ML19323A849: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 21: Line 21:
   . J..
   . J..
BOSTON E* Dis O N COMPANY B00 BovLsTON STREtt BoGTON massachusetts 02199 w
BOSTON E* Dis O N COMPANY B00 BovLsTON STREtt BoGTON massachusetts 02199 w
J. EDWARD HOWARD
J. EDWARD HOWARD we paasseaw?
                                                                                        ,
we paasseaw?
     ..,n...
     ..,n...
April 24, 1980 BECo. Ltr. #80- 81 Proposed Change #80-02 Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Operating Reactors Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.      20555 License No. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293 Ref, a)    C.E. letter to BECo. titled, " Reactor Protection System (RPS) Delay Time Tech.
April 24, 1980 BECo. Ltr. #80- 81 Proposed Change #80-02 Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Operating Reactors Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.      20555 License No. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293 Ref, a)    C.E. letter to BECo. titled, " Reactor Protection System (RPS) Delay Time Tech.
Line 33: Line 31:
Pursuant to Section 50.90 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, Boston Edison Company proposes the following modification to Specification 3.1, Appendix A of Operating License No. DPR-35. The desired change would consist of replacing the current value of 100 milli-seconds for the Reactor Protection System response time (from the opening of the sensor contact up to and including the opening of the trip actuator contacts) with a new value of 50 milli-seconds.
Pursuant to Section 50.90 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, Boston Edison Company proposes the following modification to Specification 3.1, Appendix A of Operating License No. DPR-35. The desired change would consist of replacing the current value of 100 milli-seconds for the Reactor Protection System response time (from the opening of the sensor contact up to and including the opening of the trip actuator contacts) with a new value of 50 milli-seconds.
Reason for Chance Per References a) & b) above, a review of transient analysis input parameters has shown that a value of 50 milli-seconds has been used for the Reactor Protection System delay time. This Technical Specification change is requested to assure com-patibility-between the Technical Specification and the transient analyses. Please note that measurements made at Pilgrim Station have shown the response time is actually less than 50 milli-seconds and therefore current transient analyses using this value are conservative with respect to the measured values.
Reason for Chance Per References a) & b) above, a review of transient analysis input parameters has shown that a value of 50 milli-seconds has been used for the Reactor Protection System delay time. This Technical Specification change is requested to assure com-patibility-between the Technical Specification and the transient analyses. Please note that measurements made at Pilgrim Station have shown the response time is actually less than 50 milli-seconds and therefore current transient analyses using this value are conservative with respect to the measured values.
                                                                          >-


                                                                                          .
.    .
                                      -
e J  '
e J  '
   'kOOTEN EDCON COMPANY Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito, Chief April 24, 1980 Page 2
   'kOOTEN EDCON COMPANY Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito, Chief April 24, 1980 Page 2 Safety Evaluation Decreasing the allowable response time improves the limiting operation of the Reactor Protection System and therefore, safety margins are improved. This change has been reviewed and approved by the Operations Review Committee and reviewed by the Nuclear Safety Review and Audit Committee.
              .
Safety Evaluation Decreasing the allowable response time improves the limiting operation of the Reactor Protection System and therefore, safety margins are improved. This change has been reviewed and approved by the Operations Review Committee and reviewed by the Nuclear Safety Review and Audit Committee.
Schedule of Change This change will be put into effect upon receipt of approval fron the Commission.
Schedule of Change This change will be put into effect upon receipt of approval fron the Commission.
Fee Determination In accordance with Section 170.12 of the Commission's Regulations, Boston Edison proposes this license change as a Class II. Accordingfy a check for Twelve Hundred Dollars ($1200) is enclosed.
Fee Determination In accordance with Section 170.12 of the Commission's Regulations, Boston Edison proposes this license change as a Class II. Accordingfy a check for Twelve Hundred Dollars ($1200) is enclosed.
Very truly yours,
Very truly yours, UhL' 3 signed originals and 37 copies Commonwealth of Massachusetts)
                                                                      *      -
UhL' 3 signed originals and 37 copies Commonwealth of Massachusetts)
County of Suffolk              )
County of Suffolk              )
Then personally appeared before me J. Edward Howard, who, being duly sworn, did state that he is Vice President - Nuclear of Boston Edison Company, the applicant herein, and that he is duly authorized to execute and file the sub-mittal contained herein in the name and on behalf of Boston Edison Company and that the statements in said submittal are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
Then personally appeared before me J. Edward Howard, who, being duly sworn, did state that he is Vice President - Nuclear of Boston Edison Company, the applicant herein, and that he is duly authorized to execute and file the sub-mittal contained herein in the name and on behalf of Boston Edison Company and that the statements in said submittal are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
My Commission expires:      u// [a, /($/          da          ,
My Commission expires:      u// [a, /($/          da          ,
W
W sgTtary Public 1
                                                                                '
sgTtary Public 1
I l
I l
                                                                                             !}}
                                                                                             !}}

Latest revision as of 03:35, 1 February 2020

Application to Amend License DPR-35,replacing Current Value of 100 Ms for Reactor Protection Sys Response Time W/New Value of 50 Ms
ML19323A849
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 04/24/1980
From: Howard J
BOSTON EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19323A850 List:
References
IEC-80-08, IEC-80-8, NUDOCS 8005060134
Download: ML19323A849 (2)
v • d • e


Text

.

3005000

. J..

BOSTON E* Dis O N COMPANY B00 BovLsTON STREtt BoGTON massachusetts 02199 w

J. EDWARD HOWARD we paasseaw?

..,n...

April 24, 1980 BECo. Ltr. #80- 81 Proposed Change #80-02 Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Operating Reactors Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 License No. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293 Ref, a) C.E. letter to BECo. titled, " Reactor Protection System (RPS) Delay Time Tech.

,_ _ Spec. Change" dated February 29, 1980 b) IE Circular 80-08 "BWR Technical Spec- '

ification Inconsistency - RPS Response Time" dated April 18, 1980 Proposed Technical Specification Change to Reactor Protection System (RPS) Delay Time

Dear Sir:

Pursuant to Section 50.90 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, Boston Edison Company proposes the following modification to Specification 3.1, Appendix A of Operating License No. DPR-35. The desired change would consist of replacing the current value of 100 milli-seconds for the Reactor Protection System response time (from the opening of the sensor contact up to and including the opening of the trip actuator contacts) with a new value of 50 milli-seconds.

Reason for Chance Per References a) & b) above, a review of transient analysis input parameters has shown that a value of 50 milli-seconds has been used for the Reactor Protection System delay time. This Technical Specification change is requested to assure com-patibility-between the Technical Specification and the transient analyses. Please note that measurements made at Pilgrim Station have shown the response time is actually less than 50 milli-seconds and therefore current transient analyses using this value are conservative with respect to the measured values.

e J '

'kOOTEN EDCON COMPANY Mr. Thomas A. Ippolito, Chief April 24, 1980 Page 2 Safety Evaluation Decreasing the allowable response time improves the limiting operation of the Reactor Protection System and therefore, safety margins are improved. This change has been reviewed and approved by the Operations Review Committee and reviewed by the Nuclear Safety Review and Audit Committee.

Schedule of Change This change will be put into effect upon receipt of approval fron the Commission.

Fee Determination In accordance with Section 170.12 of the Commission's Regulations, Boston Edison proposes this license change as a Class II. Accordingfy a check for Twelve Hundred Dollars ($1200) is enclosed.

Very truly yours, UhL' 3 signed originals and 37 copies Commonwealth of Massachusetts)

County of Suffolk )

Then personally appeared before me J. Edward Howard, who, being duly sworn, did state that he is Vice President - Nuclear of Boston Edison Company, the applicant herein, and that he is duly authorized to execute and file the sub-mittal contained herein in the name and on behalf of Boston Edison Company and that the statements in said submittal are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.

My Commission expires: u// [a, /($/ da ,

W sgTtary Public 1

I l

!

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19323A849&oldid=2364221"