ML20027A067: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(corrected typo with Jan 23 2020 letter.)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 22: Line 22:
==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Accepted for Review - FitzPatrick License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-568, Revision 2, "Revise Applicability of BWR/4 TS 3.6.2.5 and TS 3.6.3.2" (EPID: L-2020-LLA-0008)
Accepted for Review - FitzPatrick License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-568, Revision 2, "Revise Applicability of BWR/4 TS 3.6.2.5 and TS 3.6.3.2" (EPID: L-2020-LLA-0008)
Date:          Friday, January 24, 2020 8:59:00 AM Mr. Villar, By letter dated January 23, 2020 (ADAMS Accession No. ML20023A362), Exelon submitted the subject request for FitzPatrick. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Date:          Friday, January 24, 2020 8:59:00 AM Mr. Villar, By letter dated January 23, 2020 (ADAMS Accession No. ML19269C622), Exelon submitted the subject request for FitzPatrick. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed change in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed change in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff is expected to spend [[estimated NRC review hours::58 hours]] to complete the review by March 6, 2020.
The NRC staff is expected to spend [[estimated NRC review hours::58 hours]] to complete the review by March 6, 2020.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Samson Lee FitzPatrick Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-3168 Docket No. 50-333}}
Samson Lee FitzPatrick Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-3168 Docket No. 50-333}}
[[Category:Unfiltered]]

Latest revision as of 06:58, 15 March 2020

Accepted for Review - Fitzpatrick License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-568, Revision 2, Revise Applicability of BWR/4 TS 3.6.2.5 and TS 3.6.3.2
ML20027A067
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/24/2020
From: Samson Lee
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Enrique Villar
Exelon Generation Co
Lee S
References
EPID L-2020-LLA-0008
Download: ML20027A067 (1)


Text

From: Lee, Samson To: Villar, Enrique:(Exelon Nuclear)

Subject:

Accepted for Review - FitzPatrick License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-568, Revision 2, "Revise Applicability of BWR/4 TS 3.6.2.5 and TS 3.6.3.2" (EPID: L-2020-LLA-0008)

Date: Friday, January 24, 2020 8:59:00 AM Mr. Villar, By letter dated January 23, 2020 (ADAMS Accession No. ML19269C622), Exelon submitted the subject request for FitzPatrick. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed change in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

The NRC staff is expected to spend 58 hours2.417 days <br />0.345 weeks <br />0.0794 months <br /> to complete the review by March 6, 2020.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Samson Lee FitzPatrick Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-3168 Docket No. 50-333