ML12086A005: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Accession No. ML12086A005 From: Tam, Peter | {{#Wiki_filter:Accession No. ML12086A005 From: Tam, Peter Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 11:07 AM To: Loeffler, Richard A.; Rippy, L. Randal Cc: Hatchett, Gregory | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review for Relief Requests conveyed by NSPM letter of 9/28/2011 (TAC ME8088 - ME8096) | Acceptance Review for Relief Requests conveyed by NSPM letter of 9/28/2011 (TAC ME8088 - ME8096) | ||
Rick, Randall: | Rick, Randall: | ||
The NRC staff found the following relief requests conveyed by NSPMs 9/28/2011 letter acceptable for review in accordance with NRR Office Instruction LIC-109: | |||
The NRC staff found the following relief requests conveyed by | * Relief Request IST VR-03 for 5th interval | ||
* Relief Request IST VR-03 for | * Relief Request IST VR-02 for 5th Interval | ||
* Relief Request IST VR-02 for | * Relief Request IST VR-01 for 5th interval | ||
* Relief Request IST VR-01 for | * Relief Request IST PR-06 for 5th interval | ||
* Relief Request IST PR-06 for | * Relief Request IST PR-05 for 5th interval | ||
* Relief Request IST PR-05 for | * Relief Request IST PR-04 for 5th interval | ||
* Relief Request IST PR-04 for | * Relief Request IST PR-03 for 5th interval | ||
* Relief Request IST PR-03 for | * Relief Request IST PR-02 for 5th interval | ||
* Relief Request IST PR-02 for | * Relief Request IST PR-01 for 5th interval With respect to Relief Request IST PR-03, HPCI pump vibration, the NRC staff needs clarification of the basis for the consultants analysis which the licensees relies on, in part, to demonstrate the acceptably of the vibration in the vertical direction being in the alert range without requiring the additional testing specified in the OM Code. Further, the licensee asserts industry history demonstrates no failures have been attributed to extended hours of pump operation at vibration levels exceeding 0.325 in/Sec were found. It is unclear what industry history the licensee is referring and it would be helpful if the licensee would clarify this statement. Possibly you can communicate the clarification by a phone call or e-mail. | ||
* Relief Request IST PR-01 for | Peter S. Tam Senior Project Manager (for D. C. Cook and Monticello) | ||
Peter S. Tam Senior Project Manager | Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Tel. 301-415-1451}} |
Latest revision as of 06:21, 12 November 2019
ML12086A005 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Monticello |
Issue date: | 03/23/2012 |
From: | Tam P Plant Licensing Branch III |
To: | Loeffler R, Rippy L Northern States Power Co |
Tam P | |
References | |
TAC ME8088, TAC ME8089, TAC ME8090, TAC ME8091, TAC ME8092, TAC ME8093, TAC ME8094, TAC ME8095, TAC ME8096 | |
Download: ML12086A005 (1) | |
Text
Accession No. ML12086A005 From: Tam, Peter Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 11:07 AM To: Loeffler, Richard A.; Rippy, L. Randal Cc: Hatchett, Gregory
Subject:
Acceptance Review for Relief Requests conveyed by NSPM letter of 9/28/2011 (TAC ME8088 - ME8096)
Rick, Randall:
The NRC staff found the following relief requests conveyed by NSPMs 9/28/2011 letter acceptable for review in accordance with NRR Office Instruction LIC-109:
- Relief Request IST VR-03 for 5th interval
- Relief Request IST VR-02 for 5th Interval
- Relief Request IST VR-01 for 5th interval
- Relief Request IST PR-06 for 5th interval
- Relief Request IST PR-05 for 5th interval
- Relief Request IST PR-04 for 5th interval
- Relief Request IST PR-03 for 5th interval
- Relief Request IST PR-02 for 5th interval
- Relief Request IST PR-01 for 5th interval With respect to Relief Request IST PR-03, HPCI pump vibration, the NRC staff needs clarification of the basis for the consultants analysis which the licensees relies on, in part, to demonstrate the acceptably of the vibration in the vertical direction being in the alert range without requiring the additional testing specified in the OM Code. Further, the licensee asserts industry history demonstrates no failures have been attributed to extended hours of pump operation at vibration levels exceeding 0.325 in/Sec were found. It is unclear what industry history the licensee is referring and it would be helpful if the licensee would clarify this statement. Possibly you can communicate the clarification by a phone call or e-mail.
Peter S. Tam Senior Project Manager (for D. C. Cook and Monticello)
Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Tel. 301-415-1451