ML102030160: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN LINE ASSESSMENT REPORT SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NEW HILL, NORTH CAROLINA PREPARED FOR: PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS PREPARED BY: Ss§4 SILAR SERVICES, INC.'.983 BUTLER PIKE BLUE BELL, PA 19422.April 2009 e COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN LINE ASSESSMENT REPORT SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NEW HILL, NORTH CAROLINA PREPARED FOR: PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS PREPARED BY: ss.SILAR SERVICES, INC.983 BUTLER PIKE BLUE BELL, PA 19422 April 2009 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Sss Shearon | {{#Wiki_filter:COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN LINE ASSESSMENT REPORT SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NEW HILL, NORTH CAROLINA PREPARED FOR: | ||
............................................................................. | PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS PREPARED BY: | ||
1-1 1.1 Purpose of R eport ....................................................................... | Ss§4 SILAR SERVICES, INC.'. | ||
1-1 1.2 Project Background | 983 BUTLER PIKE BLUE BELL, PA 19422. | ||
..................................................................... | April 2009 e | ||
1-1 1.2.1 Project L ocation ........................................................................... | |||
1-1 1.2.2 Project | COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN LINE ASSESSMENT REPORT SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NEW HILL, NORTH CAROLINA PREPARED FOR: | ||
...................................................................... | PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS PREPARED BY: | ||
1-2 1.3 Scope and Objectives | ss. | ||
.................................................................. | SILAR SERVICES, INC. | ||
1-2 1.4 Report Organization | 983 BUTLER PIKE BLUE BELL, PA 19422 April 2009 | ||
.................................................................... | |||
1-2 2 ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS ........................... | Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Sss Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Purpose of R eport ....................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Background ..................................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Project L ocation ........................................................................... 1-1 1.2.2 Project Background ...................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Scope and Objectives .................................................................. 1-2 1.4 Report Organization .................................................................... 1-2 2 ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS ........................... 2-3 2.1 Assessment Activities ................................................................. 2-4 2.1.1 Soil Borings/Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation ............. 2-4 2.1.2 Groundwater Elevation Measurements ........................................ 2-6 2.1.3 Groundw ater Sam pling ............................................................... 2-6 2.2 Assessment Findings - Water Results ........................................ 2-8 2.3 Surveying and Mapping .............................................................. 2-9 3 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY AREA ..... 3-1 3.1 Surface Features .......................................................................... 3-1 3 .2 G eology ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Groundwater Hydrology ............................................................. 3-2 4 | ||
2-3 2.1 Assessment Activities | |||
................................................................. | |||
2-4 2.1.1 Soil Borings/Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation | |||
............. | |||
2-4 2.1.2 Groundwater Elevation Measurements | |||
........................................ | |||
2-6 2.1.3 | |||
2-6 2.2 Assessment Findings -Water Results ........................................ | |||
2-8 2.3 Surveying and Mapping .............................................................. | |||
2-9 3 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY AREA ..... 3-1 3.1 Surface Features .......................................................................... | |||
3-1 3 .2 G eology ....................................................................................... | |||
3-1 3.3 Groundwater Hydrology | |||
............................................................. | |||
3-2 4 | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
AND CONCLUSIONS | AND CONCLUSIONS .................... ........................... 4-1 4.1 Summary of Groundwater Conditions ........................................ 4-2 4.2 C onclusions ................................................................................. 4-3 TOC-1 | ||
.................... | |||
........................... | Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclearPower Plant SS. | ||
4-1 4.1 Summary of Groundwater Conditions | Cýý April 2009 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Layout Map Figure 3 Groundwater Flow Map Figure 4 Groundwater Analytical Results Summary March 4, 2009 Figure 5 Geologic Cross Section LIST OF TA]BLES Table 1 Monitoring Well Construction Summary Table 2 Water Level Measurements Table 3 Analytical Results - Water Samples LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Boring Logs Appendix B NCDENR Well Construction Records Appendix C Field Notes Appendix D Calculations TOC-2 | ||
........................................ | |||
4-2 4.2 C onclusions | Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Report Silar Services Incorporated (SSi) has prepared this Cooling Tower Blowdown Line (CTBL) Assessment Report to document the results of investigation activities performed along a section of the CTBL at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant (SL{NPP), located in New Hill, North Carolina. The purpose of the assessment was to identify the potential presence and extent of radiological materials in groundwater within the assessment area of the line with respect to the integrity of the line. | ||
................................................................................. | The initial assessment activities were conducted at the Site from January 21, 2009 through March 4, 2009. This Assessment Report, issued on April 1, 2009, provides a presentation of the activities completed and the findings of the assessment. | ||
4-3 TOC-1 SS.Cýý | 1.2 Project Background This section includes information on the location, description and history of the Site. | ||
The purpose of the assessment was to identify the potential presence and extent of radiological materials in groundwater within the assessment area of the line with respect to the integrity of the line.The initial assessment activities were conducted at the Site from January 21, 2009 through March 4, 2009. This Assessment Report, issued on April 1, 2009, provides a presentation of the activities completed and the findings of the assessment. | 1.2.1 Project Location The Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant is located approximately 1.6-miles east of the Town of New Hill, North Carolina, and is situated on approximately 10,700 acres site. | ||
1.2 Project Background This section includes information on the location, description and history of the Site.1.2.1 Project Location The Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant is located approximately 1.6-miles east of the Town of New Hill, North Carolina, and is situated on approximately 10,700 acres site.The Site location is depicted on Figure 1.The Cooling Tower Blowdown Line, which is buried several feet below the ground surface, runs for approximately 2 miles from the cooling tower south to the edge of Harris Lake. The line assessment area is located between Air Release System Manhole#1 (ARS#l) which is located adjacent to the composite sampler shed (approximately 0.5 miles from the cooling tower) to ARS#2, located approximately 1,110 feet south of ARS#1. The assessment area is also depicted on Figure 1.1-1 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report | The Site location is depicted on Figure 1. | ||
It was observed that subsequent to purging the manhole dry, water was continuing to enter the bottom of the manhole through a 2-inch pipe designed to drain the manhole. A water sample was collected and analyzed for tritium. Tritium was detected at an approximate concentration of 800 pCi/l. Based on these observations, Progress Energy determined that additional evaluation was warranted. | The Cooling Tower Blowdown Line, which is buried several feet below the ground surface, runs for approximately 2 miles from the cooling tower south to the edge of Harris Lake. The line assessment area is located between Air Release System Manhole | ||
1.3 Scope and Objectives The overall objectives of the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment are as follows: " Characterize the hydrogeology and geology in the area* Provide groundwater sampling and elevation measuring points* Evaluate groundwater flow and groundwater quality* Assess potential sources of tritium concentration in water.The scope of the assessment included the collection of data as close as reasonably possible to the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line while not compromising the integrity of the line.1.4 Report Organization The organization and content of the remainder of this report are described below.Section 2.0 -Investigation Activities and Findings A summary of the activities completed during planning and implementation of the assessment is provided. | #1 (ARS#l) which is located adjacent to the composite sampler shed (approximately 0.5 miles from the cooling tower) to ARS#2, located approximately 1,110 feet south of ARS#1. The assessment area is also depicted on Figure 1. | ||
The methods, locations, and results of the sampling and analysis program are presented in detail for soil and groundwater. | 1-1 | ||
1-2 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report | |||
A scope of work to complete the assessment objectives was prepared by SSi and submitted to Progress Energy on January 6, 2009. The initial scope of work called for the installation of up to 20 shallow (approximately 25 feet below ground surface or bgs) soil borings/monitoring wells to complete the study objectives. | Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant April 2009 1.2.2 Project Background On December 15, 2008, Progress Energy personnel discovered the presence of water in ARS#2. The manhole was investigated by purging the water from the manhole and evaluating conditions. It was observed that subsequent to purging the manhole dry, water was continuing to enter the bottom of the manhole through a 2-inch pipe designed to drain the manhole. A water sample was collected and analyzed for tritium. Tritium was detected at an approximate concentration of 800 pCi/l. Based on these observations, Progress Energy determined that additional evaluation was warranted. | ||
The assessment field activities were completed in two phases. The first phase was completed from January 21 to February 6, 2009, and included the following activities: " Installation of six (6) groundwater monitoring wells BDL-MW1 through BDL-MW6 at points along the blowdown line and near ARS#2," Collection of preliminary groundwater samples from BDL-MW1, BDL-MW2, and BDL-MW-3 on January 23, 2009, and* Water level measurements and preliminary groundwater samples from BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6 on February 6, 2009.Based on these initial activities and findings, the original scope of work was revised to reduce the number of wells due to the general absence of shallow groundwater. | 1.3 Scope and Objectives The overall objectives of the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment are as follows: | ||
The second phase of the assessment was completed from February 17 to March 4, 2009, and included: 2-3 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report s s . | " Characterize the hydrogeology and geology in the area | ||
The analytical results are presented and, where concentrations of radiological materials were observed, the results are also presented on figures. Throughout this section, groundwater data are discussed with respect to the USEPA drinking water standard of 20,000 pCi/L (picocuries per liter).2.1 Assessment Activities To accomplish the objectives of ote assessment, several investigatin actites complted including: | * Provide groundwater sampling and elevation measuring points | ||
soil borings/monitoning well installation, groundwater elation me andgrounhwater, sampling.The assessment methods and, results, are, discussed in the following subsections. | * Evaluate groundwater flow and groundwater quality | ||
Objective 1.3a Installation of .1 Soil] Boings/Groundwater' Monitoring Well Installation: | * Assess potential sources of tritium concentration in water. | ||
additional monitoring wells he primary objectives of the soil boring/monitoring well installation were to evaluate subsurface conditions and establish a network of monitoring wells in the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line assessment area to evaluate geology, hydrogeology and groundwater quality. To accomplish this objective, soil borings were advanced and monitoring wells were installed at the locations illustrated on Figure 2. Boreholes were logged from split spoon samples and cuttings. | The scope of the assessment included the collection of data as close as reasonably possible to the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line while not compromising the integrity of the line. | ||
The screened interval for each monitoring well was selected to intersect the depth intervals where groundwater was observed. | 1.4 Report Organization The organization and content of the remainder of this report are described below. | ||
Where no groundwater was observed the bottom of the screened interval was 2-4 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon | Section 2.0 - Investigation Activities and Findings A summary of the activities completed during planning and implementation of the assessment is provided. The methods, locations, and results of the sampling and analysis program are presented in detail for soil and groundwater. | ||
Where no groundwater was observed, the bottom of the well was set at the maximum drilling depth using the HSA techniques (BDL-MW 4 through BDL-MW6, only) and below the water level in ARS#2.* The wells were generally installed using 4'/4-inch inside diameter (ID)hollow stem augers and/or 4-inch air hammer.* At least ten feet of 2-inch-ID, Schedule 40 PVC, machine cut, well screen with 0.020-inch-slot size was set at the bottom of each well. A sufficient length of 2-inch ID, Schedule 40 PVC riser pipe was coupled to the screen to allow the PVC riser pipe to extend a minimum of two feet above the ground surface. Well screens were fitted with a nominal 2-inch solid (unslotted) bottom sediment trap.* The annular space around the well screens was backfilled with clean uniform sand (filter pack sieve #2). The filter pack was placed from the bottom of the well to a minimum of 2 feet above the top of the well screen. A minimum 2-foot-thick bentonite seal was placed above the sand and allowed to hydrate.* All wells were completed as stick-up wells, with lockable expansion plugs.2-5 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report | 1-2 | ||
Results of these measurements are summarized in Table 2, presented on Figure 3, and discussed in Section 3 of this report.2.1.3 Groundwater Sampling One round of groundwater samples was collected from the monitoring wells. All monitoring wells were sampled except BDL-MW4, which was dry. In addition, a water sample was collected directly from the drainpipe in manhole ARS#2. Water samples were analyzed for tritium at Progress Energy's Harris Energy and Environmental Center Radiochemistry Laboratory to the same lower limit of detection as the NC Division of Radiation Protection (NCDRP) laboratory. | |||
In addition, select water samples were analyzed for total zinc.Prior to sampling, each monitoring well was purged in accordance with low-flow groundwater sampling procedures to assure collection of a representative groundwater sample. Groundwater sampling was completed using a peristaltic pump, dedicated 2-6 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report | Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . Shearon Harris NuclearPower Plant April 2009 Section 3.0 - Physical Characteristics of the Study Area A description of the study area including surface features, geology and soils, surface water hydrology, and groundwater hydrology is provided in Section 3. | ||
* An optimum low-flow pumping rate was established at each well to minimize drawdown. | Section 4.0 - Summary and Conclusions A summary of the relevant environmental conditions to satisfy the objectives of the investigation is provided in Section 4. | ||
The groundwater quality parameters and depth to water were monitored and recorded at prescribed time intervals to determine when the water quality parameters had stabilized to within 10%.* Following the stabilization of the groundwater quality parameters, groundwater samples were collected from the wells and delivered to the radiological analytical laboratory. | 2 ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS The planning of the assessment activities included a number of conference calls and meetings with appropriate plant personnel. A scope of work to complete the assessment objectives was prepared by SSi and submitted to Progress Energy on January 6, 2009. The initial scope of work called for the installation of up to 20 shallow (approximately 25 feet below ground surface or bgs) soil borings/monitoring wells to complete the study objectives. | ||
* Purge water was collected and transported to the designated disposal point.ARS#2 was sampled in general accordance with the methodology specified above.2-7 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon | The assessment field activities were completed in two phases. The first phase was completed from January 21 to February 6, 2009, and included the following activities: | ||
Samples from BDL-MW1, BDL-MW5, BDL-MW8, and ARS#2 were also analyzed for zinc, since zinc is added to the cooling water and can be used as a marker analyte. Analytical results are summarized in Table 3. Figure 4 depicts the analytical results for tritium in the water samples. The results are summarized below.* Tritium was detected in five (5) of the eight (8) monitoring wells sampled and in the ARS#2 sample. The detection limit for the analyses was approximately 233 pCi/L.* Tritium in the nine (9) samples ranged from less than the detection limit (three wells) to 2,120 pCi/L at manhole ARS#2." The highest concentration of tritium detected in the samples was detected in the immediate area of ARS#2 (ARS#2, BDL-MW5, and BDL-MW6). | " Installation of six (6) groundwater monitoring wells BDL-MW1 through BDL-MW6 at points along the blowdown line and near ARS#2, | ||
The second highest concentration of tritium was detected at BDL-MW3, near the wetland in the area of groundwater discharge. | " Collection of preliminary groundwater samples from BDL-MW1, BDL-MW2, and BDL-MW-3 on January 23, 2009, and | ||
These three wells are located in close proximity to the backfilled trench of the blowdown line which is likely acting as a preferential pathway of water transport. | * Water level measurements and preliminary groundwater samples from BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6 on February 6, 2009. | ||
* The horizontal migration of tritium in groundwater from the blowdown line appears to be limited as no tritium was detected in samples from BDL-MW8 and BDL-MW9.* The vertical migration of tritium in groundwater from the blowdown line appears to be limited as no tritium was detected in the sample from BDL-MW7.2-8 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon | Based on these initial activities and findings, the original scope of work was revised to reduce the number of wells due to the general absence of shallow groundwater. | ||
On February 20, 2009 all monitoring wells, manhole ARS#1, and manhole ARS#2 were surveyed.A survey map was produced that includes scale, benchmarks, North arrow, and the locations of monitoring wells. The survey map provided the information required to produce a site basemap for this Assessment Report.2-9 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report | The second phase of the assessment was completed from February 17 to March 4, 2009, and included: | ||
3.1 Surface Features The SHNPP is located approximately 1.6 miles east of the town of New Hill, North Carolina. | 2-3 | ||
Access to the SHNPP is from Shearon Harris Road. The owner controlled area encompasses approximately 10,700 acres. The area of the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line, which is the focus of this assessment, includes approximately 15 acres.As discussed in Section 1, the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line runs underground for approximately 2 miles from the Cooling Tower south to the edge of Harris Lake. The assessment area is on a peninsula which is surrounded by Harris Lake to the south, east, and west and bounded to the north by SHNPP. Specifically, the blowdown line assessment area is located between ARS#1, located adjacent to the composite sampler shed (approximately 0.5 miles from the cooling tower), to ARS#2 which is located approximately 1,110 feet south of ARS# 1. The most significant surface feature in the assessment area is the topographic low area/wetlands, situated along the blowdown line approximately midway between ARS#1 and ARS#2. There is an approximately 30-foot elevation change between ARS#1 and the topographic low to the south. In addition, a portion of Harris Lake is located east of manhole ARS#2.The Site location is shown on Figure 1, and the Site Layout is depicted on Figure 2.3.2 Geology Regional and site-specific geology have been extensively evaluated by others during the safety analyses for Unit 1 and more recently for proposed Units 2 and 3. These reports indicate that the plant is underlain by the Upper Triassic Age Newark Supergroup. | |||
The 3-1 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report | Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant s s . April 2009 | ||
Additional information on regional and local geology can be found in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR).Site-specific geology observed in the area of the blowdown line is consistent with the regional geology. Soil borings encountered a thin layer of unconsolidated material (overburden), underlain by a reddish-brown weathered siltstone bedrock (regolith) underlain by reddish-brown siltstone. | " Installation of three (3) groundwater monitoring wells BDL-MW7 through BDL-MW9 at ARS#2 and downgradient of ARS#2 toward Harris Lake, | ||
A site-specific interpretation of the geology in the area has been developed by using boring logs from the assessment activities and is presented as a cross-section on Figure 5.3.3 Groundwater Hydrology Regional and site-specific groundwater hydrology have been extensively evaluated by others during the safety analyses for Unit 1 and more recently for proposed Units 2 and 3. These reports indicate that the groundwater hydrology within the plant area is relatively complex as a result of the influence of the main and auxiliary reservoirs and the nature of the parent rock. The previous groundwater studies have focused on the plant area, located to the north of this assessment area. The nearest previously existing monitoring well is MWA-12, which is located approximately 1,000 feet northeast of ARS#l. Historic groundwater elevation at this location was approximately 235' MSL.Groundwater monitoring activities were performed during this assessment to determine if the water entering ARS#2 is groundwater from the surrounding area, (i.e. is local groundwater discharging to ARS#2). Based on the depth to water in ARS#2, approximately 7 feet below ground surface (bgs), it was assumed that only shallow monitoring wells would be required to complete this study objective. | * Measuring water level elevations on March 3, 2009, and | ||
Therefore, eight (8) shallow (less than 30 feet bgs) and one (1) deep (approximately 60 feet bgs) wells were installed during the assessment. | * Collecting a complete round of water samples from the monitoring wells and ARS#2 on March 4, 2009. | ||
One complete round of water level measurements was collected. | These activities are described in detail below. The locations of the groundwater monitoring wells installed in the area are depicted on Figure 2. | ||
Those water level measurements and resulting elevations are shown on Figure 3. Groundwater elevations are also shown on the geologic cross-section included as Figure 5. As indicated, the groundwater elevations are highly variable 3-2 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report | The activities and findings are summarized in the following subsections. The analytical results are presented and, where concentrations of radiological materials were observed, the results are also presented on figures. Throughout this section, groundwater data are discussed with respect to the USEPA drinking water standard of 20,000 pCi/L (picocuries per liter). | ||
(-210 feet MSL)approximately 10 feet below the surface water level indicating that surface water from Harris Lake may be discharging to groundwater in this area.3-3 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report s s . | 2.1 Assessment Activities To accomplish the objectives of ote assessment, several investigatin actites *were. | ||
complted including: soil borings/monitoning well installation, groundwater elation me andgrounhwater, sampling.The assessment methods and, results, are, discussed in the following subsections. | |||
Objective 1.3a Installation of .1 Soil]Boings/Groundwater' Monitoring Well Installation: | |||
additional monitoring wells he primary objectives of the soil boring/monitoring well installation were to evaluate subsurface conditions and establish a network of monitoring wells in the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line assessment area to evaluate geology, hydrogeology and groundwater quality. To accomplish this objective, soil borings were advanced and monitoring wells were installed at the locations illustrated on Figure 2. Boreholes were logged from split spoon samples and cuttings. The screened interval for each monitoring well was selected to intersect the depth intervals where groundwater was observed. Where no groundwater was observed the bottom of the screened interval was 2-4 | |||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclearPower Plant April 2009 placed at the maximum penetration depth of the drilling technique and below observed water levels in the adjacent manholes. | |||
Hollow-stem auger (HSA) drilling methods were employed to complete the installation of groundwater monitoring wells BDL-MW1 through BDL-MW6. HSA and air rotary drilling methods were employed to complete the installation of groundwater monitoring wells BDL-MW7 through BDL-MW9. The drilling activities are described in the following sections. | |||
During the investigation, a total of nine (9) shallow groundwater monitoring wells were installed as shown on Figure 2. The general monitoring well installation procedures are summarized below. | |||
" The depth for each of the wells was selected based on presence and depth of groundwater at each well location. Where no groundwater was observed, the bottom of the well was set at the maximum drilling depth using the HSA techniques (BDL-MW 4 through BDL-MW6, only) and below the water level in ARS#2. | |||
* The wells were generally installed using 4'/4-inch inside diameter (ID) hollow stem augers and/or 4-inch air hammer. | |||
* At least ten feet of 2-inch-ID, Schedule 40 PVC, machine cut, well screen with 0.020-inch-slot size was set at the bottom of each well. A sufficient length of 2-inch ID, Schedule 40 PVC riser pipe was coupled to the screen to allow the PVC riser pipe to extend a minimum of two feet above the ground surface. Well screens were fitted with a nominal 2-inch solid (unslotted) bottom sediment trap. | |||
* The annular space around the well screens was backfilled with clean uniform sand (filter pack sieve #2). The filter pack was placed from the bottom of the well to a minimum of 2 feet above the top of the well screen. A minimum 2-foot-thick bentonite seal was placed above the sand and allowed to hydrate. | |||
* All wells were completed as stick-up wells, with lockable expansion plugs. | |||
2-5 | |||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009 | |||
" A concrete pad will be installed around the wells that are determined by Progress Energy and SSi to be completed as permanent wells. | |||
* Boring Logs were prepared for each monitoring well. | |||
A summary of the monitoring well construction details is provided in Table 1 and depicted in the Boring Logs included in Appendix A. NCDENR Well Construction Records are included in Appendix B. | |||
2.1.2 Groundwater Elevation Measurements Groundwater elevation measurements were collected from the monitoring wells and used to provide data to map the potentiometric surface of the aquifer and interpret the horizontal groundwater flow in the aquifer. One complete round of depth-to-water measurements was collected from the nine monitoring wells on March 3, 2009. | |||
Measurements were collected using a Solinst Level Indicator Probe capable of measuring depth to water within 0.01-foot accuracy. Results of these measurements are summarized in Table 2, presented on Figure 3, and discussed in Section 3 of this report. | |||
2.1.3 Groundwater Sampling One round of groundwater samples was collected from the monitoring wells. All monitoring wells were sampled except BDL-MW4, which was dry. In addition, a water sample was collected directly from the drainpipe in manhole ARS#2. Water samples were analyzed for tritium at Progress Energy's Harris Energy and Environmental Center Radiochemistry Laboratory to the same lower limit of detection as the NC Division of Radiation Protection (NCDRP) laboratory. In addition, select water samples were analyzed for total zinc. | |||
Prior to sampling, each monitoring well was purged in accordance with low-flow groundwater sampling procedures to assure collection of a representative groundwater sample. Groundwater sampling was completed using a peristaltic pump, dedicated 2-6 | |||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . tý Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant | |||
. April 2009 pump (flex) tubing, and dedicated down-hole polyethylene tubing at each monitoring well to eliminate the potential for cross-contamination between sampling points. Water quality measurements (pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, and oxidation/reduction potential) were collected during the purging activities and recorded in the field logbook (Appendix C). The procedure for monitoring well purging and sampling is generally as follows: | |||
* The security cap was removed, and the depth to water in the well was determined with a water level meter. The depth to water was recorded in the field logbook. | |||
* The dedicated down-hole tubing was lowered into the monitoring well, cut to the desired length, attached to the pre-cut flex tubing on the peristaltic pump, a new section of poly tubing was inserted on the effluent side of the pump. The sample line was connected from the pump to the in-line water quality instrument (YSI MP556 with flow through cell), the effluent line from the flow-through cell was inserted into a purge water container to capture purge water, the peristaltic pump was started, and purging of groundwater at the well was commenced. | |||
* An optimum low-flow pumping rate was established at each well to minimize drawdown. The groundwater quality parameters and depth to water were monitored and recorded at prescribed time intervals to determine when the water quality parameters had stabilized to within 10%. | |||
* Following the stabilization of the groundwater quality parameters, groundwater samples were collected from the wells and delivered to the radiological analytical laboratory. | |||
* Purge water was collected and transported to the designated disposal point. | |||
ARS#2 was sampled in general accordance with the methodology specified above. | |||
2-7 | |||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclearPower Plant April 2009 2.2 Assessment Findings - Water Results Groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells on March 4, 2009. All water samples from the wells (8 samples) and manhole (I sample) were analyzed for tritium at the on-site radiological analytical laboratory. Samples from BDL-MW1, BDL-MW5, BDL-MW8, and ARS#2 were also analyzed for zinc, since zinc is added to the cooling water and can be used as a marker analyte. Analytical results are summarized in Table 3. Figure 4 depicts the analytical results for tritium in the water samples. The results are summarized below. | |||
* Tritium was detected in five (5) of the eight (8) monitoring wells sampled and in the ARS#2 sample. The detection limit for the analyses was approximately 233 pCi/L. | |||
* Tritium in the nine (9) samples ranged from less than the detection limit (three wells) to 2,120 pCi/L at manhole ARS#2. | |||
" The highest concentration of tritium detected in the samples was detected in the immediate area of ARS#2 (ARS#2, BDL-MW5, and BDL-MW6). The second highest concentration of tritium was detected at BDL-MW3, near the wetland in the area of groundwater discharge. These three wells are located in close proximity to the backfilled trench of the blowdown line which is likely acting as a preferential pathway of water transport. | |||
* The horizontal migration of tritium in groundwater from the blowdown line appears to be limited as no tritium was detected in samples from BDL-MW8 and BDL-MW9. | |||
* The vertical migration of tritium in groundwater from the blowdown line appears to be limited as no tritium was detected in the sample from BDL-MW7. | |||
2-8 | |||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009 The highest concentration of zinc was detected in the sample from ARS#2 at a concentration of 187 ug/l, lower concentrations of zinc were detected in samples from BDL-MW8 (96 ug/h), BDL-MW5 (18 ug/1) and BDL-MW1 (8 ug/1). | |||
Based on the occurrence and distribution of tritium in the water samples, it appears that the source of tritium is a leak(s) along the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line. Analysis of the hydrogeology and groundwater conditions within the area is presented and discussed in Section 3, and further discussion regarding the possible sources of tritium is presented in Section 4. Conclusions and potential additional activities that may be performed to further evaluate the blowdown line are also presented in Section 4. | |||
2.3 Surveying and Mapping A site survey was performed and certified by a North Carolina Registered Land Surveyor (Smith and Smith). Initial surveying activities were performed on January 22, 2009 during which time the centerline of the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line was located and demarcated. On February 20, 2009 all monitoring wells, manhole ARS#1, and manhole ARS#2 were surveyed. | |||
A survey map was produced that includes scale, benchmarks, North arrow, and the locations of monitoring wells. The survey map provided the information required to produce a site basemap for this Assessment Report. | |||
2-9 | |||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . tý Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant April 2009 3 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY AREA This section presents the physical characteristics of the Site including surface features, geology, surface water hydrology, and groundwater hydrology. | |||
3.1 Surface Features The SHNPP is located approximately 1.6 miles east of the town of New Hill, North Carolina. Access to the SHNPP is from Shearon Harris Road. The owner controlled area encompasses approximately 10,700 acres. The area of the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line, which is the focus of this assessment, includes approximately 15 acres. | |||
As discussed in Section 1, the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line runs underground for approximately 2 miles from the Cooling Tower south to the edge of Harris Lake. The assessment area is on a peninsula which is surrounded by Harris Lake to the south, east, and west and bounded to the north by SHNPP. Specifically, the blowdown line assessment area is located between ARS#1, located adjacent to the composite sampler shed (approximately 0.5 miles from the cooling tower), to ARS#2 which is located approximately 1,110 feet south of ARS# 1. The most significant surface feature in the assessment area is the topographic low area/wetlands, situated along the blowdown line approximately midway between ARS#1 and ARS#2. There is an approximately 30-foot elevation change between ARS#1 and the topographic low to the south. In addition, a portion of Harris Lake is located east of manhole ARS#2. | |||
The Site location is shown on Figure 1, and the Site Layout is depicted on Figure 2. | |||
3.2 Geology Regional and site-specific geology have been extensively evaluated by others during the safety analyses for Unit 1 and more recently for proposed Units 2 and 3. These reports indicate that the plant is underlain by the Upper Triassic Age Newark Supergroup. The 3-1 | |||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report | |||
: 88. Shearon Harris NuclearPower Plant April 2009 group is characterized by siltstone and sandstone with subordinate amounts of claystone and conglomerated and igneous diabase intrusions. Additional information on regional and local geology can be found in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). | |||
Site-specific geology observed in the area of the blowdown line is consistent with the regional geology. Soil borings encountered a thin layer of unconsolidated material (overburden), underlain by a reddish-brown weathered siltstone bedrock (regolith) underlain by reddish-brown siltstone. A site-specific interpretation of the geology in the area has been developed by using boring logs from the assessment activities and is presented as a cross-section on Figure 5. | |||
3.3 Groundwater Hydrology Regional and site-specific groundwater hydrology have been extensively evaluated by others during the safety analyses for Unit 1 and more recently for proposed Units 2 and | |||
: 3. These reports indicate that the groundwater hydrology within the plant area is relatively complex as a result of the influence of the main and auxiliary reservoirs and the nature of the parent rock. The previous groundwater studies have focused on the plant area, located to the north of this assessment area. The nearest previously existing monitoring well is MWA-12, which is located approximately 1,000 feet northeast of ARS#l. Historic groundwater elevation at this location was approximately 235' MSL. | |||
Groundwater monitoring activities were performed during this assessment to determine if the water entering ARS#2 is groundwater from the surrounding area, (i.e. is local groundwater discharging to ARS#2). Based on the depth to water in ARS#2, approximately 7 feet below ground surface (bgs), it was assumed that only shallow monitoring wells would be required to complete this study objective. Therefore, eight (8) shallow (less than 30 feet bgs) and one (1) deep (approximately 60 feet bgs) wells were installed during the assessment. One complete round of water level measurements was collected. Those water level measurements and resulting elevations are shown on Figure 3. Groundwater elevations are also shown on the geologic cross-section included as Figure 5. As indicated, the groundwater elevations are highly variable 3-2 | |||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009 particularly in the area of ARS#2. General observations regarding the assessment area groundwater are as follows: | |||
" In the area of ARS#l, as characterized by BDL-MW1 through BDL-MW3, groundwater elevations indicate flow to the south toward the topographic low/wetland. | |||
" In the area of ARS#2, water was detected in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6 several days after the wells were installed, however BDL-MW4 remains dry. This indicates that the water observed in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6 is not from a local/regional groundwater source. | |||
* The water elevation in ARS#2 is higher than that in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6 indicating that flow is from the immediate vicinity of ARS#2 to these monitoring wells and not from a local/regional groundwater source. | |||
* In the area of ARS#2, groundwater was detected in BDL-MW7 at a significantly lower elevation that the water levels detected in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6, indicating that the regional groundwater elevation may be significantly lower than the water level observed in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6. | |||
* The groundwater elevation at BDL-MW8 was measured to be at or above the ground surface indicating local artesian conditions at this location. | |||
* The groundwater elevation at BDL-MW9, which is located approximately 40 feet from the edge of Harris Lake, was measure at an elevation (-210 feet MSL) approximately 10 feet below the surface water level indicating that surface water from Harris Lake may be discharging to groundwater in this area. | |||
3-3 | |||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclearPower Plant s s . April 2009 4 | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
AND CONCLUSIONS Silar Services Incorporated (SSi) has prepared this Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report to document the results of investigation activities performed along a section of the line at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, located in New Hill, North Carolina. | AND CONCLUSIONS Silar Services Incorporated (SSi) has prepared this Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report to document the results of investigation activities performed along a section of the line at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, located in New Hill, North Carolina. The purpose of the assessment was to identify the potential presence and extent of radiological materials in groundwater within the area of the line with respect to the integrity of the line. | ||
The purpose of the assessment was to identify the potential presence and extent of radiological materials in groundwater within the area of the line with respect to the integrity of the line.The Cooling Tower Blowdown Line runs underground for approximately 2 miles from the cooling tower south to the edge of Harris Lake. The line assessment area is located between Air Release System Manhole #1 (ARS#1), which is located adjacent to the composite sampler shed (approximately 0.5 miles from the cooling tower), to ARS#2, located approximately 1,110 feet south of ARS#1. The overall objectives of the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line assessment are as follows:* Characterize the hydrogeology and geology in the area* Provide groundwater sampling and elevation measuring points* Evaluate groundwater flow and groundwater quality" Assess potential sources of tritium concentration in water.<The assessment field activities were completed intwo phases. The first phase included the foll6owing activities: | The Cooling Tower Blowdown Line runs underground for approximately 2 miles from the cooling tower south to the edge of Harris Lake. The line assessment area is located between Air Release System Manhole #1 (ARS#1), which is located adjacent to the composite sampler shed (approximately 0.5 miles from the cooling tower), to ARS#2, located approximately 1,110 feet south of ARS#1. The overall objectives of the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line assessment are as follows: | ||
* Installation of six (6) groundwater monitoring wells BDL-MWl through BDL-MW6 atMpoints along the blowdown line and ARS#2.; <Collection of preliminary groundwater, samples from BDL-MWl; BD-MW2, and BDL-MW-3.," Water level measurements and preliminay groundwater samples from ~BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6.4-1 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon | * Characterize the hydrogeology and geology in the area | ||
The next highest concentration of tritium was detected at BDL-MW3, near the wetland in the area of groundwater discharge. | * Provide groundwater sampling and elevation measuring points | ||
The highest concentration of zinc was detected in the sample Objective 1.1c .. | * Evaluate groundwater flow and groundwater quality | ||
f transport oftritiated groundwater from the. area near ARS#2 to off-site areas:can be e ated using data collected during this assessment. | " Assess potential sources of tritium concentration in water. | ||
>This evaluation assumes tritiated groun dwater is introdtuiced from ARS#2' to~ the environment at a.concentration of approximately 1,260 pji/L (tritium concentration detected in water*samled from located downgradient of ARS#2). Once introduced into they environment tritiatedjgroundwater flows east northeast toward | <The assessment field activities were completed intwo phases. The first phase included the foll6owing activities: | ||
The owner-controlled area: boundary in the !general direction of groundwater flow is approximately 1.79 milesj or 9,45 1 feet from the ARS#2 ~area.. Based on these estimates it would take groundwater from the ARS#2 area a~pproximately 49 ~years to ~reachi the 4-2 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon | * Installation of six (6) groundwater monitoring wells BDL-MWl through BDL-MW6 atMpoints along the blowdown line and ARS#2. | ||
Based on Ihec ha If-life of tntiurn (12.3:3 yearstfow rate (193'~ft/year), distancee | ; <Collection of preliminary groundwater, samples from BDL-MWl; BD-MW2, and BDL-MW-3., | ||
(;9,451 eet) inital rtim m:concentration | " Water level measurements and preliminay groundwater samples from ~BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6. | ||
ýmn te environment! | 4-1 | ||
(1,260 pCi/L) the concentataonkiof tritum in groundwater reaching the. ownercontrol, boudav i.,9 yer ~will have benrdced by approximately forhalf-lives and would be less tthan 80 pCI below the current lower hmit | |||
The highest observed tritium concentration was in the sample from the ARS#2 and its immediate vicinity. | Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant April 2009 The scon~d h&&iasfhe aseset included: | ||
The water elevation in ARS#2 is higher than water elevations measured in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6, indicating that flow is from the immediate vicinity of ARS#2 to these monitoring wells. In the area of ARS#2, groundwater was detected in BDL-MW7 at a significantly lower elevation than the water levels detected in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6, indicating that the regional groundwater elevation may be significantly lower than the water level observed in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6. Water was observed to be entering ARS#2 through a pipe that was designed to drain water from the manhole to the surrounding backfill. | - Installation of three (3) groundwater monitormg wellsrBDL-MW7. through BDL-MW9at S#2 and downgradientof*ARS#2 toward Harris Lake. | ||
It is possible that the backfill surrounding the blowdown line has created a preferential pathway for the flow of water. Water leaking from the pipeline in the vicinity of ARS#2, or at some point in the pipeline at a higher elevation, may be traveling along this preferential "horizontal" pathway as it also infiltrates the surrounding natural material toward the regional water table elevation. | " Measuirinig water, level elevations. | ||
This would create an apparent groundwater mound adjacent to the line in areas where it is above the regional water table.4-3 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon | " Collecting a complete round of water samples from the mon~itoring wells~ and ARS1#2.1 4.1 Summary of Groundwater Conditions Groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells (8 samples) and manhole (1 sample) and analyzed for tritium. Samples from BDL-MW1, BDL-MW5, BDL-MW8, and ARS#2 were also analyzed for zinc, since zinc is added to the cooling water and can be used as a marker analyte. Tritium was detected in five (5) of the eight (8) monitoring wells sampled and in the ARS#2 sample at concentrations up to 2,120 pCi/L. (detected at ARS#2). | ||
* Evaluation of all manholes in the blowdown line* Installation of sampling points within the blowdown line backfill* Evaluation of the line integrity utilizing video surveillance and or pressure/exfiltration testing.4-4 Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report | The highest .concentration of tritium detected in the samples was detected in the immediate area of ARS#2 (ARS#2, BDL-MW5, and BDL-MW6). The next highest concentration of tritium was detected at BDL-MW3, near the wetland in the area of groundwater discharge. The highest concentration of zinc was detected in the sample Objective 1.1c ' .. RS#2 at a concentration of 187 ug/l. | ||
Shearon Harris Nudear Power Plant New Hill, NC FIgure 2 Sib A' Mop§~S ilar services inc. | migration* f transport oftritiated groundwater from the. area near ARS#2 to off-site areas:can be e ated using data collected during this assessment. >This evaluation assumes tritiated groun dwater is introdtuiced from ARS#2' to~the environment at a. | ||
LOCA 7ION | concentration of approximately 1,260 pji/L (tritium concentration detected in water | ||
37740' 787n9' 25268 NM AM 16. A4RS2 N- 683II.65 E -ZOIZ959.85 55r"29 785723 247.37Z 6.75 24a156 MONITORVNG 0aPT7 7?) | *samled from BDI&-M.W*5, located downgradient of ARS#2). Once introduced into they environment tritiatedjgroundwater flows generally* east northeast toward the..e owner-. | ||
controlled area boundary at a rate of 0.529.fta*dayor4P*393<tyear ThAppendixD). | |||
CROSS SECTION LOCATION 100 p .0 in 240 | The owner-controlled area: boundary in the !general direction of groundwater flow is approximately 1.79 milesj or 9,45 1 feet from the ARS#2 ~area.. Based on these estimates it would take groundwater from the ARS#2 area a~pproximately 49 ~years to ~reachi the 4-2 | ||
INTERVAL COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN LINE SILTSTONE BEDROCK | |||
78057'23' NA NA 247.31 6.75 240.56 BDL-MWI 683,346.51 2,013,326.50 35037'39'' | Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclearPower Plant April 2009 ownter con ITO Iboundary. Based on Ihec ha If-life of tntiurn (12.3:3 yearstfow rate(193'~ | ||
78057'18" 30.01 254.68 252.15 23.31 231.37 BDL-MW2 683,128.39 2,013,248.92 35037,37" 78057,19, 19.34 238.37 236.78 11.71 226.66 BDL-MW3 682,926.76 2,013,180.15 35037'35" 78057'20' 14.72 224.68 222.88 4.45 220.23 BDL-MW4 682,319.25 2,012,972.67 35o37,29"' | ft/year), fl*o~w- distancee (;9,451 eet) *and inital rtim m:concentration ýmn te environment! | ||
78o57,23' 17.29 246.96 245.14 DRY NA BDL-MW5 682,300.08 2,012,967.10 35037,29, 78057,23" 16.64 247.28 245.72 8.44 238.84 BDL-MW6 682,308.18 2,012,948.01 35037,29" 78057,23, 14.02 247.9 246.12 7.72 240.18 BDL-MW7 682,308.67 2,012,970.46 35o37'29', 78057,23, 60.94 248.07 245.21 62.93 185.14 BDL-MW8 682,370.85 2,013,154.27 35o37,30'' | (1,260 pCi/L) the concentataonkiof tritum in groundwater reaching the. ownercontrol, boudav i.,9 yer~will have benrdced by approximately forhalf-lives and would be less tthan 80 pCI below the current lower hmit offSupportmg, detecton.t | ||
78057'20, 20.33 235.9 233.18 2.05 233.85 BDL-MW9 682,417.76 2,013,249.54 35037'30' 78057'20' 17.87 225.17 222.94 15.2 209.97 Notes: bgs -Below Ground Surface TOC -Top of Well Casing MSL -Mean Sea Level NA -Not Applicable Survey data provided by Smith and Smith | {documentatin*rnf this analysis is provided in Appendix D, 4.2 Conclusions Based on the occurrence and distribution of tritium in the water samples, it appears that the source of tritium is a leak(s) along the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line. This is based on several observations. The highest observed tritium concentration was in the sample from the ARS#2 and its immediate vicinity. The water elevation in ARS#2 is higher than water elevations measured in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6, indicating that flow is from the immediate vicinity of ARS#2 to these monitoring wells. In the area of ARS#2, groundwater was detected in BDL-MW7 at a significantly lower elevation than the water levels detected in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6, indicating that the regional groundwater elevation may be significantly lower than the water level observed in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6. Water was observed to be entering ARS#2 through a pipe that was designed to drain water from the manhole to the surrounding backfill. It is possible that the backfill surrounding the blowdown line has created a preferential pathway for the flow of water. Water leaking from the pipeline in the vicinity of ARS#2, or at some point in the pipeline at a higher elevation, may be traveling along this preferential "horizontal" pathway as it also infiltrates the surrounding natural material toward the regional water table elevation. This would create an apparent groundwater mound adjacent to the line in areas where it is above the regional water table. | ||
* Zinc Location (pCi/liter) (pCi/liter) (pCi/liter) (ug/1)ARS#2 2,120 233 < LLD 187 BDL-MW1 372 232 *8 BDL-MW2 373 233 BDL-MW3 1,060 232 BDL-MW4 dry BDL-MW5 1,260 233 < LLD 18 BDL-MW6 1,450 232 BDL-MW7 < LLD 234 BDL-MW8 < LLD 232 < LLD 96 BDL-MW9 < LLD 232* The gamma analysis were counted to the Radiological Environmental Program's Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) | 4-3 | ||
SS.Cýý | |||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant April 2009 Further investigation is recommended including, but not limited to, the following: | |||
* Evaluation of all manholes in the blowdown line | |||
~> ~< \Completion Notes: Site: Ground Elevation 252.15 Casing Elevation 254.68 SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown Line New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1 4;z BORING LOG Drill Rig: Dietrich D-50 Date Drilled: 1/22/09 Logged By: Boring Dia: 6.5 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW2 Tim Silar a)-a E M, | * Installation of sampling points within the blowdown line backfill | ||
* Evaluation of the line integrity utilizing video surveillance and or pressure/exfiltration testing. | |||
. | 4-4 | ||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . Cýý Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009 FIGURES | |||
N Shearon Hanls Nuclear Power Plant eiw Now HIn. NC Quadrangle Location Figurel 0 2000 4000 Feet StSk Loctiko MW Source: New Hill Topographic U.S.G.S. &: Cokesbury,Map NC (7.5 quadrangles minute) SS -Silar Services Inc. | |||
Shearon Harris Nudear Power Plant New Hill, NC FIgure 2 Sib A' Mop | |||
§~S ilar services inc. | |||
.. | |||
. | LOCA 7ION DATA MANN*I- NOR7-N/G EAS7ING LATITUDE LIVGRE ELEVA W7DN D*MT TO GRO(NDOA 7ER MOMNM 70A? ELEVA77V MH IARSI NI 68813845 E - 2A071313. 37740' 787n9' 25268 NM AM | ||
: 16. A4RS2 N- 683II.65 E - ZOIZ959.85 55r"29 785723 247.37Z 6.75 24a156 MONITORVNG 0aPT7 7?) GCNDWA7DE NEL NAAW7IH/NDG EASPG LAT711,DC LONt., E ELEVATION GROUNDW4A7R 776V EL-7"VA OL-M#W7.PWC N- 68,346.51 E - 2014326.50 J5'339" 78y5778 254.68 2137 237.37 DL--M*2.PIW N- 6M1283,T9 f = 2.017.424a92 35,37" 785719" 23&J7 71.71 226.66 eBL-I*w*pW N- 8ZM96. E =- ,zoxaai8 J5 775' 785r2o" 22488 445 22C23 bM-Mw4.PVC N- 692371.25 E - 207297287 JTr2g" 7857r2" 246.96 DRY DRY X-MN*.phC N- 68&Z3008 C = 2-0 Z967.70 30Y772W 78M72," 247.28 844 23M84 BW-MW.PiW N- 6.9230M78 E - 2072.948.01 35729 78372J' 24Z90 Z72 24a1i8 MDL--MW7.PW N- 623,08867 f - 2072970U46 3537'29' 787"23' 24807 6293 17814 E = 2014 75427 3537'3*30 785720' 23890 205 23185 SDL/.-MN*PWC | |||
-MMW.PW. | |||
. | NA-N- | ||
8837185 68,417776 E - 201424-q54 J53*iJ 785720" 2,257 1520 20897 Shea=mf Herds Nuclear Power Plant New Hi, NC Fgmure 3 Gomwg, Fbw M A Silar Services Dnc. | |||
------ | |||
.. | nm.m Nuamr rwwu rq-x MSiwumn New HI. NC Rq4 QmmdwdwS*npho Snmy Mach 4,.200 SS. | ||
Lý- | |||
slia Servces imc | |||
... | |||
CROSS SECTION LOCATION 100 p .0 in 240 BDL-,' | |||
M& DI AM5 230 6CDL-AA,41/5W 0? | |||
... | 220 210 - 210 200 200 190 - 190 180 - 180 Fed HORIZONTAL SCALE: | ||
LEGEND VERTICAL SCALE: _ O' | |||
. | - OVERBURDEN | ||
........... | * GROUNDWA TER ELEVA 77ON Sham Hattis Nuder Pow Plnt WEA THERED SIL TS TONE SCREENED Naw H., NC | ||
............ | .-. BEDROCK (REGOLITH) INTERVAL COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN LINE F*u5 SILTSTONE BEDROCK Gfl.am tdcrn | ||
-S§ SMar Sevis Dnc- | |||
... | ss. Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant April 2009 TABLES | ||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss. | |||
. | Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009 Table I Monitoring Well Construction Summary Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, New Hill, North Carolina Annular Fill Material Well Depth TOC Ground Surface Screen Sand Interval Seal Interval Concrete Well ID. | ||
(bgs) (MSL) Elevation (MSL) Interval (feet (feet bgs) (feet bgs) Interval bgs) (feet bgs) | |||
BDL-MW1 30.01 254.68 252.15 30-10 30-5 5-0 NA BDL-MW2 19.34 238.37 236.78 19-9 19-5 5-0 NA BDL-MW3 14.72 224.68 222.88 15-5 15-3 3-0 NA BDL-MW4 17.29 246.96 245.14 17-7 17-5 5-0 NA BDL-MW5 16.64 247.28 245.72 17-7 17-5 5-0 NA BDL-MW6 14.02 247.9 246.12 14-4 14-2.5 2.5-0 NA BDL-MW7 60.94 248.07 245.21 60-30 60-25 25-23 23-0 BDL-MW8 20.33 235.9 233.18 20-10 20-8 8-6 6-0 BDL-MW9 17.87 225.17 222.94 18-8 18-6 6-4 4-0 Notes: | |||
bgs - Below Ground Surface TOC - Top of Well Casing MSL - Mean Sea Level NA - Not Applicable Survey data provided by Smith and Smith, accurate to 0.01 feet MSL | |||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant scS 4 April 2009 Table 2 Water Level Measurements Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, New Hill, North Carolina Water Level Measurements Location ID Well Depth TOC Ground Surface Depth to Water Northing Easting Latitude Longitude (bgs) (MSL) Elevation (MSL) Water Elevation I _(MSL) 2,013,313.56 35037'40 78057'19, NA NA 252.68 NA NA ARS#1 683,368.45 2,012,959.85 35o37'29"' 78057'23' NA NA 247.31 6.75 240.56 ARS#2 682,311.65 BDL-MWI 683,346.51 2,013,326.50 35037'39'' 78057'18" 30.01 254.68 252.15 23.31 231.37 BDL-MW2 683,128.39 2,013,248.92 35037,37" 78057,19, 19.34 238.37 236.78 11.71 226.66 BDL-MW3 682,926.76 2,013,180.15 35037'35" 78057'20' 14.72 224.68 222.88 4.45 220.23 BDL-MW4 682,319.25 2,012,972.67 35o37,29"' 78o57,23' 17.29 246.96 245.14 DRY NA BDL-MW5 682,300.08 2,012,967.10 35037,29, 78057,23" 16.64 247.28 245.72 8.44 238.84 BDL-MW6 682,308.18 2,012,948.01 35037,29" 78057,23, 14.02 247.9 246.12 7.72 240.18 BDL-MW7 682,308.67 2,012,970.46 35o37'29', 78057,23, 60.94 248.07 245.21 62.93 185.14 BDL-MW8 682,370.85 2,013,154.27 35o37,30'' 78057'20, 20.33 235.9 233.18 2.05 233.85 BDL-MW9 682,417.76 2,013,249.54 35037'30' 78057'20' 17.87 225.17 222.94 15.2 209.97 Notes: | |||
... | bgs - Below Ground Surface TOC - Top of Well Casing MSL - Mean Sea Level NA - Not Applicable Survey data provided by Smith and Smith | ||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report SS. Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant Ltl-ý April 2009 Table 3 Analytical Results - Water Samples Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, New Hill, North Carolina Sample Tritium Tritium LLD Gamma Analysis | |||
. | * Zinc Location (pCi/liter) (pCi/liter) (pCi/liter) (ug/1) | ||
.. | ARS#2 2,120 233 < LLD 187 BDL-MW1 372 232 *8 BDL-MW2 373 233 BDL-MW3 1,060 232 BDL-MW4 dry BDL-MW5 1,260 233 < LLD 18 BDL-MW6 1,450 232 BDL-MW7 < LLD 234 BDL-MW8 < LLD 232 < LLD 96 BDL-MW9 < LLD 232 | ||
* The gamma analysis were counted to the Radiological Environmental Program's Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) | |||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant SS. | |||
Cýý April 2009 Appendix A Boring Logs | |||
7BORING LOG Drill Rig: Dietrich D-50 Date Drilled: 1/22/09 Logged By: | |||
... | Boring Dia: 6.5 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW1 Tim Silar a) Blow Depth | ||
-a lout Comple tion E Counts Lithology Description Feet Brn sit w/sm f gr sand | |||
- ! i I Brn, gry brn sit, mottled Brn, tr gry sit w/ tr cly incresing w/ depth 5 | |||
., / | |||
/x / | |||
.. ...... Gry f gr sand w/ organic matter | |||
. I Bin md-f gr sand 10 Bm/gry cly Rd bm sit w/sm f gr sand Gm gry sit w/cly sm rd bin mottling spoon refusal at 13' bgs Weathered rd bin siltstone with tr vf gr ss and tr sh 50/4" 15 50/4" 20 | |||
: -Z-Z-. :--------- | |||
- | 50/2" 25 | ||
~> ~<\ | |||
F, 30 Completion Notes: Site: | |||
------------- | Ground Elevation 252.15 Casing Elevation 254.68 SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown Line New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1 | ||
4;z BORING LOG Drill Rig: Dietrich D-50 Date Drilled: 1/22/09 Logged By: | |||
.. | Boring Dia: 6.5 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW2 Tim Silar a) Blow Depth | ||
-a E Con npletion Lithology Description Counts Feet M, | |||
----- | ... I....... | ||
........... Brn- It brn t gr sand A | |||
Rd brn sit Weatnerea ra om siltstone M.MM IMM-L-- | |||
/ 30 50/2" 5 | |||
/ / // | |||
~/ \ | |||
26 50/2" 10 | |||
>2*>',> | |||
K | |||
MIKE MCCONAHEY Well Contractor (Individual) | * / | ||
26 50/5" 15 7)' /\ | |||
SITE WELL ID#(if applicable) | f ----------------==I Completion Notes: Site: | ||
BDL-MW- | Ground Elevation 236.78 Casing Elevation 238.37 SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown Line New Hill, NC | ||
_Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1 | |||
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Dietrich D-50 Date Drilled: 1/23/09 Logged By: | |||
Boring Dia: 6.5 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW3 Tim Silar Blow Depth lout Comple tion E Counts Lithology Description Feet (I) 6-------------- A | |||
---------- BEn sity t gr sand, sm mottling | |||
............ I- .. | |||
Highly weathered rd brn siltstone 40 50/4" - 5 Weathered rd bm siltstone, good water zone @ -10.5' bgs Y:: | |||
:Y | |||
/ | |||
36 50/3.5" 10 M -. 71-:':'--'L-1:-----:-'- | |||
- 15 Completion Notes: Site: | |||
Ground Elevation 222.88 Casing Elevation 224.68 SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown LinE New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1 | |||
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Dietrich D-50 Date Drilled: 1/23/09 Logged By: | |||
Boring Dia: 6.5 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW4 Tim Silar Blow Depth Lithology lout Comple tion E Counts Description Feet C,) tion ---------------- ,..,+ - | |||
Brn sit w/f gr sand, organic matter Rd brn w/ sm gry sit w/sm siltsone, possible fill "I',,',',, | |||
",,, "I'll".I'll | |||
.................. ... .1 n-MM1_-_n_-='M-17 Weathered rd brn siltstone, sm gry siltstone, dry 16 50/4" - 5-38 50/2" ---------- | |||
7/7 50/4.5" 10 - | |||
30 50/2" 36 50/4" 15 4 | |||
Completion Notes: Site: | |||
Ground Elevation 245.14 Casing Elevation 246.96 SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown Line New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1 | |||
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Dietrich D-50 Date Drilled: 1/26/09 Logged By: | |||
Boring Dia: 6.5 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW5 Tim Silar Blow Depth E Comple tion Lithology Description CU Counts Feet "1 Brn with sm gry sit w/ sm cly, tr f gr sand, dense, dry (IX 5 - | |||
Weathered rd brn siltstone, sm gry siltstone, dry 50/4" ---------------- - | |||
77 - | |||
10 36 50/5" 50/4" 15 | |||
- ~=- =~ | |||
Completion Notes: Site: | |||
Ground Elevation 245.72 Casing Elevation 247.28 SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown Line New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1 | |||
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Dietrich D-50 Date Drilled: 1/27/09 Logged By: | |||
Boring Dia: 6.5 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW6 Tim Silar a) | |||
'a Blow Depth E Completion Lithology Description Counts Feet (I) 4-- -- ~..---, 4 - | |||
Brn with sm rd brn sit w/ tr cly and vf gr sand, tr organic matter L= | |||
Weathered rd brn siltstone, sm gry siltstone, dry 18 26 50/5" x / | |||
26 50/5" 5 - | |||
30 50/3" V V 10 - | |||
20 40 50/3" 30 50/4" 4- | |||
- 15 - | |||
Completion Notes: Site: | |||
Ground Elevation 246.12 Casing Elevation 247.90 SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown LinE New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1 | |||
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Geoprobe Date Drilled: 2/17/09 Logged By: | |||
Boring Dia: 4 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW7 Tim Silar | |||
- ~Blow Depth Lihog BCou Completion e Lithology aE Counts Feet Description | |||
-U)O | |||
* S Brn with sm rd bm sit w/tr cly and vf gr sand, tr organic S matter a | |||
I S a Weathered rd brn siltstone, sm gry siltstone, dry a | |||
5 a | |||
*0 -------------- | |||
a 10 71 | |||
-..7' 7. 7 | |||
: a. 4 15 t I L IM.M-1M., | |||
a Siltstone a 20 a | |||
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 .1 Completion Notes: Site: | |||
Ground Elevation 245.21 Casing Elevation 248.07, Solid stem SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown LinE augers to -17' bgs with air rotary from 60' bgs New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1 | |||
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Geoprobe Date Drilled: 2/17/09 Logged By: | |||
Boring Dia: 4 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW8 Tim Silar | |||
'a Blow Completion Depth Lithology Description E Counts Feet Brn with sm rd brn sit w/ tr cly and vf gr sand, tr organic a matter | |||
'4' a a'. | |||
Weathered rd brn siltstone, sm gry siltstone, dry a | |||
a a | |||
* a 5 | |||
10 - | |||
ký----------------I Siltstone, water zone at 14-15' bgs 15 - | |||
20 Completion Notes: Site: | |||
Ground Elevation 233.18 Casing Elevation 235.90, Solid stem SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown Line augers to -12' bgs with air rotary from 20' bgs New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1 | |||
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Geoprobe Date Drilled: 2/17/09 Logged By: | |||
Boring Dia: 4 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW9 Tim Silar S Blow Completion Depth Lithology Description E Counts Feet C,, | |||
Brn and gry cly sit a | |||
a U | |||
a a | |||
- 5- | |||
- i Grysit Rd brn siltstone, dry 10 - | |||
15 - | |||
Completion Notes: Site: | |||
Ground Elevation 222.94 Casing Elevation 225.17, Solid stem SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown Line augers to -8' bgs with air rotary 18' bgs New Hill, NC | |||
_Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1 | |||
ss. Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclearPower Plant April 2009 Appendix B NCDENR Well Construction Records | |||
NON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2402 I. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.0 FT. Above Land Surface MIKE MCCONAHEY "Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118. | |||
Well Contractor (Individual) Name GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC, e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST N/A Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount N/A STREET ADDRESS 176 COMMERCE BLVD g. WATER ZONES (depth): | |||
From To__ From___ To STATESVILLE NC 28625 From__ To_ From___ To City or Town State Zip Code 704 -872-7686 From - To_ From___ To Area code- Phone number 6. CASING: Thickness/ | |||
Fro_ _ Depth To 10.0 | |||
* W~hS It W4~ral | |||
: 2. WELL INFORMATION: ____ __ | |||
SITE WELL ID#(if applicable) BDL-MW-1 Frm.0 Dpt Ft._2~1 __ ___ | |||
From To Ft. | |||
STATE WELL PERMIT#(if applicable)_ | |||
From__ To_ FLt DWQ or OTHER PERMIT #*lfapplicable) | |||
: 7. GROUT: Depth Material Method WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring 9] Municipal/Public 0 Industrial/Commercial [3 Agricultural [I Recovery D Injection 0 From To Ft. | |||
IrrigationC3 Other 0 (list use) From " To Ft_ | |||
From - To Ft. | |||
DATE DRILLED 01/22/09 8, SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material TIME COMPLETED - AMO PMQ From 10.0 To 30.0 Ft 2.0 in. .010 in, PVC | |||
: 3. WELL LOCATION: | |||
From__ To Ft. in. _ in __ | |||
CITY: NEW HILL COUNTY WAKE From _ To__ FL in. In. | |||
SHEARON HARRIS ROAD 27562 | |||
: 9. SAND/GRAVEL PACK: | |||
(Street Name, Numbera, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code) | |||
Depth Size Material TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: | |||
From. 5.0 To 30.0 Ft 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND 0 Slope OValley []Flat ORidge 0 Other From. To FtL_ | |||
(check appropriate box) | |||
LATITUDE LONGITUDE Sminutes, | |||
*May be in degres, seconds or in a decimal format From | |||
: 10. DRILLING LOG To Ft._ | |||
From To Formation Description Latitude/longitude source: oGPS oTopographic map 0.0 1.0 GRASS/TOPSOIL (location of we# must be shown on a USGS topo map and 1.0 14.0 ORANGEr/AN/WHITE SANDY CLAYEY SILT attachedto this form Inot ushig GPS) 14.0 30.0 BROWN/RED SANDY SILT | |||
: 4. FACILITY- is the nnme of fe business where thewell is wlat. | |||
FACILITY ID #(if applicable)_ | |||
NAME OF FACILITY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON PROGRESS ENERGY MAILING ADDRESS PO BOX 10429 SOUTHPORT NC 28419 11. REMARKS: | |||
City or Town State. Zip Code BENTONrTE SEAL FROM 0.0 TO 5.0 FEET Area code - Phone number | |||
: 5. WELL DETAILS: | |||
: a. TOTAL DEPTH: 30.0 FEET | |||
: b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES 0. NO E) | |||
II | |||
: c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 0.0 (DRY) FT. MIKE MCCONAHEY (Use "" IfAbove Top of Casing) | |||
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., | |||
Form GW-lb 11617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919) 733-7015 ext 568. Rev. 7/05 | |||
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2402 | |||
: 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: | |||
: d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.0 FT. Above Land Surface* | |||
MIKE MCCONAHEY *Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require a variance In accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118. | |||
Well Contractor (Individual) Name | |||
: e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST N/A GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC. | |||
Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A . Amount N/A STREET ADDRESS 176 COMMERCE BLVD g. WATER ZONES (depth): | |||
From - To - From To STATESVILLE NC 28625 From To_ _ From To City or Town State Zip Code From _ To From To (704 - 872-7686 Area code- Phone number 6. CASING: Thickness/ | |||
: 2. WELL INFORMATION: Depth Da From 0.0 To 4, 0 | |||
Ft._2 1IrCt SITE WELL.ID #(if applicable)_ BDL-MW-2 From To Ft STATE WELL PERMIT#(if applicable) | |||
From _ To_ Ft._ | |||
DWO or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable)_ | DWO or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable)_ | ||
WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring | WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring 8) Municipal/Public [I 7. GROUT: Depth Material Method Industrial/Commerciai 0 Agricultural 0 Recovery 0] Injection [0 From To Ft. | ||
Irrigationo Other 0 (list use)__ _ From _ To Ft Fromr___ To_ Ft. | |||
[I Industrial/Commerciai 0 Agricultural 0 Recovery 0] Injection | DATE DRILLED 0117.2./09 | ||
[0 Irrigationo Other 0 (list use)__ | : 8. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material TIME COMPLETED AM n PM r From 4.0 To 19.0 Ft. 2.0 in. .010 In. PVC | ||
/ LAND SETTING: OSIope OValley 0Flat []Ridge 0 Other (check appropriate box)LATITUDE _ May be in degrees, minutes, seconds or LONGITUDE in a decimal format Latitude/longitude source: oGPS oTopographic map'(location of wel must be shown on e USGS topo map and attached to this form if not using GPS)4. FACIUTY. Is the name of the business where the well Is located.FACILITY ID #(if applicable) | : 3. WELL LOCATION: | ||
NAME OF FACIUTY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 | From To Ft. in. in. | ||
CITY: NEW HILL COUNTY WAKE From _ To_ _ Ft.- in. 'tn. | |||
SHEARON HARRIS ROAD 27562 9. SANDIGRAVEL PACK: | |||
# 2402 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: | (Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdfivsion, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code) | ||
MIKE MCCONAHEY Well Contractor (Individual) | Depth Size Material TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: | ||
From 2.0 To 19.0 Ft. 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND OSIope OValley 0Flat []Ridge 0 Other (check appropriate box) From To_ _ Ft. | |||
SITE WELL ID #(it applicable) | From T.__T___ Ft. | ||
BDL-MW-3 STATE WELL PERMIT#QT applicable)_ | LATITUDE _ May be in degrees, minutes, seconds or 10. DRILLING LOG LONGITUDE in a decimal format From To Formation Description Latitude/longitude source: oGPS oTopographic map 0.0 1.0 GRASS/TOPSOIL | ||
'(location of wel must be shown on e USGS topo map and 1.0 10.0 ORANGE/TAN/WHITE SANDY CLAYEY SILT attached to this form if not using GPS) 10.0 19.0 BROWN/RED SANDY SILT | |||
: 4. FACIUTY. Is the name of the business where the well Is located. | |||
FACILITY ID#(if applicable) | |||
NAME OF FACIUTY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON PROGRESS ENERGY MAIUNG ADDRESS PO BOX 10429 SOUTHPORT NC 28419 11. REMARKS: | |||
City or Town State Zip Code BENTONITE SEAL FROM 0.0 TO 2.0 FEET Area code - Phone number 5 WELL DETAILS: A LLWCONSTRU2* TANQR DS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS | |||
: a. TOTAL DEPTH: 19.0 FEET I Y TFY THAT THIS WELL WA;S CO' 'STR*LITDINACCORDANCE WITH S 02/24/09 | |||
: b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES O NO El 0 1. | |||
SIGNATURE CP'CERTIFIED WELL C5ý "TOR DATE | |||
: c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 0.0 (DRY) FT. MIKE MCCONAHEY (Use "+" if Above Top of Casing) | |||
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., | |||
Form GW-lb 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919)733-7015 ext 568. Rev. 7105 | |||
NON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2402 | |||
: 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.0 FT. Above Land Surface* | |||
MIKE MCCONAHEY *Top of casing terrrinated at/or below land surface may require Well Contractor (Individual) Name a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118. | |||
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC. e. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST N/A Well Cortractor Company Name I. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount N/A STREET ADDRESS 176 COMMERCE BLVD g. WATER ZONES (depth): | |||
From - To From To STATESVILLE NC 28625 From To _ From - To City or Towm State Zip Code From To_ From_ To (704 . 872-7686 Area code- Phone number 6. CASING: Thickness/ | |||
: 2. WELL INFORMATION: Depth Djamfe Matria From 0 0 | |||
. To 5.0 FL 2 I PV SITE WELL ID #(it applicable) BDL-MW-3 STATE WELL PERMIT#QT applicable)_ From_ _ To Ft._ | |||
From To Ft._ | |||
DWO or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable) | DWO or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable) | ||
WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring E3 MunicipalP/iloic 0 IndustriallCommercial 0" Agricultural 0 Recovery 0 Injection 0]Irrigationo Other 0 (list use)DATE DRILLED 01/23/09 | WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring E3 MunicipalP/iloic 0 7. GROUT: Depth Material Method IndustriallCommercial 0" Agricultural 0 Recovery 0 Injection 0] From_ _ To Ft. | ||
Irrigationo Other 0 (list use) From To FL From - To_ Ft DATE DRILLED 01/23/09 | |||
: 8. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material TIME COMPLETED AM E] PMQ From 5.0 To_15.0 FL 2.0 in..010 In. PVC | |||
: 3. WELL LOCATION: | |||
From To_ Ft. in. in. | |||
CITY: NEW HILL COUNTY WAKE From- To__ Ft _ in. in. | |||
# | SHEARON HARRIS ROAD 27562 (Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code) 9. SANDIGRAVEL PACK: | ||
Depth Size Material TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: | |||
From 3.0 To 15.0 Ft. 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND 0Slope OVdley OFlat oRidge o Other (check appropriate box) | |||
From To FL_ | |||
From To Ft._ | |||
LATITUDE - _____ May be in degreezs, minutes, seconds or 10. DRILLING LOG LONGITUDE in a decimal format From To Formation Description Latitude/longitude source: OGPS oTopographic map 0.0 1.0 GRASSrTOPSOIL (locatibn of welI must be shown on a USGS topo map and 1.0 6.0 ORANGE/TAN/WHITE SANDY CLAYEY SILT attached to this form if not using GPS) 6,0 15.0 BROWN/RED SANDY SILT | |||
: 4. FACILITY- is tie nnae a the business where the well Is located. | |||
FACILITY ID #(#f applicable)_ | |||
Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)TOPOGRAPHIC | NAME OF FACILITY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON PROGRESS ENERGY MAILING ADDRESS PO BOX 10429 SOUTHPORT NC 28419 11. REMARKS: | ||
/ LAND SETTING: | City or Town State Zip Code BENTONITE SEAL FROM 0.0 TO 3.0 FEET Area code - Phone number | ||
NAME OF FACILITY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 | : 5. WELL DETAILS: THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED INACCORDANCE WfTH rRU'II SThAIDARDS, AND THAT ACOPY OF THIS | ||
: a. TOTAL DEPTH: 15.0 FEET 02/24109 | |||
: b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES 0 NO 91 SIGNATURE &F CERTIFIED WELL DATE | |||
. | : c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 0.0 (DRY) FT. MIKE MCCONAHEY (Use +" if Above Top of Casing) | ||
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., Form GW-lb 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919) 733-7015 ext 568. | |||
Rev. 7/05 | |||
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department ofEnvironment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2402 | |||
: 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: | |||
: d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.0 FT. Above Land Surface* | |||
MIKE MCCONAHEY *Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118. | |||
Well Contractor (Individual) Name GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC. e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST N/A Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount N/A | |||
: g. WATER ZONES (depth): | |||
STREET ADDRESS 176 COMMERCE BLVD From ~ To From__ To___ | |||
STATESVILLE NC 28625 From___ To_ From To City or Town State Zip Code From ___ To _ FronT To_ | |||
704 872-7686 Area code- Phone number 6. CASING: Thickness/ | |||
: 2. WELL INFORMATION: From___.. | |||
- Depth . 2% | |||
Dow I~cHvc~) ~ | |||
ameter Matei ateia From 0.0 To 7.5 FL SITE WELL ID#Nifaplicable) BDL-MW-4 From To Ft._ | |||
STATE WELL PERMIT#C'i applicable)_ | |||
From To Ft. | |||
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable) _ ..... _. | |||
WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring 01 Municipal/Public D 7. GROUT: Depth Material Method IndustzlaVCorrmerciad ] Agrlcultural 0 Recoveryo Injection 0 From_ To__ Ft Irrgationo Other 0 (list use) From To Ft. | |||
From To_____ Ft. | |||
DATE DRILLED 01/23/09 | |||
: 8. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material TIME COMPLETED AM O PM O From 7.5 To 17.5 Ft. 2.0 in. .010 in. PVC | |||
: 3. WELL LOCATION: | |||
From To Ft. In. in. | |||
CITY: NEW HILL COUNTY WAKE From____ To Ft in. _ in. | |||
SHEARON HARRIS ROAD 27562 | |||
: 9. SANDIGRAVEL PACK: | |||
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdiision. Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code) | |||
Depth Size Material TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: | |||
From 5.0 To 17.5 Ft. 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND | |||
[]Slope [3Valley 0 Fat -Ridge E] Other (check appropriate box) From To__ Ft._ | |||
From To Ft._ | |||
LATITUDE -May be in degrees. | |||
minutes, seconds or 10. DRILLING LOG LONGITUDE in a decimal format From To Formation Description Latitude/longitude source: oGPS oTopographic map 0.0 1.0 GRASS/TOPSOIL (kcation of we# must be shown on a USGS topo map and 1.0 6.0 ORANGEITANtWHITE SANDY CLAYEY SILT attachedto this form if not using GPS) 6.0 17.5 BROWN/RED SANDY SILT | |||
: 4. FACIUTY- Is the name of the business where Vie wet imloceted. | |||
FACILITY ID #(if applicable) | |||
NAME OF FACILITY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 City or Tovn State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON PROGRESS ENERGY MAILING ADDRESS P0 BOX 10429 SOUTHPORT NC 28419 11. REMARKS: | |||
City or Town State Zip Code BENTONITE SEAL FROM 0.0 TO 5.0 FEET Area code - Phone number | |||
: 5. WELL DETAILS: too AA.Y CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSiRUCOTE INACCORDANCE WITH 15~C 2C,..LL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT ACOPY OF THIS | |||
: a. TOTAL DEPTH: 17.5 FEET qjW R Is~r H~ EN PRV9ý | |||
: b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES 0 NO !] SIGNATURE O ?.CERTIFIED WELL CO OR DATE | |||
: c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 0.0(DRY) FT. MIKE MCCONAHEY (Use "+ If Above Top of Casing) | |||
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., | |||
Form GW-lb 1617 Mall Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919) 733-7015 ext 568. Rev. 7/05 | |||
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 3214 | |||
: 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.0 FT. Above Land Surface* | |||
*Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require RANDY OWNBEY a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .01 18. | |||
Wdll Contractor (Indivdual) Name GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC. a. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST N/A Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount N/A STREET ADDRESS 176 COMMERCE BLVD g. WATER ZONES (depth): | |||
From_ _ __To From To__ | |||
STATESVILLE NC 28625 From____ To_ From_ __ To City or Town State Zip Code Front_ To From_. To____ | |||
7 872-7686 Area code- Phone number 6. CASING: Thickness/ | |||
: 2. WELL INFORMATION: Depth F1ilarter Mateal From 0.0 To 7.0 FL_2 NGH PVC SITE WELL ID#(if appficabie)_ BDL-MW-5 From_ To_ Ft._ | |||
STATE WELL PERMIT#(if applicable) _ _ _ | |||
From___ To__ FL _ | |||
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable)_ | DWQ or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable)_ | ||
WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring [J MunicipaV/Public [I 7. GROUT: Depth. Material Method Industrial/Commercial 0 Agricultural [I Recovery[) Irjection D From - To Ft. | |||
NAME OF | Irrigationo Other C (list use) From _ To _ FL_ | ||
From___ To _ Ft. | |||
DATE DRILLED 01127/09 | |||
: 8. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slat Size Material TIME COMPLETED AM 0 PM 0 From 7.0 To 17.0 FL 2.0 in. .010 In. PVC | |||
: 3. WELL LOCATION: | |||
From_ _ To Ft. in. In. | |||
CITY: NEW HILL COUNTY WAKE From___ To____ Ft. in. in. | |||
SHEARON HARRIS ROAD 27562 | |||
: 9. SANDIGRAVEL PACK: | |||
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdhision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code) | |||
Depth Size Material TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: | |||
From 5.0 To 17.0 Ft. 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND | |||
[I Slope DValley [ Flat 0JRidge O Other From To Ft. | |||
(check appropriate box) | |||
From __ To Ft.___ | |||
LATITUDE _____t__,May be in degrees. | |||
minutes. seconds or 10. DRILUNG LOG LONGITUDE in a decimal format From To Formation Description Latitude/longitude source: oGPS oTopographic map 0.0 1.0 GRASS/TOPSOIL (location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and 1.0 6,0 ORANGE/TAN/WHITE SANDY CLAYEY SILT attachedto this form if not using GPS) 6-0 17.0 BROWN/RED FINE SANDY SILT | |||
: | : 4. FACILITY- Is thename or the business where te well is located. | ||
FACILITY ID #(dfapplicable) | |||
NAME OF FACIUTY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON PROGRESS ENERGY MAILING ADDRESS P0 BOX 10429 SOUTHPORT NC 28419 11. REMARKS: | |||
City or Town State Zip Code BENTONITE SEAL FROM 0.0 TO 5.0 FEET Area code - Phone number I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | |||
: 5. WELL DETAILS: 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CON U)ON STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS U | |||
ENzPI TO THE WELL OWNER. | |||
: a. TOTAL DEPTH: 17.0 FEET | |||
: b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES [I NO 9J SIGýA*TRE('5F CER'fIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE | |||
: c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 0.0 (DRY) FT. RANDY OWNBEY (Use "+* if Above Top of Casing) | |||
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., Form GW-lb 1617 Mall Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919) 733-7015 ext 568. Rev. 7/05 | |||
is | NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality | ||
NA NAME OF FACILITY Progress | "'4~, fl~' WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 3214 | ||
: 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: | |||
: d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.0 FT. Above Land Surface* | |||
RANDY OWNBEY *Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may reqLire Well Contractor (Individual) Name a variance in accordance with ISA NCAC 2C .0118. | |||
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC. e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST N/A Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount NlA STREET ADDRESS 176 COMMERCE BLVD g. WATER ZONES (depth): | |||
From To From To STATESVILLE NC 28625 From__ To _ From - To City or Town State Zip Code From - To_ From To (74 y872-7686 Area code- Phone number 6. CASING:, Thickness/ | |||
: 2. WELL INFORMATION: Depth Diareer %VWht PMaterial From 0.0 To 4.0 Ft._2N PVC SITE WELL ID#(Ifapplicable) BDL-MW-6 From - To_ Ft._ | |||
STATE WELL PERMIT#Vf applicable). | |||
From _ To__ Ft._ | |||
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable)_ _ _ | |||
WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring gj Municipal/Public 0 7. GROUT: Depth Material Method Industrial/Commercial 0 Agricultural 0 Recovery [I Injection 0 From - To_ Ft. | |||
IrrigationD Other 0 (ist use) From - To : Ft From - To_ FL DATE DRILLED 01126/09 | |||
Lot No.. Parcel, Zip Code)TOPOGRAPHIC | : 8. SCREEN: Depth Diameter , Slot Size Material TIME COMPLETED AMO PMO From 4.0 To 14.0 Ft. 2.0 in. .010 In. PVC | ||
/ LAND SETTING: | : 3. WELL LOCATION: | ||
is | From _ To _ Ft. In. in. | ||
NA NAME OF FACILITY Progress Energy Shearon H. Plant STREET ADDRESS New Hill Holleman Road New Hill NC 27562 | CITY: NEWHILL COUNTY WAKE From__ _ To _ Ft. in. in. | ||
SHEARON HARRIS ROAD 27562 | |||
: 9. SAND/GRAVEL PACK: | |||
: | (Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code) | ||
Depth Size Material TOPOGRAPHIC I LAND SETTING: | |||
From 2.0 To 14.0 Ft. 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND OSIope OValley -]OFat 0 Ridge -] Other From To Ft. _ | |||
(check appropriate box) | |||
From To Ft._ | |||
LATITUDE ____utMay be in degrees, minutes, seconds or M0.DRILUNG LOG LONGITUDE in a decimal format From To Formation Description Latitude/longitude source: OGPS oTopographic map 0.0 1.0 GRASS/TOPSOIL (location of we/ must be shown on a USGS topo map and 1.0 6.0 ORANGE/TAN/WHITE SANDY CLAYEY SILT attachedto this form if not uskig GPS) 6.0 14.0 BROWN/RED FINE SANDY SILT | |||
: 4. FACIUTY- is the name of the business where the well is located. | |||
FACIUTY ID #(if applicable)_ | |||
NAME OF FACILITY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 City or Towni State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON PROGRESS ENERGY MAILING ADDRESS PO BOX 10429 SOUTHPORT NC 28419 11. REMARKS: | |||
City or Town State Zip Code BENTONITE SEAL FROM 0.0 TO 2.0 FEET Area code - Phone number I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH S.WELL DETAILS: 15A NCAC 2C. WELL qNS RUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS REOO*DIEO TO THE WELL OWNER. | |||
..... ... | : a. TOTAL DEPTH: 14.0 FEET | ||
/V 1//02/26/09 | |||
.... | : b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES 0 NO Ej SIGN.9UIP OF CEKI-IFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE | ||
: c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 0.0 (DRY) FT. RANDY OWNBEY (Use "+" ifAbove Top of Casing) | |||
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., Form GW-lb 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919)733-7015 ext 568. Rev. 7/05 | |||
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 3106 | |||
.... .... .. | : 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5' FT. Above Land Surface* | ||
*Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require James 0. Barker a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118. | |||
- | Well Contractor (Individual) Name | ||
: e. YIELD (gpm): NA METHOD OF TEST NA Quantex, Inc. | |||
Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type NA Amount NA | |||
: g. WATER ZONES (depth): | |||
STREET ADDRESS P.O. Box 41673 From 40A To 5o' From To Raleigh, NC 27629 From To From__ To City or Town State Zip Code From To From To 9 219 - 9604 Area code- Phone number 7. CASING: Depth Diameter ThicknessNVeight Material | |||
: 2. WELL INFORMATION: | |||
NA - V*La. From_.0__ To_____ Ft 2- sch40 PVC SITE WELL ID#Qfrappllcable) | |||
From To _ Ft._ | |||
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#(if applicable) NA From To Ft OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT #(if applicable) NA | |||
: 3. WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitonnge Municipal/Publicz 8. GROUT: I Depth Material Method Industrial/CommercialD Agriculturaln Recovery[] Injection[] From 0 To 24'9 FL Neat Cement Pour Irnigatlorfj OtherO (list use) Fromi To*_I _LFL Bentonite Place DATE DRILLED 2/17/09 From _ To._ FtL TIME COMPLETED J ... AMR PME] 9. SCREEN: I Depth Diameter Slot Size Material | |||
: 4. WELL LOCATION: | |||
From_ - To 0(, FL 2* in. 0.010 in. PVC CITY: New Hill COUNTY Wake From - To Ft. in. in. | |||
New Hill Holleman Road, New Hill, NC 27562 From_ To _ Ft. in. in. | |||
(Street Name. Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel. Zip Code) | |||
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: 10. SANDIGRAVEL PACK: | |||
R Slope n Valley 13 Flat G Ridge 13 Other Depth i £ Size Material (check appropriate box) May be in degrees, From 0,6 To Ft. #2 Silica Sand From To_ Ft._ | |||
LATITUDE N35 deg. 37.024' minutes. seconds or in adecimal format From To_ Ft._ | |||
LONGITUDE W!78 deg. 57.606' 11.DRILLING LOG Latitude/longitude source: 4 GPS 0 Topographic map (location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and From To Formation Description attached to this form if not using GPS) | |||
: 5. FACIUTY. is tme nane of the business vwwereme Is bocatd. | |||
ie FACILITY ID #(if applicable) NA NAME OF FACILITY Progress Enemy Shearon H. Plant STREET ADDRESS New Hill Holleman Road New Hill NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON Tim Silar MAILING ADDRESS New Hill Holleman Road New Hill NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code | |||
: 12. REMARKS: | |||
NA Area code - Phone number _A A | |||
: 6. WELL DETAILS: | |||
20*, | |||
22c. i, C TION STANDARDS. AND THAT ACOPY F THI | |||
: a. TOTAL DEPTH: L-0 HAS PVVJJ TO THE WELL OWNER. | |||
: b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YESO NOR | |||
: c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: NA FT. | |||
SK TU OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR iATE (Use "+"if Above Top of Casing) Ja es D. Barker PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., Form GW-1b 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919) 733-7015 ext 568. Rev.12107 | |||
N ,ON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD A.A~ ... if~J7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality | |||
~ I, WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 3106 | |||
: 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING iS 2.5' FT. Above Land Surface* | |||
*Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require James D. Barker a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118. | |||
Well Contractor (Individual) Name | |||
: a. YIELD (gpm): NA METHOD OF TEST NA Quantex, Inc. | |||
Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type NA Amount NA STREETADDRESS P.O. Box 41673 g. WATER ZOIqES (depth): | |||
From 17 To_ _ From To Raleigh, NC 27629 From - To__-___ From- To City or Town State Zip Code 2 9 - From_ _ To From TO 91 1 9604 Area code- Phone number 7. CASING: i Depth , I Diameter Thickness/Weight Material | |||
: 2. WELL INFORMATION: | |||
FromQ.) To tO Ft. 2" sch4O PVC SITE WELL 10 #(ifapplicable) A9W " L-r MW' -q From To_ Ft. | |||
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#(ifapplicable) NA From To_ FL. | |||
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT #(if applicable) NA | |||
: 3. WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoringo MunlcipaV/Publlcl 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method Industrlal/Commercial Irmgatiorfl AgrlculturalO Recovery[] Injectionl3 OtherD) (list use) | |||
Fro 6 To _ _ Ft Neat Cement Pour FromZZ0 To-..:ii Ft. Bentonite Place DATE DRILLED 2117109 From To Ft. | |||
TIME COMPLETED 2 AM13s PM 9. SCREEN: ( Depth ( Diameter Slot Size Material | |||
: 4. WELL LOCATION: | |||
CITY: New Hill COUNTY Wake From dO To 2L) Ft 2" in. 0.010 in. PVC From _ To _ Ft. in. _ in. __ | |||
New Hill Holleman Road, New Hill, NC 27562 From _ To_ _ Ft. in. in. | |||
(Street Name. Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No.. Parcel, Zip Code) | |||
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: 10. SANDIGRAVEL PACK: | |||
N Slope 11 Valley [] Flat a Ridge El Other Depth I e Size Material (check appropriate box) May be in degrees, From58 To 20 Ft. #2 Silica Sand LATITUDE N35 deg. 37.024' minutes, seconds or Fromn To_ Ft. | |||
in a decimal format From To_ Ft. | |||
LONGITUDE W78 deg. 57.606' Latitude/longitude source: & GPS [] Topographic map I11DRILWNG LOG (locationof well must be shown on a USGS topo map and From To Formation Description attached to this form if not using GPS) | |||
: 5. FACIUITY. is the name of the busiress where the wel Is located. | |||
FACILITY ID#(if applicable) NA 1 R NAME OF FACILITY Progress Energy Shearon H. Plant STREET ADDRESS New Hill Holleman Road New Hill NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON Tim Silar MAILING ADDRESS New Hill Holleman Road New Hill NC 27562 12. REMARKS: | |||
City or Town State Zip Code | |||
( ). NA Area code - Phone number | |||
: 6. WELL DETAILS: ( IW FYT T S WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED INACCORDANCE WITH | |||
* FFC*C.AS ralý-l VL P ION STANDARDS, CO4 tEqF TOHEWEU. OWNER AND THAT ACOPY OFTIIS./ | |||
: a. TOTAL DEPTH:_ ____ | |||
: b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES13 NOB | |||
: c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: NA FT, T kTLURE 4F CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR 'DA11E (Use "+"if Above Top of Casing) Ja es D. Barker PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., | |||
Form GW-lb 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919) 733-7015 ext 568. Rev. 12/07 | |||
NON RESIDENTLIL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 3106 | |||
: 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5' FT. Above Land Surface* | |||
*Top of casing terminated atlor below land surface may require James D. Barker a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118. | |||
Well Contractor (Individual) Name | |||
: e. YIELD (gpm): NA METHOD OF TEST NA Quantex, Inc. | |||
Well Contractor Company Name | |||
: f. DISINFECTION: Type NA Amount NA | |||
: g. WATER ZONES (depth):.( | |||
STREET ADDRESS P.O. Box 41673 Fromj*.. To i" From To Raleigh, NC 27629 From _ To _ From_ To City or Town State Zip Code From To _ From To._ | |||
(919 219-9604 Area code- Phone number 7. CASING: ( Depth , f Diameter Thickness/Weight Material | |||
: 2. WELL INFORMATION: | |||
Fromn TOS Ft 2" sch40 PVC SITEWELLIDiAiapplicable). W "ZLL-L/ ,-' | |||
From To Ft. | |||
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#(11appicable) NA From_ ___To Ft. | |||
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT #(if applicable) NA | |||
: 3. WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoringl Municipal/Public13 8. GROUT: (Depth Material Method Industiral/CommerciaC Agriculturall] Recoveryt] InjectionrI From 0 To Ft. Neat Cement Pour IrigatiorO OtherO (list use) From= To--'r- Ft Bentonite Place DATE DRILLED 2/17/09 From _ To_ FL TIME COMPLETED 4! 30 . AMR PME 9. SCREEN: I Depth " Diameter Slot Size Material | |||
: 4. WELL LOCATION: | |||
From _.. To Ft 2 " In. 0.010 In. PVC CITY: New Hill couNTY Wake From To Ft. in. | |||
New Hill Holleman Road, New Hill, NC 27562 From_____ To Ft. In. In. | |||
(Street Name, Numbers. Community, Subdivision. Lot No.. Parcel, Zip Code) | |||
: 10. SANDIGRAVEL PACK: | |||
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: | |||
Depth , Size Material | |||
# Slope 0 Valley 0 Flat 13 Ridge E Other | |||
.(check appropriate box) May be in degrees, From -ia Tol Ft. #2 Silica Sand LATITUDE N35 deg. 37.024' minutes, seconds or From To___ __ Ft._ | |||
From To_ Ft. | |||
in a decimal formna LONGITUDE W78 deg. 57.606' 11.DRILUNG LOG Latitude/longitude source: I OPS 0 Topographic map (locationof well must be shown on a USGS topo map and From To Formation Description attachedto this form if not using GPS) | |||
: 5. FACIULTY. isme n,*a of the business whie the wau Istocted. | |||
FACILITY ID #(if applicable) NA NAME OF FACILITY Progress Energy Shearon H. Plant STREET ADDRESS New Hill Holleman Road New Hill NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON Tim Silar MAILING ADDRESS New Hill Holleman Road New Hill NC 27562 12. REMARKS: | |||
City or Town State Zip Code | |||
)- NA Area code - Phone number | |||
: 6. WELL DETAILS: 1D0 NC CERLFy .. Tm L ASD CONSTRCTED INACCORDANCE WITH iSA N9LACIC, WELLCýN RIUCi fT4DARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS | |||
: a. TOTAL DEPTH: RECM 1166WEN I ELL OWNER. | |||
: b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YESn NOW SIGNA*JRE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE | |||
: c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: NA FT (Use "+ ifAbove Top of Casing) James D. Barker PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., Form GW-lb 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919),733-7015 ext 568. Rev.12/07 | |||
ss. | |||
tXt Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant April 2009 Appendix C Field Notes | |||
2 3 S r~v 71 S | |||
cA~)A~Li~+ | |||
O L44 A | |||
'p / | |||
/ | |||
----- 7,~ | |||
C- | |||
~, I A~J | |||
- ---------- IA , | |||
2. | |||
........ -~ | |||
L bXlýe~a / 1~ | |||
-. 1-rDxh~- | |||
rI | |||
..- i I i | |||
ýk- | |||
7------ | |||
101J-4) ... A-U | |||
... ..... I ffv V 7, XlCl | |||
64 ".~ ..... | |||
~..... . . | |||
~~ | |||
Zt bL-L ; - 3 | |||
~~ | |||
.9 I 1~~'A~W A | |||
....... LYI~ *A~-~e I | |||
~~&33 6 LIS | |||
,-d~ L~C-'4-I I~~.. .~' .:-5' | |||
/~3/4b14, -z" K. *1 .~ I 1,6 796 ~ -* ~ I em V' VVV,/ 4 | |||
.....- em. s4$ 4d 4 ' | |||
2.~2 ~-v'4 ~ | |||
9 I. . . .I... ... | |||
em em K-: | |||
1 '~ | |||
~4K4 4/A | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
.~ | |||
A~a Kd | |||
) | |||
A I~ | |||
... a...e p | |||
.Fi,~ | |||
~ - -- | |||
10 11 | |||
. .... .M L~-~-~-~--4-------- -- | |||
0 | |||
- .A 7 | |||
-I------ - oq!3-L ~3i | |||
'S tA lo | |||
.4- -i | |||
'S | |||
,-"3 | |||
'S | |||
-i | |||
'S c | |||
61 | |||
,1-'77 C- | |||
12 13 | |||
-o1- .. | |||
. 4....i. | |||
7 t I I I - | |||
I TA ~------ -. | |||
- I 4ý1 | |||
14 N4 15 | |||
,~/ | |||
IIN iiS5, -l 7 | |||
-6 wx- 1...JO I I V2 1/, | |||
~yP~ /-C ~ | |||
- .q.s-~ | |||
16 w 17 | |||
.~~ .. .. ..... | |||
4 | |||
~44-oil A> | |||
9,- 1 | |||
.. s e-0~ | |||
...... / | |||
18 19 | |||
*4-~. ...... Mew"~(. &Lj.- | |||
I5IL | |||
~~~~~~ | |||
.... ~~~ .. ..... ............ | |||
20 Fc ý9. 0.. 0,)ri....S.. _2 | |||
-'4' &-t4--..' - I I . | |||
: i. . . . . i* | |||
_T~vr ~ O & ~ k ThZ> 37: | |||
7-:72,( | |||
.Oi. | |||
I 77 ZI /P / J}7- | |||
~~97t,- U.~ | |||
23 | |||
*1 23 | |||
- -J - | |||
4< I I K -4Lk 74- -- | |||
'10 | |||
............. .... .[ - , ... .. | |||
.... i....... . , .......................... | |||
/ | |||
. ............. L... .. .. .. .. . . . . . ... . | |||
V /" | |||
III | |||
_. 1........ .. | |||
Z-I ----- ........ .. - iii | |||
25 24, 24 25 | |||
-----4---- *-.--.---.4*-:107--- | |||
~ke ~w~'* ~J q-31 4 | |||
/~f~~ ............. | |||
7o.J 2; | |||
...... .A...~o | |||
.... 2 - Ip | |||
. A 6----------- | |||
/ 1ý | |||
'I | |||
~/-JV 'V-7 4 q3 | |||
.ý -y 4 | |||
,-2q~4 | |||
/ -- | |||
...i- | |||
'Se7Z-6 i ! | |||
...... N a / 7 i .i3..L.1 | |||
-g j~j- .b g,~) | |||
----...... ...... a ,~ | |||
'I-' & (-7-7, 4 9 il r 9@S ~S~7 f Of (I-, | |||
6': | |||
''76 | |||
.. i -- | |||
...... ------- /: | |||
N. - | |||
26 27 | |||
-g - ------ ......--- _ | |||
Z- 2 - ...... | |||
- -~ ~ ~1.3 ~ v '----- | |||
K---- | |||
U. | |||
U. | |||
-I | |||
.3-- a. | |||
/..... - 5 ...... | |||
b . ..... | |||
~ a.q em U. | |||
&14 em | |||
-S a. | |||
-S | |||
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant SS. | |||
Cýý April 2009 Appendix D Calculations | |||
APPENDIX D CALCULATIONS Groundwater Velocity Calculation V/s -K (dh/dl) ne V/s = Groundwater Velocity dh - Water Elevation Difference BDL-MW5 to BDL-MW8 = 4.99' dl = Horizontal Distance Difference BDL-MW6 to BDL-MW8 = 200' K = Hydraulic Conductivity 1.14 ft/day (Arithmetic Mean Value from Table 2.4.12-208, FSAR) ne = Porosity = 5% | |||
(Freeze and Cherry, 1979) | |||
V/s =1.14 ft/day (4.99 ft/215 ft) | |||
.05 V/s = 0.529 ft/day | |||
= 193 ft/year}} |
Latest revision as of 22:00, 11 March 2020
ML102030160 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Harris ![]() |
Issue date: | 04/30/2009 |
From: | Silar Services |
To: | Office of Information Services, Progress Energy Carolinas |
References | |
FOIA/PA-2010-0209 | |
Download: ML102030160 (66) | |
Text
COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN LINE ASSESSMENT REPORT SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NEW HILL, NORTH CAROLINA PREPARED FOR:
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS PREPARED BY:
Ss§4 SILAR SERVICES, INC.'.
983 BUTLER PIKE BLUE BELL, PA 19422.
April 2009 e
COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN LINE ASSESSMENT REPORT SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NEW HILL, NORTH CAROLINA PREPARED FOR:
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS PREPARED BY:
ss.
SILAR SERVICES, INC.
983 BUTLER PIKE BLUE BELL, PA 19422 April 2009
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Sss Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Purpose of R eport ....................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Background ..................................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Project L ocation ........................................................................... 1-1 1.2.2 Project Background ...................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Scope and Objectives .................................................................. 1-2 1.4 Report Organization .................................................................... 1-2 2 ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS ........................... 2-3 2.1 Assessment Activities ................................................................. 2-4 2.1.1 Soil Borings/Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation ............. 2-4 2.1.2 Groundwater Elevation Measurements ........................................ 2-6 2.1.3 Groundw ater Sam pling ............................................................... 2-6 2.2 Assessment Findings - Water Results ........................................ 2-8 2.3 Surveying and Mapping .............................................................. 2-9 3 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY AREA ..... 3-1 3.1 Surface Features .......................................................................... 3-1 3 .2 G eology ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Groundwater Hydrology ............................................................. 3-2 4
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS .................... ........................... 4-1 4.1 Summary of Groundwater Conditions ........................................ 4-2 4.2 C onclusions ................................................................................. 4-3 TOC-1
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclearPower Plant SS.
Cýý April 2009 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Layout Map Figure 3 Groundwater Flow Map Figure 4 Groundwater Analytical Results Summary March 4, 2009 Figure 5 Geologic Cross Section LIST OF TA]BLES Table 1 Monitoring Well Construction Summary Table 2 Water Level Measurements Table 3 Analytical Results - Water Samples LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Boring Logs Appendix B NCDENR Well Construction Records Appendix C Field Notes Appendix D Calculations TOC-2
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Report Silar Services Incorporated (SSi) has prepared this Cooling Tower Blowdown Line (CTBL) Assessment Report to document the results of investigation activities performed along a section of the CTBL at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant (SL{NPP), located in New Hill, North Carolina. The purpose of the assessment was to identify the potential presence and extent of radiological materials in groundwater within the assessment area of the line with respect to the integrity of the line.
The initial assessment activities were conducted at the Site from January 21, 2009 through March 4, 2009. This Assessment Report, issued on April 1, 2009, provides a presentation of the activities completed and the findings of the assessment.
1.2 Project Background This section includes information on the location, description and history of the Site.
1.2.1 Project Location The Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant is located approximately 1.6-miles east of the Town of New Hill, North Carolina, and is situated on approximately 10,700 acres site.
The Site location is depicted on Figure 1.
The Cooling Tower Blowdown Line, which is buried several feet below the ground surface, runs for approximately 2 miles from the cooling tower south to the edge of Harris Lake. The line assessment area is located between Air Release System Manhole
- 1 (ARS#l) which is located adjacent to the composite sampler shed (approximately 0.5 miles from the cooling tower) to ARS#2, located approximately 1,110 feet south of ARS#1. The assessment area is also depicted on Figure 1.
1-1
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant April 2009 1.2.2 Project Background On December 15, 2008, Progress Energy personnel discovered the presence of water in ARS#2. The manhole was investigated by purging the water from the manhole and evaluating conditions. It was observed that subsequent to purging the manhole dry, water was continuing to enter the bottom of the manhole through a 2-inch pipe designed to drain the manhole. A water sample was collected and analyzed for tritium. Tritium was detected at an approximate concentration of 800 pCi/l. Based on these observations, Progress Energy determined that additional evaluation was warranted.
1.3 Scope and Objectives The overall objectives of the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment are as follows:
" Characterize the hydrogeology and geology in the area
- Provide groundwater sampling and elevation measuring points
- Evaluate groundwater flow and groundwater quality
- Assess potential sources of tritium concentration in water.
The scope of the assessment included the collection of data as close as reasonably possible to the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line while not compromising the integrity of the line.
1.4 Report Organization The organization and content of the remainder of this report are described below.
Section 2.0 - Investigation Activities and Findings A summary of the activities completed during planning and implementation of the assessment is provided. The methods, locations, and results of the sampling and analysis program are presented in detail for soil and groundwater.
1-2
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . Shearon Harris NuclearPower Plant April 2009 Section 3.0 - Physical Characteristics of the Study Area A description of the study area including surface features, geology and soils, surface water hydrology, and groundwater hydrology is provided in Section 3.
Section 4.0 - Summary and Conclusions A summary of the relevant environmental conditions to satisfy the objectives of the investigation is provided in Section 4.
2 ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS The planning of the assessment activities included a number of conference calls and meetings with appropriate plant personnel. A scope of work to complete the assessment objectives was prepared by SSi and submitted to Progress Energy on January 6, 2009. The initial scope of work called for the installation of up to 20 shallow (approximately 25 feet below ground surface or bgs) soil borings/monitoring wells to complete the study objectives.
The assessment field activities were completed in two phases. The first phase was completed from January 21 to February 6, 2009, and included the following activities:
" Installation of six (6) groundwater monitoring wells BDL-MW1 through BDL-MW6 at points along the blowdown line and near ARS#2,
" Collection of preliminary groundwater samples from BDL-MW1, BDL-MW2, and BDL-MW-3 on January 23, 2009, and
- Water level measurements and preliminary groundwater samples from BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6 on February 6, 2009.
Based on these initial activities and findings, the original scope of work was revised to reduce the number of wells due to the general absence of shallow groundwater.
The second phase of the assessment was completed from February 17 to March 4, 2009, and included:
2-3
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant s s . April 2009
" Installation of three (3) groundwater monitoring wells BDL-MW7 through BDL-MW9 at ARS#2 and downgradient of ARS#2 toward Harris Lake,
- Measuring water level elevations on March 3, 2009, and
- Collecting a complete round of water samples from the monitoring wells and ARS#2 on March 4, 2009.
These activities are described in detail below. The locations of the groundwater monitoring wells installed in the area are depicted on Figure 2.
The activities and findings are summarized in the following subsections. The analytical results are presented and, where concentrations of radiological materials were observed, the results are also presented on figures. Throughout this section, groundwater data are discussed with respect to the USEPA drinking water standard of 20,000 pCi/L (picocuries per liter).
2.1 Assessment Activities To accomplish the objectives of ote assessment, several investigatin actites *were.
complted including: soil borings/monitoning well installation, groundwater elation me andgrounhwater, sampling.The assessment methods and, results, are, discussed in the following subsections.
Objective 1.3a Installation of .1 Soil]Boings/Groundwater' Monitoring Well Installation:
additional monitoring wells he primary objectives of the soil boring/monitoring well installation were to evaluate subsurface conditions and establish a network of monitoring wells in the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line assessment area to evaluate geology, hydrogeology and groundwater quality. To accomplish this objective, soil borings were advanced and monitoring wells were installed at the locations illustrated on Figure 2. Boreholes were logged from split spoon samples and cuttings. The screened interval for each monitoring well was selected to intersect the depth intervals where groundwater was observed. Where no groundwater was observed the bottom of the screened interval was 2-4
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclearPower Plant April 2009 placed at the maximum penetration depth of the drilling technique and below observed water levels in the adjacent manholes.
Hollow-stem auger (HSA) drilling methods were employed to complete the installation of groundwater monitoring wells BDL-MW1 through BDL-MW6. HSA and air rotary drilling methods were employed to complete the installation of groundwater monitoring wells BDL-MW7 through BDL-MW9. The drilling activities are described in the following sections.
During the investigation, a total of nine (9) shallow groundwater monitoring wells were installed as shown on Figure 2. The general monitoring well installation procedures are summarized below.
" The depth for each of the wells was selected based on presence and depth of groundwater at each well location. Where no groundwater was observed, the bottom of the well was set at the maximum drilling depth using the HSA techniques (BDL-MW 4 through BDL-MW6, only) and below the water level in ARS#2.
- The wells were generally installed using 4'/4-inch inside diameter (ID) hollow stem augers and/or 4-inch air hammer.
- At least ten feet of 2-inch-ID, Schedule 40 PVC, machine cut, well screen with 0.020-inch-slot size was set at the bottom of each well. A sufficient length of 2-inch ID, Schedule 40 PVC riser pipe was coupled to the screen to allow the PVC riser pipe to extend a minimum of two feet above the ground surface. Well screens were fitted with a nominal 2-inch solid (unslotted) bottom sediment trap.
- The annular space around the well screens was backfilled with clean uniform sand (filter pack sieve #2). The filter pack was placed from the bottom of the well to a minimum of 2 feet above the top of the well screen. A minimum 2-foot-thick bentonite seal was placed above the sand and allowed to hydrate.
- All wells were completed as stick-up wells, with lockable expansion plugs.
2-5
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009
" A concrete pad will be installed around the wells that are determined by Progress Energy and SSi to be completed as permanent wells.
- Boring Logs were prepared for each monitoring well.
A summary of the monitoring well construction details is provided in Table 1 and depicted in the Boring Logs included in Appendix A. NCDENR Well Construction Records are included in Appendix B.
2.1.2 Groundwater Elevation Measurements Groundwater elevation measurements were collected from the monitoring wells and used to provide data to map the potentiometric surface of the aquifer and interpret the horizontal groundwater flow in the aquifer. One complete round of depth-to-water measurements was collected from the nine monitoring wells on March 3, 2009.
Measurements were collected using a Solinst Level Indicator Probe capable of measuring depth to water within 0.01-foot accuracy. Results of these measurements are summarized in Table 2, presented on Figure 3, and discussed in Section 3 of this report.
2.1.3 Groundwater Sampling One round of groundwater samples was collected from the monitoring wells. All monitoring wells were sampled except BDL-MW4, which was dry. In addition, a water sample was collected directly from the drainpipe in manhole ARS#2. Water samples were analyzed for tritium at Progress Energy's Harris Energy and Environmental Center Radiochemistry Laboratory to the same lower limit of detection as the NC Division of Radiation Protection (NCDRP) laboratory. In addition, select water samples were analyzed for total zinc.
Prior to sampling, each monitoring well was purged in accordance with low-flow groundwater sampling procedures to assure collection of a representative groundwater sample. Groundwater sampling was completed using a peristaltic pump, dedicated 2-6
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . tý Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant
. April 2009 pump (flex) tubing, and dedicated down-hole polyethylene tubing at each monitoring well to eliminate the potential for cross-contamination between sampling points. Water quality measurements (pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, and oxidation/reduction potential) were collected during the purging activities and recorded in the field logbook (Appendix C). The procedure for monitoring well purging and sampling is generally as follows:
- The security cap was removed, and the depth to water in the well was determined with a water level meter. The depth to water was recorded in the field logbook.
- The dedicated down-hole tubing was lowered into the monitoring well, cut to the desired length, attached to the pre-cut flex tubing on the peristaltic pump, a new section of poly tubing was inserted on the effluent side of the pump. The sample line was connected from the pump to the in-line water quality instrument (YSI MP556 with flow through cell), the effluent line from the flow-through cell was inserted into a purge water container to capture purge water, the peristaltic pump was started, and purging of groundwater at the well was commenced.
- An optimum low-flow pumping rate was established at each well to minimize drawdown. The groundwater quality parameters and depth to water were monitored and recorded at prescribed time intervals to determine when the water quality parameters had stabilized to within 10%.
- Following the stabilization of the groundwater quality parameters, groundwater samples were collected from the wells and delivered to the radiological analytical laboratory.
- Purge water was collected and transported to the designated disposal point.
ARS#2 was sampled in general accordance with the methodology specified above.
2-7
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclearPower Plant April 2009 2.2 Assessment Findings - Water Results Groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells on March 4, 2009. All water samples from the wells (8 samples) and manhole (I sample) were analyzed for tritium at the on-site radiological analytical laboratory. Samples from BDL-MW1, BDL-MW5, BDL-MW8, and ARS#2 were also analyzed for zinc, since zinc is added to the cooling water and can be used as a marker analyte. Analytical results are summarized in Table 3. Figure 4 depicts the analytical results for tritium in the water samples. The results are summarized below.
- Tritium was detected in five (5) of the eight (8) monitoring wells sampled and in the ARS#2 sample. The detection limit for the analyses was approximately 233 pCi/L.
- Tritium in the nine (9) samples ranged from less than the detection limit (three wells) to 2,120 pCi/L at manhole ARS#2.
" The highest concentration of tritium detected in the samples was detected in the immediate area of ARS#2 (ARS#2, BDL-MW5, and BDL-MW6). The second highest concentration of tritium was detected at BDL-MW3, near the wetland in the area of groundwater discharge. These three wells are located in close proximity to the backfilled trench of the blowdown line which is likely acting as a preferential pathway of water transport.
- The horizontal migration of tritium in groundwater from the blowdown line appears to be limited as no tritium was detected in samples from BDL-MW8 and BDL-MW9.
- The vertical migration of tritium in groundwater from the blowdown line appears to be limited as no tritium was detected in the sample from BDL-MW7.
2-8
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009 The highest concentration of zinc was detected in the sample from ARS#2 at a concentration of 187 ug/l, lower concentrations of zinc were detected in samples from BDL-MW8 (96 ug/h), BDL-MW5 (18 ug/1) and BDL-MW1 (8 ug/1).
Based on the occurrence and distribution of tritium in the water samples, it appears that the source of tritium is a leak(s) along the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line. Analysis of the hydrogeology and groundwater conditions within the area is presented and discussed in Section 3, and further discussion regarding the possible sources of tritium is presented in Section 4. Conclusions and potential additional activities that may be performed to further evaluate the blowdown line are also presented in Section 4.
2.3 Surveying and Mapping A site survey was performed and certified by a North Carolina Registered Land Surveyor (Smith and Smith). Initial surveying activities were performed on January 22, 2009 during which time the centerline of the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line was located and demarcated. On February 20, 2009 all monitoring wells, manhole ARS#1, and manhole ARS#2 were surveyed.
A survey map was produced that includes scale, benchmarks, North arrow, and the locations of monitoring wells. The survey map provided the information required to produce a site basemap for this Assessment Report.
2-9
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . tý Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant April 2009 3 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY AREA This section presents the physical characteristics of the Site including surface features, geology, surface water hydrology, and groundwater hydrology.
3.1 Surface Features The SHNPP is located approximately 1.6 miles east of the town of New Hill, North Carolina. Access to the SHNPP is from Shearon Harris Road. The owner controlled area encompasses approximately 10,700 acres. The area of the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line, which is the focus of this assessment, includes approximately 15 acres.
As discussed in Section 1, the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line runs underground for approximately 2 miles from the Cooling Tower south to the edge of Harris Lake. The assessment area is on a peninsula which is surrounded by Harris Lake to the south, east, and west and bounded to the north by SHNPP. Specifically, the blowdown line assessment area is located between ARS#1, located adjacent to the composite sampler shed (approximately 0.5 miles from the cooling tower), to ARS#2 which is located approximately 1,110 feet south of ARS# 1. The most significant surface feature in the assessment area is the topographic low area/wetlands, situated along the blowdown line approximately midway between ARS#1 and ARS#2. There is an approximately 30-foot elevation change between ARS#1 and the topographic low to the south. In addition, a portion of Harris Lake is located east of manhole ARS#2.
The Site location is shown on Figure 1, and the Site Layout is depicted on Figure 2.
3.2 Geology Regional and site-specific geology have been extensively evaluated by others during the safety analyses for Unit 1 and more recently for proposed Units 2 and 3. These reports indicate that the plant is underlain by the Upper Triassic Age Newark Supergroup. The 3-1
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report
- 88. Shearon Harris NuclearPower Plant April 2009 group is characterized by siltstone and sandstone with subordinate amounts of claystone and conglomerated and igneous diabase intrusions. Additional information on regional and local geology can be found in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR).
Site-specific geology observed in the area of the blowdown line is consistent with the regional geology. Soil borings encountered a thin layer of unconsolidated material (overburden), underlain by a reddish-brown weathered siltstone bedrock (regolith) underlain by reddish-brown siltstone. A site-specific interpretation of the geology in the area has been developed by using boring logs from the assessment activities and is presented as a cross-section on Figure 5.
3.3 Groundwater Hydrology Regional and site-specific groundwater hydrology have been extensively evaluated by others during the safety analyses for Unit 1 and more recently for proposed Units 2 and
- 3. These reports indicate that the groundwater hydrology within the plant area is relatively complex as a result of the influence of the main and auxiliary reservoirs and the nature of the parent rock. The previous groundwater studies have focused on the plant area, located to the north of this assessment area. The nearest previously existing monitoring well is MWA-12, which is located approximately 1,000 feet northeast of ARS#l. Historic groundwater elevation at this location was approximately 235' MSL.
Groundwater monitoring activities were performed during this assessment to determine if the water entering ARS#2 is groundwater from the surrounding area, (i.e. is local groundwater discharging to ARS#2). Based on the depth to water in ARS#2, approximately 7 feet below ground surface (bgs), it was assumed that only shallow monitoring wells would be required to complete this study objective. Therefore, eight (8) shallow (less than 30 feet bgs) and one (1) deep (approximately 60 feet bgs) wells were installed during the assessment. One complete round of water level measurements was collected. Those water level measurements and resulting elevations are shown on Figure 3. Groundwater elevations are also shown on the geologic cross-section included as Figure 5. As indicated, the groundwater elevations are highly variable 3-2
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009 particularly in the area of ARS#2. General observations regarding the assessment area groundwater are as follows:
" In the area of ARS#l, as characterized by BDL-MW1 through BDL-MW3, groundwater elevations indicate flow to the south toward the topographic low/wetland.
" In the area of ARS#2, water was detected in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6 several days after the wells were installed, however BDL-MW4 remains dry. This indicates that the water observed in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6 is not from a local/regional groundwater source.
- The water elevation in ARS#2 is higher than that in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6 indicating that flow is from the immediate vicinity of ARS#2 to these monitoring wells and not from a local/regional groundwater source.
- In the area of ARS#2, groundwater was detected in BDL-MW7 at a significantly lower elevation that the water levels detected in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6, indicating that the regional groundwater elevation may be significantly lower than the water level observed in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6.
- The groundwater elevation at BDL-MW8 was measured to be at or above the ground surface indicating local artesian conditions at this location.
- The groundwater elevation at BDL-MW9, which is located approximately 40 feet from the edge of Harris Lake, was measure at an elevation (-210 feet MSL) approximately 10 feet below the surface water level indicating that surface water from Harris Lake may be discharging to groundwater in this area.
3-3
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclearPower Plant s s . April 2009 4
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS Silar Services Incorporated (SSi) has prepared this Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report to document the results of investigation activities performed along a section of the line at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, located in New Hill, North Carolina. The purpose of the assessment was to identify the potential presence and extent of radiological materials in groundwater within the area of the line with respect to the integrity of the line.
The Cooling Tower Blowdown Line runs underground for approximately 2 miles from the cooling tower south to the edge of Harris Lake. The line assessment area is located between Air Release System Manhole #1 (ARS#1), which is located adjacent to the composite sampler shed (approximately 0.5 miles from the cooling tower), to ARS#2, located approximately 1,110 feet south of ARS#1. The overall objectives of the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line assessment are as follows:
- Characterize the hydrogeology and geology in the area
- Provide groundwater sampling and elevation measuring points
- Evaluate groundwater flow and groundwater quality
" Assess potential sources of tritium concentration in water.
<The assessment field activities were completed intwo phases. The first phase included the foll6owing activities:
- Installation of six (6) groundwater monitoring wells BDL-MWl through BDL-MW6 atMpoints along the blowdown line and ARS#2.
- <Collection of preliminary groundwater, samples from BDL-MWl; BD-MW2, and BDL-MW-3.,
" Water level measurements and preliminay groundwater samples from ~BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6.
4-1
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant April 2009 The scon~d h&&iasfhe aseset included:
- Installation of three (3) groundwater monitormg wellsrBDL-MW7. through BDL-MW9at S#2 and downgradientof*ARS#2 toward Harris Lake.
" Measuirinig water, level elevations.
" Collecting a complete round of water samples from the mon~itoring wells~ and ARS1#2.1 4.1 Summary of Groundwater Conditions Groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells (8 samples) and manhole (1 sample) and analyzed for tritium. Samples from BDL-MW1, BDL-MW5, BDL-MW8, and ARS#2 were also analyzed for zinc, since zinc is added to the cooling water and can be used as a marker analyte. Tritium was detected in five (5) of the eight (8) monitoring wells sampled and in the ARS#2 sample at concentrations up to 2,120 pCi/L. (detected at ARS#2).
The highest .concentration of tritium detected in the samples was detected in the immediate area of ARS#2 (ARS#2, BDL-MW5, and BDL-MW6). The next highest concentration of tritium was detected at BDL-MW3, near the wetland in the area of groundwater discharge. The highest concentration of zinc was detected in the sample Objective 1.1c ' .. RS#2 at a concentration of 187 ug/l.
migration* f transport oftritiated groundwater from the. area near ARS#2 to off-site areas:can be e ated using data collected during this assessment. >This evaluation assumes tritiated groun dwater is introdtuiced from ARS#2' to~the environment at a.
concentration of approximately 1,260 pji/L (tritium concentration detected in water
- samled from BDI&-M.W*5, located downgradient of ARS#2). Once introduced into they environment tritiatedjgroundwater flows generally* east northeast toward the..e owner-.
controlled area boundary at a rate of 0.529.fta*dayor4P*393<tyear ThAppendixD).
The owner-controlled area: boundary in the !general direction of groundwater flow is approximately 1.79 milesj or 9,45 1 feet from the ARS#2 ~area.. Based on these estimates it would take groundwater from the ARS#2 area a~pproximately 49 ~years to ~reachi the 4-2
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclearPower Plant April 2009 ownter con ITO Iboundary. Based on Ihec ha If-life of tntiurn (12.3:3 yearstfow rate(193'~
ft/year), fl*o~w- distancee (;9,451 eet) *and inital rtim m:concentration ýmn te environment!
(1,260 pCi/L) the concentataonkiof tritum in groundwater reaching the. ownercontrol, boudav i.,9 yer~will have benrdced by approximately forhalf-lives and would be less tthan 80 pCI below the current lower hmit offSupportmg, detecton.t
{documentatin*rnf this analysis is provided in Appendix D, 4.2 Conclusions Based on the occurrence and distribution of tritium in the water samples, it appears that the source of tritium is a leak(s) along the Cooling Tower Blowdown Line. This is based on several observations. The highest observed tritium concentration was in the sample from the ARS#2 and its immediate vicinity. The water elevation in ARS#2 is higher than water elevations measured in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6, indicating that flow is from the immediate vicinity of ARS#2 to these monitoring wells. In the area of ARS#2, groundwater was detected in BDL-MW7 at a significantly lower elevation than the water levels detected in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6, indicating that the regional groundwater elevation may be significantly lower than the water level observed in BDL-MW5 and BDL-MW6. Water was observed to be entering ARS#2 through a pipe that was designed to drain water from the manhole to the surrounding backfill. It is possible that the backfill surrounding the blowdown line has created a preferential pathway for the flow of water. Water leaking from the pipeline in the vicinity of ARS#2, or at some point in the pipeline at a higher elevation, may be traveling along this preferential "horizontal" pathway as it also infiltrates the surrounding natural material toward the regional water table elevation. This would create an apparent groundwater mound adjacent to the line in areas where it is above the regional water table.
4-3
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant April 2009 Further investigation is recommended including, but not limited to, the following:
- Evaluation of all manholes in the blowdown line
- Installation of sampling points within the blowdown line backfill
- Evaluation of the line integrity utilizing video surveillance and or pressure/exfiltration testing.
4-4
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss . Cýý Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009 FIGURES
N Shearon Hanls Nuclear Power Plant eiw Now HIn. NC Quadrangle Location Figurel 0 2000 4000 Feet StSk Loctiko MW Source: New Hill Topographic U.S.G.S. &: Cokesbury,Map NC (7.5 quadrangles minute) SS -Silar Services Inc.
Shearon Harris Nudear Power Plant New Hill, NC FIgure 2 Sib A' Mop
§~S ilar services inc.
LOCA 7ION DATA MANN*I- NOR7-N/G EAS7ING LATITUDE LIVGRE ELEVA W7DN D*MT TO GRO(NDOA 7ER MOMNM 70A? ELEVA77V MH IARSI NI 68813845 E - 2A071313. 37740' 787n9' 25268 NM AM
- 16. A4RS2 N- 683II.65 E - ZOIZ959.85 55r"29 785723 247.37Z 6.75 24a156 MONITORVNG 0aPT7 7?) GCNDWA7DE NEL NAAW7IH/NDG EASPG LAT711,DC LONt., E ELEVATION GROUNDW4A7R 776V EL-7"VA OL-M#W7.PWC N- 68,346.51 E - 2014326.50 J5'339" 78y5778 254.68 2137 237.37 DL--M*2.PIW N- 6M1283,T9 f = 2.017.424a92 35,37" 785719" 23&J7 71.71 226.66 eBL-I*w*pW N- 8ZM96. E =- ,zoxaai8 J5 775' 785r2o" 22488 445 22C23 bM-Mw4.PVC N- 692371.25 E - 207297287 JTr2g" 7857r2" 246.96 DRY DRY X-MN*.phC N- 68&Z3008 C = 2-0 Z967.70 30Y772W 78M72," 247.28 844 23M84 BW-MW.PiW N- 6.9230M78 E - 2072.948.01 35729 78372J' 24Z90 Z72 24a1i8 MDL--MW7.PW N- 623,08867 f - 2072970U46 3537'29' 787"23' 24807 6293 17814 E = 2014 75427 3537'3*30 785720' 23890 205 23185 SDL/.-MN*PWC
-MMW.PW.
NA-N-
8837185 68,417776 E - 201424-q54 J53*iJ 785720" 2,257 1520 20897 Shea=mf Herds Nuclear Power Plant New Hi, NC Fgmure 3 Gomwg, Fbw M A Silar Services Dnc.
nm.m Nuamr rwwu rq-x MSiwumn New HI. NC Rq4 QmmdwdwS*npho Snmy Mach 4,.200 SS.
Lý-
slia Servces imc
CROSS SECTION LOCATION 100 p .0 in 240 BDL-,'
M& DI AM5 230 6CDL-AA,41/5W 0?
220 210 - 210 200 200 190 - 190 180 - 180 Fed HORIZONTAL SCALE:
LEGEND VERTICAL SCALE: _ O'
- OVERBURDEN
.-. BEDROCK (REGOLITH) INTERVAL COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN LINE F*u5 SILTSTONE BEDROCK Gfl.am tdcrn
-S§ SMar Sevis Dnc-
ss. Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant April 2009 TABLES
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report ss.
Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant April 2009 Table I Monitoring Well Construction Summary Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, New Hill, North Carolina Annular Fill Material Well Depth TOC Ground Surface Screen Sand Interval Seal Interval Concrete Well ID.
(bgs) (MSL) Elevation (MSL) Interval (feet (feet bgs) (feet bgs) Interval bgs) (feet bgs)
BDL-MW1 30.01 254.68 252.15 30-10 30-5 5-0 NA BDL-MW2 19.34 238.37 236.78 19-9 19-5 5-0 NA BDL-MW3 14.72 224.68 222.88 15-5 15-3 3-0 NA BDL-MW4 17.29 246.96 245.14 17-7 17-5 5-0 NA BDL-MW5 16.64 247.28 245.72 17-7 17-5 5-0 NA BDL-MW6 14.02 247.9 246.12 14-4 14-2.5 2.5-0 NA BDL-MW7 60.94 248.07 245.21 60-30 60-25 25-23 23-0 BDL-MW8 20.33 235.9 233.18 20-10 20-8 8-6 6-0 BDL-MW9 17.87 225.17 222.94 18-8 18-6 6-4 4-0 Notes:
bgs - Below Ground Surface TOC - Top of Well Casing MSL - Mean Sea Level NA - Not Applicable Survey data provided by Smith and Smith, accurate to 0.01 feet MSL
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant scS 4 April 2009 Table 2 Water Level Measurements Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, New Hill, North Carolina Water Level Measurements Location ID Well Depth TOC Ground Surface Depth to Water Northing Easting Latitude Longitude (bgs) (MSL) Elevation (MSL) Water Elevation I _(MSL) 2,013,313.56 35037'40 78057'19, NA NA 252.68 NA NA ARS#1 683,368.45 2,012,959.85 35o37'29"' 78057'23' NA NA 247.31 6.75 240.56 ARS#2 682,311.65 BDL-MWI 683,346.51 2,013,326.50 35037'39 78057'18" 30.01 254.68 252.15 23.31 231.37 BDL-MW2 683,128.39 2,013,248.92 35037,37" 78057,19, 19.34 238.37 236.78 11.71 226.66 BDL-MW3 682,926.76 2,013,180.15 35037'35" 78057'20' 14.72 224.68 222.88 4.45 220.23 BDL-MW4 682,319.25 2,012,972.67 35o37,29"' 78o57,23' 17.29 246.96 245.14 DRY NA BDL-MW5 682,300.08 2,012,967.10 35037,29, 78057,23" 16.64 247.28 245.72 8.44 238.84 BDL-MW6 682,308.18 2,012,948.01 35037,29" 78057,23, 14.02 247.9 246.12 7.72 240.18 BDL-MW7 682,308.67 2,012,970.46 35o37'29', 78057,23, 60.94 248.07 245.21 62.93 185.14 BDL-MW8 682,370.85 2,013,154.27 35o37,30 78057'20, 20.33 235.9 233.18 2.05 233.85 BDL-MW9 682,417.76 2,013,249.54 35037'30' 78057'20' 17.87 225.17 222.94 15.2 209.97 Notes:
bgs - Below Ground Surface TOC - Top of Well Casing MSL - Mean Sea Level NA - Not Applicable Survey data provided by Smith and Smith
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report SS. Shearon HarrisNuclear Power Plant Ltl-ý April 2009 Table 3 Analytical Results - Water Samples Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, New Hill, North Carolina Sample Tritium Tritium LLD Gamma Analysis
- Zinc Location (pCi/liter) (pCi/liter) (pCi/liter) (ug/1)
ARS#2 2,120 233 < LLD 187 BDL-MW1 372 232 *8 BDL-MW2 373 233 BDL-MW3 1,060 232 BDL-MW4 dry BDL-MW5 1,260 233 < LLD 18 BDL-MW6 1,450 232 BDL-MW7 < LLD 234 BDL-MW8 < LLD 232 < LLD 96 BDL-MW9 < LLD 232
- The gamma analysis were counted to the Radiological Environmental Program's Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant SS.
Cýý April 2009 Appendix A Boring Logs
7BORING LOG Drill Rig: Dietrich D-50 Date Drilled: 1/22/09 Logged By:
Boring Dia: 6.5 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW1 Tim Silar a) Blow Depth
-a lout Comple tion E Counts Lithology Description Feet Brn sit w/sm f gr sand
- ! i I Brn, gry brn sit, mottled Brn, tr gry sit w/ tr cly incresing w/ depth 5
., /
/x /
.. ...... Gry f gr sand w/ organic matter
. I Bin md-f gr sand 10 Bm/gry cly Rd bm sit w/sm f gr sand Gm gry sit w/cly sm rd bin mottling spoon refusal at 13' bgs Weathered rd bin siltstone with tr vf gr ss and tr sh 50/4" 15 50/4" 20
- -Z-Z-. :---------
50/2" 25
~> ~<\
F, 30 Completion Notes: Site:
Ground Elevation 252.15 Casing Elevation 254.68 SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown Line New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1
4;z BORING LOG Drill Rig: Dietrich D-50 Date Drilled: 1/22/09 Logged By:
Boring Dia: 6.5 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW2 Tim Silar a) Blow Depth
-a E Con npletion Lithology Description Counts Feet M,
... I.......
........... Brn- It brn t gr sand A
Rd brn sit Weatnerea ra om siltstone M.MM IMM-L--
/ 30 50/2" 5
/ / //
~/ \
26 50/2" 10
>2*>',>
K
- /
26 50/5" 15 7)' /\
f ----------------==I Completion Notes: Site:
Ground Elevation 236.78 Casing Elevation 238.37 SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown Line New Hill, NC
_Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Dietrich D-50 Date Drilled: 1/23/09 Logged By:
Boring Dia: 6.5 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW3 Tim Silar Blow Depth lout Comple tion E Counts Lithology Description Feet (I) 6-------------- A
BEn sity t gr sand, sm mottling
............ I- ..
Highly weathered rd brn siltstone 40 50/4" - 5 Weathered rd bm siltstone, good water zone @ -10.5' bgs Y::
- Y
/
36 50/3.5" 10 M -. 71-:':'--'L-1:-----:-'-
- 15 Completion Notes: Site:
Ground Elevation 222.88 Casing Elevation 224.68 SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown LinE New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Dietrich D-50 Date Drilled: 1/23/09 Logged By:
Boring Dia: 6.5 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW4 Tim Silar Blow Depth Lithology lout Comple tion E Counts Description Feet C,) tion ---------------- ,..,+ -
Brn sit w/f gr sand, organic matter Rd brn w/ sm gry sit w/sm siltsone, possible fill "I',,',',,
",,, "I'll".I'll
.................. ... .1 n-MM1_-_n_-='M-17 Weathered rd brn siltstone, sm gry siltstone, dry 16 50/4" - 5-38 50/2" ----------
7/7 50/4.5" 10 -
30 50/2" 36 50/4" 15 4
Completion Notes: Site:
Ground Elevation 245.14 Casing Elevation 246.96 SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown Line New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Dietrich D-50 Date Drilled: 1/26/09 Logged By:
Boring Dia: 6.5 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW5 Tim Silar Blow Depth E Comple tion Lithology Description CU Counts Feet "1 Brn with sm gry sit w/ sm cly, tr f gr sand, dense, dry (IX 5 -
Weathered rd brn siltstone, sm gry siltstone, dry 50/4" ---------------- -
77 -
10 36 50/5" 50/4" 15
- ~=- =~
Completion Notes: Site:
Ground Elevation 245.72 Casing Elevation 247.28 SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown Line New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Dietrich D-50 Date Drilled: 1/27/09 Logged By:
Boring Dia: 6.5 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW6 Tim Silar a)
'a Blow Depth E Completion Lithology Description Counts Feet (I) 4-- -- ~..---, 4 -
Brn with sm rd brn sit w/ tr cly and vf gr sand, tr organic matter L=
Weathered rd brn siltstone, sm gry siltstone, dry 18 26 50/5" x /
26 50/5" 5 -
30 50/3" V V 10 -
20 40 50/3" 30 50/4" 4-
- 15 -
Completion Notes: Site:
Ground Elevation 246.12 Casing Elevation 247.90 SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown LinE New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Geoprobe Date Drilled: 2/17/09 Logged By:
Boring Dia: 4 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW7 Tim Silar
- ~Blow Depth Lihog BCou Completion e Lithology aE Counts Feet Description
-U)O
- S Brn with sm rd bm sit w/tr cly and vf gr sand, tr organic S matter a
I S a Weathered rd brn siltstone, sm gry siltstone, dry a
5 a
- 0 --------------
a 10 71
-..7' 7. 7
- a. 4 15 t I L IM.M-1M.,
a Siltstone a 20 a
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 .1 Completion Notes: Site:
Ground Elevation 245.21 Casing Elevation 248.07, Solid stem SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown LinE augers to -17' bgs with air rotary from 60' bgs New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Geoprobe Date Drilled: 2/17/09 Logged By:
Boring Dia: 4 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW8 Tim Silar
'a Blow Completion Depth Lithology Description E Counts Feet Brn with sm rd brn sit w/ tr cly and vf gr sand, tr organic a matter
'4' a a'.
Weathered rd brn siltstone, sm gry siltstone, dry a
a a
- a 5
10 -
ký----------------I Siltstone, water zone at 14-15' bgs 15 -
20 Completion Notes: Site:
Ground Elevation 233.18 Casing Elevation 235.90, Solid stem SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown Line augers to -12' bgs with air rotary from 20' bgs New Hill, NC Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1
BORING LOG Drill Rig: Geoprobe Date Drilled: 2/17/09 Logged By:
Boring Dia: 4 Inches Boring Number: BDL-MW9 Tim Silar S Blow Completion Depth Lithology Description E Counts Feet C,,
Brn and gry cly sit a
a U
a a
- 5-
- i Grysit Rd brn siltstone, dry 10 -
15 -
Completion Notes: Site:
Ground Elevation 222.94 Casing Elevation 225.17, Solid stem SHNPP Cooling Tower Blowdown Line augers to -8' bgs with air rotary 18' bgs New Hill, NC
_Project No.: SHNPP-1 Page 1
ss. Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclearPower Plant April 2009 Appendix B NCDENR Well Construction Records
NON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2402 I. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.0 FT. Above Land Surface MIKE MCCONAHEY "Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
Well Contractor (Individual) Name GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC, e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST N/A Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount N/A STREET ADDRESS 176 COMMERCE BLVD g. WATER ZONES (depth):
From To__ From___ To STATESVILLE NC 28625 From__ To_ From___ To City or Town State Zip Code 704 -872-7686 From - To_ From___ To Area code- Phone number 6. CASING: Thickness/
Fro_ _ Depth To 10.0
- W~hS It W4~ral
- 2. WELL INFORMATION: ____ __
SITE WELL ID#(if applicable) BDL-MW-1 Frm.0 Dpt Ft._2~1 __ ___
From To Ft.
STATE WELL PERMIT#(if applicable)_
From__ To_ FLt DWQ or OTHER PERMIT #*lfapplicable)
- 7. GROUT: Depth Material Method WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring 9] Municipal/Public 0 Industrial/Commercial [3 Agricultural [I Recovery D Injection 0 From To Ft.
IrrigationC3 Other 0 (list use) From " To Ft_
From - To Ft.
DATE DRILLED 01/22/09 8, SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material TIME COMPLETED - AMO PMQ From 10.0 To 30.0 Ft 2.0 in. .010 in, PVC
- 3. WELL LOCATION:
From__ To Ft. in. _ in __
CITY: NEW HILL COUNTY WAKE From _ To__ FL in. In.
SHEARON HARRIS ROAD 27562
- 9. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
(Street Name, Numbera, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
Depth Size Material TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING:
From. 5.0 To 30.0 Ft 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND 0 Slope OValley []Flat ORidge 0 Other From. To FtL_
(check appropriate box)
LATITUDE LONGITUDE Sminutes,
- May be in degres, seconds or in a decimal format From
- 10. DRILLING LOG To Ft._
From To Formation Description Latitude/longitude source: oGPS oTopographic map 0.0 1.0 GRASS/TOPSOIL (location of we# must be shown on a USGS topo map and 1.0 14.0 ORANGEr/AN/WHITE SANDY CLAYEY SILT attachedto this form Inot ushig GPS) 14.0 30.0 BROWN/RED SANDY SILT
- 4. FACILITY- is the nnme of fe business where thewell is wlat.
FACILITY ID #(if applicable)_
NAME OF FACILITY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON PROGRESS ENERGY MAILING ADDRESS PO BOX 10429 SOUTHPORT NC 28419 11. REMARKS:
City or Town State. Zip Code BENTONrTE SEAL FROM 0.0 TO 5.0 FEET Area code - Phone number
- 5. WELL DETAILS:
- a. TOTAL DEPTH: 30.0 FEET
- b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES 0. NO E)
II
- c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 0.0 (DRY) FT. MIKE MCCONAHEY (Use "" IfAbove Top of Casing)
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt.,
Form GW-lb 11617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919) 733-7015 ext 568. Rev. 7/05
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2402
- 1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
- d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.0 FT. Above Land Surface*
MIKE MCCONAHEY *Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require a variance In accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
- e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST N/A GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC.
Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A . Amount N/A STREET ADDRESS 176 COMMERCE BLVD g. WATER ZONES (depth):
From - To - From To STATESVILLE NC 28625 From To_ _ From To City or Town State Zip Code From _ To From To (704 - 872-7686 Area code- Phone number 6. CASING: Thickness/
- 2. WELL INFORMATION: Depth Da From 0.0 To 4, 0
Ft._2 1IrCt SITE WELL.ID #(if applicable)_ BDL-MW-2 From To Ft STATE WELL PERMIT#(if applicable)
From _ To_ Ft._
DWO or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable)_
WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring 8) Municipal/Public [I 7. GROUT: Depth Material Method Industrial/Commerciai 0 Agricultural 0 Recovery 0] Injection [0 From To Ft.
Irrigationo Other 0 (list use)__ _ From _ To Ft Fromr___ To_ Ft.
DATE DRILLED 0117.2./09
- 8. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material TIME COMPLETED AM n PM r From 4.0 To 19.0 Ft. 2.0 in. .010 In. PVC
- 3. WELL LOCATION:
From To Ft. in. in.
CITY: NEW HILL COUNTY WAKE From _ To_ _ Ft.- in. 'tn.
SHEARON HARRIS ROAD 27562 9. SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdfivsion, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
Depth Size Material TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING:
From 2.0 To 19.0 Ft. 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND OSIope OValley 0Flat []Ridge 0 Other (check appropriate box) From To_ _ Ft.
From T.__T___ Ft.
LATITUDE _ May be in degrees, minutes, seconds or 10. DRILLING LOG LONGITUDE in a decimal format From To Formation Description Latitude/longitude source: oGPS oTopographic map 0.0 1.0 GRASS/TOPSOIL
'(location of wel must be shown on e USGS topo map and 1.0 10.0 ORANGE/TAN/WHITE SANDY CLAYEY SILT attached to this form if not using GPS) 10.0 19.0 BROWN/RED SANDY SILT
- 4. FACIUTY. Is the name of the business where the well Is located.
FACILITY ID#(if applicable)
NAME OF FACIUTY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON PROGRESS ENERGY MAIUNG ADDRESS PO BOX 10429 SOUTHPORT NC 28419 11. REMARKS:
City or Town State Zip Code BENTONITE SEAL FROM 0.0 TO 2.0 FEET Area code - Phone number 5 WELL DETAILS: A LLWCONSTRU2* TANQR DS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
- a. TOTAL DEPTH: 19.0 FEET I Y TFY THAT THIS WELL WA;S CO' 'STR*LITDINACCORDANCE WITH S 02/24/09
- b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES O NO El 0 1.
SIGNATURE CP'CERTIFIED WELL C5ý "TOR DATE
- c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 0.0 (DRY) FT. MIKE MCCONAHEY (Use "+" if Above Top of Casing)
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt.,
Form GW-lb 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919)733-7015 ext 568. Rev. 7105
NON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2402
- 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.0 FT. Above Land Surface*
MIKE MCCONAHEY *Top of casing terrrinated at/or below land surface may require Well Contractor (Individual) Name a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC. e. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST N/A Well Cortractor Company Name I. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount N/A STREET ADDRESS 176 COMMERCE BLVD g. WATER ZONES (depth):
From - To From To STATESVILLE NC 28625 From To _ From - To City or Towm State Zip Code From To_ From_ To (704 . 872-7686 Area code- Phone number 6. CASING: Thickness/
- 2. WELL INFORMATION: Depth Djamfe Matria From 0 0
. To 5.0 FL 2 I PV SITE WELL ID #(it applicable) BDL-MW-3 STATE WELL PERMIT#QT applicable)_ From_ _ To Ft._
From To Ft._
DWO or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable)
WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring E3 MunicipalP/iloic 0 7. GROUT: Depth Material Method IndustriallCommercial 0" Agricultural 0 Recovery 0 Injection 0] From_ _ To Ft.
Irrigationo Other 0 (list use) From To FL From - To_ Ft DATE DRILLED 01/23/09
- 8. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material TIME COMPLETED AM E] PMQ From 5.0 To_15.0 FL 2.0 in..010 In. PVC
- 3. WELL LOCATION:
From To_ Ft. in. in.
CITY: NEW HILL COUNTY WAKE From- To__ Ft _ in. in.
SHEARON HARRIS ROAD 27562 (Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code) 9. SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING:
From 3.0 To 15.0 Ft. 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND 0Slope OVdley OFlat oRidge o Other (check appropriate box)
From To FL_
From To Ft._
LATITUDE - _____ May be in degreezs, minutes, seconds or 10. DRILLING LOG LONGITUDE in a decimal format From To Formation Description Latitude/longitude source: OGPS oTopographic map 0.0 1.0 GRASSrTOPSOIL (locatibn of welI must be shown on a USGS topo map and 1.0 6.0 ORANGE/TAN/WHITE SANDY CLAYEY SILT attached to this form if not using GPS) 6,0 15.0 BROWN/RED SANDY SILT
- 4. FACILITY- is tie nnae a the business where the well Is located.
FACILITY ID #(#f applicable)_
NAME OF FACILITY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON PROGRESS ENERGY MAILING ADDRESS PO BOX 10429 SOUTHPORT NC 28419 11. REMARKS:
City or Town State Zip Code BENTONITE SEAL FROM 0.0 TO 3.0 FEET Area code - Phone number
- 5. WELL DETAILS: THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED INACCORDANCE WfTH rRU'II SThAIDARDS, AND THAT ACOPY OF THIS
- a. TOTAL DEPTH: 15.0 FEET 02/24109
- b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES 0 NO 91 SIGNATURE &F CERTIFIED WELL DATE
- c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 0.0 (DRY) FT. MIKE MCCONAHEY (Use +" if Above Top of Casing)
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., Form GW-lb 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919) 733-7015 ext 568.
Rev. 7/05
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department ofEnvironment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2402
- 1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
- d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.0 FT. Above Land Surface*
MIKE MCCONAHEY *Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
Well Contractor (Individual) Name GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC. e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST N/A Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount N/A
- g. WATER ZONES (depth):
STREET ADDRESS 176 COMMERCE BLVD From ~ To From__ To___
STATESVILLE NC 28625 From___ To_ From To City or Town State Zip Code From ___ To _ FronT To_
704 872-7686 Area code- Phone number 6. CASING: Thickness/
- 2. WELL INFORMATION: From___..
- Depth . 2%
Dow I~cHvc~) ~
ameter Matei ateia From 0.0 To 7.5 FL SITE WELL ID#Nifaplicable) BDL-MW-4 From To Ft._
STATE WELL PERMIT#C'i applicable)_
From To Ft.
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable) _ ..... _.
WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring 01 Municipal/Public D 7. GROUT: Depth Material Method IndustzlaVCorrmerciad ] Agrlcultural 0 Recoveryo Injection 0 From_ To__ Ft Irrgationo Other 0 (list use) From To Ft.
From To_____ Ft.
DATE DRILLED 01/23/09
- 8. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material TIME COMPLETED AM O PM O From 7.5 To 17.5 Ft. 2.0 in. .010 in. PVC
- 3. WELL LOCATION:
From To Ft. In. in.
CITY: NEW HILL COUNTY WAKE From____ To Ft in. _ in.
SHEARON HARRIS ROAD 27562
- 9. SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdiision. Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
Depth Size Material TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING:
From 5.0 To 17.5 Ft. 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND
[]Slope [3Valley 0 Fat -Ridge E] Other (check appropriate box) From To__ Ft._
From To Ft._
LATITUDE -May be in degrees.
minutes, seconds or 10. DRILLING LOG LONGITUDE in a decimal format From To Formation Description Latitude/longitude source: oGPS oTopographic map 0.0 1.0 GRASS/TOPSOIL (kcation of we# must be shown on a USGS topo map and 1.0 6.0 ORANGEITANtWHITE SANDY CLAYEY SILT attachedto this form if not using GPS) 6.0 17.5 BROWN/RED SANDY SILT
- 4. FACIUTY- Is the name of the business where Vie wet imloceted.
FACILITY ID #(if applicable)
NAME OF FACILITY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 City or Tovn State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON PROGRESS ENERGY MAILING ADDRESS P0 BOX 10429 SOUTHPORT NC 28419 11. REMARKS:
City or Town State Zip Code BENTONITE SEAL FROM 0.0 TO 5.0 FEET Area code - Phone number
- 5. WELL DETAILS: too AA.Y CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSiRUCOTE INACCORDANCE WITH 15~C 2C,..LL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT ACOPY OF THIS
- a. TOTAL DEPTH: 17.5 FEET qjW R Is~r H~ EN PRV9ý
- b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES 0 NO !] SIGNATURE O ?.CERTIFIED WELL CO OR DATE
- c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 0.0(DRY) FT. MIKE MCCONAHEY (Use "+ If Above Top of Casing)
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt.,
Form GW-lb 1617 Mall Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919) 733-7015 ext 568. Rev. 7/05
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 3214
- 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.0 FT. Above Land Surface*
- Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require RANDY OWNBEY a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .01 18.
Wdll Contractor (Indivdual) Name GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC. a. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST N/A Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount N/A STREET ADDRESS 176 COMMERCE BLVD g. WATER ZONES (depth):
From_ _ __To From To__
STATESVILLE NC 28625 From____ To_ From_ __ To City or Town State Zip Code Front_ To From_. To____
7 872-7686 Area code- Phone number 6. CASING: Thickness/
- 2. WELL INFORMATION: Depth F1ilarter Mateal From 0.0 To 7.0 FL_2 NGH PVC SITE WELL ID#(if appficabie)_ BDL-MW-5 From_ To_ Ft._
STATE WELL PERMIT#(if applicable) _ _ _
From___ To__ FL _
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable)_
WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring [J MunicipaV/Public [I 7. GROUT: Depth. Material Method Industrial/Commercial 0 Agricultural [I Recovery[) Irjection D From - To Ft.
Irrigationo Other C (list use) From _ To _ FL_
From___ To _ Ft.
DATE DRILLED 01127/09
- 8. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slat Size Material TIME COMPLETED AM 0 PM 0 From 7.0 To 17.0 FL 2.0 in. .010 In. PVC
- 3. WELL LOCATION:
From_ _ To Ft. in. In.
CITY: NEW HILL COUNTY WAKE From___ To____ Ft. in. in.
SHEARON HARRIS ROAD 27562
- 9. SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdhision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
Depth Size Material TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING:
From 5.0 To 17.0 Ft. 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND
[I Slope DValley [ Flat 0JRidge O Other From To Ft.
(check appropriate box)
From __ To Ft.___
LATITUDE _____t__,May be in degrees.
minutes. seconds or 10. DRILUNG LOG LONGITUDE in a decimal format From To Formation Description Latitude/longitude source: oGPS oTopographic map 0.0 1.0 GRASS/TOPSOIL (location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and 1.0 6,0 ORANGE/TAN/WHITE SANDY CLAYEY SILT attachedto this form if not using GPS) 6-0 17.0 BROWN/RED FINE SANDY SILT
- 4. FACILITY- Is thename or the business where te well is located.
FACILITY ID #(dfapplicable)
NAME OF FACIUTY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON PROGRESS ENERGY MAILING ADDRESS P0 BOX 10429 SOUTHPORT NC 28419 11. REMARKS:
City or Town State Zip Code BENTONITE SEAL FROM 0.0 TO 5.0 FEET Area code - Phone number I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
- 5. WELL DETAILS: 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CON U)ON STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS U
ENzPI TO THE WELL OWNER.
- a. TOTAL DEPTH: 17.0 FEET
- b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES [I NO 9J SIGýA*TRE('5F CER'fIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
- c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 0.0 (DRY) FT. RANDY OWNBEY (Use "+* if Above Top of Casing)
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., Form GW-lb 1617 Mall Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919) 733-7015 ext 568. Rev. 7/05
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
"'4~, fl~' WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 3214
- 1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
- d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.0 FT. Above Land Surface*
RANDY OWNBEY *Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may reqLire Well Contractor (Individual) Name a variance in accordance with ISA NCAC 2C .0118.
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC. e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST N/A Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount NlA STREET ADDRESS 176 COMMERCE BLVD g. WATER ZONES (depth):
From To From To STATESVILLE NC 28625 From__ To _ From - To City or Town State Zip Code From - To_ From To (74 y872-7686 Area code- Phone number 6. CASING:, Thickness/
- 2. WELL INFORMATION: Depth Diareer %VWht PMaterial From 0.0 To 4.0 Ft._2N PVC SITE WELL ID#(Ifapplicable) BDL-MW-6 From - To_ Ft._
STATE WELL PERMIT#Vf applicable).
From _ To__ Ft._
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable)_ _ _
WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring gj Municipal/Public 0 7. GROUT: Depth Material Method Industrial/Commercial 0 Agricultural 0 Recovery [I Injection 0 From - To_ Ft.
IrrigationD Other 0 (ist use) From - To : Ft From - To_ FL DATE DRILLED 01126/09
- 8. SCREEN: Depth Diameter , Slot Size Material TIME COMPLETED AMO PMO From 4.0 To 14.0 Ft. 2.0 in. .010 In. PVC
- 3. WELL LOCATION:
From _ To _ Ft. In. in.
CITY: NEWHILL COUNTY WAKE From__ _ To _ Ft. in. in.
SHEARON HARRIS ROAD 27562
- 9. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
Depth Size Material TOPOGRAPHIC I LAND SETTING:
From 2.0 To 14.0 Ft. 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND OSIope OValley -]OFat 0 Ridge -] Other From To Ft. _
(check appropriate box)
From To Ft._
LATITUDE ____utMay be in degrees, minutes, seconds or M0.DRILUNG LOG LONGITUDE in a decimal format From To Formation Description Latitude/longitude source: OGPS oTopographic map 0.0 1.0 GRASS/TOPSOIL (location of we/ must be shown on a USGS topo map and 1.0 6.0 ORANGE/TAN/WHITE SANDY CLAYEY SILT attachedto this form if not uskig GPS) 6.0 14.0 BROWN/RED FINE SANDY SILT
- 4. FACIUTY- is the name of the business where the well is located.
FACIUTY ID #(if applicable)_
NAME OF FACILITY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT STREET ADDRESS SHEARON HARRIS ROAD NEW HILL NC 27562 City or Towni State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON PROGRESS ENERGY MAILING ADDRESS PO BOX 10429 SOUTHPORT NC 28419 11. REMARKS:
City or Town State Zip Code BENTONITE SEAL FROM 0.0 TO 2.0 FEET Area code - Phone number I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH S.WELL DETAILS: 15A NCAC 2C. WELL qNS RUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS REOO*DIEO TO THE WELL OWNER.
- a. TOTAL DEPTH: 14.0 FEET
/V 1//02/26/09
- b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES 0 NO Ej SIGN.9UIP OF CEKI-IFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
- c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 0.0 (DRY) FT. RANDY OWNBEY (Use "+" ifAbove Top of Casing)
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., Form GW-lb 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919)733-7015 ext 568. Rev. 7/05
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 3106
- 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5' FT. Above Land Surface*
- Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require James 0. Barker a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
- e. YIELD (gpm): NA METHOD OF TEST NA Quantex, Inc.
Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type NA Amount NA
- g. WATER ZONES (depth):
STREET ADDRESS P.O. Box 41673 From 40A To 5o' From To Raleigh, NC 27629 From To From__ To City or Town State Zip Code From To From To 9 219 - 9604 Area code- Phone number 7. CASING: Depth Diameter ThicknessNVeight Material
- 2. WELL INFORMATION:
NA - V*La. From_.0__ To_____ Ft 2- sch40 PVC SITE WELL ID#Qfrappllcable)
From To _ Ft._
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#(if applicable) NA From To Ft OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT #(if applicable) NA
- 3. WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitonnge Municipal/Publicz 8. GROUT: I Depth Material Method Industrial/CommercialD Agriculturaln Recovery[] Injection[] From 0 To 24'9 FL Neat Cement Pour Irnigatlorfj OtherO (list use) Fromi To*_I _LFL Bentonite Place DATE DRILLED 2/17/09 From _ To._ FtL TIME COMPLETED J ... AMR PME] 9. SCREEN: I Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
- 4. WELL LOCATION:
From_ - To 0(, FL 2* in. 0.010 in. PVC CITY: New Hill COUNTY Wake From - To Ft. in. in.
New Hill Holleman Road, New Hill, NC 27562 From_ To _ Ft. in. in.
(Street Name. Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel. Zip Code)
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: 10. SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
R Slope n Valley 13 Flat G Ridge 13 Other Depth i £ Size Material (check appropriate box) May be in degrees, From 0,6 To Ft. #2 Silica Sand From To_ Ft._
LATITUDE N35 deg. 37.024' minutes. seconds or in adecimal format From To_ Ft._
LONGITUDE W!78 deg. 57.606' 11.DRILLING LOG Latitude/longitude source: 4 GPS 0 Topographic map (location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and From To Formation Description attached to this form if not using GPS)
- 5. FACIUTY. is tme nane of the business vwwereme Is bocatd.
ie FACILITY ID #(if applicable) NA NAME OF FACILITY Progress Enemy Shearon H. Plant STREET ADDRESS New Hill Holleman Road New Hill NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON Tim Silar MAILING ADDRESS New Hill Holleman Road New Hill NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code
- 12. REMARKS:
NA Area code - Phone number _A A
- 6. WELL DETAILS:
20*,
22c. i, C TION STANDARDS. AND THAT ACOPY F THI
- a. TOTAL DEPTH: L-0 HAS PVVJJ TO THE WELL OWNER.
- b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YESO NOR
- c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: NA FT.
SK TU OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR iATE (Use "+"if Above Top of Casing) Ja es D. Barker PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., Form GW-1b 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919) 733-7015 ext 568. Rev.12107
N ,ON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD A.A~ ... if~J7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality
~ I, WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 3106
- 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING iS 2.5' FT. Above Land Surface*
- Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require James D. Barker a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
- a. YIELD (gpm): NA METHOD OF TEST NA Quantex, Inc.
Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type NA Amount NA STREETADDRESS P.O. Box 41673 g. WATER ZOIqES (depth):
From 17 To_ _ From To Raleigh, NC 27629 From - To__-___ From- To City or Town State Zip Code 2 9 - From_ _ To From TO 91 1 9604 Area code- Phone number 7. CASING: i Depth , I Diameter Thickness/Weight Material
- 2. WELL INFORMATION:
FromQ.) To tO Ft. 2" sch4O PVC SITE WELL 10 #(ifapplicable) A9W " L-r MW' -q From To_ Ft.
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#(ifapplicable) NA From To_ FL.
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT #(if applicable) NA
- 3. WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoringo MunlcipaV/Publlcl 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method Industrlal/Commercial Irmgatiorfl AgrlculturalO Recovery[] Injectionl3 OtherD) (list use)
Fro 6 To _ _ Ft Neat Cement Pour FromZZ0 To-..:ii Ft. Bentonite Place DATE DRILLED 2117109 From To Ft.
TIME COMPLETED 2 AM13s PM 9. SCREEN: ( Depth ( Diameter Slot Size Material
- 4. WELL LOCATION:
CITY: New Hill COUNTY Wake From dO To 2L) Ft 2" in. 0.010 in. PVC From _ To _ Ft. in. _ in. __
New Hill Holleman Road, New Hill, NC 27562 From _ To_ _ Ft. in. in.
(Street Name. Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No.. Parcel, Zip Code)
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: 10. SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
N Slope 11 Valley [] Flat a Ridge El Other Depth I e Size Material (check appropriate box) May be in degrees, From58 To 20 Ft. #2 Silica Sand LATITUDE N35 deg. 37.024' minutes, seconds or Fromn To_ Ft.
in a decimal format From To_ Ft.
LONGITUDE W78 deg. 57.606' Latitude/longitude source: & GPS [] Topographic map I11DRILWNG LOG (locationof well must be shown on a USGS topo map and From To Formation Description attached to this form if not using GPS)
- 5. FACIUITY. is the name of the busiress where the wel Is located.
FACILITY ID#(if applicable) NA 1 R NAME OF FACILITY Progress Energy Shearon H. Plant STREET ADDRESS New Hill Holleman Road New Hill NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON Tim Silar MAILING ADDRESS New Hill Holleman Road New Hill NC 27562 12. REMARKS:
City or Town State Zip Code
( ). NA Area code - Phone number
- 6. WELL DETAILS: ( IW FYT T S WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED INACCORDANCE WITH
- FFC*C.AS ralý-l VL P ION STANDARDS, CO4 tEqF TOHEWEU. OWNER AND THAT ACOPY OFTIIS./
- a. TOTAL DEPTH:_ ____
- b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES13 NOB
- c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: NA FT, T kTLURE 4F CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR 'DA11E (Use "+"if Above Top of Casing) Ja es D. Barker PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt.,
Form GW-lb 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919) 733-7015 ext 568. Rev. 12/07
NON RESIDENTLIL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 3106
- 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5' FT. Above Land Surface*
- Top of casing terminated atlor below land surface may require James D. Barker a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
- e. YIELD (gpm): NA METHOD OF TEST NA Quantex, Inc.
Well Contractor Company Name
- f. DISINFECTION: Type NA Amount NA
- g. WATER ZONES (depth):.(
STREET ADDRESS P.O. Box 41673 Fromj*.. To i" From To Raleigh, NC 27629 From _ To _ From_ To City or Town State Zip Code From To _ From To._
(919 219-9604 Area code- Phone number 7. CASING: ( Depth , f Diameter Thickness/Weight Material
- 2. WELL INFORMATION:
Fromn TOS Ft 2" sch40 PVC SITEWELLIDiAiapplicable). W "ZLL-L/ ,-'
From To Ft.
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#(11appicable) NA From_ ___To Ft.
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT #(if applicable) NA
- 3. WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoringl Municipal/Public13 8. GROUT: (Depth Material Method Industiral/CommerciaC Agriculturall] Recoveryt] InjectionrI From 0 To Ft. Neat Cement Pour IrigatiorO OtherO (list use) From= To--'r- Ft Bentonite Place DATE DRILLED 2/17/09 From _ To_ FL TIME COMPLETED 4! 30 . AMR PME 9. SCREEN: I Depth " Diameter Slot Size Material
- 4. WELL LOCATION:
From _.. To Ft 2 " In. 0.010 In. PVC CITY: New Hill couNTY Wake From To Ft. in.
New Hill Holleman Road, New Hill, NC 27562 From_____ To Ft. In. In.
(Street Name, Numbers. Community, Subdivision. Lot No.. Parcel, Zip Code)
- 10. SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING:
Depth , Size Material
- Slope 0 Valley 0 Flat 13 Ridge E Other
.(check appropriate box) May be in degrees, From -ia Tol Ft. #2 Silica Sand LATITUDE N35 deg. 37.024' minutes, seconds or From To___ __ Ft._
From To_ Ft.
in a decimal formna LONGITUDE W78 deg. 57.606' 11.DRILUNG LOG Latitude/longitude source: I OPS 0 Topographic map (locationof well must be shown on a USGS topo map and From To Formation Description attachedto this form if not using GPS)
- 5. FACIULTY. isme n,*a of the business whie the wau Istocted.
FACILITY ID #(if applicable) NA NAME OF FACILITY Progress Energy Shearon H. Plant STREET ADDRESS New Hill Holleman Road New Hill NC 27562 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON Tim Silar MAILING ADDRESS New Hill Holleman Road New Hill NC 27562 12. REMARKS:
City or Town State Zip Code
)- NA Area code - Phone number
- 6. WELL DETAILS: 1D0 NC CERLFy .. Tm L ASD CONSTRCTED INACCORDANCE WITH iSA N9LACIC, WELLCýN RIUCi fT4DARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
- a. TOTAL DEPTH: RECM 1166WEN I ELL OWNER.
- b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YESn NOW SIGNA*JRE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
- c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: NA FT (Use "+ ifAbove Top of Casing) James D. Barker PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt., Form GW-lb 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. (919),733-7015 ext 568. Rev.12/07
ss.
tXt Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant April 2009 Appendix C Field Notes
2 3 S r~v 71 S
cA~)A~Li~+
O L44 A
'p /
/
7,~
C-
~, I A~J
- ---------- IA ,
2.
........ -~
L bXlýe~a / 1~
-. 1-rDxh~-
rI
..- i I i
ýk-
7------
101J-4) ... A-U
... ..... I ffv V 7, XlCl
64 ".~ .....
~..... . .
~~
Zt bL-L ; - 3
~~
.9 I 1~~'A~W A
....... LYI~ *A~-~e I
~~&33 6 LIS
,-d~ L~C-'4-I I~~.. .~' .:-5'
/~3/4b14, -z" K. *1 .~ I 1,6 796 ~ -* ~ I em V' VVV,/ 4
.....- em. s4$ 4d 4 '
2.~2 ~-v'4 ~
9 I. . . .I... ...
em em K-:
1 '~
~4K4 4/A
~
~
.~
A~a Kd
)
A I~
... a...e p
.Fi,~
~ - --
10 11
. .... .M L~-~-~-~--4-------- --
0
- .A 7
-I------ - oq!3-L ~3i
'S tA lo
.4- -i
'S
,-"3
'S
-i
'S c
61
,1-'77 C-
12 13
-o1- ..
. 4....i.
7 t I I I -
I TA ~------ -.
- I 4ý1
14 N4 15
,~/
IIN iiS5, -l 7
-6 wx- 1...JO I I V2 1/,
~yP~ /-C ~
- .q.s-~
16 w 17
.~~ .. .. .....
4
~44-oil A>
9,- 1
.. s e-0~
...... /
18 19
- 4-~. ...... Mew"~(. &Lj.-
I5IL
~~~~~~
.... ~~~ .. ..... ............
20 Fc ý9. 0.. 0,)ri....S.. _2
-'4' &-t4--..' - I I .
- i. . . . . i*
_T~vr ~ O & ~ k ThZ> 37:
7-:72,(
.Oi.
I 77 ZI /P / J}7-
~~97t,- U.~
23
- 1 23
- -J -
4< I I K -4Lk 74- --
'10
............. .... .[ - , ... ..
.... i....... . , ..........................
/
. ............. L... .. .. .. .. . . . . . ... .
V /"
III
_. 1........ ..
Z-I ----- ........ .. - iii
25 24, 24 25
4---- *-.--.---.4*-:107---
~ke ~w~'* ~J q-31 4
/~f~~ .............
7o.J 2;
...... .A...~o
.... 2 - Ip
. A 6-----------
/ 1ý
'I
~/-JV 'V-7 4 q3
.ý -y 4
,-2q~4
/ --
...i-
'Se7Z-6 i !
...... N a / 7 i .i3..L.1
-g j~j- .b g,~)
...... ...... a ,~
'I-' & (-7-7, 4 9 il r 9@S ~S~7 f Of (I-,
6':
76
.. i --
...... ------- /:
N. -
26 27
-g - ------ ......--- _
Z- 2 - ......
- -~ ~ ~1.3 ~ v '-----
K----
U.
U.
-I
.3-- a.
/..... - 5 ......
b . .....
~ a.q em U.
&14 em
-S a.
-S
Cooling Tower Blowdown Line Assessment Report Shearon HarrisNuclear PowerPlant SS.
Cýý April 2009 Appendix D Calculations
APPENDIX D CALCULATIONS Groundwater Velocity Calculation V/s -K (dh/dl) ne V/s = Groundwater Velocity dh - Water Elevation Difference BDL-MW5 to BDL-MW8 = 4.99' dl = Horizontal Distance Difference BDL-MW6 to BDL-MW8 = 200' K = Hydraulic Conductivity 1.14 ft/day (Arithmetic Mean Value from Table 2.4.12-208, FSAR) ne = Porosity = 5%
(Freeze and Cherry, 1979)
V/s =1.14 ft/day (4.99 ft/215 ft)
.05 V/s = 0.529 ft/day
= 193 ft/year