ML20247H955
| ML20247H955 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 10/03/1986 |
| From: | Scarano R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20247H936 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-88-490 NUDOCS 8909200161 | |
| Download: ML20247H955 (5) | |
Text
-
".E i p[g, h
. UNITED STATEg l
( 8s NUCLEAR RESULATORY COMMISSION 1
f,,
p REGION V yQ d
1450 MARIA LANE, SUITE 210 WALNUT CREEK, CAllFoRNIA 94$96
-OCT 3- '1986 MEMORANDUM FOR: File, Allegation RV-86-A-0070 FROM:
Ross A. Scarano, Director.
I
' Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards
SUBJECT:
ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD ACTION An Allegation Review Board, composed of Messrs. R. Scarano, A. Johnson, J. Montgomery, M. St;huster, L. Norderhaug and D. Schaefer met on August 22, 1986, to review the allegation presented by allegation number RV-86-A-0070. Also.
present as an advisar to the board was 0. Shackleton, Region V Office of Investigations (OI).
Basically, the alleger is concerned that the measures currently in effect at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) to control drug abuse (use of urine analysis for pre-employment screening and recheck after a 30-day absence) are largely ineffective particularly. for health physicists, pipefitters and maintenance l personnel. A memorandum from L. R. Norderhaug-dated August 20, 1986, provides a detailed description of the telephone conversation with the alleger on August 18, 1986.
After reviewing the allegation, the board decided that SONGS be advised of this allegation without identifying the alleger. The board also requested that 01 notify the appropriate law enforcement agency of this information.
On September 5,1986, D. Schaefer telephonically advised Mr. F. P. Eller, Jr.,
Manager, Station Security SONGS of the content of the August 21, 1986 memorandum without identifying the name, telephone number, or address of the alleger.
The board agreed that this allegation be closed upon notifying SONGS and upon 01 forwarding this information to the law enforcement agency.
W Ross A. Scarano, Director Division of Radiation Safety i
and Safeguards cc:
O. Shackleton, 01, RV
\\
L
\\
=
p.qq. qh R's 94 w v-8909200161 890918
~
E d h - mam
h
/
\\_
I eamusel,8EEit,
)
e DRUG SCREEN REPORT Sept. 1984 - July 1986 (MONTH / YEAR)
I.
TESTS GIVEN:
l SCE NON-SCE 1:
TOTALS l SUB/FAI L/%
SUB/ FAIL /%
SUB/ FAIL /5
/
_l l
1113/$0/4%
PRE-EMPLOYNENT l 1113/50/4%
l-i
_l 23/11/47%
RETEST l 23/11/41%
l
_l ROUTINE BADGING l 3995/47/1%
11,731/535/5%,
15,726/582/4%
CHALLENGE l
l 166/36/21%
_166/36/21%
(NON-SCE) 1 PTRIODIC DRUG l
l MONITORING _
_l 59/12/20%
64/14/21%
123/26/21%
5 DAY CLEANUP l
l l
l (SCE) l 62/13/30%
__ l 42/13/30%
CLEANUP RETEST l
1/0/or (SCE) i 1/0/o%
INVESTIGATORY 17/6/351
_45/10/22%
.62/16/25%
l l
l l8/0/01 POST-SUSPE__NSION
_l 8/0/07 l
FITNESS FOR DUTY 1/1/1001 l
l 1/1/1001 1
I i
OTHER-l 1/0/02 l i/n/or 12/o/02
_I TOTALS l_3760/140/3r-
- 17.007/ sos /52_
17.267/735/ar II. UNACCEPTABLE SPECIMENS:
Since April 1 985 - July 1986 SCE NON-SCE TOTALS
~
POSSIBLE TAMPERING TEMPERATURE l
REJECTIONS l
~
5BT1tTATION I
l REJECTIONS l
l l
,i OTHER l
,l _
l l
TOTALS,
95
~l 325 l
420 1
37981 Fo* V T '4 9 D S5M) 3
c a" :.
L, L
, r-
- s
@M L
Ill, TESTS SY LABORATA'v:
Since April 4985 - July 1986 lu l_:
COAST J NDUSTRIAL PHYSICIANS 245
- $NITH/KLINE 9,564 CENTAAt. DIAGNOSTIC 844 OTHER TOTALS
_10,653 COMMENTS:
e 0
PREPARED BY:
L. J. Piercy frei (,] monthly stata m
i
a yao oes:esca t
- wtruw uwtwv.
w
'^^""::
ACCBSS REINSTA D1Wf DECISION FORX 1
h following individual:
i NAME:
IIst First
~
MI SS#
received positive (failute) drug test ree.ults (1st drug test rallure 0 :
Date g 2nd drug test failure C) which resulte0 jn loss of the following access privileget Yes W
I Unescorted access to Protectei Area.
e j h following items have been completed:
8 Received negative (passing) d rug test result on -
for 5
llate C Cha))enge test g
's O io dar dependency assass\\
ment period test u
i y
C Post-suspension test COMPLETE kHEN 2ND DRUG TEST FA11XRE IS JNDICATED AldVE, O..
Received notification that B1 and bMP1 have been updated.
Yes No O
O. Reviewed input and recottnendat ion from dependency assessment sessjon(s).
Received from:
Print Name Date
}
O O
Reviewed individual's attendadce record, performance, and' job requirements I
(as appropriate).
u E ~
COMPLETE hMl?N 2ND DRUG TEST Fall.URE 15 INDICATED AIG'E.
O O
Received proof of completion of in-natient rehab2litation.
D i
The above named individual is to be:
.8 0 0
Reinststed access priv11cscs.
O Dcnied access priviloses.
Comments:
APPROVED BY:
~
DATE:
Cognizant Division Manager Distribution: Original - Central Proces ing Facility (1.50) cc: Dr. Gerald Hory (South El Monte) bg. Lgg o
K. A. Kappy (Ruom 155, Gol)
A. H. Talley (1138)
/)
" ()) R - S9 14 10 Payroll Personnel File (n1E)
(-
i l
pyso; ce2 09e8..
-.5 C E~ ~dW$. RECEPT.. _ _..
. - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
8
+
3w fa i
i
- s. :
.Cotobar 20, 1986 Memorandum To' File
SUBJECT:
Evaluation / Counseling session With offices at South El Monte.Ca October 8, ' 1986, I laat with M in our explained to a that I would be providing writtenA feedback to' management.
failures and subsequent disciplinary actiond During our time together we rug screen with the drug t illegal. drugs. est findings,; claiming he has-not usedHe disagreed user" and maintains that is the reason for his druH a
failure.
He was adamant aboht this g teet vy with the extreme improbability of su,ch an eventeven when ths Navy was open and self disclosing when talking about his children and former wife, problems when h and other personal { issues.
cautious,'and guarded when talking about SONGS e was in However, he-was treatment.
I warned him that drugs or poor prognosis.
result in his termination. an' his defensiveness,s suggested a He underst ds another drug failure vill I informed criteria established at the time of his last dra failure.
of minimum standard and is aware of my concerns regardinHe understands his program does not meet ug' screen alteration of the "normala treatzgent plan at that our At present g his involvement in treatment, session once every other w program.
Despite his minimal consequences of his cessation 6f treatmentwas g
treatment period was best detetmined by hi e the I told hia his warned him of the hazards of premature termination s counselor, but refused to comment on the consequences of his withd from treatment without the sanction of his I
rawal counselor.
GERALD L. HORN a:01081 EMP10YER ASSISTANCE COUNSEIDR
. gfa R 5 - nocM k &b Y
r
' UNITED STATES
%'i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/
RE2 ION V c
g
_ r' '
1450 MARIA LANt.SUff E 210
~
WALNUT CREEK,CAllfoRNIA edges MAY 131985 Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361 and 50-362 j
l l
Southern California Edison Company P. O. Box 800 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 Attention: Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin, Vice President Nuclear Engineering, Safety and Licensing Department Gentlemen:
Subject:
NRC Security Inspection - San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and.3 This letter refers to the routine Safeguards Inspection of your activity at
{
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), Units 1, 2 and 3 authorized under NRC License Nos. DPR-13, NPF-10 and NPF-15 conducted by Mr. D. Schaefer of this office on April 15-19, 1985.
It also refers to the discussion of the inspection findings held by the inspector with Mr. J. G. Haynes, Station Manager and members of his staff on April 19, 1985.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection report. Within these areas, the itspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with facility and contract personnel, and observations by the inspector.
Within the scope of the inspection, no violations were observed.
s In accordance with Section 2.790(d) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, documentation of the findings of your safeguards and security procedures are exempt from public disclosure; therefore, the enclosed report will not be placed in the Public Document Room and will receive limited distribution.
'We have determined that the enclosed inspection report contains Safeguards Information which nust be protected against unauthorized disclosure in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21.
Information in this record was deleted in accordanch with the Freedom c ' =duT6:06 dceog er Act, m.M.
F0IA-
- l O o
g a ~ ;p:?'
b u
.t bp
,k #
6 q
lALAW T
brirl']l
~- '
~
Ef*Waw7 W
Southern California Edison Company MAY 131985 Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to j
discuss them with you.
Sincerely, 1
/s/
i James L. Montgomery, Chief Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch
]
l
Enclosure:
' Inspection Report Nos.
50-206/85-15 i
50-361/85-14 i
50-362/85-13 (IE-V-686) j cc w/ enclosure:
D. J. Fogarty, Executive Vice President j
H. B. Ray, Vice President and Site Manager J. G. Haynes, Station Manager (San Clemente)
F. P. Eller, Manager, Station Security, SONGS State of California (w/o enc 1) bec: RSB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS) (w/o enc 1)
Mr. J. Martin l
Resident Inspector (w/o enc 1) l l
i I
i
)
i RV h
/
& (y
$k h
DSchaefer:dh MSchuster PJohnson GYuhas JM6ntgomery
?
5/ 3 /85 5/y/85 5/.5 /85 5/3 /85 5/ /0 /85 I