ML11138A027: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 05/12/2011
| issue date = 05/12/2011
| title = United States Geological Survey - Response to Questions 22.1, 22.2, 25.1, 25.2, 25.3, 25.4 and 25.6 of the Referenced RAI
| title = United States Geological Survey - Response to Questions 22.1, 22.2, 25.1, 25.2, 25.3, 25.4 and 25.6 of the Referenced RAI
| author name = DeBey T
| author name = Debey T
| author affiliation = US Dept of Interior, Geological Survey (USGS)
| author affiliation = US Dept of Interior, Geological Survey (USGS)
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:*-USGS science for a changing world Department of the Interior US Geological Survey PO Box 25046 MS 974 Denver, CO 80225-0046 May 12, 2011 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555  
{{#Wiki_filter:*-USGS science fora changingworld Department of the Interior US Geological Survey PO Box 25046 MS 974 Denver, CO 80225-0046 May 12, 2011 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555


==Reference:==
==Reference:==
U.S. Geological Survey TRIGA Reactor (GSTR), Docket 50-274, License R-1 13 Request for Additional Information (RAI) dated September 29, 2010


U.S. Geological Survey TRIGA Reactor (GSTR), Docket 50-274, License R-1 13 Request for Additional Information (RAI) dated September 29, 2010
==Subject:==
Response to Questions 22.1, 22.2, 25.1, 25.2, 25.3, 25.4 and 25.6 of the Referenced RAI Mr. Wertz:
Our responses to Questions 22.1, 22.2, 25.1, 25.2, 25.3, 25.4 and 25.6 are provided on the following pages.
Our need for outside assistance to answer the detailed, technical RAI questions is being addressed by DOE contracting with the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). This is necessary because the USGS does not have the computer codes or the in-house expertise to perform the desired computer modeling analyses. The DOE has received a proposal from CSM and is processing that award at this time. The award is expected to be in place by the end of May, 2011, and it will include a project duration of one year. In addition to this DOE assistance, reactor staff at Oregon State University have offered to assist the CSM investigators with the initial modeling setup.
Sincerely, Tim DeBey USGS Reactor Supervisor I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on 5/12/11 Copy to:
Betty Adrian, Reactor Administrator, MS 975
 
USGS Response to October, 2010 RAI Questions 22.1, 22.2, 25.1, 25.2, 25.3, 25.4 and 25.6.
Question 22
: 22. ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 3, "Limiting Conditions for Operation "identifies Limiting Conditions for Operations (LCO). The following items were noted in comparison to the GSTR TS LCOs:
22.1  ANSI-15.1-2007, Section 3.3 "Coolant Systems" recommends LCOs for requirements for leak or loss-of-coolant detection; and fission product activity detection. Specification 3 of LCO 14.3.3 does not employ the correct units (pmho/cm).
22.2  ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 3.8, "Experiments," establishes recommendations for reactivity limits and failures/malfunctions pertaining to experiments. GSTR TS LCO 14.3.8.1 does not employ the terminology "absolute value," as cited in the guidance. Please explain.
22.1 The Specifications for GSTR TS 14.3.3 "Reactor Primary Tank Water" point 3 will be changed to read the following:
: 3. The conductivity of the tank water shall be less than 5 umhos/cm when averagedover a one month period; 22.2 The Specifications for GSTR TS 14.3.8.1 "Reactivity limits" will be changed to read the following:
The reactorshall not be operated unless the following conditions governing experiments exist:
: 1. Movable experiments shall have absolute reactivity worth less than $1.00;
: 2. The absolute reactivity worth of any single secured experiment shall be less than $3.00;
: 3. Total absolute reactivity worth of all experiments shall be less than $5.00.


==Subject:==
Question 25
Response to Questions 22.1, 22.2, 25.1, 25.2, 25.3, 25.4 and 25.6 of the Referenced RAI Mr. Wertz: Our responses to Questions 22.1, 22.2, 25.1, 25.2, 25.3, 25.4 and 25.6 are provided on the following pages.Our need for outside assistance to answer the detailed, technical RAI questions is being addressed by DOE contracting with the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). This is necessary because the USGS does not have the computer codes or the in-house expertise to perform the desired computer modeling analyses.
: 25.     ANSl/ANS-1 5.1-2007, Section 6, "Administrative Controls," provides information regarding content and format. Please provide additional information:
The DOE has received a proposal from CSM and is processing that award at this time. The award is expected to be in place by the end of May, 2011, and it will include a project duration of one year. In addition to this DOE assistance, reactor staff at Oregon State University have offered to assist the CSM investigators with the initial modeling setup.Sincerely, Tim DeBey USGS Reactor Supervisor I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.Executed on 5/12/11 Copy to: Betty Adrian, Reactor Administrator, MS 975 USGS Response to October, 2010 RAI Questions 22.1, 22.2, 25.1, 25.2, 25.3, 25.4 and 25.6.Question 22 22. ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 3, "Limiting Conditions for Operation "identifies Limiting Conditions for Operations (LCO). The following items were noted in comparison to the GSTR TS LCOs: 22.1 ANSI-15.1-2007, Section 3.3 "Coolant Systems" recommends LCOs for requirements for leak or loss-of-coolant detection; and fission product activity detection.
25.1     ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.1.3(1)(b) states that "A second designated person present at facility complex able to carry out prescribed instructions."
Specification 3 of LCO 14.3.3 does not employ the correct units (pmho/cm).
GSTR Administrative Control (AC) TS 14.6.1.3 1 (b) states, "A second facility staff person present or on call," which is a variance from the guidance.
22.2 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 3.8, "Experiments," establishes recommendations for reactivity limits and failures/malfunctions pertaining to experiments.
25.2   ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.2.3, "Review Function" and Section 6.2.4, "Audit Function," provide guidance on the review and audit of specific areas. GSTR TS 14.6.2.3 "Review and Audit Function" does not state the review and audit functions. Please explain the deviation from the ANSI guidance.
GSTR TS LCO 14.3.8.1 does not employ the terminology "absolute value," as cited in the guidance.
25.3   ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.4, "Procedures," describes the content."
Please explain.22.1 The Specifications for GSTR TS 14.3.3 "Reactor Primary Tank Water" point 3 will be changed to read the following:
However, GSTR Section 14.6.4 does not include the topic "use, receipt and transfer of by-product material, if appropriate."
: 3. The conductivity of the tank water shall be less than 5 umhos/cm when averaged over a one month period;22.2 The Specifications for GSTR TS 14.3.8.1 "Reactivity limits" will be changed to read the following:
25.4   ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.5 "Experiments Review and Approval" describes the requirements that should be included for the review and approval of experiments. The GSTR Section 14 does not include a section for the review and approval of experiments in its "Administrative Controls."
The reactor shall not be operated unless the following conditions governing experiments exist: 1. Movable experiments shall have absolute reactivity worth less than $1.00;2. The absolute reactivity worth of any single secured experiment shall be less than $3.00;3. Total absolute reactivity worth of all experiments shall be less than $5.00.
25.5     ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.6 "Required Actions" describes requirements pertaining to actions to be taken and circumstances when they apply. GSTR AC 14.6.5.1 specifies actions pertaining to safety system setting limit (should be LSSS) violations. However, the value cited was 1.0 MW, not 1.1 MW, or 100 kW depending on the core configuration as detailed in Section 14.2.2. Please explain.
Question 25 25. ANSl/ANS-1 5.1-2007, Section 6, "Administrative Controls," provides information regarding content and format. Please provide additional information:
25.6     ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.8.2, "Records to be retained for at least one certification cycle," requests that retraining and requalification of records for operators be maintained at all times the individual is employed or until the certification is renewed. Per 10 CFR Section 55.55(a) this period is 6 years.
25.1 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.1.3(1)(b) states that "A second designated person present at facility complex able to carry out prescribed instructions." GSTR Administrative Control (AC) TS 14.6.1.3 1 (b) states, "A second facility staff person present or on call," which is a variance from the guidance.25.2 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.2.3, "Review Function" and Section 6.2.4, "Audit Function," provide guidance on the review and audit of specific areas. GSTR TS 14.6.2.3 "Review and Audit Function" does not state the review and audit functions.
GSTR Administrative Controls Section 14.6.7.2 identifies the retention period as one training cycle but does not define this period in years.
Please explain the deviation from the ANSI guidance.25.3 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.4, "Procedures," describes the content." However, GSTR Section 14.6.4 does not include the topic "use, receipt and transfer of by-product material, if appropriate." 25.4 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.5 "Experiments Review and Approval" describes the requirements that should be included for the review and approval of experiments.
25.1 No change shall be made to the verbiage contained in SAR 14.6.1.3. The terminology and requirements for our facility are more stringent than required by ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007. It is necessary for two significant reasons that a "facility staff person" and not a "designated person ...able to carry out prescribed instructions" be the one performing necessary tasks at this facility. Firstly, there are various layers of security personnel are required to negotiate to even access facility which no one but licensed reactor operators or senior reactor operators possess. Secondly, for the majority of tasks there is required training and/or licensing which is only practical for staff persons to attain.
The GSTR Section 14 does not include a section for the review and approval of experiments in its "Administrative Controls." 25.5 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.6 "Required Actions" describes requirements pertaining to actions to be taken and circumstances when they apply. GSTR AC 14.6.5.1 specifies actions pertaining to safety system setting limit (should be LSSS) violations.
25.2 GSTR TS 14.6.2.3 Review and Audit Function will be modified to include the following guidance from ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007 6.2.3 and 6.2.4 between sentence 1 and sentence 2 of GSTR TS 14.6.2.3:
However, the value cited was 1.0 MW, not 1.1 MW, or 100 kW depending on the core configuration as detailed in Section 14.2.2. Please explain.25.6 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.8.2, "Records to be retained for at least one certification cycle," requests that retraining and requalification of records for operators be maintained at all times the individual is employed or until the certification is renewed. Per 10 CFR Section 55.55(a) this period is 6 years.GSTR Administrative Controls Section 14.6.7.2 identifies the retention period as one training cycle but does not define this period in years.25.1 No change shall be made to the verbiage contained in SAR 14.6.1.3.
The following items shall be reviewed:
The terminology and requirements for our facility are more stringent than required by ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007.
: 1. Determinationsthat proposed changes in equipment, systems, test, experiments, or procedures are allowed without prior authorizationby the responsible authority,for example, 10 CFR 50.59 or 10 CFR 830;
It is necessary for two significant reasons that a "facility staff person" and not a "designated person ...able to carry out prescribed instructions" be the one performing necessary tasks at this facility.
: 2. All new proceduresand major revisions thereto having safety significance,proposed changes in reactorfacility equipment, or systems having safety significance;
Firstly, there are various layers of security personnel are required to negotiate to even access facility which no one but licensed reactor operators or senior reactor operators possess. Secondly, for the majority of tasks there is required training and/or licensing which is only practical for staff persons to attain.25.2 GSTR TS 14.6.2.3 Review and Audit Function will be modified to include the following guidance from ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007 6.2.3 and 6.2.4 between sentence 1 and sentence 2 of GSTR TS 14.6.2.3: The following items shall be reviewed:
: 1. Determinations that proposed changes in equipment, systems, test, experiments, or procedures are allowed without prior authorization by the responsible authority, for example, 10 CFR 50.59 or 10 CFR 830;2. All new procedures and major revisions thereto having safety significance, proposed changes in reactor facility equipment, or systems having safety significance;
: 3. All new experiments or classes of experiments that could affect reactivity or result in the release of radioactivity;
: 3. All new experiments or classes of experiments that could affect reactivity or result in the release of radioactivity;
: 4. Proposed changes in technical specifications, license, or charter;5. Violations of technical specifications, license, or charter. Violations of internal procedures or instructions having safety significance;
: 4. Proposedchanges in technicalspecifications,license, or charter;
: 6. Operating abnormalities having safety significance;
: 5. Violations of technicalspecifications, license, or charter.Violations of internal proceduresor instructionshaving safety significance;
: 7. Reportable occurrences listed in 14.6.6.2; and 8. Audit reports.A written report or minutes of the findings and recommendations of the review group shall be submitted to the Reactor Administrator and the review and audit group members in a timely manner after the review has been completed.
: 6. Operating abnormalitieshaving safety significance;
The audit function shall include selective (but comprehensive) examination of operating records, logs, and other documents.
: 7. Reportable occurrenceslisted in 14.6.6.2; and
Discussions with cognizant personnel and observation of operations should be used also as appropriate.
: 8. Audit reports.
In no case shall the individual immediately responsible for the area perform an audit in that area. The following items shall be audited: 1. Facility operations for conformance to the technical specifications and applicable license or charter conditions:
A written reportor minutes of the findings and recommendationsof the review group shall be submitted to the Reactor Administratorand the review and audit group members in a timely manner after the review has been completed.
at least once per calendar year (interval between audits not to exceed 15 months);2. The retraining and requalification program for the operating staff: at least once every other calendar year (interval between audits not to exceed 30 months);3. The results of action taken to correct those deficiencies that may occur in the reactor facility equipment, systems, structures, or methods of operations that affect reactor safety: at least once per calendar year (interval between audits not to exceed 15 months);4. The reactor facility emergency plan and implementing procedures:
The auditfunction shall include selective (but comprehensive) examination of operating records, logs, and other documents. Discussionswith cognizant personnel and observation of operationsshould be used also as appropriate.In no case shall the individualimmediately responsiblefor the area perform an audit in that area. The following items shall be audited:
at least once every other calendar year (interval between audits not to exceed 30 months).Deficiencies uncovered that affect reactor safety shall immediately be report to the Reactor Administrator.
: 1. Facilityoperationsfor conformance to the technicalspecifications and applicable license or charterconditions: at least once per calendaryear (intervalbetween audits not to exceed 15 months);
A written report of the findings of the audit shall be submitted to the Reactor Administrator and the review and audit group members within 3 months after the audit has been completed.
: 2. The retrainingand requalificationprogramfor the operatingstaff: at least once every other calendaryear (interval between audits not to exceed 30 months);
: 3. The results of action taken to correct those deficiencies that may occur in the reactorfacility equipment, systems, structures,or methods of operations that affect reactorsafety: at least once per calendaryear (interval between audits not to exceed 15 months);
: 4. The reactorfacility emergency plan and implementing procedures: at least once every other calendaryear (interval between audits not to exceed 30 months).
Deficiencies uncovered that affect reactorsafety shall immediately be reportto the Reactor Administrator. A written reportof the findings of the audit shall be submitted to the Reactor Administrator and the review and audit group members within 3 months after the audit has been completed.
25.3 GSTR TS 14.6.4 "Procedures" will be modified to include guidance from ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007 6.4 such that an additional procedure topic will be added to read "10. Use, receipt and transfer of by-product material, if appropriate."
25.3 GSTR TS 14.6.4 "Procedures" will be modified to include guidance from ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007 6.4 such that an additional procedure topic will be added to read "10. Use, receipt and transfer of by-product material, if appropriate."
25.4 GSTR Section 10.3 "Experiment Review" will be moved verbatim to Chapter 14, such that it will be the new GSTR TS 14.6.5. All following sections will be renumbered accordingly.
25.4 GSTR Section 10.3 "Experiment Review" will be moved verbatim to Chapter 14, such that it will be the new GSTR TS 14.6.5. All following sections will be renumbered accordingly.
25.5 To be answered with question 21 at a later date.25.6 All instances of the term "training cycle" within GSTR TS Chapter 14 will be changed to"certification cycle."}}
25.5 To be answered with question 21 at a later date.
25.6 All instances of the term "training cycle" within GSTR TS Chapter 14 will be changed to "certification cycle."}}

Latest revision as of 20:24, 12 November 2019

United States Geological Survey - Response to Questions 22.1, 22.2, 25.1, 25.2, 25.3, 25.4 and 25.6 of the Referenced RAI
ML11138A027
Person / Time
Site: U.S. Geological Survey
Issue date: 05/12/2011
From: Timothy Debey
US Dept of Interior, Geological Survey (USGS)
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML11138A027 (5)


Text

  • -USGS science fora changingworld Department of the Interior US Geological Survey PO Box 25046 MS 974 Denver, CO 80225-0046 May 12, 2011 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Reference:

U.S. Geological Survey TRIGA Reactor (GSTR), Docket 50-274, License R-1 13 Request for Additional Information (RAI) dated September 29, 2010

Subject:

Response to Questions 22.1, 22.2, 25.1, 25.2, 25.3, 25.4 and 25.6 of the Referenced RAI Mr. Wertz:

Our responses to Questions 22.1, 22.2, 25.1, 25.2, 25.3, 25.4 and 25.6 are provided on the following pages.

Our need for outside assistance to answer the detailed, technical RAI questions is being addressed by DOE contracting with the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). This is necessary because the USGS does not have the computer codes or the in-house expertise to perform the desired computer modeling analyses. The DOE has received a proposal from CSM and is processing that award at this time. The award is expected to be in place by the end of May, 2011, and it will include a project duration of one year. In addition to this DOE assistance, reactor staff at Oregon State University have offered to assist the CSM investigators with the initial modeling setup.

Sincerely, Tim DeBey USGS Reactor Supervisor I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on 5/12/11 Copy to:

Betty Adrian, Reactor Administrator, MS 975

USGS Response to October, 2010 RAI Questions 22.1, 22.2, 25.1, 25.2, 25.3, 25.4 and 25.6.

Question 22

22. ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 3, "Limiting Conditions for Operation "identifies Limiting Conditions for Operations (LCO). The following items were noted in comparison to the GSTR TS LCOs:

22.1 ANSI-15.1-2007, Section 3.3 "Coolant Systems" recommends LCOs for requirements for leak or loss-of-coolant detection; and fission product activity detection. Specification 3 of LCO 14.3.3 does not employ the correct units (pmho/cm).

22.2 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 3.8, "Experiments," establishes recommendations for reactivity limits and failures/malfunctions pertaining to experiments. GSTR TS LCO 14.3.8.1 does not employ the terminology "absolute value," as cited in the guidance. Please explain.

22.1 The Specifications for GSTR TS 14.3.3 "Reactor Primary Tank Water" point 3 will be changed to read the following:

3. The conductivity of the tank water shall be less than 5 umhos/cm when averagedover a one month period; 22.2 The Specifications for GSTR TS 14.3.8.1 "Reactivity limits" will be changed to read the following:

The reactorshall not be operated unless the following conditions governing experiments exist:

1. Movable experiments shall have absolute reactivity worth less than $1.00;
2. The absolute reactivity worth of any single secured experiment shall be less than $3.00;
3. Total absolute reactivity worth of all experiments shall be less than $5.00.

Question 25

25. ANSl/ANS-1 5.1-2007, Section 6, "Administrative Controls," provides information regarding content and format. Please provide additional information:

25.1 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.1.3(1)(b) states that "A second designated person present at facility complex able to carry out prescribed instructions."

GSTR Administrative Control (AC) TS 14.6.1.3 1 (b) states, "A second facility staff person present or on call," which is a variance from the guidance.

25.2 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.2.3, "Review Function" and Section 6.2.4, "Audit Function," provide guidance on the review and audit of specific areas. GSTR TS 14.6.2.3 "Review and Audit Function" does not state the review and audit functions. Please explain the deviation from the ANSI guidance.

25.3 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.4, "Procedures," describes the content."

However, GSTR Section 14.6.4 does not include the topic "use, receipt and transfer of by-product material, if appropriate."

25.4 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.5 "Experiments Review and Approval" describes the requirements that should be included for the review and approval of experiments. The GSTR Section 14 does not include a section for the review and approval of experiments in its "Administrative Controls."

25.5 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.6 "Required Actions" describes requirements pertaining to actions to be taken and circumstances when they apply. GSTR AC 14.6.5.1 specifies actions pertaining to safety system setting limit (should be LSSS) violations. However, the value cited was 1.0 MW, not 1.1 MW, or 100 kW depending on the core configuration as detailed in Section 14.2.2. Please explain.

25.6 ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007, Section 6.8.2, "Records to be retained for at least one certification cycle," requests that retraining and requalification of records for operators be maintained at all times the individual is employed or until the certification is renewed. Per 10 CFR Section 55.55(a) this period is 6 years.

GSTR Administrative Controls Section 14.6.7.2 identifies the retention period as one training cycle but does not define this period in years.

25.1 No change shall be made to the verbiage contained in SAR 14.6.1.3. The terminology and requirements for our facility are more stringent than required by ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007. It is necessary for two significant reasons that a "facility staff person" and not a "designated person ...able to carry out prescribed instructions" be the one performing necessary tasks at this facility. Firstly, there are various layers of security personnel are required to negotiate to even access facility which no one but licensed reactor operators or senior reactor operators possess. Secondly, for the majority of tasks there is required training and/or licensing which is only practical for staff persons to attain.

25.2 GSTR TS 14.6.2.3 Review and Audit Function will be modified to include the following guidance from ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007 6.2.3 and 6.2.4 between sentence 1 and sentence 2 of GSTR TS 14.6.2.3:

The following items shall be reviewed:

1. Determinationsthat proposed changes in equipment, systems, test, experiments, or procedures are allowed without prior authorizationby the responsible authority,for example, 10 CFR 50.59 or 10 CFR 830;
2. All new proceduresand major revisions thereto having safety significance,proposed changes in reactorfacility equipment, or systems having safety significance;
3. All new experiments or classes of experiments that could affect reactivity or result in the release of radioactivity;
4. Proposedchanges in technicalspecifications,license, or charter;
5. Violations of technicalspecifications, license, or charter.Violations of internal proceduresor instructionshaving safety significance;
6. Operating abnormalitieshaving safety significance;
7. Reportable occurrenceslisted in 14.6.6.2; and
8. Audit reports.

A written reportor minutes of the findings and recommendationsof the review group shall be submitted to the Reactor Administratorand the review and audit group members in a timely manner after the review has been completed.

The auditfunction shall include selective (but comprehensive) examination of operating records, logs, and other documents. Discussionswith cognizant personnel and observation of operationsshould be used also as appropriate.In no case shall the individualimmediately responsiblefor the area perform an audit in that area. The following items shall be audited:

1. Facilityoperationsfor conformance to the technicalspecifications and applicable license or charterconditions: at least once per calendaryear (intervalbetween audits not to exceed 15 months);
2. The retrainingand requalificationprogramfor the operatingstaff: at least once every other calendaryear (interval between audits not to exceed 30 months);
3. The results of action taken to correct those deficiencies that may occur in the reactorfacility equipment, systems, structures,or methods of operations that affect reactorsafety: at least once per calendaryear (interval between audits not to exceed 15 months);
4. The reactorfacility emergency plan and implementing procedures: at least once every other calendaryear (interval between audits not to exceed 30 months).

Deficiencies uncovered that affect reactorsafety shall immediately be reportto the Reactor Administrator. A written reportof the findings of the audit shall be submitted to the Reactor Administrator and the review and audit group members within 3 months after the audit has been completed.

25.3 GSTR TS 14.6.4 "Procedures" will be modified to include guidance from ANSI/ANS-15.1-2007 6.4 such that an additional procedure topic will be added to read "10. Use, receipt and transfer of by-product material, if appropriate."

25.4 GSTR Section 10.3 "Experiment Review" will be moved verbatim to Chapter 14, such that it will be the new GSTR TS 14.6.5. All following sections will be renumbered accordingly.

25.5 To be answered with question 21 at a later date.

25.6 All instances of the term "training cycle" within GSTR TS Chapter 14 will be changed to "certification cycle."