Letter Sequence Approval |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML20080N7361984-02-17017 February 1984 Responds to 831215 Request for Addl Info Re Position on Two of 11 NUREG-0737,Item II.B.3 Criteria.Licensee Should Provide Procedure to Estimate Extent of Core Damage Based on Radionuclide Concentrations Project stage: Request ML20091E3501984-04-25025 April 1984 Paper Entitled MSA GMR-I Canister for Use Against Radio Iodine & Organic Iodides, Presented at 840425 Meeting in Bethesda,Md Project stage: Meeting ML20147D8651988-01-15015 January 1988 Requests Fee for 871029 Application Re Exemption to Section III.G.2 of App R for Level Transmitters for Qcst Project stage: Other ML20153C3051988-08-26026 August 1988 Requests Exemption from 10CFR20.501,App A,Footnote d-2(c) to Allow Use of Air Purifying Respirators in Lieu of Supplied Air or self-contained Breathing Apparatuses.Fee Paid Project stage: Other ML20155G3251988-10-0606 October 1988 Submits Revised Proposal for Exemption from 10CFR20 Footnote d-2(c),per NRC 880916 & 26 Ltrs.Requests Protection Factor of 50 w/GMR-I Canister Per 10CFR20 Current Limits Since Filters Will Be Used W/Full Facepiece Respirators Project stage: Other ML20205H9461988-10-25025 October 1988 Requests Exemption from 10CFR20,App a Re Worker Respiratory Protection Apparatus.Proposes Usage of Solvent Canisters W/Protection Factor Equal to 50 or Greater Against Radioactive Iodine & Particles Project stage: Other ML20247H7261989-03-16016 March 1989 Safety Evaluation Re Use of Radioiodine Protection Factor for Sorbent Canisters Project stage: Approval ML20247H5671989-03-16016 March 1989 Forwards Exemption & Authorization for Use of Solvent Iodine Canisters W/Radioiodine Protection Factor of 50 by Plant Workers.Safety Evaluation Supporting Exemption Encl Project stage: Approval ML20236E1661989-03-16016 March 1989 Requests That Util Address Listed Items as Part of Response to Generic Ltr 87-02,per Nov 1988 Equipment Walkdown at Plant.Floor Response Spectra Needs to Be Reviewed & Approved Since Rest of Work Dependent on Spectra Project stage: Other 1988-10-25
[Table View] |
Similar Documents at Hatch |
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20217D3061999-10-13013 October 1999 SER Accepting Licensee Proposed Changes to Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant Emergency Classification Scheme to Add Emergency Action Levels Related to Operation of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ML20212A6641999-09-13013 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Relief Request RR-V-16 for Third 10 Yr Interval Inservice Testing Program ML20210J9631999-08-0202 August 1999 SER Finding That Licensee Established Acceptable Program to Verify Periodically design-basis Capability of safety-related MOVs at Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20210J9271999-08-0202 August 1999 SER Finds That Licensee Performed Appropriate Evaluations of Operational Configurations of safety-related power-operated Gate Valves to Identify Valves at Plant,Susceptible to Pressure Locking or Thermal Binding ML20207E7631999-06-0303 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Licensee Proposed Alternative to Use Code Case N-509 Contained in RR-4 Provides Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety.Considers Rev 2 to RR-4 & RR-6 Acceptable ML20206G1691999-05-0404 May 1999 SER Approving Requirements of Istb 4.6.2(b) Pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(ii) ML20207M1891999-03-11011 March 1999 SER Accepting Relief Request for Authorization of Alternative Reactor Pressure Vessel Exam for Circumferential Weld ML20196J4931998-12-0707 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Alternatives in Relief Requests RR-V-12,RR-V-15,RR-P-15,RR-V-7,RR-V-12,RR-V-14 & RR-V-15 ML20153G2481998-09-24024 September 1998 SE Concluding That Licensee Implementation Program to Resolve USI A-46 at Plant Adequately Addressed Purpose of 10CFR50.54(f) Request ML20239A2531998-09-0303 September 1998 SER Accepting Licensee Request for Relief Numbers RR-17 & RR-18 for Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.Technical Ltr Rept on Third 10-year Interval ISI Request for Reliefs for Plant,Units 1 & 2 Encl ML20236W3441998-07-30030 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Relief Requests for Second 10-yr ISI for Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20236V5191998-07-28028 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed License Amend Power Uprate Review ML20236L1821998-07-0707 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting 980428 Proposed Alternative to ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Xi,Repair & Replacement Requirements Under 10CFR50.55a(a)(3) ML20212A1981997-10-16016 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Denying Licensee Request for Relief from Implementation of 10CFR50.55a Requirements Re Use of 1992 Edition of ASME Code Section XI for ISI of Containments ML20216J8971997-09-12012 September 1997 SER Related to General Electric Nuclear Measurement Analysis & Control Power Range Neutron Monitoring Sys Upgrade Southern Nuclear Operating Co,Units 1 & 2 ML20216E9671997-09-0505 September 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting ,As Suppl by 970902 Request for Relief to Request RR-V-11 Re IST & S/Rv ML20210S9141997-09-0303 September 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Request for one-time Relief from GL 88-01 for Insp of Category E Welds at Plant, Unit 1 & 2 ML20217N9381997-08-21021 August 1997 SE Re New & Revised Relief Requests Submitted by 970130,0307 & 25 Ltrs in Relation to Third 10-yr Pump & Valve IST Program ML20217N9811997-08-21021 August 1997 Safety Evaluation for Third 10-year Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program,Southern Nuclear Operating Co,Inc,Hatch, Units 1 & 2 ML20148U6141997-07-0707 July 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Proposal for Third 10-yr Interval for Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program ML20141A1981997-06-17017 June 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Design Criteria for Sizing ECCS Suction Strainers ML20141A1431997-06-16016 June 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Third 10-yr Inservice Insp Program Plan & Associated Requests for Relief.Relief Not Required for RR-08 ML20137N1811997-04-0404 April 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 206 & 147 to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,respectively ML20134P3661997-02-21021 February 1997 SER Accepting Test & Technical Evaluations Performed for Reactor Vessel Shell Welds,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(A)(5) ML20138J5211997-02-0505 February 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Temporary Request for Relief from ASME Code Repair Requirements for ASME Code Class 3 Valve ML20134B3301997-01-28028 January 1997 SE Accepting Revised QA Program for Plant ML20129F8211996-10-24024 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Actions IAW Current Industry Practice & BWRVIP Guidelines for Reinspection of BWR Core Shrouds ML20059E6961993-10-21021 October 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 190 & 129 to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,respectively ML20128C1931992-11-20020 November 1992 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Response to Suppl 1 to GL 87-02 ML20127L4511992-11-18018 November 1992 Safety Evaluation Accepting Justification to Cancel Commitment on Seven Human Engineering Discrepancies ML20248F9791989-09-20020 September 1989 Safety Evaluation Accepting Okonite Taped Cable Splice as Electrical Connection to Replace Terminal Blocks in Selected Low Voltage Transmitter Measuring Loops ML20247H7261989-03-16016 March 1989 Safety Evaluation Re Use of Radioiodine Protection Factor for Sorbent Canisters ML20207M0431988-10-13013 October 1988 Safety Evaluation Denying Util 880711 Request for Relief from Hydrostatic Test Requirements of Section XI of ASME Code for Class 2 Portion of Main Steam Lines Between Outboard MSIVs & Turbine Stop Valves ML20153F9941988-05-0202 May 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 153 to License DPR-57 ML20238A6801987-09-0404 September 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Insps & Repairs of Igscc.Plant Can Be Safely Operated for Another 18-month Fuel Cycle in Present Configuration ML20236F9831987-07-29029 July 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 831107,840229 & 860821 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.1,3.1.2,3.2.1 & 3.2.2 ML20235X5271987-07-20020 July 1987 SER Supporting Util Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1, (Part 2) Re Vendor Interface Programs (Reactor Trip Sys Components) ML20235P8421987-07-14014 July 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Acceptance of Offsite Dose Calculation Manual as Updated & Corrected Through 861231 ML20215M3941987-06-22022 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Request for Relief from Inservice Insp Requirements ML20236F6151987-04-0101 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Analytical Method Used by Licensee to Evaluate Critical Stresses Re Mark I Containment Program Vacuum Breakers Adequate.Max Stress in Breakers Less than 30% of Code Allowable.Existing Design Structually Adequate ML20207U1441987-03-19019 March 1987 Undated Safety Evaluation Re Plant.Section 9, Radwaste Sys, of FSAR Also Encl ML20210S2731986-09-29029 September 1986 Safety Evaluation Re Inservice Insp Program & Requests for Relief ML20211F0241986-06-12012 June 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Listed Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 1) Re Identification & Classification of Reactor Trip Sys Components ML20211B3201986-05-30030 May 1986 SER Accepting Licensee 831107 & 840219 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28, Items 3.1.3 & 3.2.3 Re post-maint Testing Requirements ML20205M9461986-04-24024 April 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Plant Operation in Present Configuration for 18-month Fuel Cycle.Plans for Insp &/Or Mod of Svc Sensitive Austenitic Stainless Steel Piping Sys Requested 3 Months Before Start of Next Refueling Outage ML20151Y4631986-01-29029 January 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 122 to License DPR-57 ML20137M5311986-01-21021 January 1986 SER Supporting 850718 & 1127 Requests for Reconsideration of Relief from Requirements of Section XI of ASME Code Re Exam of Supports on ASME Piping ML20141F1261985-12-26026 December 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 120 & 59 to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,respectively ML20136A8461985-12-23023 December 1985 Safety Evaluation Re Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.1,3.1.2,3.2.1,3.2.2 & 4.5.1.Addl Info Requested on Items 3.1.1,3.1.2,3.2.1 & 3.2.2.Item 4.5.1 Acceptable ML20137E2191985-12-23023 December 1985 Safety Evaluation Re Util Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.1, Post-Trip Review (Program Description & Procedure). Program & Procedures Acceptable 1999-09-13
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217D3061999-10-13013 October 1999 SER Accepting Licensee Proposed Changes to Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant Emergency Classification Scheme to Add Emergency Action Levels Related to Operation of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation HL-5845, Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant.With ML20217A1691999-09-22022 September 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Engine Sys,Inc Controllers,Manufactured Between Dec 1997 & May 1999,that May Have Questionable Soldering Workmanship.Caused by Inadequate Personnel Training.Sent Rept to All Nuclear Customers ML20212A6641999-09-13013 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Relief Request RR-V-16 for Third 10 Yr Interval Inservice Testing Program HL-5836, Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant.With ML20210J9631999-08-0202 August 1999 SER Finding That Licensee Established Acceptable Program to Verify Periodically design-basis Capability of safety-related MOVs at Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20210J9271999-08-0202 August 1999 SER Finds That Licensee Performed Appropriate Evaluations of Operational Configurations of safety-related power-operated Gate Valves to Identify Valves at Plant,Susceptible to Pressure Locking or Thermal Binding HL-5818, Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With HL-5805, Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20207E7631999-06-0303 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Licensee Proposed Alternative to Use Code Case N-509 Contained in RR-4 Provides Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety.Considers Rev 2 to RR-4 & RR-6 Acceptable HL-5795, Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Ehnp Units 1 & 2. with1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Ehnp Units 1 & 2. with ML20206G1691999-05-0404 May 1999 SER Approving Requirements of Istb 4.6.2(b) Pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(ii) HL-5784, Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With HL-5766, Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20207M1891999-03-11011 March 1999 SER Accepting Relief Request for Authorization of Alternative Reactor Pressure Vessel Exam for Circumferential Weld HL-5755, Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20206P6981999-01-0707 January 1999 Ehnp Intake Structure Licensing Rept HL-5726, Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20196J4931998-12-0707 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Alternatives in Relief Requests RR-V-12,RR-V-15,RR-P-15,RR-V-7,RR-V-12,RR-V-14 & RR-V-15 HL-5714, Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With HL-5706, Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Hatch Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 2.With1998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Hatch Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 2.With ML20155B6121998-10-28028 October 1998 Safety Evaluation of TR SNCH-9501, BWR Steady State & Transient Analysis Methods Benchmarking Topical Rept. Rept Acceptable HL-5691, Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20153G2481998-09-24024 September 1998 SE Concluding That Licensee Implementation Program to Resolve USI A-46 at Plant Adequately Addressed Purpose of 10CFR50.54(f) Request ML20239A2531998-09-0303 September 1998 SER Accepting Licensee Request for Relief Numbers RR-17 & RR-18 for Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.Technical Ltr Rept on Third 10-year Interval ISI Request for Reliefs for Plant,Units 1 & 2 Encl HL-5675, Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 21998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20238F7131998-08-31031 August 1998 9,change 2 to QAP 1.0, Organization HL-5667, Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 21998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 HL-5657, Ro:On 980626,noted That Pami Channels Had Been Inoperable for More than Thirty Days.Cause Indeterminate.Licensee Will Replace Automatic Function W/Five Other Qualified Pamis of Like Kind in Drywell & Revised Procedures1998-07-30030 July 1998 Ro:On 980626,noted That Pami Channels Had Been Inoperable for More than Thirty Days.Cause Indeterminate.Licensee Will Replace Automatic Function W/Five Other Qualified Pamis of Like Kind in Drywell & Revised Procedures ML20236W3441998-07-30030 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Relief Requests for Second 10-yr ISI for Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20236V5191998-07-28028 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed License Amend Power Uprate Review ML20236N6751998-07-0909 July 1998 Part 21 & Deficiency Rept Re Notification of Potential Safety Hazard from Breakage of Cast Iron Suction Heads in Apkd Type Pumps.Caused by Migration of Suction Head Journal Sleeve Along Lower End of Pump Shaft.Will Inspect Pumps ML20236L1821998-07-0707 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting 980428 Proposed Alternative to ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Xi,Repair & Replacement Requirements Under 10CFR50.55a(a)(3) HL-5653, Monthly Operating Repts for June 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 21998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 HL-5640, Monthly Operating Repts for May 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 21998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20248B8651998-05-15015 May 1998 Quadrennial Simulator Certification Rept HL-5628, Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant1998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant HL-5604, Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1998 for Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 21998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1998 for Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20216B2711998-02-28028 February 1998 Extended Power Uprate Safety Analysis Rept for Ei Hatch Plant,Units 1 & 2 HL-5585, Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 21998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1998 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 HL-5571, Monthly Operating Repts for Jan 1998 for Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Unit 11998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Jan 1998 for Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Unit 1 HL-5551, Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1997 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 21997-12-31031 December 1997 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1997 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20199B0561997-12-31031 December 1997 Rev 0 GE-NE-B13-01869-122, Jet Pump Riser Weld Flaw Evaluation Handbook for Hatch Unit 1 HL-5581, Annual Operating Rept for 1997, for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 21997-12-31031 December 1997 Annual Operating Rept for 1997, for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 2 HL-5533, Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1997 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 21997-11-30030 November 1997 Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1997 for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 HL-5514, Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1997 for Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 21997-10-31031 October 1997 Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1997 for Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20212A1981997-10-16016 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Denying Licensee Request for Relief from Implementation of 10CFR50.55a Requirements Re Use of 1992 Edition of ASME Code Section XI for ISI of Containments ML20211M6491997-10-0808 October 1997 Addenda 1 to Part 21 Rept Re Weldments on Opposed Piston & Coltec-Pielstick Emergency stand-by Diesel gen-set lube-oil & Jacket Water Piping Sys.Revised List of Potentially Affected Utils to Include Asterisked Utils,Submitted ML20211H5311997-10-0101 October 1997 Rev 2 to Unit 1,Cycle 17 Colr ML20211H5251997-10-0101 October 1997 Rev 3 to Unit 1,Cycle 17 Colr 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
- _ _ -
anu y-ff >e g
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r,, j WASHWGTON, D. C 20655 7
\....+,/
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO THE USE OF A RADIOI0 DINE PROTECTION FACTOR FOR SORBENT CANISTERS AT EDWIN 1. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET WOS. 50-321 AND 50-366 INTRODUCTION By submittal dated October 25, 1988, as supplemented January 12, 1989, Georgia '
Power Company, et al., (the licensee) requested an exemption to 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix A, footnote d-2(c), and for authorization to use equipment which nas not been certified by NIOSH/MSHA. The licensee submitted this request in accordance with 10 CFR Parts 20.501 and 20.103(e).
Test data ano canister qualification information have been provided by the licensee. The exemption and authorization would allow the use of MSA GMR-I rotection factor of 50 at the Edwin I. Hatch canistersPlant, Nuclear with aUnits radiciodine 1 and 2 p(Hatch 1 and 2). Criteria and background information useo for our evaluation include 10 CFR Part 20.103; 10 CFR Part 19.12; Regulatory Guide 8.15 " Acceptable Programs for Respiratory Protection;"
Regulatory Guide 8.20, " Applications of Bioassay for I-125, and I-131;"
NUREG/CR-3403, " Cartridges and Test Methods for Certifying Air Purifying Respirator Cartridges and Canisters Against Radiciodine," and Regulatory Guide 8.8, "Information Relevant to Ensuring That Occupational Radiation Exposures at Nuclear Power Stations Will Be At low As Is Reasonably Achievable."
DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION Since a NIOSH/MSHA testing and certification schedule for sorbents for use for protection against radiotodine gases and vapors has not been developed, the NRC staff has evaluated the licensee's request and verified that the licensee has demonstrated through reliable test data and adequate quality assurance measures that the material and performance characteristics of the MSA GMR-I canister can provide the proposed degree of protection (i.e., a protection factor of 50) under the anticipated conditions of use, as required by 10 CFR Part 20.103(e),
for 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />. We considered canister efficiency and service life, and the effects of temperature, poisons, relative humidity, challenge concentration and i breathing rates on canister efficiency and service life. The programmatic evaluation considered quality control / quality assurance, and radiation protection /
ALARA considerations, including task preparation and planning, on-the-job and post-task evaluations, use of engineering controls, radiological surveillance, and radiological training.
m 8909200080 DR 890316 ADOCK 05000321 PDR
2 t
The licensee has provided reliable test information which verifies that the MSA GMR-I canister will provide a protection factor of 50 over a period of 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of continuous use, provided that the total challenge of radioactive and non-radioactive iodine and other halogenated compounds does not exceed 1 ppm, and temperature does not exceed 110'F, or up to 120*F provided the dewpoint does not exceed 107*F. The data provided by MSA showed the breakthrough point to be well beyond 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />.
Testing has been conducted under acceptable conditions of cyclic flow, and under worst case conditions for those environmental factors affecting service life: temperature, relative humidity, and challenge concentration of CH I (methyliodide/ methyl radiciodide), which is the most penetrating of the 3 challenge forms. DC.a provided from MSA indicate that the MSA GMR-I canisters perform adequately under the acceptable test conditions. These conditions - the criteria and test methods - are consistent with those derived for the canisters by the NRC steff from NUREG/CR-3403, and are acceptable.
The licensee, through acceptance of MSA QA controls, has provided commitments that the MSA GMR-I canisters will meet standards for quality assurance and quality control which are recognized by NIOSH, compatible with NRC staff and are therefore acceptable. This standard is met by demonstrating positions a 1% AQL (Acceptable Quality Limit) in a 5 to 10 ppm challenge concentration, of CH,1, 90% relative humidity,110 F, 64 LPM cyclic flow, for a service life j of 8 Hours or more, at 1% of the challenge concentration penetration, with a
)
QA/QC program comparable to that described in M1LSTD-414. Testing data provided by the licensee demonstrated that performance (i.e., service life) of canisters et 100% relative humidity is acceptable.
1 Coupled with the use of a full facepiece with the capability of providing a fit factor equal to or greater than 500 by quantitative fit test, the protection factor of 50 is acceptable. Canister efficiency will be retained for the radioiodine gas or vapors of interest (CH I,1, HOI) for this time period.
Toprecludeaging,servicelifewillbecalculatedfromunsealingtime, 2
including periods of non-use, and the canister will not be used in the presence of organic solvents or in temperatures in excess of 107'F dewpoint. Canisters will be stored in sealed humidity-barrier packaging in a cool, dry environment, and discarded after the 8-hour use period to prevent reuse. Through usage restrictions and air sampling, the licensee will preclude exposures to organic vapors and chemicals (such as decontamination compounds, lubricants, volatized paint, alcohols, freon) which could cause aging, poisoning or desorption of the '
adsorbed radiciodines.
i Certain limitations and precautions based on NUREG/CR-0403 guidance are necessary for utilization of the sorbent canisters. We agree with the following limitations and usage restrictions as proposed by the licensee:
- 1. Protection f actor equal to 50 as a maximum value.
- 2. The maximum permissible continuous use time is eight hours after which the canister will be discarded.
i 1
w__________
3
- 3. Canisters are not to be used in the presence of organic solvent vapors.
' 4. -The allowable service life for sorbent canisters is to be calculated from the time of unsealing the canister, including periods of non-exposure.
- 5. Canister is to be used with a full facepiece capable of providing a fit factor equal to or greater than 500.
- 6. Canisters are not to be used in total challenge concentrations of organic iodines and other halogenated compounds greater than 1 ppm, including nonradioactive compounds.
- 7. Canisters are not to be used in environments where temperatures are greater than 110* or up to 120 F, if the dewpoint is equal to or less than 107 F.
In addition to the liraitations and usage restrictions noted above, the following additional controls will be utilized by the' licensee:
- 1. Temperatures will be measured prior to and/or during the use of GMR-1 canisters to assure that work temperatures are within limits.
- 2. Air samples will be taken prior to and during any activities that involve the use of the GMR-I canister for protection against radioactive iodine.
- 3. A GMR-I canister found to have exceeded 3 years from date of manufacture will not be used for protection against radioactive iodine.
4 In the initial implementation of the GNR-I program, the following verification measures will be in effect:
- a. Whole body counts for individuals using the GMR-I canisters for radiciodine protection will be performed at the end of each job.
- b. A whole body count for individuals that exceed 10 MPC in a week and used the GMR-I canister for respiratory protection in that period.
- c. Anyone that measures 70 nC1 or greater iodine uptake to the thyroid during a whole body count will be restricted from entering a radiciodine atmosphere pending Health Physics evaluation.
- d. The radiological survey and whole body count information will be compiled to evaluate the effectiveness of the program.
__----_______-_D
l . -4 l 5. Hatch 1 Technical Specification 3/4.7.B and Hatch 2 Technical l Specification 3/4.6.6.1 define the availability and surveillance requirements related to the emergency Standby Gas Treatment System (SGTS) for containment atmosphere control. These requirements are used to deaunstrate system operability with respect to HEPA and charcoal filters. Additionally, the plant procedures governing the operability and functioning of the charcoal beds are in compliance with Regulatory Guides 1.140 and 1.52 for design, testing and maintenance of filtration systems. Since GMR-I canisters will most likely be used in the same areas served by the SBGT, assurance of continuing operability of the SBGT will provide assurance of the proper environment (i.e., no organic vapors or chemicals) for GMR-1 canister use.
- 6. Specific plant procedures will incorporate the limitations and usage restrictions, listed as 1 through 7 above, prior to GMR-I anister use. Additionally, training of workers on the proper use and the limitations of the GMR-I canisters will be perfomed prior to canister issuance.
The licensee will ensure that the MSA GMR-I canisters meet standards for quality control by use of a procedure or instruction requiring verification that for each canister used: (1) the seal is intact, (2) the canister shelf life has not expired, and (3) the following MSA label is attached to the canister: ,
"This cenister meets the NRC Quality Assurance Specification Required for Radioiodine Protection Factor Credit, in addition to the NIOSH/MSHA Requirements. Credit may only be taken by licensees who have been granted a NRC Exemption."
In addition, onsite QA audits and surveillance of the Respiratory Protection Program will be expanded to include GMR-I canister use and associated procedures and controls.
The primary bases for the licensee's request for exemption are the potentials for both increased worker safety and dose reduction. The utilization of air purifying respirators in lieu of air-supplied or self-contained apparatuses, where possible, can result in person-rem reductions estimated to be in a range of from 25% to 50%. The lightweight, less cumbersome air purifying respirators (i.e., sorbent canisters) can provide increased comfort and mobility in most cases, and result in increased worker efficiency and decreased time on-the-job.
Other actions taken by the licensee to assure that exposures to radiciodine are as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA) are: radiciodine air sampling before and during activities involving the use of sorbent canisters for radiciodine protection; engineering controls such as degasification of the primary coolant; area decontamination to control contamination levels; maintenance planning allowing for radioiodine decay times, where practical, prior to breaching primary systems. Whole body counts will be conducted routinely, radiological cate will be evaluated, an evalus. tion level for radioiodine uptakes has been
4c t
I' established (at 70 nC1); training of werkers and health physics technicians in the use and restrictions for the use of sorbent canisters for radiciodine protection will be conducted prior to their use; and procedures iterating the controls, restrictions, and requirements will be developed and implemented. The licensee's efforts to keep exposure ALARA are consistent with staff positions in Regulatory Guide 8.6 and are acceptable.
!- SAFETY
SUMMARY
The NRC staff review of the licensee's proposal indicates that the actions proposed by the licensee can result in significant dose savings over alternative methods while still providing effective protection. This exemption would enable the licensee to use a protection factor for air purifying radiciodine gas and vapor respirators in estimating worker exposures from radioiodine gases and vapors. The licensee has provided usage restrictions and controls which can assure an effective radioiodine protection program. The proposed criteria and test methods for verifying the effectiveness and quality of GMR-I canisters are consistent with our criteria. The licensee's proposed exemption, with the controls and limitations Review Plan (NUREG-0800), meets the NRC
, NUREG/CR-3403 and staff's positions Regulatory Guidein theand 8.8, Standard is acceptable. The actions proposed b the licensee are consistent with the i requirements of 10 CFR Part 20.103(y),
e ano form an accepttble bauis to authorize the use of equipment (MSA GMR-I canisters) in accordance with 10 CFR 20.103(e) and to authorize the granting of an exemption in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR Part 20.501.
Principal Contributor: Lawrence P. Crocker, PDII-3/NRR Dated: March 16, 1989
_ _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -_- __-___- - -_____________ a