ML093290205: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR. THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Dani Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on thel8th day of November, two thousand and nine, Nancy Burton, Petitioner, ORDER Docket Number: 09-1901-ag V.United States of America, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Respondents, Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., Intervenor-Respondent.
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR. THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Dani Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on thel8th day of November, two thousand and nine, Nancy Burton, Petitioner,                                                             ORDER Docket Number: 09-1901-ag V.
A petition having been filed in this Court on 5/4/2009; and, The Court, sua sponte, having issued an order to show cause why the proceeding should not be dismissed due to petitioner's failure to file the brief by the date set in the scheduling order; and, Petitioner not having responded to the Court as directed;IT IS ORDERED, that the proceeding is dismissed.
United States of America, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Respondents, Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.,
For the Court: Catheri:"O'Ha azn Wolfe, Cl.l k BvZ , 7/" Brenda Mojica, Deputy OlertC}}
Intervenor-Respondent.
A petition having been filed in this Court on 5/4/2009; and, The Court, sua sponte, having issued an order to show cause why the proceeding should not be dismissed due to petitioner's failure to file the brief by the date set in the scheduling order; and, Petitioner not having responded to the Court as directed; IT IS ORDERED, that the proceeding is dismissed.
For the Court:
Catheri:"O'Haazn Wolfe, Cl.lk BvZ,7/"
Brenda Mojica, Deputy OlertC}}

Revision as of 01:03, 14 November 2019

11/18/2009 - Burton V. USNRC; 09-1901-ag - Order That the Proceeding Is Dismissed
ML093290205
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 11/18/2009
From: Wolfe C
US Federal Judiciary, Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
To:
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, NRC/OGC
Robert M. Rader, 301-415-1955
References
09-1901-ag, FOIA/PA-2011-0115
Download: ML093290205 (1)


Text

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR. THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Dani Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on thel8th day of November, two thousand and nine, Nancy Burton, Petitioner, ORDER Docket Number: 09-1901-ag V.

United States of America, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Respondents, Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.,

Intervenor-Respondent.

A petition having been filed in this Court on 5/4/2009; and, The Court, sua sponte, having issued an order to show cause why the proceeding should not be dismissed due to petitioner's failure to file the brief by the date set in the scheduling order; and, Petitioner not having responded to the Court as directed; IT IS ORDERED, that the proceeding is dismissed.

For the Court:

Catheri:"O'Haazn Wolfe, Cl.lk BvZ,7/"

Brenda Mojica, Deputy OlertC