Statement of Views by Natl Power Corp,Agency of Govt of Philippines,In Response to Commission 791019 Order.Atomic Energy & Nuclear Nonproliferation Acts Were Not Promulgated to Dictate Policies on Foreign NationsML19210E618 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
05000574 |
---|
Issue date: |
11/15/1979 |
---|
From: |
PHILIPPINES |
---|
To: |
NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML19210E616 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 7912050396 |
Download: ML19210E618 (8) |
|
|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML19310A6271980-06-10010 June 1980 Brief on Appeal Before Us Court of Appeals,Dc Circuit,From Commission 800506 Orders.Case Must Be Remanded to Examine Us Common Defense & Security Under Atomic Energy Act,Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act & Nepa.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19305D4561980-04-0303 April 1980 Motion to Stay Effectiveness of Final Order,Pending Appeal & Judicial Review Re Nuclear Reactor Export to Philippines. Delay in Shipment Will Not Injure Interests of Exporter or Parties.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19294C1251980-02-29029 February 1980 Comments in Response to Commission 800208 Order Requesting Further Views on Proposed Reactor Export to Philippines. Effects on Global Commons Subminimal Per Apr 1976 Fes on Us Nuclear Power Export process,ERDA-1542.W/Certificate of Svc ML19290E3061980-02-29029 February 1980 Statement of Views in Response to Commission 800208 Order Requesting Further Submittals Re Nuclear Reactor Export to Philippines.Urges Preparation of EIS Updating ERDA-1542 & Addressing Possible Environ Impacts on Us & Global Commons ML19294C1191980-02-29029 February 1980 Comments in Response to Commission 800208 Order Requesting Further Views on Proposed Reactor Export to Philippines. Impact on Clark Air Force Base & Subic Bay Naval Station Sufficient to Pose Threat.W/Certificate of Svc ML19294C1071980-02-29029 February 1980 Response to Commission 800208 Order Requesting Further Views on Proposed Reactor Export to Philippines.Apr 1976 Fes on Us Nuclear Power Export activities,ERDA-1542,should Be Applied.Effects on Global Commons Not Related to Us Defense ML19322E2601980-02-28028 February 1980 Statement Opposing Proposed Export of Reactor & Matls to Philippines by Westinghouse.Nrc Should Not Approve Export of Reactor & Matls for Power Plant to Be Constructed on Slope of Volcano ML19294B6441980-02-28028 February 1980 Comments in Response to Commission 800208 Order Re Reactor Export to Philippines.License Should Be Issued Immediately. NRC Already Adequately Addressed Health Safety & Environ Effects ML19290E7051980-02-27027 February 1980 Comments & Argument in Response to Commission 800208 Order Inviting Further Views Re Nuclear Reactor Export to Philippines.Adopts Wl Cummings 800129 Encl Affidavit Re Health,Safety & Environ Effects on Global Commons or Us Land ML19294B6041980-02-26026 February 1980 Comments in Response to Commission 791019 & 800208 Orders Re Reactor Export to Philippines.Steps Taken by Philippine Govt Assure No Adverse Health & Environ Effects on Us Global Commons.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19290E7081980-01-29029 January 1980 Affidavit Urging Denial of Nuclear Reactor Export to Philippines.Export Threaten Philippine Sovereignity, Jeopardizes Global Commons & Affects Us Natl Security. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19211C6621979-12-27027 December 1979 Comments on NRC 791119 Position Per Commission 791019 Order. Urges Compliance w/1954 Atomic Energy Act Re Limitation of NRC Jurisdiction to Common Defense & Security of Us ML19211C6241979-12-27027 December 1979 Comments by National Power Corp of Philippines on NRC 791119 Submittal in Response to Commission 791019 Order.Urges Compliance W/Us 1954 Atomic Energy Act Limiting NRC Jurisdiction to Common Defense & Security of Us ML19257A3961979-12-19019 December 1979 Response to Westinghouse Objection to Friends of the Filipino People Request to Intervene.No Delay or Prejudice Will Arise from Granting of Request.No Other Group Can Represent Interests of Petitioners ML19257A6591979-12-19019 December 1979 Response in Opposition to Westinghouse Answer Objecting to Friends of the Filipino People Request to Intervene.Adopts Ctr for Development Policy,Movement for Environ Protection & Jn Perlas 790604 Consolidated Reply.W/Certificate of Svc ML19260C6721979-12-18018 December 1979 Reply to Applicant Response to Petitioner Motion to Intervene.Urges Commission to Grant Intervention.Affidavit of Support & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19260B6141979-11-29029 November 1979 Response in Opposition to Ctr for Development Policy, Philippine Movement for Environ Protection,Movement for Free Philippines & Nj Perias 791119 Pleading.Waiver of Export Rules Will Create Uncertainty Among Importing Countries ML19210E5401979-11-21021 November 1979 Response to NRC 791019 Request for Views on Philippine Export Proceedings.Hearing on Seven Items Outlined in 790419 Petition to Intervene Requested ML19210E5831979-11-19019 November 1979 Affidavit of C Planas on 791119 Re Westinghouse Application to Export Nuclear Reactor to Philippines.Application Should Be Denied Due to Health & Safety Risks & High Cost of Maint ML19260A6281979-11-19019 November 1979 Response to Commission 791019 Order Requesting Views on Nuclear Reactor Export to Philippines.Requests Hearing on Issues Presented in 790419 Petition to Intervene.Supporting Documentation Encl ML19262A9881979-11-19019 November 1979 Brief in Lieu of Pleading,Re Nuclear Reactor Export to Philippines.Questions Ability of Less Developed Nations to Deal W/Nuclear Technology Issues.Supporting Documentation Encl ML19253C3591979-11-19019 November 1979 Memorandum Stating Position Re Export of Nuclear Reactor to Philippines in Response to NRC 791019 Order.Nrc Has No Jurisdiction Over Matters Affecting Health & Safety in Foreign Countries.Certificate of Svc & Exhibits Encl ML19210E4861979-11-19019 November 1979 Comments in Response to Commission 791019 Order Requesting Views on Commission Jurisdiction to Consider Nuclear Reactor Effects in Foreign Country.Proceeding Affects Foreign Policy Which NRC Cannot Formulate ML19210E6181979-11-15015 November 1979 Statement of Views by Natl Power Corp,Agency of Govt of Philippines,In Response to Commission 791019 Order.Atomic Energy & Nuclear Nonproliferation Acts Were Not Promulgated to Dictate Policies on Foreign Nations ML19210D9251979-11-14014 November 1979 Response to Commission 791019 Order for Views on Procedural & Jurisdictional Issues.Relevant Legal Considerations Discussed May Justify Different NRC Health,Safety & Environ Reviews for Some Export License Applications ML19253C1351979-11-12012 November 1979 Affidavit Alleging That Philippine Govt Has Not Carefully Considered Impacts of Proposed Reactor.Nrc Should Conduct Thorough Health,Safety & Environ Review.Reactor Would Be Unsafe.Exhibits Encl ML19253C1231979-11-12012 November 1979 Petition to Intervene in Form of Brief Requesting License Denial.Urges Review of Commission 791019 Order Re Seismic & Geological Risks,Design Adequacy,Environ Impact,Spent Fuel Disposition & Other Issues.Hearings Requested ML19210D9791979-11-12012 November 1979 Responds to 791019 Order Requesting Views on Jurisdictional & Procedural Issues.Nrc Failed to Comply w/791004 Deadline for Implementation of Executive Order 12114.NRC Is Restrained from Action on Westinghouse Application ML19250C6581979-11-0808 November 1979 Natl Power Corp Statement of Views Re Pending Westinghouse Export Application.Export License Should Be Granted W/O Further Proceedings ML19268B9901979-11-0606 November 1979 Affidavit Stating Observation of Commission 790623-0810 & 0913-14 Hearing in Philadelphia,Pa.Objects to Scope of Hearing & Limited Opportunity Given to Participants ML19256F0671979-11-0202 November 1979 Brief in Lieu of Pleading Per Commission 791019 Order Inviting Submittal of Questions Re Scope of Commission Jurisdiction Over Foreign Environ.Alleges That Environ Impacts in Philippines May Be Connected W/Us Security ML19256F0731979-10-19019 October 1979 Affidavit Alleging That Westinghouse Has Been Bribed by Marcos Govt.Contends That Location of Reactor on Slope of Volcano Believed to Be Active Will Cause Harm to Us Military Personnel Located in Adjacent Areas ML19256F0721979-10-19019 October 1979 Affidavit Alleging That Philippine Environmental Matters Will Be Aggravated by Allowing Exportation of Nuclear Reactor from Us.Urges Commission to Disapprove Proposal ML19209D2001979-10-10010 October 1979 Notice of Friends of Filipino People Intention to File 791016 Petition to Intervene,Along W/Opposition & Request for Participation.States Experience Gained in Representing Us Citizens Concerned About US-Philippines Relations ML19254C8261979-10-0909 October 1979 Supplemental Memorandum in Response to NRC Supplemental Answer.Psar & Other Primary Evidence Were Prepared by Members of Group Applying for Full Participation in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc & Affidavits Encl ML19261F1541979-10-0909 October 1979 Answer in Opposition to Movement for Free Philippines Motion to Amend 791003 Petition to Intervene & Request for Hearing. Petition Is Untimely & Does Not Satisfy Requirements. Separate Intervention Status Should Not Be Granted ML19254F0231979-10-0303 October 1979 Motion That Ctr for Development Policy 790419 Petition to Intervenor Be Amended to Add Movement for Free Philippines as Petitioner.Members Are Political Refugees.Affidavit of H Alvarez & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19254F0261979-10-0303 October 1979 Supplemental Memorandum in Support of 790420 Petition to Intervene & Request for Adjudicatory Public Hearing.Asserts Vital Interest in Export Proceeding ML19254C8511979-10-0303 October 1979 Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Ctr for Development 790420 Petition to Intervene & Request for Hearing.Alleges Discovery of Contradicting Applicant Submittal ML19254C8451979-10-0303 October 1979 Motion to Amend 790419 Petition to Intervene & Request for Hearing.Participation Will Draw Filipino Attention to Risks & Hazards Created by Reactor.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19254F0271979-09-28028 September 1979 Affidavit of L Mattison on 791003 Re Supplemental Memorandum to 790420 Petition to Intervene.Intervention Is in Public Interest & Would Assist NRC in Making Required Determinations.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19254C8521979-09-28028 September 1979 Affidavit Attesting That Ctr for Development Policy Conducts Independent,Nonpartisan Research of Us Development Programs, W/Primary Attention Focused on Nanot Point Reactor Project. Requests Intervention to Present Evidence ML19254C8501979-08-31031 August 1979 Affidavit Attesting Authorization to Intervene on Behalf of Movement of Free Philippines.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19254D4891979-07-11011 July 1979 Transcript of Republic of Philippines Commission on Nuclear Power Plants 790711-13 Hearings in Manila,Philippines. Transcript Divided Into Sections by Stenographer ML19261D6981979-06-0404 June 1979 Joint Reply of Petitioners to NRC & Westinghouse Request for Denial of Intervenor Status.Petitioners Have Standing Under All Applicable Tests.Consolidation of Licenses Will Aid Proceedings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19257A2541979-05-23023 May 1979 Answer in Opposition to Friends of the Filipino People & Coalition Against Reactor Exports 791106 & 15 Briefs. Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Standing & Raised Questions Outside NRC Jurisdiction.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19269D9811979-05-23023 May 1979 Applicant Answer to 790419 Petition to Intervene.Joint Intervenors Are Untimely,Lack Standing,Raise Issues Outside Jurisdiction of NRC & Fail to Demonstrate That Hearing Is in Public Interest.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19263E2461979-04-19019 April 1979 Petition to Intervene & Request for Hearing Per 10CFR110 by Ctr for Development Policy,Jn Perlas & Philippine Movement for Environ Protection.Supporting Documentation Encl 1980-06-10
[Table view] Category:PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML19305D4561980-04-0303 April 1980 Motion to Stay Effectiveness of Final Order,Pending Appeal & Judicial Review Re Nuclear Reactor Export to Philippines. Delay in Shipment Will Not Injure Interests of Exporter or Parties.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19290E3061980-02-29029 February 1980 Statement of Views in Response to Commission 800208 Order Requesting Further Submittals Re Nuclear Reactor Export to Philippines.Urges Preparation of EIS Updating ERDA-1542 & Addressing Possible Environ Impacts on Us & Global Commons ML19294C1071980-02-29029 February 1980 Response to Commission 800208 Order Requesting Further Views on Proposed Reactor Export to Philippines.Apr 1976 Fes on Us Nuclear Power Export activities,ERDA-1542,should Be Applied.Effects on Global Commons Not Related to Us Defense ML19294C1191980-02-29029 February 1980 Comments in Response to Commission 800208 Order Requesting Further Views on Proposed Reactor Export to Philippines. Impact on Clark Air Force Base & Subic Bay Naval Station Sufficient to Pose Threat.W/Certificate of Svc ML19294C1251980-02-29029 February 1980 Comments in Response to Commission 800208 Order Requesting Further Views on Proposed Reactor Export to Philippines. Effects on Global Commons Subminimal Per Apr 1976 Fes on Us Nuclear Power Export process,ERDA-1542.W/Certificate of Svc ML19322E2601980-02-28028 February 1980 Statement Opposing Proposed Export of Reactor & Matls to Philippines by Westinghouse.Nrc Should Not Approve Export of Reactor & Matls for Power Plant to Be Constructed on Slope of Volcano ML19294B6441980-02-28028 February 1980 Comments in Response to Commission 800208 Order Re Reactor Export to Philippines.License Should Be Issued Immediately. NRC Already Adequately Addressed Health Safety & Environ Effects ML19290E7051980-02-27027 February 1980 Comments & Argument in Response to Commission 800208 Order Inviting Further Views Re Nuclear Reactor Export to Philippines.Adopts Wl Cummings 800129 Encl Affidavit Re Health,Safety & Environ Effects on Global Commons or Us Land ML19294B6041980-02-26026 February 1980 Comments in Response to Commission 791019 & 800208 Orders Re Reactor Export to Philippines.Steps Taken by Philippine Govt Assure No Adverse Health & Environ Effects on Us Global Commons.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19211C6621979-12-27027 December 1979 Comments on NRC 791119 Position Per Commission 791019 Order. Urges Compliance w/1954 Atomic Energy Act Re Limitation of NRC Jurisdiction to Common Defense & Security of Us ML19211C6241979-12-27027 December 1979 Comments by National Power Corp of Philippines on NRC 791119 Submittal in Response to Commission 791019 Order.Urges Compliance W/Us 1954 Atomic Energy Act Limiting NRC Jurisdiction to Common Defense & Security of Us ML19257A6591979-12-19019 December 1979 Response in Opposition to Westinghouse Answer Objecting to Friends of the Filipino People Request to Intervene.Adopts Ctr for Development Policy,Movement for Environ Protection & Jn Perlas 790604 Consolidated Reply.W/Certificate of Svc ML19257A3961979-12-19019 December 1979 Response to Westinghouse Objection to Friends of the Filipino People Request to Intervene.No Delay or Prejudice Will Arise from Granting of Request.No Other Group Can Represent Interests of Petitioners ML19260C6721979-12-18018 December 1979 Reply to Applicant Response to Petitioner Motion to Intervene.Urges Commission to Grant Intervention.Affidavit of Support & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19260B6141979-11-29029 November 1979 Response in Opposition to Ctr for Development Policy, Philippine Movement for Environ Protection,Movement for Free Philippines & Nj Perias 791119 Pleading.Waiver of Export Rules Will Create Uncertainty Among Importing Countries ML19210E5401979-11-21021 November 1979 Response to NRC 791019 Request for Views on Philippine Export Proceedings.Hearing on Seven Items Outlined in 790419 Petition to Intervene Requested ML19210E4861979-11-19019 November 1979 Comments in Response to Commission 791019 Order Requesting Views on Commission Jurisdiction to Consider Nuclear Reactor Effects in Foreign Country.Proceeding Affects Foreign Policy Which NRC Cannot Formulate ML19262A9881979-11-19019 November 1979 Brief in Lieu of Pleading,Re Nuclear Reactor Export to Philippines.Questions Ability of Less Developed Nations to Deal W/Nuclear Technology Issues.Supporting Documentation Encl ML19260A6281979-11-19019 November 1979 Response to Commission 791019 Order Requesting Views on Nuclear Reactor Export to Philippines.Requests Hearing on Issues Presented in 790419 Petition to Intervene.Supporting Documentation Encl ML19253C3591979-11-19019 November 1979 Memorandum Stating Position Re Export of Nuclear Reactor to Philippines in Response to NRC 791019 Order.Nrc Has No Jurisdiction Over Matters Affecting Health & Safety in Foreign Countries.Certificate of Svc & Exhibits Encl ML19210E6181979-11-15015 November 1979 Statement of Views by Natl Power Corp,Agency of Govt of Philippines,In Response to Commission 791019 Order.Atomic Energy & Nuclear Nonproliferation Acts Were Not Promulgated to Dictate Policies on Foreign Nations ML19210D9251979-11-14014 November 1979 Response to Commission 791019 Order for Views on Procedural & Jurisdictional Issues.Relevant Legal Considerations Discussed May Justify Different NRC Health,Safety & Environ Reviews for Some Export License Applications ML19210D9791979-11-12012 November 1979 Responds to 791019 Order Requesting Views on Jurisdictional & Procedural Issues.Nrc Failed to Comply w/791004 Deadline for Implementation of Executive Order 12114.NRC Is Restrained from Action on Westinghouse Application ML19250C6581979-11-0808 November 1979 Natl Power Corp Statement of Views Re Pending Westinghouse Export Application.Export License Should Be Granted W/O Further Proceedings ML19256F0671979-11-0202 November 1979 Brief in Lieu of Pleading Per Commission 791019 Order Inviting Submittal of Questions Re Scope of Commission Jurisdiction Over Foreign Environ.Alleges That Environ Impacts in Philippines May Be Connected W/Us Security ML19261F1541979-10-0909 October 1979 Answer in Opposition to Movement for Free Philippines Motion to Amend 791003 Petition to Intervene & Request for Hearing. Petition Is Untimely & Does Not Satisfy Requirements. Separate Intervention Status Should Not Be Granted ML19254C8261979-10-0909 October 1979 Supplemental Memorandum in Response to NRC Supplemental Answer.Psar & Other Primary Evidence Were Prepared by Members of Group Applying for Full Participation in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc & Affidavits Encl ML19254F0231979-10-0303 October 1979 Motion That Ctr for Development Policy 790419 Petition to Intervenor Be Amended to Add Movement for Free Philippines as Petitioner.Members Are Political Refugees.Affidavit of H Alvarez & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19254F0261979-10-0303 October 1979 Supplemental Memorandum in Support of 790420 Petition to Intervene & Request for Adjudicatory Public Hearing.Asserts Vital Interest in Export Proceeding ML19254C8451979-10-0303 October 1979 Motion to Amend 790419 Petition to Intervene & Request for Hearing.Participation Will Draw Filipino Attention to Risks & Hazards Created by Reactor.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19261D6981979-06-0404 June 1979 Joint Reply of Petitioners to NRC & Westinghouse Request for Denial of Intervenor Status.Petitioners Have Standing Under All Applicable Tests.Consolidation of Licenses Will Aid Proceedings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19257A2541979-05-23023 May 1979 Answer in Opposition to Friends of the Filipino People & Coalition Against Reactor Exports 791106 & 15 Briefs. Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Standing & Raised Questions Outside NRC Jurisdiction.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19269D9811979-05-23023 May 1979 Applicant Answer to 790419 Petition to Intervene.Joint Intervenors Are Untimely,Lack Standing,Raise Issues Outside Jurisdiction of NRC & Fail to Demonstrate That Hearing Is in Public Interest.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19263E2461979-04-19019 April 1979 Petition to Intervene & Request for Hearing Per 10CFR110 by Ctr for Development Policy,Jn Perlas & Philippine Movement for Environ Protection.Supporting Documentation Encl 1980-04-03
[Table view] |
Text
>
t n
b I' - s'
~.
D"'*]D d dJu
oJu 2.kinlo Mi'
' ' t 2 e (Nr:ID Stm3 & AMERICA g NOV 16137.3 > ::.
III2ZAR REGUIA'ICRY CMtISSICN
., ses e e.
s In the matter of ) A;plicat:fcn No. IR = 120 3
62GrTSE ET.ZC:RIC CERP. Ji 1 App 14--efm No. XIM - 0013 ..
(D@erts to the Philippines l D:cket No. 110 - 0495 W =~ * ~ " * ' - ~ -" d ;
i smnerr & vine g 1
hI
== :ar. lear vi tery e---<m eter referred to as the g M*afm") in .*ts Cedar of Octct=r 19, 1979, requests that par *4-?Mard - -
)
any other interested sarsons file with the cm'af v=fm a statement of views car -
h the e.-.1 are sur4-u -< .al sisuse y m_; in the aforesaid creer en -
t!= moeter of tha pending wantircease r"--em for emert license fer the ,
Itfifm4_= P elaar Power Plant.
- t.
It =Taars that the purpeee of the emenf== fen in requesting sutzrissicns "
eme t!= par 4-4m and any other incarenced individuals ce grimm is to 3 1
da+=mim "the prcper scope of the em= 4==icn's jurisdicticn to exan:ine health, safety and envir:nmental questiens arising ems the ccnstructicn and cperatien j t
of am net-e facilities and wat 3 -- -l :._ e 2:a a;propriate j
f=r 1darin, m issues, if e =y are - e u. . min the 1,.s autterity".
1 1
1 I. Iden*d 8#-Stics cf Party i
'I
.I{
e
- he ::atic=al Pcuer Cvtien (he.h referrai to as ":GC") is a l
, -e.u.ica McIly owned by the Gww of the Begublic cf the Philippinse and is charged by Philippine law with the naticeal resecnsibility of under- - - '
taking tha fr e 11*** m , produc tien, *n * =4m and bulk dishW of electricity in the Philippines fm indigenous and otter scurces Of erargy. !
1494 219 ;
. 79120bb l) 1
D"*D
t II. Idare4Ma*4m of Interest i
a In rubruary 9,1976, tbs NEC ccatracted the services and v4M cf .
N wastir4heuss Electric corpcratica (hereinafter referred to as we ") ..
9 to ccnstruct a 620 megawatt rnetaar pcwor plant (herairafter referred tot aar.r ; .
(PNPP-1) at Napet Peint, it:rmg, Bataan, Ph41dT4 "aa.
Se cx21 tract between NPC and MP== requires Wes*dP==, antog others, to apply for and in behalf u M, for all thited States ex;:crt licenses 1 and gar =1ts needed for the =himane and transportaticn of equi; cent and
)
S mmMrfain to tbs Philippines that are to be supplied by Westinghcuse. n. . . . ._
1 III. Discussien of Issuna "i 4
4
- 1. mother and if so, to what extent the c=1==fm scesess the loyal 2
- t authority cr a legal +14~*4m to exiunine the heelth, safety and envfremanal 3
impacts of an exgertai rnrtaar facility in reaching its 11censir4 deter =1natten )
==-4'4~11y, whidt of the seven issues raised by petiticr.ars are W=te f fcrm-f-fm rm ,
. j i
I 2e NPC sutztits and maintairs that en the bases of f s
current G rsetaar legislaticn, ireinding the 9cncrable !
rhunt==fm'ss %Ac and precedents cra the 1fmnnfng I
g and regulaticn cf expert of r'e1==v facilities, the r*wf suicn !.
is of M RWt*f to WA t.M M th, safety d 14 enviramental tws of an expected r-e'aar facility.
lf G
is In ailcw (Trratur), 3 NRC 563, 570-577 (1976), Westinghcuse t ziectric Ca aticn ASCO II, Barcelcna, Spain, Licer.m No. XR-99 (Docket !b. 50-4-74) (1976), and *W and Wile =x (Buergeraktien),
5 NBC 1332,1348 (1977), it was t'm-dMai and es*'h14 =havt by the j Hrmerable C:mnissicn that the export licarsir4,. -w under f
th.mx=-1c .and ~ .uysupp1.m,:t.deythe ;
1494 220 s
. l I I
3mm0 "
0 W g
'd 6 o S k}UL f
I I
l 1
-3 I --
Nuclear Ncn-Pm14*antL:n Act Ca@A) was not intanded to examirm ce _
l evaluate the health, safety and envizt:rz: ental t: pacts arisir4 f j !
cutside the thited States territcry from esgorted nuclear ** 4 ties.
5 s
.. :_._ r.,*ar e <re.1 lar and ethics suggests that the mwirah1 a -d 4
rwa.4.c...m shculd not arregate unto itself the ecnsideraticn of .-
==a474a health, safety and envircrs: ental 1:: pacts of an experted ,
L ruetaar facility cn the territcry that is within the severeign 3' d
3urwicticn of a fcreign -._.c, las e rh111a>1r.s. fer _
er this will lead to a situatica cf applyirq U.S. law to acticns j tt
-*? in a f=raign naticn. It is a custcznary rule cf inter- 4
'l
'**==1 las that crie country cannot 1: pose a requirement up:n .. q a foruign natica cr up:n its citi= ens within tra *=r -4*-r421
'tg s
jnrd df-*4 m of that fcraign naticn. j
% e= feregcing cIr emticos, e, <nly is== raised :
- I by the petiticriers idtich NPC cesfAars as apprt:priate fcr .
2 omstasim revier and idtich are not related to the axpert 4 of . elaar fac111 time, ars ::stters of generic safety questicns j pceed by rarimar power plants whicft are of US :normfact=re and
{
crigin. . {
I.
- 2. Is the wenim's health, safety or envirt:renntal review of
{
e export licWine ag211catiens II:nited to the cN.icIl cf t.h issues With ea !
3 US mn=rm <'afaram and se::uritf or are there other legal prirciples which per: nit ),
cr require the tw.uniemim to exa:Zine these : matters as part of its licensirq _
I 4
1
==v1=a i
.l l i 1
. - ,manee,c5 1_ eramn :
"-4ts the review of expert license a; plica-mm df em c:::nissica to : natters affeering the US mwn deferse ard sec=rity and .en- .
I 1-m14w= goals en the cra hard and to assure cear reticra -
1494 221 4 l
I i
l
@ ant l
A 3
- 1 I that the US is a r=1f ahia ard prdr *=h1= supplier of rnetaar ho j
I fusis ard ==4==a*-
i b
~
A full rendirq of the se=*==rst of policy ard purpcees (
--- = ' of the talPA irn4fr-=+== that the U.S. Cc:grees did not interd .,
the thenf amim to dictate raf fr-daa of other naticns re2 #.ive to ..
their ruetaae energy program nor of steti*"*dng CS wisd m in the rur_1 mar field in the place of trat of t.% inportirq country. 2e mattar of safety, health ard envirmmetal j ispacts of rarlaar power plants whether ex;crted frm the ,
l I Cs ce fim ether su; plier nacims are issues within the
~~
excl'asive ard legitimate concem of the inscrting country. ,.
{
d 2e fact of the matter is that the P414=4_n* Coverrrent er - .
4 any other cotuttry fer that matter a:nald still ccostruct ard operate a nuclear reacter within its territerial Wicn .
. with ccepcrects and stuismant etained fra suppliers other than I the U.s. Las, teatever probles pened by the mPP-1 cn the -
~
netter of health, safety ard envircznantal IW lies rest 4 i
qvr Inmively within the regulatory authority and laws of the ]
1 7 414 T ma 4
Covemnant . I i
i 2e N==fm, in its acticn m enczt license applica-tims, should ret act in tetal disregard of the fcreign pc11cy I t
'i14'-=**ma of its acticns. 2 e N ==4 m should make its !
l
.} f..,- cn the basis of tra views and 4n%+4m received by j i 4,
! it f:m the rcre authoritative agencies of t.% CS ww-t -
g
' cn cutters of foreign policy. Again, the fact of the matter l.
is that the CS Danct:tive Branch has rendered a faverable 1*
ltz$gment on the expert license a;plications fcr the N FP-L 5 af after a thc=cogh evaluation of tra statutcry criteria cf tra 22&A cm experts fcr rnelaar uses f:tm the U.S. j
+
a' 3
o 1494 222 ;
n'
_j
j i
i
-s- 4 4
1
! To inject core critaria thart tdiat is required by l Statutes would be ignoring the traditimal forms of d
-[ ccmcemafm, e, arwwurdaciert, v4=+4m and . _
cutual adjuct=ent of interests which has diur . Mad l $
~-
l the W of the Cnited States in its relaticns with -t _- rn -- j I
farsign naticns. It would maan a detarieratian of the C5 ..
I k credential as a reliable suppliar of nuclear aq"4== + and [
-l .
t catarials 5d11cft is cne M the goals istandai to be achieved by tNPA. i 3
k e
- 3. Mint issume arising frcIn the app"**= to export a relaar .e, .
r facility to the Philippi:me shot.1d the crewrf enfm examine in any future publie - -
W i-? -
As we have maintained in our respense to Questicn No. 2 ateve, the cnly issues that the r*-wnif e=4rvs may legitimately <
l.
ex ine and zw1., relative to nuclear expert lic-se ar"~4m , a 1,
be it for the 1*'4"~'= or any other foreign ecuntry, are thces affecting the enwrvs defense and sec:rity of the U.S. !
, and its ncn-proliferaticn goals as delirmated in the NNPA. f i
It will be recallani that Philippira PrweWnt FerdinaM E. Marece, as a result of the S.ree-Mile Island incident 6
- - d cn March 28, 1979, crdered a ev=4m of plant -
const xtien cn the INPP-1 and at the same time c: mated an !
investigative panel (Philippine ernmisafrvi) to ccrdJct an I
-l l' irrat:y cn the safeer of the PnPe-l. em Ph4"-sra i.
P cewef amim taz=1nated its hearings en Sw --r 14, 1979.
l
?m Philippine (*,m 4==4m has also secured the services of '
intam.aticnally kncun experts to act as its tac.h t
advisers in assessing and evaluatir4 the evidences and I testi:rnies sutznitted by t!n participants. "hus, it will i.
1494 223
oo . . - - - - . ... . . _ . . .
h
. o do bb,
.s_
ig
~ ~~
be seen that the P5414r4= Coverment m4== the fact _ _ ,
- that tbs heath, safr.y and erwf mm=r*=_1 igv.:ts arising fma ,,
the sr.wh at:1 eventual c5eraticn of the HIFP-1 are ...
-l matters within the jurisdiction of the Ph111; pine coverment . . . .,p
", to assess and evaluate web the c3 coverment in general u a,m [
and the c-4 == 4 m in particular aust respect an$ 7 =. 4 I
I It is not unlikaty tnat the findings of the . tilippira ,
e-4==1cn may nct be censistent with the frndings of the .
CS nulaar P-1=*ery emrn4 ==4m. An h ==45 sit::aticn would thus arise with unwarranted 6 .-- 4ms to the ,, , , , , _
foreign relaticns of the C3 with the P541*T = in the 4
., :,, 7,,,,
event of mcs.sy findings between the two tedies cn healti., j safety and envircznantal. impacts of the REFP-1.
- 4. Miat : -- I fcnnat snould the emenf ==4m adopt to examine arf 4 feraign health, safety and erw4m==+=1 issume falling within its pH 84-**m(, , , , .,,
4 i
s Cn the asetapticn that arr/ foreign health, safeef and )
en rf _m==r+=1 issues adversely affect the cranen Man == and I L
security of the CS f v1
- M its tw14h+4m goals, j h
the pr+=h4tity of which is far fetched with respect to , , . , , e Pb41*y4= applicaticn fer exp::rt license, it is rem ==4_ _
1 that the r_- Mi fcz=st that the C:nmirten should a$cpt , ,
j is a ncn-adversarf type of inquiry apprewd=*45 a legislative .,
r ccanittee hearing. "Ja parties /participartts will initially . _ _ _
e l
l h.aam to - tpcamm - andemsm ntav1-s- !
- - 1, eiu.ated by e ~ ,= m . m e = h m e, i,-
a -a - 1.gits.cy a th.1.- mterests med g f m e m a d by m - ==4- s m t ,a,e -
to par - to m e 1 ,. ;
1494 224 i t
3 e
t l
i DDD P n l
I ML ht _
j 4
3
- 7_ .}
caly the -en+=rs ce the ccumissica ce of the W*=
' - ~ ~
. . . , _f H
i investige*xi sonst will be aliced to ask cuesticms to elicit _- . _ , . - _. : q details and infer =aticn fram the parties / participants detemined to . . . . _ _ . .
be eligible by the -==4~ to participate in the fix;uiry. $
a 1
A party / participant shall have no right to mmd_ ._~.
==**== or cress-examine witnesses, any adverse party / par +4 **="*
l in centrast to, and as tculd nct happen in, a Court reca type of . _ _ .
W inc=. 21s wuld a1emi the emiurien czzplete centrcl 3 s
of the prec=ad4*? and will preclude the ===4k+14ty of investigating _
g and placing a trial highly sensitiw fereign policy and natimal- _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
interest and security atters of the imperting country, incitriing _-.gn ;. $
the Inporting c:z.mtry's pcli*d-=1 system, internaticnal and _ . . - - . - . . , ,
n*4 m.1 714c4 .
s
- 5. If health, safety and env4-=1 as; mets of a CS e-14=d r clami- ,
facility are to be avainead in the NRC exp:It 14-*47 process, is what ,,,,. . _-
~~
s
-4,4e m.,. .hmid this review be -- - t d4 8'--ly frem the n=4 ==fm's -
dmastic reactor linanming W#"e=7 Shculd the socpe of review be different, - - {
and if so, in what preci** way? l
+
2e NPC sttmits and unintains that the omniumien may i t
c:r: duct its amantic reacter 14-4m prec==d4== in what- ,
~
ever way it cay doen eclate ;m.:rsuant to its existing .. - , ,
i IT=1*4ve mandates and administrative r a-. .,u_-,..,j t *
scwever, in the satter of expert licens1=g process, .
we prepose the c -- - -1 '~--* we have d_4 e ==ad atx:me in respense to Questicn Mc. 4. .
1494 225 ,
,s I
k
. ; w-D** 0 *D 3' l
} f3_2
' E c c Ju c Ju ., .. .i 3
E d,
i ..
.- 8 .-
l .
.(
f)
- 6. Are there any factual cr legal consideratials diich w:uld justify '
a af **= rent IGC health, safety cr er:vLm
+=1 review for sm e egcet ife=e==
.]A ge14~**ma that for others? q=-47*-=1'y, are such cmsidaraticrJ ge14=hle
. : =:. =.1 .- $
t to the present niatter? ' -
[
e <~<m a cutside of the statutcry m'< ---+ for the -
~~~
M
! j t
' to nieke a ff:xiing cn the effects of the ex;x:xt of a riv-Tw 1 t ;;
facility cn the mwn defense a:xi se:mity of the US and 9
,e its w14 **v-=**m goals as m*14nad in the !aeA, IGC does not ..__.r. J 4
see any other sutstantial factual er legal ~=<d-tim = which w: : - .=.:
w:uld justify ce required a different c =f ==ias app =cach _
. "h..
l.
for sme export 11cen e sp1fc=+4cc.s fran others.
- Fce the h*=<m to adopt cme &^ for cne expert .
licanso app 14~+dm and another W fer other geidm**mm . _ - . _. s l.
ad eo say the 1s.st, t. e -~~., and .:nia do ;?
ti-violence to the equal pr +m<m provisicns of the US c:nsti- .
~
y tuticn. It would go against the C5 statutcry assurance 3-arsF to . .
the ! EPA that the Q11ted States is a reliable and effective ._
m uer e ,_ faeuu.e and fm. Such a e-t1a, :. .... 4 uny lead other estim= to view the US as a P+3 and ' -
4_ -1 ,ue,. ._.._._
.f I
! Mast 3
' ':he devalerim countrhs in the Far East and Sout. -
3
.e x.m e., _ m o m e 1d a m u ut1,4 ~ _ - - - -- . f
_ watcmr .u h .nterest the ~ . ut-t. m
_. _. j g
issuance er Scn-issuance of the ex@ 11 cense a; plicatic,J fcrth. --1.m certer - aprecumd-~ - m f
any naticnal def m these c:xr:tries will ::nks as to which 4 supplier count:*/ they Will *i..:rn to for WAir riv-'w pcNer
~
1494 226 ,
9 e
e