ML17065A060: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17065A060
| number = ML17065A060
| issue date = 02/24/2017
| issue date = 02/24/2017
| title = Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station - Final Status Survey Summary Report, January 25, 2017, Iosb Embedded Pipe, Survey Unit F8300123
| title = Final Status Survey Summary Report, January 25, 2017, Iosb Embedded Pipe, Survey Unit F8300123
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)
| author affiliation = Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Approved By: Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report January 25, 2017 IOSB Embedded Pipe Survey Unit F8300123 FSS Engineer Date: .;z.h,/r-:7'.
{{#Wiki_filter:Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report January 25, 2017 IOSB Embedded Pipe Survey Unit F8300123 FSS Engineer Approved By:  ~                          Date: .;z.h,/r-:7'.
ManaQer:anchC:
ManaQer:anchC: Seco Assets
Seco Assets FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300123 Survey Unit: F8300123, Interim Onsite Storage Building (IOSB) Embedded Piping Survey Unit
 
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300123 Survey Unit:
F8300123, Interim Onsite Storage Building (IOSB) Embedded Piping Survey Unit


== Description:==
== Description:==


Operating History: The drain and piping system in the IOSB collected liquids from the building either via trench drains (storage cells, DAW Bay, and Truck Bay), or via floor drains. Areas of elevated residual radioactivity were identified in close proximity to the trench drains or floor drains indicating the potential for a spill of radioactive liquid to have traversed down the embedded piping to the sump. Site Characterization:
Operating History: The drain and piping system in the IOSB collected liquids from the building either via trench drains (storage cells, DAW Bay, and Truck Bay), or via floor drains. Areas of elevated residual radioactivity were identified in close proximity to the trench drains or floor drains indicating the potential for a spill of radioactive liquid to have traversed down the embedded piping to the sump.
Static measurements were collected every six inches of pipe run in all sections of embedded piping. Measurements indicated residual radioactivity in the embedded piping of the hot cell drain. The highest measurement obtained in the embedded piping was collected in the hot cell drain line at 26,766 dpm. This value exceeds the level for grouting of piping listed in the RSLTP. Based upon this level, the drain line from the hot cell was classified as a Class 1 survey unit to allow it to be handled separately from the remaining embedded piping. The purpose of designating this section of pipe as a Class l was because of the residual activity and the need to perform remediation.
Site Characterization: Static measurements were collected every six inches of pipe run in all sections of th~ embedded piping. Measurements indicated residual radioactivity in the embedded piping of the hot cell drain. The highest measurement obtained in the embedded piping was collected in the hot cell drain line at 26,766 dpm. This value exceeds the level for grouting of piping listed in the RSLTP. Based upon this level, the drain line from the hot cell was classified as a Class 1 survey unit to allow it to be handled separately from the remaining embedded piping. The purpose of designating this section of pipe as a Class l was because of the residual activity and the need to perform remediation. A Class 2 buffer survey area was not designated because the density of survey points for embedded piping is independent of classification and is dictated by the RSLTP. Based on the levels of gross activity reported, the remaining, embedded piping was determined to be a Class 3 area as an indication that residual radioactivity was not detected during scopjng surveys.
A Class 2 buffer survey area was not designated because the density of survey points for embedded piping is independent of classification and is dictated by the RSLTP. Based on the levels of gross activity reported, the remaining, embedded piping was determined to be a Class 3 area as an indication that residual radioactivity was not detected during scopjng surveys. Survey Unit Design Information:
Survey Unit Design Information:
Static measurement locations were collected every six inches of accessible piping as specified in the License Termination Plan. Scanning of the length of piping was not conducted due to the number of static measurements collected.
Static measurement locations were collected every six inches of accessible piping as specified in the License Termination Plan. Scanning of the length of piping was not conducted due to the number of static measurements collected. Piping was surveyed in defined segments as shown in Table 1.
Piping was surveyed in defined segments as shown in Table 1. A total of 504 static measurements were collected in a total of 255 linear feet of embedded piping. This corresponds to a measurement collected on average every 6.07 inches of piping and is consistent with the guidance from the RSL TP for embedded piping. Data collected was compared directly to the DCGL for embedded piping of I 00,000 dpm. The instrumentation used for the survey along with the MDC values are listed in Table 2-1 Attachment  
A total of 504 static measurements were collected in a total of 255 linear feet of embedded piping. This corresponds to a measurement collected on average every 6.07 inches of piping and is consistent with the guidance from the RSL TP for embedded piping. Data collected was compared directly to the DCGL for embedded piping of I 00,000 dpm.               The instrumentation used for the survey along with the MDC values are listed in Table 2-1 Attachment 2.
: 2. 1 FSS Embedded Piping F8300123 FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300123 Survey Results: A total of 504 direct measurements were made in F8300123.
1                               FSS Embedded Piping                           F8300123
The results of the static measurements are summarized in Table 1. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL of I 00,000 dpm. None of the measurements indicated areas of elevated activity or required grouting of the piping (>21 ,000 dpm). Table 1, Static Measurement Results Section of Length of Number of Range of Embedded Piping Pipe Run Measurements Measurements (feet) (dpm) DAW Bay to Sump 86 154 4,090-7,168 DAW Staging Bay 40 87 3,819-12,437 to DAW line Cell C-1 to Sump 6 11 6, 195 -6,915 Truck Bay Trench 28 61 5,764 -6,657 to Truck Bay Sump Truck Bay Sump to 16 34 1,100-1,659 Sump 4 inch Truck Bay Sump to 23 47 5,935 -9,376 Sump 6 inch Cask Wash Down to 20 40 3,620 -5,518 Surrip Expansion line from 36 70 4,880 -6,700 Sump Table 2 contains the statistical summary of the static measurement data for the Embedded Piping. Table 2, Gamma Summary Statistics Embedded Piping Mean 5,038 Median 5,097 Standard Deviation 1,355 Minimum 1,100 Maximum 12,437 *Count 504 2 FSS Embedded Pipe f8300123 FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300123 .Survey Unit Data Assessment:
 
The survey design required a static measurement every six inches of accessible piping. Based upon the estimated length of piping and the number of measurements collected, the FSS resulted in a measurement roughly every 6.07 inches. All measurements were less than the DCGL. Survey Unit Investigations and Results: No investigations were required for the direct measurements and no investigation results are reported.
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300123 Survey Results:
A total of 504 direct measurements were made in F8300123. The results of the static measurements are summarized in Table 1. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL of I 00,000 dpm. None of the measurements indicated areas of elevated activity or required grouting of the piping (>21 ,000 dpm).
Table 1, Static Measurement Results Length of                          Range of Section of                           Number of Pipe Run                       Measurements Embedded Piping                        Measurements (feet)                             (dpm)
DAW Bay to Sump               86               154         4,090- 7,168 DAW Staging Bay 40               87       3,819- 12,437 to DAW line Cell C-1 to Sump             6               11         6, 195 - 6,915 Truck Bay Trench 28               61         5,764 - 6,657 to Truck Bay Sump Truck Bay Sump to 16               34         1,100-1,659 Sump 4 inch Truck Bay Sump to 23               47         5,935 - 9,376 Sump 6 inch Cask Wash Down to 20               40         3,620 - 5,518 Surrip Expansion line from 36               70         4,880 - 6,700 Sump Table 2 contains the statistical summary of the static measurement data for the Embedded Piping.
Table 2, Gamma Summary Statistics Embedded Piping Mean                         5,038 Median                       5,097 Standard Deviation           1,355 Minimum                       1,100 Maximum                     12,437
                            *Count                           504 2                                 FSS Embedded Pipe                         f8300123
 
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300123
.Survey Unit Data Assessment:
The survey design required a static measurement every six inches of accessible piping.
Based upon the estimated length of piping and the number of measurements collected, the FSS resulted in a measurement roughly every 6.07 inches. All measurements were less than the DCGL.
Survey Unit Investigations and Results:
No investigations were required for the direct measurements and no investigation results are reported.
ALARA Statement:
ALARA Statement:
As stated in Chapter 4 of the LTP, as long as the residual activity within the survey unit is less than the DCGL, the ALARA criterion has been met. Changes in Initial Survey Unit Assumptions:
As stated in Chapter 4 of the LTP, as long as the residual activity within the survey unit is less than the DCGL, the ALARA criterion has been met.
The survey unit was designated as a Class 3 survey area and surveyed in accordance with the RSL TP for embedded pipe. Measurements were collected every 6.07 inches on average per the RSLTP. However this did not affect the survey effectiveness as no potential areas of elevated activity were detected.  
Changes in Initial Survey Unit Assumptions:
The survey unit was designated as a Class 3 survey area and surveyed in accordance with the RSL TP for embedded pipe. Measurements were collected every 6.07 inches on average per the RSLTP. However this did not affect the survey effectiveness as no potential areas of elevated activity were detected.


==
==
Line 39: Line 54:


The FSS of this survey unit was properly designed as a Class 3 survey based on the results of the scoping survey. The required number of direct measurements made met the requirement of Table 5-6 of the LTP. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. No investigations were required.
The FSS of this survey unit was properly designed as a Class 3 survey based on the results of the scoping survey. The required number of direct measurements made met the requirement of Table 5-6 of the LTP. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. No investigations were required.
The static measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met. It is concluded that survey unit F8300123 meets the release criteria of 10CFR20.1402.
The static measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met.
3 FSS Embedded Pipe F8300123 Attachment 1 Maps February 9, 2017 Survey Unit F8300123 v-* .!_.-:.::'  
It is concluded that survey unit F8300123 meets the release criteria of 10CFR20.1402.
;
3                                 FSS Embedded Pipe                             F8300123
* J DRAIN TRENC-t """ .*' LCWER TRU%  
 
-. . * ' ! Expansion Linc HOf TRU;..K RAMP I DRAIN INTERIM ONSITE STORAGE BUILDING (IQSB) .. . . ... SMUD
Attachment 1 Maps February 9, 2017 Survey Unit F8300123
:C.unr,.v Approwd by. Oeacrfption:
 
Drown B. Dote: Approwl dot..: Rev No.: Page I r w = A-I A-2 A-".J
r v-*   .!_.-:.::' ;
! I : j 1l I! II I', i I/ ll *i : I, () Att. 1 Maps *(' h./ \:IN TRENC-H 5rdlt.'.111liP.1.
* J                                                                             w
* fl. ?.>=-= r D 8300123 Attachment 2 Instrumentation January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F8300123 l\!leasu'rement . <TY1fe. . Gamma Static Measurement 4 inch pipe Gamma Static Measurement 6 inch pipe Table 2-1. Survey Unit Instrumentation
                                                                                                                  =
*.
DRAIN TRENC-t
Type ' * -* I , *
                                                    """ ~ ::~ .*'
* Ludlum Model 2350-1 Ludlum Model 44-15 7 Detector Ludlum Model 2350-1 Ludlum Model 44-159 Detector IVlinimuJ11 Detectable Activity"*
A-I            A-2                    A-".J rr===~*===========~=========:oj--
,,I)etej::tor
LCWER TRU% l?~Y~                                                  :
** .
I, Expansion Linc HOf I:
398 dpm/100 cm 2 0.791% 247 dpm/I 00 cm 2 0.511%  
j
*Thie 203481/201151 4/15/17 203482/010057 6/30/17 a Minimum detectable activities for the count rate instrumentation were calculated in accordance with NUREG-1507, "Minimum Detectable Concentrations with Typical Radiation Survey Instruments for Various Contaminants and Field Conditions" (U.S. NRC, 1997). b Detectors are required to be calibrated once every 12 months. Calibration due date indicates the date by which the detector must be calibrated again. cm 2 = square centimeters cpm =counts per minute dpm =disintegrations per minute Pagel Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300123 Static Measurement MDA Survey Type Gamma 201151 4500 1 0.791 100 Detector Number Background count rate (cpm) Count Time (min) Efficiency Area of Detector ( cm 2) Constants 60 sec/min 2.54 cm/in Assumptions Background count time and sample count time are equivalent Calculate Static MDA Static MDA =3 + 4.65(Br
                                                                                                                                          ?.>=-=
* t)0*5/t
TRU;..K RAMP                               1l I!
III',
I                              I/
i l
                                                                                      *i
                                                                                                            \ : I N TRENC-H DRAIN INTERIM ONSITE STORAGE BUILDING (IQSB)
SMUD
                                                                        .. . . ... ~
D
                      ~.cP11inu. :C.unr,.v         Approwd by.
r Oeacrfption:
Drown B.                                                                                 ()     *('
h./
Dote:                                      Approwl dot..:                                                   5rdlt.'.111liP.1.
Rev No.:                                                                                                    ~ 111d~
* I(~ fl.
Page I                                                                                Att. 1 Maps                                            8300123
 
Attachment 2 Instrumentation January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F8300123
 
Table 2-1. Survey Unit Instrumentation l\!leasu'rement                                 IVlinimuJ11 Detectable Activity"*            ,,I)etej::tor    *Cal.il!.ra.ti~*n.
. <TY1fe. .         *. lnstrurii~nt Type
                        ~    ' * -
* I , * *
                                                                                        ** ..Efi'i~iencies    *Thie Date~
Gamma Static            Ludlum Model                   398 dpm/100 cm2                      0.791%        203481/201151 Measurement                2350-1                                                                               4/15/17 4 inch pipe              Ludlum Model 44-15 7 Detector Gamma Static            Ludlum Model                   247 dpm/I 00 cm 2                   0.511%       203482/010057 Measurement                  2350-1                                                                              6/30/17 6 inch pipe              Ludlum Model 44-159 Detector a   Minimum detectable activities for the count rate instrumentation were calculated in accordance with NUREG-1507, "Minimum Detectable Concentrations with Typical Radiation Survey Instruments for Various Contaminants and Field Conditions" (U.S. NRC, 1997).
b Detectors are required to be calibrated once every 12 months. Calibration due date indicates the date by which the detector must be calibrated again.
cm2 = square centimeters cpm =counts per minute dpm =disintegrations per minute Pagel                                         Att. 2 Instrumentation                                       F8300123
 
Static Measurement MDA Gamma    Survey Type 201151   Detector Number 4500  Background count rate (cpm) 1 Count Time (min) 0.791  Efficiency 100  Area of Detector (cm 2)
Constants 60 sec/min 2.54 cm/in Assumptions Background count time and sample count time are equivalent Calculate Static MDA Static MDA =3 + 4.65(Br
* t) 0*5/t
* E
* E
* Af,oo (NUREG 1507) Where: Br Background Countrate t Count Time (min) E Efficiency A Area of detector ( cm 2) Static MDA 398 dpm/100 cm2 Page 2 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300123 SuNey Type Gamma 10057 700 1 0.511 100 Detector Number Background count rate (cpm) Count Time (min) Efficiency Area of Detector (cm 2) Constants 60 sec/min 2.54 cm/in Assumptions Background count time and sample count time are equivalent Calculate Static MDA Static MDA =3 + 4.65(Br
* Af,oo       (NUREG 1507)
* t)0*5/t
Where:                   Br   Background Countrate t     Count Time (min)
E     Efficiency A     Area of detector (cm 2)
Static MDA                             398 dpm/100 cm2 Page 2                                 Att. 2 Instrumentation     F8300123
 
Gamma    SuNey Type 10057   Detector Number 700  Background count rate (cpm) 1 Count Time (min) 0.511  Efficiency 100  Area of Detector (cm 2)
Constants 60 sec/min 2.54 cm/in Assumptions Background count time and sample count time are equivalent Calculate Static MDA Static MDA =3 + 4.65(Br
* t) 0*5/t
* E
* E
* A/100 (NUREG 1507) Where: Br Background Countrate t Count Time (min) E Efficiency A Area of detector ( cm 2) Static MDA 247 dpm/100 cm 2 Page 3 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300123 Att. 3 Investigation Attachment 3 Investigation January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F8300123 (none required)
* A/100       (NUREG 1507)
F8300123 Attachment4 Data Assessment January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F8300123
Where:                   Br   Background Countrate t     Count Time (min)
----200 Histogram for Gamm Static Activity (dpm) Embedded Pipe  
E     Efficiency A     Area of detector (cm 2)
,,. M inm.rn 1.1)99.l<l 190 1 2..437 4 2 SD 1.:Jnn s*-0.81 '"' Kutaris :U.f 17\) I '"' I (;!lM-5.(157&1 8M o<ian 5J51.0? 9N oml<'llO..:ttb.
Static MDA                             247 dpm/100 cm 2 Page 3                                 Att. 2 Instrumentation     F8300123
ll i-Jn I Ol en B S.: 150 I I 0Mae0n:. 1'1) I 1 ll I ''" I 11 0 ) ( ,oo .;; 90 "' Ill 60 "' "' ll '" 1 0 ___ o __ 1134 ,,.., 3401 7936 11331! 1 2 471 Page 1 Att. 4 D ata Assess m e n t F8 3 00 1 23 Q..Q Plot for Gamma Static Activity (dpm) Embedded Pipe M.W JO))) ------/-... ...........
 
___........ .J 0 Theoretical Quantiles (Standard Normal) Page2 Att. 4 Data Assessment  
Attachment 3 Investigation January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F8300123 (none required)
.........
Att. 3 Investigation                      F8300123
.. -* . . F8300123 ndivly ti .. .(JS M eMaStY.:;8 Sd
 
* 1382 Slooc
Attachment4 Data Assessment January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F8300123
* 129 4 lr1eceep1
 
*5050 Corteb!IOl\.A
200 Histogram for Gamm Static Activity (dpm) Embedded Pipe                         ctel~
*0934 *il r.t.FUn:.o}}
N~rJ Vriuf:i Minm.rn                 1.1)99.l<l M~                    12..437 42 190 SD                     1.:Jnn s*-                         0.81
    '"'                                                                                                                         Kutaris
(;!lM-
:U.f 5.(157&1 17\)
    '"'                                   I I                                                                                 8Mo<ian 9Noml<'llO..:ttb.lli-Jn 5J51.0?
I I                                                                                     Olen BS.:
150                                                                                                                       0Mae0n:.
I 1'1)                             I 1ll 11 0                       )
I I
( ,oo 90 Ill 60 ll 10
___o _ _
1134 ,,..,       3401                                                     7936                 11331!       12471 Page 1                                   Att. 4 Data Assessment                        F8300 123
 
ndivly Q..Q Plot for Gamma Static Activity (dpm) Embedded Pipe ti .. .(JS MeMaStY.:;8 Sd
* 1382 M.W                                                                                                               Slooc
* 1294 lr1eceep1
* 5050 Corteb!IOl\.A
* 0934
                                                                                                                *il r.t.FUn:.o JO)))
                                ------/- -----~
                  ~
                      -~
          ~~                    ...
      ~-  ...........___........
      .J                                                               0 Theoretical Quantiles (Standard Normal)
Page2                                       Att. 4 Data Assessment                     F8300123}}

Latest revision as of 15:30, 24 February 2020

Final Status Survey Summary Report, January 25, 2017, Iosb Embedded Pipe, Survey Unit F8300123
ML17065A060
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 02/24/2017
From:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)
To:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Shared Package
ML17065A032 List:
References
DPG 17-038
Download: ML17065A060 (14)


Text

Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report January 25, 2017 IOSB Embedded Pipe Survey Unit F8300123 FSS Engineer Approved By: ~ Date: .;z.h,/r-:7'.

ManaQer:anchC: Seco Assets

FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300123 Survey Unit:

F8300123, Interim Onsite Storage Building (IOSB) Embedded Piping Survey Unit

Description:

Operating History: The drain and piping system in the IOSB collected liquids from the building either via trench drains (storage cells, DAW Bay, and Truck Bay), or via floor drains. Areas of elevated residual radioactivity were identified in close proximity to the trench drains or floor drains indicating the potential for a spill of radioactive liquid to have traversed down the embedded piping to the sump.

Site Characterization: Static measurements were collected every six inches of pipe run in all sections of th~ embedded piping. Measurements indicated residual radioactivity in the embedded piping of the hot cell drain. The highest measurement obtained in the embedded piping was collected in the hot cell drain line at 26,766 dpm. This value exceeds the level for grouting of piping listed in the RSLTP. Based upon this level, the drain line from the hot cell was classified as a Class 1 survey unit to allow it to be handled separately from the remaining embedded piping. The purpose of designating this section of pipe as a Class l was because of the residual activity and the need to perform remediation. A Class 2 buffer survey area was not designated because the density of survey points for embedded piping is independent of classification and is dictated by the RSLTP. Based on the levels of gross activity reported, the remaining, embedded piping was determined to be a Class 3 area as an indication that residual radioactivity was not detected during scopjng surveys.

Survey Unit Design Information:

Static measurement locations were collected every six inches of accessible piping as specified in the License Termination Plan. Scanning of the length of piping was not conducted due to the number of static measurements collected. Piping was surveyed in defined segments as shown in Table 1.

A total of 504 static measurements were collected in a total of 255 linear feet of embedded piping. This corresponds to a measurement collected on average every 6.07 inches of piping and is consistent with the guidance from the RSL TP for embedded piping. Data collected was compared directly to the DCGL for embedded piping of I 00,000 dpm. The instrumentation used for the survey along with the MDC values are listed in Table 2-1 Attachment 2.

1 FSS Embedded Piping F8300123

FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300123 Survey Results:

A total of 504 direct measurements were made in F8300123. The results of the static measurements are summarized in Table 1. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL of I 00,000 dpm. None of the measurements indicated areas of elevated activity or required grouting of the piping (>21 ,000 dpm).

Table 1, Static Measurement Results Length of Range of Section of Number of Pipe Run Measurements Embedded Piping Measurements (feet) (dpm)

DAW Bay to Sump 86 154 4,090- 7,168 DAW Staging Bay 40 87 3,819- 12,437 to DAW line Cell C-1 to Sump 6 11 6, 195 - 6,915 Truck Bay Trench 28 61 5,764 - 6,657 to Truck Bay Sump Truck Bay Sump to 16 34 1,100-1,659 Sump 4 inch Truck Bay Sump to 23 47 5,935 - 9,376 Sump 6 inch Cask Wash Down to 20 40 3,620 - 5,518 Surrip Expansion line from 36 70 4,880 - 6,700 Sump Table 2 contains the statistical summary of the static measurement data for the Embedded Piping.

Table 2, Gamma Summary Statistics Embedded Piping Mean 5,038 Median 5,097 Standard Deviation 1,355 Minimum 1,100 Maximum 12,437

  • Count 504 2 FSS Embedded Pipe f8300123

FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300123

.Survey Unit Data Assessment:

The survey design required a static measurement every six inches of accessible piping.

Based upon the estimated length of piping and the number of measurements collected, the FSS resulted in a measurement roughly every 6.07 inches. All measurements were less than the DCGL.

Survey Unit Investigations and Results:

No investigations were required for the direct measurements and no investigation results are reported.

ALARA Statement:

As stated in Chapter 4 of the LTP, as long as the residual activity within the survey unit is less than the DCGL, the ALARA criterion has been met.

Changes in Initial Survey Unit Assumptions:

The survey unit was designated as a Class 3 survey area and surveyed in accordance with the RSL TP for embedded pipe. Measurements were collected every 6.07 inches on average per the RSLTP. However this did not affect the survey effectiveness as no potential areas of elevated activity were detected.

==

Conclusion:==

The FSS of this survey unit was properly designed as a Class 3 survey based on the results of the scoping survey. The required number of direct measurements made met the requirement of Table 5-6 of the LTP. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. No investigations were required.

The static measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met.

It is concluded that survey unit F8300123 meets the release criteria of 10CFR20.1402.

3 FSS Embedded Pipe F8300123

Attachment 1 Maps February 9, 2017 Survey Unit F8300123

r v-* .!_.-:.::' ;

  • J w

=

DRAIN TRENC-t

""" ~ ::~ .*'

A-I A-2 A-".J rr===~*===========~=========:oj--

LCWER TRU% l?~Y~  :

I, Expansion Linc HOf I:

j

?.>=-=

TRU;..K RAMP 1l I!

III',

I I/

i l

  • i

\ : I N TRENC-H DRAIN INTERIM ONSITE STORAGE BUILDING (IQSB)

SMUD

.. . . ... ~

D

~.cP11inu. :C.unr,.v Approwd by.

r Oeacrfption:

Drown B. () *('

h./

Dote: Approwl dot..: 5rdlt.'.111liP.1.

Rev No.: ~ 111d~

  • I(~ fl.

Page I Att. 1 Maps 8300123

Attachment 2 Instrumentation January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F8300123

Table 2-1. Survey Unit Instrumentation l\!leasu'rement IVlinimuJ11 Detectable Activity"* ,,I)etej::tor *Cal.il!.ra.ti~*n.

. <TY1fe. . *. lnstrurii~nt Type

~ ' * -

  • I , * *
    • ..Efi'i~iencies *Thie Date~

Gamma Static Ludlum Model 398 dpm/100 cm2 0.791% 203481/201151 Measurement 2350-1 4/15/17 4 inch pipe Ludlum Model 44-15 7 Detector Gamma Static Ludlum Model 247 dpm/I 00 cm 2 0.511% 203482/010057 Measurement 2350-1 6/30/17 6 inch pipe Ludlum Model 44-159 Detector a Minimum detectable activities for the count rate instrumentation were calculated in accordance with NUREG-1507, "Minimum Detectable Concentrations with Typical Radiation Survey Instruments for Various Contaminants and Field Conditions" (U.S. NRC, 1997).

b Detectors are required to be calibrated once every 12 months. Calibration due date indicates the date by which the detector must be calibrated again.

cm2 = square centimeters cpm =counts per minute dpm =disintegrations per minute Pagel Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300123

Static Measurement MDA Gamma Survey Type 201151 Detector Number 4500 Background count rate (cpm) 1 Count Time (min) 0.791 Efficiency 100 Area of Detector (cm 2)

Constants 60 sec/min 2.54 cm/in Assumptions Background count time and sample count time are equivalent Calculate Static MDA Static MDA =3 + 4.65(Br

  • t) 0*5/t
  • E

Where: Br Background Countrate t Count Time (min)

E Efficiency A Area of detector (cm 2)

Static MDA 398 dpm/100 cm2 Page 2 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300123

Gamma SuNey Type 10057 Detector Number 700 Background count rate (cpm) 1 Count Time (min) 0.511 Efficiency 100 Area of Detector (cm 2)

Constants 60 sec/min 2.54 cm/in Assumptions Background count time and sample count time are equivalent Calculate Static MDA Static MDA =3 + 4.65(Br

  • t) 0*5/t
  • E

Where: Br Background Countrate t Count Time (min)

E Efficiency A Area of detector (cm 2)

Static MDA 247 dpm/100 cm 2 Page 3 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300123

Attachment 3 Investigation January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F8300123 (none required)

Att. 3 Investigation F8300123

Attachment4 Data Assessment January 25, 2017 Survey Unit F8300123

200 Histogram for Gamm Static Activity (dpm) Embedded Pipe ctel~

N~rJ Vriuf:i Minm.rn 1.1)99.l<l M~ 12..437 42 190 SD 1.:Jnn s*- 0.81

'"' Kutaris

(;!lM-

U.f 5.(157&1 17\)

'"' I I 8Mo<ian 9Noml<'llO..:ttb.lli-Jn 5J51.0?

I I Olen BS.:

150 0Mae0n:.

I 1'1) I 1ll 11 0 )

I I

( ,oo 90 Ill 60 ll 10

___o _ _

1134 ,,.., 3401 7936 11331! 12471 Page 1 Att. 4 Data Assessment F8300 123

ndivly Q..Q Plot for Gamma Static Activity (dpm) Embedded Pipe ti .. .(JS MeMaStY.:;8 Sd

  • 1382 M.W Slooc
  • 1294 lr1eceep1
  • 5050 Corteb!IOl\.A
  • 0934
  • il r.t.FUn:.o JO)))

/- -----~

~

-~

~~ ...

~- ...........___........

.J 0 Theoretical Quantiles (Standard Normal)

Page2 Att. 4 Data Assessment F8300123