ML21314A280
| ML21314A280 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/11/1983 |
| From: | Philips J Office of Administration |
| To: | Weiss E NRC/IE |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20209B956 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-729 NUDOCS 8612170084 | |
| Download: ML21314A280 (16) | |
Text
ME OR FRO :
SUBJEC V ITEDSTATE-UCLEAR REuULATORY COM ISSIO
~ HI OTO
- D. C_ 20555 MA 1 !
A.,
FOR:
Eric
- Weiss Office of Inspection and Enforcement John Philips. Chief Ru les and Procedures Bran,h Di vision of Rules and Records 0 fice of dmini s ratio Revie o Emergency Planning and Reporting Criteria
,*u 1 e - Par 5 0.
Enc1os dis a mar ed-up copy of the above subjec rul e. The ivision o Rµles and Records has re iewed e rule and ould like to cal your a en ion to the following:
l.
On p. 1, the Sulllllary paragraph as been re ritten o meet Federal Register (FR) requiremen s. T ~ ~R requi res the Su ry paragrap to answer (a) hat t e rul e does, (b) hy t he action is ecessary (c} what is the inte~ded e feet oft is rul e, and (d) hat class of lice sees is affected by he rule.
- 2.
£d1torial and stylistic c anges have been made throughou the rule.
ote particularly on p. 8 tha we have combined amendments two and t hree.
We have also updat~d the authority citation.
- 3.
A cop of this rule as been sent to Brenda Shelton for Paperwor Reduction revie.
You should contac her for further instructions o~ the appropriate paper-wur statement for this rule.
Enclosed is the revised Regul atory Analysis Guidelines for your use in completing the regulatory ana lysis for this rule.
Cost data shoul d be included in your analysis as yoy proceed with this rul ema ing.
If you have any questions pleas. call Joh Philips one tension 2-7086.
"~~
P ilips, C ief Rules and Procedures Branch Divi sion of Rules and Records 0 fice of Administra io
~~mergency Planning and Reporting cr *teria
(.
,.,... m
- c.,. I /21'"4-G-l~a.,,, ~ l';
~ -/
AGE C
- tuclear Regulatory CoD1Tiission.
ACT IO :
Proposed u1 e ~
759 -01]
1r~
I I_,,
SU ARY:
The Nuclear Regulator Co ission is proposing to amend its regula ions for operati ng commercia l nuclear ~ower plants to rerno e the "Unusual Event 11 category rom the emergency classes in a li censees' emer ency pl ans. The "Unusual Event" u egcry rti:;u1ts in a icensee declaring an emergency<{_ oo lo of a t res old.
Remo al of is category would raise t he threshold at which a licensee declares an emergency. thus elimina ing unnecessary ac i a ions of state local and Federal emergency plans.
DATE:
The conmen period expires Coll1Tle ~-s rr:ceived a. ter this da e ill be consider d if i s practical to do so but t s~u ra ce o on,:,
consid ra*ion canno be gi en e cep as to comments receivedAbefore tis da e.
ADDRESSES:
Mail rit en co ents tor Jhe SecretarvJ f t~e e"11'tlis,ior, U.S.
~
Nuclear egulatory ColllTiissio and Service Branch.
ashing on, D_7C 20555, Atten *o: Doc e i g Deli er co ments tot, Room 1121, 171i H St. N., ashington, D.C., bet een 8:15 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. weekdays.
Copies of t he regulatory ar,alysis, 0MB cleara ce supper ing s, ate e t, a conme ts recei ed may bee arni~ed a the RC Public Document Roo at 1717 H St. ' *, Washington, 0 C.
(7590-01
' FOR FU HE I FOR TIO CO TACT:
Eric '* eiss, Of ice o spec io ad En orcerr.e
, U.S.
uclear Regu a o y Co issio, 'as gto, D t 20555, elep one (301) 492-4973.
SUPPL E TARY I FOR IO T e 'uclear Regulatory Corrrnission is respo sible f~ ': : :-:ensing a d regulating nuclear po er plans. L*censees are no subject to certai g l '
cation require ents, bo *h as to he con ens oft eir applica *ons o opera ing lice ses a~d to actions aut orized y the opera ing licenses.
11 appl *ca* *o s for 1 *ce ses under sec io s 103 and 104b of e
o,ic Ee gy c (Ac ) o 954 as a e ed 42 USC 2133, are no requirei y §50.5 o i elude e erge cy as at co tain the arious e e ens set for
- n 10 CF Part 50 A e d' E.
ese sec io 103 and 10 facili ies a et e co ercial nuclear po er ac*1; es a
oroduce elec rici su jec o t ese or public consump *on.
esearch and est reac ors are o i *ca io equiremen s as hey are 1 *ce sed u de sec o 104a ad 104c o he Atomic Energy Ac.Section I of Appe di E requ ires the pla s to include procedures for no
- ying local, sta ea d *2~eral of icials.
0 ce an ope a i g license u der sectio 103 and 104b is granted, e licensee is required by 10 CFR 50.72 o actua e imrnedia e notifica ion procedures upo the occurrencf: of any of the specific 11significant events" described in §50. 72.
Since the enactment of sec ion 201, the RC has provided further guidance to opera ing lice sees as o si uations or even s, ich require o ifica io by the licensee o the RC and ta e and local response organizations ado her
[7590-01) e ~rgency perso nel.
On gus 19, 1980, e
RC published a final rule o e rge c pl a g, effecti e o ovember 3 1980 (45 fR 55402). T s u e es abl *shed a u ti aceted e g cy planing and preparedness progra a among ot er t ings, required procedures to be es abl 'shed for i diate notifica ion of the
- RC and tate, and local e r,gency response personn l in cer a i s itua ions.
These situations ere discussed in Revision 1 to UREG-0654/FE
-REP-1, entitled "Cri ria for Prep(l1Q1.; ::,*'
rf E aluatio of Rad 'o1ogica f er e cy Respo,se Plans and Preparedness i Support o uclear Plan s" (hereina ter Revision 1"), hich as issued i o e ber 19 0, shor ly a ter e Emergency Pl an. ng rule became e fective. 1 e s. on 1 specified four classes o E erge C io Le els i al ing notifica ion ac 0 s-- oti ica io of U usual C
Aler t Site Area E ergency and General E ergency.
ev*sion 1 also se or ea ples of i
- ia i g cod' io s or eac of ese our Emerge cy C asses.
s e plained in e 'sion e original ra iona e or the o "ficc io o cy Unusual Event was ro ide earl and prop o *t*catio o or eve s ic could lead o more serious consequences given o era o er or a* l u e or which might be indicative of ore seri ous condit*o s hich are no e
ully rea ized. The ler e,ergency class was supposed to re lect events w ich involve an actual o po en ial su s an ial deg radat*on o the lee o e sa e of t e p 1 an.
he s*te E erge c class as supposed to eflec co i io s were some significant releases are 1 i ely or are occurring but where a core melt situa ion is no indicated based on current infonnation.
The General E ergency 1copies of U EG docu ents ar a ai lable at t e Co issio 's Pu lie Docu en Room 1717 H Stree,
, ashing on, D. C. 20555.
Copies may be purchased fro the Governmen Printing Offi ce.
Infonna *o on curren prices ay be obtai ed y
r, 1ng the U.S.
uclear egu a cry Co. issio, as ington,
. C. 20555.
Attention : Publications Sales Manager.
. (7 9 -0 J class. t s rious class, as supposed to in ol e actual or
- en su s a al co e degrada io or 1 ing *H t e po en *a fo*r loss o co ai ent.
e criteria set forth in Re ision 1 and t e exa ples of evens t *ggeri g the respective Emergency Classes ( it attendant noti ication actions) pro ide add' ional guidance for every opera *ng licensee int e preparatio, appro al, and ulti tel, t e imple ntatio of their emergency preparedness plans w *c mus be sub i ed o RC for evalua *on pursuant o O CF 50. 7.
Hoe er, as a prac ical matter, the presen e rgency c1assif "cation sche e has resul ed i an u e pee edly la ge nu ber of e erge cy declarations b
/""' a...
lice s es and he conco it large nu e o needless ac i atio so local, state, ad !ederal e e gene plans.
For
- a ple during Ja uary 9 3, ere w re
~
163 e1ep o e notif'ca ions o e R Operations Cen er pursuan o 10 C
. 72.
0 hese o i
- ca i o sJ 19 eported 11U11usua 1 t:ven s II a d 1 repor e a "Aler. "
- 1 houg the Co issio as ound io s o be use ul or ide tif
- g gene ic issues, e U usual Eve t class has o usua ly ee "indica-iv o r.o e ser *ous co d' *o s hie are o ye u ly realized.
11 In o her
- ords, he Unusua1 E ent noti ica ons are useful to th Co1T1Tiiss *o as no emer-ge c repor s bu o as precurso o 'fica *o s of serious acciden s.
ecause i
would eli i ate needless activa ions of the l *censee 's emergency pi e
Co1T1Tiissio ins tha i
ould be in e in eres of public eal and sa E y to remove the Unusual E ent class from thee ergency classes lea ing only tree such classes: Alert, Site Area Emergency and General Emergency.
eedless ac iva ion o a lice see's e erge cy plan has several ad erse i pac s.
Besides the obvious waste of ime, effort, and expense, need ess acti atio s of an emergenc planTt,e d to reduce e credibility of the emergency pla ith he
[7590-01] publ *cad wit go ern t agen:ies d~rec ly i valved.
Te pu lie e*t er beco es unnecessarily a a d, or a er se eral un arranted acti ations, the ou lie dis,isses all acti a io s as no really representing at ue e ergency.
Si i ar1, state, local, and ~ederal agencies ca eco dese si ized by need ess ac iva ions.
~
0 erall the effect of needless activations o the licensee's e rgency plan is to reduce safe y ya process analagous o he proverbial "er** g of olf."
In order to re o e "Unusual Even u fro he E rgency Classes, three s eps us be u de ta e.
Fi s,
U EG-0654/ FE.- EP-1 us be revised.
e Co ss *o c:nd he Federal E rge cy a age en gency
- 1 be unde a ing is as i
t e near fu ure. Seco d e
ss 0 's reg at*o so u
ediate 0 i ica io equ
- remen for Opera ing UC ear Po er Reac ors 11 must be revised in oder 0
co er as 11 on-E ergencies 11 t ose eve s pre *cusly repor ed as 11 Unusual E 'e S
- II is as recen ly bee acco lis~e on as descr*bed i n e
r Feder a 1 Regi e (
F ______ ).
hird, bo 10 CF 50 poe d ' E 11E1 ergenc Pla n
- g ;, 1d Prepared ess o Pro uc *o a d
- 11za *o Fac* 1;
- s 11 a,d O cm 50.47, 11 E ergency Pla s 11 must e rev*sed. This third step is he subjec o this pro osed rule a ng.
r.o VI ED In lig of he pre ious discussion, e
RC is particu arly
- erested in recei ing corrrnents concern~ng he following:
1ha safe y alue, and do lar bene it is assoc*a ed w*
U usual Event froi he Emergency Classes?
remo i g
(7590-0)
- 2.
a safe y i.pact a d dollar cos is associate
- it remo i g Unusua Eve ro he E rge cy Classes?
- 3.
hat o he c anges sold e i car ora ed in a e isio 2 o U EG-0'5 /
-REP-1?
- 4.
Should any portion of U EG-0654/FEMA-REP-l, such as the e a ples for the a ious E erge c Classes be specifically incorpora e in o t e Coil1Tiiss*o 's regu1a ions instead cf referencin,g the docu nt as i" done no ?
SU Y
a..
he Co issio s proposi g rule a *ng tha would change the nu ber o E rgenc Classes i lice see's e ergency plans or opera ing uclear o er plants.
he u er of E erge cy C asses wo ld e reduced
- o our 0
ree classes as a resu1 0
t e elimina ion of the "U usua 1 Event" category.
eac or even s p e iousl a
Q i h.
t e 11Unusua E en 11 categor ouldsill be reported o be Co ission but as on-Emerge cies pursua to 10 CF
- 50. 2.
he Coll1'f'lission has prepared a re9ula ory a alysis o h"s regula on.
T ~
analys :s exami es the costs and benefits of the,ule as considered by the Co ssio.
co of the regula ory analysis is available for inspectio and copy *ng or a fee at he C Pu l i c Docu ent Roo, 1717 Stree,
. ' as i g O,
/"")
}Ive/ s *ng1e copies of the analysis ay be obtained fro Eri
. eiss, Office o Inspectfon and Enforcement, U. S.
uclear Regulatory Co ission, ashington, 0. C.
20555, Te1ep one (301) 492-4973.
[
9.Ql) STATE\\£
- ave bee ap ro d
ed c o ct,
- 96-Sll(clearance number 3150-0011).
REGULA O FLE IBIL T CE TIFICA IO In accordance it he egu a or Fle ibility ct of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 605
{b),
e Co sio hereby certi ies ta s regu at io
'* 1 o
ave a s i g ficant econo ic i pac o a su s a ial s
1 en i ies.
is regula-io affec s elec r'c u i i ies ha are do *na n
e*r res ec i e se ce areas ad ha o
ad opera e nuclear u *1 *zation acili *es *ce sed under Sec o s 103 a d 10 b oft e 0 ic E ergy C of 19 as a e ded.
e a men s clar"fy and modi y presen 1 existi g e rge a
i g requ Accordingly, t ere s s*g ca eco omic ese ce sees.
nor do he affec ed full ice sees all
. hi e scope o n o "s all enti ies set or e egula ory F e Sma 11 Business Size S a dards set or h in egula 0 S issued e S.a Business Adminis ra io a 13 CFR Pa, t... 21.
LIS I OF SUBJECT 10 CFR PAR 50 A i rus Classi *ed or a io, Fire pre e ~
ergo ern,, al rela o s, uclear po er plan s and reactors.)
Penal y, ad*a ion Pro ect*o,
Reacto siti ng er
- eria, Re orting require ents.
~
-,,, -,)(,-,Pr".
/t' a.--.o """1 u.µ
/r,,
~~~life,~~
e ic Energy c of 1954, as a nded, e Ee gy S.V- * $, C.
Reorganization Act o 1974, as ame ded, ad,ectiQR 6e2 an& 55~.o.f r; t 1e S of d-
.IV, C,".f ~0P1.s :
- IA..t;(r. 7 CJ:.I' P A.,,r+ So,
- a ~'"t'tli,e,e.N"[, e fo lo *ng a 10 ~13ter I, Geee ef
cf'~
I
.s "f). ('t)
~~,, \\11"
~ 2. tn §50.47 parag a 11 ( b) (17)
- Jded and footno e 1 re ised to read as fol lo s:
- r.,:. 4 7 E er~e cy Pl a
- r.
lb)
The onsite and, except as ro ided in paragrap (d) of
~s sec ion o fsi e e rgenc res ons lans for nuclear po er reactors us eet e ol o *i g standard ~l
{1 7) The emergenc
)
must inclv e hree Emergency Cl asses :
(i) Al~rt.
(ii) Sf e Area E ergenc
{iii) Ge'fleral Emerg r;,,
l These sta dd ds are ado, ess s °t:J s pe,fie criteria in UREG-065; HM
- f? ~l en i t led "Criteria or Preparatio ad E alua io of Radiological ;.~,.. gency Response Plans and Pteparedness in Support o
ucl ear nwer Plants-or In ~r
- Use and
- 1rrrnent 11 January 1980.
Hoe ~r, the categor; " otifir.ation of Unusual Event' is no longer con$idered an e er.enr:_ cl ss.
,, 0 ----:Q.D
- lit
- g w u ~
... ~ ~ -lf::#_..,., -~
~ -* ***a **cao o 1.:t_ o LJ.l_o *e.o.:a_o._~...:R.J. - -***
rm..,~* *.c o era :D ~
u:e o B:&E.:u :a;>**
-...i*CII. OJII :g-~***-:e:u:t~ ~
- a. **..o:.e.v*.
I
+
red www.-nr****-L
(7590-01)
' Fedeta1 Regoletfons, P,e.1 t 50 end e'f"t JtwblisAed as a doet:HneAt s"~jc.ci to"'""-.,_
~---- PART 50 - 00 ESTIC LICE SING 0!_::::,
CPROOUCTIO FACILITIES
- 1.
The aut ority citation for Par 50 cont*nues to read as follc s:
AUTHOR! Y:
Secs. 103, 104, 161, 182, 183. 186, 189, 68 Stat. 936, 937, 948,
953, 954, 955, 956, as amended sec. 2~4, 83 Stat. 1244, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2133, 2134, 2201, 2232, 2233, 2236, 2239, 2282)* secs. 201, 202, 206r. 88 Stat.
12 2, 124, 1246, as ame ded (42 u.s.c.1s 1, 5842, 58 6), u less othe i e no ed.
Section 50.7 also issued under Pub. L.95-601, sec. 10, 92 Stat. 2951 (42 U.S.C. 5851).
Sec *on 50.78 also issued under sec. 122, 68 Sa. 939 (42
'I'S,.,,I U.S.C. 2152). Sec *ans 50.80-50.81 a so issued under sec. 184 68 Stat.~as a ended ( 2 U.S.C. 2234).
2..
Sa. 955
.S.C. 2236).
t)
Sec io s 50.100-5,2.102 also issued u der sec. 186, 6 For he purposes of sec 223, 68 Stat. 958, as a.e de (42 U.S.C. 2273 ),
§§50.lO(e), { ), ad (c), 50.44, 50. 6, 50.~8, 50.54, ano 50.SO(a) are issu d under sec. 161b, 68 Sat. 948, as amended (42 U.S.C. 220l (b)} ; §§50.101/) and (t) ad 50.54 are *ssued under sec. 16li, 68 Stat. 949, as a ended (42 U.S.C.
220l(i)
- and §§50.55(e), 50.59(b), 50.70, 50.71, 50.72, and 50.78 are issued
~ i e
- 3.
e ca egory II otification of Unusual E entu is no longer
(i590-
~:
I I
..-. ~
- r.
I 3
fr.,4, 1r,,,,,* f
/ ~ ;:::b. ~-:-- ::,,,
/
j
~ -1.J'aragr3p IV. C. l]Ac i atio o E ergenc Orga izat'on" is revised to
~fo]l01s: )
/i ze-.,,
/1('-,/,'v ;/,' c;,
h,c r5* ~<*
(./r_e.
- f'le enti re spec ru gene cm,ditions tha i *ol e t e aler *ng or acti ating o progressively larger seg ents of** e total emergency organizatio shall be described.
The colffllUr.i.ca ion steps to be taken to alert or activate eme gency personnel under eac class of emergency s a 1 be desc ibed. E ergency act*on levels {ba ed not o ly on onsite and offsite radiation~~ itoring informa *on but also on readi ngs fro. a number of sensors that indicate a poten ial e ergency, such as the pressure in contain,er.
and the response of the E rgency Cor Cooi ng Sys em) for notification of off-site age cies s all be described.
The exi stence, but not the details, of a message authe tica on sc eme shall b no ed o sue agr.ncies.
he emerge c c asses def* ed shad (2) site area e
ge. cy, a d *:( 3) general e erge cy.
T ese cl asses are ur her discussed in LI G-065 FE REP 1.
e ca egory II otificatio o tiiusual t;ve " is no lonqer considered an e iergency class.
Dated at Washington, o1c/
"hisAday of _______ _
- 83.
For the uc1ea Regu atory Commiss*o Samual J. Chil k Secretary of the Corrrnission
I EGULATORY A LYS S
(§50.47 and Part 50 ppendi E)
E Te objective of he proposed re is'on of §50.47 and Part 50 Appendi E
is o reMo e he* "U isua E n 11 categor ro the emerge cy c a!>ses in licensees' e ergency plans.
By raising the threshold a which t e licensee dee ares a erge cy.
hese proposed ame
- s -..d 11 r duce the number of activations of s a e local and federa1 e ergenc pla s.
These ~reposed allliler.
ents s oul d eriha ce pub l
- c ea 1 t and sa et i creasing e cred*b*-
li y of e lice see ' s e erge cy
,an a dee ara io so ~. e erge cy.
v reducl'fTg t.e u.ber of needless Ea~ opera 9 CO, ercial nuclear po er pla icensed by the RC ms ave a a pro ed e erge c a
e prese l'lerge cy c assi ca 0
sc el""e as our classes :
( ) 'o ;
ca 0
of U us a E ent (2 ) Aler
( 3) s*
rea fmergency and (4 ) Ge eral Ernergenc The class
- t1ed "Unusual E ent" results in 1
- cens e dec l aring a e erge Y a 0 10 0
a res o d.
h se our e ergenc classes are described b exa ples i UREG-0654/FE EP-.
- U EG-0654/FEMA-E -1 en itled "Cr*ter *a for Preparation and Ea uatio of Radiological Ernergenc Re e Plans and Preparedness in Su port of uclear
- s.
11 ev.
9 0.
Co i e s of' U ~ E., doc u,,e
'a * -
Co ss* o s oc:.
tree,
\\.as o,
- 5.
- es ay ron G
rie Pr
.. 9 o
i o current ai e ng hP.
'uclear egu ry Co iss*o,
20555.
ti
- ca io s Sa es Manager.
Hoe.er, as a practical matter, e present e ergency classi "ca io scheme has resu1 ed 1 a une pectedly large nu ber of emergency declara io s by licensees and the concotr¢i& t large number of needless activations of local sta e, and federa emergen~y plans.
For example during January 1983, there were 163 telephone notifications to the RC Operatio s Center pursuan to 10 CFR
- 50. 72.
0 these otifica ionsJ19 reported "U usual Evens" and 1 re m* ed an "Alert.
II 1 hough the Corrmission has fou d these notifications to be ust' ul or ide ti ing generic issues, the Unusua E *ent c ass has 0
usually ee
indica ive of more serious condi io s which are no yet fully realized."
In other ords, he U usual E ent no ifica ions are useful o
e Co ission as onemergency reports but no as precursor notif'cat*ons of se ious a~cide s.
The Co,,*ssio tins a it would e int e interes of pu ic eal, and safety to remove the Unusual Event class fro t e emergency classes lea ing only three uc classes:
Alert, Site Area Emergenc~and General Err~rgency.
eedless activation o a *censee's emergency plan has severa l ad erse i pac s.
Besides he o v*ous was e uf ime, e r, ad e pe se ee less ac iva i so a emergency panted o reduce he credi ili.y o plan with tne public and with go ernment agencies directly invo1 ed.
e e erge cy he publ *c ei her eco es u ecessar*1 ala ed, or after severe u arranted ac a o s the pu lie dis isses all activatio s as no really representing a rue e erge c s* ilar y, s a e, local, and _ederal agencies can become dese ~itized ac i ations. Overall the effect of ~edless acti a *o of e licensee 's emergency plan is o reduce safe y by a process analagous to the proverbial "cry
- g o o f.
11 COSTS he RC is in i *.g industry and public co ent on precisely hat dollar bene its and costs ar,e associa ed ith eli inating "Unusual E ent 11 from the emergency classes.
T is regula ory analysis wil1 be revised to reflect the precise cost data obtained subsequent to the publishing of the proposed rule.
Indus ry The RC expects ere o
substantial xpense associa ed with revis *o of the licensee's e ergen~y pa s.
his ould ea leas par ially offse over the life of the plant byte reduced costs associated it fewer activations of he licensee's emerge cy pla 0 her go ernmen age c*es educing e erge cy pa activa io s s ould result in substan ial savi gs fo s a e, local and federal age cies w o ill no be
~
respon ing to u warranted decla a io s of e ergencies.
Sta e, local, and federal e ergenc pla s
- elude act
- ations or t e placing o stand y of arious
?'
res po se ea,s.
P l i c The chief bene i s uld accrue to the public as a result of increased safe y.
The public will no beco e u necessarily alarmed as a resu t of u ecessary declara ions o e.ergency and t ere sou d be less cop.ace cy o he part o hose age cies respo,di g o a e ergenc dee a a o ec2use sue a dee ara
ALTER A IVES The three alterna i e for difying the emergency classes are:
- 1.
have the same nu ber of eports.
- 2.
reduce the number of reports.
- 3.
increase the number of reports.
lternative 1 ould impose he same burden on the ce sees t*t would perm't fe er emergency classes and thus fe er declaratio s of emergency.
ter at* ve 2 would reduce e urden o, lice sees bu wou d *mpa i r RC's abili y to ide ify generic issues and tre ds of p1a t per ormance rela ed o safet Al er a ive 3 is un *arra ed ecause t ere is no co,pell 'ng reaso for increasing the nu ber of re o s.
Conseque ly, al ernative 1 as selected.
The revision o 50, 47 and Part 50 ppendi E ta elimina e "Unusua Even 11 s a e ergency c s s u d raise et resho d a c a ce see dee ares a e.erge cy.
his 1
ca ge he number of re orts r ce
- 11ed b e
C bu should elimina e unnecessary acti a ions of emergency plan.
FI AL DECIS 0 T e proposed ru le should, 'f promul ated, e a ce pu lie health and sa e and here ore should e pu lis ed.
Oocume t a e:
REG A ALYSIS 50.
& P SO Requestor's 10:
ICHELLE Author's Name:
eiss Docume t Corrrnen s: