ML20247Q589
| ML20247Q589 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yankee Rowe |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1988 |
| From: | Papanic G YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| BYR-89-61, NUDOCS 8904070164 | |
| Download: ML20247Q589 (41) | |
Text
.c _.
t EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL SEMIANNUAL REPORT j i
FOR j l
THIRD AND FOURTil QUARTERS,1988 l INCLUDING l l
ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN 1 i
i FOR 1988 l l
l l
l .
l I
l Yankee Atomic Electric Company \
Rowe, Massachusetts i
l 2819R l i< D K 5
\ \ l
v ,
6 i I
e
. TABLE OF CONTENTS Eage I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
.............................................'........ 1 !
i 1
2.0 METEOROLOGICAL DATA.............................................. 3 l
3.0 4 DO S E A S S ES SM ENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1 Doses From Liquid Effluents................................ 4 1 3.2 Doses From Noble Gases..................................... 5 3.3 Doses from Iodine-131, Tritium and Radionuclides j in Particulate Form With Half-Lives Greater !
Than 8 Days................................................ 6 l 1
)
REFERENCES....................................................... 8 t
TABLES........................................................... 9 APPENDIX A Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation...................................... A-1 ,
I APPENDIX B Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation...................................... B-1 APPENDIX C Liquid Holdup Tanks.................................. C-1 l
APPENDIX D Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program........ D-1 ;
APPENDIX E Land Use Census...................................... E-1 APPENDIX F Process Control Program.............................. F-1 APPENDIX G Of f-Si t e Do s e Cal cula t ior. Man e.al . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G-1 l APPENDIX H Radioactive Liquid, Gaseous and Solid Waste ,
Treatment Systems.................................... H-1 '
APPENDIX I Supplemental Information............................. I-1 2819R I
I
v 7
.= ,
1
% l E
, LIET of ToEES Numtter Iitin Eagn I s
1A Gaseous Effluents - Summation Of All Releases 9 1B Gaseous Effluents - Elevated Feleases 10 q 1C Gaseous Effluents - Routine Ground Level Releases 11 q 2A Liquid Effluents - Summation Of All Releases 12 l 2B Liquid Effluents - Routine Releases 13 1
3 Solid Waste and Irradiated Fuel Shipments 14 I l
4 Maximum Off-Site Doses and Dose Commitments to Members of l the Public 15-16 l SA to 511 Annual Summary of Upper Level Joint Frequency Distribution 17-24 (
l
(
l l
l l
l 1
1 l
l 1
I l
l l
l
-111-2819R 1
v q
. s !
YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY i SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT JULY - DECEMBER 1988 1
i 1.0 INIRQllEGIIDN )
Tables 1 through 3 list the recorded radioactive liquid and gaseous !
I cffluents and solid waste for the second six months of the year, with data summarized on a quarterly basis. Table 4 summarizes the estimated radiological dose commitments from all radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released during the year 1988. Tables SA through 5H report th?
cumulative joint frequency distributions of wind speed, wind direction, and )
I atmospheric stability for the 12-month period, January to December 1988.
Radioactive effluents reported in the Semiannual Effluent Report covering the l first six months of the year were used to determine the off-site doses for the i first half of 1988.
As required by Technical Specification 6.9.5.b dose commitments j l
resulting from the release of radioactive materials in liquids and gases were )
l estimated in accordance with the " Yankee Nuclear Power Station Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual" (0DCM). These dose estimates were made using a l " Method II" analysis as described in the ODCM. A " Method II" analysis
- incorporates the methodology of Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Reference 1) and l
l actual measured meteorological data recorded during the reporting period. For batch gaseous releases, the meteorological conditions concurrent with the time of release of radioactive materials (as determined by sampling frequency and !
measurement) were used for determining the gaseous pathway doses. As required l by Technical Specification 6.9.5.b.(2), this report shall also include an ,
assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive effluents to member (s) of the public due to allowed recreational activities inside the site boundary during the year. However, for this reporting period, no recreational activities inside the site boundary were permitted, and therefore are not addressed. The limited use of the Information Center on-site is associated with educational activities as they pertain to the production of electricity and as such are not included under Specification 6.9.5.b.(2). Assesment of 2819R l
1 L ___--__ - _ _ - - _ _ _ -
)
4 radiation doses (including direct radiation) to the likely most exposed real member (s) of the public for the calendar year for the purposes of demonstrating conformance with 40 CFR 190, Environmental Radiation Protection l Standards for Nuclear Power Operations, are also required to be included in this report, if the conditions indicated in Technical Specification 3.11.4, I i
" Total Dose" have been exceeded during the year. 'Since the conditions indicated in the action tatement under Technical Specification 3.11.4.a were not entered into during the year, no additional radiation dose assessments are l l
reclui red .
i All calculated dose estimates for this reporting period are well below l
the dose criteria of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I.
Appendices A through II indicate the status of reportable items per the I
recluirements of Technical Specifications 3.3.3.6, 3.3.3.7, 3.11.1.4, 3.4.12.1, 3.12.2, 6.14.1, 6.15.2, and 6.16.1.
1 i
l 2819R l
I
-v
. s 2.0 t1ETEDRQLOGICAL_DAIA Meteorological data was collected during the reporting period from the site's 200 foot meteorological tower located approximately 180 mrters north of the vapor container. The tower instrumentation is designed to meet the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.23 (Reference 2) for meteorological monitoring.
The main release point for gases discharged from the plant is via the 150 foot primary vent stack, located between the vapor container and the primary auxiliary building. The primary vent stack is treated as a mixed mode elevated release point dependent upon windspeed as described in Regulatory Guide 1.111 (Reference 3).
X/Q and D/Q values were derived for all receptor points from the site meteorological record using a straight line airflow model. All dispersion and deposition factors have been calculated employing appropriate source configuration considerations and removal mechanism (e.g., dry deposition) described in Regulatory Guide 1.111 (Reference 3). Terrain elevations, including downwind valley flow corrections for the surrounding area were factored into the calculation of X/Q and D/Q values at each receptor location.
2819R i
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ __]
. l o I
. s I
3.0 DOS U SSESSliENI 3.1 Doneti pln_ liquid Ef fluents Technical Specification 3.11.1.2 limits total body (1.5 mrem per quarter, and 3 mrem per year) and organ doses (5 mrem per quarter, and 10 mrem per year) from liquid effluents to a member of the public to those specified l in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I. By implementing the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Technical Specification 3.11.1.2 assures that the release l of radioactive material in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is l 1
reasonably achievable." !
l 4 Exposure pathways that could exist as a result of liquid effluents are fish, direct exposure from river shoreline sedimentation, milk and meat via i animal ingestion of the Deerfield River water, and meat, milk and vegetable pathways via crop irrigation with water withdrawn from the Deerfield River. -
The drinking water and aquatic invertebrate pathways do not exist downriver of ,
I the Yankee Plant at Rowe.
l The dose analysis for the liquid pathways, given above, assumes a dilution based on the monthly average flow at the Sherman Dam. This results in conservative dose estimates from the liquid effluents.
l The resultant whole body and organ doses from liquid effluents were determined by summing the contributions from all pathways at each location.
The whole body and orga. doses to a member of the public from liquid effluents are given in Table 4. the estimated quarterly and annual ~0oses due to liquid ef fluents are well below the 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I dose criteria of Technical Specification 3.11.1.2.
l l
1 l
l l
l
! 2819R l
v s .
3.2 Dasss From Noble Gaara Technical Specification 3.11.2.2 limits the gamma air dose (5 mrad per quar [er, and 10 mrad per year) and beta air (10 mrad per quarter, and 20 mrad
~
per year) dose from noble gases released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the site boundary to those specified in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I. By implementing the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Technical Specification 3.11.2.2 assures that the releases of radioactive noble gsses in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably
. achievable."
l Dose estimates due to the release of noble gases to the atmosphere were calculated at the site boundary, nearest resident, nearest vegetable garden and nearest milk animal in each of'the sixteen principle compass' directions, as well as the point of highest off-site ground level air concentration of radioactive materials. Gamma and beta air doses, as well as whole body and-skin doses, were calculated at each of the above locations.
To determine the beta contribution to the skin dose, a semi-infinite cloud model was utilized. The whole body gamma dose was calculated using a
~
finite cloud sector average model with a Gaussian distribution of activity in the vertical plane. The gamma radiation received from the cloud e,t a point of interest was determined by integrating the contribution from a differential volume over the entire cloud, taking into account the geometry of the cloud, variation in concentration, attenuation by the interaction of photons with matter in the path between the source and receptor point, and scattering of I
radiation from material outside the direct path to the point of interest. For skin and whole body doses an attenuation factor of 0.7 was applied to the dose calculations to account for the dose reduction due to shielding which would be provided by a residential structure. No additional credit was taken for decay of radionuclides in transit to the receptor point.
The estimated quarterly and annual gamma and beta air doses at the-point of highest off-site exposure are listed in Table 4. The estimated gamma and beta air doses due to noble gases released in gaseota ef fluents are well 2819R
y b
below the 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I dose. criteria of Technical Specification 3.11.2.2.
3.3 DQEns From Iodine-13L, Tritium and Radionuclides in Particulate Form With
.llalf-Lives Greater Than 8 Days Technical Specification 3.11.2.3 limits the organ dose to a member of the public f rom iodine-131, tritium and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days (hereafter called iodines and particulate) in gaseous effluents released from the site to areas at and beyond the site boundary to those specified in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I (7.5 mrem per quarter, and 15 mrem per year). By implementing the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Technical Specification 3.11.2.3 assures that the releases of iodines and particulate in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable."
Exposure pathways that could exist as a result of the release of iodines and particulate to the atmosphere include external irradiation from activity deposited onto the ground surface, inhalation and ingestion of vegetables, meat and milk. Dose estimates were made at the site boundary, nearest resident, nearest vegetable garden and nearest milk animal in each of l the sixteen principle compass directions. The nearest resident, nearest vegetable garden ~and nearest milk animal in each sector were identified by the most recent Annual Land Use Census as required by Technical Specification' 3.12.2. Doses were also calculated at the point of maximum ground level air concentration of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents. Doses were calculated for pathways which were determined by the field survey to actually exist. Conservatively, a vegetabic garden was assumed to exist at each milk animal location. Furthermore, the meat pathway was assumed to exist at each milk animal location. Meat animals were assumed to receive their entire intake from pasture during the second and third quarters. Milk: animals were assumed to receive 50 percent of their intake from pasture during this
- period. This assumption is realistic since most dairy operations utilize supplemental feeding of animals when on pasture or actually restrict animals to full time silage feeding throughout the entire year.
-c,-
2819R l~
l
n . .. . _ _
p
- The resultant organ doses were determined after. adding the contributions from all pathways at each location. Doses were calculated for the whole body, GI-tract, bone, liver, kidney, thyroid, lung and skin for adults, teenagers, children and infants. The maximum estimated quarterly and annual organ doses due to iodines and particulate at any of the off-site receptor locations are reported in Table 4. The doses to all other organs at all other locations for all other age groups are less than the doses reported in Table 4. The estimated organ doses from iodines and particulate in gaseous ef fluents are well below the 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I dose criteria l 1
of Technical Specification 3.11.2.3.
l l
\
l I
l l
l l
l l
_7_
2819R
EETEREN ES
- 1. Regulatory Guide 1.109, " Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Release of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance With 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Standards Development, Revision 1,' October 1977.
- 2. Regulatory Guide 1.23, "On-Site Meteorological Programs (Safety Guide 23)," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Standards Development, February 1972!.
- 3. Regulatory Guide 1.111, " Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and -;
Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light - Water.-
Cooled Reactors," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Standards I
Development, Revision 1, October 1977.
1 1
i j
a l
I
_g.
2819R
s- ;
]
S- .- TABLE 1A i
Yankee Atomic Electric Company. Rowe. Massachusetts
~
{
Effluent and Waste Disposal Semiannual Report Third and Fourth Ouarters. 1988 Qanggus Ef fluents -- Summation of All Releases j I
Unit ' Quarter Quarter Est.: Total 3 4 Error. %'
A. Fission and Activation Gases )
i la Total release C1 5.39E+01 3.79E+01 5.50E+01-R. Average release rate for period uCi/sec 6.86E+00 4.82E+0D )
- 3. Percent of Tech. Spec. 13mit (1) %- 5.10E-01 1.24E-01 B. Iodines
.4
- 1. Total Iodine-131 Ci 5.91E-06 4.01E-05 2.50E+01 22 _Ayerage reinase rate for period u ci/sec 7.51E-07 5.10E 3. Percent of Tech. Spec. limit (2) % 8.36E 9.57E-01 C. Particulate
- 1. Particulate with T-1/2 > 8_ days C1 3.72E-06 1.32E-06 3.00E+01
- 2. Average release rate for period uC1/sec 4.73E-07 1.68E-07 32 Percent of Tech. Spec. limit % (3) (3) 4 i_Htona_ alpha _radinac11Yity Ci 3.00E-08 9.00E-09 D. Tritium
___L_IntaLrelease C1 9.40E-01 1.09E+00 23.00E+01 at_Ayntage release rate for period uC1/sgp 1.20E-01 1.39E-01
- 3. PcIncut of Tech. Spec. limit 1 (3)- (3)
(1) Technical Specification 3.11.2.2.a for gamma air dose. Percent values for Technical Specification 3.11.2.2.b for beta air. dose are approximately. the same.
(2) Technical Specification 3.11.2.3.a for dose from I-131, tritium, and radionucl4 des in particulate form.
(3) Per Technical Specification 3.11.2.3, dose contribution from tritium and particulate are included with I-131 above in Part B.
2819R
=
- l
- 16BLE 1B Xanken_Alomic Electric Company. Rowe. Massachusetts f Effluent and Waste Disposal Semiannual Report Third and Fourth Ouarters, 1988 Gaseous Effluents - Elevated. Release 1 Continuous Mode Batch Mode Nuclidua_ Released Unit Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter l 3 4 3* 4
- 1. Fission Gases Krvoton-85 C1 2.89E-02 3.37E-01 3.67E+00
___ Krypton-85m Ci 6.12E-01 1.03E-01 1.35E-03
___Kry.pton-87 Ci 5.10E-01 9.34E-02 <l.25E-02 1 Krypton-88 C1 1.09E+00 1.83E-01' <1.33E-02 !
Xnann-133 Ci 2.71E+01 1.84E+01 7.74E+00 j Kcnon-135 C1 1.17E+01 2.45E+00 1.97E-01
___2enon-135m C1 1.15E+01 3.14E+00 <8.02E-03
___ Xenon-138 Xenon-133m Ci Ci 2.65E-01 6.12E-01 1.95E-02 2.01E-01
<1.23E 4.46E-02'
]
Argan-37 Ci 9.16E-02 1.70E-01 3.40E-01 _
___ Argon-41 Ci 3.33E-01 5.58E-02 <5.06E-03 Carbon-14 C1 5.05E-03 6.23E-02 5.60E-01 Xenon-131m Ci 6.55E-03 1.08E-01 1.08E-02 I Unidentified Ci J Intal for period Ci 5.39E+01 2.53E+01 1.26E+01 1._Jodines Iodine-131 Ci 5.91E-06 2.29E-05 1.72E-05 Indine-133 Qi 1.16E-05 7.52E-07 5.68E-07 -
Indine-135 C1 <6.96E-07 <4.51E-08 <3.41E-08
___Iolal for period C1 1.75E-05 2.37E-05 1.78E-05
- 3. Particulate
___ Strontium-89 C1 <2.77E-07 <2.27E-07 <1.71E-07 Etrantium-90 C1 <2.04E-08 <7.17E-08 <5.41E-08 Cualum-134 Ci <2.71E-07 <5.99E-07 <4.52E-07 j Cngium-137 Ci 4.17E-07 -2.01E-07 1.51E-07 l Ratium-Lanthanum-140 Ci <8.12E-07 <1.73E-06 <1.31E-06 Zinc-65 C1 <6.48E-07 <1.40E-06 <1.06E-06 L Cabalt-58 C1 <2.93E-07 <6.50E-07 (4.90E-07 ;
Cobalt-60 C1 3.30E-06 5.51E-07 4.15E-07 l Irpn-59 Ci <5.86E-07 <1.31E-06 <9.85E-07 i Chtomium-51 Ci <1.65E-06 <3.56E-06 <2.69E-06
_ 7,irqRaiDm-Hinhium-95 C1 <4,JJE-07 <1.03E-06 <7.74E-07 Qetium-141 Ci (2.19E-07 (4.85E-07 <3.66E-07
___Qerium-144 Ci (9.40E-07 <2.09E-06 <1 58E-06
___AnLimony-124 C1 <2.58E-07 e62 04E-07 <4.56E-07 Manganese-54 Ci <2.89E-07 <6.78E-Ol_ <5.12E-07
._ ._Silur-ll0m Ci < 215E-QL (5.63E-07 _ <4.25E ___ Molybdenum-99 01 <1.86E-06 <3.851-06 <2.90E-06 Ruthenium-103 Ci (2.29E-07 <4.74E-07 <3 57E-07
__._Inlal_inI_ period Ci 3.72E-06 7.52E-07__ 5.66E-07
- There were no Latch mode releases during this reporting period.
2819R
I
. 'IABLE__1f i Yankee Atomic Electric Company. Rowe. Massachusetts
'EfUnent and Waste Disposal Semiannual Report Third and Fourth Ouarters 1988-Gas.gons Effluents'- Ground Level Releases There were no routine measured ground. level continuous or batch mode gaseous 1 releases'during the third or fourth quarters of 1988. ]
i l
i
).
1 l
I i
)
)
l l
I i
j 1
'I
-i 2819R
_ _____.____..____________.____._________m._ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _
v v
TABLE 2A YankfLLAtomic Electric Company. Rowe. Massachusetts Effluent aui Raale_Disguaal Semiannual Repart Ibir.d_and Fourth Ouarters.1988 Liquid _Efiluents - Summation of All Releases l
Unit Quarter Quarter Est. Total 3 4 Error. % l A. Fission and Activation Products l
- 1. Total release (not including l tritium._ganna2_ alpha) Ci 3.04E-02 8.72E-03 2.00E+01 l
- 2. Average diluted concentration
_ during_ period uC1/mi 4.90E-10 2.75E-LQ_
__l d tsept of applisable limit (1) % 3.46E-04 2.20E-01_ i B. Tritium
__.11_Inlal release ci 6.62E+01 1.88E+01 1.00E+01
- 2. Average diluted concentration during_pariod uti/mi 1.07E-06 5.93E-07
__.lt Perceni._nf_npplicable limit (1) % 3.57E-02 1.98E-02 C. Dissolved and Entrained Gases
_ _lt_Tntal._rcicase C1 3.42E-02 1.84E-02 2.00E+01
- 2. Average diluted concentration during_pstiod uC1/mi 5.51E-10 5.80E-10
___J. Percent of applicable limit (2) % 2.76E-04 2.90E-04 D. Gross Alpha Radioactivity
- 1. Tolal_ralcase Ci 6.97E-08 <1.97E-06 3.50E+01 l l
l E. Volume of waste released (prior to
___dilnLionl_ liters 6.98E+06 4.67E+06 3.00E+01 i
F. Volume of dilution water used
__,during_perind liters 6.20E+10 3.17E+10 7.00E+00 (1) Concentration limits specified in 10CFR, Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Technical Specification 3.11.1.1). The percent of applicable limit reported is based on the average diluted concentration during the period. At no time did any release exceed the concentration limit.
(2) Concentration limits for dissolved and entrained noble gases is 2E-04 microcuries/ml (Technical Specification 3.11.1). The percent of applicable limit reported is based on the average diluted concentration during the period. At no time did any release exceed the concentration limit.
2819R
v 5 . TABLE 2B Yanice Atomic Electric Company. Rowe. Massachusetts Effluent and_ Haste Disposal Semiannual Report Third and Fourth Ouarters. 1988 Liquid Effluents Continuous Mode Batch Mode JKunlides Rele:ased Unit Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter 3 4 3 4
[51ron11um-39 Ci < 2_,j!0 E-04 <1.42E-04 <2.37E-05 <1.32E-05
_Ektantium-90 Ci <3.38E-05 <2.23E-05 <6.50E-06 <4.88E-06
_Cnnium-134 Ci 2.51E-06 3.91E-05 3.85E-04 1.52E-04
_Cealum-137 Ci 5.53E-06 6.74E-05 4.27E-04 1.89E-04
_ lodine:131 Ci <2.08E-05 <1.31E-05 3.34E-05 1.96E-04
_Cubalt-58 C1 <2.35E-05 <1.31E-05 <8.10E-06 <9.05E-06
_Cohalt-60 Ci 1.70E-05 6.18E-06 2.39E-05 3.96E-05 .
_Jrgn-59 Ci <4.59E-05 <2.71E-05 <1.50E-05 <1.70E-05 l'
_ Zinc-65 C1 <5.04E-05 <2.88E-05 <1.71E-05 <1.89E-05
_Mauganese-54 C1 1.92E-06 <1.34E-05 (8.38E-06 3.66E-06
_ Chromium-51 Ci <1.72E-04 <1.05E-04 <9.94E-05 <8.38E-05 l
_Zitconium-Niobium-95 Ci <3.92E-05 <2.31E-05 <1.49E-05 <1.53E-05 l
- _Molyhdenum-99 Ci <1.65E-04 <9.65E-05 <6.29E-05 <6 13E-05 l _Iechnetium-99m Ci 1.57E-06 2.89E-06 <1.06E-05 <9.03E-06 l _DariumLanthanum:140 Ci <7.40E-05 <4.51E-05 <4.30E-05 <3.60E-05 l _Cutium:1!11 C1 <2.99E-05 <1.77E-05 <1.70E-05 <1.44E-05 l
l Ci <2.16E-05 <1.31E-05 <1.23E-05 <1.01E-05 I
_ Ruthenium.-103
_ferium-144 Ci <1.36E-04 <8.15E-05 <7.84E-05 <6.52E-05
_ lodine:133 Ci <2.15E-05 <1.32E-05 1.10E-06 <1.03E-05
_Scienium-75 Ci <2.40E-05 <1.43E-05 <1.34E-05 <1.16E-05
_Eilvst:110m C1 <2.23E-05 <1.36E-05 <1.02E-05 <1.01E-05
_ Antimony:1.24 Ci <2.09E-05 <1.36E-05 1.76E-06 <1.31E-05 l _Carkan-14 C1 - -
2.94E-02 6.94E-03 l _Irnn-55 Ci <5.13E-04 <4.04E-04 1.50E-04 1.08E-03
_Ccalum-136 Ci <2.24E-05 <1.27E-05 <7.86E-06 <8.86E-06
_ Antimony 125 Ci <5.73E-05 <3.71E-05 <3.83E-05 <3.07E-05
_Unidentilind Ci
._TotaLLar_perind (above) Ci 2.85E-05 1.16E3 3.04E-02 8.60E-03
_Xcnon-133 Ci 4.0JE-06 <3.54E-05 J J E-02 1.44E-QjL_ ;
_%cuan-135 Ci 1.30E-03 <1.08E-05 f.95E-05 5.41E-06
_ Xenon-131m. Ci <7.53E-04 <4.54E-04 8.1SE-04 4.41E-04 l
_ Xenon:133m Ci (1.44E-04 (8.64E-05 1.01E-04 2.60E-05
_Kryptun 85 01 ._,d.d/E-031 <4.18E-03 8.12E-03 __,1,.ME 03__
1 i
2819R l
. TABLE 3 Yankge Atomic Electric Company. Rowe. Massachusetts Effluent and Waste Disposal Semiannual Report Ibird and Fourth Ouarters. 1988 Solid Waste and Irradiated Fuel Shipments A. Solid Waste Shipped Off-Site for Burial or Disposal (Not Irradiated Fuel) i Unit 6-Month Est. Total Period Error. %
- 1. Type of Waste
- a. Evaporator bottoms *, Class A waste, m3 1.70E+01-LSA container. 55 galinn (drums) Ci 3.05EiD0 3.00E+01
- b. Dry compressible vaste, contaminated m3 6.54E+01
[ equipment, etc., Class A' waste, Ci 9.15E-01 cl.00E+02 LSA, 105 ft3 (boxna)
- c. Irradiated components, control rods, m3 3.25E+00 etc., Class C waste. STL LIN HIC, C1 8.81E+03 5.00E+01 57.4 ft3
- d. Dewatered spent resin, Class B waste, m3 3.40E+00 Polv HIC.i_12Q23ft3 Ci 4.08E+01 5.00E+01
- e. m3 C1
- 2. Estimate of Major Nuclide Composition (By Type of Waste)**
a._ Tritium 3.51E+01% Cohalt-60 3.93E400% d. (Measured)
Cesium-137 2.09E+01% Niobium-95 2.77E+00% Cesium-137 5.86E+01%
Iron =55 1.91E401% Nickel-63 2.05E+00% Cesium-134 2.00E+01%
Craium-134 1. 78EtD1% Iron-59 1.63E+00% Irou 6.67E+00%
Cahalt-60 310HE100% Mangansse-54 1.11E+00% Cobalt-60 6.03E+00%
Nichni-63 1.64E+00% Nickel-63 3.73E+00%
Nichium-95 1.4QE+00% c. Silver-110m 3.82E+01% Strontium-90 1;98E+00%
Iron-55 2.74E+01% Manganese-54 1.38E+00%
hi_ Cesium-137 3.23E+011_____ Cobalt-60 2.43E+01% Cerium-144 1.15E+00%.
Ccalum-134 2.97E+01% _ Nickel-63 6.30E+00%
IInn55 2.65E+01% Antimony-125 3.25E+00%
- 3. Solid Waste Disposition liumhnr__Q1_Shipntenta Mede of Transnortatinn Destination 7 Truck Barnwell, SC B. Irradiated Fuel Shipments (Disposition): None
- Solidification agent is cement. ,
- Excluding nuclides with half-lives less than 12.8 days.
l 2819R
__ -_ _____-_____-_ - Q
v-
. IABL U Xankee Atomic _ Electric Company. Rowe. Massachusetts ELiluent and Waste Disposal Semiannual Report 116B Maximum
- Off-Site Doses and Dose Commitments to Members of the Public Dose (mrem)**
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
__Spurce Ouarter Ouarter Ouarter Ouarter Year ***
Liquid Effluents Whole Body (1) 1.38E-02 9.98E-02 1.39E-01 9.11E-03 2.62E-01 Critical Organ 1.63E-02 3.25E-01 4.84E-01 1.39E-02 8.39E-01 (2) (3) (3) (2)
Airborne Ef fluents Iodines and Particulate (4) 7.01E-03 8.13E-03 6.27E-03 7.18E-02 9.32E-02 l
Noble Gases Beta Air 5.64E-02 5.40E-02 5.84E-02 3.07E-02 2.00E-01 (5) (mrad)
Gamma Air 2.49E-02 2.51E-02 2.55E-02 6.18E-03 8.17E-02 (mrad)
- " Maximum" means the largest fraction of corresponding 10CFR50, Appendix I, dose design objective.
- The numbered footnotes indicate the location of the dose receptor, age group, !
nnd organ, where appropriate. ]
- " Maximum" dose for the year is the sum of the maximum doses for each quarter.
This results in a conservative yearly dose estimate, but still well within the limits of 100FR50.
(1) Child l (2) Liver of child I (3) Done of child (4) Bone of child, SW and WSW-1300 meters (5) S and SSE-800 meterc 1
1 1
2819R 1
l l
l . _ - . _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
i
- IA EE_4 LDontinundl THIS PAGE INTfETIONALLY LEFT BLANI l
l l
l 2819R l
v
- 4 TABLE 5A YANKEE ROWE JAN88-0EC88 METEOROLOGICAL DATA JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION 196.0 FT WIND DATA STABILITY CLASS A CLASS FREQUENCY (PERCENT) = 3.79 WINO DIRECTION FROH l
SPEED (M?H) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SV WSW W WWW NW NNW VRBL 17.TAL l i
)
l CALM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l i
(1) .00 .00 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 J (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 l 1
i C-3 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 11 l
(1) .00 .62 1.54 .00 .31 .00 .00 .00 .00 .31 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .62 .00 3 38 '
(2) .00 .02 .06 .00 .01 .00 .00 00 .00 .01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .02 .00 .13 ,
l 4-7 3 5 2 1 1 1 2 7 12 16 36 11 7 1 0 3 0 108 (1) .92 1.54 62 .31 .31 .31 .62 2.15 3.69 4.92 11.08 3.38 2.15 .31 .00 .92 .00 33.23 (2) .03 .06 .02 .01 .01 .01 .02 .08 .14 .19 42 .13 .08 .01 .00 .03 .00 1.26 j I
8 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 18 24 80 48 6 4 0 0 0 188 l (1) .31 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .92 1.23 5.54 7.38 24.62 14.77 1.85 1.23 .00 .00 .00 57.85 1
(2) .01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .03 .05 .21 .28 .93 .56 .07 .05 .00 .00 .00 2.19 '
13-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 8 4 2 0 0 0 0 18 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .62 .62 2.46 1.23 .62 .00 .00 .00 .00 5 . 5 '.
(2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 .02 .02 .09 .05 .02 .00 .00 .00 .00 .21 19 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 GT 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 l
(2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .C3 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ALL SPEEDS 4 7 7 1 2 1 5 11 32 43 124 63 15 5 0 5 0 325 (1) 1.23 2.15 2.15 .31 .62 .31 1.54 3.38 9.85 13.?3 38.15 19.38 4.62 1,54 .00 1.54 .00 100.00 (2) .05 .08 .08 .01 .02 .01 .06 .13 .37 .50 1.45 .73 .17 .06 .00 .03 .00 3.M (1)= PERCENT OF ALL GOCD COSERVATIONS FOR THIS PAGE (2)=0ERCENT OF ALL GCXV OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PER100 Ca CALM (WIND SPEED LESS H1AN AR ECUAL 70 .60 MPH) l l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
y TABLE 5B' l
l YANKEE ROWS JADB8 0EC88 METEOROLOGICAL DATA J0!NT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION l l
196.0 FT WIND DATA STABILITY CL/SS 8 CLASS FREQUENCY (PERCENT) = 3.94 WIND DIRECTION FROM
, SPEED (KPH) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW VRBL TOTAL 1
l CALU 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
l (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 l (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 -00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 i I
l C-3 6 4 2 2 3 0 1 0 2 3 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 29 I l
(1) 1.78 1.18 .59 .59 .8? .00 .0
- 00 .59 .89 .30 .59 .00 .89 .00 .00 .00 8.58 (2) .07 05 .02 .02 .03 .00 .01 .00 .02 .03 .01 .02 .00 .03 00 .00 .00 .34 l l
l 47 8 5 4 4 2 4 4 6 12 16 21 16 10 5 8 5 0 132 l (1) 2.37 1.48 1.18 1.18 .59 1.18 1.78 1.78 3.55 4.73 6.21 4.73 2.96 1.48 2.37 1.48 .00 39.05 l (2) .09 .06 .05 .05 .02 .05 .07 .07 .14 .19 .24 .19 .12 .06 .09 .06 .00 1.54 l 8 12 15 14 1 0 2 0 2 5 7 12 35 29 9 8 4 7 0 150 (1) 4.4% 4.14 .30 .00 .59 .00 .59 1.48 2.07 3.5s 10.36 8.58 2.66 2.37 1.18 2.07 .00 44.38 (2) .17 .16 .01 .00 .02 .00 .02 .06 .08 .14 .41 .34 .10 .09 .05 .08 .00 1.75 13-18 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 7 0 0 0 1 0 27 (1) ,89 1.16 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.55 2.07 .00 .00 .00 .30 .00 7.99 (2) .01 05 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .14 .08 .00 .00 .00 .01 .00 .31 19 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 i- CT 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
(1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ALL SPEEDS 32 27 7 6 7 4 9 ' 11 21 31 69 54 19 16 12 13 0 338 (1) 9.47 7.99 2.07 1.78 2.07 1.18 2.66 3.25 6.21 9.17 20.41 15.98 5.62 4.73 3.55 3.85 .00 100.00 (2) .37 .31 .08 .07 .08 .05 .10 .13 .24 .36 .80 .63 .22 .19 .14 .15 .00 - 3.94 (1)sPERCENT OF ALL GOOD OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PAGE a (2)sPERCtNT OF ALL C000 OBSERVAT!DNS FOR THis PERIOD Cs CALM (WIND SPEED LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO .60 MPH)
l- 1 I
g ,
. i TABLE SC 1
l l
I YANKEE 40WE JAN88 DEC88 METEOROLOGICAL DATA JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION 196.0 ff WIND DATA STABILITY. CLASS C CLASS FREQUENCY (PERCENT) = 5.78 _i l
WIND DIRECTION FROM j SPEED (MPH) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE $$E S SSW SW WSW W WWW NW NNW VR8L TOTAL CALM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 C3 1 5 6 4 4 1 1 0 5 5 2 3 1 0 2 2 0 42 (1) .20 1.01 1.21 .81 .81 .20 .20 .00 1.01 1.01 40 .60 .20 .00 .40 .40 .00 8.47 (2) .01 .06 .07 .05 .05 .01 .01 .00 .06 .06 .02 .03 .01 .00 - .02 .02 .00 .49 47 40 15 9 3 1 1 3 5 13 15 28 21 7 9 5 15 0 190
, (1) 8.06 3.02 1.81 .60 .20 .20 .60 1.01 2.62 3.02 5.65 4.23 1.41 1.81 1.01 3.02 .00 38.31 (2) .47 .17 .10 .03 .01 .01 .03 .06 .15 .17 .33 .24 .08 .10 .06 .17 .00 2.21 i
8-12 43 24 1 0 1 3 0 1 13 15 33 28 15 4 11 20 0 212 l (1) 8.67 4.84 .20 .00 .20 .~60 .00 .20 2.62 3.02 6.65 5.65 3.02 .81 2.22 4.03 .00 42.74 (2) .50 .28 .01 .00 .01 .03 .00 .01 .15 .17 .38 .33 .17 .05 .13 .23 .00 2.47 :
J 13-18 19 10 0 0 0 0 0 .0 1 2 8 11 0 0 0 1- 0 52 l (1) 3.83 2.02 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .20 40 1.61 2.22 .00 .00 - .00 .20 .00 10.48 (2) .22 .12 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01- .02 .09 .13 .00 .00 .00 .01 .00 .61 19-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00. . 00 -- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 GT 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 . 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .b0 .00 .00 l
ALL SPEEDS 103 54 16 7 6 5 4 6 32 37 71 63 23 13 18 38 0 496 ;
(1) 20.77 10.89 3.23 1.41 1.21 1.01 .81 1.21 6.45 7.46 14.31 12.70 4.64 2.62 3.63 7.66 .00 100.00- l (2) 1.20 .63 .19 08 .07 .06 .05 .07 .37 43 .83 .73 .27 .15- .21 .44 .00 5.78 (1)sPERCENT OF ALL GOOD 00 SERVAT 10NS FOR THIS PACE (2)aPERCENT OF ALL C000 OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PERIOD C= CALM (WIND SPEED LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO .60 MPH) t I _._______________m.__ . _ _ . _ _
m-1 .
I TABLE 5D l
YANKEE ROWE JAN88 DEC88 METEOROLOGICAL DATA JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION 196.0 FT WIND DATA STABILITY CLASS D CLASS FREQUENCY (PERCENT) = 48.33 VIND DIRECTION FROM i i l l \
SPEED (MPN) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE $ $$W CW WSW W WNW NW NNW VR8L TOTAL CALM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 1
' .00 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 l (2) .00 .00 .00 .C0 00 .03 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 C3 84 197 98 34 24 24 19 28 36 56 64 52 26 25 22 17 0 806 I (1) 2.03 4.75 2.36 .82 .58 .58 .46 .68 .87 1.35 1.54 1.25 .63 .60 .53 41 .00 19.44 j e
(2) .98 2.30 1.14 .40 .28 .28 .22 .33 .42 .65 .75 .61 .30 .29 .26 .20 .00 9.39 l 47 247 323 81 31 25 23 28 61 133 198 235 171 108 74 - 97 111 0 1946
)
( (1) 5.96 7.79 1.95 .75 .60 .55 .68 1.47 3.21 4.77 5.67 4.12 2.60 1.78 2.34 2.68 .00 46.93 'i t (2) 2.88 3.76 .94 .36 .29 .27 .33 .71 1.55 2.31 2.74 1.99 1.26 .86 1.13 1.29 .00 22.68
, 8 12 234 169 11 5 0 2 0 9 33 132 147 213 65 40 45 72 0 1177 (1) 5.64 4.08 .27 .12 .00 .05 .00 .22 .80 3.18 3.54 5.14 1.57 .% 1.09 1.74 .00 28.38 (2) 2. 73 1.97 13 .06 .00 .02 .00 .10 .38 1.54' 1.71 2.48 .76 .47- .52 .84 .00 13.72 i 13 18 57 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 41 50 5 3 4 6 0 211 (1) 1.37 .77 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .02 .29 .99 1.21 .12- .07 .10 .14 .00 5.09 (2) .66 .37 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .14 48 .58 ' .06 .03 .05 .07 .00 2.46 19 24 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 7-(1) .00 .02 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .02 .05 .05 .00 .00 .00 .02 .00 .17 (2) .00 .01 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 .00 .00 .01 .02 .02 .00 .00 .00 .01 .00 .08 OT 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0
'(1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ALL SPEEDS 622 722 190 70 49 49 47 98 203 399 489 488 204 142 168 207 0 414?
(1) 15.00 17.41 4.58. 1.69 1.18 1.18 1.13 2.36 4.90 9.62 11.79 11.77 4.92 3.42 4.05 4.99 .00 100.00 (2) 7.25 ,5.41 2.21 .82 ~ .57 .57 .55 1.14 2.37 4.65' 5.70 5.64 1.38 1.66 1.96 2.41 .00 48.33 j 3 (1) PERCENT OF ALL 0000 OBSERVATIONS FOR TN!S PA0E (2)* PERCENT OF ALL C000 OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PERIOD Cs CALM (WIND SPEED LES$ THAN OR EQUAL TO .60 MPH)
)
9
=
1 TABLE SE l
l I
l l
)
l YANKEE ROWE JAN88 DEC88 METEOROLOGICAL DATA JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION I 196.0 FT WIND DATA STABILITY CLASS E CLASS FREQUENCY (PERCENT) = 30.45 l
j WIND DIRECTION FROM l
SPEED (MPH) N WNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SV WSW W WNW NW NNW VRBL TOTAL CALM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 f
C-3 274 556 162 73 48 45 44 48 63 81 110 57 55 33 39 67 0 1755 (1) 10.49 21.28 6.20 2.79 1.84 1.72 1.68 1.84 2.41 3.10 4.21 2.18 2.10 1.26 1.49 2.56 .00 67.16 (2) 3.19 6.48 1.89 .85 .56 .52 .51 .56 .73 .94 1.28 .66 .64 .38 .45 .78 .00 20.45 47 91 221 44 4 6 8 12 22 46 74 99 34 21 14 14 16 0 726 (1) 3.48 8.46 1.68 .15 .23 .31 46 .84 1.76 2.83 3.79 1.30 .80 .54 .54 .61 .00 27.78 {
(2) 1.06 2.58 .51 .05 .07 .09 .14 .26 .54 .86 1.15 .40 .24 .16 .16 .19 .00 8.46
'8 12 7 17 2 0 0 1 4 3 9 24 28 7 3 2 2 1 0 110 (1) .27 .65 .08 .00 .00 .04 .15 .11 .34 .92 1.07 .27 .11 .08 .08 .04 .00 4.21 l' (2) .08 .20 .02 .00 .00 .01 .05 .03 .10 .28 .33 .08 .03 .02 .02 .01 .00 1.28 13-18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 (1) .04 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .08 .61 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .73 (2) .01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .02 .19 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .22 l
l 19 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .11 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .11 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .03 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .03 GT 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 '
ALL SPEEDS 373 794 203 77 54 54 60 73 118 181 256 98 79 49 55 84 0 2613 (1) 14.27 30.3? 7.96 2.95 2.07 2.07 2.30 2.79 4.52 6.93 9.80 3.75 3.02 1.88 2.10 3.21 .00 100.00 (2) 4.35 9.25 2.42 .90 .63 .63 .70 .85 1.38 2.11 2.98 1.14 .92 .57 .64 .98 .00 30.45 (1)= PERCENT OF ALL COCU OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PA(.E (2)= PERCENT OF ALL GOOD OBSERVAfl0NS FOR TMIS PERICO C= CALM (WIND SPEED LESS THAN OR EQUAL TC .60 McH3
y _ -..
n s
TABLE 5F YANKEE ROWE JAN88-0EC88 METEOROLOGICAL DATA JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION i 196.0 FT WIND DATA STABILITY CLASS F CLASS FREQUENCY (PERCENT) = 5.87 l
WIND DIRECTION FROM l
l SPEED (MPH) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW 'WSW W WNW NW NNW VR8L TOTAL l
CALM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 - .00 .00 .00 .00 C3 28 77 48 17 19 15 19 15 19 22 26 12 15 7 6 11 0 356 (1) 5.56 15.28 9.52 3.37 3.77 2.98 3.77 2.98 3.77 4.37 5.16 2.38 2.98 't.39 1.19 2.18 .00 70.63 (2) .33 .90 .56 .20 .22 .17 .22 .17 .22 .26 .30 .14 .17 .08 .07 .13 .00 4.15 47 to 31 6 0 0 1 4 9 9 15 25 14 6 5 2 2 0 139
, (1) 1.98 6.15 1.19 .00 .00 .20 .79 1.79 1.79 2.98 4.96 2.78 1.19 .99 40 40 .00. 27.58 (2) .12 .36 .07 .00 .00 .01 .05 .10 .10 .17 .29 .16 .07 .06 .02 .02 .00 1.62 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 1 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 9 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 .00 . .20 .60 40 .40 .20 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,79 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .03 .02 .02 .01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .10 l
~
13 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O l
(1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 1
19 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 GT 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .'00 - .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 f
l ALL SPfEDS 38 108 54 17 19 16 23 24 29 40 5's 28 22 12 8 13 0 504 (1) 7.54 21.43 10.71 3.37 3.77 3.17 4.56 4.76 5.75 7.94 10.52 5.56 4.37'2.38 1.59 2.58 .00 100.00 (2) .44 1.26 .63 .20 .22 .19 .27 .28 .34 .47 .62 . .33 .26 .14 .09 .15 .00 5.87
<1hPARCINT OF ALL GOOD OBSERVATIONS FOR THis PAGE (2)* PERCENT OF ALL COCO 08SERVAfl0NS FOR THl3 PERIOD C= CALM (WIND SPEED LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO .60 MPH)
- 2 2..
l TABLE SG l
YANKEE ROWE JAN8d-DEC88 METEOROLOGICAL DATA J0!NT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION 196.0 FT WIND DATA STABILITY CLASS C CLAST FREQUENCY (PERCENT) = 1.83 WIND DIRF.' TION FROM SPEED (MPH) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW VRBL TOTAL CALM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 C3 4 9 9 6 7 3 5 12 9 3 8 3 5 4 4 0 0 91 (1) 2.55 5.73 5. 73 3.82 4.46 1.91 3.18 7.64 5.73 1.91 5.10 1.91 3.18 2.55 2.55 .00 .00 57.96 (2) .05 .10 .10 .07 .08 .03 .06 .14 .10 .03 .09 .03 .06 .05 .05 .00 .00 1.06 47 2 2 2 0 2 2 3 11 7 13 7 5 0 0 1 2 0 59 (1) 1.27 1.27 1.27 .00 1.27 1.27 1.91 7.01 4.46 8.28 4.46 3.18 .00 .00 .64 1.27 .00 37.58 (2) .02 .02 .02 .00 .02 .02 .03 .13 .08 .15 .08 .06 .00 .00 .01 .02 .00 .69 8 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 (1) .00 .64 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.27 1.27 .64 .64 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.46 (2) .00 .01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .02 .02 .01 .01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .08 13 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .
(2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 19-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .D0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .06 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 GT 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ALL SPEEDS 6 12 11 6 9 5 6 23 18 18 16 9 5 4 5 2 0 157 (1) 3.82 7.64 7.01 3.82 5.73 3.18 5.10 14.65 11.46 11.46 'LO.19 S.73 3.18 2.55 3.18 1.27 .00 100.00 (2) .07 .14 .13 .07 .10 .06 .09 .27 .21 .21 .19 .10 .06 .05 .06 .02 .00 1.83 ,
(1)* PERCENT OF ALL G000 00SERVAfl0NS FOR THIS PAGE (2)*PIRCENT OF .ALL GOOD OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PERIOD C= CALM (MlWD SPEED LESS THAN OR EQUAL 70 .60 MPH)
v l
TABLE SH s
l l
YANKEE ROWE JAN88 DEC88 METEOROLOGICAL DATA JolNT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION 196.0 FT WIND DATA STABILITY CLASS ALL CLASS FREQUENCY (PERCENT) = 100.00 WIND DIRECTION FROM SPEED (MPH) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW VRBL TOTAL CALM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 C-3 397 850 330 136 106 88 89 103 134 171 211 129 102 72 73 99 0 3090 )
(1) 4.63 9.91 3.85 1.59 1.24 1.03 1.04 1.20 1.56 1.99 2.46 1.50 1.19 .84 .85 1.15 .00 36.01 l (2) 4.63 9.91 3.85 1.59 1.24 1.03 1.04 1.20 1.56 1.99 2.46 1.50 1.19 .84 .85 1.15 .00 36.01 I 47 401 602 148 43 37 40 58 121 232 347 451 272 159 108 127 154 0 3300 j (1) 4.67 7.02 1.72 .50 .43 .47 .68 1.41 2.70 4.04 5.26 3.17 1.85 1.26 1.48 1.79 .00 38.46 j (2) 4.67 7.02 1.72 .50 43 47 .68 1.41 2.70 4.04 5.26 3.17 1.85 1.26 1.48 1.79 .00 38.46 j 8-12 300 225 15 5 3 6 9 22 83 212 326 328 99 58 62 .100 0 1853 I (1) 3.50, 2.62 .17 .06 .03 .07 .10 .26 .97 2.47 3.80 3.82 1.15 .68 .72 1.17 .00 21.60 (2) 3.50 2.62 .17 .06 .03 .07 .10 .26 .97 2.47 3.80 3.82 1.15 .68 .72 1.17 .00 21.60 13 18 80 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 18 85 72 7 3 4 8 0 327 (1) .93 .54 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .05 .21 .99 .84 .08 .03 .05 .09 .00 3.81 j (2) .93 .54 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .05 .21 .99 .84 .08 03 .05 .09 .00 3.81 i 19 24 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 2 0 0 0 1 0 to
! (1) .00 .01 .00 .00 .00 00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .06 .02 .00 .00 .00 .01 .00 .12 (2) .00 .01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .06 .02 .00 .00 .00 .01 .00 .12 GT 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (2) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ALL SPEEDS 1178 1724 493 184 146 134 156 246 453 749 1078 803 367 241 266 362 0 8580 (1) 13.73 20.09 5.75 2.14 1.70 1.56 1.82 2.87 5.28 8.73 12.56 9.36 4.28 2.81 3.10 4.22 .00 100.00 (2) 13.73 20.09 5.75 2.14 1.70 1.56 1.82 2.87 5.28 8.73 12.56 9.36 4.28 2.81 3.10 4.22 .00 100.00 (1)= PERCENT of All COOD OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PACE (2)= PERCENT of ALL C000 OBSERVATIONS FOR THIS PERIOD C= CALM (WIND SPEED LESS THAN OR EQUAL 70 .60 MPH) l l
l
. i M2fhD1X h Radioactive Liquid Ef fluent Monitoring Instrumentation Requiremnni: Radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels are required to be operable in accordance with Technical Specification 3.3.3.6. With less than the minimum number of channels operable and reasonable efforts to return the instrument (s) to operable status within 30 days being f unsuccessful, Technical Specification 3.3.3.6.b requires an explanation for the delay in correcting the inoperability in the next Semiannual Effluent Release Report.
Reannaan: Since the requirements of Technical Specification 3.3.3.6 governing the operability of radioactive liquid effluent .
monitoring instrumentation were met for this reporting period, l no response is required.
1 1
I j
A-1 2819R j i
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ a
q l
AEPENDIX B Radioactive caseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Requirement: Radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels -
l are required to be operable in accordance with Technical Specification 3.3.3.7. With less tnan the minimum number of channels operable and reasonabic efforts to return the l instrument (s) to operable status within 30 days being unsuccessful. Technical Specification 3.3.3.7.b requires an ,
explanation for the delay in correcting the inoperability in the !
l next Semiannual Effluent Release Report. l I
Besennan: Since the requirements of Technical Specification 3.3.3.7 governing the operability of radioactive gaseous ef fluent l monitoring instrumentation were met for this reporting period, no response is required.
1 I
1 4
)
1 1 1 l l
4 B-1 2819R
v AEl'E E H L C IdnuiLBoldup_lanh Ecuults: ment: Technical Specification 3.11.1.4 limits the quantity of radioactive material contained in any outside temporary tank.
With the quantity of radioactive material in any outside
- t. 4-0rary tank exceeding the limits of Technical Specification 3.11.1.4, a description of the events leading to this conditio.
!s required in the next Semiannual Effluent Release Report.
Response: The limits of Technical Specification 3.11.1.4 were not exceeded during this reporting period, l
l 4
l l
C-1 2819R
v AEfENDIX D l RadioingicaLEavironmental Monitoring Program Re.quir.cment : The radiological environmental monitoring program is conducted in accordance with Technical Specification 3.4.12.1. With milk ,
or fresh leafy vegetation samples no longer available from one or more of the required sample locations, Technical Specification 3.4.12.1.c requires the identification of the new location (s) for obtaining replacement sample (s) in the next Semiannual Effluent Release Report and inclusion of revised Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual figure (s) and table (s) reflecting the ne. location (s).
Response: All required milk and fresh leafy vegetation samples were availabic during this reporting period.
f 1
D-1 2819R
v e.
AEERIDlX_E Land Use Cenana Requirement: A land use census is conducted in accordance with Technical Specification 3.12.2. With a land use census identifying a location (s) which yields at least a 20 percent greater dose or dose commitment than the values currently being calculated in Technical Specification 4.11.2.3, Technical Specification 3.12.2.a requires the identification of the new location (s) in l the next Semiannual Effluent Release Report.
Response: The land use census for this reporting period did not identify any locations yielding at least a 20 percent greater dose or dose commitment than the values currently being calculated in I Technical Specification 4.11.2.3.
Re.quir_cment : With a land use census identifying a location (s) which yields a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) at least 20 percent greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with Technical Specification 3.12.1, Technical Specification 3.12.2.b requires that the location (s) be added to the program if permission from the owner to collect samples can be obtained and if sufficient sample volume is available. The identification of l
l the new locstion(s) is required in the next Semiannual Effluent Reicase Report.
Response: No changes were made in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program as a result of the 1988 land use census.
E-1 2819R
v l- e. ,
]
t e
AffENDIX F FIncess Control Progtsa l
Requirement: Technical Specification 6.14.1 requires that licensee initiated 1
j l changes to the Process Control Program be submitted to the {
Commission in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report l
l for the period in which the change (s) was made.
Ecspann.c: There was no licensee initiated change (s) to the Process Control Program during this reporting period.
j l
l l
l 1
l 1
l l
J i
l F-1 j 2819R
s-
?
- ' l APPENDIX G
}
l Off-Site Dose. Calculation Manual Requirement: Technical Specification 6.15.2 requires that IJcensee initiated changes to the Of f-Site Dose Calculation Manual be submitted to )
l the Commission in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which the change (s) was made effective.
1 Restwnae: There were no licensee initiated changes to the Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual during this reporting period. ;
l j
i 1
l i
I c-1 2819R l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
8, ,
Al'2E.iD_lX._ll RadiDaCli1C_3,iSuid..a_GaECQua.,_and Solid Waste Treatment Systems Esquittmunt: Technical Specification 6.16.1 requires that licensee initiated major changes to the radioactive waste systems (liquid, gaseous, and solid) be reported to the Commission in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which the evaluation was reviewed by the Plant Operation Review Committee.
Reapanne: There were no licensee initiated major changes to the radioactive waste systems (liquid, gaseous, and solid) during this reporting period.
I 1
l 1
l i
I 1
l l
11 - 1 2819R
,,s, ,
- I gy . ., l
/>EFERRIK_I fiupplemental Information ThirLanLEnurth Ouarters.1933 1
- 1. InchnicaLSpecification_Limi.ta - QD ac_AnLDanalate 1
l Ie chnicaLSnecifica119n_anLCategory Limit I J
l
- a. Habic Ganca
{
3.11.2.1 Total body dose rate 500 mrem /yr )
3.11.2.1 Skin dose rate 3000 mrem /yr 3.11.2.2 Gamma air dose 5 mrad in a quarter 3.11.2.2 Gamma air dose 10 mrad in a year l 3.11.2.2 Beta air dose 10 mrad in a quarter 1
3.11.2.2 Beta air dose 20 mrad in a year i
l
, b. lodinc-131 _ Tritium and RadionuclidCE l
in_ particulate Form With Half-Lives 9_rcalcr_Than 8 Days 3.11.2.1 Organ dose rate 1500 mrem /yr 3.11.2.3 Organ dose 7.5 mrem in a quarter l
3.11.2.3 Organ dose 15 mrem in a year i
- c. Li_quida 3.11.1.2 Total body dose 1.5 mrem in a quarter 3.11.1.2 Total body dose 3 mrem in a year 3.11.1.2 Organ dose 5 mrem in a quarter 3.11.1.2 Organ dose 10 mrem in a year I-1 2819R
1
. a o
- 1
- 2. Iechnical_Snecificationlimits - Concentration i
Ic chnical_ Specific ation_anLfale r o ry Limit l
\
- a. Nohin_ Danes No MFC limits l
- b. Indine-131._ Tritium _and_Radionuclidna No MPC limits in Particulate _fntm_Wilit_Jialf-Livra Ginatsr__Than_fLDays
- c. Linuida 3.11.1.1 Total sum of the fraction of MPC (10CFR20, Appendix B, Tables II, j Column 2), excluding noble gases less than: 1.0 3.11.1.1 Total noble gas concentration 2E-04 uCi/cc hl
- 3. Measstements.AndJpproxima11nns of Total Radioactivity l l
- a. Nohic_Daara i
a
{
" Continuous discharges" are determined by indirect measurement. l Primary gas samples are taken periodically and analyzed. It is assumed that in primary to secondary leakage all gases are ejected ,
through the air ejector. In primary coolant charging pump icakage all gases are ejected to the primary vent stack either during i
flashing or liquid waste processing. " Batch discharges" are l determined by direct measurement. Errors associated with these measurements are estimated to be 155 percent.
- b. Indines Iodines are continuously monitored by drawing a sample from the primary vent stack through a particulate filter and charcoal cartridge. The filter and charcoal cartridge are removed and I-2 2819R
- l
~
$ ' I
( analyzed weekly. The errors associated with these measurements are estimated to be 125 percent. i l
l
- c. fartirulalca {
J l
The particulate filter described in '.b) above is analyzed weekly. l l
The errors associated with the determination of particulate effluents are estimated to be 130 percent.
i
- d. Liquid Effluen1E ,
Liquid effluents are determined by direct measurement. In line J
composite samples are analyzed for strontium-89, strontium-90, gross j I
l alpha activity and carbon-14. There is no-compositing of samples for I tritium or dissolved fission gas analysis. For continuous discharges 1
composite samples are used for gamma isotopic analysis. A gamma isotopic analysis is performed on a representative sample for each batch release using the Marinelli Beaker geometry. The errors associated with these measurements are as follows: fission and activation products, 120 percent; tritium, 110 percent; dissolved fission gases, 120 percent; alpha activity, 135 percent.
- 4. l}atch_Relfasta ,
d
- a. Liquida I Ibir1LQuatter Number of batch releases: 25 Total time period for batch releases: 8,681 minutes Maximum time period for a batch release: 1,345 minutes Average time period for batch releases: 347 minutes l
Minimum time period for a batch release: 210 minutes Average stream flow during period (Sherman Dam): 331 cfs 1
Average discharge rate: 20.8 gpm i I-3 l 1
2819R l
v t g
?
e ,
- (
EcuritLQuarter Number of batch releases: 32 Total time- period for batch releases: 9,346 minutes i Maximum time period for a batch release: 875' minutes Average time period for batch releases: 292 minutes l l Minimum time period for a batch release: 10 minutes Average atream flow during period (Sherman Dam): 602 cfs l Average discharge rate: 22.1 gpm l
- b. Sa::ca Ibitd_ Quarter I i There were no batch releases during the-third quarter.
Enurih Ouarter Number of batch releases: 4 Total time period for batch releases: 1,351 minutes Maximum time period for a batch release: 600 minutes 1 l
Average time period for batch releases: 338 minutes i Minimum time period for a batch release: 38 minutes
- 5. Abncomal_ Releases i
- a. Liquid Technical Specification 6.9.5.b requires the reporting of any unplanned releases from the site to.the site boundary'of radioactive material in gaseo:ts and liquid effluents made during the reporting period.
I-4 2819R E-
- o. ,.
s
- I o'
o '
" Description of Occurrence: At 0630 hours0.00729 days <br />0.175 hours <br />0.00104 weeks <br />2.39715e-4 months <br />, November 23, 1988, following the completion of OP-2000.223, " Hydrostatic Test for the I l
Replacement of Pipe between VD-V-692 and VD-V-1150", S/G No. 2 I blowdown line was returned to service. In accordance with OP-2000.223, the blowdown line was aligned to TV-401B, which was closed. During the previous day all blowdown line isolation valves I were checked closed, including VD-V-608, which isolates the blowdown line of S/G No. 2. While realigning valves to return S/G No. 2 blowdown line to service, the Shif t Supervisor assumed that VD-V-608 was closed since it had not been operated during the execution of l l
OP-2000.223. The Shif t Supervisor ordered the Control Room Operator {
to open TV-401B to normalize the header. Contrary to the acsumption, !
1 VD-V-608 had been opened and, therefore; created a flowpath from l S/G No.2, via the blowdown header, to the 001 circulating water outlet and Sherman Pond. An Auxiliary Operator (AO) noticed the noise created by the flow through the blowdown header and immediately notified the Control Room. The A0 was ordered to close VD-V-608 which terminated the release. The level in S/G No.2 decreased from .
~20 feet to ~12 feet, resulting in a release of approximately 2,000 gallons.
The release was not planned, but was monitored and recorded by the Steam Generator Blowdown Monitor (RIRM-108). Subsequent radionuclides analyses of the remaining water in the steam generator indicated no positive activity values. The release did not exceed the requirements of 10CFR50.73. Corrective action has been implemented to prevent reoccurrence.
- b. Gaaes There were no nonroutine gaseous releases during the reporting period.
I-5 2819R
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ -____-_D
YAN,KGE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY "'fy"No"?g]l7s;*l" r* g.
xY 580 Main Street. Bolton, Massachusetts 01740-1398
.Y#uxse,-
March 31, 1989 BYR 89-61
]
l United States Nucicar Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 l'
References:
(a) License No. DPR-3 (Docket No. 50-29)
(b) Letter, YAEC to USNRC, dated February 27, 1989 Subj ec t: Semiannual Effluent Release Report
Dear Sir:
Enclosed please find the supplemental report which includes the summary of estimates of off-site radiation doses resulting from plant effluents i
during 1988. This information is submitted in accordance with Technical Specification 6.9.5.b.
For convenience, the above supplemental report is submitted with the inclusion of the 1988 third and fourth quarters radioactive liquid and gaseous releases, and solid waste disposal table summaries, which were previously submitted in Reference (b).
We trust that this information is satisfactory; however, should you have any questions, please contact us.
[
k Very truly yours, YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY v y yA%
G. Papd61c, Jr. y Senior Project Engineer Licensing GP/gbc Enclosures cc: USNRC Region 1 USNRC Resident Inspector, YNPS t