ML17325B344: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| page count = 9
| page count = 9
| project =
| stage = Request
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMON~)TIMTION SYSTEM 0                                ~
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:8912040016              DOC.DATE: 89/11/28    NOTARIZED: NO          DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana 6                  05000315 50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana 6                05000316 AUTH. NAME            AUTHOR AFFILIATION ALEXICH,M.P.          Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana & Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME            RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E.            Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
 
==SUBJECT:==
Application for amends to Licenses DPR-58 6 DPR-74,changing mxn volume for diesel generator fuel storage sys.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: AOOID TITLE:  OR COPIES RECEIVED:LTR Submittal: General Distribution                J  ENCL
                                                                      $  SIZE:  df NOTES RECIPIENT              COPIES            RECIPIENT          COPIES ID  CODE/NAME            LTTR ENCL      ID  CODE/NAME      LTTR ENCL PD3-1 LA                    1      1    PD3-1 PD              1    1 GIITTER,J.                  5      5 INTERNAL: NRR/DET 8H3                  1      1    NRR/DET/ECMB 9H        1    1 NRR/DOEA/OTSB11              1      1    NRR/DST      8E2      1    1 NRR/DST/SELB 8D              1      1    NRR/DST/SICB 7E        1    1 NRR/DST/SRXB 8E              1      1    NUDOCS-ABSTRACT        1    1 1      0    OGC/HDS1              1    0 REG  FIL        01        1      1    RES/DSIR/EIB          1    1 EXTERNAL: LPDR                          1      1    NRC PDR                1    1 NSIC                        1      1 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WAS'! CONTACT THE, DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR              22  ENCL  20
 
Indiana l5chigan Power Company P.O. Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 AEP:NRC:0896K Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units      1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 REVISION OF MINIMUM REQUIRED VOLUME FOR DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL STORAGE SYSTEM U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:      Document  Control Desk Washington,      D.CD 20555 Attn: T.        E. Murley November 28, 1989
 
==Dear Dr. Murley:==
 
This letter constitutes an application for amendment to the Technical Specifications for the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2. Specifically, we are proposing to change the required minimum volume of the diesel generator fuel storage tanks from 42,000 gallons of fuel to 46,000 gallons of fuel. We are also clarifying the T/S such that the 46,000 gallons is specified as an indicated volume. The reasons for the changes and our analysis concerning significant hazards are included in Attachment 1 of this letter. Attachment 2 contains the proposed revised Technical Specification pages.
We    believe the proposed changes will not result in (1) a significant change      in the types of effluents or a significant increase in the amounts      of any effluent, that may be released, offsite, or (2) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
These proposed changes have been reviewed by the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee and by the Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee.
In compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.91 (b)(1), copies of this letter and its attachments have been transmitted to Mr. R. C. Callen of the Michigan Public Service Commission and to the Michigan Department of Public Health.
S9i20400i6 85'1128  05000315
'PDR        ADOCK P                        PDC
 
Dr, T. E. Murley                                AEP: NRC: 0896K This document has been prepared following Corporate procedures which incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned.
.Sincerely, M. P. Alex ch Vice President ldp Attachments cc:  D. H. Williams, Jr.
A. A. Blind - Bridgman R. C. Callen G. Charnoff A. B. Davis - Region  III NRC  Resident Inspector - Bridgman NFEM Section Chief
 
S' ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:0896K REASONS AND 10 CFR 50.92 SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS EVALUATION FOR CHANGES TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2
 
ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:0896K                                Page 1 Introduction In this Technical Specification (T/S) application, we propose to change the required minimum volume of the diesel generator fuel storage tanks. Specifically, we are proposing changes to Specifications 3.8.l.l.b.2 and 3.8.1.2.b.2 that would increase the required minimum volume of the storage tanks from 42,000 gallons of fuel oil to 46,000 gallons of fuel oil. Ve are also clarifying the T/S such that the 46,000 gallon minimum is specified as an indicated volume.
Back round Information Notice 89-50 alerted licensees to the possibility that the T/S requirements for minimum volume of diesel generator fuel oil may not be sufficient. The information notice referenced Regulatory Guide 1.137 (Fuel Oil Systems for Standby Diesel Generators) for guidance in calculating the minimum required volume.
ANSI N195-1976, which  is referenced by Regulatory Guide 1.137, requires that sufficient on-site oil storage be provided to operate the required number of diesel generators for either seven days or for the time required to replenish the oil from sources outside the plant site following a design basis event or accident without interrupting the operation of the diesels, whichever is longer. Regulatory Guide 1.137 and ANSI N195-1976 provide two methods for calculating fuel oil storage requirements,    The first alternative accounts for the variation of loads placed on the diesel generator during the seven-day period (i.e., the load history). If this alternative is chosen, a margin of 10% must be added to the calculated storage requirement. In the second alternative, which is the recommended one, it is conservatively assumed that the diesel operates continuously for seven days at its rated capacity. At the Cook Nuclear Plant, we have employed the second alternative in determining our required minimum volume for the fuel storage tanks'he calculations are based on seven days of operation, since we believe this to be the more limiting of the requirements for the Cook Nuclear Plant.
Reasons  For Chan e As  per Information Notice 89-50, we have recently updated our calculation for determining fuel oil storage requirements. In our calculations we used the second (recommended) alternative of Regulatory Guide 1.137, i.e., we assumed the diesel is operated at rated capacity for seven days. Our calculations showed that the
 
ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:0896K                                                  Page 2 seven-day consumption rate was 43,240 gallons. This value is slightly above the current T/S-required minimum volume which was based on our earlier calculations,                    We are proposing to increase the required minimum volume to 46,000 gallons and to clarify that this is an "indicated" volume. The physical characteristics of the tank are such that not all of the volume of the tank is accessible.                  The bottom of the outlet pipe is located approximately six inches from the bottom of the tank.
Additionally, the tanks are installed with a slight downward slope. One method of determining tank volume is with a depth stick, which is inserted towards the deep end of the tank. The difference between the minimum calculated fuel that is necessary for seven days operation and our proposed T/S minimum indicated quantity of 46,000 gallons provides ample margin to account for these tank characteristics.
It is noted that even though the T/S requirement was slightly non-conservative with respect to the calculated seven-day requirements, we procedurally require that at least 46,000 gallons of fuel oil be maintained in the tanks. Historically, we have maintained the tank volume above 50,000 gallons. Our practice has been to "top off" the tanks whenever they reach approximately 50,000 gallons'ustification For Chan  e The proposed minimum                  indicated tank volume of 46,000 gallons is conservative with respect to our current calculations and is more restrictive than our current T/S requirement of 42,000 gallons.
Anal sis of Si                  nificant  Hazards Per 10  CFR          50.92, a proposed amendment will not involve a significant                hazards consideration    if the proposed amendment does not:
: 1)          Involve        a  significant increase in the probability or consequences          of  an accident previously evaluated,
: 2)          Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously analyzed or evaluated, or
: 3)          Involve        a  significant reduction in  a  margin of safety.
 
~ ~
ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:0896K                                      Page 3 Criterion  1 The  basis for determining fuel    oil storage requirements is defined in  ANSI N195-1976 and Regulatory Guide 1.137.      Since our proposed T/S  value  is  conservative  with respect  to our calculations performed in accordance with these documents and is more restrictive than our current T/S value, this proposed change will not significantly increase the probability or consequences of a previously analyzed accident, nor will      it involve a reduction in a margin of safety.
Criterion  2 This proposed change      will require the plant to be operated under more  restrictive conditions    than currently required. Therefore, the change should not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously analyzed or evaluated.
Criterion  3 See  Criterion  1  above.
Lastly,  we note that the Commission has provided guidance concerning the determination of significant hazards by providing certain examples (48 FR 14870) of amendments considered not likely to involve significant hazards consideration, The second of these examples refers to changes which constitute additional limitations, restrictions, or controls not presently included in the T/Ss. As described above, this change is more restrictive in nature than the present T/S. Therefore, we believe the example cited is applicable and that the change should not involve significant    hazards consideration.}}

Latest revision as of 04:12, 10 November 2019

Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,revising Tech Specs Re Min Vol for Diesel Generator Fuel Storage Tanks from 42,000 Gallons to 46,000 Gallons of Fuel
ML17325B344
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 11/28/1989
From: Alexich M
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: Murley T
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML17325B345 List:
References
AEP:NRC:0896K, AEP:NRC:896K, NUDOCS 8912040016
Download: ML17325B344 (9)


Text

ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMON~)TIMTION SYSTEM 0 ~

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:8912040016 DOC.DATE: 89/11/28 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana 6 05000315 50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana 6 05000316 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION ALEXICH,M.P. Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana & Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E. Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Application for amends to Licenses DPR-58 6 DPR-74,changing mxn volume for diesel generator fuel storage sys.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: AOOID TITLE: OR COPIES RECEIVED:LTR Submittal: General Distribution J ENCL

$ SIZE: df NOTES RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD3-1 LA 1 1 PD3-1 PD 1 1 GIITTER,J. 5 5 INTERNAL: NRR/DET 8H3 1 1 NRR/DET/ECMB 9H 1 1 NRR/DOEA/OTSB11 1 1 NRR/DST 8E2 1 1 NRR/DST/SELB 8D 1 1 NRR/DST/SICB 7E 1 1 NRR/DST/SRXB 8E 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 1 0 OGC/HDS1 1 0 REG FIL 01 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WAS'! CONTACT THE, DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 22 ENCL 20

Indiana l5chigan Power Company P.O. Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 AEP:NRC:0896K Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 REVISION OF MINIMUM REQUIRED VOLUME FOR DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL STORAGE SYSTEM U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.CD 20555 Attn: T. E. Murley November 28, 1989

Dear Dr. Murley:

This letter constitutes an application for amendment to the Technical Specifications for the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2. Specifically, we are proposing to change the required minimum volume of the diesel generator fuel storage tanks from 42,000 gallons of fuel to 46,000 gallons of fuel. We are also clarifying the T/S such that the 46,000 gallons is specified as an indicated volume. The reasons for the changes and our analysis concerning significant hazards are included in Attachment 1 of this letter. Attachment 2 contains the proposed revised Technical Specification pages.

We believe the proposed changes will not result in (1) a significant change in the types of effluents or a significant increase in the amounts of any effluent, that may be released, offsite, or (2) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.

These proposed changes have been reviewed by the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee and by the Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee.

In compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.91 (b)(1), copies of this letter and its attachments have been transmitted to Mr. R. C. Callen of the Michigan Public Service Commission and to the Michigan Department of Public Health.

S9i20400i6 85'1128 05000315

'PDR ADOCK P PDC

Dr, T. E. Murley AEP: NRC: 0896K This document has been prepared following Corporate procedures which incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned.

.Sincerely, M. P. Alex ch Vice President ldp Attachments cc: D. H. Williams, Jr.

A. A. Blind - Bridgman R. C. Callen G. Charnoff A. B. Davis - Region III NRC Resident Inspector - Bridgman NFEM Section Chief

S' ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:0896K REASONS AND 10 CFR 50.92 SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS EVALUATION FOR CHANGES TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2

ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:0896K Page 1 Introduction In this Technical Specification (T/S) application, we propose to change the required minimum volume of the diesel generator fuel storage tanks. Specifically, we are proposing changes to Specifications 3.8.l.l.b.2 and 3.8.1.2.b.2 that would increase the required minimum volume of the storage tanks from 42,000 gallons of fuel oil to 46,000 gallons of fuel oil. Ve are also clarifying the T/S such that the 46,000 gallon minimum is specified as an indicated volume.

Back round Information Notice 89-50 alerted licensees to the possibility that the T/S requirements for minimum volume of diesel generator fuel oil may not be sufficient. The information notice referenced Regulatory Guide 1.137 (Fuel Oil Systems for Standby Diesel Generators) for guidance in calculating the minimum required volume.

ANSI N195-1976, which is referenced by Regulatory Guide 1.137, requires that sufficient on-site oil storage be provided to operate the required number of diesel generators for either seven days or for the time required to replenish the oil from sources outside the plant site following a design basis event or accident without interrupting the operation of the diesels, whichever is longer. Regulatory Guide 1.137 and ANSI N195-1976 provide two methods for calculating fuel oil storage requirements, The first alternative accounts for the variation of loads placed on the diesel generator during the seven-day period (i.e., the load history). If this alternative is chosen, a margin of 10% must be added to the calculated storage requirement. In the second alternative, which is the recommended one, it is conservatively assumed that the diesel operates continuously for seven days at its rated capacity. At the Cook Nuclear Plant, we have employed the second alternative in determining our required minimum volume for the fuel storage tanks'he calculations are based on seven days of operation, since we believe this to be the more limiting of the requirements for the Cook Nuclear Plant.

Reasons For Chan e As per Information Notice 89-50, we have recently updated our calculation for determining fuel oil storage requirements. In our calculations we used the second (recommended) alternative of Regulatory Guide 1.137, i.e., we assumed the diesel is operated at rated capacity for seven days. Our calculations showed that the

ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:0896K Page 2 seven-day consumption rate was 43,240 gallons. This value is slightly above the current T/S-required minimum volume which was based on our earlier calculations, We are proposing to increase the required minimum volume to 46,000 gallons and to clarify that this is an "indicated" volume. The physical characteristics of the tank are such that not all of the volume of the tank is accessible. The bottom of the outlet pipe is located approximately six inches from the bottom of the tank.

Additionally, the tanks are installed with a slight downward slope. One method of determining tank volume is with a depth stick, which is inserted towards the deep end of the tank. The difference between the minimum calculated fuel that is necessary for seven days operation and our proposed T/S minimum indicated quantity of 46,000 gallons provides ample margin to account for these tank characteristics.

It is noted that even though the T/S requirement was slightly non-conservative with respect to the calculated seven-day requirements, we procedurally require that at least 46,000 gallons of fuel oil be maintained in the tanks. Historically, we have maintained the tank volume above 50,000 gallons. Our practice has been to "top off" the tanks whenever they reach approximately 50,000 gallons'ustification For Chan e The proposed minimum indicated tank volume of 46,000 gallons is conservative with respect to our current calculations and is more restrictive than our current T/S requirement of 42,000 gallons.

Anal sis of Si nificant Hazards Per 10 CFR 50.92, a proposed amendment will not involve a significant hazards consideration if the proposed amendment does not:

1) Involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated,
2) Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously analyzed or evaluated, or
3) Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

~ ~

ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:0896K Page 3 Criterion 1 The basis for determining fuel oil storage requirements is defined in ANSI N195-1976 and Regulatory Guide 1.137. Since our proposed T/S value is conservative with respect to our calculations performed in accordance with these documents and is more restrictive than our current T/S value, this proposed change will not significantly increase the probability or consequences of a previously analyzed accident, nor will it involve a reduction in a margin of safety.

Criterion 2 This proposed change will require the plant to be operated under more restrictive conditions than currently required. Therefore, the change should not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously analyzed or evaluated.

Criterion 3 See Criterion 1 above.

Lastly, we note that the Commission has provided guidance concerning the determination of significant hazards by providing certain examples (48 FR 14870) of amendments considered not likely to involve significant hazards consideration, The second of these examples refers to changes which constitute additional limitations, restrictions, or controls not presently included in the T/Ss. As described above, this change is more restrictive in nature than the present T/S. Therefore, we believe the example cited is applicable and that the change should not involve significant hazards consideration.