ML18101A385: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 11/30/1994
| issue date = 11/30/1994
| title = Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1994 for Salem Generating Station Unit 1.W/941213 Ltr
| title = Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1994 for Salem Generating Station Unit 1.W/941213 Ltr
| author name = HAGAN J J, MORRONI M
| author name = Hagan J, Morroni M
| author affiliation = PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS CO. OF NEW JERSEY
| author affiliation = PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS CO. OF NEW JERSEY
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:e Publi,c; Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit December 13, 1994 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attn.: Document Control Desk MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEMNO. 1 DOCKET NO: 50-272 In compliance with Section 6.9.1.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original copy of the monthly operating reports for the month of November 1994 are being sent to you. RH:vls Enclosures C Mr. Thomas T. Martin Average Daily Unit Power Level Operating Data Report Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions 10CFR50.59 Evaluations Operating Summary Refueling Information Sincerely yours, Salem Operations Regional Administrator USNRC, Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19046 8-1-7.R4 The  
{{#Wiki_filter:e PS~G Publi,c; Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit December 13, 1994 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attn.: Document Control Desk MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEMNO. 1 DOCKET NO: 50-272 In compliance with Section 6.9.1.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original copy of the monthly operating reports for the month of November 1994 are being sent to you.
: 9412190093  
Average Daily Unit Power Level Operating Data Report Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions 10CFR50.59 Evaluations Operating Summary Refueling Information Sincerely yours, ger-Salem Operations RH:vls Enclosures C        Mr. Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator USNRC, Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19046 8-1-7.R4 The P9-wffis_in_vour_h~mds
: PDR ADOCK , R 941130 05000272 PDR 95-2168 REV. 6/ 4 _J
:       9412190093 941130
.ERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER Docket No.: 50-272 ' .. ' . Unit Name: Salem #1 Date: 12/10/94 Completed by: Mike Morroni Telephone:
:       PDR ADOCK 05000272                                                             95-2168 REV. 6/ 4
339-5142 Month November 1994 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 1088 17 1108 2 1123 18 867 3 1100 19 1005 4 1078 20 1113 5 1033 21 1113 6 1102 22 1099 7 1100 23 1105 8 1111 . 24 1106 9 1128 25 1107 10 1094 26 1108 11 1113 27 1102 12 1102 28 810 13 1132 29 233 14 1099 30 348 15 1087 31 -----16 1029 P. 8.1-7 Rl OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No: Date: Completed by: Mike Morroni Telephone:
      ,        R                      PDR                                                                        _J
Operating Status 1. Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes 2. Reporting Period November 1994 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) Report, Give Reason N A. 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any 12. Hours in Reporting Period 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 14. Hours Generator On-Line 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) 19. Unit Service Factor 20. Unit Availability Factor 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate This Month 720 720 0 720 0 2296142.4 769720 737771 100 100 92.6 91.9 0 NA Year to Date 8016 5843.6 0 5124.3 0 16921828.8 5277830 4980197 63.9 63.9 56.2 55.7 28.6 50-272 12/10/94 339-5142 since Last N/A Cumulative 152713 100975.6 0 97012.2 0 307694142.8 101813800 96917750 63.5 63.5 57.4 56.9 21.4 24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each) Refueling outage scheduled to start 4-8-95 and last 60 days. 25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup: N A. 8-1-7.R2 NO. DATE 1958 11-16-94 F 1972 11-19-94 F 1984 11-28-94 F 1 2 F: Forced S: Scheduled DURATION TYPE 1 (HOURS) REASON 2 4.7 A 4.9 A* 46.8 B Reason A-Equipment Failure (explain)
 
B-Maintenance or Test C-Refueling D-Requlatory Restriction UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH NOVEMBER 1994 METHOD OF SHUTTING LICENSE DOWN EVENT REACTOR REPORT # 5 ___ .. _____ HF 5 ---------EA SYSTEM CODE 4 5 ---------EA 3 Method: 1-Manual 2-Manual Scram E-Operator Training & License Examination F-Administrative 3-Automatic Scram 4-Continuation of Previous Outage 5-Load Reduction 9-0ther G-Operational Error (Explain)
                          .ERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LE~
H-Other (Explain)
Docket No.:   50-272
COMPONENT CODE 6 DOCKET NO.
              ' ..                                   Unit Name:   Salem #1 Date:         12/10/94 Completed by:     Mike Morroni                     Telephone:   339-5142 Month     November     1994 Day Average Daily Power Level             Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET)                                 (MWe-NET) 1         1088                             17       1108 2         1123                             18         867 3         1100                             19       1005 4         1078                             20       1113 5         1033                             21       1113 6         1102                             22       1099 7         1100                             23       1105 8         1111                           . 24       1106 9         1128                             25       1107 10           1094                             26       1108 11         1113                             27       1102 12           1102                             28         810 13         1132                             29         233 14         1099                             30         348 15         1087                             31       -----
UNIT NAME: Salem #1 DATE: 12-10-94 COMPLETED BY: Mike Morroni TELEPHONE:
16         1029 P. 8.1-7 Rl
339.-5142  
 
' CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACllf)N TO PREVENT RECURRENCE FILTER cw. INTAKE TRASH RAKE JAMMED RELAYX FAULTY CONTROL RELAYS RELAYX ACTUATION OF DIFF. PROTECTION RELAY FOR 4 # 2 S.P.T. Exhibit G -Instructions for Preparation of Data Entry Sheets for Licensee Event Report (LER) File (NUREG-0161) 5 Exhibit 1 -Same Source
OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No:     50-272 Date:         12/10/94 Completed by:     Mike Morroni                     Telephone:     339-5142 Operating Status
: 1. Unit Name                         Salem No. 1     Notes
: 2. Reporting Period             November 1994
: 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt)               3411
: 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe)               1170
: 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe)         1115
: 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149
: 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe)     1106
: 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give Reason     N A.
: 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe)           N/A
: 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any               NA This Month    Year to Date    Cumulative
: 12. Hours in Reporting Period           720            8016          152713
: 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical         720            5843.6        100975.6
: 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs.         0                0              0
: 14. Hours Generator On-Line             720            5124.3        97012.2
: 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours           0                0              0
: 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH)                     2296142.4    16921828.8      307694142.8
: 17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH)                     769720          5277830      101813800
: 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH)       737771          4980197        96917750
: 19. Unit Service Factor                   100            63.9          63.5
: 20. Unit Availability Factor             100            63.9          63.5
: 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net)                   92.6          56.2          57.4
: 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net)                   91.9          55.7          56.9
: 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate                 0           28.6           21.4
: 24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each)
Refueling outage scheduled to start 4-8-95 and last 60 days.
: 25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup:
N A.
8-1-7.R2
 
UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH NOVEMBER 1994                                                   DOCKET NO. :-'5,.,0::_-.::.272=----
UNIT NAME: Salem #1 DATE: 12-10-94 COMPLETED BY: Mike Morroni TELEPHONE: 339.-5142 METHOD OF SHUTTING        LICENSE                                                                            '
DURATION                          DOWN            EVENT            SYSTEM    COMPONENT                CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACllf)N NO.          DATE        TYPE 1      (HOURS)          REASON 2      REACTOR        REPORT #          CODE 4    CODE 6                      TO PREVENT RECURRENCE 1958      11-16-94      F          4.7            A                5                                HF        FILTER             cw. INTAKE TRASH RAKE JAMMED 1972      11-19-94      F          4.9            A*              5              ---------        EA        RELAYX             FAULTY CONTROL RELAYS 1984      11-28-94      F        46.8              B              5              ---------        EA        RELAYX             ACTUATION OF DIFF. PROTECTION RELAY FOR
                                                                                                                                    # 2 S.P.T.
1                  2                                                          3                          4                                    5 F:  Forced        Reason                                                      Method:                    Exhibit G - Instructions             Exhibit 1 - Same S:  Scheduled      A-Equipment Failure (explain)                                1-Manual                  for Preparation of Data             Source B-Maintenance or Test                                        2-Manual Scram            Entry Sheets for Licensee C-Refueling                                                3-Automatic Scram          Event Report (LER) File D-Requlatory Restriction                                    4-Continuation of          (NUREG-0161)
E-Operator Training & License Examination                        Previous Outage F-Administrative                                          5-Load Reduction G-Operational Error (Explain)                                9-0ther H-Other (Explain)
* Most probable cause was faulty control relays actuated causing 4 T60 disconnect to open on# 4 Station Pwr. Trans ** relays have been replaced.
* Most probable cause was faulty control relays actuated causing 4 T60 disconnect to open on# 4 Station Pwr. Trans ** relays have been replaced.
lOCFRS-0.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272 SALEM 1 12/10/94 R.HELLER 609-339-5162
 
'. .
10CFRS-0.59
* MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 UNIT NAME: DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
  '.    . EVALUATIONS                               DOCKET NO:           50-272
The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59.
* MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994                                   UNIT NAME:           SALEM 1 DATE:         12/10/94 COMPLETED BY:             R.HELLER TELEPHONE:           609-339-5162 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations.
The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations.  
: 1. Design Change Packages (DCP) lEA-1063, Pkg. 1     Added l" Drain Valves and Component I.D. Numbers to Required Documentation - This DCP adds l" drain valves and component I.D. Numbers to P&ID 205249 (Sht 3),
: 1. Design Change Packages (DCP) lEA-1063, Pkg. 1 lEA-1073, Pkg. 1 lEC-3324, Pkg. 1 Added l" Drain Valves and Component I.D. Numbers to Required Documentation  
piping arrangement drawing 212823 and MMIS database.
-This DCP adds l" drain valves and component I.D. Numbers to P&ID 205249 (Sht 3), piping arrangement drawing 212823 and MMIS database.
These valves were installed on fire pump (350 gallon) day tanks 1DFE21and1DFE23, located in the fire pump house at Salem Generating Station, but were never addressed appropriately on P&ID's or MMIS. This DCP is for documentation update and does not modify any system or process. The Fire Pump Room Fuel Oil System is not addressed in the Technical Specifications. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-083) lEA-1073, Pkg. 1        Document Update on Salem Biocide Monitoring Building -
These valves were installed on fire pump (350 gallon) day tanks 1DFE21and1DFE23, located in the fire pump house at Salem Generating Station, but were never addressed appropriately on P&ID's or MMIS. This DCP is for documentation update and does not modify any system or process. The Fire Pump Room Fuel Oil System is not addressed in the Technical Specifications.
All pertinent documentation will be revised to show that the Biocide Monitoring Building is no longer operable and has been converted over to a Service Water Fab Shop. All drawings will be revised to reflect an as-built condition.
There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-083) Document Update on Salem Biocide Monitoring Building -All pertinent documentation will be revised to show that the Biocide Monitoring Building is no longer operable and has been converted over to a Service Water Fab Shop. All drawings will be revised to reflect an as-built condition.
Salem FSAR Fig. 1.2-1 (General Site Plan) will be revised to show a Service Water Fab Shop in place of the Biocide Monitoring Building. This DCP is for documentation update and does not modify any system or process. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-083) lEC-3324, Pkg. 1        RG 1.97 Isolator Replacement and Separate Class IE from Non-Class IE Loads - This DCP will install new signal isolation devices in class IE instrument loops within instrument racks which contain various monitoring and
Salem FSAR Fig. 1.2-1 (General Site Plan) will be revised to show a Service Water Fab Shop in place of the Biocide Monitoring Building.
 
This DCP is for documentation update and does not modify any system or process. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-083) RG 1.97 Isolator Replacement and Separate Class IE from Non-Class IE Loads -This DCP will install new signal isolation devices in class IE instrument loops within instrument racks which contain various monitoring and lOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS . MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-272 SALEM 1 12/10/94 R.HELLER 609-339-5I62 IEC-3324, Pkg. 3 IEC-3206, Pkg. 2 IEC-3340, Pkg. I DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
10CFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS                         DOCKET NO:          50-272
protection channels.
. MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994                           UNIT NAME:           SALEM 1 DATE:        12/10/94 COMPLETED BY:              R.HELLER TELEPHONE:          609-339-5I62 protection channels. Installation of these components will provide electrical isolation for Reg. Guide I.97 instrument loops, ensuring that faults within non-class IE portions of these loops will not propagate to the Class IE portion, damaging the functions provided by the affected instrument.
Installation of these components will provide electrical isolation for Reg. Guide I.97 instrument loops, ensuring that faults within non-class IE portions of these loops will not propagate to the Class IE portion, damaging the functions provided by the affected instrument.
This DCP will make no changes to the functional, operational or design requirements of any of the affected instrument loops, including instrument ranges, setpoints and protection channel response times. The margin of safety as defined in the bases of the Technical Specifications will not be reduced. (SORC 94-083)
This DCP will make no changes to the functional, operational or design requirements of any of the affected instrument loops, including instrument ranges, setpoints and protection channel response times. The margin of safety as defined in the bases of the Technical Specifications will not be reduced. (SORC 94-083) Separate class IE from Non-Class IE Loads -This modification separates Class IE loads from Non-Class IE loads in various process and computer interface racks by internal wiring modifications and the use of spare breakers in the I I 5 V AC Vital Instrument Busses. This modification does not involve any margin of safety as described in the basis section of the Technical Specifications.
IEC-3324, Pkg. 3  Separate class IE from Non-Class IE Loads - This modification separates Class IE loads from Non-Class IE loads in various process and computer interface racks by internal wiring modifications and the use of spare breakers in the I I 5 VAC Vital Instrument Busses. This modification does not involve any margin of safety as described in the basis section of the Technical Specifications. The margin of safety as defined in the bases of the Technical Specifications will not be reduced. (SORC 94-083)
The margin of safety as defined in the bases of the Technical Specifications will not be reduced. (SORC 94-083) Digital Feedwater/Reg.
IEC-3206, Pkg. 2  Digital Feedwater/Reg. Guide I.97 Isolators - This DCP will install new signal isolation devices in Class IE instrument loops within instrument racks which contain various monitoring and protection channels. Installation of these components will provide electrical isolation for Reg.
Guide I.97 Isolators  
Guide I. 97 instrument loops, ensuring that faults within non-class IE portions of these loops will not propagate to the Class IE portion. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis of any Technical Specification.
-This DCP will install new signal isolation devices in Class IE instrument loops within instrument racks which contain various monitoring and protection channels.
(SORC 94-083)
Installation of these components will provide electrical isolation for Reg. Guide I. 97 instrument loops, ensuring that faults within non-class IE portions of these loops will not propagate to the Class IE portion. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis of any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-083) Waste Gas Setpoint Modification  
IEC-3340, Pkg. I  Waste Gas Setpoint Modification - The purpose of this DCP is to implement the necessary setpoint and piping changes to enable the Waste Gas Comnpressors to operate
-The purpose of this DCP is to implement the necessary setpoint and piping changes to enable the Waste Gas Comnpressors to operate lOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS . MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-272 SALEM 1 12/10/94 R.HELLER 609-3 3 9-5162 (Cont'd) lEC-3345, Pkg. 2 lEC-3337, Pkg. 1 lEC-3289, Pkg. 1 DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
 
in the continuous/automatic mode, as cited in the SAR. All plant modifications for this DCP are confined to the recalibration of selected Waste Gas intrumentation and rerouting of existing compressor recirculation piping. The affected components remain in the same location and do not change in regard to their function in the loops. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis of any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-083) Steam Generator Narrow Range Low and Low Low Level Setpoint Change -Steam Generator Narrow Range Low and Low Low Level Setpoint Change -The purpose of this DCP is to change the SG NR Level Low Setpoints from 25% to 10% and the corresponding allowable values from 24% to 9%. In addition, this DCP also changes the SN NR Level Low-Low setpoints from 16% to 9% and the corresponding allowable values from 14.8% to 8%. The proposed setpoint and allowable values continue to ensure that the assumptions in the safety analyses remain valid, with appropriate consideration of protection system channel uncertainties.
10CFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS                         DOCKET NO:          50-272
Therefore, there is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-085) Switchgear  
. MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994                             UNIT NAME:         SALEM 1 DATE:        12/10/94 COMPLETED BY:            R.HELLER TELEPHONE:          609-3 39-5162 (Cont'd) in the continuous/automatic mode, as cited in the SAR. All plant modifications for this DCP are confined to the recalibration of selected Waste Gas intrumentation and rerouting of existing compressor recirculation piping. The affected components remain in the same location and do not change in regard to their function in the loops. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis of any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-083) lEC-3345, Pkg. 2 Steam Generator Narrow Range Low and Low Low Level Setpoint Change - Steam Generator Narrow Range Low and Low Low Level Setpoint Change -The purpose of this DCP is to change the SG NR Level Low Setpoints from 25% to 10% and the corresponding allowable values from 24% to 9%. In addition, this DCP also changes the SN NR Level Low-Low setpoints from 16% to 9% and the corresponding allowable values from 14.8% to 8%. The proposed setpoint and allowable values continue to ensure that the assumptions in the safety analyses remain valid, with appropriate consideration of protection system channel uncertainties. Therefore, there is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-085) lEC-3337, Pkg. 1 Switchgear & Penetration Area Ventilation System Upgrade
& Penetration Area Ventilation System Upgrade -This project provides design enhancements which will improve switchgear and penetration area ventilation (SP AV) system performance, reliability, and reduce area pressure problems.
                        - This project provides design enhancements which will improve switchgear and penetration area ventilation (SP AV) system performance, reliability, and reduce area pressure problems. The Technical Specifications do not address the SPAV system. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-085) lEC-3289, Pkg. 1 Cable Protection - Safety Related - This DCP provides improved cable protection of the subject circuits without limiting the load capability and also improves the protection
The Technical Specifications do not address the SP AV system. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-085) Cable Protection  
 
-Safety Related -This DCP provides improved cable protection of the subject circuits without limiting the load capability and also improves the protection lOCFR50.59 EVALUATIONS  
10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS                         DOCKET NO:            50-272
.. MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-272 SALEM 1 12/10/94 lEC-3321, Pkg. 1 lEC-3338, Pkg. 1 DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
..MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994                           UNIT NAME:           SALEM 1 DATE:        12/10/94 COMPLETED BY:             R. HELLER TELEPHONE:            609-339-5162 and operability of the equipment. This DCP will also remove the jumpers from the overload heater circuits that are presently in place for safety-related MOVs. This modification is in compliance with Reg. Guide 1.106, Thermal Overload Protection for Electric Motors on Motor Operated Valves. Calculation ES-18.006, Selection of Thermal Overload Heater Elements, Unit 1 & 2, Safety Related MOVs, documents the sizing of the overloads to comply with the requirements of Reg. Guide 1.106. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-088) lEC-3321, Pkg. 1  Diesel Generator Combustion Air Modification - This design change modifies the combustion air intake and exhaust subsystem of the emergency diesel generator system "DG'' and consists of the following scope items: 1.)
R. HELLER 609-339-5162 and operability of the equipment.
Installation of a protective tornado barrier for each of the three combustion air intakes; 2.) Replacement of the combustion air exhaust piping from the exhaust silencer to the auxiliary bldg. roof, and 3.) Installation/ modification of the subsystem's piping supports such that the subsystem meets seismic class I. The work performed during Modes 5
This DCP will also remove the jumpers from the overload heater circuits that are presently in place for safety-related MOVs. This modification is in compliance with Reg. Guide 1.106, Thermal Overload Protection for Electric Motors on Motor Operated Valves. Calculation ES-18.006, Selection of Thermal Overload Heater Elements, Unit 1 & 2, Safety Related MOV s, documents the sizing of the overloads to comply with the requirements of Reg. Guide 1.106. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-088) Diesel Generator Combustion Air Modification  
                      &6 will only proceed on one DG at a time, such that no less than two separate and independent DGs will be operable at any given time. Surveillance requirement 4. 8 .1. 2 will be performed to ensure operability of the DGs. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-090) lEC-3338, Pkg. 1  Rod Control Timing Change - This modification is to make a rod control timing change. The change is incorporated by changing the orientation or existing diodes on existing slave cycle decoder circuits cards located in the logic cabinet.
-This design change modifies the combustion air intake and exhaust subsystem of the emergency diesel generator system "DG'' and consists of the following scope items: 1.) Installation of a protective tornado barrier for each of the three combustion air intakes; 2.) Replacement of the combustion air exhaust piping from the exhaust silencer to the auxiliary bldg. roof, and 3.) Installation/
The decoder cards have been manufactured to accommodate the timing changes of this DCP. Testing of the slave cycler outputs will be performed at the Training
modification of the subsystem's piping supports such that the subsystem meets seismic class I. The work performed during Modes 5 &6 will only proceed on one DG at a time, such that no less than two separate and independent DGs will be operable at any given time. Surveillance requirement  
 
: 4. 8 .1. 2 will be performed to ensure operability of the DGs. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-090) Rod Control Timing Change -This modification is to make a rod control timing change. The change is incorporated by changing the orientation or existing diodes on existing slave cycle decoder circuits cards located in the logic cabinet. The decoder cards have been manufactured to accommodate the timing changes of this DCP. Testing of the slave cycler outputs will be performed at the Training lOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS . MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-272 SALEM 1 12/10/94 R.HELLER 609-339-5162 lEE-0066, Pkg. 1 lEE-0067, Pkg. 1 lEE-0068, Pkg. 1 lEE-0069, Pkg. 1 lEE-0070, Pkg. 1 lEE-0071, Pkg. 1 DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
10CFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS                         DOCKET NO:          50-272
Center first, then repeated in the plant. The DCP will schedule these two surveillance's of a refueling cycle frequency.
. MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994                           UNIT NAME:           SALEM 1 DATE:        12/10/94 COMPLETED BY:            R.HELLER TELEPHONE:          609-339-5162 Center first, then repeated in the plant. The DCP will schedule these two surveillance's of a refueling cycle frequency. The proposed timing changes do not affect the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. A generic safety evaluation has been performed by WOG which concluded that all safety limits continue to be met. In fact, the timing change in combination with the Rod Control surveillance tests increase the reliability of the Rod Control System.
The proposed timing changes do not affect the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification.
(SORC 94-090) lEE-0066, Pkg. 1  Circulating Water Traveling Screen 1 lA, 1 lB, 12A, 12B, lEE-0067, Pkg. 1  13A, 13B Modifications - These modifications will replace lEE-0068, Pkg. 1  the existing fish baskets in the circulating water traveling lEE-0069, Pkg. 1  screens with redesigned baskets to provide greater fish lEE-0070, Pkg. 1  survivability. Two additional spray nozzles will be added to lEE-0071, Pkg. 1  the main debris spray header to provide better spray coverage to the traveling water screen and improve debris removal. Two spray nozzles will be added to the source pipe of the two inside fish spray headers to provide better spray coverage and improve fish handling. A shield will be provided over the top of the existing fish spray nozzles to prevent grass and other debris from lodging on the spray nozzles and blocking the flow. The Circulating Water System is non-safety related and is not required to support the safe shutdown of the reactor plant or maintain it in a safe condition after shutdown. The function and operation of the equipment and system remains the same. Therefore, there is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-092)
A generic safety evaluation has been performed by WOG which concluded that all safety limits continue to be met. In fact, the timing change in combination with the Rod Control surveillance tests increase the reliability of the Rod Control System. (SORC 94-090) Circulating Water Traveling Screen 1 lA, 1 lB, 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B Modifications  
 
-These modifications will replace the existing fish baskets in the circulating water traveling screens with redesigned baskets to provide greater fish survivability.
10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS                               DOCKET NO:            50-272
Two additional spray nozzles will be added to the main debris spray header to provide better spray coverage to the traveling water screen and improve debris removal. Two spray nozzles will be added to the source pipe of the two inside fish spray headers to provide better spray coverage and improve fish handling.
, "MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994                                 UNIT NAME:             SALEM 1 DATE:        12/10/94 COMPLETED BY:              R.HELLER TELEPHONE:            609-339-5162 (Cont'd)
A shield will be provided over the top of the existing fish spray nozzles to prevent grass and other debris from lodging on the spray nozzles and blocking the flow. The Circulating Water System is non-safety related and is not required to support the safe shutdown of the reactor plant or maintain it in a safe condition after shutdown.
: 2. Temporary Modifications (T-Mods)
The function and operation of the equipment and system remains the same. Therefore, there is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-092) 10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS , "MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-272 SALEM 1 12/10/94 R.HELLER 609-339-5162 DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE: (Cont'd) 2. Temporary Modifications (T-Mods) T-Mod 93-109 Fuel Handling Crane Ambient Temperature Requirement  
T-Mod 93-109         Fuel Handling Crane Ambient Temperature Requirement -
-This T-Mod is to upgrade the hoisting capacity of the Fuel Handling Crane from 5 Tons to 20 Tons. The safety evaluation which accompanied the LCR for the Spent fuel Pool rerack stated that to assure absence of brittle fracture tendency of the crane material, ambient temperature in the fuel pool area will be kept above 70°F during the rack lift operation.
This T-Mod is to upgrade the hoisting capacity of the Fuel Handling Crane from 5 Tons to 20 Tons. The safety evaluation which accompanied the LCR for the Spent fuel Pool rerack stated that to assure absence of brittle fracture tendency of the crane material, ambient temperature in the fuel pool area will be kept above 70°F during the rack lift operation. Because this requirement cannot be met, it was necessary to justify operation of the Fuel Handling Crane at a lower temperature. The new Rack Handling Trolley has plate sizes greater than 1/2", therefore it is subject to the requirements of NUREG-0554, Paragraph 2.4. UT examination of these plates shows there are no flaws.
Because this requirement cannot be met, it was necessary to justify operation of the Fuel Handling Crane at a lower temperature.
According to Figure 1 of ASTM E208, ifthere are no flaws in the material, fracture initiation will not start if the service temperature is kept at or above the Nil Ductility Temperature (NDT) of the material. ASME Table NC-231 l(a)-1 shows that the NDT of ASTM A36 material is
The new Rack Handling Trolley has plate sizes greater than 1/2", therefore it is subject to the requirements of NUREG-0554, Paragraph 2.4. UT examination of these plates shows there are no flaws. According to Figure 1 of ASTM E208, ifthere are no flaws in the material, fracture initiation will not start if the service temperature is kept at or above the Nil Ductility Temperature (NDT) of the material.
                              +40°F. To assure absence of brittle fracture tendency of the material of the temporary trolley, minimum ambient temperature will be kept at or above +45°F. Also, the maximum stresses that the crane will experience are less than 20% of the brittle fracture stress of 36,000 psi. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-086)
ASME Table NC-231 l(a)-1 shows that the NDT of ASTM A36 material is +40°F. To assure absence of brittle fracture tendency of the material of the temporary trolley, minimum ambient temperature will be kept at or above +45°F. Also, the maximum stresses that the crane will experience are less than 20% of the brittle fracture stress of 36,000 psi. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-086) _J IOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS . MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-272 SALEM 1 12/10/94 R.HELLER 609-339-5162  
_J
: 3. Safety Evaluations S-C-ZZ-ESE-0841  
 
: 4. Procedures DATE: C01\1PLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
IOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS                           DOCKET NO:            50-272
Safety Evaluation for Separation Distance of Cables in Free Air Installed in Salem Unit 1 and Unit 2 Relay Rooms (El. 100) -This evaluation will be used to create SAR Change Notice 94-40 which will revise UFSAR section 8.1.4.2.4, "Separation in Plant" and will provide additional flexibility to the allowable separation distance between cables in redundant channels, including associated circuit cables, which are installed in free air of the Salem Units 1 and 2 relay rooms (El. 100). There is no existing Technical Specification that is associated with Salem's Appendix R Alternate Shutdown Methodology.
. MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994                             UNIT NAME:           SALEM 1 DATE:        12/10/94 C01\1PLETED BY:          R.HELLER TELEPHONE:            609-339-5162
Therefore, the proposed text change in the UFSAR does not reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-083) NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0065(Q)
: 3. Safety Evaluations S-C-ZZ-ESE-0841     Safety Evaluation for Separation Distance of Cables in Free Air Installed in Salem Unit 1 and Unit 2 Relay Rooms (El.
Nuclear Department Resource Allocation Program -Rev. 2 -This revision deletes this procedure and creates a new Nuclear Business Procedure ND.OA-BP.ZZ-0005(Z) to cover this information.
100) - This evaluation will be used to create SAR Change Notice 94-40 which will revise UFSAR section 8.1.4.2.4, "Separation in Plant" and will provide additional flexibility to the allowable separation distance between cables in redundant channels, including associated circuit cables, which are installed in free air of the Salem Units 1 and 2 relay rooms (El. 100). There is no existing Technical Specification that is associated with Salem's Appendix R Alternate Shutdown Methodology. Therefore, the proposed text change in the UFSAR does not reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-083)
The operational Quality Assurance Program does not apply to this procedure.
: 4. Procedures NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0065(Q) Nuclear Department Resource Allocation Program - Rev. 2
although this procedure is briefly described in the UFSAR (Section 13 .5.1 (Hope Creek), Plant Procedures, and Section 13.5.1.1 (Salem), Nuclear Administrative Procedures), it performs no function relative to the safe operation of either Hope Creek or Salem Stations.
                        - This revision deletes this procedure and creates a new Nuclear Business Procedure ND.OA-BP.ZZ-0005(Z) to cover this information. The operational Quality Assurance Program does not apply to this procedure. although this procedure is briefly described in the UFSAR (Section 13 .5.1 (Hope Creek), Plant Procedures, and Section 13.5.1.1 (Salem), Nuclear Administrative Procedures), it performs no function relative to the safe operation of either Hope Creek or Salem Stations. Therefore, deleting this procedure will have no affect on the safe operation of either Hope creek or Salem Stations. UFSAR Change Requests for Hope creek and Salem UFSARs are being prepared to remove the description ofthis procedure from the UFSAR.
Therefore, deleting this procedure will have no affect on the safe operation of either Hope creek or Salem Stations.
There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-087)
UFSAR Change Requests for Hope creek and Salem UFSARs are being prepared to remove the description ofthis procedure from the UFSAR. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-087)
 
REFUELING INFORMATION  
REFUELING INFORMATION                                   DOCKET NO:        50-272
-MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
- MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994                                   UNIT NAME:       SALEM 1 DATE:       12/10/94 COMPLETED BY:          R. HELLER TELEPHONE:        609-339-5162 MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994
50-272 SALEM 1 12/10/94 R. HELLER 609-339-5162  
: 1. Refueling information has changed from last month: YES _ _NO _X_
: 1. Refueling information has changed from last month: YES __ NO _X_ 2. Scheduled date for next refueling:
: 2. Scheduled date for next refueling: April 8. 1995
April 8. 1995 3. Scheduled date for restart following refueling:
: 3. Scheduled date for restart following refueling: June 6. 1995
June 6. 1995 4. a. Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?
: 4. a. Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?
YES NOT DETERMINED TO DATE _X_ b. Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?
YES         NO~-
YES NO ____A_ If no, when is it scheduled?
NOT DETERMINED TO DATE _X_
March 1995 5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action:  
: b. Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?
: 6. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling:  
YES         NO ____A_
: 7. Number ofFuel Assemblies:  
If no, when is it scheduled? March 1995
: a. Incore b. In Spent Fuel Storage 8. Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity:
: 5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: ---~NIA~---
Future spent fuel storage capacity:  
: 6. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling:
: 9. Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity:
: 7. Number ofFuel Assemblies:
8-1-7.R4 _193 __ 732 1632 _1632 __ September 2008
: a. Incore                                                             _193 _ _
* SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING  
: b. In Spent Fuel Storage                                                   732
: 8. Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity:                             1632 Future spent fuel storage capacity:                                   _1632_ _
: 9. Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity:            September 2008 8-1-7.R4
 
SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
  -UNIT 1 NOVEMBER 1994 SALEM UNIT NO. 1 The Unit began the period operating at 100% power and continued to operate at essentially full power until 11/16/94, when power was briefly reduced to 80% to free up the trash rake which had become jammed. The Unit was restored to full power later, the same day, and continued to operate at full power until 11/19/94, when load was reduced due to the loss of#4 and #14 station power transformers.
  - UNIT 1 NOVEMBER 1994 SALEM UNIT NO. 1 The Unit began the period operating at 100% power and continued to operate at essentially full power until 11/16/94, when power was briefly reduced to 80% to free up the trash rake which had become jammed. The Unit was restored to full power later, the same day, and continued to operate at full power until 11/19/94, when load was reduced due to the loss of#4 and #14 station power transformers. The Unit was restored to full power on 11/19/94 and continued to operate at essentially full power until 11/28/94, when load was reduced to 30% due to loss of#2 station power transformer. The transformer was returned to service and a power escalation commenced on 11/30/94. The Unit ended the period with a power escalation in progress.}}
The Unit was restored to full power on 11/19/94 and continued to operate at essentially full power until 11/28/94, when load was reduced to 30% due to loss of#2 station power transformer.
The transformer was returned to service and a power escalation commenced on 11/30/94.
The Unit ended the period with a power escalation in progress.}}

Latest revision as of 05:49, 3 February 2020

Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1994 for Salem Generating Station Unit 1.W/941213 Ltr
ML18101A385
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 11/30/1994
From: Hagan J, Morroni M
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9412190093
Download: ML18101A385 (13)


Text

e PS~G Publi,c; Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit December 13, 1994 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attn.: Document Control Desk MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEMNO. 1 DOCKET NO: 50-272 In compliance with Section 6.9.1.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original copy of the monthly operating reports for the month of November 1994 are being sent to you.

Average Daily Unit Power Level Operating Data Report Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions 10CFR50.59 Evaluations Operating Summary Refueling Information Sincerely yours, ger-Salem Operations RH:vls Enclosures C Mr. Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator USNRC, Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19046 8-1-7.R4 The P9-wffis_in_vour_h~mds

9412190093 941130
PDR ADOCK 05000272 95-2168 REV. 6/ 4

, R PDR _J

.ERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LE~

Docket No.: 50-272

' .. Unit Name: Salem #1 Date: 12/10/94 Completed by: Mike Morroni Telephone: 339-5142 Month November 1994 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 1088 17 1108 2 1123 18 867 3 1100 19 1005 4 1078 20 1113 5 1033 21 1113 6 1102 22 1099 7 1100 23 1105 8 1111 . 24 1106 9 1128 25 1107 10 1094 26 1108 11 1113 27 1102 12 1102 28 810 13 1132 29 233 14 1099 30 348 15 1087 31 -----

16 1029 P. 8.1-7 Rl

OPERATING DATA REPORT Docket No: 50-272 Date: 12/10/94 Completed by: Mike Morroni Telephone: 339-5142 Operating Status

1. Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes
2. Reporting Period November 1994
3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411
4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170
5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115
6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149
7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106
8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give Reason N A.
9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) N/A
10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any NA This Month Year to Date Cumulative
12. Hours in Reporting Period 720 8016 152713
12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 720 5843.6 100975.6
13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 0 0 0
14. Hours Generator On-Line 720 5124.3 97012.2
15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 0 0 0
16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 2296142.4 16921828.8 307694142.8
17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 769720 5277830 101813800
18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) 737771 4980197 96917750
19. Unit Service Factor 100 63.9 63.5
20. Unit Availability Factor 100 63.9 63.5
21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 92.6 56.2 57.4
22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 91.9 55.7 56.9
23. Unit Forced Outage Rate 0 28.6 21.4
24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each)

Refueling outage scheduled to start 4-8-95 and last 60 days.

25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup:

N A.

8-1-7.R2

UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH NOVEMBER 1994 DOCKET NO. :-'5,.,0::_-.::.272=----

UNIT NAME: Salem #1 DATE: 12-10-94 COMPLETED BY: Mike Morroni TELEPHONE: 339.-5142 METHOD OF SHUTTING LICENSE '

DURATION DOWN EVENT SYSTEM COMPONENT CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACllf)N NO. DATE TYPE 1 (HOURS) REASON 2 REACTOR REPORT # CODE 4 CODE 6 TO PREVENT RECURRENCE 1958 11-16-94 F 4.7 A 5 HF FILTER cw. INTAKE TRASH RAKE JAMMED 1972 11-19-94 F 4.9 A* 5 --------- EA RELAYX FAULTY CONTROL RELAYS 1984 11-28-94 F 46.8 B 5 --------- EA RELAYX ACTUATION OF DIFF. PROTECTION RELAY FOR

  1. 2 S.P.T.

1 2 3 4 5 F: Forced Reason Method: Exhibit G - Instructions Exhibit 1 - Same S: Scheduled A-Equipment Failure (explain) 1-Manual for Preparation of Data Source B-Maintenance or Test 2-Manual Scram Entry Sheets for Licensee C-Refueling 3-Automatic Scram Event Report (LER) File D-Requlatory Restriction 4-Continuation of (NUREG-0161)

E-Operator Training & License Examination Previous Outage F-Administrative 5-Load Reduction G-Operational Error (Explain) 9-0ther H-Other (Explain)

  • Most probable cause was faulty control relays actuated causing 4 T60 disconnect to open on# 4 Station Pwr. Trans ** relays have been replaced.

10CFRS-0.59

'. . EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272

  • MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: 12/10/94 COMPLETED BY: R.HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations.
1. Design Change Packages (DCP) lEA-1063, Pkg. 1 Added l" Drain Valves and Component I.D. Numbers to Required Documentation - This DCP adds l" drain valves and component I.D. Numbers to P&ID 205249 (Sht 3),

piping arrangement drawing 212823 and MMIS database.

These valves were installed on fire pump (350 gallon) day tanks 1DFE21and1DFE23, located in the fire pump house at Salem Generating Station, but were never addressed appropriately on P&ID's or MMIS. This DCP is for documentation update and does not modify any system or process. The Fire Pump Room Fuel Oil System is not addressed in the Technical Specifications. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-083) lEA-1073, Pkg. 1 Document Update on Salem Biocide Monitoring Building -

All pertinent documentation will be revised to show that the Biocide Monitoring Building is no longer operable and has been converted over to a Service Water Fab Shop. All drawings will be revised to reflect an as-built condition.

Salem FSAR Fig. 1.2-1 (General Site Plan) will be revised to show a Service Water Fab Shop in place of the Biocide Monitoring Building. This DCP is for documentation update and does not modify any system or process. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-083) lEC-3324, Pkg. 1 RG 1.97 Isolator Replacement and Separate Class IE from Non-Class IE Loads - This DCP will install new signal isolation devices in class IE instrument loops within instrument racks which contain various monitoring and

10CFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272

. MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: 12/10/94 COMPLETED BY: R.HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5I62 protection channels. Installation of these components will provide electrical isolation for Reg. Guide I.97 instrument loops, ensuring that faults within non-class IE portions of these loops will not propagate to the Class IE portion, damaging the functions provided by the affected instrument.

This DCP will make no changes to the functional, operational or design requirements of any of the affected instrument loops, including instrument ranges, setpoints and protection channel response times. The margin of safety as defined in the bases of the Technical Specifications will not be reduced. (SORC 94-083)

IEC-3324, Pkg. 3 Separate class IE from Non-Class IE Loads - This modification separates Class IE loads from Non-Class IE loads in various process and computer interface racks by internal wiring modifications and the use of spare breakers in the I I 5 VAC Vital Instrument Busses. This modification does not involve any margin of safety as described in the basis section of the Technical Specifications. The margin of safety as defined in the bases of the Technical Specifications will not be reduced. (SORC 94-083)

IEC-3206, Pkg. 2 Digital Feedwater/Reg. Guide I.97 Isolators - This DCP will install new signal isolation devices in Class IE instrument loops within instrument racks which contain various monitoring and protection channels. Installation of these components will provide electrical isolation for Reg.

Guide I. 97 instrument loops, ensuring that faults within non-class IE portions of these loops will not propagate to the Class IE portion. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis of any Technical Specification.

(SORC 94-083)

IEC-3340, Pkg. I Waste Gas Setpoint Modification - The purpose of this DCP is to implement the necessary setpoint and piping changes to enable the Waste Gas Comnpressors to operate

10CFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272

. MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: 12/10/94 COMPLETED BY: R.HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-3 39-5162 (Cont'd) in the continuous/automatic mode, as cited in the SAR. All plant modifications for this DCP are confined to the recalibration of selected Waste Gas intrumentation and rerouting of existing compressor recirculation piping. The affected components remain in the same location and do not change in regard to their function in the loops. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis of any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-083) lEC-3345, Pkg. 2 Steam Generator Narrow Range Low and Low Low Level Setpoint Change - Steam Generator Narrow Range Low and Low Low Level Setpoint Change -The purpose of this DCP is to change the SG NR Level Low Setpoints from 25% to 10% and the corresponding allowable values from 24% to 9%. In addition, this DCP also changes the SN NR Level Low-Low setpoints from 16% to 9% and the corresponding allowable values from 14.8% to 8%. The proposed setpoint and allowable values continue to ensure that the assumptions in the safety analyses remain valid, with appropriate consideration of protection system channel uncertainties. Therefore, there is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-085) lEC-3337, Pkg. 1 Switchgear & Penetration Area Ventilation System Upgrade

- This project provides design enhancements which will improve switchgear and penetration area ventilation (SP AV) system performance, reliability, and reduce area pressure problems. The Technical Specifications do not address the SPAV system. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-085) lEC-3289, Pkg. 1 Cable Protection - Safety Related - This DCP provides improved cable protection of the subject circuits without limiting the load capability and also improves the protection

10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272

..MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: 12/10/94 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 and operability of the equipment. This DCP will also remove the jumpers from the overload heater circuits that are presently in place for safety-related MOVs. This modification is in compliance with Reg. Guide 1.106, Thermal Overload Protection for Electric Motors on Motor Operated Valves. Calculation ES-18.006, Selection of Thermal Overload Heater Elements, Unit 1 & 2, Safety Related MOVs, documents the sizing of the overloads to comply with the requirements of Reg. Guide 1.106. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-088) lEC-3321, Pkg. 1 Diesel Generator Combustion Air Modification - This design change modifies the combustion air intake and exhaust subsystem of the emergency diesel generator system "DG and consists of the following scope items: 1.)

Installation of a protective tornado barrier for each of the three combustion air intakes; 2.) Replacement of the combustion air exhaust piping from the exhaust silencer to the auxiliary bldg. roof, and 3.) Installation/ modification of the subsystem's piping supports such that the subsystem meets seismic class I. The work performed during Modes 5

&6 will only proceed on one DG at a time, such that no less than two separate and independent DGs will be operable at any given time. Surveillance requirement 4. 8 .1. 2 will be performed to ensure operability of the DGs. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-090) lEC-3338, Pkg. 1 Rod Control Timing Change - This modification is to make a rod control timing change. The change is incorporated by changing the orientation or existing diodes on existing slave cycle decoder circuits cards located in the logic cabinet.

The decoder cards have been manufactured to accommodate the timing changes of this DCP. Testing of the slave cycler outputs will be performed at the Training

10CFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272

. MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: 12/10/94 COMPLETED BY: R.HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 Center first, then repeated in the plant. The DCP will schedule these two surveillance's of a refueling cycle frequency. The proposed timing changes do not affect the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. A generic safety evaluation has been performed by WOG which concluded that all safety limits continue to be met. In fact, the timing change in combination with the Rod Control surveillance tests increase the reliability of the Rod Control System.

(SORC 94-090) lEE-0066, Pkg. 1 Circulating Water Traveling Screen 1 lA, 1 lB, 12A, 12B, lEE-0067, Pkg. 1 13A, 13B Modifications - These modifications will replace lEE-0068, Pkg. 1 the existing fish baskets in the circulating water traveling lEE-0069, Pkg. 1 screens with redesigned baskets to provide greater fish lEE-0070, Pkg. 1 survivability. Two additional spray nozzles will be added to lEE-0071, Pkg. 1 the main debris spray header to provide better spray coverage to the traveling water screen and improve debris removal. Two spray nozzles will be added to the source pipe of the two inside fish spray headers to provide better spray coverage and improve fish handling. A shield will be provided over the top of the existing fish spray nozzles to prevent grass and other debris from lodging on the spray nozzles and blocking the flow. The Circulating Water System is non-safety related and is not required to support the safe shutdown of the reactor plant or maintain it in a safe condition after shutdown. The function and operation of the equipment and system remains the same. Therefore, there is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-092)

10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272

, "MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: 12/10/94 COMPLETED BY: R.HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 (Cont'd)

2. Temporary Modifications (T-Mods)

T-Mod 93-109 Fuel Handling Crane Ambient Temperature Requirement -

This T-Mod is to upgrade the hoisting capacity of the Fuel Handling Crane from 5 Tons to 20 Tons. The safety evaluation which accompanied the LCR for the Spent fuel Pool rerack stated that to assure absence of brittle fracture tendency of the crane material, ambient temperature in the fuel pool area will be kept above 70°F during the rack lift operation. Because this requirement cannot be met, it was necessary to justify operation of the Fuel Handling Crane at a lower temperature. The new Rack Handling Trolley has plate sizes greater than 1/2", therefore it is subject to the requirements of NUREG-0554, Paragraph 2.4. UT examination of these plates shows there are no flaws.

According to Figure 1 of ASTM E208, ifthere are no flaws in the material, fracture initiation will not start if the service temperature is kept at or above the Nil Ductility Temperature (NDT) of the material. ASME Table NC-231 l(a)-1 shows that the NDT of ASTM A36 material is

+40°F. To assure absence of brittle fracture tendency of the material of the temporary trolley, minimum ambient temperature will be kept at or above +45°F. Also, the maximum stresses that the crane will experience are less than 20% of the brittle fracture stress of 36,000 psi. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-086)

_J

IOCFRS0.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-272

. MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: 12/10/94 C01\1PLETED BY: R.HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162

3. Safety Evaluations S-C-ZZ-ESE-0841 Safety Evaluation for Separation Distance of Cables in Free Air Installed in Salem Unit 1 and Unit 2 Relay Rooms (El.

100) - This evaluation will be used to create SAR Change Notice 94-40 which will revise UFSAR section 8.1.4.2.4, "Separation in Plant" and will provide additional flexibility to the allowable separation distance between cables in redundant channels, including associated circuit cables, which are installed in free air of the Salem Units 1 and 2 relay rooms (El. 100). There is no existing Technical Specification that is associated with Salem's Appendix R Alternate Shutdown Methodology. Therefore, the proposed text change in the UFSAR does not reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-083)

4. Procedures NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0065(Q) Nuclear Department Resource Allocation Program - Rev. 2

- This revision deletes this procedure and creates a new Nuclear Business Procedure ND.OA-BP.ZZ-0005(Z) to cover this information. The operational Quality Assurance Program does not apply to this procedure. although this procedure is briefly described in the UFSAR (Section 13 .5.1 (Hope Creek), Plant Procedures, and Section 13.5.1.1 (Salem), Nuclear Administrative Procedures), it performs no function relative to the safe operation of either Hope Creek or Salem Stations. Therefore, deleting this procedure will have no affect on the safe operation of either Hope creek or Salem Stations. UFSAR Change Requests for Hope creek and Salem UFSARs are being prepared to remove the description ofthis procedure from the UFSAR.

There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for the Technical Specifications. (SORC 94-087)

REFUELING INFORMATION DOCKET NO: 50-272

- MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: 12/10/94 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 MONTH: NOVEMBER 1994

1. Refueling information has changed from last month: YES _ _NO _X_
2. Scheduled date for next refueling: April 8. 1995
3. Scheduled date for restart following refueling: June 6. 1995
4. a. Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?

YES NO~-

NOT DETERMINED TO DATE _X_

b. Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?

YES NO ____A_

If no, when is it scheduled? March 1995

5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: ---~NIA~---
6. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling:
7. Number ofFuel Assemblies:
a. Incore _193 _ _
b. In Spent Fuel Storage 732
8. Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: 1632 Future spent fuel storage capacity: _1632_ _
9. Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity: September 2008 8-1-7.R4

SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING

SUMMARY

- UNIT 1 NOVEMBER 1994 SALEM UNIT NO. 1 The Unit began the period operating at 100% power and continued to operate at essentially full power until 11/16/94, when power was briefly reduced to 80% to free up the trash rake which had become jammed. The Unit was restored to full power later, the same day, and continued to operate at full power until 11/19/94, when load was reduced due to the loss of#4 and #14 station power transformers. The Unit was restored to full power on 11/19/94 and continued to operate at essentially full power until 11/28/94, when load was reduced to 30% due to loss of#2 station power transformer. The transformer was returned to service and a power escalation commenced on 11/30/94. The Unit ended the period with a power escalation in progress.