RBG-46111, Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2002
| ML031260668 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 04/30/2003 |
| From: | King R Entergy Operations |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RBF1-03-0077, RBG-46111 | |
| Download: ML031260668 (48) | |
Text
En tergy Entergy Operations, Inc.
River Bend Station 5485 U S Highway 61 P 0 Box 220 St Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225 336 6225 Fax 225 635 5068 Rick J. King Director Nuclear Safety Assurance April 30, 2003 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2002 River Bend Station License No. NPF-47 Docket No. 50-458 FileNos.:
G9.5, G9.25.1.5, G1O.6 RBG-461 11 RBF1-03-0077 Ladies and Gentlemen:
Enclosed is the River Bend Station (RBS) Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for the period January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002. This report is submitted in accordance with the RBS Technical Specifications, Section 5.6.2.
Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed information, please contact Mr. Bill Fountain of my staff at (225) 381-4625.
Sincerely, RJK/IJF enclosure
- is
Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2002 RBG-46111 Page 2 of 2 cc:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 NRC Resident Inspector PO Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 Mr. Michael K. Webb, NRR Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission M/S OWFN / 7 D1 Washington, DC 20555
RIVER BEND STATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 2002 Complied By:
McGehee Reed Specialist - Environmental, Sr.
Reviewed By:
Fvtt ftl-4 /A~
C / Arlie. Wells Superintendent - Radia Troy Han B4rnett tion Control 7 Superintendent - Chemistry at, B:
xY v -'e Thomas Tr5knier General Manager - Plant Operations
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
5 1.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 5
1.2 Pathways Monitored 5
1.3 Land UseCensus 5
2.0 INTERPRETATION AND TRENDS OF RESULTS 16 2.1 Air Particulate and Radioiodine Sample Results 16 2.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Sample Results 16 2.3 Water Sample Results 16 2.4 Sediment Sample Results 17 2.5 Milk Sample Results 17 2.6 Fish and Invertebrate Sample Results 18 2.7 Food Products Sample Results 18 2.8 Land Use Census Results 18 2.9 Interlaboratory Comparison Results 18 3.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
21 3.1 2002 Program Results Summary 21 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING PROGRAM 7
TABLE 2.1 LAND USE CENSUS RESULTS 19 TABLE 3.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
22 ii -
LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1-1 FIGURE 1-2 FIGURE 1-3 FIGURE 2-1 FIGURE 2-2 EXPOSURE PATHWAYS SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES - NEAR FIELD SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES - FAR FIELD TLD INDICATOR RESULTS VERSUS CONTROL DATA INDICATOR GROSS BETA RESULTS VERSUS CONTROL DATA 13 14 15 20 20 111 -
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS 2002 RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT
SUMMARY
OF MONITORING RESULTS 27 ATTACHMENT 1
- iv-
Summary The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report presents data obtained through analyses of environmental samples collected for the River Bend Station (RBS) Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the period January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002.
This report fulfills a requirement specified in RBS Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) 5.6.2 as required by Technical Specification 5.6.2 of Appendix A to RBS License Number NPF-47. During 2002, REMP results remained at background levels, as has been the case in previous years.
All required lower limit of detection (LLD) capabilities were achieved in all sample analyses during 2002. No measurable levels of radiation above baseline levels were detected in the vicinity of River Bend Station. The 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program thus substantiated the adequacy of source control and effluent monitoring at River Bend Station with no observed impact of plant operations on the environment.
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RBS established the REMP prior to the station's becoming operational (1985) to provide data on background radiation and radioactivity normally present in the area. RBS has continued to monitor the environment by sampling air, water, sediment, fish and food products, as well as measuring direct radiation. RBS also samples milk if milk-producing animals used for human consumption are present within five miles (8 km) of the plant.
The REMP includes sampling indicator and control locations within an approximately 20-mile radius of the plant. The REMP utilizes indicator locations near the site to show any increases or buildup of radioactivity that might occur due to station operation, and control locations farther away from the site to indicate the presence of only naturally occurring radioactivity.
RBS personnel compare indicator results with control and preoperational results to assess any impact RBS operation might have had on the surrounding environment.
In 2002, environmental samples were collected for radiological analysis. The results of indicator locations were compared with control locations and previous studies. It was concluded that overall, no significant relationship exists between RBS operation and effect on the area around the plant. The review of 2002 data, in many cases, showed radioactivity levels in the environment were undetectable in many locations and near background levels in significant pathways.
Harmful Effects or Irreversible Dama2e The REMP monitoring did not detect any harmful effects or evidence of irreversible damage in 2002.
Therefore, no analysis or planned course of action to alleviate problems was necessary.
Reportina Levels RBS's review indicates that no samples equaled or exceeded reporting levels for radioactivity concentration in environmental samples, as outlined in RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-2, when averaged over any calendar quarter. Therefore, 2002 results did not trigger any Radiological Monitoring Program Special Reports.
Radioactivity Not Attributable to RBS The RBS REMP detected no radioactivity attributable to other sources during year 2002.
Following the radioactive plume release due to reactor core degradation at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 1986, RBS REMP detected 1-131 in water, vegetation, and air samples. I-131 was also detected during 1998 in the wastewater treatment plant effluent.
This was attributed to the medical treatment of a RBS employee.
Comparison to Federal and State Programs RBS personnel compared REMP data to federal and state monitoring programs as results became available. Historically, the programs used for comparison have included the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) TLD Direct Radiation Monitoring Network and the Environmental Radiological Laboratory - Department of Environmental Quality Laboratory Services Division (ERL-DEQLSD).
The NRC TLD Network Program was discontinued in 1998. Historically these results have compared to those from the RBS REMP. RBS TLD results continue to remain similar to the historical average and continue to verify that plant operation is not affecting the ambient radiation levels in the environment.
The (ERL-DEQLSD) and the RBS REMP entail similar radiological environmental monitoring program requirements.
These programs include collocated air samples and splitting or sharing sample media such as water, fish and food products. Both programs have obtained similar results over previous years.
Sample Deviations
- Milk The REMP did not include milk sampling within five miles (8 km) of RBS in 2002 due to unavailability of milk-producing animals used for human consumption. RBS's Technical Requirements Manual requires collection of milk samples if available commercially within 8 km (5 miles) of the plant. RBS personnel collected vegetation samples to monitor the ingestion pathway, as specified in RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-1, because of milk unavailability.
- Required Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) Values All LLDs during this reporting period were less than the acceptable limits required by the RBS Technical Requirement Manual (TRM).
- Air Samples Listed below are sample/sampling deviations that occurred during 2002.
These deviations did not result in a missed sample and no LLD values were exceeded. As described in footnote (a) to RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-1, deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule due to malfunction of equipment or other legitimate reasons.
Station Sampling Period Problem Comment Description API 4/1/02 - 4/15/02 Calibration Due Air sampler in service past calibration Date due date of 3/31/02. Incorrect due date recorded on sample data sheet. Sampler replaced 4/15/02.
"As found data" indicated sampler within calibration criteria.
ANI 4/1/02 - 4/15/02 Power Outage Loss of 101 hours0.00117 days <br />0.0281 hours <br />1.669974e-4 weeks <br />3.84305e-5 months <br /> or 30% of sample volume. Required LLD achieved API &
7/8/02 - 7/22/02 Power Outage Weather related outage with loss of 1.9 ANI hours (0.6%) at API and 1.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> (0.5%) at AN1 location.
- Missed Samples No missed samples occurred during the 2002 sampling period.
- Unavailable Results There were no unavailable results during the year 2002.
Program Modifications RBS made no modifications to the REMP during the year 2002.
Attachments contains results of air, TLD, water, sediment, fish, food products and special samples collected in 2002. TLDs were analyzed by Waterford-3 Dosimetry. All remaining samples were analyzed by RBS Environmental Laboratory. Attachment 1 also contains RBS' participation in the interlaboratory comparison program during the year 2002.
1.0 Introduction 1.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RBS established the REMP to ensure that plant operating controls properly function to minimize any associated radiation endangerment to human health or the environment. The REMP is designed for:
Analyzing important pathways for anticipated types and quantities of radionuclides released into the environment.
Considering the possibility of a buildup of long-lived radionuclides in the environment and identifying physical and biological accumulations that may contribute to human exposures.
Considering the potential radiation exposure to plant and animal life in the environment surrounding RBS.
- Correlating levels of radiation and radioactivity in the environment with radioactive releases from station operation.
1.2 Pathways Monitored The airborne, direct radiation, waterborne and ingestion pathways, as seen in Figure 1-1, are monitored as required by the RBS Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.1. A description of the RBS REMP sample locations utilized to monitor exposure pathways are described in Table 1.1 and shown in Figures 1-2 and 1-3. RBS may occasionally supplement this program with additional sampling in order to provide a comprehensive and well-balanced program.
Section 2.0 of this report provides a discussion of 2002 sampling results with Section 3.0 providing a summary of results for the monitored exposure pathways.
1.3 Land Use Census RBS personnel conduct a land use census biannually, as required by RBS Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.2.
The land use census was performed in 2002. The purpose of this census is to identify changes in uses of land within five miles of RBS that would require modifications to the REMP or the Technical Requirements Manual. The most important criteria during this census is to determine location in each sector of the nearest:
- 1) Residence
- 2) Animal milked for human consumption
- 3) Garden of greater than 50 m2 (500 ft2) producing broadleaf vegetation
- The method used by RBS personnel for conducting this land use census is as follows:
- RBS personnel conduct door-to-door field surveys and/or aerial surveys in each meteorological sector out to five miles in order to locate the nearest resident and milk animal.
- Consultation with local agricultural authorities is used in instances when personal contact cannot be made.
As a result of these surveys, the following information is obtained in each meteorological sector:
- 1) Nearest permanent residence
- 2) Nearest milking animal RBS personnel identify locations on the map, measure distances to RBS and record results.
- Locations, if any, are identified which yield a calculated dose or dose commitments greater than those currently calculated in the Technical Requirements Manual.
- RBS personnel compare results to previous census.
RBS personnel do not perform a garden census since Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.2 allows the routine sampling of broadleaf vegetation in the highest D/Q sector near the site boundary in lieu of the garden census.
Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Airborne Radlolodine and Particulates 2 samples from close to the 2 SITE AN1 (0.9 km W) - RBS site Hwy 965; 0.4 Continuous sampler operation Radioiodine Cannisters -
1-131 BOUNDARY locations, in different km south of Activity Center.
with sample collection every analysis every two weeks.
- sectors, of the highest calculated annual average groundlevel D/Q.
API (0.9 km WNW) - Behind River Bend two weeks, or more frequently Station Activity Center.
if required by dust loading.
Air Particulate Gross beta radioactivity analysis following filter change.
Radioiodine and Particulates 1 sample from the vicinity of a AQS2 (5.8 km NW)
St.
Francis community having the highest Substation on US Hwy. (Bus.) 61 in St.
calculated annual average groundlevel Francisville.
D/Q.
Radioiodine and Particulates 1 sample from a control location, as for AGC (17.0 km SE) -
Entergy Service example 15 - 30 km distance and in the Center compound in Zachary. (Control) least prevalent wind direction.
Direct TLDs Radiation One ring of stations, one in each TA (1.7 km N) - River Bend Training Quarterly mR exposure quarterly.
meteorological sector in the general TAnt(1.7 mN ie edTann urel area of the SITE BOUNDARY.
Center.
TB1 (0.5 km NNE) - Utility pole near River Bend Station cooling tower yard area.
TC1 (1.7 km NE) - Stub pole at Jct. US Hwy. 61 and Old Highway 61.
Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Direct TLDs Radiation One ring of stations, one in each 1.6 km EN)- Stub pole along WF7, Quarterly mR exposure quarterly.
meteorological sector in the genera-Stub pole along WF7, area of the SITE BOUNDARY.
IS0m S of Jct. WF7 and US Hwy. 61.
TE1 (1.3 km E) - Stub pole along WF7, I km S of Jct. WF7 and US Hwy. 61.
TF1 (1.3 km ESE) - Stub pole along WF7, 1.6 km S of Jct. WF7 and US Hwy. 61.
TGi (1.6 km SE) - Stub pole along WF7, 2 km S of Jct. WF7 and US Hwy. 61.
THI (1.7 km SSE) - Stub pole at power line crossing of WF7 (near Grants Bayou).
TJ1 (1.5 km S) - Stub pole near River Bend Station Gate #23 on Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965).
TKI (0.9 km SSW) - Utility pole on Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965), 20 m S of River Bend Station River Access Road.
TLI (1.0 km SW) -
First utility pole on Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965) S of former Illinois Central Gulf RR crossing.
Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Direct TLIs Radiation One ring of stations, one in each TM1 (0.9 km WSW) - Third utility pole on Quarterly mR exposure quarterly.
meteorological sector in the general Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965) N of area of the SITE BOUNDARY.
former Illinois Central Gulf RR crossing.
TNI (0.9 km W) -
Utility pole along Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965), near garden and ANI air sampler location.
TPI (0.9 km WNW) - Behind River Bend Station Activity Center at AP1 air sampler location.
TQ1 (0.6 km NW) - Access from MA-1 on RBS North Access Road.
TRI (0.8 km NNW) -
River Bend Station North Access Road across from Main Plant entrance.
TLDs The balance of the stations (8) to be TAC (15.8 km N) - Utility pole at Jct. of US placed in special interest areas such Hwy. 61 and LA Hwy. 421, 7.9 km north of as population
- centers, nearby Bains. (Control) residences, schools, and in 1 or 2 areas to serve as control locations.
TCS (12.3 km NE) - Utility pole at gate to East Louisiana State Hospital in Jackson.
(Special)
TEC (16.0 km E) - Stub pole at jct. of Hwy.
955 and Midway Road, 4.8 km North of Jct. of Hwys 955 and 964. (Control)
Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Direct TLDs Radiation The balance of the stations (8) to be TGS (17.0 km SE) - Entergy Service Center Quarterly mR exposure quarterly.
placed in special interest areas such compound in Zachary. (Special) as population
- centers, nearby residences, schools, and in 1 or 2 TNS (6.0 km W) - Utility pole with electrical areas to serve as control locations.
meter at west bank ferry landing (LA Hwy. 10).
(Special)
TQS1 (4.0 km NW) -
Utility pole front of Pentecostal church (opposite West Feliciana Parish Hospital) near Jct. US Hwy. 61 and Ferdinand Street. (Special)
TQS2 (5.8 km NW) - St. Francis Substation on business US Hwy. 61 in St. Francisville.
(Special)
TRS (9.2 km NNW) - Stub pole at Jct. of US Hwy. 61 and WF2 near Bains (West Feliciana High School). (Special)
Waterborne Surface Water 1 sample upstream and 1 sample SWU (5.0 km W) - Mississippi River about 4 Grab samples quarterly Gamma isotopic analysis downstream.
km upstream from the plant liquid discharge quarterly, tritium analysis outfall, near LA Hwy. 10 ferry crossing.
quarterly.
SWD (7.75 km S) - Mississippi River about 4 km downstream from plant liquid discharge outfall, near paper mill.
Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Waterborne Groundwater Samples from 1 or 2 sources only If WU (-470 m NNE) - Upland Terrace Aquifer Semiannually Gamma isotopic and tritium likely to be affected.
well upgradient from plant.
analysis semiannually.
WD (-470 m SW) - Upland Terrace Aquifer well downgradient from plant.
Sediment From Shoreline 1 sample from downstream area with SEDD (7.75 km S) - Mississippi River about Annually Gamma isotopic analysis existing or potential recreational value.
4 km downstream from plant liquid discharge annually.
outfall, near paper mill.
Ingestion Milk If commercially available, 1 sample Currently, no available milking animals within Quarterly when animals are Gamma isotopic and 1-131 from milking animals within 8 km 8 km of RBS.
on pasture.
analysis quarterly when animals distant where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per year.
are on pasture.
1 sample from milking animals at a control location 15 -
30 km distant when an indicator location exists.
Fish and Invertebrates 1 sample of a commercially and/or FD (7.75 km S) -
One sample of a Annually Gamma isotopic analysis on recreationally important species in commercially and/or recreationally important edible portions annually vicinity of plant discharge area.
species from downstream area influenced by plant discharge.
1 sample of similar species in area not FU (4.0 km WSW)
- One sample of a influenced by plant discharge.
commercially and/or recreationally important species from upstream area not influenced by plant discharge.
Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Ingestion Food Products 1 sample of one type of broadleaf GNI (0.9 km W) -
Sampling will be Quarterly during the growing Gamma isotopic and 1-131 vegetation grown near the SITE performed in accordance with Table 3.12.1-1 BOUNDARY location of highest Section 4.a of the Technical Requirements season.
analysisquarterly.
predicted annual average groundlevel Manual.
D/Q if milk sampling is not performed.
1 sample of similar broadleaf GQC (32.0 km NW) - One sample of similar vegetation grown 15 - 30 km distant, if vegetables from LA State Penitentiary at milk sampling is not performed.
Angola. (Control)
FIGURE 1-1 EXPOSURE PATHWAYS Irrrdlditiofl 00
%f "- -
<&5-IC15( -=
- 4::Po CCZ?4 13
FIGURE 1-2 SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES - NEAR FIELD
/
I '
Q (NW)
R X
(NNW)
B (NNE)
/
/
C
,/
(NE)
N 1%
N1
/
P (WNW)
N N%
N%
N (W)
Ptoperly Lino
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/G (SE)
/
I\\
/
/
/
/
/
I I
k I
I I
I I
I sn.term S
(SW) l I
H (SSE)
/
/
I
/
/
/
K (SSW)
I I
Environmental Monitoring Locations A_ Air Sampler T_ TLD WU Sampling Well (Upgradient)
WD Sampling Well (Downgradient)
GN1 Onsite Garden J
(S)
FIGURE 1-3 SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES - FAR FIELD I
I I
I I
B (NNE)
/
/
C (NE) r
/
/
/
/
D (ENE)
/
/
N~
/
J*Cksoft
.1 N
(W)
E (E)
F (ESE)
M (WSW)
I I
I I
I I
t II
\\ I
.Lr..eI~ ke#
k)
/
/
/
/
/
L (SW)
/
/
I
/
K (SSW)
/
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I.
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I'
!~i I~
\\-',
I z
G
.1
.SI I
I I
I Stn Rouge Far.- fid Radiological Environmental Monitoring Locations AC Air Sampler Control A_S Air Sampler Special T_ I TLD Indicator T_C TLD Control T_S_ Special TLDs GQC Vegetation Control SWU Upstream Surface Water SWD Downstream Surface Water SEDD Downstream Sediment FU Upstream Fish/lnvertebrates FD Downstream Flsh/lnvertebrates
-I r NF E..
I I
5 10 kilonu,.tefs -
)
J (S) 2.0 Interpretation and Trends of Results 2.1 Air Particulate and Radioiodine Sample Results Iodine-131 was not detected in the radioiodine cartridges during 2002, as has been the case in previous years.
Indicator gross beta air particulate results for 2002 were similar to preoperational and operational levels as seen below. Results are reported as annual average pCi/m3.
Monitoring Period Result Preoperational 0.03 2001 0.021 2002 0.020 Table 3.1 provides a comparison of the indicator and control location mean values, which further emphasizes that the airborne pathway continues to remain at background levels. Figure 2-2 also shows a comparison of indicator results versus control location data from 1996 to 2001. All indicator results are below the upper control three-standard-deviation limit.
2.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Sample Results Gamma radiation dose in the reporting period compares to previous years and remains below preoperational levels. Figure 2-1 compares quarterly indicator results for 2002 with control location data from 1996 to 2001. All indicator results are below the upper control three-standard-deviation limit.
RBS normalizes measured doses to 90 days and relies on comparison of the indicator locations to the control as a measure of plant impact. RBS's comparison of the inner ring and special interest area TLD results to the controls, as seen in Table 3.1, indicates that the ambient radiation levels are unaffected by plant operations.
Therefore, levels continue to remain at or near background.
2.3 Water Sample Results Analytical results for 2002 surface water and groundwater samples were similar to those reported in previous years.
Surface water samples were collected from two locations (indicator and control) and analyzed for gamma radionuclides and tritium. Gamma radionuclides were below detectable limits at the indicator and control locations.
Tritium was also below detectable limits at all locations. Listed below is a comparison of 2002 results from the indicator location as compared to the preoperational and operational years.
Results are reported as annual average pCi/l.
Radionuclide 2002 1996 - 2001 Preoperational Gammas
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD Tritium
<LLD 258
<LLD Groundwater samples were collected from two locations (indicator and control) and analyzed for gamma radionuclides and tritium. Gamma radionuclides and Tritium were below detectable limits at the indicator and control locations. Listed below is a comparison of 2002 results from the indicator location as compared to the preoperational and operational years. Results are reported as annual average pCi/l.
Radionuclide 2002 1996 - 2001 Preoperational Gammas
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD Tritium
. <LLD 290
<LLD Based on these comparisons, the operation of RBS had no impact on this pathway during 2002, and levels of radionuclides monitored for this pathway continue to remain similar to those obtained in operational and preoperational years.
RBS personnel also collected special effluent wastewater samples from the sewage treatment plant during 2002 to supplement the REMP.
RBS did not detect any gamma radionuclides in these samples.
2.4 Sediment Sample Results Sediment samples were collected from the indicator location in 2002 and analyzed for gamma radionuclides. In 2002, gamma radionuclides were below detectable limits, which is consistent with the preoperational and operational monitoring periods.
Therefore, based on these measurements, RBS operations had no significant radiological impact upon the environment or public by this pathway.
RBS personnel also collected special sediment samples from East Creek and West Creek during 2002 to supplement the REMP.
RBS did not detect any gamma radionuclides in these samples.
2.5 Milk Sample Results Milk samples were not collected during 2002 due to the unavailability of indicator locations within 5 miles (8 km) of RBS. Since there are no dairies within five miles of the RBS site, it is concluded RBS's operation had no impact on this pathway in 2002.
2.6 Fish and Invertebrate Sample Results Fish samples were collected from two locations (indicator and control) and analyzed for gamma radionuclides. In 2002, gamma radionuclides were below detectable limits, which is consistent with the preoperational and operational monitoring periods.
Therefore, based on these measurements, RBS operations had no significant radiological impact upon the environment or public by this pathway.
2.7 Food Product Sample Results Food product samples were collected when available from two locations (indicator and control) in 2002 and analyzed for Iodine-131 and gamma radionuclides.
The 2002 levels remained undetectable, which is consistent with previous operational years. Therefore, since levels continue to remain at background, it can be concluded that plant operations is not impacting this pathway.
2.8 Land Use Census Results The land use census was conducted during the 2002 growing season in accordance with RBS Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.2. Although there were some minor changes between the 2000 and 2002 census as seen in Table 2.1, the land use census did not identify any location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in requirement TSR 3.11.2.3.1. In addition, no dairy animals were found within 8 km of RBS during the 2002 census.
RBS personnel did not perform a garden census since Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.2 allows the routine sampling of broadleaf vegetation in the highest D/Q sector near the site boundary in lieu of the garden census.
2.9 Interlaboratory Comparison Results RBS' Environmental Laboratory analyzed interlaboratory comparison samples to fulfill the requirements of Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.3.,
2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report, contains these results. RBS's review of interlaboratory comparison results indicated that 98% of the sample results for accuracy were within the acceptable control limits of the three normalized deviations. For those sample results outside the acceptable control limits, RBS's review indicated no impact on previously reported data. Attachment 1 also provides additional discussion regarding sample results outside the acceptable control limits.
Table 2-1 Land Use Census Results Item Sector Direction 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A
B C
D E
F G
H J
K L
M N
P Q
R N
NNE NE ENE E
WNW NW NNW Nearest Residence Havard' Dreher Bickham, J.
Goulette Bickhlam, S.
Letoureau2 Burton3 Hubbard Knecht Guillory Fountain Lacost Hermann Stokes Young Range (km) 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.4 2.2 2.8 3.9 1.7 1.8 7.4 7.9 Nearest Range Milk Animal (km) 6.1 3.4 1.3 1.7 2
3 New resident at the same range in sector A.
New resident at a range of 2.8 km., compared to 2.9 km. in 2000 census, in sector F.
New resident at a range of 3.9 km., compared to 6.6 km. in 2000 census, in sector G.
IFIGURE 2-1 TLD Indicator Res ults Versus Control Data (1 996-200 1) 20.0-18.0 -i2 16.0-
~14.0 E12.0 a--
10.0 A
x*
8.0 6 0 TAl T131 TGl TDI TEl TF1 TG1 THi TJ1 711 TLl lvii Thi TI T01 TRI Indicator Locations 1 st QtrO02 a
2nd Qtr 02 A
3rd Qtr 02 X
4thQtr02 -
Upper Control
- Lwr Con~to I FIGURE 2-2 Indicator Gross Beta Results Versus Control Data (1 996.2001) 0 040-0035 0 030 A
0 0025 -.
.9 0 020 A-PeA IL iijI
'R,~
0 0015 0 010 0 005 0 000 01101102 02101/02 03/01/02 04/01102 05101/02 06/01/02 07/01/02 08/01/02 09/01/02 10101102 11/01/02 12/01/02 1
ANI m
API A
AOS2 -
UPPER CONTROL -
LOWER CONTROLI 3.0 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary 3.1 2002 Program Results Summary Table 3.1 summarizes the 2002 REMP results. RBS personnel did not use values reported as less than the lower limit of detection (<LLD) when determining ranges and means for indicator and control locations.
TABLE 3.1 Radioloical Environmental Monitorine Proaram Summary Name of Facility: River Bend Station Docket No: 50-458 Location of Facility: West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana Reporting Period: January - December 2002 Sample Type Type & Number LLD b Indicator Locations Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of (Units) of Analyses a Mean (F) c Mean (F) c Nonroutine
[RangeI
[ Rangel Results e Mean (F) C Location d I
Range I Air Particulates Gross Beta 110 0.01 0.020 ( 83 / 83 )
API 0.022 ( 28 / 28 )
0.022 ( 27 / 27 )
0 (pCi/m3 )
[ 0.007- 0.034]
(0.9 km WNW)
[0.012-0.033]
[0.011 -0.032]
Airborne Iodine I-131 110 0.07
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
( pCi/m3 )
Indicators TLDs Gamma 64 (f) 12.37 ( 64 / 64)
TG1 14.87 (4 /4)
N/A 0
( mR/Qtr )
[ 9.04 - 16.56]
(1.6kmSE)
[ 13.59 - 16.56 ]
Special Interest TLDs Gamma 20 (f) 12.62 ( 20/ 20)
TRS 13.89 (4 /4)
N/A 0
( mR/Qtr )
[ 10.69 - 14.97]
(9.2 kmNNW)
[ 13.11 - 14.78 ]
Control TLDs Gamma 12 (f)
N/A N/A N/A 14.76 ( 12/ 12) 0 (mR/Qtr)
[13.50- 15.82]
TABLE 3.1 Radioloaical Environmental Monitoring Pro2ram Summary Name of Facility: River Bend Station Docket No: 50458 Location of Facility: West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana Reporting Period: January - December 2002 Sample Type Type & Number LLD b Indicator Location Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of (Units) of Analyses a Mean (F) c Mean (F) c Nonroutine Rangel
[Range I Results e Mean (F) c Location d t Range I Surface Water H-3 8
3000
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
(pCi/I)
Gamma 8
<LLD Mn-54 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Co-58 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Fe-59 30
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Co-60 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Zn-65 30
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Zr-95 30
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Nb-95 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
I-131 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Cs-134 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Cs-137 18
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Ba-140 60
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
La-140 15
<LLD N/A N/A 0
TABLE 3.1 Radiolozical Environmental Monitorina Program Summary Name of Facility: River Bend Station Docket No: 50458 Location of Facility: West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana Reporting Period: January - December 2002 Sample Type Type & Number LLD b Indicator Locations Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of (Units) of Analyses a Mean (F) c Mean (F) c Nonroutine
[Range]
[Range l Results e Mean (F) c Location d l Range l Groundwater H-3 4
3000
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
(pCi/1)
Gamma 4
Mn-54 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Co-58 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Fe-59 30
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Co-60 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Zn-65 30
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Zr-95 30
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Nb-95 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
I-131 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Cs-134 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Cs-137 18
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Ba-140 60
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
La-140 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Shoreline Sediment Gamma 1
(pCi/kg)
Cs-134 150
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Cs-137 180
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
TABLE 3.1 Radiolonical Environmental Monitorine Prowram Summary Name of Facility: River Bend Station Docket No: 50458 Location of Facility: West Feliciana Parish. Louisiana Reporting Period: January - December 2002 Sample Type Type & Number LLD b Indicator Location Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of (Units) of Analyses a Mean ( F) c Mean ( F) c Nonroutine Range IRange Results e Mean ( F) C Location d I
Range Fish Gamma 2
(pCi/kg)
Mn-54 130
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Fe-59 260
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Co-58 130
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Co-60 130
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Zn-65 260
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Cs-134 130
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Cs-137 150
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Food Products I-131 8
60
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
(pCi/kg)
Gamma 8
Cs-134 60
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Cs-137 80
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Special Sediment Gamma 8
(East & West Creek)
Cs-134 150
<LLD N/A N/A N/A 0
(pCi/kg)
Cs-137 180
<LLD N/A N/A N/A 0
TABLE 3.1 Radiolodical Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility: River Bend Station Docket No: 50458 Location of Facility: West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana Reporting Period: January - December 2002 a
b c
d e
f g
1-131 = Iodine-131; H-3 = Tritium LLD = Required lower limit of detection based on RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-3.
Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parenthesis (F).
Locations are specified (1) by name and (2) direction and distance relative to reactor site.
Non-routine results are those which exceed ten times the control station value. If no control station value is available, the result is considered non-routine if it exceeds ten times the preoperational value for the location.
LLD is not defined in RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-3.
Control location for sediment is upstream surface water sample.
2002 Radiological Monitoring Report Summary of Monitoring Results TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE 1.1 TABLE 1.2 TABLE 1.3 TABLE 1.4 TABLE 2.1 TABLE 3.1 TABLE 4.1 TABLE 5.1 TABLE 6.1 TABLE 7.1 TABLE 8.1 TABLE 9.1 TABLE 10.1 AIR SAMPLE LOCATION ANI AIR SAMPLE LOCATION API AIR SAMPLE LOCATION AQS2 AIR SAMPLE LOCATION AGC THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS SURFACE WATER GROUNDWATER SHORELINE SEDIMENT FOOD PRODUCTS FISH AND INVERTEBRATES SEDIMENTS (SPECIAL)
WASTEWATER PLANT EFFLUENT (SPECIAL)
INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON RESULTS 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 36 37 38 39 40 Table 1.1 Sample Type:
Analysis:
Units:
Air Particulate and Charcoal Cartridge - Indicator Location ANi Gross Beta and Iodine pCi/m3 LLD (pCi/m 3)
LAB ID 0.07 1-131 0.01 GROSS BETA START DATE END DATE 20020002 20020015 20020052 20020094 20020120 20020153 20020188 20020238 20020293 20020324 20020374 20020405 20020438 20020480 20020521 20020576 20020606 20020637 20020661 20020691 20020735 20020752 20020793 20020838 20020889 20020944 20020995 20021050 12/20/2001 1/3/2002 1/8/2002 1/22/2002 2/5/2002 2/19/2002 3/4/2002 3/18/2002 4/1/2002 4/15/2002 4/29/2002 5/13/2002 5/28/2002 6/11/2002 6/24/2002 7/8/2002 7/22/2002 8/5/2002 8/19/2002 9/3/2002 9/16/2002 9/24/2002 9/30/2002 10/14/2002 10/28/2002 11/11/2002 11/25/2002 12/9/2002 1/3/2002 1/8/2002 1/22/2002 2/5/2002 2/19/2002 3/4/2002 3/18/2002 4/1/2002 4/15/2002 4/29/2002 5/13/2002 5/28/2002 6/11/2002 6/24/2002 7/8/2002 7/22/2002 8/5/2002 8/19/2002 9/3/2002 9/16/2002 9/24/2002 9/30/2002 10/14/2002 10/28/2002 11/11/2002 11/25/2002 12/9/2002 12/23/2002
< 0.007
< 0 014
< 0.009
< 0.007
< 0.007
< 0.009
< 0.009
< 0.006
< 0.016
< 0.009
< 0 009
< 0.009
< 0.008
< 0.009
< 0 012
< 0.008
< 0.007
< 0.009
< 0.007
< 0.007
< 0.012
< 0.013
< 0 008
< 0 008
< 0.006
< 0.006
< 0.008
< 0.009 0.019 +/-0.001 0.019 +/-0.002 0.013 +/-0.001 0.011 +/-0.001 0.009 +/-0.001 0.011 +/-0.001 0.010 +/-0.001 0.010 +/-0.001 0.014 +/-0.001 0.007 +/-0.001 0.018 +/-0 001 0.021 +/-0 001 0.020 +/-0.001 0.021 +/-0.001 0.018 +/-0.001 0.017 +/-0.001 0.019 +/-0.001 0.017 +/-0.001 0.021 +/-0.001 0.025 +/-0 001 0.023 +/-0.002 0.015 +/-0.002 0 013 +/-0.001 0.025 +/-0 001 0.029 +/-0 001 0.024 +/-0.001 0.026 +/-0.001 0.030 +/-0.001 Average:
Maximum:
Minimum:
0.018 0.030 0.007 Table 1.2 Sample Type:
Analysis:
Units:
Air Particulate and Charcoal Cartridge - Indicator Location API Gross Beta and Iodine pCi/M 3 LLD (pCi/M3)
LAB ID 0.07 1-131 0.01 GROSS BETA START DATE END DATE LAB ID START DATE END DATE 20020001 20020014 20020051 20020093 20020119 20020152 20020187 20020237 20020292 20020323 20020373 20020404 20020437 20020479 20020520 20020575 20020605 20020636 20020660 20020690 20020734 20020751 20020792 20020837 20020888 20020943 20020994 20021049 12/20/2001 1/3/2002 1/8/2002 1/22/2002 2/5/2002 2/19/2002 3/4/2002 3/18/2002 1/3/2002 1/8/2002 1/22/2002 2/5/2002 2/19/2002 3/4/2002 3/18/2002 4/1/2002 4/1/2002 4/15/2002 4/15/2002 4/29/2002 4/29/2002 5/13/2002 5/28/2002 6/11/2002 6/24/2002 7/8/2002 7/22/2002 8/5/2002 8/19/2002 9/3/2002 9/16/2002 9/24/2002 9/30/2002 10/14/2002 10/28/2002 11/11/2002 11/25/2002 12/9/2002 5/13/2002 5/28/2002 6/11/2002 6/24/2002 7/8/2002 7/22/2002 8/5/2002 8/19/2002 9/3/2002 9/16/2002 9/24/2002 9/30/2002 10/14/2002 10/28/2002 11/11/2002 11/25/2002 12/9/2002 12/23/2002
< 0.005
< 0.019
< 0.008
< 0.006
< 0.008
< 0.008
< 0.008
< 0.008
< 0.008
< 0 008
< 0.009
< 0.009
< 0.009
< 0.009
< 0.009
< 0.007
< 0.008
< 0.011
< 0.007
< 0.007
< 0.011
< 0.015
< 0.010
< 0.008
< 0.008
< 0.007
< 0.006
< 0.008 0.027 +/-0.001 0.033 +/-0.003 0 024 +/-0.001 0.023 +/-0.001 0.023 +/-0.001 0.026 +/-0.001 0.022 +/-0.001 0.023 +/-0.001 0.023 +/-0.001 0.020 +/-0.001 0.021 +/-0.001 0.017 +/-0.001 0017 +/-0.001 0.019 +/-0.001 0.018 +/-0.001 0 016 +/-0.001 0.017 +/-0.001 0.014 +/-0.001 0.018 +/-0.001 0.025 +/-0.001 0.021 +/-0.002 0.014 +/-0.002 0.012 +/-0.001 0.023 +/-0.001 0.030 +/-0.001 0.025 +/-0.001 0.026 +/-0.001 0.033 +/-0.001 Average:
Maximum:
Minimum:
0.022 0.033 0 012 Table 1.3 Sample Type-Analysis:
Units:
Air Particulate and Charcoal Cartridge - Indicator Location AQS2 Gross Beta and Iodine pCi/Mn3 LLD (pCiMr3)
LAB ID 0.07 1-131 0.01 GROSS BETA START DATE END DATE 20020003 20020016 20020053 20020095 20020121 20020154 20020189 20020239 20020294 20020325 20020375 20020406 20020439 20020481 20020522 20020577 20020607 20020638 20020662 20020692 20020753 20020794 20020839 20020890 20020945 20020996 20021051 12/20/2001 1/3/2002 1/8/2002 1/22/2002 2/5/2002 2/19/2002 3/4/2002 3/18/2002 4/1/2002 4/15/2002 4/29/2002 5/13/2002 5/28/2002 6/11/2002 6/24/2002 7/8/2002 7/22/2002 8/5/2002 8/19/2002 9/3/2002 9/16/2002 9/30/2002 10/14/2002 10/28/2002 11/11/2002 11/25/2002 12/9/2002 1/3/2002 1/8/2002 1/22/2002 2/5/2002 2/19/2002 3/4/2002 3/18/2002 4/1/2002 4/15/2002 4/29/2002 5/13/2002 5/28/2002 6/11/2002 6/24/2002 7/8/2002 7/22/2002 8/5/2002 8/19/2002 9/3/2002 9/16/2002 9/30/2002 10/14/2002 10/28/2002 11/11/2002 11/25/2002 12/9/2002 12/23/2002 0.007 0.017 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.007 0 009 0 010 0.008 0.008 0.008 0 009 0 009 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.007 0 025 0.028 0.025 0.024 0.019 0.023 0.021 0.020 0.019 0.017 0.018 0.020 0.018 0.019 0.018 0.016 0.019 0.014 0.018 0 024 0.017 0 012 0.023 0.029 0.024 0.027 0.034
+/-0.001
+/-0.003
+/-0.001
+/-0.00 1
+/-0.001
+/-0.001
+/-0.001
+/-0.00 1
+/-0.00 1
+/-0.001
+/-0.00 1
+/-0.001
+/-0.001
+/-0 001
+/-0.001
+/-0.001
+/-0.001
+/-0.001
+/-0.001
+/-0.00 1
+/-0.001
+/-0.001
+/-0.00 1
+/-0.001
+/-0.001
+/-0.001
+/-0.002 Average:
Maximum:
Minimum:
0 021 0.034 0.012 Table 1.4 Sample Type:
Analysis:
Units:
Air Particulate and Charcoal Cartridge - Control Location AGC Gross Beta and Iodine pCrM3 LLD (pCi/M 3 )
LAB ID 0.07 1-131 0.01 GROSS BETA START DATE END DATE 20020004 20020017 20020054 20020096 20020122 20020155 20020190 20020240 20020295 20020326 20020376 20020407 20020440 20020482 20020523 20020578 20020608 20020639 20020663 20020693 20020754 20020795 20020840 20020891 20020946 20020997 20021052 12/20/2001 1/3/2002 1/8/2002 1/22/2002 2/5/2002 2/19/2002 3/4/2002 3/18/2002 4/1/2002 4/15/2002 4/29/2002 5/13/2002 5/28/2002 6/11/2002 6/24/2002 7/8/2002 7/22/2002 8/5/2002 8/19/2002 9/3/2002 9/16/2002 9/30/2002 10/14/2002 10/28/2002 11/11/2002 11/25/2002 12/9/2002 1/3/2002 1/8/2002 1/22/2002 2/5/2002 2/19/2002 3/4/2002 3/18/2002 4/1/2002 4/15/2002 4/29/2002 5/13/2002 5/28/2002 6/11/2002 6/24/2002 7/8/2002 7/22/2002 8/5/2002 8/19/2002 9/3/2002 9/16/2002 9/30/2002 10/14/2002 10/28/2002 11/11/2002 11/25/2002 12/9/2002 12/23/2002 0.007 0.013 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.010 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.006 0 005 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.006 0.024 +/-0 001 0.031 +/-0.003 0.025 +/-0.001 0.020 +/-0.001 0.021 +/-0.001 0.026 +/- 0.001 0.023 +/-0.001 0.019 +/-0.001 0.019 +/-0.001 0.018 +/-0.001 0 017 +/-0.001 0.021 +/-0.001 0.019 +/-0.001 0.022 +/- 0.001 0.020 +/- 0.001 0.018 +/-0.001 0.019 +/-0.001 0.016 +/-0 001 0 020 +/-0.001 0.028 +/-0.001 0.016 +/-0.001 0011 +/-0.001 0.022 +/- 0.001 0.029 +/- 0.001 0 022 +/-0.001 0 024 +/-0.001 0.032 +/- 0.001 Average:
Maximum:
Minimum:
0.022 0.032 0.011 Table 2.1 Sample Type:
Analysis:
Units:
Thermoluminescent Dosimeters mR Exposure mrem/Qtr Normalized Gamma-Ray Exposure Summary (mR)
Quarterly Environmental Thermoluminescence Dosimeter Results for Year 2002 INDICATORS TAI TBI TC1 TDI TE1 TF1 TG1 TH1 TJi TKI TL1 TM1I TNI TPI TQ1 TRI 1 ST QTR 10.88 14.07 14.27 13.88 13.11 11.85 13.59 10.49 11.36 12.14 12.14 10.78 9.91 10.69 9.04 9.33 2ND QTR 10.52 15.17 14.38 15.47 13.98 14.38 16.56 12.11 14.08 13.59 13.59 11.71 12.20 12.50 10.13 10.52 3RD QTR 9.44 14.68 13.69 14.19 13.00 12.80 14.58 11.52 11.91 12.90 13.10 10.63 11.02 11.42 9.54 9.64 4TH QTR 10.45 14.85 14.15 14.25 13.75 12.85 14.75 11.55 12.45 13.25 13.35 11.15 11.25 11.15 9.85 10.05 MEAN 10.32 14.70 14.12 14.45 13.46 12.97 14.87 11.42 12.45 12.97 13.04 11.07 11.10 11.44 9.64 9.89 MAX AVG MIN 14.27 11.72 9.04 16.56 13.18 10.13 14.68 12.13 9.44 14.85 12.45 9.85 14.87 12.37 9.64 SPECIAL INTEREST TCS TNS TQS1 TQS2 TRS 1ST QTR 12.53 10.69 12.24 10.98 13.11 2ND QTR 12.60 11.12 12.80 14.97 14.78 3RD QTR 11.02 11.91 13.59 11.62 13.50 4TH QTR 12.05 12.20 14.37 12.20 14.18 MEAN 12.05 11.48 13.25 12.44 13.89 MAX 13.11 14.97 13.59 14.37 13.89 AVG 11.91 13.25 12.33 13.00 12.62 MIN 10.69 11.12 11.02 12.05 11.48 CONTROLS 1ST QTR 2ND QTIR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR MEAN TAC 15.82 14.87 14.58 14.67 14.99 TEC 15.24 14.68 13.50 13.75 14.29 TGS 14.56 15.76 14.88 14.85 15.01 MAX AVG MIN 15.82 15.20 14.56 15.76 15.11 14.68 14.88 14.32 13.50 14.85 14.42 13.75 15.01 14.76 14.29 MAX AVG MIN INDICATOR 16.56 12.37 9.04 CONTROL 15.82 14.76 13.50 SPECIAL 14.97 12.62 10.69 Table 3.1 Sample Type:
Surface Water Analysis:
Gamma Isotopic and Tritium Units:
pCi/M LLD (pCi/I) 15 15 30 15 30 15 30 15 15 18 60 15 LAB ID LOCATION DATE MN-54 CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 NB-95 ZR-95 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 BA-140 LA-140 20020048 SWU 1/22/2002
< 436
< 472
< 1060
< 498
< 781
< 507
< 950
< 447
< 5.20
< 4.90
< 2060
< 476 20020049 SWD 1/22/2002
< 580
< 544
< 808
< 481
< 11.10
< 534
< 1050
< 582
< 463
< 609
< 2000
< 554 20020290 SWD 4/11/2002
< 5.51
< 429
< 1123
< 553
< 606
< 379
< 898
< 518
< 4.71
< 5.93
< 1780
< 369 20020291 SWU 4/11/2002
< 3.96
< 396
< 730
< 605
< 9.72
< 447
< 764
< 579
< 5.41
< 3.60
< 1600
< 7.73 20020524 SWU 7/8/2002
< 494
< 421
< 831
< 694
< 909
< 480
< 993
< 561
< 5.88
< 562
< 2160
< 604 20020526 SWD 7/8/2002
< 408
< 3.91
< 7 63
< 429
< 10 80
< 574
< 669
< 6.15
< 5.79
< 523
< 2130
< 699 20020760 SWU 10/8/2002
< 458
< 560
< 871
< 379
< 1070
< 644
< 701
< 602
< 5.00
< 559
< 1840
< 322 20020761 SWD 10/8/2002
< 5.11
< 3 94
< 957
< 402
< 1160
< 471
< 7.35
< 5.03
< 6 10
< 440
< 1620
< 633 LLD (pCiII) 3000 LAB ID LOCATION DATE TRITIUM 20020048 SWU 1/22/2002
< 545.00 20020049 SWD 1/22/2002
< 545.00 20020290 SWD 4/11/2002
< 571.00 20020291 SWU 4/11/2002
< 561.00 20020525 SWU 7/8/2002
< 573.00 20020527 SWD 7/8/2002
< 571.00 20020760 SWU 10/8/2002
< 614.00 20020761 SWD 10/8/2002
< 605.00 Table 4.1 Sample Type:
Groundwater Analysis:
Gamma Isotopic and Tritium Units:
pCi/l LLD (pCi/1) 15 1
LAB ID LOCATION DATE MN-54 CO 20020466 WD 6/19/2002
< 427 20020467 WU 6/19/2002
< 787 20021036 WU 12/18/2002
< 5 15 20021037 WD 12/18/2002
< 373 5
-58 4 04 5 50 5 89 3 80 30 FE-59
< 1080
< 1030
< 13 10
< 971 15 CO-60
< 4.70
< 828
< 631
< 5.58 30 ZN-65
< 12.30
< 14.30
< 12.20
< 6.20 15 NB-95
< 6.34
< 8.31
< 5.90
< 5.58 30 ZR-95
< 642
< 1300
< 11.30
< 907 15 1-131
< 544
< 756
< 854
< 462 15 18 CS-134 CS-137
< 397
< 412 60 BA-140
< 1680
< 24 30
< 22.70
< 1750 15 LA-140
< 537
< 888
< 729
< 703
< 636
< 7.35
< 502
< 723
< 7.58
< 382 LLD(pCi/1)
LAB ID 20020466 20020467 20021036 20021037 LOCATION WD WU WU WD DATE 6/19/2002 6/19/2002 12/18/2002 12/18/2002 3000 TRITIUM
< 572.00
< 573.00
< 603.00
< 607.00 Table 5.1 Sample Type:
Analysis:
Units:
LLD (pCi/kg)
LAB ID 20021014 Shoreline Sediment Gamma Isotopic pCi/kg, dry DATE 12/17/2002 150 CS-134
< 19.50 180 CS-137
< 19.60 Table 6.1 Sample Type:
Analysis:
Units:
LLD (pCi/kg, wi LAB ID 20020050 20020128 20020321 20020386 20020582 20020641 20020827 20020917 Food Products Gamma Isotopic pCi/kg, wet et)
LOCATION GN1 GQC GNI GQC GN1 GQC GN1 GQC DATE 1/22/2002 2/19/2002 4/24/2002 5/21/2002 7/25/2002 8/21/2002 10/22/2002 11/19/2002 60 1-131
< 45.50
< 39.30
< 36.60
< 34.40
< 41.40
< 37.00
< 43.80
< 30.90 60 CS-134
< 57.70
< 27.30
< 36.40
< 36.50
< 45.80
< 38.60
< 58.40
< 36.30 80 CS-137
< 51.00
< 21.00
< 20.70
< 40.30
< 54.80
< 31.40
< 38.70
< 34.60 Table 7.1 Sample Type:
Analysis:
Units:
LLD(pCilkg)
LAB ID Fish Gamma Isotopic pCi/kg, wet DATE LOCATION 130 MN-54 130 CO-58 260 FE-59 130 CO-60 260 ZN-65 130 CS-134 150 CS-137 20020992 20020993 12/7/2002 12/7/2002 FU FD
< 14.40
< 21.30
< 11.80
< 21.10
< 48.80
< 55.10
< 14.10
< 33.70
< 46.50
< 63.50
< 13.00
< 23.80
< 18.50
< 27.60 Table 8.1 Sample Type:
Sediments (Special)
Analysis:
Gamma Isotopic Units:
pCi/kg, dry LLD (pCi/kg, dry)
LAB ID 20020304 20020305 20020445 20020446 20020703 20020704 20021015 20021016 DATE 3/27/2002 3/27/2002 6/12/2002 6/12/2002 9/16/2002 9/16/2002 12/17/2002 12/17/2002 LOCATION WEST CREEK EAST CREEK WEST CREEK EAST CREEK EAST CREEK WEST CREEK WEST CREEK EAST CREEK 150 CS-134
< 30.10
< 37.00
< 14.20
< 11.90
< 13.10
< 17.90
< 13.40
< 12.00 180 CS-137
< 34.50
< 33.20
< 13.80
< 12.90
< 14.70
< 21.10
< 14.70
< 13.10 Table 9.1 Sample Type:
Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent (Special)
Analysis:
Gamma Isotopic Units:
pCi/i LLD OiCUI) 15 15 30 15 30 15 30 15 15 18 60 15 LAB ID DATE MIN-54 CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 NB-95 ZR-95 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 BA-140 LA-140 20020071 1/30/2002
< 3.74
< 458
<5.97
<486
< 785
< 345
< 6 15
< 4.11
< 367
< 461
< 11.60
< 390 20020146 2/28/2002
< 5.58
< 5.90
< 8.89
< 3.60
< 1040
< 415
< 607
< 445
< 444
< 448
< 12.90
< 687 20020231 3/27/2002
< 383
< 465
< 5.42
< 4.93
< 862
< 428
< 726
<502
< 491
< 421
< 11.90
< 4.81 20020322 4/24/2002
< 386
< 284
< 7.34
< 415
< 555
< 4.41
< 6.86
<457
< 332
< 423
< 1560
< 4.86 20020412 5/30/2002
< 447
< 423
< 874
< 376
< 939
< 316
< 646
<4.05
< 382
< 450
< 1480
< 511 20020497 6/26/2002
< 368
< 295
< 614
< 376
< 813
< 4.47
< 7.30
< 3.97
< 499
< 308
< 12.70
< 633 20020594 8/1/2002
< 523
< 547
< 1300
< 600
< 10.70
< 3.92
< 895
<478
< 569
< 610
< 2050
< 1.81 20020654 8/28/2002
< 315
< 573
< 1090
< 6.90
< 9.63
< 608
< 878
<512
< 492
< 511
< 1750
< 460 20020741 9/26/2002
< 440
< 5 12
< 805
< 446
< 7.12
< 3.02
< 863
< 6.71
< 402
< 469
< 1830
< 676 20020854 10/30/20002
< 470
< 200
< 791
< 356
< 885
< 408
< 464
<4.78
< 3.79
< 442
< 1740
< 511 20020953 11/27/2002
< 407
< 330
< 683
< 353
< 946
< 443
< 580
<4.66
< 3.73
< 444
< 1410
< 672 20021078 12/31/2002
< 540
< 450
< 1140
< 465
< 1190
< 559
< 750
<670
< 4.86
< 556
< 21.70
< 936 Table 10.1 Sample Type: Interlaboratorv Comparison Analysis:
Gross Beta, Iodine-131, Tritium, and Gamma Isotopic Sample Type Study Date Analysis RBS RBS RBS (units)
"Known" Value Value N-N-RANGEC
~D EV b 8 hairc:9al E3236-125 6/13/02 1-131 94.0 16.28 93 4
-0 12 0.358 (pCilcartridge) a~7lIter)
E3049-125 3114/02 BETA 130 22 5 137 0.98 0 273 E3047-125 3/14/02 CR-51 198 34.3 209 0.96 0.776 MN-54 166+/-28 7 177 1.11 0 605 FE-59 86 0 +/- 14 9 97.8 2.37 0.103 CO-60 117+/-20 3 116
-0.10 0 252 ZN-65 164+/-284 176 1.27 0.432 1-131 61.0+/-10 6 58.7
-0.65 0 271 CS-134 91.0+/-15 8 89.8
-0.23 0 032 CS-137 197+/-34 1 196
-0.06 0120 CE-141 242 +/-41.9 241
-0 05 0.024 E3048-125 3/14/02 CR-51 198 +/- 34 3 204 0 52 0 955 (Duplicate)
MN-54 166 +/- 28 7 179 1.36 0.320 FE-59 860+/-14 9 96 4 2.09 1.264 CO-60 117+/-20 3 113
-0 64 0404 ZN-65 164+/-284 176 1.30 0 864 1-131 61.0+/-10 6 62.7 0 47 0 504 CS-134 91.0+/-15 8 89 0
-0 37 0435 CS-137 197+/-34 1 202 0 41 0.420 CE-141 242+/-41.9 243 0.05 0.073 E3235-125 6/13/02 H-3 6970+/- 1207 7298 0.82 0.217 tplitreF r)
E3323-125 9/12/02 BETA 69 0+/- 11.95 73.4 1.11 0.094 E3382-125 9/12/02 CR-51 171 +/-29 6 178 0.68 1.105 MN-54 115+/-19 9 132 2.61
- 0.308 CO-58 73.0 +/- 12.6 77.2 1.00 0.372 FE-59 67.0+/-11.6 80 8 3 57" 0 062 CO-60 112+/-19 4 124 1.86 0 422 ZN-65 141 +/-24 4 156 1.84 0 628 CS-134 990+/-17.2 994 0 08 0.024 CS-137 95.0+/-16.5 103 1.46 0 249 CE-141 120+/-20.8 133 1.83 0.148 Table 10.1 Sample Type:
Analysis:
Interlaboratory Comparison Gamma Isotopic Errorl Bookmark Study Date Analysis V
"Known" Value Value N-DEV" N-RANGEc Sample Type (units)
Sediment E3383-125 9/12102 CR-51 0 354 +/- 0.061 0.366 0 603 0 818 (pCi/gram)
MN-54 0.238 +/- 0 041 0.266 2.038 0 347 CO-58 0.151 +/- 0.026 0.159 0.956 0.196 FE-59 0.138 +/- 0 024 0.150 1 464 0 300 CO-60 0 232 +/- 0 040 0.243 0.846 0 229 ZN-65 0 293 +/- 0 051 0 330 2.207 0 403 CS-134 0 205 +/- 0 036 0 204
-0.056 0 288 CS-137 0 282 +/- 0.049 0 323 2.539 0.105 CE-141 0 249 +/- 0 043 0 272 1.577 0.735 NOTES:
(a) The 'known' values are listed with a range reflecting control (3 sigma) limits (b) The normalized deviation from the 'known" value is computed from the deviation and the standard error of the mean +/-2 000 is the warning limit and +/-3 000 is the control limit This is a measure of accuracy of the analytical methods (c) The normalized range is computed from the mean range, the control limit, and the standard error of the range;
+2.000 is the warning limit and +3 000 is the control limit This is a measure of precision of the analytical methods (d) The results reported were out of the control limits Exceptions:
There was one result outside the control limits for accuracy in the 2002 cross check program participation studies. This result was in a gamma isotopic analysis of an air particulate filter sample.
The study result outside the control limits for accuracy was in the analysis of the nuclide Fe-59 in sample study 3382-125 of 9/12/2002.
RBS normalized-deviation for the analysis was +3.57 with control limits of +/-3.00. This high-bias result is considered conservative and is considered as having no impact on past results of the program. The bias high result for Fe-59 is contributed to coincidence summing effects. A coincidence summing correction was employed in the past, but was discontinued due to the production of non-conservative low-bias results. Fe-59 results were all within control limits in other cross check samples for the year 2002.