ML11235A630: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility: AN1 First Exam Date:
{{#Wiki_filter:DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility:           AN1                                 First Exam Date:       August 26, 2011 Written Exam Outline (Sent June 9, 2011)
August 26, 2011 Written Exam Outline (Sent June 9, 2011
Comment                                         Resolution On the ES-401-4 (RO Exam), the               Discussed, no issue needing a corrective second item (062 AA1.05) says that           action document.
) Comment Resolution 1 On the ES-401-4 (RO Exam), the second item (062 AA1.05) says that there isn't any procedural guidance on how to address CCW system (ICW at ANO U1) effects/perturbations as a result of loss of Nuclear Service Water. Is there a corrective action document to track resolving this issue?
there isnt any procedural guidance on how to address CCW system (ICW at 1
Discussed, no issue needing a corrective action document.
ANO U1) effects/perturbations as a result of loss of Nuclear Service Water.
2 In the SRO outline, there were two items where the K/A topic described didn't match the K/A number provided. The K/A number should be the one randomly selected in the outline building process, and the description should match it.
Is there a corrective action document to track resolving this issue?
- Tier 2, Group 1: 007 Pressurizer Relief/Quench Tank, says K/A is A2.01, but one described is A2.02 - Tier 2, Group 2: 045 Main Turbine Generator, says K/A is A2.07, but one described is A2.17 Copy submitted with draft exam corrected these issues.
In the SRO outline, there were two items     Copy submitted with draft exam corrected where the K/A topic described didnt        these issues.
Administrative JPM Outline (Sent June 9, 2011
match the K/A number provided. The K/A number should be the one randomly selected in the outline building process, and the description should match it.
) Comment Resolution 1 On the ES-301-1, the descriptions need to provide information that describing the JPM. The K/A is re
          - Tier 2, Group 1: 007 Pressurizer 2
-written, but no description to correlate to the K/A statement is provided.
Relief/Quench Tank, says K/A is A2.01, but one described is A2.02
The 2010 exam outlines provide an example.
          - Tier 2, Group 2: 045 Main Turbine Generator, says K/A is A2.07, but one described is A2.17 Administrative JPM Outline (Sent June 9, 2011)
The licensee expanded the text to provide a description of the JPMs in the ES
Comment                                         Resolution On the ES-301-1, the descriptions need The licensee expanded the text to provide a to provide information that describing the description of the JPMs in the ES-301-1 JPM. The K/A is re-written, but no           forms.
-301-1 forms. Control Room / In
1 description to correlate to the K/A statement is provided. The 2010 exam outlines provide an example.
-Plant System JPM Outline (Sent June 9, 2011
Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (Sent June 9, 2011)
) Comment Resolution 1 (Editorial) For Simulator JPM a, fill in the Importance Rating for SROs.
Comment                                         Resolution (Editorial) For Simulator JPM a, fill in the Resolved based on revisions made during 1
Resolved based on revisions made during exam development process.
Importance Rating for SROs.                  exam development process.
2 On the ES-301-2, it says that there are 2 Resolved based on revisions made during Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Emergency or Abnormal In
2   On the ES-301-2, it says that there are 2 Resolved based on revisions made during                                                         OBDI 202 - IOLE Process
-Plant JPMs. JPM i is the "E" classified one to meet this. JPM d would not meet this.
 
exam development proce ss. Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Sent June 9, 2011
Emergency or Abnormal In-Plant JPMs.       exam development process.
) Comment Resolution 1   2   3   4   5}}
JPM i is the E classified one to meet this. JPM d would not meet this.
Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Sent June 9, 2011)
Comment                                     Resolution 1
2 3
4 5                                                     OBDI 202 - IOLE Process}}

Latest revision as of 15:46, 12 November 2019

2011-08 DRAFT-Outline Comments
ML11235A630
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/26/2011
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
50-313/11-08
Download: ML11235A630 (2)
v • d • e


Text

DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility: AN1 First Exam Date: August 26, 2011 Written Exam Outline (Sent June 9, 2011)

Comment Resolution On the ES-401-4 (RO Exam), the Discussed, no issue needing a corrective second item (062 AA1.05) says that action document.

there isnt any procedural guidance on how to address CCW system (ICW at 1

ANO U1) effects/perturbations as a result of loss of Nuclear Service Water.

Is there a corrective action document to track resolving this issue?

In the SRO outline, there were two items Copy submitted with draft exam corrected where the K/A topic described didnt these issues.

match the K/A number provided. The K/A number should be the one randomly selected in the outline building process, and the description should match it.

- Tier 2, Group 1: 007 Pressurizer 2

Relief/Quench Tank, says K/A is A2.01, but one described is A2.02

- Tier 2, Group 2: 045 Main Turbine Generator, says K/A is A2.07, but one described is A2.17 Administrative JPM Outline (Sent June 9, 2011)

Comment Resolution On the ES-301-1, the descriptions need The licensee expanded the text to provide a to provide information that describing the description of the JPMs in the ES-301-1 JPM. The K/A is re-written, but no forms.

1 description to correlate to the K/A statement is provided. The 2010 exam outlines provide an example.

Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (Sent June 9, 2011)

Comment Resolution (Editorial) For Simulator JPM a, fill in the Resolved based on revisions made during 1

Importance Rating for SROs. exam development process.

2 On the ES-301-2, it says that there are 2 Resolved based on revisions made during OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

Emergency or Abnormal In-Plant JPMs. exam development process.

JPM i is the E classified one to meet this. JPM d would not meet this.

Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Sent June 9, 2011)

Comment Resolution 1

2 3

4 5 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML11235A630&oldid=2113717"