ML12257A188: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 09/11/2012
| issue date = 09/11/2012
| title = Limited Appearance Statement of Tim K. Takaro Opposing Indian Point License Renewal Application
| title = Limited Appearance Statement of Tim K. Takaro Opposing Indian Point License Renewal Application
| author name = Takaro T K
| author name = Takaro T
| author affiliation = Simon Fraser Univ, Univ of Washington
| author affiliation = Simon Fraser Univ, Univ of Washington
| addressee name = Siarnacki A J
| addressee name = Siarnacki A
| addressee affiliation = NRC/SECY/RAS
| addressee affiliation = NRC/SECY/RAS
| docket = 05000247, 05000286
| docket = 05000247, 05000286
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Docket, Hearing From: Tim Takaro [ttakaro@sfu.ca]
{{#Wiki_filter:Docket, Hearing From:                     Tim Takaro [ttakaro@sfu.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:30 PM To: Docket, Hearing; Siarnacki, Anne Cc: Lynn Ringenberg; Catherine Thomasson  
Sent:                     Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:30 PM To:                       Docket, Hearing; Siarnacki, Anne Cc:                       Lynn Ringenberg; Catherine Thomasson


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
relicensing Indian Point To the Commission:
relicensing Indian Point To the Commission:
As a public health scientist and practicing physician I appreciate the opportunity to express my opposition to relicensing of the Indian Point nuclear plant. The risk to human health in the event of an accident is just too great for this technology in this location.
As a public health scientist and practicing physician I appreciate the opportunity to express my opposition to relicensing of the Indian Point nuclear plant. The risk to human health in the event of an accident is just too great for this technology in this location. We have seen many examples in recent history where our best technology fails disasterously despite 'failsafe' and redundant safeguards. It is impossible to justify use of this outdated nuclear technology so close to a major population center. Even if there is no REAL disaster, a false alarm and unjustified evacuation would be extremely dangerous. Don't be lulled into complacency by unsupportable claims of technological much less behavioral safeguards. Do the right thing and close this dangerous time-bomb.
We have seen many examples in recent history where our best technology fails disasterously despite 'failsafe' and redundant safeguards.
Thank you for your consideration Tim K. Takaro, MD, MPH, MS.
It is impossible to justify use of this outdated nuclear technology so close to a major population center. Even if there is no REAL disaster, a false alarm and unjustified evacuation would be extremely dangerous.
Professor Faculty of Health Sciences Simon Fraser University Clinical Associate Professor Dept. of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences University of Washington DOCKETED USNRC September 11, 2012 (1:30 p.m.)
Don't be lulled into complacency by unsupportable claims of technological much less behavioral safeguards.
OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF 01                                                                       - 3}}
Do the right thing and close this dangerous time-bomb.
Thank you for your consideration Tim K. Takaro, MD, MPH, MS.Professor Faculty of Health Sciences Simon Fraser University Clinical Associate Professor Dept. of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences University of Washington DOCKETED USNRC September 11, 2012 (1:30 p.m.)OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF 01 -3}}

Latest revision as of 23:47, 11 November 2019

Limited Appearance Statement of Tim K. Takaro Opposing Indian Point License Renewal Application
ML12257A188
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/11/2012
From: Takaro T
Simon Fraser Univ, Univ of Washington
To: Siarnacki A
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY RAS
References
50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, RAS E-840
Download: ML12257A188 (1)


Text

Docket, Hearing From: Tim Takaro [ttakaro@sfu.ca]

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:30 PM To: Docket, Hearing; Siarnacki, Anne Cc: Lynn Ringenberg; Catherine Thomasson

Subject:

relicensing Indian Point To the Commission:

As a public health scientist and practicing physician I appreciate the opportunity to express my opposition to relicensing of the Indian Point nuclear plant. The risk to human health in the event of an accident is just too great for this technology in this location. We have seen many examples in recent history where our best technology fails disasterously despite 'failsafe' and redundant safeguards. It is impossible to justify use of this outdated nuclear technology so close to a major population center. Even if there is no REAL disaster, a false alarm and unjustified evacuation would be extremely dangerous. Don't be lulled into complacency by unsupportable claims of technological much less behavioral safeguards. Do the right thing and close this dangerous time-bomb.

Thank you for your consideration Tim K. Takaro, MD, MPH, MS.

Professor Faculty of Health Sciences Simon Fraser University Clinical Associate Professor Dept. of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences University of Washington DOCKETED USNRC September 11, 2012 (1:30 p.m.)

OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF 01 - 3