U-600301, Final Deficiency Rept 55-85-06 Re Wiring & Workmanship Defects in safety-related Electrical Panels.Initially Reported on 850626.Panels Reworked & Engineering Drawings Corrected

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Deficiency Rept 55-85-06 Re Wiring & Workmanship Defects in safety-related Electrical Panels.Initially Reported on 850626.Panels Reworked & Engineering Drawings Corrected
ML20138P499
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/24/1985
From: Hall D
ILLINOIS POWER CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
55-85-06, 55-85-6, U-600301, NUDOCS 8511070204
Download: ML20138P499 (6)


Text

,

. biv1 (L i '.' U- 600301

., L14-85 (10 - 24 ) -L 1A.120

/LLINDIS POWER COMPANY October 24, 1985 Docket No. 50-461 Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Adminiscrator Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137

Subject:

Reportable 10CFR50.55(e) Deficiency 55-85-06:

Wiring and Workmanship Deficiencies in Safetv-Related Vendor Supplied Electrical Panels

Dear Mr. Keppler:

On June 26, 1985, Illinois Power Company notified Mr. F. Jablonski, NRC Region III, (ref: IP memorandum Y-36012 dated June 26, 1985) of a potentially reportable deficiency under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e) concerning various internal wiring and workmanship deficiencies in vendor supplied safety-related electrical panels. The quality and adequacy of certain panels to perform their intended design function was indeterminate. This initial notification was followed by one (1) interim report (Ref:

IP letter U-600204, D. P. Hall to J. G. Keppler dated July 26, 1985). Our investigation of this matter is complete.

Illinois Power has reviewed and evaluated the findings associated with this investigation and has determined that the identified deficiencies associated with the excessively bent lugs and broken conductor strands could have resulted in a condition adverse to the safety of operations of the Clinton Power Station (CPS). On this basis the issue is considered to be reportable under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e). This letter is submitted as a final report in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.55(e).

Attachment A provides the details of our investigation.

E' Mi !!!#ds PDR l0CT281985 2: ets 7 ' \ l

.. _ - . . . . .- . - . - . ~ - . . . . _ - . . _ . . .

{

i U- 600301 4 -

.. L14-85( 10-24 )-L I 1A.120

) We trust that this final report provides you sufficient background information to perform a general assessment of l

this reportable deficiency and adequately describes our 3

overall approach to resolve this issue.

) ours, l  !

l

. P. Hall Vice President

, RLC/cke Attachment i cc: NRC Resident Office

Director, Office of I&E, USNRC, Washington, DC 20555 i' Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety
INFO Records Center

{ B. L. Siegel, NRC Clinton Licensing Project Manager i

i 1

N j

1 1

3 l

I f

-l 1

5 i

4 i

i

- _ . . _. . . _ . . ._ .- . - . . . . . . , _ . . _ , _ _ _ _ _ . _ , , . - , _ , _ _ _ . . . , _ _ . . . - _ . . . . - . . . . _ , _ _ ~ , _ . - . .

U-600301 L14-85 40 -24 )-L 1A.120 ATTACHMENT A Illinois Power Company Clinton Power Station Docket No. 50-461 Reportable 10CFR50.55(e) Deficiency 55-85-06:

Wiring and Workmanship Deficiencies in Safety-Related Vendor Supplied Electrical Panels Final Report Statement of Reportable Deficiency / Background A condition potentially adverse to quality was identified in the area of vendor supplied safety-related electrical panels involving internal wiring and workmanship deficiencies.

Prompted by reports of documentation, wiring, and workmanship deficiencies at Enrico Fermi, Beaver Valley II, and other nuclear power plants, Illinois Power Quality Assurance (IPQA) Department initiated a sampling inspection program of safety-related electrical panels at the Clinton Power Station (CPS). The initial inspections identified instances of internal wiring and workmanship deficiencies involving various vendors. A 10CFR50.55(e) investigation was initiated to address class IE electrical panels. A list of panels to be inspected was generated from Sargent &

Lundy's Mechanical Department Equipment List. Panels with no internal vendor wiring, and panels previously inspected or evaluated as being acceptable were excluded. The following panels were excluded:

1. The General Electric Power Generation Control Complex (PGCC) had previously been inspected on a sample basis with no significant discrepancies identified. The PGCC had also been factory inspected to verify all indent-compression (crimp) connections. Additionally the PGCC was subject to four audits by Illinois Power Quality Assurance (IPQA) Department during the manufacturing period.

No findings related to workmanship were issued.

2. MCC Powers' Panels were also excluded from reinspection based on a sample inspection which indicated overall satisfactory workmanship with no significant deficiencies identified.

Investigation Results Illinois Power Quality Assurance (IPQA) reviewed for adequacy the following Baldwin Associates' procedures for field modifications and inspection of electrical panel equipment:

Page 1 of 4

ATTACHMENT A

. (continued)

1. BAP 2.3, Rev. 13, Receiving and Issuance
2. BAP 2.10, Rev. 11, Equipment Installation
3. BAP 3.3.3, Rev. 7, Cable Terminations.

The above review by IPQA concluded that the contractors' procedures were adequate to preclude workmanship deficiencies resulting from work performed on electrical panels by the constructor.

A total of 98 Class IE electrical panels were included in our inspection effort, comprised of medium voltage switchgear, low voltage switchgear, motor control centers, and other electrical equipment. This inspection resulted in the initiation of 77 Nonconforming Material Reports (NCMRs) which documented identified deficiencies. The following major deficiencies were identified:

1. Improperly made indent-compression (crimp) connections.
2. Broken conductor strands in excess of allowable.
3. Conductor insulation not under the jacket of insulated lugs.
4. Missing or incorrect identification on wire or at terminating device.
5. Panel internal wiring not to the vendors'/ engineers' drawings.

Corrective Action Corrective action associated with this investigation includes physical rework of panels as well as vendors' and engineers drawing corrections as required by the NCMR dispositions.

Some reported differences between physical installations and drawings (at the time of inspections) were simply due to either physical work not yet performed (from design changes) or design change documents still outstanding against drawings. Because no problems were discovered in the tracking mechanisms in these areas, no corrective action

, for these differences is required.

A small number of vendors' and engineers' (vendor reproduced) drawings contained omissions (i.e. , jumper not shown) or did not show as-built wiring. These drawings are being corrected in accordance with approved procedures.

It is anticipated that all corrective action associated with this investigation will be completed by November 30, 1985.

Page 2 of 4

.. ATTACHMENT A

. (continued)

Root Cause Our investigation of this matter has determined the root cause(s) to be:

A lack of attention to details by the vendor surveillance and receipt inspection personnel regardin vendors'gfacilities, the inspection and of work performed inspection of fieldat the modifications performed at the Clinton Power Station (CPS).

Safety Implications of Identified Deficiencies The following is a discussion of the safety implications associated with the five (5) major deficiencies identified as a result of this investigation:

1. Problems with indent-compression connections (crimping practices).

Of the observed deficient conditions, instances of poorly crimped conductors were the most numerous.

If one of the improperly crimped wires were to detach from its lug under vibratory seismic loadings, a loss of function of the equipment could result.

There were two generic problems reported with crimping practices.

The first generic problem concerned the wire not extending to the end of the lug barrel. If the wire extends beyond the barrel indent, the wire is adequately captured within the crimp, and is acceptable.

The second generic problem concerned twisted, or excessively bent lugs. Copper work-hardens, and eventually cracks and breaks. Thus, the condition of a twisted or excessively bent lug is indeterminate, and could crack and break due to vibratory motion.

2. Broken conductor strands.

Several instances were found where conductors were partially cut or nicked, and conductor strands were broken. In specific instances conductor damage was excessive, resulting in reduced Page 3 of 4

,- ATTACHMENT A

, (continued) conductor capacity. If left uncorrected, this could cause failure of the equipment to perform its intended functions.

3. Conductor insulation not under jacket of insulated lugs.

A slight gap between the conductor insulation and lug insulation would not adversely affect the termination of the circuit. The installed configuration on the terminal block would have effectively isolated the exposed conductor from possible shorts.

4. Missing or incorrect identification on wire or at terminating device.

A missing or incorrect label has no effect on circuit performance.

5. Panel internal wiring not to engineers' (vendor reproduced) drawings.

One case was found in the hydrogen recombiner panel where the as installed condition did not agree with the engineers' drawings for wiring to several internal devices. However, the panels were functionally correct, and had been checked and tested for proper circuit and system function in the factory.

Safety Implication / Significance Illinois Power has reviewed and evaluated the findings associated with this investigation and has determined that the identified deficiencies associated with the excessively bent lugs and broken conductor strands could have resulted in a condition adverse to the safety of operations of CPS.

On this basis the issue is considered to be reportable under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e).

Page 4 of 4