RBG-47021, Response to Request for Additional Information on License Amendment Request 2009-05, 24-Month Fuel Cycles: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Entergy Operations, Inc.River Bend Station 5485 U. S. Highway 61N St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225 381 4149"EntergyJ EFax 225 635 5068 jrober3@entergy.com Jerry C. Roberts Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance RBG-47021 April 22, 2010 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn.: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
{{#Wiki_filter:Entergy Operations, Inc.
River Bend Station 5485 U. S. Highway 61N "EntergyJ                                                                      St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel   225 381 4149 EFax                                                                               225 635 5068 jrober3@entergy.com Jerry C. Roberts Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance RBG-47021 April 22, 2010 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn.: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Response to Request for Additional Information on License Amendment Request 2009-05, 24-month Fuel Cycles River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47


==REFERENCES:==
==REFERENCES:==
: 1. Entergy letter to NRC, dated August 10, 2009, License Amendment Request 2009-05, 24-month Fuel Cycles (Letter No.
RBG-46932)
: 2. NRC letter to Entergy (via email), dated April 8, 2010, Request for Additional Information RBF1-10-0057 File Code No.: G9.5


Response to Request for Additional Information on License Amendment Request 2009-05, 24-month Fuel Cycles River Bend Station -Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 1. Entergy letter to NRC, dated August 10, 2009, License Amendment Request 2009-05, 24-month Fuel Cycles (Letter No.RBG-46932)
==Dear Sir or Madam:==
: 2. NRC letter to Entergy (via email), dated April 8, 2010, Request for Additional Information RBF1-10-0057 File Code No.: G9.5


==Dear Sir or Madam:==
On August 10, 2009, Entergy submitted a request to amend the station's operating license to allow implementation of 24-month fuel cycles (Reference 1). During their review, the NRC staff determined that additional information is needed to complete the processing and approval of Entergy's request. The request for that information was transmitted to Entergy per Reference 2. The attachment to this letter contains the requested information.
On August 10, 2009, Entergy submitted a request to amend the station's operating license to allow implementation of 24-month fuel cycles (Reference 1). During their review, the NRC staff determined that additional information is needed to complete the processing and approval of Entergy's request. The request for that information was transmitted to Entergy per Reference
This letter contains no commitments. If you have any questions on this matter, please contact David Lorfing, Manager - Licensing, at 225-381-4157.
: 2. The attachment to this letter contains the requested information.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
This letter contains no commitments.
Sincerely, DirctJerry C. Roberts Director - Nuclear Safety Assurance                                                                           cof~-
If you have any questions on this matter, please contact David Lorfing, Manager -Licensing, at 225-381-4157.
 
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.Sincerely, DirctJerry C. Roberts Director -Nuclear Safety Assurance cof~-
RBG-47021 April 22, 2010 Page 2 of 2
RBG-47021 April 22, 2010 Page 2 of 2  


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
Response to Request for Additional Information cc:    Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 NRC Senior Resident Inspector P. O. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn.: Mr. Alan B. Wang One White Flint MS 0-8 B1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Mr. Jeffrey P. Myers Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Attn.: OEC-ERSD P. 0. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312
Attachment to RBG-47021 River Bend Station License Amendment Request 2009-05 Response to Request for Additional Information
Attachment RBG-47021 April 22, 2010 Page 1 of 1 Request for Additional Information:
In your August 10, 2009, submittal, on page 15, under Section 3.4 "Source Term", it is stated that RBS's core source term will be based on the ORIGN01 P computer code instead of the previously approved CINDER computer code. Please provide additional information on any design bases parameters, assumptions or methodologies (other than the one mentioned previously) that were changed in the radiological design basis accident analyses as a result of the change? If there are many changes it would be helpful to compare and contrast them in a table. Also, please provide a justification for any changes.


Response to Request for Additional Information cc: Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 NRC Senior Resident Inspector P. O. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn.: Mr. Alan B. Wang One White Flint MS 0-8 B1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Mr. Jeffrey P. Myers Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Attn.: OEC-ERSD P. 0. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312 Attachment to RBG-47021 River Bend Station License Amendment Request 2009-05 Response to Request for Additional Information Attachment RBG-47021 April 22, 2010 Page 1 of 1 Request for Additional Information:
===Response===
In your August 10, 2009, submittal, on page 15, under Section 3.4 "Source Term", it is stated that RBS's core source term will be based on the ORIGN01 P computer code instead of the previously approved CINDER computer code. Please provide additional information on any design bases parameters, assumptions or methodologies (other than the one mentioned previously) that were changed in the radiological design basis accident analyses as a result of the change? If there are many changes it would be helpful to compare and contrast them in a table. Also, please provide a justification for any changes.Response: There are two fundamental changes related to source term discussed in the License Amendment Request, as described below.(1) There was a change in the computer code used to generate the RBS source termr as a result of the previous transition from AREVA nuclear fuel to GNF nuclear fuel. This involved the transition from the CINDER7 computer code for generating the core source term to the ORIGEN 2.1 computer code. The CINDER7 computer code, which is no longer supported by General Electric (GE), was used for the core source term prior to the current fuel cycle. GE now uses ORIGEN 2.1, which is one of the recommended source term codes in Regulatory Guide 1.183. The change in source term computer code was approved using the 1 0CFR50.59 process as part of the current cycle 16 core design.(2) The Updated Safety Analysis Report Chapter 15 accident analysis was evaluated based on the 24-month fuel cycle source term. This analysis modified the reactor core source term (radionuclide inventory) resulting from the transition to a 24-month fuel cycle. There were no other input changes. The code version used for the dose calculations was not changed. The resulting change in main control room, exclusion area boundary, and low population zone doses for each of the accident scenarios was less than 10% of the current USAR value which is within the licensee-controlled margin (refer to NEI 96-07, Section 4.3.3). This analysis is in the final stages of completion by the vendor. These changes must receive final approval by Entergy via the design change process which includes an evaluation per 10CFR50.59.}}
There are two fundamental changes related to source term discussed in the License Amendment Request, as described below.
(1) There was a change in the computer code used to generate the RBS source termr as a result of the previous transition from AREVA nuclear fuel to GNF nuclear fuel. This involved the transition from the CINDER7 computer code for generating the core source term to the ORIGEN 2.1 computer code. The CINDER7 computer code, which is no longer supported by General Electric (GE), was used for the core source term prior to the current fuel cycle. GE now uses ORIGEN 2.1, which is one of the recommended source term codes in Regulatory Guide 1.183. The change in source term computer code was approved using the 10CFR50.59 process as part of the current cycle 16 core design.
(2) The Updated Safety Analysis Report Chapter 15 accident analysis was evaluated based on the 24-month fuel cycle source term. This analysis modified the reactor core source term (radionuclide inventory) resulting from the transition to a 24-month fuel cycle. There were no other input changes. The code version used for the dose calculations was not changed. The resulting change in main control room, exclusion area boundary, and low population zone doses for each of the accident scenarios was less than 10% of the current USAR value which is within the licensee-controlled margin (refer to NEI 96-07, Section 4.3.3). This analysis is in the final stages of completion by the vendor. These changes must receive final approval by Entergy via the design change process which includes an evaluation per 10CFR50.59.}}

Latest revision as of 20:28, 13 November 2019

Response to Request for Additional Information on License Amendment Request 2009-05, 24-Month Fuel Cycles
ML101170109
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/22/2010
From: Roberts J
Entergy Operations
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
G9.5, RBF1-10-0057, RBG-47021
Download: ML101170109 (4)
v • d • e


Text

Entergy Operations, Inc.

River Bend Station 5485 U. S. Highway 61N "EntergyJ St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225 381 4149 EFax 225 635 5068 jrober3@entergy.com Jerry C. Roberts Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance RBG-47021 April 22, 2010 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn.: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

Response to Request for Additional Information on License Amendment Request 2009-05, 24-month Fuel Cycles River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47

REFERENCES:

1. Entergy letter to NRC, dated August 10, 2009, License Amendment Request 2009-05, 24-month Fuel Cycles (Letter No.

RBG-46932)

2. NRC letter to Entergy (via email), dated April 8, 2010, Request for Additional Information RBF1-10-0057 File Code No.: G9.5

Dear Sir or Madam:

On August 10, 2009, Entergy submitted a request to amend the station's operating license to allow implementation of 24-month fuel cycles (Reference 1). During their review, the NRC staff determined that additional information is needed to complete the processing and approval of Entergy's request. The request for that information was transmitted to Entergy per Reference 2. The attachment to this letter contains the requested information.

This letter contains no commitments. If you have any questions on this matter, please contact David Lorfing, Manager - Licensing, at 225-381-4157.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Sincerely, DirctJerry C. Roberts Director - Nuclear Safety Assurance cof~-

RBG-47021 April 22, 2010 Page 2 of 2

Attachment:

Response to Request for Additional Information cc: Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 NRC Senior Resident Inspector P. O. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn.: Mr. Alan B. Wang One White Flint MS 0-8 B1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Mr. Jeffrey P. Myers Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Attn.: OEC-ERSD P. 0. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312

Attachment to RBG-47021 River Bend Station License Amendment Request 2009-05 Response to Request for Additional Information

Attachment RBG-47021 April 22, 2010 Page 1 of 1 Request for Additional Information:

In your August 10, 2009, submittal, on page 15, under Section 3.4 "Source Term", it is stated that RBS's core source term will be based on the ORIGN01 P computer code instead of the previously approved CINDER computer code. Please provide additional information on any design bases parameters, assumptions or methodologies (other than the one mentioned previously) that were changed in the radiological design basis accident analyses as a result of the change? If there are many changes it would be helpful to compare and contrast them in a table. Also, please provide a justification for any changes.

Response

There are two fundamental changes related to source term discussed in the License Amendment Request, as described below.

(1) There was a change in the computer code used to generate the RBS source termr as a result of the previous transition from AREVA nuclear fuel to GNF nuclear fuel. This involved the transition from the CINDER7 computer code for generating the core source term to the ORIGEN 2.1 computer code. The CINDER7 computer code, which is no longer supported by General Electric (GE), was used for the core source term prior to the current fuel cycle. GE now uses ORIGEN 2.1, which is one of the recommended source term codes in Regulatory Guide 1.183. The change in source term computer code was approved using the 10CFR50.59 process as part of the current cycle 16 core design.

(2) The Updated Safety Analysis Report Chapter 15 accident analysis was evaluated based on the 24-month fuel cycle source term. This analysis modified the reactor core source term (radionuclide inventory) resulting from the transition to a 24-month fuel cycle. There were no other input changes. The code version used for the dose calculations was not changed. The resulting change in main control room, exclusion area boundary, and low population zone doses for each of the accident scenarios was less than 10% of the current USAR value which is within the licensee-controlled margin (refer to NEI 96-07, Section 4.3.3). This analysis is in the final stages of completion by the vendor. These changes must receive final approval by Entergy via the design change process which includes an evaluation per 10CFR50.59.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=RBG-47021,_Response_to_Request_for_Additional_Information_on_License_Amendment_Request_2009-05,_24-Month_Fuel_Cycles&oldid=2134175"