ML072770514: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S, NUCLEAR AEGULA1t3RY COMMIUON infttmMowhof AMiWAA\QN=VCO)
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S, NUCLEAR AEGULA1t3RY COMMIUON infttmMowhof AMiWAA\QN=VCO) AQ OD0"N 0.9).Vq1g-LM._Off IralExhibitd N.
AQ OD0"N 0.9).Vq1g-LM._Off IralExhibitd N.OFFERED by"piýat nsee Intervenor________
                                              .      APPLICANTS EXH. 22 08/22/00 09:45:22 OFFERED by"piýat NRq St4ff nsee Intervenor________
NRq St4ff Other_______
Other_______
APPLICANTS EXH. 22.08/22/00 09:45:22 C-.1.0 PROBLEM STATEMENT 1.1 Background DOCKETED USNRC October 1,2007 (10:45pm)OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF*('.._da The design of the carbon steel drywell includes a sand bed which is located around the outside circumference between elevations 81-11-1/4" and 12'-3". Leakage was observed from the sand bed drains during the 1980, 1983 and 1986 refueling outages indicating that water had intruded into the annular region between the drywell shell and the concrete shield wall.The drywell shell was inspected in 1986 during the 1OR outage to determine if corrosion was occurring.
C-.
The inspection methods, results and conclusions are documented in Ref. 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3.As a result of these inspections it was concluded that a long term monitoring program would be established.
1.0   PROBLEM STATEMENT 1.1   Background The design of the carbon steel drywell includes a sand bed which is located around the outside circumference between elevations DOCKETED 81-11-1/4" and 12'-3". Leakage was observed from the sand bed USNRC drains during the 1980, 1983 and 1986 refueling outages indicating October 1,2007 (10:45pm)      that water had intruded into the annular region between the drywell shell and the concrete shield wall.
This program includes repetitive Ultrasonic Thickness (UT).measurements in the sand bed region at a nominal elevation of 11'-3" in bays IIA, 11C, 17D, 19A, 19B, and 19C.The continued presence of water in the sand bed raised concerns of potential corrosion at higher elevations.
OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND            The drywell shell was inspected in 1986 during the 1OR outage to ADJUDICATIONS STAFF          determine if corrosion was occurring. The inspection methods, results and conclusions are documented in Ref. 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3.
Therefore, UT measurements were taken at the 51' and 87' elevations in November 1987 during the 1IR outage. As a result. of these inspections, repetitive measurements in Bay 5 at elevation 51' and in Bays 9, 13 and 15 at the 87' elevation were added to the long term monitoring program to confirm that corrosion is not occurring at these higher elevations.
As a result of these inspections it was concluded that a long term monitoring program would be established. This program includes repetitive Ultrasonic Thickness (UT).measurements in the sand bed region at a nominal elevation of 11'-3" in bays IIA, 11C, 17D, 19A, 19B, and 19C.
A cathodic protection system is being installed in selected regions of the sand bed during the 12R outage to minimize corrosion of the drywell. The long term monitoring program was also expanded during the 12R outage to include measurements in the sand bed region of Bays 1D, 3D, 5D, 7D, 9A, 13A, 13C, 13D, 15A, 15D and 17A which are not covered by the cathodic protection system. It also includes measurements in the sand bed region between Bays 17 and 19 which is covered by the cathodic protection system, but does not have a reference electrode to monitor its effectiveness in this region.Some measurements in the long term monitoring program are to be taken at each outage of opportunity, while others are taken during each refueling outage. The functional requirements-for these inspections are documented in Ref. 3.4. The primary purpose of the UT measurements in the sand bed region is to determine the corrosion rate and monitor it over time. When the cathodic protection system is installed and operating, these data will be used to monitor its effectiveness.
      *('.._da                      The continued presence of water in the sand bed raised concerns of potential corrosion at higher elevations. Therefore, UT measurements were taken at the 51' and 87' elevations in November 1987 during the 1IR outage. As a result. of these inspections, repetitive measurements in Bay 5 at elevation 51' and in Bays 9, 13 and 15 at the 87' elevation were added to the long term monitoring program to confirm that corrosion is not occurring at these higher elevations.
The purpose of the measurements at other locations is to confirm that corrosion is not occurring in those regions.N 0016 (0-86)OCLROO020134 k-Te /hp (o-+e = S'P_ 6 Y-. 0 2 Er 08/22/00 09:45:22 Caic. No. C-1302-1B7-5300-005 Rev. No. 0 Page t. of 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this calculation is to: (1) Statistically analyze the thickness measurements for Bays 1IA, 1IC, 17D, 19A, 19B and 19C in the sand bed region to determine the mean thickness and corrosion rate.(2) Statistically analyze the thickness measurements for Bay 5 at elevation 51' and Bays 9, 13 and 15 at elevation 87' to determine the mean thickness corrosion rate.(3) To the extent possible, statistically analyze the limited data for the 6" x. 6" grids in the sand bed region of Bays 9D, 13A, 15D and 17A to calculate the mean thickness and determine if there is ongoing corrosion.
A cathodic protection system is being installed in selected regions of the sand bed during the 12R outage to minimize corrosion of the drywell. The long term monitoring program was also expanded during the 12R outage to include measurements in the sand bed region of Bays 1D, 3D, 5D, 7D, 9A, 13A, 13C, 13D, 15A, 15D and 17A which are not covered by the cathodic protection system. It also includes measurements in the sand bed region between Bays 17 and 19 which is covered by the cathodic protection system, but does not have a reference electrode to monitor its effectiveness in this region.
(4) To the extent possible, statistically analyze the limited data for the 6" x I" horizontal strips in the sand bed region of Bays ID, 3D, 5D, 7D, 9A, 13C and 15A to calculate the mean thickness and determine if there is ongoing corrosion.
Some measurements in the long term monitoring program are to be taken at each outage of opportunity, while others are taken during each refueling outage. The functional requirements-for these inspections are documented in Ref. 3.4. The primary purpose of the UT measurements in the sand bed region is to determine the corrosion rate and monitor it over time. When the cathodic protection system is installed and operating, these data will be used to monitor its effectiveness. The purpose of the measurements at other locations is to confirm that corrosion is not occurring in those regions.
Statistically compare the thickness data from December 1986 and December 1988 for the trench in Bay 17D to calculate the mean thickness at various elevations in the trench and..determine if there is ongoing corrosion.
N 0016 (0-86) k OCLROO020134
(5) Statistically analyze the thickness data from December 1988 for the Frame Cutout between Bays 17 and 19 to calculate the mean thickness.
-Te /hp (o-+e= S'P_ 6 Y-. 0 2 Er
OCLROO020135 08/22/00 09:45:22 Calc, No. C-1302-IB7-5300-005 Rev. No. 0 Page .of I.'2.0  
 
08/22/00 09:45:22 Caic. No. C-1302-1B7-5300-005 Rev. No. 0 Page t.of 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this calculation is to:
(1) Statistically analyze the thickness measurements for Bays 1IA, 1IC, 17D, 19A, 19B and 19C in the sand bed region to determine the mean thickness and corrosion rate.
(2)   Statistically analyze the thickness measurements for Bay 5 at elevation 51' and Bays 9, 13 and 15 at elevation 87' to determine the mean thickness corrosion rate.
(3)   To the extent possible, statistically analyze the limited data for the 6" x.6" grids in the sand bed region of Bays 9D, 13A, 15D and 17A to calculate the mean thickness and determine if there is ongoing corrosion.
(4) To the extent possible, statistically analyze the limited data for the 6" x I" horizontal strips in the sand bed region of Bays ID, 3D, 5D, 7D, 9A, 13C and 15A to calculate the mean thickness and determine if there is ongoing corrosion.
Statistically compare the thickness data from December 1986 and December 1988 for the trench in Bay 17D to calculate the mean thickness at various elevations in the trench and
        ..determine if there is ongoing corrosion.
(5)   Statistically analyze the thickness data from December 1988 for the Frame Cutout between Bays 17 and 19 to calculate the mean thickness.
OCLROO020135
 
08/22/00 09:45:22 Calc, No. C-1302-IB7-5300-005 Rev. No. 0 Page . of I.'
2.0  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF RESULTS Bay Area Location Corrosion Rate** Mean Thickness***
OF RESULTS Bay   Area     Location         Corrosion Rate**         Mean Thickness***
2.1 6"x6" Grids in Sand Bed Region at Original Locations 11A Sand Bed Not significant 908.6 +5.0 mils aic Sand Bed Indeterminablb 916.6 +10.4 mils 17D Sand Bed -27.6 +6.1 mpy 864.8 +6.8 mils 19A Sand Bed -23.7 +4.3 mpy 837.9 +4.8 mils 19B Sand Bed -29.2 +0.5 mpy 856.5 +0.5 mils 19C. Sand Bed -25.9 +4.1 mpy 860.9 +4.0 mils 2.2 6"x6" Grids in Sand Bed Reqion at New Locations 9D Sand Bed Indeterminable*
2.1     6"x6" Grids in Sand Bed Region at Original Locations 11A             Sand Bed         Not significant             908.6 +5.0 mils aic             Sand Bed         Indeterminablb             916.6 +10.4 mils 17D             Sand Bed         -27.6 +6.1 mpy             864.8 +6.8 mils 19A             Sand Bed         -23.7 +4.3 mpy             837.9 +4.8 mils 19B             Sand Bed         -29.2 +0.5 mpy             856.5 +0.5 mils 19C.             Sand Bed         -25.9 +4.1 mpy             860.9 +4.0 mils 2.2     6"x6" Grids in Sand Bed Reqion at New Locations 9D             Sand Bed         Indeterminable*           1021.4 +9.7.mils 13A             Sand Bed         Not significant*           905.3 +-10.1 mils 15D             Sand Bed         Possible*                 1056.0 +9.1 mils 17A             Sand Bed         Indeterminable*           957.4 +9.2 mils 2.3     6"x6" Grids at Upper Elevations 5             5v' Blev.         -4.3 +0.03 mpy             750.0   +0.02 mils 9             87' Elev.         Not significant             620.3   +1.0 mils
1021.4 +9.7.mils 13A Sand Bed Not significant*
. 13 15 87' 87' Elev.
905.3 +-10.1 mils 15D Sand Bed Possible*
Elev.
1056.0 +9.1 mils 17A Sand Bed Indeterminable*
Not significant Not significant 635.6 634.8
957.4 +9.2 mils 2.3 6"x6" Grids at Upper Elevations 5 5v' Blev. -4.3 +0.03 mpy 750.0 +0.02 mils 9 87' Elev. Not significant 620.3 +1.0 mils 13 87' Elev. Not significant 635.6 +0.7 mils.15 87' Elev. Not significant 634.8 +0.7 mils 2.4 Multiple 6"x6" Grids in Trench 17D Trench Not significant*
                                                                        +0.7 mils
981.2 +6.7 mils 17/19 Frame Cutout Indeterminable*
                                                                        +0.7 mils 2.4     Multiple 6"x6" Grids in Trench 17D             Trench             Not significant*           981.2   +6.7 mils 17/19           Frame Cutout       Indeterminable*           981.7   +4.4 mils 2.5     6" Strips in Sand Bed Region ID             Sand Bed         Indeterminable*         1114.7 +30.6 mils 3D             Sand Bed         Not significant*         1177.7 +5.6 mils 51             Sand Bed         Not significant*         1174.0 +2.2 mils 7D             Sand Bed         Possible*               1135.1 +4.9 mils 9A             Sand Bed         Indeterminable*           1154.6 +-4.8 mils 13C             Sand Bed         Not significant*         1147.4 +3.7 mils 13D             Sand Bed         Not significant*           962.1 +22.3 mils 15A             Sand Bed         Not significant*         1120.0 +12.6 mils 2.6     Evaluation of Individual Measurements Below 800 Mile One data point in Bay 19A and one data point in Bay 5 Elev. 51' fell outside the 99% confidence interval and thus are statistically different from the mean thickness.
981.7 +4.4 mils 2.5 6" Strips in Sand Bed Region ID Sand Bed Indeterminable*
      *Based on limited data. See text for interpretation.
1114.7 +30.6 mils 3D Sand Bed Not significant*
    **Mean corrosion rate in mile per year + standard error of the mean
1177.7 +5.6 mils 51 Sand Bed Not significant*
  ***Current mean thickness in mils + standard error of the mean OCLROO020136
1174.0 +2.2 mils 7D Sand Bed Possible*
 
1135.1 +4.9 mils 9A Sand Bed Indeterminable*
08/22/00 09:45:22 Calc. No. C-1302-187-5300-005 Rev. No. 0 Page 4   of /?t
1154.6 +-4.8 mils 13C Sand Bed Not significant*
1147.4 +3.7 mils 13D Sand Bed Not significant*
962.1 +22.3 mils 15A Sand Bed Not significant*
1120.0 +12.6 mils 2.6 Evaluation of Individual Measurements Below 800 Mile One data point in Bay 19A and one data point in Bay 5 Elev. 51' fell outside the 99% confidence interval and thus are statistically different from the mean thickness.
*Based on limited data. See text for interpretation.
**Mean corrosion rate in mile per year + standard error of the mean***Current mean thickness in mils + standard error of the mean OCLROO020136 08/22/00 09:45:22 Calc. No. C-1302-187-5300-005 Rev. No. 0 Page 4 of /?t  


==3.0 REFERENCES==
==3.0 REFERENCES==


3.1 GPUN Safety Evaluation SE-000243-002, Rev. D, "Drywell Steel Shell Plate Thickness Reduction at the Base Sand Cushion Entrenchment Region" 3.2 GPUN TDR 854, Rev. 0, "Drywell Corrosion Assessment" 3.3 GPUN TDR 851, Rev. 0, "Assessment of Oyster Creek Drywell Shell" 3.4 GPUN installation Specification IS-328227-004, Rev. 3, "]'unctional Requirements for Drywell Containment Vessel Thickness Examination" 3.5 Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd.Edition, N.R. Draper & H. Smith, John Wiley & Sons, 1981 3.6 Statistical Concepts and Methods G.K..Bhattacharyya  
3.1   GPUN Safety Evaluation SE-000243-002, Rev. D, "Drywell Steel Shell Plate Thickness Reduction at the Base Sand Cushion Entrenchment Region" 3.2   GPUN TDR 854, Rev. 0, "Drywell Corrosion Assessment" 3.3   GPUN TDR 851, Rev. 0, "Assessment of Oyster Creek Drywell Shell" 3.4   GPUN installation Specification IS-328227-004, Rev. 3, "]'unctional Requirements for Drywell Containment Vessel Thickness Examination" 3.5   Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd.Edition, N.R. Draper & H. Smith, John Wiley & Sons, 1981 3.6   Statistical Concepts and Methods G.K..Bhattacharyya & R.A. Johnson, John Wiley & sons, 1977 OCLROO020137}}
& R.A. Johnson, John Wiley & sons, 1977 OCLROO020137}}

Revision as of 03:10, 23 November 2019

1989/02/02-Oyster Creek September 2007 Evidentiary Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 22, Gpu Calculation No. C-1302-187-5300-005 (05 Calc.) Statistical Analysis of Drywell Thickness Data Thru 12-31-88
ML072770514
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 02/02/1989
From: Johari Moore
GPU Nuclear Corp
To:
NRC/SECY
SECY RAS
References
50-219-LR, AmerGen-Applicant-22, RAS 14229 C-1302-187-5300-005, Rev 00
Download: ML072770514 (4)
v • d • e


Text

U.S, NUCLEAR AEGULA1t3RY COMMIUON infttmMowhof AMiWAA\QN=VCO) AQ OD0"N 0.9).Vq1g-LM._Off IralExhibitd N.

. APPLICANTS EXH. 22 08/22/00 09:45:22 OFFERED by"piýat NRq St4ff nsee Intervenor________

Other_______

C-.

1.0 PROBLEM STATEMENT 1.1 Background The design of the carbon steel drywell includes a sand bed which is located around the outside circumference between elevations DOCKETED 81-11-1/4" and 12'-3". Leakage was observed from the sand bed USNRC drains during the 1980, 1983 and 1986 refueling outages indicating October 1,2007 (10:45pm) that water had intruded into the annular region between the drywell shell and the concrete shield wall.

OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND The drywell shell was inspected in 1986 during the 1OR outage to ADJUDICATIONS STAFF determine if corrosion was occurring. The inspection methods, results and conclusions are documented in Ref. 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3.

As a result of these inspections it was concluded that a long term monitoring program would be established. This program includes repetitive Ultrasonic Thickness (UT).measurements in the sand bed region at a nominal elevation of 11'-3" in bays IIA, 11C, 17D, 19A, 19B, and 19C.

  • ('.._da The continued presence of water in the sand bed raised concerns of potential corrosion at higher elevations. Therefore, UT measurements were taken at the 51' and 87' elevations in November 1987 during the 1IR outage. As a result. of these inspections, repetitive measurements in Bay 5 at elevation 51' and in Bays 9, 13 and 15 at the 87' elevation were added to the long term monitoring program to confirm that corrosion is not occurring at these higher elevations.

A cathodic protection system is being installed in selected regions of the sand bed during the 12R outage to minimize corrosion of the drywell. The long term monitoring program was also expanded during the 12R outage to include measurements in the sand bed region of Bays 1D, 3D, 5D, 7D, 9A, 13A, 13C, 13D, 15A, 15D and 17A which are not covered by the cathodic protection system. It also includes measurements in the sand bed region between Bays 17 and 19 which is covered by the cathodic protection system, but does not have a reference electrode to monitor its effectiveness in this region.

Some measurements in the long term monitoring program are to be taken at each outage of opportunity, while others are taken during each refueling outage. The functional requirements-for these inspections are documented in Ref. 3.4. The primary purpose of the UT measurements in the sand bed region is to determine the corrosion rate and monitor it over time. When the cathodic protection system is installed and operating, these data will be used to monitor its effectiveness. The purpose of the measurements at other locations is to confirm that corrosion is not occurring in those regions.

N 0016 (0-86) k OCLROO020134

-Te /hp (o-+e= S'P_ 6 Y-. 0 2 Er

08/22/00 09:45:22 Caic. No. C-1302-1B7-5300-005 Rev. No. 0 Page t.of 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this calculation is to:

(1) Statistically analyze the thickness measurements for Bays 1IA, 1IC, 17D, 19A, 19B and 19C in the sand bed region to determine the mean thickness and corrosion rate.

(2) Statistically analyze the thickness measurements for Bay 5 at elevation 51' and Bays 9, 13 and 15 at elevation 87' to determine the mean thickness corrosion rate.

(3) To the extent possible, statistically analyze the limited data for the 6" x.6" grids in the sand bed region of Bays 9D, 13A, 15D and 17A to calculate the mean thickness and determine if there is ongoing corrosion.

(4) To the extent possible, statistically analyze the limited data for the 6" x I" horizontal strips in the sand bed region of Bays ID, 3D, 5D, 7D, 9A, 13C and 15A to calculate the mean thickness and determine if there is ongoing corrosion.

Statistically compare the thickness data from December 1986 and December 1988 for the trench in Bay 17D to calculate the mean thickness at various elevations in the trench and

..determine if there is ongoing corrosion.

(5) Statistically analyze the thickness data from December 1988 for the Frame Cutout between Bays 17 and 19 to calculate the mean thickness.

OCLROO020135

08/22/00 09:45:22 Calc, No. C-1302-IB7-5300-005 Rev. No. 0 Page . of I.'

2.0

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS Bay Area Location Corrosion Rate** Mean Thickness***

2.1 6"x6" Grids in Sand Bed Region at Original Locations 11A Sand Bed Not significant 908.6 +5.0 mils aic Sand Bed Indeterminablb 916.6 +10.4 mils 17D Sand Bed -27.6 +6.1 mpy 864.8 +6.8 mils 19A Sand Bed -23.7 +4.3 mpy 837.9 +4.8 mils 19B Sand Bed -29.2 +0.5 mpy 856.5 +0.5 mils 19C. Sand Bed -25.9 +4.1 mpy 860.9 +4.0 mils 2.2 6"x6" Grids in Sand Bed Reqion at New Locations 9D Sand Bed Indeterminable* 1021.4 +9.7.mils 13A Sand Bed Not significant* 905.3 +-10.1 mils 15D Sand Bed Possible* 1056.0 +9.1 mils 17A Sand Bed Indeterminable* 957.4 +9.2 mils 2.3 6"x6" Grids at Upper Elevations 5 5v' Blev. -4.3 +0.03 mpy 750.0 +0.02 mils 9 87' Elev. Not significant 620.3 +1.0 mils

. 13 15 87' 87' Elev.

Elev.

Not significant Not significant 635.6 634.8

+0.7 mils

+0.7 mils 2.4 Multiple 6"x6" Grids in Trench 17D Trench Not significant* 981.2 +6.7 mils 17/19 Frame Cutout Indeterminable* 981.7 +4.4 mils 2.5 6" Strips in Sand Bed Region ID Sand Bed Indeterminable* 1114.7 +30.6 mils 3D Sand Bed Not significant* 1177.7 +5.6 mils 51 Sand Bed Not significant* 1174.0 +2.2 mils 7D Sand Bed Possible* 1135.1 +4.9 mils 9A Sand Bed Indeterminable* 1154.6 +-4.8 mils 13C Sand Bed Not significant* 1147.4 +3.7 mils 13D Sand Bed Not significant* 962.1 +22.3 mils 15A Sand Bed Not significant* 1120.0 +12.6 mils 2.6 Evaluation of Individual Measurements Below 800 Mile One data point in Bay 19A and one data point in Bay 5 Elev. 51' fell outside the 99% confidence interval and thus are statistically different from the mean thickness.

  • Based on limited data. See text for interpretation.
    • Mean corrosion rate in mile per year + standard error of the mean
      • Current mean thickness in mils + standard error of the mean OCLROO020136

08/22/00 09:45:22 Calc. No. C-1302-187-5300-005 Rev. No. 0 Page 4 of /?t

3.0 REFERENCES

3.1 GPUN Safety Evaluation SE-000243-002, Rev. D, "Drywell Steel Shell Plate Thickness Reduction at the Base Sand Cushion Entrenchment Region" 3.2 GPUN TDR 854, Rev. 0, "Drywell Corrosion Assessment" 3.3 GPUN TDR 851, Rev. 0, "Assessment of Oyster Creek Drywell Shell" 3.4 GPUN installation Specification IS-328227-004, Rev. 3, "]'unctional Requirements for Drywell Containment Vessel Thickness Examination" 3.5 Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd.Edition, N.R. Draper & H. Smith, John Wiley & Sons, 1981 3.6 Statistical Concepts and Methods G.K..Bhattacharyya & R.A. Johnson, John Wiley & sons, 1977 OCLROO020137

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML072770514&oldid=2172706"