ML23072A089
| ML23072A089 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone, Summer, Surry, North Anna |
| Issue date: | 05/01/2023 |
| From: | Geoffrey Miller Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Stoddard D Dominion Nuclear |
| Miller G | |
| References | |
| EPID L-2022-LLA-0078 | |
| Download: ML23072A089 (55) | |
Text
May 1, 2023 Mr. Daniel G. Stoddard Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711
SUBJECT:
MILLSTONE POWER STATION, UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3, NORTH ANNA POWER STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2, SURRY POWER STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2, AND VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO. 1
ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT NO(S). 346 AND 286 (MILLSTONE), 294 AND 277 (NORTH ANNA), 311 AND 311 (SURRY), AND 225 (SUMMER) TO REVISE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TO ADOPT TSTF-554, REVISE REACTOR COOLANT LEAKAGE REQUIREMENTS (EPID L-2022-LLA-0078)
Dear Mr. Stoddard:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment Nos. 346 and 286 to Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-65 and NPF-49 for the Millstone Power Station, Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Amendment Nos. 294 and 277 to Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-4 and NPF-7 for the North Anna Power Station (North Anna), Unit Nos. 1 and 2, respectively, Amendment Nos. 311 and 311 to Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 for the Surry Power Station (Surry), Unit Nos. 1 and 2, respectively and Amendment No. 225 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-12 for the Virgil C.
Summer Nuclear Station, Unit No. 1. These amendments are in response to your application dated May 25, 2022 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML22146A027).
The amendments revise the respective Technical Specifications (TSs) consistent with Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-554, Revise Reactor Coolant Leakage Requirements, to revise the TS definition of leakage, clarify the requirements when pressure boundary leakage is detected, and adds a Required Action when pressure boundary leakage is identified.
A copy of the related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. A Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commissions biweekly Federal Register notice.
Sincerely,
/RA/
G. Edward Miller, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-336, 50-423, 50-338, 50-339, 50-280, 50-281, and 50-395
Enclosures:
- 1. Amendment No. 346 to DPR-65
- 2. Amendment No. 286 to NPF-49
- 2. Amendment No. 294 to NPF-4
- 4. Amendment No. 277 to NPF-7
- 5. Amendment No. 311 to DPR-32
- 6. Amendment No. 311 to DPR-37
- 7. Amendment No. 225 to NPF-12
- 8. Safety Evaluation cc: Listserv DOMINION ENERGY NUCLEAR CONNECTICUT, INC.
DOCKET NO. 50-336 MILLSTONE POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 2 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 346 Renewed License No. DPR-65
- 1.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment by Dominion Energy Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
(the licensee) dated May 25, 2022, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commissions rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C.
There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations; D.
The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commissions regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
- 2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-65 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(2)
Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 346 are hereby incorporated in the renewed license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
- 3.
This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance, and shall be implemented within 60 days of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Michael T. Markley, Chief Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
Changes to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-65 and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: May 1, 2023 Michael T.
Markley Digitally signed by Michael T. Markley Date: 2023.05.01 08:49:12 -04'00' DOMINION ENERGY NUCLEAR CONNECTICUT, INC., ET AL DOCKET NO. 50-423 MILLSTONE POWER STATION UNIT NO. 3 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 286 Renewed License No. NPF-49
- 1.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment by Dominion Energy Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
(DENC, the licensee), dated May 25, 2022, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commissions rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C.
There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations; D.
The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commissions regulations, and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
- 2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-49 are hereby amended to read as follows:
(2)
Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, revised through Amendment No. 286 and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, both of which are attached hereto are hereby incorporated into the license. DENC shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.
- 3.
This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Michael T. Markley, Chief Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Operation
Attachment:
Changes to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-49 and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: May 1, 2023 Michael T.
Markley Digitally signed by Michael T. Markley Date: 2023.05.01 08:49:56 -04'00'
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 346 MILLSTONE POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 2 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-65 DOCKET NO. 50-336 LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 286 MILLSTONE POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 3 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NOS. NPF-49 DOCKET NO. 50-423 Replace the following pages of the Facility Operating License and Renewed Facility Operating Licenses with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
Remove Insert DPR-65, page 3 DPR-65, page 3 NPF-49, page 4 NPF-49, page 4 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
Millstone Unit No. 2 Remove Insert 1-3 1-3 3/4 4-9 3/4 4-9 Millstone Unit No. 3 Remove Insert 1-4 1-4 3/4 4-22 3/4 4-22 3/4 4-23 3/4 4-23 3/4 4-23a 3/4 4-23a Connecticut, in accordance with the procedures and limitations set forth in this renewed operating license; (2)
Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Part 70, to receive, possess and use at any time special nuclear material as reactor fuel, in accordance with the limitations for storage and amounts required for reactor operation, as described in the Final Safety Analysis Report, as supplemented and amended; (3)
Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70, to receive, possess and use at any time any byproduct, source and special nuclear material as sealed neutron sources for reactor startup, sealed sources for reactor instrumentation and radiation monitoring equipment calibration, and as fission detectors in amounts as required; (4)
Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70, to receive, possess and use in amounts as required any byproduct, source or special nuclear material without restriction to chemical or physical form for sample analysis or instrument and equipment calibration or associated with radioactive apparatus or components; (5)
Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, to possess, but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility.
C.
This renewed operating license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations in 10 CFR Chapter 1: Part 20, Section 30.34 of Part 30, Section 40.41 of Part 40, Section 50.54 and 50.59 of Part 50, and Section 70.32 of Part 70; and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:
(1)
Maximum Power Level The licensee is authorized to operate the facility at steady-state reactor core power levels not in excess of 2700 megawatts thermal.
(2)
Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 346 are hereby incorporated in the renewed license.
The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
Renewed License No. DPR-65 Amendment No. 346 (2)
Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, revised through Amendment No. 286 and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, both of which are attached hereto are hereby incorporated into the license. DENC shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.
(3)
DENC shall not take any action that would cause Dominion Energy, Inc.
or its parent companies to void, cancel, or diminish DENCs Commitment to have sufficient funds available to fund an extended plant shutdown as represented in the application for approval of the transfer of the licenses for MPS Unit No. 3.
(4)
Immediately after the transfer of interests in MPS Unit No. 3 to DNC*, the amount in the decommissioning trust fund for MPS Unit No. 3 must, with respect to the interest in MPS Unit No. 3, that DNC* would then hold, be at a level no less than the formula amount under 10 CFR 50.75.
(5)
The decommissioning trust agreement for MPS Unit No. 3 at the time the transfer of the unit to DNC* is effected and thereafter is subject to the following:
(a)
The decommissioning trust agreement must be in a form acceptable to the NRC.
(b)
With respect to the decommissioning trust fund, investments in the securities or other obligations of Dominion Energy, Inc. or its affiliates or subsidiaries, successors, or assigns are prohibited.
Except for investments tied to market indexes or other non-nuclear-sector mutual funds, investments in any entity owning one or more nuclear power plants are prohibited.
(c)
The decommissioning trust agreement for MPS Unit No. 3 must provide that no disbursements or payments from the trust, other than for ordinary administrative expenses, shall be made by the trustee until the trustee has first given the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 30 days prior written notice of payment The decommissioning trust agreement shall further contain a provision that no disbursements or payments from the trust shall be made if the trustee receives prior written notice of objection from the NRC.
(d)
The decommissioning trust agreement must provide that the agreement cannot be amended in any material respect without 30 days prior written notification to the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
- On May 12, 2017, the name Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. changed to Dominion Energy Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
Renewed License No. NPF-49 Amendment No. 273, 275, 276, 277, 278 279 283 284 285 286
MILLSTONE - UNIT 2 DEFINITIONS CORE ALTERATION 1.12 CORE ALTERATION shall be the movement of any fuel, sources, or reactivity control components within the reactor vessel with the vessel head removed and fuel in the vessel.
Suspension of CORE ALTERATIONS shall not preclude completion of movement of a component to a safe position.
SHUTDOWN MARGIN 1.13 SHUTDOWN MARGIN shall be the instantaneous amount of reactivity by which the reactor is subcritical or would be subcritical from its present condition assuming all control element assemblies (shutdown and regulating) are fully inserted except for the single assembly of highest reactivity worth which is assumed to be fully withdrawn.
LEAKAGE 1.14 LEAKAGE shall be:
1.14.1 CONTROLLED LEAKAGE CONTROLLED LEAKAGE shall be the water flow from the reactor coolant pump seals, and 1.14.2 IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE shall be:
a.
Leakage (except CONTROLLED LEAKAGE) into closed systems, such as pump seal or valve packing leaks that are captured and conducted to a sump or collecting tank, or b.
Leakage into the containment atmosphere from sources that are both specifically located and known to not interfere with the operation of Leakage Detection Systems; or c.
Reactor Coolant System (RCS) LEAKAGE through a steam generator to the Secondary System (primary to secondary LEAKAGE);
1.14.3 PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE shall be LEAKAGE (except primary to secondary LEAKAGE) through a fault in an RCS component body, pipe wall, or vessel wall. LEAKAGE past seals, packing, and gaskets is not PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, and 1.14.4 UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE shall be all LEAKAGE which is not IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE or CONTROLLED LEAKAGE.
Amendment No. 38, 263, 280, 299, 346 1-3
MILLSTONE - UNIT 2 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM OPERATIONAL LEAKAGE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.4.6.2 Reactor Coolant System Operational LEAKAGE shall be limited to:
a.
No PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, b.
1 GPM UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE, c.
75 GPD primary to secondary LEAKAGE through any one steam generator, and d.
10 GPM IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE.
APPLICABILITY:
MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.
ACTION:
a.
With PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, isolate affected component, pipe, or vessel from the RCS by use of a closed manual value, closed and de-activated automatic valve, blind flange, or check valve within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
b.
With any RCS operational LEAKAGE not within limits for reasons other than PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE or primary to secondary LEAKAGE, reduce LEAKAGE to within limits within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
c.
With ACTION and associated completion time not met, or primary to secondary LEAKAGE not within limits, be in HOT STANDBY within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and be in COLD SHUTDOWN within 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.4.6.2.1 NOTES 1.
Not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> after establishment of steady state operation.
2.
Not applicable to primary to secondary LEAKAGE.
Verify RCS operational LEAKAGE is within limits by performance of RCS water inventory balance at the frequency specified in the Surveillance Frequency Control Program.
Amendment No. 25, 37, 82, 85, 101, 121, 138, 215, 228, 299, 324, 346 3/4 4-9
MILLSTONE - UNIT 3 DEFINITIONS
- b. Leakage into the containment atmosphere from sources that are both specifically located and known to not interfere with the operation of Leakage Detection Systems; or c.
Reactor Coolant System (RCS) LEAKAGE through a steam generator to the Secondary System (primary to secondary LEAKAGE);
1.16.3 PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE shall be LEAKAGE (except primary to secondary LEAKAGE) through a fault in a RCS component body, pipe wall, or vessel wall. LEAKAGE past seals, packing, and gaskets is not PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, and 1.16.4 UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE shall be all LEAKAGE which is not IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE or CONTROLLED LEAKAGE.
MASTER RELAY TEST 1.17 A MASTER RELAY TEST shall be the energization of each master relay and verification of OPERABILITY of each relay. The MASTER RELAY TEST shall include continuity check of each associated slave relay.
MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC 1.18 MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC shall include all persons who are not occupationally associated with the plant. This category does not include employees of the licensee, its contractors, or vendors. Also excluded from this category are persons who enter the site to service equipment or to make deliveries. This category does include persons who use portions of the site for recreational, occupational, or other purposes not associated with the plant.
The term REAL MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC means an individual who is exposed to existing dose pathways at one particular location.
OPERABLE - OPERABILITY 1.19 A system, subsystem, train, component or device shall be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY when it is capable of performing its specified function(s), and when all necessary attendant instrumentation, controls, electrical power, cooling or seal water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the system, subsystem, train, component, or device to perform its function(s) are also capable of performing their related support function(s).
Amendment No. 238, 283, 286 1-4
MILLSTONE - UNIT 3 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM OPERATIONAL LEAKAGE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.4.6.2 Reactor Coolant System operational LEAKAGE shall be limited to:
a.
No PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, b.
1 gpm UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE, c.
150 gallons per day primary to secondary LEAKAGE through any one steam generator, d.
10 gpm IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE, e.
40 gpm CONTROLLED LEAKAGE at a Reactor Coolant System pressure of 2250 20 psia, and f.*
0.5 gpm LEAKAGE per nominal inch of valve size up to a maximum of 5 gpm at a Reactor Coolant System pressure of 2250 20 psia from any Reactor Coolant System Pressure Isolation Valve specified in Table 3.4-1.
APPLICABILITY:
MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4.
ACTION:
a.
With PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, isolate affected component, pipe, or vessel from the RCS by use of a closed manual valve, closed and de-activiated automatic valve, blind flange, or check valve within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
b.
With primary to secondary LEAKAGE not within limits, be in at least HOT STANDBY within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
c.
With any RCS operational LEAKAGE not within limits for reasons other than PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, primary to secondary LEAKAGE, or LEAKAGE from Reactor Coolant System Pressure Isolation Valves, reduce LEAKAGE to within limits within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in the COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
This requirement does not apply to Pressure Isolation Valves in the Residual Heat Removal flow path when in, or during the transition to or from, the shutdown cooling mode of operation.
Amendment No. 209, 238, 286 3/4 4-22
MILLSTONE - UNIT 3 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM OPERATIONAL LEAKAGE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION (Continued) d.
With any Reactor Coolant System Pressure Isolation Valve LEAKAGE greater than the above limit, isolate the high pressure portion of the affected system from the low pressure portion within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> by use of at least two closed manual or deactivated automatic valves, or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
4.4.6.2.1 Reactor Coolant System operational LEAKAGE shall be demonstrated to be within each of the above limits by:
a.
Deleted b.
Deleted c.
Measurement of the CONTROLLED LEAKAGE to the reactor coolant pump seals when the Reactor Coolant System pressure is 2250 +/-20 psia at the frequency specified in the Surveillance Frequency Control Program with the modulating valve fully open. The provisions of Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable for entry into MODE 3 or 4; NOTES 1.
Not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> after establishment of steady state operation.
2.
Not applicable to primary to secondary LEAKAGE.
d.
Performance of a Reactor Coolant System water inventory balance at the frequency specified in the Surveillance Frequency Control Program; NOTE Not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> after establishment of steady state operation.
e.
Verification that primary to secondary LEAKAGE is 150 gallons per day through any one Steam Generator at the frequency specified in the Surveillance Frequency Control Program, and; f.
Monitoring the Reactor Head Flange Leakoff System at the frequency specified in the Surveillance Frequency Control Program.
Amendment No. 100, 133, 174, 206, 209, 238, 258, 286 3/4 4-23
MILLSTONE - UNIT 3 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM OPERATIONAL LEAKAGE SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued) 4.4.6.2.2(1)(2)Each Reactor Coolant System Pressure Isolation Valve specified in Table 3.4-1 shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by verifying LEAKAGE to be within its limit:
a.
At the frequency specified in the Surveillance Frequency Control Program, b.
Prior to entering MODE 2 whenever the plant has been in COLD SHUTDOWN for 7 days or more and if leakage testing has not been performed in the previous 9 months, c.
Deleted d.
Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> following valve actuation due to automatic or manual action or flow through the valve, and e.
When tested pursuant to Specification 4.0.5.
(1) The provisions of Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable for entry into MODE 3 or 4.
(2) This surveillance is not required to be performed on Reactor Coolant System Pressure Isolation Valves located in the RHR flow path when in, or during the transition to or from, the shutdown cooling mode of operation.
Amendment No. 238, 258, 286 3/4 4-23a
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-338 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 294 Renewed License No. NPF-4
- 1.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment by Virginia Electric and Power Company et al.,
(the licensee) dated May 25, 2022 complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commissions rules and regulations as set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C.
There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations; D.
The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commissions regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
- 2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to paragraph 2.C (2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-4, as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and is hereby amended to read as follows:
(2)
Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A, as revised through Amendment No. 294, are hereby incorporated in the renewed license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
- 3.
This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Michael T. Markley, Chief Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Operation
Attachment:
Changes to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-4 and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: May 1, 2023 Michael T.
Markley Digitally signed by Michael T. Markley Date: 2023.05.01 08:52:12 -04'00'
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-339 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 2 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 277 Renewed License No. NPF-7
- 1.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment by Virginia Electric and Power Company et al.,
(the licensee) dated May 25, 2022, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commissions rules and regulations as set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C.
There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations; D.
The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commissions regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
- 2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to paragraph 2.C (2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-7, as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and is hereby amended to read as follows:
(2)
Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 277, are hereby incorporated in the renewed license.
The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
- 3.
This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Michael T. Markley, Chief Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Operation
Attachment:
Changes to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-7 and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: May 1, 2023 Michael T.
Markley Digitally signed by Michael T. Markley Date: 2023.05.01 08:53:00 -04'00'
ATTACHMENT TO NORTH ANNA POWER STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 294 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-4 DOCKET NO. 50-338 LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 277 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-7 DOCKET NO. 50-339 Replace the following pages of the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
Remove Insert NPF-4, page 3 NPF-4, page 3 NPF-7, page 3 NPF-7, page 3 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
Remove Insert 1.1-4 1.1-4 1.1-5 1.1-5 1.1-6 1.1-6 1.1-7 1.1-7 3.4.13-1 3.4.13-1 3.4.13-2 3.4.13-2
NORTH ANNA - UNIT 1 Renewed License NPF-4 Amendment No. 294 (2) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Part 70, VEPCO to receive, possess, and use at any time special nuclear material as reactor fuel, in accordance with the limitations for storage and amounts required for reactor operation, as described in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report; (3) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70, VEPCO to receive, possess, and use at any time any byproduct, source, and special nuclear material as sealed neutron sources for reactor startup, sealed sources for reactor instrumentation and radiation monitoring equipment calibration, and as fission detectors in amounts as required; (4) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70, VEPCO to receive, possess, and use in amounts as required any byproduct, source, or special nuclear material, without restriction to chemical or physical form, for sample analysis or instrument calibration or associated with radioactive apparatus or component; and (5) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, VEPCO to possess, but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility.
C. This renewed operating license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I; Part 20, Section 30.34 of Part 30, Section 40.41 of Part 40, Sections 50.54 and 50.59 of Part 50, and Section 70.32 of Part 70; is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:
(1) Maximum Power Level VEPCO is authorized to operate the North Anna Power Station, Unit No. 1, at reactor core power levels not in excess of 2940 megawatts (thermal).
(2) Technical Specifications Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 294 are hereby incorporated in the renewed license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
NORTH ANNA - UNIT 2 Renewed License NPF-7 Amendment No. 277 (3) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70, VEPCO to receive possess, and use at any time any byproduct, source, and special nuclear material as sealed neutron sources for reactor startup, sealed sources for reactor instrumentation and radiation monitoring equipment calibration, and as fission detectors in amounts as required; (4) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70, VEPCO to receive, possess, and use in amounts as required any byproduct, source, or special nuclear material, without restriction to chemical or physical form, for sample analysis or instrument calibration or associated with radioactive apparatus or component; and (5) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70, VEPCO to possess, but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility.
C. This renewed license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the Commissions regulations as set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:
(1) Maximum Power Level VEPCO is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power levels not in excess of 2940 megawatts (thermal).
(2) Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 277 are hereby incorporated in the renewed license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
(3) Additional Conditions The matters specified in the following conditions shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Commission within the stated time periods following the insurance of the condition or within the operational restrictions indicated. The removal of these conditions shall be made by an amendment to the renewed license supported by a favorable evaluation by the Commission:
- a. If VEPCO plans to remove or to make significant changes in the normal operation of equipment that controls the amount of radioactivity in effluents from the North Anna Power Station, the
North Anna Units 1 and 2 1.1-4 Amendments 294 and 277 Definitions 1.1 1.1 Definitions LEAKAGE (continued)
- 2. LEAKAGE into the containment atmosphere from sources that are both specifically located and known to not interfere with the operation of leakage detection systems; or
- 3. Reactor Coolant System (RCS) LEAKAGE through a steam generator to the Secondary System (primary to secondary LEAKAGE);
- b. Unidentified LEAKAGE All LEAKAGE (except RCP seal water injection or leakoff) that is not identified LEAKAGE;
- c. Pressure Boundary LEAKAGE LEAKAGE (except primary to secondary LEAKAGE) through a fault in an RCS component body, pipe wall, or vessel wall. LEAKAGE past seals, packing, and gaskets is not pressure boundary LEAKAGE.
MASTER RELAY TEST A MASTER RELAY TEST shall consist of energizing all master relays in the channel required for channel OPERABILITY and verifying the OPERABILITY of each required master relay. The MASTER RELAY TEST shall include a continuity check of each associated required slave relay. The MASTER RELAY TEST may be performed by means of any series of sequential, overlapping, or total steps.
MODE A MODE shall correspond to any one inclusive combination of core reactivity condition, power level, average reactor coolant temperature, and reactor vessel head closure bolt tensioning specified in Table 1.1-1 with fuel in the reactor vessel.
OPERABLEOPERABILITY A system, subsystem, train, component, or device shall be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY when it is capable of performing its specified safety function(s) and when all necessary attendant instrumentation, controls, normal or emergency electrical power, cooling and seal water, (continued)
Definitions 1.1 1.1 Definitions North Anna Units 1 and 2 1.1-5 Amendments 294 and 277 OPERABLEOPERABILITY (continued) lubrication, and other auxiliary equipment that are required for the system, subsystem, train, component, or device to perform its specified safety function(s) are also capable of performing their related support function(s).
PHYSICS TESTS PHYSICS TESTS shall be those tests performed to measure the fundamental nuclear characteristics of the reactor core and related instrumentation.
These tests are:
- a. Described in Chapter 14, Initial Tests and Operation, of the UFSAR;
- b. Authorized under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59; or
- c. Otherwise approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
QUADRANT POWER TILT RATIO (QPTR)
QPTR shall be the ratio of the maximum upper excore detector calibrated output to the average of the upper excore detector calibrated outputs, or the ratio of the maximum lower excore detector calibrated output to the average of the lower excore detector calibrated outputs, whichever is greater.
RATED THERMAL POWER (RTP)
RTP shall be a total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant of 2940 MWt.
REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM (RTS) RESPONSE TIME The RTS RESPONSE TIME shall be that time interval from when the monitored parameter exceeds its RTS trip setpoint at the channel sensor until loss of stationary gripper coil voltage. The response time may be measured by means of any series of sequential, overlapping, or total steps so that the entire response time is measured. In lieu of measurement, response time may be verified for selected components provided that the components and methodology for verification have been previously reviewed and approved by the NRC, or the components have been evaluated in accordance with an NRC approved methodology.
North Anna Units 1 and 2 1.1-6 Amendments 294 and 277 Definitions 1.1 1.1 Definitions SHUTDOWN MARGIN (SDM)
SDM shall be the instantaneous amount of reactivity by which the reactor is subcritical or would be subcritical from its present condition assuming:
- a. All rod cluster control assemblies (RCCAs) are fully inserted except for the single RCCA of highest reactivity worth, which is assumed to be fully withdrawn. With any RCCA not capable of being fully inserted, the reactivity worth of the RCCA must be accounted for in the determination of SDM; and
- b. In MODES 1 and 2, the fuel and moderator temperatures are changed to the nominal zero power design level.
SLAVE RELAY TEST A SLAVE RELAY TEST shall consist of energizing all slave relays in the channel required for channel OPERABILITY and verifying the OPERABILITY of each required slave relay. The SLAVE RELAY TEST shall include a continuity check of associated required testable actuation devices. The SLAVE RELAY TEST may be performed by means of any series of sequential, overlapping, or total steps.
STAGGERED TEST BASIS A STAGGERED TEST BASIS shall consist of the testing of one of the systems, subsystems, channels, or other designated components during the interval specified by the Surveillance Frequency, so that all systems, subsystems, channels, or other designated components are tested during n Surveillance Frequency intervals, where n is the total number of systems, subsystems, channels, or other designated components in the associated function.
THERMAL POWER THERMAL POWER shall be the total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant.
TRIP ACTUATING DEVICE OPERATIONAL TEST (TADOT)
A TADOT shall consist of operating the trip actuating device and verifying the OPERABILITY of all devices in the channel required for trip actuating device OPERABILITY. The TADOT shall include adjustment, as necessary, of the trip (continued)
North Anna Units 1 and 2 1.1-7 Amendments 294 and 277 Definitions 1.1 1.1 Definitions TRIP ACTUATING DEVICE OPERATIONAL TEST (TADOT)
(Continued) actuating device so that it actuates at the required setpoint within the necessary accuracy.
The TADOT may be performed by means of any series of sequential, overlapping, or total channel steps.
RCS Operational LEAKAGE 3.4.13 North Anna Units 1 and 2 3.4.13-1 Amendments 294 and 277 3.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS) 3.4.13 RCS Operational LEAKAGE LCO 3.4.13 RCS operational LEAKAGE shall be limited to:
- a. No pressure boundary LEAKAGE;
- b. 1 gpm unidentified LEAKAGE;
- c. 10 gpm identified LEAKAGE;
- d. 150 gallons per day primary to secondary LEAKAGE through any one steam generator (SG).
APPLICABILITY:
MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4.
ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A.
Pressure boundary LEAKAGE exists.
A.1 Isolate affected component, pipe, or vessel from the RCS by use of a closed manual valve, closed and de-activated automatic valve, blind flange, or check valve.
4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> B.
RCS operational LEAKAGE not within limits for reasons other than pressure boundary LEAKAGE or primary to secondary LEAKAGE.
B.1 Reduce LEAKAGE to within limits.
4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />
RCS Operational LEAKAGE 3.4.13 North Anna Units 1 and 2 3.4.13-2 Amendments 294 and 277 C.
Required Action and associated Completion Time not met.
OR Primary to secondary LEAKAGE not within limit.
C.1 Be in MODE 3.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> AND C.2 Be in MODE 5.
36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.4.13.1
NOTES-------------------
- 1. Not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> after establishment of steady state operation.
- 2. Not applicable to primary to secondary LEAKAGE.
Verify RCS operational LEAKAGE is within limits by performance of RCS water inventory balance.
In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.4.13.2
NOTE--------------------
Not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> after establishment of steady state operation.
Verify primary to secondary LEAKAGE is
< 150 gallons per day through any one SG.
In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program ACTIONS
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-280 SURRY POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1 AMENDMENT TO SUBSEQUENT RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 311 Subsequent Renewed License No. DPR-32
- 1.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment by Virginia Electric and Power Company (the licensee) dated May 25, 2022, as supplemented by letter dated June 13, 2022, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commissions rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C.
There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations; D.
The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commissions regulations, and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
- 2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specification as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment of the Subsequent Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-32 are hereby amended to read as follows:
B.
Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 311, are hereby incorporated in the subsequent renewed license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
- 3.
The license amendment is effective as of the date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days of the date of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Michael T. Markley, Chief Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
Changes to Subsequent Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-32 and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: May 1, 2023 Michael T.
Markley Digitally signed by Michael T. Markley Date: 2023.05.01 08:55:34 -04'00'
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-281 SURRY POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 2 AMENDMENT TO SUBSEQUENT RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 311 Subsequent Renewed License No. DPR-37
- 1.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment by Virginia Electric and Power Company (the licensee) dated May 25, 2022 complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commissions rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C.
There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations; D.
The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commissions regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
- 2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specification as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment of the Subsequent Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-37 are hereby amended to read as follows:
B.
Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 311, are hereby incorporated in the subsequent renewed license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
- 3. The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days of the date of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Michael T. Markley, Chief Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
Changes to Subsequent Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-37 and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: May 1, 2023 Michael T.
Markley Digitally signed by Michael T. Markley Date: 2023.05.01 08:56:18 -04'00'
ATTACHMENT TO SURRY POWER STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 311 SUBSEQUENT RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-32 DOCKET NO. 50-280 LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 311 SUBSEQUENT RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-37 DOCKET NO. 50-281 Replace the following pages of the Subsequent Renewed Facility Operating Licenses with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
Remove Insert DPR-32, page 3 DPR-32, page 3 DPR-37, page 3 DPR-37, page 3 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
Remove Insert 1.0-8 1.0-8 3.1-13 3.1-13 3.1-13a 3.1-13a Surry - Unit 1 Subsequent Renewed License No. DPR-32 Amendment No. 311
- 3. This subsequent renewed license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations: 10 CFR Part 20, Section 30.34 of 10 CFR Part 30, Section 40.41 of 10 CFR Part 40, Sections 50.54 and 50.59 of 10 CFR Part 50, and Section 70.32 of 10 CFR Part 70; and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified below:
A. Maximum Power Level The licensee is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power levels not in excess of 2587 megawatts (thermal).
B. Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 311 are hereby incorporated in the subsequent renewed license.
The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
C. Reports The licensee shall make certain reports in accordance with the requirements of the Technical Specifications.
D. Records The licensee shall keep facility operating records in accordance with the requirements of the Technical Specifications.
E. Deleted by Amendment 65 F. Deleted by Amendment 71 G. Deleted by Amendment 227 H. Deleted by Amendment 227 Surry - Unit 2 Subsequent Renewed License No. DPR-37 Amendment No. 311
- 3. This subsequent renewed license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations: 10 CFR Part 20, Section 30.34 of 10 CFR Part 30, Section 40.41 of 10 CFR Part 40, Sections 50.54 and 50.59 of 10 CFR Part 50, and Section 70.32 of 10 CFR Part 70; and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified below:
A. Maximum Power Level The licensee is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power Levels not in excess of 2587 megawatts (thermal).
B. Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 311 are hereby incorporated in this subsequent renewed license.
The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
C. Reports The licensee shall make certain reports in accordance with the requirements of the Technical Specifications.
D. Records The licensee shall keep facility operating records in accordance with the Requirements of the Technical Specifications.
E. Deleted by Amendment 54 F. Deleted by Amendment 59 and Amendment 65 G. Deleted by Amendment 227 H. Deleted by Amendment 227
W.
STAGGERED TEST BASIS A staggered test basis shall consist of:
a.
A test schedule for n systems, subsystems, trains or other designated components obtained by dividing the specified test interval into n equal subintervals, and b.
The testing of one system, subsystem, train, or other designated component at the beginning of each subinterval.
X.
LEAKAGE LEAKAGE shall be:
a.
Identified LEAKAGE 1.
LEAKAGE, such as that from pump seals or valve packing (except reactor coolant pump (RCP) seal water injection or leakoff), that is captured and conducted to collection systems or a sump or collecting tank,;
2.
LEAKAGE into the containment atmosphere from sources that are both specifically located and known to not interfere with the operation of leakage detection systems, or; 3.
Reactor Coolant System (RCS) LEAKAGE through a steam generator to the Secondary System (primary to secondary LEAKAGE).
b.
Unidentified LEAKAGE All LEAKAGE (except RCP seal water injection or leakoff) that is not identified LEAKAGE, and c.
Pressure Boundary LEAKAGE LEAKAGE (except primary to secondary LEAKAGE) through a fault in an RCS component body, pipe wall, or vessel wall. LEAKAGE past seals, packing, and gaskets is not pressure boundary LEAKAGE.
Amendment Nos. 311 and 311 TS 1.0-8
C.
RCS Operational LEAKAGE Applicability The following specifications are applicable to RCS operational LEAKAGE whenever Tavg (average RCS temperature) exceeds 200°F (200 degrees Fahrenheit).
Specifications 1.
RCS operational LEAKAGE shall be limited to:
a.
No pressure boundary LEAKAGE, b.
1 gpm unidentified LEAKAGE, c.
10 gpm identified LEAKAGE, and d.
150 gallons per day primary to secondary LEAKAGE through any one steam generator (SG).
2.a. If pressure boundary LEAKAGE exists, isolate affected component, pipe, or vessel from the RCS by use of a closed manual valve, closed and de-activated automatic valve, blind flange, or check valve within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
b.
If the pressure boundary LEAKAGE is not isolated as specified within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, the unit shall be brought to HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
3.a. If RCS operational LEAKAGE is not within the limits of 3.1.C.1 for reasons other than pressure boundary LEAKAGE or primary to secondary LEAKAGE, reduce LEAKAGE to within the specified limits within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
b.
If the LEAKAGE is not reduced to within the specified limits within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, the unit shall be brought to HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
4.
If primary to secondary LEAKAGE is not within the limit specified in 3.1.C.1.d, the unit shall be brought to HOT SHUTDOWN within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
TS 3.1-13 Amendment Nos. 311 and 311
5.
Detected or suspected leakage from the Reactor Coolant System shall be investigated and evaluated. At least two means shall be available to detect reactor coolant system leakage. One of these means must depend on the detection of radionuclides in the containment.
6.a. Prior to going critical all primary coolant system pressure isolation valves listed below shall be functional as a pressure isolation device, except as specified in 3.1.C.6.b. Valve leakage shall not exceed the amounts indicated.
b.
If Specification 3.1.C.6.a cannot be met, an orderly shutdown shall be initiated and the reactor shall be in HOT SHUTDOWN within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
Notes (a) 1.
Leakage rates less than or equal to 1.0 gpm are considered acceptable.
2.
Leakage rates greater than 1.0 gpm but less than or equal to 5.0 gpm are considered acceptable if the latest measured rate has not exceeded the rate determined by the previous test by an amount that reduces the margin between measured leakage rate and the maximum permissible rate of 5.0 gpm by 50% or greater.
3.
Leakage rates greater than 1.0 gpm but less than or equal to 5.0 gpm are considered unacceptable if the latest measured rate exceeded the rate determined by the previous test by an amount that reduces the margin between measured leakage rate and the maximum permissible rate of 5.0 gpm by 50% or greater.
4.
Leakage rates greater than 5.0 gpm are considered unacceptable.
Unit 1 Unit 2 Max. Allowable Leakage (see note (a) below)
Loop A, Cold Leg 1-SI-79, 1-SI-241 2-SI-79, 2-SI-241 5.0 gpm for each valve Loop B, Cold Leg 1-SI-82, 1-SI-242 2-SI-82, 2-SI-242 Loop C, Cold Leg 1-SI-85, 1-SI-243 2-SI-85, 2-SI-243 TS 3.1-13a Amendment Nos. 311 and 311
DOMINION ENERGY SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.
SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY DOCKET NO. 50-395 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 225 Renewed License No. NPF-12
- 1.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment to the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit No. 1 (the facility), Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-12, filed by the Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc. (the licensee), dated May 25, 2022, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commissions rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C.
There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering public health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regulations as set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; D.
The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commissions regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
- 2.
Accordingly, the license is hereby amended by a page change to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-12 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(2)
Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 225, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the license. Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc. shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.
- 3.
This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Michael T. Markley, Chief Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
Changes to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-12 and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: May 1, 2023 Michael T.
Markley Digitally signed by Michael T. Markley Date: 2023.05.01 08:58:10 -04'00'
ATTACHMENT TO VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO. 1 LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 225 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-12 DOCKET NO. 50-395 Replace the following pages of the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
Remove Insert NPF-12, page 3 NPF-12, page 3 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
Remove Insert 1-3 1-3 1-4 1-4 3/4 4-19 3/4 4-19
Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-12 Amendment No. 225 (3)
SCE&G, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Part 70, to receive, possess and use at any time special nuclear material as reactor fuel, in accordance with the limitations for storage amounts required for reactor operation, as described in the Final Safety Analysis Report, as amended through Amendment No. 33; (4)
SCE&G, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Part 30, 40 and 70 to receive, possess and use at any time byproduct, source and special nuclear material as sealed neutron sources for reactor startup, sealed neutron sources for reactor instrumentation and radiation monitoring equipment calibration, and as fission detectors in amounts as required; (5)
SCE&G, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70, to receive, possess and use in amounts as required any byproduct source or special nuclear material without restriction to chemical or physical form, for sample analysis or instrument calibration or associated with radioactive apparatus of components; and (6)
SCE&G, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70, to possess, but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as m[a]y be produced by the operation of the facility.
C.
This renewed license shall be deemed to contain, and is subject to, the conditions specified in the Commissions regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:
(1)
Maximum Power Level SCE&G is authorized to perathe the facility at reactor core power levels not in excess of 2900 megawatts thermal in accordance with the conditions specified herein and in Attachment 1 to this renewed license.
The preoccupation tests, startup tests and other items identified in to this renewed license shall be completed as specified. is hereby incorporated into this renewed license.
(2)
Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plant The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 225, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the renewed license. South Carolina Electric & Gas Company shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.
SUMMER - UNIT 1 1-3 Amendment No. 146,179,221, 225 DEFINITIONS E - AVERAGE DISINTEGRATION ENERGY 1.11 E shall be the average (weighted in proportion to the concentration of each radionuclide in the reactor coolant at the time of sampling) of the sum of the average beta and gamma energies per disintegration (in MeV) for isotopes, other than iodines, with half lives greater than 15 minutes, making up at least 95% of the total non-iodine activity in the coolant.
ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE RESPONSE TIME 1.12 The ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE RESPONSE TIME shall be that time interval from when the monitored parameter exceeds its ESF actuation setpoint at the channel sensor until the ESF equipment is capable of performing its safety function (i.e., the valves travel to their required positions, pump discharge pressures reach their required values, etc.). Times shall include diesel generator starting and sequence loading delays where applicable. The response time may be measured by means of any series of sequential, overlapping, or total steps so that the entire response time is measured. In lieu of measurement, response time may be verified for selected components provided that the components and the methodology for verification have been previously reviewed and approved by the NRC or the components have been evaluated in accordance with an NRC approved methodology.
FREQUENCY NOTATION 1.13 The FREQUENCY NOTATION specified for the performance of Surveillance Requirements shall correspond to the intervals defined in Table 1.2.
GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.14 A GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM is any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting primary coolant system offgases from the primary system and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to release to the environment.
IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE 1.15 IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE shall be:
a.
Leakage (except CONTROLLED LEAKAGE) into closed systems, such as pump seal or valve packing leaks that are captured and conducted to a sump or collecting tank, or b.
Leakage into the containment atmosphere from sources that are both specifically located and known to not interfere with the operation of leakage detection systems, or c.
Reactor coolant system leakage through a steam generator to the secondary system (primary-to-secondary leakage).
MASTER RELAY TEST 1.16 A MASTER RELAY TEST shall be the energization of each master relay and verification of OPERABILITY of each relay. The MASTER RELAY TEST shall include a continuity check of each associated slave relay.
SUMMER - UNIT 1 1-4 Amendment No. 104, 117, 179 225 DEFINITIONS OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) 1.17 The OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) shall contain the methodology and parameters used in the calculation of offsite doses resulting from radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, in the calculation of gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring Alarm/Trip Setpoints, and in the conduct of the Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program. The ODCM shall also contain (1) the Radioactive Effluent Controls and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs required by Section 6.8.4 and (2) descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating and Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports required by Specifications 6.9.1.6 and 6.9.1.8.
OPERABLE - OPERABILITY 1.18 A system, subsystem, train, component or device shall be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY when it is capable of performing its specified function(s), and when all necessary attendant instrumentation, controls, electrical power, cooling or seal water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the system, subsystem, train, component or device to perform its function(s) are also capable of performing their related support function(s).
OPERATIONAL MODE - MODE 1.19 An OPERATIONAL MODE (i.e., MODE) shall correspond to any one inclusive combination of core reactivity condition, power level and average reactor coolant temperature specified in Table 1.1.
PHYSICS TESTS 1.20 PHYSICS TESTS shall be those tests performed to measure the fundamental nuclear characteristics of the reactor core and related instrumentation and 1) described in Chapter 14.0 of the FSAR, 2) authorized under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59, or 3) otherwise approved by the Commission.
PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE 1.21 PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE shall be leakage (except primary-to-secondary leakage) through a fault in a Reactor Coolant System component body, pipe wall or vessel wall. Leakage past seals, packing, and gaskets is not PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE.
PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) 1.22 The PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) shall contain the current formulas, sampling, analyses, tests, and determinations to be made to ensure that processing and packaging of solid radioactive wastes based on demonstrated processing of actual or simulated wet solid wastes will be accomplished in such a way as to assure compliance with 10 CFR Parts 20, 61, and 71, State regulations, burial ground requirements, and other requirements governing the disposal of solid radioactive waste.
SUMMER - UNIT 1 3/4 4-19 Amendment No. 154, 179, 222, 225 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM OPERATIONAL LEAKAGE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.4.6.2 Reactor Coolant System operational leakage shall be limited to:
a.
No PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, b.
1 GPM UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE, c.
150 gallons per day primary-to-secondary leakage through any one steam generator, d.
10 GPM IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE from the Reactor Coolant System, and e.
33 GPM CONTROLLED LEAKAGE at a Reactor Coolant System pressure of 2235 +/- 20 psig.
f.
The leakage rate specified for each Reactor Coolant System Pressure Isolation Valve in Table 3.4-1 at a Reactor Coolant System pressure of 2235 +/- 20 psig.
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4 ACTION:
a.
With PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, isolate affected component, pipe, or vessel from the RCS by use of a closed manual valve, closed and de-activated automatic valve, blind flange, or check valve within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
b.
With primary to secondary leakage not within limits, be in at least HOT STANDBY within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
c.
With RCS operational leakage not within limits for reasons other than PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, primary to secondary leakage, or leakage from Reactor Coolant System Pressure Isolation Valves, reduce leakage to within limits within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
d.
With any Reactor Coolant System Pressure Isolation Valve Leakage greater than the limit, isolate the high pressure portion of the affected system from the low pressure portion within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> by use of at least two closed manual or deactivated automatic valves, or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.4.6.2.1 The Reactor Coolant System operational leakages shall be demonstrated to be within each of the above limits by:
a.
Monitoring the reactor building atmosphere (gaseous or particulate) radioactivity monitor in accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program.
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO MILLSTONE POWER STATION, UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 AMENDMENT NO. 346 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-65 AMENDMENT NO. 286 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-49 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 AMENDMENT NO. 294 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-4 AMENDMENT NO. 277 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-7 SURRY POWER STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 AMENDMENT NO. 311 TO SUBSEQUENT RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-32 AMENDMENT NO. 311 TO SUBSEQUENT RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-37 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO. 1 AMENDMENT NO. 225 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-12 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY DOMINION ENERGY NUCLEAR CONNECTICUT, INC.
DOMINION ENERGY SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.
DOCKET NOS. 50-336, 50-423. 50-338, 50-338, 50-280, 50-281, AND 50-395
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By application dated May 25, 2025 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML22146A027), Dominion Energy Connecticut, Inc., Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion Energy Virginia), and Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.
(hereafter referred to as Dominion or the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for the Millstone Power Station (Millstone or MPS) Units 2 and 3, North Anna Power Station (North Anna or NAPS) Units 1 and 2, Surry Power Station (Surry, or SPS) Units 1 and 2, and Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station (Summer or VCS) Unit 1.
The amendments would revise the respective Technical Specifications (TSs) consistent with Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-554, Revise Reactor Coolant Leakage Requirements, to revise the TS definition of leakage, clarify the requirements when pressure boundary leakage is detected, and adds a Required Action when pressure boundary leakage is identified. The NRC approved TSTF-554, under the Consolidated Line-Item Improvement Process (CLIIP) on December 18, 2020 (ML20324A083).
The licensee has proposed variations from the TS changes described in Traveler TSTF-554, Revision 1. The variations are described and evaluated in section 3.3 of this safety evaluation (SE).
1.1 Reactor Coolant System Description Components that contain or transport the coolant to or from the reactor core make up the Reactor Coolant System (RCS). Materials can degrade as a result of the complex interaction of the materials, the stresses they encounter, and through operational wear or mechanical deterioration during normal and upset operating environments. Such material degradation could lead to leakage of reactor coolant into containment buildings.
The RCS leakage falls under two main categories - identified leakage and unidentified leakage.
Identifying the sources of leakage is necessary for prompt identification of potentially adverse conditions, assessment of safety significance of the leakage, and quick corrective action. A limited amount of leakage from the reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB) directly into the containment atmosphere is expected as the RCS and other connected systems cannot be made 100 percent leak tight. This leakage is detected, located, and isolated from the containment atmosphere so as to not interfere with measurement of unexpected RCS leakage detection.
The safety significance of RCS leakage varies widely depending on its source, rate, and duration. Therefore, detecting and monitoring RCS leakage into the containment area is necessary. Separation of identified leakage from unidentified leakage provides quantitative information to the operators, allowing them to take corrective action should leakage occur that is detrimental to the safety of the unit and the public.
1.2 Proposed TS Changes to Adopt TSTF-554 The licensee proposed changes that would revise the TSs related to RCS operational leakage and the definition of the term IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE1 and PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE. Specifically, the licensee proposed the following changes be made to the TSs in order to adopt TSTF-554:
Changes to TS Definitions The IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE definition in TS 1.14.2b for MPS Unit 2, TS 1.16.2b for MPS Unit 3, TS 1.1.a.2 for NAPS Units 1 and 2, 1 The NRC is using all capital letters to denote terms that are formally defined in the TSs, but the TS for Surry only capitalize the first letter the word Identified (i.e., Identified LEAKAGE).
TS Section X.a.2 for SPS Units 1 and 2, and TS 1.15b for VCS Unit 1, would be revised to remove the exclusion of pressure boundary leakage from identified leakage by deleting either and the phrase or not to be pressure boundary LEAKAGE.
The PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE definition in TS 1.14.3 for MPS Unit 2, TS 1.16.3 for MPS Unit 3, TS 1.1.c for NAPS Units 1 and 2, TS Section 1.0.X.c for SPS Units 1 and 2, and TS 1.21 for VCS Unit 1, would be revised to delete the word nonisolable. The sentence, LEAKAGE past seals, packing, and gaskets is not pressure boundary LEAKAGE, would be added to the definition.
The pressure boundary LEAKAGE definition in TS Section 1.0.X.c for SPS Units 1 and 2, would be revised to add a sentence stating the LEAKAGE past seals, packing, and gaskets is not pressure boundary LEAKAGE.
Additionally, for each facility, the LEAKAGE definition would be revised by other editorial and punctuation changes to reflect the deletion and listed definitions.
Plant Specific Changes to Operational LEAKAGE ACTIONS The TS RCS Operational LEAKAGE ACTIONS would be revised (a) to add a new Condition to address isolation of the pressure boundary leakage within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, (b) to be applicable should any Action of new condition is not met, and (c) to delete the condition for when pressure boundary leakage exists because pressure boundary leakage would be addressed by the new Condition.
The plant specific TS changes are as follows:
MPS Unit 2 TS 3.4.6.2 changes:
o New Condition a:
With PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, isolate affected component, pipe, or vessel from the RCS by use of a closed manual valve, closed and de-activated automatic valve, blind flange, or check valve within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
o Existing Condition a revised to b with no change:
o Existing Condition b revised to c with the following change:
With ACTION and associated completion time of ACTION a. not met, or PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE exists, or primary to secondary LEAKAGE not within limits, be in HOT STANDBY within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and be in COLD SHUTDOWN within 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />.
MPS Unit 3 and VCS Unit 1 TS 3.4.6.2 changes:
o New TS Condition a With PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, isolate affected component, pipe, or vessel from the RCS by use of a closed manual valve, closed and de-activated automatic valve, blind flange, or check valve within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
o Existing TS Condition a revised to b with the following change:
With primary to secondary LEAKAGE not within limits or any PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, be in at least HOT STANDBY within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
o Existing TS Condition b revised to c with the following change:
With and RCS operational LEAKAGE not within limits, other that PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, LEAKAGE from Reactor Coolant System Pressure Isolation Valves or primary to secondary LEAKAGE, reduce the leakage rate With any RCS operational LEAKAGE not within limits for reasons other than PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, primary to secondary LEAKAGE, or LEAKAGE from Reactor Coolant System Pressure Isolation Valves, reduce LEAKAGE to within limits within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY with the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
o Existing TS Condition c revised to d no change:
NAPS Units 2 and 3 TS 3.4.13 changes:
o New TS Condition A Pressure boundary LEAKAGE exists.
o New TS Required Action A.1 Isolate affected component, pipe, or vessel from the RCS by use of a closed manual valve, closed and de-activated automatic valve, blind flange, or check valve o New TS Completion Time A 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> o Existing TS Condition, Required Action, and Completion Time A revised to B with no change o Existing TS Condition, Required Action, and Completion Time B revised to C with the following change to the Condition:
Required Action and associated Completion Time of Condition A not met.
OR Pressure Boundary LEAKAGE exists. OR Primary to secondary LEAKAGE not within limit.
SPS Units 2 and 3 TS 3.1.C changes:
o New TS Condition C.2.a and C.2.b as follows:
- a. If pressure boundary LEAKAGE exists, isolate affected component, pipe, or vessel from the RCS by use of a closed manual valve, closed and de-activated automatic valve, blind flange, or check valve within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
- b. If the pressure boundary LEAKAGE is not isolated as specified within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, the unit shall be brought to HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
o Existing Action C.2.a and C.2.b revised to C.3.a and C.3.b with no change o Existing Action C.3 revised to Action C.4 with the following change:
If RCS pressure boundary LEAKAGE exists, or primary to secondary LEAKAGE is not within the limit specified in 3.1.C.1.d, the unit shall be brought to HOT SHUTDOWN within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
o Existing Action C.4 revised to Action C.5 with the no change o Existing Action C.5.a revised to Action C.5.a with no change o Existing Action C.5.b revised to Action C.5.b with the following change:
If Specification 3.1.C.5.a 3.1.c.6.a cannot be met, an orderly shutdown shall be initiated and the reactor shall be in HOT SHUTDOWN within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION
The regulation at 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2) requires that TSs include limiting conditions for operation (LCOs). Per 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(i), LCOs are the lowest functional capability or performance levels of equipment required for safe operation of the facility. The regulation also requires that when an LCO of a nuclear reactor is not met, the licensee shall shut down the reactor or follow any remedial action permitted by the TSs until the condition can be met.
The regulation at 10 CFR 50.2, Definitions, defines the reactor coolant pressure boundary as all those pressure-containing components of boiling and pressurized water-cooled nuclear power reactors, such as pressure vessels, piping, pumps, and valves.
Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.45, Revision 1, Guidance on Monitoring and Responding to Reactor Coolant System Leakage, dated May 2008 (ML073200271), Section B, Discussion Leakage Separation, provides information related to separation between identified and unidentified leakage.
The NRC staffs guidance for the review of TSs is in Chapter 16.0, Technical Specifications, of NUREG-0800, Revision 3, Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR [Light-Water Reactor] Edition (SRP), March 2010 (ML100351425).
As described therein, as part of the regulatory standardization effort, the NRC staff has prepared Standard Technical Specifications (STSs) for each of the LWR nuclear designs.
Traveler TSTF-554 proposed a revision to the STSs related to RCS operational leakage and the definition of the term LEAKAGE.
3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION
3.1 IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE and PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE Definitions The change to the leakage definitions applies to leakage from an RCS component that would be released directly into the containment/drywell atmosphere where the leakage would be detectable by the RCS leakage detection systems. The revised definition of IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE removes the existing exclusion of leakage known to be PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE. It also clarifies that IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE is leakage known to not impair leakage detection system operation, such as by masking other leakage. Therefore, all RCS leakage that is specifically located and known to not interfere with the operation of leakage detection systems would be considered identified leakage, regardless of the source of leakage.
RG 1.45, Section B, Discussion, subsection, Leakage Separation, provides the following related to separation between identified and unidentified leakage:
Procedures for separating the sources of leakage (i.e., leakage from an identified source versus leakage from an unidentified source) are necessary for prompt identification of potentially adverse conditions, assessment of the safety significance of the leakage, and quick corrective action.
The reactor vessel closure seals and safety and relief valves should not have significant leakage; however, if leakage occurs through these paths or through pump and valve seals, it should be detectable and collectable, and the system should isolate it from the containment atmosphere to the extent practical so as not to mask any potentially serious leakage that may occur. This leakage is identified leakage, and it should discharge to tanks or sumps so that the plant operator can measure or calculate, monitor, and analyze the flow rate and trend in flow rate during plant operation.
Leakage to the containment atmosphere, which is not collected (such as from valve stem packing glands and other sources), increases the humidity of the containment. The moisture removed from the atmosphere by air coolers, together with any associated liquid leakage to the containment, is unidentified leakage, and the system should collect it in tanks or sumps separate from the identified leakage so that the plant operator can establish, monitor, and analyze the flow rate and the trend in flow rate of the unidentified leakage during plant operation.
It is important to note that there may be leakage into the containment from systems other than the RCS (e.g., secondary-side steam leakage in a PWR). This non-RCS leakage may increase the unidentified leakage rate. Chemical analysis of samples of the unidentified leakage may provide an indication of whether the unidentified leakage is from the RCS or from other sources.
The distinction between IDENTIFIED and UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE is the capability to collect and measure identified leakage such that it does not impair the leakage detection system function to monitor UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE. The source of the leakage is not relevant to this capability provided that separate, appropriate limits on pressure boundary leakage have been established. Therefore, the proposed change to the definition of IDEENTIFIED LEAKAGE is acceptable. The proposed change to the definition of pressure boundary leakage deletes the word nonisolable and adds a sentence clarifying that pressure boundary leakage does not include leakage past seals, packing, and gaskets. RG 1.45 defines RCPB leakage as:
The proposed change to the definition of PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE deletes the word nonisolable and adds a sentence clarifying that PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE does not include leakage past seals, packing, and gaskets. RG 1.45 defines RCPB leakage as:
leakage from a nonisolable fault in the material of an RCS component, pipe wall (including welds), or vessel wall. Leakage from seals, gaskets, and mechanical connections (e.g., bolts, valve seals) is not considered RCPB leakage although these components are part of the RCPB, as defined in 10 CFR 50.2, Definitions... Thus, RCPB leakage is indicative of degradation of pressure-retaining components that could ultimately result in a loss of component structural integrity.
The word nonisolable has been interpreted inconsistently in the definition of PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE. In some interpretations, it has been considered a means of emphasizing that the leakage fault is in the base material of the pressure boundary and, therefore, the leakage cannot be stopped by adjusting packing or seals. In such a case, the fault represents degradation of the pressure boundary material that could result in a loss of structural integrity. Another interpretation is that leakage through a fault in portions of the pressure boundary that can be separated from the RCS by an isolation device (typically an installed valve) need not be considered as PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE once the isolation device is performing its isolation function. This would allow certain small sections of the RCPB between the outermost two valves to be removed from consideration as RCPB leakage when the inner valve is closed.
Regardless of the interpretation, deletion of the word nonisolable does not alter the fundamental meaning that pressure boundary leakage represents degradation that could ultimately result in a loss of structural integrity. Therefore, the NRC staff finds that removing the term nonisolable provides a clearer definition of pressure boundary leakage and does not conflict with the RCPB definition in 10 CFR 50.2. Additionally, the NRC staff finds that the additional sentence LEAKAGE past seals, packing, and gaskets is not PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE, is consistent with the RG 1.45 discussion that pressure boundary leakage is not leakage from seals, gaskets, or packing.
3.2 Reactor Coolant System Operational Leakage The licensees proposed to add a new condition to the respective TSs. This condition applies if PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE exists. The new action requires isolation of the affected component, pipe, or vessel from the RCS by use of a closed manual valve, closed and de-activated automatic valve, blind flange, or check valve, within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />. This action may only be completed when the component is located where an existing isolation device or feature can be configured to provide the isolation function within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />. If the 4-hour completion time cannot be met, the plant must initiate shutdown.
The proposed completion time of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> for the new condition is consistent with the existing condition for when the identified, unidentified or total leakage exceeds limit as defined in the TSs. If the leak cannot be isolated within the allotted time period, the plant will begin shutdown activities before any significant damage to the RCPB can take place. Therefore, the NRC staff finds that the 4-hour completion time is acceptable because it is a reasonable time frame for a leak to be isolated and provides a reasonable period to isolate the flaw while avoiding further damage to the RCPB.
Additionally, formatting and numbering/lettering changes were proposed to TSs caused by the addition of a new Condition A. The NRC staff finds these proposed changes acceptable because they maintain the existing other TS requirements.
3.3 Variations from TSTF-554 The Licensee is proposing the following variation from the TS changes described in TSTF-554 or the applicable parts of the NRC staff safety evaluation, dated December 18, 2020:
SPS Units 1 and 2, MPS Units 2 and 3 and VCS Unit 1 utilize different numbering and titles than the Standard Technical Specifications (STS) on which TSTF-554 was based. The numbering differences do not affect the language, or usage of the definitions SPS Units 1 and 2, MPS Units 2 and 3 and VCS Unit 1 TS.
In the Standard Technical Specifications on which TSTF-554 is based, all leakage definitions appear as part of a single defined term, "LEAKAGE." In the VCS Unit 1 TS, the terms related to leakage are separate definitions consistent with NUREG-0452, Revision 4, Standard Technical Specifications for Westinghouse Pressurized Reactors, Fall 1981, (ML102590431).
However, the changes to the affected defined terms IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE and PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE are the same as the changes made to those terms in TSTF-554.
The staffs review finds that the variations do not affect the staffs technical evaluation provided in this SE for the applicability of TSTF-554 to the Dominion Operating Fleets TSs, and therefore the variations are acceptable.
4.0 STATE CONSULTATION
In accordance with the Commissions regulations, the Commonwealth of Virginia official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendments on January 23, 2023. On January 23, 2023, the state official confirmed that the Commonwealth had no comments.
In accordance with the Commissions regulations, the NRC staff notified the South Carolina State official of the proposed issuance of the amendment on January 23, 2023. On January 24, 2023, the state official confirmed that the State of South Carolina had no comments.
In accordance with the Commissions regulations, the NRC staff notified the Connecticut State official of the proposed issuance of the amendment on January 23, 2023. On January 23, 2023, the State official confirmed the State of Connecticut had no comments.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
The amendments change requirements with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 and changes surveillance requirements. The NRC staff has determined that the amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendments involve no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding published in the Federal Register on August 9, 2022 (87 FR 48516).
Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.
6.0 CONCLUSION
The NRC staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) there is reasonable assurance that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor: R. Grover, NRR Date: May 1, 2023
NAME GEMiller KGoldstein VCusumano*
DRoth DATE 3/7/2023 03/14/2023 1/24/2023 4/19/2023 OFFICE NRR/DORL/LPL2-1/BC NRR/DORL/LPL2-1/PM NAME MMarkley GEMiller DATE 5/1/2023 5/1/2023