ML18101B004: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL e Docket No.: 50-272 Unit Name: Salem #1 ' Date: 09/11/95 Completed by: Robert Phillips Telephone: | DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL e Docket No.: 50-272 Unit Name: Salem #1 ' Date: 09/11/95 Completed by: Robert Phillips Telephone: | ||
339-2735 Month August 1995 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 0 2 0 18 0 3 0 19 0 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0 11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 0 14 0 30 0 15 0 31 0 16 0 P. 8.1-7 Rl e OPERATING DATA REPORT e Docket No: 50-272 Date: 09/11/95 Completed by: Robert Phillips Telephone: | 339-2735 Month August 1995 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 0 2 0 18 0 3 0 19 0 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0 11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 0 14 0 30 0 15 0 31 0 16 0 P. 8.1-7 Rl e OPERATING DATA REPORT e Docket No: 50-272 Date: 09/11/95 Completed by: Robert Phillips Telephone: | ||
339-2735 Operating status 1. Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes 2. Reporting 1 Period August 1995 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give | 339-2735 Operating status 1. Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes 2. Reporting 1 Period August 1995 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give | ||
: 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any 12. Hours in Reporting Period 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 14. Hours Generator On-Line 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) 19. Unit Service Factor 20. Unit Availability Factor 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate This Month 744 0 0 0 0 0 0 -5500 0 0 0 0 100 NA Year to Date 5831 2660.9 0 2632.1 0 8010326.4 2689850 2532635 45.1 45.1 39.3 39.0 54.9 N/A cumulative 159288 104380.5 0 100388.3 0 318062229.2 105301000 100214799 63.0 63.0 56.9 56.4 22.8 24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each) To be dtermined. | : 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any 12. Hours in Reporting Period 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 14. Hours Generator On-Line 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) 19. Unit Service Factor 20. Unit Availability Factor 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate This Month 744 0 0 0 0 0 0 -5500 0 0 0 0 100 NA Year to Date 5831 2660.9 0 2632.1 0 8010326.4 2689850 2532635 45.1 45.1 39.3 39.0 54.9 N/A cumulative 159288 104380.5 0 100388.3 0 318062229.2 105301000 100214799 63.0 63.0 56.9 56.4 22.8 24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each) To be dtermined. | ||
: 25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup: To be determined. | : 25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup: To be determined. | ||
8-l-7.R2 NO. DATE 2671 8-1-95 F 1 2 F: Forced S: Scheduled DURATION TYPE 1 (HOURS) REASON 2 744 D Reason A-Equipment Failure (explain) | 8-l-7.R2 NO. DATE 2671 8-1-95 F 1 2 F: Forced S: Scheduled DURATION TYPE 1 (HOURS) REASON 2 744 D Reason A-Equipment Failure (explain) | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
TO PREVENT RECURRENCE 3.0.3 5 Exhibit 1 -Same Source lOC:fR50.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: AUGUST 1995 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-272 SALEM 1 09/10/95 DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE: | TO PREVENT RECURRENCE 3.0.3 5 Exhibit 1 -Same Source lOC:fR50.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: AUGUST 1995 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-272 SALEM 1 09/10/95 DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE: | ||
R. HELLER 609-339-5162 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. | R. HELLER 609-339-5162 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. | ||
The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations. | The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations. | ||
: 1. Design Change Packages (DCP) The reporting ofDCP related 10CFR50.59 evaluations is being modified to address these items only after they have been implemented and turned to Operations. | : 1. Design Change Packages (DCP) The reporting ofDCP related 10CFR50.59 evaluations is being modified to address these items only after they have been implemented and turned to Operations. | ||
For the next several months, during this transition phase, we anticipate few new DCPs to report. 2. Temporary Modifications (T-Mod) 95-028 3. Procedures SECG/HECG E-Plan "Boiler Feed Iron Sampling Modification" Rev. 0 -An iron entrainment sample system, consisting of an isolation valve, a pressure regulator, a flow meter, a heat exchanger, a filter assembly, and interconnecting tubing and fittings, will be connected to the Unit 1 Boiler Feedwater Drain Valve 12BF39. This system will be used to obtain data on iron entrained in the feedwater en route to the 16B Feedwater Heater. This modification is in accordance with PSE&G pipe specs and will meet the pressure and temperature limitations of the system. A second isolation valve will be installed to improve modification isolation. | For the next several months, during this transition phase, we anticipate few new DCPs to report. 2. Temporary Modifications (T-Mod) 95-028 3. Procedures SECG/HECG E-Plan "Boiler Feed Iron Sampling Modification" Rev. 0 -An iron entrainment sample system, consisting of an isolation valve, a pressure regulator, a flow meter, a heat exchanger, a filter assembly, and interconnecting tubing and fittings, will be connected to the Unit 1 Boiler Feedwater Drain Valve 12BF39. This system will be used to obtain data on iron entrained in the feedwater en route to the 16B Feedwater Heater. This modification is in accordance with PSE&G pipe specs and will meet the pressure and temperature limitations of the system. A second isolation valve will be installed to improve modification isolation. | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
YES NOJ_ If no, when is it scheduled? (to be determined ) Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: ___ | YES NOJ_ If no, when is it scheduled? (to be determined ) Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: ___ | ||
Important licensing considerations associated with refueling: | Important licensing considerations associated with refueling: | ||
Number of Fuel Assemblies: | Number of Fuel Assemblies: | ||
: a. Incore b. In Spent Fuel Storage Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: | : a. Incore b. In Spent Fuel Storage Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: | ||
Future spent fuel storage capacity: | Future spent fuel storage capacity: |
Revision as of 15:14, 25 April 2019
ML18101B004 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Salem ![]() |
Issue date: | 08/31/1995 |
From: | PHILLIPS R, WARREN C Public Service Enterprise Group |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
References | |
NUDOCS 9509190252 | |
Download: ML18101B004 (9) | |
Text
L ,. e Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attn.: Document Control Desk MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEMN0.1 DOCKET NO: 50-272 September 11, 1995 In compliance with Section 6.9.1.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original copy of the monthly operating reports for the month of August are being sent to you. RH:vls Enclosures C Mr. Thomas T. Martin General Manager -Salem Operations Regional Administrator USNRC, Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19046 8-l-7.R4 The power i9jn
___ _ PDR ADOCK 05000272 . R PDR 95*2168 REV. 6/9
,*
DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL e Docket No.: 50-272 Unit Name: Salem #1 ' Date: 09/11/95 Completed by: Robert Phillips Telephone:
339-2735 Month August 1995 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 0 2 0 18 0 3 0 19 0 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0 11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 0 14 0 30 0 15 0 31 0 16 0 P. 8.1-7 Rl e OPERATING DATA REPORT e Docket No: 50-272 Date: 09/11/95 Completed by: Robert Phillips Telephone:
339-2735 Operating status 1. Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes 2. Reporting 1 Period August 1995 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115 6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give
- 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any 12. Hours in Reporting Period 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 14. Hours Generator On-Line 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) 19. Unit Service Factor 20. Unit Availability Factor 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate This Month 744 0 0 0 0 0 0 -5500 0 0 0 0 100 NA Year to Date 5831 2660.9 0 2632.1 0 8010326.4 2689850 2532635 45.1 45.1 39.3 39.0 54.9 N/A cumulative 159288 104380.5 0 100388.3 0 318062229.2 105301000 100214799 63.0 63.0 56.9 56.4 22.8 24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each) To be dtermined.
- 25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup: To be determined.
8-l-7.R2 NO. DATE 2671 8-1-95 F 1 2 F: Forced S: Scheduled DURATION TYPE 1 (HOURS) REASON 2 744 D Reason A-Equipment Failure (explain)
B-Maintenance or Test C-Refuel ing D-Requlatory Restriction 4 I UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH AUGUST 1995 METHOD OF SHUTTING DOWN *.REACTOR LICENSE EVENT REPORT # -----------
SH 3 , Method: 1-Manua l 2-Manual Scram SYSTEM CODE 4 E-Operator Training & License Examination F-Administrative 3-Automatic Scram 4-Continuation of Previous Outage 5-Load Reduction 9-0ther G-Operational Error (Explain)
H-Other (Explain)
DOCKET NO;: "'"'5""'0'-..,.-=27...,2:..,,.,.---
UNIT NAME: Salem #1 *. DATE: 9-10-95 COMPLETED BY: Robert Phillips TELEPHONE:
609-339-2735 COMPONENT CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION CODE 5 CKTBRK TECH. SPEC. 4 ' Exhibit G -Instructions for Preparation of Data Entry Sheets for Licensee Event Report CLER) File (NUREG-0161)
TO PREVENT RECURRENCE 3.0.3 5 Exhibit 1 -Same Source lOC:fR50.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: AUGUST 1995 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-272 SALEM 1 09/10/95 DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
R. HELLER 609-339-5162 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59.
The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations.
- 1. Design Change Packages (DCP) The reporting ofDCP related 10CFR50.59 evaluations is being modified to address these items only after they have been implemented and turned to Operations.
For the next several months, during this transition phase, we anticipate few new DCPs to report. 2. Temporary Modifications (T-Mod)95-028 3. Procedures SECG/HECG E-Plan "Boiler Feed Iron Sampling Modification" Rev. 0 -An iron entrainment sample system, consisting of an isolation valve, a pressure regulator, a flow meter, a heat exchanger, a filter assembly, and interconnecting tubing and fittings, will be connected to the Unit 1 Boiler Feedwater Drain Valve 12BF39. This system will be used to obtain data on iron entrained in the feedwater en route to the 16B Feedwater Heater. This modification is in accordance with PSE&G pipe specs and will meet the pressure and temperature limitations of the system. A second isolation valve will be installed to improve modification isolation.
This modification is installed on a secondary plant system with no safety related equipment.
The equipment important to safety near this modification is weather tight and will function as per design and would not be impacted from a total failure of the temporary modification.
There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the bases for any Technical Specifications. (SORC 95-097) "Salem ECG Sections I -11, Hope Creek ECG Sections I-11, Emergency Plan Section 5" -The Salem and Hope Creek Event Classification Guides are being revised to provide an improved set of Emergency Action Levels (EALs) and Reporting Action 10C:fR50.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: AUGUST 1995 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: 50-272 SALEM 1 09/10/95 (Cont'd) 4. Safety Evaluations SCN95-037 SCN 95-39 DATE: CO:MPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
R. HELLER 609-339-5162 Levels (RALs) which are consistent with the revised NUMARC methodology on emergency classification.
In addition to revising all EALs, a new document titled "Event Classification Guide Technical Basis", (ECGTB), is being provided for each ECG which will provide the ECG users with a basis and discussion for each EAL. The ECGTB will also provide the calculations and assumptions used to provide the EAL threshold values. Implementation of the NUMARC EALs does not reduce the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan based on NRC acceptance of the methodology.
There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-090) * "Revision of Organization Titles and Duties for Chief Nuclear Officer, Director Quality Assurance and Nuclear Safety Review, Chemistry and Radiation Protection Managers IA W Provisions ofT.S. Amendment 168/150" -This UFSAR revision changes the position titles for the Chief Nuclear Officer and President
-Nuclear Business Unit and for the Director -Quality Assurance and Nuclear Safety Review. There are no changes to the functional responsibilities for either position.
The proposed reorganization splits the Radiation Protection and Chemistry organization into distinct departments (as reflected in Technical Specification Amendments 168/150).
This change is anticipated to improve the oversight in both areas. These changes do not conflict with any Technical Specification requirement or reduce the margin of safety required by the Technical Specifications.
The specific programs and policies are still required by UFSAR Section 12.3.5, Procedures. (SORC 95-092) "Increase in Tech Spec Minimum Volume Required in Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tanks (Salem Amendments 170/152)" -The proposed revisions clarify implementation of the design basis for the storage capacity of the diesel fuel oil storage system. This clarification is necessary to resolve a potential deviation 10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS MONTH: AUGUST 1995 DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
50-272 SALEM 1 09/10/95 R. HELLER 609-339-5162 identified by the NRC during an EDSFI performed at Salem during August and September of 1993. The EDSFI identified that the SAR currently states each 30,000 gallon diesel fuel oil storage tank can supply one EDG with enough fuel oil to operate it for seven days at full load; however, the ability of the as-built system to meet this requirement could not be verified.
The proposed revisions are being made to provide an accurate description of the diesel fuel oil storage system design and operation in the SAR and to raise the Technical Specification fuel oil limit to an acceptable level. These changes, and the identified procedure changes, are being made to enable the diesels to operate for seven days at full load. The EDG fuel Oil Storage System meets the design basis goal by supplying approximately 4 1/2 days from the Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tanks for 2 EDG operation or 2 112 days if 3 EDGs are in operation.
The EPIP provides an action plan for alternate fuel oil supply to replenish the Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tanks from on-site storage or offsite sources to ensure the required fuel supply for seven days. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-094)
REFpELING INFORMATION MONTH: AUGUST 1995 MONTH : AUGUST 1995
- DOCKET NO: UNIT NAME: DATE: COMPLETED BY: TELEPHONE:
50-272 SALEM 1 09/10/95 R. HELLER 609-339-5162 Refueling information has changed from last month: YES X NO __ Scheduled date for next refueling:
07 /10/95 Scheduled date for restart following refueling:
1st quarter 1996 a. Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?
YES NOT DETERMINED TO DATE J_ b. Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?
YES NOJ_ If no, when is it scheduled? (to be determined ) Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: ___
Important licensing considerations associated with refueling:
Number of Fuel Assemblies:
- a. Incore b. In Spent Fuel Storage Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity:
Future spent fuel storage capacity:
Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity:
8-1-7.R4 0 973 1632 1632 September 2008
.. *
- SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING
SUMMARY
.:.
UNIT 1 AUGUST 1995 SALEM UNIT NO. 1 The Unit is in a refueling outage and remained shutdown for the entire period. According to commitments from PSE&G and a subsequent confirmatory action letter from the NRC, both Units will remain shutdown pending completion of the following actions:
- Appropriately address long standing equipment reliability and operability issues
- After the work is completed, conduct a restart readiness review to determine for ourselves the ability of each Unit to operate in a safe, event free manner
- After the restart review, meet with the NRC and communicate the results of that review