Semantic search
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Issue date | Title | Topic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PY-CEI-NRR-2284, Comment Opposing Proposed Generic Communication, Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal | 21 May 1998 | Comment Opposing Proposed Generic Communication, Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal | Enforcement Discretion |
| PY-CEI-NRR-2269, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.NRC Should Demonstrate That Not Only Is Code Process Flawed,But That Proposed Change Justified from Cost Versus Safety Protective | 3 April 1998 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.NRC Should Demonstrate That Not Only Is Code Process Flawed,But That Proposed Change Justified from Cost Versus Safety Protective | Dissimilar Metal Weld Backfit |
| PY-CEI-NRR-2034, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Reporting Requirements for Unauthorized Use of Licensed Radioactive Matl | 11 March 1996 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Reporting Requirements for Unauthorized Use of Licensed Radioactive Matl | Stolen |
| ML20096E247 | 3 January 1996 | Comment on PRM 50-64 Re Stockpiling Ki for Use as Thyroid Protectant in Event of Nuclear Accident.Supports Distribution of Ki to Public | Chernobyl |
| ML20045B566 | 7 June 1993 | Comment Re Proposed Generic Communication on Mod of TS Administrative Control Requirements for Emergency & Security Plans,As Published in Fr on 930401 (58FR17293).Believes Concept of Technical Review Not Addressed by STS | |
| ML20044E278 | 13 May 1993 | Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Emergency Planning Exercise from Annual to Biennial | |
| ML20114D254 | 31 August 1992 | Comment Opposing Proposed Concentration Averaging & Encapsulation Technical Position | |
| PY-CEI-NRR-1530, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Minor Mods to Nuclear Power Reactor Event Reporting Requirements | 27 July 1992 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Minor Mods to Nuclear Power Reactor Event Reporting Requirements | Safe Shutdown Condition Adverse to Quality Backfit |
| PY-CEI-NRR-1524, Comment on Proposed Suppl 1 to NRC Bulletin 90-01, Loss of Fill Oil in Transmitters Mfg by Rosemount. Endorses NUMARC & BWR Owners Group Comments.Enhanced Surveillance Programs Appropriate & Effective in Resolving Transmitter Concern | 20 July 1992 | Comment on Proposed Suppl 1 to NRC Bulletin 90-01, Loss of Fill Oil in Transmitters Mfg by Rosemount. Endorses NUMARC & BWR Owners Group Comments.Enhanced Surveillance Programs Appropriate & Effective in Resolving Transmitter Concerns | |
| ML20094K668 | 16 March 1992 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Environ Review for Renewal of Operating Licenses & Requests That Perry Unit 2 Be Included within Scope of Proposed Rulemaking | License Renewal |
| PY-CEI-NRR-1448, Comments on Draft Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys - 10CFR50.72 & 50.73:Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting | 30 January 1992 | Comments on Draft Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys - 10CFR50.72 & 50.73:Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting | Unanalyzed Condition |
| ML20077C370 | 10 May 1991 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery | |
| ML20058H438 | 19 October 1990 | Comment Conditionally Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Scope of Environ Effects Concerning License Renewal Process | License Renewal |
| ML20245D248 | 16 June 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. NRC Must Consider Provision in Rule to Permit Indiscriminate Storage of Spent Fuel at Reactors | |
| ML20246P085 | 17 March 1989 | Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-20-19 Requiring Detectable Odor to Be Injected Into Radioactive Emissions of Nuclear Power Plants & All Other Facilities | |
| PY-CEI-NRR-0976, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint for Nuclear Plants.Strongly Support NUMARC Position & Emphasize That Rule Unnecessary W/Many Required Program Elements Already in Place at Plant.Rule Would Do More Harm than Good | 27 February 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint for Nuclear Plants.Strongly Support NUMARC Position & Emphasize That Rule Unnecessary W/Many Required Program Elements Already in Place at Plant.Rule Would Do More Harm than Good | Backfit |
| ML20235T549 | 22 February 1989 | Comment on Behalf of Ocre Re Proposed Rule Concerning OL Amend Request.Amend Request,As Submitted,Deficient Because Stability Analysis Not Conducted | |
| PY-CEI-NRR-0941, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util in Agreement W/Majority of Comments Submitted by NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group | 18 November 1988 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util in Agreement W/Majority of Comments Submitted by NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group | Fitness for Duty Backfit |
| ML20206D178 | 10 November 1988 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program for Nuclear Power Plants.Objects to Any Testing Being Performed Until Completely Satisfied W/Ruling | Fitness for Duty |
| ML20195F342 | 3 June 1988 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations.New England Needs Energy | |
| ML20151B515 | 11 March 1987 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning | |
| ML20150F352 | 24 February 1987 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning | |
| ML20151D908 | 16 February 1987 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning | Chernobyl |