ULNRC-03900, Forwards Response to NRC 980715 & 0721 RAIs Re Util 970515 Application for Amend to License NPF-30 to Convert to Improved TS Sections 3.4 & 5.0

From kanterella
(Redirected from ULNRC-03900)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards Response to NRC 980715 & 0721 RAIs Re Util 970515 Application for Amend to License NPF-30 to Convert to Improved TS Sections 3.4 & 5.0
ML20154A276
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 09/24/1998
From: Passwater A
UNION ELECTRIC CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20154A279 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-1431 TAC-M98803, ULNRC-03900, ULNRC-3900, NUDOCS 9810020255
Download: ML20154A276 (10)


Text

__

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - ' - - -

! Union Elsctric One Ameren Plaza p ,,

1901 Chouteau Avenue r

PO Box 66149 b

St. louis, MO 631646149 September 24,1998 msnmu U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Station PI-137 Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 5

ULNRC-03900 Gentlemen: TAC NO. M98803 DOCKET NUMBER 50-483 CALLAWAY PLANT gf4 UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED CONVERSION TO THE

[ IMPROVED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS 3.4 ANQLO

References:

1. ULNRC-03578 dated May 15,1997
2. Letter dated July 15,1998 from K. M. Thomas, NRC, to G. L. Randolph

( 3. Letter dated July 21,1998 from K. M. Thomas, NRC, to G. L. Randolph Union Electric Company requested an amendment to the Callaway Facility Operating License (NPF-30) by incorporating changes to the Technical Specifications (TS) as provided in Reference 1. The NRC staff requested additional information regasding Section 3.4, " Reactor Coolant System," and 5.0,

" Administrative Controls" of the proposed TS changes in References 2 and 3. The requested information is provided in the Attachments to this letter as are any additional changes needed for Section 3.4 and Section 5.0 as identified by Union Electric Company, o

This letter and its Attachments are not a supplement to Reference I and have not been reviewed by the Onsite Review Committee or Nuclear Safety Review /

Board. A supplement to Reference I will be provided at a later date.

Ifyou have any questions concerning this response, please contact us.

\

Sincerely, d

' Q 9810020255 990924 PDR P

ADOCK 05000483

' PDR

? Ad#

Alan C. Passwater N"

Manager, Corporate Nuclear Services GGY/pir Attachments a subsidiary of Amoren Corporation

1 a

l STATE OF MISSOURI )

) SS CITY OF ST. LOUIS )

Alan C. Passwater, of lawful age, being first duly sworn upon oath says that he is Manager, Corporate Nuclear Services for Union Electric Company; that he has read the foregoing document and knows the content thereof; that he l has executed the same for and on behalf of said company with j full power and authority to do so; and that the facts l therein stated are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.

d'NM f ~

By -

Alan C. Passwater Manager, Corporate Nuclear Services SUBSCRIBED and sworn to befc,re me this M day of .Nrpit'm /VL , 1998.

$dA / 72 W

,,es.s T t i c = & ,..

icmeGWBenci

0. . . iA.

PATRICIA L REYNOLDS WTARY PURU0-6 TATE OF RAWOW ST. LOUIS COUNTY Iff CORARIGIONEXPNB DE 4m

it e.

e cc: M. H. Fletcher Professional Nuclear Consulting, Inc. l

-19041 Raines Drive Derwood, MD 20855-2432 Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 61*1 Ryan Plaza L tve Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 Senior Resident Inspector Callaway Resident Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 8201 NRC Road Steedman, MO 65077 Kristine M. Thomas (2)

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1 White Flint, North, Mail Stop 13E16 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Manager, Electric Department Missouri Public Service Commission P.O. Box 360 Jefferson City, MO 65102 Ron Kucera Department of Natural Resources )

P.O. Box 176 l Jefferson City, MO 65102 1 Denny Buschbaum TU Electric P.O. Box 1002 Glen Rose, TX 76043 Pat Nugent Pacific Gas & Electric Regulatory Services P.O. Box 56 Avila Beach, CA 93424

.~. .- . - . . . . . - . - . - . . - - - ._ . _ . -. . .._.... . . ._-.. - .

JLS CONVERSION TO IMPROVED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CTS 3.4 - REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM ITS 3.4 - REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND LICENSEE INITIATED

ADDITIONAL CHANGES I

t 1

l s

INDEX OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION l

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION APPLICABILITY ENCLOSED NUMBER 3.4. Gen-1 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.1-1 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.1-2 CA, CP, DC, WC YES l 3.4.1-3 DC NA

( 3.4.2-1 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.3-1 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.4-1 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.5-1 CA,'NC YES 3.4.5-2 CA, WC YES 3.4.5-3 CA, WC YES 3.4.5-4 CP NA 3.4.6-1 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.6-2 DC NA 3.4.7-1 WC NA 3.4.7-2 WC NA 3.4.7-3 CA YES 3.4.8-1 CA, CP, DC, WC YES l 3.4.8-2 DC NA 3.4.9-1 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.9-2 CA YES 3.4.9-3 CP, DC, WC NA i

! 3.4.9-4 DC NA 3.4.10-1 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.11-1 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.11-2 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.11-3 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.11-4 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.11-5 WC NA 3.4.11-6 CA, CP, WC YES 3.4.12-1 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.12-2 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.12-3 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.12-4 CA, CP, WC YES 3.4.12-5 CA, WC YES 3.4.12-6 DC NA 3.4.12-7 CP NA 3.4.12-8 CP NA i 3.4.13-1 DC,WC NA l 3.4.13-2 CA, CP, DC, WC YES ,

i 3.4.13-3 CA, CP, WC YES

, 3.4.13-4 CP,DC NA 3.4.13-5 DC NA 3.4.13-6 CA YES

1

! INDEX OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (cont.)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION APPLICABILITY ENCLOSED NUMBER 3.4.14-1 CA, CP, WC YES 3.4.14-2 CP, DC, WC NA 3.4.14-3 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.14-4 CA, WC YES 3.4.14-5 DC, WC NA 3.4.15-1 CA, DC, WC YES I

3.4.15-2 CA, WC YES 3.4.15-3 WC NA 3.4.15-4 CP, DC NA 3.4.15-5 DC NA 3.4.16-1 CA, CP, DC, WC YES 3.4.16-2 WC NA 3.4.16-3 WC NA 3.4.G-1 CP NA CA 3.4-002 CA YES CA 3.4-003 CA YES CA 3.4-004 CA, CP, DC, WC YES CP 3.4-004 CP NA DC 3.4-ED DC NA DC ALL-001 (3.4 changes only) DC NA l DC ALL-002 (3.4 changes only) DC NA l

DC ALL-005 (3.4 changes only) DC NA DC 3.4-003 DC NA TR 3.4-004 CA, CP, DC, WC YES

, TR 3.4-005 CA, CP, DC, WC YES

! TR 3.4-006 CA, CP, DC, WC YES TR 3.4-009 CA, CP, DC, WC YES WC 3.4-001 WC, CP NA l

WC 3.4-002 CA, CP, DC, WC YES WC 3.4-004 WC NA i

WC 3.4-006 WC NA WC 3.4-007 WC, CA, DC YES WC 3.4-008 WC, CA YES WC 3.4-009 WC NA WC 3.4-0010 WC, CA YES l

1

_ -__ _ _ - _ - . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ . _ . . _ . _ _ . __m.

JOINT LICENSING SUBCOMMITTEE METHODOLOGY FOR PROVIDING ADDITIONALINFORMATION The following methodology is followed for submitting additional information:

1, Each licensee is submitting a separate response for each section.
2. If an RAI does not apply to a licensee (i.e., does not actually impact the information that defines the technical specification change for that licensee), "NA" has been entered in the index column labeled " ENCLOSED" and no information is provided in the response for that licensee.
3. If a licensee initiated change does not apply, "NA" has been entered in the index column labeled " ENCLOSED" and no information is provided in the response for that Ucensee.
4. The common portions of the " Additional Information Cover Sheets" are identical, except for brackets, where applicable (using the same methodology used in enclosures 3A, 3B,4,6A and 6B of the conversion submittals). The list of attached pages will vary to 1 match the licensee specific conversion submittals. A licensee's FLOG response may not address all applicable plants if there is insufficient similarity in the plant specific responses to justify their inclusion in each submittal. In those cases, the response wi;i be prefaced with a heading such as " PLANT SPECIFIC DISCUSSION."
5. Changes are indicated using the redline / strikeout tool of Wordperfect or by using a  !

hand markup that indicates insertions and deletions. If the area being revised is not  ;

clear, the affected portion of the page is circled. The markup techniques vary as l necessary, based on the specifics of the area being changed and the complexity of the changes, to provide the clearest possible indication of the changes.

6. A marginal note (the Additional Information Number from the index) is added in the right margin of each page being changed, adjacent to the area being changed, to identify the source of each change.
7. Some changes are not applicable to one licensee but still require changes to the l Tables provided in Enclosures 3A,3B,4,6A, and BB of the originallicense amendment request to reflect the changes being made by one or more of the other licensees.

These changes are not included in the additional information for the licensee to which the change does not apply, as the changes are only for consistency, do not technically affect the request for that licensee, and are being provided in the additional information being provided by the licensees for which the change is applicable. The complete set of changes for the license amendment request will be provided in a licensing amendment request supplement to be provided later.

. J

JOINT LICENSING SUBCOMMITTEE METHODOLOGY FOR PROVIDING ADDITIONALINFOhMATION (continued)

8. The item numbers are formatted as follows: [ Source][lTS Section]-(nnn]

Source = Q - NRC Ouestion CA- AmerenUE DC-PG&E-WC - WCNOC CP - TU Electric TR - Traveler  ;

ITS Section = The ITS section associated with tie : tem (e.g., 3.3). If all sections are potentially impacted by a broad change or set of ch::.1ges, "ALL"is used for the section number.

nnn = a three digit sequential number or ED (ED indicates editorial correction with no impact on meaning) i

l ADDITIONAL INFORMATION COVER SHEET ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NO: Q 3.4. Gen-1 APPLICABILITY: CA, CP, DC, WC l REQUEST: ITS 3.4.x Bases 1

! There have been a number of instances that the specific changes to the STS Bases are not properly identified with redline or strikeout marks.

l Comment: Perform an audit of all STS Bases markups and identify instances where additions and/or deletions of Bases were not properly idenufied in the original submittal.

i FLOG RESPONSE: The submitted ITS Bases markups for Section 3.4 have been compared to the STS Bases. Some differences that were identified were in accordance with the markup methodologies (e.g., deletion of brackets and reviewer's notes). Most of the differences were l editorial in nature and would not have affected the review. Examples of editorial changes are:

1) Capitalizing a letter with only a " redline" but not striking out the lower case letter that it replaced.

!. Changing a verb from singular to plural by adding an "s" without redlining 2) the "s".

3) Deleting instead of striking-out the A, B, C, etc., following a specification title (e.g., SR 3.6.6A.7).
4) Changing a bracketed reference (in the reference section) v ith only a

" redline" for the new reference but failing to include the strika-out of the old reference.

5) In some instances the brackets were retained (and struck-out) but the unchanged text within the brackets was not redlined.
6) Not redlining a title of a bracketed section. The methodology calls for the section title to be redlined when an entire section wa . ' mcketed.
7) Additional text not contained in the STS Bases was added to the ITS Bases by the lead FLOG member during the development of the ,

submittal. Once it was determined to not be applicable, the text was then struck-out and remains in the ITS Bases markup.

Differences of the above editorial nature will not be provided as attachments to this response.

The pages requiring changes that are more than editorial and are not consistent with the l markup methodology are attached.

l l

l l

ATTACHED PAGES:

Attachment 10, CTS 3/4.4 - ITS 3.4 Enclosure 58, pages B 3.4-2, B 3.4-8, B 3.4-14, B 3.4-19, B 3.4-25, B 3.4-26, B 3.4-28, B 3.4-31, B 3.4-39, B 3.4-40, B 3.4-46, B 3.4-47, B 3.4-48, B 3.4-49, B 3.4-50, B 3.4-57, B 3.4-59, B 3.4-60, B 3.4-61, B 3.4-63, B 3.4-65, 9 3.4-66, B 3.4-67, B 3.4-68, B 3.4-69, B 3.4-70, B 3.4-71, B 3.4-73, B 3.4-74, B 3.4-77, B 3.4-83, B 3.4-84, B 3.4-87, B 3.4-88, B 3.4-92, B 3.4-95, B 3.4-98, B 3.4-102, and B 3.4-106

'T 4