ML100770100: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = Letter, Licensee Response to Notice of Violation
| document type = Letter, Licensee Response to Notice of Violation
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
| project =
| stage = Other
}}
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000528/2009005]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:10 CFR 2.201 EA-09-330 L A MA subsidiary
{{#Wiki_filter:10 CFR 2.201 EA-09-330 L A MA                       subsidiaryof Pinnacle West CapitalCorporation Dwight C. Mims                                                       Mail Station 7605 Palo Verde Nuclear      Vice President                                     Tel. 623-393-5403 P.O. Box 52034 Generating Station      Regulatory Affairs and Plant Improvement          Fax 623-393-6077 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034 102-06149-DCM/MLLJDCE March 11, 2010 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
of Pinnacle West Capital Corporation
 
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating
==Reference:==
Station Dwight C. Mims Vice President Regulatory
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station - NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, and Notice of Violation, dated February 9, 2010
Affairs and Plant Improvement
 
Tel. 623-393-5403
==Subject:==
Fax 623-393-6077
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)
Mail Station 7605 P.O. Box 52034 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034
Units 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos. STN 50-628, 50-529, and 50-530 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330
102-06149-DCM/MLLJDCE
 
March 11, 2010 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory  
==Dear Sirs:==
Commission
 
Washington, DC 20555-0001
In the above referenced letter to Arizona Public Service (APS), the NRC identified that APS failed to ensure that an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink.
Reference:
Pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 and Notice of Violation (NOV) EA-09-330, attached to the above referenced letter, APS hereby submits its reply to the NOV.
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating  
Enclosure I to this letter contains a restatement of the violation. Enclosure 2 contains the APS reply to the NOV.
Station -NRC Integrated
D1 A member of the STARS (Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing) Alliance Callaway
Inspection  
* Comanche Peak - Diablo Canyon
Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, and Notice of Violation, dated February 9, 2010 Subject: Palo Verde Nuclear Generating  
* Palo Verde
Station (PVNGS)Units 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos. STN 50-628, 50-529, and 50-530 Reply to Notice of Violation  
* San Onofre - South Texas
EA-09-330 Dear Sirs: In the above referenced  
* Wolf Creek
letter to Arizona Public Service (APS), the NRC identified  
 
that APS failed to ensure that an adequate procedure  
ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Page 2 The following commitment is being made to the NRC by this letter:
was available  
Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds.
to control essential  
If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Webb, Regulatory Affairs,.
spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability  
Compliance Section Leader, at (623) 393-5730.
of the ultimate heat sink.Pursuant to the requirements  
Sincerely, DCM/MNW/DCE/gat
of 10 CFR 2.201 and Notice of Violation (NOV) EA-09-330, attached to the above referenced  
 
letter, APS hereby submits its reply to the NOV.Enclosure  
==Enclosures:==
I to this letter contains a restatement  
: 1. Restatement of Violation EA-09-330
of the violation.  
: 2. Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 cc:     E. E. Collins Jr. NRC Region IV Regional Administrator J. R. Hall           NRC NRR Project Manager R. I. Treadway       NRC Senior Resident Inspector for PVNGS
Enclosure  
 
2 contains the APS reply to the NOV.D1 A member of the STARS (Strategic  
Enclosure 1 Restatement of Notice of Violation EA-09-330 During an NRC inspection conducted on October 1 through December 31, 2009, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below:
Teaming and Resource Sharing) Alliance Callaway * Comanche Peak -Diablo Canyon * Palo Verde * San Onofre -South Texas * Wolf Creek  
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, "Instructions, Procedures,, and Drawings," requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory  
Contrary to the above, from July 11, 2008 through December 31, 2009, the licensee failed to prescribe adequate procedures for the essential spray ponds. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink.
Commission
This violation is associated with a Green Significance Determination Process finding.
Reply to Notice of Violation  
I
EA-09-330 Page 2 The following  
 
commitment  
Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station concurs with the violation. The NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, noted prior non-cited violations with respect-to control of potential tornado borne missile hazards. A root cause investigation of recurrent examples of failure to control potential tornado borne hazards was initiated on December 18, 2009, and completed on February 17, 2010. The investigation concluded that the root cause was inadequacies in the potential tornado borne missile control process with respect to work control processes and the clarity of procedure requirements. This root cause is consistent with the cited violation.
is being made to the NRC by this letter: Full compliance  
The Reason for the Violation Several reasons resulted in the recurrence of the failure to control potential tornado borne missile hazards:
with Criterion  
* Weak ownership of the potential tornado borne missile control program resulted in the inconsistent implementation of program requirements.
V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing  
* Ineffective use of trending and ineffective corrective, actions in the corrective action program resulted in a failure to identify and correct recurrent non-compliance with the potential tornado borne missile control program.
adequate potential  
" A lack of knowledge existed among station personnel regarding the potential tornado borne missile control program, the requirements of the program, and where existing information is located.
tornado borne missile control procedures  
A lack of sensitivity existed among station personnel regarding the safety significance of the spray ponds and associated spray nozzles used for heat removal during normal and post-accident conditions.
will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing  
* Weak standards existed among station personnel in the implementation of the requirements relative to controlling potential tornado borne missiles.
a stand alone site-wide procedure  
The Corrective Steps that Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved A site-wide communication has been issued in the station newsletter entitled "Tornado Borne Missile Hazards Require Vigilance to Ensure Spray Ponds Remain Operable." Additional communication on this subject was provided by Executive Management in All Hands meetings.
and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential  
The station's potential tornado borne missile control specification and the housekeeping procedure have been revised to specify only three acceptable methods for storing unattended transient potential tornado borne missile hazards 1
spray ponds.If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Webb, Regulatory  
 
Affairs,.Compliance  
Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 within missile zones when they are not being actively used for work in progress.
Section Leader, at (623) 393-5730.Sincerely, DCM/MNW/DCE/gat
These three approved methods are:
Enclosures:  
" Storage within "safe zones," i.e., areas within 50 ft. of designated structures.
1. Restatement  
" Storage inside enclosed C-Vans that weigh more than 4000 pounds when empty.
of Violation  
" Storage within an approved shielded configuration, such as within the area bounded by C-Vans in an approved horseshoe configuration.
EA-09-330 2. Reply to Notice of Violation  
A Palo Verde Missile Mitigation Team has been created to establish ownership areas for walkdowns and enforcement strategy. A Charter has been developed to document the Mitigation Team composition. Initial clean-up and control actions for tornado missile hazards have been performed.
EA-09-330 cc: E. E. Collins Jr. NRC Region IV Regional Administrator
Weekly walkdowns of missile zones within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds have been initiated. The intent of these walkdowns is to enforce the existing housekeeping procedure standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles to ensure missile density margins for operability are not challenged. Identified non-compliance with the missile control housekeeping standards will be documented and tracked via the corrective action program.
J. R. Hall NRC NRR Project Manager R. I. Treadway NRC Senior Resident Inspector  
These walkdowns will continue until the actions needed to restore full compliance are completed and determined to be effective.
for PVNGS  
The most recent engineering verification of missile density, completed on March 4, 2010, confirmed that the missile density was less than the maximum density that could be sustained to consider the essential spray ponds OPERABLE.
Enclosure  
The Corrective Steps That Will Be Taken To Avoid FurtherViolations The potential tornado borne missile control program procedure will identify the program owner and stakeholders and identify corresponding responsibilities.
1 Restatement  
This action will anchor ownership and establish standards for implementation of the program.
of Notice of Violation  
The station will implement an interactive automated trending program to facilitate identification of developing trends at both line and site levels, enabling program owners to identify issues and lagging performance.               I To improve knowledge of the program requirements for implementation of potential tornado borne missile controls, training will be provided to targeted populations of the station's work force. A training needs analysis will identify the population and the needed objectives. Additionally, a communication plan will be 2
EA-09-330 During an NRC inspection  
 
conducted  
Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 implemented to raise the station's overall awareness of the need to control potential tornado borne missiles and the program's requirements.
on October 1 through December 31, 2009, a violation  
The station will implement a performance indicator to provide the potential tornado borne missile control program health indication. The potential tornado borne missile density will be included in the station's 06:30 am Teamwork and Communication Meeting report. The objectives of these actions are to improve the visibility of the program among the staff and raise the sensitivity to potential tornado borne missiles and their impact on the essential spray ponds and nuclear safety.
of NRC requirements  
The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Until full compliance with Criterion V is established, weekly monitoring of existing housekeeping standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles, as described above, will ensure that non-compliances that may have an adverse impact on spray pond operability are identified and corrected in a timely manner.
was identified.  
Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds.
In accordance  
3}}
with the NRC Enforcement  
Policy, the violation  
is listed below: 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion  
V, "Instructions, Procedures,, and Drawings," requires, in part, that activities  
affecting  
quality shall be prescribed  
by documented  
instructions, procedures, or drawings, and shall be accomplished  
in accordance  
with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.Contrary to the above, from July 11, 2008 through December 31, 2009, the licensee failed to prescribe  
adequate procedures  
for the essential spray ponds. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure an adequate procedure  
was available  
to control essential  
spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability  
of the ultimate heat sink.This violation  
is associated  
with a Green Significance  
Determination  
Process finding.I  
Enclosure  
2 Reply to Notice of Violation  
EA-09-330 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating  
Station concurs with the violation.  
The NRC Integrated  
Inspection  
Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, noted prior non-cited  
violations  
with respect-to  
control of potential  
tornado borne missile hazards. A root cause investigation  
of recurrent examples of failure to control potential  
tornado borne hazards was initiated  
on December 18, 2009, and completed  
on February 17, 2010. The investigation
concluded  
that the root cause was inadequacies  
in the potential  
tornado borne missile control process with respect to work control processes  
and the clarity of procedure  
requirements.  
This root cause is consistent  
with the cited violation.
The Reason for the Violation Several reasons resulted in the recurrence  
of the failure to control potential tornado borne missile hazards:* Weak ownership  
of the potential  
tornado borne missile control program resulted in the inconsistent  
implementation  
of program requirements.
* Ineffective  
use of trending and ineffective  
corrective, actions in the corrective
action program resulted in a failure to identify and correct recurrent  
non-compliance  
with the potential  
tornado borne missile control program." A lack of knowledge  
existed among station personnel  
regarding  
the potential tornado borne missile control program, the requirements  
of the program, and where existing information  
is located.A lack of sensitivity  
existed among station personnel  
regarding  
the safety significance  
of the spray ponds and associated  
spray nozzles used for heat removal during normal and post-accident  
conditions.
* Weak standards  
existed among station personnel  
in the implementation  
of the requirements  
relative to controlling  
potential  
tornado borne missiles.The Corrective  
Steps that Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved A site-wide  
communication  
has been issued in the station newsletter  
entitled"Tornado Borne Missile Hazards Require Vigilance  
to Ensure Spray Ponds Remain Operable." Additional  
communication  
on this subject was provided by Executive  
Management  
in All Hands meetings.The station's  
potential  
tornado borne missile control specification  
and the housekeeping  
procedure  
have been revised to specify only three acceptable
methods for storing unattended  
transient  
potential  
tornado borne missile hazards 1  
Enclosure  
2 Reply to Notice of Violation  
EA-09-330 within missile zones when they are not being actively used for work in progress.These three approved methods are: " Storage within "safe zones," i.e., areas within 50 ft. of designated  
structures." Storage inside enclosed C-Vans that weigh more than 4000 pounds when empty." Storage within an approved shielded configuration, such as within the area bounded by C-Vans in an approved horseshoe  
configuration.
A Palo Verde Missile Mitigation  
Team has been created to establish  
ownership areas for walkdowns  
and enforcement  
strategy.  
A Charter has been developed to document the Mitigation  
Team composition.  
Initial clean-up and control actions for tornado missile hazards have been performed.
Weekly walkdowns  
of missile zones within 400 ft. of the essential  
spray ponds have been initiated.  
The intent of these walkdowns  
is to enforce the existing housekeeping  
procedure  
standards  
for control of transient  
potential  
tornado borne missiles to ensure missile density margins for operability  
are not challenged.  
Identified  
non-compliance  
with the missile control housekeeping
standards  
will be documented  
and tracked via the corrective  
action program.These walkdowns  
will continue until the actions needed to restore full compliance
are completed  
and determined  
to be effective.
The most recent engineering  
verification  
of missile density, completed  
on March 4, 2010, confirmed  
that the missile density was less than the maximum density that could be sustained  
to consider the essential  
spray ponds OPERABLE.The Corrective  
Steps That Will Be Taken To Avoid FurtherViolations
The potential  
tornado borne missile control program procedure  
will identify the program owner and stakeholders  
and identify corresponding  
responsibilities.
This action will anchor ownership  
and establish  
standards  
for implementation  
of the program.The station will implement  
an interactive  
automated  
trending program to facilitate
identification  
of developing  
trends at both line and site levels, enabling program owners to identify issues and lagging performance.  
I To improve knowledge  
of the program requirements  
for implementation  
of potential  
tornado borne missile controls, training will be provided to targeted populations  
of the station's  
work force. A training needs analysis will identify the population  
and the needed objectives.  
Additionally, a communication  
plan will be 2  
Enclosure  
2 Reply to Notice of Violation  
EA-09-330 implemented  
to raise the station's  
overall awareness  
of the need to control potential  
tornado borne missiles and the program's  
requirements.
The station will implement  
a performance  
indicator  
to provide the potential tornado borne missile control program health indication.  
The potential  
tornado borne missile density will be included in the station's  
06:30 am Teamwork and Communication  
Meeting report. The objectives  
of these actions are to improve the visibility  
of the program among the staff and raise the sensitivity  
to potential tornado borne missiles and their impact on the essential  
spray ponds and nuclear safety.The Date When Full Compliance  
Will Be Achieved Until full compliance  
with Criterion  
V is established, weekly monitoring  
of existing housekeeping  
standards  
for control of transient  
potential  
tornado borne missiles, as described  
above, will ensure that non-compliances  
that may have an adverse impact on spray pond operability  
are identified  
and corrected  
in a timely manner.Full compliance  
with Criterion  
V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing  
adequate potential  
tornado borne missile control procedures  
will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing  
a stand alone site-wide  
procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential  
tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential  
spray ponds.3
}}

Latest revision as of 21:42, 13 November 2019

NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528-09-005, 05000529-09-005, and 05000530-09-005, and Notice of Violation, Dated February 9, 2010
ML100770100
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 03/11/2010
From: Mims D
Arizona Public Service Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
102-06149-DCM/MLL/DCE, EA-09-330, IR-09-005
Download: ML100770100 (6)


Text

10 CFR 2.201 EA-09-330 L A MA subsidiaryof Pinnacle West CapitalCorporation Dwight C. Mims Mail Station 7605 Palo Verde Nuclear Vice President Tel. 623-393-5403 P.O. Box 52034 Generating Station Regulatory Affairs and Plant Improvement Fax 623-393-6077 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034 102-06149-DCM/MLLJDCE March 11, 2010 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Reference:

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station - NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, and Notice of Violation, dated February 9, 2010

Subject:

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)

Units 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos. STN 50-628, 50-529, and 50-530 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330

Dear Sirs:

In the above referenced letter to Arizona Public Service (APS), the NRC identified that APS failed to ensure that an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink.

Pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 and Notice of Violation (NOV) EA-09-330, attached to the above referenced letter, APS hereby submits its reply to the NOV.

Enclosure I to this letter contains a restatement of the violation. Enclosure 2 contains the APS reply to the NOV.

D1 A member of the STARS (Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing) Alliance Callaway

  • Comanche Peak - Diablo Canyon
  • Palo Verde
  • Wolf Creek

ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Page 2 The following commitment is being made to the NRC by this letter:

Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds.

If you have any questions, please contact Marianne Webb, Regulatory Affairs,.

Compliance Section Leader, at (623) 393-5730.

Sincerely, DCM/MNW/DCE/gat

Enclosures:

1. Restatement of Violation EA-09-330
2. Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 cc: E. E. Collins Jr. NRC Region IV Regional Administrator J. R. Hall NRC NRR Project Manager R. I. Treadway NRC Senior Resident Inspector for PVNGS

Enclosure 1 Restatement of Notice of Violation EA-09-330 During an NRC inspection conducted on October 1 through December 31, 2009, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below:

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, "Instructions, Procedures,, and Drawings," requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.

Contrary to the above, from July 11, 2008 through December 31, 2009, the licensee failed to prescribe adequate procedures for the essential spray ponds. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure an adequate procedure was available to control essential spray pond missile hazards and ensure operability of the ultimate heat sink.

This violation is associated with a Green Significance Determination Process finding.

I

Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station concurs with the violation. The NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000528/2009005, 05000529/2009005, and 05000530/2009005, noted prior non-cited violations with respect-to control of potential tornado borne missile hazards. A root cause investigation of recurrent examples of failure to control potential tornado borne hazards was initiated on December 18, 2009, and completed on February 17, 2010. The investigation concluded that the root cause was inadequacies in the potential tornado borne missile control process with respect to work control processes and the clarity of procedure requirements. This root cause is consistent with the cited violation.

The Reason for the Violation Several reasons resulted in the recurrence of the failure to control potential tornado borne missile hazards:

  • Weak ownership of the potential tornado borne missile control program resulted in the inconsistent implementation of program requirements.
  • Ineffective use of trending and ineffective corrective, actions in the corrective action program resulted in a failure to identify and correct recurrent non-compliance with the potential tornado borne missile control program.

" A lack of knowledge existed among station personnel regarding the potential tornado borne missile control program, the requirements of the program, and where existing information is located.

A lack of sensitivity existed among station personnel regarding the safety significance of the spray ponds and associated spray nozzles used for heat removal during normal and post-accident conditions.

  • Weak standards existed among station personnel in the implementation of the requirements relative to controlling potential tornado borne missiles.

The Corrective Steps that Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved A site-wide communication has been issued in the station newsletter entitled "Tornado Borne Missile Hazards Require Vigilance to Ensure Spray Ponds Remain Operable." Additional communication on this subject was provided by Executive Management in All Hands meetings.

The station's potential tornado borne missile control specification and the housekeeping procedure have been revised to specify only three acceptable methods for storing unattended transient potential tornado borne missile hazards 1

Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 within missile zones when they are not being actively used for work in progress.

These three approved methods are:

" Storage within "safe zones," i.e., areas within 50 ft. of designated structures.

" Storage inside enclosed C-Vans that weigh more than 4000 pounds when empty.

" Storage within an approved shielded configuration, such as within the area bounded by C-Vans in an approved horseshoe configuration.

A Palo Verde Missile Mitigation Team has been created to establish ownership areas for walkdowns and enforcement strategy. A Charter has been developed to document the Mitigation Team composition. Initial clean-up and control actions for tornado missile hazards have been performed.

Weekly walkdowns of missile zones within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds have been initiated. The intent of these walkdowns is to enforce the existing housekeeping procedure standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles to ensure missile density margins for operability are not challenged. Identified non-compliance with the missile control housekeeping standards will be documented and tracked via the corrective action program.

These walkdowns will continue until the actions needed to restore full compliance are completed and determined to be effective.

The most recent engineering verification of missile density, completed on March 4, 2010, confirmed that the missile density was less than the maximum density that could be sustained to consider the essential spray ponds OPERABLE.

The Corrective Steps That Will Be Taken To Avoid FurtherViolations The potential tornado borne missile control program procedure will identify the program owner and stakeholders and identify corresponding responsibilities.

This action will anchor ownership and establish standards for implementation of the program.

The station will implement an interactive automated trending program to facilitate identification of developing trends at both line and site levels, enabling program owners to identify issues and lagging performance. I To improve knowledge of the program requirements for implementation of potential tornado borne missile controls, training will be provided to targeted populations of the station's work force. A training needs analysis will identify the population and the needed objectives. Additionally, a communication plan will be 2

Enclosure 2 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-09-330 implemented to raise the station's overall awareness of the need to control potential tornado borne missiles and the program's requirements.

The station will implement a performance indicator to provide the potential tornado borne missile control program health indication. The potential tornado borne missile density will be included in the station's 06:30 am Teamwork and Communication Meeting report. The objectives of these actions are to improve the visibility of the program among the staff and raise the sensitivity to potential tornado borne missiles and their impact on the essential spray ponds and nuclear safety.

The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Until full compliance with Criterion V is established, weekly monitoring of existing housekeeping standards for control of transient potential tornado borne missiles, as described above, will ensure that non-compliances that may have an adverse impact on spray pond operability are identified and corrected in a timely manner.

Full compliance with Criterion V of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B with respect to establishing adequate potential tornado borne missile control procedures will be achieved by June 30, 2010, by implementing a stand alone site-wide procedure and a tracking system to evaluate, approve, and track potential tornado borne missiles in outside areas within 400 ft. of the essential spray ponds.

3