|
|
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 13: |
Line 13: |
| | document type = Legal-Limited Appearance Statement | | | document type = Legal-Limited Appearance Statement |
| | page count = 1 | | | page count = 1 |
| | | project = |
| | | stage = Other |
| }} | | }} |
| | |
| | =Text= |
| | {{#Wiki_filter:Docket, Hearing From: Kristin Norderval [nordervalk@mac.com] |
| | Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:11 PM To: NRCREP Resource |
| | |
| | ==Subject:== |
| | Response from "Comment on NRC Documents" Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Kristin Norderval (nordervalk(mac.com) on Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 21:10:59 |
| | ........................................................................... |
| | DocumentTitle: Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Supplement 38 Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 - - Draft Report for Comment NUREG-1437, Supplement 38, Volume 4, Draft Report Comments: |
| | |
| | ==Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission:== |
| | |
| | I live in Northern Manhattan, New York City, about 25 miles from the Indian Point nuclear reactors, which are up for relicensing in 2013 and 2015. I am writing to urge that you deny them the new licenses and begin to remove the irradiated fuel rods. |
| | According to your own findings, one of the Indian Pt reactors, number 3, is the US reactor most likely to suffer core damage in the event of an earthquake, and the other reactor, number 2, was found by you on April 2, 2000, to be the most trouble-plagued reactor in the country. |
| | The 911 Commission found that Al Qaeda had the Indian Pt reactors in their documents as a potential target, when they decided, instead, to destroy the World Trade towers. NYC would have been a devastated sacrifice zone, as there is more irradiated fuel in the fuel pools there than in the fuel pools at Fukushima. There's no way that the more than 20 million people living in a 50 mile radius of Indian Pt. could be evacuated in the event of a terrorist attack or natural disaster. The US required that US citizens be evacuated within a 50 mile radius of the Fukushima reactors; surely you must know that it would be impossible in this dense urban-suburban area. |
| | Please do the right thing and deny the renewal licenses. We have numerous studies to show that there would be adequate replacement energy from efficiency, solar, wind, tidal. Thank you for your serious and conscientious attention to this request organization: |
| | addressl: 110 Seaman Avenue #4J address2: |
| | city: New York state: NY DOCKETED zip: 10034 USNRC country: USA September 14, 2012 (8:30 a.m.) |
| | phone: 212-304-4644 OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF o3& -}} |
Latest revision as of 23:20, 11 November 2019
|
---|
Category:Legal-Limited Appearance Statement
MONTHYEARML16337A4042016-11-21021 November 2016 Rock the Earth Petitions with 590 Signatures Requesting Shutdown of Indian Point Facility ML16237A2762016-08-16016 August 2016 Limited Appearance Statement - Ulster County Legislature Resolution 365 - Opposing the Re-License of Certain Nuclear Generating Units ML16222A9012016-08-0101 August 2016 Rock the Earth Petitions with 1,029 Signatures Requesting Shutdown of Indian Point Facility ML15231A8092015-08-19019 August 2015 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Response to 08/04/2015 Letter from the Legislature of Rockland County Requesting for Accessible Public Hearing Venues for All Hearings on Indian Point License Amendments ML15208A5832015-07-22022 July 2015 Limited Appearance Statement - 37622 Care2 Signatures to Shut Down Indian Point ML15208A5842015-07-0707 July 2015 Limited Appearance Statement - Rockland County Legislature Resolution No. 316 Opposing Indian Point'S License Renewal ML15176A5892015-06-24024 June 2015 Limited Appearance Statement - Chairman Burns Reply Letter to Initial April 30, 2015 Letter from Congresswoman Nita M. Lowey Regarding Natural Gas Pipeline Near Indian Point Units 2 and 3 ML15168B1142015-06-16016 June 2015 Limited Appearance Statement - Chairman Burns Reply Letter to Initial Letter from Congresswoman Nita M. Lowey Regarding the May 9, 2015 Transformer Fire at Indian Point, Unit 3 ML15106A8792015-03-30030 March 2015 Letter from Kristin Welch, Environmental Studies Student at Stony Brook University, Requesting the NRC to Deny Indian Point License Renewal ML14287A7862014-09-15015 September 2014 Citizen Form Letters from 30 Individuals Regarding Indian Point License Renewal ML14273A5812014-09-0808 September 2014 Citizen Form Letters from 93 Individuals Regarding Indian Point License Renewal ML14258B2152014-08-29029 August 2014 Citizen Form Letters from 23 Individuals Regarding Indian Point License Renewal ML14254A4312014-08-28028 August 2014 Citizen Form Letters from 21 Individuals Regarding Indian Point License Renewal ML14253A3882014-08-23023 August 2014 Citizen Form Letters from 58 Individuals Regarding Indian Point License Renewal ML14238A5562014-08-0909 August 2014 Citizen Form Letters from 62 Individuals Regarding Indian Point License Renewal ML14156A3152014-05-27027 May 2014 Limited Appearance Statement - Letter from J. Capozzelli Regarding Denying Relicensing of Indian Point ML14038A4232014-02-0707 February 2014 Notice of Appearance - Andrew B. Reid ML14027A5332014-01-14014 January 2014 Limited Appearance Statement of Patrick Turner in Support of Indian Point License Renewal ML13273A4712013-09-16016 September 2013 Limited Appearance Statement of Sandra R. Galef, Albany, Ny Assembly, Regarding Emergency Response Property Development in Phillipstown, Ny ML13248A3602013-09-0404 September 2013 Limited Appearance Statement of Russell Faller, Member of Riverkeeper, Regarding Earthquake Risk to Indian Point ML13240A3442013-08-27027 August 2013 Limited Appearance Statement of Richard Vultaggio, Riverkeeper, Inc., Regarding Earthquake Risk to Indian Point ML13238A2552013-08-22022 August 2013 Limited Appearance Statements from Multiple Members of Riverkeeper (S. Etherton, Fern Stearney, Catherine Miller, Annmarie Parmenter, Maria Deangelis, Doreen Tignanelli, Kevin Hughes) ML13231A2412013-08-19019 August 2013 Limited Appearance Statement of Nita M. Lowey, U.S. Congress, Opposing Indian Point License Renewal ML13233A3512013-08-13013 August 2013 Limited Appearance Statement of Steven Laifer, Putnam County Legislature, Regarding Approval/Resolution for Public Health & Safety Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant ML13294A4932013-07-26026 July 2013 Limited Appearance Statement of Susan Lerner, Common Cause New York, Regarding Generating Influence Study of Entergy Political Spending and Public Relations Campaign for Indian Point License Renewal ML13212A3142013-07-23023 July 2013 Limited Appearance Statement of Manna Jo Greene, Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc., Regarding Attached Petitions Calling for the Closure of Indian Point and for Improved Health and Safety Measures ML13164A2712013-05-23023 May 2013 Limited Appearance Statement of Putnam County Legislature Enclosing Resolution # 73 to Extend the Emergency Evacuation Zone, Transfer Spent Fuel Rods to Hardened Dry Cask Storage, and Consider New Seismological Data ML13140A4092013-05-0101 May 2013 Limited Appearance Statement of Eliza Gercke and Adam Brunell, Co-Presidents - Vassar Greens Environmental Group of Vassar College, Opposing the Indian Point License Renewal Application ML13140A4072013-04-22022 April 2013 Limited Appearance Statement of Elena Fregoso and Guillermo Valdez, Co-Presidents - Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano/A De Aztlan, Vassar College, Opposing the Indian Point License Renewal Application ML13140A4032013-04-21021 April 2013 Limited Appearance Statement of Jason Rubin, President of the Vassar Student Association, Opposing the Indian Point License Renewal Application ML13011A2972012-12-31031 December 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Dagan Lacorte Re Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc to Renew Operating Licenses for Indian Point, Units 2 & 3 ML12325A7502012-11-0505 November 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Tammy L Nosek Supporting Extension of Licenses for Indian Point Units 2 & 3 ML12305A0042012-10-22022 October 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Maureen Murphy Opposing Renewal of Licensing for Indian Point Units 2 & 3 ML12286A0562012-10-0505 October 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Salvatore Bongiorno in Support of Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12277A1752012-10-0202 October 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Anthony T. Spaziani in Support of Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Applications ML12276A2102012-10-0101 October 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Vincent J. Ammirato Supporting the Indian Point 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12275A5432012-10-0101 October 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Durossert D. Clerval Supporting Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12286A0532012-09-29029 September 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Francis D. Peplees Indian Point Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12286A0542012-09-28028 September 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Jerzy Oginski in Support of Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12286A0522012-09-28028 September 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Robert Nichols Supporting Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12275A5442012-09-28028 September 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Tom Noonan Supporting Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12275A5422012-09-28028 September 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of William G. O'Callaghan Supporting Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12275A2212012-09-28028 September 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Patrick M Duggan Supporting Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12275A1262012-09-28028 September 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Bill Lettmoden Supporting Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12264A0242012-09-19019 September 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Neil Roman on Behalf of Sipan Construction Co., Corp., Supporting Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12264A0232012-09-19019 September 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of John A. Basile Supporting Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12264A1022012-09-18018 September 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Barbara Deronde Opposing Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12272A3412012-09-18018 September 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Jane Brown Opposing Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML1226302422012-09-17017 September 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Gabriella Stern Opposing Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application ML12264A5472012-09-17017 September 2012 Limited Appearance Statement of Major R. Owens Supporting Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application 2016-08-16
[Table view] |
Text
Docket, Hearing From: Kristin Norderval [nordervalk@mac.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:11 PM To: NRCREP Resource
Subject:
Response from "Comment on NRC Documents" Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Kristin Norderval (nordervalk(mac.com) on Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 21:10:59
...........................................................................
DocumentTitle: Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Supplement 38 Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 - - Draft Report for Comment NUREG-1437, Supplement 38, Volume 4, Draft Report Comments:
Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
I live in Northern Manhattan, New York City, about 25 miles from the Indian Point nuclear reactors, which are up for relicensing in 2013 and 2015. I am writing to urge that you deny them the new licenses and begin to remove the irradiated fuel rods.
According to your own findings, one of the Indian Pt reactors, number 3, is the US reactor most likely to suffer core damage in the event of an earthquake, and the other reactor, number 2, was found by you on April 2, 2000, to be the most trouble-plagued reactor in the country.
The 911 Commission found that Al Qaeda had the Indian Pt reactors in their documents as a potential target, when they decided, instead, to destroy the World Trade towers. NYC would have been a devastated sacrifice zone, as there is more irradiated fuel in the fuel pools there than in the fuel pools at Fukushima. There's no way that the more than 20 million people living in a 50 mile radius of Indian Pt. could be evacuated in the event of a terrorist attack or natural disaster. The US required that US citizens be evacuated within a 50 mile radius of the Fukushima reactors; surely you must know that it would be impossible in this dense urban-suburban area.
Please do the right thing and deny the renewal licenses. We have numerous studies to show that there would be adequate replacement energy from efficiency, solar, wind, tidal. Thank you for your serious and conscientious attention to this request organization:
addressl: 110 Seaman Avenue #4J address2:
city: New York state: NY DOCKETED zip: 10034 USNRC country: USA September 14, 2012 (8:30 a.m.)
phone: 212-304-4644 OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF o3& -