstep Rise (*F)

(hr) (hr) -____

0 1 65.3 3.78E+08 13.78E+08 25.95 1 2 65.3 8.46E+08 4.68E+08 32.20 2 3 65.3 1.36E+09 5.11E+08 35.16 3 -4 65.3 --- 1.88E+09 5.21E+08 35.80--  !

4 1 5 65.3 2.25E+09 3.69E+08 25.36 5 . 6 1 65.3 2.57E+09 i 3.26E+08 22.43 6 1 7 . 65.3 2.88E+09 3.09E+081 21.26 7 8 65.3 3.18E+09 2.96E+08 r 20.32 8 9 65.3 3.46E+09 2.82E+08 19.39 9 10 65.3 3.73E+09 2.70E+08 18.57 10 11 6 3.99E+09 2.61E+08 17.96 11 2 65.3 4.24E+09 2.54E+08 17.45 12 13 65.3 4.49E+09 2.47E+08 16.98 13 14 65.3 4.73E+09 2.42E+08 16.64 14 15 65.3 4.97E+09 2.38E+08 16.35 15 16 65.3 5.21E+09 2.35E+08 16.17 16 17 86.0 5.63E+09 4.27E+08 22.29 17 1 18 86.0 6.OOE+09 3.69E+08 19.27 18 19 86.0 6.33E+09 3.28E+08 17.13 19 20 86.0 6.63E+09 2.99E+08 I 15.60 20 21 86.0 6.91E+09 2.77E+08 14.46 21 22 86.0 7.17E+09 2.64E+08I 13.79 22 23 86.0 7.43E+09 2.57E+08 13.42 23 . 24 86.0 7.68E+09 2.53E+08 13.22 24 25 -- 86.0 1-7.93E+09-! 2.50E+08- -- 13.05----

- 26 86.0 I 8.18E+09 2.45E+08 I-12.80 261 277 86.0 8.42E+09 2.40E+08 12.52 27 28 86.0 8.65E+09 2.35E+08 - 12.27 28 I 29 86.0 8.88E+09 1 2.32E+08 1 12.10 29 30 86.0 9.11E+09 2.30E+08 11.98 30 I 31_ 86.0 _9.34E+09 _ 2.28E+08- 11.88 31 1 32 86.0 -9.57E+09 12.26E+08 11.79 32 I 33 - 86.0 9.79E+09 2.24E+08 i 11.71 331 34 86.0 1.OOE+10 2.23E+08 I 11.65 34 !- 35 _ 86.0 J 1.02E+10 2.22E+081 11.58 ,

_ 35J_ 36 ... 86.0 _ 1.05E+10 2.21 E+08t __11.51 ...

-_36 37 86.0 1.07E+10 I 2.19E+08J- 11.45

_37 -_ 38 86.0 j_1009E+10 2.18E+08 11.39 38 39 86.0 1.11E+10 L_217E+08 11.33 39 - 40 86.0 1.13E+10 l 2.16E+08 11.27_i 40 41 86.0 1.15E+10 2.15E+081 11.21 41 42 86.0 1.18E+10- 2.14E+8 11.16 42 143 j 86.0 1.20E+10 2.13E+08 11.10 43 44 86.0 1.22E+10 2.12E+08 11.04 44 45 86.0 1.24E+10 I 2.11E+08 __ 10.99 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P40 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Starting Ending IntegratedI Heat Rate Plant Time Time Flow Rate UHS Heat per Temperature (hr) (hr) (cfs) ep Rise (°F)

()Load(BTU) e(BTU/hr) 45 46 86.0 i 1.26E+10 2.10E+08 10.94 46 . 47 L 86.0 j 1.28E+10 2.09E+08 1 0 89

. [

-47_ j 48 -86.0 I 1.30E '+10 2.08E+08 ! 10.84 48 1 49 -J 86.0 1.32E+10 2.07E+08 10.79 49-j 50 86.0 1.34E+10 2.06E+08 10.75 50 51 86.0 1.36E+10 2.05E+08 10.71 51 52 86.0 1.38E+10 2.05E+08 10.68 52 53 86.0 f 1.40E+10CI 2.04E+08 10.64 53 54 86.0 1.42E+10 2.03E+08 10.60 54 55 86.0 f 1.44E+10 2.02E+08 10.56 55 56 86.0 1.46E+10 2.02E+08 10.53 56 57 86.0 1.49E+10 2.01E+08 I 10.49 57 --58 86.0 1.51E+10 I 2.OOE+08 I 10.46 58 59 86.0 1.53E+10 2.OOE+08 10.42 59 60 60 61 86.0 86.0 1.54E+10 1.56E+10 1.99E+08 1.98E+08 f 10.39 10.35 61 - 62 86.0 1.58E+10 1.98E+08 10.32 62 63 86.0 1.60E+10 1.97E+08 10.29 63 64 86.0 1.62E+10 1.96E+08 10.25 64 65 86.0 1.64E+10 I 1.96E+08 10.22 65 66 86.0 1.66E+10 I 1.95E+08 10.19 66 67 86.0 1.68E+10 1.95E+08 10.15 67 68-- 86.0 _ 1.70E+10 1.94E+08 10.12 68 69 86.0 , 1.72E+10 1.93E+08 10.09__

69 I__ 70 86.0 1.74E+1i_01-_ 1.93E+08 _l 10.06 70 71 I 86.0 1.76E+10 _ 1.92E+08 10.02I-71 .1 72 . 86.0 1.78E+10 1.91E+08 9.99 72 73 86.0 1.80E+10 1.95E+08 10.18 73 J 74 i 86.0 - 1.82E+10 1.99E+081 10.41 74 75 86.0 1.84E+10 1.96E+08 10.25 75 ------76--- 86.0 1.86E+10 1.93E+08 10.10 76 77 I 86.0 1.88E+10 1.91E+08 I 9.99 77 78 - 86.0 1.90E+10 1.90E+08I 9.91 78 79 86.0 11.91E+106_1.89E+08 9.86 79 1 80 86.0 1.93E+10 1.88E+08I 9.82 80--r 81 86.0 I.95E+10 1.87E+087- 9.79 1 2

81 j18 86.0 1.97E+10 1.87E+08 9.75 82 I 83 1 86.0 1.99E+10 1.86E+08 _ 9.73 83 84 1 86.0 2.01E+10 1.86E+08 9.70 i 84 85 p 86.0 2.03E+10 1.85E+08 9.67 85 86 86.0 2.04E+10 1.85E+08 9.65 86 -87 86.0 1 2.06E+10 1.84E+08 9.62 87 88

________- 86.0 -2.08E+10 1 1.84E+08 - -I-- 9.60 88 89 86.0 2.1E+10 1.83E+08 9.58 89 90 86.0 2.12E+10 ; 1.83E+08J-- 9.55 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P41 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Starting Endin Integrated Heat Rate Plant Time Time UHS Heat per Temperature (hr) (hr) (cfs) Load (BTU) TimesteP Rise (°F)

(BTU/hr) 90 91 86.0 2.14E+10 1.83E+08 9.53 91

  • 92 F 86.0 2.15E+l1 1.82E+08 9.51 92 j 93 86.0 2.17E+10 1.82E+08 9.48 93 F94F 86.0 2.19E+10 1.81E+08 9.46 9 95 86.0 2.21E+10 1.81E+08 9.43 95 L 96 F 86.0 2.23E+10 1.80E+08 9.41 96 97 j I 97-1 98 86.0 86.0 2.25E+10 2.26E+10 1.80E+08 1.79E+08 9.39 9.37 98! 99 86.0 2.28E+10 1.79E+08 9.35 99 100 86.0 2.30E+10 1.79E+08 9.33 100 101 [ 86.0 2.32E+10 1.78E+08 9.31 101 102 86.0 2.33E+10 1.78E+08 9.30 102 103 86.0 2.35E+10 1.78E+08 9.28 103 104 86.0 2.37E+10 1.77E+08 9.26 104 1 105 86.0 2.39E+10 1.77E+08 9.24 105 1 106 86.0 2.41E+10 1.77E+08 9.22 106 107 86.0 2.42E+10 1.76E+08 9.21 107 108 86.0 2.44E+10i. 1.76E+08 9.19 108 F 109 86.0 2.46E+10 - 1.76E+081 9.17 109_1 110 86.0 I_2.48E+10 1 1.75E+08 9.15 110 111 86.0 F 2.49E+10 1.75E+08 9.13 111 112 86.0 _2.51E+10 1.75E+08 9.11 112 113 86.0 2.53E+10 1.74E+08 9.10 113 114 86.0 2.55E+10 1.74E+08 9.08 114 115 86.0 2.56E+10 1.74E+08 9.07 115 116 86.0 _j 2.58E+10 1.73E+08 9.05_

116 117 1-86.0-' 2.60E+10 1.73E+08 9.03 117 118 F 86.0 2.61E+10 1.73E+08 9.01 118 119 86.0 2.63E+10 1.72E+08 9.00 119 120 86.0 J 2.65E+10 1.72E+08 8.98 120 121 86.0 -2.67E+10--, 1.78E+08 9.27 121 122 86.0 12.69E+10 1.90E+08 9.93 122 F 123 86.0 F2.70E+10 _ 1.87E+08 F1 9.76 123 124 86.0 j 2.72E+10 1.81E+08 9.43 124 125 86.0 F2.74E+10 1.77E+08 9.23 125 126 86.0 2.76E+10 1.745+08 9.10 126 F 127 86.0 2.78E+10 1.73E+08 9.01 127 .F 128 86.0 2.79E+10 1.71E+08 8.95 128 129 86.0 2.81E+10j1.1+08 8.91 129 130 86.0 2.84E+10 1.70E+08 8.8910 130 131 86.0 2.84E+10 1.70E+08 8.86 1312 132 86.0 2.86E+10 1.69E+08 8.84 132! 133fl 86.0 F2.88E+10 1.69E+08 8.82 133 134 86.0 2.89E+10 1.69E+08 8.81 134 F 135 86.0 2.91E+10 1.68E+08 8.79 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P42 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Startingi Ending Integrated Heat e Plant Time 1 Time flo UHS Heat Temperature (hr) (hr) Load (BTU) t Timestep (BTU/sr) Rise (0F)

Temprtr (BTU/hr) 1351136 86.0 i 2.93E+10 1.68E+08 8.78 136 137 86.0 2.94E+10 1.68E+08 8.76 137 138 86.0 2.96E+10 1.68E+08 8.75 1381 139 86.0 2.98E+10 1.67E+08- 8.74 139 1 140 86.0 2.99E+10I 1.67E+08 8.72 140 141 86.0 3.01E+10 1.67E+08 8.71 1 141 142 86.0 3.03E+10 1.67E+08 8.70 142 143 86.0 3.04E+10 1.66E+08_ 8.68 143 144 86.0 3.06E+10 1.66E+08 8.67 144J 145 86.0 3.08E+10 1.83E+08 9.55 145 146 86.0 3.10E+10 2.07E+08 10.82 1461 147 86.0 3.12E+10 1.97E+08 10.28 147 1 148 86.0 3.14E+10I 1.85E+08 9.65 148 l 149 86.0 3.16E+10 1.77E+08 9.26 149 150 86.0 3.17E+10 1.72E+08 8.98 150 151 86.0 3.19E+ iL[1.69E+08 8.83 ,

151 i 152 86.0 3.21E+10 I 1.67E+08 8.73 152 I 153 86.0 ,-3.22E+10 1.66E+08 8.67 153_ 154! 86.0 3.24_E+10 1.65E+08 8.62 154._ 155 86.0 3.26E+10 1.64E+08 8.59 155 156 j 86.0 3.27E+10 - 1.64E+08 I 8.56 156 157__ 86.0 3.29E+10 1.64E+08 1 8.54 157-- 158 86.0 3.31E+10 1.63E+08 8.52 158 159 86.0 3.32E+10-i 1.63E+08 8.51 I 159 160 86.0 3.34E+10 I1.63E+081 8.50

-- 160 161-1 86.0 3.35E+10I_1.63E+08 - 8.48 161 __162 86.0 3.37E+10 1.62E+08 8.47 162 163 86.0 3.39E+10 1.62E+08 8.46 163-I 164 86.0 3.40E+10 1.62E+08 r 8.45 164 165 86.0 3.42E+10 1.62E+08 8.44 165 166 86.0 1 3.44E+10 1.61E+08 8.43 166 167 86.0 3.45E+10 1.61E+08 8.41 167 168 86.0 3.47E+10 1.61E+08 8.40 168 169 86.0 73.48E+10 1.61E+08I 8.39 169 170 86.0 3.50E+10 1.61E+08 j 8.38 _

170 171 86.0 3.52E+10 1.60E+08 1.60E+08 838 8.37 172 86.0 3.53E+10 171*

172 173 86.0 3.55E+101 1.60E+08 8.36 173 174 86.0 3.56E+10 1.60E+08 8.35 174 175 86.0 .358E+10 1,60E+08 8.34 175 176 - 86.0 __ . 3.60E+10 1.60E+08 8.33 176 177 86.0 3.61E+10 1.60E+08 8.33 177 178 86.0 3.63E+10 1.59E+08- 8.32 178 179 86.0 3.64E+10 1.59E+08 8.31 179 180O 86.0 3.66E+10 1.59E+08 8.30 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P43 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Startingi Ending Flow Rate Integrated Heat Rate Plant Time Time UHS Heat per Temperature 180)(h)I (hr))

181hr)Load (hrTU(crs)Rise Lod (BTU) ,UTimestep, (BTU/hr) 8 (°F)

Rise 180 181 86.0 3.68E+10 1.59E+08 8.29 181 182 86.0 3.69E+10 1.59E+08 I 8.29 182 183 86.0 3.71E+10 1.59E+08 I 8.28 183 14 184 86.0 3.72E+10 1.58E+08 . 8.27 185 86.0 __ 3.745_+1_0. _ 1.58E +08 _j 8...826 . .

185 186 86.0 3.75E+10 1.58E+08I 8.25 186 187 86.0 3.77E+10 1.58E+08 L 8.24 187 188 86.0 3.79E+10 1.58E+08 8.24 188 189 86.0 3.80E+10 1.58E+08 8.23 189 190 86.0 3.82E+10 1.57E+08 8.22 190 191 86.0 3.83E+10 1.57E+08- 8.21 191 192 86.0-_-- 3.85E+10 1.57E+08 8.20 192 193 86.0 3.86E+10 1.57E+08 I 8.20

-193] 194 86.0 3.88E+10 1.57E+08 8.19 1941 195 [ 86.0 3.90E+10 [ 1.57E+08 8.18 195 196 86.0 3.91E+10 1.57E+08 8.17 196 197 86.0 3.93E+10 1.56E+08 8.17 197 j 198 I 86.0 3.94E+10I 1.56E+08 8.16 198 199 86.0 3.96E+10 1.56E+08 8.15 199 200 86.0 3.97E+10 1.56E+08 I 8.14 200 201 86.0 3.99E+10 1.56E+08 8.14 201 202 86.0 __ 4.01E+10 1.56E+08 8.13 202 j 203 86.0 4.02E+10 1.56E+08 8.12 203 1204 86.0 1 4.04E+10 j 1.55E+08 8.11 204_ ',_ 205 .... 86.0_ _I__4.05E+10 1.55E+08 8.11 205 206 I 86.0 4.07E+10 1.55E+08 8.10 206 207 86.0 4.08E+10 1.55E+08! 8.09 207 I 208 86.0 4.10E+10 1.55E+08 8.08 208 209 86.0 4.11E+10 1.55E+08 l 8.08 209 . 210 86.0 4.13E+10 1.55E+08l 8.07 2101 211 86.0 4.14E+10 1.54E+08 I 8.06 211 212 86.0 - 4.16E+10 1.54E+08! 8.05 212 213 86.0 4.18E+10 1.54E+08 8.05 213 I 214 86.0 .14.19E+10 1.54E+08 j 8.04 214 1 215 j 86.0 I 4.21E+10 I 1.54E+08 8.03

_215 [ 216 . 86.0 4.22E+10 1.54E+_08 8.02 216 217 . 86.0 4.24E+10 I1.54E+08 8.02 217 218 . 86.06- 4.25E+10I 1.53E+084_ 891_

218 219 86.0 4.27E+10 1.53E+08_ 8.00

__219 220 86.0 -4.28E+ 10 1.53E+08 8.00 220 221 86.0 I 4.30E+10 1.53E+08 7.99 221 -222 ' 86.0 .1-4.31E+10 1.53E+08 G- 7.98 222 1- 223 86.0 4.33E+10 I 1.-3-E+08- 7.98 223 224 86.0 4.34E+10- 1.53E+08 7.97 224 225 86.0 4.36E+10 1.53E+08 7.96 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P44 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Starting Ending Flow Rate Integrated HeatperRate Plant Temperature Time Time (cfs) UHS Heat Timestep Rise (°F) r) (hr) Load (BTU) (BTU/hr) R 225 I 226 j 8 6 .0 4.37E+10i 1.52E+08 7.96 226 L2271 86.0 4.39E+10 1.52E+08 7.95 227 286.0 228 4.41E+10 1.52E+08 .- .7.95 228 _229 86.0 4.42E+10 1.52E+08 7.94

-229 230 - 86.0 4.44E+10 [ 1.52E+08 7.93 230 231 86.0 4.45E+10 1.52E+08 7.93 231 232 I 86.0 4.47E+10 1.52E+08 - 7.92 232 233 86.0 4.48E+10 1.52E+08[ 7.92 233 234 86.0 4.50E+10 1.52E+08 7.91 234 235 86.0 4.51E+10 1.51E+08 7.91 235f 236 86.0 4.53E+10 1.51E+08 7.90 236 237 2- 86.0 4.54E+10 1.51E+08 7.90 237 238 86.0 4.56E+10 1. 1E+08i 7.89 238 239 I 86.0 4.57E+10 1.51E+08 7.88 239 240 86.0 4.59E+10 1.51 E+08 7.88 240 241 86.0 4.60E+10 1.51E+08 7.87 241 242 I 86.0 4.62E+10 1.51E+081 7.87 242 243 86.0 4.63E+10 1.51E+08 7.86 243 244 I 86.0 4.65E+10 1.51E+08 7.86 244 245 86.0 4.66E+10 1 1.50E+081- 7.85 245 _246 86.0 4.68E+10 1.50E+08 I 7.85 246 247 86.0 4.69E+10 1.50E+08 1 7.84 247 248 86.0 . 4.71E+10 ! 1.50E+081 7.84 248 249 86.0 4.72E+10 1.50E+08I 7.83 249 250 86.0 4.74E+10 1.50E+08 7.83 250 251 86.0

  • 4.75E+10 1.50E+08 7.82 251 252 86.0 4.77E+10 1.50E+08
  • 7.82 252 253 86.0 4.78E+10 1.50E+08 [ 7.81 253 254j 86.0 4.80E+10 1.50E+08 7.81 254 255 1 86.0 I 4.81E+10 I 1.49E+08 7.80 255 256 . 86.0 4.83E+10 1.49E+08 - 7.80 256 I 257 I 86.0 4.84E+10 1.49E+08 I 7.79 257 I 258 1 86.0 I 4.86E+10 I 1.49E+08 I 7.79 258 259 1 86.0 4.87E+10 j 1.49E+08 7.78 259 I 260 86.0 4.89E+10 1.49E+081 7.78 260 261 86.0 4.90E+10 1.49E+08 7.77 261 262 86.0 -4.92E+1-0-- 1.,49E+08 7. 262_ 263 86.0 1 4.93E+10 11.49E+08 j 7.76 263 264 86.0 1 4.95E+10 1.49E+08 _ 7.76 264 1 265 86.0 4.96E+10 1.481E+08_ 7.75 26 86 0 5 266 . j 4.98E+10 1.48E+08 7.75 266 267 86.0 1 4.99E+10 1.48E+08 7.74 267 268 86.0 5.01E+10 1.48E+08 7.74 268 269-I 86.0 5.02E+10 1.48E+08 7.73 269 270 86.0 5.04E+10_,1.48E+08 7.73 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P45 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Starting Ending FowRt TiEnTime Integrated UHS Heat HeatperRate Plant Pan T Time Times Temperature (hr) (hr) Load (BTU) (BTUihr) Rise (*F) 270 271 86.0 15.05E+10 1.48E+08 r 7.72 271 272 86.0 5.07E+10 1.48E+08 7.72 2721 273 86.0 5.08E+101. 1.48E+08 7.71 273 274 86.0.---j-09E+10-; ._1.48E+08 .1 7..71 274 1 275 r 86.0_  ! 5.11E+10 1.48E+08.! 7.70 S275 1276 86.0 5.12E+10 1.47E+08L 7.70 276: 277 86.0 5.14E+10 1.47E+08 7.69 277 278 86.0 -_5.15E+10 L 1.47E+08 7.69 278 279 86.0 5.17E+10L 1.47E+08 7.69 279j 280 86.0 I 5.18E+10 1.47E+08 7.68 280 281 86.0 5.20E+10 1.47E+08 I 7.68 281 282 86.0 5.21E+10 1.47E+08 7.67 282 _._283 86.0 5.23E+10 1.47E+08 7.67 283 1284 86.0 5.24E+10 1.47E+081 7.67 284 285 86.0 5.26E+10 1.47E+08 7.66 285 286 86.0 5.27E+10 1.47E+08 7.66 286 287 86.0 5.29E+10 1.47E+08 7.65

_287 288 j 86.0 5.30E+10 1.47E+08 7.65 288 289 86.0 5.32E+10 1.46E+08 7.65 289 290 86.0 -__5.33E+10 1.46E+08 7.64 290 291_! 86.0 5.34E+10 J 1.46E+08 7.64 291 292 86.0 5.36E+10 1.46E+08. 763 292 293 86.0 5.37E+10 1.46E+08 7.63 I 294 I 86.0 5.391E+10 1.46E+08 7.63 294 295 _ 86.0 5.40E+10 1.46E+08 7.62 295 296 86.0 5.42E+10 1.46E+08 7.62 1 296 297 86.0 5.43E+10 1.46E+08 7.62 297 298 86.0 5.45E+10 1.46E+08 7.61 298 299 86.0 5.46E+10 1.46E+08 7.61 299 300 86.0 5.48E+10 1.46E+08 7.61 300 301 86.0 5.49E+ 1_ 1.4_6_E+08 7.60 301 302 I 86.0__ 5.50E+10 1_.46E+08 7.60 302 303 86.0 . 5.52E+10 1.45E+08

_7.59 303 304 86.0 5.53E+10 1.45E+08 I 7.59 304 305 86.0 5.55E+10 1.45E+08 7.59

-366 886-.0 -i5-56-E+10- 1-1.4-5E&N-1 -7.5-8 305J 307 86.0 5.58E+10 1.45E+08I 7.58 307 308 86.0 5.59E+10 1.45E+08 7.58 308 309 86.0 5.61E+10 [ 1.45E+08 7.57=

309 t- 310 86.0 5.62E+10 1.45E+08 I 7.57 310 311 86.0 5.64E+10 1.45E+08_ 7.57 311 312 86.0 5.65E+10 1.45E+08 7.56 312 __ 313 86.0 15.66E+10 1.45E+08 7.56 313 1 314 86.0 5.68E+10 1.45E+08 i 7.55 314 F 315 86.0 5.69E+10 . 1.45E+08 1 7.55 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P46 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Starting Ending Integrated Heat Rate Plant Flow Rate per Time Time UHS Heat step Temperature (hr) (hr) Load (BTU) I(BTUehr) Rise (F) 315 1 316 _. 86.0 5.71E+10 1.45E+08t 7.55 316 _317 86.0 5.72E+10 1.45E+081 7.54 317 318 86.0 5.74E+10 1.44E+08 7.54 .

318 319 86.0 5.75E+10' 1.44E+08 I 7.54 319  ! 320 86.0 5.77E+10I 1.44E+08 7.53 320I 321 86.0 5.78E+10 1.44E+08 ] 7.53 321 322 86.0 5.79E+10.; 1.44E+08 7.53 322- 323 86.0 _L5.81E+10 1.44E+08 7.52 323 ] 324 86.0 5.82E+10 1.44E+08 7.52 324 325 86.0 5.84E+10 1.44E+08 7.52 325 326 86.0 5.85E+10 [1.44E+08 7.51 326 I 327 86.0 1 5.87E+10 F 1.44E+08 7.51 327 I 328 86.0 5.88E+10 I 1.44E+08 7.51 328 329 86.0 5.90E+10 I 1.44E+08__ 7.50 329 330 86.0 5.91E+10 I 1.44E+08 7.50 330 331 86.0 5.92E+10 1.44E+08 7.49 331_I1332 I 86.0 5.94E+10 I 1.44E+08 7.49 332 1 333 86.0 5.95E+10 I 1.43E+08 7.49 333[334 86.0 1 5.97E+10 .j 1.43E+08 . 7.48 334 335 86.0 5.98E+10 1.43E+08 I 7.48 35 336 86. I6.00E+19 14E+8 7.48 -

336 337 86.0 6.01E+10 1.43E+08 7.47 -

337 338 86.0 6.02E+10+ 1.43E+08 I 7.47 338 I 339 i 86.0 '_ 6.04E+10 1.43E+08.__1 --- 7.47 339 340 j 86.0 . 6.05E+10 1.43E+08 I 7.46 340 I 341 i. 86.0 6.07E+10 ! 1.43E+08 - 7.46 341 342 .. 86.0 6.08E+10i 1.43E+08 7.46 342 I 343_ 86-0 6-10E+10 1.43E+08 7 745 343 3 .86.0 6.11E+10 .43+08 7.45 344 I 345 86.0 6.12E+10 I 1.43E+08 7.45

-345 346 I 86.0 1 6.14E+10 1.43E+08j 7.44 346 347 - 86.0 6.15E+10 1.43E+08 7.44 347 I 348 86.0 6.17E+10 i1.42E+08 I 7.44

348 349 86.0 6.18E+10 1.42E+08 7.43 349 1 350 86.0 6.20E+10 1.42E+08 7.43 350 351 86.0 6.21E+10 1.42E+08 __7.43 351 352 86.0 I 6.22E+10I 1.42E+08 7.42 352 353 86.0 6.24E+10 1.42E+08 7.42 353 354 86.0 6.25E+10 1.42E+08 7.42

" 354i9 355 86 .0 6.27E+10_[ 1.42E+08 7.41 355 356 -- 86.0 -6.28E+100 1.42E+08- 7.41-356 357 86.0 6.29E+10_1.42E+08 7.41 357 358 I 86.0 6.31E+10 L 1.42E+087 7.40 358 359 86.0 6.32E+10 1.42E+08 7.40 _

359 360 86.0 6.34E+10 [ 1.42E+08 7.40 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P47 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Starting Ending EnigFlow Rate Integrated Heat per Rate Pln Plant (hr)

Time (hr)

Time (h)(r I (cfs)

Flow Integra UHS HeatR Tietp Load (BTU) (BTU/hr)

La(T TUimerte Rie(F Temperature Rise (°F) 360 361 86.0 6.35E+10 1.42E+08 7.39 361 J 362 j 86.0 6.37E+10 1.42E+08 7.39 362 363 86_.0_ J. 6.38E+10__: 1.42E+08 7.39-363 364 86.0 6.39E+10 1.41E+08 _7.38 364 365 86.0 6.41E+10 1.41E+08 7.38 365  : 366 86.0 6.42E+10- 1.41E+08 7.38 366 367 86.0 6.44E+10 1.41E+08 7.37 367 _ 368 86.0 6.45E+101 1.41E+08 7.37 368 369 86.0 6.46E+10 1.41E+08 7.37 369 370 86.0 6.48E+10 1.41E+08 7.36 370 371 86.0 6.49E+10 1.41E+08 7.36 371 { 372 86.0 6.51E+10 1.41E+08 7.36 372 373 86.0 6.52E+10 1.41E+08 7.35_

373 374 86.0 6.54E+10 1.41E+08 7.35 374 375 86.0 6.55E+10 [ 1.41E+08 7.35 375 376 86.0 6.56E+10 I 1.41E+08 7.34 376 377 86.0 6.58E+10 1.41E+08 7.34 377 378 86.0 I6.59E+10 J 1.41E+08 7.34 378 379 86.0 6.61E+10 1.41E+08 7.33 379 380-i 86.0 6.62E+10- 1.40E+081I 7.33 J

__380 381 86.0 _ 6.63E+10 1.40E+08I 7.33 381 I 382 86.0 '6.65E+10 1.40E+08I 7.33 382 1383 86.0 6.66E+10 1.40E+08I 7.32 383 I-384 i 86.0 . 6.68E+10 1.40E+08-I 7.32 384 _385 86.0 6.69E+10 i1.40E+08 7.32 __

385 386 86.0 6.70E+10 1.40E+08 7.31 386 _ 387 86.0 6.72E+10- 1.40E+08 7.31 387 I 388 86.0 6.73E+10 J1.40E+08 7.31 3881 389 86.0 6.75E+10 1.40E+08 7.30 389 ! 390 86.0 6.76E+109 1.40E+08 7.30 390-1 391 86.0 6.77E-10 1.40E+08 7.30 391 392

- W86.0 6.79E+10 !- 1.40E+08- 7.29 --

392 393 86.0 6.80E+10 1.40E+08 . 7.29 393 I 394 86.0 6.82E+10 1.40E+08 7.29 394 F 395 86.0 6.83E+10 1.40E+08 7.28 395 396 86.0 6.84E+10 i 1.39E08 7.28 396 397 86.0 6.86E+10 --- 139E+0- 7.28 397 398 86.0 6.87E+10 1.39E+08 7.28 398 399 86.0 6.89E+10{1.39E+08 7.27 399 400 86.0 6.90E+10 1.39E+08 7.27 400 401 86.0 6.91E+10 1.39E+08 7.27 401 402 86.0  ! 6.93E+10 1.39E+08 7.26 402 403 86.0 6.94E+10 1.39E+08 - 7.26 403 404 86.0 6.95E+10 1.39E+08 7.26 404 1 405 86.0 6.97E+10 i1-39E+08 7.25 1 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P48 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results

.1Heat Starting Ending Integrated HerRate Plant Time Time (estep i UHS Heat Time p ise(°F Temperature (hr) (hr) ( Load (BTU) Timestep

,_____ _____ . I (BTU/hr)____________

405 [ 406 86.0 1 6.98E+10 1.39E+08 7.25 406 407 86.0 7.00E+10 1.39E+08 7.25 1

407 '-408 86.0-,--7.01-E+410 1 1.39E+08 7.24 408 409 86.0 I 7.02E+10 1.39E+08 I 7.24 409 410 86.0 7.04E+10 1.39E+08 7.24 410 411 86.0 7.05E+10 1.39E+08 7.23

. 411] 412 I 86.0 7.07E+10 1.39E+081 7.23 412 1 413 86.0 7.08E+10 1.38E+08 7.23

  • 413 414 86.0 7.09E+10 1.38E+08 7.23 414 415 86.0 7.11E+10 1.38E+08 7.22 415 416 86.0 7.12E+10 1.38E+08 7.22 416 _ 417 86.0 7.14E+10 1.38E+08 7.22 417 418 86.0 7.15E+10 1.38E+08 7.21 418 _419 86.0 7.16E+10 1.38E+08 7.21 419 420 86.0 7.18E+10 1.38E+08 7.21 420 L 421 86.0 7.19E+10 1.38E+08 7.20 421 422 86.0 7.20E+10 1.38E+08 7.20 422 423 86.0 7.22E+10 1.38E+08 7.20 42:3 424
-__*86.0 7.23E+10 1.38E+08__ 7.20 424 1 425 1 86.0 7.25E+10 1.38E+08 1 7.19 425 426 f_86.-0 _7--.2.o6E+ 101ý.-
  • .7._l E+.08*.199_

426 427, 86.0 7.27E+10 1.38E+08 7.19 427 428 86.0 _ 7.29E+10 I 1.38E+08 I 7.19

-428-- 429 - 86.0 7.30E+100 1.38E+08 7.19 4,29 430 86.o J7.31E+10 1 1.38E+08 7.18 430 431 86.0 7.33E+10 1.38E+08 7.18 431j434I 86.0 7.34E+10 1.38E+08 7.18 432- I4-33 -8'6'.0 7.36E+10 1.37E+08 ___7.18 433 J434 1 86.0 1 7.37E10 1.37E+08 7.17 43641 435 86.0 7.38E+10I 1.37E+08 I 7.17 435 I 436 86.0 7.40E+10I 1.37E+081 7.17 436 1437 1_86.0 7-ý.41E+10- -1.37E-+08.- 7.17 437 I 438 86.0 7.42E+10 I_1.37E+08I 7.16 438 J-439 I 86.0 7.44E+10 I11.37E+081 7.16 439 1 440 86.0 7.45E+10 I 1.37E+08 I 7.16 1440 1441 - -1 86.0 -_7.47E+l 0 1.37E+08 I 7.16 441 442 86.0 I 7.48E+10 1.37E+08 7.15
  • 2j 443 86.0 r 7.49E+10 J 1.37E+08 7.15 443 L 444 86.0 7.51E+10 1.37E+08 7.15 444 445 86.0 7.52E+10 1.37E+08 I 7.15 445 - 446 86.0 7.53E+10 1.37E+081 7.14--1 446 447 86.0 7.55E+10i 1.37E+08 7.14 447 448 86.0 7.56E+10 I 1.37E+08 7.14 448 449 86.0 7.57E+10 1.37E+08 7.14 449 I 450 86.0 7.59E+10 1.37E+08 7.14 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P49 of P58 CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P49 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Starting Ending F Integrated Heat Rate Plant Time Time F a UHS Heat per Temperature Time Time (cfs) Load (BTU) Timestep (BTU/hr) Rise (°F) 450 . 451 [ 86.0 7.60E+10 1.37E+08 7.13 451 j 452 86.0 7.62E+10 1.37E+08 7.13 45271 453 86.0 7.63E+10!1 1.37E+08 7.13

__453 - 454 -J 86.0 7.64E+ 10 [ 1.37E+08 7.13 454 455 86.0 7.66E+10 I 1.36E+08 7.12 455 456 86.0 7.67E+ 10 J 1.36E+08 7.12 456 I 457 86.0 7.68E+10 1.36E+08 7.12 457 458 86.0 7.70E+10t 1.36E+08 7.12 45458 459 86.0 7.71E+10 1.36E+08 7.11 459 460 86.0 7.72E+10 1.36E+08 7.11 460 461 86.0 7.74E+10 1.36E+08 7.11 461 j 462 86.0 7.75E+10-1.36E+08 7.11 462J 463 86.0 7.77E+10 1.36E+08 7.11 463 464 86.0 7.78E+10 1.36E+08 7.10

_464 I 465 86.0 7.79E+10 1.36E+08 7.10 465 1 466 86.0 7.81E+10 1.36E+08 7.10 466 467 86.0 7.82E+1 1.36E+08 7.10 467 468 86.0 J 7.83E+ 10 1.36E+08 7.09 468 46 9- 860 '7.85E+10 I 1.36E+08 7.09 469 I 470 86.0 ' 7.86E+10 1.36E+08 7.09 470 I 471 86.0 7.87E+10 1.36E+08 7.09 471 [ 472 . 86.0~ 7.89E+10 1.36E+08 _ 7.08 472 + 473 86.0 7.90E+10 1.36E+08 7.08 j474 4473 86.0 7.92E+10 j 1.36E+08 7.08 474 I 475 86.0 7.93E+10 1.36E+08 7.08 475 476 86.0 7.94E+10 1.36E+08 7.08 476 I 477 86.0 7.96E+10 1.35E+08 7.07 4771 478 86.0 7.97E+10 1.35E+081 7.07 -

478 479 86.0 7.98E+10 1.35E+08 7.07 479 480 86.0 8.00E+10 1.35E+08 7.07 480 481 86.0 8.01E+10 1.35E+08 7.06 481 J 482 86.0 8.02E+10 1.35E+08 7.06 482 1483 86.0 8.04E+10 1.35E+081 7.06 483 1 484 I 86.0 8.05E+10 I 1.35E+08 1 7.06 484 485 86.0 8.06E+10I 1.35E+081 7.05 485. 486 86.0 8.08E+10 j 1.35E+08 7.05 486 487 86.0 18.09E+10 I 1.35E+08- I 7.05 .

487 I 488 I 86.0 8.10E+10 I 1.35E+08 7.05 488 489 86.0 r8.12E+10 J1.35E+08 705 489_ 490 - 86.0 8.13E+10 1.35E+08 1 7.04 490 I 491 I 86.0 8.15E+10 1.35E+08 7.04 491 492 86.0 8.16E+10 1.35E+08 7.04_ _

492 I 493 86.0 8.17E+10 1.35E+08 7.04 493__ 494 86.0 8.19E+10 1.35E+08 I 7.04 494 I 495 86.0 8.20E+10 1.35E+08 7.03 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P50 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Starting Ending Heat Rate Plant TimeFlow Rate UHS Heatd per ITemperature (hr) (hr) (cfs) Load(BTU) (BTU/hr) Rise (*F) 495 496 86.0 8.21E+10 1.35E+08 7.03 496 497 86.0 I 8.23E+10 1.35E+08L 7.03 497 498 86.0 8.24E+10 1.35E+08 7.03 4988 499 86.0 8.25E+1

_ 1.35E+08 7.02 ....

499 500 86.0i 8.27E+10 1.35E+08 7.02 500 501 j 86.0 I 8.28E+10i 1.34E+08 7.02 501 502 I 86.0 8.29E+10 j 1.34E+08 7.02 502 503 86.0 8.31E+10 [ 1.34E+08 7.02 503 504 86.0 I 8.32E+10 _ 1.34E+08 7.01 504 505 86.0 8.33E+10 1.40E+081 7.33 505 F 506 86.0 8.35E+10 1.52E+08 I 7.93 506 - 507 86.0 8.36E+10 1.50E+08 7.83 507 I 508 86.0 8.38E+10 I 1.44E+08 7.51 508 1509 86.0 8.39E+10 [ 1.40E+08 7.33 509 510 86.0 8.41E+10 1.38E+08 7.20 510 511 86.0 8.42E+10 1.36E+08 7.11 511 512 I 86.0 8.43E+10 1.35E+08 7.07 _

512 51_3 86.0 8.45E+10 1.35E+08 7.04 513 514 86.0 8.46E+10 .1.35E+08 7.02 514 515 86.0 8.47E+10 1.34E+08j 7.01 5151516 86.0 8.49E+10 1.34E+08 7.00 I 516 517 86.0 8.50E+10 1_1.34E+08 _ 6.99 517 518  : 86.0 8.51E+10 1.34E+08 6.99 518 519 86.0 8.53E+10 1.34E+08I 6.99 519 520 86.0 8.54E+10 I 1.34E+08 I 6.98 -_

520 521 I 86.0 8.55E+10 1.34E+08[ 6.98 521 -- 522  ! 86.0 8.57E+10 1.34E+08 6.98 522 ! 523 86.0 8.58E+10 I 1-34E+08 6.97

-- 523-] 524 86.0 8.59E+10-1 1.34E+08 1" 6.97 524 525 86.0 8.61E+10I 1.34E+08 6.97 525 526 86.0 8.62E+10 I 1.33E+08 6.97 526 I 527 86.0 8.63E+10 1.33E+08 6.97 527 I 528 86.0 8.65E+10 I 1.33E+08 6.96 _1 528 1 529 86.0 1 8.66E+10 ' 1.33E+08 6.96 5291 530 86.0 8.67E+10 1.33E+08 6.96 530 1-531 86.0 8.69E+10 1.33E+08 6.96 531] 532 . 86.0 8.70E+10 1.33E+08 6.95 532 533 86.0 I 8.71E+10 1.33E+08 6.95 533 534 86.0 8.73E+10 1.33E+08 6.95 534 535 86.0 8.74E+10 1.33E+08 6.95 535 536 86.0 8.75E+10 1.33E+08 6.95 .

536 537 86.0 8.77E+10 1.33E+08 6.95 537 538 86.0 8.78E+10 1.33E+08 6.94 I 538 539 86.0 8.79E+10 1.33E+08 6.94 539 540 86.0 8.81E+10 1.33E+08 L 6.94 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P51 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Starting EnIn Flow Rate Iper Ending Integrated Heat Rate lPlant Time Time UHS Heat Timestep erature (hr) (hr) (cfs) Load(BTU) (BT Rise (*F) 540 541 1 86.0 8.82E+10 1.33E+08 6.94 541 I 542 86.0 8.83E+10 j 1.33E+08 6.93 542 543 86.0 8.85E+10 1.33E+08 6.93 543 544 86.0 8.86E+10 1.33E+08 6.93 544 545 - 86.0 8.87E+10 1.33E+08 6.93 545 546 86.0 I 8.89E+10 1.33E+08 6.93 546 547 I 86.0 8.90E+10 1.33E+08 6.92 547 548 - 86.0 8.91E+10 1.33E+08 6.92 548 549 1 86.0 8.93E+10 1.33E+08 6.92 5491 550 86.0 8.94E+10 1.33E+08 6.92 550l 551 86.0 8.95E+10 1.32E+08 6.92 551 -- 552 1 86.0 8.97E+10-1 1.32E+08 6.91 552 553 86.0 8.98E+10 I 1.32E+08 6.91 k553] 1554 86.0 8.99E+10 I 1.32E+081 6.91 554 555 86.0 9.01E+10 1.32E+08 _ 6.91 555 556 86.0 9.02E+10 1.32E+08 6.91 556 557 1 86.0 9.03E+10 1.32E+08 6.90 557 I 558 86.0 9.05E+10 1.32E+08 6.90 5581 559 86.0 9.06E+10 1.32E+08I 6.90 559 560 86.0 9.07E+10 1.32E+08 6.90 560 561 86.0 9.09E+10 1.32E+08 6.90 561 _ 562 86.0 9.10E+10 1.32E+08 6.90 562 563 86.0 9.11E+10 1.32E+08 6.89 563 I 564 . 86.0 9.13E+10 1.32E+08 6.89 564 565 86.0 9.14E+10 1.32E+0_8.,1* 6.89 565 I 566 I 86.0 9.15E+10j 1.32E+08 6.89 566 1567 86.0 9.17E+10 1.32E+08-- 6.89 567 1 568 1 86.0 9.18E+101 1.32E+08 6.89 5687T 569 I 86.0 9.19E+10 1.32E+08 6.88 569 1 570 86.0 1 9.20E+10 1 1.32E+08 1 6.88 570 1571 86.0 1 9.22E+10 I 1.32E+08 6.88 571 I 572 86.0 9.23E+10 1.32E+08 6.88 5721 573 86.0 9.24E+10I 1.32E+08 I 6.88 573 I 574 86.0 - 9.26E+10 1.32E+08 6.88 574 1 575 86.0 9.27E+10_ 1.32E+08 6.87

--- 575 _*_ 576---;! 86.0__ 9.2.8E+10 1.32E+08J - 6.87 1 576I._577L9 86.0 9.30E+10 I 1.32E+08 6.87 577 ý 578 86.0 9.31E+10 1.32E+08j 6.87 578. 579 86.0 9.32E+10 1.32E+08 6.87 579 1.580 -86.0

  • 9.34E+10 1.32E+081 6.86

__5.80 i 581 I 86.0_' _'9.35E+10_1 1.31E+08 6.86 581 582 ' 86.0 -: 9.36E+10 I 1.31E+08 6.8 6 582 r 583 86.0 9.38E+10 I 1.31E+08 6.86 583 j 584 86.0 9.39E+10 1.31E+08 6.86 584 i 585 86.0 .l 9"40E+10_; 1.31E+08 6.86 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P52 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Starting! Ending Flow Ra Integrated Heat Rate Plant Time Time UHS Heat pe Temperature (hr) (hr) (cfs) ILoad (BTU) Timestep Rise (*F)

(BTU/hr) 585 . 586 86.0 9.42E+10 1.31E+08 j 6.86 586 587 86.0 9.43E+10 1.31E+081 6.85 587 588 86.0 9.44E+10 1.31E+08 6.85 588 589 86.0 9.45E+10 1.31E+08 6.85 589 590 86.0 9.47E+10 1.31E+)8 6.85 590 . 591 86.0 -9.48E+10 1.31E+08 1 6.85 591 592 86.0 9.49E+10 I 1.31E+08 [ 6.85 592 593 86.0 9.51E+10 1.31E+08 6.84 593 594 86.0 9.52E+10 1.31E+08 6.84 594 595 86.0 9.53E+10 1.31E+08 6.84 595 596 86.0 9.55E+10 1.31E+08 6.84 5963 597 1-86.0-1 9.56E+10 1.31E+08 6.84 597 598 86.0 9.57E+10 1.31E+08[ 6.84 598 599 86.0 9.59E+10 1.31E+08 6.83 599 600 86.0 9.60E+10 1.31E+08 . 6.83 6001601 86.0 9.61E+10 1.31E+08I 6.83 601 602 86.0 I 9.62E+10 1.31E+08 6.83 602 603 86.0 9.64E+10 1.31E+08 6.83 603 604 86.0 9.65E+10 1.31E+08 _ 6.83 604 605 86.0 9.66E+10 1.31E+08 6.82 605 _606 86.0 9.68E+10 1.31E+08 6.82____

606 607

  • 86.0 9.69E+10 1.31E+08 6.82 607_ 608 _; 86._0 .70E+10

_ 1.31 E+08 6.82 608 609 86.0 I 9.72E+10 1.31E+08- 6.82-1 609 610 86.0 9.73E+10 1.31E+08 6.82 611 611 86.0 I 9.74E+10 !1.31E+08 6.81 611 612 86.0 9.76E+10 1.31E+08 6.81 61l2 613 86.0 977E+10 1.30E+08 6.81 613 614 86.0 9.78E+10 1.30E+08 . 6.81 614j- 615 86.0 I 9.79E+10 I 1.30E+08 6.81 615 616 I 86.0 - 9.81E+10 _ 1.30E+08 6.81 617 616 -__86.0 9.8 2E 1.30E+08 -6.1 617 618 86.0 I 9.83E+10 1.30E+08 I 6.80 618 619 86.0 f 9.85E+10Oi 1.30E+08 6.80

  • 619L 620 86.0 9.86E+101_1.30E+08 6.80 620 621 86.0 I 9.87E+10 1.30E+08 6.80 1 621 622 86.0 9.89E+10 1.30E+08 6.80 622 623 86.0 9.90E+10 1.30E+08 6.80 623 624 86.0 9.91E+10 _ 1.30E+08[ 6.79 ,

624 625 86.0 9.92E+10J 1.30E+08 I 6.79 625 626 86.0 I 9.94E+10 1.30E+08 6.79-626 627 86.0 -9.95E+10_1 .30E+08 6.79 627 628 86.0 9.96E+10 1.30E+08 6.79_-

628 629 86.0 9.98E+10 1.30E+08* 6.79 629 630 86.0 9.99E+10. 1.30E+08 -. 6.78 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P53 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Starting Ending Flow Ra

  • te Integrated IoHeat perRate Plant Time Time t UHS Heat per . Temperature (hr) (hr) ] ( Timete Load (BTU) ~(BTUlhr) Rise (*F) 630 631 86.0 1.-i 1+11 1.30E+08 - 6.78_

21

_6_32..

632 1-86.0 633 __86.0 I11.00E+11

.OOE+1 1 11.30E+08 1.30E+08 j 6.78 6.78 6334 634 86.0 I_1.00E+11 ! 1.30E+08 1 6.78 6341 635_..__.I. 86.0 [1.01E+11 1.30E+08J 6.78 635 636 86.0 1.01E+11 1.30E+08 6.77 6361[637 86.0 1.01E+11 1.30E+08J 6.77 637 638 86.0 1.01E+11 1.30E+08 - 6.77 638 639 86.0 1.01E+11 1.30E+08 6.77 639 640 86.0 1.01E+11 1.30E+08 6.77 640 641 F 86 .0 _ 1.01E+11 1.30E+08] 6.77 641j 642 86.0 1.01E+11 1.30E+081 6.77 642 643 86.0 L 1.02E+ 11 1.30E+08_ 6.76 6431. 644 86.0 1.02E+11 I1.30E+08 F 6.76 644 645 86.0 1.02E+11 1.30E+08 I 6.76 6451 646 86.0. 1.02E+11 1.29E+081 6.76 646" 647 86.0 1.02E+11 1.29E+08 6.76 6471 648 86.0 1.02E+11 1.29E+08 6.76 648 I 649 I 86.0 1.02E+11 1.29E+08 6.75 649__ 650 86.0 - 1.02E+11 i 1.29E+08 6.75 650 ... 65 1i 86.0 1.03E+11 I 1.29E+08 6.75 651 652 1 86.0 1.03E+11 1.29E+08 I 6.75 652 653 86.0 I 1.03E+11 I 1.29E+08 I 6.75 653 1 654 I 86.0 i 1.03E+11 1.29E+08 6.75 654 655 86.0 1.03E+11 I 1.29E+08 6.74 656 6567 86.0 I 1.03E+11 1.29E+08 ! 6.74 657 658 86.0 1.04E+11 1.29E+08 6.74 658 659 j 86.0 1.04E+11 1.29E+08 6.74 6:ý58:= 659 86.0 1.04E+1 1 1.29E+08 6.74 659 660 86.0 I 1.04E+11 1.29E+08 6.74 6_60 661 86.0 1.04E+11 _ 1.29E+08_ 6.743 .

661 662 86.0 1.04E+11 1.29E+08 6.73 662 I 6634 86.0 1.04E+11 1.29E+08 6.73 663 664 86.0 1.04E+ 11 1.29E+08 6.73 664 665 86.0 1.04E+11 1.29E+08 6.73 665 666 86.0 1.05E+11 I 1.29E+08 6.73 666] 667 86.0 I_1.05E+11 1.29E+08 6.73 667 668 86.0 1 1.05E+11 1.29E+08 6.72 668 669 86.0 I 1.05E+11 1 1.29E+08 6.72 66 670~ 86.0

  • 1.05E+ 11 i1.29E+08 I 6.72 670 i 671 6.0-- - .0-5E+11- 1.2gE+0 . .6.72 671 672 86.0 1.05E+11 I 1.29E+08 6.72 672 673 86.0 _ 1.05E+11 1.29E+08 6.72 673 674 86.0 1.06E+11 1.29E+08 6.72

___674_ 675 86.0 1.06E+11 1.29E+08 6.71 j PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P54 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Starting Ending Integrated Heat Rate Plant Flow Rate UHS Heat per Tern Time (hr) Time (hr) (cfs) Load (BTU) Timestep (BTU/hr) Re (°F)

Rise 675 676 86.0 1 1.06E+11 1.29E+08 6.71 676 _ 677 86.0 1.06E+11 1.291E+08 6.71 677 678 1 86.0 1.06E+11 1.29E+08 6.71 678--- 679 186.0 1.06E+11 1.29E+08 6.71 679 j 680 86.0 1.06E+11 1.28E+08 6.71 680 681 - 86.0 1.06E+11 1.28E+08 1_6.71 681 682~ 86.0 1.07E+11 1.28E+08 6.70 682I 683 86.0 1.07E+11 1.28E+08 6.70 6832 684 86.0 1.07E+11 1.28E+08 6.70 684 685 86.0 1.07E+11 1.28E+08 j 6.70 685 686 86.0 1 1.07E+11 1.28E+08 6.70 686 687 86.0 i 1.07E+11 1.28E+08 6.70 687 688 86.0 1.07E+11 1.28E+08 f 6.69 688 689 86.0 1.08E+11 I 1.28E+08I 6.69 689 690 86.0 1.08E+11 1.28E+08 6.69 690 691 86.0 1.08E+11 1.28E+08__ 6.69 691 692 86.0 1.08E+11 1.28E+08 . 6.69 692 693 86.0 1.08E+11_

_j 1.28E+08 66.69 6693 694 694 695 __86.0 86.0 1.08E+11 +08 I[

1.28E+08 1.08E+1 1 i1.28E 6.696 6.68 694 695 86.0 1.08E+11 _ 1.28E+08 6.68__ I 695 696 86.0 I 1.08E+11 1.28E+08 6.68 696 697 86.0 71.09E+11 1.28E+08 6.68 697 6989 86.0 1.09E+11 1.28E+08 6.68 698 699 i 86.0 1.09E+11 1.28E+08 6.68 699* 700 _ 86.0 I 1.09E+1_1 _1.28E+08 6.6_8 700 701 I 86.0 1.09E+11 1.28E+08 6.68 701 702 86.0 1.09E+11 1.28E-+-08 6.67 702 703 86.0 1.09E+11 1.28E+08 6.67 703 ]-7704 8-86.0 1.09E+11 1.28E+08 6.67 704 1 705 86.0 1.10E+11I 1.28E+08 6.67 77705 706 86.0 . 1 1.10E+11 1.28E+08 _ 6.67.

706 1 707 1- 86.0 1.10E+11 1.28E+08 I 6.67 707 708 i 86.0 1.10E+11 1 1.28E+08 7 7081- 709 I 86.0 . 1.10E+11 . 1.28E+08 6.66 709 710 86.0 1.10E+11 1.28E+08 6.66 710 711 86.0 1.10E+11 I 1.28E+081 6.66 711 --712 86.0 1.10E+11 1.28E+08 6.66 712 713 1 86.0 ;1.11E+11 1.28E+08 6.66 713 714 86.0 I 1.1E+111.28E+08 6.66 714 715 86.0 1.11E+11 1.275+08 6.65 715 716 86.0__ 1.11E+11 1 1.27E+08 6.65 i 1.11E+11 716 717 717 718 86.0 86.0 - 1.11E+11 1.27E+08 1.27E+08 6.65 6.65 718 719 86.0 1.11E+11 1.27E+08 6.65 719 726 86.0 11.11E+11 1.27E+08 6.65 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P55 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Heat Rate Plant Starting Ending Flow Rate eIntegrated r

Time Time UHS Heat T* p Temperature (hr) (hr) (cfs) Load (BTU imesteP Rise (*F)

TU) (BTU/hr) 720 721 86.0 1.12E+11 . 1.27E+08 6.65 721 !722 86.0 1.12E+11 I 1.27E+08 6.64 722 723 86.0 1.12E+11 1.27E+08 6.64 723 724 86.0 1.12E+11 1.27E+08 6.64 724 725 86.0 1.12E+11 1.27E+08 6.64 725 726 86.0 1.12E+11 I 1.27E+08 6.64 726 727 86.0 1.12E+11 I 1.27E+08 6.64 727 728 86.0 1.12E+11 1.27E+08 I 6.64 728 729 86.0 1.13E+11 1.27E+081 6.64 729 730 86.0 1.13E+11 1.27E+08 I 6.63 730 731 86.0 1.13E+11 1.27E+08 I 6.63 731 732 86.0 1.13E+11_' 1.27E+08 6 6.63 732 733 86.0 1.13E+11 1.27E+08 I 6.63 733 734 86.0 1.13E+11 1.27E+08 I 6.63 734 735 86.0 1.13E+11 1.27E+08 6.63 735 736 86.0 1.14E+11 "1.27E+08- 6.63 736 737 86.0 1.14E+11 1.27E+08 6.63 737 738 86.0 1.14E+11 1.27E+08 6.62 738 739 1 86.0 1.14E+ 11 1.27E+08 6.62 739 740 86.0 i 1.14E+11 1.27E+08 I 6.62 740 741 86.0 I1.14E+11 1.27E+08 6.62 7411 742 86.0 1.14E+11 1.27E+08 6.62 742 I 743 86.0 :114E11 1.27E+08 6.62 743 744 86.0 1.15E+11 1.27E+08I 6.62 744 I 745 86.0 1.15E+11 1.27E+08 .. 6.62 745 I 746 86.0 1.15E+11 1.27E+08 6.62 746 74i 86.0 1.15E+11 1.27E+08 6.61 747 748 1 86.0 1.15E+11 1.27E+08 6.61 748 749 86.0 1.15E+11 1.27E+08r 6.61 749 750 86.0 1.15E+11 1.27E+08 6.61 750 751 86.0 1.15E+11 1.27E+08 I 6.61 751 752 86.0 1.16E+11 1.27E+08. 6.61 752 753 86.0 1.16E+11 1.27E+08 I 6.61 753 754 86.0 1.16E+11 1.27E+08 I 6.61 754 755 86.0 1.16E+11 1.27E+08 I 6.60 755 756 86.0 1.16E+11 1.26E+08 6.60 756 757 86.0 1.16E+11 1.26E+08 -6.60 757 -758 86.0 1.16E+11 1.26E+08 6.60 758 759 86.0 1.16E+11 1.26E+08 1 6.60 759 I 760 86.0 1.17E+11 1.26E+08 6.60 760 ] 761 86.0 1.17E+11 1.26E+08 6.60 761 762 86.0 1.17E+11 1.26E+08 6.60 762 763 86.0 1.17E+11 1.26E+08 6.59 763 764 86.0 1.17E+11 1.26E+08 6.59 764 765 86.0 1.17E+11 1.26E+08 j 6.59 J PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P56 of P58 Appendix P9.2: Plant Temperature Rise Results Heat Rate Plant Starting Ending Integrated Flow Rate per Temperature Time Time UHS Heat (cfs) Timestep Rise ('F)

(hr) (hr) Load (BTU) (BTU/hr) 765 [ 766 86.0 1.17E+11 1.26E+08 6.59 766 [767 86.0 1.17E+11 1.26E+08 6.59 767 _768 86.0 1.18E+11 1.26E+08 6.59 768 769 86.0 1.18E+11 1.26E+08 6.59-1 6.59 1 7691 770 86.0 1.18E+11 1.26E+08 770 771 7 86.0 1.18E+11 1.26E+08 6.58 771 772 86.0 1.18E+11 1.26E+08 6.58 772 773 86.0 1.18E+11 1.26E+08 6.58 773 774 86.0 1.18E+11 1.26E+08 6.58 774 775 86.0 1.18E+11 1.26E+08 6.58 775 776 86.0 1.19E+11 1.26E+08 6.58 776 777 86.0 1.19E+11 1 .26E+08 6.58 777 778 86.0 1.19E+11 1.26E+08 6.58 778 779 119E+11

.86.0 I 1.26E+08 { 6.58 779 780 86.0 1.19E+11 F 1.26E+08 6.57 780 781 86.0 1.19E+11 1.26E+08 6.57 781H782 86.0 1.19E+11 1.26E+08 ' 657 782 783 86.0 1.19E+11 1.26E+08 i 6.57 783 784 86.0 1.20E+11 1.26E+081 6.57 784 785 I 785 i 86 86.0 860 1.20E+111 1.20E+1 1.26E+08 . _6.57 785 786 Ij 7867 78 86.0 86.0 1 1.20E+11 1.20E+11 1.26E+08 1.26E+08

[ 6.57 6.57 787 1 788 86.0 1.20E+11 1.26E+08 I 6.57 788-1 789 789 790 86.0 1.20E+11 1.26E+08 1.26E+08 I_ 6.57 6.57 790 I 791 1 86.0 - 1.20E+11 1.26E+08 I 6.57 791{ 792 86.0 1.21E+11 T 1.26E+08 6.57 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P57 of P58 Appendix P9.3: Excel Equations Integrated UHS Heat Load Equations A I B C D 1 Time ITime Total UHS Heat Load Integrated UHS Heat Load 2 Seconds Hours BTUIhr BTU 3 0 =A3/3600 70974500 0 4 60 =A4/3600 227506921.442497 =(C3+C4)/2*(B4-B3)+D3 5 120 =A5/3600 275031004.627322 =(C4+C5)/2*(B5-B4)+D4 6 180 =A6/3600 278889380.509937 =(C5+C6)/2*(B6-B5)+D5 7 240 =A7/3600 282644648.159748 =(C6+C7)/2*(B7-B6)+D6 8 300 =A8/3600 286299374.760107 =(C7+C8)/2*(B8-B7)+D7 9 360 =A9/3600 289856095.608311 =(C8+C9)/2*(B9-B8)+D8 10 420 =A1 0/3600 293317314.115603 =(C9+C1 0)/2*(B1 0-B9)+D9 11 480 =A11/3600 296685501.807169 =(CC10+C11)/2*(B113B10)+D10 12 540 =A1 2/3600 343523098.322145 =(C1 1+C1 2)/2*(B1 2-B11)+D 11 13 600 =A13/3600 346712511.413607 =(C12+C13)/2*(B13-B12)+D12 14 3451 =A14/3600 441783283.320893 =(C1 3+C1 4)/2*(BI14-B1 3)+D 13 15 6301 =A1 5/3600 473170223.236624 =(C1 4+C 15)/2*(B1 5-B1 4)+D 14 16 9152 =A1 6/3600 528760943.735491 =(C1 5+CI 6)/2*(B1 6-B1 5)+D 15 17 12000 =A17/3600 519091778.174626 =(C16+C17)/2*(B1 7-B16)+D16 18 14850 =A1 8/3600 359428890 =(C17)*(B18-B17)+D17 19 17700 =A1 9/3600 339095598.333333 =(C1 8+C1 9)/2*(B1 9-B1 8)+D 18 20 20550 =A20/3600 322295431.666667 =(C19+C20)/2*(B20-B19)+D19 21 23400 =A21/3600 308557015 =(C20+C21)/2*(B21 -B20)+D20 22 26260 =A22/3600 297328342.777778 =(C21+C22)/2*(B22-B21)+D21 23 29110 =A23/3600 287571967.777778 =(C22+C23)/2*(B23-B22)+D22 24 31960 =A24/3600 276985259.444444 =(C23+C24)/2*(B24-B23)+D23 25 34810 =A25/3600 268393440 =(C24+C25)/2*(B25-B24)+D24 26 37660 =A26/3600 261201865 =(C25+C26)/2*(B26-B25)+D25 27 40510 =A27/3600 254949342.777778 =(C26+C27)/2*(B27-B26)+D26 28 43360 =A28/3600 249681781.666667 =(C27+C28)/2*(B28-B27)+D27 29 46210 1=A29/3600 245278781.666667 =(C28+C29)/2*(B29-B28)+D28 30 49060 =A30/3600 241448815 =(C29+C30)/2*(B30-B29)+D29 31 51910 =A31/3600 238054990 =(C30+C31)/2*(B31 -B30)+D30 32 5*4760 =A32/3600 234938259.444444 =(C31 +C32)/2*(B32-B31)+D31 33 57610 =A33/3600 469308546.541219 =(C32)*(B33-B32)+D32 34 60460 =A34/3600 407852051.111111 =(C33+C34)/2*(B34-B33)+D33 35 63310 =A35/3600 362828250.483871 =(C34+C35)/2*(B35-B34)+D34 36 66160 =A36/3600 329583531.935484 =(C35+C36)/2*(B36-B35)+D35 37 69010 =A37/3600 305037949.52381 =(C36+C37)/2*(B37-B36)+D36 38 71860 =A38/3600 286794408.27957 =(C37+C38)/2*(B38-B37)+D37 39 74720 =A39/3600 273077790 =(C38+C39)/2*(B39-B38)+D38 40 77570 =A40/3600 262786654.784946 =(C39+C40)/2*(B40-B39)+D39 41 80420 I =A41/3600 256810372.258065 =(C40+C41)/2*(B41 -B40)+D40 PROJECT NO. 11333-297

CALCULATION NO. L-002457 REVISION NO. 8 ATTACHMENT P, PAGE P58 of P58 Appendix P9.3: Excel Equations Plant Temperature Rise Equations I A B C ID I E IF G I H I I I J I K I L M I N 0s P 1 1 TS Flowrate 65.3 _ cfs _ Mass Flow =$D$1$D$2*36O Ibm/hr / S Flowrate 186 cfsM F $L$VL$23600 Ibm/hlr 2 Density 62 . bm/ft3 cp j=cpt(14.3,100) BTU/,bm-F/ . Density 66 - ,bm/ft3 I cP -cpt(14.3,100) BTUbm-F

] A 8 C , 1__ E F Starting Endng Flow Time Tine Rate Heat Rate per rimestep Plant Temperature 1 (hr) (hr) (CIS) Integrated Generated Heat Load (BTU) IBTUI*r) Rise (Deg F) 2 0 1 =FORECASTt$82,OFFSET(Total!$D$3:5$1003.RATCH(S2.Total!SS3:$8$1003 ,1,I,02 .OFFSET(TotaI!$8S3:$B$10O3.l*ATCHi$82.TotaI!$6$3:S8S1003.1,-1.0,2:, =D2[B2-12I '=$E2/SH$li-H$2

=55.3 =FORECAST $83.OFFSET(Total!$D$3:5D$1003.IATCH(S83.ThtaI!$B$3:$B$1003,1ý-1,0 2`.OFFSET(Total!$8$3:$B$1003**IATCHI$83.Totall$8$3:$8S1002.1-1,0.2;I =lD3-D21'AB3-,3'. $ES 1-SH1$2 4 =83 =A4-1 =FORECAST(SB4.OFFSET(Total!$D$3:SD$1003.IAATCH(I$4,Total!$8$3:$B$1003.1;,-1,0 2,.OFFSET(TotaI!$8S3:$B$1003,MATCHI$84,TotaI!$8$3:$8S1003.1;-1,0,21) =(04-03D4 9444-B$E41.-l$1$I-I$S2 5 :134 =A5+1 =55,3 =FORECAST($85.OFFSET(Total!$D$3:SD$1003.MAATCH(I8r5.Total!$8$3:$8$1003,V1,1.2: OFFSET(TotaI!$853:$$1003.LhATCH($85,TataII$B$3:$8$1S03 1A0.2:1, =0D5-04*1B5-A51 *$E&$1tSH$2 6 z85 =A6+1 =FORECAST($B6OFFSET(Total!$0$3:SD$1003,.MATCH(S86.TotaI!$B$3:$B$1003.1 -1.0.2, OFFSET(Tota6!$8$3:5B$1003.IAATCHt$S6.TotaI!$8$3:$8S1003.1,-1.0.2!) =lO6-D5~l86ý.BA5. S=$E65$H$1lSH$2 7 =85 =A7+1 =.3 =FORECAST($87,OFFSETlTotai!$D$3:$D$1003,MATCH(S87`Total!SB$3:$B$1003.1>1.0.21.OFFSET(Tota!S8$3:$8$1003.MATCH$87.Tota1!$8$3:$BS1003.11,-1.02) =(0D7-0D;(B7-A7ý %$E7If5HS$H$2 8 =87 =A$*1 =55ý.3 =FORECAST(SB89OFFSET(Total!SD$3:SD$1003.fMTCH{S89.Total!S8$3:$951003.1,-1.0 2:.0FFSET(Total!,S$3:$8$1003.IATCHi$88.TotaI!$853:$B$1003.1;1,0.2;) =(DS-D7V(8S-ASW &$ElSH$1i5IH$2 9 =88 =A9*1 =FORECASTV581OFFSETjqotal!$D$3:SD$1003If4ATCH(S89.Tota!$S$3.$8$1003.1:-I.0.2.OFFSET(Total$8S3:$B$1003.JITCHlSBg.TotaO!$8$3:$BS1003.1 -1.0.2,) =(D9-D8'f89-AI9 '*=$E9,4'SHS-I$2 10 =B9 =A10,1 =FORECST5$810 OFFSETITotaI!S0$3:SD$1003.ItATCH($B11,Totai!$8$3:$8$1003.1 1.02 ,OFFSET(Totafl$8535B$1003.MATCH($B11.Total!SBS3:$8$1003.1;-1,0.2: =(D10.-D;i810-410 '-$E10,'H$1$,$2 11 --810 =A,11-I =(D11-D10ý?111411: ý$Ell115H -15H2

=FORECASTM$811OFFSETjTotaI!S)S3:SD$1003,f4,TCHl$811.TotaI!$8$3.$851003.1 1.0 2.OFFSETTotal!$853 $81003.T*CH(S81l.Total.5S3:$B51003,1;-1.0,2,:

=(D12-0 111,121 l2: 'ý$E 12,/*511S-152 12 =811 =412÷1 =553 =FORECAST$S8123OFFSETtTotaI!$053:$D$1003.IA TCHISB12.Total!$B$3 $851003.1:-!,0.2.OFFSETiTotalS5B$3$5B$1003.10, TCH(S812.TotaI!SB$3:$851003.1;-l.0,2.:

13=812 =A13-1 =F=.3 =FORECAST SB13 OFFSET(Total!SD$3:ýD$1003MIAATCHISB13,Total!8$3 $B$1003.1;-1.0.2..OFFSETý(otaI!$B$3:BS10031AATCH($813,TotaI!SBS3:$B$1003.1,-1.0.2.: =(D13-D124B1341-A13 -$E1354H$1&K$2 14 =113 =414-1 :653 =FORECAST 5814 OFFSET(Total!$D$3:$0$1003.,I TCH($BI4.Total!$8$3:$8$1003.11-1.0.2.,OFFSETiTotaI!$B$3$8$1003.14TCH($B14.TotaI!SBS3:SB$1003.1-1.0.2ý1 =TO14-013AB 14-A14%:S14'H$1iVI$H2

=tDIS-14;*B1-A1:-$E15&V..$1SH$2 15 =814 =,'15-1 =65;.3 =FORECAST($815 OFFSET(Total!SD$3:SD$1003.l TCH($815.Total!$8$3:$8$1003.1 >1.0.2.,OFFSETITotal!$B$3 $B51003,MATCH(SB15,TotaI!B$$3:$B$1003.1-1.0.2., =(D16-01 ý (B16-ý16; ý-$EW16H$1I1..$2 16 =815 =A16-1 =953 =FORECAST($8157OFFSET(Total!SD$3:SD$1003.IATCH($B16,TotaI!$853:$851003.1 -1,0.2 OFFSET(Total!$8$3 $851003,.tATCH($B16,Total!SB$3:$851003.1,.10.2,;

7 =8816=W17+1 =FORECASTiSB17,OFFSET(Tota!$D$3:S)$1003.MATCHISBI7.TotaI!$B$3.$8$1003.1 -1.0 2!OFFSET(Total!SB$3$B$1003.LIATCHi$S17.Total!SBS3:$851003.11-1,02'i =(D17-D lI5'#(B17-A17.T $E17TSH$1t$H$2 18=817 =A18-1 =FORECkSTi$818 OFFSET(TotaI!SO$3:SD$1003.14ATCH(S819.TotaI!$8$3 $8$1003.1 -1.0.2F.OFFSETiTotaI!S83:$$1l003.IAýTCH(i$18.TotaI!$853:$58100311+02 =(D18-D17)14B18.A18' ý-E18I5PS11P$2 19 =818 =:A19-1 7FORECASTi$SB19 OFFSETiTotalI!SD$3:SC$1003.1.ATCHISB19.Total$B$3 $851003.1 -10.2'.OFFSET(TotaI!SB$3.$8B1003,M TCH(SB19.Total!58S3:$8$1003. I 1.0.21 0; =(D19-D 18ý2(B 19-419' ýS$E19W$I1SPS2 297819 *20÷1 =:020-D19y;B20-20) '$E20NSPVSPS2

=85 =FORECAST$820.OFFSETtTotal!SD$3:SC$1003.j4ATCH1,B20,Totatf$853 $8$1003.1ý-1.0 2OFFSETJTotaI!$B$3$B$1003.MATCH(5B20 Total!SB$3: $B1003.11+02 :

21 =:20 =A21+1 =85 =FORECAST $B21OFFSETTotal!SD$3:$$1003.hATCH'$821.TotaI!$8S3 5851003.1>1.0 2,OFFSET(TotaI!$B$3 $8$1003.1,tTCHiSB21.TotaI!S8S3:$81003,1.10 2ýý =(D21-D209,21-21ý *$E2UIVP$1ISP2 2i =821 =:22+1=85 =FORECAST,$22 OFFSET(Totat!SD$3:S,$1003.MATCH($822.ToaI $BS3 $8$1003.1 1.0 2,OFFSET.TotaI!$B$3 S$51003.*tATCH($822.TotaIP$S3:$B$1003.110l2, =(D22-21)21B22-422ý: $E22,'SPSISP$2 ff =822 =A23-1 =86 =FORECAST($823OFFSET*TotaI!S$03:S$1003.!TCH($823.TotaI?$8$3$851003.1 1-.0.2'.OFFSET(Total!$B$3 SB$1003,1IATCH(SB23.Total!S8S3:SB$1003.1)-I ,01 =(023-D22 !B23-A23: ý$E23$P$1,SP$2

=FORECAST($B24,0FFSET(Total!SD$3:SD$1003,!4/tTCH($824,TotaI!$B$3:$B$1003.1*-10.0,20FFSETf'rotaI!$B$3 $B$1003.HATCHýS824,Total.WS3:$B$1003.1ý1-l.02 =D24-02...824.A24, '*SE24$SP1,$P52 24 =823 =,24÷1 =85 25 7824 =A25*I =85 =FORECST($B25 OFFSET(TotaI!IS$3:$0$1003 ,tIATCH($825.Totat!$8$3:$B$1003.1 ,-1,0.2>OFFSET(TotaI!$B$3 $B$1003.1,IATCH(5826.Total!S8$3:SB$1003.1,-i.0.2 =(D25-.249B25A2ý '$E25,P1SPS1'PS2 29 =825 =,Q6+1 =:6 =FORECAST($B25.OFFSETiTotal!SD$3:S$1003.tt4TCH($826.Totai$8$3S$B$1003.1 -12.02,OFFSETcTotaI!$B$3:$B$1003,MATCH($826,TotaI!SB$3:$B1003.1'-1.0.2 I =lD26-D259AB25-AQ6 '-$E26.SPS1t$P$2 27 =826 =:27+1 =85 =FORECAST$827.OFFSETITotal!SD$3ýS$1003.hiATCH'$B27.TotaIt$8$3:$B$1003.1 >!0.2u,.OFFSET(TotaI!$B$3:$B$1003,14ATCH(SB27,Total.$8S3:$B$10031)-1.0.2', =fD27-D25AVBV727-*.' $E27$PS$1SP$2 2_ =B27 =A28+1 =85 =FORECAST($B28.OFFSETITotaI!SD$3:$$1003.kIATCHI$828.TotaI!$8$3:$6$1003.1 1,0 2:.OFFSETITotaI!$8$3:$B$1003,M4ATCH($B28.Total.S853:$B$1003,.110. ; =(D28-D27'1282-A28:ý $E2,SE$1$SP$2

=828 zA29+1 =FORECAST($829.-FFSET(Tota8!0D$3:SD$1003.81ATCH0SB20,Tol3I!$B$3:$0$1003,100 .12)I.OFFSET0TotaI!2B$3.$B$1003.1ATCH($B29,Total!$BS3:$B$1003,1ý-102ý; =1D29-D289,B29-,29; '=$E29-$1$V$PS2 30 =829 =A30+1 =FORECASTi$B30.OFFSETITota!SD$3:0$1003.},ATCH($830,Totai!$8$3:$8$1003,1 -1.02:,OFFSETtTotaI!$B$35$81003.jATCH(S830.TotaI!$B$3:$B$1003.11-10.2 : =(030-D291,830-30' ':EM30P$11SP$2 31 =830 :;,31÷1 =86.' =85

95 =FORECAST($831.OFFSETiTotal!50$3:$D$1003,IATCHlSB31.TotaI!B$358$1003,1 )-1.0.2.OFFSET(TotaI!8$3:$851003.MATCH(SB31.Total!S8$3:$B51003ý1-l.102 : =4D31-D30)AB31-A31:ý $E31/SPSV$PS$2 32 =831 =432-1 =85 =FORECA5T$832,OFFSETITotaI!$D$3:SD$1003.MATCH($632,Totat!$B$3$651003.1 >1.02.OFFSET(TotaI0$B$35B$1003.2 TCHt$832,TotaI!S6$3:$B51003.1 -1 0,2: =:032-D31,'B 32-A32 Z =$E32)$1P$VP52

=332 =A33+1 =85 =FORECAST(5833,OFFSET1otaI!t$3:SD$1003.4, TCHI$833,Total!$8$38$E1003,1 '1,0.2.,OFFSETiTotaI!$B$3 58$1003.1MATCH(SB33.TotaI!SS$3:$B$1003,1>1.0,2 : =(D33-D3Z iB33A33; ý$E33,,P$1;5P$2 4=33 =A34+1 =FORECASTiSB34.OFFSETiqotaI!$D$3:$0$1003MATCH($834.Total$8$3 $851003,1 -1.0 2..0FFSET(TotaI!$B$3 SB$1003,.ATCH(SB34.TotaI!S$B3:$5B1003,1;-1.0.2.; ='D34-D33'B34.A34ý '$E34$FP$1$PS2 PROJECT NO. 11333-297