SVP-19-018, Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 26
| ML19085A082 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 03/26/2019 |
| From: | Ohr K Exelon Generation Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| SVP-19-018 | |
| Download: ML19085A082 (74) | |
Text
Exelon Generation SVP-19-018 March 26, 2019 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-29 NRC Docket No. 50-254 Core Operating Limits Report for Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 26 10 CFR 50 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 was shutdown for Refuel Outage 25 (Q1 R25) on March 18, 2019. In accordance with Technical Specifications Section 5.6.5.d, enclosed is the Core Operating Limits Report (COLA) for Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 26.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. Mark Humphrey at (309) 227-2800.
R/~
Kenneth S. Ohr Site Vice President Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station
Enclosure:
Core Operating Limits Report for Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 26 cc:
Regional Administrator - NRC Region Ill NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station
SVP-19-018 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 of 2 bee:
NRC Project Manager - NRR Kimberly.Green@nrc.gov (Ecopy w/o enclosure)
Charlie Matthews - Illinois Emergency Management Agency-Department of Nuclear Safety-Charlie.mathews@illinois.gov (Ecopy w/o enclosure)
Dave Gullett, Director, Licensing and Regulatory Affairs - Cantera (ECopy w/o enclosure)
Exelon Document Control Desk Licensing (Hard Copy w/ enclosure)
Exelon Document Control Desk Licensing (ECopy w/ enclosure)
Spencer T. Moore - MidAmerican Energy Company STMoore@midamerican.com (ECopy w/o enclosure)
Bruce Franzen - Regulatory Assurance Manager - Dresden Nuclear Power Station (Ecopy w/o enclosure)
Mark Humphrey - Regulatory Assurance Manager - Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station (Ecopy w/o enclosure)
Tom A. Petersen, NRC Coordinator - Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station (Ecopy w/o enclosure)
SVP Letter File Q:\\SVP\\
Reg. Assurance Clerk (copy for record turnover)
Enclosure Core Operating Limits Report for Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 26
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Core Operating Limits Report For
~
Quitd:Cities Unit 1 Cycle 26
~#
Prepared By:------~---*-----
Ann Hopkins - Nuclear Fuels Reviewed By: ~
~I\\
Corie Glenn - Nuclear Fuels
~-
Reviewed By: ______________ _
Christopher Staum - Engineering Safety Analysis Reviewed By: __ ~_-=
____ ~-~-~
Zachary Bundies - Reactor Engineering Approved By:----~--*
_'() __
'JJ~_.
SQRBy:
SFAM Approval:
Armando Johnson - NF Senior Manager Page 1of71 Date:
2/19/2019 Date: 2/19/19 Date:
2/20/2019 Date: 2/20/19 Date: 20FEB19 Date: 3 I II I rt oate: 3-11=- 1 ~
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table of Contents Page Record of Quad Citie*s 1 Cycle 26 COLR Revisions........................................................ 3
- 1. Terms and Definitions................................................................................................. 6
- 2. General Information...........................................................................................
~*......... 7
- 3. Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate............................................................. 8
- 4. Operating Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio.......................................................... 30 4.1. Manual Flow Control MCPR Limits...................................................................... 30 4.1.1. Power-Dependent MCPR.:............................................................................ 30 4.1.2. Flow-Dependent MCPR................................................................................ 30 4.2. Scram Time......................................................................................................... 31 4.3. Exposure Dependent MCPR Limits..................................................................... 32 4.4. Recirculation* Pump ASD Settings....................................................................... 32
- 5. Linear Heat Generation Rate.................................................................................... 58
- 6. Control Rod'Block Setpoints..................................................................................... 64 7: Stability Protection Setpoints............................................................... :..................... 65
- 8. Modes of Operation................................................................................................... 66
- 9. Methodology.................................................... :......................................................... 69
- 10. References.............................................................................................................. 71 Page 2 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Record of Quad Cities 1 Cycle 26 COLR Revisions Revision Description 14 Initial issuance for Q1C26 Page 3 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 List of Tables Page Table 3-1: MAPLHGR SLO Multipliers.......................................................................................................... 8 Table 3-2: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattices 101and108.......................................................................... 8 Table 3-3: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 171.......................................................................................... 9 Table 3-4: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 172........................................................................................ 10 Table 3-5: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 173........................................................................................ 11 Table 3-6: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 174........................................................................................ 12 Table 3-7: MAPLHGR for0PTIMA2Lattice175........................................................................................ 13 Table 3-8: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 176........................................................................................ 14 Table 3-9: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 177........................................................................................ 15 Table 3-10: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2Lattice178...................................................................................... 16 Table 3-11: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 179...................................................................................... 17 Table 3-12: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 180...................................................................................... 18 Table 3-13: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 181...................................................................................... 19 Table 3-14: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 182...................................................................................... 20 Table 3-15: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 183...................................................................................... 21 Table 3-16: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 184...................................................................................... 22 Table 3-17: MAPLHGR for, OPTIMA2 Lattice 185...................................................................................... 23 Table 3-18: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 186...................................................................................... 24 Table 3-19: MAPLHGR forOPTIMA2Lattice187...................................................................................... 25 Table 3-20: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 188...................................................................................... 26 Table 3-21: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 189...................................................................................... 27 Table 3-22: MAPLHGR for ATRIUM 1 OXM Bottom Lattices....................................................................... 28 Table 3-23: MAPLHGR for ATRIUM 10XM Top Lattices............................................................................ 28 Table 3-24: MAPLHGR for ATRIUM 10XM Top Lattices XMLCT-4596L-17G80 and XMLCTP-4596L-17G80................................................................................................................. 29 Table 4-1: Scram Times.............................................................................................................................. 31 Table 4-2: Exposure Basis for Transient Analysis...................................................................................... 32 Table 4-3: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRµ Limits for NSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,887 MWd/MTU CAVEX)........................................................................................................................ 33 Table 4-4: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRP Limits for ISS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,887 MWd/MTU CAVEX).......................................................................................................................................... 34 Table 4-5: ATRIUM 1 OXM TLO MCPRµ Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,887 MWd/MTU CAVEX)........................................................................................................................ 35 Table 4-6: ATRIUM 1 OXM TLC MCPRµ Limits for NSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,398 MWd/MTU CAVEX).................................................................................................. :................. :*... 36 Table 4-7: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRµ Limits for ISS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,398 MWd/MTU CAVEX)........................................................................................................................ 37 Table 4-8: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,398 MWd/MTU CAVEX)........................................................................................................................ 38 Table 4-9: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,903 MWd/MTU CAVEX).................................................................................................................. :...... 39 Table 4~10: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, EOFPLB ~o EOCLB (37,903 MWd/MTU CAVEX)..........................................,............................................................................. 40 Table 4-11: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,903
. MWd/MTU CAVEX)............. :........................................................................................................... 41 Table 4-12: OPTIMA2 TLC MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,887 MWd/MTU CAVEX).......................................................................................................................................... 42 Table 4-13: OPTlMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,887 MWd/MTU CAVEX)................................................................................................................................ ;......... 43 Table 4-14: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,887 MWd/MTU CAVEX).......................................................................................................................................... 44 Table 4-15: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,398 MWd/MTU CAVEX)........................................................................................................................ 45 Page 4 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-16: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,398 MWd/MTU CAVEX).......................................................................................................................................... 46 Table 4-17: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,398 MWd/MTU CAVEX)........................................................................................................................ 47 Table 4-18: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,903 MWd/MTU CAVEX)........................................................................................................................ 48 Table 4-19: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRP Limits for ISS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,903 MWd/MTU CA VEX)........................................................................................................................ 49 Table 4-20: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,903 MWd/MTU CAVEX)........................................................................................................................ 50 Table 4-21: ATRIUM 10XM SLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, All Exposures......................... 51 Table 4-22: ATRIUM 1 OXM SLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, All Exposures........................... 52 Table 4-23: ATRIUM 1 OXM SLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, All Exposures....................... 53 Table 4-24: OPTIMA2 SLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, All Exposures.................................. 54 Table 4-25: OPTIMA2 SLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, All Exposures................................... 55 Table 4-26: OPTIMA2 SLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, All Exposures................................ 56 Table 4-27: ATRIUM 10XM and OPTIMA2 MCPRt Limits.......................................................................... 57 Table 5-1: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 101 and 108...................................................................... 59 Table 5-2: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 181, 185, 186, 187, and 189............................................. 59 Table 5-3: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 171, 172, 173, 17 4, 178, 179, 180, 183, and 188............ 59 Table 5-4: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 176, 177, and 184°............................................................. 60 Table 5-5: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 175 and 182...................................................................... 60 Table 5-6: LHGR Limits for ATRIUM 10XM................................................................................................ 60 Table 5-7: ATRIUM 10XM LHGRFACp Multipliers for All Scram Insertion Times, All Exposures.............. 61 Table 5-8: OPTIMA2 LHGRFACp Multipliers for All Scram Insertion Times, All Exposures....................... 62 Table 5-9: ATRIUM 10XM LHGRFAC1 Multipliers for All Cycle 26 Exposures, All EOOS......................... 63 Table 5-10: OPTIMA2 LHGRFAC1 Multipliers for All Cycle 26 Exposures, All EOOS....................... -......... 63 Table 6-1: RBM Allowable Values.............................................................................................................. 64 Table 7-1: OPRM PBDA Trip Settings........................................................................................................ 65 Table 8-1: Modes of Operation................................................................................................................... 66 Table 8-2: Core Operational Restrictions for EOOS Conditions................................................................. 67 Page 5 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14
- 1. Terms and Definitions AOO ASD CAVEX CPR CRWE EFPD EFPH EOCLB EOFPL EOFPLB EOOS FHOOS FWT GWd/MTU ICF ISS LHGR LHGRFACf LHGRFACp LPRM MAPLHGR MCPR MCPR1 MCPRp MELL LA MSIVOOS MWd/MTU NEOC NRC NSS OLMCPR oos OPRM PBDA PCOOS PLUOOS SLMCPR SLO TBV TBVOOS TCV TIP TLO TMOL TRM TSSS TSV Anticipated operational occurrence Adjustable Speed Drive Core average exposure Critical power ratio Control rod withdrawal error Effective full power day Effective full power hour
-End of cycle licensing basis End of full power life End of full power licensing basis Equipment out of service Feedwater heater out of service Feedwater temperature Gigawatt days per metric ton Uranium Increased core flow Intermediate scram speed Linear heat generation rate Flow dependent LHGR multiplier Power dependent LHGR multiplier Local power range monitor Maximum average planar linear heat generation rate Minimum critical power ratio Flow dependent MCPR Power dependent MCPR Maximum extended load line limit analysis Main steam isolation valve out of service Megawatt days per metric ton Uranium Near end of cycle Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nominal scram speed Operating limit minimum critical power ratio Out of service Oscillation power range monitor Period based detection algorithm Pressure controller out of service Power load unbalance out of service Safety limit minimum critical power ratio Single loop operation Turbine bypass valve Turbine bypass valves out of service Turbine control valve Traversing incore probe Two loop operation Thermal mechanicafoperating limit Technical Requirements Manual Technical Specification scram speed Turbine stop valve Page 6 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14
- 2. General Information This report is prepared in accordance with Technical Specification 5,6.5. The 01 C26 reload is licensed by Framatome. However, some legacy analyses by Westinghouse are still applicable for OPTIMA2 fuel
. as described in Reference 2.
Licensed rated thermal power is 2957 MWth. Rated core flow is 98 Mlb/hr. Operation up to 108% rated core flow is licensed for this cycle. For allowed operati.ng regions, see applicable power/flow map.
The licensing analysis supports full power operation to EOCLB (37,903 MWd/MTU CAVEX). Note that this value includes coastdown, where full power operation is not expected. The transient analysis limits are provided for operation up to specific CAVEX exposures as defined in Section 4.3.
Coastdown is defined as operation beyond EOFPL with the plant power gradually reducing as available core reactivity diminishes.
The Q1C26 reload analyses do not credit this reduced power during coastdown and the EOCLB limits remain valid for operation up.to rated power.
Power and flow dependent limits are listed for various power and flow levels. Linear interpolation on power and flow (as applicable) is to be used to find intermediate values. Linear interpolation is also.to be used for table items intentionally left blank, as indicated by boxes which are grayed out.
MCPRp for both fuel types (i.e., ATRIUM 10XM and OPTIMA2) varies with scram speed. All other thermal limits are analyzed to remain valid with NSS, ISS, and TSSS.
LHGRFAC1 is independent of feedwater temperature and EOOS conditions.
For thermal limit monitoring above 100% rated power or 108% rated core flow, the 100% rated power and the 108% core flow thermal limit values, respectively, shall be used.
Steady state operation is not allowed in this region. Limits are provided for transient conditions only.
Page 7 of71
COLRQuad Cities 1 Revision 14
- 3. Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate Technical Specification Sections 3.2.1 and 3.4.1 Table 3-1 provides the MAPLHGR SLO multipliers for ATRIUM 10XM and OPTIMA2 fuel.
For OPTIMA2 natural uranium lattices, TLO and SLO MAPLHGR values are provided in Table 3-2. For all other OPTIMA2 lattices, lattice-specific MAPLHGR values for TLO are provided in Tables 3-3 through 3-21. For ATRIUM 10XM fuel, the lattice-specific MAPLHGR limits for TLO can be found in Tables 3-22 through 3-24.
During SLO, the limits in Tables 3-3 through 3-24 are multiplied by the fuel-specific SLO multiplier listed in Table 3-1. The ATRIUM 1 OXM multiplier may be applied to OPTIMA2 for SLO conditions, as the ATRIUM 10XM multiplier is more limiting.
Table 3-1: MAPLHGR SLO Multipliers (References 2 and 5)
Fuel Type Multiplier ATRIUM 10XM 0.80 OPTIMA2 0.86 Table 3-2: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattices 101 and 108 (References 5 and 7)
All OPTIMA2 Bundles Lattices 101: Opt2-80.71 108: Opt2-T0.71 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO MAPLHGR (GWd/MTU)
(kW/ft) 0 7.65 75.0 7.65 Page 8 of 71 I
COLR Quad Cities 1Revision14 Table 3-3: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 171 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle 0 pt2-4.03-16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)
Lattice 171: Oot2-B4.33-16G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLC (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.08 2.5 9.42 5.0 9.34 7.5 9.51 10.0 9.72 12.0 9.86 15.0 10.08 17.0 10.19 20.0 10.38 22.0 10.39 24.0 10.39 30.0 10.19 36.0 10.05 42.0 9.93 50.0 9.83 75.0 9.83 Page 9 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-4: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 172
{References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2*4.03-16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)
Lattice 172: Opt2-B4.47 *16G8.00-2GS.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.01 2.5 9.35 5.0 9.26 7.5 9.23 10.0 9.38 12.0 9.46 15.0 9.60 17.0 9.66 20.0 9.79 22.0 9.90 24.0 10.02 30.0 10.02 36.0 9.98 42.0 9.94 50.0 9.95 75.0 9.95 Page 10 of71 I
I I
!1
'I
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3~5: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 173 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.03-16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)
Lattice 173: Opt2-BE4.56-1 SG8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.04 2.5 9.36 5.0 9.26 7.5 9.25 10.0 9.44 12.0 9.53 15.0 9.68 17.0 9.75 20.0 9.90 22.0 10.01 24.0 10.15 30.0 10.11 36.0 10.08 42.0 10.02 50.0 9.98 75.0 9.98 Page 11 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-6: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2Lattice174 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.03-16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)
Lattice 174: Opt2-M4.56-16G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.02 2.5 9.36 5.0 9.25 7.5 9.26 10.0 9.44 12.0 9.54 15.0 9.69 17.0 9.76 20.0 9.92 22.0 10.02 24.0 10.16 30.0 10.10 36.0 10.07 42.0 10.01 50.0 9.94*
75.0 9.94 Page 12 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-7: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2Lattice175 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.03-16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)
Lattice 175: Qpt2-ME4.52-16G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.15 2.5 9.50 5.0 9.39 7.5 9.41 10.0 9.59 12.0 9.70 15.0 9.86 17.0 9.96 20.0 10.21 22.0 10.38 24.0 10.35 30.0 _
10.31 36.0 10.25 42.0 10.19 50.0 10.06 75.0 10.06 Page 13 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-8: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 176 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.03*16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)
Lattice 176: Oot2-T4.52-16G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.20 2.5 9.53 5.0 9.42 7.5 9.40 10.0 9.56 12.0 9.66
- 15.0 9.80 17.0 9.88 20.0 10.20.
22.0 10.39 24.0 10.34 30.0 10.31 36.0 10.24 42.0 10.13 50.0 10.03 75.0 10.03 Page 14 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-9: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 177 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.03-16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)
Lattice 177: Opt2-T4.53-16G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.63 2.5 9.98 5.0 9.93 7.5 9.71 10.0 9.82 12.0 9.92 15.0 10.19 17.0 10.39 20.0 10.45 22.0 10.44 24.0 10.40 30.0 10.35 36.0 10.28 42.0 10.23 50.0 10.11 75.0 10.11 Page 15 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-10: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2Lattice178 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.03-14GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24)
Lattice 178: 0pt2-84.33-14G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.36 2.5 9.68 5.0 9.56 7.5 9.64 10.0 9.77 12.0 9.94 15.0' 10.13 17.0 10.22 20.0 10.34 22.0 10.36 24.0 10.38 30.0 10.18 36.0 10.03 42.0 9.90 50.0 9.80 75.0 9.80 Page 16 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14
. Table 3-11: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 179 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.03-14GZS.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24}
Lattice 179: Qpt2-84.46-14G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.29 2.5 9.59 5.0 9.4"9 7.5 9.38 10.0 9.46 12.0 9.54 15.0 9.66 17.0 9.70 20.0 9.76 22.0 9.87 24.0 9.98 30.0 10.02 36.0 9.98 42.0 9.93 50.0 9.90 75.0 9.90 Page 17 of71 i I I l
l
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-12: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 180 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.03-14GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24)
Lattice 180: 0pt2-BE4.55-14G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.32 2.5 9.62 5.0 9.48 7.5 9.43 10.0 9.56 12.0 9.61 15.0 9.74 17.0 9.79 20.0 9.86 22.0 9.98 24.0 10.11 30.0 10.11 36.0 10.08 42.0 10.00 50.0 9.91 75.0 9.91 Page 18 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-13: MAPLHGR forOPTIMA2Lattice181 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.03-14GZ8.00f5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24)
Lattice 181: Opt2-M4.55-14G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWdfMTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.31 2.5 9.62 5.0 9.53 7.5 9.47 10.0 9.57 12.0 9.63 15.0
. 9.75 17.0 9.80 20.0 9.87 22.0 10.00 24.0 10.12 30.0 10.10 36.0 10.07 42.0 10.00 50.0 9.84 75.0 9.84 Page 19 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-14: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2Lattice182 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.03-14GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24)
Lattice 182: Opt2-ME4.51-14G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.46 2.5 9.78 5.0 9.66 7.5 9.61 10.0 9.73 12.0 9.80 15.0 9.93 17.0 9.98 20.0 10.14 22.0 10.32 24.0 10.36 30.0 10.31 36.0 10.27 42.0 10.16 50.0 10.06 75.0 10.06 Page 20 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-15: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2Lattice183 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.03-14GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24)
Lattice 183: Qpt2-T4.51-14G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.51 2.5 9.82 5.0 9.69 7.5 9.59 10.0 9.71 12.0 9.77 15.0 9.89 17.0 9.94 20.0 10.17 22.0 10.36 24.0 10.34 30.0 10.32 36.0 10.24 42.0 10.12 50.0 9.96 75.0 9.96 Page 21of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-16: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 184 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.03"14GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24)
Lattice 184: Oot2-T4.52-14G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.98 2.5 10.25 5.0 10.18 7.5 9.89 10.0 9.90 12.0 10.01 15.0 10.18 17.0 10.36 20.0 10.45 22.0 10.46 24.0 10.42 30.0 10.37 36.0 10.30 42.0 10.22 50.0 10.04 75.0 10.04 Page 22 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3*17: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 185 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.16*12G6.00*2GZ6.00 (Q024)
Lattice 185: 0Dt2-84.58-14G6.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.31 2.5*
9.51 5.0 9.45 7.5 9.46 10.0 9.50 12.0 9.56 15.0 9.67 17.0 9.75 20.0 9.87 22.0 9.97 24.0 9.99 30.0 10.01 36.0 10.03 42.0 10.01 50.0 9.99 75.0 9.99 Page 23 of71
I COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14
.Table 3-18:* MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 186 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.16-12G6.00-2GZ6.00 (Q024)
Lattice 186: 0pt2-BE4.67-14G6.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.34 2.5 9.56 5.0 9.49 7.5 9.52 10.0 9.67 12.0 9.65 15.0 9.75 17.0 9.85 20.0 9.99 22.0 10.08 24.0 10.11 30.0 10.15 36.0 10.14 42.0 10.09 50.0 10.02
'75.0 10.02 Page 24 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-19: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 187 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.16-12G6.00-2GZ6.00 (Q024)
Lattice 187: Oot2-M4.67-14G6.00 Avg. Planar Exposure
. TLC (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.32 2.5 9.57 5.0 9.47 7.5 9.51 10.0 9.70 12.0 9.66 15.0 9.76 17.0 9.86 20.0 10.05 22.0 10.09 24.0 10.11 30.0 10.17 36.0 10.13 42.0 10.08 50.0 9.99 75.0 9.99 Page 25 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-20: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 188 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.16-12G6.00-2GZ6.00 (Q024)
Lattice 188: Opt2-ME4.64-14G6.00 Avg. Planar Exposure --
TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.51 2.5 9.75 5.0 9.67 7.5 9.71 10.0 9.80 12.0 9.84 15.0 9.98 17.0 10.13 20.0 10.31 22.0 10.37 24.0 10.38 30.0 10.41 36.0 10.37 42.0 10.32 50.0 10.16 75.0 10.16 Page 26 of 71 I
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-21: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 189 (References 5 and 7)
Bundle Opt2-4.16-12G6.00-2GZ6.00 (Q024)
Lattice 189: Opt2-T4.64-12G6.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU)
MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.91 2.5 10.14 5.0 9.98 7.5 10.01 10.0 9.98 12.0 9.96 15.0 10.07 17.0 10.16 20.0 10.31 22.0 10.37 24.0 10.37 30.0 10.37 36.0 10.38 42.0 10.31 50.0 10.13 75.0 10.13 Page 27 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-22: MAPLHGR for ATRIUM 10XM Bottom Lattices (References 2 arid 4)
All ATRIUM 10XM Bundles Lattices XMLCP-0720L-OGO, XMLCB-0720L-OGO, XMLCB-4475L-16GV80, XMLCB-4487L-14GV80, XMLCB-4487L-14G80, XMLCB-4499L-12GV80, XMLCB-4538L-17G80, XMLCB-4538L-17GV80, XMLCB-4538L-17GV80A, XM LCB-4556L-17G80, XMLCB-4561 L-16GV80, XMLCB-4642L-13G80, XMLCB"0720L-OGOa XMLCP-0720L-OGOa Avg. Planar Exposure TLOMAPLHGR (GWdJMTU)
(kW/ft) 0.0 11.70 20.0 11.70 67.0 6.60 Table 3-23: MAPLHGR for ATRIUM 10XM Top Lattices (References 2 and 4)
All ATRIUM 10XM Bundles Lattices XMLCT-0720L-OG0d, XMLCT-0720L-OGO, XMLCT-4355L-12G30, XMLCT -4523L-14G80, XMLCTP-4523L-14G80, XML CT -45~0L-12GV80, XMLCTP-4530L-12GV80, XMLCT-0720L-OGOda, XMLCT-0720L-OG0a, XMLCT -4602L-16GV65A,
- XMLCT-4602L-16GV65, XMLCT-4721 L-12G65, XMLCT-4715L-13G80, XMLCTP-4715L-13G80 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO MAPLHGR (GWdJMTUl (kW/ft) 0.0 11.70 15.0 11.60 20.0 11.21 67.0 6.60 Page 28 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 3-24: MAPLHGR for ATRIUM 10XM Top Lattices XMLCT-4596L-17G80 and XMLCTP-4596L-17G80 (References 2 and 4)
ATRIUM 10XM Bundles XMLC-40708-17GV80, XMLC-4081 B-17GV80 Lattices XMLCT-4596L-17G80, XMLCTP-4596L-17G80 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO MAPLHGR lGWd/MTU\\
lkW/ftl 0.0 11.70 15.0 11.44 20.0 11.21 67.0 6.60 Page 29 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14
- 4. Operating Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio Technical Specification Sections 3.2.2. 3.4.1. and 3.7.7 The OLMCPRs for Q1C26 are established so that less than 0.1 % of the fuel rods in the core are expected to experience boiling transition during an AOO initiated from rated or off-rated conditions and support current Technical Specifications SLMCPR values {Reference 2).
Tables 4-3 through 4-27 include MCPR limits for various specified EOOS conditions.
The EOOS conditions separated by"/" in these tables represent single EOOS conditions and not any combination of conditions. Refer to Section 8 for a detailed explanation of allowable EOOS conditions.
4.1. Manual Flow Control MCPR Limits The OLMCPR is determined for a given power and flow condition by evaluating the power-dependent MCPR and the flow-dependent MCPR and selecting the greater of the two.
4.1.1. Power-Dependent MCPR.
The OLMCPR as a function of core thermal power (MCPRp) is shown in Tables 4-3 through 4-26. MCPRp limits are dependent on scram times as described in Section 4.2, exposure as described in Section 4.3, fuel type, FWT, and whether the plant is in TLO or SLO.
- TLO limits for ATRIUM 1 OXM fuel are given in Tables 4-3 through 4-11 and SLO limits for ATRIUM 10XM fuel are given in Tables 4-21 through 4-23. TLO limits for OPTIMA2 fuel are given in Tables 4-12 through 4-20 and SLO limits for OPTIMA2 fuel are given in Tables 4-24 through 4-26.
4.1.2. Flow-Dependent MCPR Table 4-27 gives the OLMCPR limit as a function of the flow (MCPR1) based on the applicable plant condition.
These values are applicable to both ATRIUM 10XM and OPTJ MA2 fuel.
Page 30 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 4.2. Scram Time TSSS, ISS, and NSS refer to scram speeds. The scram time values associated with these speeds are shown in Table 4-1. The TSSS scram times shown in Table 4-1 are the same as those specified in the Technical Specifications (Reference 8).
To utilize the OLMCPR limits for NSS in Tables 4-3, 4-6, 4-9, 4-12, 4-15, 4-18, 4-21, and 4-24, the average control rod insertion time at each control rod insertion fraction must be equal to or less than the NSS time shown in Table 4-1 below.
To utilize the OLMCPR limits for ISS in Tables 4-4, 4-7, 4-10, 4-13, 4-16, 4-19, 4-22, and 4-25, the average control rod insertion time at each control rod insertion fraction must be equal to or less than the ISS time shown in Table 4-1 below.
The "Average Control Rod Insertion Time" is defined as the sum of the control rod insertion times of all operable control rods divided by the number of operable control rods.
Conservative adjustments to the NSS and ISS scram speeds were made to the analysis inputs to appropriately account for the effects of 1 stuck control rod and one additional control rod that is assumed to fail to scram (Reference 2).
To utilize the OLMCPR limits for TSSS in Tables 4-5, 4-8, 4-11, 4-14, 4-17, 4-20, 4-23, and 4-26, the control rod insertion time of each operable control rod at each control rod insertion fraction must be less than or equal to the TSSS time shown in Table 4-1. The Technical Specifications allow operation with up to 12 "slow" and 1 stuck control rod.
One additional control rod is assumed to fail to scram for the system transient analyses performed to establish MCPRp limits (Reference 2). Conservative adjustments to the TSSS scram speeds were made to the analysis inputs to appropriately account for the effects of the slow and stuck rods on scram reactivity (Reference 2).
For cases below 38.5% power (Pbypass), the results are relatively insensitive to scram speed, and only TSSS analyses were performed (Reference 2).
Control Rod Insertion Fraction
(%)
5 20 50 90 Table 4-1: *scram Times (References 2 and 8)
NSS (seconds)
ISS (seconds) 0.324 0.360 0.694 0.720 1.510 1.580 2.670 2.800 Page 31of71 TSSS (seconds) 0.48 0.89 1.98 3.44
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 4.3. Exposure Dependent MCPR Limits Exposure-dependent MCPRp limits were established to support operation for the entire cycle duration.* Note that the thermal limits are based on CAVEX. The CAVEX values at which point the MCPRp limits are required to be changed are shown in Table 4-2 below. The. limits at a later exposure range can be used earlier in the cycle as they are the same or more conservative.
Table 4-2: Exposure Basis for Transient Analysis (Reference 2)
Core Average Exposure Description (MWd/MTU) 34,887 Break point for exposure-dependent MCPRp limits (NEOC) 37,398 Design basis rod patterns to EOFPL
+ 25 EFPD (EOFPLB) 37,903 EOCLB-Maximum licensing core exposure, including coastdown 4.4. Recirculation Pump ASD Settings Technical Requirement Manual 2.1.a.1 Quad Cities 1 Cycle 26 was analyzed with a slow flow excursion event assuming a failure of the recirculation flow control system such that the core flow increases slowly to the maximum flow physically permitted by the equipment. assumed to be 112% of rated core flow (Reference 2);
therefore the recirculation pump ASD must be set to maintain core flow less than 112%
(109. 76 Mlb/hr) for all runout events.
Page 32 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-3: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS lnsertiOn Times, BOC to NEOC (34,887 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT Core Core Power(% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 S38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck
- 60 2.52 2.52 2.16 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.94 1.50
>60 2.72 2.72 2.35 S60 3.36 3.36 2.61 TBVOOS 1.99 1.51
> 60 3.42 3.42 2.75 TCVSlow S60 2.53 2.53 2.33 Closure/
2.33 1.95 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35 FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition flow
% rated 0
25 S38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.58 2.58 2.23 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.05 1.50
>60 2.72 2.72 2.35 S60 3.46 3.46 2.68 TBVOOS 2.09 1.51
>60 3.53 3.53 2.83 TCVSlow
- 60 2.58 2.58 2.33 Closure/
2.33 1.95 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>60 2.72 2.72 2.35 Page 33 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-4: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,887 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
NominalFWT Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25
- $ 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck
- S 60 2.52 2.52 2.16 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.94 1.50
>60 2.72 2.72 2.35
.s 60 3.36 3.36 2.61 TBVOOS 1.99 1.51
> 60 3.42 3.42 2.75 TCVSlow
.s 60 2.53 2.53 2.33 Closure/
2.33 1.95 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35 FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 s 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck
.s 60 2.58 2.58 2.23 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.06 1.50
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35
.s 60 3.46 3.46 2.68 TBVOOS 2.10 1.51
>60 3.53 3.53 2.83 TCV Slow S60 2.58 2.58 2.33 Closure/
2.33 1.95 1.50
-PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35 Page 34 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1Revision14 Table 4M5: ATRIUM 1 OXM TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,887 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 S38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck s 60 2.52 2.52 2.16 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.97 1.50
>60 2.72 2.72 2.35 s 60 3.36
.3.36 2.61 TBVOOS 2.02 1.51
> 60 3.42 3.42 2.75 TCVSlow S60 2.53 2.53 2.35.
Closure/
2.35 1.97 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>60 2.72 2.72 2.35 FHOOS Core Core Power(% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 s 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.58 2;58 2.23 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.12 1.50
> 60 2.72 2.72
. 2.35 S60 3.46 3.46 2.68 TBVOOS 2.12 1.51
> 60 3.53 3.53 2.83 TCVSlow S60 2.58 2.58 2.35 Closure/
2.35 1.97 1.50 PLUOOS/ PCOOS
> 60 2.72 2.72
.2.35 Page 35 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-6: ATRIUM 1 OXM TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,398 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
Nomlna/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 S38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck s60 2.52 2.52 2.16 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.94 1.50
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35
- S 60 3.36 3.36 2.61 TBVOOS 1.99 1.51
> 60 3.42 3.42 2.75 TCVSlow
- S 60 2.53 2.53 2.33 Closure/
2.33 1.95 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35 FHOOS Core Core Power {% rated)
EOOS Condition.
Flow
% rated 0
25 s 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck s 60 2.58 2.58 2.23 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.05 1.50
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35
- S 60 3.46 3.46 2.68 TBVOOS 2.09 1.51
>60 3.53 3.53 2.83 TCVSlow S60 2.58 2.58 2.33 Closure/
2.33 1.95 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.72 J,.72 2.35 Page 36 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4--7: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,398 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
Nomfna/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25
- 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.52 2.52 2.16 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.94 1.50
>60 2.72 2.72 2.35 S60 3.36 3.36 2.61 T.BVOOS 1.99 1.51
> 60 3.42 3.42 2.75 TCVSlow sea 2.53 2.53 2.33 Closure/
2.33 1.95 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>60 2.72 2.72 2.35 FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25
- 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.58 2.58 2.23 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.06 1.50
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35 S60 3.46 3.46 2.68 TBVOOS 2.10 1.51
> 60 3.53 3.53 2.83 TCVSlow S60 2.58 2.58 2.33 Closure/
2.33 1.95 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35 Page 37 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-8: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,398 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
NomlnalFWT Core Core Power(% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 S38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.52 2.52 2.16 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.97 1.50
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35
- 60 3.36 3.36 2.61 TBVOOS 2.02 1.51
> 60 3.42 3.42 2.75 TCVS!ow S60 2.53 2.53 2.35 Closure/
2.35 1.97 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>.60 2.72 2.72 2.35 FHOOS Core Core Power(% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 S3S.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck s 60 2.58 2.58 2.23 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.12 1.50
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35 s 60 3.46 3.46 2.68 TBVOOS 2.12 1.51
> 60 3.53 3.53 2.83 TCVSlow
- 60 2.58 2.58 2.35 Closure/
2.35 1.97 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35
. Page 38 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4~9: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,903 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
Nominal FWT Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 S38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.52 2.52 2.16 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.94 1.50
>60 2.72 2.72 2.35 S60 3.36 3.36 2.61 TBVOOS 1.99 1.51
>60 3.42 3.42 2.75 TCVSlow S60 2.53 2.53 2.33 Closure/
2.33 1.95 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>60 2.72 2.72 2.35 FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 S38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.58 2.58 2.23 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.0~
1.50
>60 2.72 2.72 2.35 S60 3.46 3.46 2.68 TBVOOS 2.09 1.51
>60 3.53 3.53 2.83 TCVSlow S60 2.58 2.58 2.33 Closure/
2.33 1.95 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>60 2.72 2.72 2.35 Page 39 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-10: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,903 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT
- Core Core Power(% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25
- 5'38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck
- S 60 2.52 2.52 2.16 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.94 1.50
. >60 2.72 2.72 2.35
- S 60 3.36 3.36 2.61 TBVOOS 1.99 1.51
> 60 3.42 3.42 2.75 TCVSlow
- S 60 2.53 2.53 2.33 Closure/
2.33 1.95 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35 FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25
- 5'38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck
- S 60 2.58 2.58 2.23 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.06 1.50
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35 S60 3.46 3.46 2.68 TBVOOS 2.10 1.51
> 60 3.53 3.53 2.83 TCVSlow
- S 60 2.58 2.58 2.33 Closure/
2.33 1.95 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35 Page 40 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-11: ATRIUM 1 OXM TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,903 MWd/MTU CA VEX)
(Reference 2)
NominalFWT Core*
Core Power (%rated}
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25
- 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck
- ea 2.52 2.52 2.16 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.97 1.50
>_60 2.72 2.72 2.35 S60 3.36 3.36 2.61 TBVOOS 2.02 1.51
> 60 3.42 3.42 2.75 TCVSlow S60 2.53 2.53 2.35 Closure/
2.35 1.97 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35 FHOOS Core Core Power {% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25
- 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.58 2.58 2.23 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.12 1.50
>> 60 2.72 2.72 2.35
- 60 3.46 3.46 2.68 TBVOOS 2.12 1.51
> 60 3.53 3.53 2.83 TCVSlow
- S 60 2.58 2.58 2.35 Closure/
2.35 1.97 1.50 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>60 2.72 2.72 2.35 Page 41 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revisiqn 14 Table 4-12: OPTIMA~ TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,887 MWd/MTU CA VEX)
(Reference 2)
Nomlna/FWT Core Core Power{% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25
- $ 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck
- S 60 2.42 2.42 2.10 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.94 1.52
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40
- S 60' 3.25 3.25 2.50 TBVOOS 2.01 1.57
> 60 3.47 3.47 2.80 TCVSJow
- S 60 2.42 2.42 2.38 Closure/
2.38 1.99 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>60 2.77 2.77 2.40 FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 S38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck
- S 60 2.53 2.53 2.13 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.09 1.52
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 s 60 3.36 3.36 2.58 TBVOOS 2.12 1.57
> 60 3.54 3.54 2.86 TCVSlow
- S 60 2.53 2.53 2.38 Closure/
2.38 1.99 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 Page 42 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-13: OPTIMA2* TLO MCPRp Limits for-ISS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,8~7 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 s 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.42 2.42 2.10 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.95 1.52
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 S60 3.25 3.25 2.50 TBVOOS 2.02 1.57
> 60 3.47 3.47 2.80 TCVSlow S60 2.42 2.42 2.38 Closure/
2.38 1.99 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 FHOOS Core Core Power(% rated)
EOOS Condition
- Flow
% rated 0
25 s 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.53 2.53 2.13 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.10 1.52
'> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 TBVOOS S60 3.36 3.36 2.58 2.12 1.57
>60 3.54 3.54 2.86 TCVSlow
- 5 60 2.53 2.53 2.38 Closure/
2.38 1.99 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 Page 43 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-14: OPTIMA21'.LO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,887 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
Nom/na/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 s 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.42 2.42 2.10 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.00 1.52
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 S60 3.25 3.25 2.50 TBVOOS 2.05 1.57
> 60 3.47 3.47 2.80 TCVSlow S60 2.42 2.42 2.40 Closure/
2.40 2.01 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 S38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.53 2.53 2.14 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.14 1.52
> 60 2.77 2.77' 2.40 S60 3.36 3.36 2.58 TBVOOS 2.17 1.57
> 60 3.54 3.54 2.86 TCV Slow s 60 2.53 2.53 2.40 Closure/
2.40 2.01 1.52 PLUOOS/ PCOOS
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 Page 44 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-15: 0PTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,398 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25
- S 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.42 2.42 2.10 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.94 1.52
>60 2.77 2.77 2.40 S60 3.25 3.25 2.50 TBVOOS 2.01 1.57
>60 3.47 3.47 2.80 TCVSlow
- S 60 2.42 2.42 2.38 Closure/
2.38 1.99 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS C~:>nditlon Flow
% rated 0
25
- S 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck
- S 60 2.53 2.53 2.13
. Closed/MSIVOOS 2.09 1.52
>60 2.77 2.77 2.40 s60 3.36 3.36 2.58 TBVOOS 2.12 1.57
>60 3.54 3.54 2.86 TCVSlow S60 2.53 2.53 2.38 Closure/
2.38 1.99 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>60 2.77 2.77 2.40 Page 45 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-16: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,398 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT Core Core Power(% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25
- $ 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck
- S 60 2.42 2.42
. 2.10 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.95 1.52
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40
- S 60 3.25 3.25
. 2.50 TBVOOS 2.02 1.57
> 60 3.47 3.47
. 2.80*
TCVSlow
- S 60 2.42 2.42 2.38 Closure/
2.38 1.99 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow.
% rated 0
25 s 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck
- S 60 2.53 2.53 2.13 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.10 1.52
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40
- S 60 3.36 3.36 2.58 TBVOOS 2.12 1.57
> 60 3.54 3.54 2.86 TCVSlow
- S 60 2.53 2.53 2.38 Closure/
2.38 1.99 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 Page 46 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4*17: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,398 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
Nomlna/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25
- $ 38.6
> 38.6 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.42 2.42 2.10 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.00 1.52
>60 2.77 2.77 2.40 S60 3.25 3.25 2.50 TBVOOS 2.05 1.57
> 60 3.47 3.47 2.80 TCVSlow s 60 2.42 2.42 2.40 Closure!
2.40 2.01 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>60 2.77 2.77 2.40 FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
. 25
- 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.53 2.53 2.14 ClosedfMSIVOOS 2.14 1.52
>60 2.77 2.77 2.40 S60 3.36 3.36 2.58 TBVOOS 2.17 1.57
>60 3.54 3.54 2.86 TCVSlow S60 2.53 2.53 2.40 Closure/
2.40 2.01 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>60 2.77 2.77 2.40 Page 47 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-18: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRµ Limits for NSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,903 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
Nom/na/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition
- Flow
% rated 0
25
- 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.42 2.42 2.10 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.94 1.52
> 60 2.77 2.7V 2.40 S60 3.25 3.25 2.50 TBVOOS 2.01 1.57
> 60 3.47 3.47 2.80 TCV Slow S60 2.42 2.42 2.38 Closure/
2.38 1.99 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 FHOO$
Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condi~lon Flow
% rated 0
25
- as.5
>38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.53 2.53 2.13 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.09 1.52
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 S60 3.36 3.36 2.58 TBVOOS 2.12 1.57
> 60 3.54 3.54 2.86 TCVSlow S60 2.53 2.53 2.38 Closure/
2.38 1.99 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 Page 48 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-19: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,903 MWd/MTU CAVEX)
(Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25
$38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.42 2.42 2.10 Closed/MSIVOOS 1.95 1.52
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 S60 3.25 3.25 2.50 TBVOOS 2.0~
1.57
> 60 3.47 3.47 2.80 TCVSlow s 60 2.42 2.42 2.38 Closure/
2.38 1.99 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25 s 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.53 2.53 2.13 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.10 1.52
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 TBVbOS
- 60 3.36 3.36
. 2.58 2.12 1.57
>60.
3.54 3.54 2.86 TCVSlow S60 2.53 2.53 2.38 Closure/
2.38 1.99 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 Page 49 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-20: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,903 MWd/MTU Cf!. VEX)
(Reference 2)
Nomlna/FWT Core Core.Power(% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow
% rated 0
25
- s: 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 2.42 2.42 2.10 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.00 1.52
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40
.s 60 3.25 3.25 2.50 TBVOOS 2.05 1.57
> 60 3.47 3.47 2.80 TCVSlow
.s 60 2.42 2.42 2.40 Closure/
2.40 2.01 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40 FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition flow
% rated 0
25
=ii 38.5
> 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck
.s 60 2.53 2.53 2.14 Closed/MSIVOOS 2.14 1.52
> 60 2.77 2.77 2.40
.s 60 3.36 3.36 2.58 TBVOQS 2.17 1.57
>60 3.54 3.54 2.86 TCVSlow
.s 60 2.53 2.53 2.40 Closure/
2.40 2.01 1.52 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>60 2.77 2.77 2.40 Page 50 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-21: ATRIUM 1 OXM SLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT EOOS Condition Core Power (% rated)
(all include SLO) 0 25
- 38.5
> 38.5
. 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.55 2.55 -
2.19 2.09 2.06 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.39 3.39 2.64 2.09 2.06 TCVSlow Closure/
2.56 2.. 56 2.36 2.36 2.25 PLUOOS/PCOOS FHOOS EOOS Condition Core Power(% rated)
(all include SLO) 0 25
- 3a.s
> 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.61 2.61 2.26 2.09 2.06 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.49 3.49 2.71 2.12 2.06 TCVSlow Closure/
2.61
. 2.61 2.36 2.36 2.25 PLUOOS/PCOOS Page 51 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-22: ATRIUM 10XM SLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT EOOS Com;lition Core Power(% rated)
(all include SLO) 0 25 S38.5
> 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.55 2.55 2.19 2.09 2.06 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.39 3.39 2.64 2.09 2.06 TCVSlow Closure/
2.56 2.56 2.36 2.36 2.25 PLUOOS/PCOOS FHOOS EOOS Condition Core Power (% rated)
(all include SLO) 0 25 s 38.5
> 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.61 2.61 2.26 2.09 2.06 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.49 3~49 2.71 2.13 2.06 TCVSlow Closure/
2.61 2.61 2.36 2.36 2.25 PLUOOS/PCOOS Page 52 of 71
COLR Quad c*ities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-23: ATRIUM 10XM SLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT EOOS Condition Core Power (% rated)
{all include SLO) 0
- 25.
s; 38.5
> 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.55 2.55 2.19 2.09 2.06 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.39 3.39 2.64 2.09 2.06 TCVSlow Closure/
2.56 2.56 2.38 2.38 2.27 PLUOOS/PCOOS FHOOS EOOS Condition Core Power {% rated)
(all include SLO) 0 25 s; 38.5
> 38.5 50
- Base/TCV Stuck 2.61 2.61 2.26 2.15 2.06 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.49 3.49 2.71 2.15 2.06 TCVSlow Closure/
2.61 2.61 2.38 2.38 2.27 PLUOOS/PCOOS Page 53 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-24: OPTlMA2 SLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)
NomlnalFWT EOOS Condition Core Power (% rated)
(all include SLO) 0 25
- S 38.5
> 38.5 Base/TCV Stuck 2.45 2.45 2.13 2.11 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.28 3.28 2.53 2.11 TCVSlow Closure/
2.45 2.45 2.41 2.41 PLUOOS/PCOOS FHOOS
- EOOS Condition Core Power(% rated)
(all include SLO) 0 25
- S 38.5
> 38.S Base/TCV Stuck*
2.56 2.56 2.16 2.12 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.39 3.39 2.61
. 2.15 TCVSlaw Closure/
2.56 2.56 2.41 2.41 PLUOOS/PCOOS Page 54 of71 50 2.08 2.08 2.29 50 2.08 2.08 2.29
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-25: OPTIMA2 SLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT EOOS Condition Core Power(% rated)
(all include SLO) 0 25 S38.5
> 38.5 Base/TCV Stuck 2.45 2.45 2.13 2.11 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.28 3.28 2.53 2.11 TCVSlow Closure/
2.45 2.45 2.41 2.41 PLUOOS/PCOOS FHOOS EOOS Condition Core Power (% rated)
(all include SLO) 0 25 S38.5
> 38.5 Base/TCV Stuck 2.56 2.56 2.16 2.13 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.39 3.39 2.61 2.15 TCVSlow Closure/
2.56 2.56 2.41 2.41 PLUOOS/PCOOS Page 55 of 71 50 2.08 2.08 2.29 50 2.08 2.08 2.29
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-26: OPTIMA2 SLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT EOOS Condition Core Power (% rated)
(all include SLO) 0 25
!::38.5
> 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.45 2.45 2.13 2.11 2.08 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.28 3.28 2.53 2.11 2.08 TCVSlow Closure/
2.45 2.45 2.43 2.43 2.31 PLUOOS/PCOOS FHOOS EOOS Condition Core Power (% rated)
(all include SLO) 0 25
- 38.5
> 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.56 2.56 2.17 2.17 2.08 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.39 3.39 2.61 2.20 2.09 TCVSlow Closure/
2.56 2.56 2.43 2.43 2.31 PLUOOS/PCOOS Page 56 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 4-27: ATRIUM 1 OXM and OPTIMA2 MCPRt Limits (Reference 2)
EOOS Condition*
Core Flow (% rated)
MCPRt Limit Base Case I FHOOS I PCOOS I PLUOOS I 0
1.70 TCV Slow Closure I 35 1.70 PLUOOS and PCOOS in TLO and SLO 108 1.18 0
1.81 Any Scenario** with 35 1.81 OneMSIVOOS 108 1.18 0
1.90 Any Scenario** with 35 1.90 TBVOOS 108 1.35 0
1.70 Any Scenario** with 1 35 1.70 Stuck Closed TCV/TSV 108 1.18
- See Section 8 for further operating restrictions.
- "Any Scenario" includes any other combination of allowable EOOS conditions that is not otherwise covered by this table.
Note that the MCPRr limits for any scenario with 1 stuck closed TCV/TSV are identical to base case MCPRr limits. This is reflected in the thermal limit sets presented in Table 8-1.
Page 57 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14
- 5. Linear Heat Generation Rate Technical Specification Sections 3.2.3. 3.4.1. and 3.7.7
- The TMOL at rated conditions for the OPTIMA2 and ATRIUM 10XM fuel is established in terms of the maximum LHGR as a function of rod nodal (peak pellet) exposure. The LHGR limits for OPT1MA2 fuel are presented in Tables 5-1 through 5-5. The limits in Table 5-1 apply to OPT1MA2 natural blanket lattices (lattice types 101 and 108). The limits in Tables 5-2 through 5-5 apply to non-natural blanket OPTIMA2 lattices that require Gadolinia set down penalties. The LHGR limits for AJRIUM 1 OXM fuel are presented in Table 5-6.
The power-and flow-dependent LHGR multipliers (LHGRFACp and LHGRFAC1) are applied directly to the LHGR limits to protect against fuel melting and overstraining of the cladding during an AOO (Reference 2). In all conditions, the margin to the LHGR limits is determined by applying the lowest multiplier from the applicable LHGRFACp and LHGRFAC1 multipliers for the power/flow statepoint of interest to the steady state LHGR limit (Reference 2).
LHGRFACp and LHGRFAC1 multipliers were established to support base case and EOOS conditions for all Cycle 26 exposures and scram speeds. The LHGRFACp multipliers for ATRIUM 10XM and OPT1MA2 are presented in Table 5-7 and Table 5-8, respectively. The LHGRFAC1 multipliers for ATRIUM 10XM and OPTIMA2 are presented in Table 5-9 and Table 5-10, respectively. The LHGRFACp and LHGRFACr multipliers are applicable in both TLO and SLO.
- The EOOS conditions separated by "r in these tables represent single EOOS conditions and not any combination of conditions.
Page 58 of 71
Peak Pellet Exposure LHGRLimit (GWd/MTU)
(kW/ft) r 0.000 13.72 14.000 13.11 23.000 12.22 57.000 8.87 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.43 Table 5-2: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 181, 185, 186, 187, and 189 (Reference 3)
Peak Pellet Exposure LHGRLimit (GWd/MTU)
(kW/ft) 0.000 13.72 14.000 13.11 23.000 12.22 57.000 8.87 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.43 Table 5-3: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 171, 172, 173, 174, 178, 179, 180, 183, and 188 (Reference 3)
Peak Pellet Exposure LHGRLimit (GWd/MTU)
(kW/ft) 0.000 13.72 14.000 13.11 19.500 12.56 19.501 12.44 23.000 12.09
- 34.000 11.01 34.001 11.13 57.000 8.87 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.4_3 Page 59 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 5-4: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 176, 177, and 184 (Reference 3)
Peak Pellet Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MTU)
(kW/ft) 0.000 13.72 14.000 13.11 18.500 12.66 18.501 12.41 23.000 11.97 41.000 10.23 41.001 10.44 57.000 8.87 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.43 Table 5-5: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 175 and 182 (Reference 3)
Peak Pellet Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MTU)
(kW/ft) 0.000 13.72 13.999 13.11.
14.000 12.71 23.000 11.85.
36.000 10.60 36.001 10.93 57.000 8.87 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.43 Table 5-6: LHGR Limits for ATRIUM 10XM (Reference 2)
Peak Pellet Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MTU)
(kW/ft) 0.0 14.1 18.9 14.1 74.4 7.4 Page 60 of 71 I
I
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 5-7: ATRIUM 10XM LHGRFACp Multipliers for All Scram Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow(%
rated) 0 25 S38.5
> 38.5 50 80 100 Base/TCV Stuck
- S 60 0.51 0.51 0.55 Closed/MSIVOOS 0.67 0.69 0.93 1.00
>60 0.51 0.51 0.55
- S 60 0.38 0.38.
0.49 TBVOOS 0.67 0.69 0.93 1.00
>60 0.36 0.36 0.49 TCVSlow
- 60 0.50 0.50 0.55 Closure/
0.67 0.68 0.89 1.00 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>60 0.50 0.50 0.55 FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)
EOOS Condition Flow(%
rated) 0 25 S38.5
> 38.5 50 80 100 Base/TCV Stuck
- >60 0.47 0.47 0.53 Closed/MSIVOOS 0.67 0.69 0.90 1.00
>60 0.47 0.47 0.53
- S60 0.35 0.35 0.45 TBVOOS 0.67.
0.69 0.90 1.00.
> 60 0.35 0.35 0.45 TCVSlow
- S60 0.47 0.47 0.53 Closure/
0.67.
0.68 0.89 1.00 PLUOOS/PCOOS
>60 0.47 0.47 0.53 Page 61of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 5-8: OPTIMA2 LHGRFACp Multipliers for All Scram Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)
Nomina/FWT Core Core Power(% rated)
Flow EOOS Condition
(%
rated 0
25
- S 38.5
> 38.5 50 80 100 Base/TCV Stuck S60 0.60 0.60 0.63 Closed/MSIVOOS 0.70 0.74 0.88 1.00
>.60 0.53 0.53 0.60 S60 0.43 0.43 0.53 TBVOOS 0.69 0.72 0.78 0.99
> 60 0.41 0.41 0.50 TCVSlow S60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Closure/
0.60 0.66 0.87 0.99 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 0.53 0.53 0.60 FHOOS Core Core Power(% rated)
Flow EOOS Condition
(%
rated 0
25 s 38.5
> 38.5 50 80 100 Base/TCV Stuck s 60 0.55 0.55 0.60 Closed/MSIVOOS 0.65 0.69 0.83 0.99
> 60 0.53 0.53 0.60 S60 0.42 0.42 0.51 TBVOOS 0.65 0.69 0.78 0.96
>60 0.41 0.41 0.49 TCVSlow S60 0.55 0.55 0.60 Closure/
0.60 0.66 0.83 0.99 PLUOOS/PCOOS
> 60 0.53 0.53 0.60 Page 62 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 5-9: ATRIUM 10XM LHGRFACr Multipliers for All Cycle 26 Exposures, All EOOS (Reference 2) 1 Core Flow (% rated)
LHGRFACf 0.0 0.57 35.0 0.57 80.0 1.00 108.0 1.00 Table 5-10: OPTIMA2 LHGRFACr Multipliers for All Cycle 26 Exposures, All EOOS (Reference 2)
Core Flow (% rated)
LHGRFACr 0.0 0.27 20.0 0.43 40.0 0.60 80.0 1.00 100.0 1.00 108.0 1.00 Page 63 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14
- 6. Control Rod Block Setpoints Technical Specification Sections 3.3.2.1 and 3.4.1 The Rod Block* Monitor Upscale Instrumentation Setpoints are determined from the relationships shown in Table 6-1.
Table 6-1: RBM Allowable Values (Reference 6)
ROD BLOCK MONITOR UPSCALE TRIP FUNCTION ALLOWABLE VALUE Two Recirculation Loop 0.65 Wd + 56.1%
Operation Single Recirculation Loop Operation 0.65 Wd + 51.4%
Wd - percent of recirculation loop drive flow required to produce a rated core flow of 98.0 Mlb/hr.
The setpoint may be lower/higher and will still comply with the CRWE analysis because CRWE is analyzed unblocked (Reference 2).
Page 64 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14
- 7. Stability Protection Setpoints Technical Specifications Section 3.3.1.3 The OPRM PBDA Trip Settings are provided in Table 7-1.
Table 7-1: OPRM PBDA Trip Settings (Reference 2)
PBDA Trip Amplitude Setpoint (Sp)
Corresponding Maximum Confirmation Count Setpoint {Np) 1.14*
16
- A higher setpoint is allowed per Reference 2, but the PBDA Trip Amplitude Setpoint is being kept at 1.14 per site request. This is acceptable per Reference 2.
The PBDA is the only OPRM setting credited in the safety analysis as documented in the licensing basis for the OPRM system {Methodology 3).
The OPRM PBDA trip settings are based, in part, on the cycle specific OLMCPR and the power/flow-dependent MCPR limits. Any change to the OLMCPR values and/or the power/flow-dependent MCPR limits should be evaluated for potential impact on the OPRM PBDA trip settings.
The OPRM PBDA trip settings are applicable when the OPRM system is declared operable, and the associated Technical Specifications are implemented.
Page 65 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14
- 8. Modes of Operation The allowed modes of operation with combinations of equipment out-of-service are as described in Table 8-1. The EOOS conditions separated by"/" in these tables represent single EOOS conditions and not combinations of conditions.
Note that the following EOOS options have operational restrictions: all SLO, all EOOS options with 1 TCV/TSV stuck closed, and MSIVOOS. See Table 8-2 for specific restrictions.
Table 8-1: Modes of Operation (Reference 2)
EOOS Option Thermal Limit Set BASE CASE Base Case
)>
TLO orSLO
)>
Nominal FWT or FHOOS TBVOOS due to Main Generator Load Reject PLUOOS/TCV SLOW C
- Trip Relays OOS
)>
TLO for Nominal FWT*
TBVOOS TBVOOS
)>
TLO orSLO
)>
Nominal FWT or FHOOS BASE CASE 1 rcvrrsv Stuck Closed
)>
TLO orSLO
)>
Nominal FWT or FHOOS MSIVOOS One MSIVOOS
)>
TLO orSLO
)>
Nominal FWT or FHOOS PLUOosrrcv SLOW c TCV Slow Closure
)>
TLO orSLO
)>
Nominal FWT or FHOOS PLUOOSrrcv SLOW c PLUOOS
)>
TLO or SLO* *
)>
Nominal FWT or FHOOS PLUOosrrcv SLOW c PCOOS
)>
)>
Nom.inal FWT or FHOOS PLUOOSrrcv SLOW c PLUOPS and 1 TCV/TSV Stuck Closed
)>
)>
SLO for Nominal FWT**
PLUOOS/TCV SLOW C PCOOS and PLUOOS
)>
)>
SLO for Nominal FWT**
PLUOOsrrcv SLOW c PCOOS and 1 rcvrrsv Stuck Closed
)>
)>
SLO for Nominal FWT**
- .SLO and FHOOS cannot be applied for the case of TBVOOS due to main generator load reject trip relays OOS.
Page 66 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Table 8*2: Core Operational Restrictions for EOOS Conditions (Reference 2)
EOOS Condition Core Flow.(% of Core Thermal Power (%
Rated}
of Rated Power) 1 TCV Stuck Closed*
<75 OneMSIVOOS NIA
< 75 SLO
< 51
<50
- Also applicable to one TSV stuck closed.
All requirements for all applicable conditions listed in Table 8-2 MUST be met.
Page 67 of71 Rod Line(%)
< 80 NIA NIA
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14 Common Notes:
- 1. All. modes are allowed for operation at MELLLA, ICF (up to 108% rated core flow), and coastdown subject to the power restrictions in Table 8-2 (Reference 2). The licensing analysis supports full power operation to EOCLB (37,903 MWd/MTU CAVEX). Note that this value includes coastdown, where full power operation is not expected. Each OOS Option may be combined with each of the following conditioris (Reference 2):
- a.
Up to 40% of the TIP channels OOS
- b.
- c.
An LPRM calibration frequency of up to 2500 EFPH
- 2.
Nominal FWT results are valid for application within a +10°F/-30°F temperature band around the no.minal FWT curve (Reference 2). For operation outside of nominal FWT, a FWT reduction of up to 120°F is supported for all FHOOS conditions listed in Table 8-1 for cycle operation through EOCLB (Reference 2). At lower power levels, the feedwater temperature reduction is less (Reference 2). Per Reference 10, there is a restriction which requires that for a FWT reduction greater than 100°F, operation needs to be restricted to less than the 100% load line.
For a feedwater temperature reduction of between 30°F and 120°F, the FHOOS limits should be applied.
- 3. The base case and EOOS limits and multipliers support operation with 8 of the 9 turbine bypass valves operational (i.e., one bypass valve out of service) with the exception of the TBVOOS condition in which *all bypass valves are inoperable (Reference 2). Use of the response curve in TRM Appendix H supports operation with any single TBV OOS. TRM Appendix H facilitates analysis with one valve OOS in that the capacity at 0.45 seconds from start of TSV closure is equivalent to the total capacity with e*ight out of the nine valves in service (Reference 9). The analyses also support Turbine Bypass flow of 29.6% of vessel rated steam flow (Reference 9), equivalent to one TBV OOS (or partially closed TBVs equivalent to one closed TBV), if the assumed opening profile for the remaining TBVs is met. If the opening profile is NOT met, or if the TBV system CANNOT pass an equivalent of 29.6% of vessel rated steam flow, utilize the TBVOOS condition.
- 4.
For the TBVOOS condition, analyses assume zero TBVs trip open and zero TBVs are available for pressure control during the slow' portion of the transient analysis (Reference 9). Steam relief capacity is defined in Reference 9.
- 5.
Failure of the main generator load reject trip relays to actuate (e.g., main generator load reject trip relays OOS) will render the turbine bypass valve system inoperable during load reject events (Reference 2). Operation with the main generator load* reject trip relays out of service in TLO is supported by the TCV slow closure limits (Reference 2), meaning that, in accordance with Table 8-1, the "PLUOOS/TCV SLOW C" thermal limit set should be applied. This is applicable between 25%
and 50% of rated thermal power.
Page 68 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14
- 9. Methodology The analytical methods used to determine the core operating limits shall be those previously reviewed and approved by the NRC, specifically those described in the following documents:
- 1.
GE Topical Report NEDE-24011-P-A, Revision 14, "General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel (GESTAR)," June 2000.
- 2.
Removed.
- 3.
GE Topical Report NED0-32465-A, Revision 0, "Reactor Stability Detect and Suppress Solutions Licensing Basi~ Methodology for Reload Applications;" August 1996.
- 4. Westinghouse Topical Report CENPD-300-P-A, Revision 0, "Reference Safety Report for Boiling Water Reactor Reload Fuel," July 1996.
- 5.
Westinghouse Report WCAP-16081-P-A, Revision 0, "10x10 SVEA Fuel Critical Power Experiments and CPR Correlation: SVEA-96 Optima2," March 2005.
- 6. Westinghouse Report WCAP-15682-P-A, Revision 0, "Westinghouse BWR ECCS Evaluation Model:
Supplement 2 to Code Description, Qualification and Application," April 2003.
- 7.
WestJnghouse Report WCAP-16078-P-A, Revision 0, "Westinghouse BWR ECCS Evaluation Model:
Supplement 3 to Code Description, Qualification and Application to SVEA-96 Optima2 Fuel,"
November 2004.
- 8.
Westinghouse Topical Report WCAP-15836-P-A, Revision 0, "Fuel Rod Design Methods for Boiling Water Reactors - Supplement 1," April 2006.
- 9.
Westinghouse Topical Report WCAP-15942-P-A, Revision 0, "Fuel Assembly Mechanical Design Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors Supplement 1 to CENP-287," March 2006.
- 10. Westinghouse Topical Report CENPD-390-P-A, Revision 0, "The Advanced PHOENIX and POLCA Codes for Nuclear Design of Boiling Water Reactors," December 2000.
- 11. Westinghouse Report WCAP-16865-P-A, Revision 1, "Westinghouse BWR ECCS Evaluation Model Updates: Supplement 4 to Code Description, Qualification and Application," October 2011.
- 12. Exxon Nuclear Company Report XN-NF-81-58(P)(A), Revision 2 and Supplements 1 and 2, "RODEX2 Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Response Evaluation Model," March 1984.
- 13. Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation Report ANF-89-98(P)(A), Revision 1 and Supplement 1, "Generic Mechanical Design Criteria for BWR Fuel Designs," May 1995.
- 14. Siemens Power Corporation Report EMF-85-74(P), Revision 0 Supplement 1 (P)(A) and Supplement 2 (P)(A), "RODEX2A (BWR) Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Evaluation Model," February 1998.
- 15. AREVA NP Topical Report BAW-10247PA, Revision 0, "Realistic Thermal-Mechanical Fuel Rod Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors," February 2008.
- 16. Exxon Nuclear Company Topical Report XN-NF-80-19(P)(A), Volume 1 Revision 0 and Supplements 1 and 2, "EXxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors - Neutronic Methods for Design and Analysis," March 1983.
Page 69 of71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14
- 17. Exxon Nuclear Company Topical Report XN-NF-80-19(P)(A), Volume 4 Revision 1, "Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors: Application of the ENC Methodology for BWR Reloads,"
June 1986.
- 18. Exxon Nuclear Company Topical Report XN-NF-80-19(P)(A), Volume 3 Revision 2, "Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors, THERMEX: Thermal Limits Methodology Summary Description," January 1987.
- 19. Siemens Power Corporation Topical Report EMF-2158(P)(A), Revision 0, "Siemens Power Corporation Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors: Evaluation and Validation of CASM0-4/MICROBURN-B2," October 1999.
- 20. Siemens Power Corporation Report EMF-2245(P)(A), Revision 0, "Application of Siemens Power Corporation's Critical Power Correlations to Co-Resident Fuel," August 2000.
- 21. AREVA NP Report EMF-2209(P)(A), Revision 3, "SPCB Critical Power Correlation," September 2009.
- 22. AREVA Topical Report ANP-10298P-A, Revision 1, "ACE/ATRIUM 10XM Critical Power Correlation,"
March 2014.
- 23. AREVA NP Topical Report ANP-10307PA, Revision 0, "AREVA MCPR Safety Limit Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors," June 2011.
- 24. Exxon Nuclear Company Report XN-NF-84-105(P)(A), Volume* 1 Revision 0 and Volume 1 Supplements 1 and 2, "XCOBRA-T: A Computer Code for BWR Transient Thermal-Hydraulic Core Analysis," February 1987.
- 25. Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation Report ANF-913(P)(A), Volume 1 Revision 1 and Volume 1 Supplements 2, 3, and 4, "COTRANSA2: A Computer Program for Boiling Water Reactor Transient Analyses," August 1990.
May 2001.
- 27. Siemens Power Corporation Report EMF-2292 (P)(A), Revision O, "ATRIUM'-10: Appendix K Spray Heat Transfer Coefficients," September.2000.
- 28. Framatome ANP Topical Report ANF-1358(P)(A), Revision 3, "The Loss of Feedwater Heating Transient in Boiling Water Reactors," September 2005.
- 29. Siemens Power Corporation Topical Report EMF-CC-074(P)(A), Volume 4 Revision 0, "BWR Stability Analysis: Assessment of STAIF with Input from MICROBURN-82," August 2000.
Page 70 of 71
COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 14
- 10. References
- 1.
Exelon Generation Company, LLC and MidAmerican Energy Company, Docket No. 50-254, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1, Renewed Facility Operating License, License No. DPR-29.
- 2.
Framatome Report ANP-3744P Revision 0, "Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 26 Reload Safety Analysis," January 2019.
- 3.
Westinghouse Report NF-BEX-15-2 Revision 0, "Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 Cycle 24 Reload Licensing Report", January 2015.
- 4.
Framatome Report ANP-3718P Revision 0, "Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 26 ATRIUM 10XM Fuel Nuclear Fuel Design Report," August 2018.
- 5.
Westinghouse Report NF-BEX-14-135-NP Revision 1, "Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 Cycle 24 Supplemental MAPLHGR Report," October 2015.
- 6.
- Document, GE ORF C51-00217-01, "Instrument Setpoint Calculation Nuclear Instrumentation, Rod Block Monitor, Commonwealth Edison Company, Quad Cities 1 & 2,"
December 14, 1999. (Attachment A to Exelon Design Analysis, QDC-0700-1-1419, Revision 0).
- 7.
Westinghouse Report NF-BEX-14-98 Revision 0, "Bundle Design Report for Quad Cities 1 Cycle 24," August 2014.
- 8.
Exelon Technical Specifications for Quad Cities 1 and 2, Table 3.1.4-1, "Control Rod Scram Times."
- 9.
Exelon TOOi ES1800018 Revision 0, "Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 26 Plant Parameters Document,"
June 29, 2018.
- 10. Exelon Letter, NF-MW:02-0081, "Approval of GE Evaluation of Dresden and Quad Cities Extended Final Feedwater Temperature Reduction," Carlos de la Hoz to Doug Wise and Alex Misak, August 27, 2002:
Page 71of71