Semantic search
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Issue date | Title | Topic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NG-99-1232, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50.48, Fire Protection, & App R to 10CFR50, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to 790101 | 24 September 1999 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50.48, Fire Protection, & App R to 10CFR50, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to 790101 | Fire Protection Program |
| NG-99-1296, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Approves mark-up to Draft Revision 2 to NUREG-1022 with Description & Basis for Each Change for Review & Consideration | 20 September 1999 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Approves mark-up to Draft Revision 2 to NUREG-1022 with Description & Basis for Each Change for Review & Consideration | Safe Shutdown Unanalyzed Condition Time of Discovery High Radiation Area Fire Barrier Fuel cladding |
| NG-99-1263, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Change to 10CFR50.47, Emergency Plans & Endorsing L Hendricks Ltr Re Use of Potassium Iodide | 10 September 1999 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Change to 10CFR50.47, Emergency Plans & Endorsing L Hendricks Ltr Re Use of Potassium Iodide | |
| NG-99-0616, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re Rev of Fee Structures | 30 April 1999 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re Rev of Fee Structures | |
| NG-98-2045, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes, Tests & Experiments | 18 December 1998 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes, Tests & Experiments | |
| NG-98-2056, Comment Supporting Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Author,However Have Some Concerns Re Proposed Rule Language Itself | 14 December 1998 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Author,However Have Some Concerns Re Proposed Rule Language Itself | Probabilistic Risk Assessment |
| NG-98-0926, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 on Codes & Standards:Ieee National Consensus Standard. Ies Utilities Believes Proposed Rule Will Impose Addl Costs & Vulnerabilities on Licensees W/No Substantial Improvement | 22 May 1998 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 on Codes & Standards:Ieee National Consensus Standard. Ies Utilities Believes Proposed Rule Will Impose Addl Costs & Vulnerabilities on Licensees W/No Substantial Improvement | Exemption Request Backfit |
| NG-98-0329, Comments on Pr 10CFR50 Re Engineering Judgment for Activities or Evaluations of Components or Sys.Change to 10CFR50.55a Should Be Defined If NRC Concerned About Specific Application of Using Engineering Judgment | 20 February 1998 | Comments on Pr 10CFR50 Re Engineering Judgment for Activities or Evaluations of Components or Sys.Change to 10CFR50.55a Should Be Defined If NRC Concerned About Specific Application of Using Engineering Judgment | Safe Shutdown Stroke time Incorporated by reference Earthquake Dissimilar Metal Weld Backfit |
| NG-98-0065, Comment on Draft Standard Review Plan 3.9.8, for Review of Risked-Informed Inservice Insp of Piping & Draft Reg Guide DG-1063, Approach for Plant-Specific,Risked-Informed Decisionmaking:Inservice Insp of Piping | 9 January 1998 | Comment on Draft Standard Review Plan 3.9.8, for Review of Risked-Informed Inservice Insp of Piping & Draft Reg Guide DG-1063, Approach for Plant-Specific,Risked-Informed Decisionmaking:Inservice Insp of Piping | Probabilistic Risk Assessment |
| NG-97-2036, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.55(h) Re Draft RG DG-1042, Criteria for Safety Sys. Amended Rule Not Clear Regarding Application to Plants That Received Their Const Permits Prior to 1971 | 25 November 1997 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.55(h) Re Draft RG DG-1042, Criteria for Safety Sys. Amended Rule Not Clear Regarding Application to Plants That Received Their Const Permits Prior to 1971 | Exemption Request Backfit |
| NG-97-1213, Comment on NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Test or Experiments) | 3 July 1997 | Comment on NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Test or Experiments) | Temporary Modification Severe Accident Management Guideline |
| NG-95-2723, Comment Supporting Revised NRC SALP Program | 5 September 1995 | Comment Supporting Revised NRC SALP Program | Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance |
| NG-95-1404, Comment Supporting Nuclear Energy Inst Comments on Draft Policy Statement, Freedom of Employees in Nuclear Industry to Raise Safety Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation | 11 April 1995 | Comment Supporting Nuclear Energy Inst Comments on Draft Policy Statement, Freedom of Employees in Nuclear Industry to Raise Safety Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation | |
| NG-95-0464, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 for Shutdown & low-power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors | 3 February 1995 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 for Shutdown & low-power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors | |
| NG-94-4468, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re NPP License Renewal.Util Encourages NRC to Give Consideration to NUMARC Recommendation That Rule Include Addl Criterion Permitting Generic Exclusion of Redundant Structures | 8 December 1994 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re NPP License Renewal.Util Encourages NRC to Give Consideration to NUMARC Recommendation That Rule Include Addl Criterion Permitting Generic Exclusion of Redundant Structures | Aging Management License Renewal |
| ML20056G335 | 27 August 1993 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 10CFR2.206 Process | |
| NG-93-3257, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses | 12 August 1993 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses | License Renewal |
| ML20045F856 | 22 June 1993 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Endorses NUMARC Comments | |
| ML20086K043 | 2 December 1991 | Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-8003 & NUREG-1400, Air Sampling in Workplace. Licensee Feels That Concept Could Be Useful Tool in Determining When Air Sampling Is Warranted But Feels Hazard Index Level Needs Clarification | |
| NG-91-1144, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments.Nrc Should Revise Proposed Schedule for Collection of Increased Fee for 1991 | 13 May 1991 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments.Nrc Should Revise Proposed Schedule for Collection of Increased Fee for 1991 | |
| NG-91-0222, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule on Secy 90-347 Re Regulatory Impact Survey Rept | 28 January 1991 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule on Secy 90-347 Re Regulatory Impact Survey Rept | |
| NG-90-2541, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program | 30 October 1990 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program | |
| NG-90-1446, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re FSAR Revs,Per 10CFR50.71(e)(4) Requirements | 2 July 1990 | Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re FSAR Revs,Per 10CFR50.71(e)(4) Requirements | |
| ML20195J900 | 29 November 1988 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Detailed Comments on Rule Encl | Fitness for Duty |