ML091271100

2009-02 - Draft Operating Test Comments

ML091271100
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	02/04/2009
From:	McKernon T O NRC Region 4
To:	Southern California Edison Co
References
50-361/09-301, 50-362/09-301 50-361/09-301, 50-362/09-301
Download: ML091271100 (3)

Text

Attachment 10 Page 1 of 3 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process SO - 2009 - 02 DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS ADMIN JPMS

3. Attributes

4. Job Content Errors JPM# 1. Dyn (D/S) 2. LOD (1-5) IC Focus Cues Critical Steps Scope (N/B) Over- lap Job-Link Minutia 5. U/E/S 6. Explanation (See below for instructions)

SRO (A1a) None SRO (A1b) None SRO (A2) None SRO (A3) None SRO (A4) None Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating tests. Additional information on these areas may be found in Exam ination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.

1. Determine whether the task is dynamic (D) or static (S). A dynamic task is one that involves continuous monitoring and response to varying parameters. A static task is basically a system reconf iguration or realignment.

2. Determine level of difficulty (LOD) using established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level fo r the license being tested. 3. Check the appropriate box when an attribute weakness is identified: The initiating cue is not sufficiently clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin. The JPM does not contain sufficient c ues that are objective (not leading). All critical steps (elements) have not been properly identified. Scope of the task is either too narrow (N) or too broad (B). Excessive overlap with other part of operating test or wr itten examination. 4. Check the appropriate box when a job content error is identified: Topics not linked to job content (e.g., di sguised task, not required in real job). Task is trivial and without safety significance. 5. Based on the reviewer

=s judgment, is the JPM as written (U)na cceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory? 6. Provide a brief description of any U or E rating in the explanation column. 7. Save initial review comments as normal black text; indicate how comments were resolved using blue text so that each JPM used on the exam is reflected by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form.

Attachment 10 Page 2 of 3 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process SO - 2009 - 02 DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS CONTROL ROOM/IN-PLANT SYSTEMS JPMS

3. Attributes

4. Job Content Errors JPM# 1. Dyn (D/S) 2. LOD (1-5) IC Focus Cues Critical Steps Scope (N/B) Over- lap Job-Link Minutia 5. U/E/S 6. Explanation (See below for instructions)

S1 None S2 None S3 None S4 None S5 None S6 None S7 None P1 None P2 None P3 None Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating tests. Additional information on these areas may be found in Exam ination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.

1. Determine whether the task is dynamic (D) or static (S). A dynamic task is one that involves continuous monitoring and response to varying parameters. A static task is basically a system reconf iguration or realignment.

2. Determine level of difficulty (LOD) using established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level fo r the license being tested. 3. Check the appropriate box when an attribute weakness is identified:

$ The initiating cue is not sufficiently clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin.

$ The JPM does not contain sufficient c ues that are objective (not leading).

$ All critical steps (elements) have not been properly identified.

$ Scope of the task is either too narrow (N) or too broad (B).

$ Excessive overlap with other part of operating test or wr itten examination. 4. Check the appropriate box when a job content error is identified: Topics not linked to job content (e.g., di sguised task, not required in real job). Task is trivial and without safety significance. 5. Based on the reviewer

=s judgment, is the JPM as written (U)na cceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory? 6. Provide a brief description of any U or E rating in the explanation column. 7. Save initial review comments as normal black text; indicate how comments were resolved using blue text so that each JPM used on the exam is reflected by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form.

Attachment 10 Page 3 of 3 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process SO - 2009 - 02 DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS SCENARIOS Scenario Set 1. ES 2. TS 3. Crit 4. IC 5. Pred 6. TL 7. L/C 8. Eff 9. U/E/S 10. Explanation (See below for instructions)

N /A Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating test scenario sets. Additional information on these areas may be found in Ex amination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the iss ue in the space provided. 1. ES: ES-301 checklists 4, 5, & 6 satisfied.

2. TS: Set includes SRO TS actions for each SRO, with required actions explicitly detailed.

3. Crit: Each manipulation or evolution has explicit success criteria documented in Form ES-D-2.

4. IC: Out of service equipment and other initial conditions reasonably consistent between scenarios and not predictive of scen ario events and actions.

5. Pred: Scenario sequence and other factors avoid predictability issues.

6. TL: Time line constructed, including ev ent and process triggered conditions, such t hat scenario can run without routine exam iner cuing.

7. L/C: Length and complexity for each scenario in the set is reasonable for the crew mix being examined, such that all applicants have reasonably sim ilar exposure and events are needed for evaluation purposes.

8. Eff: Sequence of events is reasonably efficient for examination purposes, especially with respect to long delays or interact ions. 9. Based on the reviewer

=s judgment, rate the scenario set as (U)nacceptable (requiring r epair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory.

10. Provide a brief description of problem in the explanation column.

11. Save initial review comments as normal black text; indicate how comments were resolved using blue text so that each JPM used on the exam is reflected by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form.