ML113290026: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 11/25/2011
| issue date = 11/25/2011
| title = E-mail, Miller to Loomis, TMI Acceptance Review of Relief Request PR-05
| title = E-mail, Miller to Loomis, TMI Acceptance Review of Relief Request PR-05
| author name = Miller G E
| author name = Miller G
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2
| addressee name = Loomis T
| addressee name = Loomis T
Line 12: Line 12:
| document type = E-Mail, Acceptance Review Letter
| document type = E-Mail, Acceptance Review Letter
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project =
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                      Miller, Ed Sent:                      Friday, November 25, 2011 9:01 AM To:                        'thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com'
==Subject:==
TMI Acceptance Review of Relief Request PR-05
: Tom, By letter dated October 28, 2011, Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted relief request PR-05 for the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No. 1. The request would allow an alternative method for performing the reactor building emergency cooling river water pump testing.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide you with the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and protection of public health and safety and the environment.
If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2481.
G. Edward Miller Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation}}

Latest revision as of 11:37, 12 November 2019

E-mail, Miller to Loomis, TMI Acceptance Review of Relief Request PR-05
ML113290026
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/25/2011
From: Geoffrey Miller
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Tom Loomis
Exelon Corp
Miller G, NRR/DORL/LPL1-2, 415-2481
References
Download: ML113290026 (1)


Text

From: Miller, Ed Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 9:01 AM To: 'thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com'

Subject:

TMI Acceptance Review of Relief Request PR-05

Tom, By letter dated October 28, 2011, Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted relief request PR-05 for the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No. 1. The request would allow an alternative method for performing the reactor building emergency cooling river water pump testing.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide you with the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and protection of public health and safety and the environment.

If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2481.

G. Edward Miller Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation