Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Issue dateTitleTopic
LIC-99-0094, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Eliminating Requirement for Licensees to Revise Their Inservice Insp & Testing Programs Beyond Baseline Edition & Addenda of ASME Code1 October 1999Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Eliminating Requirement for Licensees to Revise Their Inservice Insp & Testing Programs Beyond Baseline Edition & Addenda of ASME Code
ML20216F67617 September 1999Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & NUREG-1022,Rev 1Backfit
LIC-99-0082, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to NRC Emergency Preparedness Regulations on Use of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans10 September 1999Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to NRC Emergency Preparedness Regulations on Use of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans
LIC-98-0168, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Concerns Raised by NEI Well Founded & Endorses NEI Comments9 December 1998Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Concerns Raised by NEI Well Founded & Endorses NEI CommentsProbabilistic Risk Assessment
LIC-98-0052, Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal27 March 1998Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated CharcoalEnforcement Discretion
LIC-97-0034, Comment on Proposed Rev to RG 5.62, Reporting of Safeguards Events. Generally Draft Suggests More Stringent Reporting Requirements than Industry Now Following in Generic Ltr 91-03.No Analysis Performed to Determine Cost/Benefit2 March 1998Comment on Proposed Rev to RG 5.62, Reporting of Safeguards Events. Generally Draft Suggests More Stringent Reporting Requirements than Industry Now Following in Generic Ltr 91-03.No Analysis Performed to Determine Cost/Benefit
LIC-98-0025, Comment on Proposed Communications Re Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at NPP24 February 1998Comment on Proposed Communications Re Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at NPPAnticipated operational occurrence
Incorporated by reference
Backfit
LIC-97-0136, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 73, Frequency of Reviews & Audits for Emergency Preparedness Programs, Safeguards Contingency Plans & Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors28 August 1997Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 73, Frequency of Reviews & Audits for Emergency Preparedness Programs, Safeguards Contingency Plans & Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20151L99024 July 1997Comments on NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Tests or Experiments)
ML20141B8826 May 1997Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements.Rule Should Not Be Limited to Designated Licensee or licensee-owned Vehicles,For Listed Reasons
LIC-97-0052, Comment Opposing Proposed safety-conscious Work Environ Strategies17 April 1997Comment Opposing Proposed safety-conscious Work Environ Strategies
ML20128F65726 September 1996Comment on Proposed Generic Communication Re Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism & Other Vessel Head Penetrations
LIC-96-0110, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mod to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements5 August 1996Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mod to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements
ML20117P09618 June 1996Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors. Any Addl Costs Imposed on Licensee Due to Change in Decommissioning Funding Will Aggravate Potential InvestmentDecommissioning Funding Plan
LIC-96-0069, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.76, Reporting Reliability & Availability Info for Risk-Significant Sys & Equipment11 June 1996Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.76, Reporting Reliability & Availability Info for Risk-Significant Sys & EquipmentProbabilistic Risk Assessment
LIC-95-0193, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of NPPs11 October 1995Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of NPPs
LIC-95-0165, Comments Supporting Revised Salp29 August 1995Comments Supporting Revised SalpSystematic Assessment of Licensee Performance
ML20086T39120 July 1995Comments on Proposed Generic Communications Re Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits
LIC-95-0116, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control25 May 1995Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control
LIC-95-0106, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial22 May 1995Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial
LIC-94-0236, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Frequency of Medical Exams for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment. Util Feels Proposed Change Would Be Beneficial in Terms of Cost Savings11 November 1994Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Frequency of Medical Exams for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment. Util Feels Proposed Change Would Be Beneficial in Terms of Cost Savings
LIC-94-0137, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50 & 73 Concerning Frequency for Conducting Independent Reviews & Audits of Safeguards Contingency Plan & Security Program18 July 1994Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50 & 73 Concerning Frequency for Conducting Independent Reviews & Audits of Safeguards Contingency Plan & Security Program
LIC-94-0072, Informs That Implementation of Proposed Rulemaking at Plant Would Require Numerous Procedure Changes,Addl Dosimetry for Members of Public, & Changes to Chemical Effluent Release Software Due to Deletion of Term Controlled Area31 March 1994Informs That Implementation of Proposed Rulemaking at Plant Would Require Numerous Procedure Changes,Addl Dosimetry for Members of Public, & Changes to Chemical Effluent Release Software Due to Deletion of Term Controlled Area
LIC-94-0047, Comment on Draft NUREG-1482, Guidelines for IST Programs at Npps. Licensee Should Not Have to State in IST Program Methods of Ensuring Code Compliance,If Licensee Complying W/ Code18 February 1994Comment on Draft NUREG-1482, Guidelines for IST Programs at Npps. Licensee Should Not Have to State in IST Program Methods of Ensuring Code Compliance,If Licensee Complying W/ CodeSafe Shutdown
Stroke time
Grace period
LIC-94-0035, Comments on Proposed GL Guidance for Mod of Tech Specs to Reflect Revs to 10CFR20 & 10CR50.36,related Current Industry Initiatives & Miscellaneous Related Editorial Clarifications4 February 1994Comments on Proposed GL Guidance for Mod of Tech Specs to Reflect Revs to 10CFR20 & 10CR50.36,related Current Industry Initiatives & Miscellaneous Related Editorial ClarificationsDeep Dose Equivalent
LIC-93-0300, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPPs20 December 1993Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPPs
ML20045H3236 July 1993Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Supports RuleJob Performance Measure
ML20096A0351 May 1992Comment on Petition for Rulemaking, Elimination of Requirements Marginal to SafetyFire Protection Program
ML20094K78317 March 1992Comments Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-57 Re Insurance Requirements for Shutdown Reactors
ML20092D27931 January 1992Comment Supporting & Endorsing Positions Submitted by NUMARC & BWR Owners Group Re Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys
ML20086F89311 November 1991Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-30-59 Re Rev of Decommissioning Regulations to Provide for Means of self-guarantee of Decommissioning Funding Costs by Licensees Meeting Stringent Financial Assurance Requirements
ML20085K15823 October 1991Supports Proposed Rule 10CFR50,requiring That NRC Evaluate Decommissioning Funding Plans for Power Reactors That Shut Down Prematurely on case-by-case BasisDecommissioning Funding Plan
LIC-91-0063, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986- 1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a15 April 1991Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986- 1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a
LIC-91-0046, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule (Misc 90-10), Regulatory Impact Survey Rept25 January 1991Comment Supporting Proposed Rule (Misc 90-10), Regulatory Impact Survey Rept
LIC-90-0820, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses NUMARC Comments12 October 1990Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses NUMARC CommentsLicense Renewal
ML20012C64712 March 1990Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Thermal Shock Events. Recommends That Use of Credible Surveillance Data Be Allowed to Establish Consistent Calculational Method W/Reg Guide
ML19353B20930 November 1989Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Supports NUMARC Position
ML20246K2445 July 1989Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Enactment of Generic Ltr 89-02 Requirements & Info Sharing Would Achieve Desired Results
LIC-88-1031, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty. Endorses NUMARC Comments.Believes That 100% Annual Testing Frequency Appropriate as Adequate Deterrent & More than 100% Would Install Burden of Excess for Certain Employees21 November 1988Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty. Endorses NUMARC Comments.Believes That 100% Annual Testing Frequency Appropriate as Adequate Deterrent & More than 100% Would Install Burden of Excess for Certain EmployeesFitness for Duty