ML17065A040: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report October 21, 2016 IOSB Storage Cell B-1 Survey Unit F8300193 Prepared By:_£ __ ** _G _______ Date: JI. f
{{#Wiki_filter:L-~. I~
* I to FSS Engineer Approved By: Date: . Manage;an:S:Co Assets \
Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report October 21, 2016 IOSB Storage Cell B-1 Survey Unit F8300193 Prepared By:_£__ ** _G_______              Date: JI. f
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193 Survey Unit: F8300193, Interim Onsite Storage Building (IOSB) Storage Cell B-1 Survey Unit
* I to FSS Engineer Approved By:   ~~~                        Date:
              . Manage;an:S:Co Assets
                                                                    \
 
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193 Survey Unit:
F8300193, Interim Onsite Storage Building (IOSB) Storage Cell B-1 Survey Unit


== Description:==
== Description:==


Operating History: Designed primarily to store packaged radioactive waste containers safely, protected from the elements, and maintain radiological dose as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), each storage cell possibly stored media of many types, including filters, resins, contaminated chemicals, DAW, activated reactor components, contaminated plant components and other contaminated items. Site Characterization:
Operating History: Designed primarily to store packaged radioactive waste containers safely, protected from the elements, and maintain radiological dose as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), each storage cell possibly stored media of many types, including filters, resins, contaminated chemicals, DAW, activated reactor components, contaminated plant components and other contaminated items.
Static measurements were made of the interior surfaces of the storage cell, to confirm the absence or presence of plant-derived radionuclides.
Site Characterization: Static measurements were made of the interior surfaces of the storage cell, to confirm the absence or presence of plant-derived radionuclides. Static measurements showed a mean gross activity level of 2,071 dpm/100 cm 2 and a maximum value of 2,416 dpm/100 cm2
Static measurements showed a mean gross activity level of 2,071 dpm/100 cm 2 and a maximum value of 2,416 dpm/100 cm 2* Based on the levels of gross activity reported, the area was determined to be a Class 3 area. Survey Unit Design Information:
* Based on the levels of gross activity reported, the area was determined to be a Class 3 area.
The Survey Unit Design Parameters are presented in Table 1 below. The survey unit and measurement locations are depicted on the maps in Attachment  
Survey Unit Design Information:
: 1. Static measurement locations were randomly determined and approximately 33% of the area scanned. The instrumentation used for the survey along with the MDC values are listed in Table 2-1 Attachment
The Survey Unit Design Parameters are presented in Table 1 below. The survey unit and measurement locations are depicted on the maps in Attachment 1. Static measurement locations were randomly determined and approximately 33% of the area scanned. The instrumentation used for the survey along with the MDC values are listed in Table 2-1 .
: 2. FSS Storage Cell B-1 F8300193 FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193 Table 1, Survey Unit Design Parameters  
FSS Storage Cell B-1                       F8300193
.. .. ,* .
 
*
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193 Table 1, Survey Unit Design Parameters i:yaluatio~ ~fo-~fotVatue~                          .;,* _,,, .. "
.;,* _,,, .. " Survey Package: F830 Storage Cell 8-1 Survev Unit: 019 Class 3 SU Area (m2) 23.1 Evaluator:
* toinm~nts*
JR DCGLw: 43,000 Gross Activity DCGL Area Factor N/A Class 3 Design DCGLemc (dpm/100cm 2): N/A Class 3 DCGLemc: N/A Class 3 LBGR: 21,500 Default= 50% DCGL Sigma: 177 Scoping Survey Data Type I error: 0.05 Type II error: 0.05 Predominant Nuclide Cs-137 Sample Area (m2) N/A Total Instrument Efficiency:
Survey Package:                     F830       Storage Cell 8-1 Survev Unit:                     019 Class                         3 SU Area (m2)                     23.1 Evaluator:                       JR DCGLw:             43,000         Gross Activity DCGL Area Factor                     N/A     Class 3 Design DCGLemc (dpm/100cm 2 ):                                       N/A     Class 3 DCGLemc:                     N/A     Class 3 LBGR:             21,500         Default= 50% DCGL Sigma:                   177     Scoping Survey Data Type I error:                   0.05 Type II error:                   0.05 Predominant Nuclide               Cs-137 Sample Area (m2)                       N/A Total Instrument Efficiency:                       0.129 Total Area Scanned (m 2 ):                     7.51 Scan Coverage(%)             ,;::;i; -,;~::3%~:*' Class 3 Choosing 'N/A' sets material Material Tvoe:                     N/A     background to "O"
0.129 ---.. .. --**--Total Area Scanned (m 2): 7.51 Scan Coverage(%)  
\*,;.;:
,;::;i; Class 3 Choosing 'N/A' sets material Material Tvoe: N/A background to "O" \*,;.;: ,,,1:_11 .**.*,.< ..  
\.  *- .: .
..  
                ,,,1:_11
'>'\"":f\::;  
            -~ ~.
.. ,.,, . *,*. ;*:;-. *; <' . \. *-. : . .. . , -*> ..  
                        .**.*,.< . /c~i.ciii~t~d~V~iife$:i'~E1 ::::::::~.f,~ :*)~;~: ..'>'\"":f\::;
; ./. \ :""'" Z1-a: ':
                                                                                  .       . ,      -*>  ,.,, . *,*. ;*:;-.; ./.*; <'
Z1-a: *J."645 Sign p: 0:9"9865" Calculated Relative Shift:
                                                                                                    ....Comment~.                 \ :""'."
* 121'.4 Relative Shift Used: 3.0 Uses 3.0 if Relative Shift >3 N-Value: 11 N-Value+20%:
Z1-a:         ': 1.64~.
14 2 FSS Storage Cell B-1 F8300193 FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193 Survey Results: A total of 15 direct measurements were made in F8300193.
Z1-a:             *J."645 Sign p:       0:9"9865" Calculated Relative Shift:
The results of the static measurements are shown in Table 2. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. None of the scan measurements indicated areas of elevated activity.
* 121'.4 Relative Shift Used:                     3.0 Uses 3.0 if Relative Shift >3 N-Value:                       11 N-Value+20%:                         14 2                                                             FSS Storage Cell B-1                                                   F8300193
Swipe data did not indicate elevated activity levels above the MDA. Table 2, Static Measurement Results .. Sam Beta.(ppm)
 
Beta (dpm)
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193 Survey Results:
.. " .. pt"":"*,*, 1 F8300193X00001 225 1,744 2 F8300193X00002 238 1,845 3 F8300193X00003 247 1,915 4 F8300193X00004 242 1,876 5 F8300193X00005 227 1,760 6 F8300193X00006 236 1,829 7 F8300193X00007 254 1,969 ----*---.. 8 F8300193X00008 246 1,907 9 F8300193X00009 224 1,736 10 F8300193X00010 208 1,612. 11 F8300193X00011 244 1,891 12 F8300193X00012 213 1,651 13 F8300193X00013 251 1,946 14 F8300193X00014 241 1,868 15 F8300193X00015 268 2,078 Table 3 contains the statistical summary of the static measurement data for the Storage Cell B-1. Table 3, Beta Summary Statistics Beta Statics B-1 Mean 1,842 Median 1,868 Standard Deviation 123 Minimum 1,612 Maximum 2,078 Count 15 FSS Storage Cell B-1 F8300193 FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193 Survey Unit Data Assessment:
A total of 15 direct measurements were made in F8300193. The results of the static measurements are shown in Table 2. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. None of the scan measurements indicated areas of elevated activity. Swipe data did not indicate elevated activity levels above the MDA.
The survey design required 14 static measurements for the Sign Test. A total of 15 static measurements were collected.
Table 2, Static Measurement Results Num~er      ..
The critical value and the results of the Sign Test are presented in Table 4. The sample mean and median values were less than the DCGL. Table 4, Data Assessment Results .* .... Number of Samples: * .15 Median: 1,868* Mean: 1,842 Static Data Standard Deviation:
                      "  ..Sam pl~.#::
123. Maximum: 2,078 ;: ...  
pt"":"*,*,
'*;;i.;;;  
Beta.(ppm)      Beta (dpm) 1   F8300193X00001                         225           1,744 2   F8300193X00002                         238           1,845 3   F8300193X00003                         247           1,915 4   F8300193X00004                         242           1,876 5   F8300193X00005                         227           1,760 6   F8300193X00006                         236           1,829 7   F8300193X00007 254           1,969 8   F8300193X00008                         246           1,907 9   F8300193X00009                         224           1,736 10   F8300193X00010                         208           1,612.
"***>,,'' , * .: . ;
11   F8300193X00011                         244           1,891 12   F8300193X00012                         213           1,651 13   F8300193X00013                         251           1,946 14   F8300193X00014                         241           1,868 15   F8300193X00015                         268           2,078 Table 3 contains the statistical summary of the static measurement data for the Storage Cell B-1.
.:' . . --
Table 3, Beta Summary Statistics Beta Statics B-1 Mean                                 1,842 Median                               1,868 Standard Deviation                     123 Minimum                             1,612 Maximum                             2,078 Count                                   15 FSS Storage Cell B-1                     F8300193
.. *' Adjusted N Value: 14. S+ Value: * -1.5 Critical Value: i 0 Sufficient samples collected:
 
Pass* Maximum value <DCGLw: Pass'. Median value <DCGLw: P'ass: .'l Mean value <DCGLw:
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193 Survey Unit Data Assessment:
* Pass : Maximum value <DCGLemc:
The survey design required 14 static measurements for the Sign Test. A total of 15 static measurements were collected. The critical value and the results of the Sign Test are presented in Table 4. The sample mean and median values were less than the DCGL.
N/A SiQn test results:
Table 4, Data Assessment Results Number of Samples: * .15 Median: 1,868*
* Pass* The survey unit passes all conditions:
Mean: 1,842 Static Data Standard Deviation:           123.
Pass Survey Unit Investigations and Results: No investigations were required for either direct or scan measurements and no investigation results are reported.
Maximum: 2,078
;:...        ~*;*:,::>;*_*-:~"$iQWr~$fR.'~siii.iS<;r:.::._;,:'t.:: '*;;i.;;; "***>,,'' ***:'.~*c9*mm:0nts:*. ,
* Adjusted N Value:             14.
S+ Value:       * -1.5 Critical Value:           i0
.: . ; -.~*.    .:' .. --
  ~.;"      ..  *'
Sufficient samples collected:         Pass*
Maximum value <DCGLw:             Pass'.
Median value <DCGLw:           P'ass:
                                                                      .'l Mean value <DCGLw:
* Pass :
Maximum value <DCGLemc:               N/A SiQn test results:
* Pass*
The survey unit passes all conditions:               Pass Survey Unit Investigations and Results:
No investigations were required for either direct or scan measurements and no investigation results are reported.
ALARA Statement:
ALARA Statement:
As stated in Chapter 4 of the LTP, as long as the residual activity within the survey unit is less than the DCGL, the ALARA criterion has been met. Changes in Initial Survey Unit Assumptions:
As stated in Chapter 4 of the LTP, as long as the residual activity within the survey unit is less than the DCGL, the ALARA criterion has been met.
The survey unit was designed as a Class 3 survey and the sample results are consistent with that classification.
Changes in Initial Survey Unit Assumptions:
The variability of the survey results was less than the characterization data used for survey design. No potential areas of elevated activity were detected.
The survey unit was designed as a Class 3 survey and the sample results are consistent with that classification. The variability of the survey results was less than the characterization data used for survey design. No potential areas of elevated activity were detected.
4 FSS Storage Cell B-1 F8300193 FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193
4                                                     FSS Storage Cell B-1                                       F8300193
 
FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193


== Conclusion:==
==
Conclusion:==


The FSS of this survey unit was properly designed as a Class 3 survey based on the results of the scoping survey. The required number of direct measurements was made and the scan coverage !Jlet the requirement of Table 5-6 of the LTP. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. No investigations were required.
The FSS of this survey unit was properly designed as a Class 3 survey based on the results of the scoping survey. The required number of direct measurements was made and the scan coverage !Jlet the requirement of Table 5-6 of the LTP. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. No investigations were required.
The static measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met. It is concluded that survey unit F8300193 meets the release criteria of 1OCFR20.l402.
The static measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met.
5 FSS Storage Cell B-1 F8300193 Attachment 1 Maps November 8, 2016 Survey Unit F8300193
It is concluded that survey unit F8300193 meets the release criteria of 10CFR20.l402.
,._I M IN 8-1 B-2 6-3 3 CH Q-2 =:-1 *-E-3 TID E WATER IN S MUD Page 1 Att. I Maps 15 100Ct!!"'
5                                 FSS Storage Cell B-1                           F8300193
F.S300193X.DOOO
 
* -"4ol dpfl\*100 fll300193 00005 4> ri * !!CH ClDMI i 00 cm" "*' F8300193 Attachment 2 Instrumentation September 23, 2016 Survey Unit F8300193
Attachment 1 Maps November 8, 2016 Survey Unit F8300193
 
      ,._I M   IN 8-1 CH B-2 Q-2 6-3 3
                                                                                                "* '  ~
      =: E-3 15 100Ct!!"'
fll300193 00005 4>
ri * !!CH ClDMI i 00 cm" F.S300193X.DOOO
                                            *  -  "4ol dpfl\*100 ~
                                                              ~
TIDEWATER IN SMUD
                                                                                                *~
Page 1                          Att. I Maps                                                  F8300193


**-:., *, ,* :*.
Attachment 2 Instrumentation September 23, 2016 Survey Unit F8300193
* type ' .1,,' *I*
 
* Beta Static Measurement Swipe Measurements Table 2-1. Survey Unit Instrumentation Ludlum Model 2350-1 Ludlum Model 44-1 16 B Detector Ludlum Model 2929 Ludlum Model 44-10-1
Table 2-1. Survey Unit Instrumentation Me~stirement
* Mini rn u l:>Je
* Mini rn unf.J)e~~~ta l:>Je Activity~:.   :oet~c.tor      (J~lil:>r~tion
'! '. Beta -569 dpm/100 cm 2 Alpha -11 dpm/l 00 cm 2 Beta -80 dpm/100 cm 2 12.9% 36.9% 42.8%
* type
317899/331973 2/10117 1667161170380 11/3/16
        ' .1,,' *I* * ~:                                '!  '.
* Minimum detectable activities for the count rate instrumentation were calculated in accordance with NUREG-1507, "Minimum Detectable Concentrations with Typical Radiation Survey Instruments for Various Contaminants and Field Conditions" (U.S. NRC, 1997). . b Detectors are required to be calibrated once every 12 months. Calibration due date indicates the date by which the detector must be calibrated again. cm 2 = square centimeters cpm =counts per minute dpm = disintegrations per minute Page 1 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300193 Static Measurement MDA Variables Beta Survey Type 331973 Detector Number 229 Background count rate (cpm) 1 Count Time (min) 0.129 Efficiency Area of Detector 100 (cm 2) Constants 60 sec/min 2.54 cm/in Assumptions Background count time and sample count time are equivalent Calculate Static MDA Static MDA =3 + 4.65(Br
Effi~ierlcies      Due))ate~
* t)0*5/t
Beta Static             Ludlum Model          Beta - 569 dpm/100 cm 2                 12.9%        317899/331973 Measurement                      2350-1                                                                       2/10117 Ludlum Model 44-1 16 B Detector Swipe            Ludlum Model 2929         Alpha - 11 dpm/l 00 cm 2               36.9%        1667161170380 Measurements                Ludlum Model 44-        Beta - 80 dpm/100 cm 2                 42.8%             11/3/16 10-1
* Minimum detectable activities for the count rate instrumentation were calculated in accordance with NUREG-1507, "Minimum Detectable Concentrations with Typical Radiation Survey Instruments for Various Contaminants and Field Conditions" (U.S. NRC, 1997).                           .
b Detectors are required to be calibrated once every 12 months. Calibration due date indicates the date by which the detector must be calibrated again.
cm 2 = square centimeters cpm =counts per minute dpm = disintegrations per minute Page 1                                         Att. 2 Instrumentation                                   F8300193
 
Static Measurement MDA Variables Beta Survey Type 331973   Detector Number 229 Background count rate (cpm) 1 Count Time (min) 0.129 Efficiency Area of Detector 100 (cm 2)
Constants 60 sec/min 2.54 cm/in Assumptions Background count time and sample count time are equivalent Calculate Static MDA Static MDA =3 + 4.65(Br
* t) 0 *5/t
* E
* E
* A/100 (NUREG 1507) Where: Static MDA Page 2 Br t E A Background Countrate Count Time (min) Efficiency Area of detector (cm 2) 569 dpm/100 cm2 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300193 Att. 3 Investigation Attachment 3 Investigation September 23, 2016 Survey Unit F8300193 (none required)
* A/100       (NUREG 1507)
F8300193 Attachment 4 Data Assessment September 23, 2016 Survey Unit F830019 Histogram for Beta Static Activity Storage Cell B-1 (Ac t i vity I NllT'berofValues-1 5 1 Minirnun 1.612.40 M"&deg;""" 2.077.52 1 so 1 2333 S kewnes& -0.2!h KutosU -0.03 1 eJMe.an 1.841.86! eJMedan 1.ooa.22 1 I OLessBm I I 0McreBN 1628 1721 1767 181' 1BEO 1907 1953 2047 2093 Page 1 Att. 4 Data Assessment F8300193
 
*.!.* .. 2. 2040 .. 1911) 1920 *1.5 *1.0 Page 2 Q-Q Plot for Beta Static Activity Storage Cell B-1 -0.5 0.0 05 Theoretical Quantiles (Standard Normal) Att. 4 Data Assessment
===Background===
: 1.0 1.5 F8300193 ActivQ H *15 Mean*1B42 Sd* 123.3 Skipe*lV.4 lrtttc:1:P(
Where:       Br               Countrate t               Count Time (min)
* 1842 ((JfdCJtior'l.R  
E                Efficiency Area of detector A                (cm 2 )
*0.9SS Smear_Data_Calculation_Sheet_l01316 I IOSB Final Status SurveYi I LCl LC2 LC3 LC4 LC6 LCS CPM 13 dpm Date/Time of Count Sample Comments I l F830 019 3 x 00001 SM Cell B-1 59 20 08/31/16 10:04 2 F830 019 3 x 00002 SM Cell B-1 51 1 I 08/31/16 10:05 3 F830 019 3 x 00003 SM Cell B-1 43 -18 ' 08/31/16 10:06 4 F830 019 3 x 00004 SM Cell B-1 53 6 I 08/31/16 10:07 5 F830 019 ., x 00005 SM Cell B-1 47 -8 i 08/31/16 10:09 :) ' 6 F830 019 3 x 00006 SM Cell B-1 51 1 ' 08/31/16 10:10 I 7 F830 019 3 x 00007 SM Cell 8-1 55 11 i 08/31/16 10:11 ' 8 F830 019 3 x 00008 SM Cell B-1 57 15 I 08/31/16 10:12 9 F830 019 3 x 00009 SM Cell 8-1 52 4 : 08/31/16 10:13 10 F830 019 3 x 00010 SM Cell B-1 42 -20 ' 08/31/16 10:15 ; 11 F830 019 3 x 00011 SM Cell B-1 43 -18 i 08/31/16 10:16 12 F830 019 3 x 00012 SM Cell B-1 38 -29 08/31/16 1.0:18 13 F830 Oi9 3 x 00013 SM Celi B-1 60 22 08/31/16 10:19 --' 14 F830 019 3 x 00014 SM Cell B-1 53 6 08/31/16 10:20 *--* 15 F830 019 3 x 00015 SM Cell B-1 48 -6 ! 08/31/16 10:21 Comments By signature below, the required source check and background checks were satisfaftorily performed prior to use of the instrument identified below. ' : ' Ludlum 2929 Benchtop Instrument t bkg etficiency bkg count 2929 S/N: 166716 rate time MDA 0.4 1 11.0 a 0.369 44-10-1 S/N: 170380 cpm min dpm per i .... )'X'i.---i  
Static MDA                            569 dpm/100 cm2 Page 2                                  Att. 2 Instrumentation     F8300193
'.r;_ t *:;.f "" ' '* -g *tti *c.->1 /(f; i 50:5 1. 80.2* Tech A Sign/  
 
*e f;;; I Cal Due Date:;ll/3/2016 0 0.428 -* pi {A Tech B Sign/ Date ' cpm min dpm per area}}
Attachment 3 Investigation September 23, 2016 Survey Unit F8300193 (none required)
Att. 3 Investigation                      F8300193
 
Attachment 4 Data Assessment September 23, 2016 Survey Unit F830019
 
(Activity                    I Histogram for Beta Static Activity Storage Cell B-1 NllT'berofValues-       151 Minirnun         1.612.40 M"&deg;"""           2.077.52 1 so                 12333 Skewnes&             -0.2!h KutosU               -0.031 eJMe.an           1.841.86!
eJMedan           1.ooa.221 I ~Norma!OitbbJtir.n OLessBm I
I 0McreBN 1628       1721 1767         181'         1BEO         1907       1953   2047 2093 Page 1                         Att. 4 Data Assessment                 F8300193
 
ActivQ
*.!.*.. 2.                       Q-Q Plot for Beta Static Activity Storage Cell B-1 H *15 Mean*1B42 Sd* 123.3 Skipe*lV.4 lrtttc:1:P(
* 1842 2040 . .
((JfdCJtior'l.R *0.9SS 1911) 1920
                *1.5        *1.0  -0.5                      0.0                  05 1.0         1.5 Theoretical Quantiles (Standard Normal)
Page 2                Att. 4 Data Assessment :                    F8300193
 
Smear_Data_Calculation_Sheet_l01316 I                                                                                   IOSB Final Status SurveYi                                                                   I LCl   LC2         LC3 LC4         LC6       LCS                               ~ CPM       13 dpm       Date/Time of Count               Sample Comments I
l   F830   019           3       x 00001         SM                 Cell B-1         59             20       08/31/16       10:04 2   F830   019           3       x 00002           SM               Cell B-1         51             1     I 08/31/16       10:05 3   F830   019           3       x 00003         SM                 Cell B-1         43           -18     ' 08/31/16       10:06 4   F830   019           3       x 00004           SM               Cell B-1         53             6     I 08/31/16     10:07
                            .,:)    x                 SM               Cell B-1 5  F830  019                      00005                                              47             -8     i 08/31/16       10:09 6   F830   019           3       x 00006           SM               Cell B-1         51             1     '
I  08/31/16       10:10 7   F830   019           3       x 00007         SM                 Cell 8-1         55           11 i
08/31/16       10:11 8   F830   019           3       x 00008         SM                 Cell B-1         57           15 I
08/31/16       10:12 9   F830   019           3       x 00009         SM                 Cell 8-1         52             4     : 08/31/16     10:13 10   F830   019           3       x 00010         SM                 Cell B-1         42           -20     ' 08/31/16
                                                                                                                ;                10:15 11   F830   019           3       x 00011         SM                 Cell B-1         43           -18     i 08/31/16     10:16 12   F830   019           3       x 00012         SM                 Cell B-1         38           -29         08/31/16     1.0:18 13   F830   Oi9           3       x 00013         SM                 Celi B-1         60           22         08/31/16     10:19 F830  019
                          --         x 00014         SM                 Cell B-1                             '
14                        3                                                            53             6       08/31/16     10:20 15   F830   019           3       x 00015         SM                 Cell B-1         48             -6 08/31/16     10:21 Comments   By signature below, the required source check and background checks were satisfaftorily performed prior to use of the instrument identified below.
Ludlum 2929 Benchtop Instrument t                                             bkg etficiency   bkg count 2929 S/N: 166716                                     rate time   MDA 0.4     1     11.0 44-10-1 S/N: 170380 a      0.369 cpm   min dpm per <ire~
i ....)'X'i.---i                   '.r;_ t *:;.f   ""                                     '
                                        '* -g     *tti           *c.->1                                     i 50:5     1.
Tech A Sign/ Date~-,                    *e   f;;;                         /(f;                                                                                      80.2*
0 I
                          -*                                                                      Cal Due Date:;ll/3/2016                 0.428 Tech B Sign/ Date                 pi {A                                                                        '                                     cpm   min dpm per area}}

Latest revision as of 19:47, 4 February 2020

Final Status Survey Report, October 21, 2016, Iosb Storage Cell B-1, Survey Unit F8300193
ML17065A040
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 11/17/2016
From:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)
To:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Shared Package
ML17065A032 List:
References
DPG 17-038, F8300193
Download: ML17065A040 (16)
v • d • e


Text

L-~. I~

Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report October 21, 2016 IOSB Storage Cell B-1 Survey Unit F8300193 Prepared By:_£__ ** _G_______ Date: JI. f

  • I to FSS Engineer Approved By: ~~~ Date:

. Manage;an:S:Co Assets

\

FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193 Survey Unit:

F8300193, Interim Onsite Storage Building (IOSB) Storage Cell B-1 Survey Unit

Description:

Operating History: Designed primarily to store packaged radioactive waste containers safely, protected from the elements, and maintain radiological dose as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), each storage cell possibly stored media of many types, including filters, resins, contaminated chemicals, DAW, activated reactor components, contaminated plant components and other contaminated items.

Site Characterization: Static measurements were made of the interior surfaces of the storage cell, to confirm the absence or presence of plant-derived radionuclides. Static measurements showed a mean gross activity level of 2,071 dpm/100 cm 2 and a maximum value of 2,416 dpm/100 cm2

  • Based on the levels of gross activity reported, the area was determined to be a Class 3 area.

Survey Unit Design Information:

The Survey Unit Design Parameters are presented in Table 1 below. The survey unit and measurement locations are depicted on the maps in Attachment 1. Static measurement locations were randomly determined and approximately 33% of the area scanned. The instrumentation used for the survey along with the MDC values are listed in Table 2-1 .

FSS Storage Cell B-1 F8300193

FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193 Table 1, Survey Unit Design Parameters i:yaluatio~ ~fo-~fotVatue~ .;,* _,,, .. "

  • toinm~nts*

Survey Package: F830 Storage Cell 8-1 Survev Unit: 019 Class 3 SU Area (m2) 23.1 Evaluator: JR DCGLw: 43,000 Gross Activity DCGL Area Factor N/A Class 3 Design DCGLemc (dpm/100cm 2 ): N/A Class 3 DCGLemc: N/A Class 3 LBGR: 21,500 Default= 50% DCGL Sigma: 177 Scoping Survey Data Type I error: 0.05 Type II error: 0.05 Predominant Nuclide Cs-137 Sample Area (m2) N/A Total Instrument Efficiency: 0.129 Total Area Scanned (m 2 ): 7.51 Scan Coverage(%) ,;::;i; -,;~::3%~:*' Class 3 Choosing 'N/A' sets material Material Tvoe: N/A background to "O"

\*,;.;:

\. *- .: .

,,,1:_11

-~ ~.

.**.*,.< . /c~i.ciii~t~d~V~iife$:i'~E1 ::::::::~.f,~ :*)~;~: ..'>'\"":f\::;

. . , -*> ,.,, . *,*. ;*:;-.; ./.*; <'

....Comment~. \ :""'."

Z1-a: ': 1.64~.

Z1-a: *J."645 Sign p: 0:9"9865" Calculated Relative Shift:

  • 121'.4 Relative Shift Used: 3.0 Uses 3.0 if Relative Shift >3 N-Value: 11 N-Value+20%: 14 2 FSS Storage Cell B-1 F8300193

FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193 Survey Results:

A total of 15 direct measurements were made in F8300193. The results of the static measurements are shown in Table 2. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. None of the scan measurements indicated areas of elevated activity. Swipe data did not indicate elevated activity levels above the MDA.

Table 2, Static Measurement Results Num~er ..

" ..Sam pl~.#::

pt"":"*,*,

Beta.(ppm) Beta (dpm) 1 F8300193X00001 225 1,744 2 F8300193X00002 238 1,845 3 F8300193X00003 247 1,915 4 F8300193X00004 242 1,876 5 F8300193X00005 227 1,760 6 F8300193X00006 236 1,829 7 F8300193X00007 254 1,969 8 F8300193X00008 246 1,907 9 F8300193X00009 224 1,736 10 F8300193X00010 208 1,612.

11 F8300193X00011 244 1,891 12 F8300193X00012 213 1,651 13 F8300193X00013 251 1,946 14 F8300193X00014 241 1,868 15 F8300193X00015 268 2,078 Table 3 contains the statistical summary of the static measurement data for the Storage Cell B-1.

Table 3, Beta Summary Statistics Beta Statics B-1 Mean 1,842 Median 1,868 Standard Deviation 123 Minimum 1,612 Maximum 2,078 Count 15 FSS Storage Cell B-1 F8300193

FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193 Survey Unit Data Assessment:

The survey design required 14 static measurements for the Sign Test. A total of 15 static measurements were collected. The critical value and the results of the Sign Test are presented in Table 4. The sample mean and median values were less than the DCGL.

Table 4, Data Assessment Results Number of Samples: * .15 Median: 1,868*

Mean: 1,842 Static Data Standard Deviation: 123.

Maximum: 2,078

... ~*;*
,::>;*_*-:~"$iQWr~$fR.'~siii.iS<;r:.::._;,:'t.:: '*;;i.;;; "***>,, ***:'.~*c9*mm:0nts:*. ,
  • Adjusted N Value: 14.

S+ Value: * -1.5 Critical Value: i0

.: . ; -.~*. .:' .. --

~.;" .. *'

Sufficient samples collected: Pass*

Maximum value <DCGLw: Pass'.

Median value <DCGLw: P'ass:

.'l Mean value <DCGLw:

  • Pass :

Maximum value <DCGLemc: N/A SiQn test results:

  • Pass*

The survey unit passes all conditions: Pass Survey Unit Investigations and Results:

No investigations were required for either direct or scan measurements and no investigation results are reported.

ALARA Statement:

As stated in Chapter 4 of the LTP, as long as the residual activity within the survey unit is less than the DCGL, the ALARA criterion has been met.

Changes in Initial Survey Unit Assumptions:

The survey unit was designed as a Class 3 survey and the sample results are consistent with that classification. The variability of the survey results was less than the characterization data used for survey design. No potential areas of elevated activity were detected.

4 FSS Storage Cell B-1 F8300193

FINAL STATUS SURVEY F8300193

==

Conclusion:==

The FSS of this survey unit was properly designed as a Class 3 survey based on the results of the scoping survey. The required number of direct measurements was made and the scan coverage !Jlet the requirement of Table 5-6 of the LTP. All of the static measurements were less than the DCGL. No investigations were required.

The static measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met.

It is concluded that survey unit F8300193 meets the release criteria of 10CFR20.l402.

5 FSS Storage Cell B-1 F8300193

Attachment 1 Maps November 8, 2016 Survey Unit F8300193

,._I M IN 8-1 CH B-2 Q-2 6-3 3

"* ' ~

=: E-3 15 100Ct!!"'

fll300193 00005 4>

ri * !!CH ClDMI i 00 cm" F.S300193X.DOOO

  • - "4ol dpfl\*100 ~

~

TIDEWATER IN SMUD

  • ~

Page 1 Att. I Maps F8300193

Attachment 2 Instrumentation September 23, 2016 Survey Unit F8300193

Table 2-1. Survey Unit Instrumentation Me~stirement

  • Mini rn unf.J)e~~~ta l:>Je Activity~:. :oet~c.tor (J~lil:>r~tion
  • type

' .1,,' *I* * ~: '! '.

Effi~ierlcies Due))ate~

Beta Static Ludlum Model Beta - 569 dpm/100 cm 2 12.9% 317899/331973 Measurement 2350-1 2/10117 Ludlum Model 44-1 16 B Detector Swipe Ludlum Model 2929 Alpha - 11 dpm/l 00 cm 2 36.9% 1667161170380 Measurements Ludlum Model 44- Beta - 80 dpm/100 cm 2 42.8% 11/3/16 10-1

  • Minimum detectable activities for the count rate instrumentation were calculated in accordance with NUREG-1507, "Minimum Detectable Concentrations with Typical Radiation Survey Instruments for Various Contaminants and Field Conditions" (U.S. NRC, 1997). .

b Detectors are required to be calibrated once every 12 months. Calibration due date indicates the date by which the detector must be calibrated again.

cm 2 = square centimeters cpm =counts per minute dpm = disintegrations per minute Page 1 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300193

Static Measurement MDA Variables Beta Survey Type 331973 Detector Number 229 Background count rate (cpm) 1 Count Time (min) 0.129 Efficiency Area of Detector 100 (cm 2)

Constants 60 sec/min 2.54 cm/in Assumptions Background count time and sample count time are equivalent Calculate Static MDA Static MDA =3 + 4.65(Br

  • t) 0 *5/t
  • E

Background

Where: Br Countrate t Count Time (min)

E Efficiency Area of detector A (cm 2 )

Static MDA 569 dpm/100 cm2 Page 2 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8300193

Attachment 3 Investigation September 23, 2016 Survey Unit F8300193 (none required)

Att. 3 Investigation F8300193

Attachment 4 Data Assessment September 23, 2016 Survey Unit F830019

(Activity I Histogram for Beta Static Activity Storage Cell B-1 NllT'berofValues- 151 Minirnun 1.612.40 M"°""" 2.077.52 1 so 12333 Skewnes& -0.2!h KutosU -0.031 eJMe.an 1.841.86!

eJMedan 1.ooa.221 I ~Norma!OitbbJtir.n OLessBm I

I 0McreBN 1628 1721 1767 181' 1BEO 1907 1953 2047 2093 Page 1 Att. 4 Data Assessment F8300193

ActivQ

  • .!.*.. 2. Q-Q Plot for Beta Static Activity Storage Cell B-1 H *15 Mean*1B42 Sd* 123.3 Skipe*lV.4 lrtttc:1:P(
  • 1842 2040 . .

((JfdCJtior'l.R *0.9SS 1911) 1920

  • 1.5 *1.0 -0.5 0.0 05 1.0 1.5 Theoretical Quantiles (Standard Normal)

Page 2 Att. 4 Data Assessment : F8300193

Smear_Data_Calculation_Sheet_l01316 I IOSB Final Status SurveYi I LCl LC2 LC3 LC4 LC6 LCS ~ CPM 13 dpm Date/Time of Count Sample Comments I

l F830 019 3 x 00001 SM Cell B-1 59 20 08/31/16 10:04 2 F830 019 3 x 00002 SM Cell B-1 51 1 I 08/31/16 10:05 3 F830 019 3 x 00003 SM Cell B-1 43 -18 ' 08/31/16 10:06 4 F830 019 3 x 00004 SM Cell B-1 53 6 I 08/31/16 10:07

.,:) x SM Cell B-1 5 F830 019 00005 47 -8 i 08/31/16 10:09 6 F830 019 3 x 00006 SM Cell B-1 51 1 '

I 08/31/16 10:10 7 F830 019 3 x 00007 SM Cell 8-1 55 11 i

08/31/16 10:11 8 F830 019 3 x 00008 SM Cell B-1 57 15 I

08/31/16 10:12 9 F830 019 3 x 00009 SM Cell 8-1 52 4  : 08/31/16 10:13 10 F830 019 3 x 00010 SM Cell B-1 42 -20 ' 08/31/16

10
15 11 F830 019 3 x 00011 SM Cell B-1 43 -18 i 08/31/16 10:16 12 F830 019 3 x 00012 SM Cell B-1 38 -29 08/31/16 1.0:18 13 F830 Oi9 3 x 00013 SM Celi B-1 60 22 08/31/16 10:19 F830 019

-- x 00014 SM Cell B-1 '

14 3 53 6 08/31/16 10:20 15 F830 019 3 x 00015 SM Cell B-1 48 -6 08/31/16 10:21 Comments By signature below, the required source check and background checks were satisfaftorily performed prior to use of the instrument identified below.

Ludlum 2929 Benchtop Instrument t bkg etficiency bkg count 2929 S/N: 166716 rate time MDA 0.4 1 11.0 44-10-1 S/N: 170380 a 0.369 cpm min dpm per <ire~

i ....)'X'i.---i '.r;_ t *:;.f "" '

'* -g *tti *c.->1 i 50:5 1.

Tech A Sign/ Date~-, *e f;;; /(f; 80.2*

0 I

-* Cal Due Date:;ll/3/2016 0.428 Tech B Sign/ Date pi {A ' cpm min dpm per area

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17065A040&oldid=2440103"