Information Notice 2004-19, Problems Associated with Back-up Power Supplies to Emergency Response Facilities and Equipment: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555November 4, 2004NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2004-19:PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH BACK-UPPOWER SUPPLIES TO EMERGENCY
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES


===RESPONSE FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT===
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 November 4, 2004 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2004-19:                PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH BACK-UP
 
POWER SUPPLIES TO EMERGENCY
 
RESPONSE FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT


==ADDRESSEES==
==ADDRESSEES==
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who havepermanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have
 
permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed


from the reactor vessel.
from the reactor vessel.


==PURPOSE==
==PURPOSE==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alertaddressees to problems with back-up power supplies for emergency response facilities (ERFs)and equipment.  Emergency response equipment and ERFs need to be functional in the event
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert


of an emergency. It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability totheir facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems.  However,suggestions contained in this information notice are not
addressees to problems with back-up power supplies for emergency response facilities (ERFs)
and equipment. Emergency response equipment and ERFs need to be functional in the event


NRC requirements; therefore, nospecific action or written response is required.
of an emergency. It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to
 
their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no
 
specific action or written response is required.


==BACKGROUND==
==BACKGROUND==
The ERF and emergency response equipment requirements must meet the following standardof Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Paragraph 47(b)(8):Adequate emergency facilities and equipment to support the emergency response areprovided and maintained.Requirements are also found in Section IV.E "Emergency Facilities and Equipment" ofAppendix E to 10 CFR Part 50:Adequate provisions shall be made and described for emergency facilities andequipment, including:A licensee onsite technical support center (TSC) and a licensee near-site emergencyoperations facility from which effective direction can be given and effective control canbe exercised during an emergency.
The ERF and emergency response equipment requirements must meet the following standard
 
of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Paragraph 47(b)(8):
        Adequate emergency facilities and equipment to support the emergency response are
 
provided and maintained.
 
Requirements are also found in Section IV.E Emergency Facilities and Equipment of
 
Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50:
        Adequate provisions shall be made and described for emergency facilities and
 
equipment, including:
        A licensee onsite technical support center (TSC) and a licensee near-site emergency
 
operations facility from which effective direction can be given and effective control can
 
be exercised during an emergency.


==DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES==
==DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES==
Line 38: Line 70:


==DISCUSSION==
==DISCUSSION==
TSC Emergency Diesel Generator Switch MisalignmentOn June 14, 2004, as a result of a loss of offsite power (LOOP) event at Palo Verde NuclearGenerating Station, electrical power was lost to the TSC.  The TSC diesel generator started asdesigned, but subsequently tripped due to high engine temperature.  During troubleshooting, itwas determined that the engine operating switch was in idle.  With the switch in idle, the dieselgenerator started on loss of electrical power to the TSC, but did not come up to proper voltage


and frequency and did not reenergize the TSC electrical distribution panel. As a result, the
===TSC Emergency Diesel Generator Switch Misalignment===
On June 14, 2004, as a result of a loss of offsite power (LOOP) event at Palo Verde Nuclear
 
Generating Station, electrical power was lost to the TSC. The TSC diesel generator started as
 
designed, but subsequently tripped due to high engine temperature. During troubleshooting, it
 
was determined that the engine operating switch was in idle. With the switch in idle, the diesel
 
generator started on loss of electrical power to the TSC, but did not come up to proper voltage
 
and frequency and did not reenergize the TSC electrical distribution panel. As a result, the
 
engine radiator cooling fan did not start; therefore, the engine overheated and tripped on high
 
temperature.
 
The licensee determined that the engine operating switch was apparently left in the idle position
 
following post-maintenance testing of the engine-starting system performed on June 8, 2004.


engine radiator cooling fan did not start; therefore, the engine overheated and tripped on hightemperature. The licensee determined that the engine operating switch was apparently left in the idle positionfollowing post-maintenance testing of the engine-starting system performed on June 8, 2004. After corrective maintenance was performed on one battery terminal and connector, the team
After corrective maintenance was performed on one battery terminal and connector, the team


leader allowed the electricians to test the engine starting system without a working copy of thetest procedure in the field, since this test was routinely performed by the electricians. After the
leader allowed the electricians to test the engine starting system without a working copy of the
 
test procedure in the field, since this test was routinely performed by the electricians. After the


diesel generator was successfully started, the engine operating switch was moved from run to
diesel generator was successfully started, the engine operating switch was moved from run to


idle to allow the engine to run at a slower speed and cool down before being secured. A follow- up NRC inspection determined that the failure to have a working copy of the test procedure atthe engine during this post-maintenance testing and failure to use the restoration guidance
idle to allow the engine to run at a slower speed and cool down before being secured. A follow- up NRC inspection determined that the failure to have a working copy of the test procedure at
 
the engine during this post-maintenance testing and failure to use the restoration guidance


contained in the test procedure contributed directly to the failure to restore the TSC diesel
contained in the test procedure contributed directly to the failure to restore the TSC diesel


generator to its normal standby condition. The NRC inspection also determined that the dieselgenerator failure contributed to a delay in staffing the TSC because the responding members of
generator to its normal standby condition. The NRC inspection also determined that the diesel


the emergency response organization were moved to an alternate TSC.  This issue was
generator failure contributed to a delay in staffing the TSC because the responding members of


documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000528/2004012; 05000529/2004012;05000530/2004012.  (ADAMS# ML042020061)Procedural Changes Modifying the Effectiveness of the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) On June 25, 2001, the NRC resident inspector at the Cooper Nuclear Station observed thelicensee's response to an alert declaration due to a fire affecting the station startup transformer.
the emergency response organization were moved to an alternate TSC. This issue was


During the event, the inspector noted that the EOF had no alternating current (AC) power.  Thenormal power supply to the EOF was deenergized when the startup transformer isolated
documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000528/2004012; 05000529/2004012;
05000530/2004012. (ADAMS# ML042020061)
Procedural Changes Modifying the Effectiveness of the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF)
On June 25, 2001, the NRC resident inspector at the Cooper Nuclear Station observed the


following an electrical component failure.  As a result, the EOF had limited communication
licensees response to an alert declaration due to a fire affecting the station startup transformer.


abilities and emergency battery powered lighting. Although a back-up power supply existed for the EOF, it was only allowed to supply power tonecessary equipment when the plant was operating in Mode 4, cold shutdown or Mode 5,refueling.  In operating Modes 1, 2, and 3, power operations, startup, and hot shutdown,respectfully, the back-up power supply was allowed to power only communication equipment
During the event, the inspector noted that the EOF had no alternating current (AC) power. The


due to electrical loading restrictions on the switchgear. The NRC resident inspector determinedthat this restriction significantly compromised the ability of the emergency operations facility toadequately function following a loss of normal power in Modes 1, 2, and 3. In 1986, the licensee performed a design change to increase the reliability of the EOF andprovide a back-up source of power during a loss of offsite power event. This design change
normal power supply to the EOF was deenergized when the startup transformer isolated
 
following an electrical component failure. As a result, the EOF had limited communication
 
abilities and emergency battery powered lighting.
 
Although a back-up power supply existed for the EOF, it was only allowed to supply power to
 
necessary equipment when the plant was operating in Mode 4, cold shutdown or Mode 5, refueling. In operating Modes 1, 2, and 3, power operations, startup, and hot shutdown, respectfully, the back-up power supply was allowed to power only communication equipment
 
due to electrical loading restrictions on the switchgear. The NRC resident inspector determined
 
that this restriction significantly compromised the ability of the emergency operations facility to
 
adequately function following a loss of normal power in Modes 1, 2, and 3. In 1986, the licensee performed a design change to increase the reliability of the EOF and
 
provide a back-up source of power during a loss of offsite power event. This design change


originally placed no restrictions on using the back-up power supply to the EOF for any operating
originally placed no restrictions on using the back-up power supply to the EOF for any operating


mode. On September 14, 1991, the licensee revi
mode. On September 14, 1991, the licensee revised a system operating procedure which
 
restricted the back-up power source to supply only the emergency operations facility
 
communication system when operating in Modes 1, 2, and 3, due to power limitations on the
 
electrical switchgear. This issue was documented in NRC Inspection Report 50-298/01-09.
 
(ADAMS# ML043070372)
 
===Failure to Maintain the TSC Batteries===
On December 11, 2003, the NRC completed an inspection at the Indian Point Nuclear
 
Generating Station, Unit 2. While reviewing condition reports, the inspection team noted that, during the quarterly surveillance tests performed on October 21, 2003, one cell in each of the
 
two TSC battery banks did not meet the acceptance criteria specified in the test procedures.
 
Although the cells were marginally out of specification, the team determined that the licensee
 
did not take prompt corrective actions either to return the two cells to within specifications or to
 
evaluate the impact of the out of specification conditions on the functionality of the battery
 
banks. Although the TSC battery banks performed as designed during the northeastern grid


sed a system operating procedure whichrestricted the back-up power source to supply only the emergency operations facilitycommunication system when operating in Modes 1, 2, and 3, due to power limitations on theelectrical switchgear.  This issue was documented in NRC Inspection Report 50-298/01-09. (ADAMS# ML043070372) Failure to Maintain the TSC Batteries
blackout on August 14, 2003 (August 14 event), the team determined that the degraded cells


On December 11, 2003, the NRC completed an inspection at the Indian Point NuclearGenerating Station, Unit 2.  While reviewing condition reports, the inspection team noted that,during the quarterly surveillance tests performed on October 21, 2003, one cell in each of thetwo TSC battery banks did not meet the acceptance criteria specified in the test procedures.
had the potential to adversely affect the facilities and equipment required to support emergency


Although the cells were marginally out of specification, the team determined that the licenseedid not take prompt corrective actions either to return the two cells to within specifications or to
response. This issue was documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2004003.


evaluate the impact of the out of specification conditions on the functionality of the batterybanks.  Although the TSC battery banks performed as designed during the northeastern grid
(ADAMS# ML040360248)


blackout on August 14, 2003 (August 14 event), the team determined that the degraded cellshad the potential to adversely affect the facilities and equipment required to support emergencyresponse.  This issue was documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2004003. (ADAMS# ML040360248)  Miscellaneous Failures During the August 14 Event
===Miscellaneous Failures During the August 14 Event===
During the August 14 event, the TSC back-up diesel generator at Indian Point Unit 2 failed to


During the August 14 event, the TSC back-up diesel generator at Indian Point Unit 2 failed toautomatically start and subsequent operator actions to manually start and load the diesel failed.
automatically start and subsequent operator actions to manually start and load the diesel failed.


The Unit 2 TSC diesel generator failed to function due to electrical loading in excess of its
The Unit 2 TSC diesel generator failed to function due to electrical loading in excess of its


design capacity. This condition was initially identified in February 2000 and was not resolved in
design capacity. This condition was initially identified in February 2000 and was not resolved in
 
a timely manner. Observations by the licensee during emergency planning training revealed a
 
potential for the TSC back-up diesel generator to be overloaded. Also, a review by the licensee
 
of the electrical power distribution drawings showed a potential existed for the TSC back-up


a timely manner. Observations by the licensee during emergency planning training revealed a
diesel generator to be overloaded under some conditions. Long-term corrective actions for this


potential for the TSC back-up diesel generator to be overloaded. Also, a review by the licensee
diesel were postponed. The Unit 2 TSC and Operational Support Center remained without a


of the electrical power distribution drawings showed a potential existed for the TSC back-updiesel generator to be overloaded under some conditions.  Long-term corrective actions for this
back-up AC electrical power supply until September 15, 2003, when a temporary alteration was


diesel were postponed. The Unit 2 TSC and Operational Support Center remained without aback-up AC electrical power supply until September 15, 2003, when a temporary alteration was
installed and satisfactorily tested.


installed and satisfactorily tested. Additionally during the August 14 event, the Indian Point Unit 3 TSC back-up diesel generatorstarted and then tripped while being loaded and was unavailable for the duration of the
Additionally during the August 14 event, the Indian Point Unit 3 TSC back-up diesel generator


blackout.  The Unit 3 TSC diesel generator failed to function due to a malfunctioning overspeed
started and then tripped while being loaded and was unavailable for the duration of the


controller. The diesel generator was repaired and restored to service on September 16, 2003. During a refueling outage, on April 18, 2003, the Unit 3 TSC back-up diesel generator wastested under simulated blackout conditions and tripped while being loaded. Subsequently, a licensee system engineer initiated a work order to replace a suspected faulty overspeed tripmodule.  Seven hours later, the Unit 3 TSC diesel was retested in an unloaded condition and
blackout. The Unit 3 TSC diesel generator failed to function due to a malfunctioning overspeed


declared operable. The work order to replace the TSC diesel generator overspeed trip module
controller. The diesel generator was repaired and restored to service on September 16, 2003.


was postponed by the licensee's maintenance planning organization until November 2003, based upon a determination that the diesel problem was "not an operability concern."During an inspection at Indian Point Units 2 and 3, following the August 14 event, an NRC teamidentified that the licensee did not have a preventive maintenance program in place to ensurethe continued functionality of the numerous Un-Interruptible Power Supplies (UPSs) in the EOFwhich provide back-up power to emergency response equipment.  By design, there is no
During a refueling outage, on April 18, 2003, the Unit 3 TSC back-up diesel generator was


electrical back-up power supply to the EOF. Instead, the EOF has a number of UPSs which
tested under simulated blackout conditions and tripped while being loaded. Subsequently, a licensee system engineer initiated a work order to replace a suspected faulty overspeed trip
 
module. Seven hours later, the Unit 3 TSC diesel was retested in an unloaded condition and
 
declared operable. The work order to replace the TSC diesel generator overspeed trip module
 
was postponed by the licensees maintenance planning organization until November 2003, based upon a determination that the diesel problem was not an operability concern.
 
During an inspection at Indian Point Units 2 and 3, following the August 14 event, an NRC team
 
identified that the licensee did not have a preventive maintenance program in place to ensure
 
the continued functionality of the numerous Un-Interruptible Power Supplies (UPSs) in the EOF
 
which provide back-up power to emergency response equipment. By design, there is no
 
electrical back-up power supply to the EOF. Instead, the EOF has a number of UPSs which


provide short-term battery back-up power to dedicated ERF communications and data
provide short-term battery back-up power to dedicated ERF communications and data


transmission systems. During t
transmission systems. During the August 14 event, the UPSs failed or functioned at only a
 
fraction of their design capacity.
 
The failures of the Unit 2 and 3 TSC back-up diesel generators and the EOF UPSs were
 
documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2003013 and 05000286/2003010. (ADAMS#
ML033570386)
CONCLUSION


he August 14 event, the UPSs failed or functioned at only afraction of their design capacity.The failures of the Unit 2 and 3 TSC back-up diesel generators and the EOF UPSs weredocumented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2003013 and 05000286/2003010.  (ADAMS#ML033570386)CONCLUSION
Problems with back-up power supplies and equipment have the potential to impact the ability of


Problems with back-up power supplies and equipment have the potential to impact the ability ofERFs to support a prompt and effective response to an emergency. The occurrence of these
ERFs to support a prompt and effective response to an emergency. The occurrence of these


types of problems can be reduced by following restoration procedures after testing and
types of problems can be reduced by following restoration procedures after testing and


maintenance, promptly resolving deficiencies identified during testing and maintenance, and reviewing design changes for impact on the operability of ERF back-up power supplies.
maintenance, promptly resolving deficiencies identified during testing and maintenance, and
 
reviewing design changes for impact on the operability of ERF back-up power supplies.


==CONTACT==
==CONTACT==
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct anyquestions about information in this notice to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any
 
questions about information in this notice to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation project managers.
 
/RA/
                                              Patrick L. Hiland, Chief


Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation project managers./RA/Patrick L. Hiland, Chief
Reactor Operations Branch


===Reactor Operations Branch===
Division of Inspection Program Management
Division of Inspection Program Management


===Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation===
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


===Technical Contact:===
===Technical Contact:===
Jason L. Flemming(301) 415-5787 E-mail: jlf2@nrc.govAttachment:  List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices licensee system engineer initiated a work order to replace a suspected faulty overspeed tripmodule.  Seven hours later, the TSC diesel was retested in an unloaded condition and declared


operable. The work order to replace the TSC diesel generator overspeed trip module was
===Jason L. Flemming===
                        (301) 415-5787 E-mail: jlf2@nrc.gov
 
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices licensee system engineer initiated a work order to replace a suspected faulty overspeed trip
 
module. Seven hours later, the TSC diesel was retested in an unloaded condition and declared
 
operable. The work order to replace the TSC diesel generator overspeed trip module was
 
postponed by the licensees maintenance planning organization until November 2003, based
 
upon a determination that the diesel problem was not an operability concern.
 
Failure of EOF Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPSs)
During an inspection at Indian Point Units 2 and 3, following the August 14 event, an NRC team
 
identified that the licensee did not have a preventive maintenance program in place to ensure
 
the continued functionality of the numerous UPSs in the EOF which provide back-up power to
 
emergency response equipment. By design, there is no electrical back-up power supply to the


postponed by the licensee's maintenance planning organization until November 2003, based
EOF. Instead, the EOF has a number of UPSs which provide short-term battery back-up power


upon a determination that the diesel problem was "not an operability concern."Failure of EOF Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPSs)
to dedicated ERF communications and data transmission systems. During the August 14 event, the UPSs failed or functioned at only a fraction of their design capacity.
During an inspection at Indian Point Units 2 and 3, following the August 14 event, an NRC teamidentified that the licensee did not have a preventive maintenance program in place to ensurethe continued functionality of the numerous UPSs in the EOF which provide back-up power to


emergency response equipment.  By design, there is no electrical back-up power supply to the
The failures of the Unit 2 and 3 TSC back-up diesel generators and the EOF UPSs were


EOF. Instead, the EOF has a number of UPSs which provide short-term battery back-up power
documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2003013 and 05000286/2003010. (ADAMS#
ML033570386)
CONCLUSION


to dedicated ERF communications and data transmission systems.  During the August 14event, the UPSs failed or functioned at only a fraction of their design capacity.The failures of the Unit 2 and 3 TSC back-up diesel generators and the EOF UPSs weredocumented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2003013 and 05000286/2003010.  (ADAMS#ML033570386)CONCLUSION
Problems with back-up power supplies and equipment have the potential to impact the ability of


Problems with back-up power supplies and equipment have the potential to impact the ability ofERFs to support a prompt and effective response to an emergency. The occurrence of these
ERFs to support a prompt and effective response to an emergency. The occurrence of these


types of problems can be reduced by following restoration procedures after testing and
types of problems can be reduced by following restoration procedures after testing and


maintenance, promptly resolving deficiencies identified during testing and maintenance, and reviewing design changes for impact on the operability of ERF back-up power supplies.
maintenance, promptly resolving deficiencies identified during testing and maintenance, and
 
reviewing design changes for impact on the operability of ERF back-up power supplies.


==CONTACT==
==CONTACT==
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct anyquestions about information in this notice to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any
 
questions about information in this notice to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation project managers.


Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation project managers./RA/Patrick L. Hiland, Chief
/RA/
                                              Patrick L. Hiland, Chief
 
Reactor Operations Branch


===Reactor Operations Branch===
Division of Inspection Program Management
Division of Inspection Program Management


===Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation===
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


===Technical Contact:===
===Technical Contact:===
Jason L. Flemming(301) 415-5787 E-mail: jlf2@nrc.govAttachment:  List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesDISTRIBUTION:ADAMSIN FileADAMS ACCESSION #: ML042730010
DOCUMENT NAME:  E:\Filenet\ML042730010.wpdOFFICEDPR:EPD:NSIRTECH EDITOREMCBEPD:DPR:NSIRD:EPD:DPR:NSIRNAMEJLFlemmingPKleeneSLRosenbergEWWeissNLMamishDATE10/06/200409/23/200410/17/200410/08/200410/12/2004OFFICEDPR:NSIROES:IROB:DIPMA:SC:OES:IROB:DIPMA:C:IROB:DIPMNAMEEJLeedsCDPetroneACMcMurtrayPLHiland


DATE10/14/200410/18/200411/03/200411/04/2004     /       /2004OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
===Jason L. Flemming===
                        (301) 415-5787 E-mail: jlf2@nrc.gov
 
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
 
DISTRIBUTION:                    ADAMS                IN File
 
ADAMS ACCESSION #: ML042730010
DOCUMENT NAME: E:\Filenet\ML042730010.wpd
 
OFFICE  DPR:EPD:NSIR      TECH EDITOR      EMCB                EPD:DPR:NSIR  D:EPD:DPR:NSIR
 
NAME    JLFlemming        PKleene          SLRosenberg          EWWeiss        NLMamish
 
DATE    10/06/2004        09/23/2004      10/17/2004          10/08/2004    10/12/2004 OFFICE  DPR:NSIR          OES:IROB:DIPM    A:SC:OES:IROB:DIPM A:C:IROB:DIPM
 
NAME    EJLeeds          CDPetrone        ACMcMurtray          PLHiland
 
DATE    10/14/2004        10/18/2004      11/03/2004          11/04/2004       /   /2004 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
 
Attachment 1 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
 
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES


______________________________________________________________________________________OL = Operating License
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Information                                              Date of


CP = Construction PermitAttachment 1 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDNRC INFORMATION NOTICES
Notice No.              Subject                          Issuance      Issued to


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
InformationDate of
2004-18          Recent Safety-related Event at        10/26/2004      All licensees authorized to


===Notice No.        SubjectIssuanceIssued to===
Panoramic Wet-source-                                  possess and use sealed sources


_____________________________________________________________________________________2004-18Recent Safety-related Event atPanoramic Wet-source- storage Irradiator10/26/2004All licensees authorized topossess and use sealed sources
storage Irradiator                                    in panoramic wet-source-storage


in panoramic wet-source-storage
irradiators, and irradiator vendors.


irradiators, and irradiator vendors.2004-17Loose Part Detection and Computerized Eddy Current
2004-17          Loose Part Detection and               08/25/2004      All holders of operating licenses


===Data Analysis in Steam===
Computerized Eddy Current                              for pressurized-water reactors
Generators08/25/2004All holders of operating licensesfor pressurized-water reactors


(PWRs), except those who have
Data Analysis in Steam                                (PWRs), except those who have


permanently ceased operations
Generators                                            permanently ceased operations


and have certified that fuel has
and have certified that fuel has
Line 192: Line 375:
been permanently removed from
been permanently removed from


the reactor.2004-16Tube Leakage Due to aFabrication Flaw in a
the reactor.
 
2004-16          Tube Leakage Due to a                 08/03/2004      All holders of operating licenses


Replacement Steam Generator08/03/2004All holders of operating licensesfor pressurized-water reactors
Fabrication Flaw in a                                  for pressurized-water reactors


(PWRs), except those who have
Replacement Steam Generator                            (PWRs), except those who have


permanently ceased operations
permanently ceased operations
Line 204: Line 389:
been permanently removed from
been permanently removed from


the reactor.2004-15Dual-Unit Scram at PeachBottom Units 2 and 307/22/2004All holders of operating licensesfor nuclear power reactors except
the reactor.
 
2004-15          Dual-Unit Scram at Peach              07/22/2004      All holders of operating licenses
 
Bottom Units 2 and 3                                  for nuclear power reactors except


those who have permanently
those who have permanently
Line 214: Line 403:
permanently removed from the
permanently removed from the


reactor vessel.2004-14Use of less than OptimalBounding Assumptions in
reactor vessel.
 
2004-14          Use of less than Optimal              07/19/2004      All licensees authorized to
 
Bounding Assumptions in                               possess a critical mass of special
 
Criticality Safety Analysis at                        nuclear material.
 
Fuel Cycle Facilities
 
Note:            NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are
 
issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:
                To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following
 
command in the message portion:
                                    subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname


===Criticality Safety Analysis at===
______________________________________________________________________________________
Fuel Cycle Facilities07/19/2004All licensees authorized topossess a critical mass of special
OL = Operating License


nuclear material.Note: NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they areissued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the followingcommand in the message portion:subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname}}
CP = Construction Permit}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 01:54, 24 November 2019

Problems Associated with Back-up Power Supplies to Emergency Response Facilities and Equipment
ML042730010
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/04/2004
From: Hiland P
NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB
To:
Fleming J NSIR/DPR/EPD 415-1587
References
TAC MC4467 IN-04-019
Download: ML042730010 (6)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 November 4, 2004 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2004-19: PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH BACK-UP

POWER SUPPLIES TO EMERGENCY

RESPONSE FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT

ADDRESSEES

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have

permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed

from the reactor vessel.

PURPOSE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert

addressees to problems with back-up power supplies for emergency response facilities (ERFs)

and equipment. Emergency response equipment and ERFs need to be functional in the event

of an emergency. It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to

their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no

specific action or written response is required.

BACKGROUND

The ERF and emergency response equipment requirements must meet the following standard

of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Paragraph 47(b)(8):

Adequate emergency facilities and equipment to support the emergency response are

provided and maintained.

Requirements are also found in Section IV.E Emergency Facilities and Equipment of

Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50:

Adequate provisions shall be made and described for emergency facilities and

equipment, including:

A licensee onsite technical support center (TSC) and a licensee near-site emergency

operations facility from which effective direction can be given and effective control can

be exercised during an emergency.

DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES

AND

DISCUSSION

TSC Emergency Diesel Generator Switch Misalignment

On June 14, 2004, as a result of a loss of offsite power (LOOP) event at Palo Verde Nuclear

Generating Station, electrical power was lost to the TSC. The TSC diesel generator started as

designed, but subsequently tripped due to high engine temperature. During troubleshooting, it

was determined that the engine operating switch was in idle. With the switch in idle, the diesel

generator started on loss of electrical power to the TSC, but did not come up to proper voltage

and frequency and did not reenergize the TSC electrical distribution panel. As a result, the

engine radiator cooling fan did not start; therefore, the engine overheated and tripped on high

temperature.

The licensee determined that the engine operating switch was apparently left in the idle position

following post-maintenance testing of the engine-starting system performed on June 8, 2004.

After corrective maintenance was performed on one battery terminal and connector, the team

leader allowed the electricians to test the engine starting system without a working copy of the

test procedure in the field, since this test was routinely performed by the electricians. After the

diesel generator was successfully started, the engine operating switch was moved from run to

idle to allow the engine to run at a slower speed and cool down before being secured. A follow- up NRC inspection determined that the failure to have a working copy of the test procedure at

the engine during this post-maintenance testing and failure to use the restoration guidance

contained in the test procedure contributed directly to the failure to restore the TSC diesel

generator to its normal standby condition. The NRC inspection also determined that the diesel

generator failure contributed to a delay in staffing the TSC because the responding members of

the emergency response organization were moved to an alternate TSC. This issue was

documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000528/2004012; 05000529/2004012;

05000530/2004012. (ADAMS# ML042020061)

Procedural Changes Modifying the Effectiveness of the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF)

On June 25, 2001, the NRC resident inspector at the Cooper Nuclear Station observed the

licensees response to an alert declaration due to a fire affecting the station startup transformer.

During the event, the inspector noted that the EOF had no alternating current (AC) power. The

normal power supply to the EOF was deenergized when the startup transformer isolated

following an electrical component failure. As a result, the EOF had limited communication

abilities and emergency battery powered lighting.

Although a back-up power supply existed for the EOF, it was only allowed to supply power to

necessary equipment when the plant was operating in Mode 4, cold shutdown or Mode 5, refueling. In operating Modes 1, 2, and 3, power operations, startup, and hot shutdown, respectfully, the back-up power supply was allowed to power only communication equipment

due to electrical loading restrictions on the switchgear. The NRC resident inspector determined

that this restriction significantly compromised the ability of the emergency operations facility to

adequately function following a loss of normal power in Modes 1, 2, and 3. In 1986, the licensee performed a design change to increase the reliability of the EOF and

provide a back-up source of power during a loss of offsite power event. This design change

originally placed no restrictions on using the back-up power supply to the EOF for any operating

mode. On September 14, 1991, the licensee revised a system operating procedure which

restricted the back-up power source to supply only the emergency operations facility

communication system when operating in Modes 1, 2, and 3, due to power limitations on the

electrical switchgear. This issue was documented in NRC Inspection Report 50-298/01-09.

(ADAMS# ML043070372)

Failure to Maintain the TSC Batteries

On December 11, 2003, the NRC completed an inspection at the Indian Point Nuclear

Generating Station, Unit 2. While reviewing condition reports, the inspection team noted that, during the quarterly surveillance tests performed on October 21, 2003, one cell in each of the

two TSC battery banks did not meet the acceptance criteria specified in the test procedures.

Although the cells were marginally out of specification, the team determined that the licensee

did not take prompt corrective actions either to return the two cells to within specifications or to

evaluate the impact of the out of specification conditions on the functionality of the battery

banks. Although the TSC battery banks performed as designed during the northeastern grid

blackout on August 14, 2003 (August 14 event), the team determined that the degraded cells

had the potential to adversely affect the facilities and equipment required to support emergency

response. This issue was documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2004003.

(ADAMS# ML040360248)

Miscellaneous Failures During the August 14 Event

During the August 14 event, the TSC back-up diesel generator at Indian Point Unit 2 failed to

automatically start and subsequent operator actions to manually start and load the diesel failed.

The Unit 2 TSC diesel generator failed to function due to electrical loading in excess of its

design capacity. This condition was initially identified in February 2000 and was not resolved in

a timely manner. Observations by the licensee during emergency planning training revealed a

potential for the TSC back-up diesel generator to be overloaded. Also, a review by the licensee

of the electrical power distribution drawings showed a potential existed for the TSC back-up

diesel generator to be overloaded under some conditions. Long-term corrective actions for this

diesel were postponed. The Unit 2 TSC and Operational Support Center remained without a

back-up AC electrical power supply until September 15, 2003, when a temporary alteration was

installed and satisfactorily tested.

Additionally during the August 14 event, the Indian Point Unit 3 TSC back-up diesel generator

started and then tripped while being loaded and was unavailable for the duration of the

blackout. The Unit 3 TSC diesel generator failed to function due to a malfunctioning overspeed

controller. The diesel generator was repaired and restored to service on September 16, 2003.

During a refueling outage, on April 18, 2003, the Unit 3 TSC back-up diesel generator was

tested under simulated blackout conditions and tripped while being loaded. Subsequently, a licensee system engineer initiated a work order to replace a suspected faulty overspeed trip

module. Seven hours later, the Unit 3 TSC diesel was retested in an unloaded condition and

declared operable. The work order to replace the TSC diesel generator overspeed trip module

was postponed by the licensees maintenance planning organization until November 2003, based upon a determination that the diesel problem was not an operability concern.

During an inspection at Indian Point Units 2 and 3, following the August 14 event, an NRC team

identified that the licensee did not have a preventive maintenance program in place to ensure

the continued functionality of the numerous Un-Interruptible Power Supplies (UPSs) in the EOF

which provide back-up power to emergency response equipment. By design, there is no

electrical back-up power supply to the EOF. Instead, the EOF has a number of UPSs which

provide short-term battery back-up power to dedicated ERF communications and data

transmission systems. During the August 14 event, the UPSs failed or functioned at only a

fraction of their design capacity.

The failures of the Unit 2 and 3 TSC back-up diesel generators and the EOF UPSs were

documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2003013 and 05000286/2003010. (ADAMS#

ML033570386)

CONCLUSION

Problems with back-up power supplies and equipment have the potential to impact the ability of

ERFs to support a prompt and effective response to an emergency. The occurrence of these

types of problems can be reduced by following restoration procedures after testing and

maintenance, promptly resolving deficiencies identified during testing and maintenance, and

reviewing design changes for impact on the operability of ERF back-up power supplies.

CONTACT

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any

questions about information in this notice to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation project managers.

/RA/

Patrick L. Hiland, Chief

Reactor Operations Branch

Division of Inspection Program Management

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contact:

Jason L. Flemming

(301) 415-5787 E-mail: jlf2@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices licensee system engineer initiated a work order to replace a suspected faulty overspeed trip

module. Seven hours later, the TSC diesel was retested in an unloaded condition and declared

operable. The work order to replace the TSC diesel generator overspeed trip module was

postponed by the licensees maintenance planning organization until November 2003, based

upon a determination that the diesel problem was not an operability concern.

Failure of EOF Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPSs)

During an inspection at Indian Point Units 2 and 3, following the August 14 event, an NRC team

identified that the licensee did not have a preventive maintenance program in place to ensure

the continued functionality of the numerous UPSs in the EOF which provide back-up power to

emergency response equipment. By design, there is no electrical back-up power supply to the

EOF. Instead, the EOF has a number of UPSs which provide short-term battery back-up power

to dedicated ERF communications and data transmission systems. During the August 14 event, the UPSs failed or functioned at only a fraction of their design capacity.

The failures of the Unit 2 and 3 TSC back-up diesel generators and the EOF UPSs were

documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000247/2003013 and 05000286/2003010. (ADAMS#

ML033570386)

CONCLUSION

Problems with back-up power supplies and equipment have the potential to impact the ability of

ERFs to support a prompt and effective response to an emergency. The occurrence of these

types of problems can be reduced by following restoration procedures after testing and

maintenance, promptly resolving deficiencies identified during testing and maintenance, and

reviewing design changes for impact on the operability of ERF back-up power supplies.

CONTACT

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any

questions about information in this notice to the technical contact listed below or the appropriate

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation project managers.

/RA/

Patrick L. Hiland, Chief

Reactor Operations Branch

Division of Inspection Program Management

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contact:

Jason L. Flemming

(301) 415-5787 E-mail: jlf2@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

DISTRIBUTION: ADAMS IN File

ADAMS ACCESSION #: ML042730010

DOCUMENT NAME: E:\Filenet\ML042730010.wpd

OFFICE DPR:EPD:NSIR TECH EDITOR EMCB EPD:DPR:NSIR D:EPD:DPR:NSIR

NAME JLFlemming PKleene SLRosenberg EWWeiss NLMamish

DATE 10/06/2004 09/23/2004 10/17/2004 10/08/2004 10/12/2004 OFFICE DPR:NSIR OES:IROB:DIPM A:SC:OES:IROB:DIPM A:C:IROB:DIPM

NAME EJLeeds CDPetrone ACMcMurtray PLHiland

DATE 10/14/2004 10/18/2004 11/03/2004 11/04/2004 / /2004 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Attachment 1 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC INFORMATION NOTICES

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Information Date of

Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to

_____________________________________________________________________________________

2004-18 Recent Safety-related Event at 10/26/2004 All licensees authorized to

Panoramic Wet-source- possess and use sealed sources

storage Irradiator in panoramic wet-source-storage

irradiators, and irradiator vendors.

2004-17 Loose Part Detection and 08/25/2004 All holders of operating licenses

Computerized Eddy Current for pressurized-water reactors

Data Analysis in Steam (PWRs), except those who have

Generators permanently ceased operations

and have certified that fuel has

been permanently removed from

the reactor.

2004-16 Tube Leakage Due to a 08/03/2004 All holders of operating licenses

Fabrication Flaw in a for pressurized-water reactors

Replacement Steam Generator (PWRs), except those who have

permanently ceased operations

and have certified that fuel has

been permanently removed from

the reactor.

2004-15 Dual-Unit Scram at Peach 07/22/2004 All holders of operating licenses

Bottom Units 2 and 3 for nuclear power reactors except

those who have permanently

ceased operation and have

certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the

reactor vessel.

2004-14 Use of less than Optimal 07/19/2004 All licensees authorized to

Bounding Assumptions in possess a critical mass of special

Criticality Safety Analysis at nuclear material.

Fuel Cycle Facilities

Note: NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are

issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:

To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following

command in the message portion:

subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname

______________________________________________________________________________________

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit