ML13301A731

VC Summer Initial Exam 2013-301 Final Administrative Documents

ML13301A731
Person / Time
Site:	Summer
Issue date:	10/23/2013
From:	NRC/RGN-II
To:	South Carolina Electric & Gas Co
References
Download: ML13301A731 (75)

Text

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Facility: VC SUMMER Date of Examination:

8/19/2013 Examination Level (circle one):

RO / SRO Operating Test Number:

NRC ILO-11-01 Administrative Topic (see Note) Type Code* Describe activity to be performed Conduct of Operations (A1-a) D,P Calculate Head Venting Time in accordance with EOP-18.2, Response to Voids in Reactor Vessel, Attachment 2.

K/A: 2.1.25 (RO:3.9, SRO:4.2)

Conduct of Operations (A1-b) D Manually calculate QPTR with a dropped control rod in accordance with STP

-108.001. K/A: 2.1.37 (RO:4.3, SRO:4.6

) Equipment Control (A2) N Perform a boric acid flowpath operability verification in accordance with STP

-104.003. K/A: 2.2.12 (RO: 3.7, SRO:4.1)

Radiation Control (A3) M RO/SRO Common Calculate stay times for various workers in accordance with HPP-0153 and determine who can do the work

. K/A: 2.3.4 (RO:3.2, SRO:3.7)

Emergency Plan (A4) Not selected for RO.

NOTE: All items (5 total

) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

• Type Codes & Criteria:

(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (< 3 for ROs;

< 4 for SROs & RO retakes)

(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (> 1) (P)revious 2 exams (< 1; randomly selected)

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Facility: VC SUMMER Date of Examination:

8/19/2013 Examination Level (circle one):

RO / SR O Operating Test Number:

NRC ILO-11-01 Administrative Topic (see Note) Type Code* Describe activity to be performed Conduct of Operations (A1-a) M Review NIS Power Range Heat Balance in accordance with STP

-102.002. K/A: 2.1.45: (RO:4.3, SRO:4.3)

Conduct of Operations (A1-b) M Manually calculate QPTR with a dropped control rod in accordance with STP

-108.001. K/A: 2.1.37 (RO:4.3, SRO:4.6

) Equipment Control (A2) N Review an "A" train Control room Emergency Air Cleanup System Operability Test in accordance with STP-124.001.

K/A: 2.2.12 (RO: 3.7, SRO:4.1)

Radiation Control (A3) M RO/SRO Common Calculate stay times for various workers in accordance

with HPP-0153 and determine who can do the work

. K/A: 2.3.4 (RO:3.2, SRO:3.7)

Emergency Plan (A4) D Declare a n Alert in accordance with EPP

-001. K/A: 2.4.41 (RO:2.9, SRO: 4.6)

NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

• Type Codes & Criteria:

(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (< 3 for ROs;

< 4 for SROs & RO retakes)

(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (> 1) (P)revious 2 exams (< 1; randomly selected)

ES-301 Control Room/In

-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Facility: VC Summer Date of Examination:

8/19/2013 Exam Level (circle one):

RO / SRO(I)

/ SRO(U) Operating Test No.:

NRC ILO-11-01 Control Room Systems (8 for RO; 7 for SRO

-I 2 or 3 for SRO

-U) System / JPM Title Type Code*

Safety Function

a. Generic Abnormal Plant Evolution 001 [

NJPSF-141A] Continuous Rod Withdrawal (AOP

-403.3, EOP

-1.0 , E-0) A,L,M,S 1 b. System 022

[NJPSF-159] Swap running RBCU's (SOP

-114) A,EN,N,S 5 c. System 004 [

NJPS-034A] Increase Letdown Flow to a Maximum to Improve Chemistry (SOP-102) D,S 2 d. Generic Emergency Plant Evolution 038 [

NJPSF-059B] Alternate Isolation of Ruptured S/G (MSIV fails to close) (EOP-4.0/E-3) A,D,S 3 e. System 005 [

NJPS-151] Shift RHR Loops with RHR in service (SOP

-115) D,L,S 4P f. System 059

[NJPSF-16 1] Respond to a feed regulating valve closure (AOP

-210.1) A,N,S 4S g. System 062

[NJPS-162] Start and Load the Main Generator (SOP

-301) N,S 6 h. System 103

[NJPS-152] Respond to high reactor building pressure (SOP

-114) D,S 8 In-Plant Systems (3 for RO; 3 for SRO

-I; 3 or 2 for SRO

-U) i. Generic Abnormal Plant Evolution 068

[JPPF-013A/B] Start and load the diesel generator during control room evacuation (AOP

-600.1) A,E,N 8 j. Generic Abnormal Plant Evolution 040 [JPP-107 A] Locally Close and De

-Energize MS Loop "B" and "C " to the Turbine Driven Emergency Feedwater Pump (EOP-3.0, E-2) M ,E 4 S k. Generic Emergency Plant Evolution 055 [JPP F-066 A] Locally Isolate RCP Seals During a Total Loss of ESF Power (EOP-6.0, ECA-0.0) E,M,R 6 ES-301 Control Room/In

-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 NUREG-1021, Revision 9

@ All control room (and in

-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; in

-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

• Type Codes Criteria for: RO / SRO

-I / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3 5 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank 9 / 8 / 4 4 (E)mergency or abnormal in

-plant 1 / 1 / 1 3 (EN)gineered safety feature NA / NA / 1 (L)ow-Power / Shutdown 1 / 1 / 1 2 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A) 2 / 2 / 1 7 (P)revious 2 exams 3 / 3 / 2 0 (R)CA 1 / 1 / 1 1 (S)imulator

ES-301 Control Room/In

-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Facility: VC Summer Date of Examination:

8/19/2013 Exam Level (circle one):

RO / SRO(I)

/ SRO(U) Operating Test No.:

NRC ILO-11-01 Control Room Systems (8 for RO; 7 for SRO

-I 2 or 3 for SRO

-U) System / JPM Title Type Code*

Safety Function

a. Generic Abnormal Plant Evolution 001 [

NJPSF-141A] Continuous Rod Withdrawal (AOP

-403.3, EOP

-1.0 , E-0) A,L,M,S 1 b. System 022

[NJPSF-159] Swap running RBCU's (SOP

-114) A,EN,N,S 5 c. System 004 [

NJPS-034A] Increase Letdown Flow to a Maximum to Improve Chemistry (SOP-102) D,S 2 d. Generic Emergency Plant Evolution 038 [

NJPSF-059B] Alternate Isolation of Ruptured S/G (MSIV fails to close) (EOP-4.0/E-3) A,D,S 3 e. System 005 [

NJPS-151] Shift RHR Loops with RHR in service (SOP

-115) D,L,S 4P f. System 059

[NJPSF-16 1] Respond to a feed regulating valve closure (AOP

-210.1) A,N,S 4S g. System 062

[NJPS-162] Start and Load the Main Generator (SOP

-301) N,S 6 h. Not selected for the SRO

-I In-Plant Systems (3 for RO; 3 for SRO

-I; 3 or 2 for SRO-U) i. Generic Abnormal Plant Evolution 068 [JPPF-013A/B] Start and load the diesel generator during control room evacuation (AOP

-600.1) A,E,N 8 j. Generic Abnormal Plant Evolution 040 [JPP-107 A] Locally Close and De

-Energize MS Loop "B" and "C" to the Turbine Driven Emergency Feedwater Pump (EOP-3.0, E-2) M ,E 4S k. Generic Emergency Plant Evolution 055 [JPPF-066A] Locally Isolate RCP Seals During a Total Loss of ESF Power (EOP-6.0, ECA-0.0) E,M,R 6 ES-301 Control Room/In

-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 NUREG-1021, Revision 9

@ All control room (and in

-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; in

-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

• Type Codes Criteria for:

RO / SRO-I / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3 5 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank 9 / 8 / 4 3 (E)mergency or abnormal in

-plant 1 / 1 / 1 3 (EN)gineered safety feature NA / NA / 1 (L)ow-Power / Shutdown 1 / 1 / 1 2 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A) 2 / 2 / 1 7 (P)revious 2 exams 3 / 3 / 2 0 (R)CA 1 / 1 / 1 1 (S)imulator

ES-301 Control Room/In

-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Facility: VC Summer Date of Examination:

8/19/2013 Exam Level (circle one):

RO / SRO(I)

/ SRO(U) Operating Test No.:

NRC ILO-11-01 Control Room Systems (8 for RO; 7 for SRO

-I 2 or 3 for SRO

-U) System / JPM Title Type Code*

Safety Function

a. Generic Abnormal Plant Evolution 001 [

NJPSF-141A] Continuous Rod Withdrawal (AOP

-403.3, EOP

-1.0 , E-0) A,L,M,S 1 b. System 022

[NJPSF-159] Swap running RBCU's (SOP

-114) A,EN,N,S 5 c. Not selected for the SRO

-U d. Not selected for the SRO

-U e. Not selected for the SRO

-U f. Not selected for the SRO

-U g. Not selected for the SRO

-U h. Not selected for the SRO

-U In-Plant Systems (3 for RO; 3 for SRO

-I; 3 or 2 for SRO

-U) i. Generic Abnormal Plant Evolution 068 [JPPF-013A/B] Start and load the diesel generator during control room evacuation (AOP

-600.1) A,E,N 8 j. Generic Abnormal Plant Evolution 040 [JPP-107 A] Locally Close and De

-Energize MS Loop "B" and "C" to the Turbine Driven Emergency Feedwater Pump (EOP-3.0, E-2) M ,E 4S k. Generic Emergency Plant Evolution 055 [JPPF-066A] Locally Isolate RCP Seals During a Total Loss of ESF Power (EOP-6.0, ECA-0.0) E,M,R 6 ES-301 Control Room/In

-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 NUREG-1021, Revision 9

@ All control room (and in

-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; in

-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

• Type Codes Criteria for:

RO / SRO-I / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3 3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank 9 / 8 / 4 0 (E)mergency or abnormal in

-plant 1 / 1 / 1 3 (EN)gineered safety feature NA / NA / 1(control room system) 1 (L)ow-Power / Shutdown 1 / 1 / 1 1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A) 2 / 2 / 1 5 (P)revious 2 exams 3 / 3 / 2 (randomly selected) 0 (R)CA 1 / 1 / 1 1 (S)imulator

ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 Instructions [Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.] 1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level. 2. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 5 (easy difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 4 range are acceptable). 3. Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified: The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information). The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc). The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements. The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable. One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem). 4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified: The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid K/A but, as written, is not operational in content). The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory). The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons). The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements. 5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved K/A and those that are designated SRO-only (K/A and license level mismatches are unacceptable). 6. Enter question source: (B)ank, (M)odified, or (N)ew. Check that (M)odified questions meet criteria of ES-401 Section D.2.f. 7. Based on the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory? 8. At a tings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9 Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 1 H 2 X M E S 002 A2.02 Cred Dist: Stating that accumulators are injecting at 950 psig not plausible. Lowered RCS pressure to 750 and ruptured SG pressure to 650 psig to increase plausibility. ecessary? Loss of offsite power is required to convey that RCPs are not running to set up voiding. Cooldown complete is included to convey that an expected depressurization of EOP-4.0 is in progress. Changed question to replace CFT injecting. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 2 H 3 N S 003 K2.02 3 F 1 X N U S 004 K5.02 Cred Dist: B just not plausible. None of the distractors really look plausible when compared to A. Recommend asking a percentage and an action. Changed to 2X2 question why degas and what the steady state limit is for oxygen. CVCS 201 rejected because of plausibility of distracters. K Schaaf agreed to allow a question on the Hydrogen spec in the Waste Gas system. Waste Gas 66 drafted Changed question to ask about H2, Ox limitations in the waste decay tanks. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 4 H 3 X M E S 005 K5.05 bullet? It makes the three distractors too easy to eliminate (i.e. not plausible). Since this KA is very specific, it would go to put them in a place where thethem. Changed RCS temperature to more firmly place in a solid plant OPS condition. Removed statement of solid plant condition. Changes ok. Question SAT 7/26. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 5 H 3 X M E S 006 A3.08 Stem Focus: For the 4th bullet, can I say that the attachment is complete? Is there a time delay associated with the swap? Eliminated wording about pumps and valves and just indicated Attachment 3 complete. There is no time delay associated with the suction valve swaps other than the stroke time for the valves. Ok with changes. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 6 H 3 X N E S 006 K2.02 Stem Focus: I would recommend changing the second part to :Power to MVG-8808C ______ is/is not available. All 4 answers stated that power is available to MVG-8808A. Changed per comment. Ok with changes. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 7 H 3 X M E S 007 EK1.02 Cred Dist: SDM decreasing one minute after a trip not plausible. Could the boron be injecting within one minute after a trip? Changed first half of question to test which isotope is decaying. Ok with changes Question SAT 7/26. KDS 8 F 2 M S 007 K4.01 9 F 2 M S 008 AK2.03 10 H 3 X M U S 008 G2.4.11 Cred Dist: Exceeding an operating limit but waiting to trip the component while reducing power is not plausible. 2nd part of A&B not plausible. Recommend making reactor power 35 % and for the 2nd Changed per comment. Ok with changes Question SAT 7/26. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 11 H 2 X M E S 008 K3.01 Cred Dist: 2nd to protect seals. 2nd prevent steam binding. Changed A to say Charging pump motor bearing rather than RCP seals. Changed the answer in B from Chargin pump gearbox to Charging pump thrust bearing to be more correct. Changed C to say RHR pump bearing. Ok with changes Question SAT 7/26. KDS 12 H 2 X M E S 009 EK1.02 Stem Focus: The stem has you stop the A CCP and the correct answer has you start the same pump. This seems confusing unless you split up the conditions with some time spacing such that the pump was secured but conditions have now changed. Established a time line per comment. Plaus Statement for C states I would start the CCP if < 67.5 degrees and the others state it as 52.5 degrees. Stated in that manner to discuss difference in requirements for restarting pump depending on whether adverse containment conditions are in effect. Ok with changes Question SAT 7/26. KDS 13 H 2 X B E S 010 K2.01 Stem Focus: Remove the last bullet. Removed last bullet per comment. Ok with changes Question SAT 7/26. KDS 14 H 3 X N U S 011 EG2.2.44 Cred Dist: A&B Steam Generators as a heat sink is not plausible. Replaced question. 7/26 KS did not think injection at 550 psig was plausible. Replaced with new question. Changed during review in office. Question SAT 7/26. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 15 H 2 X M U S 012 A1.01 Cred Dist: 2nd part of B&C, having axial flux becoming excessively negative on a rod pull is not plausible. Where are the CRs at 75% power. Revised question to remove direction of rod motion and to lower power to have rods at a lower position. 7/26 negative delta-flux still not plausible, replaced question with RCS temp 38. Insert channel and wording about pressurizer heaters Changed during review in office. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 16 F 2 X M E S 012 K6.10 Cred Dist: P9 & P12 not plausible for a loop flow malfunction. Recommend keeping P7 & P8 and making a two part question. Changed per comment. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 17 H 2 X M E S 013 A3.02 Cred Dist: Do the additional valves in C&D ever operate automatically? If not, they are not plausible. Remove 3rd bullet. Removed third bullet and eliminated valves that do not automatically reposition per comment. Changed during review in office. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 18 F 3 B S 013 K6.01 Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 19 H 3 X M S Need to ensure that A and D are incorrect. What is highlilghted in the reference pack for the correct answer entry cur until step 180 so I think this could be argued. Also (3) Any Control Rod is inoperable OR misaligned from the Group Step Counder demand position by 12 steps or more. They are only 8 steps out in the stem. not sure if there are no correct answers or several correct answers. Per operations, AOP-403.5 would likely be used for a significant difference that is less than 12 steps. Control Rod is inoperable OR misaligned from the Group Step for misaligned rod to 174 steps. Changed during review in office. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 20 F 2 X M E S 015 G2.1.28 Stem Focus: Change power to 9%. Change the second question to ask if the reactor should have automatically tripped. Cloned question and revised per comment. Ok with changes. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 21 H 2 X B E S 016 K1.12 Cred Dist: B, steam flow failing low causing an increase in level not plausible. Are there any parameters that would cause this condition even if they are not in Ch III? If at 70% power, the controls would normally be in Automatic, remove the second bullet. Removed 2nd bullet and changed B distracter. Question SAT 7/26. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 22 H 2 X N E S 022 A1.01 oF. This will change the answer and test whether or not the applicant knows if entry is based on average or highest reading. Changed per comment. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 23 H 2 X N U S 022 AK3.07 Cred Dist: A down stream failing closed giving the indicated oscillations not plausible. Created new question to test the valves that would cause a loss of suction. Ok with changes. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 24 F 2 X M U S 025 AK2.05 Cred Dist: B,C,D not plausible. Based on reference provided, it discusses air entrainment, not cavitation. Not sure if A is actually correct. Replaced question with EOPS 844. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 25 F 3 M S 026 A4.01 26 F 3 N S 026 AA1.06 Can I reset a Phase A signal before I reset a Phase B signal? Yes Question SAT 7/26. KDS 27 F 2 N S 029 EA1.01 28 F 2 N S 033 K3.02 29 F 2 M S 034 K6.02 30 F 2 X M E S 035 K5.03 removed from the question. Its too easy to argue. Removed (1) from stem and the word potentially per comment. Question SAT 7/26. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 31 F 2 X B E S 036 AA1.04 Ensure Ops Mgmt ok with asking questions about sequence of steps in procedures. Cred Dist: Change C to one train to make it more plausible. Changed per comment. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 32 H 3 X N E S 037 AA2.08 Cred Dist: 2nd part of C&D not plausible. What does the RM read out in? Question good as is. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 33 H 3 N S 039 A1.06 34 H 3 X B E S 039 A2.01 Cred Dist: A not plausible to be the first action. D not plausible to do what looks like opening them with temperature going down. Changed D to say adjustment of controllers to higher value (to close the valves). Replaced A with closure of turbine drain valves. Ensure Ops Mgmt ok with asking questions about sequence of steps in procedures. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 35 H 3 X N E S 040 AA2.02 the question to ask something similar to: Reactor trip due to __________. SI is required due to __________. Re-wrote in office. Question SAT 7/26. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 36 H 3 X X N E S 054 AK1.01 coming in? Why is Tave increasing? Indications of feed rupture. Cred Dist: SI termination not plausible with the given indications. Changed to EOP-3.0. Consider changing 2nd part to: Based on the above conditions, EOP 1.0 will direct the operator to GO TO ________. Changed per comment. Modified stem in office. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 37 H 3 X B E S 056 G2.4.1 Stem Focus. Move 2nd bullet under current conditions to initial conditions. Change 1st bullet under Current conditions to EOP-1.1, REACTOR TRIP RECOVERY has been initiated. Bullet containing EDG event cannot be moved since EOP-1.1 would not be initiated in that time sequence. question to have just actions that the operator performs. Reworded to be consistent with wording that discusses high level action steps in OAP-103.4 EOP/AOP Users Guide. Ensure Ops Mgmt ok with asking questions about sequence of steps in procedures. Modified stem during review. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 38 F 2 X M E S 059 AK1.02 Cred Dist: Replace > 25 with 15 (the annual limit for Lense). Changed per comment Question SAT 7/26. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 39 F 2 X E S 059 G2.4.31 Changed per comment. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 40 H 2 M S 061 K6.02 41 H 2 X X M E S 062 AA2.01 Cred Dist: A is not plausible. Cue: the correct answer is the only answer that has 2B in it. The question is asking for a loop B component. Is there a component that the question stem? pump valve scheme (ex) that has all of one number on one train. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 42 H 2 B S 062 K1.02 43 F 2 N S 062 K4.06 44 F 2 X X B E S 063 K1.03 Cred Distwhy the plausibility statement has them going through an inverter). Since the batteries are normally floated by the charger, it really hard to see them as plausible. Part: At the same time, I think I could argue that if the battery charger voltage fluctuates, there are times when in a normal lineup, that the battery could be supplying the bus. It would be easier to give some voltages and ask what is supplying or ask if the charger goes down, which battery is supplying. Changed question to test knowledge of source based on bus voltage as per comment. Question SAT 7/26. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 45 H 3 X B E S 064 A4.03 Cred Dist: 1st part of C&D: pushing the EMERG START when the DG is already running is not plausible. Changed EMERG START to position ot the EDG SYNC SEL switch. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 46 F 2 N S 065 AK3.08 47 F 3 M S 069 AK2.03 48 F 2 N S 071 A3.01 49 H 2 X N E S 073 A2.01 Changed per comment. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 50 H 3 X X N U S 074 EG2.1.19 SBLOCA (Still have 1300 psig in the RCS) is operationally valid. Cred Dist: A&B are direct lookup. Would be a direct lookup if the candidate is given EOP-12.0, CSFSTs. In this case the candidate has to know where the pertinent parameters are found and apply them to the CSFST logic from memory. It will be ok if there is some additional decision making involved in A&B and containment pressure is lowered. Changed so that has two faulted generators in reference. A LOCA and loss of injection lead to current conditions. Modified in office. Question SAT 7/26. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 51 F 2 X U S 075 K2.03 Cred Dist: A&B SWP breakers staying closed on a loss of power is not plausible unless there are some other big breakers on that bus that will not load shed. Just asking the power supply would be fine. Changed to a question asking B SWP power supply. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 52 F 2 M S 076 K3.07 53 F 2 N S 077 AA1.03 54 H 3 N S 078 K4.02 55 F 2 X N U S 079 K4.01 Cred Dist: A&B Given two compressors with two setpoints, why would I pick either to start at 65 psig? This makes A&B not plausible. Replaced question. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 56 F 2 X M E S 086 A1.01 The answers for this question mix and match the words start and running. A appears to be ok. B, C & D could be eliminated by not mentioning the Jockey Pump. As pressure decreases to < 85 psig, the Jockey Pump will start. This gives the question no correct answers. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 57 H 3 B S 103 K1.02 58 F 2 N S 103 K3.01 59 F 2 N S G 2.1.13 Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 60 H 3 N U S G 2.1.20 Cred Dist: A Waiting 20 minutes in the EOP for a MD pump to return is not plausible. Stem Focus: In the correct answer (C), the answer states to Notify local Operators. Granted that this has to be done to operate the that is used in the left column at step g (2). The procedure RNO column has the local operator OPEN the EFW MS Block and close the MS Header EFW STM SUPPLY. The correct answer (C) states to close the MS Header EFW STM SUPPLY ONLY. This is not true so there are arguably no correct answers. Reduced expected restoration time to 5 minutes. 7/26 Per KS, A distractor not plausible, either replace A distractor or entire question. KA reviewed, there is flexibility in selection of question. Question replaced. Question SAT 8/6. KDS 61 H 2 B E S G 2.1.7 Cred Dist: A not plausible because it state that you are diluting on a down power. D is not plausible because the steam dumps opening would not result in the CRB INSRT LMT LO alarm. Replaced A distracter and adjusted D distracter for clarity. 7/26 per KS, D not plausible, clonsed and revised into a 2x2. Question SAT 8/6. KDS 62 F 2 X N E S G 2.2.39 Cred Dist: B not plausible when your not talking about a safety bus. Changed B an re-odered distracters. Changed wording of stem to say one hour after lockout instead of using 1100 and 1200. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 63 F 2 X M E S G 2.2.40 Changed per comment. Question SAT 7/26. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 64 H 3 X B S/E S G 2.3.11 Stem Focus: Is the 4th bullet needed? If not, remove. Do I have to take the selector switch to CLOSE at all when resetting? Is there a procedure step for this function or is this procedure action only contained in a note? NO change. Per 1MS-41-012-0161, with the valve in open, the only action required to physically open the valve is for the controller to be taken to zero. There are no procedural directions to reset from a radiation spike other than in the note so there is no direction to take valve to close during reset. The 4th bullet is required because RM-A10 also interlocks HCV-0014 closed so the candidate has to know that that monitor is not in alarm. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 65 F 2 X M U S G2.3.12 Cred Dist: No plausible to NOT tag the actual component which makes A&B not plausible. When waiving the IV, is the line left blank? Replaced A and B distracters and reordered. 7/26 per KS, distractor B not plausible. Create 2x2 as a modification to the existing question. Question SAT 8/6. KDS 66 H 2 X M E S G 2.4.32 Stem Focus: Changed per comment Question SAT 7/26. KDS 67 F 2 X N E S 2.4.37 Cred DistLooking at EPP-028 Rev 1, It looks like the correct answer happens for redirects but not dispatches. The TSC contacts the OSC but it n? There may not be a correct answer. Need to discuss. Changed question from how AOs are dispatched to how AOs are redirected. Question SAT 7/26. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 68 H 3 X B U S G 2.4.9 Cred Dist: A&B are not actions. Based on the plant conditions, could I make a reasonable conclusion that I have a loss of all RHR. Rec putting parameters (i.e. Flow fluctuating 400-1200 gpm) Ensure Ops Mgmt ok with asking questions about sequence of steps in procedures. OK. Replaced original A and B distracters, reordered distracters and put RHR flow as per comment. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 69 H 2 X N E S WE01EA2.1 Cred Dist; A Loss of Secondary or Reactor Coolant not plausible with a SGTR and Faulted SG. Walk through procedure to get to EOP 1.5 Replaced distracter with EOP-1.0. 7/26 per KS, EOP-1.0 not plausible. Changed stem to indicate that normal charging is established to add plausibility. Question SAT 8/6. KDS 70 H 2 N S WE03 EK3.3 Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 71 H 3 M E S WE04 EA2.2 Change 2nd Changed per comment. I question whether or not this is really operationally valid. Unless does it make. Does not make a difference which loop only consistent with actual procedure step. Cred Dist: C&D closing both loops at the same time would lose your LP injection and you would risk restarting the leak when you tried to re- With pressure at 1770 psig and decreasing, it is plausible to think that RHR could remain isolated since RHR pumps are typically secured in the EOPs when not injecting. Additionally, if the sole location of the leak is the RHR lines, then transition would be made to EOP-2.0 and then to EOP-1.2 to terminate SI. Raised RCS pressure to make higher above shutoff head of RHR (165 psig). Ensure Ops Mgmt ok with asking questions about sequence of steps in procedures. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 72 H 3 X X N U S WE05 EK2.2 Stem Focus: Will the PZR PORVs open when I still have level in the SGs? As per FR-H.1 basis, RCS pressure and PORV opening at setpoint is a diverse indication for loss of heat sink. Cred Dist: 1st part of C&D, They are told that there is a loss of secondary heat sink in the stem so expecting them to think that the RCPs are secured to minimize coolant loss is not plausible. Replaced with question that has a increased RB pressure and trip due to phase B as a distractor. Question SAT 7/26. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 73 H 3 N S/U S WE07 EK1.2 Walk through the procedure path from the point of the trip with a LOCA and SGTR. If the path is valid, the question is SAT. EOP-1.0 would transfer to EOP-2.0 due to LOCA. Reference page criteria would drive transfer to EOP-4.0. Due to LOCA and SGTR, transfer to EOP-4.2 would occur at Step 21. Due to a lack of expected water going to the RHR sump vs. RWST depletion, transfer would occur at step 16. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 74 H 2 N E S WE11 EK3.2 Cred Dist: D Minimizing SCM to prevent Thermal Shock is not plausible. Changed to inject accumulators. C plausibility statement is confusing in that it talks about depressurizing SGs. Modified in office. Question SAT 7/26. KDS 75 H 3 X N E S WE16 EK3.2 Cred Dist: A gives no reason. Does an evaluation of integrated radiation dose to the instruments need to be done. It seems like your stating that its not required reason for the correct answer C. Simplified answer and distracters for clarity. Need a better explanation of why D is incorrect. Adjusted justification statements. Question SAT 7/26. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 76 H 3 N U/E S 003 AA2.02 Is there any way that the CR is within 12 steps of the bank? No. Control Bank A is fully withdrawn at 100% power. Can the CR be moved? Is it operable? It looks like no based on the answer but how is the applicant to know that? This was implied in the original stem but inserted per comment for clarity. Since a SDM is provided, If I assume that the CR is NOT movable (3.1.3.1.a), I have to be in HOT STBY in 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. Adjusting trip setpoints is performed if I am to stay at power. In the case presented the rod is not immovable due to mechanical interference, i.e., it is trippable. This condition does not require shutdown. Licensee to walk through: AOP-403.5 (Misaligned CR), AOP-403.6 Dropped CR, TS. The control rod is trippable, as stated in the stem. ments without a reference? Reducing trip setpoints to less than or equal to 85% is a 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> requirement. The 85% trip setpoint limit is not listed in the bases. (dmb) Ensure Ops Mgmt is ok with this. Changed to ask which setpoints will be reduced rather than the setpoint. Also changed re-analyzed to reevaluated to be consistent with the bases. Question SAT 8/6. KDS 77 H 3 N E S 003 G2.2.12 If you had a loss of heat sink, assuming that you went through the EOPs (securing RCPs IAW EOP-15) would you remain in Mode 3 or would you be shutting down? The question appears to be technically accurate and at the SRO level, I question its operational validity. Licensee to discuss. The addition of the procedural path or timeline that led to the currently stated conditions could add to the operational validity of the question. (dmb) Removed the discussion of loss of heat sink. Question SAT 8/6. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 78 H 3 X X X N U S 007 A2.02 Stem Focus: With the faulted SG and subsequent falling RCS pressure, a PORV suddenly failing open is not plausible. Am I to assume that the SG is dry and the RCS has filled due to SI? If so, its not operationally valid to assume that no operator actions were taken. does not contain a step for closing the PZR PORV Block Valves. Why would it? (dmb) n EOP-2.0 you check if SI flow should be reduced and then go to EOP-1.2 (Safety Injection Termination) if it should be. (dmb) Why would closing PORV Block Valves be contained in the SI Termination Procedure? This is not an SRO only question. (dmb) Replaced question with one that tests using the SOP to identify a leaking PORV. Question SAT 8/12. KDS 79 H 3 X X M U S 007 EA2.02 Cred Dist: 1st part is a procedure selection which makes it SRO, not racking out a the racking tool if the breaker is closed can you? If you have any procedure that allows this and a breaker that it can be done on, we can discuss. If not, C&D are not plausible. Replaced with question testing actions required to restore ESF bus with alternate source after failure of an EDG to start. Question SAT 8/6. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 80 H 3 X X X B U S 011 A2.06 Stem Focus: Should the applicants know what step 5 is? Cred Dist/Cue: The stem states that SI is not required and asks what required actions are. The 1st part of A&B state to manually initiate SI. I understand that pressure is continuing to decrease but as the question is written, A&B are not plausible. to interpretation (discuss wording). based on RO knowledge since heaters cannot overcome spray. However, based on EOP-1.1 Alternative Action step 8.b.3), the CRS will dsince the same step in the procedure states that you may have to Replaced question with one that tests the same procedure selection but test the use of PORVs and Aux spray. Question SAT 8/6. KDS 81 H 3 X N U S 011 EA2.10 May not be SRO only. Is it RO knowledge to be able to interpret RVLIS Readings? Is it RO knowledge to be able to identify a red path? Licensee to discuss. Changed question to test whether the conditions indicate whether core cooling is adequate rather than identify a procedure title. Question SAT 8/6. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 82 H 3 N E S 022 G2.4.50 Spacing on 2nd bullet. Adjusted spacing. EOP PND was added to valve name in last bullet. Why would the applicants receive EAL classification tables for this question?.....C&P from another question? Question asks about full train of depressurization in accordance with matrix on EAL classification tables so reference is applicable to this question. Stem Focus: In the RNO column for step 7 of Att. 3, if 3107A is not closed, it directs taking the booster pump to PTL and closing 3107A before refilling the system. The way the question is worded (what addresses the condition), filling is incorrect without first securing the booster pump and closing 3107A. Added pla Part: In attachment 3, step 7a: Ensure two Service Water Pumps are correct? The plausibility statement states that if 3107A were closed, it would be correct (referring to RNO step b.1). The procedure states that if 3107A is closed, to start the SW Booster Pump. ???? No alarms indicate that SW pumps failed to start. Choices C and D discuss starting the SWBPs and not the SW pumps. Plausiblity statement is if 3107A had automatically closed and if it was closed when implementing the step not if operators had to close it. (dmb) SOP-117 Section IV M has operators start the SWBP after filling the RBCU lines for 10 minutes at step 2.10. Question SAT 8/6. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 83 F 3 X M U S 025 AA2.05 Are the applicants required to know this? Preventing boron stratification should be added to the answer for can be eliminated based on RO above the line knowledge. Knowledge of the bases is not required when the question can be answered solely by knowing that cavity level is above 23 feet and one train of RHR is in service. (dmb) Changed to a 2x2 that asks if RHR loops operable meet the specification and for the basis for 2800 gpm Question SAT 8/6. KDS 84 H 3 X M E/S S 026 AG2.2.44 Walk through the operability of each train. of CCW to cool it. It is plausible that it might be operable because it can be run indefinitely with local temperature monitoring. wn. be operable. information (memory) and an action. Without reference, question is ok. The reference is provided to provide plausibility for distracters C and D since these items are not required from memory. Removed extra highlighted space on answer B. Question SAT 8/6. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 85 H 3 X N E/S S 028 AA2.02 Stem Focus: Why is the reference provided? I would expect an SRO to know from memory. 3.0.4 applicability statement and actions required in excess of one hour are not required from memory. If minimum channel requirement was the only item being tested, a reference would not be provided. Action 6 states that startup may continue provided the inoperable channel is placed in the tripped condition within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. This is not end of the stem. Do you expect the SRO to know instrument tolerances from memory? (dmb) ROs should know the instrument tolerances since they are the operators who take the logs and report to the CRS if out of tolerance. Can we provide a copy of the log page containing the tolerance? Question SAT 8/6. KDS 86 H 2 N E S 036 AG2.4.41 The nomenclature for the seismic recorder in bullet 4 does not exactly match the classification matrix. (RDCDR versus RCDR) (dmb) Changed to RCDR. Question SAT 8/6. KDS 87 H 2 X M E S 055 EG2.4.21 Cred Dist: 1st part of A&B would be ok unless your comparing to the 1st part of C&D. What if RB pressure peaked at 62 psig, then rapidly reduced to 2 psig (something that would indicate containment breach). Would you transfer out of EOP-EOP-6 is valid for SROs. Cloned and revised question to provide indications for the two red paths to core cooling and eliminated the RB pressure aspect. Question SAT 8/6. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 88 H 3 X X N E S 062 AG2.4.8 Stem Focus: The attached note states that :IF backfill will not cause a loss of SDM or chemistry issue then EOP-4.1A is preferred. With the stating that it would and use EOP-4.1C. Part: If you were going to cooldown using steam dumps, would you also. Caution to EOP-Range level is GREATER THAN 90% [83%] this procedure should NOT be used, since water may exist in the Question SAT 8/8. KDS 89 F 3 X N E S 064 A2.03 Does VC Summer require SRO operators to know 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> specs? The verifications of operability on the train opposite of the inoperable diesel are discussed in the bases. assumptions made to make the 2nd part plausible philosophy for the 1st and 2nd part seem to contradict each other. with Verify operabit would be an action if offsite to 1DA was considered inoperable Rearranged choices. Question SAT 8/6. KDS 90 H 3 X N E S 068 AG2.4.8 Stem Focus: The stem of this question is difficult to put into a sequence. Is EOP-1.1 being run concurrently with FEP-4.0? As I read the question it is. The FEP reference page states that EOP implementation during FEP usage is undesired. It seems that I would have evacuated the CR by the time I had to make the decision to go to EOP-15.0 The actual question appears to be ok but the stem needs some work and we need to walk though to verify that its operationally valid. Worked on stem. Placed fire later in timeline and left loss of heat sink and application of EOP-15.0 until after CR evacuation. Question SAT 8/6. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 91 H 3 X X N U S 072 G2.4.18 Cred Dist: It seems reasonable to assume that RCS pressure is being purposely reduced by using spray to reduce the leak rate. Plus RCPs on until secured by the cooldown procedure. That being said, the second part of B&D appear to not be plausible. Added RM-G19B and C as area radiation monitors to match K/A. Remove discussion of cooldown from second question to make B and D plausible. The step would actually cause RCP trip on low pressure (unless operators know to apply note). Question SAT 8/6. KDS 92 F 3 N S 073 A2.02 93 H 2 N S/E S 086 A2.04 Is the 2nd part question a direct lookup? (dmb) It is not a direct lookup because it requires referencing a drawing and then cross referencing the information obtained to the additional reference. This information is required for Shift Supervisors. Question SAT 8/6. KDS 94 H 2 X X M U S G 2.1.32 Why is information on SG A&B there? Removed A and B SG conditions. Cred Dist: 2nd second part of B&D. Changed distracters A and C. SRO: This appears to be RO knowledge for RCP start criteria. I knowledge there as well. First half is RO. SRO is being claimed on basis of why not allowed to start. Question SAT 8/6. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 95 H 3 X N S/E S G 2.1.5 Without more information about the reason for the TS action, the applicant considers this would delay recovery from a challenge to a safety system function. Need to discuss. (dmb) Discussed, no change. Question SAT 8/6. KDS 96 F 2 X M U S G 2.2.17 Cred Dist: B&C are not plausible when compared to A&D. Replaced question with one that test calculation of risk as an alternate approach to meeting the KA. Question SAT 8/6. KDS 97 F 3 X N E S G 2.2.21 Stem Focus: Can the 1st part of the question be dropped? You would have to know the retest requirement to know which TS applies. Need to discuss the attachment. By giving them the TS page, its setting them up to pick the incorrect answer. We need to agree that operations is ok with this aspect of the question. With regard to the original submittal, the second aspect of the CCW pumps after racking up one breaker and then make the operability call. In order to maintain that context, the first question needs to be asked. Operations is OK with the question as written. Replaced the question with a revised version that eliminates the in which a single train is restored. The reference is required in this case to provide the answer. Question SAT 8/6. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 98 H 2 X N U S G 2.3.6 If the wind was from East- Yes. Yes. Cred Dist: Having to sample the tank before releasing it (when you have made an addition to it) is pretty basic knowledge unless you have an example of when that would not be required. This makes A&B not plausible. Recommend dropping the addition to the tank, keeping the wind direction and asking (1) who has to approve the release and (2) can the release be restarted with the current wind direction. Discuss with examiner that there was a question on the audit that asks who approves a liquid release with one monitor out of service (different system, scenario and question). Changed as per comment to 2x2. Who has to approve (if was >24 hours then would have to get another sample and count room would have to sign off again) and if the current wind direction allows a reestablishing the release. Question SAT 8/6. KDS 99 F 2 X N U S G2.4.28 Cred Dist: A&B are not plausible. D is too obvious as the MOST severe. I am not opposed to another classification question. Replaced question with one that contains hostile action. Question SAT 8/6. KDS Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. B/M/N 7. U/E/S 8. Explanation Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist. Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ units Back-ward Q= K/A SRO Only 100 X X N E S 2.4.40 Is there a site assembly for declaring an Alert? If so, assuming the assembly time is 30 minutes, are there going to be issues with the 1530 time being correct? The question is not asking about evac & account. No site assembly for an Alert Cred Dist: Is it stated anywhere to direct non-essential personnel to their residences? EPP-012 states that it is one of the options. 5.3.1 is the exact announcement made and contains the option to release to personal residences. Stem Focus: It appears in the stem that you are aware of the containment breach with a LOCA (2 barriers) and an alert was then declared. It was then another half hour before a SAE was declared with no other information. Revised question to split out loss of the two barriers. So that declare alert after LOCA and then escalate to a Site Area Emergency after the breach in containment. Question SAT 8/6. KDS