Revision as of 19:34, 31 October 2019

Text

2014 DC Cook Nuclear Power Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-301-3
	ML14316A306
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	08/01/2014
From:	Mcneil D; NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	; Indiana Michigan Power Co
References
	Download: ML14316A306 (1)
	v • d • e

__0'"""'*P..~rating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301*3 Operating Test Number .2.0J4~1Q1.

Initials

1. General Criteria

----------*----

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., *10 CFR 55.45, operational importance. safety function distribution).

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered dunng this examination.

c. The operating test shall not duplicate 1tems from the applicants' audit test(s). l.see / ~

SectlonD.1.a.) .\

11--------------------------------*---------------t=.L.L+-lr-+_;__-ll

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. dw..

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated lic<mse level.

"2"'._W.;..;;..:a:..;lk:..;*-:.T=hr_!?.~9h Criteria

a. Each JPM includes U1e foilowmg, as applicable:

initial conditions

initiating cues

references and tools. including associated procedures

reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be lime-critical by the facility licensee

operationally important specific performance criteria that include.

o detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature o system response and other examiner cues

') statements describing important observations to be made by the applic:ant o criteria for successful completion of the task o identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards lf---------'-o- restrictions on the sequence of steps. if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use. repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator tests (scenario sets) have be*.m revieweci in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and Date Author Facility R(';vle'Ner(')

d. NRC Supervisor NOTE* is net applicable f*x NRC. dev*;loped tests.

revievver ~nlti~ll lit~rns In Co!urnn *c~ chief exarntnf~r conc:urrf;:;nce required

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 =Text=
-{{#Wiki_filter:__ 0'"""'*
+{{#Wiki_filter:__0'"""'*P..~rating Test Quality Checklist                                            Form ES-301*3 Operating Test Number .2.0J4~1Q1.
-Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301*3 Operating Test Number
+Initials
-: 1. General Criteria *----------*----
+: 1. General Criteria
-The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., *10 CFR 55.45, operational importance.
+                                                                        *----------*----
-safety function distribution).
+The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., *10 CFR 55.45, operational importance. safety function distribution).
-: b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered dunng this examination.
+: b.         There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered dunng this examination.
-Initials The operating test shall not duplicate 1tems from the applicants' audit test(s). l.see / SectlonD.1.a.)
+: c.         The operating test shall not duplicate 1tems from the applicants' audit test(s). l.see                                             / ~
-.\ c. 11--------------------------------*---------------t=.L.L+-lr-+_;__-ll
+SectlonD.1.a.)                                                                                                                     .\
-: d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated lic<mse level.
+--------------------------------*---------------t=.L.L+-lr-+_;__-ll
-Criteria a. Each JPM includes U1e foilowmg, as applicable:
+: d.         Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.                                                                                                                  dw..
+It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated lic<mse level.
+                  ------------"2"'._W.;..;;..:a:..;lk:..;*-:.T=hr_!?.~9h Criteria
+: a.         Each JPM includes U1e foilowmg, as applicable:
 * initial conditions
 * initiating cues
 * references and tools. including associated procedures
 * reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be lime-critical by the facility licensee
-* operationally important specific performance criteria that include. o detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature o system response and other examiner cues ') statements describing important observations to be made by the applic:ant o criteria for successful completion of the task o identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards lf---------'-o-restrictions on the sequence of steps. if applicable
+* operationally important specific performance criteria that include.
-: b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use. repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
+o      detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature o      system response and other examiner cues
-The associated simulator Form ES-301-4 and Author Facility R(';vle'Ner(')
+                  ')     statements describing important observations to be made by the applic:ant o      criteria for successful completion of the task o      identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards lf---------'-o- restrictions on the sequence of steps. if applicable
-: d. NRC Supervisor NOTE* 3. Simulator Criteria tests (scenario sets) have be*.m revieweci in accordance with is net applicable f*x NRC .. dev*;loped tests. revievver In Co!urnn chief conc:urrf;:;nce required Date dw..}}
+: b.         Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use. repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
+: 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator                  tests (scenario sets) have be*.m revieweci in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and Date Author Facility R(';vle'Ner(')
+: d. NRC Supervisor NOTE*                                      is net applicable f*x NRC. dev*;loped tests.
+revievver   ~nlti~ll lit~rns In Co!urnn *c~ chief exarntnf~r conc:urrf;:;nce required}}

ML14316A306: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:34, 31 October 2019

Text

Navigation menu

ML14316A306: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:34, 31 October 2019

Text

Navigation menu

Search