|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML19004A0752019-01-0303 January 2019 Comment of Janet Tauro on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML19003A2422018-12-28028 December 2018 Comment of Donald Weigl on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML18362A0952018-12-23023 December 2018 Comment of Gary Defranco of Trans Tech Industries on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML18324A7762018-11-18018 November 2018 Comment (2) of Alfred Decker on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML18302A2232018-10-29029 October 2018 Comment (1) of Brain Kube on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML18255A0422018-09-12012 September 2018 Comment (3) of Ron Martyn on Behalf of Community Civic Affairs Group on Decommissioning Creek Nuclear of Exelon'S Oyster Generating Station ML11264A0902011-09-13013 September 2011 Comment (8) of John Runyan, on Behalf of Self, on Consideration of Rulemaking to Address Prompt Remediation of Residual Radioactivity During Operations ML0822000512008-07-0909 July 2008 Comment (2) of David P. Helker, on Behalf of Exelon and Amergen, Concerning Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1195, Availability of Electric Power Sources. ML0808604892008-03-13013 March 2008 Comment (4) of David P. Helker on Behalf of Exelon Generation and Amergen Supporting Draft Regulatory Guide DG-5015, Training and Qualification of Security Personnel at Nuclear Power Reactor Facilities. ML0720501772007-04-26026 April 2007 Local Area Personal Income ML0706600532007-02-21021 February 2007 Comment (1) of John Filippelli on Behalf of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regarding Renewal of Operating License for Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant ML0630703242006-10-21021 October 2006 Comment (2) of Raymond Tierney, on Reactor Oversight Process as Described in Solicitation Letter #7590-01-P ML0628605662006-09-15015 September 2006 2006/09/15-Comment (1) of J. Lipoti Supporting to the Proposed License Renewal Interim Staff Guidance LR-ISG-2006-03 for Preparing Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) Analyses ML0626102482006-09-14014 September 2006 2006/09/14-Comment (20) of Willie Decamp Regarding Waste Accumulation for Oyster Creek License Renewal ML0626800332006-09-14014 September 2006 2006/09/14-Comment (23) of Richard Webster, on NUREG-1437:Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants,Supplement 28, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Draft Report for Comment: Comment on Safety & Secu ML0626504562006-09-14014 September 2006 Comment (22) of Mary Miazza, Opposing Relicensing of 35 Year Old Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant ML0626203482006-09-14014 September 2006 2006/09/14-Comment (21) of Kenneth C. Koschek on License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant ML0626102442006-09-13013 September 2006 2006/09/13-Comment (18) of Jennifer Samson on Behalf of Clean Ocean Action and American Littoral Society on NUREG-1437: Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Suppl, 28, Oyster Creek Draft Report for C ML0626102452006-09-12012 September 2006 Comment (19) of Edith Gbur Re Oyster Creek EIS ML0626102362006-09-11011 September 2006 Comment (12) of Eugene Creamer on Nrc'S Environmental Impact Statement for Renewal of License for Oyster Creek ML0626103592006-09-11011 September 2006 Comment (11) of Richard Webster, Resending EIS Comments ML0626104162006-09-0808 September 2006 Comment (10) of Raechelle Edwards on Behalf of Julia Lemense Huff Re Renewal of Oyster Creek License ML0626102422006-09-0707 September 2006 2006/09/07-Comment (16) of John Filippelli on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Oyster Creek. Recommends That the Final SEIS Address Opportunities for Pollution Prevention & Waste Recycling ML0626102342006-09-0707 September 2006 Comment (9) of Robert Scro on Behalf of Barnegat Bay National Estuary Program Opposing the Generic Environmental Impact Station for Oyster Creek, ML0625501632006-09-0606 September 2006 Comment (5) of Jessie Carr, Re Comments on Draft Supplement 28 to GEIS (NUREG-1437) Specific to Application for 20-Year License Extension for Oyster Creek Generating Station ML0625501702006-09-0505 September 2006 Comment (8) of Tom D. Jones Voicing Concerns and Objections to Relicensing of Nuclear Power Plant in Lacey Township, Nj ML0626102402006-09-0404 September 2006 Comment (15) of Mary Mazza Opposing Relicensing Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant; So Much Technology for Safer Cleaner Energy Alternatives Are Now Available and During the Next 5 Years, More Will Be ML0626102392006-09-0404 September 2006 Comment (14) of Joan K. Rubin and Gail Marsh Saxer, League of Women Voters, on Nrc'S Draft Generic Environmental Impact Study for Re-Licensing of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. League Supports Recommendation by the State of Nj ML0625501682006-09-0101 September 2006 Comment (7) of David J. Mckeon, Re Oyster Creek EIS - Question on Strontium-90 Emission ML0630001342006-08-30030 August 2006 Comment (27) of Diane Lazinsky Regarding the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (Geis) for License Renewal at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (NUREG-1437, Suppl. 28) ML0625501582006-08-30030 August 2006 2006/08/30-Comment (3) of Michael J. Kennish on Generic Environmental Impact Statement (Geis) Regarding License Renewal of Oyster Creek ML0625501662006-08-30030 August 2006 Comment (6) of Edith Gbur, Re Questions Regarding EIS ML0625501612006-08-28028 August 2006 2006/08/28-Comment (4) of Michael P. Gallagher on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 28 Regarding Oyster Creek, Dated June 2006 ML0624800412006-08-0909 August 2006 2006/08/09-Comment (2) of Jim Saxton Opposing Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Issued as Part of the Operating License Renewal Process for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Facility in Forked River, New Jersey ML0620503092006-07-14014 July 2006 Comment (1) of Joseph Mangano on Renewal of Oyster Creek License for Another 20 Years. Urges NRC to Thoroughly Examine Potential Health Risks from Plant Using Available Data ML0630001172006-07-13013 July 2006 Comment (26) of Pat Crocker Supporting License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Station ML0630001062006-07-0505 July 2006 Comment (24) of Dotty Reynolds on Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Renewal Hearings ML0436200752004-12-10010 December 2004 Comment (10) of Jill Lipoti on Solicitation of Public Comments on the Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process, Dated October 25, 2004 ML0300204912002-12-16016 December 2002 Comment from Jill Lipoti on the Third Year of Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) 2019-01-03
[Table view] |
Text
- - -
I
(-)J; L J Q r;JAD - 7f .J,.4A, .A4 Mq we6 9*1 e- l cZLS2JJLq 7 4~eA T.,L-~i)- )~~-~~n
_Ar? e___ J Re 14 Ar,
______ & -~ ~, Azf~
0 jt A&-t l-a
-Jv A C
_______ 2 - ~ -' ?P S~ 7je7~Ji-rn 7 Cc _
_ _ let
______~ ~~__
Z/A/J z~'-~
I
In this plan, Fla. garbage is toast
$425M Sunshine State plant would vaporize 3,000 tons of trash and create elerty BY BRIAN SKOLOFF But experts say population ASSOCIATED PRESS gwth will limit space available for FORT PIERCE, Fla. - A Flor future landfills.
ida county has grand plans to ditch "Welve only got the size of the its dump, generate electricity and planet," said Richard Tedder, pro help build roads - all by vaporizing grm administrator for the Florida garbage at temperatures hotter Department of Environmental Pro than the sun. tection's solid waste division. "Be The $425 million facility ex cam of all of the pressures of de pected to be built in St. Lucie velopment, people don't want land County will use lightning-like plasma arcs to turn trash into gas and rock-like material. It will be the first such plant in the nation oper
- 11. It's going to be harder and er to site new landfills, and it's oig to be harder for existing dmls to continue to expand."
- - - LDKWAS#/AS01AT1D PESS Leo Cordeiro, let St Lucle County solid waste director, and assistant I
ating on such a massive scale and , The plasma-arc gasification fa director Ron Roberts stand at fthlandflD InFort Pierce, Fla.
the largest in the world. ty in St. Lucie County, on cen Supporters say the process is ragFlorida's Atlantic Coast, aims s some tough questions," Wil rent energy cris."
cleaner than traditional trash incin rotve that problem by eliminat ýon said. He said that if large plasma fa the need for a landfill. Only two Bruce Parker, president and were put to use nationwide eration, though skeptics question ,TO of the Washington, D.C. ctes whether the technology can meet facilities are operating in vaporize trash, they could theo
.world - both in Japan - but xased National Solid Wastes Man theJlofty expectations igement Association, scoffs at the a generate electricity equlva
-The 100,000-square-foot plant, %ure -aslf' garbage on a much iller scale. iotion that plasma technology will to tent about 25 nuclear plants.
srad to be operational in two liminate the need for landfills.
years, is expected to vaporize 3,000 'Up to eight plasma arc Sipped cupolas will vaporize "We do know that plasma arc is tons of garbage a day. County offi i legitimate technology, but let's cials estimate their entire landffil year-round, nonstop. Gar ge will be brought in on conveyor we first how this thing works for 4.3 million tons of trash collected t. Lucie County," Parker said.
since 1978 - will be gone in 18 Its and dumped into the cylindri ..TAF/\ L,
,cupolas where it falls into a "It's too soon for people to make years. .Id claims that we won't need No byproduct will go unused, ne of heat more than 10,000 de *dfllls."
according to Geoplasma, the At s Fahrenheit.
Louis Circeo, director of Geor linta-based company building and "We didnt want to do it like ev Tech's plasma research divi 7-Io-o~ ~'
paying for the plant. rbody else," said Leo Cordeiro, e county's solid waste director. on, said that as energy prices soar Synthetic, combustible gas pro cdlandfill fees increase, plasma duced in the process will be used to We knew there were better ways."
No emissions are released dur I technology will become more run turbines to create electricity ffordable.
about 120 megawatts a day - that the closed-loop gasification, Ge 'municipal solid waste is per will be sold back to the grid. The plasma says. The only emissions aps the largest renewable energy facility will operate on about a Ill come from the synthetic gas
-third f the powerit generatesfree powered turbiris&_tat create_
from outside electricity. electricity. Even that will be cleaner resource that is available to us,"
About 80,000 pounds of steam than burning coal or natural gas, Circeo said, adding that the pro experts say., cess "could not only solve the gar per day will be sold to a neighbor Few other toxins will be ing Tropicana Products Inc. facility rage and landfill problems In the to power the juice plant's turbines. generated, if any at all, Geoplasma nited, States and elsewhere, but it
- Sludge rnom the county's waste says.
But critics disagree. .ould significantly alleviate the cur-water treatment plant will be va porized, and a material created "we've found projects similar to from melted organic matter - up this being misrepresented all over to .600 tons a day - will be hard the country," said Monica Wilson of ened into slag, and sold for use in the Global Alliance for Incinerator
ýAtematives.
road and construction projects.
Wilson said there aren't enough "This is sustainability in its tru udies yet to prove the companys est and finest form," said Hilburn ,laims that emissions will likely be Hillestad, president of Geoplasma, ess than from a standard natural a subsidiary of Jacoby Develop gs power plant.
ment Inc.
"I think this is the time for the For years, some waste-manage sidents of this county to start ment facilities have been convert ing methane - created by rotting trash in landfills - to power. Oth ers also bum trash to produce electricity.