ML19210E618: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
da+=mim "the prcper scope of the em= 4==icn's jurisdicticn to exan:ine health, safety and envir:nmental questiens arising ems the ccnstructicn and cperatien j t | da+=mim "the prcper scope of the em= 4==icn's jurisdicticn to exan:ine health, safety and envir:nmental questiens arising ems the ccnstructicn and cperatien j t | ||
of am net-e facilities and wat 3 -- -l :._ e 2:a a;propriate j | of am net-e facilities and wat 3 -- -l :._ e 2:a a;propriate j | ||
f=r 1darin, m issues, if e =y are - e u. . min the 1,.s | f=r 1darin, m issues, if e =y are - e u. . min the 1,.s autterity". | ||
autterity". | |||
1 1 | 1 1 | ||
1 | 1 I. Iden*d 8#-Stics cf Party i | ||
I. Iden*d 8#-Stics cf Party i | |||
'I | 'I | ||
.I{ | .I{ | ||
Line 88: | Line 84: | ||
th.mx=-1c .and ~ .uysupp1.m,:t.deythe ; | th.mx=-1c .and ~ .uysupp1.m,:t.deythe ; | ||
1494 220 s | 1494 220 s | ||
. l I I | . l I I | ||
Line 168: | Line 163: | ||
a' 3 | a' 3 | ||
o 1494 222 ; | o 1494 222 ; | ||
n' | n' | ||
_j | _j | ||
Line 276: | Line 270: | ||
~ | ~ | ||
ever way it cay doen eclate ;m.:rsuant to its existing .. - , , | ever way it cay doen eclate ;m.:rsuant to its existing .. - , , | ||
i IT=1*4ve mandates and administrative r a-. .,u_-,..,j | i IT=1*4ve mandates and administrative r a-. .,u_-,..,j t * | ||
t * | |||
'' scwever, in the satter of expert licens1=g process, . | '' scwever, in the satter of expert licens1=g process, . | ||
we prepose the c -- - -1 '~--* we have d_4 e ==ad atx:me in respense to Questicn Mc. 4. . | we prepose the c -- - -1 '~--* we have d_4 e ==ad atx:me in respense to Questicn Mc. 4. . | ||
Line 284: | Line 276: | ||
,s I | ,s I | ||
k | k | ||
. ; w-D** 0 *D 3' l | . ; w-D** 0 *D 3' l | ||
Line 315: | Line 306: | ||
for sme export 11cen e sp1fc=+4cc.s fran others. | for sme export 11cen e sp1fc=+4cc.s fran others. | ||
- Fce the h*=<m to adopt cme &^ for cne expert . | - Fce the h*=<m to adopt cme &^ for cne expert . | ||
licanso app 14~+dm and another W fer other geidm**mm . _ - . _. s l. | licanso app 14~+dm and another W fer other geidm**mm . _ - . _. s l. | ||
ad eo say the 1s.st, t. e -~~., and .:nia do ;? | ad eo say the 1s.st, t. e -~~., and .:nia do ;? | ||
Line 322: | Line 312: | ||
y tuticn. It would go against the C5 statutcry assurance 3-arsF to . . | y tuticn. It would go against the C5 statutcry assurance 3-arsF to . . | ||
the ! EPA that the Q11ted States is a reliable and effective ._ | the ! EPA that the Q11ted States is a reliable and effective ._ | ||
m uer e ,_ faeuu.e and fm. Such a e-t1a, :. .... 4 uny lead other estim= to view the US as a P+3 and ' - | m uer e ,_ faeuu.e and fm. Such a e-t1a, :. .... 4 uny lead other estim= to view the US as a P+3 and ' - | ||
4_ -1 ,ue,. ._.._._ | 4_ -1 ,ue,. ._.._._ |
Latest revision as of 11:57, 22 February 2020
ML19210E618 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | 05000574 |
Issue date: | 11/15/1979 |
From: | PHILIPPINES |
To: | NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
Shared Package | |
ML19210E616 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 7912050396 | |
Download: ML19210E618 (8) | |
Text
>
t n
b I' - s'
~.
D"'*]D d dJu
- }~9~}]~
oJu 2.kinlo Mi'
' ' t 2 e (Nr:ID Stm3 & AMERICA g NOV 16137.3 > ::.
III2ZAR REGUIA'ICRY CMtISSICN
., ses e e.
- ) '
s In the matter of ) A;plicat:fcn No. IR = 120 3
62GrTSE ET.ZC:RIC CERP. Ji 1 App 14--efm No. XIM - 0013 ..
(D@erts to the Philippines l D:cket No. 110 - 0495 W =~ * ~ " * ' - ~ -" d ;
i smnerr & vine g 1
hI
== :ar. lear vi tery e---<m eter referred to as the g M*afm") in .*ts Cedar of Octct=r 19, 1979, requests that par *4-?Mard - -
)
any other interested sarsons file with the cm'af v=fm a statement of views car -
h the e.-.1 are sur4-u -< .al sisuse y m_; in the aforesaid creer en -
t!= moeter of tha pending wantircease r"--em for emert license fer the ,
Itfifm4_= P elaar Power Plant.
- t.
It =Taars that the purpeee of the emenf== fen in requesting sutzrissicns "
eme t!= par 4-4m and any other incarenced individuals ce grimm is to 3 1
da+=mim "the prcper scope of the em= 4==icn's jurisdicticn to exan:ine health, safety and envir:nmental questiens arising ems the ccnstructicn and cperatien j t
of am net-e facilities and wat 3 -- -l :._ e 2:a a;propriate j
f=r 1darin, m issues, if e =y are - e u. . min the 1,.s autterity".
1 1
1 I. Iden*d 8#-Stics cf Party i
'I
.I{
e
- he ::atic=al Pcuer Cvtien (he.h referrai to as ":GC") is a l
, -e.u.ica McIly owned by the Gww of the Begublic cf the Philippinse and is charged by Philippine law with the naticeal resecnsibility of under- - - '
taking tha fr e 11*** m , produc tien, *n * =4m and bulk dishW of electricity in the Philippines fm indigenous and otter scurces Of erargy. !
1494 219 ;
. 79120bb l) 1
D"*D
- T OO & J - x
- r l .
t II. Idare4Ma*4m of Interest i
a In rubruary 9,1976, tbs NEC ccatracted the services and v4M cf .
N wastir4heuss Electric corpcratica (hereinafter referred to as we ") ..
9 to ccnstruct a 620 megawatt rnetaar pcwor plant (herairafter referred tot aar.r ; .
(PNPP-1) at Napet Peint, it:rmg, Bataan, Ph41dT4 "aa.
Se cx21 tract between NPC and MP== requires Wes*dP==, antog others, to apply for and in behalf u M, for all thited States ex;:crt licenses 1 and gar =1ts needed for the =himane and transportaticn of equi; cent and
)
S mmMrfain to tbs Philippines that are to be supplied by Westinghcuse. n. . . . ._
1 III. Discussien of Issuna "i 4
4
- 1. mother and if so, to what extent the c=1==fm scesess the loyal 2
- t authority cr a legal +14~*4m to exiunine the heelth, safety and envfremanal 3
impacts of an exgertai rnrtaar facility in reaching its 11censir4 deter =1natten )
==-4'4~11y, whidt of the seven issues raised by petiticr.ars are W=te f fcrm-f-fm rm ,
. j i
I 2e NPC sutztits and maintairs that en the bases of f s
current G rsetaar legislaticn, ireinding the 9cncrable !
rhunt==fm'ss %Ac and precedents cra the 1fmnnfng I
g and regulaticn cf expert of r'e1==v facilities, the r*wf suicn !.
is of M RWt*f to WA t.M M th, safety d 14 enviramental tws of an expected r-e'aar facility.
lf G
is In ailcw (Trratur), 3 NRC 563, 570-577 (1976), Westinghcuse t ziectric Ca aticn ASCO II, Barcelcna, Spain, Licer.m No. XR-99 (Docket !b. 50-4-74) (1976), and *W and Wile =x (Buergeraktien),
5 NBC 1332,1348 (1977), it was t'm-dMai and es*'h14 =havt by the j Hrmerable C:mnissicn that the export licarsir4,. -w under f
th.mx=-1c .and ~ .uysupp1.m,:t.deythe ;
1494 220 s
. l I I
3mm0 "
0 W g
'd 6 o S k}UL f
I I
l 1
-3 I --
Nuclear Ncn-Pm14*antL:n Act Ca@A) was not intanded to examirm ce _
l evaluate the health, safety and envizt:rz: ental t: pacts arisir4 f j !
cutside the thited States territcry from esgorted nuclear ** 4 ties.
5 s
.. :_._ r.,*ar e <re.1 lar and ethics suggests that the mwirah1 a -d 4
rwa.4.c...m shculd not arregate unto itself the ecnsideraticn of .-
==a474a health, safety and envircrs: ental 1:: pacts of an experted ,
L ruetaar facility cn the territcry that is within the severeign 3' d
3urwicticn of a fcreign -._.c, las e rh111a>1r.s. fer _
er this will lead to a situatica cf applyirq U.S. law to acticns j tt
-*? in a f=raign naticn. It is a custcznary rule cf inter- 4
'l
'**==1 las that crie country cannot 1: pose a requirement up:n .. q a foruign natica cr up:n its citi= ens within tra *=r -4*-r421
'tg s
jnrd df-*4 m of that fcraign naticn. j
% e= feregcing cIr emticos, e, <nly is== raised :
- I by the petiticriers idtich NPC cesfAars as apprt:priate fcr .
2 omstasim revier and idtich are not related to the axpert 4 of . elaar fac111 time, ars ::stters of generic safety questicns j pceed by rarimar power plants whicft are of US :normfact=re and
{
crigin. . {
I.
- 2. Is the wenim's health, safety or envirt:renntal review of
{
e export licWine ag211catiens II:nited to the cN.icIl cf t.h issues With ea !
3 US mn=rm <'afaram and se::uritf or are there other legal prirciples which per: nit ),
cr require the tw.uniemim to exa:Zine these : matters as part of its licensirq _
I 4
1
==v1=a i
.l l i 1
. - ,manee,c5 1_ eramn :
"-4ts the review of expert license a; plica-mm df em c:::nissica to : natters affeering the US mwn deferse ard sec=rity and .en- .
I 1-m14w= goals en the cra hard and to assure cear reticra -
1494 221 4 l
I i
l
@ ant l
A 3
- 1 I that the US is a r=1f ahia ard prdr *=h1= supplier of rnetaar ho j
I fusis ard ==4==a*-
i b
~
A full rendirq of the se=*==rst of policy ard purpcees (
--- = ' of the talPA irn4fr-=+== that the U.S. Cc:grees did not interd .,
the thenf amim to dictate raf fr-daa of other naticns re2 #.ive to ..
their ruetaae energy program nor of steti*"*dng CS wisd m in the rur_1 mar field in the place of trat of t.% inportirq country. 2e mattar of safety, health ard envirmmetal j ispacts of rarlaar power plants whether ex;crted frm the ,
l I Cs ce fim ether su; plier nacims are issues within the
~~
excl'asive ard legitimate concem of the inscrting country. ,.
{
d 2e fact of the matter is that the P414=4_n* Coverrrent er - .
4 any other cotuttry fer that matter a:nald still ccostruct ard operate a nuclear reacter within its territerial Wicn .
. with ccepcrects and stuismant etained fra suppliers other than I the U.s. Las, teatever probles pened by the mPP-1 cn the -
~
netter of health, safety ard envircznantal IW lies rest 4 i
qvr Inmively within the regulatory authority and laws of the ]
1 7 414 T ma 4
Covemnant . I i
i 2e N==fm, in its acticn m enczt license applica-tims, should ret act in tetal disregard of the fcreign pc11cy I t
'i14'-=**ma of its acticns. 2 e N ==4 m should make its !
l
.} f..,- cn the basis of tra views and 4n%+4m received by j i 4,
! it f:m the rcre authoritative agencies of t.% CS ww-t -
g
' cn cutters of foreign policy. Again, the fact of the matter l.
is that the CS Danct:tive Branch has rendered a faverable 1*
ltz$gment on the expert license a;plications fcr the N FP-L 5 af after a thc=cogh evaluation of tra statutcry criteria cf tra 22&A cm experts fcr rnelaar uses f:tm the U.S. j
+
a' 3
o 1494 222 ;
n'
_j
j i
i
-s- 4 4
1
! To inject core critaria thart tdiat is required by l Statutes would be ignoring the traditimal forms of d
-[ ccmcemafm, e, arwwurdaciert, v4=+4m and . _
cutual adjuct=ent of interests which has diur . Mad l $
~-
l the W of the Cnited States in its relaticns with -t _- rn -- j I
farsign naticns. It would maan a detarieratian of the C5 ..
I k credential as a reliable suppliar of nuclear aq"4== + and [
-l .
t catarials 5d11cft is cne M the goals istandai to be achieved by tNPA. i 3
k e
- 3. Mint issume arising frcIn the app"**= to export a relaar .e, .
r facility to the Philippi:me shot.1d the crewrf enfm examine in any future publie - -
W i-? -
As we have maintained in our respense to Questicn No. 2 ateve, the cnly issues that the r*-wnif e=4rvs may legitimately <
l.
ex ine and zw1., relative to nuclear expert lic-se ar"~4m , a 1,
be it for the 1*'4"~'= or any other foreign ecuntry, are thces affecting the enwrvs defense and sec:rity of the U.S. !
, and its ncn-proliferaticn goals as delirmated in the NNPA. f i
It will be recallani that Philippira PrweWnt FerdinaM E. Marece, as a result of the S.ree-Mile Island incident 6
- - d cn March 28, 1979, crdered a ev=4m of plant -
const xtien cn the INPP-1 and at the same time c: mated an !
investigative panel (Philippine ernmisafrvi) to ccrdJct an I
-l l' irrat:y cn the safeer of the PnPe-l. em Ph4"-sra i.
P cewef amim taz=1nated its hearings en Sw --r 14, 1979.
l
?m Philippine (*,m 4==4m has also secured the services of '
intam.aticnally kncun experts to act as its tac.h t
advisers in assessing and evaluatir4 the evidences and I testi:rnies sutznitted by t!n participants. "hus, it will i.
1494 223
oo . . - - - - . ... . . _ . . .
h
. o do bb,
.s_
ig
~ ~~
be seen that the P5414r4= Coverment m4== the fact _ _ ,
- that tbs heath, safr.y and erwf mm=r*=_1 igv.:ts arising fma ,,
the sr.wh at:1 eventual c5eraticn of the HIFP-1 are ...
-l matters within the jurisdiction of the Ph111; pine coverment . . . .,p
", to assess and evaluate web the c3 coverment in general u a,m [
and the c-4 == 4 m in particular aust respect an$ 7 =. 4 I
I It is not unlikaty tnat the findings of the . tilippira ,
e-4==1cn may nct be censistent with the frndings of the .
CS nulaar P-1=*ery emrn4 ==4m. An h ==45 sit::aticn would thus arise with unwarranted 6 .-- 4ms to the ,, , , , , _
foreign relaticns of the C3 with the P541*T = in the 4
., :,, 7,,,,
event of mcs.sy findings between the two tedies cn healti., j safety and envircznantal. impacts of the REFP-1.
- 4. Miat : -- I fcnnat snould the emenf ==4m adopt to examine arf 4 feraign health, safety and erw4m==+=1 issume falling within its pH 84-**m(, , , , .,,
4 i
s Cn the asetapticn that arr/ foreign health, safeef and )
en rf _m==r+=1 issues adversely affect the cranen Man == and I L
security of the CS f v1
- M its tw14h+4m goals, j h
the pr+=h4tity of which is far fetched with respect to , , . , , e Pb41*y4= applicaticn fer exp::rt license, it is rem ==4_ _
1 that the r_- Mi fcz=st that the C:nmirten should a$cpt , ,
j is a ncn-adversarf type of inquiry apprewd=*45 a legislative .,
r ccanittee hearing. "Ja parties /participartts will initially . _ _ _
e l
l h.aam to - tpcamm - andemsm ntav1-s- !
- - 1, eiu.ated by e ~ ,= m . m e = h m e, i,-
a -a - 1.gits.cy a th.1.- mterests med g f m e m a d by m - ==4- s m t ,a,e -
to par - to m e 1 ,. ;
1494 224 i t
3 e
t l
i DDD P n l
I ML ht _
j 4
3
- 7_ .}
caly the -en+=rs ce the ccumissica ce of the W*=
' - ~ ~
. . . , _f H
i investige*xi sonst will be aliced to ask cuesticms to elicit _- . _ , . - _. : q details and infer =aticn fram the parties / participants detemined to . . . . _ _ . .
be eligible by the -==4~ to participate in the fix;uiry. $
a 1
A party / participant shall have no right to mmd_ ._~.
==**== or cress-examine witnesses, any adverse party / par +4 **="*
l in centrast to, and as tculd nct happen in, a Court reca type of . _ _ .
W inc=. 21s wuld a1emi the emiurien czzplete centrcl 3 s
of the prec=ad4*? and will preclude the ===4k+14ty of investigating _
g and placing a trial highly sensitiw fereign policy and natimal- _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
interest and security atters of the imperting country, incitriing _-.gn ;. $
the Inporting c:z.mtry's pcli*d-=1 system, internaticnal and _ . . - - . - . . , ,
n*4 m.1 714c4 .
s
- 5. If health, safety and env4-=1 as; mets of a CS e-14=d r clami- ,
facility are to be avainead in the NRC exp:It 14-*47 process, is what ,,,,. . _-
~~
s
-4,4e m.,. .hmid this review be -- - t d4 8'--ly frem the n=4 ==fm's -
dmastic reactor linanming W#"e=7 Shculd the socpe of review be different, - - {
and if so, in what preci** way? l
+
2e NPC sttmits and unintains that the omniumien may i t
c:r: duct its amantic reacter 14-4m prec==d4== in what- ,
~
ever way it cay doen eclate ;m.:rsuant to its existing .. - , ,
i IT=1*4ve mandates and administrative r a-. .,u_-,..,j t *
scwever, in the satter of expert licens1=g process, .
we prepose the c -- - -1 '~--* we have d_4 e ==ad atx:me in respense to Questicn Mc. 4. .
1494 225 ,
,s I
k
. ; w-D** 0 *D 3' l
} f3_2
' E c c Ju c Ju ., .. .i 3
E d,
i ..
.- 8 .-
l .
.(
f)
- 6. Are there any factual cr legal consideratials diich w:uld justify '
a af **= rent IGC health, safety cr er:vLm
+=1 review for sm e egcet ife=e==
.]A ge14~**ma that for others? q=-47*-=1'y, are such cmsidaraticrJ ge14=hle
. : =:. =.1 .- $
t to the present niatter? ' -
[
e <~<m a cutside of the statutcry m'< ---+ for the -
~~~
M
! j t
' to nieke a ff:xiing cn the effects of the ex;x:xt of a riv-Tw 1 t ;;
facility cn the mwn defense a:xi se:mity of the US and 9
,e its w14 **v-=**m goals as m*14nad in the !aeA, IGC does not ..__.r. J 4
see any other sutstantial factual er legal ~=<d-tim = which w: : - .=.:
w:uld justify ce required a different c =f ==ias app =cach _
. "h..
l.
for sme export 11cen e sp1fc=+4cc.s fran others.
- Fce the h*=<m to adopt cme &^ for cne expert .
licanso app 14~+dm and another W fer other geidm**mm . _ - . _. s l.
ad eo say the 1s.st, t. e -~~., and .:nia do ;?
ti-violence to the equal pr +m<m provisicns of the US c:nsti- .
~
y tuticn. It would go against the C5 statutcry assurance 3-arsF to . .
the ! EPA that the Q11ted States is a reliable and effective ._
m uer e ,_ faeuu.e and fm. Such a e-t1a, :. .... 4 uny lead other estim= to view the US as a P+3 and ' -
4_ -1 ,ue,. ._.._._
.f I
! Mast 3
' ':he devalerim countrhs in the Far East and Sout. -
3
.e x.m e., _ m o m e 1d a m u ut1,4 ~ _ - - - -- . f
_ watcmr .u h .nterest the ~ . ut-t. m
_. _. j g
issuance er Scn-issuance of the ex@ 11 cense a; plicatic,J fcrth. --1.m certer - aprecumd-~ - m f
any naticnal def m these c:xr:tries will ::nks as to which 4 supplier count:*/ they Will *i..:rn to for WAir riv-'w pcNer
~
1494 226 ,
9 e
e